Abstract
Previous studies have suggested that a specific community of bacteria coexists within the phycosphere of marine dinoflagellates. In order to better understand the dinoflagellate-bacteria relationships, a fosmid clone library was constructed from the metagenome DNA and analyzed. Some of the fosmid clones were end-sequenced. A total of 1501 fosmid clones with insert sizes of 30–40 Kbp were produced. End sequencing of 238 clones showed that 55% of the genes had known functions, 11% were of putative function and 34% were genes of unknown function or had no match in Genbank. There were approximately 14% sequences with no classification and could potentially represent novel genes. Analysis of these partial sequences also revealed some promising enzymes that possess various potential industrial applications such as chitinases, kinases, agarases and oxygenases. The results also showed that the bacterial flora of the Alexandrium tamiyavanichii culture was dominated by the Alpha-proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes and Gamma-proteobacteria. The findings in this study suggested that the bacterial community may play various role in the association with dinoflagellate. This study had also shown that dinoflagellate-associated bacterial community is a valuable source for discovery of novel genes and gene products.
Keywords
- metagenomic
- fosmid library
- bacterial community
- toxic dinoflagellate
- genes discovery
1. Introduction
Microalgae are the major producers of biomass and organic compounds in the ocean. More than 5000 species of marine microalgae are known to date and are separated into six major divisions:
Many planktonic organisms can form mass occurrences in the water column. When the cell densities reach values considerably higher than their general background distribution, they are called blooms [3]. Blooms can be almost mono specific, others are formed by a combination of species [4, 5]. Many prominent blooms can be traced back to high nutrient loads [6, 7, 8], but they can occur whenever a species is able to outgrow its competitors while partially reducing grazer pressure [9].
Microscopic marine algae can be vectors of microbial communities because they are universally associated in the ocean. In nature, most microbial communities are found adhered to microalgae, organism and inanimate surfaces. These interactions are dynamic and are important factors in microbial proliferation and survival. Aquatic algae in situ as well as in laboratory culture condition are often found to be associated with a variety of bacterial strains [10]. Bacteria community can be defined as multi – species of bacteria assemblages in which organisms live together in a contiguous environment (host) and interact with other [11]. Bacteria reproduce asexually, are sized between 0.1 to 20 μm, and can be rod, cocci or comma shaped.
For marine microorganisms (bacterioplankton), there are approximately 106 bacterial cells per ml of surface seawater throughout the world’s oceans [12]. While this number has been known for at least 30 years, how many bacterial species are actually present in the bacterioplankton are still unknown. Bacterioplankton commonly found in marine environment are mainly from bacteria group of Proteobacteria, Cytophaga-Flexibactar-Bacteroides (CFB), marine Archaea and other groups of bacteria, where bacteria group from Proteobacteria is the largest. Proteobacteria group are divided to some class, which are Alpha (α-), Beta (β-), Delta (δ-), Epsilon (ε-) and Gamma (γ-) Proteobacteria [13]. Up until now, the estimated abundance and genetic diversity of bacterioplankton are based on the data in the GenBank database. Hagström et al. [14] had analyzed on all of the 16S rDNA sequences sent to GenBank to get the estimation of marine bacterioplankton species that were available in the GenBank database. Their studies show that the richness of marine bacterioplankton species in the GenBank database was low relatively.
The ecology of bacterioplankton and phytoplankton is widely recognized to be tightly coupled. Interactions between bacteria and phytoplankton such as dinoflagellates may play an important role in regulating dinoflagellate toxin production. Previous studies on the interactions between bacteria and dinoflagellates have been shown to be highly variable and are sometimes specific. Effects of bacteria on toxic dinoflagellates include negative effects such as cell lysis and death [15] and positive effects such as growth enhancement with an addition of bacteria to cultures [16]. Examples of factors which may cause stimulation or inhibition by bacteria include production of co-factors and secretion of signaling molecules controlling cellular processes of dinoflagellates [17]. In addition, bacterial influences on nutrient availability may result in stimulation or inhibition of the growth or toxin production of dinoflagellates. Both toxin production by dinoflagellates and bacteria associated with toxic or non-toxic dinoflagellates have been documented. For example, Gallacher et al. [18] described evidence of paralytic shellfish toxin (PST) production by bacteria associated with dinoflagellates cultures.
