Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

High-Temperature Effect on Plant Development and Tuber Induction and Filling in Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.)

Written By

María del Socorro Sánchez-Correa, María del Rocío Reyero-Saavedra, Gladys Edith Jiménez-Nopala, Manuel Mandujano Piña and Juan Gerardo Ortiz-Montiel

Submitted: 30 December 2023 Reviewed: 21 February 2024 Published: 24 April 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.114336

Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants IntechOpen
Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants Edited by Mirza Hasanuzzaman

From the Edited Volume

Abiotic Stress in Crop Plants [Working Title]

Prof. Mirza Hasanuzzaman and MSc. Kamrun Nahar

Chapter metrics overview

9 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Heat stress significantly impacts the physiology of potato plants (Solanum tuberosum L.). Regardless of the phenological stage at which thermal stress occurs, the most notable effect consistently emerges in tuber production. Heat stress can disrupt photosynthesis, transpiration, and overall plant metabolism. It is known that various genes encoding enzymes and glucose and sucrose transporters respond to temperature changes, influencing the partitioning of carbohydrates toward storage organs. This disturbance leads to disruptions in starch formation in tubers, affecting their development, and subsequently, the yield and quality of tubers. Understanding these interactions is crucial for developing heat-tolerant potato varieties in the face of climate change resulting from global warming.

Keywords

  • potato
  • heat stress
  • tuberization
  • tuber physiology
  • thermal tolerance
  • glycoalkaloids

1. Introduction

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts a gradual increase in global temperatures, which will alter the geographical distribution of climate zones. This change will impact the distribution and abundance of many plant species, modify crop phenology, and reduce agricultural yields [1]. It is estimated that climate change will result in a reduction in global potato production by 18–32% [2].

Potatoes, ranking fourth in global food crops after rice, wheat, and corn, are crucial for worldwide food production. This crop yields more energy per unit area than any other and boasts the second-highest protein content after soy, providing an excellent balance of essential amino acids, particularly lysine [3].

Optimal potato development occurs in temperatures between 15 and 20°C [4], with yields ranging from 12 to 60 tons of tubers per hectare. However, observations show a decline in yield when the ambient temperature exceeds 24°C. This reduction is attributed to a combination of independent morphological, physiological, and developmental issues.

The generation of potato plants from seeds is vital for plant breeding. Although there is growing interest in true potato seed (TPS) production in some tropical and subtropical regions [5], most countries cultivate potatoes from seed tubers.

Potato cultivation undergoes various stages characterized by physiological and morphological changes. The sprouting of seed tubers (Figure 1), considered the interruption of dormancy, occurs when seed tubers have initial sprouts with identifiable nodes, recognizable by visible scale leaves. The description and interruption of the dormancy state in potatoes have been extensively documented [6]. Seed tubers can be planted with or without sprouts or cut into two or three pieces, which are planted independently. The conditions of humidity, light, and temperature in which they are stored for sprouting are crucial, as these sprouts determine many of the plant’s developmental characteristics.

Figure 1.

Tuber anatomy. Sprout started and, in the future, a whole plant will grow.

The number of sprouts that a seed tuber produces depends on both genotype and its previous development. According to the concept of the “physiological age” of the tuber: a “young” tuber exhibits apical dominance and produces a single sprout, whereas a tuber with more time loses apical dominance and forms several sprouts [7].

Plant emergence is defined as the appearance of a sprout from the soil, and its development and growth are described based on the appearance of individual leaves up to the stem. It is preferred to define the stages of shoot growth and expansion based on the number of nodes, as they are easily identified as points of leaf insertion into the stem and can be counted along the shoot [6].

Shoot growth is determined by the number of nodes along the stem from the soil surface, as no morphological differences defining the moment of maturity of individual leaves are observed [8].

Flowering begins with the appearance of the floral bud and extends until the first flower is fully open, marking the end of vegetative development [9].

Tuberization is a stage that occurs shortly before flowering. In plants derived from seed tubers, the initiation of stolons generally occurs soon after plant emergence when it has a developed shoot. In most cultivars, stolons initiate in the axillary buds of the basal nodes of the stem and then elongate. The extension of stolons depends on genotype and environment. Stolons generated near the soil surface tend to be longer and initiate tubers later than stolons formed more deeply in the soil and closer to the original tuber. Moreover, the transition from stolon to tuber involves significant changes in both cell division and growth events, influenced by hormonal levels, with specific transcription factors and small RNAs playing crucial roles in tuberization. Stolon elongation ceases at the initiation of the tuber, and thickening occurs at its apical part, defined as the point at which the stolon thickens to double its initial diameter [10]. Tubercle growth is not considered a distinct developmental stage but is defined as when tubers on 80% of stolons are over 10 mm in diameter and progress.

