Abstract
Adaptive façade systems are a promising approach to achieve a dynamic response to varying weather conditions and to individual user demands. Within the framework of the Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 1244 at the University of Stuttgart the use of adaptive systems and the related architectural potential is explored with the aim of reducing the consumption of natural resources as well as waste generation and hazardous emissions. The targeted parameters for the façade design include solar radiation, temperature, wind speed, relative humidity, daylighting, and user interaction. To generate an experimental platform for the research work, a 36.5 m high adaptive experimental tower, D1244, has been designed and built on the University campus. The temporary façade of the tower is currently being replaced floor by floor, in order to validate different research approaches. The first implemented façades focus on textile systems, because of their lightweight and the different functions that can be easily integrated. Further material systems will be investigated in the next future.
Keywords
- adaptivity
- textile solutions
- resilience
- interaction
- kinetic architecture
1. Introduction
The Collaborative Research Center (CRC) 1244 “Adaptive Skins and Structures for the Built Environment of Tomorrow” at the University of Stuttgart has been working since 2017 on the question of how future built environments can be created reducing the use of resources and the associated greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). The building sector is responsible for more than 50% of global resource consumption and for more than 38% of global CO2 emissions [1]. The target of the interdisciplinary program is the development of new design strategies and technologies, which enable structures and envelopes to be adaptive against loading and environmental actions. The research group comprises architects as well as structural, mechanical, control, and aeronautical engineers and computer scientists.
Within the scope of CRC 1244, adaptive structures and façades are understood as systems whose physical properties are actively manipulated by means of control systems. The state of the system is monitored by sensors. In the specific case of façades, the overall target is the design and validation of systems that enable the manipulation of transparency, reflectivity, humidity rate, insulation, cooling and acoustic properties, in order to control indoor as well as outdoor conditions in the vicinity of the building envelope.
Conventional envelopes can only provide a very limited range of reactions to varying external agents or to changing user needs. When using such systems, façade engineers often can achieve sub-optimal design [2]. While other researchers have been in the past investigating performances and design methods of adaptive skins in general [3], in this chapter the focus is on a specific field: adaptive textile façades. The reason for this focus is the lightweight character of such façade types and the potential of integrating and combining different functions while keeping a low ecological footprint.
CRC 1244 has set a strong experimental background for the research work. A 36.5 m high adaptive experimental tower, called D1244, has been built to test the proposed approaches on a large-scale experimental structure that offers real-world conditions (Figure 1). D1244 is the world’s first adaptive high-rise building [4]. The unique feature of this demonstrator is the integration of sensors and adaptive components into the load-bearing structure and skin. All elements are assembled in such a way that they can be later substituted without generating any waste. The adaptive components in the load-bearing structure enable it to react autonomously against external disturbances such as winds and earthquakes. The building envelope currently consists of a single-layer recycled membrane that is being gradually replaced by adaptive façades as the research projects unfold.
This chapter focuses on three systems:
2. HydroSKIN
2.1 Climate context
Heavy rainfall events and extreme heat are becoming more intense, frequent, and long-lasting [5]. The increasing urban densification with coherent surface sealing in urban agglomerations enhances precipitation runoff on the one hand, as well as solar radiation absorption, thus causing urban heat island effects on the other hand. While social developments lead to increasing urban densification, surface sealing, and the construction of high-rise buildings, the effects of climate change, such as extreme heat and heavy rainfall, require the opposite: the creation of more permeable surfaces and buffer areas for reducing inundation and heat exposure. The average annual ratio between evaporation and runoff for non-built-up surfaces, such as green areas, is about 60% evapotranspiration, 25% groundwater recharge, and 15% rainwater runoff. In comparison, sealed surfaces demonstrate an average runoff of over 90% [6]. In conclusion, the aim is to approximate the water balance of built-up areas to that of non-built-up areas by reducing the precipitation runoff after heavy rainfall events, as well as by increasing evaporation and latent cooling in urban areas.
