Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Anti-Quorum Sensing Compounds from Rare Actinobacteria

Written By

Sunita Bundale and Aashlesha Pathak

Submitted: 26 October 2021 Reviewed: 13 July 2022 Published: 09 November 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106526

From the Edited Volume

Actinobacteria - Diversity, Applications and Medical Aspects

Edited by Wael N. Hozzein

Chapter metrics overview

160 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Actinobacteria have exceptional metabolic diversity and are a rich source of several useful bioactive natural products. Most of these have been derived from Streptomyces, the dominant genus of Actinobacteria. Hence, it is necessary to explore rare actinobacteria for the production of novel bioactive compounds. Amongst the novel metabolites, anti-quorum-sensing agents, which can curb infection without killing pathogens, are gaining importance. Not many studies are targeting anti-quorum-sensing agents from rare actinobacteria and this research area is still in its infancy. This field may lead to novel bioactive compounds that can act against bacterial quorum-sensing systems. These agents can attenuate the virulence of the pathogens without challenging their growth, thereby preventing the emergence of resistant strains and facilitating the elimination of pathogens by the host’s immune system. Therefore, this chapter describes the general characteristics and habitats of rare actinobacteria, isolation and cultivation methods, the methods of screening rare actinobacteria for anti-quorum sensing compounds, methods of evaluation of their properties, and future prospects in drug discovery.

Keywords

  • rare actinobacteria
  • quorum sensing
  • anti-quorum-sensing compounds
  • swarming
  • biofilm

1. Introduction

Actinobacteria are Gram-positive and high G + C containing bacteria with exceptional metabolic diversity. They are a rich source of several useful bioactive natural products many of which have been reported for their potential roles as antimicrobial, antibacterial, antiviral, anticancer, and antifungal compounds. More than 22,000 bioactive secondary metabolites from microorganisms have been identified and published in the scientific and patent literature, and about half of these compounds are produced by actinobacteria [1]. Currently, approximately 160 antibiotics have been used in human therapy and agriculture, and 100–120 of these compounds, including streptomycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, vancomycin, avermectin, etc., are produced by actinobacteria [2].

Most of these antibiotics in clinical use today have been developed from compounds isolated from Streptomyces, the dominant genus [3]. However, the recent search for the novel compounds from Streptomyces species has often led to the rediscovery of known compounds. Hence, the focus of screening programs has shifted to bioactive compounds from non-Streptomyces genera; also referred to as rare actinobacteria [4].

Recent evidence has demonstrated that rare actinobacteria, might represent a unique source of novel biologically active compounds, and methods designed to isolate and identify a wide variety of such actinobacteria have been developed. These methods include a variety of pre-treatment techniques in combination with appropriately supplementing selective agar media with specific antimicrobial agents.

At present, not more than 50 rare actinobacterial taxa are reported to produce 2500 bioactive compounds [5]. Thus, it is crucial that new groups of rare actinobacteria be pursued as sources of novel pharmaceutically active metabolites. Amongst the novel metabolites, anti-quorum sensing (AQS) agents, which can curb infection without a killing action, are gaining importance. Bacterial cell–cell communication, dubbed quorum sensing, is intricately related to virulence. An associated phenomenon is bacterial swarming which allows the spread of disease and virulence.

The discovery that many pathogenic bacteria employ quorum sensing (QS) to regulate their pathogenicity and virulence factor production makes the QS system an attractive target for antimicrobial therapy. Targeting the pathogenesis instead of killing the organism may provide less selective pressure for the development of resistance. Therefore, it has been suggested that inactivating the QS system in bacteria using QS inhibitors holds great promise for the treatment of infectious diseases. These compounds can attenuate the virulence of the pathogens without challenging their growth, thereby preventing the emergence of resistant strains and facilitating the elimination of pathogens by the host’s immune system. Therefore, a search for anti-quorum-sensing agents as attractive alternatives to treat infection has become logical and gathered momentum [6].

Although antimicrobial properties of actinobacteria have been extensively studied, less is known about AQS activities of rare actinobacteria which may be a rich source of active compounds that can act against bacterial quorum-sensing systems.

Advertisement

2. Defining rare Actinobacteria

Rare Actinobacteria are defined as certain types of Actinobacteria which are abundant in various habitats but are difficult to isolate [7]. These include all non-Streptomyces actinobacterial genera like Actinomadura, Actinoplanes, Amycolatopsis, Dactylosporangium, Planomonospora, Planobispora, Salinispora, Streptosporangium, Verrucosispora and Microbiospora [8]. Even though a major percentage of antibiotics are secreted by bacteria from the genus Streptomyces [9] rare actinobacteria account for 25–30% of these. The importance of rare actinobacteria is further demonstrated by the fact that many of the successful bioactive products in the market like rifamycin, erythromycin, teicoplanin, vancomycin, and gentamycin are produced by such rare actinobacteria [10]. Consequently, rare actinobacteria are being unveiled as highly prospective sources of bioactive compounds.

Members of the genus Actinomadura have been reported to secrete about 350 different types of bioactive compounds exhibiting a wide range of mechanisms of action [11, 12]. Some strains of the genus Actinoplanes are known for the production of acarbose, a secondary metabolite that is an α-glucosidase enzyme inhibitor [13] and is currently being used in treating type 2 diabetes [14]. While numerous bioactive compounds are isolated from the strains of Amycolatopsis, vancomycin and rifamycin are the most familiar ones [15]. Research also led to the discovery of the first naturally occurring tetracycline C2 amides called dactylocyclines which are produced by members of the genus Dactylosporangium [16]. Metabolomic studies conducted on the genus Planomonospora led to the discovery of multiple compounds with biosynthetic activities such as Ureylene-containing oligopeptide antipain, the thiopeptide siomycin and sphaericin and lantibiotic 97,518 [17]. Planobispora rosea is found to secrete a novel antibiotic called GE 2770A and thiazolyl peptides which are protein synthesis inhibitors [18]. Arenimycin is another antibiotic produced by the marine actinobacterium Salinispora arenicola and is found to be effective against drug resistant S. aureus and a few other Gram-positive bacteria [19]. Molecular studies done on compounds isolated from Streptosporangium oxazolinicum, resulted in the discovery of three novel alkaloids having anti-trypanosomal activity [20]. Studies conducted using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC–MS) and one strain-many compounds strategy led to the detection of another bioactive compound abyssomicin from the marine actinobacterium Verrucosispora [21]. Members of the genus Micromonospora have been a major source of Gentamicin, apart from which about 740 different antibiotics are found from other strains [22]. All the above mentioned actinobacteria and few more are a subject of intense investigations and prove to be a rich source of many novel antibiotics when modern approaches such as transcriptomics and metabolomics are employed.