Tuber maturation begins with the suberization of the periderm to form distinct skin, and development concludes when tubers detach from the stolons. For the optimal development of crops of this species, recommended temperatures are 13°C during the sprouting period, 12–14°C for shoot growth of foliar development, 18°C during the flowering process, and 16–20°C during tuber formation [11]. On the other hand, 20°C is recommended as an optimal temperature for photosynthesis in some European potato varieties [12]. From an ecological perspective, considering the potato’s center of origin, its cultivation thrives at relatively cool temperatures. In the Andean region, likely the native habitat of the potato, the average temperature of the warmest month is 16°C [13]. In the United States, the highest yields are obtained in regions with cooler summer temperatures, while in Scotland and northern Europe, they occur in July when the average temperature is around 15°C [14].

This chapter will explore the effect of temperatures exceeding 24°C on the metabolism and development at each phenological stage of this crop and the implications for tuber formation.

Advertisement

2. Sprouting of the seed tuber and sprout growth

The seed is a crucial factor in every agricultural production process, and for potatoes, the tuber plays a pivotal role in generating a new plant, earning it the label “seed tuber”. The health and physiological condition of these tubers significantly influence crop yield [15]. Seed tubers can be planted intact or divided; to a lesser extent, cuttings and microtubers obtained through in vitro culture are also utilized (Figure 2). In all these scenarios, the genetic makeup remains unchanged, as clonal reproduction is involved. The utilization of sexual seeds is primarily reserved for plant breeding purposes.

Figure 2.

Microtubers structure. Microtubers obtained by in vitro culture.

Seed tubers are temporarily stored at low temperatures and ambient humidity to suppress tuber metabolic activity and inhibit the development of microorganisms [16]. To break dormancy, the relative humidity of the environment is usually increased, as sprouts tend to emerge at low temperatures [17]. It is essential for seed tubers to reach their optimal sprouting state when planting for better yields. Sprout formation depends on the potato variety, determining the rest or dormancy period and physiological age, which, in turn, relies on storage conditions.

As a vegetative reproductive organ, part of its physiological development in the plant and post-harvest, the tuber goes through a state of rest or dormancy, a period of relative inactivity before sprout formation. The latency period is characteristic of each variety, and its duration is crucial for planting [18]. This period ends with the initiation of the first sprout’s growth. The dormancy period is generally considered from the end of harvest until the emergence of sprouts [19].

It has been observed that during the dormancy period of tuber storage, the physiological maturation process accelerates at high temperatures, consequently reducing the dormancy period. This phenomenon is not limited to high temperatures; low temperatures can also shorten this process. The end of dormancy is characterized by the initiation of vegetative bud growth, often with the apical bud emerging first in a state of dominance, followed by the formation of sprouts. However, apical growth is not desirable as it may result in a single-sprout plant. Therefore, it is common practice to remove the tip of the sprout, inducing a state of multiple-sprout growth, stored at low temperatures and diffuse light [20]. Nevertheless, seed tubers in multiple sprouting may age rapidly, developing etiolated and weak sprouts that form unproductive plants [21]. Physiologically young seed tubers, unlike old ones, realize their full potential yield, and potato cultivation extends over a longer period, resulting in higher overall yields [22].

Environmental conditions can influence the duration of the dormancy period in seed tubers during their development. The most crucial condition is high temperature during tuber development; alterations in moisture content or nutrient depletion in the soil can modify seed tuber development and physiology, affecting dormancy [17].

Drought, salinity, and above all, heat, are environmental factors that can severely impact the growth and yield of potato crops [23]. The development of seed tubers requires a temperature between 6°C and 18°C for optimal stem elongation [24].

Advertisement

3. Emergency and plant development

The vegetative part of the potato comprises a generally short and shallow root system, stems capable of growing submerged in the soil, known as stolons, where tubers develop, and stems emerging from the soil bearing compound leaves, representing the photosynthetic portion of the plant.

The development of the potato plant is complex, whether it originates from True Potato Seed (TPS) or a seed tuber. When TPS germinates to form a potato plant, the root system develops from the radicle, growing into an axonomorphic root and later creating a system of adventitious roots through branching [25]. From seed germination, a single stem develops after cotyledon emergence, which then branches at different heights from the axils of the leaves of the main stem, forming a sympodium. Additionally, it branches at basal nodes, forming a variable number of stolons where tubers develop. In this case, a single inflorescence develops at the apex of the main stem [26].

When the plant originates from a seed tuber, the vegetative part consists of a variable number of stems, depending on the number of sprouts in the original tuber. These stems can develop either above or below the ground. Leaves grow on the aerial stems, and an inflorescence can form at the apex of each. In the submerged stems or stolons, the tubers develop [27]. Sprouting must be complete and adequate to generate productive plants with optimal growth. Altered sprouting can result in a single shoot with apical dominance, leading to abnormal stem development.

