Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Combinatorial Oligonucleotide FISH (COMBO-FISH): Computer Designed Probe Sets for Microscopy Research of Chromatin in Cell Nuclei

Written By

Michael Hausmann and Eberhard Schmitt

Submitted: 21 August 2022 Reviewed: 11 October 2022 Published: 19 November 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.108551

From the Edited Volume

Oligonucleotides - Overview and Applications

Edited by Arghya Sett

Chapter metrics overview

91 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Genome sequence databases of many species have been completed so that it is possible to apply an established technique of FISH (Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization) called COMBO-FISH (COMBinatorial Oligonucleotide FISH). It makes use of bioinformatic sequence database search for probe design. Oligonucleotides of typical lengths of 15–30 nucleotides are selected in such a way that they only co-localize at the given genome target. Typical probe sets of 20–40 stretches label about 50–250 kb specifically. The probes are either solely composed of purines or pyrimidines, respectively, for Hoogsteen-type binding, or of purines and pyrimidines together for Watson-Crick type binding. We present probe sets for tumor cell analysis. With an improved sequence database analysis and sequence search according to uniqueness, a novel family of probes repetitively binding to characteristic genome features like SINEs (Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements, e.g., ALU elements), LINEs (Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements, e.g., L1), or centromeres has been developed. All types of probes can be synthesized commercially as DNA or PNA probes, labelled by dye molecules, and specifically attached to the targets for microscopy research. With appropriate dyes labelled, cell nuclei can be subjected to super-resolution localization microscopy.

Keywords

  • DNA database analysis
  • computer designed oligonucleotide probes
  • specific fluorescence labeling of genome targets
  • fluorescence microscopy of chromosomes and cell nuclei
  • super-resolution localization microscopy for chromatin architecture research

1. Introduction

Although first models assuming that chromatin in the interphase nucleus is well organized in distinct territories and domains, can be found in the late 19th and early 20th centuries [1, 2], experimental methods of visualization of genome architecture were missing until the 1970s/1980s [3]. With the breakthrough of three-dimensional (3D) light microscopy, especially 3D fluorescence confocal laser scanning microscopy also developments of specific labeling techniques like fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; for review see [4]) started their story of success in genome research and medical diagnostics.

FISH is based on the principle that a DNA probe either amplified in bacteria or by PCR represents the nucleic acid sequence of a given target DNA in the cell nucleus or of a metaphase chromosome [5]. Such a probe has to be thermally or chemically denatured into single DNA strands (if not synthesized by PCR) that can bind complementary to the single, that is, denatured DNA strands of given targets [6, 7]. The probes are labeled with fluorochromes. If these single-stranded probe molecules are added in excess to the denatured target strands, they specifically bind to their complementary target DNA so that a DNA–DNA hybrid with fluorescence labeling is formed [8]. Using various probes labeled with fluorochromes of different colors, multi-target visualization can be processed simultaneously [5].

With automated methods for artificial synthesis of high-purity DNA or PNA [9] oligonucleotides, probe sets of custom-made oligonucleotides have become available for many genomic target sites. Also, highly repetitive sequences in centromeres or telomeres were labeled [10]. By means of so-called “oligopaint” probes (fluorescently-labeled single-stranded DNA oligonucleotides) covering target sites by huge amounts of oligonucleotides, sequential, highly specific labeling of various targets from 5 kb up to a few Mb was performed. Oligopaint procedures depend on molecular biology techniques while COMBO-FISH probe design is fully based on computer database investigations. Further details of oligopaint can be found in References [11, 12, 13, 14].

Standard FISH probes as well as oligopainting probes work on probe-target base-pairing according to the Watson–Crick binding scheme, that is, the single-stranded probe complementarily binds to one target strand. This requires heat or chemical denaturation of the complete DNA in a cell nucleus [6, 7] which could impact the preservation of chromosome morphology and especially chromatin nano-structure [15]. In addition, FISH under vital conditions appears to be nearly impossible.

PNA oligonucleotide probes show a higher target affinity than DNA probes. This allows PNA probes sufficient access to DNA targets without additional heat denaturation, because native chromatin acts in an equilibrium state of single- and double-strand conformation [16]. Experimentally, this was only shown for repetitive DNA targets [17] but not in oligopainting experiments of complex targets.

In principle, COMBinatorial Oligonucleotide FISH (COMBO-FISH) potentially has several advantages over standard FISH and could also overcome all such drawbacks mentioned above. COMBO-FISH has been invented in the late 1990s [18] and experimentally realized in the early 2000s [19]. It only uses a few short oligonucleotides for specific labeling of a target. These COMBO-FISH probes can be synthesized as DNA or PNA sequences binding complementarily either as a Watson–Crick double-strand or as a Hoogsteen triple-strand [20, 21, 22] (Figure 1). A low number of probes labeling a target strand reduces synthesis costs and (triple)-strand binding without a strong denaturation step conserves chromatin morphology and organization with the nowadays advantage that the native chromatin structure can be analyzed on the nano-scale by super-resolution localization microscopy in 3D conserved cell nuclei [23, 24, 25].

Figure 1.

Snapshot of a molecular dynamics simulation showing Watson–Crick double-strand pairing and triplex structures of the two classical Hoogsteen pairs for parallel binding: C + *GC (left) and T*AT (right). Note: This figure was originally published in [20] and is reproduced with general permission of the publisher.

Advertisement

2. COMBO-FISH: principle and applications

In contrast to standard FISH where probes are usually cut and amplified by molecular biology techniques, COMBinatorial Oligonucleotide FISH (COMBO-FISH) follows a completely different strategy for probe design [19, 20, 26, 27]. If a genome of a species is sequenced and the sequence is cataloged in a database, oligonucleotide probes can be searched and a set of probes can be designed in silico. Also, their specificity is controlled by computer analysis searching for all possible binding sites of each probe [20, 28, 29].

Any given genome target that should be specifically labeled, can be selected in a DNA sequence database and the numbers of the beginning and end nucleotides are determined exactly. This cannot only be done for human but also for any other species with completely known DNA sequences that can be read in established DNA database archives like NCBI.

