Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Reconstruction of Parental SSR Haplotypes from a Single Grape Seed

Written By

Gizella Győrffyné Jahnke, Zóra Annamária Nagy, Csaba Németh, Gyöngyi Knolmajerné Szigeti and János Májer

Submitted: 22 January 2019 Reviewed: 06 March 2019 Published: 03 April 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.85685

From the Edited Volume

Advances in Grape and Wine Biotechnology

Edited by Antonio Morata and Iris Loira

Chapter metrics overview

972 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Microsatellite (‘single sequence repeats’, SSR) markers were widely used in the last decade for the identification of parents of a given grapevine variety or for pedigree reconstruction as well. By now the pedigree of the majority of the most important varieties is established. At the same time, knowing both of the parents gives information about which one was the mother plant and which one was the pollinator. Analyses of archaeological grapevine seeds can give new opportunities in the research of the evolution of varieties. In most of the angiosperms, the endosperm is triploid with two genome equivalents from the maternal line and one from the paternal line. Our presumption was that this numeral difference in the maternal and paternal alleles causes measureable difference in the amplification of SSR alleles from grapevine seeds. To validate our method, pre-experiments were carried out on 12 ‘Pinot gris’ seeds, which verified our theory.

Keywords

  • grapevine
  • single sequence repeats (SSR)
  • double fertilisation

1. Introduction

Microsatellite (SSR) markers were widely used in the last decade for the identification of parents of a given grapevine variety or for pedigree reconstruction as well. By now the pedigree of the majority of the most important varieties is established. For example, large-scale parentage analyses were carried out by Lacombe et al. [1]. At the same time, knowing both of the parents gives information about which one was the mother plant and which one was the pollinator only in special cases, for example, if one of the parents is female flowered. Based on only SSR analyses, no information is available about the time, when the given variety was born.

Analyses of archaeological grapevine seeds can give new opportunities in the research of the evolution of varieties. Over the analyses of seed morphology, the genetic analyses of the seeds can provide interesting data.

Angiosperms have a complex fertilisation process, the so-called double fertilisation (Figure 1). It is double, because two female cells, the egg cell and the central cells, are fertilised by two sperm cells forming the embryo and endosperm, respectively. This unique procedure was discovered parallel by Nawaschin [3] and Guignard [4]. Due to the double fertilisation, in such species, where the mass of the endosperm is significantly higher than the mass of the embryo, the haplotype of the parents can be determinable. The main point of the idea is based on the fact that in most of the angiosperms, the endosperm is triploid with two genome equivalents from the maternal line and one from the paternal line [5]. Our presumption was that this numeral difference in the maternal and paternal alleles causes measureable difference in the amplification of SSR alleles.

Figure 1.

Process of double fertilisation [2].

To validate our method, pre-experiments were carried out on 12 Pinot gris seeds.

Advertisement

2. Materials and methods

Fully matured berries were collected from Pinot gris (clone B. 10) stocks in September 2016. Seeds were removed from the berries, washed in tap water and dried in room temperature. Only fully matured, brown-coloured seeds were used in the analyses. Pinot noir, Pinot gris (clone B. 10.), Chardonnay and Cabernet sauvignon DNA (extracted formerly from leaves) were also used as controls.

DNA was extracted from 12 single seeds. Prior to extraction the seeds were crushed in a mortar to powder; then, this powder was moved to a tube. Qiagen Plant Mini Kits were used for DNA extraction following the instructions of the manufacturer. The amount and quality of DNA were determined spectrophotometrically. The DNA was diluted to a concentration of 10 ng/ml.