One of the crucial phenomena for vegetative development and tuber production is photosynthesis. The most suitable temperature for photosynthesis in potato plants is between 16°C and 20°C [28]. The measurement of chlorophyll a fluorescence, as a parameter of photosynthetic efficiency, has allowed deductions that plants cultivated under a low-temperature regime (18/16°C, day/night) experience less stress during the initiation stage of stolon growth compared to higher temperatures [29].

The optimal temperature for canopy-level photosynthesis is determined to be around 24°C [30]. However, temperatures above 25°C promote the formation of taller plants with more lateral branches and smaller leaves [31]. Although this delays or even inhibits the formation of stolons and the induction and growth of the tuber [32]. On the other hand, the combination of high temperatures with long days inhibits tuber growth, resulting in a significant reduction in yield [33]. This negatively affects metabolic processes at different stages of plant development, stem growth, and morphology, particularly the tuberization process [30, 32].

High temperatures adversely affect photosynthesis, transpiration rate, photochemical efficiency, leaf structure, stem growth, tuber growth, and overall yield. These negative impacts are further exacerbated by concurrent water stress [34].

During plant development under thermal stress, leaves increase stomatal conductance to reduce leaf temperature. However, if water is scarce, leaves decrease stomatal conductance to prevent transpiration loss, leading to reduced evaporative cooling and increased tissue temperature [35].

Well-irrigated potato plants exposed to moderate heat (30/20°C Day/Night) exhibit a 3.5-fold increase in stomatal conductance compared to low temperatures, accompanied by an improved net carbon assimilation rate [34].

High temperatures affect tuber growth more drastically than shoot growth because more dry matter is allocated to shoots than roots, stolons, and tubers [33, 36].

Advertisement

4. Flowering

Among all developmental stages of potatoes, flowering is the least studied, particularly regarding the potential impact of temperature increases. However, a recent study by Zhu and colleagues [37] revealed that the heat shock transcription factor SpHsfA4c, isolated from wild potatoes (Solanum pinnatisectum Dun), is predominantly expressed in the leaves and flowers of these plants. The study observed that the expression of the SpHsfA4c gene was induced by thermal stress, and plants with this gene demonstrated increased heat resistance, suggesting its potential for developing heat-tolerant potato plants.

In several plant species, a “florigen” exists—a molecule that induces flowering. This protein was first described in Arabidopsis thaliana and named FT (FLOWERING LOCUS T), considered a universal florigen [38]. In potatoes, there are FT-like proteins, such as StSP3D, acting as a florigen, and another crucial one, StSP6A, described as a “tuberigen” [39, 40].

Advertisement

5. Tuberization

Optimal tuberization concerning weight, number, and tuber quality per plant is promoted by long nights (less than 12 hours of daylight), low temperatures, and a moderate nitrogen supply. Conversely, tuberization is diminished by short nights, high temperatures, and nitrogen-rich fertilization [41, 42].

While numerous studies have explored factors influencing tuberization, with a particular emphasis on photoperiod, only a few have delved into understanding how high temperatures impact this process [43]. Tuberization is affected when temperatures rise, with observations indicating that temperatures exceeding 25°C strongly alter assimilate distribution, causing a delay in tuber formation and reduced tuber growth [4]. These responses vary among different cultivars [44], but it has been confirmed in various potato cultivars that temperature affects tuberization. However, the exact regulatory mechanisms remain unclear [43]. Therefore, comprehending how temperature increases affect the genetic regulation of tuberization [45] is crucial.

The FT-like protein StSP6A (SELF-PRUNING 6A) is the “tuberigen”, crucial for tuber formation [39, 40]. StSP6A is expressed in the leaves and translocates to the tips of stolons when tuberization begins [40]. Despite reports indicating StSP6A’s involvement in photoperiod-induced tuberization, it has been observed that silencing this gene in short-day cultivars delays tuberization. Conversely, overexpression in long-day cultivars induces tuberization, even in those not dependent on photoperiod, emphasizing that its regulation is primarily attributed to temperature [39]. Its expression decreases as this abiotic factor increases [34, 46, 47].

The transcript of StSP6A is suppressed by heat [34, 46]. Studies subjecting potato plants to different temperatures (22°C, 30°C, and 35°C) have shown that heat impacts tuberization [43]. The number and size of tubers were measured at 5 and 9 weeks, revealing a delay in tuberization (Figure 1).

The expression of StSP6A in leaves gradually increases in plants at 22°C but diminishes in those subjected to high temperatures [43]. However, when measuring gene expression, it remains relatively consistent across different temperature treatments. This suggests that the expression of StSP6A alone is insufficient to explain the tuberization delay. Thus, tuberization may result from the transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation of StSP6A. This was corroborated in experiments with transgenic potatoes overexpressing StSP6A, where, under high temperatures, the number of tubers per plant recovered, but the overall yield did not [43].

The regulation of StSP6A occurs through a microRNA called SUPPRESSING EXPRESSION OF SP6A (SES), which targets StSP6A and is induced by high temperatures [43, 46]. SES regulates StSP6A at high temperatures by degrading it (targeting it for degradation). Additionally, it is known that StSP6A’s expression occurs in leaves, but the protein moves to the stolon, indicating a potential post-translational regulation as well [48].

