Abstract
This chapter reviews recent research in psychology, neuroscience, and quantum physics relating to perception, paradox, synchronicity, brain chemicals, brain mapping, and the so-called social brain, discussing the gaps between scientific findings and the integration of these findings into human behavior. Specific implications of the identified gaps relating to happiness and well-being are identified and seven quantum skills are introduced. These quantum skills are designed to pragmatize recent research; thus, promoting the integration of new scientific knowledge into human behavior. The authors propose future research that measures the efficacy of these skills for creating sustained happiness and well-being at the individual level, as well as increased global flourishing.
Keywords
- happiness
- paradox
- positive psychology
- perception
- quantum skills
- social brain
- synchronicity
- well-being
1. Introduction
The desire for happiness appears to be universal, though its attainment remains elusive. Significant differences in the definition of happiness across cultures, coupled with widely varying theories regarding how it can be achieved, add measurement complexity. For example, Western cultures typically associate happiness with positive affect; thus, Western happiness research has historically defined happiness as the presence of positive emotions [1]. The Western happiness literature primarily uses measures of subjective well-being (SWB) as a proxy for happiness [2, 3]; and Western psychological theories of happiness typically focus on individualistic values such as autonomy, self-esteem, and mastery [4]. Even though the Western happiness literature differs considerably as to the factors that contribute to happiness, there is general agreement that the result of happiness is an emotional sense of subjective well-being (SWB).
On the other hand, Eastern cultures associate happiness with contentment or peace of mind [5, 6]. Happiness is not associated with positive affect; and, contrary to Western cultures, Eastern cultures do not view happiness as incompatible with suffering [7]. Thus, it is not surprising that while Western theories associate happiness with high arousal positive states (e.g., excitement), Eastern happiness theories typically define happiness using terms associated with low arousal states (e.g., calmness) [8]. Eastern beliefs regarding happiness have their roots in ancient religions (e.g., Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, Hinduism, and Sufism); yet they are reflected in contemporary Eastern secular cultural values such as cooperation and harmony [1].
In addition to cultural differences, the happiness literature has attempted to differentiate between hedonic happiness/well-being (i.e., positive affect) and eudaimonic happiness/well-being (i.e., self-actualization) [2, 9]. Though many studies have attempted to differentiate these two concepts, there has not been a consistent definition of the two terms; thus, measurement issues add complexity and confusion to the findings. Additionally, there appears to be an overlap between the two constructs as measures of hedonic and eudaimonic happiness strongly correlate [10]. Kashdan et al. [3] comment: “until issues of definition, methodology, and relatedness are better understood, research programs attending to differences in these types of well-being will be relatively weak and difficult to interpret meaningfully” (p. 227).
As most Western research uses happiness and well-being as interchangeable, or at least inter-related concepts [11], this chapter will not differentiate between them. Though there may be differences between happiness (feeling good) and well-being (feeling fulfilled) this chapter will not make such a distinction. Rather the authors will follow the precedent of other research and use the term well-being as an overarching construct that encompasses happiness [12]. However, contrary to other Western research that focuses on techniques for increasing well-being by increasing positive affect, this chapter presents a comprehensive set of life skills grounded in concepts that are congruent with both Western and Eastern perspectives about happiness, as well as both eudemonic and hedonic constructs. These skills are derived from concepts in quantum physics and recent discoveries in neuroscience, as well as research in the field of positive psychology. They enable users to apply a comprehensive set of research findings from three disparate disciples in order to close the gap between what is known scientifically and the beliefs and behaviors of the general population. It is hypothesized that closing this gap will lead to higher levels of happiness and well-being.
2. Positive psychology research
During the last decade of the twentieth century, the field of psychology began to shift from a focus on pathology to a focus on possibility [13]. While numerous factors contributed to this shift, a growing body of research on the subjectivity of human perception undoubtedly played a significant role [14, 15]. The 1990s were characterized by breakthrough research into the perceptual process, enabled by positron emission tomography (PET) and later functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Research into the role of intention and attention in the perceptual process led to an increasing awareness that intention is the psychological process by which humans create reality [16]. Intention shifts attention; thus, providing access to new perceptual choices that otherwise would have been missed.
Positive psychology focuses on identifying factors that enable people to live a good life—a life of happiness. Obviously, intention is a key factor. Intention causes people to focus their attention on certain goals, while ignoring a plethora of other perceptual possibilities, thus aligning perceptions with desires. This led to the first wave of positive psychology interventions including affirmations, visual imagery, and gratitude journals, to name only a few. More recently a growing body of researchers has labeled positive psychology as hedonic due to its focus on individual mastery and positive affect as the critical ingredients for achieving happiness [17]. In other words, the early research in positive psychology framed happiness as the absence of negative emotions and focused more on individual agency than on human connectivity.
Scholarly pushback regarding this Western bias in happiness research has led to an emergent wave of scholarship referred to by a variety of labels: existential positive psychology [18], the second wave of positive psychology [19, 20], and positive psychology 2.0 [21]. At the heart of positive psychology 2.0 (PP2.0) is the recognition that optimal well-being comes from the dynamic interplay between positive and negative experiences and emotions [21]. In other words, PP2.0 recognizes the importance of dialectical (paradoxical) thinking which is based on the philosophical idea that everything is composed of opposites. For example, it is possible to feel both happy and sad, and to love and hate simultaneously. Nothing is ever all good or all bad.
