Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Cellulose-Based Thermoplastics and Elastomers via Controlled Radical Polymerization

Written By

Feng Jiang, Fenfen Wang, Chenqian Pan and Yanxiong Fang

Submitted: 15 August 2019 Reviewed: 30 August 2019 Published: 28 September 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.89436

From the Edited Volume

Thermosoftening Plastics

Edited by Gülşen Akın Evingür, Önder Pekcan and Dimitris S. Achilias

Chapter metrics overview

1,144 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with the recent progress in cellulose-based thermoplastic plastics and elastomers via homogeneous controlled radical polymerizations (CRPs), including atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization, and nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP). The first section is a brief introduction of cellulose and cellulose graft copolymers. The second section is recent developments in cellulose graft copolymers synthesized by CRPs. The third part is a perspective on design and applications of novel cellulose-based materials. The combination of cellulose and CRPs can provide new opportunities for sustainable materials ranging from thermoplastics to elastomers, and these fascinating materials can find a pyramid of applications in our daily life in the near future.

Keywords

  • cellulose
  • graft copolymers
  • controlled radical polymerization
  • thermoplastics
  • elastomers

1. Introduction

As the most abundant biomaterial on earth, cellulose has received enormous attention due to its wide applications in different fields, such as packaging [1], drug delivery [2], cosmetics [3], textiles [4], membranes [5], bioengineering [6], and electronics [7]. Cellulose has some outstanding advantages, including low cost, non-toxicity, good mechanical properties, and excellent biodegradability and biocompatibility [8]. However, cellulose is lack of thermoplasticity and shows poor dimensional stability and crease resistance. Due to the high crystallinity and presence of a large amount of intra- and inter-molecular hydrogen bonding, cellulose is difficult to be dissolved in common solvents [9]. Different solvent systems have been proposed to dissolve cellulose, including N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMAc)/lithium chloride (LiCl) [10], dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)/tetrabutylammonium fluoride (TBAF) [11], N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF)/dinitrogen tetroxide (N2O4) [12], N-methyl morpholine-N-oxide (NMMO) [13], alkali/urea aqueous [14], and ionic liquids [15]. The existence of three hydroxyl groups in each anhydroglucose repeating unit makes cellulose an active material to develop various derivatives via etherification [16], esterification [17], amination [18], carboxylation [19], carbanilation [20], acetylation [21], grafting [22], sulfation [23], and silylation [24]. It is worth noting that the hydroxyl group in the 6 position of cellulose is most reactive, followed by the hydroxyl groups at 2 and 3 positions. The degree of substitution (DS) indicated the substituted number of hydroxyl group in anhydroglucose unit (AGU).

Cellulose graft copolymers, which combine cellulose and grafted side chains in one macromolecule can open new opportunities toward developing novel bio-based materials with tunable properties. Cellulose graft copolymers can be achieved with grafting-to, grafting-through, and grafting-from strategies [25]. Among these methods, the grafting-from strategy is the most effective route for designing cellulose graft copolymers from thermoplastics to thermoplastic elastomers. Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) [26, 27], reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) [28, 29] polymerization, and nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP) [30, 31] are well-established controlled radical polymerizations (CRPs) that can be performed to prepare cellulose-based copolymers with well-defined structures and narrow molecular weight distributions in both heterogeneous and homogeneous conditions. This chapter summarizes recent advances that have been made in cellulose-based thermoplastics and elastomers from native cellulose via homogeneous CRPs.

Advertisement

2. Cellulose graft copolymers via homogeneous CRPs

2.1 Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP)

ATRP is the most used grafting method to prepare graft copolymers with cellulose-based macroinitiators and transition-metal catalysts. In general, the macroinitiators can be prepared by substituting the hydroxyl groups on cellulose backbone with chlorine or bromine-contained compounds. As shown in Figure 1, the macroinitiators, cellulose 2-bromopropionate (Cell-Bp), cellulose 2-bromoisobutyrylate (Cell-BiB), and cellulose chloroacetyl (Cell-ClAc) can be synthesized by reacting cellulose with 2-bromopropiomyl bromide, 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide, and chloroacetyl chloride in 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (AMIMCl), 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (BMIMCl) or DMAc/LiCl solution [32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37] under homogeneous conditions. The solubility of cellulose-based macroinitiator is strongly related to the DS of acylation, which can be adjusted by the molar ratio of acylating agent/AGU and reaction time [35, 38, 39, 40]. Therefore, it is flexible and convenient to prepare cellulose graft copolymers with controlled grafting density. Different solvents have been utilized as the media to synthesize cellulose graft copolymers via ATRP, including DMF, DMSO, 1,4-dioxane, AMIMCl, and BMIMCl. Moreover, varied catalyst systems, such as copper(I) chloride/2,2′-bipyridine (CuCl/bpy), CuCl/tris(2-(dimethylamino)ethyl)amine) (CuCl/Me6TREN), copper(I) bromide/bpy (CuBr/bpy), CuCl/N,N,N′,N″,N″-pentamethyldiethylenetriamine (CuCl/PMDETA), CuBr/PMDETA, CuBr/ethylenediamine, and CuBr/diethylenetriamine (CuBr/DETA), have been reported to control the grafting polymerization initiated by cellulose macroinitiator. During polymerization, the attached bromine or chlorine groups on cellulose macroinitiators can undergo a reversible redox process with metal catalysts and thus form active radicals to react and propagate with monomers. The active radicals can capture the halide ions from the oxidized metal complex to form activators and dormant halide species which can be reactivated. When polymerization is finished, the resultant cellulose graft copolymer can be obtained by removing the metal catalyst and precipitating into a poor solvent.