Other studies have proposed additional regulators of StSP6A, such as the homolog of TOC1 (TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1) described in A. thaliana. TOC1 responds to temperature as a transcriptional regulator suppressing StSP6A expression [34, 47]. Silencing StTOC1 increases the expression of StSP6A and enhances tuberization, suggesting that StTOC1 likely directly binds to the promoter of StSP6A [47]. Other regulators affect StSP6A, including CYCLING DOF FACTOR (StCDF1), StSP5G (SELF-PRUNING 5G), StCOL1 (CONSTANS-LIKE 1), and GIGANTEA, whose expression increases in high temperatures. However, their role in tuberization has been primarily described in the induction of tuberization by photoperiod [34, 40, 48, 49, 50].

This intricate network of regulators underscores the complexity of the molecular mechanisms governing tuberization in response to temperature, providing valuable insights for future studies aiming to enhance potato crop resilience under changing climatic conditions.

In the transcriptomic analysis conducted by Park et al., [43], other potential genes involved in the thermo-regulation of tuberization are suggested. Genes such as StCEN1 (CENTRORADIALIS) and StGA2ox1-1 show decreased expression, while StCOL1 increases its expression with temperature, along with StERF5-3 (ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 5-3). This list includes genes related to plant hormones like gibberellins, which negatively affect tuberization [43], and ethylene, which also delays tuberization [51].

Another factor influencing tuberization is sugar transport. Mokrani and colleagues [52] reported a higher accumulation of glucose, sucrose, and starch in leaves at low temperatures. In contrast, plants grown at higher temperatures exhibited lower carbohydrate levels in leaves, leading to early tuberization, likely due to accelerated tuber initiation metabolism. The authors note that gene expression levels in leaves during temperature decrease favor the conversion of sucrose into starch during tuber maturation. In many cultivars, temperatures above 23°C resulted in increased photosynthesis, causing a noticeable shift in metabolites between leaves and tubers, generally resulting in decreased tuber yield [34].

The tuber-filling stage, dependent on carbohydrate metabolism, is highly sensitive to heat. The carbohydrate content in the stem (glucose, fructose, and sucrose) is altered under heat stress. High acid invertase activity has been observed in the stems of plants under heat stress, reducing assimilate partitioning to the tubers and increasing transport to the leaves [4, 36]. While this increase in invertase activity promotes stem growth, it reduces the assimilates that should contribute to tuber filling, leading to increased starch synthesis in the tuber. This phenomenon was observed by reducing the activity of enzymes involved in starch metabolism at soil temperatures of 30°C [52].

Tuberization induction begins with the thickening of stolon tips, as assimilate transport shifts from apoplastic to symplastic in the subapical region of the stolon. This is accompanied by an increase in sucrose concentration in the symplast, inducing the expression of sucrose synthase [53, 54]. This shift decreases soluble invertase activity in the stolon [54].

Among the enzymes involved in tuber growth through the assimilation of translocated photosynthates to the stolon tip is AGPase (Adenine Diphosphoglucose Pyrophosphorylase), which is activated at low temperatures [55].

During photosynthesis, a series of primary reactions occur, involving sunlight, water, chloroplasts, pigment molecules associated with proteins forming antenna complexes, and two reaction centers. Enzymes are also involved in the formation of ATP and NADPH2. Additionally, Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate Carboxylase-Oxygenase can catalyze both carboxylation and oxygenation of Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate in the Calvin-Benson cycle. Carboxylation of Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate results in two molecules of 3-phosphoglycerate, characterizing the cycle as C3 type. Oxygenation produces one molecule of 3-phosphoglycerate and another of 2-phosphoglycerate, which participates in the photorespiration process [35].

The potato plant typically undergoes the C3 photosynthetic process. It has been confirmed that high temperatures lead to increased photorespiration [56], consequently causing a considerable loss of carbohydrates in the photosynthetic leaves or storage organs [57]. This energy expenditure also results in a reduction in sucrose export to the tuber [36].

5.1 Tuber initiation

For tuber development, it is not only necessary to have stolons but also to form a sufficient leaf area to sustain the carbon fixation rate. The growth of tubers relies primarily on net photosynthesis rather than on previously accumulated photosynthetic products in the foliage [57]. The initiation stage is crucial, marked by the increase and subsequent suppression of StSP6A expression, facilitating tuberization [43].

Temperature plays a pivotal role in both the initiation and growth of tubers. Cool nighttime temperatures, coupled with a short photoperiod, favor tuber initiation [58]. The inhibitory impact of high temperatures on tuber initiation involves a common hormonal control that disrupts the balance between endogenous gibberellins and inhibitors such as abscisic acid [59].

