1. Introduction
Cellulose, being the major cell wall component and the most abundant organic matter, produced by living organisms, is not uniformly distributed within plant tissues. There are numerous cells, like the parenchyma ones, which even at maturity have thin cell wall. Thick cell walls are characteristic for the tissues with mechanical function. Among those, there are cell walls, which contain several major components, and those, the predominant component of which is cellulose. The most pure natural cellulose is considered to be present in cotton seed hairs (sometimes erroneously called “cotton fibers”) – over 90% of cell wall [1]. Very close to this value is a special group of plant fibers – cellulosic or gelatinous fibers, the proportion of cellulose in which amounts for 85-90% [2,3]. The cell wall thickness in such fibers may reach 15 μm, as compared to 0.2 μm in cells with thin cell wall. So, the very significant portion of total plant cellulose may be concentrated within the gelatinous fibers, making them the important source for production of biofuels and bio-based products. An additional attractiveness of cellulosic fibers for such applications comes from the fact that gelatinous cell wall layers are devoid of lignin – the major hurdle in using plant biomass [1].
Cell wall of cellulosic fiber is of very special design, which provides unusual properties. Such fibers serve as a kind of plant “muscles” [4,5]. The revealing of mechanisms of the formation and function of cellulosic fibers is important for understanding the determinants of general plant architecture and can be useful in construction of new bio-based materials.
2. Definition of plant cellulosic fibers
In terms of plant biology, a fiber is an individual cell of mechanical tissue (sclerenchyma), characterized by the extreme cell length and well developed secondary cell wall, architecture of which is the major determinant of fiber properties. Plant fibers are one of the most economically important raw material, used both for traditional and innovative technologies [6,7]. Due to the massive cell wall, fibers comprise a significant proportion of plant biomass, thus being the valuable source of bio-based products and biofuels. For plant itself fibers are very important for the general architecture and mechanical properties of certain organs.
The functional roles of fibers within the plant and their numerous commercial applications are largely based on the characteristics of their well-developed cell wall of considerable thickness. Fibers of different origin are not uniform in their structure and cell wall composition. The thick cell walls of fully differentiated fibers can be categorized into two broad types – the xylan and the gelatinous ones [2] (Figure 1).
A secondary cell wall of the xylan type is the most common one in various types of cells with secondary cell walls in land plants. The xylan type secondary cell walls are characterized by helical orientation of cellulose microfibrils, predominance of xylan in non-cellulose matrix, and high degree of lignification. The orientation of cellulose microfibrils may be significantly changed several times through the development of the xylan type secondary cell wall, leading to the formation of distinct layers, designated as S1, S2, and S3 layers (S from “secondary”) in the order of deposition. Total thickness of the xylan type secondary cell walls is between 1 and 4 μm. They comprise the bulk of secondary cell walls in various types of wood cells, including vessels and wood parenchyma, and are also present in the bast fibers of some species, for example, jute and kenaf.
The second (gelatinous) type of thick cell wall is present only in fibers. It was firstly described by Th. Hartig at the end of the XIX century as a peculiar layer (G-layer) produced in the reaction wood of dicotyledonous plants (cited after [8]). The reason for such name came from the artefactual swelling of this layer in the cross-section due to the presence of certain components (e.g. alkali) of the solutions used to prepare the sample for microscopy. Fibers, which have developed G-layer of cell wall, get the name “gelatinous fibers”. With modern techniques of sample preparation for microscopy, this layer doesn’t look like a jelly. Moreover, G-layer was described as having exclusively high content of cellulose (up to 90%) with high degree of crystallinity [9], giving the reason for the alternative name – “cellulosic fibers”. However, the justification for a term “gelatinous” was recently provided by description of the gel-like performance of G-layer upon drying (large shrinkage [8,10-12] and high rigidification [13]), and hydrogel type of structure, which has special characteristics of mesoporosity. G-layer has high content of mesopores (pore size between 2 nm and 50 nm); in tension wood fibers the pore surface areas may be more than 30 times higher than that in normal wood as was revealed by nitrogen adsorption technique [8, 14]. Mesoporosity was suggested as a new parameter for G-layer characterization [14].
Gelatinous cell-wall layer is deposited inward to the xylan type secondary wall layers; the degree of S-layer development in fibers with G-layer differs from well pronounced, like in tension wood [15], to barely detectable, as in flax [2]. Though not appropriately recognized, this type of fibers is widespread and is present in various organs of plants from many taxa [2,3]. Among others, phloem fibers of flax, hemp, and ramie, gelatinous fibers of tension wood, some fibers of bamboo and
Specific characteristics of the gelatinous layer of cell wall include: a) the overwhelming content of cellulose (80-90%); b) high crystallinity of cellulose; c) very low angle of cellulose microfibrils, which are laid almost parallel to the fiber’s longitudinal axis throughout the whole layer; d) considerable thickness, which in some species can reach more than 15 μm; e) the absence of xylan, f) the absence of lignin, g) special composition of matrix polysaccharides, presented mostly by galactose-containing pectins with rhamnogalacturonan backbone; h) high water content, as compared to S-layers, i) mesoporosity, j) exclusive presence in fibers, and, as discussed below, k) contractile properties.
The very peculiar characteristic of fibers with the gelatinous cell wall is their contractile properties. Such fibers may serve to move the plant parts in space. For instance, the tension wood fibres contract longitudinally during differentiation and generate longitudinal tensile stresses of up to about 70 MPa [19], providing rightning force in the tilted tree. A high-tensile growth stress generated on the surface of the xylem in the tension wood region often becomes ten times as large as that in the normal wood region [20]. The ability of a plant organ to contract is proportional to the degree of the development of fibers with G-layers [21,22].
Plants do not possess animal-type muscles, which contract due to protein-protein interactions. However, they have a different mechanism, which has the ability to move even very heavy plant parts in space. This mechanism is specifically developed in cellulosic fibers. Their contractile properties are based on tension developing within the specially designed thick cell walls. The efficacy of such fibers is remarkable. Thus, the gelatinous fibers may to a certain extent be named as “cell-wall-based plant muscles”, though they do not have the ability to relax and the time-scale of their contraction is very different from that of animal muscles.