Figure 1.

Illustration for the synthesis of cellulose-based macroinitiators.

ATRP can be performed to synthesize different kinds of thermoplastics and elastomeric polymers due to its high tolerance. As displayed in Figure 2, a variety of vinyl and acrylate monomers, including methyl methacrylate (MMA) [33, 35, 37, 41, 42, 43, 44], N-isopropylacrylamide (NIPAM) [45, 46, 47, 48], 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine (MPC) [32], styrene (St) [35, 42], n-butyl acrylate (BA) [44], tert-butyl acrylate (tBA) [49, 50], 4-vinylpyridine (4-VP) [49, 51], acrylamide (AM) [40], 3-ethyl-3-methacryloyloxy-methyloxetane (EMO) [12], N,N-dimethylamino-2-ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA) [34, 52], N,N-dimethylacrylamide (DMA) [40, 53, 54, 55], 2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DEAEMA) [56], poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate (PEGA) [57], isoprene [36, 58, 59], ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) [60], soybean oil-based methacrylates (SOM1 and SOM2) [61], lauryl methacrylate (LMA), and dehydroabietic ethyl methacrylate (DAEMA) [62], have been grafted from cellulose via homogeneous ATRP to develop novel cellulose graft copolymers.

Figure 2.

Monomers have been used to prepare cellulose graft copolymers via ATRP strategy in homogeneous conditions.

Thermoplastics and elastomers are essential polymeric materials in our daily life, and they are commercially available and can be used in diverse areas, such as household goods, clothing, packaging, auto parts, electronics, sensors, drug delivery, seals, foods, and tissue engineering [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73]. Cellulose is an interesting natural polymeric material with high strength and durability. The marriage of cellulose and synthetic polymers can promote the development of novel thermoplastics and elastomers with excellent thermal and mechanical properties. Cellulose chains can be used as rigid backbones to design high-performance elastomers. As shown in Figure 3, Cell-g-P(BA-co-MMA) copolymer thermoplastic elastomers (TPEs) or cross-linked Cell-g-PI brush polymer elastomers (CBPs) were fabricated in our group via activators regenerated by electron transfer for atom transfer radical polymerization (ARGET ATRP) or combination of ARGET ATRP and activators regenerated by electron transfer for atom transfer radical coupling (ARGET ATRC) [44, 58]. The design concept of cellulose graft elastomers is to graft soft rubbery random polymer matrixes from cellulose backbones, and these rigid backbones can act as minority physical cross-linking points to significantly enhance the macroscopic mechanical properties of resultant elastomer materials. The tensile strength, extensibility, and elasticity can be systematically tuned by adjusting the composition and molecular weight of the grafted side chains during polymerization. ARGET ATRP was selected because of the relatively low catalyst concentration and simple purification process. Such kind of multigraft architectures can bring up huge impacts on developing new-generation sustainable thermoplastics and elastomers by elaborate molecular design with renewable resource derived monomers [74, 75].

Figure 3.

(a) Illustration for synthesis of Cell-g-P(BA-co-MMA) as TPEs via ARGET ATRP (adapted with permission from Ref. [44]). (b) Design concept of CBPs via ARGET ATRP and subsequent ARGET ATRC (adapted with permission from Ref. [58]).

Novel renewable polymers derived from resources have opened the door for sustainable science and engineering. Plant oils, which can be produced from different plants, such as palm, coconut, sunflower, olive, soy, and peanut, are typical natural resources for the chemical industry [76]. By reacting with (meth)acryloyl chloride or methacrylate anhydride, plant oils can be transformed into polymerizable monomers for free radical polymerization. Recently, two soybean oil-based sustainable monomers, SOM1 and SOM2, were designed and used by Wang and coworkers to produce Cell-g-P(SOM1-co-SOM2) copolymers via ATRP [61]. By changing the molar ratios of SOM1/SOM2 during grafting polymerization, the glass transition temperatures (Tgs) of resultant cellulose graft copolymers varied from 40.7 to −0.7°C. For comparison purpose, they also synthesized linear P(SOM1-co-SOM2) copolymers as counterparts via free radical polymerization. However, the Tg values are located in the range from −6.9 to 30.6°C, which were much lower than the values of corresponding graft counterparts. In cellulose graft copolymers, the chain mobility of P(SOM1-co-SOM2) side chains was significantly reduced due to the presence of rigid cellulose backbones and hydrogen bonding formed by hydroxyl groups on cellulose and amide groups on side chains. These transparent Cell-g-P(SOM1-co-SOM2) films show different mechanical behaviors from thermoplastics to elastomers, depending on the composition of grafted chains and cellulose content. The incorporation of cellulose as the backbone in graft copolymers could significantly enhance the tensile strength and Young’s modulus, since the corresponding linear counterparts showed much poorer mechanical properties. The combination of two kinds of distinct natural resources, cellulose and soy oils, is a promising area for developing fantastic biomaterials. Moreover, cellulose graft copolymers can also be used as templates for the synthesis of diverse one-dimensional (1D) nanocrystals with precisely controlled dimensions and compositions, including plain nanorods, core-shell nanorods, and nanotubes. In this work, cellulose-based bottlebrush-like block copolymers synthesized by sequential ATRP were applied as amphiphilic unimolecular nanoreactors to develop well-defined nanorod materials, which can find various applications in electronics, optics, sensors, optoeletronics, catalysis, and magnetic technologies [49].

