Summary of the electronic properties of the FeCl3-doped SLG used.
Abstract
The inherent complexity of the structures of active-matrix (AM) organic light-emitting diode (OLED) displays severely limits not only their size but also device performance. Surface-emitting organic light-emitting transistors (OLETs) may offer an attractive alternative to AM displays. We report some characteristics of vertical-type OLETs (VOLETs) composed of a source electrode of low-dimensional materials and an emissive channel layer. With a functionalized graphene source, it is shown that the full-surface electroluminescent emission of a VOLET can be effectively controlled by the gate voltage with a high luminance on/off ratio (104). The current efficiency and effective aperture ratios were observed to be more than 150% of those of a control OLED, even at high luminances exceeding 500 cd m−2. Moreover, high device performance of micro-VOLET pixels has been also successfully demonstrated using inkjet-patterned emissive channel layers. These significant improvements in the device performance were attributed to the effective gate-voltage-induced modulation of the hole tunneling injection at the source electrode.
Keywords
- organic light-emitting diode (OLED)
- organic light-emitting transistor (OLET)
- vertical-type OLETs
- graphene
- on/off ratio
- aperture ratio
- inkjet printing
- tunneling injection
1. Introduction
In recent years, researchers of state-of-the-art electronics utilizing organic semiconducting materials have succeeded in advancing various devices, such as organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), photovoltaic cells, organic thin-film transistors (OTFTs), and sensors, among others [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. Among these, intensive efforts in OLEDs have led to high brightness, efficiency, and full-color electroluminescent (EL) emissions for various light-emitting optoelectronic devices [7, 8, 9, 10]. The advantages of such OLEDs over conventional liquid crystal displays (LCDs) are well known, especially for high-quality displays in terms of their viewing angle, response time, thickness, and contrast ratio [11]. For instance, small OLED displays are constructed on an array of thin-film transistor (TFT) switches, allowing precise control of the states of the pixels [12, 13, 14]. In such active-matrix OLEDs (AM-OLEDs), the OLED is driven in the current mode; thus, at least two TFTs, in this case a switching TFT to select a pixel and a driving TFT to operate the OLED, are required, as shown in Figure 1(a) [12, 13]. Perhaps unexpectedly, however, the complexity of such pixel circuit designs with their sophisticated procedures has led to a significantly limited light-emitting area and aperture ratio (the light-emitting area as a fraction of the total area of the device, typical aperture ratios: 25–34%) [13, 14, 15], introducing severe problems associated with limited device performance and limited display sizes for AM-OLEDs. Besides these issues, fundamental factors related to the architecture of the OLED itself, such as exciton quenching and photon loss, also still limit the efficiency and brightness of these devices.
To overcome some of the limitations of (AM-)OLEDs, research on different structures and materials is currently yielding new developments [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. Among these, organic light-emitting transistors (OLETs), such as static-induction-transistor OLETs (SIT-OLETs) [17, 18], metal-insulator-semiconductor OLETs (MIS-OLETs) [19], lateral-type OLETs [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29], and vertical-type OLETs (VOLETs) [30], have been devised by integrating the capability of the OLED to generate EL light with the switching functionality of a field-effect transistor (FET) into a single device structure. In these OLETs, the current that flows through emissive semiconductor channel layers can be controlled by the gate voltage, which can also change the EL emission brightness state from the dark off- to the bright on-state. The on-state implies that holes and electrons injected into the channel layer form excitons that recombine radiatively to generate EL light [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. These OLETs are of key interest; not only do they provide a novel device architecture to investigate fundamental optoelectronic properties related to charge carrier injection, transport, and radiative exciton recombination processes in organic semiconducting materials, at the same time OLETs can also be used to develop highly integrated organic optoelectronic devices such as highly bright and efficient light sources, optical communication systems, and electrically driven organic lasers [21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30].