The process works as follows [20]: firstly, the beginning and end numbers of a given target (for instance, a gene) are selected. Then oligonucleotide stretches of 15–30 distinct bases are determined in such a way that just the combination of those stretches is singularly co-localizing at the given target site. All binding sites of each probe are determined. Finally, several probe combinations may be excluded from consideration: (a) these are those that have accessory binding sites at other locations in a genome than at the given target site or (b) those that co-localize at several loci in the same genome (Table 1). In addition to these principles governing the basic probe selection, further characteristic features (experimental and theoretical) can be taken into account to ensure a stable homogenous hybridization protocol. Among these, the most important ones are oligonucleotide length, binding energy [28], homo-purine/homo-pyrimidine sequences [30, 31], melting temperature [32], CG-content [32], etc. (see Table 2 as an example). Typically, such oligonucleotide stretches included in a probe set have a length of 15–30 nucleotides each.

GenePosition on chromosomeBase positionBR
NRAS1p13.24773158.48241586235
AKT31q441714365.20697165537
MSH22p22.3-p22.15331083.55030088049
GNLY2p12-q1117,295,832..1730029811333
RASSF13p21.3587,156..59830613461
FHIT3p14.23106362.33714078450
PIM16p21.227,935,054..2794032910152
ABCB1 (MDR)7q21.112,367,353..125767438554
MET7q3141,489,038..416130119026
CMYC8q24.12-q24.1191,836..19782711357
CDKN2A(p16)9p2121,935,774..2196332210153
PTEN10q23.3897,571..10005076641
ATM11q22.311,636,339..117798874427
KRAS212p11.22,778,774..28249146943
RB113q1417452380.176306146434
PNN14q1319,564,443..195721995232
SNRPNup15q123595436.37503734021
IGF1R15q25-q26297,646..60640310159
FANCA16q24.3610,999..6901004932
D17S12517p12-p11.27,147,833..714803110530
ERBB2171593840.162288815977
LAMA318q11.22,933,849..302405912059
AKT219q13.l-q13.213,007,022..130600738143
MYBL220q13.17,348,623..73980387739
PTPN120q13.1-q13.214,179,798..142539957845
ZNF21720q13.2-q13.317236471.172524946939
PCNT221qtel3053753.31753767138
PDGFB (SIS)22q13.118,834,148..1885584411460
TBX122q11.22892106.29189966438

Table 1.

Examples of COMBO-FISH target sites (“Gene”), their positions according to the banding annotation (“Positions on chromosome”), start and end position in the human data base (“Base position”), possible number of probes (“B”) and the finally remaining specifically co-localizing probes (“R”).

Note: This table was originally published in [20] and is reproduced with general permission of the publisher.


Probe IDLength (bp)GC content (%)Tma (°C)Molar mass (g/mol)Sequence
AMACR11643.S40.66110.2AGGAAGAAGGGGAAAA
AMACR21643.834.46110.2GGAGGAAAAGAGAAAG
AMACR71540.031.25781.0AGAAAGAAAAGAGGG
AMACR91735.330.66068.1CTTCTCTTCTTTCTCTT
AMACR101758.845.36471.5GAAGAGGAAAGGGAGGG
AMACR111637.537.95763.9TCTTCCTTTTCCCTTT
AMACR121643.830.66110.2GGAGAGAAGAAAGAAG
AMACR131776.557.96519.5GGGGGGAAGGGGAGGGA
AMACR141566.743.35399.7CCCCTCCCTCTTTCC
AMACR161662.545.55703.9TTCCTCCCTCCCCTCT
AMACR171540.031.75459.7TTTCTCCTCTTTTCC
AMACR231560.037.05829.0GAGAAGAAGAGGGGG
AMACR261553.337.05813.0AAGGAAGGAAGAGGG
AMACR271553.329.95813.0GAAGAGAAGGGAGAG
AMACR281637.534.66094.2AGGGAAAGAAGAAAAG
AMACR301566.739.95845.0GAAGAGGGGGGAGAG
AMACR311553.334.05429.7CCTCCTTTCCTTCTC
AMACR321550.032.95733.9CTCCTCTTTCTCCTCT
AMACR331533.328.25765.0AAAAGAAGGAAAGAG
AMACR361643.837.35748.9TCCCTTTTCTTCTCCT
AMACR371741.234.16053.1CTTTCCTCTTCTTTCTC
AMACR381741.236.96423.5AGAGAAAGAGGAAAAGG
AMACR391752.942.26455.5AGAGGAAGAAAGGGAGG
AMACR401637.534.65763.9CTTCTTCCTTCCTTTT
AMACR431546.734.05797.0AGAGGAGAAAGGGAA
AMACR451540.027.15459.7CTCTCTCCTTCTTTT
AMACR461752.942.36023.1TTTCTCCTCCCCTCTCT
AMACR481546.734.75444.7TCTTCTTCCTTTCCC
AMACR501540.034.95781.0AAAAGGGAGGAAAAG

Table 2.

Example of a COMBO-FISH probe set for AMACR and some physical values considered in the selection of oligonucleotide stretches.

Note: This table was originally published under CC BY license in [32].


Melting temperature (median value of the denaturation curve).


Several probe sets created according to this procedure (e.g., ABL, BCR, Her2neu, GRB7, AMACR, etc., see below) have been published or will be shown in the next chapter.

Finally, the computer-optimized probe set can be synthesized as DNA probes, PNA probes, SMART probes, or TINA (Twisted Intercalating Nuclear Acid) probes with high purity [30, 33, 34, 35]. PNA probes have a peptide backbone instead of a sugar–phosphate backbone of DNA. SMART probes also called molecular beacons consist of a stem-loop conformation quenching fluorescence by the closed loop until loop opening when probe and target are binding. TINA probes are oligonucleotides with additional anchoring molecules incorporated. Custom made oligonucleotide probes usually carry one dye molecule at one end or both ends each.

