Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Perspective Chapter: Why Are Compositae Weeds More Invasive?

Written By

Heng Yang and Jieshi Tang

Submitted: 08 December 2023 Reviewed: 14 December 2023 Published: 24 April 2024

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.1005126

Weed Management - Global Strategies IntechOpen
Weed Management - Global Strategies Edited by Muhammad Aamir Iqbal

From the Edited Volume

Weed Management - Global Strategies [Working Title]

Dr. Muhammad Aamir Iqbal

Chapter metrics overview

7 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Biological invasion is a global ecological problem, and it is important to understand the mechanism of successful invasion for the prevention and control of invasive weeds. Based on my experience and expertise in ecology, I have observed a significant gap in the literature regarding Compositae weeds invasions, and aimed to address this gap. We searched the literature related to Compositae weeds invasions published after 2000 in the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. A list of 60 major Compositae weeds that are widely invasive around the world, and five important reasons (reproductive strategies, ecological adaptations, genetic diversity, enemy release, and human activities) explored that could be responsible for the powerful invasiveness of Compositae weeds. We offer a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge in this field and present a different perspective that incorporates existing theories. A clear address about the aggressive invasiveness of invasive species belonging to Compositae, and proposing scientific prevention, control, and management strategies will help prevent further invasion around the world in the future.

Keywords

  • biological invasions
  • Compositae weeds
  • reproductive strategies
  • ecological adaptations
  • genetic diversity
  • enemy release
  • human activities

1. Introduction

Invasive weed species pose a significant threat to global ecosystems and economy around the world [1]. Compositae weeds have been particularly successful at invading heterogeneous habitats, many species within this family have become invasive in various regions (Table 1, contains references [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61]), especially in agroecological zones and grassland areas [62, 63]. Here, we aim to explore the factors that contribute to the strong invasiveness of Compositae weeds. Several reasons for their success in invading new habitats will be discussed, including their reproductive strategies, ecological adaptations, genetic diversity, enemy release, and the impacts of human activities on their spread (Figure 1). Understanding these factors can aid in the development of effective management strategies for controlling the invasion of Compositae weeds.