Advertisement

3. Habitats of rare Actinobacteria

Actinobacteria inhabit a wide range of habitats with diverse climatic conditions, including those of extreme temperatures and pH as well as marine waters, deserts and soil [23]. However, they are mainly found in soil. It is also observed that even though actinobacteria are found in all layers of soil, their density decreases with increasing depth [24]. Environmental factors such as pH of the soil, humus content and soil type directly influence the population density and type of rare actinobacteria present [7]. Table 1 summarizes a few rare actinobacteria isolated from various habitats.

HabitatGenusReference
Forest SoilConexibacter, Actinospica,Catenulispora, Sinomonas, Longispora etc.[25, 26, 27, 28, 29]
Desert SoilYuhushiella, Dietzia, Kineococcus, Microbacterium etc[30, 31, 32, 33]
Garden SoilOrnithinimicrobium[34]
Alkaline soilMyceligenerans, Yonghaparkia[35, 36]
Soil sample from Oil springsSmaragdicoccus[37]
Sandy SoilKrasilnikovia, Sphaerosporangium, Micromonospora[38, 39, 40]
Farmland SoilRuania, Agromyces[41, 42]
Saline SoilZhihengliuella, Nocardiopsis, Nesterenkonia, Brevibacterium, Kocuria[43, 44, 45, 46, 47]
Soil from tropical rainforestDactylosporangium, Saccharopolyspora, Pseudonocardia Planotetraspora, Sphaerisporangium[48, 49, 50, 51, 52]
Soil sample from Paddy fieldsHumihabitans, Humibacillus, Arthrobacter[53, 54, 55]
Soil near wastewater Treatment facility/Activated SludgeFlexivirga, Micrococcus, Gordonia, Nocardioides[56, 57, 58, 59]
Dried SeaweedPhycicoccus, Labedella, Phycicola, Aeromicrobium[60, 61, 62, 63]
Marine WaterTessaracoccus, Paraoerskovia, Marinactinospora, Demequina, Verrucosispora[64, 65, 66, 67, 68]
CavesKnoellia, Hoyosella, Jiangella[69, 70, 71]
Roots of PlantsPlantactinospora, Phytohabitans, Actinophytocola, Flindersiella, Phytomonospora[71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76]
Leaves of PlantsFrondicola, Rhodococcus, Nonomuraea[77, 78, 79]
Stems of PlantsGlycomyces, Saccharopolyspora, Kineosporia, Nocardia[80, 81, 82, 83]
GlaciersCryobacterium, Leifsonia, Arthrobacter[84, 85, 86]
Volcanic rocksAllocatelliglobosispora, Thermoactinospora,[87, 88]

Table 1.

Habitats of rare actinobacteria.

Advertisement

4. Isolation of rare Actinobacteria

4.1 Pretreatment methods

Isolation of rare actinobacteria is a strenuous task, mainly because they are slow growing. After collection of samples, the type of pretreatment method used decides the viability and isolation of the species under study. While several types of pretreatment methods are available, the requirement of each organism is different. A few common methods include suspending samples in distilled water followed by incubation in a rotary shaker, air drying the samples, or heat treatment in oven at 45֯C–65֯C [89]. Alferova and Terekhova have reported a modified procedure for treatment of soil samples with calcium carbonate under humid conditions [90]. This gave efficient increase in the number of isolates as well as representatives of rare genera. Chemical treatment methods such as treating the sample with 1.5% phenol or physical methods combined with other conventional or sucrose gradient centrifugation methods also proved to be highly effective [91]. Isolation of rare actinobacteria is still an area of active research and hence a particular pretreatment method does not guarantee the isolation of a specific actinobacteria. However, other prescribed pretreatment methods available in literature can be tried to achieve exclusive isolation. These methods are summarized in Table 2.

Pretreatment methodType of ActinobacteriaAntibiotic for selective isolationSuggested isolation mediaReference
  1. Physical methods

    1. Fresh samples w/o pretreatment

    1. Air dried in room temperature for 2 weeks

    1. Samples kept in oven at 40֯C-65֯C

    1. Samples heated in oven at 110֯C for 1 h

    1. Pre-treatment followed by calcium carbonate

  2. Chemical methods

    1. SDS 0.05% and Yeast extract 5%

    1. Phenol 1.5%

    1. Chloramine-T

Thermophilic ActinobacteriaCycloheximide, KanamycinCzapeck medium, glycerol asparagine medium, Oatmeal medium[92, 93]
Halophilic and Alkalophilic actinobacteriaNalidixic acidStarch-casein agar, glycerol asparagine medium, T3 medium,[30, 94]
Acidophilic
Actinobacteria
Cycloheximide, NystatinISP4, ISP2, Acidified oatmeal agar and modified Bennett’s agar[95, 96]
Actinobacteria from Plant originsPimaricin, penicillin G and polymyxin BSodium Propionate medium, Yeast extract medium, ISP2, ISP3, Potato dextrose agar[97, 98]
Actinobacteria from SoilActidione, NystatinHV Agar, Glycerol-arginine medium, Medium supplied with superoxide dismutase, PDA[30, 99, 100]
Marine ActinobacteriaCycloheximide, NystatinGlycerol-asparagine, Glycerol-glycine, Chitin, Starch-Casein[101, 102, 103]
Rare ActinobacteriaNystatinHV, HP, Trehalose-Proline agar, ISP5, B4,[89, 104]

Table 2.

Pretreatment method, antibiotic and isolation media used for selective isolation of rare actinobacteria.

4.2 Use of antibiotics for selective isolation

Pretreatments do reduce a fraction of unwanted predominant fast-growing organisms. However, use of antibiotics in isolation media along with pretreatment substantially increases the chances of selective isolation as it effectively eliminates fast growing and competitive bacteria. By virtue of this property, antibiotics like gentamicin and novobiocin were successfully used to isolate members of the genus Micromonospora [24]. Similarly, members of genus Microtetraspora were isolated using nalidixic acid and trimethoprim [104]. Currently available antibiotics for selection of actinobacteria along with the type of actinobacteria isolated are summarized in Table 2.

4.3 Use of specific isolation media

It is observed that the growth of rare actinobacteria is highly sensitive to contamination by some known fast-growing organisms such as fungus, other bacteria and a few common streptomyces. Hence conventional methods of isolation are ineffective in isolating rare actinobacteria and there is a need to find more advanced and highly selective isolation methods [24]. Studies have shown that in abundance of nutrients, Actinobacteria prefer exponential growth over the production of secondary metabolite [105]. It is also reported that enzymes for secondary metabolite production are inhibited in presence of glucose [106]. Factors such as the type of chemical or physical pre-treatment used [24], pH, temperature and duration of incubation as well as sources of essential nutrients used greatly affect the rate of growth of rare actinomycetes as well as metabolite production [107]. Effect of each of these factors should be considered while designing a culture medium.