Depending on the base composition of the oligonucleotide probes, they can be designed in their 3′–5′ direction either for Watson–Crick binding (duplex forming probes result in complimentary probe-target double strands) or for Hoogsteen binding (triplex forming probes result in triple strands to homo-purine or homo-pyrimidine sequences as targets of the intact double strand) (Figure 1). COMBO-FISH probes targeting in Watson–Crick configuration are more flexible since they can be designed in a mixture of purine and pyrimidine bases. Hoogsteen binding probes use solely either purines or pyrimidines. It should mentioned that also exceptional (non-homo) Hoogsteen triples exist which can be incorporated into the probe design.

Due to the optical diffraction of a microscope lens, the point image of a fluorescence dye molecule spreads to an image of typically about 250 nm using a high numerical aperture lens. So the fluorescence of a probe combination within a target size less than typically about 250 kb merges into a homogeneous COMBO-FISH “spot”. Typical examples are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Example fluorescence microscopy images of COMBO-FISH labeling (arrows) of gene targets: (A) HER2/NEU gene labeling in a cell nucleus and (B) on metaphase (combination of 18 oligonucleotide probes); (C) TBX1 gene labeling in a cell nucleus and (D) in an early stage of mitosis (combination of 15 oligonucleotide probes); (E) FMR1 promotor region labeling on chromosome X of a male cell nucleus (combination of 20 oligonucleotide probes); AMACR gene labeling in a cell nucleus (combination of 29 oligonucleotide probes; see Table 2). Note: With the exception of the nucleus in (E), no counterstain was applied.

Detailed protocols for COMBO-FISH labeling of blood cells, fibroblasts, tumor culture cells, or tissue cells are described elsewhere [27, 29]. These protocols can be applied for duplex or triplex forming probe sets. COMBO-FISH for labeling of specific gene targets in cell nuclei has been described for several applications as for instance: The gene of the receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (HER2/NEU) [28, 34] (Figure 2A and B), the gene of the growth factor receptor-bound protein 7 (GRB7) [34], the breakpoint cluster region (BCR) on chromosome 22 [30], the ABL proto-oncogene 1 (ABL) on chromosome 9 [19, 30, 31], and T-box 1(TBX1) [33] (Figure 2C and D), the promotor region of the FMR1 gene [36] (Figure 2E) and the Alpha-Methylacyl-CoA Racemase coding gene (AMACR) on chromosome 5 [32] (Table 2; Figure 2F). Using the probe set for the ABL gene region and Spatially Modulated Illumination Microscopy [37], significant volume changes of the labeled regions were observed in cell nuclei of CML patients before and after medical treatment [35]. Beyond gene target labeling by probe sets of several different probe-sequences co-localizing at a given target only, also unique probes were found that were specifically labeling either interspersed genome regions by one copy each or centromeres by multi-copies (see chapter 4). Such an 18mer oligonucleotide PNA probe repetitively binding on centromere 9 was micro-injected into lymphocyte cell nuclei under in vivo conditions. After further incubation of the labeled cells, the sample was fixed and subjected to microscopy. The results indicated that the probe material was binding to the target region in the nuclei before fixation [33].

Advertisement

3. COMBO-FISH probe sets for genes and breakpoint regions in oncology

Cancer cells are mutations of former “normal” cells. One reason for cancer cell malfunctions are over-expressions of genes, which are mainly caused by two reasons, either one gene is over-expressed or one gene is amplified and additionally to the original gene the copies also express. The latter frequently occurring in solid tumors leads to measureable copy number increases which can be used as diagnostic parameter in tumor biology and medicine. In contrast to solid tumors, blood cell tumors show structural aberration-like translocations in the early stages which can then be followed by numerical aberrations of larger chromosome parts or even whole chromosomes. Translocation chromosomes are resulting by fusion of two parts of different chromosomes that were broken very exactly at breakpoints within a certain breakpoint region; for example, for CML (chronic myeloid leukemia) a famous hallmark is the Philadelphia chromosome with the translocation ABL-BCR t(9,22)(q34,q11), in which a fusion of a part of the abl-region on chromosome 9 with part of the bcr-region on chromosome 22 takes place (for review [38]). Since the breaks occur very exactly at certain breakpoints the fusion region can be transcribed into a functioning protein that does normally not exist in a cell and that is involved in CML-induction.

Although appropriate target sites for homo-purine or homo-pyrimidine probes only make about a few percent of the genome, some prominent tumor genes and breakpoint regions can be specifically labeled by uniquely co-localizing sets of COMBO-FISH probes. Others can only be labeled by a set overlapping on neighboring regions. Probe sets for Her2/neu, abl, and bcr have been published elsewhere [29, 30, 31, 34]. In the following we will show further examples.

It has been observed that in various types of cancer such as breast, ovarian, and squamous cell cancer an amplification of 20q13 occurs. When analyzing such cancers it has been found that often the region which encodes ZNF217 is amplified and an increased expression of the specific region of ZNF217 has been observed. In some cases also neighboring gene encoding sequences are also amplified. It has to be mentioned that the detection of the copy number of ZNF217 can be done by standard FISH, but the shortest available sequence to detect ZNF217 has a length of about 245 kb [39], which means—compared to the length of ZNF217 of about 16 kb—that further amplifications within the probe-binding sequence might not have been visualized using this method. To further reduce the length of the detected target, a COMBO-FISH probe set was designed (Table 3). As a result, we obtained 25 oligonucleotide probes within a range of 133 kb. When reducing the number of sequences to 21 by removing the first and the last three probes the length of the considered DNA region can be downscaled to 91 kb.

Probe numberBeginning nucleotide number
19,58822,316,443agggaggaaggagggaggaaggaagga
19,59522,329,806agagaaaagagagaaaa
19,60022,332,226agggaagaggaagagg
19,60122,333,382cctctctcttccctctccttcccctct
19,60622,338,710ttccttctttccttccttttctt
19,60722,338,734cttccttttctcccc
19,60922,340,472gagggaggagggagggaaaa
19,61622,347,605ggggaaagaaagaaa
19,62322,352,916tcttctcttttctttccttttcct
19,62822,357,318ctctttccccttctt
19,64122,373,058ggggagagaagaagg
19,64322,373,175ctttctcccttttccctcc
*1965022,376,231ccttttctcccctcccctcccctcccct
+19,65922,389,995cttctttcctcctttt
19,66222,396,940ctttcctccctctctct
19,66522,403,663ctcctccttcctcccct
19,67122,407,703ccctttcccctcctccct
19,67422,410,694ggaggggaagaagaggg
19,67522,411,085aaggagaagagaaagagag
19,67622,411,601gggagggggaggaggggggagg
19,67722,412,039aggagaggggaaaag
19,68522,421,078aggaggaaagagaggg
19,71022,436,400ggggagggggaaaag
19,72422,445,917gagagagagagagagagagaagaaa
19,72922,449,049agaaagaaaagagaaagaagagaagag

Table 3.

