Mechanisms proposed for rippling
1. Introduction
Productivity in different welding techniques can be improved by increasing welding speed and current. This strategy, however, is limited by the appearance of surface defects such as rippling, humping, undercutting, etc [1]. Weld ripples exhibit rather regular, arc-shaped topographic features on a solidified surface, for example, as shown in Figure 1 in EBW of Al 6061 [2]. The ripples slightly elevate above the surface. Figure 2 shows a rippling structure on silicon surface irradiated by a p-polarized laser beam, provided by Pedraza et al. [3]. Notice tiny little “fingers” in lower rim of fringes and asymmetry in fringe profile taken in downward direction.
On the other hand, more complicated humping shows an irregular and unpredictable surface contour consisting of a series of swelled protuberance, as can be seen in Figures 3(a)-(d). Morphologies of humped welds are quite complicated, which were roughly categorized into the gouging region and beaded cylinder morphologies [4]. Typical gouging region morphology defects in GTAW at high currents and high travel speeds are shown in Figure 3(a) [5]. The front of the weld pool exhibits a large depression known as the gouging region. Open, unfilled dry spots in between the humped beads can also be seen. In some cases, two small channels appear at the walls of the gouging region. The weld bead having parallel grooves at the side is the undercutting defect.
Figure 3(b) shows a parallel humping or a split bead, separated by an empty channel [5]. Figure 3(c) shows beaded cylinder morphology defects, which are quite different from the gouging region morphology [6]. The beaded cylinder morphology includes beadlike protuberances that sit above the workpiece surface and are connected by a narrow central channel. In some cases of disconnected protuberances, traces of a central channel can still be seen. It is interesting to find that the gouged region and bead cylinder morphology are inverse phenomenon. Different morphologies therefore can be revealed by simply interchanging the liquid and gas phases. Figure 3(d) shows humping in EBW of Al 5083 [2]. Figure 4 also shows the a “star-like” or finger structure develops as well as the number of rays increases with laser power in etching of regular holes in Mo films with an
Even though formation of the defects have been extensively proposed in the past, more systematical understanding of pattern formations is still limited. The aims of this work are to provide rigorous and pictorial interpretation based on thermal science concepts, and clarify and propose some physics involved in the mechanisms of weld bead formation. Clear physical concepts associated with quantitative scale analysis are important and beneficial for predicting, controlling and avoiding the occurrence of surface defects [1].
2. Mechanisms of surface patterns
Different mechanisms of rippling have been proposed and summarized in Table 1.
Solidification rate fluctuations | Cheever and Howden [8], D'annessa [9] |
Power source effects | Garland and Davies [10], Ecer et al. [ 11] |
Thermocapillary instability | Fujimura et al. [ 12] |
Kelvin-Helmholtz instability | Ang et al. [13] |
Rayleigh-Taylor instability | Bennett et al. [14], Lugomer [15] |
Instability due to evaporation | Emel’yanov et al. [16] |
Morphological instability | Weizman et al. [17], Style and Wettlaufer [ 18] |
Thermocapillary edge flow | Anthony and Cline [19], Wei et al. [20, 21] |
Laser interactions | Birnbaum [22], Siegman and Fauchet [ 23] |
On the other hand, different mechanisms responsible for humping are presented in Table 2.
Rayleigh’s capillary instability | Bradstreet [24], Gratzke et al. [25], Albright and Chiang [26] |
Kelvin-Helmholtz instability | Kumar and DebRoy [27], Tytkin et al. [28] |
Hydraulic jump | Shimada and Hoshinouchi [29] |
Thermocapillary edge flow | Wei [1] |
Kelvin-Helmholtz instability | Dynamic pressure difference |
Rayleigh-Taylor instability | Density difference |
Rayleigh capillary instability | Capillary pressure difference |
Morphological instability | Solute supersaturation |
Thermocapillary instability | Surface tension gradient |
Evaporation instability | Evaporation pressure difference |
Hydraulic jump | Hydraulic pressure difference |
Laser interaction | Polarizations |
Gravitational-electromagnetic instability | Interactions between gravitational and electromagnetic forces |
Surface roughness including rippling, gouging, humping, fingers, etc., therefore can be affected by mechanisms shown in Table 3. Understanding their physical meanings is described as follows.