The examples of contractile action of cellulosic fibers (Figure 2) include the restoration of young tree vertical position, if disturbed [15,23], deepening of geophyte shoot in the soil by contraction of roots in the course of adaptive reaction [24], shortening of aerial roots when they reach the soil to form the effective support to heavy branches [21]; correction of lateral branch angle and, in case of apical meristem death, upward bending of lateral branch in order to transform into dominant [25-27]. The cellulosic gelatinous fibers are especially developed in the plants exposed to high mechanical stresses due to high ratio between stem height and stem diameter (most of fiber crops, like flax, hemp, ramie, nettle) [2] – this gives the properties of spring to the plant stem, helping to restore vertical position when disturbed, for example by wind. Such plants, similar to plants with developed tension wood [28,29], also exhibit the pronounced negative gravitropism, being able to turn back to vertical position a long stem, if bent, far away from the growing apical stem region. Cellulosic fibers seem to be present in the spines of cacti [30], and are developed in peduncles helping to support heavy fruits, like in the sausage tree, fruits of which may weight up to 10 kg [31]. The gelatinous fibers were demonstrated to be widely involved in the twining of vines and the coiling of tendrils [32,33].
3. Cellulose microfibrils in gelatinous cell wall
The very specific characteristic of cellulose microfibrils in the gelatinous cell wall is their axial orientation, which is not observed in any other cell wall type of any other but fiber cell type. This is especially remarkable, if one remembers the total thickness of G-layers. The axial orientation of cellulose microfibrils throughout the gelatinous cell wall layer was known long ago [9,34] and was confirmed by several techniques, including microbeam X-ray diffraction [35], wide-angle X-ray scattering [36], and scanning Raman microscopy [24,37]. In accordance to that, cortical microtubules, which are considered to rule the microfibril orientation, are axially oriented during deposition of the gelatinous cell wall layers [38].
In the gelatinous fibers cellulose microfibrils are characterized by a higher degree of crystallinity and a larger size of crystalline regions (crystallites) as compared with most other plant tissues [39, 40]. The diameter of cellulose crystallites was measured in various species by several authors and though the absolute values might differ, the general conclusion was that in G-layers it was larger than in the S-layers [12,35,41-44]. The roentgen structural analysis showed that the diameter of cellulose crystal transverse sections in tension wood G-layer (6.5 nm) is markedly larger than in the neighboring S-layer of the xylan cell wall (about 3 nm), i.e., its section area is approximately fourfold higher [35]. Thus, cellulose microfibrils within the gelatinous layer exist in the form of aggregates. This allowed a supposition that individual cellulose microfibrils, each of which is formed by individual cellulose-synthesizing complex, so-called “rosette”, in the gelatinous layer interact laterally [4]. Such lateral interaction is stimulated due to similar (axial) orientation of all microfibrils, the absence of lignin and of considerable amount of matrix polysaccharides, which separate microfibrils, like in S-layer. Despite the high degree of crystallinity of the cellulose, G-layer has a remarkable hygroscopicity and high water content [37,45].
Cellulose microfibrils in the gelatinous layer are under tension. This was proved by the increase in cellulose lattice spacing revealed by synchrotron radiation microdiffraction [46]. The visual demonstration of tension comes from shrinkage of G-layer along the cell longitudinal axis upon the release of tension, as observed by scanning microscopy of tension wood cross-sections [10].
For a long time, the gelatinous cell wall was believed to be composed of cellulose only [9]. Correspondingly, the ideas on tension origin were based on cellulose microfibril properties. Cellulose microfibrils themselves are virtually incontractible. So, the problem was how to get contraction, having incontractible basis of cellulose microfibrils. One of the possible solutions suggests that the contraction of the fibre is not caused by the G-layer directly, but by interaction of the G-layer with the surrounding S-layer. It was proposed that the origin of tension in cell wall of cellulosic fibers lays in the differential parameters of swelling of the S- and G-layers due to different orientation of cellulose microfibrils [36].
The cell walls with helicoidal orientation of microfibrils increase in length upon swelling, while the ones with axial orientation shrink [47]. The stress–strain-curves of cell walls show the influence of the cellulose microfibril orientation on the deformation behavior of plant tissues [48]. Within plant organism, such differences are indeed exploited in some mechanisms, for instance in opening of pine cones [49]. Fibers and sclereids located at the opposite sides of a cone scale have different angle between the long axis of the cell and the direction of cellulose microfibrils (MFA): it is high in sclerids and low in fibers. Correspondingly, the coefficient of hygroscopic expansion of fibers is significantly lower than that of sclerids. Due to that, the increase in relative humidity leads to the increase of the angle between the scale and the frame, leading to cone opening. Similar is the mechanism of wheat awn opening aimed to seed dispersal [48,50].
Similarly, the differences in swelling of S- and G-layers were suggested to explain the formation of tension in fibers of reaction wood [36]. The idea is based on the established fact that the enzymatic removal of the G-layer lead to the longitudinal extension and tangential shrinkage of tissues within the tension wood slice. It was proposed that in the living plant, a lateral swelling of the G-layer forced the surrounding S-layers to shrink in the axial direction.
Such forces may indeed be the part of the tension creation mechanisms in gelatinous fibers. But: 1) such system would be highly dependent on humidity, same as the openings of pine cones and wheat awns; 2) in some species, like flax or ramie, S-layer in the gelatinous fibers is poorly developed [2] and hardly may serve as a mechanical counterpart of very thick G-layer; 3) mesoporosity of the G-layer is not explained; 4) tension is argumented to be developed within the G-layer itself [10,51]. Finally, specific matrix polysaccharides, which were not considered in the above hypothesis, appear at the onset of G-layer formation.
4. Matrix polysaccharides in cellulosic fibers
The presence of a polymer within a certain cell wall layer is not easy to prove. The biochemical analysis in the majority of studies is usually performed without separation into different cell wall layers, which is rather hard to achieve. In most of the experiments on the analysis of the gelatinous fiber composition, primary cell wall was not detached from the secondary one, and the xylan layers were not separated from the gelatinous ones. Moreover, such analysis is often done on the samples, like wood, which contain complex mixture of various cell types (e.g. parenchyma, vessels, fibers) at different stages of the development. A significant amount of data concerning the composition and structure of the gelatinous type cell walls was obtained by the analysis of phloem fiber bundles, which extreme strength permited their mechanical or enzymatic separation from surrounding tissues. Although gelatinous layers predominate in such fiber cell walls, the primary cell wall and S-layer of the secondary wall are also present. That’s why, for instance, polygalacturonic acid (PGA) or rhamnogalacturonan I (RG I), described in numerous papers on plant fibers (e.g. [52-55] can not be attributed to a certain cell wall layer. The presence of polymers just in the G-layers must be additionally proved.