Numerous scholars have expressed concern that by focusing only on the positive, the first wave of positive psychology failed to adequately acknowledge that people live in a multi-faceted reality—not a binary world. The second wave of positive psychology recognizes well-being requires “appreciating and even embracing the complex and ambivalent nature of life” ([11], p. 1757). In certain situations, positive qualities (e.g., optimism) can even be detrimental to well-being, while frequently labeled negative emotions (e.g., anxiety) are sometimes useful [11]. Cognitive flexibility is a prerequisite to seeing both the positive and negative aspects embedded in each of life’s challenges. Seeing life from multiple perspectives requires dialectical thinking.
The theoretical evolution of positive psychology not only integrates hedonic and eudaimonic definitions of well-being, but PP2.0 is also a step toward integrating Eastern and Western perspectives on happiness. As noted above, there is increasing recognition that hardship and negative emotions may be unavoidable aspects of a good life. Ho and Ho [22] comment that “true happiness includes the wisdom to embrace unhappiness as a part of life” noting that happiness may “come naturally when one is no longer obsessed with pursuing it” (p. 64).
Yet, even as the field of positive psychology is broadening its definition of happiness and well-being, a large population of Western “happiness seekers” [23] continue to focus on simply learning techniques (e.g., gratitude journals, affirmations, and vision boards) rather than expanding their worldview to incorporate the scientific discoveries of the twenty-first century and their behavior to align with these discoveries. There are tens of thousands of instantly downloadable self-help applications claiming happiness to be only a few clicks (or techniques) away [23], yet their long-term efficacy is primarily untested. This chapter is not meant to discount the value of digital self-help apps, rather it is intended to provide a complementary and much more comprehensive set of skills that integrate scientific findings from three disparate disciplines into a new way of conceptualizing, creating, and sustaining human happiness and a subjective sense of well-being.
3. Neuroscience research
During the past two decades, neuroscience research has made remarkable discoveries about the human brain. Many of these discoveries are a result of novel ways of imaging the brain such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This noninvasive procedure creates computerized images that allow researchers to digitally track individual thoughts, feelings, and behaviors in order to map the corresponding biological pathways. Some of the pathways and circuitry identified relate to the experience of well-being. An example is the so-called social brain [24]. The social brain circuitry suggests that humans are hardwired to connect with others and that human connection is a prerequisite for optimal thriving [25]. A sense of connection reduces anxiety and depression [26]; conversely, loneliness increases mental, physical, and emotional distress [27].
Similarly, new knowledge regarding neurotransmitters such as oxytocin and dopamine provides new insights into the biochemistry of well-being. Dopamine, sometimes referred to as the pleasure chemical [28], has mental health implications far beyond the treatment of addictions [29] and ADHD [30]. Recent research indicates dopamine levels can be increased via lifestyle changes such as a high protein diet [31], physical exercise [32], adequate sleep [33], listening to music [34], sunlight exposure [35], and yoga [36], thus increasing a sense of well-being. Meditation has an especially strong correlation with increased dopamine levels. One study identified a 65% increase in dopamine production after 1 hour of meditating, compared to a control group that was resting quietly [37].
Recent research has also expanded our understanding of the role that oxytocin plays in well-being. This brain chemical, often referred to as the bonding hormone, is not only released during the birthing process to promote bonding between female mammals and their offspring, it can also be released by experiences ranging from simple human touch to eye contact with a pet [38]. Empathy and trust are both increased by oxytocin [39, 40]. Oxytocin produces antidepressant-like effects in animals [41] and low levels of oxytocin are believed to be a factor in human depression [42]. Current research is also investigating the role that serotonin plays in mood disorders and mental health issues [43].
One of the most remarkable discoveries is the identification of the brain’s neuroplasticity, an umbrella term that refers to the brain’s ability to modify, change and adapt both structure and function throughout life and in response to experience [44]. Using fMRI researchers have discovered that individuals can actually change neural connections, thus re-wiring their brains [45]. Furthermore, the development of new neural networks appears to be facilitated via positive interactions with others. Studies at Oxford University found that as adult monkeys were encouraged to interact in positive ways with other monkeys, the brain pathways linked to the social brains of these monkeys increased both in size and connectivity [46]. At the human level, research suggests that the human brain has the ability to synchronize with other brains creating increased empathy and cooperation which leads to a greater sense of well-being [47]. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIS) has shown that brain synchrony increases when individuals mirror the body movements of others; while MRI studies have demonstrated the power of eye contact to stimulate the mirror neurons in the limbic system, thus deepening a sense of connection to others and increasing awareness of others’ intentions [48].
Even though neuroscience research has made remarkable progress in understanding brain functioning, researchers have not yet fully identified the role that the brain plays in human consciousness. Chalmers [49] refers to this as the “hard problem” in neuroscience and purports that consciousness can never be explained solely via classical analysis due to the qualitative/subjective properties (i.e., qualia) of lived experience. Though other researchers [50] have a very different perspective and continue to strive to analyze the neural correlates of consciousness, there is a growing body of research suggesting that consciousness is a function of quantum processes in the brain [51]. These scholars believe brain/mind/consciousness processes are so complex that they cannot be reduced to the sum of their elementary ingredients [52]; furthermore, if consciousness is a function of quantum processes at the subatomic level of the brain, these processes will never be observable via classical brain mapping.