A carbon source can thus either be suitable for growth or for metabolite production but not both. Generally, monosaccharides or sugars that are metabolized rapidly are found to be most suitable for growth while polysaccharides or sugars that metabolize slowly are more suitable for antibiotic production [107]. A comparison between inorganic and organic nitrogen sources used revealed that use of organic nitrogen source resulted in maximum growth as well as metabolite production [104]. Evidences have shown that antibiotic accumulation increases as soon as the nitrogen source used in medium is entirely utilized by the organism [108]. Addition of excess inorganic phosphates resulted in rapid growth since it aids the consumption of Carbon and Nitrogen sources as well as accelerates the rate of cellular respiration but it lowers the production of secondary metabolites [109].

Antibiotic production begins extensively in mid log and late log phase and is continuous in the stationary phase of bacterial growth curve [110]. Multiple studies done on various species of actinobacteria suggest that, antibiotic production is maximum at neutral pH [111] and temperature of 30°C [112, 113]. Further, requirement of other important constituents of growth medium such as trace metals and minerals vary with species and culture conditions.

Apart from all the above-mentioned common isolation media, the requirement of each bacterium is different and hence the selective media should be designed keeping in mind the nutritional requirements of target organism. In order to facilitate the process of designing selective isolation media, information from various taxonomic, phenotypic and antibiotic sensitivity databases can be used [97].

Advertisement

5. Anti-quorum sensing

Quorum sensing is a mechanism of cell-to-cell communication seen in bacteria which occurs by the means of certain autoinducer or chemical signal molecules. The concentration of these autoinducer molecules increases with increase in cell density. Once a certain threshold concentration is reached, these autoinducer molecules lead to alteration of gene expression in the population [114]. It is now known that quorum sensing is the underlying mechanism of a wide spectrum of bacterial physiological processes such as virulence [115, 116], bioluminescence [117], motility [118], sporulation [119], conjugation [120], development of genetic competence [121] as well as synthesis of antibiotics [122].

Considering the implications of quorum sensing in various aspects of bacterial life processes, it is evident that inhibiting quorum sensing could have potential therapeutic applications [123, 124]. There are various strategies in which the quorum sensing pathways can be inhibited. Together, they are called as quorum-quenching and the compounds or molecules used to do so are called as AQS compounds. Strategies used in quorum quenching include: Inhibition of synthesis of autoinducer molecule, designing analogues of autoinducer molecule or receptor analogues [125] and antibody or enzyme catalyzed hydrolysis of autoinducer molecule [126].

N-acyl homoserine lactones (AHLs) are an important class of signaling molecules produced by Gram negative bacteria which are known to govern the population density [127]. Lactonases are the enzymes which hydrolyse either the amide linkage between lactone and acyl side chain or affects the ester bond thereby inhibiting the signaling molecule [128]. Further, acylases [129] and oxidoreductases [130] are also found to have quorum quenching activities. Degradation of signaling molecules is also possible via antibody mediated catalysis. Lamo Marinet al. in their studies reported that hydrolysis of AHL is efficiently achieved by original squaric monoester monoamide hapten [131]. Kristina MSmith and YigongBu reported two novel compounds: N-(2-oxocyclohexyl)-3-oxododecanamide which was a moderate antagonist and N-(trans-2-hydroxycyclopentyl)-3-oxododecanamide which was a strong antagonist of autoinducer molecules of P. aeruginosa [125].

Advertisement

6. Methods of screening and evaluation of anti-quorum sensing compounds isolated from rare Actinobacteria

While the method of preparation of bacterial extracts remains the same, various conventional and virtual screening methods are used to screen compounds for their AQS activity.

6.1 Pigment inhibition assays

Formation of violacein, a purple pigment in the reporter strain Chromobacterium violaceum is controlled by quorum sensing [132]. Quantifying the inhibition of violacein synthesis, by paper disc diffusion as well as flask incubation assay is thus used as a method for screening AQS activity of a given compound. Presence of a zone of inhibition in paper disk diffusion plates and significant reduction in violacein content in flasks, are considered as positive results. This method was efficiently used to test the AQS activity of Vanilla extract [133], pigments extracted from Auricularia auricular [134], essential oils [135], fruit extracts of Passiflora edulis [136], and a few compounds isolated from plant endophytic bacteria [137]. Similarly, inhibition of pigment production in Serratia marcescens is also a coherent test to determine the quorum quenching activity of a compound [138].

6.2 Swarming motility and biofilm formation assays

Swarming and biofilm formation are other quorum sensing controlled processes seen in bacteria such as P. aeruginosa [139], S. marcescens [140], P. mirabilis [6] and are known to play a major role in pathogenesis. Reduction in diameter of the swarm zone, alteration in swarming patterns and significant reduction in biofilm formation [141] indicate that given compound has AQS activity. While reduction in swarm zone diameter and alteration of swarming patterns can be quantified directly, inhibition in biofilm formation can be quantified using microtiter plate method and observing topographical changes in biofilm by scanning electron microscopy [125] as well as confocal laser scanning microscopy. Wijaya et al., have reported that crude extracts from marine actinobacteria isolated from Indonesia, show significant reduction of biofilm formation by inhibiting quorum sensing in Gram positive and Gram negative pathogenic bacteria [142]. Similar activity is reported in extracts from Nocardiopsis sp [143].

6.3 Molecular and physiochemical methods

Genes encoding polyketide synthase I and II (PKS-I and PKS-II), and nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS), are responsible for synthesis of novel AQS compounds in rare actinobacteria [138, 144]. PCR Screening of a given bacterium for these genes is helpful in detecting the presence of quorum quenching activity [145]. Purified compounds isolated from the broth cultures of such bacteria can be further subjected to Physiochemical screening methods such as UV–Vis spectrophotometry, TLC to determine the nature of compound which exhibits AQS activity [138]. Some strains of Nocardia [146] and Micromonospora [147] are subjected to such studies and novel AQS compounds were found.

6.4 In silico screening methods

Biosynthetic gene clusters in a given bacteria can be identified using genome mining studies. 20 biosynthetic gene clusters are reported in a single strain of Pseudoalteromonads most of which were NPRS and PKS gene clusters [148]. CLUSEAN (CLUster SEquence ANalyzer) [149] and antiSMASH [150] are tools used for analysis of bacterial secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters and can be used to predict AQS activity in a given bacterium. Using structures available in various databases, performing molecular docking [151] studies on compounds having AQS activities is possible and can provide remarkable information on molecular interactions involved in inhibition of quorum sensing.