Compositae weedsCommon namePlace originInvasive habitatsReferences
Ageratina adenophorasticky snakerootMexicosparse vegetation, bare landPoudel et al. [2]
Ageratum conyzoidestropical whiteweedTropical Americavalley, understory, meadow, wastelandErida et al. [3]
Ambrosia artemisiifoliaannual ragweedCentral and North Americaroadside, channels, riverbanks, streetsGusev et al. [4]
Ambrosia trifidagreat ragweedNorth Americafields, roadsides, wetlandsXu et al. [5]
Aster subulatusannual saltmarsh asterNorth Americaroadside, abandoned land, wildernessXu et al. [6]
Bidens albacommon beggar’s tickTropical Americavillageside, roadside, wastelandWang et al. [7]
Bidens frondosadevil’s beggartickNorth Americawet fieldMin et al. [8]
Bidens pilosahairy beggarticksAmericavillageside, roadside, wastelandLi et al. [9]
Chromolaena odorataSiam weedMexicohilly land, savannaXu et al. [10]
Erigeron annuusannual fleabaneNorth Americahillsides, roadsides, fieldsHuang et al. [11]
Erigeron canadensishorseweedNorth Americawilderness, wasteland, field edge, roadsideLiendo et al. [12]
Erigeron sumatrensisfleabane daisySouth Americameadow, wilderness, roadsideMaslo et al. [13]
Flaveria bidentisbristly yellowtopSouth Americawilderness, pasture, abandoned farmlandDai et al. [14]
Mikania micranthaAmerican ropeCentral and South Americaforest, farmlandJiang et al. [15]
Parthenium hysterophorusfamine weedTropical Americaopen land, roadside, riverside, slopesUllah et al. [16]
Praxelis clematideafleabaneSouth Americaroadside, wasteland, farmland, grasslandIntanon et al. [17]
Solidago canadensisCanada goldenrodNorth Americariver beach, wasteland, roadside, farmland sideTian et al. [18]
Tithonia diversifoliatree marigoldMexicoriver beach, roadside, farmlandJiao et al. [19]
Ageratum houstonianumflossflowerTropical Americaforest edge, riverside, farmland, grasslandEl Hadidy et al. [20]
Crassocephalum crepidioidesredflower ragleafAfricaunderwood, bushes, beside ditchesXie et al. [21]
Erigeron bonariensisBrazilian fleabaneSouth Americaroadside, river embankment, hillside, countrysideQasem et al. [22]
Galinsoga parvifloragallant soldierSouth Americaroadside, open spaceRipanda et al. [23]
Galinsoga quadriradiatagallant soldierMexicoforest, roadsideLiu et al. [24]
Sphagneticola trilobatawedeliaTropical Americaseaside, waterside, limestone areasZhang et al. [25]
Xanthium italicumItalian cockleburEurope, North Americawasteland, waterside, farmlandShi et al. [26]
Xanthium spinosumspiny cockleburAmericaroadside, wasteland, farmlandDudás et al. [27]
Bidens bipinnataSpanish needlesAmericawastelands, hillsides, fieldsZhuang et al. [28]
Coreopsis lanceolatalanceleaf coreopsisUSAwoods, mountainsKim et al. [29]
Cosmos sulphureussulfur cosmosMexicopastoral, sandy landLiu et al. [30]
Cyclachaena xanthiifoliagiant false ragweedNorth Americahighway, the manure pileAbramova & Nurmieva [31]
Erigeron philadelphicusPhiladelphia fleabaneNorth Americaroadside, wilderness, hillside, orchard, forestXu et al. [32]
Tagetes minutawild marigoldTropical Americaalpine areasMoghaddam et al. [33]
Tagetes patulaFrench marigoldMexicograssland, forest, gardenPrebeg et al. [34]
Tragopogon dubiuswestern salsifyCentral Asia, Europeriver beach, wasteland, field edgeJordon-Thaden et al. [35]
Xanthium mongolicumMongolian cockleburMexicoroadside, ditchside, field edge, grasslandHan et al. [36]
Cichorium intybuschicoryEurope, West Central Asia, North Africawasteland, prairie, field, slopeGazwi et al. [37]
Eclipta prostratafalse daisyAmericariverside, fieldside, roadsideTimalsina & Devkota [38]
Erechtites hieraciifoliuspilewortTropical Americaunderstory, hillsides, shrubs, wetlandsHung et al. [39]
Erechtites valerianifoliusAmerican burnweedTropical Americafieldside, roadsideFunez et al. [40]
Glebionis carinatacorn marigoldMoroccopastoral, wastelandMircea et al. [41]
Helianthus tuberosusJerusalem artichokeNorth Americaruins, houseside, roadsidePhongphan et al. [42]
Senecio vulgariscommon groundselEuropegrassland, hillside, roadsideEbadi & Eftekharian [43]
Silybum marianummilk thistleWest Asia, North Africa, Southern Europeopen space, wasteland, roadsideHossain et al. [44]
Soliva anthemifoliaannual sowthistleSouth Americawasteland, fieldGhoshal et al. [45]
Sonchus asperprickly sowthistleEurope, the Mediterraneanhillside, forest edge, watersideSidhu et al. [46]
Sonchus oleraceuscommon sowthistleEurope,d the Mediterraneanforest, field, open spaceChoudhary et al. [47]
Taraxacum officinaledandelionEuropegrassland, forest, field, roadsideWatanabe et al. [48]
Zinnia peruvianaPeruvian zinniaMexicohillside, grass, roadsideMohamed et al. [49]
Acanthospermum hispidumbristly starburSouth Americaflat slopes, riversides, ditchsides, roadsidesSukholozova et al. [50]
Acmella oleraceaparacressSouth Americafieldside, roadsideKato-Noguchi et al. [51]
Anthemis arvensiscorn mayweedEuroperoadsideWozniak et al. [52]
Anthemis tinctoriayellow chamomileEuropeparks, fieldsOrlando et al. [53]
Aster subulatu var. cubensisCuban asterCaribbeanseaside, wetlandCheng et al. [54]
Calyptocarpus vialisstraggler daisyCuba, Mexico and the United Stateswilderness, cultivated land, roadside, housesideLal et al. [55]
Centaurea cyanuscornflowerEuropewasteland, fieldPalma-Bautista et al. [56]
Centaurea diffusadiffuse knapweedWest Asia, Europewasteland, fieldKeever et al. [57]
Centaurea maculosaspotted knapweedEuropewasteland, fieldMummey et al. [58]
Coreopsis basalisgoldenmane tickseedNorth Americaparks, gardensCrawford & Smith [59]
Coreopsis grandifloralarge-flowered tickseedUSAwasteland, mountainsHuang et al. [60]
Coreopsis tinctoriagolden tickseedUSAwasteland, mountains, fieldJiang et al. [61]

Table 1.

Informations on the 60 most important species of Compositae weeds.

Figure 1.

Main reasons for the global invasion success of Compositae weeds. Five important reasons can be responsible for explaining the strong invasiveness of Compositae weeds, including reproductive strategies, ecological adaptations, genetic diversity, enemy release, and human activities.