It is convenient to graft polymers with apparently opposite physical properties by grafting from strategy via ATRP and thus to form self-induced nanostructures in bulk or in solutions. As shown in Figure 4, cellulose-g-polyisoprene (Cell-g-PI) composed of flexible and hydrophobic polyisoprene (PI) grafts and rigid and hydrophobic cellulose backbone synthesized via ATRP can be self-organized into core-shell nanostructures by a simple solvent-evaporation process [36]. In the past two decades, stimuli-responsive molecular brushes composed of a backbone and densely grafted side chains, which are sensitive to small external changes, such as pH, temperature, and ionic strength, have received increased attention due to their unique stimuli-responsive properties [77]. Cellulose-based polymeric micelles can be applied in drug deliveries by introducing functional polymers with good environmental sensitivities, hydrophilicity, and biocompatibility, such as poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) [45, 46, 47, 48], poly(4-vinylpyridine) (P4VP) [51], poly(N,N-dimethylamino-2-ethyl methacrylate) (PMDAEMA) [34], and poly(2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate) (PDEAEMA) [56].

Figure 4.

(a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis of Cell-g-PI by ATRP and (b) fabrication of Cell-g-PI core-shell nanoparticles with a PI core and cellulose shell (adapted with permission from Ref. [36]).

2.2 Reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization

RAFT polymerization is an alternative method to synthesize well-defined and narrow distributed polymers with complex topological architectures by choosing a proper chain transfer agent (CTA). RAFT polymerization can be conducted without using any metal catalyst, and thus it is convenient and easy to purify the resultant polymers, which is the biggest advantage over ATRP. To date, only limited attention has been paid to cellulose graft copolymers through homogeneous RAFT polymerization in the literature [78, 79, 80, 81]. The combination of cellulose and RAFT polymerization can provide new opportunities for graft copolymers, especially those that could not be synthesized directly via ATRP strategy. Recently, our group designed a novel cellulose-based macromolecular chain transfer agent by introducing a trithiocarbonate derivative with dodecyl as stabilizing group on cellulose backbone from Cell-BiB for the synthesis of Cell-g-P(BA-co-AM) copolymers as strong materials from thermoplastics to elastomers via RAFT polymerization [82]. As shown in Figure 5, the bromine groups on Cell-BiB can be substituted by reacting with 1-dodecanethiol, carbon disulfide (CS2), and triethylamine (TEA) in DMSO. This Cell-CTA is versatile and suitable for a lot of monomers, and the DS of Cell-CTA can be manipulated by changing the molar ratios of above chemical reagents. AM and BA were chosen as the rigid and soft segments in the grafted side chains. PAM can provide reversible physical network structure in the cellulose graft copolymers. The N▬H and C=O groups in AM units can form strong self-complementary hydrogen bonds, and they are distributed homogeneously in the polymer matrix, leading to the strong and tough elastomer materials. Inspired by this work, we propose that high-performance cellulose graft copolymer can be accessed by introducing other supramolecular interactions into the matrix as reversible physical networks, such as metal-ligand coordination, π-π stacking, and host-guest complexation.

Figure 5.

Illustrations for the synthesis of Cell-CTA, Cell-g-P(BA-co-AM) copolymer, and the self-complementary hydrogen bonding in the cellulose graft copolymer (adapted from Ref. [82]).

2.3 Nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP)

NMP is the first and easiest CRP technology controlled by a reversible termination mechanism between the nitroxide moieties and growing propagating macroradicals. A wide range of monomers, including acrylates, styrene derivatives, vinylpyridines, acrylonitrile, acryl acid, acrylamide derivatives, cyclic ketene acetals, and miscellaneous, can be polymerized via NMP to develop well-defined polymers [31]. The primary advantage of NMP is the absence of post-treatment since no catalyst or bimolecular exchange is needed during the polymerization. However, the higher polymerization temperatures and lower polymerization rates limit the wide applications of NMP. To the best of our knowledge, only one study reported the synthesis of cellulose graft copolymers through homogeneous NMP strategy started from microcrystalline cellulose [83]. In this work, pretreated cellulose was dispersed in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran and reacted with 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide and pyridine to prepare Cell-BiB. As shown in Figure 6, Cell-BiB could react with 4-hydroxy-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl (TEMPOL) in DMF in the presence of sodium hydride (NaH) to obtain functionalized cellulose (Cell-TEMPOL). At first, PS was grafted from cellulose backbone with Cell-TEMPOL as macroinitiator in the absence of any catalyst to produce Cell-g-PS. Cell-g-(PMMA-b-PS) copolymer was synthesized by chain extension of above Cell-g-PS via the second NMP. Such kind of cellulose graft block copolymers may be applied as reinforcing agents, packing materials, and membrane materials. More efforts can be made in the future by grafting functional block polymers from cellulose via NMP to design novel stimuli-responsive hybrid materials with excellent macroscopic mechanical properties.