Cultures of dinoflagellates contain a considerable amount of bacteria which probably accompanied the dinoflagellates in the original sample. Bacterial assemblage found in the phycosphere of dinoflagellates may play an important role in regulating dinoflagellate toxin production. While several studies have suggested that bacteria-phytoplankton interactions have the potential to dramatically influence harmful algal bloom dynamics, little is known about how bacteria and phytoplankton communities interact at the species composition level. Other studies have indicated that inside a phytoplankton bloom, α-Proteobacteria overwhelm the free-living bacterioplankton, while microorganisms connected to phytoplankton are basically distinguished as fitting in with (CFB), γ-Proteobacteria, and Planctomycetes groups [19, 20].
At present the precise association of bacteria with cultured dinoflagellates is still not well understood. Moreover, current estimates indicate that more than 99% of the microorganisms present in many natural environments are not readily culturable and therefore not accessible for biotechnology or basic research [21]. Technology to access the genomic DNA or RNA of microorganisms, directly from environmental samples without prior cultivation, has opened new ways of understanding microbial diversity and functions. Thus, this present study is an important step towards understanding bacteria-dinoflagellate interactions.
Metagenomics has become a powerful tool to investigate the biodiversity of complex microbial communities and for studying its metabolic pathways. This technique can be considered as a revolutionary approach to study the microbial community that is unapproachable by available conventional methods and this approach also can capture the total genomes that present in a community of interest. According to Schloss and Handelsman [22], metagenomics was builds on advances in microbial genomics and in the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and cloning of genes. The field of metagenomics has played a pivotal role for significant progress in microbial ecology, evolution, and diversity over the past years. This approach has allowed researchers to elucidate some possible mechanisms governing ecosystem function and diversity.
2. Methodology
3. Results and Discussion
About 4–6 x 1030 microbes exist on this earth [29]. They form the foundation of the biosphere, regulate the biogeochemical cycle and influence geology, hydrology, local and global climate. Furthermore, microorganisms have the potential to produce beneficial products to humans such as bioactive compound products, enzymes and polymers. Research on microbial interactions in a natural environment allows us to better understand complex global issues such as greenhouse gases, biodegradation of harmful compounds and enable us to discover new natural products such as antibiotics. However, it is estimated that 99% of the microbes are “viable but nonculturable” [21, 30]. In the meantime, the function and role of the majority of microbes present in the natural environment are still not well understood. Furthermore, they are a valuable resource in biotechnology applications and new product discoveries. The design of metagenomic techniques has allowed us to study in-depth interactions and the role of microbial communities in a natural environment without the need for culturing [31].
The metagenomic approach to studying the bacterial community has begun about more than 20 years ago. Since then, the analysis of bacterial communities using this technique has been widely reported. However, most metagenomic studies have been carried out on bacterial communities from seawater samples, sediments, freshwater. Some metagenomic studies on bacterial communities associated with other organisms were also reported such as from the marine sponges [32], beetle [33], polychetes [34] and tubeworm [35]. However, the analysis of bacterial communities associated with HAB by using metagenomic methods is still poorly reported.
A total of 1501 fosmid clones with insert sizes of 30 kbp to 40 kbp were selected for amplification. Sequences of 80 bp to 550 bp in length were obtained from 238 clones. BLASTX results showed that 23% of the sequences had no match with GenBank data at e-value >10−4, 11% were functionally unknown and 11% were putative (Figure 1). Figure 2 shows the functional classification of significant sequences. Most of the sequences could be functionally categorized into a metabolism cluster (37%). There were approximately 14% sequences with no classification and could potentially represent novel genes. Analysis of these partial sequences also revealed some promising enzymes that possess various potential industrial applications such as chitinases, kinases, agarases and oxygenases.