To avoid irreversible damage to humans and the environment, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change is pursuing two complementary approaches, based on the concepts of mitigation and adaption. The first aim is to reduce climate change by significant and sustained reductions in greenhouse gasses (mitigation). However, since climatic consequences are to be expected even with zero manmade CO2 emissions, strategies and technologies for adaptation to the expected climate situation are being developed [5].
The combination of climate mitigation and adaptation strategies, by addressing both climate challenges of urban heat islands as well as pluvial inundation risks, is seen to have great potential for dealing with global environmental issues sustainably and effectively.
2.2 Concept
Most façade systems only focus on the building-physical performance.
During heavy rainfall events accompanied by wind, the
2.3 System design
An intermediate layer with high water absorbency can optionally be integrated to increase water storage capacity and evaporation duration of the textile multi-layer system in very hot and dry regions. The water-bearing layer, consisting e.g., of a foil, is on the inside and serves to provide water drainage and collection into the lower profile system. The individual layers are assembled by a force fit and are fixed in a frame profile system by means of textile joining techniques. The polymer-based textiles can be manufactured out of recycled material. Besides the textile mono-material system can be easily detached from the enclosing frame profile to return all system components to the material cycle. The water supply and discharge conduits are connected to the frame profile, enabling both the wetting of the
2.4 Potential
The advantages of façade-integrated rainwater harvesting consist not only in relieving the load on urban sewage infrastructure but also in reducing global freshwater consumption of residential buildings by up to 46% as well as in saving energy by up to 26% [7, 10].
Compared to conventional hard building surfaces, such as glass, optical investigations of the droplet impact behavior indicate a high permeability of textile materials. Evaporative cooling is one of the oldest and simplest principles of air-conditioning technology: the phase transition of water from the liquid to the gaseous state at temperatures below the boiling point extracts heat energy from the surrounding air. Frescoes from around 2500 BC show the fanning out of ceramic vessels filled with water, whose large pore content allows a large amount of water to be absorbed and evaporated on its surface [11, 12]. By the specifically adjustable surface structure and porosity of textiles, one can obtain a maximum surface area for water evaporation with a minimum amount of material. Thus, textiles are of particular interest for their application as evaporative cooling materials. The development of synthetic fibers since 1945 has even increased their evaporative cooling potential, since their large surface structure can be functionalized precisely [9, 13].
The evaporative cooling potential of water-saturated textile fabrics shown in Figure 5 was investigated by empirical test series on an evaporation test bench under laboratory conditions of approx. 35°C room air temperature and 20–30% room air humidity. Humidification of the textile results in an immediate temperature reduction of 8–12 K, which under real weather conditions including wind velocity increases to a façade surface temperature reduction of more than 20 K. The temperature decrease is accompanied by a coherent cool downdraft of about 0.2–0.4 m/s, which indicates a potentially useful implementation in tall buildings providing a cooling tower for the urban space below.
2.5 Implementation
Further development of the
Conventional high-rise buildings are characterized by a significant consumption of material and energy as well as high emission values, offering at best only marginal qualities for urban climate resilience. As Fazlur Khan once pointed out by his expression “Premium for height,” the material consumption, as well as the embedded amount of “gray” energy bound up in the building, increases disproportionally with the building height due to the rising wind loads acting on the building façade [16]. On the other side, benefits result from the implementation of the
The façade surface of tall buildings such as skyscrapers offers not only a much larger absorption surface than its horizontal roof or ground surface. Simulations show, that above a building height of approx. 30 m, the amount of wind-driven rain yields per square meter façade surface is even greater than the amount of vertically falling precipitation per square meter on horizontal roof or ground surfaces. With the building height, wind speed rises, thus causing a stronger horizontal deflection of the precipitation drops and increasing wind-driven rain yields hitting the building façade [7]. During hot days, such wind velocities cause higher evaporation of water and enhance the cooling performance. Considering this potential of vertical retention and evaporation surfaces as a new “benefit for height” we wish for a new era of climate-adaptive and climate-resilient high-rise buildings (Figure 6).