Compositae weeds are recognized for their invasive tendencies, presenting significant challenges such as decreased biodiversity and habitat degradation [64]. These invasive plants possess traits like rapid growth, prolific seed production, and adaptability to various environmental conditions, which enable them to outcompete native vegetation and dominate ecosystems [65]. The spread of invasive Compositae weeds is facilitated by human activities, habitat disturbances, and the absence of natural predators in new habitats [66]. Effective control measures, including mechanical removal and targeted herbicide application, are essential to manage their invasion and safeguard native ecosystems from further disruption [67, 68].

Compositae weeds display a wide range of life forms, including annuals, biennials, and perennials [69]. They are characterized by their composite flower heads, which consist of multiple individual flowers on a single head [70]. Compositae weeds have become widely distributed around the world due to their excellent adaptability to different environments and their high reproduction rates [71]. As a result, many species within this family have been introduced to new areas, where they often outcompete and displace native species [72]. For example, Italian cocklebur (Figure 2). Understanding the reasons behind their invasiveness is crucial for effective management and conservation practices.

Figure 2.

The current invasion status of Compositae plant X. italicum in China. Four habitat types can be invaded by the alien Compositae plant X. italicum, including farmland, reservoirs, ditches, and wasteland.

Advertisement

2. Methodology

The China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science search engines were used in the literature collection [73]. Only journal articles and reviews that were published English after 2000 in this study [74]. The search terms and strategies are as follows: TS = (“biological invasions*”) OR TI = (“Compositae/Asteraceae weeds*”) OR TI = (“strong invasiveness*”) OR TI = (“successful invasion*”) [75].

Advertisement

3. Reasons for the strong invasiveness of Compositae weeds

3.1 Reproductive strategies

One of the key factors contributing to the invasiveness of Compositae weeds is their unique reproductive strategies. Many species within this family produce large quantities of small, lightweight seeds that are easily dispersed over long distances by wind or water [76]. Additionally, their ability to asexual reproduction, self-pollinate, and insect pollination allows them to rapidly colonize new habitats [77]. These reproductive characteristics provide Compositae weeds with a competitive advantage, allowing them to establish and dominate over other native weed species. Such as Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Solidago Canadensis, and Ageratina adenophora.

3.2 Ecological adaptations

Compositae weeds exhibit various ecological adaptations that contribute to their invasiveness. They are known for their ability to thrive in disturbed habitats, such as roadsides, fields, and forests. Their wide tolerance to different soil types, pH levels, and moisture conditions also enables them to occupy diverse ecological niches [78]. Furthermore, Compositae weeds often possess allelopathic compounds that inhibit the growth of neighboring weeds, further enhancing their ability to outcompete native species [79]. Such as Helianthus annuus, Senecio jacobaea, and Acroptilon repens.

3.3 Genetic diversity

Genetic diversity plays a crucial role in the invasiveness of Compositae weeds. Species within this family often have high genetic variability, which allows them to adapt to new environments and overcome biotic and abiotic stresses [80]. This genetic diversity also increases the chances of hybridization and the formation of novel genotypes with increased invasiveness. Additionally, the presence of polyploid species within Compositae contributes to their ability to occupy new habitats and rapidly expand their range, such as Conyza bonariensis, Erigeron philadelphicus, and Conyza canadensis.

3.4 Enemy release

In their native range, Compositae weeds coexist with specialized herbivores, diseases, and pathogens, regulating their population growth [81]. However, when introduced to new geographic regions, they often escape from their natural enemies, enabling population growth without significant constraints. This lack of natural enemies can lead to uncontrolled proliferation and invasion of Compositae weeds, posing a threat to native biodiversity, such as Cirsium vulgare, Solidago canadensis, and Ambrosia artemisiifolia.

3.5 Human activities

Human activities such as agriculture, horticulture, and international trade have significantly facilitated the spread of Compositae weeds [82]. For example, their introduction as ornamental weeds has resulted in accidental escapes and subsequent invasions in many parts of the world. Furthermore, the disturbance of natural ecosystems through land clearing, urbanization, and climate change creates favorable conditions for the establishment and spread of invasive Compositae species [83]. Prevention measures to control their introduction and spread should be implemented to minimize their impact on native biodiversity, such as Acroptilon repens, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, and Solidago canadensis.

Advertisement

4. Future management strategies of Compositae plant invasions

Effective management strategies for controlling invasive weeds typically involve a combination of prevention, early detection, eradication, and ongoing monitoring. Prevention efforts include implementing strict regulations on the importation and sale of potentially invasive Compositae species, as well as raising public awareness about the risks associated with introducing non-native Compositae plants into natural ecosystems [84].

