Open access peer-reviewed chapter

A Concise Review on Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) and Their Mechanical Significance Including Industrial Applications

Written By

Challa Gangu Naidu, Challa V. V. Ramana, Yarraguntla Srinivasa Rao, Kollabathula Vara Prasada Rao, Dadi Vasudha, Gandi Anusha and Koppisetty B. Rajeshbabu

Submitted: 18 September 2022 Reviewed: 05 December 2022 Published: 05 January 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.109339

From the Edited Volume

Carbon Nanotubes - Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Potential Applications

Edited by Mohammed Muzibur Rahman, Abdullah Mohammed Asiri and Mohammad Asaduzzaman Chowdhury

Chapter metrics overview

181 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Excellent characteristics of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) include light weight, high strength, high modulus, and high temperature resistance. CFRP has a wide range of potential applications in the domains of public safety, aviation, and high-end non-military people products. Different methods have been used to modify the CFRP in order to increase surface action, harshness, and wettability, improving the interfacial binding between the fiber and network for better mechanical properties. Finally, a few CFRP-related difficulties are looked at, and future directions in interfacial support research are predicted. In this day and age, innovation-focused applications are becoming more significant, and the use of mechanical cycles is progressing swiftly and steadily. Due to their exceptional performance, such as low weight, high specific strength, and high specific stiffness, carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites have a wide application viewpoint in the aerospace, military, and wind power sector high-quality civilian products. Currently, there is still a significant discrepancy between the theoretical calculation of the CFRP and the actual force. Improving the interface rationally is the key to solving this fundamental issue. The development, properties, and contemporary applications of CFRP composite materials, as well as their processing and boring activities, are discussed in this overview along with recent innovations and potential future applications.

Keywords

  • CFRP
  • macro systems
  • machinability
  • reinforcement
  • high specific strength

1. Introduction

Recently, carbon fiber has emerged as one of the most important supporting materials due to its incredible strength, modulus, and high temperature resistance (Figure 1). Many logical efforts have been made to enhance and analyze their exhibition, particularly composite frameworks [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Despite these advantages and efforts, it should be noted that a composite framework’s interfacial bond between the carbon strands and the framework is too weak to ensure excellent mechanical performance [6, 7]. Because van der Waals attraction and the hydrogen force are present at the point of interaction in a composite framework, the degree of bonding at the connection point between the fiber and lattice plays a substantial role in the development of the future mechanical behavior. In addition, numerous functional group interactions through carbon fiber connectivity as well as machinability gradually increased [8, 9], and the level of binding at points of interaction is essential. They can also respond with a variety of different polymer materials.

Figure 1.

Schematic representation of composite material structure.

Metals, plastics, ceramics, and composite materials are the four main groups into which the materials are separated based on their properties (like hardness, strength, thickness, and liquefying temperature). While the qualities, designs, and application areas of each of these materials vary, composite materials have recently emerged as common and valuable designing materials for a wide range of applications. Composite materials should perform better because they are minutely heterogeneous, have significant variations in the mechanical characteristics of their component materials, and have a volumetric ratio of component materials more than 10%.

However, the characteristics of these composites are controlled by the characteristics of the individual components as well as by the junction between the strands and the framework saps (status, access, power, and stuff). All that is needed to sustain composite materials effectively is for enough pressure to pass between the network pitches and strands. The two have a tangible, bodily link that attests to this. Epoxy resins and gums cannot form a strong bind with untreated carbon strands. To combat this, pretreatments of fiber surfaces have been promoted. These are typically oxidative in nature and considerably improve the fiber/network connection in various classes, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Representative classes of the composite materials.

