Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Comparative Analysis Carried Out on Modern Indentation Techniques for the Measurement of Mechanical Properties: A Review

By Saquib Rouf, Sobura Altaf, Shezan Malik and Kaleem Ahmad Najar

Submitted: July 24th 2020Reviewed: September 28th 2020Published: October 30th 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94224

Downloaded: 47

Abstract

Nowadays many indentation techniques are being commonly employed for determining some mechanical properties (harness, elastic modulus, toughness, etc.) using simple method of measuring the indentation depth. On the basis of measurement of depth of penetration, indentation technique has be classified into major categories i.e. microindentation and nanoindentation. Nanoindentation technique uses indirect method of determining the contact area as the depth of penetration is measured in nanometers, while in conventional indentation the area in contact is measured by elementary measurement of the residual area after the indenter is removed from the specimen. Dynamic hardness is the best result of dynamic indentation which can be expressed as the ratio of energy consumed during a rapid indentation to the volume of indentation. The parameter which are taken into consideration are indentation depth, contact force, contact area, mean contact pressure.

Keywords

  • hardness
  • elastic modulus
  • nano/microindentation
  • Berkovich indenter
  • spherical indenter & vicker indenter

1. Introduction

We are having distinct techniques to rule out the mechanical properties of materials; one among them is nanoindentation. Nanoindentation is the most accepted method to regulate the mechanical properties like hardness, elastic modulus, toughness and stiffness of a material. Thus, nanoindentation is also noted by its different names in mechanical engineering field like; depth sensing indentation (DSI), instrumental indentation technique (IIT) and universal hardness test (UHT).

The indenter is the main component of nanoindentation testing which is pressured through the exterior of a material. With a prescribed load, the displacement of the indenter inside a material is observed. The hardness of the material is shown by the equation:

H=PmaxAr

Where, Pmaxis a maximum load for depth (h) and Aris the residual area or the projection of indenter. This residual area inside a material is then measured by atomic force microscope. The residual area builds upon the kind of indenter and material of indenter. Therefore, the mechanical properties can vary as the penetrating material changes from one experiment to another.

The nanoindentation is also used to measure reduced elastic modulus and the sample modulus by using the following Equations [1];

Reduced elastic modulus,Er=dPdh×12×πAr.
Sample modulus,Es=1vs21Er1viEi

Where, Eiis the modulus of indenter and, vsand viis the poisson’s ratio for sample and indenter, respectively [1, 2].

1.1 Types of indenters

The various types of indenters with their specifications are mentioned in Table 1 [3]. Generally, nanoindentation itself has a wide range of applications in physical science and concedes us to examine nanoscale surface adjustments in solid materials and specify the appearing variations in its mechanical response. From atomic structure to atomic defects, this has made a revolution in material engineering. It can be used to study discrete atomic rearrangement of specimen under loading conditions. When equipped with Raman spectroscopy and Atomic Force Microscope, it can find its place in studying lattice dislocations [4].

IndenterProjected areaSemi angle
Sphere2πRhpNot available
Berkovich3hp2tanθ265.3°
Vickers4hp2tanθ268°
Knoop2hptanθ1tanθ2θ1=86.25°, θ2=65°
Cube Cone3hp2tanθ235.26°
Coneπhp2tanα2αeffective cone angle

Table 1.

Indenter specifications [3].

From literature survey, it has been found that results of nanoindentation depend upon the indenter tip, shape and its orientation [5]. AFM plays a vital role in nanoindentation process. It is used to measure the residual indentation area of the specimen which is further used to calculate hardness of material. It has been clearly observed and proved that nanoindentation results depend upon the type of indenter used. So, we can say that nanoindentation results vary for different indenters. To achieve better results in indentation process, continuous nanoindentation has been introduced. This approach involves intially loading the indenter at peak load and then unloading 90% of the peak load for 50 seconds and keeping it after 90% of unloading for almost 100 seconds and lastly unloading wholly the indenter. The continuous nanoindentation is used to find stiffness in terms of indentation depth in a one shot experiment.

1.1.1 Spherical indenter

Spherical indenters are used for soft materials. It has been established that even a single alteration of the indenter size or radius can give collectible observation into heterogeneous aspects of the radiation-induced-damage region. The most common spherical indenter known is diamond spherical indenter which has radius less than 1 micron. We know that indentation hardness is used as; H=PA, where, P is the applied load and A is the area of indenter.

The indentation hardness equation can be also known as =4Pπd2, where, d is the diameter of contact circle when at full load. The nanoindentation deals with the size of impression, whose area is to be calculated and is found by [1, 2, 3]:

A=2πRihc

where, Ri is radius of the indenter and hc is the depth of contact also called contact depth.