Figure 6.

Schematic illustration for the synthesis of Cell-g-PS and Cell-g-(PMMA-b-PS) copolymers through NMP technique.

Advertisement

3. Perspective

CRPs are versatile and robust techniques to develop well-defined cellulose graft copolymers as novel thermoplastic and elastomers with desired properties for particular application demands. As the most adopted technique for cellulose graft copolymers, conventional ATRP suffers from the limitation of removing metal catalysts from the resultant products, which may cause undesired toxicity and coloration. Recently, new advances in ARTP have been reported, and metal-free ATRP has been developed to synthesize narrowly distributed polymers with well-defined structures by using photoredox organic catalysts under light irradiation instead of metal catalysts [84, 85, 86]. This new strategy can greatly promote the design and preparation of cellulose graft copolymers for different application fields. Cellulose graft copolymers show improved properties compared to the linear counterparts due to their unique molecular architectures, and the macroscopic performance of cellulose graft copolymers is affected by the degree of polymerization of cellulose backbone, the grafting density (the average number of grafts per anhydroglucose unit), the degree of polymerization, and distribution of grafts. Various block and random copolymers have been grafted from cellulose via CRPs as described above. However, as exhibited in Figure 7a, heterograft and graft-on-graft architectures with cellulose as backbone remain unreported, and these interesting graft copolymers can be synthesized by the combination of RAFT polymerization and ATRP, ring-opening polymerization (ROP) and ATRP or ROP and RAFT polymerization.

Figure 7.

(a) Heterograft and graft-on-graft architectures of cellulose graft copolymers. (b) Sustainable monomers derived from different bioresources.

Due to the increased attention paid on biomass-derived thermoplastics and elastomers, it becomes necessary and desirable to explore new monomers, which can be synthesized from bioresources, including lignins, terpenes, plant oils, rosin acids, and coumarins. For instance, bioresources, 7-hydroxyl-4-methylcoumarin, vanillin, guaiacol, and oleyl alcohol, can be used to synthesize sustainable monomers by reacting with acryloyl chloride, methacryloyl chloride or methacrylate anhydride as shown in Figure 7b. Among these monomers, 7-acryloyloxy-4-methylcoumarin (AMC), 7-methacryloyloxy-4-methylcoumarin (MMC), acrylated vanillin (AV), methacrylated vanillin (MV), acrylated guaiacol (AG), and methacylated guaiacol (MG) can be utilized as rigid segments, while oleyl acrylate (OA) and oleyl methacrylate (OM) can be utilized as soft segments in the graft copolymers. Though there has been considerable progress, it is still challenging to achieve breakthroughs for the development of cellulose graft copolymers with ultra-strong mechanical properties comparable to commercial petroleum-based products. The marriage of cellulose and novel bio-based monomers via CRPs can provide a variety of opportunities for sustainable materials ranging from thermoplastics to elastomers, and these fascinating materials can find a pyramid of applications in our daily life in the near future.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 51603199 and 21776049) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant 2017M622629).