The SSR analysis was performed at 19 loci (see Table 1). PCR reaction mix was the following: 0.2 mM of each primer, 12.5 ml of Hot Start Master Mix (Quiagen) and 50 ng of template DNA, completed to the total volume of 25 ml with DNA- and RNA-free distilled water. The following thermal profile was used: (1) 94°C for 45 min; 35 cycles of: (2) 94°C for 1 min, (3) annealing temperature (see Table 1) for 1 min, 73°C for 1 min; and (4) 73°C for 7 min. Each forward primer of the primer pairs was fluorescently labelled with 6FAM on the 5′ end of the DNA chain. Separation of the amplified products was carried out through capillary electrophoresis in a PE-Applied Biosystems 3100 Automated Capillary DNA Sequencer; the molecular sizes of the products were determined using Peak Scanner Software (v. 1.0; Applied Biosystems) [8]. Allele sizes and peak area were also recorded for every single allele. Data were stored in Microsoft Excel [8].

Linkage groupa SSR locus Annealing temp.
1 VMC8A7 64°C
2 VMC7G3 60°C
3 VVMD28 62°C
4 VrZag21 62°C
5 VrZag79 60°C
6 VMC4G6 50°C
7 VVMD7 50°C
8 VMC1F10 57°C
9 VMC1C10 60°C
10 VrZag25 67°C
11 VVS2 60°C
12 VMC2H4 57°C
13 VMC3D12 57°C
14 VMCNG1E1 58°C
15 VMC5G8 58°C
16 VVMD5 53°C
17 Scu06vv 60°C
18 VVIM10 57°C
19 VMC5E9 58°C

Table 1.

List of SSR loci [6].

Linkage group numbers according to Adam-Blondon et al. [7].


Advertisement

3. Results

DNA extraction and amplification in 18 loci (out of the 19) were successful in all of the 12 seeds. In VVMD5 the amplification was weak, so the results were unevaluated. In all of the remaining 18 loci, the maternal and parental alleles were determined (Figure 2); according to our presumption, the allele with the higher area value was supposed to be maternal. Ratio of the quantity of maternal and paternal alleles was computed based on area values. In some loci (where ‘Pinot gris’ has a homozygote genotype and the majority of the seeds showed also homozygote genotype—VMC4G6 and VMCNG1E1), this ration was excluded from the further analyses.

Figure 2.

Example for the determination of maternal and paternal allele in the case of seed no. 11 and VMC4A1 locus: maternal allele, 270; paternal allele, 282 (maternal genotype, 270:278).

Based on the remaining 16 loci, the average ratio of maternal and paternal alleles ranged from 1.89 (VMC5E9) to 2.58 (VrZag25), which confirms our presumption.

Maternal and paternal haplotypes were determined by the separation of maternal and paternal alleles based on the method described previously (Table 2).

Locus Maternal haplotype Paternal haplotype ‘Pinot gris’ genotype
VMC8A7 158 158 158:158
VVMD28 236 236 218:236
VrZag79 242 248 242:248
VVMD7 240 238 240:244
VMC1C10 157 157 157:157
VVS2 150 134 134:150
VMC3D12 236 234 200:236
VMC5G8 315 311 311:315
Scu06vv 164 172 164:172
VMC5E9 220 218 216:220
VMC7G3 116 114 116:116
VrZag21 205 195 199:205
VMC4G6 122 122 122:122
VMC1F10 190 208 190:208
VrZag25 237 225 225:237
VMC2H4 206 204 206:224
VMCNG1E1 124 124 124:124
VVIM10 335 335 335:339

Table 2.

Determination of parental haplotypes in the case of seed no. 4. (Alleles of ‘Pinot gris’ are red coloured, bold letters; alleles not in ‘Pinot gris’ genotype are blue coloured, italic letters) [9].

Based on our results, it can be established that most of the seeds are originating from the selfing of ‘Pinot gris’, but cross-fertilisation is appearing in some cases, such as in the case of seed no. 4, where in six loci the paternal allele is absent from ‘Pinot gris’ (blue coloured, italic letters in Table 2). These alleles were inherited from the pollinator, which is surely different from ‘Pinot gris’.

Advertisement

4. Discussion

Such amount of DNA can be extracted from a single grape seed, which is suitable for SSR analyses. The amplification of DNA is successful in most of the loci; the PCR reaction optimised for other plant parts can be applied.

Our method is safely applicable for the determination of parental haplotypes. Based on the determined haplotypes, the parental identity could be determined by the use of databases.