4. Quantum physics research
We are living in an era that could be called The Quantum Age [53]. The technological advancements of the past century have been made possible by a theory of physics called quantum mechanics. Nuclear power, computers, PET scans, and artificial intelligence represent only a few of the remarkable outcomes of this so-called “new physics.” Quantum mechanics, or quantum physics as it is commonly called, is the science of the microscopic realm. Classical, or Newtonian physics, is the science of the observable world of three-dimensional matter. Not only is the scale of investigation different, but the theories that govern the world of matter are directly opposed to the laws that govern subatomic behavior [54].
For example, Newton’s first law of motion purports that if an object is moving in a straight line, it will continue moving in a straight line forever, unless it is acted upon by an outside force. This law, a fundamental principle in classical physics, works flawlessly in the macro world. It has led to a belief that the physical world is stable and predictable. Quantum physics, however, proves this to be an incorrect assumption. At the subatomic level, particles do not behave in a predictable manner. They make unexpected and unexplainable quantum leaps which defy rational analysis [55]. At the subatomic level, the parts do not determine the behavior of the whole; rather, the whole determines the behavior of the parts. Subatomic particles can also interact across great distances of time and space, a concept referred to as nonlocal causation which means the interactions between the whole and the parts can never be precisely known [56]. Therefore, classical analytical processes are inadequate for explaining the behavior of subatomic particles.
The theory of quantum mechanics also violates Newton’s second law of motion. This law, which states that every action is accompanied by an equal and opposite reaction, is used to predict the behavior of objects in the macro world. At the subatomic level, particle behavior is impossible to predict due to nonlocal interactions [54]. In quantum physics, statistical probability replaces Newtonian predictability [57].
Newtonian physics assumes the physical world is objective. At the macro level of classical physics, observation does not change the nature of what is being observed. This is not the case at the subatomic level where human observation influences subatomic particle behavior. For example, the expectations of the scientist appear to influence how subatomic particles behave [58]. At the subatomic level, Newtonian objectivity is replaced by quantum subjectivity. Subatomic interactions are not only unexplainable and unpredictable, but they are also, in some yet unidentifiable way, affected by the intentions of their observers [59].
It is apparent that the basic principles of quantum mechanics violate the laws of classical Newtonian physics. Newton’s laws, however, still apply in the observable realm of everyday experience where quantum effects are suppressed, or, at least, camouflaged, by the Principle of Correspondence [57]. This principle, based on a mathematical formula called Planck’s constant, shows that there is a strong relationship between an object’s size and its susceptibility to quantum uncertainty. Consequently, until recently, scientists have been hesitant to apply quantum concepts to human behavior. Opinions are, however, shifting. Recent brain research suggests that we are, indeed, quantum beings [60, 61]. Humans, like everything else in the universe, are composed of subatomic particles that originated from one common particle pool. Even though humans are material beings, subject to Newton’s classical laws, they also have an invisible, nonmaterial dimension (the mind or consciousness) that may function according to quantum principles [59, 62].
5. Identifying the knowing/doing happiness gaps
The research reviewed in this chapter suggests a gap between information in the scientific literature and the worldview of many, if not most, of the world’s population. The first of these gaps relates to the subjectivity of human perception and the role of intention. Research in positive psychology and quantum physics demonstrates the subjectiveness of the three-dimensional world. Many people acknowledge that perception is reality; yet it appears that many others base their happiness on subjective, incomplete judgments regarding the material world. Perception research suggests that at least 80% of the information used to create a perception comes from the brain, while only 20% comes from external stimuli [63, 64]. New skills are needed—skills that can assist in neutralizing the tendency for selective perception, perceptual blindness, perceptual constancy, and premature cognitive commitment, all of which can be blocks to happiness [65, 66].
Renowned neuroscientist, Iain McGilchrist [67] writes: “The kind of attention we bring to bear on the world changes the nature of the world we attend to … Attention changes what kind of a thing comes into being for us: in that way it changes the world” (p. 28). Physicist Fred Alan Wolf agrees. He comments: “How matter appears depends on our minds’ choice; reality is a matter of choice” ([64], p. 129). British physicist David Bohm [59] referred to the creation of matter as a cosmic dance choreographed by human perception. The implications for human happiness are self-evident.
A second gap relates to the role of paradox. Western cultures’ over-reliance on logical, linear thinking has limited many people’s ability to think paradoxically; yet a sustained sense of well-being necessitates paradoxical thinking. We do not live in a black-and-white universe. Opposites can co-exist. Positive psychology 2.0 research purports that authentic happiness necessitates acknowledging, and even embracing, unhappiness [22]. Paradox is also deeply embedded in quantum theory. Energy can manifest as both particle and wave, and the three-dimensional world of matter is composed solely of invisible energy [54].
It is difficult for many people to acknowledge the value of paradoxical or dialectical thinking. Logic and rationality have been highly valued for centuries. Aristotle’s (384–322 B.C.) Law of the Excluded Middle paved the way for the Western world’s obsession with logical thinking [66]. Yet, the complexities of contemporary society, coupled with radical new scientific discoveries, challenge the current accuracy of Aristotle’s law. Recent research in fuzzy logic, based on the premise that the universe is non-binary, is now being widely used to inform the technological revolution [68]; yet many humans are still stuck in either/or thinking, believing things are one way or the other (e.g., good or bad; right or wrong).