3. FiberSKIN
3.1 Concept
The idea behind the design of
Featuring the integration of lightweight textiles and a double-sliding mechanism,
3.2 Panel design
The design is based on a geometric pattern radiating from intentionally placed clamping points. The number of clamping points differs depending on the function of the panels: the two 5.2 m wide movable panels are clamped with 17 nodes along the horizontal edge to glide smoothly along the curved corners, while the 6.6 m long fixed panels only need 10 nodes to withstand wind forces (see Figure 9). In order to achieve a consistent pattern across all sides, a geometric rule is applied. This rule affects the pattern parametrically in response to variations in distance between nodes. The resulting pattern design leads to an extraordinary spatial experience indoors and outdoors based on the way the shadows are cast and the angle at which they are cast.
A color scheme inspired by the constituent materials of the fibers (basalt and glass) has been laid out to enhance the metaphorical level of the design. In the fixed panel both materials are laid together by engaging the i-Mesh fiber placement technology: the basalt fibers are concentrated in the bottom part and generate a metaphorical and optical link to the ground and the earth, given their volcanic origin. Meanwhile, glass fibers placed primarily at the top of the panel transmit considerably more light and are used to create a link to the sky. In the moving panel, the two material constituents are made visible in a different way since the two panels overlap in the closed position: the front panel is made entirely out of glass fibers and the back panel is made entirely out of basalt fibers.
3.3 Kinetic concept and mechanical implementation
The task for the kinetic concept was to arrange a semitransparent façade with a weather protection function, to be flexible enough to allow the interior to be fully opened for events. To meet these requirements, various methods were applied in an interdisciplinary manner between architects and mechanical engineers to find a variety of innovative solutions. With the help of brainwriting and the gallery method [19], more than 20 different opening concepts were developed within a very short period of time, which on the one hand were reminiscent of familiar openings such as theater curtains, but on the other hand also exhibited quite complex and organic movement patterns.
The concepts generated were then evaluated and selected based on various factors such as visual appearance and ease of implementation. The result was a concept in which two layers of textile move in front of each other, and the irregular distribution of fibers creates a superimposed interference effect. This also plays with the visibility of the building’s interior technology, as some sections are more transparent than others, as well as with the incident light.
To implement the mechanical structure, some reference applications were studied at the beginning. For example, sailboats, garage doors, or conveyor systems in mechanical engineering have similar properties to those required for this façade. In order to gain an insight into the design and construction as well as the special features, manufacturers of each of these products were contacted and expert opinions on the transferability of this façade system were obtained. In the course of this exchange, industrial partners were also acquired to support the implementation of the adaptive façade with knowledge and technical components.
In the end, the mechanical system was inspired by the side sectional garage doors from Hörmann KG. These move in a similar way on the horizontal plane and their guide system was therefore a good reference. In addition, the thematic proximity to the construction industry was another advantage. The CAD model for the substructure of FiberSKIN is depicted in Figure 10. One major challenge in designing the façade was the transition from tolerances between the structure of the building (some cm) to the façade (a few mm). In order to achieve this, two specially designed support structures were integrated into the design. The first one is shown in Figure 10 in the right upper corner. The sheet-metal design was selected as it meets the requirements for lightweight design and a high degree of design freedom. Here, another industry partner (TRUMPF Werkzeugmaschinen SE + Co. KG) was supporting to proper design of the brackets.
On the lower side of the façade, a classic L-profile was used, in which sufficient adjustment possibilities were provided by means of elongated holes in order to meet the small tolerances of the adaptive façade. As a measure to compensate for further tolerances and, in particular, to pre-tension the textile, a variety of roller carriers with corresponding compression springs were installed (see Figure 10, middle detail picture). These springs allow continuous adjustment of the pre-tensioning of the façade and are at the same time reliable even under high wind loads on the textile since they cannot overstretch in contrast to tension springs.
These combined measures jointly made it possible to meet a tolerance of approx. 2 mm over the entire width of 6 meters. Corresponding laboratory tests confirmed the design through endurance tests in which the façade underwent over 20,000 cycles.
