Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Benefits and Barriers of Physical Activity in Social Inclusion and Quality of Life in People with Serious Mental Disorders

Written By

Cristina Méndez-Aguado, Adolfo J. Cangas, María Jesús Lirola, Juan Leandro Cerezuela and Andrés López-Pardo

Submitted: 08 July 2022 Reviewed: 26 July 2022 Published: 28 November 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.106767

From the Edited Volume

Mental Health - Preventive Strategies

Edited by Adilson Marques, Margarida Gaspar de Matos and Hugo Sarmento

Chapter metrics overview

85 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

This book chapter presents a review of the main benefits that the practice of physical activity brings to people with severe mental disorder (SMD), as well as highlighting the most significant barriers that hinder their adherence. In this regard, it should be noted that this is a population sector in which sedentary lifestyle habits predominate, showing that physical activity is not only beneficial for physical health but also for mental and social health. However, people with severe mental disorder face barriers in which personal, social, and intervention program factors play a role, what makes regular practice difficult for them and, therefore, to access the numerous benefits it brings.

Keywords

  • Severe mental disorder
  • physical activity
  • benefits
  • barriers
  • inclusion

1. Introduction

Severe mental disorder (SMD) refers to different psychopathological conditions, such as severe depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or severe personality disorders, which have a duration of at least 2 years and affect several aspects of the person’s life (social, clinical, educational, judicial, etc.) [1, 2]. Due to their high impact on quality of life and their current prevalence, they are considered as one of the major health issues [3]. These are people who, for instance, see their life expectancy reduced by 10–20 years [1].

These individuals are at increased risk of medical problems, mainly associated with sedentary lifestyles, poor dietary habits, and the adverse physical and mental effects of toxic intake or medication effects. Possible secondary medical complications include cardiovascular complications, metabolic syndrome, and the development of diabetes [4, 5].

Among the recommendations to palliate these difficulties, the practice of physical activity stands out, as it has benefits not only on physical but also on personal well-being and mental health [6, 7]. Through this practice, cardiometabolic complications are affected [8, 9], as well as psychological factors such as mood, self-esteem, and psychological and social well-being, which is also closely related to another common problem in this field, such as stigma toward mental health problems [10].

However, despite the fact that this is a problem with a high incidence among the current population, there are not many studies that focus specifically on the effect of physical activity on people with SMD. This is a topic that has not been formally studied and is mostly based on interventions without follow-up or carried out for short periods of time (1 to 3 months), making it difficult to identify long-term benefits and barriers. Therefore, despite its relevance, there is still a predominant lack of justification for its transfer to clinical routines.

In that sense, this chapter presents a review of the existing literature, with the aim of determining the factors that have a positive effect on the practice of physical activity, as well as the barriers that people with SMD have to face so as to do it. For this purpose, specific attention will be paid to those physical activity programs that have been actively implemented in this population sector, being able to extract the relevant data from them thanks to their empirical analyses, based on the collection of qualitative and quantitative data.

Advertisement

2. Benefits

One of the characteristics of the population with some type of SMD is the reduction in the level of quality of life. This has been defined by the World Health Organization [11] as a personal perception, based on the objectives, standards, concerns, and expectations of each individual, of the position they occupy in life according to the cultural environment and the value system established at the time of measurement. In order to quantify this broad concept, six main factors must be addressed: physical health, psychological state, level of dependence, social relations, personal beliefs, and the relationship with the environment.

Of all these factors, three stand out for having been directly analyzed in the available studies on the implementation of physical activity programs for people with SMD. These factors are physical health, mental health, and social relationships, and the benefits obtained in these studies promote the recommendation of physical activity for people with SMD in all clinical intervention guidelines. However, it should be noted that the WHO currently recommends at least 150 minutes of aerobic physical activity per week at a moderate or vigorous intensity in order to obtain significant results, guidelines followed by the studies analyzed for the benefits described in the following section.

2.1 Physical health

The contributions of the programs examined in the area of physical health, understood as the link between well-being and proper bodily functioning, have been various.

Applying WHO recommendations, the regular practice of physical activity has been directly and significantly related to improvements in anthropometric measurements, functional fitness, and motor skills of participants. This is due not only to the individual effect on each of these variables but also to the interrelationship between them. Anthropometric measurements include body weight and body circumference and are related to the nutritional and health status of the participants. Their in-depth analysis not only allows predictions to be made about users’ performance but also about their health and even survival. At the same time, changes in anthropometric measurements lead to changes in body composition which, together with muscular strength, cardiorespiratory endurance, flexibility, and balance are the main components of functional fitness, as well as motor qualities for which benefits have been proven in different studies [12, 13].