Rosch purports that humans’ obsession with binary thinking originates in the structure of the brain [68]. Even though the neocortex can create and choose among paradoxical options, many people operate out of the early reptilian and limbic centers which are incapable of conceptualizing seemingly contradictory options. Additionally, many continue to rely solely on left-brain cognitive processes, thus, perceiving only a limited perspective of “reality,” failing to acknowledge that opposites co-exist. The implications for happiness are again self-evident.
A third knowing/doing gap relates to quantum theory’s proposition that there is an infinite supply of energy in the universe. According to Einstein’s famous formula E = mc2, the energy contained in matter is equal to its mass multiplied by the speed of light squared. Therefore, even the smallest particle of matter contains a huge potential of concentrated energy [53]. The question becomes why do so many people have trouble accessing the physical energy that lies dormant in their bodies? The soaring statistics relating to burnout [69] and depression [70] suggest that many still feel victims of their environments rather than co-creators of their experiences.
Neuroscience research provides insight into solutions by providing evidence of the regenerative power of the human brain—not only to see things differently but to literally re-wire cognitive pathways [44] and to produce and release the so-called happiness and harmony hormones [28, 29]. Unfortunately, many, if not most, still believe happiness is a function of external events rather than a by-product of individual cognitions and behaviors. Taking responsibility for lifestyle decisions such as diet, exercise, sleep and relaxation, as well as paying conscious attention to mental processes, can impact brain chemistry and increase happiness and a sense of well-being [33, 35].
A fourth knowing/doing gap relates to ways of knowing. William James used the word noetic to describe the process of knowing without sensory input [71]. Both quantum theory and neuroscience research demonstrate the limitations of the human senses. Quantum field theory postulates that humans are connected to an infinite field of intelligence that lies beyond sensory perception [55, 72, 73]. Research suggests that mindfulness practices connect humans to this infinite field of possibility. Mindfulness transcends the limitations of the human senses which, due to human perceptual apparatus, always provide limited input. Numerous studies have found that mindfulness practices result in an increased ability to evaluate all possible choices, leading to improved decision-making [74, 75]. Borysenko [76] has found that meditation facilitates “inner listening” and leads to the identification of more creative choices. Increasing dopamine activity in the brain has also been found to be correlated with improved decision-making [77]; and eating high protein food creates increased levels of the precursor for dopamine [31]. These research findings raise questions regarding society’s current focus on collecting and analyzing ever-more Big Data in order to find the right answers.
Fuzzy logic’s Law of Incompatibility is based on the premise that “as complexity rises, precise statements lose meaning and meaningful statements lose precision” ([68], p. 42). This law demonstrates the inverse relationship between the complexity of a situation and the value of ever-more data collection. Attempting to measure complex problems often increases their fuzziness. Human happiness mandates learning to balance sensory input with noetic processing. Reality is larger than any amount of data collected.
The fifth gap relates to the interconnectivity of everything. In quantum theory, two particles, once connected, remain connected even across distances of time and space [54]. Furthermore, due to their quantum entanglement, any measurement of one of these particles impacts the behavior of the second one (Principle of Non-separability). Quantum computers, using the principles of quantum entanglement, are creating once unimaginable technological advances. This same principle has the capacity to transform our view of our relationships with each other and our planet.
Unfortunately, Western cultures with their focus on extreme individuality typically have not recognized the applicability of the non-separability principle to happiness. However, the neuroscience literature extends this concept to the macro level. For example, fNIS research demonstrates that when humans connect deeply to others by mirroring body movements and maintaining eye contact, their brains synchronize, resulting in increased empathy and cooperation, as well as an increased sense of well-being [47]. This discovery underscores the impact that humans have on each other. It also suggests that as each person begins to think and act differently, her/his changes can impact the thoughts and behavior of others [78].
The sixth gap relates to the human desire for prediction and control. The stifling of this need often results in frustration and stress. Yet, research in a variety of disparate disciplines shines a spotlight on the futility of this desire. In quantum theory subatomic particles make unexpected quantum leaps that cannot be explained through a process of rational analysis; thus, at the subatomic level, the concept of predictability is null and void. This does not mean that subatomic movements are random. It means they are not the result of a local cause [54]. Wheatley explains ([79], p. 20):
Research in a variety of disciplines suggests that the physical universe is a self-organizing system with intelligence embedded in its structure, evolving into ever higher levels of complexity and coherency [53]. Chaos theory demonstrates how this principle works at the macro level where it has been found that the flapping of a butterfly’s wings in Tokyo can influence the weather in New York (the so-called butterfly effect) [80]. At both the subatomic and the macro level, there appears to be an invisible ordering principle at work. If chaos is the engine of evolution, as Prigogine and Stengers [80] suggest, humans need to learn to ride the rapids of change gracefully, trusting in each other and life’s self-organizing processes. The well-being literature consistently emphasizes the important role that trust in others plays in creating a sense of well-being [81, 82, 83]. Resisting change and resenting chaos decreases the capacity for human happiness, while trust increases a sense of well-being.
The final knowing/doing gap relates to the critical role that relationships play in human happiness and well-being. Classical neuroscience research into the so-called “social brain” demonstrates that humans are hardwired to connect with others [24]. The literature clearly confirms that human connection is required for optimal flourishing. Holt-Lunstad et al. [25] found a 50% increased likelihood of survival for research participants with stronger social networks, regardless of age, sex, or initial health status. Tiwari [27] found that the effect of loneliness on the human body is equivalent to that of smoking a pack of cigarettes each day over many years. Conversely, connection reduces anxiety and depression and releases oxytocin and dopamine; thus, increasing human happiness [26]. Much of the early happiness research focused on individual mastery and personal agency. The research above suggests that more attention must be given to the role relationships play in happiness and well-being.
