Genes and encoded proteins implicated in halotolerance in
Abstract
Here, we report the osmoadaptation strategies adopted by the halotolerant species Halomonas titanicae BH1(T) inferred from genome sequence analysis. BH strain was isolated in 2010 from a rusticated sample collected in 1991 from the wreck of the Titanic, genome deposited in the database under the accession number (CP059082.1). It showed a high salt tolerance ranging from 0.5 to 25% NaCl (w/v) (optimal growth at 10% NaCl) with no growth in the absence of NaCl. The phylogenomic analysis showed that the BH1 strain is more closely related to the Halomonas sedementi QX-2, a strain isolated from deep-sea sediments. The RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology) annotation revealed divergent mechanisms involved in the primary and secondary response to osmotic stress citing protein implicated in potassium transport, periplasmic glucan synthesis, choline and betaine upake system, biosynthesis of glycine-betaine, ectoine, and proline. These findings provide an overview of the osmoadaptive mechanisms of H. titanicae BH1, and could offer helpful information to future biotechnological applications like osmolyte synthesis and related applications.
Keywords
- Halomonas titanicae BH1
- osmoadaptation
- osmolytes
- genome sequence
1. Introduction
Here, we attempt to unravel the mechanisms of osmoadaption of adopted by
2. Material and method
2.1 H. titanicae BH1 genome sequence analysis
2.2 Phylogenomic analysis of H. titanicae BH1
The whole-genome-based taxonomic analysis was performed by type strain genome server (TYGS) (at https://tygs.dsmz.de) [12]. The phylogenomic tree assessment was carried out using FastME algorithm [13] from the Genome BLAST Distance Phylogeny (GBDP). All pairwise-genome comparisons were conducted using Genome BLAST Distance Phylogeny approach (GBDP) under the algorithm “coverage” and distance formula d5 [14]. The trees were rooted at the midpoint [15]. Branch supports were inferred from 100 pseudo-bootstrap replicates.
2.3 Identification of genes involved in halotolerance in H. titanicae BH1
Genome sequence annotation was uploaded in Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology server (RAST, http://rast.nmpdr.org/) to identify potential genes and subsystems involved in the osomoadaptation pathways.
3. Results and discussions
3.1 Genome features and phylogenomic analysis
Whole genome-based phylogenetic tree conducted by TYGS illustrated that strain BH1 forms a distinct clade with and forms a distinct cluster with
The distribution of predicted genes based on RAST annotation among the subsystem database (Figure 3) revealed that subsystems with “Amino Acids and Derivatives (414)” and “Carbohydrates (281)” were the most represented subsystem features. In addition, the annotated subsystem features denoted 107 genes associated with “Stress response.”
3.2 Genes related to osmoadaptation strategies in H. titanicae strain BH1
3.2.1 Primary responses to osmotic stress
3.2.1.1 Salt-in strategy: potassium transport
The Trk-type transporter system: Mining of the BH1 genome sequence showed three Trk-type transporters (Table 1) (i) TrkA system potassium uptake protein, serves to control the activity of the potassium translocating subunit (ii) TrkH system potassium uptake protein, exhibits only a low affinity for K+ (iii) TrkI system potassium uptake protein, the main K+ transporter in osmotically adapted cells, exhibits medium affinity for K+. Several studies reported the role of K+ uptake
Subsystem | Gene | Predicted protein |
---|---|---|
Primary response to osmotic stress | ||
Trk-like transporter | Potassium transporter TrkA | |
Trk system potassium uptake protein | ||
Trk system potassium uptake protein | ||
transcriptional regulatory protein | ||
Histidine kinase | ||
Synthesis of osmoregulated periplasmic glucans | Glucan biosynthesis glucosyltransferase H | |
Glucan biosynthesis protein G precursor | ||
Secondary response to osmotic stress—use of osmolytes | ||
Ectoine biosynthesis and uptake | L-aspartate-β-semialdehyde dehydrogenase | |
L-aspartate kinase | ||
L-2,4-diaminobutyric acid acetyltransferase | ||
Diaminobutyrate-pyruvate aminotransferase | ||
L-ectoine synthase | ||
Ectoine hydroxylase | ||
Ectoine-binding periplasmic protein | ||
Ectoine TRAP transporter large permease protein | ||
TRAP-T-associated universal stress protein | ||
Ectoine TRAP transporter small permease protein | ||
Xaa-Pro dipeptidase | ||
Choline and Betaine Uptake and Betaine Biosynthesis | Choline transporter | |
Glycine betaine transporter | ||
Choline dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.99.1) | ||
betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase | ||
Choline-sulfatase (EC 3.1.6.6) | ||
HTH-type transcriptional regulator BetI | ||
dimethylglycine demethylation protein | ||
SoxBDAG | ||
Glycine betaine transporter | ||
Glycine betaine ABC transport system, glycine betaine-binding protein | ||
L-proline glycine betaine binding ABC transporter protein | ||
Glycine betaine/carnitine transport binding protein | ||
Quaternary-amine-transporting ATPase | ||
Glycine betaine uptake system permease protein | ||
Glycine betaine uptake system permease protein | ||
L-carnitine/gamma-butyrobetaine antiporter | ||
Proline synthesis and uptake | proline/glycine betaine ABC transporter permease | |
proA | glutamate semialdehyde dehydrogenase | |
proJ | the glutamate 5-kinase | |
Glutamate-5-semialdehyde dehydrogenase | ||
proline/glycine betaine ABC transporter permease | ||
Proline racemase | Proline, 4-hydroxyproline uptake and utilization | |
PutR for proline utilization, | Proline, 4-hydroxyproline uptake and utilization |
Trk-type transporter systems have an important role in controlling the flux of potassium (K+) ions into cells. Generally, K+ ions enter passively
3.2.1.2 Periplasmic glucans synthesis
Periplasmic glucans synthesis (OPG) in
3.2.2 Secondary response to osmotic stress: biosynthesis and uptake of osmolytes
Osmolytes are organic molecules with low molecular weight, which can accumulate in cells at elevated concentrations without interfering with cell function, thanks to their high solubility and non-interaction with proteins [5, 7]. Analysis of the BH1 genome sequence revealed several osmolytes implicated in osmodapatation.