The Brinell hardness number for spherical indenters is calculated as [6]:

BHN=2PπD(DD2d2)

Where, D is the diameter of indenter. The Brinell hardness number depends on the real curved surface response.

Researcher [7] has adopted the use of spherical indenter to figure out the structural characteristics of SS400, SM490 and SM520 using finite element analysis to create a shift of algorithm. The specifications taken under consideration are yield strength (σy), the hardening exponent (n), and the ratio (α). The α here is characterized as the ratio between the strain at beginning point of strain hardening and the yield strain. The spherical indenter with the value of 1141GPa as elastic modulus and that of poisson’s ratio as 0.07, the radius of the indenter is put up to R = 5 μm and the maximum indentation depth is kept 0.3R, the results derived from the indentation process on the above mentioned specimens are very much reliable with the proposed model of reverse algorithm and can provide the best parameters of structural steel. Thus, the study of the radius of the indenter is an important factor for supposition of disorder nucleation shear stress implied from spherical indentation retortion.

Dynamic indentation of elastic plastic solid has been also reported here [8]. Dynamic hardness is the best result of dynamic indentation which can be expressed as the ratio of energy consumed during a rapid indentation to the volume of indentation. There is a restraination to either the displacement or the force of the indenter by the indentation equipment. Indentation depth, contact area, contact force, and mean contact pressure were the parameters that are taken into account and the finite element technique has been operated to determine the contact issues. The author observed that parameters like contact force, contact area and mean contact pressure are directly dependent on indentation velocity irrespective of material’s elastic plastic property. The dynamic indentation of a material is linked to a dimensionless parameter which can be attained as the ratio between the kinetic energy density shifted towards the indented material to the sufficient net energy of the material and the initial yield. It has been seen that this dimensionless parameter is associated with the plastic deformation of a solid which implies larger the dimensionless parameter larger will be the plastic deformation of solid. Down below Figure 1 distinguishes the types of indenters [9] as: (a) Spherical (b) Conical (c) Square- pyramidal (vicker) & (d) Berkovich, respectively.

Figure 1.

Types of indenters [9]: (a) spherical (b) conical (c) square- pyramidal (vicker) & (d) Berkovich.

1.2 Berkovich indenter

The Berkovich indenter tip has a geometry of a three-sided pyramid that can be rested to a point, hence upholding a self-similar geometry to very small extent. This geometry is generally much approved than the Vickers indenter tip which has a geometry of four-sided pyramid. It is most often preferred for certaining the mechanical parameters of materials. Berkovich indenter with geometry of three sided pyramid contains a face angle of 65.3°between the sides. The indenter tip is blunted and has been constructed with the hard materials example diamond. It is more precise than vicker indenter due to its sharp point. The Berkovich indenter tip is of optimal use for most testing funtions. It is not easily impaired and can be promptly built. It brings about plasticity at slight loads too generating a relevant share of hardness. The Berkovich indenter tip is feasible as a traceable standard.

On the specimen, the projected area of Berkovich indenter is given as [3];Ap=33hc2tanθ2, where θ is the face angle. For θ=65.3°, AP=24.5hc2.

Further, the Meyer hardness is given by [10]:

H=PAP=P24.5hc2

From the above equation we can conclude that Meyer hardness for Berkovich indenter is the function of contact depth. Researchers [11] have reported the nanoindentation of zirconia yttria and alumina zirconi-yttria with the help of the Berkovich diamond indenters having a tip radius of 20 to 25 nm. The main function of this indentation practise is to resolve the mechanical properties like modulus of elasticity (E) and fracture toughness of the above mentioned biomedical ceramics. The values of mechanical properties are calculated at different loads like 1.5 mN, 2 mN and 5 mN. The frequency for indentation is 75 Hz with poisson’s coefficient v = 0.25. AFM is engaged in the analysis of the continuing samples of nanoindentation. The equation given below (Sneddon equation) is employed in the calculation of the modulus of elasticity [12]:

S=2β(AπEr)

Where, A is the area of contact which in return is a function of indentation depth (h) also called as depth of penetration. Er is reduced modulus of elasticity and β which is a constant based upon the geometry of indenter and for Berkovich indenter value of β is 1.034. The modulus of elasticity is calculated by the following Equation [13]:

E=1V21Er1Vi2Ei

Where, Ei, E and Vi, V are constants of modulus of elasticity and poisson’s ratio of diamond indenter and specimen respectively. Further fracture toughness of the material is given as [14]:

K=kEH12PC3/2

Where, H is the hardness of material, P is the load practiced, E is the modulus of elasticity, k is empirical constant depending upon the geometry of indenter and c is the crack length. The results obtained are mentioned in Table 2 .