Due to their exceptional display, such as their excellent binding nature, and sensible connection improvement, carbon fiber-supported polymer (CFRP) composites have a wide range of application possibilities in the aircraft, military, wind power device, and high-grade common items [10]. The connection point is a unique component of composites that directly affects the effective transfer and distribution of load between the network and support, hence, determining the strength and robustness of composites [11]. However, Carbon fiber exhibits poorly at the interfacial interface with gum due to its jumbled graphite structure, smooth, synthetically inactive surface, and low surface energy [12, 13]. The application of CFRP is therefore severely constrained. In order to address the aforementioned problems, different CFRP enhancement studies have recently been carried out. Displaying a sufficient amount of polar groups on the Carbon fiber surface, primarily carboxyl, hydroxyl [14], epoxy [15], and amino [16] would not only frame synthetic reactions with the gum but also increase the wettability of the Carbon fiber surface. In addition, improving non-covalent bond communication within the network of filaments, such as van der Waals force, hydrogen security link, and electrostatic cooperation [17], could improve the attachment to focus on interfacial qualities without compromising single-fiber elasticity (TS). There have been a variety of methods used to modify carbon fiber up to this point, including oxidation, plasm treatment, estimating/covering [18], fume testimony [19], in-situ self-gathering [20], synthetic uniting [21], and multi-scale underlying surface designs [22], which helped increase the wettability, substance holding, mechanical interlocking between fiber and lattice, and shaping a progress layer to work with the pressure move consistently and lower. Unfortunately, the rising bond may weaken the connection point stage change, causing the break tip to spread out quickly along the connection point course once a break is formed and deboning occurs close to the point of interaction. This would result in decreased influence properties, which is another problem that needs to be addressed urgently. With CFRP’s rapid advancement as a cutting-edge designing material, it has become a staple of the assembly sector. Therefore, in order to advance the examination process for high-proficiency change methods, it is crucial to summarize the various points of interaction treatment techniques for CFRP. In this, we summarized a few significant developments in the CFRP interface change, the most of which occurred in the past 10 years. In addition, our opinions on interface upgrades and support components are listed in the following paragraphs in relation to the aforementioned points.

Advertisement

2. Manufacturing processes

In order to create composite primary components, a variety of assembly techniques are used. These techniques include resting, shaping, winding, pultrusion, and others. We focus on four main assembling techniques among them: (1) the rest-up procedure involves the creation by hand or machine of mats of strands that are permanently preserved by a gum framework. Using this method, it is possible to advance several layers with different fiber directions toward the appropriate sheet thickness and product shape. (2) Trim is a piece of fabric having various cross sections that is used to hide surface changes or for ornamentation. One of the most popular methods for molding plastic pitches is forming. (3) Pitch-soaked fiber strands can be folded over a mandrel using a mechanical fiber-winding cycle to produce oblong or polygonal shapes. (4) In the pultrusion interaction, the fiber rovings and mats are persistently pulled through a tar shower and then dropped into a heated bite of dust. The composite network is fixed into a constant primary shape in terms of cross section thanks to the increased temperature inside bite the dust.

2.1 CFRP surface adsorption

Although it is understood that topical medications help people to hold their fiber-gum better, it is still unclear exactly how this is accomplished. There are three important components that could be added to fibrous materials, according to all the signs.

However, the existing composite approach does not account for the consequences of fiber extraction, fiber bridging, or fiber fracture. This fracture process can be caused by the fact that when bending stress is applied to specimens with various loads, shear stress (t) or transverse tensile stress (t) can be generated at the fiber matrix interfaces. Figure 3 depicts the fiber matrix interface structures under shear stress when the span length is short. The detailed manufacturer and precursor properties as given in Table 1.

Figure 3.

The oxidative carbon surface and their functional reacting groups/sites.

Name of the productManufacturerPrecursor typeProperties
P100AmocoPitchHigh modulus
T300AmocoPANHigh strength
HMSHercules Inc.PANHigh modulus
HMUHercules Inc.PANHigh modulus
Type INot reportedPANHigh modulus
Type IINot reportedPANHigh Strength
AGLe Carbone LerrainePANHigh modulus
ACLe Carbone LerrainePANHigh Strength
HMG-50HictoRayonHigh Strength
Thornel-25Union carbideRayonHigh Strength

Table 1.

The detailed manufacturer and precursor properties.

Schematic portrayal of the conceivable take-up system, aggregation, and circulation of nanofertilizers in crops.

2.2 Polymeric composites (CFRP)

Carbon is arguably one of the most important elements found in life. Because it forms the basis for almost everything on the current synthetic platform, including novel materials with physical, chemical, and machinability properties of its equivalents, carbon is a necessary component for life [2, 23, 24]. Low thickness, high strength, and high hardness are the characteristics of carbon fiber. These strands typically have a carbon content of between 80 and 95 percent, can have a staple or fiber structure, have excellent mechanical properties, are lightweight, and have a thickness of 2268 g/cm3 [2, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. Numerous advantages of this composite type include its extremely high rigidity/weight ratios, elastic modulus/weight ratios, low coefficient of warm development, high weakness properties, and warm conductivity. High clear strength of up to 4500 MPa, firmness with damping highlight, and theoretically negligible warm extension coefficient are all characteristics of CFRPs [31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. These anticipated characteristics make CFRPs ideal for a wide range of applications, including parts for aviation, automobiles, electronics, clinical, and sporting equipment [36, 37, 38, 39]. Its electrical conductivity is quite low, its extensive strength is insufficient, and its molding capacity and alloying nature of synthesized materials are a few of its drawbacks [40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45].