Early detection is crucial for addressing invasive Compositae weeds before they become established and widespread. This involves training volunteers and professionals to identify invasive Compositae plants and implementing surveillance programs to quickly detect and respond to new invasions [85].

Eradication methods vary depending on the invasive Compositae species and the extent of the invasion but may include mechanical methods such as hand-pulling, mowing, or cutting, as well as chemical control methods like herbicide application. Biological control, using natural enemies such as insects or pathogens to suppress invasive Compositae weeds, can also be an effective long-term strategy when implemented carefully to minimize unintended consequences [86, 87, 88, 89].

Ongoing monitoring and management are essential to prevent the re-establishment and spread of invasive Compositae plants. This includes regular surveys to detect and treat new invasions, as well as restoration efforts to rehabilitate areas impacted by invasive weeds and promote the recovery of native plant communities [90].

Collaboration among government agencies, land managers, researchers, and the public is critical for successful invasive Compositae weeds management. By implementing integrated and adaptive management approaches, we can work toward reducing the impact of invasive Compositae weeds and preserving the health and biodiversity of our local ecosystems, especially in agricultural production areas [91].

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

Here, we present a list of the 60 most important Compositae invasive weeds around the world and discuss the reasons why they are so invasive. The aggressive invasiveness of Compositae weeds can be attributed to a combination of factors such as their reproductive strategies, ecological adaptations, genetic diversity, enemy release, and the influence of human activities. Understanding the mechanisms driving their invasiveness is essential for managing and controlling the spread of these species. Further research is needed to assess the impacts of different control measures and develop effective strategies to prevent the further spread of invasive Compositae weeds and protect native ecosystems.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Central Public-Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund of China (fund No. 1610012024003).