List of COMBO-FISH probe targets for ZNF217 and its surroundings (target sequences are written from left to right in the 5′-XXXX-3′ direction).

+, probe completely on ZNF217; *, probe partly on ZNF217.


The gene TP53 (sometimes called p53) encodes the “tumor protein 53” (P53). Its purpose is to maintain genomic stability and to control cell growth. Moreover, it is important for the induction of apoptosis and the coordination of repair processes. Labeling of this gene can be obtained by five COMBO-FISH probes only (Table 4). The detection of 10 fluorochromes (dye molecules at both ends of each oligonucleotide probe) would require not only a sensitive microscope but also a background free preparation. Since in tumors P53 is inactivated (sometimes associated by a copy number loss of the gene, see, e.g., [40]), the protein MDM2 which can inactivate P53 when overexpressed can be investigated. In cells with an overexpression of MDM2 an extreme inactivation of the tumor suppressor protein can occur via binding of MDM2 to the transactivation domain of TP53. However, the treated gene, MDM2, does not contain sufficient homo-purine/homo-pyrimidine sequences so that a probe set has to be designed with an overlap on neighboring regions (Table 5).

Probe numberBeginning nucleotide number
70427,177,418agaggagggggagaag
70467,181,933aggaagaggaaggaga
70677,193,067cttctttecctccct
70687,193,145aaagaaggggaggga
70697,193,288ttttctctctetctcctcccctctc

Table 4.

List of COMBO-FISH probe targets for TP53 (target sequences are written from left to right in the 5′-XXXX-3′ direction).

Probe numberBeginning nucleotide number
24,60231,285,270gaagagaagaaaggaga
24,60331,287,071aagagggaaggaaggg
24,60531,288,864cttttctcctccttct
24,60831,292,189aaggaagaggagaag
24,60931,292,783aagagagagaggggaggaaa
24,61831,301,112ctccctctccccctccctcttttccctcctt
24,62631,312,583tctctcttcctcttctt
24,64831,336,603aaggaggaaggagaggaaaa
24,65131,339,431aagagaagggaggggaa
24,65631,341,897gggaaggaggagaaggggggagg
24,65731,342,918cttctctctctctccccc
24,65931,344,079gggagaagggaagga
+24,66331,349,552aaaaggaagggagaaag
+24,68231,375,469gggaaaaggaagaag
24,69031,388,934ttttctcccccttcccccttct
24,69231,390,072aagagggaggggaaaag
24,69431,390,823gggaaggggagggaaggggaggggag
*2469531,390,850ggaggaaagaagaaaaggaagggaaggggaggg
24,69631,390,925aggaagaggagaaggaaggaagaaaggaaagaaa
24,69931,392,284aaggaggaagagaaag
24,70031,392,733tttctcccttcttct
24,70431,397,317tttccttctccctttctct
24,70631,398,270ctttctttcctttcctctt
24,71031,407,205aagaggggaagggagag
24,72431,422,982aggaaaagaagaaaaga
24,72631,425,374aaagaaggagggaaa

Table 5.

List of COMBO-FISH probe targets for MDM2 and its surroundings (target sequences are written from left to right in the 5′-XXXX-3′ direction).

+, probe completely on MDM2; *, probe partly on MDM2.


CD44 is a receptor for hyaluronic acid, which plays an important role in cell migration, tumor growth and progression. Accumulating evidences have shown that the CD44 gene is abundantly expressed in cancer-initiating cells (CICs), and has thus been implicated as a CIC marker [41, 42] in several malignancies of hematopoietic and epithelial origin, including gastric cancer. Moreover, CD44 gene amplification was also found in gastric cancer. Table 6 shows the targets for an appropriate CD44 gene probe set.

Probe numberBeginning nucleotide number
24,97135,103,408gaaggggagaaggaggaaaggggaaggaaaggag
−24,97235,108,828gagggagggagagaaa
24,97335,109,919aagagggggaggggaa
24,97535,112,662agagagaggggagaggagagaaa
24,97735,119,179ctccctccttectcctc
24,97835,120,540ttttcctccctctccc
24,98035,121,359ctccttctccctttt
−24,98135,122,451tctctctttctctttctctctctctc
24,98235,123,378gggggggaagaggag
24,98435,126,758agggagagaaagaaa
24,98535,129,005tccttttcccttcct
24,98635,132,494tttcttcccctctct
−24,98735,135,378cctetctcctttette
−24,98835,136,463aggaaggagagaaagagag
24,99135,139,280gaaagggaaaaggaaag
−24,99235,139,595agagagagggagaaag
24,99335,140,078aaaaggggaggaaag
−24,99435,141,641tctctttccctctct
24,99635,146,244tcttcttttctcctttt
−24,99835,147,116tcttcctccctccctctctcc
24,99935,147,168tctccttcttcctcttt
25,00435,151,365ccttttctctctccc
25,01335,169,216aaaggggggaagaggg
25,01435,173,890tcttctctcctcccccc
25,01935,181,667ggggaaagagaagaa
−25,02135,185,117ccctctccctcctccc
25,02235,185,516aaggagaaagagaagg
25,02635,192,486agaaagaagaagaaaag
25,02735,192,612ccctctcccctccctctctccctcc
−25,02835,192,661cttcctttctcttct

Table 6.

List of COMBO-FISH probe targets for the CD44 gene (target sequences are written from left to right in the 5′-XXXX-3′ direction).

−, probes are excluded since they form secondary clusters.