Relationships also appear to be a basic design feature at the subatomic level, Quantum physics research documents that matter comes into existence only through relationships. Subatomic particles are abstractions whose properties are definable and observable only through their interactions with other particles.
Physics has not, however, always been viewed as a science of relationships. Newton saw particles as distinct entities with rigid boundaries, billiard balls moved around by external forces [73]. Newtonian objects can influence each other’s external behavior, but they cannot change each other’s internal characteristics. This is not what happens in a quantum relationship where two particles can actually merge together, sharing boundaries and identities and thereby becoming a quantum system that is greater than the sum of the two individual parts. Research indicates that this “merger” phenomenon can also happen at the level of human consciousness as the brain activity of one person who is physically and sensorily isolated can influence another’s brain processes [78].
6. Quantum skills
These quantum physics discoveries, along with research in positive psychology and neuroscience, provide the conceptual foundation for seven quantum skills [53]. These skills are premised on a worldview that characterizes the universe as a dynamic, unpredictable, subjective, self-organizing system rather than as a static, predictable, objective machine. Such a view necessitates new skills that enable humans not only to
These quantum skills are designed to increase a sense of well-being by aligning individual behavior with relevant scientific breakthroughs. Currently, many of the discoveries of the past several decades remain at a level of abstraction that is unusable for those outside the scientific community. These quantum skills are an attempt to pragmatize these new discoveries and integrate them into human behavior so that those who use them can improve their sense of happiness/well-being by re-creating their lives from the inside out.
6.1 Quantum Seeing
The first skill,
Beliefs reinforce perceptions and perceptions reinforce beliefs; unfortunately, it is not easy to break this cycle. It is learned early and controlled primarily at an unconscious level of awareness. However, it is possible to become more aware of intentions and as intentions change, perceptions shift accordingly. Intention is the psychological process through which reality is constructed [85]. Intentions cause attention to focus on certain stimuli, while a plethora of other perceptual possibilities are totally ignored. The skill of
6.2 Quantum Thinking
The second skill,
In order to think more paradoxically, the capacities of the right hemisphere of the brain must be developed. The right brain can gather up seemingly unrelated ideas and arrange them into highly creative idea constellations, thereby, bypassing the left brain’s propensity for binary thinking. The right brain hemisphere has another important creative advantage. It can process millions of visual images in microseconds and solve problems exponentially faster than the clock-bound left hemisphere. Thus, through the process of imagistic thinking people can escape the tyranny of time and enter a realm where seemingly opposite options can effortlessly superimpose themselves into highly creative solutions [87]. The skill of
6.3 Quantum Feeling
The third skill,
Using this skill requires learning how to harmonize opposite feelings. The participants in Delle Fave et al.’s Eudaimonic and Hedonic Happiness research project selected “harmony” as the most important self-rated component of happiness. Harmony was defined as “balancing opposite elements into a whole” ([12], p. 199). The ability to balance the inevitable positive and negative aspects of living appears to be foundational to happiness. As people use the skill of
6.4 Quantum Knowing
The fourth skill,
The universe is basically a set of signals or a field of information. It is much more like a Great Thought than the Great Machine metaphor of the Newtonian paradigm.
6.5 Quantum Acting
The fifth skill,
Non-local causation, also referred to as quantum entanglement, is transforming life as it is presently known through astounding technological advances; but more importantly, this same principle has the potential to shift our view of ourselves and our relationship to others and the physical universe. Gribbin ([89], p. 229) explains why:
Everything in the universe is a part of a correlated, complex whole in which each part influences and is influenced by every other part.
6.6 Quantum Trusting
The sixth skill,
Bohm’s concept of an invisible ordering principle applies to the subatomic world of quantum phenomena. Chaos theory, based on classical physics and applicable to the macroscopic world, has a similar concept, the strange attractor. This is a computer term used to trace the evolution of a chaotic system. As chaos theory would predict, a computerized system in chaos behaves in a totally unpredictable manner. However, over time even the most chaotic systems never go beyond certain phase space boundaries, the boundary of the strange attractor. Strange attractors provide visual images of a world in which structure emerges out of chaos. Structured chaos is a remarkable paradox. It suggests that we function in a universe that is both orderly and chaotic, a world that displays structure without clockwork regularity—potentiality without predictability.
6.7 Quantum Being
The seventh skill,
The skill of
7. Summary and future recommendations
Over 50 years ago renowned psychiatrist Carl Jung predicted a conceptual integration of psychology and physics. He wrote [95]:
The era that Jung foresaw has arrived. Research has now identified common themes in disciplines as diverse as psychology and physics. Unfortunately, these discoveries have impacted the material world more than the subjective realm of well-being. For example, discoveries in quantum mechanics enabled a technological revolution that has totally transformed society over the past 100 years; however, these discoveries have not yet led to a significant shift in human beliefs or behaviors. This chapter attempts to do so by showing the relationship of these quantum breakthroughs to other paradigm-breaking research in positive psychology and neuroscience and integrating these findings into a set of quantum skills.