To do so, several approaches can be used or, better, combined: a) isolation of the G-layers and the biochemical analysis of constituents; b) cytochemistry, including immunocytochemistry; c) the analysis of deposition dynamics: search for the marker monomer, sugar linkage type or other specific characteristic of a certain polysaccharide, the formation of which goes in parallel to the G-layer deposition; pulse-chase experiments with labeled precursors can be especially effective since they permit to exclude the background of previously synthesized polymers; d) tracing the transcription of the identified genes, involved in the metabolism of certain cell wall polysaccharide, in the course of the G-layer formation; e) detection within G-layer of the enzyme or enzymatic activity, involved in modification of matrix polysaccharide, by various types of staining. The best way to analyze the components of the gelatinous cell walls is isolation of the G-layers, like it was done for poplar tension wood [28,56]. To this end, thin tissue sections (20 μm) are prepared and treated with ultrasound; however, this procedure permits obtaining only small amount of the material.
Among neutral monosaccharides present in polymers of the isolated G-layers, rhamnose, arabinose, galactose, and xylose were found along with glucose [56]. The cell wall matrix polysaccharides, which were identified or suggested to be present in the G-layer include xyloglucan [56], arabinogalactan proteins [57], pectic galactan [58], and, probably some arabinans [30]. Usually these polymers are considered to be the components of the primary cell walls. The obtained data on their presence in the G-layer were recently summarized in the review [5], so here we consider them only briefly.
Arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) are highly water soluble polymers, which consist of protein backbone and carbohydrate side chains of variable structure, which can comprise over 90% of the molecule. Glycan component of AGPs has various length chains of β-(1→4)-galactan and β-(1→6)-galactan units, often decorated by terminal arabinose residues and connected to each other by (1→3,1→6)-linked branch points, which are indicative of AGPs. Protein backbone may also vary in structure and is encoded by a large gene family, the several representatives of which are always detected among the most up-regulated upon the G-layer induction genes, both in tension wood [59-62] and in fiber crops [63-65]. Carbohydrate constituents of AGPs were detected within the G-layer by immunocytochemical [57,60], cytochemical (by staining with Yariv reagent) [58,66] and biochemical [56] approaches. AGPs, different both in carbohydrate and protein part of the molecules, are present in many, if not all, plant tissues, but their exact function is still unknown.
There is not much information about another possible constituents of the gelatinous fibers – the arabinans. They were reported to be the major cell wall matrix component of cellulosic fibers in cactus spines [30]. It is not clear if the arabinans are attached to the RG I backbones.
The most substantial evidence for the matrix cell wall polysaccharides of the G-layers was collected on xyloglucan. This cross-linking glycan is composed of a backbone, which is built similar to cellulose molecule as β-(1→4)-glucan. The side chain of xylose, which is sometimes additionally substituted by galactose and further – by fucose, are attached to the backbone. Xyloglucan is the major noncellulosic polysaccharide in the isolated G-layers of poplar tension wood; its content was assessed to be 10–15% of the cell wall mass [28,56,67]. The presence of xyloglucan was detected by several methods, including the biochemical analysis of the types of bonds between monosaccharides and immunocytochemistry. Moreover, the presence of xyloglucan endotransglycosylase, an enzyme providing for connection between the regions of two different xyloglucan molecules, was demonstrated in the G-layers of the secondary cell wall. Two main functions were suggested for xyloglucan in the secondary cell walls of tension wood fibers [67]. The first one is binding of the G-layer to the neighboring xylan layer because xyloglucan and xyloglucan endotransglycosylase are localized just at the boundary between these two layers, as was shown immunocytochemically. The second supposed function is the creation of tension – it will be considered in the next chapter.
One more component of the G-layers is pectic galactan, built as a very complex rhamnogalacturonan I with a high degree of branching and a varying structure of side chains, which are mainly composed of β-(1→4)-galactose [52,58,68]. The predominant monosaccharide in the polymer is galactose, which determines the polymer name as a galactan [69]. The side chains may include only one or two galactose residues; long chains of several tens galactose residues, likely branched side chains, which are not cleaved by galactanase; side chains, decorated with a single pentose, most likely arabinose or a galactose residue connected by other than β-(1→4) linkage [68,70]. This type of pectic galactan is fiber- and stage-specific, being present only in fibers, while forming G-layer [2,71].
Pectic galactan may be of the specific three-dimensional organization, the signs of which are revealed upon the treatment with specific glycanases. The hydrolysis of considerable part of galactose side chains of galactan as well as the partial degradation of its backbone do not change the total hydrodynamic volume, which determines the efficiency of elution from gel-filtration column, and the polymer elutes in the same part of profile, as before enzymatic treatments [68,72]. The unusual property of pectic galactan from the gelatinous fibers is the ability to form water-soluble associates, so that the charged backbone is located at the periphery of it, while the neutral side chains form the core zone (Mikshina, Gorshkova, in preparation).
The presence of the galactan within the gelatinous layer was confirmed by the analysis of the dynamics of its formation, which coincides with the G-layer deposition [71], by immunolocalization of the galactan side chains [71,73-75], by presence of tissue- and stage specific β-(1→4)-galactosidase, the substrate of which is the described galactan [75-77]. The gene of this galactosidase is highly upregulated at the onset of the G-layer formation [63, 78] and the activity is detected within fibers, forming gelatinous cell wall [64,75].
The complex galactans built mainly from β-(1→4)-galactose were found in tension wood fibers in 60-ties of the XXth century [79,80], though the linkage with the RG I backbone was not proved at that time. The content of galactose was even suggested as an indicator of the extent of the G-layer development [81]. However, these old data were actually put away for several decades due to the overwhelming notion that the G-layers were pure cellulosic, so that the published in 2008 paper describing the detection of rhamnogalacturonan I by cytochemical approaches in tension wood of several species was entitled “…gelatinous fibers contain more than just cellulose” [57].