Elevated temperatures can lead to excessive elongation of the stolon and its branching, resulting in chain tuberization and stolon growth in a process known as heat sprouting [60].

High temperatures promote the partitioning of dry matter in the stems while reducing it in roots, stolons, and tubers, thereby decreasing the number of formed tubers. Consequently, the negative feedback effect of high temperature, after stolon development begins, includes a reduction in tuber initiation, diminishing the demand for photosynthate translocation to them and adversely affecting the photosynthetic system [60, 61].

5.2 Tuber growth

Sucrose serves as the primary sugar translocated in many plants, with its synthesis catalyzed by sucrose phosphate synthase and sucrose-6-phosphate. Degradation, on the other hand, is facilitated by sucrose synthase or invertase. The control of photosynthate partitioning between sucrose and starch in leaves lies with sucrose phosphate synthase, while sucrose synthase is considered the principal enzyme for sucrose cleavage in various tissues.

Growing tubers exhibit heightened sucrose synthase activity and ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase, both of which decrease as tubers develop. The conversion of sucrose to starch and subsequent starch deposition in tubers is regulated by starch synthase and ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase [62].

Under heat stress, carbohydrate partitioning in potato plants shifts from shoots to tubers, resulting in an overall reduction in plant yield [36]. The impact of heat stress on enzymes that control sucrose metabolism in potatoes is not yet fully understood. Studies by [43] indicate that the photosynthetic performance of StSP6A-overexpressing potato plants remains unchanged, suggesting that photosynthetic capacity does not account for the lack of tuber growth. However, at later stages (9 weeks), sucrose, glucose, and fructose content increases in leaves at high temperatures, regardless of StSP6A overexpression, indicating a correlation with sugar transport rather than accumulation [43, 48].

Inhibiting sugar transport may occur at the level of transporters, exemplified by the interaction between StSWEET11 transporter and StSP6A. This interaction hinders tuber filling, promoting sucrose transport through the symplastic pathway. StSP6A RNAi plants exhibit a more abundant sugar flow in the stem, indicating increased flow. Understanding how sugar transport to the tuber occurs at high temperatures requires further investigation [43].

Activities of enzymes like starch synthase and ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase decrease at temperatures above 25°C, resulting in less conversion of sucrose into starch in initiated tubers [62, 63].

Sucrose transport from leaves to photosynthate-demanding tissues is facilitated by sucrose transporters susceptible to high temperatures [64]. However, the regulation of sucrose transporter genes and their impact on sucrose transport and loading in tubers at high temperatures remain areas of limited understanding. Elevated temperatures lead to decreased total tuber yield, with low nighttime temperatures increasing the number of tubers per plant [65].

In some cultivars, larger tubers are obtained at higher temperatures when fewer tubers are formed per plant. While elevated daytime and nighttime temperatures reduce tuber yield, high nighttime temperatures seem to have a more detrimental effect. Potato plants grown at 31/29°C compared to 19/17°C Day/Night exhibit reduced sucrose synthase activity, ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, and tuber growth rate [52].

Krauss and Marschner [66] found decreased starch synthase activity, lower starch content, and slower tuber growth rates in three potato cultivars when exposed to 30°C compared to constant temperatures of 20°C.

5.3 Tuber maturation

During the tuber maturation stage, elevated temperatures (25/22°C Day/Night) enabled plants to produce increased amounts of glucose and fructose in photosynthate-demanding organs. Conversely, plants grown under low-temperature conditions exhibited high sucrose phosphate synthase activity. The temperature rise during tuber maturation also impacts the biosynthesis of steroidal glycoalkaloids (SGA), compounds that are toxic to human health and remain unaffected by cooking [67]. Therefore, the temperature increase not only influences potato crop productivity but also poses risks to human health [68].

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

Heat stress significantly disrupts tuber production in potato plants, marking the most affected stage among all phenological stages. Heat stress induces changes in crucial physiological processes, including photosynthesis, transpiration, and overall plant metabolism, directly affecting crop performance. Genes encoding enzymes and glucose and sucrose transporters respond to temperature fluctuations, influencing the allocation of carbohydrates to storage organs and causing disruptions in starch formation in tubers. Given the vulnerability of potato plants to thermal stress, unraveling these interactions becomes imperative for the development of heat-tolerant varieties, particularly in the context of climate change and global warming.