The results also showed that the bacterial flora of the
Fosmid end-sequencing has been done to assess the diversity of gene reservoirs in the constructed metagenomic fosmid library. The nucleotide sequence analysis obtained from 238 fosmid clones showed that most of the sequences are still functionally unknown and are believed to represent most of the undiscovered proteins and potentially to provide important new information or pathways if analyzed more deeply. The analysis of the fosmid end sequences also revealed that the majority of the sequences have similarities with the sequence of the Proteobacteria phylum. Some studies also showed that microflora around the marine dinoflagelate phycosphere was dominated by the Proteobacteria phylum [36, 37, 39]. We also found that part of the sequences was matched with genes derived from Roseobacter-Sulfitobacter-Silicibacter clade. Many
Analysis of these partial sequences also revealed some genes that might be important in bacteria-algal interactions. One of the contigs was similar to the response regulator of the LuxR family protein from
The end-sequences obtained can not be used to describe the metabolic activity of each bacterial taxon involved but the analysis of the nucleotide sequences has shown that the constructed metagenomic library has great potential as a source to study the physiology and function of the bacterial community involved.
4. Conclusion
The advantage of metagenomic method is that it allows us to study the genome of the bacterial community directly from the natural environment in which the function and role of certain bacteria on the environment can be determined. Studies have shown that metagenomics are a very useful technology in finding genes that can be applied in industrial, biotechnology, pharmaceutical and medical fields such as esterase, lipase, agarase, polymerase, polyketide synthases, chitinase and so on. Some potentially uncultured microbes and new genes were discovered through this study. In this study, metagenomic libraries using fosmid vectors were constructed from the bacterial community associated with A. tamiyavanichii. A total of 1501 fosmid clones ranging from 30 to 40 Kbp have been obtained and this is equivalent to 13 bacterial genomes. Finally, to our knowledge, the metagenomic library in this study was the first being constructed from the bacterial communities associated with toxic marine dinoflagellate. This collection of libraries can be used as a major source for finding new genes or pathways for biosynthesis and to study the interactions of dinoflagelates more profoundly, especially in the production of the saxitoxins as there is a hypothesis that the toxins produced by dinoflagelates are derived from bacteria.
Acknowledgments
We thank all the people involved directly or indirectly in this study especially staffs from the School of Fisheries and Aquaculture Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu and Bachok Marine Research Station, University of Malaya.
References
- 1.
Hallegraeff GM. Harmful algal blooms: A global overview. In: Hallegraeff GM, Anderson DM, Cembella AD, editors. Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae. Vol. 33. UNESCO; 1995. pp. 1-22 - 2.
Daranas AH, Norte M, Fernandez JJ. Toxic marine microalgae. Toxicon. 2001; 39 :1101-1132. DOI: 10.1016/S0041-0101(00)00255-5 - 3.
Smayda TJ. What is a bloom? A commentary. Limnology and Oceanography. 1997; 42 (5part2):1132-1136. DOI: 10.4319/lo.1997.42.5_part_2.1132 - 4.
Garcés E, Vila M, Masó M, Sampedro N, Giacobbe MG, Penna A. Taxon-specific analysis of growth and mortality rates of harmful dinoflagellates during bloom conditions. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2005; 301 :67-79. DOI: 10.3354/meps301067 - 5.
Popovich CA, Spetter CV, Marcovecchio JE, Freije RH. Dissolved nutrient availability during winter diatom bloom in a turbid and shallow estuary (Bahía Blanca, Argentina). Journal of Coastal Research. 2008:95-102. DOI: 10.2112/06-0656.1 - 6.
Hallegraeff GM. A review of harmful algal blooms and their apparent global increase. Phycologia. 1993; 32 (2):79-99. DOI: 10.2216/i0031-8884-32-2-79.1 - 7.