The research suggests that as humans master these seven quantum skills, they will learn to more fully utilize both of the brain’s hemispheres and greatly expand the capacity of the brain’s highest processing center, the neocortex. In so doing, they will be able to transcend the basic survival programming of our ancient reptilian brains (the R-complex) and the pain/pleasure mechanisms of the limbic system. Wade’s research [60] suggests that as people learn to fully utilize the capacity of the neocortex, conscious awareness increases; thus, giving increased ability to make conscious choice regarding thoughts and actions that support well-being.
The authors hypothesize that using these quantum skills will result in increased happiness as measured by a subjective sense of well-being. Research is needed to test the efficacy of these skills to accomplish this hypothesized result. Such a project would need to be based on a culturally inclusive definition of happiness that aligns with the research reviewed in this chapter. Future opportunities for disseminating these quantum skills include the design of a comprehensive, cross-cultural curriculum for teaching these skills at a variety of age levels. This chapter is a call for the academic community to test and teach these skills, thus reducing the current knowing/doing gap and helping to create global flourishing.
References
- 1.
Joshanloo M. Eastern conceptualizations of happiness: Fundamental differences with western views. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2014; 15 (2):475-492. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-013-9431-1 - 2.
Tov W, Lee HW. A closer look at the hedonics of everyday meaning and satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2016; 111 (4):585-609. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000081 - 3.
Kashdan TB, Biswas-Diener R, King LA. Reconsidering happiness: The cost of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2008; 3 (4):219-233. DOI: 10.1080/17439760802303044 - 4.
Christopher JC, Hickinbottom S. Positive psychology, ethnocentrism, and the disguised ideology of individualism. Theory & Psychology. 2008; 18 (5):563-589. DOI: 10.1177%2F0959354308093396 - 5.
Bhawuk DPS. Methodology for building psychological models from scriptures. Psychology and Developing Societies. 2010; 22 (1):49-93. DOI: 10.1177%2F097133360902200103 - 6.
Ip PK. Is confucianism good for business ethics in China? Journal of Business Ethics. 2009; 88 (3):463-476. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-009-0120-2 - 7.
Ricard M. The Dalai Lama: Happiness from within. International Journal of Wellbeing. 2011; 1 (2):274-290. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v1i2.9 - 8.
Tsai JL. Ideal affect: Cultural causes and behavioral consequences. Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2007; 2 (3):242-259. DOI: 10.1111%2Fj.17456916.2007 - 9.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudiamonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001; 52 :141-166. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 - 10.
Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Aaker JL, Garbinsky EN. Some key differences between a happy life and a meaningful life. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2013; 8 (6):505-516. DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2013.830764 - 11.
Lomas T, Ivtzan I. Second wave positive psychology: Exploring the positive—negative dialectics of wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2016; 17 :1753-1768. DOI: 10.1007/s10902-015-9668-y - 12.
Delle Fave A, Brdar I, Freire T, Vella-Brodrick D, Wissing M. The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research. 2011; 100 (2):185-207 - 13.
Seligman M, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist. 2000; 55 (1):5-14. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8_18 - 14.
Gregory RL. Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing. 4th ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1990 - 15.
O’Regan JK, Noë A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2001; 24 (5):939-973. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X01000115 - 16.
Csikszentmihalyi M. The Evolving Self: A Psychology for the Third Millennium. New York, NY: Harper Collins; 1993 - 17.
Haybron DM. Philosophy and the science of subjective well-being. In: Eid M, Larsen RJ, editors. editorsThe Science of Subjective Well-being. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2008. pp. 17-43 - 18.
Wong PT. What is existential positive psychology? International Journal of Existential Psychology and Psychotherapy. 2010; 3 :1-10 - 19.
Held BS. The negative side of positive psychology. Journal of Humanistic Psychology. 2004; 44 (1):9-46. DOI: 10.1177%2F0022167803259645 - 20.
Ivtzan I, Lomas T, Hefferon K, Worth P. Second Wave Positive Psychology: Embracing the Dark Side of Life. London: Routledge; 2015. DOI: 10.4324/9781315740010 - 21.
Wong PT, Ivtzan I, Lomas T. Good work: The meaning-centered approach. In: The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of Positivity and Strengths-Based Approaches at Work. Wiley Online; 2016. pp. 231-247. DOI: 10.1002/9781118977620.ch14 - 22.
Ho DYF, Ho RTH. Measuring spirituality and spiritual emptiness: Toward ecumenicity and transcultural applicability. Review of General Psychology. 2007; 11 (1):62. DOI: 10.1037%2F1089-2680.11.1.62 - 23.
Howells A, Ivtzan I, Eiroa-Orosa FJ. Putting the ‘app’ in Happiness: A randomized controlled trial of a smartphone-based mindfulness intervention to enhance wellbeing. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2016; 17 :163-185 - 24.
Dreher J, Tremblay L, editors. Decision Neuroscience: An Integrative Perspective. The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2016 - 25.
Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine. 2010; 7 (7):e1000316. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316 - 26.
Kawachi I, Berkman L. Social ties and mental health. Journal of Urban Health. 2001; 78 (3):458-467. DOI: 10.1093/jurban/78.3.458 - 27.
Tiwari SCL. A disease? Indian Journal of Psychiatry. 2013; 55 (4):320-322. DOI: 10.4103%2F0019-5545.120536 - 28.
Malenka RC, Nestler EJ, Hyman SE, Sydor A, Brown RY, editors. Molecular Neuropharmacology: A Foundation for Clinical Neuroscience. 2nd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Medical; 2009 - 29.