In principle, the luminance from OLETs can be modulated by the gate voltage without any additional driving devices; thus, displays using OLETs have the advantage of greatly reducing both the number of TFTs and the circuit complexity (Figure 1(b)), thereby providing an effective means of increasing the aperture ratio [29]. Hence, OLETs could be a key part of the development of next-generation AM display technology [29]. Indeed, a proof-of-principle device was recently developed using carbon nanotubes (CNTs, Figure 2), delivering a CNT-based vertical-type OLET (CNT-VOLET) [31, 32, 33, 34]. In the CNT-VOLET, a dilute network of CNTs is used as a source electrode, leading to several improvements, such as a high on/off ratio, attributed to the gate-bias-induced modulation of the lateral (or horizontal) Schottky barrier height [31, 32]. Nevertheless, the improvement of the effective aperture ratio (
In this chapter, for the VOLET, the use of a nonporous, homogeneous, smooth, and easily processable graphene layer is described as the source contact, together with an emissive channel layer. Here, the graphene is a two-dimensional (2D) material in the form of a single atomic layer of carbon with a hexagonal lattice structure bonded in the sp2 configuration (Figure 2) [36, 37, 38]. Despite the similar low dimensionality of graphene to CNTs [36, 37], the optoelectric properties of a VOLET based on graphene have not yet been fully characterized. Herein, the fabrication and characterization are described for a simple VOLET with a single-layer graphene (SLG) source contact (Gr-VOLET), capable of efficiently modulating device performance levels with high luminance on/off ratios (~104) upon the application of a gate voltage. The Gr-VOLETs with doped SLG sources with FeCl3 are demonstrated to exhibit greatly improved device performance, especially in their enhanced current efficiency and
2. 2D material electrode: doped CVD graphene
2.1 Preparation of SLG source electrodes
2.2 Characterization of SLGs
In this study, a transferred SLG was investigated as a source contact, where the FeCl3 doping is processed spontaneously during the graphene transfer process [40]. The basic properties of the three SLG sources are shown in Figures 3 and 4 and are summarized in Table 1.
Work function [eV] | Dirac point energy [eV] | Hole mobility [cm2V−1 s−1] | Sheet resistance, [kΩ square−1] |
---|---|---|---|
5.21 | 4.89 | 410 | 1.20 |
In order to identify the SLG used, the surface composition of the SLG on the SiO2/Si substrates was analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Figure 3(a) presents the wide-scan XPS spectra, showing strong photoelectron lines at binding energies of ~104, ~285, and ~531 eV, which are attributed to Si2p, C1s and O1s, respectively. Note that there is no Cu peak in the range of 932–935 eV (Cu2p and Cu2+), implying the complete etching of the Cu foil. In addition, the XPS spectra also revealed small but measurable amounts of Cl and Fe. These are likely residues of the etchant (FeCl3) used during the etching process. When such FeCl3 residues adsorb onto the SLG, the transfer of electrons to the Cl from the SLG (chlorination) [46] induces unintentional p-doping of the SLG.
Figure 3(b) shows the surface morphology of the SLG on the VOLET substrate as measured by a noncontact atomic force microscope (AFM). As indicated by the AFM morphology, the SLG samples exhibit a fairly smooth surface; the SLG presented an AFM morphology that was nearly identical at different positions on the investigated SLG samples with low RMS roughness levels of 1.4–2.0 nm.
The surface-contact potential difference (
where
Next, the transport characteristics of the SLG used were observed by assessing a liquid-gated lateral FET with SLG channels, a Gr-FET, as shown in Figure 3(d). The lateral FET substrate was prepared using the VOLET substrate or a heavily doped n-type Si wafer substrate (0.05-ohm cm) with a thermally grown SiO2 layer (300-nm-thick) as the gate dielectric for the OTFT, together with a laterally patterned metal source and drain electrodes consisting of a Cr layer (5.5-nm-thick) and a Au layer (50-nm-thick) formed on the substrate via a vacuum deposition process with a mask. The channel length (
For the SLG used here, the Gr-FET showed a clear asymmetrical V-shaped
Here, 4.8 eV is the absolute energy level of the ferrocene and ferrocenium (Fc/Fc+) redox couple below the vacuum energy level, and
where
For the SLG studied here, Raman spectroscopy was also carried out using a confocal Raman system with a laser source operating at 514.5 nm (~1 mW on sample surface). As shown in Figure 4(a), the Raman spectra of the SLGs studied here have two strong characteristic peaks, a G band at around ~1580–1600 cm−1, due to the E2g vibration of sp2-bonded carbon atoms, and a 2D band at around ~2644–2665 cm−1, which is a second-order type of vibrational mode caused by the scattering of phonons at the zone boundary [54, 55]. It can be observed that there are very small disorder-induced D bands around ~1340–1350 cm−1, indicating the sparse formation of sp3 bonds due to the relatively few defects in the SLGs studied.