Advertisement

7. Conclusion

Though work on Rare actinobacteria and bioactive compounds from them is gathering momentum, not many studies are targeted towards isolation and identification of AQS compounds from rare actinobacteria and this research area is still in its infancy. These studies may lead to novel bioactive compounds that can act against bacterial quorum sensing systems. These agents can attenuate the virulence of the pathogens without challenging their growth, thereby preventing the emergence of resistant strains.

Such potent anti-quorum -sensing compounds may lead to the development of alternative therapies to address the glaring problem of antibiotic resistance.

This would be of immense medical and commercial benefit.

References

  1. 1. Berdy J. Bioactive microbial metabolites. The Journal of Antibiotics. 2005;58(1):1-26
  2. 2. Sharma P, Dutta J, Thakur D. Chapter 21-Future prospects of actinobacteria in health and industry. In: New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering. Elsevier; 2018. pp. 305-324
  3. 3. Barka EA, Vatsa P, Sanchez L, Gaveau-Vaillant N, Jacquard C, Klenk HP, et al. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of Actinobacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2016;80(1):1-43
  4. 4. Bundale S, Begde D, Pillai D, Gangwani K, Nashikkar N, Kadam T, et al. Novel aromatic polyketides from soil Streptomyces spp.: Purification, characterization and bioactivity studies. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2018;34(5):1-6
  5. 5. Kurtböke DI. Biodiscovery from rare actinomycetes: An eco-taxonomical perspective. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2012;93(5):1843-1852
  6. 6. Nashikkar N, Begde D, Bundale S, Pise M, Rudra J, Upadhyay A. Inhibition of swarming motility, biofilm formation and virulence factor expression of urinary pathogens by Euphorbia trigona latex extracts. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research. 2011;2(3):558
  7. 7. Amin DH, Abdallah NA, Abolmaaty A, Tolba S, Wellington EM. Microbiological and molecular insights on rare Actinobacteria harboring bioactive prospective. Bulletin of the National Research Centre. 2020;44(1):1-2
  8. 8. Arul Jose PO, Jebakumar SR. Non-streptomycete actinomycetes nourish the current microbial antibiotic drug discovery. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2013;4:240
  9. 9. Quinn GA, Banat AM, Abdelhameed AM, Banat IM. Streptomyces from traditional medicine: Sources of new innovations in antibiotic discovery. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2020;69(8):1040
  10. 10. Lazzarini A, Cavaletti L, Toppo G, Marinelli F. Rare genera of actinomycetes as potential producers of new antibiotics. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2000;78(3):399-405
  11. 11. Bhattacharjee K, Kumar S, Palepu NR, Patra PK, Rao KM, Joshi SR. Structure elucidation and in silico docking studies of a novel furopyrimidine antibiotics synthesized by endolithic bacterium Actinomadura sp. AL2. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2017;33(10):1-6
  12. 12. Kroppenstedt RM, Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. Taxonomic revision of the actinomycete genera Actinomadura and Microtetraspora. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 1990;13(2):148-160
  13. 13. Wehmeier UF. The biosynthesis and metabolism of acarbose in Actinoplanes sp. SE 50/110: A progress report. Biocatalysis and Biotransformation. 2003;21(4-5):279-284
  14. 14. Acarbose LH. Clinical Drug Investigation. 2002;22(3):141-156
  15. 15. Song Z, Xu T, Wang J, Hou Y, Liu C, Liu S, et al. Secondary metabolites of the genus Amycolatopsis: Structures, bioactivities and biosynthesis. Molecules. 2021;26(7):1884
  16. 16. Wells JS, O'Sullivan JO, Aklonis C, HA AX, Tymiak AA, Kirsch DR, et al. Dactylocyclines, novel tetracycline derivatives produced by a Dactylosporangium sp. I. Taxonomy, production, isolation and biological activity. The Journal of Antibiotics. 1992;45(12):1892-1898
  17. 17. Zdouc MM, Iorio M, Maffioli SI, Crüsemann M, Donadio S, Sosio M. Planomonospora: A metabolomics perspective on an underexplored Actinobacteria genus. Journal of Natural Products. 2021;84(2):204-219
  18. 18. Selva E, Beretta G, Montanini N, Saddler GS, Gastaldo L, Ferrari P, et al. Antibiotic GE2270 a: A novel inhibitor of bacterial protein synthesis I. isolation and characterization. The Journal of Antibiotics. 1991;44(7):693-701
  19. 19. Asolkar RN, Kirkland TN, Jensen PR, Fenical W. Arenimycin, an antibiotic effective against rifampin-and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from the marine actinomycete Salinispora arenicola. The Journal of Antibiotics. 2010;63(1):37-39
  20. 20. Inahashi Y, Iwatsuki M, Ishiyama A, Namatame M, Nishihara-Tsukashima A, Matsumoto A, et al. Spoxazomicins A–C, novel antitrypanosomal alkaloids produced by an endophytic actinomycete, Streptosporangium oxazolinicum K07-0460 T. The Journal of Antibiotics. 2011;64(4):303-307
  21. 21. Zhang J, Li B, Qin Y, Karthik L, Zhu G, Hou C, et al. A new abyssomicin polyketide with anti-influenza a virus activity from a marine-derived Verrucosispora sp. MS100137. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2020;104(4):1533-1543
  22. 22. Boumehira AZ, El-Enshasy HA, Hacène H, Elsayed EA, Aziz R, Park EY. Recent progress on the development of antibiotics from the genus Micromonospora. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering. 2016;21(2):199-223
  23. 23. Qin S, Li WJ, Klenk HP, Hozzein WN, Ahmed I. Actinobacteria in special and extreme habitats: Diversity, function roles and environmental adaptations. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;10:944
  24. 24. Tiwari K, Gupta RK. Diversity and isolation of rare actinomycetes: An overview. Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 2013;39(3):256-294
  25. 25. Monciardini P, Cavaletti L, Schumann P, Rohde M, Donadio S. Conexibacter woesei gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel representative of a deep evolutionary line of descent within the class Actinobacteria. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2003;53(2):569-576
  26. 26. Cavaletti L, Monciardini P, Schumann P, Rohde M, Bamonte R, Busti E, et al. Actinospica robiniae gen. nov., sp. nov. and Actinospica acidiphila sp. nov.: Proposal for Actinospicaceae fam. nov. and Catenulisporinae subord. nov. in the order Actinomycetales. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2006;56(8):1747-1753
  27. 27. Busti E, Cavaletti L, Monciardini P, Schumann P, Rohde M, Sosio M, et al. Catenulispora acidiphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel, mycelium-forming actinomycete, and proposal of Catenulisporaceae fam. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2006;56(8):1741-1746