However, physical health is not only related to physical fitness but also to the development of healthy eating and consumption habits. These habits are particularly relevant among people with SMD as, due to medication and the symptoms of the disorder itself, they tend to have a greater appetite and have diets that are low in fruit and vegetables but high in fat and sugar. Physical activity programs have reported improvements in this area by combining physical exercise with educational workshops on healthy behaviors, improving participants’ diets and promoting the abandonment of substance, alcohol, and tobacco use, which reduces the possibility of developing diseases related to unhealthy habits [14].

All these improvements, both in terms of physical fitness and eating habits, promote the improvement of the autonomy of this sector of the population. Although this is also influenced by the social aspect, the physical sphere plays a very important role [15]. Improved anthropometric measurements, functional fitness, and motor skills allow for better performance of daily activities, without the need for assistance and/or support. In addition, the inclusion of healthy eating habits and the reduction or cessation of substance, alcohol, and tobacco use also contribute positively, as they do not require supervision in this regard and prevent the occurrence of related health problems.

2.2 Mental health

Physical activity programs for people with SMD have also reported various benefits in terms of mental health, understood as a state of being aware of one’s individual capacities and being able to face everyday difficulties, work productively, and contribute to the community of which one is a part.

Several authors have focused their studies in this area, determining the improvement of factors such as self-esteem, stress, and anxiety [16, 17]. Similarly, in other work where the effect of a regular football league on mental health was evaluated, they also found improvements in self-stigma [18]. Even in studies where mental health status has been measured in a general way, mental health status has improved equally [19]. Physical activity allows participants to create new goals that they are capable of achieving, giving them the confidence that they can achieve what they set out to do and feel that they contribute to the community in some way. In this way, the perception of self-worth is positively modified while increasing self-esteem and self-image, thus promoting improved mental health.

Likewise, several authors have found significant improvements in symptomatology, both positive and negative, in SMD [20, 21, 22] that is addressed through the practice of physical activity thanks to the contributions of this type of activity. On the one hand, the hormonal release that is produced intervenes in the reduction of symptoms related to certain disorders, such as depression or anxiety. On the other hand, the possibility it offers in terms of disconnection also plays a positive role. Users have the opportunity to disconnect the mind by focusing on the task at hand, reducing the attention on negative symptoms that are occurring.

Therefore, physical activity programs develop positive expectations toward symptom improvement so that adherence to such programs is increased [23]. However, the need to control the energy used in physical activity is demonstrated, given that excess energy can also lead to problems in adaptation and behavioral problems [24].

Likewise, in other study proposed, it can be observed how the practice of regular physical activity from an early age acts as a protective factor in various psychological problems, such as depression by acting on all the factors studied earlier [25].

2.3 Social relationships

Although there are few practical studies that have directly measured how physical activity affects interactions between two or more people involving a set of implicit norms, they have demonstrated benefits for participants.

In terms of the benefits of physical activity on a social level, some studies highlight improvements in personal and social functioning [12], allowing for the emergence of positive social relationships, reducing self-stigma, all thanks to the contact established during the activity sessions, both between people with SMD and those who do not have SMD [16]. Therefore, the socialization of this group is promoted [15], in which fun acts as a common thread, leading to a reduction in stereotypes and symptomatology and the creation of bonds between those involved [26]. In this way, the practice of physical activity may be a suitable way to improve social support for people with SMD [17].

These improvements appear indirectly, i.e. it does not seem to be necessary for physical activity programs to devote part of the session to this task. In fact, these are benefits detected through studies whose objectives were physical and mental health variables, in which no improvements were obtained, but which were nevertheless positively valued by the participants in view of the social possibilities presented [27].

The internal characteristics of team activities, especially when they are carried out in groups, and the wide range of possibilities they offer, allow participants to value them positively by fostering positive experiences through the exchange of sessions with like-minded people. Team activities offer a wide range of social opportunities by allowing interaction between participants, both during the activity itself, which requires cooperation, and after the activity has ended, and by encouraging the emergence of positive stimulus from other users who are in the same situation.

