Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Magnesium Borates: The Relationship between the Characteristics, Properties, and Novel Technologies

Written By

Fatma Tugce Senberber Dumanli

Submitted: February 11th, 2022 Reviewed: March 14th, 2022 Published: April 17th, 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104487

IntechOpen
Current Trends in Magnesium (Mg) Research Edited by Sailaja S. Sunkari

From the Edited Volume

Current Trends in Magnesium (Mg) Research [Working Title]

Dr. Sailaja S. S. Sunkari

Chapter metrics overview

16 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Magnesium borates are compounds including mainly magnesium (Mg), boron (B) oxygen (O), and hydrogen (H). Magnesium borates are traditionally famous for their strong thermoluminescence, mechanical and thermal features due to their high elasticity coefficient, corrosion, and heat resistance. Because of being beneficial, especially in the applications such as thermoluminescence and X-ray screening, and ease of synthesis, magnesium borates are produced by using different experimental procedures exhibiting different characteristics. Main traditional synthesis techniques can be classified as liquid state and solid-state synthesis methods. With the help of novelties in synthesis technology, new techniques are beginning to emerge in magnesium borate syntheses such as hybrid synthesis, ultrasound, microwave, and capping agent addition. The strengthened characteristics of the compounds would lead to new applications such as stomach cancer chemotherapy and wastewater treatment. In this chapter, it is aimed to make a comparison between the characteristics of synthesized magnesium borates and their properties. In addition, new types of magnesium borates obtained by various synthetic techniques are expected to be useful for industrial applications such as space technology, radiation dosimetry, X-ray screening, ion batteries, and hydrocarbon reaction catalysis. Such classification of properties and the synthesis techniques will enlighten the relationship between the characteristics and novel applications of magnesium borates.

Keywords

  • advanced synthesis methods
  • characterization
  • magnesium borates
  • microwave synthesis
  • reaction mechanism
  • ultrasonic synthesis

1. Introduction

Magnesium is the third most abundant element by mass in Earth’s surface composition. Magnesium-based materials are preferable, especially for their lightweight. Magnesium is found in nature as the combination of oxygen to form different minerals such as sulfates, carbonates, nitrates, and borates [1, 2]. Some kinds of magnesium compounds can be soluble, such as magnesium sulfate, magnesium nitrate, and magnesium bromide. These compounds are generally hygroscopic. Other types of magnesium compounds are known as insoluble, such as magnesium borate, magnesium oxide, and magnesium phosphate. The salt group of magnesium is effective in the corrosive behavior of magnesium compounds [3]. Being insoluble in water makes magnesium borates production easier with developed technology, such as hybrid synthesis methods, the use of microwave and ultrasound technologies.

As a magnesium-based compound, magnesium borate can be utilized in the applications of X-ray screening, radiation permeation, catalysis of organic reactions, strengthening of plastics, and ion-battery systems. The studies on magnesium borates are generally focused on synthesis techniques. The common aim of the developed synthesis methods is to decrease energy consumption. However, the characteristics of the prepared sample are related to the designed experimental setup. A thorough understanding of the relationship between synthesis procedures and characteristics of the novel borates obtained will help increased the use of the correct form of magnesium borate in industry.

Advertisement

2. Magnesium borate minerals

As being notable magnesium compounds, magnesium borates mainly include the atoms of Mg, B, O; however, other types of elements may be included according to the reserves they are mined. According to the conditions they formed in nature or fabricated in the laboratory, the magnesium borates can include crystal waters and/or hydroxyl groups. Therefore, this type of magnesium minerals can be classified as hydrated or dehydrated forms. The common examples of identified magnesium borates and their crystal systems are presented in Table 1.

The arrangement of functional groups in the molecule determines the properties of magnesium borate [5]. As a chemical compound, magnesium borates mainly include the functional groups of three and four coordinated borate anions (B(3)-O and B(4)-O) connected to the magnesium atoms (Figure 1). The typical symmetric and asymmetric stretching in a molecule can be determined by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and/or Raman Spectroscopy.

Figure 1.

The examples of boron-oxygen linkages B(3)-O and B(4)-O.

Spectral analyses result of Admontite (MgB6O10·7H2O) samples prepared at different reaction times in hydrothermal conditions were presented in Figure 2. In FT-IR analyses of magnesium borates, the spectrum begins with the peak around 3500 cm−1 which indicates the crystal water for the hydrated compounds. The region above the 1600 cm−1 is generally called as “free H2O zone”. The effects of hydroxyl anions are seen as “bending of hydroxyl groups in plane” and “bending of hydroxyl groups out of plane”. The peaks between 1400 and 1200 cm−1 indicate “bending of hydroxyl groups in plane” whereas the peaks between 950 and 750 cm−1 are related with the “bending of hydroxyl groups out of plane”. The stretching between boron and oxygen atom is commonly seen between 1600 and 650 cm−1. The peaks in the region of 1600–1400 cm−1 are related with the “asymmetric stretching of B(3)-O”. “Asymmetric stretching of B(4)-O” can be explained with the peaks in the range of 1200–950 cm−1. The peaks at the lower wavelength values of 750 cm−1 can be interpreted with the “bending of B(3)-O” [6, 7, 8].

Figure 2.

Spectral analyses result of Admontite prepared at different reaction times (a) FT-IR spectra, and (b) Raman spectra [6].