The kinetic movement of the adaptive façade can be seen in the
3.4 Details embedded in manufacture
In order to keep the engineering effort and the costs for the prototype as low as possible, while maintaining a high degree of design freedom, suitable reference applications were selected. The advantage here is that a large number of components have already been designed for similar use cases, which can only be slightly adapted and transferred for our prototype. A high degree of design freedom was otherwise allowed by the customized pattern design or by bespoke detailing. The focus was set on the clamps and on the large brackets that hold the façade. The clamps, which were placed regularly along the façade, served as an interface between the mechanical and architectural components. These are an integral part of the kinetic mechanism and fix the textile through special keder connections (see nodes blue marked in Figure 9).
The interdisciplinary and integrated design process of the clamps can be visualized based on their development. As these form the interface between the architectural part and the mechanical engineering part, they were subject to the most iterations. Figure 11 visualizes the different development stages. It can be seen, that the design process started with a very rudimentary functional oriented CAD model of the assembly (Figure 11, Gen. (1). After the first discussions the improvements in the clamp design were mostly linked to lightweight design but also included some first shape finding aspects. Afterward, the shape was significantly improved in the third generation. Further improvements integrating new functionalities (Gen. 4 and 5, further connection possibilities were added) led finally to the stage where the clamps were integrated in the whole assembly back again. Generation 6 shows the detailed and final manufacturing version of the assembly including the clamps. This assembly was then used to frame and pre-tension the mesh. Therefore, on each of the blue-marked connection points in Figure 9, one of the clamp assemblies was mounted. Together with the mesh, this forms the two movable panels of the adaptive FiberSKIN façade.
4. MagneticSKIN
A user-centric approach in façade design involves placing the needs, preferences, and experiences of building occupants and users at the forefront of the design process. It emphasizes creating façades that not only fulfill functional requirements but also enhance the well-being, comfort, and overall satisfaction of the people who interact with the building skin.
4.1 Concept
In contemporary architectural practices, there is a growing emphasis on the ability to tailor specific properties of building envelopes to enhance comfort and overall space usability [20]. This focus primarily revolves around meeting physiological needs and individual preferences. However, the exploration of psychological needs and the broader activation of human senses remains largely uncharted territory. The proposed system delves into the significance of bridging this gap and investigates the potential benefits of integrating sensory stimuli to create more engaging and immersive built environments.
“Touch is the sensory mode that integrates our experience of the world with that of ourselves” according to Juhani Pallasmaa [21]. By considering touch and other sensory experiences during the design process, architects can enhance the emotional connection people have with their surroundings, leading to more memorable and enjoyable spaces [22]. The overall aim is to create a system that places the user at the core of the design process and to start understanding how haptic experiences influence perception, emotions, and behavior.
The interaction system follows the principles of system dynamics comprising of a set of sensors and actuators interconnected through a microcontroller and a specific set of rules or code. This design allows the system’s behavior to be dynamically shaped by continuous interaction with users.
4.2 Pattern design
The arrangement of the round permanent magnets on the membrane surface follows a deliberate pattern inspired by the key trigger points found in an average-sized human hand. The abstract representation of these points results in a group of eight magnets. There is a total of five variations of this group, out of which the overall semi-regular clustered pattern is created by organically arranging them across the canvas (see Figure 13).
Each group of eight magnets corresponds to an electromagnet and sensor, working together to form what is referred to as an “active module.” In addition to the active modules, there are “passive modules” composed of either individual permanent magnets or groups of magnets, to which no actuator is assigned. The role of these passive modules is to harmoniously integrate the pattern, especially in areas not easily reachable by hand for users interacting with the façade.
4.3 Detailing
The structural system consists of a wooden frame placed on adjustable steel posts for water protection and supported at the top by steel brackets (see Figure 10). By employing exclusively bolt/screw connections, the entire system can be easily disassembled, making it highly reusable and recyclable. The same principle applies to both inner and outer lightweight textile layers, which cover up the substructure, as well as to all components of the interaction system.