Advertisement

3. Barriers

However, despite all these benefits, the practice of physical activity continues to be a pending subject in this population, possibly due to different barriers, that is to say, elements that hinder participation and continuation in programs of this type. These barriers can be classified into three main groups: personal, social, and/or related to the activity program itself.

3.1 Personal barriers

Regarding this type of factors, a study points to the importance of lack of motivation and fatigue [28], to which other researchers add poor physical self-awareness that leads to shortcomings at the motivational level as it predetermines poor performance and performance in physical activity [29]. To these variables, some authors add their own emotional influences [30], closely related to low mood and the presence of high levels of stress [31]. Another research also includes low self-efficacy and stigma [32]. Although it has previously been concluded that these variables are reduced or even eliminated, their existence hinders adherence to physical activity programs and thus the possibility of eliminating them and accessing the benefits they bring.

Along the same lines, it is established as a barrier the personal experience with the disorder, taking into account the symptoms of the disorder and the side effects of medication [33]. To this, together with negative expectations and an incorrect body perception, we must add the achievement of immediate negative results and the misconceptions evoked toward the sport practice itself (type of activity, intensity, etc.) [23].

However, these are barriers that can be overcome by providing the right support to the participants, both during, before, and after the tasks. In this way, the creation of false expectations would be avoided and the demotivation inherent in their nonachievement would be easier to counteract. Such support should come from the relationships established between the providers of the intervention, as well as from the rest of those involved in the program. This would require coordination between all those involved, although this is a barrier that is still present today [34].

3.2 Social barriers

The existence of certain social conditioning factors also plays an important role, such as a clear lack of support, both at family and social level and from the health system itself [33]. Thus, according to other studies, the lack of medical staff involved during the development of physical activity is considered a barrier to its practice, since it is interpreted as a lack of support from the environment and increases demotivation [21, 29]. This is a sector of the population that requires more support from their environment to adhere to this type of activities, facing the personal barriers they face.

It is highlighted the shortcomings at the organizational level. On the one hand, they highlight the lack of staff during the development of the physical activity, resulting in difficulties at the level of supervision and, therefore, of individual adaptation of the activity itself, as well as in the absence of guidance and support. On the other hand, they highlight the usual lack of financial resources, not only at an organizational level for these programs, but also at a personal level. These are people with greater economic difficulties that affect the possibilities of accessing sports facilities and acquiring adequate material [35].

3.3 Program barriers

With regard to the constraints related to the physical activity program itself, environmental restrictions, lack of staff and support in supervising the implementation of the activities, and the presence of rigid structures that limit spontaneous exercise, that is to say, preestablished exercise site conditions that allow for few changes, are identified [24]. The existence of such structures and the lack of support result in a lack of adaptation of the activities to be performed, which is considered another barrier to be taken into account [21].

At the same time, the lack of appropriate equipment is also seen as a barrier. Currently, the logistical factors of these interventions are characterized by being mostly deficient and not adapted to the needs of the participants or needing to be provided by the participants themselves, a sector of the population with economic deficiencies. This not only leads to lower participation but also contributes to feelings of insecurity during the activities [36].

On the other hand, there is a notable lack of physical activity programs that include and consider the participation of people with severe mental disorder (SMD) [26]. There is insufficient support from previous physical activity programs that could serve as a reference and motivation for both the organizers and the participants themselves. Thus, participation is diminished, as well as the creation of interventions that consider the inclusion of this population.

Advertisement

4. Conclusions

The review of the literature carried out throughout this work has allowed us to develop the main objective established, which was to identify the benefits reported by the practice of physical activity for people with SMD and the barriers that act as a hindrance to its implementation.

The results obtained reveal that the practice of physical activity in people suffering from some type of SMD has many benefits. It allows for an improvement in physical fitness, whether in terms of anthropometric measurements or physical condition, and facilitates the acquisition of healthy habits, thereby reducing the likelihood of developing diseases related to unhealthy habits, such as smoking or a sedentary lifestyle [37]. This is of great relevance as it aims to reduce certain health risk factors identified by the World Health Organization as the main causes of death from cardiovascular problems, placing it at around 61% of total deaths [38].

In terms of mental health, this also benefits as the practice of physical activity intervenes on psychological problems such as self-esteem, stress, or anxiety. The development of these factors is of great importance as it contributes positively to the improvement of autonomy [39]. This improvement also contributes to the reduction of the symptoms of the disorder, as stated by Stubbs. This reduction in symptomatology could lead to a reduction in the consumption of drugs, together with the benefits of sport on certain health problems derived from the side effects of the medication prescribed for the disorder in question [40].