3.2.2.1 Ectoine biosynthesis and uptake
The complete biosynthetic pathway of ectoine/hydroxyectoine was identified in BH1 genome sequence (Table 1, Figure 4). In fact, the biosynthesis of ectoine from aspartate is catalyzed successively by five enzymes: L-aspartate kinase (Ask), L-aspartate-β-semialdehyde dehydrogenase (Asd), L-2,4-diaminobutyrate aminotransferase (EctB), L-2,4-diaminobutyrate acetyltransferase (EctA), and ectoine synthase (EctC). In addition, ectoine hydroxylase (EctD), which catalyzes the conversion of ectoine to hydroxyectoine, has been identified. The genes encoding EctB, EctA, and EctC are typically present as a gene cluster (ectABC) in some cases with ectD [21, 22].
In addition, the TeaABCD gene cluster, involved in the uptake of ectoine as a response to an osmotic shock, has also been identified (Figure 4, Table 1).
3.2.2.2 Choline and glycine betaine uptake and biosynthesis
Osmotic adaptation can also be achieved by the uptake of betaine/choline osmolytes available in the environment. It should be noted that the uptake strategy is favored as it is significantly less energetically expensive than the
3.2.2.3 Uptake of choline and glycine betaine
Choline uptake is achieved by the BetT2 osmo-dependent choline transporter, transcribed
3.2.2.4 Glycine betaine biosynthesis
3.2.2.5 Proline biosynthesis and uptake
Glutamate is considered as the primary precursor amino acid for proline synthesis. The biosynthesis is catalyzed by three enzymes (Table 1, Figure 6) [26, 27]: First, glutamate 5-kinase (proJ), catalyzes the transfer of a phosphate group to glutamate to form L-glutamate 5-phosphate. Then, glutamate semialdehyde dehydrogenase (proA), catalyzes the NADPH-dependent reduction of L-glutamate 5-phosphate to L-glutamate 5-semialdehyde. Next, Pyrroline-5-carboxylate reductase (proH) catalyzes the reduction of 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate (PCA) to L-proline. The uptake of proline is under osmotic control and is mediated by the osmoregulated glycine betaine transport systems and 4-hydroxyproline uptake and utilization (Table 1).
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, the analysis of the whole genome sequence gave us an insight into the osmotic adaptation mechanisms adopted by the
References
- 1.
Sánchez-Porro C, Kaur B, Mann H, Ventosa A. Halomonas titanicae sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium isolated from the RMS titanic. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 2010;60 :2768-2774 - 2.
de la Haba RR, Sánchez-Porro C, Ventosa A. Taxonomy, phylogeny, and biotechnological interest of the family Halomonadaceae. In: Ventosa A, Oren A, Ma Y, editors. Halophiles and Hypersaline Environments. Heidelbeg, Germany: Springer; 2011. pp. 27-64 - 3.
Zhang T, Zhang X, Li Y, Yang N, Qiao L, Miao Z, et al. Study of osmoadaptation mechanisms of halophilic Halomonas alkaliphila XH26 under salt stress by transcriptome and ectoine analysis. Extremophiles. 2022; 26 (1):14 - 4.
Arahal DR, Ventosa A. The family Halomonadaceae . In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Eosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E, editors. The Prokaryotes: A Handbook on the Biology of Bacteria. Singapore: Springer Science; 2006. pp. 811-835 - 5.
Roberts, m. f. Osmoadaptation and osmoregulation in archaea: Update 2004. Frontiers in Bioscience. 2004; 2004 :1999-2019 - 6.