3. Thermal science analysis of surface patterns
Rippling or humping is determined by the formation of capillary wave on the free surface. Under surface tension, the pressure differences created at a curve interface support deformation of the interface, as sketched in figure 5.
Mathematically speaking, it is governed by Young-Laplace equation
where
The factors affecting surface patterns listed in Table 3 are rigorously described as follows:
4. Kelvin-Helmholtz instability
KH instability arises due to difference in velocities between gas and liquid. KH instability is the simplest and widely encountered instability, derived from Young-Laplace equation, where liquid and gas pressures are determined from conservation of mechanical energy (namely, the Bernoulli’s equation) with specified constant liquid and gas velocities
Wavelength of surface deformation due to KH instability therefore reduces if the difference in velocities between gas and liquid increases. Provided that gas velocity is 10 m/s, the length for roughness in liquid metals is around 10
5. Rayleigh-Taylor instability
RT instability occurs when a heavier liquid overlies a lighter liquid. The pressure involved is hydrostatic pressure, which is a function of gravitational acceleration and the depth location considered. As illustrated in figure 8, the difference in hydrostatic pressures of liquid and gas across a surface with a deformation
Scaling Young-Laplace equation (1) by substituting equation (3) leads to RT instability with the critical wavelength
Provided that deformation is toward the lighter fluid, a positive perturbed pressure deviated from the base state results. A negative perturbed pressure simultaneously occurs with deformation toward the heavier liquid. Deformation further increases. At later times, initial perturbations grow into spikes of heavier fluid “falling” into lighter fluid and bubble of the lighter fluid “rising” into the heavier fluid. Hence, RT instability has also been stated to occur when the pressure and density gradients are in opposite directions, or a lighter fluid pushes or accelerates a heavier fluid. Equation (4) indicates that an increase in surface tension or decrease in difference in densities across a free surface increases wavelength of ripples.
Acceleration in equation (4) may not be the earth’s gravity. RT instability can also occur at an interface separating fluids through which a blast wave has been transmitted from a heavier to a lighter fluid. This instability is Richtmyer-Meshkov instability, often called impulsive or shock-induced RT instability. In high intensity beam welding, the produced shock waves propagate with discontinuities of densities, pressures and velocities in different magnitudes and directions across the free surface. Provided that the interface subject to an oblique shock, it will give rise to complicated instabilities or patterns at the interface. The normal component of the shock generates RM instability, and the parallel component generates KH instability. If a normal acceleration is also present, RT instability occurs.