References

  1. 1. IPCC. Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Lee, Romero J editors. IPCC Switzerland, 2023;35-115. DOI: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
  2. 2. Hijmans RJ. The effect of climate change on global potato production. American Journal of Potato Research. 2003;80:271-279. DOI: 10.1007/BF02855363
  3. 3. Bajaj S. Biotechnology of nutritional improvement of potato. In: Bajaj YPS, editor. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry 3: Potato. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1987. pp. 143-145. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-72773-3_10
  4. 4. Van Dam J, Kooman PL, Struik PC. Effects of temperature and photoperiod on early growth and final number of tubers in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato Research. 1996;39:51-62. DOI: 10.1007/BF02358206
  5. 5. Ababaker SKH, Esho KB. Producing potato from true seed review. Agricultural Science. 2022;6(3):51-63. DOI: 10.31080/ASAG.2022.06.1111
  6. 6. Tizio R. Physiology of dormancy in potato tubers and its relationships with the hormonal mechanism of tuberization. Agricultural Science. 1982;3:91-105. DOI: 10.31047/1668.298x.v3.n1.905
  7. 7. Ewing EE, Struik PC. Tuber formation in potato: Induction, initiation, and growth. Horticultural Reviews. 1992;14:89-198. DOI: 10.1002/9780470650523.ch3
  8. 8. Gong H, Dusengemungu L, Igiraneza C, Placide P. Molecular regulation of potato tuber dormancy and sprouting: A mini-review. Plant Biotechnology Reports. 2021;15(4):1-18. DOI: 10.1007/S11816-021-00689-Y
  9. 9. Kumar R. The canon of potato science: 42. Flowering Potato Research. 2007;50:383-385. DOI: 10.1007/s11540-008-9066-5
  10. 10. Kondhare KR, Natarajan B, Banerjee AK. Molecular signals that govern tuber development in potato. International Journal of Developmental Biology. 2019;64(1):133-140. DOI: 10.1387/IJDB.190132AB
  11. 11. Sonnewald U. Control of potato tuber sprouting. Trends in Plant Science. 2001;6(8):333-335. DOI: 10.1016/s1360-1385(01)02020-9
  12. 12. Burton WG. Challenges for stress physiology in potato. American Potato Journal. 1981;58(1):3-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF02855376
  13. 13. Sanabria J, Calanca P, Alarcón C, Canchari G. Potential impacts of early twenty-first century changes in temperature and precipitation on rainfed annual crops in the Central Andes of Peru. Regional Environmental Change. 2014;14(4):1533-1548. DOI: 10.1007/S10113-014-0595-Y
  14. 14. Guedes ML, Haynes KG, Vinyard BT, et al. Heat tolerance in diploid wild potato species in vitro. American Journal of Potato Research. 2019;96:294-302. DOI: 10.1007/s12230-019-09716-9
  15. 15. Kwambai TK, Griffin D, Nyongesa M, et al. Dormancy and physiological age of seed tubers from a diverse set of potato cultivars grown at different altitudes and in different seasons in Kenya. Potato Research. 2023;66:1091-1115. DOI: 10.1007/s11540-023-09617-9
  16. 16. Zhang J, Yao J, Mao L, et al. Low temperature reduces potato wound formation by inhibiting phenylpropanoid metabolism and fatty acid biosynthesis. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;13:1109953. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1109953
  17. 17. Wszelaczyńska E, Pobereżny J, Dudek S, et al. The effects of fertilizers, irrigation, and storage on the properties of potato tubers and their constituent starches. Starch-Starke. 2015;67:478-492. DOI: 10.1002/STAR.201400196
  18. 18. Prossy N, Aijuka S, Arinda O, Mateeka B, Barekye A. Early generation seed starter materials and approaches to seed production: Challenge for improving the potato seed system in Uganda. Crop Science. 2023;27:1-9. DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20969
  19. 19. Haider MW, Nafees M, Iqbal R, et al. Postharvest starch, and sugars adjustment in potato tubers of wide-ranging dormancy genotypes subjected to various sprout forcing techniques. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(1):1-22. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37711-y
  20. 20. Qiannan H, Tang C, Zhou X, et al. Potatoes dormancy release and sprouting commencement: A review on current and prospects. Food Frontiers. 2023;4(3):1001-1018. DOI: 10.1002/fft2.228
  21. 21. Kara K, Imanparast F, Kara T. The effect of pre-sprouting and planting time on different sized potato tuber yields (Solanum tuberosum L.). Journal of Agricultural Science. 2022;32(4):754-765. DOI: 10.29133/yyutbd.1136457
  22. 22. Paul V, Buckseth T, Singh RK, et al. Alternative methods of seed potato (Solanum tuberosum) production: Indian perspective—A review. Current Horticulture. 2022;10:3-11. DOI: 10.5958/2455-7560.2022.00019.X
  23. 23. Demirel U. Environmental requirements of potato and abiotic stress factors. In: Çalişkan ME, Bakhsh A, Jabran K, editors. Potato Production Worldwide London. London: Academic Press; 2023. pp. 71-86. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822925-5.00011-6
  24. 24. Kumar M, Rahul L, Tiwari K, et al. Mechanistic concept of physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses of the potato crop to heat and drought stress. Plants. 2022;11(21):2857-2857. DOI: 10.3390/plants11212857
  25. 25. Joshi M, Ginzberg I. Adventitious root formation in crops – potato as an example. Physiologia Plantarum. 2021;172(1):124-133. DOI: 10.1111/PPL.13305