From the Raman peak intensities, it was found that the ratios of the integrated Raman intensities of the G band to the 2D band for the FeCl3-doped SLG were in the approximate range of 1.7–1.8, indicating that the SLGs studied here are high-quality monolayer graphene [55]. Moreover, from the peak positions, it was found that while the G and 2D peaks of the intrinsic undoped SLG are positioned at ~1579 cm−1 and ~2669 cm−1, respectively, the G and 2D peak positions of the SLG used are correspondingly upshifted to ~1585 cm−1 and ~2677 cm−1. Through a comparison of these with other examples in an earlier report of the relationship between the G and 2D peak positions of graphenes [55], it was verified that the SLG used here is p-type doped SLG.
Subsequently, the densities of the defects, the distances between the defects, and the porosities of nano-defects for the SLG were estimated from the ratio of the Raman intensities of the G bands to the D bands, ID/IG, as shown in the Raman spectra above. The density of the defects (
Next, for this SLG, polarized optical microscopy was also carried out using SLG covered with commercial nematic liquid crystals (NLCs, Merck LC ZLI-2293) in a crossed polarization state [58]. As shown in Figure 4(b), the polarized optical microscopic image of a spin-coated NLC layer on the SLG shows large graphene domains (with an average radius of the domains >100 μm) in the form of highly uniform optical retardation, in addition to small domains of several hundreds of nanometers in size [59, 60], clearly indicating that the SLG studied here is high-quality graphene with large-area graphene domains.
3. VOLETs with a doped CVD graphene source
3.1 Fabrication of SLG-based VOLETs
Figure 5 presents a schematic illustration of the structure used and the stages of the fabrication of the SLG-based VOLETs (Gr-VOLETs) with an ITO gate separated by an Al2O3 gate dielectric layer, a SLG source, organic channel layers, and an Al drain. The fabrication steps of the Gr-VOLET investigated are described below. To construct the Gr-VOLET, SLG (4 mm by 20 mm) was transferred onto a VOLET substrate, as mentioned above (Steps 1, 2). The source electrode used was FeCl3-doped SLG. Next, organic semiconducting materials were deposited over the SLG source electrode regions; a channel layer of poly(para-phenylene vinylene) copolymer (known as SY, 70-nm-thick) was coated as an emissive channel layer by spin coating (Step 3), after which a 2-nm-thick electron injection layer of CsF and a 80-nm-thick drain electrode of Al were deposited on the top of the SY channel layer in sequence via thermal deposition at a rate of 0.05 nm s−1 under a base pressure of less than 2.7 × 10−4 Pa (Step 4). Finally, the fabricated device was encapsulated with an epoxy resin in a glove box. The photograph in Figure 5 shows the microscopic morphology of the device cross section as observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM).
3.2 Operating characteristics of Gr-VOLETs
The operating characteristics of the Gr-VOLET were observed using a luminance meter in conjunction with two source meters. To operate the Gr-VOLETs, source-drain voltage
Figure 6 shows the EL light emissions of a Gr-VOLET operating under different
The output current and luminance characteristics of the Gr-VOLET were investigated as described below. For comparative purposes, the diode characteristics of the Gr-VOLET were also observed with the gate electrodes isolated from the external circuits (Gr-OLED). As shown in Figure 7, the current density-voltage (
Interestingly, as shown in Figure 7, at
Next, the device performance,
Next, the
3.3 Charge injection process at SLG sources
At this point, our investigation turns to the hole injection mechanism at the interface between the SY channel layer and the SLG source. To be injected across the interface (SLG/SY), the holes must overcome the barrier height at the interface either via thermionic emission or tunneling processes [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68]. Figure 9(a) shows examples of Fowler-Nordheim (F-N) curves [63, 64, 65, 66, 67] for the Gr-VOLET at various
where
The observations above show the working principle of the Gr-VOLET, as illustrated in the energy-level diagrams in Figure 10. At a given
In addition, notable instances of hysteresis were clearly observed, as shown above. Thus, bistable-like switching operations of a Gr-VOLET can allow novel applications for simple and inexpensive driving schemes together with low power consumption. However, this hysteresis effect may become an issue when attempting to realize high-quality grayscale outcomes and should be carefully, therefore, controlled when preparing the dielectric layer.