Fusion proteins originate from reciprocal translocations. Sets of oligonucleotides were designed in such a way that translocations get cognizable. There are two breakpoint regions—one on every chromosome. Therefore, four sets of oligonucleotides are needed: One before and after the breakpoint on the two chromosomes. For microscopy labeling with different colors is necessary; the sets of the first chromosome need to be labeled for instance with a red dye and the ones on the second chromosome, for instance, with a green dye. After hybridizing there are the following possible results: (a) Two red spots and two green spots are close together for each color, but the red ones are clearly separated from the green ones. This is the normal case without translocation. (b) There are two parts where one red and one green spot are next to each other. In this case the translocation has occurred: Both chromosomes broke at the major breakpoint and the wrong ends were joined. With four colors more details are visible. For example, when one color is visible on two locations, another breakpoint has been observed.

The minimum requirement for detecting clusters of homo-purine/homo-pyrimidine sequences on DNA is 6 oligonucleotides within a range of 250 kb. It is not necessary that the oligonucleotides are all located on the breakpoint regions itself. To get bright and emphasized signals, sets with 30 oligonucleotids each were designed for the following examples: ABL - BCR t(9,22)(q34,q11); AML1 - ETO t(8;21)(q22;q22); MYC - IGH t(8,14)(q24,q32); PML - RARA t(15,17)(q22,q21);PLZF - RARA t(11,17)(q23,q21). Since these lists would extend the article to an inacceptable size, the lists will be available from the authors on request.

Advertisement

4. COMBO-FISH with repetitively binding, unique single probes, and applications of super-resolution localization microscopy

The following chapter will focus on further novel developments of COMBO-FISH using probe sets of only one uniquely binding oligonucleotide [29] that binds repetitively to a given target like a centromere so that the merging fluorescence leads to a microscopic signal. In Figure 3, examples for centromere 9 [33] and 17 [34] are shown.

Figure 3.

Example fluorescence microscopy images of COMBO-FISH labeling of centromere targets: (A) centromere 17 labeling in a lymphocyte cell nucleus with the repetitively binding probe (Alexa647-5′-cttctgtcttctttttata-3′) and (B) with the repetitively binding probe (Alexa488-5′-tataaaaagaagacagaag-3′). In (C) an overview image of centromere 9 labeling in lymphocyte cell nuclei with the repetitively binding probe (Alexa546-5′-aatcaacccgagtgcaat-3′) is shown indicating a hybridization efficiency better than 90%.

COMBO-FISH probes carrying one fluorochrome molecule at one end of each oligonucleotide are ideal nano-probes for Single Molecule Localization Microscopy [23, 24, 43] (SMLM) in order to analyze chromatin structure and architecture on the nano-scale in subchromosomal regions of cell nuclei [32, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47].

As an example, multiple copies of a repetitive probe for a tri-nucleotide expansion region were hybridized and analyzed quantitatively in cells with Fragile-X syndrome (FXS) or Martin-Bell-Syndrome. FXS belongs to the group of the so-called “trinucleotide repeat expansion disorders” consisting of the expansion of a trinucleotide frequency ((CGG)n-expansion) in the 5′ untranslated region of the Fragile-X Mental Retardation 1 gene (FMR1) on the X-chromosome. The enlargement of the CGG triplet-repeat results in a deactivation of the FMR1 gene and mental retardation of the patient. Multiplets of 6 trinucleotide units ((CGG)6 or (CCG)6 probes) were synthesized showing high specificity to the (CGG)-repeat expansion of the FMR1 gene; thereby a minimum of accessory binding sites were found due to the 6-times repetition. Considering the probe length of six trinucleotide units together with one dye molecule at one end, the results of SMLM indicated small chromatin loops for the expansion region rearranging chromatin on the nanoscale so that a deactivation could be explained by geometric reasons in the genome architecture [36].

Although established programs for the design of COMBO-FISH probes and probe sets were available [20, 26], novel so-called alignment-free investigations of k-mers, their frequencies and their positioning along the nucleotide sequence of a chromosome [48, 49] have found oligonucleotide probes that uniquely bind in a given repetition rate to chromatin sequences repetitively occurring as interspersed motives [29]. New generations of specific COMBO-FISH probes were elucidated against SINEs (Short Interspersed Nuclear Elements, e.g., ALU elements [32, 48, 50], Figure 4), LINEs (Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements, e.g., L1 [32]), or centromeres [44]. With these probes, first evaluations of the spatial organization of chromosome 9 were calculated (Figure 5) [32].

Figure 4.

(A) ALU-distribution along the genome: The intensity of the bars indicates the frequency within a 500 kb section of the given chromosome. Red: Position of the designed 17mer ALU probe. The sequence associated with the ALU probe appears in the entire genome at different frequency densities. Blue: Corresponding positions of the ALU consensus sequence. The number of emergence of the 17mer probe sequence was compared with the density of the ALU consensus sequence by using the program “Repeatmasker” [50]. Green: Distribution of a selected 17mer from the L1 element. Although this 17mer appears very often in the genome, the frequency density is significantly different from the selected ALU consensus 17mer. (B) Examples of SMLM images of cell nuclei after COMBO-FISH labeling with the 17mer ALU probe. Note: (A) was originally published under CC BY license in [48].

Figure 5.

(A) SMLM overlay image of Alu densities (green), a centromere 9 points cluster (red), and overlaying regions (blue). Note: Only one image plane (no projection) is shown, where one centromere 9 is located. A magnified point coordinate representation of the white box is shown below. (B)–(D) Estimates of chromosome 9 architecture by its centromere and genomic Alu. (B) Plot of the raw point matrix obtained from SMLM data of (A). A circular approximation of a chromosome 9 territory (black circle) modeled from the theoretical distribution of Alu elements (blue dots) around the chromosome 9 centromere (red dots). Lower image: Magnification of the region of interest in the upper image. (C) Idiogram of chromosome 9 showing the positional distribution of Alu probe binding sites (red), Alu consensus sequences (blue), and binding sites of a probe against genomic L1 elements (green). (D) The radial distribution of Alu signal points around a centromere 9 cluster centroid averaged over 38 centromere 9 clusters. Note: These figures were originally published under CC BY license in [32].