6. Rayleigh’s capillary instability
Rayleigh’s capillary instability is a crucial factor to understand a bulged or gouging region of surface roughness. The gouged region exhibits an inverse feature of the bulged region. Rayleigh’s capillary instability can be revealed from figure 9. Radius
Since the difference in the perturbed pressures at two locations affects instability, the minimum wavelength for onset of instability is the balance between two components of capillary pressure. The critical wavelength thus is of the same order of the radius of the liquid cylinder [31]. Stability of a bead should depend on the boundary conditions at its contact lines on the surface. Gau et al. [32] experimentally found that cylindrical segments for water on hydrophilic stripes with the apparent contact angle less than
7. Morphological instability
Morphological instability is a consequence of thermal and metallurgical processes. Surface morphology becomes unstable by decreasing surface tension and increasing constitutional supercooling (namely,
In view of the rapid drop of solute concentration ahead of the freezing front, the actual temperature may be below the liquidus temperature and result in constitutional supercooling or morphological instability, as shown in figure 11. Mathematically speaking, morphological instability can be simply found by considering interfacial temperature governed by Gibbs-Thomson equation [35]
where
8. Instability due to evaporation
It is well-known that a semi-infinite liquid heated below is susceptible to evaporative instability, as illustrated in figure 12(a). As surface deformation is closer to the bottom surface than the flat surface, temperature at the trough is greater than the equilibrium temperature, meaning that higher evaporation takes place at the trough than the base state. On the other hand, a deformation away from the bottom surface leads to lower evaporation rate than that at the base state. Liquid pressure therefore increases from the surface trough to crest. The induced flow from the trough to crest thus enhances surface deformation, leading to evaporative instability (referring to figure 6(b)). However, in welding and manufacturing processes, workpieces are irradiated by incident flux at the top surfaces. A liquid heated from above, which is the case opposite to previous figure 12(a), is stable, as illustrated in figure 12(b). In this work, it is found that evaporation may also induce instability subject to base temperature decreasing in radial directions, as illustrated in figure 12(c) [1]. For a typical welding process the isothermal field is in a roughly spherical shape. Provided that surface deforms toward the bottom, temperature at the crest, which is close to the pool edge, can be lower than that at the trough. The decrease in pressures therefore pushes the liquid from the trough to crest and gives rise to instability.
9. Thermocapillary instability
All pure liquid metals and alloys containing minor surface active solutes such as O, S, Se, Te, et al. have negative surface tension coefficient (
A negative surface tension coefficient induces an outward surface flow, provided that surface temperature decreases in the outward direction. Consider an interface to be displaced toward the hot surface at the bottom, as illustrated in figure 14(a). Temperature at the trough thus is hotter than other points on the deformed surface. This results in an outward lateral flow from the trough to crest along the interface. To conserve mass, the perturbed liquid flows downwards and further deforms the interface with speed w (referring to figure 6(b)). The system thus is unstable. The well-accepted interpretation is incorrect. Rather than perturbed downward flow, it is usually interpreted as that instability results from incessant and amplified upward flow accompanying with enhanced energy at the trough due to increased thermocapillary force from the trough to crest [31].
In this work, it is proposed that a free surface heated from above and a negative surface tension coefficient may still cause instability, as illustrated in figure 14(b) [1]. Provided that the surface is strongly deformed toward the bottom, significant heat conduction is transport from the interior to free surface. Enhanced downward thermocapillary surface flow therefore is required to balance horizontal conduction, and results in further deformation. This work also proposes that thermocapillary instability takes place near the edge of the molten pool, where
10. Thermocapillary edge flow
Deformation of the free surface near the solidification front is responsible for rippling or humping. As illustrated in figure 15, an increase in liquid pressure due to a decreased surface flow from the central to rear edge of the pool give rise to deformation of the free surface near the solidification front. Subtracting Young-Laplace equation at two locations which are away and near the edge of the pool surface, and introducing the pressure difference between two locations from Bernoulli’s equation,, the amplitude of ripples can be found to be [1,20]
where the loss coefficient
11. Hydraulic jump
Studying hydraulic jump usually assumes liquid pressure to be hydrostatic pressure. Hydraulic jump occurs if the pressure gradient becomes increasingly adverse as the flow proceeds downstream. As sketched in figure 16(a), an increased liquid height (
12. Fingers
Fingers can be accompanied with hydraulic jump (see figure 4). This is because pressure and density gradients are in opposite directions in the course of splashing, leading to RT instability. Allen [40] was the first to propose that the splashing of a droplet impact on a surface is an example of RT instability, caused by a rapidly decelerating interface. Replacing gravitational acceleration by
Provided that time is short, equation (9) indicates that radius of the ring-shaped spread is less than wavelength of fingers. The ring-shaped spread thus is free from fingers. On the other hand, larger time results in the ring-shaped spread covered with n fingers.