3.4 Inkjet-printing arrays of Gr-VOLET micro-pixels
Next, we turn our attention to a micro-pixel fabrication process for the Gr-VOLET using the inkjet-printing technique, as commonly used in solution-processable OLEDs [39, 71, 72]. Here, the inkjet technique used is based on the deposition of a small solvent drop onto an insulator layer, which can be easily redissolved and preferentially redeposited at the edge of the sessile drop (the contact line of the solvent drop), resulting in the formation of a via-hole with the shape of a crater, that is inkjet-etching [39].
To investigate the in situ formation of micro Gr-VOLET pixels created by means of inkjet-etching, an insulating polymer of poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) was introduced as a via-forming material, as P4VP is a hydrophilic polymer that dissolves in dimethyl formamide (DMF), toluene, chloroform, in lower alcohols, and in aqueous mineralic acids [71]. To fabricate a via-hole forming layer, a solution of P4VP with isopropanol (IPA) was spin-coated on top of the light-emitting channel layer of SY pre-coated onto a Gr-VOLET substrate (VOLET substrate/SLG/SY/P4VP). For micro-patterning, an etching solvent of chloroform for P4VP was inkjet-printed on top of the SY/P4VP layers (Figure 11(a)). This inkjet-printed solvent drop of chloroform can dissolve the P4VP layer, and the capillary flow of the solvent pushes the dissolved P4VP from the center to the contact line of droplet due to the coffee ring effect [39, 72, 73, 74], resulting the formation of the via-hole through the P4VP layer. Thus, after the deposition of even a single solvent droplet (~150 pL per droplet) on a 30-nm-thick P4VP film, the P4VP polymers are removed from the printed position and completely etched, forming via-holes through the P4VP layer, of which the inner and outer diameters are ~90 μm and ~120 μm, respectively, and finally uncovering the surface of the underlying SY layer. These P4VP via-holes on the light-emitting SY layer act as micro-patterned pixel openings for the light-emitting active areas of the Gr-VOLETs. Then, to complete the device of an array of micro Gr-VOLETs, the CsF/Al/Ag cathode is deposited following the procedure described in Section 3.1.
Figure 11(a) also presents the switching behavior of EL light emissions from the array of micro Gr-VOLET pixels for two different gate voltages,
Next, the output characteristics of the inkjet-printed Gr-VOLET pixels were investigated. As shown in Figure 11(b), the
4. Conclusions
In summary, herein, graphene-based VOLETs have been explored, consisting of a nonporous, homogeneous, and p-doped SLG source with FeCl3, an Al drain, and an emissive channel layer for efficient switching of the device performance using the gate voltage. Initially, we investigated transferred CVD SLG, which was used as the source electrode. It was found that the SLG used here was unintended p-doped SLG, exhibiting a Dirac point energy of ~4.9 eV and a work function of 5.2 eV with a shift of the Fermi level from the Dirac point and high hole mobility. It is shown that the high device performance capabilities of SLG-based VOLETs were mainly due to the p-doping effects, which were estimated quantitatively and analyzed based on the energy levels of the SLGs. It is also shown that low-drain-voltage operations and increased brightness with a high luminance on/off ratio (~104) can be achieved even at high brightness for the Gr-VOLET without any HIL. Moreover, the current efficiency and effective aperture ratio of the Gr-VOLET were at least 150% higher than those of a control OLED, with low parasitic power consumption of 5%. These significant improvements of the device performance can be attributed to the gate-bias-induced modulation of the hole tunneling injection from the FeCl3-doped SLG source into the emissive channel layer. Further, the feasibility of the simple fabrication process of micro Gr-VOLET pixels, that is, the inkjet-printing technique, was also proven.
The foregoing results demonstrate the notable device performance of the Gr-VOLET with graphene source, indicating considerable promise with respect to the development of high-performance VOLETs. The advances afforded by the Gr-VOLET with reliable switching performance, even at high luminance levels, clearly show its effective light-emitting transistor functionality and make it a feasible candidate for development of new voltage-driving light-emitting devices and/or highly integrated organic optoelectronics. Finally, it will be possible to apply advanced material layers to these Gr-VOLETs, which could lead to more efficient devices that operate even at low voltage levels, enabling the development of inexpensive, large-area, fast, and high-performance AM displays. Further improvements and characterizations are in progress and will be published elsewhere.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean Government (MEST) (2017R1A2A1A17069729).
References
- 1.
Tang CW, VanSlyke SA. Organic electroluminescent diodes. Applied Physics Letters. 1987; 51 :913-915. DOI: 10.1063/1.98799 - 2.