Ghoddse H. Ghodse’s Drugs and Addictive Behaviour: A Guide to Treatment. 4th ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010 - 30.
Wu J, Xiao H, Sun H, Zou L, Zhu LQ. Role of dopamine receptors in ADHA: A systematic meta-analysis. Molecular Biology. 2012; 45 :605-620. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-012-8278-5 - 31.
Wurtman RJ, Wurtman JJ, Regan MM, McDermott JM, Tsay RH, Breu JJ. Effects or normal meals rich in carbohydrates or proteins on plasma tryptophan and tyrosine ratios. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003; 77 (1):128-132. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/77.1.128 - 32.
Meeusen R, Piacentini MF, Meirleir KD. Brain microdialysis in exercise research. Sports Medicine. 2001; 31 (14):965-983. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200131140-00002 - 33.
Korshunov KS, Blakemore LJ, Trombley PQ. Dopamine: A modulator of circadian rhythms in the central nervous system. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 2017; 11 :91. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2017.00091 - 34.
Salimpoor VN, Benovoy M, Larcher K, Dagher A, Zatorre RJ. Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nature Neuroscience. 2011; 14 (2):257-262. DOI: 10.1038/nn.2726 - 35.
Tsai HY, Chen KC, Yang YK, Chen PS, Yeh TL, Chiu NT, et al. Sunshine-exposure variation of human striatal dopamine D(2)/D(3) receptor availability in healthy volunteers. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry. 2011; 35 (1):107-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.09.014 - 36.
Pal R, Singh SN, Chatterjee A, Saha M. Age-related changes in cardiovascular system, autonomic functions, and levels of BDNF of healthy active males: Role of yogic practice. AGE. 2014; 36 (4):9683. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-014-9683-7 - 37.
Kjaer TW, Bertelsen C, Piccini P, Brooks D, Alving J, Lou HC. Increased dopamine tone during meditation-induced change of consciousness. Cognitive Brain Research. 2002; 13 (2):255-259. DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00106-9 - 38.
Uvas-Moberg K, Handlin L, Petersson M. Self-soothing behaviors with particular reference to oxytocin release induced by non-noxious sensory stimulation. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015; 5 :1529. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01529 - 39.
Hurlemann R, Patin A, Onur OA, Cohen MX, Baumgartner T, Metzler S, et al. Oxytocin enhances amygdala-dependent, socially reinforced learning and emotional empathy in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience. 2010; 30 (14):4999-5007. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5538-09.2010 - 40.
Baumgartner T, Heinrichs M, Vonlanthen A, Fischbacher U, Fehr E. Oxytocin shapes the neural circuitry of trust and trust adaptation in humans. Neuron. 2008; 58 (4):639-650. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.04.009 - 41.
Matsuzaki M, Matsushita H, Tomizawa K, Matsui H. Oxytocin: A therapeutic target for mental disorders. The Journal of Physiological Sciences. 2012; 62 (6):441-444. DOI: 10.1007/s12576-012-0232-9 - 42.
McQuaid RJ, McInnis OA, Abizaid A, Anisman H. Making room for oxytocin in understanding depression. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2014; 45 :305-322 - 43.
Tonello L, Cocchi M, Gabrielli F, Tuszynski JA. On the possible quantum role of serotonin in consciousness. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience. 2015; 14 (3):295-308. DOI: 10.1142/S021963521550017X - 44.
Voss P, Thomas M, Cisneros-Franco JM, deVillers-Sidani E. Dynamic brains and the changing rules of neuroplasticity: Implications for learning and recovery. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017; 8 :1657. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01657 - 45.
Yotsuoto Y, Chang L, Ni R, Pierce R, Anderson GJ, Watanabe T, et al. White matter in the older brain is more plastic than in the younger brain. Nature Communications. 2014; 5 :6504. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6504 - 46.
Sallet J, Mars RB, Noonan MP, Andersson JL, O’Reilly JX, et al. Social network size affects neural circuits in macaques. Science. 2011; 334 (6056):697-700. DOI: 10.1126/science.1210027 - 47.
Behrens F, Snijdewinte A, Moulder RG, Prochazkova E, Syak-Shie E, et al. Physiological synchrony promotes cooperative success in real-life interactions. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10 :19609. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76539-8 - 48.
Gamliel HN, Nevat M, Gvirts Probolovski HA, Karklinsky M, Han S, et al. Inter-group conflict affects interbrain synchrony during synchronized movements. NeuroImage. 2021; 245 :118661. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118661 - 49.
Chalmers D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1996 - 50.
Koch C. The Quest for Consciousness: A Neurobiological Approach. Englewood: Roberts and Co.; 2004 - 51.
Penrose R, Hameroff S. Consciousness in the universe: Neuroscience, quantum space-time geometry and Orch OR Theory. Journal of Cosmology. 2011; 14 :1-33 - 52.
Cocchi M, Tonello L, Gabrielli F. Quantum paradigms of psychopathology: From consciousness to neuroethics. Open Journal of Depression. 2017; 6 (1):74317 - 53.
Shelton C. Quantum Leaps: 7 Skills for Workplace ReCreation. New York, NY: Routledge; 1999 - 54.
Bohm D. Quantum Theory. New York, NY: Dover Publications; 2012 - 55.
Capra F. The Tao of Physics. 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Shambhala; 1983 - 56.