13. Gravitational-electromagnetic instability
In plasma, Rayleigh-Taylor instability can occur because the magnetic field acts as a light fluid supporting a heavy fluid (plasma), [41]. This is because the ion drift velocity U0 is in the direction of g
14. Conclusions
Physical interpretation of bead defects is important and beneficial for controlling quality of welding joint. It involves inter-discipline among different sciences of thermal physics, aerodynamics, electromagnetism, optics and metallurgy, morphology, pattern selection, instabilities, and contact line dynamics. Phase transitions between liquid and gas, and solid and liquid are also included. Spaces and amplitudes of rippling and humping can be effectively revealed from scaling of a force balance between perturbed liquid and gas pressures and surface tension. Any factor which can induce pressure differences or influence surface tension is responsible for specific surface patterns. This study provides a general, relevant and rigorous interpretation of physical mechanisms involved in surface roughness.
Acknowledgement
The author is grateful for Mr. Sheng-You Tsai drawing the pictures
References
- 1.
Wei P. S. 2011 Thermal science of weld bead defects- a review, ASME Journal of Heat Transfer, 133: 031005 - 2.
Wei P. S. Chuang K. C. Ku J. S. Deb Roy. T. 2012 Mechanisms of spiking and humping in keyhole welding. IEEE Transactions on Components, Packaging and Manufacturing Technology2 383 394 - 3.
Pedraza A. J. Guan Y. F. Fowlkes J. D. Smith D. A. 2004 Nanostructures produced by ultraviolet laser irradiation of silicon. I. rippled structures. Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology B22 2823 2835 - 4.
Soderstrom E. Mendez P. 2006 Humping mechanisms present in high speed welding. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining11 572 579 - 5.
Mendez P. F. Eagar T. W. 2003 Penetration and defect formation in high-current arc welding. Welding Journal82 296 s to 306-s. - 6.
Cho M. H. Farson D. F. 2007 Understanding bead hump formation in gas metal arc welding using a numerical simulation. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B38 305 319 - 7.
Bäuerle D. 1996 Laser Processing and Chemistry, Springer-Verlag, New York. - 8.
Cheever D. L. Howden D. G. 1969 Technical note: nature of weld surface ripples. Welding Journal48 179 s to 180-s. - 9.
D’annessa A. T. 1970 Sources and effects of growth rate fluctuations during weld metal solidification. Welding Journal49 41 s to 45-s. - 10.
Garland J. G. Davies G. J. 1970 Surface rippling and growth perturbations during weld pool solidification. Metal Construction and British Welding Journal2 171 175 - 11.
Ecer G. M. Tzavaras A. Gokhale A. Brody H. D. 1982 Weld pool fluid motion and ripple Formation in pulsed-current GTAW. Trends in Welding Research in the United States, (editor David, S. A.), Proceedings of a conference sponsored by the Joining Division of American Society for Metals, New Orleans, Nov. 16-18, 1981,419 442 - 12.
Fujimura K. Ogawa M. Seki M. 1992 Possible mechanism of the roughness formation on a liquid layer caused by a high heat flux. Fusion Engineering and Design19 183 191 - 13.
Ang L. K. Lau Y. Y. Gilgenbach R. M. Spindler H. L. Lash J. S. Kovaleski S. D. 1998 Surface instability of multipulse laser ablation on a metallic target. Journal of Applied Physics83 4466 4471 - 14.
Bennett T. D. Grigoropoulos C. P. Krajnovich D. J. 1995 Near-threshold laser sputtering of gold. Journal of Applied Physics77 849 864 - 15.
Lugomer S. 2007 Micro-fluid dynamics via laser-matter interaction: vortex filament structures, helical instability, reconnection, merging, and undulation. Physics Letters A361 87 97 - 16.
Emel’yanov V. I. Konov V. I. Tokarev V. N. Seminogov V. N. 1989 Formation of periodic surface ripples under the action of pulsed carbon dioxide laser radiation on fused silica. Journal of Optical Society of America B6 104 114 - 17.