Burroughes JH, Bradley DDC, Brown AR, Marks RN, Mackay K, Friend RH, et al. Light-emitting diodes based on conjugated polymers. Nature. 1990; 347 :539-541. DOI: 10.1038/348352a0 - 3.
Yu G, Gao J, Hummelen JC, Wudl F, Heeger AJ. Polymer photovoltaic cells: Enhanced efficiencies via a network of internal donor-acceptor heterojunctions. Science. 1995; 270 :1789-1791. DOI: 10.1126/science - 4.
Chen HY, Hou J, Zhang S, Liang Y, Yang G, Yang Y, et al. Polymer solar cells with enhanced open-circuit voltage and efficiency. Nature Photonics. 2009; 3 :649-653. DOI: 10.1038/nphoton.2009.192 - 5.
Sirringhaus H, Brown PJ, Friend RH, Nielsen MM, Bechgaard K, Langeveld-Voss BMW, et al. Two-dimensional charge transport in self-organized, high-mobility conjugated polymers. Nature. 1999; 401 :685-688. DOI: 10.1038/44359 - 6.
Bucella SG, Luzio A, Gann E, Thomsen L, McNeill CR, Pace G, et al. Macroscopic and high-throughput printing of aligned nanostructured polymer semiconductors for MHz large-area electronics. Nature Communications. 2015; 6 :8394. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms9394 - 7.
Baldo MA, O’Brien DF, You Y, Shoustikov A, Sibley S, Thompson ME, et al. Highly efficient phosphorescent emission from organic electroluminescent devices. Nature. 1998; 395 :151-154. DOI: 10.1038/25954 - 8.
Wang Q , Ding J, Ma D, Cheng Y, Wang L, Jing X, et al. Harvesting excitons via two parallel channels for efficient white organic LEDs with nearly 100% internal quantum efficiency: Fabrication and emission-mechanism analysis. Advanced Functional Materials. 2009; 19 :84-95. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200800918 - 9.
Gu G, Forrest SR. Design of flat-panel displays based on organic light-emitting devices. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 1998; 4 :83-99. DOI: 10.1109/2944.669473 - 10.
Shinar J, Shinar R. Organic light-emitting devices (OLEDs) and OLED-based chemical and biological sensors: An overview. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2008; 41 :133001. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/13/133001 - 11.
Lin YY, Gundlach DI, Nelson SF, Jackson TN. Pentacene-based organic thin-film transistors. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 1997; 44 :1325-1331. DOI: 10.1109/16.605476 - 12.
Brody TP, Luo FC, Szepesi ZP, Davies DHA. A 6 × 6-in 20-lpi electroluminescent display panel. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices. 1975; 22 :739-748. DOI: 10.1109/T-ED.1975.18214 - 13.
Nam WJ, Kim CY, Lee JH, Park SG, Han MK. 44.3: High-aperture ratio AMOLED pixel design employing VDD line elimination for reducing OLED current density. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 2005; 36 :1456-1459. DOI: 10.1889/1.2036282 - 14.
Nag M, Obata K, Fukui Y, Myny K, Schols S, Vicca P, et al. 20.1: Flexible AMOLED display and gate-driver with self-aligned IGZO TFT on plastic foil. In: SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. Vol. 45. 2014. pp. 248-251. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-0159.2014.tb00068.x - 15.
Ohta S, Chuman T, Miyaguchi S, Satoh H, Tanabe T, Okuda Y, et al. Active matrix driving organic light-emitting diode panel using organic thin-film transistors. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2005; 44 :3678-3681. DOI: 10.1143/jjap.44.3678 - 16.
Perumal A, Fröbel M, Gorantla S, Gemming T, Lüssem B, Eckert J, et al. Novel approach for alternating current (AC)-driven organic light-emitting devices. Advanced Functional Materials. 2012; 22 :210-217. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201100747 - 17.
Kudo K, Tanaka S, Iizuka M, Nakamura M. Fabrication and device characterization of organic light emitting transistors. Thin Solid Films. 2003; 438 :330-333. DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(03)00751-x - 18.
Park B, Takezoe H. Enhanced luminescence in top-gate-type organic light-emitting transistors. Applied Physics Letters. 2004; 85 :1280-1282. DOI: 10.1063/1.1784044 - 19.
Nakamura K, Hata T, Yoshizawa A, Obata K, Endo H, Kudo K. Improvement of metal–insulator–semiconductor-type organic light-emitting transistors. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2008; 47 :1889-1893. DOI: 10.1143/jjap.47.1889 - 20.