2.3 Synthesis of CFRP high-degree purity of reinforced composite materials

Carbon strands can be used in staple fiber, yarn, woven, or weaving constructions as one of the principal support elements for composites [2]. The cross section of the fiber is typically rounded, although other shapes are also possible (rectangular, hexagonal, etc.) [46]. Three classifications of commercially available carbon filaments are distinguished: universally usable (GP), elite execution (HP), and enacted (ACF). As shown in Figure 4, business carbon filaments are formed of pitch or poly acrylonitrile (Skillet), natural materials, and global data. Carbon fiber of the skillet type has a high modulus of versatility and a high strength (Figure 5). Pitch type, on the other hand, has excellent strength and is inexpensive [2, 34, 47, 48, 49, 50]. Typically, 3, 6, and 12 K carbon fibers are made in tow form (K = 1000 filaments). Typically, they are cleaned and sized [2].

Figure 4.

Global demand of CFRP materials through percentage (%) wise in different sectors.

Figure 5.

Production of CFRP through PAN and PITCH-based protocols.

It is possible to construct composites with firmness and strength by using solid-fiber support materials that are lightweight [51]. The majority of the weight of composites is supported by the fiber part [46]. Therefore, it is important to decide on the fiber direction that will be used in the composite. The orientation of the fibers also has an impact on surface quality [52, 53]. Figure 5 depicts the sequential steps in the manufacturing of innovative materials; including polymerization, wet spinning, stabilization, carbonization, and graphitization, melt spinning, infusibilization, and PITCH preparation.

2.4 Mechanical properties of CFRP

Recently, experts and researchers have tended to choose polymer-based composite materials over those made of metal. Thus, an important creative movement where this kind of material will be used is the machining of composite materials [26]. This interaction is necessary to reshape the materials into usable parts by removing inaccessible areas [34]. The majority of the time, composites are produced in close-to-net shape, but they still require post-machining operations like managing, turning, processing, or piercing to alter their resilience, surface finish, and other properties [5, 36, 41, 47, 51].

The machining of CFRPs differs greatly from the machining of metals [53]. Due to the anisotropic, inhomogeneous, grating design, and low thermal conductivity of CFRP composites, it is problematic. The grating design and poor thermal conductivity of the carbon filaments used in these materials (Figure 6) provide the best explanations for why machinability of CFRP composites is not precisely the same as that of other materials.

Figure 6.

Schematic representation of (a) Various composites parts used in A320 Airbus air craft (b) CFRP Composite used in a stealth Airbus (Turkish unnamed aircraft ANKA c) CFRP composite used in suspension and gearbox in the Formula 1 racing car.

2.5 CFRP composite materials applications

Following World War II, US manufacturers began developing composite boat hulls and radomes made of fiberglass and polyester (radar cover). In the middle of the 1950s, the automotive industry introduced composites to vehicle bodies (Figure 7). The buyers also started offering composite baths, coverings, railings, stepping stools, and electrical components due to the incredibly useful lightweight, and erosion obstruction. A vault building built in Benghazi in 1968 was the first respectable application in a long time, and other designs subsequently followed.

  • Automotives

  • Commercial spares (Aircrafts, Charted flights, Defense sector spares)

  • Energy generation (Water, air, tidal, wind)

  • Underground energy (Deep water, oil production, gas pipelines)

  • Green energy generation (Hydrogen fuel, Electricity transmission

  • Construction field (Civil aviation)

Figure 7.

Different Applications of CFRP composites.

Advertisement

3. Conclusions

Carbon fibers serve as the fiber phase of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites, a type of fiber composite material. A series of materials known as carbon fibers are primarily composed of the elemental carbon. The pyrolysis of organic fibers produces this. The aircraft industry’s requirement for a material with a mix of high robustness, high rigidity, and low weight served as the primary driving force behind the development of carbon fibers. The market has started to recognize the potential of carbon fibers to offer solutions to a variety of issues related to the deterioration and strengthening of the infrastructure. By effectively utilizing CFRP, structures’ useful lives could be greatly extended while requiring less care. In order to meet ever-increasing demands, researchers are still thought to be working to synthesis a high degree of polymers using high performance Carbon fiber as a resin-reinforced composites. Therefore, the synthesis of recent research in this review would serve as a theoretical guide for future design of the interface composition and structure of CFRP and aid in the advancement of the field of enhanced carbon fiber-reinforced polymeric composition.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Vignan’s Institute of Information Technology (VIIT) and Vignan’s Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology (VIPT) for their constant support and motivation to communicate this book chapter for publication in International debute.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

All the authors are declared that there is no conflict of interest for this book chapter.