5. Matrix polymers as the causative agent for cellulose tension in gelatinous cell wall
Presence of specific matrix polysaccharides within G-layer suggests their importance for function of cellulosic fibers, including tension creation to form contractile properties. Mellerowicz et al. [4] put forward an idea that matrix polysaccharides are entrapped by laterally interacting cellulose microfibrils. The presence of such entrapped polysaccharides between cellulose microfibrils limits their interaction and results in creation of tension, which underlies specific mechanical properties of cellulosic fibers (Figure 3).
Originally, xyloglucan was proposed as the polymer entrapped by the laterally interacting cellulose microfibrils. Xyloglucan is, indeed, very important for the function of gelatinous fibers in tension wood of some species, like poplar. This is proved by the fact that in transgenic poplars with the expressed gene of fungal xyloglucanase, which decreased the content of xyloglucan, righting of stem basal regions in placed horizontally young plants was completely abolished, while the G-layer formation was not affected [29,82]. The expression of other endoglycanases, which decreased the levels of xylan or arabinogalactan, had no effect on the ability of transgenic plant to exhibit gravitropic reaction, restoring the stem vertical position.
However, the exact function of xyloglucan in tension wood fibers is still a matter of debate. Firstly, xyloglucan was detected in the G-layers only in limited plant species, it was never conclusively reported (though searched) to be present in thick secondary walls of cellulosic fibers in fiber crops, like flax, hemp, etc. Further evidence comes from the analysis of polysaccharides, strongly retained by cellulose microfibrils upon extraction: if entrapped between the interacting laterally cellulose microfibrils, a polymer should not be extracted by the conventional methods and should come out only after degradation of microfibrils by chemical or enzymatic means. However, due to high crystallinity of cellulose in the gelatinous layers, in natural form it is poorly degraded by specific enzymes [66] and thus, has to be first dissolved by corresponding chemicals.
To analyze the polysaccharides, which are especially strongly retained within cell wall, a special protocol was developed [83]. After removal of the extractable polysaccharides by chelators and concentrated alkali, the residual cell wall material was dissolved in solution of lithium chloride in N,N-dimethylacetamide and afterwards cellulose was precipitated by water. Such treatment turned natural cellulose I (with parallel orientation of individual cellulose chains) into cellulose II (with antiparallel orientation of individual cellulose chains) and made it completely degradable by purified cellulase. The matrix polysaccharides, which were present in the fraction, remained in polymeric form, making possible to separate them by gel-filtration for further analysis.
We have compared the composition of matrix polysaccharides, strongly retained by cellulose microfibrils, in fibers with different proportions of the secondary cell walls of xylan and gelatinous types (Figure 4). The polymers from fibers with only xylan type secondary cell wall eluted in the region below 30 kDa. The monosaccharide analysis and antibody binding indicated that the major component of this fraction was xylan. It is known that small proportion of matrix polymers, both in the primary and the secondary cell walls get entrapped by cellulose microfibrils in the process of their crystallization [84,85]. Some polygalacturonic acid was also present, which could be originated from the primary cell wall.
In fibers with the G-layers, the major peak of matrix polysaccharide eluted between 100 and 400 kDa; its predominating component was pectic galactan. This galactan from flax fibers was characterized by various techniques, including 1H and 13C NMR and antibody binging [83]. The ratio between high and low molecular mass peaks on the elution profile depended on the proportion of the S- and G-layers within the fiber cell wall. Antibody to xyloglucan epitopes didn’t bind any fraction on the elution profile.
The proportion of pectic polymers, which were strongly retained by cellulose microfibrils, from their total content in cell wall of the gelatinous type, could be much higher than that of xylan in the S-layers. Such selectivity in entrapping of certain polymers can not be explained by their affinity to cellulose as the charged pectic molecules are far less competitive, compared to xylan. The obtained data suggest the alternative mechanism of interaction between cellulose and pectic galactan, which is specifically developed in cell walls of the gelatinous type.
The above data suggest that in cellulosic fibers it is pectic galactan that is entrapped by laterally interacting cellulose microfibrils. This polymer, due to ability to form associates, can perfectly fit the proposed function in tension creation, as illustrated in Figure 3. In the xylan type of secondary cell wall (a), high content of matrix polysaccharides prevents the lateral interaction of cellulose microfibrils. At low content of matrix polysaccharides in G-layer (b), cellulose microfibrils tend to lateral interactions, giving reason for higher degree of crystallinity and larger size of crystallites. Matrix polysaccharides with high affinity to cellulose, if entrapped (c) won’t cause much of tension. Most effective would be compact polysaccharide of considerable size with low affinity to cellulose (d). Associates of pectic galactan with RG I backbone may be a good choice of Nature for such purpose. They have compact structure of considerable volume, which has poor ability (due to charged surface) to interact with cellulose (e).
Additional arguments for the important role of pectic galactans in creation of tension come from the analysis of the course of the G-layer formation and of
6. Dynamics of the G-layer formation and in muro modifications of cell wall polymer
Formation of a cell wall layer is a complicated event. Partly it is based on the processes of polysaccharides’ self-assembly in specific surroundings. Besides, the cell wall formation may involve modification of the interacting polysaccharides. The very illustrative example of the latter is the remodeling of the deposited G-layer in flax cellulosic fibers. In the dynamics of the G-layer formation two stages are clearly visualized at microscopic investigation of the flax fiber cell wall formation [71,86]. Under electron and/or light microscope, one can see that the inner part of the cell wall has a characteristic appearance of the loose structure where the electron dense parallel bands alternate with light regions; the outer part has much more homogenous structure (Figure 5). These two parts of the cell wall are designated as the Gn- and G-layers. During formation of the secondary cell wall, the thickness of outer layer gradually increases, while additional portions of the Gn-layer are added by the protoplast. This indicates that with time the Gn-layer is transformed into the G-layer.