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Spence KL, Venditti RA, Rojas OJ, Habibi Y, Pawlak JJ. The effect of chemical composition on microfibrillar cellulose films from wood pulps: Water interactions and physical properties for packaging applications. Cellulose. 2010;17:835-848. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-010-9424-8
  2. 2. Amin MCIM, Ahmad N, Halib N, Ahmad I. Synthesis and characterization of thermo- and pH-responsive bacterial cellulose/acrylic acid hydrogels for drug delivery. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012;88:465-473. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.12.022
  3. 3. Ullah H, Santos HA, Khan T. Applications of bacterial cellulose in food, cosmetics and drug delivery. Cellulose. 2016;23:2291-2314. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-0986-y
  4. 4. Forsman N, Lozhechnikova A, Khakalo A, Johansson LS, Vartiainen J, Österberg M. Layer-by-layer assembled hydrophobic coatings for cellulose nanofibril films and textiles, made of polylysine and natural wax particles. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2017;173:392-402. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.007
  5. 5. Livazovic S, Li Z, Behzad AR, Peinemann KV, Nunes SP. Cellulose multilayer membranes manufacture with ionic liquid. Journal of Membrane Science. 2015;490:282-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.009
  6. 6. Zhang QL, Lin DQ, Yao SJ. Review on biomedical and bioengineering applications of cellulose sulfate. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2015;132:311-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.06.041
  7. 7. Jung YH, Chang TH, Zhang HL, Yao CH, Zheng QF, Yang VW, et al. High-performance green flexible electronics based on biodegradable cellulose nanofibril paper. Nature Communications. 2015;6:7170. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8170
  8. 8. Moon RJ, Martini A, Nairn J, Simonsen J, Youngblood J. Cellulose nanomaterials review: Structure, properties and nanocomposites. Chemical Society Reviews. 2011;40:3941-3994. DOI: 10.1039/c0cs00108b
  9. 9. Zhang X, Mao YM, Tyagi M, Jiang F, Henderson D, Jiang B, et al. Molecular partitioning in ternary solutions of cellulose. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2019;220:157-162. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.054
  10. 10. Araki J, Kataoka T, Katsuyama N, Teramoto A, Ito K, Abe K. A preliminary study for fiber spinning of mixed solutions of polyrotaxane and cellulose in a dimethylacetamide/lithium chloride (DMAC/LiCl) solvent system. Polymer. 2006;47:8241-8246. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.09.060
  11. 11. Ostlund Å, Lundberg D, Nordstierna L, Holmberg K, Nydén M. Dissolution and gelation of cellulose in TBAF/DMSO solutions: The roles of fluoride ions and water. Biomacromolecules. 2009;10:2401-2407. DOI: 10.1021/bm900667q
  12. 12. Philipp B, Nehls I, Wagenknecht W, Schnabelrauch M. 13C-NMR spectroscopic study of the homogeneous sulphation of cellulose and xylan in the N2O4-DMF system. Carbohydrate Research. 1987;164:107-116. DOI: 10.1016/0008-6215(87)80123-4
  13. 13. Rosenau T, Potthast A, Sixta H, Kosma P. The chemistry of side reactions and byproduct formation in the system NMMO/cellulose (Lyocell process). Progress in Polymer Science. 2001;26:1763-1837. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6700(01)00023-5
  14. 14. Cai J, Zhang LN. Unique gelation behavior of cellulose in NaOH/urea aqueous solution. Biomacromolecules. 2006;7:183-189. DOI: 10.1021/bm0505585
  15. 15. Pinkert A, Marsh KN, Pang SS, Staiger MP. Ionic liquids and their interaction with cellulose. Chemical Reviews. 2009;109:6712-6728. DOI: 10.1021/cr9001947
  16. 16. Fox SC, Li B, Xu DQ, Edgar KJ. Regioselective esterification and etherification of cellulose: A review. Biomacromolecules. 2011;12:1956-1972. DOI: 10.1021/bm200260d
  17. 17. Satgé C, Verneuil B, Branland P, Granet R, Krausz P, Rozier J, et al. Rapid homogeneous esterification of cellulose induced by microwave irradiation. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2002;49:373-376. DOI: 10.1016/S0144-8617(02)00004-8
  18. 18. Yu TL, Liu SQ, Xu M, Peng J, Li JQ, Zhai ML. Synthesis of novel aminated cellulose microsphere adsorbent for efficient Cr(VI) removal. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2016;125:94-101. DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.03.019
  19. 19. Montanari S, Roumani M, Heux L, Vignon MR. Topochemistry of carboxylated cellulose nanocrystals resulting from TEMPO-mediated oxidation. Macromolecules. 2005;38:1665-1671. DOI: 10.1021/ma048396c
  20. 20. Barthel S, Heinze T. Acylation and carbanilation of cellulose in ionic liquids. Green Chemistry. 2006;8:301-306. DOI: 10.1039/B513157J
  21. 21. Wu J, Zhang J, Zhang H, He JS, Ren Q, Guo ML. Homogeneous acetylation of cellulose in a new ionic liquid. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:266-268. DOI: 10.1021/bm034398d
  22. 22. Carlmark A, Larsson E, Malmström E. Grafting of cellulose by ring-opening polymerisation-a review. European Polymer Journal. 2012;48:1646-1659. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2012.06.013