  26. 26. Almekinders CJM, Struik PC. Shoot development and flowering in potato (Solanum tuberosum L). Potato Research. 1996;39(4):581-607. DOI: 10.1007/BF02358477
  27. 27. Struik PC. Plant Development in Potato. In: Çalişkan ME, Bakhsh A, Jabran K, editors. Potato Production Worldwide. London: Academic Press; 2023. pp. 57-70. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-822925-5.00025-6
  28. 28. Winkler E. Kartoffelbau in Tirol. II. Photosynthesevermögen und Respiration von verschiedenen Kartoffelsorten. Potato Research. 1971;14:1-18. DOI: 10.1007/BF02355914
  29. 29. Havaux M. Rapid photosynthetic adaptation to heat stress triggered in potato leaves by moderately elevated temperatures. Plant, Cell & Environment. 1993;16(4):461-467. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00893.x
  30. 30. Fleisher DH, Timlin D. Modeling Expansion of Individual Leaves in the Potato Canopy. Agricultural Meteorology. 2006;139:84-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.06.002
  31. 31. Desta B, Tena N, Amare G. Response of potato to heat stress and strategic methods to cope with it. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 2023:1-9. DOI: 10.22159/ijags.2023.v11i1.46889
  32. 32. Struik PC. Responses of the potato plant to the temperature. In: Vreugdenhil D, Bradshaw J, Gebhardt C, Govers F, Taylor M, MacKerron D, Ross H, editors. Potato Biology and Biotechnology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2007. pp. 367-393. DOI: 10.1016/B978-044451018-1/50060-9
  33. 33. Ewing EE. Heat stress and the tuberization stimulus. American Potato Journal. 1981;58:31-49. DOI: 10.1007/BF02855378
  34. 34. Hancock RD, Morris WL, Ducreux L, et al. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plant to moderately elevated temperature. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2014;37(2):439-450. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12168
  35. 35. Taiz L, Moller IM, Murphy A, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology and Development. 7th ed. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2022. pp. 432-435
  36. 36. Wolf S, Olesinski AA, Rudich J, Marani A. Effect of high temperature on photosynthesis in potatoes. Annals of Botany. 1990;65(2):179-185. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087922
  37. 37. Zhu W, Li PP, Xue C, Chen M, Wang Z, Yang Q. Potato plants overexpressing SpHsfA4c exhibit enhanced tolerance to high-temperature stress. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 2021;68(6):1-10. DOI: 10.1134/S1021443721060248
  38. 38. Putterill J, Varkonyi-Gasic E. FT and florigen long-distance flowering control in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology. 2016;33:77-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.06.008
  39. 39. Navarro C, Abelenda JA, Cuéllar C, Tamaki S, Shimamoto K, Prat S. Control of flowering and storage organ formation in potato by FLOWERING LOCUS T. Nature. 2011;478:119-122. DOI: 10.1038/nature10431
  40. 40. Morris WL, Hancock RD, Ducreux LJ, et al. Day length dependent restructuring of the leaf transcriptome and metabolome in potato genotypes with contrasting tuberization phenotypes. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2014;37(6):1351-1363. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12238
  41. 41. Zhang LX, Nie B, et al. Nitrogen management can inhibit or induce the sprouting of potato tubers: Consequences of regulation tuberization. Post Biology Technology. 2022;183:111722. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2021.111722
  42. 42. Rodríguez-Falcón M, Bou J, Prat S. Seasonal control of tuberization in potato: Conserved elements with the flowering response. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2006;57:151-180. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105224
  43. 43. Park JS, Park SJ, Kwon SY, et al. Temporally distinct regulatory pathways coordinate thermo-responsive storage organ formation in potato. Cell Reports. 2022;38(13):110579. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110579
  44. 44. Rykaczewska K. The effect of high temperature occurring in subsequent stages of plant development on potato yield and tuber physiological defects. American Journal of Potato Research. 2015;92:339-349. DOI: 10.1007/s12230-015-9436-x
  45. 45. George TS, Taylor MA, Dodd IC, White PJ. Climate change and consequences for potato production: A review of tolerance to emerging abiotic stress. Potato Research. 2017;60(3):239-268. DOI: 10.1007/S11540-018-9366-3
  46. 46. Lehretz GG,Sonnewald S, Hornyik C, Corral JM, Sonnewald U. Post-transcriptional regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T modulates heat-dependent source-sink development in potato. Current Biology. 2019;29:1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.027
  47. 47. Morris WL, Ducreux LJM, Morris JJ, et al. Identification of TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 as a temperature-sensitive negative regulator of tuberization in potato. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2019;70:5703-5714. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz336