Transition from the Gn- to G-layer is coupled with changes in cellulose crystallinity. It is confirmed by the cytochemical analysis using the enzyme–gold complex, which showed that as distinct from G-layer, Gn-layer poorly bound cellobiohydrolase, the substrate of which is crystalline cellulose [58,87]. Besides, in pulse-chase experiments with 14СО2 with intact flax plant, the dynamics of cellulose crystallization in fiber-enriched peels from all other analyzed samples. In roots, stem xylem, and stem apical part, which do not contain fibers with the gelatinous cell wall, the proportion of crystalline cellulose did not change during the entire experiment, while in fibers starting at the same level as in other tissues, it increased twice through the first day of chase and only later attained the plateau, which was at much higher level than in other tissues [88] (Figure 6). This indicated that crystallization of cellulose microfibrils in the G-layer was a biphasic process: the first stage occured right after the individual cellulose chain synthesis, similar to other plant tissues, while the second stage, which gave additional increase in crystallinity, occured
The Gn- and G-layers differently bind not only cellobiohydrolase probe, but also the LM5 antibody, which is specific for β-(1→4)-galactan [89]. With LM5 the number of gold particles per area unit in the Gn-layer was fivefold higher than in the G-layer [71]. So, the reverse pattern was observed with binding the probes for cellulose crystallinity and for pectic galactan. Keeping in mind that antibody binding depends not only on the presence of the epitope but also on its availability, we consider it possible to suppose that changes in the degree of cellulose crystallization were related to
The pectic galactans are subjected to intensive
The detected differences between the nascent and entrapped galactans suggested that they might be the result of
Shortening of the galactan side chains permits microfibril lateral interaction, due to which an additional portion of galactan is captured by them. The necessity of pectic galactan modification with the participation of β-galactosidase for the remodeling of cell wall supramolecular structure and transformation of the Gn-layer into mature the G-layer was demonstrated [75]. The role of fiber-specific β-galactosidase in providing the particular mechanical properties of gelatinous fibers was confirmed with transgenic flax plants (reduced galactan modifications – less mechanical strength) [75]. Antibodies raised to fiber-specific β-galactosidase of flax, revealed similar protein in the G-layers of cellulosic fibers in other plants (poplar tension wood fibers and both primary and the secondary phloem fibers of hemp), indicating that the process of the G-layer remodeling may be similar in fibers of different origin [77].
Thus, in the last several years the views on matrix polysaccharides of the gelatinous cell walls have changed dramatically: from rejecting their presence – to ascribing the major role to them in the development and function of cellulosic fibers.
7. Conclusions and perspectives for future research
Summary of our ideas on the cell wall design of cellulosic fibers and the origin of their contractile properties include the following statements, based on the considered in the current review literature data and our own results:
Tension is caused due to lateral interaction of cellulose microfibrils and entrapment of matrix polysaccharides.
Lateral interaction is possible because of very high cellulose content, absence of xylan and lignin.
Similar axial orientation of all cellulose microfibrils in thick G-layer helps to cumulate tension of individual microfibrils and to develop it in the necessary direction. The effect is increased due to extreme length of fiber cells.
The entrapped polysaccharide – complex rhamnogalacturonan I with galactan side chains of specific structure and distribution, which is able to form water-soluble associates.
Entrapment of such associates leads to increased mesoporosity and to the development of cellulose microfibril tension.
High hydroscopic capacity of RG I helps to keep water in the G-layer.
Conditions for lateral interaction of cellulose microfibrils may be provided by
Additional important factors may be the interaction of the G-layer with the S-layer through the action of xyloglucan-modifying enzyme, the activity of which is mainly detected at the boundary between layers, and/or different deformation behavior of the S- and the G-layers upon swelling due to different orientation of cellulose microfibrils.
Cellulosic fibers are the example of very peculiar cell wall type. Its formation includes significant reprogramming of synthesis and secretion of matrix polysaccharides, reorientation of cellulose microfibrils, active remodeling of the deposited cell wall layers, specific inter- and intra-molecular interactions between cell wall polymers. The study of these processes may give additional clues for general understanding of the plant cell wall formation, which still belongs to the most enigmatic biological processes. Of special interest is the investigation of specific three-dimensional organization of pectic galactans from cellulosic fibers in order to elucidate the largely unknown principles of supramolecular structure of complex polysaccharides. Comparison of the gelatinous cell wall formation in fibers of various organs may help to figure out the biological determinants of plant fiber yield and quality in order to improve the characteristics of plant biomass for effective conversion into biofuels and bio-based products.
Acknowledgement
This work was partially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 11-04-01602), and the Program of State Support of Leading Scientific Schools (project no. 825.2012.4, 12-04-31418).
References
- 1.
Plant Cell Walls. New York: Garland Science;Albersheim P. Darvill A. Roberts K. Sederoff R. Staehelin A. 2011 - 2.
Gorshkova T. A. Gurjanov O. P. Mikshina P. V. Ibragimova N. N. Mokshina N. E. Salnikov V. V. Ageeva M. V. Amenitskii S. I. Chernova T. E. Chemikosova S. B. Specific Type of Secondary Cell Wall Formed by Plant Fibers 2010 57 328 - 3.
Gorshkova T. Brutch N. Chabbert B. Deyholos M. Hayashi T. Lev-yadun S. Mellerowicz E. J. Morvan C. Neutelings G. Pilate G. Plant Fiber Formation: State of the Art, Recent and Expected Progress, and Open Questions 2012 31 3 201 228 - 4.
Mellerowicz E. J. Immerzeel P. Hayashi T. Xyloglucan: the Molecular Muscle of Trees Annals of Botany2008 102 659 - 5.
Mellerowicz E. Gorshkova T. A. Tensional Stress Generation in Gelatinous Fibres: a Review and Possible Mechanism Based on Cell-Wall Structure and Composition. 2012 63 2 551 565 - 6.
Bledzki A. K. Gassan J. Composites Reinforced with Cellulose Based Fibres 1999 24 221 - 7.
Biofibres and Biocomposites. Carbohydrate PolymersJacob M. Thomas S. 2008 71 343 - 8.
Di Renzo F, Yamamoto H, Quignard F.Clair B. Gril J. Characterization of a Gel in the Cell Wall to Elucidate the Paradoxical Shrinkage of Tension Wood. 2008 9 494 - 9.