MaterialCompositionModulus of Elasticty (GPa)Nano-hardness (GPa)Stiffness (N/m)Kic (Mpa)
ATZ20wt%Al2O3 + 80wt%TZ-3Y355 ± 721 ± 1.2157,471 ± 124.2 ± 0.1
ZTA80wt%Al2O3 + 20wt%TZ-3Y360 ± 635 ± 1161,190 ± 123.50 ± 0.2
3Y-TZP97%molZrO2 + 3%molY2O3354 ± 725 ± 0.883,886 ± 95.1 ± 0.2
8Y-CSZ92%molZrO2 + 8%molY2O3385 ± 231.3 ± 0.2153,423 ± 123.77 ± 0.02

Table 2.

Mechanical properties of various materials [11].

Generally, Chech et al. [15] reported the bluntness of Berkovich indenter in their research. The materials that were employed were those whose young’s modulus were already known; like fused silica and BK7 glass. The indentation results were compared with the results from AFM. It was found that the pointless radius of a spherical cap representing the indenter bluntness depends upon the technique accepted.

1.3 Vicker indenter

The Vickers indenter resembles to pyramid of square shape with faces and edges at angles of 68°and 148°respectively. The most common vicker indenter is vicker diamond indenter. The vicker hardness is given as [16]:

VH=1.8544Pd2

Where, d is the distance from one corner to its opposite corner of the projection left on the specimen. The Meyer hardness of vicker indenter is given by [17]:

H=2Pd2

Also, the projected area of indenter,Ap=4hc2tanθ2, where θis the face angle and is equal to 68°, hc is the contact depth [18].

The vicker indenter is utilized in determination of the fracture toughness of brittle materials example glass. Fracture toughness (KC) is explained as resistance offered by a material to abrupt generation of cracks [19]. However, Anstis et al. [20] proposed an equation to measure the fracture toughness. This equation was a result of experiments on 16 materials. The equation for fracture toughness is given below:

Kic=χEVHPC32

The above equation has an uncertainty of 25%, in this equation, VH is the vicker hardness, E is the modulus of elasticity in Mpa and χ is the dimensional less constant based upon the frame of indenter and geometry of crack generated. Usually χ varies from 0.016 to 0.004 for vicker indenter.

Herval et al. [21] reported the comparison of fracture toughness from vicker indenter using Anstis equation for these materials; crown glass (BK7), heavy flint glass (SF17), zerodur glass and hydroxyapatite ceramic. The experimentation has been performed on Zwick Roell with load varying from 2 to 100 N with dwell time at maximum load of 10 seconds. The Cracks are examined using optical microscope. Thus, the results obtained are summarized in the Table 3 . The authors conclude by verifying that fracture toughness remains constant for a specific material under varying loads. This means that polishing does not generate residual stress on sample.

1.3.1 Fracture toughness of Y-TZP dental ceramic

Fracture toughness is the basic criteria for studying the potential of bio ceramics. The most common ceramic used is zirconia. It finds its application in bone and dental implants. Y-TZP dental ceramic contains 2–3 mol% of yttrium oxide which produces of 6MPam1/2 [22]. Donaka [23] reported the indentation of Y-TZP dental ceramic by vicker indenter. The samples were cut into 10 × 10 × 2 mm plates. Following four set of loads were applied; 24.03 N (VH3), 49.03 N (VH5), 196.13 N (VH20) and 294.20 N (VH30). Each load has been applied 30 times. The fracture toughness has been directly determined by crack length. Table 4 can sum up the above experiment.

ParameterCrown glassHeavy flint glassZerodur glassHydroxyapatite ceramic
Kic(MPa)0.5±0.400.47 ± 0.030.93 ± 0.11.20 ± 0.03
VH (GPa)6.3 ± 0.34.4 ± 0.36.7 ± 0.64.4 ± 0.6

Table 3.

Comparison of fracture toughness by vicker indenter.

LoadVicker hardness (average)
VH31379
VH51344
VH201345
VH301337

Table 4.

Fracture toughness of Y-TZP with varying loads.

The data above shows that with the increase in applied load, the hardness of Y-TZP increases. This reaction is recognized as normal indentation size effect [24]. Fracture toughness depends upon the type of crack formed. So, for the process of attaining the fracture toughness of a material, the fundamental step is to notice the type of crack formed. Usually palmqvist and median cracks are formed due to vicker indentation. Palmqvist cracks can be found in tough materials at high loads and in brittle materials at low loads [25]. Depending upon the type of crack developed various methods have been used to calculate fracture toughness. Some of them are mentioned in the Table 5 .