Najjari A et al. Patterns and determinants of halophilic Archaea (class Halobacteria) diversity in Tunisian endorheic Salt Lakes and Sebkhet systems. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2015; 81 (13):4432-4441. DOI: 10.1128/aem.01097-15 - 7.
Youssef NH et al. Trehalose/2-sulfotrehalose biosynthesis and glycine-betaine uptake are widely spread mechanisms for osmoadaptation in the Halobacteriales. ISME Journal. 2014; 8 (3):636-649. DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2013.165 - 8.
Hill AE, Shachar-Hill Y. ‘Are Aquaporins the Missing Transmembrane Osmosensors ?’. 2015. DOI: 10.1007/s00232-015-9790-0. - 9.
Ferrer J, San E. Competition for water between protein (from Haloferax mediterranei) and cations Na + and K +: A quantum approach to problem. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts. 2016; 135 (9):1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00214-016-1983-9 - 10.
Vaidya S, Dev K, Sourirajan A. Distinct Osmoadaptation strategies in the strict halophilic and halotolerant Bacteria isolated from Lunsu salt water body of north West Himalayas. Current Microbiology. 2018; 75 (7):888-895. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-018-1462-8 - 11.
Sánchez-Porro C, de la Haba RR, Cruz-Hernández N, González JM, Reyes-Guirao C, Navarro-Sampedro L, et al. Draft genome of the marine Gammaproteobacterium Halomonas titanicae. Genome Announcements. 2013; 1 (2):e0008313. DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.00083-13 - 12.
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nature Communications. 2019; 10 :2182. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3 - 13.
Desper R, Gascuel O. Fast and accurate phylogeny reconstruction algorithms based on the minimum-evolution principle. Journal of Computational Biology. 2002; 9 (5):687-705. DOI: 10.1089/106652702761034136 - 14.
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013; 14 :60 - 15.
Farris JS. Estimating phylogenetic trees from distance matrices. The American Naturalist. 1972; 106 :645-668. DOI: 10.1086/282802 - 16.
Qiu X, Yu L, Cao X, Wu H, Xu G, Tang X. Halomonas sedimenti sp. nov., a halotolerant bacterium isolated from Deep-Sea sediment of the Southwest Indian Ocean. Current Microbiology. 2021 Apr; 78 (4):1662-1669. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-021-02425-9 - 17.
Bremer E, Krämer R. Responses of microorganisms to osmotic stress. Annual Review of Microbiology. 2019; 73 :313-334. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115504 - 18.
Sleator RD, Hill C. Bacterial osmoadaptation: The role of osmolytes in bacterial stress and virulence. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2002; 26 :49-71. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1574-6976.2002.tb00598.x - 19.
Price-Whelan A, Poon CK, Benson MA, Eidem TT, Roux CM, Boyd JM, et al. Transcriptional profiling of Staphylococcus aureus during growth in 2 M NaCl leads to clarification of physiological roles for Kdp and Ktr K+ uptake systems. mBio. 2013; 4 :e00407-e00413. DOI: 10.1128/mBio.00407- 13 - 20.
Kindzierski V, Raschke S, Knabe N, Siedler F, Scheffer B, Pflüger-Grau K, et al. Osmoregulation in the halophilic bacterium Halomonas elongata: A case study for integrative systems biology. PLoS One. 2017; 12 :e0168818. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168818 - 21.
Ono H, Sawada K, Khunajakr N, Tao T, Yamamoto M, Hiramoto M, et al. Characterization of biosynthetic enzymes for ectoine as a compatible solute in a moderately halophilic eubacterium, Halomonas elongata . Journal of Bacteriology. 1999;181 :91-99 - 22.
Liu M, Liu H, Shi M, et al. Microbial production of ectoine and hydroxyectoine as high-value chemicals. Microbial Cell Factories. 2021; 20 :76. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-021-01567-6 - 23.
Tetsch L, Kunte HJ. The substrate-binding protein TeaA of the osmoregulated ectoine transporter TeaABC from Halomonas elongata: Purification and characterization of recombinant TeaA. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2002; 211 (2):213-218. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11227.x - 24.
Imhoff JF, Rahn T, Künzel S, Keller A, Neulinger SC. Osmotic adaptation and compatible solute biosynthesis of phototrophic Bacteria as revealed from genome analyses. Microorganisms. 2020; 9 (1):46 - 25.
Wargo MJ. Homeostasis and catabolism of choline and glycine betaine: Lessons from Pseudomonas aeruginosa . Applied Environmental Microbiology;79 (7):2112-2120. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.03565-12 - 26.
Gowrishankar J. Identification of osmoresponsive genes in Escherichia coli : Evidence for participation of potassium and proline transport systems in osmoregulation. Journal of Bacteriology. 1985;164 :434-445 - 27.
Saum SH, Müller V. Salinity-dependent switching of osmolyte strategies in a moderately halophilic bacterium: Glutamate induces proline biosynthesis in Halobacillus halophilus. Journal of Bacteriology. 2007; 189 :6968-6975. DOI: 10.1128/jb.00775-777