Santato C, Capelli R, Loi MA, Murgia M, Cicoira F, Roy VAL, et al. Tetracene-based organic light-emitting transistors: Optoelectronic properties and electron injection mechanism. Synthetic Metals. 2004; 146 :329-334. DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2004.08.028 - 21.
Muccini M. A bright future for organic field-effect transistors. Nature Materials. 2006; 5 :605-613. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1699 - 22.
Muhieddine K, Ullah M, Pal BN, Burn P, Namadas EB. All solution-processed, hybrid light emitting field-effect transistors. Advanced Materials. 2014; 26 :6410-6415. DOI: 1002/adma.201400938 - 23.
Capelli R, Toffanin S, Generali G, Usta H, Facchetti A, Muccini M. Organic light-emitting transistors with an efficiency that outperforms the equivalent light-emitting diodes. Nature Materials. 2010; 9 :496-503. DOI: 10.1038/nmat2751 - 24.
Ullah M, Armin A, Tandy K, Yambem SD, Burn PL, Meredith P, et al. Defining the light emitting area for displays in the unipolar regime of highly efficient light emitting transistors. Scientific Reports. 2015; 5 :8818. DOI: 10.1038/srep08818 - 25.
Muhieddine K, Ullah M, Maasoumi F, Burn PL, Namdas EB. Hybrid area-emitting transistors: Solution processable and with high aperture ratios. Advanced Materials. 2015; 27 :6677-6682. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201502554 - 26.
Hu Y, Lin J, Song L, Lu Q , Zhu W, Liu X. Vertical microcavity organic light-emitting field-effect transistors. Scientific Reports. 2016; 6 :23210. DOI: 10.1038/srep23210 - 27.
Zhang C, Chen P, Hu W. Organic light-emitting transistors: Materials, device configurations, and operations. Small. 2016; 12 :1252-1294. DOI: 10.1002/smll.201502546 - 28.
Liu CF, Liu X, Lai WY, Huang W. Organic light-emitting field-effect transistors: Device geometries and fabrication techniques. Advanced Materials. 2018; 30 :1802466. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201802466 - 29.
Muccini M, Toffanin S. Handbook of Organic Light-Emitting Transistors: Towards the Next Generation Display Technology. 1st ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2016. 277 p. DOI: 10.1002/9781119189978 - 30.
Nakayama K, Pu YJ, Kido J. Surface-light-emitting transistors based on vertical-type metal-base organic transistors. Journal of the Society for Information Display. 2011; 19 :602-607. DOI: 10.1889/jsid19.9.602 - 31.
Liu B, McCarthy MA, Yoon Y, Kim DY, Wu Z. So F, et al. carbon-nanotube-enabled vertical field effect and light-emitting transistors. Advanced Materials. 2008; 20 :3605-3609. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200800601 - 32.
McCarthy MA, Liu B, Donoghue EP, Kravchenko I, Kim DY. So F, et al. low-voltage, low-power, organic light-emitting transistors for active matrix displays. Science. 2011; 332 :570-573. DOI: 10.1126/science.1203052 - 33.
Liu B, McCarthy MA, Iheanacho B, Wong WS, Rinzler AG. Recent developments of carbon nanotube enabled vertical organic light emitting transistors for OLED displays. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 2013; 44 :251-253. DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-0159.2013.tb06192.x - 34.
McCarthy MA, Liu B, Cheney DJ, Lemaitre MG, Jayaraman R, Mativenga M, et al. QVGA AMOLED displays using the carbon nanotube enabled vertical organic light emitting transistor. SID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers. 2016; 47 :1796-1798. DOI: 10.1002/sdtp.11071 - 35.
Lee B, Chen Y, Cook A, Zakhidov A, Podzorov V. Stable doping of carbon nanotubes via molecular self-assembly. Journal of Applied Physics. 2014; 116 :144503. DOI: 10.1063/1.4897550 - 36.
Geim AK, Novoselov KS. The rise of graphene. Nature Materials. 2007; 6 :183-191. DOI: 10.1038/nmat1849 - 37.
Ando T. The electronic properties of graphene and carbon nanotubes. NPG Asia Materials. 2009; 1 :17-21. DOI: 10.1038/asiamat.2009.1 - 38.
Bae S, Kim H, Lee Y, Xu X, Park JS, Zheng Y, et al. Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes. Nature Nanotechnology. 2010; 5 :574-578. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2010.132 - 39.