The method could be suitable for the analyses of archaeological grapevine seeds, with the following limitations:

The quality and quantity of the extracted DNA could be poor because of the degradation; it depends on the age of the seeds and the environmental effects, e.g. carbonisation processes [10].

Mutations can occur in the SSR loci during the time, which can be manifested in the occurrence of the so-called null alleles. Null alleles result in amplification failures, which can be rid by the use of shortened primers in the PCR reactions ([11, 12]).

Licencing

The file from Figure 1 is created under the Creative Commons Attribution licence [13].

References

  1. 1. Lacombe T, Boursiquot JM, Laucou V, Di Vecchi-Staraz M, Péros JP, This P. Large-scale parentage analysis in an extended set of grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2013;126(2):401-414
  2. 2. Double fertilization from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Available from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Double_Fertilization.jpg Description: Kiesselbach TA. The structure and reproduction of corn. Nebr. Agric. Exp. Stn Annu. Rep. 1949;161:1-96. (2019.01.15.)
  3. 3. Nawaschin S. Resultate einer revision der befruchtungsvorgänge bei Lilium martagon und Fritillaria tenella. Bulletin de l'Académie impériale des sciences de St.-Pétersbourg. 1898;9:377-382
  4. 4. Guignard ML. Sur les anthérozoides et la double copulation sexuelle chez les végétaux angiospermes. Revue Générale de Botanique. 1899;11:129-135
  5. 5. Walbot V, Evans MM. Unique features of the plant life cycle and their consequences. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2003;4:369-379
  6. 6. Kocsis L, Győrffyné Jahnke G. Teleki szőlőalanyok eredete. (Origin of the Teleki's grape rootstocks) LII. Georgikon Napok (52th Georgikon Scientific Conference-Proceedings). 2010. Available from: http://napok.georgikon.hu/upload/publications/2010-08-23_17-26-18__teleki-szoloalanyainak-eredete-lii-georgikon-napok.doc
  7. 7. Adam-Blondon AF, Roux C, Claux D, Butterlin G, Merdinoglu D, This P. Mapping 245 SSR markers on the Vitis vinifera genome: A tool for grape genetics. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2004;109(5):1017-1027
  8. 8. Jahnke G, Májer J, Lakatos A, Györffyné Molnár J, Deák E, Stefanovits-Bányai É, et al. Isoenzyme and microsatellite analysis of Vitis vinifera L. varieties from the Hungarian grape germplasm. Scientia Horticulturae. 2009;120(2):213-221
  9. 9. Győrffyné Jahnke G, Nagy ZA, Májer J. Szülői haplotípusok rekonstruálása egyetlen szőlő magból. LIX Georgikon Napok (59th Georgikon Scientific Conference-Proceedings). 2017. Available from: www.napok.georgikon.hu/hu/cikkadatbazis/cikkek-2012/doc_download/411-gyorffyne-jahnke-gizella-nagy-zora-annamaria-majer-janos-szuloi-haplotipusok-rekonstrualasa-egyetlen-szolo-magbol
  10. 10. Manen JF, Bouby L, Dalnoki O, Marinval P, Turgay M, Schlumbaum A. Microsatellites from archaeological Vitis vinifera seeds allow a tentative assignment of the geographical origin of ancient cultivars. Journal of Archaeological Science. 2003;30(6):721-729
  11. 11. Dakin EE, Avise JC. Microsatellite null alleles in parentage analysis. Heredity. 2004;93:504-509
  12. 12. Kwok S, Kellogg DE, Mckinney N, Spasic D, Goda L, Levenson C, et al. Effects of primer-template mismatches on the polymerase chain reaction: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 model studies. Nucleic Acids Research. 1990;18(4):999-1005
  13. 13. Creative Commons Attribution Licece: Available from: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/legalcode

Written By

Gizella Győrffyné Jahnke, Zóra Annamária Nagy, Csaba Németh, Gyöngyi Knolmajerné Szigeti and János Májer

Submitted: 22 January 2019 Reviewed: 06 March 2019 Published: 03 April 2019