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Advertisement

Author contribution statement

H. Yang and J.S. Tang collected the data and H. Yang wrote the manuscript, and J.S. Tang revised the manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Diagne C, Leroy B, Vaissière AC, et al. High and rising economic costs of biological invasions worldwide. Nature. 2021;592:571-576. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-03405-6
  2. 2. Poudel AS, Jha PK, Shrestha BB, et al. Biology and management of the invasive weed Ageratina adenophora (Asteraceae): Current state of knowledge and future research needs. Weed Research. 2019;59:79-92. DOI: 10.1111/wre.12351
  3. 3. Erida G, Ichsan CN, Syamsuddin, et al. Potential of secondary metabolites of Ageratum conyzoides L. in weed management: A review. Allelopathy Journal. 2023;58:23-40. DOI: 10.26651/allelo.j/2023-58-1-1417
  4. 4. Gusev AP. Invasion of ambrosia artemisifolia L. into the landscapes of the southeastern Belarus. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions. 2019;10:129-135. DOI: 10.1134/S2075111719020061
  5. 5. Xu K, Liu XY, Zhao CX, et al. Nitrogen deposition further increases Ambrosia trifida root exudate invasiveness under global warming. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2023;195:759. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11380-w
  6. 6. Xu ZL, Zhong SS, Yu YL, et al. Drought stress intensifies the phytotoxicity of five Asteraceae exotic invasive plants. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences. 2023;70:162-172. DOI: 10.1163/22238980-bja10078
  7. 7. Wang Y, Lian JY, Shen H, et al. The effects of Bidens alba invasion on soil bacterial communities across different coastal ecosystem land-use types in southern China. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0253358. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253358
  8. 8. Min GG, Park TS, Park JS, et al. First report of cucumber mosaic virus infecting Bidens frondosa (devil's beggarticks) in Korea. Journal of Plant Pathology. 2023;105:1739-1740. DOI: 10.1007/s42161-023-01493-z
  9. 9. Li YN, Gu YS, Li MZ, et al. Comparison on the phytoextraction efficiency of Bidens pilosa at heavy metal contaminated site in natural and electrokinetic conditions. Journal of Groundwater Science and Engineering. 2021;9:121-128. DOI: 10.19637/j.cnki.2305-7068.2021.02.004
  10. 10. Xu QY, Wang D, Quan GM, et al. Pennisetum Hydridum's potential for controlling invasive Chromolaena Odorata. Sustainability. 2019;11:5990. DOI: 10.3390/su11215990
  11. 11. Huang YM, Zhang GL, Fu WD, et al. Impacts of climate change on climatically suitable regions of two invasive erigeron weeds in China. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2023;14:1238656. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1238656
  12. 12. Liendo D, García-Mijangos I, Biurrun I, et al. Annual weedy species of erigeron in the northern Iberian Peninsula: A review. Mediterranean Botany. 2021;42:e67649. DOI: 10.5209/mbot.67649
  13. 13. Maslo S, Saric S. Erigeron sumatrensis Retz. (Compositae), a recently recognized invasive alien species in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Glasnik Hrvatskog Botanickog Drustva. 2020;8:88-93. DOI: 10.46232/glashbod.8.2.3
  14. 14. Dai L, Wu LL, Zhou XR, et al. Effects of water extracts of Flaveria bidentis on the seed germination and seedling growth of three plants. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:17700. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22527-z
  15. 15. Jiang ZY, Wang YT, Zheng YP, et al. Physiological and transcriptomic responses of Mikania micrantha stem to shading yield novel insights into its invasiveness. Biological Invasions. 2021;23:2927-2943. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-021-02546-z
  16. 16. Ullah S, Shakir M, Iqbal MS, et al. Identifying optimal waveband positions for discriminating Parthenium hysterophorus using hyperspectral data. Ecological Informatics. 2021;64:101362. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101362
  17. 17. Intanon S, Wiengmoon B, Mallory-Smith CA. Seed morphology and allelopathy of invasive Praxelis clematidea. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2020;48:261-272. DOI: 10.15835/nbha48111831
  18. 18. Tian ZS, Cheng JL, Xu JX. Cytogeography of naturalized Solidago canadensis populations in Europe. Plants-Basel. 2023;12:1113. DOI: 10.3390/plants12051113
  19. 19. Jiao Y, Cheng XP, Wang SH, et al. Characteristics of allometric growth of Tithonia diversifolia, an alien invasive plant. Journal of West China Forestry Science. 2020;49:156-161. DOI: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2020.01.024
  20. 20. El Hadidy D, El Sayed AM, El Tantawy M, et al. Larvicidal and repellent potential of Ageratum houstonianum against Culex pipiens. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:21410. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25939-z
  21. 21. Xie YD, Wang LM, Yang LX, et al. Intercropping with Eclipta prostrata and Crassocephalum crepidioides decrease cadmium uptake of tomato seedlings. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry. 2021;101:1231-1239. DOI: 10.1080/03067319.2019.1678606
  22. 22. Qasem JR. Chemical control and herbicide resistance of hairy fleabane (Erigeron bonariensis L.) in Jordan. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0263154. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263154
  23. 23. Ripanda A, Luanda A, Sule KS, et al. Galinsoga parviflora (Cav.): A comprehensive review on ethnomedicinal, phytochemical and pharmacological studies. Heliyon. 2023;9:e13517. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13517
