Chapters authored
Vegetation Dynamics. Natural versus Cultural and the Regeneration Potential. The Example of Sahara-Sahel
There is a principal and controversial debate on the so-called ‘Greening-Regreening’ of the Sahel. There still is the old philosophy of an expanding/shrinking ecosystem Sahara versus Sahel. In some concepts, it is presented as annual. Another concept is based on a general degradation of the Sahelian savannas – in some cases with a decline to a lower state of ecological equilibrium after a short period of resilience. Anyhow, there are also signs of still ongoing regeneration processes of vegetation and soil. The main problem, however, lies in the principal lack of terrestrial observation and in the confusion of terms. This mostly concern on vegetation units and their dynamics. The goal of this article is to explain the general nature of the Sahara and the Sahel based on maps and graphs. We try to analyse the dynamics of boundaries during the last 200 years. The main results are the tripartite nature of the Sahara, divided into semidesert, desert and Saharan savanna with relatively stable boundaries. A reconstruction of the vegetation for the last 200 years confirmed the position of these borderlines even under different states of the plant cover. It also revealed the nature of Sahelian savannas as cultural landscapes – in higher diversity and density. It is also possible that the North Sahelian savannas had been for long times under the dynamics of elephant landscapes. A high-resolution sediment and pollen record from the Middle Sahel of Niger evidenced the high diversity and resilience up to the severe drought of the 1970s. It was a definite stroke from which these savannas never reached again their former diversity despite a slide recovery named ‘Regreening’. The various projects for regeneration or conservation in Sahara or Sahel differ in two types of projects. The one is the installation of Nature Reserves/National Parks with special reserves for emblematic animals as keystone organisms and an auto-regeneration of vegetation and soil. The other type consists of pasture rotation projects such as in the Malian Gourma or in the Central Air Mts. The first initiative resulted in the decade-long protection against the severe degradations, which were typical for the surrounding regions. The rotation system was based on timewise open wells and of observed pasture status. It was conceived together with the local populations and has been respected until the invasion of northern cattle keepers during the peak of drought in 1984. After severe quarrels, the system collapsed and the savannas degraded heavily. A comparable project worked in the central Air Mts. for 5 years. Remarkable results have been, but the rebellion of the 1990s, put a sudden end on it. The general insecurity of the last decades caused by civil war and/or various terrrorist groups led to a re-evaluation of a great number of regeneration initiatives including the pharaonic ‘Great Green Wall’, a continent wide forest belt. However, smaller projects on the village level may better develop as they are under the responsability of local population, which can reactivate their long experience. The ‘regreening’ might be restricted to the region of the southern Sahara and the northern Sahel as well as to the traditional park systems. Anyhow, even if a long-time amelioration of production systems will happen, the former must be regarded on the background of a rapidly increasing demography.
Part of the book: Plant Communities and Their Environment