  23. 23. Horikawa M, Fujiki T, Shirosaki T, Ryu N, Sakurai H, Nagaoka S, et al. The development of a highly conductive PEDOT system by doping with partially crystalline sulfated cellulose and its electric conductivity. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 2015;3:8881-8887. DOI: 10.1039/c5tc02074c
  24. 24. Zhang Z, Tingaut P, Rentsch D, Zimmermann T, Sèbe G. Controlled silylation of nanofibrillated cellulose in water: Reinforcement of a model polydimethylsiloxane network. ChemSusChem. 2015;8:2681-2690. DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201500525
  25. 25. Roy D, Semsarilar M, Guthrie JT, Perrier S. Cellulose modification by polymer grafting: A review. Chemical Society Reviews. 2009;38:2046-2064. DOI: 10.1039/b808639g
  26. 26. Matyjaszewski K. Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP): Current status and future perspectives. Macromolecules. 2012;45:4015-4039. DOI: 10.1021/ma3001719
  27. 27. Siegwart DJ, Oh JK, Matyjaszewski K. ATRP in the design of functional materials for biomedical applications. Progress in Polymer Science. 2012;37:18-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2011.08.001
  28. 28. Chiefari J, Chong YK, Ercole F, Krstina J, Jeffery J, Le TP, et al. Living free-radical polymerization by reversible addition-fragmentation chain transfer: The RAFT process. Macromolecules. 1998;31:5559-5562. DOI: 10.1021/ma9804951
  29. 29. Boyer C, Bulmus V, Davis TP, Ladmiral V, Liu JQ, Perrier S. Bioapplications of RAFT polymerization. Chemical Reviews. 2009;109:5402-5436. DOI: 10.1021/cr9001403
  30. 30. Hawker CJ, Bosman AW, Harth E. New polymer synthesis by nitroxide mediated living radical polymerizations. Chemical Reviews. 2001;101:3661-3688. DOI: 10.1021/cr990119u
  31. 31. Nicolas J, Guillaneuf Y, Lefay C, Bertin D, Gigmes D, Charleux B. Nitroxide-mediated polymerization. Progress in Polymer Science. 2013;38:63-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.06.002
  32. 32. Yan LF, Ishihara K. Graft copolymerization of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine to cellulose in homogeneous media using atom transfer radical polymerization for providing new hemocompatible coating materials. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2008;46:3306-3313. DOI: 10.1002/pola.22670
  33. 33. Chang FX, Yamabuki K, Onimura K, Oishi T. Modification of cellulose by using atom transfer radical polymerization and ring-opening polymerization. Polymer Journal. 2008;40:1170. DOI: 10.1295/polymj.PJ2008136
  34. 34. Sui XF, Yuan JY, Zhou M, Zhang J, Yang HJ, Yuan WZ, et al. Synthesis of cellulose-graft-poly(N,N-dimethylamino-2-ethyl methacrylate) copolymers via homogeneous ATRP and their aggregates in aqueous media. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:2615-2620. DOI: 10.1021/bm800538d
  35. 35. Meng T, Gao X, Zhang J, Yuan JY, Zhang YZ, He JS. Graft copolymers prepared by atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) from cellulose. Polymer. 2009;50:447-454. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.11.011
  36. 36. Wang ZK, Zhang YQ, Jiang F, Fang HG, Wang ZG. Synthesis and characterization of designed cellulose-graft-polyisoprene copolymers. Polymer Chemistry. 2014;5:3379-3388. DOI: 10.1039/c3py01574b
  37. 37. Lin CX, Zhan HY, Liu MH, Fu SY, Zhang JJ. Preparation of cellulose graft poly(methyl methacrylate) copolymers by atom transfer radical polymerization in an ionic liquid. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2009;78:432-438. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.04.032
  38. 38. Wang HL, Fu YJ, Wang ZF, Shao ZY, Qin MH. Regioselectivity in the acylation of cellulose with 2-bromoisobutyryl bromide under homogeneous conditions. Cellulose Chemistry and Technology. 2017;51:11-21
  39. 39. Fu YJ, Li GB, Wang RR, Zhang FS, Qin MH. Effect of the molecular structure of acylating agents on the regioselectivity of cellulosic hydroxyl groups in ionic liquid. BioResources. 2017;12:992-1006. DOI: 10.15376/biores.12.1.992-1006
  40. 40. Hiltunen MS, Raula J, Maunu SL. Tailoring of water-soluble cellulose-g-copolymers in homogeneous medium using single-electron-transfer living radical polymerization. Polymer International. 2011;60:1370-1379. DOI: 10.1002/pi.3090
  41. 41. Xin TT, Yuan TQ, Xiao S, He J. Synthesis of cellulose-graft-poly(methyl methacrylate) via homogeneous ATRP. BioResources. 2011;6:2941-2953
  42. 42. Raus V, Štěpánek M, Uchman M, Šlouf M, Látalová P, Čadová E, et al. Cellulose-based graft copolymers with controlled architecture prepared in a homogeneous phase. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2011;49:4353-4367. DOI: 10.1002/pola.24876
  43. 43. Zhong JF, Chai XS, Fu SY. Homogeneous grafting poly(methyl methacrylate) on cellulose by atom transfer radical polymerization. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012;87:1869-1873. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.07.037
  44. 44. Jiang F, Wang ZK, Qiao YL, Wang ZG, Tang CB. A novel architecture toward third-generation thermoplastic elastomers by a grafting strategy. Macromolecules. 2013;46:4772-4780. DOI: 10.1021/ma4007472
  45. 45. Ifuku S, Kadla JF. Preparation of a thermosensitive highly regioselective cellulose/N-isopropylacrylamide copolymer through atom transfer radical polymerization. Biomacromolecules. 2008;9:3308-3313. DOI: 10.1021/bm800911w
  46. 46. Cui GH, Li YH, Shi TT, Gao ZG, Qiu NN, Satoh T, et al. Synthesis and characterization of Eu(III) complexes of modified cellulose and poly(N-isopropylacrylamide). Carbohydrate Polymers. 2013;94:77-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.01.045