Other reported benefits are related to social factors. The studies analyzed have found that the practice of physical activity promotes socialization and the development of social relationships, which acts against the usual isolation in this population [41].

Nevertheless, it should be noted that, despite the potential negative impact and recommendations due to the benefits found, people with SMD often do not engage in any type of physical activity [42]. Low adherence is prevalent and needs to be corrected to achieve significant results as regular practice is important [43]. This lack of adherence is due, in part, to the presence of various barriers that need to be addressed. According to those found throughout the literature review, these include personal, social, and program-specific factors.

Regarding the former, the main stumbling block to consider is demotivation toward this practice. This may be related to various factors, such as a low self-concept, fatigue, erroneous beliefs about individual abilities and skills, and even negative emotional influence caused by stress or low mood. These problems are derived from the physical inactivity itself or appear as a consequence of the disorder or as side effects of the pharmacological treatment administered [39, 44, 45].

There are also barriers around the physical activity program itself. These lie in logistical factors such as lack of equipment, lack of support from physical activity specialists, and nonstandardized locations, i.e. limitations intrinsic to the facilities in which the activity takes place. These barriers contribute to demotivation due to the difficulties of access that they entail [32].

In terms of social factors, two main ones stand out. On the one hand, the lack of support from the environment and, on the other hand, the problems derived from the healthcare system. In this regard, the lack of training and awareness in this regard both on the part of the immediate environment and healthcare staff stands out [32]. Similarly, the current healthcare system gives greater importance to pharmacological treatment [46], leaving other types of interventions such as physical activity in the background.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work has been financed with the support of a project of the Andalusian Knowledge Agency (P20_00232).