AuthorCrack typeEquation
Casellas [26]Palmqvist0.024FC32FVH12
Palmqvist [27]Palmqvist0.0028VH12.FVH12
Shetty et al. [28]Palmqvist0.0319Fal12
Niihara et al. [29]Palmqvist0.0089EVH25Fal12
Anstis [30]Median0.016FC32EVH12
Evans and Charles [30]Median0.0752FC32
Tanaka [30]Median0.0725FC32
Niihara, Morena and Hasselman [29]Median0.0309EVH25FC32
Lankford [28]Anykind0.0782VHa12EVH25Ca1.56

Table 5.

Various methods to calculate fracture toughness depending upon the crack formed [26, 27, 28, 29, 30].

The vicker indentation on Y-TZP Ceramic results in crack propagation which is further used to calculate fracture toughness. Crack propagation mainly depends upon the indentation load applied and the type of material. For E = 210 GPa, the fracture toughness of palmqvist crack varies from 4.96 to 7.73 MPam1/2 and 3.96 to 6.72 MPam1/2 for median crack profile. The lankford model gives the highest of values 7.73 MPam1/2 for 29.42 N and Anstis give lowest of 4.49MPam1/2 for 294.20 [28, 29, 30].

1.4 Nanoindentation for nuclear materials

The nanoindentation technique for irradiated materials started back in 1986 [31]. From last few decades, nanoindentation has been acknowledged as well founded means to explore the bounded mechanical properties at small scale. Therefore, the idea of the sequence of ion irradiation and nanoindentation has been greatly advanced in later years to examine the mechanical role of nuclearly arranged materials with irradiation developed.

Various studies [32, 33, 34] have been performed on the different combination of materials with the focus on effect of crystal structure and irradiation temperature on hardness of material. For ion irradiation there is a plan of action that needs to be followed to observe the irradiation damage prompt by energetic neutrons. It is very difficult to evaluate the mechanical properties of ion irradiated materials. The most important factors are limited indentation depths and inhomogenous distribution of irradiation induced defects [35]. Additionally, upon ion-irradiation the metal surface is modified by a thin radiation-damaged layer which causes a change in its mechanical response as compared to the bulk of the sample. In order to successfully study the effects of radiation damage on the indentation behavior, we need to first decouple the effects of orientation from the effects of the increased defect density caused by irradiation. It was observed that there exists a strong orientation effect of radiation which induces mechanical changes at the grain scale. Obviously, surface energies for the orientation is quite different. So there can be significant differences in the damage experienced by these grains [36, 37].

The impact of high energy particles on the metalic materials for energy systems are widely studied as the mechanical properties of these materials are highly effected [38, 39]. This study is very important to develop a smart and effective nuclear energy production system. Mechanical characterization methods like uniaxial compression and tension remain invalid [40], as high spatial resolution is required [41, 42, 43]. Since nanoindentation gives rich statistical data [44, 45], hence it is convenient for mechanical characterization of ion irradiated materials. Nanoindentation for irradiation material can be broadly classified into two categories; suface nanoindendation and cross-sectional nanoindentation [36, 46].

Figure 2.

(a) Surface nanoindentation and (b) cross-sectional nanoindentation [46].

For irradiated materials, spherical indentation is widely preferred over berkovich indentation as it can analyze the irradiation effect not only on materials yielding but also the elasto-plastic transition and strain hardening behavior, by converting the force-depth (F h) relationships into the indentation stress–strain (ISS) relationships [47, 48]. High temperature nanoindentation can be used to determine the thermo-mechanical behavior of irradiated materials at the actual working temperature [49].

1.5 Nanoindentation for polymeric materials

From past one decade, the use of polymeric composite matrix has been widely used due to their high energy absorption, light weight and good adhesion [50]. A large number of researchers [50, 51, 52, 53] have reported the nanoindentation on polymeric surfaces and it has been observed that assessment of elastic modulus has remained a challenge. For nanoindentation of soft polymeric materials, the materials complaince can create difficulties in tracing the initial contact [54]. Researcher [55] has shown the main problem of nanoindentation with polymeric materials, the elastic moduli obtained by nanoindentation does not coincide with the moduli obatined by conventional micro tension and compression. There has been an increase in the moduli obtained by the nanoindentation of polymeric materials. Studies performed on polystyrene and polycarbonate show 64% and 70% shift in moduli, respectively [52]. Moreover, for PMMA [56], 67% shift is seen and 20% for poly bemzocyclobutene [53]. The elastic moduli for nanoindentation have been plotted against the micro moduli of the selected set of polymers, shown in Figure 2(a) .