To achieve a sleek, canvas-like appearance, an aluminum tendering frame from Roho is utilized to secure and prestress the outer membrane also around the corners. This frame is raised 8 cm above the ground, creating a hovering effect that gives the illusion of the façade smoothly floating above the concrete platform.
The outer membrane protects the inside space and the electrical components. It consists of a silver PVC-coated PES membrane onto which round permanent neodymium magnets are positioned: these measure 15 mm in diameter and 2–3 mm in thickness. By placing one magnet on the inside and one on the outside of the membrane, the connection is made solely by the electromagnetic field, making a later dismantling, reuse, and even repositioning of magnets extremely simple.
On the inside of the façade system, there is an additional layer made of highly flexible elastane with iridescent visual properties, onto which round permanent magnets with the same 15 mm diameter but only half the thickness (1, 5 mm) are placed (see Figure 14).
This configuration allows for a dynamic interaction between the inner and outer layers, enhancing the overall sensory experience and interaction. While the outer membrane was completed in May 2023, a mock-up of the inner layer has been temporarily installed. It offers visitors a chance to experience the different haptic qualities and to test interaction scenarios between inside and outside space.
4.4 System dynamics
By touching the inner or outer side of the façade, users push that specific area of the textile back toward the core of the system, thus triggering an interaction. This inward movement is continuously monitored by ultrasonic sensors, which measure the distance to the default state of the membrane. The sensors then transmit this information to the Arduino microcontroller, which processes the data and sends corresponding commands to the appropriate actuators (Figure 15). For each sensor in the system, there is an associated actuator, which is turned on only when the predefined conditions stipulated in the Arduino code are being met. Distance and time are the defining parameters in reaching the desired effect. By experimenting with the time intervals between activations, changes in polarity, and the natural vibration frequency of the membrane, different pulsation rhythms can be achieved.
The name
4.5 Output and future perspectives
The feedback from the users who have interacted with the system since May 2023 has been overwhelmingly positive, with many describing a puls-like sensation similar to a heartbeat and expressing a willingness to engage with it, thus confirming the relevance of the interaction with building skins and the perception of the built environment. By having had the opportunity to observe the system in use, it can be stated that incorporating interactive elements in the façade design encourages user engagement and instills a sense of ownership over the building.
Embracing interactive technologies and haptic qualities of materials could give architects the opportunity to create immersive experiences, where architecture transcends its traditional role and becomes a dynamic medium for human interaction and sensory perception. Moreover, the research on
5. Outlook
The three façade systems described in the present article show the high range of functionalities that can be achieved by using textile skin systems in new ways. Due to their lightweight and flexibility, it is easy to move and deform such panels. Thus, they can easily be adapted to different architectural purposes. Moreover, extended production ranges (as shown e.g. at the multi-layered 3D-textile for
In general, adaptive kinetic façades are designed to respond in real-time to changing environmental conditions and indoor comfort requirements by means of kinetic mechanisms that allow them to dynamically adjust their form, position, or transparency. Such façade systems can allow for proper shading and enhance occupant comfort while improving energy efficiency [23, 24].
The objective of this research is the optimization of indoor daylighting conditions and the reduction of solar heat gain as well as unwanted solar radiation in the urban canyon [25]. Excess solar radiation is reflected into the atmosphere, reducing the urban heat island effect. This is performed by reorienting the wings (façade modules) in response to changing weather conditions. The upper wing tracks the sun and reflects solar radiation to its source, thereby reducing undesired solar heat gain and reducing building energy consumption. At the same time, the lower wing serves users’ visual comfort (illuminance and view).
A small number of actuators were employed to prevent adding weight to the façade and to keep energy usage low. During the hot summer months, the façade can minimize solar heat gain by shading the windows, thus reducing the demand for air-conditioning. In winter, it can allow sunlight to naturally warm up the interior, minimizing the need for heating. The system is designed to optimize natural daylight penetration into a building’s interior so that artificial lighting needs are reduced. Moreover, it enhances comfort by regulating indoor temperatures and reducing glare.