  24. 24. Liu RL, Zhang WG, Lee BR, et al. Rhizosphere and root fungal community of the invasive plant Galinsoga quadriradiata changes along its elevational expansion route. Journal of Plant Ecology. 2023;16:rtac055. DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtac055
  25. 25. Zhang QL, Chen GX, Shao L, et al. The hybridization between Sphagneticola trilobata (L.) Pruski and Sphagneticola calendulacea (L.) Pruski improved the tolerance of hybrid to cadmium stress. Chemosphere. 2020;249:126540. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126540
  26. 26. Shi T, Long ZZ, Miao M. Glomus mosseae promotes Xanthium italicum invasion. Sains Malaysiana. 2020;49:2425-2432. DOI: 10.17576/jsm-2020-4910-08
  27. 27. Dudás M, Eliás P. Alien weed Xanthium spinosum in Slovakia I: Distribution and habitats. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 2021;22:305-316. DOI: 10.5513/JCEA01/22.2.3083
  28. 28. Zhuang G, Wang YQ , Li SJ, et al. Tissue distribution and molecular docking research on the active components of Bidens bipinnata L. against hyperlipidemia. Biomedical Chromatography. 2021;35:e5026. DOI: 10.1002/bmc.5026
  29. 29. Kim HG, Oh HJ, Ko JH, et al. New flavonoids from the flowers of Coreopsis lanceolata and their pharmacological activities. Planta Medica. 2019;85:1495-1496. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3399913
  30. 30. Liu XY, Ou H, Gregersen H, et al. Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of Cosmos sulphureus seed oil with ultrasound assistance. Journal of CO2 Utilization. 2023;70:102429. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2023.102429
  31. 31. Abramova LM, Nurmieva SV. On the ecology and biology of invasive species Cyclachaena xanthiifolia (Nutt.) Fresen. in the southern Urals and Cisural region. Russian Journal of Ecology. 2014;45:249-255. DOI: 10.1134/s106741361404002x
  32. 32. Xu SS, Zhao YH, Yan J, et al. Light availability and anthropogenic stress shape plant understory invasions in understory of urban forests: A case study in Shanghai. Biological Invasions. 2023;25:3223-3236. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-023-03104-5
  33. 33. Moghaddam M, Farhadi N, Panjtandoust M, et al. Seed germination, antioxidant enzymes activity and proline content in medicinal plant Tagetes minuta under salinity stress. Plant Biosystems. 2020;154:835-842. DOI: 10.1080/11263504.2019.1701122
  34. 34. Prebeg T, Bedran S, Zutic I. The effect of mechanical stress on transplants of three ornamental Asteraceae species. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 2019;20:365-375. DOI: 10.5513/JCEA01/20.1.2063
  35. 35. Jordon-Thaden IE, Spoelhof JP, Viccini LF, et al. Phenotypic trait variation in the north American Tragopogon allopolyploid complex. American Journal of Botany. 2023;110:1-16. DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.16189
  36. 36. Han J, Wang JW, Wang YC, et al. Sesquiterpene lactones-enriched fractions from Xanthium mongolicum Kitag alleviate RA by regulating M1 macrophage polarization via NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathway. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2023;14:1104153. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1104153
  37. 37. Gazwi HSS, Mahmoud ME, Toson EMA. Analysis of the phytochemicals of Coriandrum sativum and Cichorium intybus aqueous extracts and their biological effects on broiler chickens. Scientific Reports. 2022;12:9964. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14645-5
  38. 38. Timalsina D, Devkota HP. Eclipta prostrata (L.) L. (Asteraceae): Ethnomedicinal uses, chemical constituents, and biological activities. Biomolecules. 2021;11:1738. DOI: 10.3390/biom11111738
  39. 39. Hung NH, Satyal P, Hieu HV, et al. Mosquito larvicidal activity of the essential oils of Erechtites species growing wild in Vietnam. Insects. 2019;10:47. DOI: 10.3390/insects10020047
  40. 40. Funez L, Hassemer G, Peroni N, et al. Taxonomic notes on Erechtites (Asteraceae: Senecioneae). Phytotaxa. 2021;489:155-170. DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.489.2.4
  41. 41. Mircea DM, Calone R, Shakya R, et al. Use of multivariate analysis in screening for drought tolerance in ornamental Asteraceae species. Agronomy-Basel. 2023;13:687. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy13030687
  42. 42. Phongphan J, Wiyada M, Thanaset S, et al. Bioactive compounds from organic extracts of Helianthus tuberosus L. flowers. Industrial Crops and Products. 2018;119:57-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.03.060
  43. 43. Ebadi M, Eftekharian R. Morphological and genetic diversity of Senecio vulgaris L. (Asteraceae) in Iran. Acta Botanica Croatica. 2021;80:125-130. DOI: 10.37427/botcro-2021-012
  44. 44. Hossain MM, Cho SB, Kim IH. Silybum marianum seed extract as a potential phytogenic feed additive for improving growth performance and nutrient digestibility in growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2023;00:1-6. DOI: 10.1139/cjas-2023-0053
  45. 45. Ghoshal PP, Padal SB, Anand K, et al. Soliva (Asteraceae: Anthemideae) - a new generic record to the flora of erstwhile Bihar (Jharkhand) with a note on its nomenclature. Indian Journal of Forestry. 2019;42:177-180. DOI: 10.54207/bsmps1000-2019-4JWS8A
  46. 46. Sidhu MC, Rai S, Singh R. A cytomorphological investigation of three species of the genus Sonchus L. (Asterales: Asteraceae) from Punjab, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 2021;13:19640-19644. DOI: 10.11609/jott.7367.13.11.19640-19644%20