  47. 47. Yang LL, Zhang JM, He JS, Zhang J, Gan ZH. Synthesis and characterization of temperature-sensitive cellulose-graft-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) copolymers. Chinese Journal of Polymer Science. 2015;33:1640-1649. DOI: 10.1007/s10118-015-1703-2
  48. 48. Liu YD, Huang GC, Pang YY, Han MM, Ji SX. One-pot synthesis of thermoresponsive cellulose-based miktoarm graft copolymer by simultaneous ATRP and ROP. Journal of Renewable Materials. 2015;3:113-119. DOI: 10.7569/JRM.2014.634141
  49. 49. Pang XC, He YJ, Jung J, Lin ZQ. 1d nanocrystals with precisely controlled dimensions, compositions, and architectures. Science. 2016;353:1268-1272. DOI: 10.1126/science.aad8279
  50. 50. Chmielarz P. Cellulose-based graft copolymers prepared by simplified electrochemically mediated ATRP. Express Polymer Letters. 2017;11:140. DOI: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2017.15
  51. 51. Du H, Han RT, Tang EJ, Zhou J, Liu SJ, Guo XF, et al. Synthesis of pH-responsive cellulose-g-P4VP by atom transfer radical polymerization in ionic liquid, loading, and controlled release of aspirin. Journal of Polymer Research. 2018;25:205. DOI: 10.1007/s10965-018-1601-8
  52. 52. Parviainen H, Hiltunen M, Maunu SL. Preparation and flocculation behavior of cellulose-g-PMOTAC copolymer. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2014;131:40448. DOI: 10.1002/app.40448
  53. 53. Hiltunen M, Siirilä J, Aseyev V, Maunu SL. Cellulose-g-PDMAam copolymers by controlled radical polymerization in homogeneous medium and their aqueous solution properties. European Polymer Journal. 2012;48:136-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.10.010
  54. 54. Hiltunen M, Siirilä J, Maunu SL. Effect of catalyst systems and reaction conditions on the synthesis of cellulose-g-PDMAam copolymers by controlled radical polymerization. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2012;50:3067-3076. DOI: 10.1002/pola.26092
  55. 55. Yan LF, Wei T. Graft copolymerization of N,N-dimethylacrylamide to cellulose in homogeneous media using atom transfer radical polymerization for hemocompatibility. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering. 2008;1:37. DOI: 10.4236/jbise.2008.11006
  56. 56. Tang EJ, Du KD, Feng XY, Yuan M, Liu SJ, Zhao DS. Controlled synthesis of cellulose-graft-poly[2-(diethylamino)-ethyl methacrylate] by ATRP in ionic liquid [AMIM]Cl and its pH-responsive property. European Polymer Journal. 2015;66:228-235. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.01.041
  57. 57. Zhang YQ, Xu ZH, Wang ZK, Ding YS, Wang ZG. Strong enhancements of nucleation and spherulitic growth rates through amplified interfacial effects for immiscible linear polymer/comb-like copolymer double-layer films. RSC Advances. 2014;4:20582-20591. DOI: 10.1039/c4ra02167c
  58. 58. Wang ZK, Jiang F, Zhang YQ, You YZ, Wang ZG, Guan ZB. Bioinspired design of nanostructured elastomers with cross-linked soft matrix grafting on the oriented rigid nanofibers to mimic mechanical properties of human skin. ACS Nano. 2015;9:271-278. DOI: 10.1021/nn506960f
  59. 59. Wang ZK, Yuan L, Jiang F, Zhang YQ, Wang ZG, Tang CB. Bioinspired high resilient elastomers to mimic resilin. ACS Macro Letters. 2016;5:220-223. DOI: 10.1021/acsmacrolett.5b00843
  60. 60. Zhou J, Tang EJ, Zhao L, Han RT, Liu SJ, Zhao DS. Adjustment of molecular weight for a cellulose-graft-poly(ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) plymer brush by atom transfer radical polymerization in an ionic liquid. Journal of Polymer Materials. 2018;35:245-256. DOI: 10.32381/JPM.2018.35.02.9
  61. 61. Wu M, Zhang YQ, Peng Q, Song LZ, Hu ZG, Li Z, et al. Mechanically strong plant oil-derived thermoplastic polymers prepared via cellulose graft strategy. Applied Surface Science. 2018;458:495-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.072
  62. 62. Liu YP, Yao KJ, Chen XM, Wang JF, Wang ZK, Ploehn HJ, et al. Sustainable thermoplastic elastomers derived from renewable cellulose, rosin and fatty acids. Polymer Chemistry. 2014;5:3170-3181. DOI: 10.1039/c3py01260c
  63. 63. Puskas JE, Chen YH. Biomedical application of commercial polymers and novel polyisobutylene-based thermoplastic elastomers for soft tissue replacement. Biomacromolecules. 2004;5:1141-1154. DOI: 10.1021/bm034513k
  64. 64. Adhikari B, Majumdar S. Polymers in sensor applications. Progress in Polymer Science. 2004;29:699-766. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2004.03.002
  65. 65. Cheng YJ, Yang SH, Hsu CS. Synthesis of conjugated polymers for organic solar cell applications. Chemical Reviews. 2009;109:5868-5923. DOI: 10.1021/cr900182s
  66. 66. Jiang F, Zhang YQ, Fang C, Wang ZK, Wang ZG. From soft to strong elastomers: The role of additional crosslinkings in copolymer-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotube composite thermoplastic elastomers. RSC Advances. 2014;4:60079-60085. DOI: 10.1039/c4ra11626g
  67. 67. Jiang F, Zhang YQ, Wang ZK, Fang HG, Ding YS, Xu HX, et al. Synthesis and characterization of nanostructured copolymer-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotube composite thermoplastic elastomers toward unique morphology and strongly enhanced mechanical properties. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2014;53:20154-20167. DOI: 10.1021/ie504005f