Physical and Chemical Properties of Gelatinous Layer in Tension Wood Fibers of Aspen (Populus Tremula L.). HolzforschungNorberg P. H. Meier H. 1966 20 174 - 10.
Clair B. Thibault B. Shrinkage of the Gelatinous Layer of Poplar and Beech Tension Wood 2001 22 121 - 11.
Yamamoto H. Abe K. Arakawa Y. Okuyama T. Gril J. Role of the Gelatinous Layer (G-Layer) on the Origin of the Physical Properties of the Tension Wood of Acer Sieboldianum 2005 51 222 - 12.
Yamamoto H. Ruelle J. Arakawa Y. Yoshida M. Clair B. Gril J. Origin of the Characteristic Hygro-Mechanical Properties of the Gelatinous Layer in Tension Wood from Kunugi Oak (Quercus Acutissima) 2010 44 149 - 13.
Clair B. Ruelle J. Thibaut B. Relationship between Growth Stress, Mechanical-Physical Properties and Proportion of Fibre with Gelatinous Layer in Chestnut (Castanea Sativa Mill.) 2003 57 189 - 14.
Di Renzo F, Quignard F, Zhao GJ, Yamamoto H, Gril J.Chang S. S. Clair B. Ruelle J. Beauchene J. Mesoporosity as a New Parameter for Understanding Tension Stress Generation in Trees 2009 60 3023 - 15.
Unraveling Cell Wall Formation in the Woody Dicot Stem. Plant Molecular BiologyMellerowicz E. J. Baucher M. Sundberg B. Boerjan W. 2001 47 239 - 16.
Wyatt S. E. Sederoff R. Flaishman M. A. Lev-yadun S. Arabidopsis Thaliana as a Model for Gelatinous Fiber Formation 2010 57 3 363 367 - 17.
Reaction Tissue Formation and Stem Tensile Modulus Properties in Wild-Tipe and P-Coumarate-3- Hydroxylase Downregulated Lines of Alfalfa, Medicago Sativa (Fabaceae). American Journal of BotanyPatten A. M. Jourdes M. Brown E. E. Laborie M-P. Davin L. B. Lewis N. G. 2007 94 6 912 925 - 18.
Chernova T. E. Gorshkova T. A. Biogenesis of Plant Fibers 2007 38 221 - 19.
Okuyama T. Yamamoto H. Yoshida M. Hattori Y. Archer R. R. Growth Stresses in Tension Wood: Role of Microfibrils and Lignification Annals of Forest Science1994 51 291 - 20.
Role of the Gelatinous Layer on the Origin of the Physical Properties of the Tension Wood. Journal of Wood ScienceYamamato H. 2004 50 197 - 21.
Zimmermann M. H. Wardrop A. B. Tomlinson P. B. Tension Wood in Aerial Roots of Ficus Benjamina L. Wood Science Technology1968 2 95 - 22.
Fang C. H. Clair B. Gril J. Liu S. Q. Growth Stresses are Highly Controlled by the Amount of G-Layer in Poplar Tension Wood 2008 29 237 - 23.
Pilate G. Chabbert B. Cathala B. Yoshinaga A. Leple J. C. Laurans F. Lapierre C. Ruel K. Lignification and Tension Wood. 2004 327 889 - 24.
Burgert I. G-Fibres in Storage Roots of Trifolium Pretense (Fabaceae): Tensile Stress Generators for Contraction. The Plant JournalSchreiber N. Gierlinger N. Putz N. Fratzl P. Neinhuis C. 2010 61 854 - 25.
Fisher J. B. Stevenson J. W. Occurrence of Reaction Wood in Branches of Dicotyledons and Its Role in Tree Architecture Botanical Gazette1981 142 82 - 26.
Hsu Y. S. Chen S. J. Lee C. M. Kuo-huang L. L. Anatomical Characteristics of the Secondary Phloem in Branches of Zelkova Serrata Makino 2005 46 143 - 27.
Tension Wood Formation Following Release of Upland Oak Advance Reproduction. Journal Wood and Fiber ScienceHamilton J. R. Thomas C. K. Carvell K. L. 1985 17 3 380 390 - 28.
swst metapress.com/content/q70t6764831872r1/ (accessed 27 June2007 - 29.
Kaku T. Serada S. Baba K. Tanaka F. Hayashi T. Proteomic Analysis of the G-Layer in Poplar Tension Wood 2009 55 250 - 30.
Hayashi T. Kaida R. Kaku T. Baba K. Loosening Xyloglucan Prevents Tensile Stress in Tree Stem Bending but Accelerates the Enzymatic Degradation of Cellulose 2010 57 316 - 31.
Vignon M. R. Heux L. Malainine M. E. Mahrouz M. Arabinan-Cellulose Composite in Opuntia Ficus-Indica Prickly Pear Spines. Carbohydrate Rese arch2004 339 1 123 131 - 32.
Sivan P. Mishra P. Rao K. S. Occurrence of Reaction Xylem in the Peduncle of Couroupita Guianensis and Kigelia Pinnata 2010 31 203 - 33.
Meloche C. G. Knox J. P. Vaughn K. C. A Cortical Band of Gelatinous Fibers Causes the Coiling of Redvine Tendrils: a Model Based upon Cytochemical and Immunocytochemical Studies 2007 225 485 - 34.
Bowling A. J. Vaughn K. C. Gelatinous Fibers are Widespread in Coiling Tendrils and Twining Vines 2009 96 719 - 35.
Dadswell H. E. Wardrop A. B. The Structure and Properties of Tension Wood 1955 9 97 - 36.
Direct Investigation of the Structural Properties of Tension Wood Cellulose Microfibrils Using Microbeam X-Ray Fibre Diffraction. HolzforschungMüller M. Burghammer M. Sugiyama J. 2006 60 474 - 37.
Dunlop JWC, Jungnikl K, Eder M, Gierlinger N, Coutand C, Jeronimidis G, Fratzl P, Burgert I.Goswami L. Stress Generation in the Tension Wood of Poplar is Based on the Lateral Swelling Power of the G-Layer 2008 56 531 - 38.
Gierlinger N. Schwanninger M. Chemical Imaging of Poplar Wood Cell Walls by Confocal Raman Microscopy Plant Physiology2006 140 1246 - 39.