References

  1. 1. Liu NH, Daumit GL, Dua T, Aquila R, Charlson F, Cuijpers P, et al. Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders: A multilevel intervention framework and priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas. World Psychiatry. 2017;16:30-40. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20384
  2. 2. National Institute of Mental Health. Towards a model for a comprehensive community based mental health system. Washington DC: NIMH; 1987
  3. 3. Marco A. Programa de promoción de hábitos de vida saludable para personas con trastorno mental grave en una unidad de salud mental comunitaria. Revista de Enfermería en Salud Mental. 2020;14:20-24. DOI: 10.5538/2385-703X.2020.14.20
  4. 4. Das-Munshi J, Chang C-K, Dutta R, Morgan C, Nazroo J, Stewart R, et al. Ethnicity and excess mortality in severe mental illness: A cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry. 2017;4:389-399. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30097-4
  5. 5. Martín, G. El deporte como tratamiento no farmacológico de la enfermedad mental. In: Proyecto MENS editors. 12 artículos que conectan salud mental con deporte y actividad física. Brussels: ENALMH; 2018. p. 107-118
  6. 6. Holt NL. Positive Youth Development Through Sport. Abingdon: Routledge; 2016
  7. 7. Schuch FB, Vancampfort D, Firth J, Rosenbaum S, Ward PB, Silva ES, et al. Physical activity and incident depression: A meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2018;175:631-648. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17111194
  8. 8. Correll CU, Solmi M, Veronese N, Bortolato B, Rosson S, Santonastaso P, et al. Prevalence, incidence and mortality from cardiovascular disease in patients with pooled and specific severe mental illness: A large-scale meta-analysis of 3,211,768 patients and 113,383,368 controls. World Psychiatry. 2017;16:163-180. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20420
  9. 9. Vancampfort D, Stubbs B, Mitchell AJ, De Hert M, Wampers M, Ward PB, et al. Risk of metabolic syndrome and its components in people with schizophrenia and related psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2015;14:339-347. DOI: 10.1002/wps.20252
  10. 10. Vaca S, Martínez JM. Análisis del estigma hacia personas con trastorno mental grave en la población de Cáceres. Revista de Educación Social. 2019;29:142-153
  11. 11. WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization Quality of life assessment (WHOQOL). Position Paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine. 1995;41(10):1.403-1.409
  12. 12. Mullor D, Gallego J, Cangas AJ, Aguilar-Parra JM, Valenzuela L, Mateu JM, et al. Efectividad de un programa de actividad física en personas con trastorno mental grave/effectiveness of a program of physical activity in people with serious mental disorder. Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad Física y el Deporte. 2017;17:507-521. DOI: 10.15366/rimcafd2017.67.008
  13. 13. Pérez-Cruzado D, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Vera-García E, Mayoral-Cleries F. Physical fitness and levels of physical activity in people with severe mental illness: A cross-sectional study. BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2017;9:1-6. DOI: 10.1186/s13102-017-0082-0
  14. 14. Smith J, Griffiths LA, Band M, Hird-Smith R, Williams B, Bold J, et al. Early intervention in psychosis: Effectiveness and implementation of a combined exercise and health behavior intervention within routine care. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2020;11:1-19. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.577691
  15. 15. Guérin E, Dupuis J-P, Jacob J-D, Prud’homme D. Incorporating a physical activity program into an assertive community treatment team: Impact and strategies. Community Mental Health Journal. 2019;55:1293-1297. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-019-00440-6
  16. 16. Galán-Casado D, Castillo J, García B. Deporte e inclusión social en personas con trastorno mental grave (TMG). Psychology, Society and Education. 2020;12:71-83. DOI: 10.25115/psye.v10i1.2343
  17. 17. Young D, Yat-Nam P, Cheng D, Hong LC. Effects of physical activity intervention for Chinese people with severe mental illness. Research on Social Work Practice. 2019;29:796-807. DOI: 10.1177/1049731518804900
  18. 18. Moraleda A, Galán-Casado D, Cangas AJ. Reducing self-stigma in people with severe mental illness participating in a regular football league: An exploratory study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019;16:3599. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16193599
  19. 19. Battaglia G, Alesi M, Inguglia M, Roccella M, Caramazza G, Bellafiore M, et al. Soccer practice as an add-on treatment in the management of individuals with diagnosis of schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. 2013;9:595-603. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S44066
  20. 20. Firth J, Carney R, Pownall M, French P, Elliott R, Cotter J, et al. Challenges in implementing an exercise intervention within residential psychiatric care: A mixed methods study. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2017;12:141-146. DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.04.004
  21. 21. Kinnafick F-E, Papathomas A, Regoczi D. Promoting exercise behavior in a secure mental health setting: Healthcare assistant perspectives. International Journal of mental Health Nursing. 2018;27:1776-1783. DOI: 10.1111/inm.12484
  22. 22. Mullor D, Cangas AJ, Gallego J, Trigueros R, López A. Impacto psicológico y social de un programa de deporte inclusivo entre estudiantes y personas con trastorno mental grave. Revista de Psicología del Deporte. 2020;29:5-15
  23. 23. Rastad C, Martin C, Asenlöf P. Barriers, benefits and strategies for physical activity in patients with schizophrenia. Psyhical Therapy. 2014;94:1467-1479. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20120443
  24. 24. Rogers E, Papathomas A, Kinnafick F-E. Inpatient perspectives on physical activity in a secure mental health setting. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2021;52:101827. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101827
  25. 25. Nietola M, Huovinen H, Heiskala A, Nordström T, Miettunen J, Korkeila J, et al. Early childhood and adolescent risk factors for psychotic depression in a general population birth cohort sample. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2020;55:1179-1186. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-01835-7