Hwang DF, Lu YH. Influence of environmental and nutritional factors on growth, toxicity, and toxin profile of dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum . Toxicon. 2000;38 (11):1491-1503. DOI: 10.1016/S0041-0101(00)00080-5 - 8.
Yentsch CS, Lapointe BE, Poulton N, Phinney DA. Anatomy of a red tide bloom off the southwest coast of Florida. Harmful Algae. 2008; 7 (6):817-826. DOI: 10.1016/j.hal.2008.04.008 - 9.
Irigoien X, Flynn KJ, Harris RP. Phytoplankton blooms: A ‘loophole’ in microzooplankton grazing impact? Journal of Plankton Research. 2005; 27 (4):313-321. DOI: 10.1093/plankt/fbi011 - 10.
Berland BR, Bonin DJ, Maestrini SY. Study of bacteria associated with marine algae in culture. Marine Biology. 1970; 5 (1):68-76. DOI: 10.1007/BF00352494 - 11.
Konopka A. What is microbial community ecology? The ISME Journal. 2009; 3 :1223-1230. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2009.88 - 12.
Ducklow H. Bacterial production and biomass in the oceans. Microbial Ecology of the Oceans. 2000; 1 :85-120 - 13.
Hagström Å, Pinhassi J, Zweifel UL. Biogeographical diversity among marine bacterioplankton. Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 2000; 21 (3):231-244. DOI: 10.3354/ame021231 - 14.
Hagström Å, Pommier T, Rohwer F, Simu K, Stolte W, Svensson D, et al. Use of 16S ribosomal DNA for delineation of marine bacterioplankton species. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2002; 68 (7):3628-3633. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.68.7.3628-3633.2002 - 15.
Lovejoy C, Bowman JP, Hallegraeff GM. Algicidal effects of a novel marinepseudoalteromonas isolate (Class Proteobacteria, Gamma Subdivision) on harmful algal bloom species of the generachattonella, gymnodinium, and heterosigma. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1998; 64 (8):2806-2813 - 16.
Ferrier M, Martin JL, Rooney-Varga JN. Stimulation of Alexandrium fundyense growth by bacterial assemblages from the Bay of Fundy. Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2002;92 (4):706-716. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01576.x - 17.
Gallacher S, Smith EA. Bacteria and paralytic shellfish toxins. Protist. 1999; 150 (3):245-255. DOI: 10.1016/S1434-4610(99)70027-1 - 18.
Gallacher S, Flynn KJ, Franco JM, Brueggemann EE, Hines HB. Evidence for production of paralytic shellfish toxins by bacteria associated with Alexandrium spp.(Dinophyta) in culture. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1997;63 (1):239-245 - 19.
DeLong EF, Franks DG, Alldredge AL. Phylogenetic diversity of aggregate-attached vs. free-living marine bacterial assemblages. Limnology and Oceanography. 1993; 38 (5):924-934. DOI: 10.4319/lo.1993.38.5.0924 - 20.
González JM, Moran MA. Numerical dominance of a group of marine bacteria in the alpha-subclass of the class Proteobacteria in coastal seawater. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1997; 63 (11):4237-4242 - 21.
Amann RI, Ludwig W, Schleifer KH. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 1995; 59 (1):143-169 - 22.
Schloss PD, Handelsman J. Biotechnological prospects from metagenomics. Current Opinion in Biotechnology. 2003; 14 (3):303-310. DOI: 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00067-3 - 23.
Kokinos JP, Anderson DM. Morphological development of resting cysts in cultures of the marine dinoflagellate Lingulodinium polyedrum (= L. machaerophorum). Palynology. 1995;19 (1):143-166. DOI: 10.1080/01916122.1995.9989457 - 24.
Danish-Daniel M, Ahmad A, Usup G. Microbial communities associated with some harmful dinoflagellates from Malaysian waters revealed by culture-independent and culturedependent approaches. Aquaculture, Aquarium, Conservation & Legislation. 2016; 9 (5):976-984 - 25.