Sal’nikov VV, Snegireva AV, van Dam JEG, van Veenendaal WLH, Emons AMC, Gorshkova TA, van Lammeren AAM.Ageeva M. V. Petrovska B. Kieft H. Intrusive Growth of Flax Phloem Fibers is of Intercalary Type Planta2005 222 565 - 40.
Viëtor R. J. Newman R. H. Ha M. A. Apperley D. C. Jarvis M. C. Conformational Features of Crystal-Surface Cellulose from Higher Plants Plant Journal2002 30 721 - 41.
Sturcova A. His I. Apperley D. C. Sugiyama J. Jarvis M. C. Structural Details of Crystalline Cellulose from Higher Plants. Biomacromoles2004 5 1333 - 42.
Washusen R. Evans R. The Association Between Cellulose Crystallite Width and Tension Wood Occurrence in Eucalyptus Globulus 2001 22235 243 - 43.
Hillis W. E. Evans R. Washusen R. An Unusual Formation of Tension Wood in a Natural Forest Acacia sp. 2004 58 241 - 44.
Growth Stresses and Cellulose Structural Parameters in Tension and Normal Wood from Three Tropical Rainforest Angiosperms Species. BioresourcesRuelle J. Yamamoto H. Thibaut B. 2007 2 235 - 45.
Enlargement of Individual Cellulose Microfibrils in Transgenic Poplars Over Expressing Xyloglucanase. Journal of Wood ScienceYamamoto M. Saito T. Isogai A. Kurita M. Kondo T. Taniguchi T. Kaida R. Baba K. Hayashi T. 2011 57 71 - 46.
Abe K. Yamamoto H. The Influences of Boiling and Drying Treatments on the Behaviors of Tension Wood with Gelatinous Layers in Zelkova Serrata 2007 53 5 - 47.
Clair B. Almeras T. Pilate G. Jullien D. Sugiyama J. Riekel C. Maturation Stress Generation in Poplar Tension Wood Studied by Synchrotron Radiation Microdiffraction. 2010 152 1650 - 48.
Burgert I. Eder M. Gierlinger N. Fratzl P. Tensile and Compressive Stresses in Tracheids are Induced by Swelling Based on Geometrical Constraints of the Wood Cell 2007 226 981 - 49.
Burgert I. Fratzl P. Plants Control the Properties and Actuation of Their Organs through the Orientation of Cellulose Fibrils in Their Cell Walls. 2009 49 69 - 50.
Vincent JFV, Rocca AM.Dawson C. How Pine Cones Open 1997 668 EOF - 51.
Elbaum R. Gorb S. Fratzl P. Structures in the Cell Wall that Enable Hygroscopic Movement of Wheat Awns. 2008 164 101 - 52.
Clair B. Almeras T. Pilate G. Jullien D. Sugiyama J. Riekel C. Maturation Stress Generation in Poplar Tension Wood Studied by Synchrotron Radiation Microdiffraction. 2011 155 562 - 53.
Herve du Penhoat C, Morvan C Isolation and N.M.R. Study of Pectins from Flax (Linum usitatissirnum L.). Carbohydrate ResearchDavis E. A. Derouet C. 1990 197 205 - 54.
Mooney C. Stolle-smits T. Schols H. De Jong E. Analysis of Retted and Non Retted Flax Fibres by Chemical and Enzymatic Means. 2001 89 205 - 55.
Morvan C. Andeme-onzighi C. Girault R. Himmelsbach D. S. Driouich A. Akin D. E. Building Flax Fibres: More Than One Brick in the Walls Plant Physiology and Biochemistry2003 41 935 - 56.
Cronier D. Monties B. Chabbert B. Structure and Chemical Composition of Bast Fibers Isolated from Developing Hemp Stem. 2005 53 8279 - 57.
Xyloglucan Endotransglycosylase (XET) Functions in Gelatinous Layers of Tension Wood Fibers in Poplar- A Glimpse into the Mechanism of the Balancing Act of Trees. Plant and Cell PhysiologyNishikubo N. Awano T. Banasiak A. Bourquin V. Ibatullin F. Funada R. Brumer H. Teeri T. T. Hayashi T. Sundberg B. Mellerowicz E. J. 2007 48 843 - 58.
Bowling A. J. Vaughn K. C. Immunocytochemical Characterization of Tension Wood: Gelatinous Fibers Contain More Than Just Cellulose 2008 95 655 - 59.
Secondary Cell-Wall Assembly in Flax Phloem Fibers: Role of Galactans. PlantaGorshkova T. Morvan C. 2006 223 149 - 60.
Expressed Sequence Tags from Poplar Wood Tissues- a Comparative Analysis from Multiple Libraries. Plant BiologyDejardin A. Leple J-C. Lesage-descauses M-C. Costa G. Pilate G. 2004 6 55 - 61.
Lafarguette F. Leple J-C. Dejardin A. Laurans F. Costa G. Lesage-descauses M-C. Pilate G. Poplar Genes Encoding Fasciclin-Like Arabinogalactan Proteins are Highly Expressed in Tension Wood 2004 164 107 - 62.
Andersson-gunneras S. Mellerowicz E. J. Love J. Segerman B. Ohmiya Y. Coutinho P. M. Nilsson P. Henrissat B. Moritz T. Sundberg B. Biosynthesis of Cellulose-Enriched Tension Wood in Populus: Global Analysis of Transcripts and Metabolites Identifies Biochemical and Developmental Regulators in Secondary Wall Biosynthesis. 2006 45 144 - 63.
Qiu D. Wilson I. W. Gan S. Washusen R. Moran G. F. Southerton S. G. Gene Expression in Eucalyptus Branch Wood with Marked Variation in Cellulose Microfibril Orientation and Lacking G-Layers New Phytology2008 179 94 - 64.
Roach M. J. Deyholos M. K. Microarray Analysis of Flax (Linum Usitatissimum L.) Stems Identifies Transcripts Enriched in Fibre-Bearing Phloem Tissues 2007 278 149 - 65.
Roach M. J. Deyholos M. K. Microarray Analysis of Developing Flax Hypocotyls Identifies Novel Transcripts Correlated with Specific Stages of Phloem Fibre Differentiation Annals of Botany2008 102 317 - 66.