PAOSS represents another approach of a targeted, kinetic sun and glare protection system using a simple, resilient, and low-energy actuation mechanism. The pneumatically operated origami sun shading system-abbreviated “PAOSS”—is used for the targeted control of light transmission. It combines the esthetic and material-immanent qualities of textile materials with the functional aspects of integrated active pneumatic actuators to initiate the change of shape e.g. to open the elements (Figure 17). Textile folding structures are particularly suitable for changing their shape from a large shading area to a minimal folded state and vice versa by reversible folding. They are therefore highly interesting as selective sun and glare protection elements for improving user comfort and reducing energy consumption. The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has developed an origami folding geometry for astrophysical purposes called “Starshade” [26], which is characterized by a particularly large difference in area between the opened and folded closed state. An adaptive, pneumatically actuated sun and glare protection system inspired by “Starshade” was designed and developed to be embedded as an interlayer in ETFE cushion façades. Through the use of active components, it is possible to achieve a targeted, partial, or full-surface regulation of light and radiation transmission, as well as the back-reflection properties of the façade [27]. The ETFE façade is planned to be installed on the eleventh floor of D1244.
Within three to four years all 12 floors of D1244 will be clad with different adaptive façade systems. One of the focuses will be set on insulated glass units, integrating further functions such as cooling, energy harvesting and storage, etc. As soon as all the façades are installed, the next cycle will start, thus establishing for the D1244 the experimental character of a laboratory at a real scale.
Acknowledgments
The Collaborative Research Center CRC 1244 has been funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG)-Project-ID 279064222–SFB 1244. The five described projects have been made possible through the research work of different interdisciplinary teams and thanks to the support of several industrial partners and the engagement of the ILEK technicians (T. Tronsberg and M. Berndt). The authors are grateful for the support.
Partners: Dr. Zwissler Holding AG, Essedea GmbH & Co. KG
Partners: Sailmaker International (i-Mesh), Hörmann KG Verkaufsgesellschaft, TRUMPF Werkzeugmaschinen SE + Co. KG
Partners: Roho GmbH, Koch Membranen GmbH, Mehler-Texnologies GmbH
Partners: Josef Gartner GmbH
PAOSS Team: C. Eisenbarth, W. Haase, Y. Klett, L. Blandini, W. Sobek (ILEK)
Partners: Global Safety Textiles GmbH, Carl Stahl AG, Mehler Texnologies GmbH
Video materials
Video materials referenced in this chapter can be downloaded at: https://bit.ly/46n1DgX
References
- 1.
UNEP. 2020 Global Status Report for Buildings and Construction: Towards a Zero-469 Emissions, Efficient and Resilient Buildings and Construction Sector. Nairobi: UNEP; 2020 - 2.
Blandini L. Glass facades: Present and future challenges. In: Weller B, Schneider H, Louter C, Tasche S, editors. Engineered Transparency 497 2021. Berlin: Ernst & Sohn; 2021. pp. 1-12 - 3.
Bedon C, Honfi D, Machalická KV, Eliášová M, et al. Structural characterisation of adaptive facades in Europe—490 part I: Insight on classification rules, performance metrics and design methods. Journal of Building Engineering. 2019; 25 :100721. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.02.013 - 4.
Blandini L, Haase W, Weidner S, Böhm M, et al. D1244: Design and construction of the first adaptive high-rise experimental building. Frontiers in Built Environment. 2022; 8 :814911. DOI: 10.3389/fbuil.2022.814911 - 5.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. In: Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2021 - 6.
Leistner P, Kaufmann A, Koehler M, Würth M, Hofbauer WK, Dittrich S, et al. Bauphysik urbaner Oberflächen. Bauphysik. 2018; 40 :358-368. DOI: 10.1002/bapi.201800009 - 7.