Using quantitative SMLM, the in such a way designed ALU COMBO-FISH probe has also been successfully applied in extending the standard methods of biological dosimetry, which aims at reconstructing or estimating from chromosome aberrations the dose from former radiation exposure [48, 50]. In addition, a novel improved preparation protocol circumvents any heat treatment for target denaturation so that mixed purine–pyrimidine probes can be used, that usually undergo Watson–Crick double-strand pairing (Figure 1). This so-called low-temperature protocol is the prerequisite to combine oligonucleotide-based COMBO-FISH and immunofluorescence staining by means of specific antibodies [29, 48].

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

COMBO-FISH offers a highly variable toolbox of labeling combinations and strategies for chromatin architecture and bio-medical research. Here we have introduced three strategies: (a) Design of a COMBO-FISH probe set which consists of several oligonucleotide probes that specifically co-localize at a given genome target as for instance, a tumor-relevant gene that could be involved in gene copy number changes or tumor-inducing translocations. (b) Design of a COMBO-FISH probe set which consists of one oligonucleotide probe which in many copies specifically co-localize at a given genome target as for instance a centromere. (c) Design of a COMBO-FISH probe set which consists of one oligonucleotide probe that uniquely occurs at several given repetitively occurring genome targets only as for instance SINEs or LINEs. The efficiency of the probe set can be further enhanced by incorporating structural [51, 52, 53] and dynamical parameters determined by molecular dynamics simulations (e.g., AMBER [54, 55, 56], GROMOS [57, 58], CHARMM [59, 60]) into the probe design, which we currently investigate.

In combination with super-resolution localization microscopy and novel tools of data evaluation and interpretation by geometric and topological algorithms [61, 62, 63, 64] COMBO-FISH probes offer new perspectives in understanding the reaction of chromatin as a system as a whole during gene expression, proliferation, or stress response [47].