Zhang Y, Liua C, Whalley DC. The impact of substrate temperature on the size and aspect ratio of inkjet-dissolved via holes in thin poly(4-vinyl phenol) dielectric layers. Applied Physics Letters. 2013; 102 :103303-103305. DOI: 10.1063/1.4795447 - 40.
Park B, Huh JN, Lee WS, Bae IG. Simple and rapid cleaning of graphenes with a ‘bubble-free’ electrochemical treatment. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2018; 6 :2234-2244. DOI: 10.1039/c7tc05695h - 41.
Reina A, Jia X, Ho J, Nezich D, Son H, Bulovic V, et al. Large area, few-layer graphene films on arbitrary substrates by chemical vapor deposition. Nano Letters. 2009; 9 :30-35. DOI: 10.1021/nl801827v - 42.
Li X, Cai W, An J, Kim S, Nah J, Yang D, et al. Large-area synthesis of high-quality and uniform graphene films on copper foils. Science. 2009; 324 :1312-1314. DOI: 10.1126/science.1171245 - 43.
Zhang Y, Zhang L, Zhou C. Review of chemical vapor deposition of Graphene and related applications. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2013; 46 :2329-2339. DOI: 10.1021/ar300203n - 44.
Suk JW, Kitt A, Magnuson CW, Hao Y, Ahmed S, An J, et al. Transfer of CVD-grown monolayer graphene onto arbitrary substrates. ACS Nano. 2011; 5 :6916-6924. DOI: 10.1021/nn201207c - 45.
Li X, Zhu Y, Cai W, Borysiak M, Han B, Chen D, et al. Transfer of large-area graphene films for high-performance transparent conductive electrodes. Nano Letters. 2009; 9 :4359-4363. DOI: 10.1021/nl902623y - 46.
Vinogradov NA, Simonov KA, Generalov AV, Vinogradov AS, Vyalikh DV, Laubschat C, et al. Controllable p-doping of graphene on Ir(1 1 1) by chlorination with FeCl3. Journal of Physics Condensed Matters. 2012; 24 :314202. DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/24/31/314202 - 47.
Yu YJ, Zhao Y, Ryu S, Brus LE, Kim KS, Kim P. Tuning the graphene work function by electric field effect. Nano Letters. 2009; 9 :3430-3434. DOI: 10.1021/nl901572a - 48.
Panchal V, Pearce R, Yakimova R, Tzalenchuk A, Kazakova O. Standardization of surface potential measurements of graphene domains. Scientific Reports. 2013; 3 :2597. DOI: 10.1038/srep02597 - 49.
Park B, Lee WS, Na SY, Huh JN, Bae IG. Full-surface emission of graphene-based vertical-type organic light-emitting transistors with high on/off contrast ratios and enhanced efficiencies. Scientific Reports. 2019; 9 :6328. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42800-y - 50.
Ohno Y, Maehashi K, Yamashiro Y, Matsumoto K. Electrolyte-gated graphene field-effect transistors for detecting pH and protein adsorption. Nano Letters. 2009; 9 :3318-3322. DOI: 10.1021/nl901596m - 51.
Padhy H, Huang JH, Sahu D, Patra D, Kekuda D, Chu CW, et al. Synthesis and applications of low-bandgap conjugated polymers containing phenothiazine donor and various benzodiazole acceptors for polymer solar cells. Journal of Polymer Science. Part A. Polymer Chemistry. 2010; 48 :4823-4834. DOI: 10.1002/pola.24273 - 52.
Gugel D, Niesner D, Eickhoff C, Wagner S, Weinelt M, Fauster T. Two-photon photoemission from image-potential states of epitaxial graphene. 2D Materials. 2015; 2 :045001. DOI: 10.1088/2053-1583/2/4/045001 - 53.
Schwierz F. Graphene transistors. Nature Nanotechnology. 2010; 5 :487-496. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2010.89 - 54.
Ferrari AC. Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, electron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Communications. 2007; 143 :47-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052 - 55.
Wang QH, Jin Z, Kim KK, Hilmer AJ, Paulus GLC, Shih CJ, et al. Understanding and controlling the substrate effect on graphene electron-transfer chemistry via reactivity imprint lithography. Nature Chemistry. 2012; 4 :724-732. DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.1421 - 56.