  28. 28. Zhou Y, Wei W, Wang X, Lai R. Proposal of Sinomonas flava gen. nov., sp. nov., and description of Sinomonas atrocyanea comb. nov. to accommodate Arthrobacter atrocyaneus. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(2):259-263
  29. 29. Shiratori-Takano H, Yamada K, Beppu T, Ueda K. Longispora fulva sp. nov., isolated from a forest soil, and emended description of the genus Longispora. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61(4):804-809
  30. 30. Mao J, Wang J, Dai HQ, Zhang ZD, Tang QY, Ren B, et al. Yuhushiella deserti gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the suborder Pseudonocardineae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61(3):621-630
  31. 31. Liu M, Peng F, Wang Y, Zhang K, Chen G, Fang C. Kineococcus xinjiangensis sp. nov., isolated from desert sand. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(5):1090-1093
  32. 32. Jiang Y, Cao Y, Zhao L, Tang S, Wang Y, Li W, et al. Large numbers of new bacterial taxa found by Yunnan Institute of Microbiology. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2011;56(8):709-712
  33. 33. Zhang W, Zhu HH, Yuan M, Yao Q, Tang R, Lin M, et al. Microbacterium radiodurans sp. nov., a UV radiation-resistant bacterium isolated from soil. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2010;60(11):2665-2670
  34. 34. Groth I, Schumann P, Weiss N, Schuetze B, Augsten K, Stackebrandt E. Ornithinimicrobium humiphilum gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel soil actinomycete with L-ornithine in the peptidoglycan. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2001;51(1):81-87
  35. 35. Cui X, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E, Kroppenstedt RM, Pukall R, Xu L, et al. Myceligenerans xiligouense gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel hyphae-forming member of the family Promicromonosporaceae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2004;54(4):1287-1293
  36. 36. Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Schumann P, Oh TK. Yonghaparkia alkaliphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Microbacteriaceae isolated from an alkaline soil. International journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2006;56(10):2415-2420
  37. 37. Adachi K, Katsuta A, Matsuda S, Peng X, Misawa N, Shizuri Y, et al. Smaragdicoccus niigatensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the suborder Corynebacterineae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(2):297-301
  38. 38. Ara I, Kudo T. Krasilnikovia gen. nov., a new member of the family Micromonosporaceae and description of Krasilnikovia cinnamonea sp. nov. Actinomycetologica. 2007;21(1):1-0
  39. 39. Ara I, Kudo T. Sphaerosporangium gen. nov., a new member of the family Streptosporangiaceae, with descriptions of three new species as Sphaerosporangium melleum sp. nov., Sphaerosporangium rubeum sp. nov. and Sphaerosporangium cinnabarinum sp. nov., and transfer of Streptosporangium viridialbum Nonomura and Ohara 1960 to Sphaerosporangium viridialbum comb. nov. Actinomycetologica. 2007;21:11-21
  40. 40. Ara I, Kudo T. Two new species of the genus Micromonospora: Micromonospora chokoriensis sp. nov. and Micromonospora coxensis sp. nov., isolated from sandy soil. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. 2007;53(1):29-37
  41. 41. Gu Q, Paściak M, Luo H, Gamian A, Liu Z, Huang Y. Ruania albidiflava gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the suborder Micrococcineae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(4):809-814
  42. 42. Lee M, Ten LN, Woo SG, Park J. Agromyces soli sp. nov., isolated from farm soil. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61(6):1286-1292
  43. 43. Zhang YQ, Schumann P, Yu LY, Liu HY, Zhang YQ, Xu LH, et al. Zhihengliuella halotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family Micrococcaceae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(5):1018-1023
  44. 44. Chen YG, Cui XL, Kroppenstedt RM, Stackebrandt E, Wen ML, Xu LH, et al. Nocardiopsis quinghaiensis sp. nov., isolated from saline soil in China. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(3):699-705
  45. 45. Li WJ, Zhang YQ, Schumann P, Liu HY, Yu LY, Zhang YQ, et al. Nesterenkonia halophila sp. nov., a moderately halophilic, alkalitolerant actinobacterium isolated from a saline soil. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(6):1359-1363
  46. 46. Tang SK, Wang Y, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E, Lou K, Jiang CL, et al. Brevibacterium album sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from a saline soil in China. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(3):574-577
  47. 47. Tang SK, Wang Y, Lou K, Mao PH, Xu LH, Jiang CL, et al. Kocuria halotolerans sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from a saline soil in China. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(6):1316-1320
  48. 48. Chiaraphongphon S, Suriyachadkun C, Tamura T, Thawai C. Dactylosporangium maewongense sp. nov., isolated from soil. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2010;60(5):1200-1205
  49. 49. Qin S, Chen HH, Klenk HP, Kim CJ, Xu LH, Li WJ. Saccharopolyspora gloriosae sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the stem of Gloriosa superba L. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2010;60(5):1147-1151
  50. 50. Qin S, Zhu WY, Jiang JH, Klenk HP, Li J, Zhao GZ, et al. Pseudonocardia tropica sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the stem of Maytenus austroyunnanensis. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2010;60(11):2524-2528
  51. 51. Suriyachadkun C, Chunhametha S, Thawai C, Tamura T, Potacharoen W, Kirtikara K, et al. Planotetraspora thailandica sp. nov., isolated from soil in Thailand. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(5):992-997
  52. 52. Suriyachadkun C, Chunhametha S, Ngaemthao W, Tamura T, Kirtikara K, Sanglier JJ, et al. Sphaerisporangium krabiense sp. nov., isolated from soil. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61(12):2890-2894
  53. 53. Kageyama A, Takahashi Y, Ōmura S. Humihabitans oryzae gen. nov., sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(9):2163-2166
  54. 54. Kageyama A, Matsumoto A, Ōmura S, Takahashi Y. Humibacillus xanthopallidus gen. nov., sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(7):1547-1551
  55. 55. Kageyama A, Morisaki K, Ōmura S, Takahashi Y. Arthrobacter oryzae sp. nov. and Arthrobacter humicola sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(1):53-56
  56. 56. Anzai K, Sugiyama T, Sukisaki M, Sakiyama Y, Otoguro M, Ando K. Flexivirga alba gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinobacterial taxon in the family Dermacoccaceae. The Journal of Antibiotics. 2011;64(9):613-616