  47. 47. Choudhary VK, Dubey RP, Singh PK. Management of field sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus L.): An emerging threat in winter crops. Indian Journal of Weed Science. 2021;53:142-145. DOI: 10.5958/0974-8164.2021.00026.5
  48. 48. Watanabe K, Shibaike H, Suzuki T, et al. DNA contents and karyotypes of the natural hybrids in Taraxacum (Asteraceae) in Japan. Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica. 2021;72:135-144. DOI: 10.18942/apg.202013
  49. 49. Mohamed AM, Cifuente DA, Satorres SE, et al. Biological activity of roots and aerial parts of Zinnia peruviana on pathogenic micro-organisms in planktonic state and biofilm forming. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2022;74:419-428. DOI: 10.1111/lam.13622
  50. 50. Sukholozova EA, Orlova JV, Kulakova YY, et al. Monitoring of the phytosanitary status of the hispid starburr in Primorsky Krai. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions. 2023;14:240-250. DOI: 10.1134/S2075111723020133
  51. 51. Kato-Noguchi H, Suwitchayanon P, Boonmee S, et al. Plant growth inhibitory activity of the extracts of Acmella oleracea and its growth inhibitory substances. Natural Product Communications. 2019;14:1-5. DOI: 10.1177/1934578X19858-805
  52. 52. Wozniak A. Effect of cropping systems on quantitative changes in prevailing weed species. Agronomy Science. 2023;78:121-133. DOI: 10.24326/as.2023.5025
  53. 53. Orlando G, Zengin G, Ferrante C, et al. Chemical profiles and pharmacological properties of two Anthemis species: Anthemis tinctoria var. pallida and A. Cretica subsp. tenuiloba. Planta Medica. 2019;85:1416-1417. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3399708
  54. 54. Cheng HY, Wang S, Wei M, et al. Effect of leaf water extracts of four Asteraceae alien invasive plants on germination performance of Lactuca sativa L. under acid deposition. Plant Ecology. 2021;222:433-443. DOI: 10.1007/s11258-021-01117-5
  55. 55. Lal R, Kaur A, Kaur S, et al. Nature of phytotoxic interference of alien weed 'Calyptocarpus vialis' against some crop plants. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 2021;193:334. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-021-09092-0
  56. 56. Palma-Bautista C, Vázquez- García JG, de Portugal J, et al. Enhanced detoxification via Cyt-P450 governs cross-tolerance to ALS-inhibiting herbicides in weed species of Centaurea. Environmental Pollution. 2023;322:121140. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.121140
  57. 57. Keever CC, Gültekin L, Bourchier RS, et al. Post-release genetic assessment of two congeneric weed biological control agents. Biological Control. 2021;152:104462. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104462
  58. 58. Mummey DL, Rillig MC. The invasive plant species Centaurea maculosa alters arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in the field. Plant and Soil. 2006;288:81-90. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-006-9091-6
  59. 59. Crawford DJ, Smith EB. Leaf flavonoid chemistry and taxonomy of coreopsis sect. Coreopsis. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 1985;13:115-118. DOI: 10.1016/0305-1978(85)90068-7
  60. 60. Huang YQ , Li BQ , Chen HF, et al. Gamma-aminobutyric acid enhances cadmium phytoextraction by Coreopsis grandiflora by remodeling the rhizospheric environment. Plants-Basel. 2023;12:1484. DOI: 10.3390/plants12071484
  61. 61. Jiang H, Li ZY, Jiang XM, et al. Physiological changes and transcript identification in Coreopsis tinctoria Nutt. in early stages of salt stress. Peer J. 2021;9:e11888. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11888
  62. 62. Bieker VC, Battlay P, Petersen B, et al. Uncovering the genomic basis of an extraordinary weed invasion. Science Advances. 2022;8:eabo5115. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abo5115
  63. 63. Tian BL, Pei YC, Huang W, et al. Increasing flavonoid concentrations in root exudates enhance associations between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and an invasive weed. ISME Journal. 2021;15:1919-1930. DOI: 10.1038/s41396-021-00894-1
  64. 64. Mcgaughran A, Dhami MK, Parvizi E, et al. Genomic tools in biological invasions: Current state and future frontiers. Genome Biology and Evolution. 2024;16:evad230. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evad230
  65. 65. Zhang Q , Wang YP, Liu X. Risk of introduction and establishment of alien vertebrate species in transboundary neighboring areas. Nature Communications. 2024;15:870. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-45025-4
  66. 66. Croft L, Matheson P, Flemming C. Population structure and interspecific hybridisation of two invasive blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) following replicated incursions into New Zealand. Ecology and Evolution. 2024;14:e10832. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.10832
  67. 67. Chen YY, Gao YC, Huang XN. Incorporating adaptive genomic variation into predictive models for invasion risk assessment. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology. 2024;18:100299. DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2023.100299
  68. 68. Hulme PE, Ahmed DA, Haubrock PJ, et al. Widespread imprecision in estimates of the economic costs of invasive alien species worldwide. Science of the Total Environment. 2024;909:167997. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167997