Eisenbarth C, Haase W, Blandini L, Sobek W. Potentials of hydroactive lightweight façades for urban climate resilience. Civil Engineering Design. 2022; 4 :14-24. DOI: 10.1002/cend.202200003 - 8.
Eisenbarth C, Haase W, Blandini L, Sobek W. Climate-adaptive façades: An integral approach for urban rainwater and temperature management. In: Structures and Architecture A Viable Urban Perspective?. Aalborg: CRC Press; 2022 - 9.
Eisenbarth C, Haase W, Blandini L, Sobek W. HydroSKIN: Lightweight façade element for urban rainwater harvesting and evaporative cooling. In: Proceedings of the Facade Tectonics 2022 World Congress. Los Angeles: Facade Tectonics Institute; 2022 - 10.
Smith A, Gill G. Residensity-A Carbon Analysis of Residential Typologies. Chicago: Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture (ASGG); 2018 - 11.
Jaber S, Ajib S. Evaporative cooling as an efficient system in Mediterranean region. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2011; 31 :2590-2596 - 12.
Szilágyi A, Farkas I, Seres I. Evaporation cooling with ceramics in air-conditioning system. Journal of Scientific and Engineering Research. 2018; 5 (11):152-157 - 13.
Pires L, Silva PD, Castro Gomes JP. Performance of textile and building materials for a particular evaporative cooling purpose. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science. 2011; 35 :670-675. DOI: 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2010.12.017 - 14.
Schmid FC, Haase W, Sobek W. Textile and film based building envelopes-lightweight and adaptive. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures. 2015; 56 :61-74 - 15.
Rentz A, Oei M, Eisenbarth C, Haase W, Böhm M, Blandini L, et al. A hydroactive facade for rainwater harvesting and evaporative cooling: Dynamic modeling and simplification for application in optimization-based long-term building operation strategy. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA 2022). Trieste: IEEE; 2022 - 16.
Khan FR. Appendix I-Current trends in concrete high-rise buildings. In: Coull A, Smith BS, editors. Tall Buildings. Pergamon: University of Southampton; 1967. pp. 571-590. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-08-011692-1.50033-X - 17.
Blandini L, Eisenbarth C, Jeong MY. Adaptive Facade Systems, Detail, Nr. 9, S. 12-15, 2023 - 18.
Voigt M, Chwalek K, Roth D, Kreimeyer M, Blandini L. The integrated design process of adaptive façades-A comprehensive perspective. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023; 67 :106043 - 19.
Hellfritz H. Innovationen Via Galeriemethode. Königstein im Taunus: Eigenverlag; 1978 - 20.
Attia S, Lioure R, Declaude Q. Future trends and main concepts of adaptive facade systems. Energy Science & Engineering. 2020: 8 (9):3255-3272. DOI: 10.1002/ese3.725 - 21.
Pallasmaa J. The Eyes of the Skin: Architecture and the Senses. Chichester, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Academy, John Wiley & Sons; 2012 - 22.
Fadzil A. Sensory Immersion in Architecture. Portsmouth: University of Portsmouth; 2015 - 23.
Aksamija A. Sustainable Facades: Design Methods for High-Performance Building Envelopes. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2013 - 24.
Schnittich C, Krippner R, Lang W. Detail: Building Skins. Basel: Birkhäuser; 2006 - 25.
Jeong MY, Matheou M, Blandini L. Optimisation of daylighting performance through adaptive kinetic envelopes. In: Kanaani M, editor. The Routledge Companion to Ecological Design Thinking Healthful Ecotopian Visions for Architecture and Urbanism. New York: Routledge; 2022. pp. 251-262 - 26.
Sigel D, Trease BP, Thomson MW, et al. Application of origami in starshade spacecraft blanket design. In: ASME 2014 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Buffalo, New York. 2014. doi: 10.1115/DETC2014-34315 - 27.
Eisenbarth C, Haase W, Klett Y, Blandini L, Sobek W. PAOSS: Pneumatically actuated origami sun shading. JFDE. 2021; 9 :147-162. DOI: 10.7480/jfde.2021.1.5535