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors thank former and present team members, Wilhelm von Rosenberg, Laura Doll, Jens Rösler, Stefan Stein, Michael Stuhlmüller, Jin-Ho Lee, Florence Laure Djikimi Tchetgna, Matthias Krufczik, Aaron Sievers, and Jutta Schwarz-Finsterle at the Kirchhoff-Institute of Physics, Heidelberg University for images taken from their theses and publications.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Boveri T. Die Blastomerenkerne von Ascaris megalocephala und die Theorie der Chromosomenindividualität. Archiv für Experimentelle Zellforschung. 1909;3:181-268
  2. 2. Rabl C. Über Zellteilung. Gegenbaurs Morphologisches Jahrbuch. 1885;10:214-330
  3. 3. Cremer T, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nature Reviews. Genetics. 2001;2:292-301
  4. 4. Ma T, Chen L, Shi M, Niu J, Zhang X, Yang X, et al. Developing novel methods to image and visualize 3D genomes. Cell Biology and Toxicology. 2018;34:367-380
  5. 5. Hausmann M, Lee J-H, Hildenbrand G. 3D DNA FISH for analyses of chromatin-nuclear architecture. In: Tollefsbol T, editor. Epigenetics Methods. Vol. 18. Amsterdam: Academic Press, Elsevier; 2020. pp. 399-418. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819414-0.00020-3
  6. 6. Wolf D, Rauch J, Hausmann M, Cremer C. Comparison of the thermal denaturation behaviour of DNA-solutions and chromosome preparations in suspension. Biophysical Chemistry. 1999;81:207-221
  7. 7. Rauch J, Wolf D, Hausmann M, Cremer C. The influence of formamide on thermal denaturation profiles of DNA and metaphase chromosomes in suspensions. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung. Section C. 2000;55:737-746
  8. 8. Bridger JM, Volpi EV, editors. Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) – Protocols and Applications. Springer, New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Humana Press; 2010
  9. 9. Egholm M, Buchardt O, Christensen L, Behrens C, Freier SM, Driver DA, et al. PNA hybridizes to complementary oligonucleotides obeying the Watson-Crick hydrogen-bonding rules. Nature. 1993;365:566-568
  10. 10. Matera AG, Ward DC. Oligonucleotide probes for the analysis of specific repetitive DNA sequences by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Human Molecular Genetics. 1992;1:535-539
  11. 11. Beliveau BJ, Boettiger AN, Avendano MS, Jungmann R, McCole RB, Joyce EF, et al. Single-molecule super-resolution imaging of chromosomes and in situ haplotype visualization using Oligopaint FISH probes. Nature Communications. 2015;6:7147
  12. 12. Beliveau BJ, Joyce EF, Apostolopoulos N, Yilmaz F, Fonseka CY, McCole RB, et al. Versatile design and synthesis platform for visualizing genomes with Oligopaint FISH probes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012;109:21301-21306
  13. 13. Boyle S, Rodesch MJ, Halvensleben HA, Jeddeloh JA, Bickmore WA. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with high-complexity repeat-free oligonucleotide probes generated by massively parallel synthesis. Chromosome Research. 2011;19:901-909
  14. 14. Yamada NA, Rector LS, Tsang P, Carr E, Scheffer A, Sederberg MC, et al. Visualization of fine-scale genomic structure by oligonucleotide-based high-resolution FISH. Cytogenetic and Genome Research. 2010;132:248-254
  15. 15. Winkler R, Perner B, Rapp A, Durm M, Cremer C, Greulich KO, et al. Labelling quality and chromosome morphology after low temperature FISH analysed by scanning far-field and scanning near-field optical microscopy. Journal of Microscopy. 2003;209:23-33
  16. 16. Dobruck J, Darzynkiewicz Z. Chromatin condensation and sensitivity of DNA in situ to denaturation during cell cycle and apoptosis – a confocal microscopy study. Micron. 2001;32:645-652
  17. 17. Genet MD, Cartwright IM, Kato TA. Direct DNA and PNA probe binding to telomeric regions without classical in situ hybridization. Molecular Cytogenetics. 2013;6:42
  18. 18. Cremer C, Hausmann M, Cremer T (1998) Markierung von Nukleinsäuren mit speziellen Probengemischen. German Patent DE 198 06 962 A1.
  19. 19. Hausmann M, Winkler R, Hildenbrand G, Finsterle J, Weisel A, Rapp A, et al. COMBO-FISH: Specific labelling of nondenatured chromatin targets by computer-selected DNA oligonucleotide probe combinations. BioTechniques. 2003;35:564-577
  20. 20. Schmitt E, Wagner J, Hausmann M. Combinatorial selection of short triplex forming oligonucleotides for fluorescence in situ hybridisation COMBO-FISH. Journal of Computer Science. 2012;3:328-334
  21. 21. Felsenfeld G, Davies DR, Rich A. Formation of a three-stranded polynucleotide molecule. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1957;79:2023-2024
  22. 22. Felsenfeld G, Rich A. Studies on the formation of two and three stranded polynucleotides. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1957;26:457-468
  23. 23. Lemmer P, Gunkel M, Baddeley D, Kaufmann R, Urich A, Weiland Y, et al. SPDM – light microscopy with single molecule resolution at the nanoscale. Applied Physics B: Lasers and Optics. 2008;93:1-12
  24. 24. Cremer C, Kaufmann R, Gunkel M, Pres S, Weiland Y, Müller P, et al. Super-resolution imaging of biological nanostructures by Spectral Precision Distance Microscopy (SPDM). Reviews in Biotechnology. 2011;6:1037-1051
  25. 25. Eberle JP, Rapp A, Krufczik M, Eryilmaz M, Gunkel M, Erfle H, et al. Super-resolution microscopy techniques and their potential for applications in radiation biophysics. In: Erfle H, editor. Super-resolution Microscopy – Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 1663. Totowa, New Jersey: Springer; 2017. pp. 1-13
  26. 26. Kepper N, Schmitt E, Lesnussa M, Weiland Y, Eussen HB, Grosveld F, et al. Visualization, analysis, and design of COMBO-FISH probes in the Grid-based GLOBE 3D genome platform. In: Solomonides T, Blanquer I, Breton V, Glatard T, Legré Y, editors. Healthgrid Applications and Core Technologies: Proceedings of HealthGrid, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Vol. 159. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2010. pp. 171-180
  27. 27. Schmitt E, Schwarz-Finsterle J, Stein S, Boxler C, Müller P, Mokhir A, et al. Combinatorial oligo FISH: Directed labelling of specific genome domains in differentially fixed cell material and live cells. In: Bidger JM, Volpi EV, editors. Fluorescence In Situ Hybrdization, Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 659. Totowa, New Jersey: Springer; 2010. pp. 185-202
  28. 28. Zeller D, Kepper N, Hausmann M, Schmitt E. Sequential and structural biophysical aspects of combinatorial oligo-FISH in Her2/Neu breast cancer diagnostics. IFMBE Proceedings. 2013;38:82-85
  29. 29. Hausmann M, Lee J-H, Sievers A, Krufczik M, Hildenbrand G. COMBinatorial Oligonucleotide FISH (COMBO-FISH) with uniquely binding repetitive DNA probes. In: Hancock R, editor. The Nucleus, Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 2175. Totowa, New Jersey: Springer; 2020. pp. 65-77
  30. 30. Schwarz-Finsterle J, Stein S, Großmann C, Schmitt E, Schneider H, Trakhtenbrot L, et al. COMBO-FISH for focussed fluorescence labelling of gene domains: 3D-analysis of the genome architecture of abl and bcr in human blood cells. Cell Biology International. 2005;29:1038-1046
  31. 31. Schwarz-Finsterle J, Stein S, Großmann C, Schmitt E, Trakhtenbrot L, Rechavi G, et al. Comparison of triplehelical COMBO-FISH and standard FISH by means of quantitative microscopic image analysis of abl/bcr genome organisation. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods. 2007;70:397-406
  32. 32. Lee J-H, Laure Djikimi Tchetgna F, Krufczik M, Schmitt E, Cremer C, Bestvater F, et al. COMBO-FISH: A versatile tool beyond standard FISH to study chromatin organization by fluorescence light microscopy. OBM Genetics. 2019;3(1):064; pp. 28. DOI: 10.21926/obm.genet.1901064