Cançado LG, Jorio A, Martins Ferreira EH, Stavale F, Achete CA, Capaz RB, et al. Quantifying defects in graphene via Raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. Nano Letters. 2011; 11 :3190-3196. DOI: 10.1021/nl201432g - 57.
Huang S, Dakhchoune M, Luo W, Oveisi E, He G, Rezaei M, et al. Single-layer graphene membranes by crack-free transfer for gas mixture separation. Nature Communications. 2018; 9 :2632-2642. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04904-3 - 58.
Kim DW, Kim YH, Jeong HS, Jung HT. Direct visualization of large-area graphene domains and boundaries by optical birefringency. Nature Nanotechnology. 2012; 7 :29-34. DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2011.198 - 59.
Huang PY, Ruiz-Vargas CS, van der Zande AM, Whitney WS, Levendorf MP, Kevek JW, et al. Grains and grain boundaries in single-layer graphene atomic patchwork quilts. Nature. 2011; 469 :389-392. DOI: 10.1038/nature09718 - 60.
Nemes-Incze P, Yoo KJ, Tapasztó L, Dobrik G, Lábár J, Horváth ZE, et al. Revealing the grain structure of graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition. Applied Physics Letters. 2011; 99 :023104. DOI: 10.1063/1.3610941 - 61.
Li SH, Xu Z, Yang G, Ma L, Yang Y. Solution-processed poly(3-hexylthiophene) vertical organic transistor. Applied Physics Letters. 2008; 93 :213301. DOI: 10.1063/1.3030990 - 62.
Tsujioka T, Fujii H, Hamada Y, Takahashi H. Driving duty ratio dependence of lifetime of tris(8-hydroxy-quinolinate)aluminum-based organic light-emitting diodes. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 2001; 40 :2523-2526. DOI: 10.1143/jjap.40.2523 - 63.
Köhler A, Bässler H. Handbook of Electronic Processes in Organic Semiconductors: An Introduction. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2015. pp. 424. DOI: 10.1002/9783527685172 - 64.
Fowler RH, Nordheim L. Electron emission in intense electric fields. Proceedings of the Royal Society A. 1928; 119 :173-181. DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1928.0091 - 65.
Sze SM. Handbook of Physics of Semiconductor Devices. 2nd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1981 868 pp - 66.
Chiguvare Z, Parisi J, Dyakonov V. Current limiting mechanisms in indium-tin-oxide/poly3-hexylthiophene/aluminum thin film devices. Journal of Applied Physics. 2003; 94 :2440-2448. DOI: 10.1063/1.1588358 - 67.
Blum R, Sprave M, Sablotny J, Eich M. High-electric-field poling of nonlinear optical polymers. Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 1998; 15 :318-328. DOI: 10.1364/josab.15.000318 - 68.
Saker BK, Khondaker SI. Thermionic emission and tunneling at carbon nanotube-organic semiconductor interface. ACS Nano. 2012; 6 :4993-4999. DOI: 10.1021/nn300544v - 69.
Yang H, Heo J, Park S, Song HJ, Seo DH, Byun KE, et al. Graphene Barristor, a triode device with a gate-controlled Schottky barrier. Science. 2012; 336 :1140-1143. DOI: 10.1126/science.1220527 - 70.
Bartolomeo AD. Graphene Schottky diodes: An experimental review of the rectifying graphene/semiconductor heterojunction. Physics Reports. 2016; 606 :1-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2015.10.003 - 71.
Hsueh HY, Yao CT, Ho RM. Well-ordered nanohybrids and nanoporous materials from gyroid block copolymer templates. Chemical Society Reviews. 2015; 44 :1974-2018. DOI: 10.1039/C4CS00424H - 72.
Chang SC, Liu J, Bharathan J, Yang Y, Onohara J, Kido J. Multicolor organic light-emitting diodes processed by hybrid inkjet printing. Advanced Materials. 1999; 11 :734-737. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1521-4095(199906)11:9<734::AID-ADMA734>3.0.CO;2-D - 73.
Singh M, Haverinen HM, Dhagat P, Jabbour GE. Inkjet printing-process and its applications. Advanced Materials. 2010; 22 :673-685. DOI: 10.1002/adma.200901141 - 74.
Wang J, Song C, Zhong Z, Hu Z, Han S, Xu W, et al. In situ patterning of microgrooves via inkjet etching for a solution-processed OLED display. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2017; 5 :5005-5009. DOI: 10.1039/C7TC01330B