  57. 57. Liu XY, Wang BJ, Jiang CY, Liu SJ. Micrococcus flavus sp. nov., isolated from activated sludge in a bioreactor. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(1):66-69
  58. 58. Yassin AF, Shen FT, Hupfer H, Arun AB, Lai WA, Rekha PD, et al. Gordonia malaquae sp. nov., isolated from sludge of a wastewater treatment plant. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(5):1065-1068
  59. 59. Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Park S, Kim W, Oh TK. Nocardioides caeni sp. nov., isolated from wastewater. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(11):2794-2797
  60. 60. Lee DW, Lee JM, Seo JP, Schumann P, Kim SJ, Lee SD. Phycicola gilvus gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from living seaweed. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(6):1318-1323
  61. 61. Lee SD. Labedella gwakjiensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel actinomycete of the family Microbacteriaceae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(11):2498-2502
  62. 62. Lee SD. Phycicoccus jejuensis gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from seaweed. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2006;56(10):2369-2373
  63. 63. Lee SD, Kim SJ. Aeromicrobium tamlense sp. nov., isolated from dried seaweed. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(2):337-341
  64. 64. Lee DW, Lee SD. Tessaracoccus flavescens sp. nov., isolated from marine sediment. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(4):785-789
  65. 65. Khan ST, Harayama S, Tamura T, Ando K, Takagi M, Kazuo SY. Paraoerskovia marina gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from marine sediment. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(8):2094-2098
  66. 66. Tian XP, Tang SK, Dong JD, Zhang YQ, Xu LH, Zhang S, et al. Marinactinospora thermotolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine actinomycete isolated from a sediment in the northern South China Sea. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(5):948-952
  67. 67. Ue H, Matsuo Y, Kasai H, Yokota A. Demequina globuliformis sp. nov., Demequina oxidasica sp. nov. and Demequina aurantiaca sp. nov., actinobacteria isolated from marine environments, and proposal of Demequinaceae fam. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61(6):1322-1329
  68. 68. Goodfellow M, Stach JE, Brown R, Bonda AN, Jones AL, Mexson J, et al. Verrucosispora maris sp. nov., a novel deep-sea actinomycete isolated from a marine sediment which produces abyssomicins. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;101(1):185-193
  69. 69. Groth I, Schumann P, Schütze B, Augsten K, Stackebrandt E. Knoellia sinensis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Knoellia subterranea sp. nov., two novel actinobacteria isolated from a cave. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2002;52(1):77-84
  70. 70. Jurado V, Kroppenstedt RM, Saiz-Jimenez C, Klenk HP, Mouniee D, Laiz L, et al. Hoyosella altamirensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the order Actinomycetales isolated from a cave biofilm. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(12):3105-3110
  71. 71. Lee SD. Jiangella alkaliphila sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from a cave. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(5):1176-1179
  72. 72. Qin S, Li J, Zhang YQ, Zhu WY, Zhao GZ, Xu LH, et al. Plantactinospora mayteni gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Micromonosporaceae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(10):2527-2533
  73. 73. Inahashi Y, Matsumoto A, Danbara H, Ōmura S, Takahashi Y. Phytohabitans suffuscus gen. nov., sp. nov., an actinomycete of the family Micromonosporaceae isolated from plant roots. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2010;60(11):2652-2658
  74. 74. Indananda C, Matsumoto A, Inahashi Y, Takahashi Y, Duangmal K, Thamchaipenet A. Actinophytocola oryzae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the roots of Thai glutinous rice plants, a new member of the family Pseudonocardiaceae. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2010;60(5):1141-1146
  75. 75. Kaewkla O, Franco CM. Flindersiella endophytica gen. nov., sp. nov., an endophytic actinobacterium isolated from the root of Grey box, an endemic eucalyptus tree. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61(9):2135-2140
  76. 76. Li J, Zhao GZ, Zhu WY, Huang HY, Xu LH, Zhang S, et al. Phytomonospora endophytica gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the roots of Artemisia annua L. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61(12):2967-2973
  77. 77. Zhang L, Xu Z, Patel BK. Frondicola australicus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from decaying leaf litter from a pine forest. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(6):1177-1182
  78. 78. Li J, Zhao GZ, Chen HH, Qin S, Xu LH, Jiang CL, et al. Rhodococcus cercidiphylli sp. nov., a new endophytic actinobacterium isolated from a Cercidiphyllum japonicum leaf. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 2008;31(2):108-113
  79. 79. Qin S, Zhao GZ, Klenk HP, Li J, Zhu WY, Xu LH, et al. Nonomuraea antimicrobica sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from a leaf of Maytenus austroyunnanensis. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(11):2747-2751
  80. 80. Gu Q, Zheng W, Huang Y. Glycomyces sambucus sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the stem of Sambucus adnata wall. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(9):1995-1998
  81. 81. Li J, Zhao GZ, Qin S, Huang HY, Zhu WY, Xu LH, et al. Saccharopolyspora tripterygii sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the stem of Tripterygium hypoglaucum. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(12):3040-3044
  82. 82. Li J, Zhao GZ, Huang HY, Qin S, Zhu WY, Xu LH, et al. Kineosporia mesophila sp. nov., isolated from surface-sterilized stems of Tripterygium wilfordii. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2009;59(12):3150-3154
  83. 83. Zhao GZ, Li J, Zhu WY, Klenk HP, Xu LH, Li WJ. Nocardia artemisiae sp. nov., an endophytic actinobacterium isolated from a surface-sterilized stem of Artemisia annua L. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61(12):2933-2937
  84. 84. Zhang DC, Wang HX, Cui HL, Yang Y, Liu HC, Dong XZ, et al. Cryobacterium psychrotolerans sp. nov., a novel psychrotolerant bacterium isolated from the China No. 1 glacier. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2007;57(4):866-869
  85. 85. Reddy GS, Prabagaran SR, Shivaji S. Leifsonia pindariensis sp. nov., isolated from the Pindari glacier of the Indian Himalayas, and emended description of the genus Leifsonia. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(9):2229-2234