The other approaches like dynamic modulus approach are applied. This method is often termed as continuous stiffness measurement. The two important parameters in this are storage moduli and loss moduli [57]. The parameters can be also used with dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA). The storage moduli and loss moduli were obtained by both dynamic indentation and DMA for thermoplastic materials [58]. The results of the two methods were compared with each other as shown in Figure 2(b) . The consistent trend of greater dynamic indentation moduli than DMA moduli was observed for various materials. By this study, it can be observed that dynamic indentation moduli’s can be subjected to a percent of error while characterizing the polymeric materials.

1.6 Nanoindentation in biological materials

The mechanical properties of biological materials are the early stage of development. Among all the techniques for mechanical characterization of biological materials, nanoindentation is most powerful tool due to its wide nanolevel force resolution [60] and mainly because of its surface and interfacial properties which play significant role not only in biology but also in synthesis of biomaterials. Therefore, the study of adoption of nanoindentation for biological materials and systems is of great interest.

New studies have been performed were it has been described how the diseases respond towards the mechanical characteristics up to the molecular level [61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66]. The method has also been used to carry out the mechanical analysis of fossils [67]. Indentation finds its application in describing the behavior of human skin which can be used to solve the aging problem of skin [68, 69]. Application of nanoindentation technique to biomaterials research is also expanded up to human enamel and eye tissues. In the coming years, the importance of nanoindentation testing in biology and biomaterials research is likely to show a rapid increase. Nanoindentation testing is implicated on both soft and hard tissues and also on biomaterials especially those with hierarchical microstructures. The nanoindentation methods are also applied to highlight the study of skeletal and dental tissues [70]. There also exist nanomechanics for soft, living tissues and polymeric biomaterials. Nanoindentation is now also being applied to the problem with studies examining connective tissues and polymers using both static and dynamic methods. The nanoindentation investigations on natural biomaterials have contributed significantly to biomimetics and the development of new composite materials. Continuing advancements in nanoindentation analysis will increase the method’s utility in the characterization of biomaterials [71].

The measurement protocol for nanoindentation of biological samples (sometimes referred as bioindentation) takes into account the irregularity of the surface of the samples by incorporating an automatic surface detection procedure in the measurement matrix. The use of large spherical indenters facilitates contact detection on extremely soft samples (hydrogels [72], cartilage, scaffolds) by providing larger contact stiffness and averages surface and structural inhomogeneity. The penetrations seen in bioindentation are usually in the range of ten to several hundred micrometers, thus testing a large volume of tissue rather than single cells [73]. The applications of the bioindenter are very wide. Many human tissues are subject to mechanical loading and their mechanical characterization can provide valuable information for disease evolutions, treatments and also developments of artificial replacements (implants, scaffolds). Bioindentation can be used in the diagnostic of disease (liver functions, arteries) and for fundamental research on treatment of these diseases [74].

2. Conclusion

Nanoindentation is a dynamic perceptible method for attaining mechanical properties from very limited content. In delicately regulated tests in which the acceptance of the elastic contact analysis are met, accuracy of a few percent is smoothly obtainable for indentations as micro as 10 nm. Specialists must be constantly aware of the holdings of variations from these suppositions on nanoindentation results. Exact evaluation for load, displacement and machine concurrence are requirement, as is an effective rational sketch of the shape of the tip, and a configuration devised to reduce the consequences of thermal drift and plasticity.

If there arise a need to measure a surface layer or other small volume, then evading the effects of surface conditions, or nearby free surfaces or interfaces, a practical indentation size range can be found analytically. Size effects, pile-up and anisotropy can advance precise deviations that must be alleged.

Nanoindentation is an area of powerful research and development and data analysis practices are frequently being revised. Future developments of nanoindentation are foreseen in the area of periodic incorporation of computer simulations, (FEM and others) and quantitative imaging technique to boost in analysis of depth-sensing indentation data, and much development in dynamic contact analysis system in addition to incorporation of acoustic practices.

Download for free

chapter PDF

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Saquib Rouf, Sobura Altaf, Shezan Malik and Kaleem Ahmad Najar (October 30th 2020). Comparative Analysis Carried Out on Modern Indentation Techniques for the Measurement of Mechanical Properties: A Review [Online First], IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94224. Available from:

chapter statistics

47total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us