  48. 48. Abelenda JA, Cruz-Oro E, Franco-Zorrilla JM, Prat S. Potato StCONSTANS-like 1 suppresses storage organ formation by directly activating the FT-like StSP5G repressor. Current Biology. 2016;26:872-881. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.066
  49. 49. Singh A, Siddappa S, Bhardwaj V, Singh B, Kumar D, Singh BP. Expression profiling of potato cultivars with contrasting tuberization at elevated temperature using microarray analysis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2015;97:108-116. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.09.014
  50. 50. Gonzalez-Schain ND, Diaz-Mendoza M, Zurczak M, Suarez-Lopez P. Potato CONSTANS is involved in photoperiodic tuberization in a graft-transmissible manner. The Plant Journal. 2012;70:678-690. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04909.x
  51. 51. Mingo-Castel AM, Smith OE, Kumamoto J. Studies on the carbon dioxide promotion and ethylene inhibition of tuberization in potato ex plants cultured in vitro. Plant Physiology. 1976;57:480-485. DOI: 10.1104/pp.57.4.480
  52. 52. Mokrani K, Kühn C, Tarchoun N. Temperature effects on tuber production and carbohydrates partitioning in different cultivars during consecutive stages of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Growth. Potato Research. 2023;66:75-299. DOI: 10.1007/s11540-022-09543-2
  53. 53. Salanoubat M, Belliard G. The steady-state level of potato sucrose synthase mRN a is dependent on wounding, anaerobiosis and sucrose concentration. Gene. 1989;84(1):181-185. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(89)90153-4
  54. 54. Viola R, Roberts A, Haupt S, et al. Tuberization in potato involves a switch from apoplastic to symplastic phloem unloading. The Plant Cell. 2001;13(2):385-398. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.13.2.385
  55. 55. Jaiswal S, Paul K, Raman KV, et al. Differential expression pattern of UGPase gene homologs (StUGPase1 and StUGPase2) in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during tuberization process and post-harvest storage conditions. Russ. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2023;70(71):38-46. DOI: 10.1134/S1021443722602749
  56. 56. Dahal K, Li XQ , Tai H, Creelman A, Bizimungu B. Improving potato stress tolerance and tuber yield under a climate change scenario-a current overview. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2019;10:1-16. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00563
  57. 57. Farrar JF, Williams ML. The effects of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide and temperature on carbon partitioning, source-sink relations, and respiration. Plant, Cell & Environment. 1991;14(8):819-830. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01445.x
  58. 58. Menzel CM. Tuberization in potato at high temperatures: Responses to gibberellin and growth inhibitors. Annals of Botany. 1980;46(3):259-265. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085916
  59. 59. Brown PH. The canon of potato science: 37. Stolonization, tuber induction and tuberization. Potato Research. 2007;50(3-4):363-365. DOI: 10.1007/s11540-008-9070-9
  60. 60. Momčilović I. Effects of heat stress on potato productivity and nutritive quality. Hrana Ishra. 2019;60(2):43-48. DOI: 10.5937/hraIsh1902043M
  61. 61. Zhang G, Tang R, Niu S, et al. Heat-stress-induced sprouting, and differential gene expression in growing potato tubers: Comparative transcriptomics with that induced by postharvest sprouting. Horticulture Research. 2021;8(1):226-226. DOI: 10.1038/S41438-021-00680-2
  62. 62. Geigenberger P, Stitt M, Fernie AR. Metabolic control analysis and regulation of the conversion of sucrose to starch in growing potato tubers. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2004;27(6):655-673. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01183.x
  63. 63. Denyer K, Hylton CM, Smith AM. The effect of high temperature on starch synthesis and the activity of starch synthase. Functional Plant Biology. 1994;21(6):783-789. DOI: 10.1071/PP9940783
  64. 64. Kühn C. A comparison of the sucrose transporter systems of different plant species. Plant Biology. 2003;5(3):215-232. DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-40798
  65. 65. Levy D, Veilleux RE. Adaptation of potato to high temperatures and salinity—A review. American Journal of Potato Research. 2007;84:487-506. DOI: 10.1007/BF02987885
  66. 66. Krauss A, Marschner H. Influence of nitrogen nutrition, day length and temperature on contents of gibberellic and abscisic acid and on tuberization in potato plants. Potato Research. 1982;25:13-21. DOI: 10.1007/BF02357269
  67. 67. Musita CN, Okoth MW, Abong’ GO, Omayio DG. Glycoalkaloids in commercial potato varieties traded in Nairobi, Kenya. F1000 Research. 2020;9(423):1-12. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.23783.2
  68. 68. Fogelman E, Oren-Shamir M, Hirshberg J, et al. Nutritional value of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in hot climates: Anthocyanins, carotenoids, and steroidal glycoalkaloids. Planta. 2019;249(4):1143-1155. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-018-03078-y

Written By

María del Socorro Sánchez-Correa, María del Rocío Reyero-Saavedra, Gladys Edith Jiménez-Nopala, Manuel Mandujano Piña and Juan Gerardo Ortiz-Montiel

Submitted: 30 December 2023 Reviewed: 21 February 2024 Published: 24 April 2024