  26. 26. Brooke LE, Gucciardi DF, Ntoumanis N, Lin A. Qualitative investigation of perceived barriers to and enablers of sport participation for young people first episode psychosis. Early Intervention in Psychiatry. 2019;14:293-306. DOI: 10.1111/eip.12854
  27. 27. Walburg FS, de Joode JW, Brandt HE, van Tulder MW, Adriaanse MC, van Meijel B. Implementation of a lifestyle intervention for people with severe mental illness (SMILE): A process evaluation. BMC Health Services Research. 2022;22:1-12. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-07391-3
  28. 28. Romain AJ, Longpré-Poirier C, Tannous M, Abdel-Baki A. Physical activity for patients with severe mental illness: Preferences, barriers and perceptions of counselling. Science and Sports. 2020;35:289-299. DOI: 10.1016/j.scispo.2020.03.005
  29. 29. Yap J, McCartan C, Davidson G, White C, Bradley L, Webb P, et al. An exercise intervention for people with serious mental illness: Findings from a qualitative data analysis using participatory theme elicitation. Health Expectations. 2020;23:1579-1593. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13141
  30. 30. Matthews E, Cowman M, Brannigan M, Sloan D, Ward PB, Denieffe S. Examining the barriers to physical activity between active and inactive people with severe mental illness in Ireland. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2018;15:139-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2018.10.003
  31. 31. Firth J, Rosenbaum S, Stubbs B, Gorcynski P, Yung AR, Vancampfort D. Motivating factors and barriers towards exercise in severe mental illness: A systematic review ad meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. 2016;46:2869-2881. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291716001732
  32. 32. Chen M-D, I J-H, Pellegrini CA, Tang T-C, Kuo C-C. A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to physical activity participation in people with severe mental illness in Taiwan. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2017;13:100-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.09.004
  33. 33. Rezaie L, Shafaroodi N, Philips D. The barriers to participation in leisure time physical activities among Iranian women with severe mental illness: A qualitative study. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2017;13:171-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.09.008
  34. 34. Melamed OC, Fernando I, Soklaridis S, Hahn MK, LeMessurier KW, Taylor VH. Understanding engagement with a physical health service: A qualitative study of patients with severe mental illness. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2019;64:872-880. DOI: 10.1177/0706743719862980
  35. 35. Deenik J, Tenback DE, Tak ECPM, Henkemans OAB, Rosenbaum S, Hendriksen IJM, et al. Implementation barriers and facilitators of an integrated multidisciplinary lifestyle enhancing treatment for inpatients with severe mental illness: The MULTI study IV. Health Service Research. 2019;19:1-13. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4608-x
  36. 36. Martland R, Gaughran F, Stubbs B, Onwumere J. Perspectives on implementing HIIT interventions for service users in inpatient mental health settings: A qualitative study investigating patient, carer and staff attitudes. Journal of Affective Disorders. 2021;283:198-206. DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2021.716
  37. 37. Mullor D, Cangas AJ, Gallego J, Aguilar R, A., López, A. A longitudinal study about the impact of an inclusive sports program in people with diagnosis of schizophrenia. Psychosis - Psychological Social and Integrative Approaches. 2019;11:75-84. DOI: 10.1080/17522439.2018.1559873
  38. 38. World Health Organization. Global Health Risks: Mortality and Burden of Disease Attributable to Selected Major Risks. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009
  39. 39. Pereira CS, Padoan CS, García LF, Patusco L, Magalhães PVS. Barreras y facilitadores percibidos por personas con trastorno bipolar para la práctica del ejercicio: Un estudio cualitativo. Tendencias Psiquiatría Psicoterapeuta. 2019;41:1-8
  40. 40. Stubbs B, Vancampfort D, Hallgren M, Firth J, Veronese N, Solmi M, et al. EPA guidance on physical activity as a treatment for severe mental illness: A meta-review of the evidence and Position Statement from the European Psychiatric Association (EPA), supported by the International Organization of Physical Therapists in Mental Health (IOPTMH). European Psychiatry. 2018;54:124-144. DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.07.004
  41. 41. Hargreaves J, Lucock M, Rodriguez A. From inactivity to becoming physically active: The experiences of behaviour change in people with serious mental illness. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2017;13:83-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2017.09.006
  42. 42. Ashdown-Franks G, Williams J, Vancampfort D, Firth J, Schuch F, Hubbard K, et al. Is it possible for people with severe mental illness to sit less and move more? A systematic review of interventions to increase physical activity or reduce sedentary behavior. Schizophrenia Research. 2018;202:3-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.06.058
  43. 43. Barton J, Rogerson M. The importance of greenspace for mental health. British Journal of Psychiatry International. 2017;14:79-81. DOI: 10.1192/s2056474000002051
  44. 44. Ballesteros N, Moruno P. Análisis descriptivo de la actividad física en personas con enfermedad mental que asisten a Centros de Rehabilitación Psicosocial y Laboral en Castilla La-Mancha. Estudio Piloto. Revista Electrónicas de Terapia Ocupacional Galicia. 2012;9:1-27
  45. 45. Shor R, Shalev A. Barriers to involvement in physical activities of persons with mental illness. Health Promotion International. 2016;31:116-123. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dau078
  46. 46. Mugisha J, De Hertc M, Knizekd BL, Kwiringiraa J, Kinyandae E, Byansil W, et al. Health care professionals’ perspectives on physical activity within the Ugandan mental health care system. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2019;16:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2019.02.001

Written By

Cristina Méndez-Aguado, Adolfo J. Cangas, María Jesús Lirola, Juan Leandro Cerezuela and Andrés López-Pardo

Submitted: 08 July 2022 Reviewed: 26 July 2022 Published: 28 November 2022