Weizman M. Nickel N. H. Sieber I. Yan B. 2008 Laser-induced self-organization in silicon-germanium thin films. Journal of Applied Physics 103: 093536. - 18.
Style R. W. Wettlaufer J. S. 2007 Evaporatively driven morphological instability. Physical Review E 76: 011602. - 19.
Anthony T. R. Cline H. E. 1977 Surface rippling induced by surface-tension gradients during laser surface melting and alloying. Journal of Applied Physics48 3888 3894 - 20.
Wei P. S. Chang C. Y. Chen C. T. 199 1996 Surface ripple in electron-beam welding solidification. ASME Journal of Heat Transfer118 960 969 - 21.
Wei P. S. Chen Y. H. Ku J. S. Ho C. Y. 2003 Active solute effects on surface ripples in electron-beam welding solidification. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions B34 421 432 - 22.
Birnbaum M. 1965 Semiconductor Surface Damage Produced by Ruby Lasers, Journal of Applied Physics,36 3688 3689 - 23.
Siegman A. E. Fauchet P. M. 1986 Stimulated Wood’s anomalies on laser-illuminated surfaces. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics QE-22 1384 1403 - 24.
Bradstreet B. J. 1968 Effect of surface tension and metal flow on weld bead formation. Welding Journal,47 314 s to 322-s. - 25.
Gratzke U. Kapadia P. D. Dowden J. Kroos J. Simon G. 1992 Theoretical approach to the humping phenomenon in welding processes. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics25 1640 1647 - 26.
Albright C. E. Chiang S. 1988 High-speed laser welding discontinuities. Journal of Laser Applications1 18 24 - 27.
Kumar A. Deb Roy. T. 2006 Toward a unified model to prevent humping defects in gas tungsten arc welding. Welding Journal85 292 s to 304-s. - 28.
Tytkin Yu. M. Ryazantsev O. V. Chuvilo V. N. 1981 The mechanism of formation of a coarse flaky surface of weld metal in welding under high-power conditions. Svar. Proiz. 2: 4-5 (3 5 - 29.
Shimada W. Hoshinouchi S. 1982 A study on bead formation by low pressure TIG arc and prevention of under-cut bead. Transactions of the Japan Welding Society51 280 286 - 30.
Li W. H. Lam S. H. 1964 Principles of Fluid Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1964. - 31.
Miller C. A. Neogi P. 1985 Interfacial Phenomena, Equilibrium and Dynamic Effects, Marcel Dekker, New York. - 32.
Gau H. Herminghaus S. Lenz P. Lipowsky R. 1999 Liquid morphologies on structured surfaces: from microchannels to microchips. Science283 46 49 - 33.
Speth R. L. Lauga E. 2009 Capillary instability on a hydrophilic stripe. New Journal of Physics 11: 075024. - 34.
Rutter J. W. Chalmers B. 1953 A prismatic substructure formed during solidification of metals. Canadian Journal of Physics31 15 39 - 35.
Mullins W. W. Sekerka R. F. 1964 Stability of a planar interface during solidification of a dilute binary alloy. Journal of Applied Physics35 444 451 - 36.
Pearson J. R. A. 1958 On convection cells induced by surface tension. Journal of Fluid Mechanics4 489 500 - 37.
Ostrach S. 1982 Low-Gravity Fluid Flows, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics14 313 345 - 38.
Wei P. S. Liu H. J. Lin C. L. 2012 Scaling weld or melt pool shape induced by thermocapillary convection, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer55 2328 2337 - 39.
Ellegaard C. Hansen A. E. Haaning A. Hansen K. Marcussen A. Bohr T. Hansen J. L. Watanabe S. 1998 Creating corners in kitchen sinks. Nature392 767 768 - 40.
Allen R. F. 1975 The role of surface tension in splashing. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science51 350 351 - 41.
Chen F. F. 1974 Introduction to Plasma Physics, Plenum Press, New York