References

  1. 1. Donnet JB, Bansal RC. Carbon Fibers. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1990. p. 470
  2. 2. Morgan PE. Carbon Fibers and their Composites. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press; 2005
  3. 3. Park SJ. Carbon Materials. Seoul: Daeyoungsa; 2006
  4. 4. Seong MC, Jung H-T. Highly enhanced mechanical properties of polypropylene-long carbon fiber composites by a combined method of coupling agent and surface modification of long carbon fiber. Macromolecular Research. 2014;22:1066-1073
  5. 5. Schwartz M. Composite Materials Handbook. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1992
  6. 6. Wu S. Polymer Interface and Adhesion. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1982
  7. 7. Park SJ, Seo MK, Ma TJ, Lee DR. Effect of chemical treatment of kevlar fibers on mechanical interfacial properties of composites. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2002:252-249
  8. 8. Ho KK, Lamoriniere S, Kalinka G, Schulz E, Bismarck A. Interfacial behavior between atmospheric-plasma-fluorinated carbon fibers and poly(vinylidene fluoride). Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2007;313:476
  9. 9. Yosomiya R, Morimoto K, Nakajima A, Ikada Y, Suzuki T. Adhesion and Bonding in Composites. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1990
  10. 10. Liu L, Jia C, He J, Zhao F, Fan D, Xing L, et al. Interfacial characterization, control and modification of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2015;121:56-72
  11. 11. Hochard C, Aubourg PA, Charles JP. Modelling of the mechanical behavior of woven-fabric CFRP laminates up to failure. Composites Science and Technology. 2001;61(2):221-230
  12. 12. He M, Xu P, Zhang Y, Liu K, Yang X. Phthalocyanine nanowires@GO/carbon fiber composites with enhanced interfacial properties and electromagnetic interference shielding performance. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2020;388:124255
  13. 13. Wu Y, Wang Z, Xu L, Wang H, Peng S, Zheng L, et al. Preparation of silver-plated carbon nanotubes/carbon fiber hybrid fibers by combining freeze-drying deposition with a sizing process to enhance the mechanical properties of carbon fiber composites. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2021;146:106421
  14. 14. Gao B, Zhang J, Hao Z, Huo L, Zhang R, Shao L. In-situ modification of carbon fibers with hyperbranched polyglycerol via anionic ring-opening polymerization for use in high-performance composites. Carbon. 2017;123:548-557
  15. 15. Zhao F, Huang Y. Grafting of polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxanes on a carbon fiber surface: Novel coupling agents for fiber/polymer matrix composites. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2011;21(11):3695
  16. 16. Ma L, Meng L, Wang Y, Wu G, Fan D, Yu J, et al. Interfacial properties and impact toughness of dendritic hexamethylenetetramine functionalized carbon fiber with varying chain lengths. RSC Advances. 2014;4(74):39156-39166
  17. 17. Wu Q , Yang X, Wan Q , Zhao R, He J, Zhu J. Layer-by-layer assembled nacre-like polyether amine/GO hierarchical structure on carbon fiber surface toward composites with excellent interfacial strength and toughness. Composites Science and Technology. 2020;198:108296
  18. 18. Yuan H, Zhang S, Lu C, He S, An F. Improved interfacial adhesion in carbon fiber/polyether sulfone composites through an organic solvent-free polyamic acid sizing. Applied Surface Science. 2013;279:279-284
  19. 19. Zheng L, Wang Y, Qin J, Wang X, Lu R, Qu C, et al. Scalable manufacturing of carbon nanotubes on continuous carbon fibers surface from chemical vapor deposition. Vacuum. 2018;152:84-90
  20. 20. Wang C, Xia L, Zhong B, Yang H, Huang L, Xiong L, et al. Fabrication and mechanical properties of carbon fibers/lithium aluminosilicate ceramic matrix composites reinforced by in-situ growth SiC nanowires. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2019;39(15):4625-4633
  21. 21. Zhao M, Meng L, Ma L, Ma L, Yang X, Huang Y, et al. Layer-by-layer grafting CNTs onto carbon fibers surface for enhancing the interfacial properties of epoxy resin composites. Composites Science and Technology. 2018;154:28-36
  22. 22. Feng P, Song G, Li X, Xu H, Xu L, Lv D, et al. Effects of different “rigid-flexible” structures of carbon fibers surface on the interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy resin composites. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2021;583:13-23
  23. 23. Ferreira JR, Coppini NL, Neto FL. Characteristics of carbon-carbon composite turning. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2001;109(1-2):65-71
  24. 24. Buckley JD, Edie DD. Carbon-Carbon Materials and Composites. New Jersey: Noyes Publications; 1993