Cole KC. Sympathetic Vibrations: Reflections on Physics as a Way of Life. New York, NY: Bantam Books; 1985 - 57.
Herbert N. Elemental Mind: Human Consciousness and the New Physics. New York, NY: Dutton; 1993 - 58.
Capra F. The Turning Point: Science, Society, and the Rising culture. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 1982 - 59.
Bohm D. Wholeness and the Implicate Order. New York, NY: Routledge; 2002 - 60.
Cocchi M, Tonello L, Gabrielli F, Pregnolato M, Pessa E. Quantum human and animal consciousness: A concept embracing philosophy, quantitative molecular biology and mathematics. Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research. 2011; 2 (4):547-574 - 61.
Hameroff S. Consciousness, neurobiology and quantum mechanics: The case for a connection. In: Tuszynski J, editor. The Emerging Physics of Consciousness. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006. DOI: org/10.1007/3-540-36723-3_6 - 62.
Wade J. Changes of Mind: A Holonomic theory of the Evolution of Consciousness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1996 - 63.
Wheatley MJ, Kellner-Rogers M. A Simpler Way. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler; 1996 - 64.
Wolf FA. Taking the Quantum Leap: The New Physics for Non-Scientists. New York, NY: Harper and Row; 1989 - 65.
Chopra D. Quantum Healing: Exploring the Frontiers of Mind/Body Medicine. New York, NY: Bantam Books; 1990 - 66.
Harman W, Rheingold H. Higher Creativity: Liberating the Unconscious for Breakthrough Insights. Los Angeles, CA: Jeremy P. Tarcher; 1984 - 67.
McGilchrist I. The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press; 2019 - 68.
McNeill D, Freiberger P. Fuzzy Logic. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 1994 - 69.
Aronsson G, Theorell T, Grape T, et al. A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and burnout symptoms. BMC Public Health. 2017; 17 :264. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4153-7 - 70.
Evans-Lacko S, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Al-Hamzawi A, et al. Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Psychological Medicine. 2018; 48 (9):1560-1571 - 71.
Perry RB. The thought and character of William James. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press; 1948 - 72.
Wald G. Life and mind in the universe. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry: Quantum Biology Symposium. 1984; 26 (S11):1-15 - 73.
Zohar D. The Quantum Self: Human Nature and Consciousness Defined by the New Physics. New York, NY: William Morrow; 1990 - 74.
Hafenbrack AC, Kinias Z, Barsade SG. Debiasing the mind through meditation: Mindfulness and the sunk-cost bias. Psychological Science. 2014; 25 (2):369-376 - 75.
McCarthy K. Uncertainty is a blessing, not a bane. APA Monitor. September 1994. p. 28 - 76.
Borysenko J. Minding the Body: Mending the Mind. Cambridge: Da Capo Press; 2007 - 77.
Siju KP, Stih V, Aimon S, et al. Valence and state-dependent population coding in dopaminergic neurons in the fly mushroom body. Current Biology. 2020; 30 (11):2104-2115. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.037 - 78.
Goswami A. The Self-Aware Universe: How Consciousness Creates the Material World. New York, NY: G.P. Putnam; 1993 - 79.
Wheatley MJ. Leadership and the New Science: Learning About Organizations from an Orderly Universe. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler; 1992 - 80.
Prigogine I, Stengers I. Order Out of Chaos: Man’s New Dialogue with Nature. Boulder, CO: Shambhala; 1984 - 81.
Helliwell J, Putnam RD. The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. 2004; 359 :1435-1446. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522 - 82.
Hudson J. Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU. Kyklos. 2006; 59 (1):43-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00319.x - 83.
Helliwell JF, Huang H, Wang S. New evidence on trust and well-being. National Bureau of Economic Research. 2016. Working paper 22450. DOI: 10.3386/w22450 - 84.
Zukav G. The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics. New York, NY: Bantam Books; 1979 - 85.
Csikszentmihalyi M. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York, NY: Harper Collins; 1990 - 86.
Hey T, Walters P. The Quantum Universe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987 - 87.
Shelton C. Spirituality, mental health and the new physics. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies. 2010; 7 (2):161-171. DOI: 10.1002/aps.243 - 88.
IHM. Research Update. Boulder Creek, CA: Institute of HeartMath; 1993 - 89.
Gribbin J. In Search of Schrödinger’s Cat: Quantum Physics and Reality. New York, NY: Bantam Books; 1984 - 90.
Briggs J, Peat FD. Turbulent Mirror: An Illustrated Guide to Chaos Theory and the Science of Wholeness. New York, NY: Harper and Row; 1989 - 91.
Diener E, Seligman M. Very happy people. Psychological Science. 2002; 13 (1):81-84. DOI: 10.1111%2F1467-9280.00415 - 92.
Powdthavee N. Putting a price tag on friends, relatives, and neighbours: Using surveys of life satisfaction to value social relationship. The Journal of Socio-Economics. 2008; 37 (4):1459-1480. DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2007.04.004 - 93.
Putnam R. Social capital: Measurement and consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research. 2001; 2 (1):41-51 - 94.
Uchida Y, Kitayama S. Happiness and unhappiness in east and west: Themes and variations. Emotion. 2009; 9 (4):441-456. DOI: 10.1037/a0015634 - 95.
Jung CG. Avion: Researches into the Phenomenology of the Self. 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1969