Staden R. The Staden sequence analysis package. Molecular Biotechnology. 1996; 5 (3):233. DOI: 10.1007/BF02900361 - 26.
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research. 1997; 25 (17):3389-3402. DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 - 27.
Huson DH, Auch AF, Qi J, Schuster SC. MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Research. 2007; 17 (3):377-386. DOI: 10.1101/gr.5969107 - 28.
Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Williams TD, Nagaraj SH, Nueda MJ, et al. High-throughput functional annotation and data mining with the Blast2GO suite. Nucleic Acids Research. 2008; 36 (10):3420-3435. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkn176 - 29.
Johri BM. Microbial diversity. Current Science. 2005; 89 :3-4 - 30.
Colwell RR, Grimes DJ. Semantics and strategies. In: Nonculturable Microorganisms in the Environment. Boston, MA: Springer; 2000. pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-0271-2_1 - 31.
Rondon MR, August PR, Bettermann AD, Brady SF, Grossman TH, Liles MR, et al. Cloning the soil metagenome: A strategy for accessing the genetic and functional diversity of uncultured microorganisms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2000; 66 (6):2541-2547. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.6.2541-2547.2000 - 32.
Fieseler L, Quaiser A, Schleper C, Hentschel U. Analysis of the first genome fragment from the marine sponge-associated, novel candidate phylum Poribacteria by environmental genomics. Environmental Microbiology. 2006; 8 (4):612-624. DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00937.x - 33.
Piel J. A polyketide synthase-peptide synthetase gene cluster from an uncultured bacterial symbiont of Paederus beetles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2002;99 (22):14002-14007. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.222481399 - 34.
Campbell BJ, Stein JL, Cary SC. Evidence of chemolithoautotrophy in the bacterial community associated with Alvinella pompejana , a hydrothermal vent polychaete. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003;69 (9):5070-5078. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.9.5070-5078.2003 - 35.
Hughes DS, Felbeck H, Stein JL. A histidine protein kinase homolog from the endosymbiont of the hydrothermal vent tubeworm Riftia pachyptila . Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1997;63 (9):3494-3498 - 36.
Hold GL, Smith EA, Rappë MS, Maas EW, Moore ER, Stroempl C, et al. Characterisation of bacterial communities associated with toxic and non-toxic dinoflagellates: Alexandrium spp. andScrippsiella trochoidea . FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2001;37 (2):161-173. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00864.x - 37.
Green DH, Llewellyn LE, Negri AP, Blackburn SI, Bolch CJ. Phylogenetic and functional diversity of the cultivable bacterial community associated with the paralytic shellfish poisoning dinoflagellate Gymnodinium catenatum . FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2004;47 (3):345-357. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00298-8 - 38.
Dennis P, Edwards EA, Liss SN, Fulthorpe R. Monitoring gene expression in mixed microbial communities by using DNA microarrays. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2003; 69 (2):769-778. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.69.2.769-778.2003 - 39.
Babinchak JA, Doucette GJ. Isolation and characterization of the bacterial flora associated with PSP- related dinoflagellate species. In: VIII International conference on Harmful algae-Abstracts and Posters Classification. vp; 1997 - 40.
Jasti S, Sieracki ME, Poulton NJ, Giewat MW, Rooney-Varga JN. Phylogenetic diversity and specificity of bacteria closely associated with Alexandrium spp. and other phytoplankton. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2005;71 (7):3483-3494. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3483-3494.2005 - 41.
Fuqua WC, Winans SC, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in bacteria: The LuxR-LuxI family of cell density-responsive transcriptional regulators. Journal of Bacteriology. 1994; 176 (2):269. DOI: 10.1128/jb.176.2.269-275.1994 - 42.
Parsek MR, Greenberg EP. Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing in gram-negative bacteria: A signaling mechanism involved in associations with higher organisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000; 97 (16):8789-8793. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.8789