  86. 86. Margesin R, Schumann P, Zhang DC, Redzic M, Zhou YG, Liu HC, et al. Arthrobacter cryoconiti sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from alpine glacier cryoconite. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2012;62(2):397-402
  87. 87. Lee DW, Lee SD. Allocatelliglobosispora scoriae gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from volcanic ash. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2011;61(2):264-270
  88. 88. Zhou EM, Tang SK, Sjøholm C, Song ZQ, Yu TT, Yang LL, et al. Thermoactinospora rubra gen. nov., sp. nov., a thermophilic actinomycete isolated from Tengchong, Yunnan province, south–West China. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2012;102(1):177-185
  89. 89. Fang BZ, Salam N, Han MX, Jiao JY, Cheng J, Wei DQ, et al. Insights on the effects of heat pretreatment, pH, and calcium salts on isolation of rare Actinobacteria from karstic caves. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017;8:1535
  90. 90. Alferova IV, Terekhova LP. Use of the method of enriching of soil samples with calcium carbonate for isolation of Actinomyces. Antibiotiki i khimioterapiia= Antibiotics and Chemoterapy [sic]. 1988;33(12):888-890
  91. 91. Hayakawa M. Studies on the isolation and distribution of rare actinomycetes in soil. Actinomycetologica. 2008;22(1):12-19
  92. 92. McCarthy AJ, Cross T. A note on a selective isolation medium for the thermophilic actinomycete Thermomonospora chromogena. Journal of Applied Bacteriology. 1981;51(2):299-302
  93. 93. Shirling ET, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species1. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 1966;16(3):313-340
  94. 94. Meena B, Anburajan L, Vinithkumar NV, Kirubagaran R, Dharani G. Biodiversity and antibacterial potential of cultivable halophilic actinobacteria from the deep sea sediments of active volcanic Barren Island. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2019;132:129-136
  95. 95. Cho SH, Han JH, Ko HY, Kim SB. Streptacidiphilus anmyonensis sp. nov., Streptacidiphilus rugosus sp. nov. and Streptacidiphilus melanogenes sp. nov., acidophilic actinobacteria isolated from Pinus soils. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2008;58(7):1566-1570
  96. 96. Hallberg KB, Johnson DB. Biodiversity of acidophilic microorganisms. Advances in Applied Microbiology. 2001;49:37-84
  97. 97. Goodfellow M. Selective isolation of Actinobacteria. In: Manual of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. Wiley Online Library; 2010. pp. 13-27
  98. 98. Sengupta S, Pramanik A, Ghosh A, Bhattacharyya M. Antimicrobial activities of actinomycetes isolated from unexplored regions of Sundarbans mangrove ecosystem. BMC Microbiology. 2015;15(1):1-6
  99. 99. Hayakawa M, Nonomura H. A new method for the intensive isolation of actinomycetes from soil. Actinomycetologica. 1989;3(2):95-104
  100. 100. Takahashi Y, Katoh S, Shikura N, Tomoda H, Omura S. Superoxide dismutase produced by soil bacteria increases bacterial colony growth from soil samples. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. 2003;49(4):263-266
  101. 101. Porter JN, Wilhelm JJ, Tresner HD. Method for the preferential isolation of actinomycetes from soils. Applied Microbiology. 1960;8(3):174-178
  102. 102. Barcina I, Iriberri J, Egea L. Enumeration, isolation and some physiological properties of actinomycetes from sea water and sediment. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 1987;10(1):85-91
  103. 103. Ghanem NB, Sabry SA, El-Sherif ZM, El-Ela GA. Isolation and enumeration of marine actinomycetes from seawater and sediments in Alexandria. The Journal of General and Applied Microbiology. 2000;46(3):105-111
  104. 104. Bundale S, Begde D, Nashikkar N, Kadam T, Upadhyay A. Optimization of culture conditions for production of bioactive metabolites by Streptomyces spp. isolated from soil. Advances in Microbiology. 2015;5(06):441-451
  105. 105. Gallo M, Katz E. Regulation of secondary metabolite biosynthesis: Catabolite repression of phenoxazinone synthase and actinomycin formation by glucose. Journal of Bacteriology. 1972;109(2):659-667
  106. 106. Reddy NG, Ramakrishna DP, Rajagopal SV. Optimization of culture conditions of Streptomyces rochei (MTCC 10109) for the production of antimicrobial metabolites. Egyptian Journal of Biology. 2011;13:21-29
  107. 107. Iwai Y, Omura S. Culture conditions for screening of new antibiotics. The Journal of Antibiotics. 1982;35(2):123-141
  108. 108. Aharonowitz Y. Nitrogen metabolite regulation of antibiotic biosynthesis. Annual Reviews in Microbiology. 1980;34(1):209-233
  109. 109. Demain AL, Fang A. Emerging concepts of secondary metabolism in actinomycetes. Actinomycetologica. 1995;9(2):98-117
  110. 110. Sejiny M. Growth phases of some antibiotics producing Streptomyces and their identification. Journal of King Abdulaziz University. 1991;3:21-29
  111. 111. Singh V, Khan M, Khan S, Tripathi CK. Optimization of actinomycin V production by Streptomyces triostinicus using artificial neural network and genetic algorithm. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2009;82(2):379-385
  112. 112. Hassan MA, El-Naggar MY, Said WY. Physiological factors affecting the production of an antimicrobial substance by Streptomyces violatus in batch cultures. Egyptian Journal of Biology 2001;3(1):1-0
  113. 113. Oskay M. Effects of some environmental conditions on biomass and antimicrobial metabolite production by Streptomyces Sp., KGG32. International Journal of Agriculture & Biology. 2011;13(3):317-324
  114. 114. Miller MB, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annual Reviews in Microbiology. 2001;55(1):165-199
  115. 115. Castillo-Juárez I, Maeda T, Mandujano-Tinoco EA, Tomás M, Pérez-Eretza B, García-Contreras SJ, et al. Role of quorum sensing in bacterial infections. World Journal of Clinical Cases: WJCC. 2015;3(7):575
  116. 116. Deep A, Chaudhary U, Gupta V. Quorum sensing and bacterial pathogenicity: From molecules to disease. Journal of Laboratory Physicians. 2011;3(01):004-011
  117. 117. Popham DL, Stevens AM. Bacterial quorum sensing and bioluminescence. In: 2005 Proc. Assoc. Biol. Lab. Educ. (ABLE). Vol. 27. Association for Biology Laboratory Education (ABLE); 2005. pp. 201-215
  118. 118. Asfour HZ. Anti-quorum sensing natural compounds. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure. 2018;6(1):1
  119. 119. Steiner E, Scott J, Minton NP, Winzer K. An agr quorum sensing system that regulates granulose formation and sporulation in clostridium acetobutylicum. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2012;78(4):1113-1122
  120. 120. Koraimann G, Wagner MA. Social behavior and decision making in bacterial conjugation. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2014;4:54