  25. 25. Philippe S, Figueiredo JL. Carbon Materials for Catalysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2009
  26. 26. Chawla KK. Composite Materials: Science and Engineering. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 2012
  27. 27. Asthana R, Kumar A, Dahotre NB. Materials Processing and Manufacturing Science. Elsevier, Boston, MA: Science & Technology Books; 2005
  28. 28. Fitzer E. Carbon fibers-present state and future expectations. In: Carbon Fibers Filaments and Composites. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-6847-0_1
  29. 29. Eyckens DJ, Arnold CL, Simon Ž, Gengenbach TR, Henderson LC. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2021;140:106147
  30. 30. Szabó L, Milotskyi R, Fujie T, Tsukegi T, Wada N, Ninomiya K, et al. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2019;7:757
  31. 31. Pecat O, Rentsch R, Brinksmeier E. Influence of milling process parameters on the surface integrity of CFRP. In: Fifth CIRP Conference on High Performance Cutting. 2012. Vol. 1. pp. 466-470
  32. 32. Tagliaferri V, Diilio A, Visconti IC. Laser cutting of fiber-reinforced polyesters. Composites. 1985;16(4):317-325
  33. 33. Haynes WM. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. 95th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press, LCC; 2012
  34. 34. Mallick PK. Fiber-Reinforced Composites: Materials, Manufacturing, and Design. 3rd ed. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis. CRC Press; 2008
  35. 35. William D, Callister J, Rethwisch DG. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 8th ed. New York: Wiley; 2009
  36. 36. Shyha IS et al. Drill geometry and operating effects when cutting small diameter holes in CFRP. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2009;49(12-13):1008-1014
  37. 37. Wang YG et al. Cutting performance of carbon fiber reinforced plastics using PCD tool. Advances in Materials Research. 2011;215:14-18
  38. 38. Chao PY, Hwang YD. An improved Taguchi’s method in design of experiments for milling CFRP composite. International Journal of Production Research. 1997;35(1):51-66
  39. 39. Hult J, Rammerstorfer FG. Engineering mechanics of fiber reinforced polymers and composite structures. In: CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences (CISM). Vol. 348. 1994
  40. 40. Zemann R, Kain L, Bleicher F. Vibration assisted machining of carbon fiber reinforced polymers. In: 24th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation; Vol. 69. 2014. pp. 536-543
  41. 41. Teti R. Machining of composite materials. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology. 2002;51(2):611-634
  42. 42. Soutis C. Carbon fiber reinforced plastics in aircraft construction. Materials Science and Engineering A: Structural Materials: Properties, Microstructures and Processing. 2005;412(1-2):171-176
  43. 43. Hull D, Clyne TW. An Introduction to Composite Materials. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press; 1996
  44. 44. Karnik SR et al. Delamination analysis in high speed drilling of carbon fiber reinforced plastics (CFRP) using artificial neural network model. Materials and Design. 2008;29(9):1768-1776
  45. 45. Zółkiewski S. Selection and impact of parameters in composite materials designing. In: 13th World Congress in Mechanism and Machine Science, Guanajuato, México. 2011
  46. 46. Groover MP. Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials Processes, and Systems. New York: Wiley; 2007
  47. 47. Chung DDL. Carbon Fiber Composites. Washington: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1994
  48. 48. Burchell TD. Carbon Materials for Advanced Technologies. Pergamon: Elsevier; 1999
  49. 49. Takahashi K et al. Heat conduction analysis of laser CFRP processing with IR and UV laser light. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing. 2016;84:114-122
  50. 50. Suresha B et al. Friction and dry sliding wear behavior of carbon and glass fabric reinforced vinyl ester composites. Tribology International. 2010;43(3):602-609
  51. 51. Liu DF, Tang YJ, Cong WL. A review of mechanical drilling for composite laminates. Composite Structures. 94(4):1265-1279
  52. 52. Wang XM, Zhang LC. An experimental investigation into the orthogonal cutting of unidirectional fiber reinforced plastics. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture. 2003;43(10):1015-1022
  53. 53. Islam F, Ramkumar J, Milani AS. A simplified damage prediction framework for milling of unidirectional carbon fiber-reinforced plastics. Advanced Manufacturing: Polymer & Composites Science. 2015;1(4):175-184

Written By

Challa Gangu Naidu, Challa V. V. Ramana, Yarraguntla Srinivasa Rao, Kollabathula Vara Prasada Rao, Dadi Vasudha, Gandi Anusha and Koppisetty B. Rajeshbabu

Submitted: 18 September 2022 Reviewed: 05 December 2022 Published: 05 January 2023