  69. 69. Mohammed HA, Qureshi KA, Ali HM, et al. Bio-evaluation of the wound healing activity of Artemisia Judaica L. as part of the weed’s use in traditional medicine; phytochemical, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antibiofilm properties of the weed’s essential oils. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11:332. DOI: 10.3390/antiox11020332
  70. 70. Prusinkiewicz P, Zhang T, Owens A, et al. Phyllotaxis without symmetry: What can we learn from flower heads? Journal of Experimental Botany. 2022;73:3319-3329. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erac101
  71. 71. Liu B, Yan J, Li WH, et al. Mikania micrantha genome provides insights into the molecular mechanism of rapid growth. Nature Communications. 2020;11:340. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-13926-4
  72. 72. Hannula SE, Heinen R, Huberty M, et al. Persistence of plant-mediated microbial soil legacy effects in soil and inside roots. Nature Communications. 2021;12:5686. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-25971-z
  73. 73. Alemu SM, Tura AK, do Amaral GSG, et al. How applicable is geospatial analysis in maternal and neonatal health in sub-Saharan Africa? A systematic review, Journal of Globalization and Health 2022;12:04066. DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.04066
  74. 74. Zhao X. Stakeholder-associated factors influencing construction and demolition waste management: A systematic review. Buildings. 2021;11(4):149-149. DOI: 10.3390/buildings11040149
  75. 75. Li M, Lu Y, Xu X. Mapping the scientific structure and evolution of renewable energy for sustainable development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 2022;29(43):64832-64845. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-20361-4
  76. 76. Eppinga MB, Baudena M, Haber EA, et al. Spatially explicit removal strategies increase the efficiency of invasive plant species control. Ecological Applications. 2021;31:e02257. DOI: 10.1002/eap.2257
  77. 77. Giavi S, Fontaine C, Knop E. Impact of artificial light at night on diurnal plant-pollinator interactions. Nature Communications. 2021;12:1690. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22011-8
  78. 78. Zhang Y, Tang JS, Ren G, et al. Global potential distribution prediction of Xanthium italicum based on Maxent model. Scientific Reports. 2021;11:16545. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96041-z
  79. 79. Takemori A, Naiki A, Takakura KI, et al. Comparison of mechanisms of reproductive interference in Taraxacum. Annals of Botany. 2019;123:1017-1027. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcz007
  80. 80. Tang JS, Mao KS, Zhang HY, et al. Multiple introductions and genetic admixture facilitate the successful invasion of Plantago virginica into China. Biological Invasions. 2022;24:2261-2272. DOI: 10.1007/s10530-022-02773-y
  81. 81. Lin TT, Vrieling K, Laplanche D, et al. Evolutionary changes in an invasive plant support the defensive role of plant volatiles. Current Biology. 2021;31:3450-3456. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.055
  82. 82. Ryan SF, Lombaert E, Espeset A, et al. Global invasion history of the agricultural pest butterfly Pieris rapae revealed with genomics and citizen science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2019;116:2261-2272. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1907492116
  83. 83. Wang XX, Xiao XM, He Q , et al. Biological invasions in China’s coastal zone. Science. 2022;378:957. DOI: 10.1126/science.ade9665
  84. 84. Botella C, Bonnet P, Hui C, et al. Dynamic species distribution modeling reveals the pivotal role of human-mediated long-distance dispersal in plant invasion. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(9):1293. DOI: 10.3390/biology11091293
  85. 85. du Plessis NS, Rebelo AJ, Richardson DM, et al. Guiding restoration of riparian ecosystems degraded by plant invasions: Insights from a complex social-ecological system in the global south. Ambio. 2021;51:1552-1568. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-021-01691-y
  86. 86. Zhang L, Rohr J, Cui R, et al. Biological invasions facilitate zoonotic disease emergences. Nature Communications. 2022;13(1):1762. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29378-2
  87. 87. Tang JS, Liu Y, Zhang C, et al. Identification of pathogenic fungi causing leaf spot of Urtica cannabina and Malus sieversii in the wild fruit forest of Tianshan Mountain, Xinjiang, China. Sains Malaysiana. 2022;51(7):2025-2032. DOI: 10.17576/jsm-2022-5107-07
  88. 88. Tang JS, Huang L, Liu Y, et al. Two phytotoxins isolated from the pathogenic fungus of the invasive weed Xanthium italicum. Chemistry & Biodiversity. 2020;17(4):e200004. DOI: 10.1002/cbdv.202000043
  89. 89. Tang JS, Jiang CY, Liu Y, et al. Allelopathic potential of volatile organic compounds released by Xanthium sibiricum Patrin ex Widder. Allelopathy Journal. 2019;47(2):233-241. DOI: 10.26651/allelo.j/2019-47-2-1234
  90. 90. Wong MKL, Lee RH, Leong CM, et al. Trait-mediated competition drives an ant invasion and alters functional diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences. 1977;2022(289):20220504. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0504
  91. 91. Lu M, Bond WJ, Sheffer E, et al. Biome boundary maintained by intense belowground resource competition in world's thinnest-rooted plant community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2022;119(9):e2117514119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2117514119

Written By

Heng Yang and Jieshi Tang

Submitted: 08 December 2023 Reviewed: 14 December 2023 Published: 24 April 2024