  121. 121. van der Ploeg JR. Regulation of bacteriocin production in Streptococcus mutans by the quorum-sensing system required for development of genetic competence. Journal of Bacteriology. 2005;187(12):3980-3989
  122. 122. Duerkop BA, Varga J, Chandler JR, Peterson SB, Herman JP, Churchill ME, et al. Quorum-sensing control of antibiotic synthesis in Burkholderia thailandensis. Journal of Bacteriology. 2009;191(12):3909-3918
  123. 123. Defoirdt T. Quorum-sensing systems as targets for antivirulence therapy. Trends in Microbiology. 2018;26(4):313-328
  124. 124. Rasmussen TB, Givskov M. Quorum-sensing inhibitors as anti-pathogenic drugs. International Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2006;296(2-3):149-161
  125. 125. Smith KM, Bu Y, Suga H. Induction and inhibition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing by synthetic autoinducer analogs. Chemistry & Biology. 2003;10(1):81-89
  126. 126. Vadakkan K, Choudhury AA, Gunasekaran R, Hemapriya J, Vijayanand S. Quorum sensing intervened bacterial signaling: Pursuit of its cognizance and repression. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 2018;16(2):239-252
  127. 127. Papenfort K, Bassler BL. Quorum sensing signal-response systems in gram-negative bacteria. Nature Reviews. Microbiology. 2016;14(9):576-588. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.89 PMID: 27510864; PMCID: PMC5056591
  128. 128. Dong YH, Wang LH, Xu JL, Zhang HB, Zhang XF, Zhang LH. Quenching quorum-sensing-dependent bacterial infection by an N-acyl homoserine lactonase. Nature. 2001;411(6839):813-817
  129. 129. Czajkowski R, Krzyżanowska D, Karczewska J, Atkinson S, Przysowa J, Lojkowska E, et al. Inactivation of AHLs by Ochrobactrum sp. A44 depends on the activity of a novel class of AHL acylase. Environmental Microbiology Reports. 2011;3(1):59-68
  130. 130. Bijtenhoorn P, Mayerhofer H, Müller-Dieckmann J, Utpatel C, Schipper C, Hornung C, et al. A novel metagenomic short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase attenuates Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and virulence on Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26278
  131. 131. Marin SD, Xu Y, Meijler MM, Janda KD. Antibody catalyzed hydrolysis of a quorum sensing signal found in gram-negative bacteria. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2007;17(6):1549-1552
  132. 132. Lichstein HC, Van De Sand VF. Violacein, an antibiotic pigment produced by Chromobacterium violaceum. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1945;76(1):47-51
  133. 133. Choo JH, Rukayadi Y, Hwang JK. Inhibition of bacterial quorum sensing by vanilla extract. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2006;42(6):637-641
  134. 134. Zhu H, He CC, Chu QH. Inhibition of quorum sensing in Chromobacterium violaceum by pigments extracted from Auricularia auricular. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2011;52(3):269-274
  135. 135. Poli JP, Guinoiseau E, de Rocca SD, Sutour S, Paoli M, Tomi F, et al. Anti-quorum sensing activity of 12 essential oils on chromobacterium violaceum and specific action of cis-cis-p-Menthenolide from Corsican Mentha suaveolens ssp. Insularis. Molecules. 2018;23(9):2125
  136. 136. Venkatramanan M, Sankar Ganesh P, Senthil R, Akshay J, Veera Ravi A, Langeswaran K, et al. Inhibition of quorum sensing and biofilm formation in Chromobacterium violaceum by fruit extracts of Passiflora edulis. ACS Omega. 2020;5(40):25605-25616
  137. 137. Koh KH, Tham FY. Screening of traditional Chinese medicinal plants for quorum-sensing inhibitors activity. Journal of Microbiology, Immunology and Infection. 2011;44(2):144-148
  138. 138. Bundale S, Singh J, Begde D, Nashikkar N, Upadhyay A. Rare actinobacteria: A potential source of bioactive polyketides and peptides. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2019;35(6):1-1
  139. 139. Kalia M, Yadav VK, Singh PK, Sharma D, Pandey H, Narvi SS, et al. Effect of cinnamon oil on quorum sensing-controlled virulence factors and biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0135495
  140. 140. Bakkiyaraj D, Sivasankar C, Pandian SK. Inhibition of quorum sensing regulated biofilm formation in Serratia marcescens causing nosocomial infections. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2012;22(9):3089-3094
  141. 141. Brackman G, Coenye T. Quorum sensing inhibitors as anti-biofilm agents. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2015;21(1):5-11
  142. 142. Wijaya M, Delicia D, Waturangi DE. Screening and quantification of antiquorum-sensing activity of Actinobacteria isolates against gram-positive and gram-negative biofilm associated bacteria. Research Square. 2020 [Preprint]
  143. 143. Rajivgandhi G, Vijayan R, Maruthupandy M, Vaseeharan B, Manoharan N. Antibiofilm effect of Nocardiopsis sp. GRG 1 (KT235640) compound against biofilm forming gram negative bacteria on UTIs. Microbial Pathogenesis. 2018;118:190-198
  144. 144. Bundale SB, Begde DN, Nashikkar NN, Kadam TA, Upadhyay AA. Isolation of aromatic polyketide producing soil Streptomyces using combinatorial screening strategies. Open Access Library Journal. 2014;1:1-6
  145. 145. Hamedi J, Imanparast S, Mohammadipanah F. Molecular, chemical and biological screening of soil actinomycete isolates in seeking bioactive peptide metabolites. Iranian Journal of Microbiology. 2015;7(1):23
  146. 146. El-Kurdi N, Abdulla H, Hanora A. Anti-quorum sensing activity of some marine bacteria isolated from different marine resources in Egypt. Biotechnology Letters. 2021;43(2):455-468
  147. 147. Kavimalar DN. Quorum Quenching Potential of Actinobacteria Isolated from Selected Habitats in Peninsular Malaysia/Kavimalar Devaraj Naidu [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Malaya; 2017
  148. 148. Ong JF, Goh HC, Lim SC, Pang LM, Chin JS, Tan KS, et al. Integrated genomic and metabolomic approach to the discovery of potential anti-quorum sensing natural products from microbes associated with marine samples from Singapore. Marine Drugs. 2019;17(1):72
  149. 149. Weber T, Rausch C, Lopez P, Hoof I, Gaykova V, Huson DH, et al. CLUSEAN: A computer-based framework for the automated analysis of bacterial secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters. Journal of Biotechnology. 2009;140(1-2):13-17
  150. 150. Medema MH, Blin K, Cimermancic P, De Jager V, Zakrzewski P, Fischbach MA, et al. antiSMASH: Rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. 2011;39(suppl_2):W339-W346
  151. 151. Priyanka S, Jayashree M, Shivani R, Anwesha S, Rao KB. Characterisation and identification of antibacterial compound from marine actinobacteria: In vitro and in silico analysis. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2019;12(1):83-89

Written By

Sunita Bundale and Aashlesha Pathak

Submitted: 26 October 2021 Reviewed: 13 July 2022 Published: 09 November 2022