  33. 33. Nolte O, Müller M, Häfner B, Knemeyer J-P, Stöhr K, Wolfrum J, et al. Novel singly labelled probes for identification of microorganisms, detection of antibiotic resistance genes and mutations, and tumor diagnosis (SMART PROBES). In: Popp J, Strehle M, editors. Biophotonics. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2006. pp. 167-230
  34. 34. Müller P, Rößler J, Schwarz-Finsterle J, Pedersen EB, Géci I, Schmitt E, et al. PNA-COMBO-FISH: From combinatorial probe design in silico to vitality compatible, specific labelling of gene targets in cell nuclei. Experimental Cell Research. 2016;345:51-59
  35. 35. Grossmann C, Schwarz-Finsterle J, Schmitt E, Birk U, Hildenbrand G, Cremer C, et al. Variations of the spatial fluorescence distribution in ABL gene chromatin domains measured in blood cell nuclei by SMI microscopy after COMBO-FISH labelling. In: Méndez-Vilas A, Díaz Álvarez J, editors. Microscopy: Science, Technology, Applications and Education. Vol. 1. Badajoz, España: Formatex Research Center; 2010. pp. 688-695
  36. 36. Stuhlmüller M, Schwarz-Finsterle J, Fey E, Lux J, Bach M, Cremer C, et al. In situ optical sequencing and nano-structure analysis of a trinucleotide expansion region by localization microscopy after specific COMBO-FISH labelling. Nanoscale. 2015;7:17938-17946
  37. 37. Hausmann M, Hildenbrand G, Schwarz-Finsterle J, Birk U, Schneider H, Cremer C, et al. New technologies measure genome domains – high resolution microscopy and novel labeling procedures enable 3-D studies of the functional architecture of gene domains in cell nuclei. Biophotonics International. 2005;12(10):34-37
  38. 38. Senapati J, Sasaki K. Chromosomal instability in chronic myeloid leukemia: Mechanistic insights and effects. Cancers. 2022;14(10):2533. DOI: 10.3390/cancers 14102533
  39. 39. Cytocell Ltd ZNF217 Amplification LPS 005, Available from: http://www.cytocell.co.uk/products/aquarius/pathology/ZNF217-probe. 2012
  40. 40. Albrecht B, Hausmann M, Zitzelsberger H, Stein H, Siewert JR, Hopt U, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization for the detection of DNA sequence copy number changes in Barrett’s adenocarcinoma. The Journal of Pathology. 2004;203:780-788
  41. 41. Chen C, Zhao S, Karnad A, Freeman JW. The biology and role of CD44 in cancer progression: Therapeutic implications. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2018;11:64. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-018-0605-5
  42. 42. Xu H, Niu M, Yuan X, Wu K, Liu A. CD44 as a tumor biomarker and therapeutic target. Experimental Hematology & Oncology. 2020;9:36. DOI: doi.org/10.1186/s40164-020-00192-0
  43. 43. Müller P, Weiland Y, Kaufmann R, Gunkel M, Hillebrandt S, Cremer C, Hausmann M. Analysis of fluorescent nanostructures in biological systems by means of Spectral Position Determination Microscopy (SPDM). In: Méndez-Vilas A, editor. Current Microscopy Contributions to Advances in Science and Technology. Badajoz, España: Formatex Research Center; 2021;1:3-12
  44. 44. Müller P, Schmitt E, Jacob A, Hoheisel J, Kaufmann R, Cremer C, et al. COMBO-FISH enables high precision localization microscopy as a prerequisite for nanostructure analysis of genome loci. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2010;11:4094-4105
  45. 45. Krigerts J, Salmina K, Freivalds T, Zayakin P, Rumnieks F, Inashkina I, et al. Differentiating breast cancer cells reveal early large-scale genome regulation by pericentric domains. Biophysical Journal. 2021;120:711-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.01.002
  46. 46. Erenpreisa J, Krigerts J, Salmina K, Gerashchenko BI, Freivalds T, Kurg R, et al. Heterochromatin networks: topology, dynamics, and function (a working hypothesis). Cell. 2021;10:1582. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10071582
  47. 47. Hausmann M, Hildenbrand G, Pilarczyk G. Networks and islands of genome nano-architecture and their potential relevance for radiation biology (A hypothesis and experimental verification hints). In: Kloc M, Kubiak JZ, editors. Nuclear, Chromosomal, and Genomic Architecture in Biology and Medicine. In press. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2022
  48. 48. Krufczik M, Sievers A, Hausmann A, Lee J-H, Hildenbrand G, Schaufler W, et al. Combining low temperature fluorescence DNA-hybridization, immunostaining, and super-resolution localization microscopy for nano-structure analysis of ALU elements and their influence on chromatin structure. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18:1005. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18051005
  49. 49. Sievers A, Bosiek K, Bisch M, Dreessen C, Riedel J, Froß P, et al. Kmer content, correlation and position analysis of genome DNA sequences for identification of function and evolutionary features. Genes. 2017;8:122. DOI: 10.3390/genes8040122
  50. 50. Hausmann M, Ilić N, Pilarczyk G, Lee J-H, Logeswaran A, Borroni AP, et al. Challenges for super-resolution localization microscopy and biomolecular fluorescent nano-probing in cancer research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2017;18:2066. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18102066
  51. 51. Markham NR, Zuker M. DINAMelt web server for nucleic acid melting prediction. Nucleic Acids Research. 2005;33:W577-W581. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki591
  52. 52. Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Research. 2003;31:3406-3415. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkg595
  53. 53. Mathews DH, Turner DH. Prediction of RNA secondary structure by free energy minimization. Current Opinion in Structural Biology. 2006;16:270-278. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.sbi.2006.05.010
  54. 54. General information on: https://ambermd.org/
  55. 55. Case DA, Cheatham TE, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM Jr, et al. The AMBER biomolecular simulation programs. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2005;26(16):1668-1688. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20290
  56. 56. Salomon-Ferrer R, Case DA, Walker RC. An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package. WIREs Computational Molecular Science. 2013;3:198-210. DOI: 10.1002/wcms.112
  57. 57. General information on: http://www.gromos.net/
  58. 58. Schmid N, Christ CD, Christen M, Eichenberger AP, van Gunsteren WF. Architecture, implementation and parallelisation of the GROMOS Software for biomolecular simulation. Computer Physics Communications. 2012;183:890-903
  59. 59. General information on: https://www.charmm.org/, https://academiccharmm.org/
  60. 60. Hynninen A, Crowley MF. New faster CHARMM molecular dynamics engine. Journal of Computational Chemistry. 2014;35:406-413. DOI: 10.1002/jcc.23501
  61. 61. Hofmann A, Krufczik M, Heermann DW, Hausmann M. Using persistent homology as a new approach for super-resolution localization microscopy data analysis and classification of γH2AX foci/clusters. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19:2263. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082263
  62. 62. Hausmann M, Neitzel C, Bobkova E, Nagel D, Hofmann A, Chramko T, et al. Single molecule localization microscopy analyses of DNA-repair foci and clusters detected along particle damage tracks. Frontiers of Physics. 2020;8:578662. DOI: 10.3389/fphy.2020.578662
  63. 63. Hausmann M, Falk M, Neitzel C, Hofmann A, Biswas A, Gier T, et al. Elucidation of the clustered nano-architecture of radiation-induced DNA damage sites and surrounding chromatin in cancer cells: A single molecule localization microscopy approach. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22:3636. DOI: doi.org/10.3390/ijms22073636
  64. 64. Hahn H, Neitzel C, Kopečná O, Heermann DW, Falk M, Hausmann M. Topological analysis of γH2AX and MRE11 clusters detected by localization microscopy during X-ray-induced DNA double-strand break repair. Cancers. 2021;13:5561. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13215561

Written By

Michael Hausmann and Eberhard Schmitt

Submitted: 21 August 2022 Reviewed: 11 October 2022 Published: 19 November 2022