  68. 68. Jiang F, Zhang YQ, Wang ZK, Wang WT, Xu ZH, Wang ZG. Combination of magnetic and enhanced mechanical properties for copolymer-grafted magnetite composite thermoplastic elastomers. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2015;7:10563-10575. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b02208
  69. 69. Fang C, Zhang YQ, Wang WT, Wang ZK, Jiang F, Wang ZG. Fabrication of copolymer-grafted multiwalled carbon nanotube composite thermoplastic elastomers filled with unmodified MWCNTs as additional nanofillers to significantly improve both electrical conductivity and mechanical properties. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2015;54:12597-12606. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.5b03599
  70. 70. Jiang F, Fang C, Zhang J, Wang WT, Wang ZG. Triblock copolymer elastomers with enhanced mechanical properties synthesized by RAFT polymerization and subsequent quaternization through incorporation of a comonomer with imidazole groups of about 2.0 mass percentage. Macromolecules. 2017;50:6218-6226. DOI: 10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01414
  71. 71. Wang WT, Wang XH, Jiang F, Wang ZG. Synthesis, order-to-disorder transition, microphase morphology and mechanical properties of BAB triblock copolymer elastomers with hard middle block and soft outer blocks. Polymer Chemistry. 2018;9:3067-3079. DOI: 10.1039/C8PY00375K
  72. 72. Jiang F, Zhang X, Hwang W, Briber RM, Fang YX, Wang H. Supramolecular luminescent triblock copolymer thermoplastic elastomer via metal-ligand coordination. Polymer Testing. 2019;78:105956. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.105956
  73. 73. Wang WT, Zhang J, Jiang F, Wang XH, Wang ZG. Reprocessable supramolecular thermoplastic BAB-type triblock copolymer elastomers with enhanced tensile strength and toughness via metal-ligand coordination. ACS Applied Polymer Materials. 2019;1:571-583. DOI: 10.1021/acsapm.8b00277
  74. 74. Wang ZK, Yuan L, Tang CB. Sustainable elastomers from renewable biomass. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2017;50:1762-1773. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00209
  75. 75. Wang WY, Lu W, Goodwin A, Wang HQ, Yin PC, Kang NG, et al. Recent advances in thermoplastic elastomers from living polymerizations: Macromolecular architectures and supramolecular chemistry. Progress in Polymer Science. 2019;95:1-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.04.002
  76. 76. Tschan MJ-L, Brulé E, Haquette P, Thomas CM. Synthesis of biodegradable polymers from renewable resources. Polymer Chemistry. 2012;3:836-851. DOI: 10.1039/C2PY00452F
  77. 77. Lee H, Pietrasik J, Sheiko SS, Matyjaszewski K. Stimuli-responsive molecular brushes. Progress in Polymer Science. 2010;35:24-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2009.11.002
  78. 78. Lin CX, Zhan HY, Liu MH, Habibi Y, Fu SY, Lucia LA. RAFT synthesis of cellulose-g-polymethylmethacrylate copolymer in an ionic liquid. Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2013;127:4840-4849. DOI: 10.1002/app.38071
  79. 79. Hufendiek A, Trouillet V, Meier MA, Barner-Kowollik C. Temperature responsive cellulose-graft-copolymers via cellulose functionalization in an ionic liquid and RAFT polymerization. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15:2563-2572. DOI: 10.1021/bm500416m
  80. 80. Liu YD, Jin XS, Zhang XS, Han MM, Ji SX. Self-assembly and chiroptical property of poly(N-acryloyl-L-amino acid) grafted celluloses synthesized by raft polymerization. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2015;117:312-318. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.09.074
  81. 81. Ott MW, Herbert H, Graf M, Biesalski M. Cellulose-graft-polystyrene bottle-brush copolymers by homogeneous raft polymerization of soluble cellulose macro-ctas and “cta-shuttled” r-group approach. Polymer. 2016;98:505-515. DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.006
  82. 82. Jiang F, Pan CQ, Zhang YQ, Fang YX. Cellulose graft copolymers toward strong thermoplastic elastomers via raft polymerization. Applied Surface Science. 2019;480:162-171. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.210
  83. 83. Karaj-Abad SG, Abbasian M, Jaymand M. Grafting of poly[(methyl methacrylate)-block-styrene] onto cellulose via nitroxide-mediated polymerization, and its polymer/clay nanocomposite. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2016;152:297-305. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.017
  84. 84. Treat NJ, Sprafke H, Kramer JW, Clark PG, Barton BE, Read de Alaniz J, et al. Metal-free atom transfer radical polymerization. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2014;136:16096-16101. DOI: 10.1021/ja510389m
  85. 85. Theriot JC, Lim C-H, Yang H, Ryan MD, Musgrave CB, Miyake GM. Organocatalyzed atom transfer radical polymerization driven by visible light. Science. 2016;352:1082-1086. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaf3935
  86. 86. Lu CW, Wang CP, Yu J, Wang JF, Chu FX. Metal-free ATRP “grafting from” technique for renewable cellulose graft copolymers. Green Chemistry. 2019;21:2759-2770. DOI: 10.1039/C9GC00138G

Written By

Feng Jiang, Fenfen Wang, Chenqian Pan and Yanxiong Fang

Submitted: 15 August 2019 Reviewed: 30 August 2019 Published: 28 September 2019