Gene Expression in Tension Wood and Bast Fibers. Russian Journal of Plant PhysiologyHobson N. Roach M. J. Deyholos M. K. 2010 57 339 - 67.
Girault R. His I. Andeme-onzighi C. Driouich A. Morvan C. Identification and Partial Characterization of Proteins and Proteoglycans Encrusting the Secondary Cell Walls of Flax Fibres. 2000 211 256 - 68.
Mellerowicz E. Sundberg B. Wood Cell Walls: Biosynthesis, Developmental Dynamics and Their Implication for Wood Properties. 2008 11 293 - 69.
van Dam JEG.Gurjanov O. P. Gorshkova T. A. Kabel M. A. Schols H. A. MALDI-TOF MS Evidence for the Linking of Flax Bast Fibre Galactan to Rhamnogalacturonan Backbone 2007 67 86 - 70.
Gorshkova T. A. Wyatt S. E. Salnikov V. V. Gibeaut D. M. Ibragimov M. R. Lozovaya V. V. Carpita N. C. Cell-Wall Polysaccharides of Developing Flax Plants Plant. Physiology1996 110 2 721 729 - 71.
Mikshina P. V. Gurjanov O. P. Mukhitova F. K. Petrova A. A. Shashkov A. S. Gorshkova T. A. Structural Details of Pectic Galactan from the Secondary Cell Walls of Flax (Linum Usitatissimum L.) Phloem Fibres 2012 87 853 - 72.
van Dam JEG.Gorshkova T. A. Chemikosova S. B. Salnikov V. V. Pavlencheva N. V. Gurjanov O. P. Stoll-smits T. Occurrence of Cell-Specific Galactan is Coinciding with Bast Fibre Developmental Transition in Flax 2004 19 217 - 73.
Pectins in Secondary Cell Walls: Modifications during Cell Wall Assembly and Maturation. In: Schols HA, Visser RGF, Voragen AGJ. (eds) Pectins and Pectinases. Wageningen: Academic Publishers;Gorshkova A. Mikshina P. V. Ibragimova N. N. Mokshina N. E. Chernova T. E. Gurjanov O. P. Chemikosova S. B. 2009 149 164 - 74.
Polar-Localized Poplar K+ Channel Capable of Controlling Electrical Properties of Wood-Forming Cells. PlantaArend M. Stinzing A. Wind C. Langer K. Latz A. Ache P. Fromm J. Hedrich R. 2005 223 140 - 75.
Salnikov V. V. Ageeva M. V. Gorshkova T. A. Homofusion of Golgi Secretory Vesicles in Flax Phloem Fibers during Formation of Gelatinous Secondary Cell Wall. 2008 233 269 - 76.
Roach M. J. Mokshina N. Y. Snegireva A. V. Badhan A. Hobson N. Deyholos M. K. Gorshkova T. A. Development of Cellulosic Secondary Walls in Flax Fibers Requires ß-Galactosidase. Plant Phy siology2011 156 1351 - 77.
Gorshkova TA Free Galactose and Galactosidase Activity in the Course of Flax Fiber Development. Russian Journal of Plant PhysiologyMikshina P. V. Chemikosova S. B. Mokshina N. E. Ibragimova N. N. 2009 56 58 - 78.
Mokshina N. E. Ibragimova N. N. Salnikov V. V. Amenitskii S. I. Gorshkova T. A. Galactosidase of Plant Fibers with Gelatinous Cell Wall: Identification and Localization 2012 59 2 246 254 - 79.
Genomics of plant fibers. Mutants with modified character of the fiber development. In: Gorshkova T. (ed.) Biogenesis of plant fibers. Moscow: Nauka;Amenitsky S. I. Snegireva A. V. Gorshkova T. A. 2009 189 207 - 80.
Meier H. Studies on a Galactan from Tension Wood of Beech (Fagus Silvatica L.) Acta Chemica Scandinavica1962 16 2275 - 81.
Isolation and Characterization of a Galactan from Tension Wood of American beech (Fagus Grandifolia Ehrl.). Svensk PapperstidKuo C. M. Timell T. E. 1969 72 703 - 82.
Goring DAI.Ruel K. Barnoud F. Lamellation in the S2 Layer of Softwood Tracheids as Demonstrated by Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy 1978 12 4 287 291 - 83.
Baba K. Park Y. W. Kaku T. Kaida R. Takeuchi M. Yoshida M. Hosoo Y. Ojio Y. Okuyama T. Taniguchi T. Ohmiya Y. Kondo T. Shani Z. Shoseyov O. Awano T. Serada S. Norioka N. Norioka S. Hayashi T. Xyloglucan for Generating Tensile Stress to Bend Tree Stem. 2009 2 893 - 84.
Gurjanov O. P. Ibragimova N. N. Gnezdilov O. I. Gorshkova T. A. Polysaccharides, Tightly Bound to Cellulose in Cell Wall of Flax Bast Fibre: Isolation and Identification 2008 72 719 - 85.
Hayashi T. Xyloglucans in the primary cell wall Plant Physiology. Plant Molecular Biology1989 40 139 - 86.
Pauly M. Albersheim P. Darvill A. York W. S. Molecular Domains of the Cellulose/Xyloglucan Network in the Cell Walls of Higher Plants. Plant Journal1999 20 629 - 87.
The Ultrastructure of Bast Fibers. Russian Journal of Plant PhysiologySalnikov V. V. Ageeva M. V. Yumashev V. N. Lozovaya V. V. 1993 40 458 - 88.
Andeme-onzighi C. Girault R. His I. Morvan C. Driouich A. Immunocytochemical Characterization of Early-Developing Flax Fiber Cell Walls 2000 213 235 - 89.
Gorshkova T. A. Chemikosova S. B. Lozovaya V. V. Carpita N. C. Turnover of Galactans and Other Cell Wall Polysaccharides during Development of Flax Plants. Plant Physiology1997 114 2 723 729 - 90.
Localization of Pectic Galactan in Tomato Cell Wall Using a Monoclonal Antibody Specific to (1?4)-ß-D-Galactan. Plant PhysiologyJones L. Seymour G. Knox J. P. 1997 113 1405