In Raman analyses of magnesium borates, the characteristic peaks are seen in the wavelength region of 1200–250 cm−1. The peaks between 1200 and 1050 cm−1 are interpreted with the “asymmetric stretching of B(4)-O”. “Symmetric stretching of B(3)-O” and “symmetric stretching of B(4)-O” are seen in the range of 1050–900 cm−1 and 900–750 cm−1, respectively. For the hydrated forms of magnesium borates, the stretching for polyanion of [B6O7(OH)6]−2 and [B3O3(OH)4]−2 is seen between 750 and 620 cm−1. The “bending of B(3)-O” and “bending of B(4)-O” can be seen in the Raman shift wavelength ranges of 620–500 cm−1 and 500–250 cm−1, respectively [6, 7, 9].

2.1 Properties

The characterization studies on magnesium borates make them preferable in industrial applications. These compounds are known for their superior thermal and mechanical strength, stability, and high coefficient elasticity. According to their specific characteristics, magnesium borates can be used as anticorrosive agent, catalyst, lubricant, and adsorbent. Due to their thermoluminescence properties, they also have applications in radiation dosimetry, X-ray screens, space research, and nonlinear optic laser systems [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16].

Magnesium borates can be utilized in hydrogen storage systems, acoustic insulation, and ion-battery systems thanks to their high corrosion resistance. The viscosity of melted magnesium borates is relatively low and exhibits excellent electro-conductivity. Therefore, magnesium borates can be used as either a coating agent on lithium-ion batteries or as an additive for electrolyte solutions [17, 18, 19, 20].

For being of biocompatible properties of magnesium, magnesium borate compounds have also begun to be evaluated as a biomaterial for being unhazardous to the environment and human health. The eco-friendly behavior of these compounds increased their applications in health and wastewater treatments. Fan et al., studied the role of magnesium borate on stomach cancer chemotherapy as a hydrogen release agent [21]. Ma and Liu [22] experimented with the Congo Red adsorption from wastewater by using the sample of 2MgO·B2O3·H2O [22].

2.1.1 Thermoluminescence

In nuclear research, dehydrated forms of magnesium borates such as MgB4O7, Mg2B2O5, and MgB2O4 are generally preferred. This can be explained by the decreasing hygroscopicity at reaction temperatures higher than 950°C and the ease of solid-state synthesis methods [11, 23, 24, 25]. Souza et al. [26] compared the thermoluminescence features of the synthesized magnesium borates in liquid-state and solid-state conditions and indicated better results of dehydrated samples [26]. MgB4O7 is the most studied composition among the magnesium borates, due to its thermoluminescence behavior. The studies on the thermoluminescence behavior of magnesium borates indicated their suitability of them in beta, neutron, and radiation dosimetry. Several rare earth elements of Cerium, Dysprosium, Samarium, Silver, Terbium, Thulium, have been doped to increase their efficiency in applications [23, 26, 27, 28, 29]. Also, Prokic and Christeen [30] and Pellicioni et al. [31] experimented with the beneficial effects of graphite addition to magnesium borates; and the 3% graphite content was determined suitable for the optimum thermoluminescence [30, 31].

2.1.2 Mechanical strength

Modification of thermoplastic materials with dehydrated magnesium borates can strengthen the tensile strength and strain failure. This situation can be explained with the increased physical crosslinking density and decrease in the size of bubble growth. For the mechanical strength increase, Mg2B2O5 is commonly preferred in literature [32]. Zhang et al. [33], analyzed the strengthening effects of magnesium borate addition on aluminum-based composites [33]. Baghebanadi et al., indicated the beneficial effects of dehydrated magnesium borates (Mg2B2O5 and Mg3B2O5) in addition to the cold crushing strength of magnesium-graphite composite [34].

2.1.3 Catalyst effect in reactions

Catalyst effect of magnesium borates can be utilized to both increase reaction conversion in the reactions of hydrocarbon and/or they can also be evaluated to catalyze the other types of inorganic borates such as boron nitride [35, 36]. In the catalytic utilization of magnesium borate, the purity and the morphology of prepared magnesium borate are notable. In this case, the synthesis of magnesium borate at different morphologies will promote the comprehensive use of this type of compound.

Ahmad et al. [10], studied the catalyst effect of rod-like magnesium borates on the electrochemical activity of the dopamine enzyme [10]. Intemann et al. [13], used magnesium borates to catalyze the selective reduction of pyridine [13]. Loiland et al. [35], investigated the catalysis effect of magnesium borate complexes on the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane and propane mixtures [35].

2.1.4 Adsorption behavior

The determination of the adsorption behavior of magnesium borates is an up-and-coming practice among its applications. The few researches on the adsorption behavior of these compounds include the azo anionic dye of Congo red adsorption on the hierarchic porous particles of magnesium borates. According to the isothermal and kinetic estimations of the adsorption study, the adsorption mechanism can be explained with the Langmuir isotherm and Pseudo second-order kinetic model. The results also showed that adsorbents can be recycled with calcination at 400°C [22, 37, 38]. The comparison of maximum adsorbent capacity values (qM) for magnesium borates is presented in Table 2.

TypeMineral nameChemical formulaCrystal system
HydratedAdmontiteMgB6O10·7H2OMonoclinic
AksaiteMg[B6O10(OH)6]·2H2OOrthorhombic
HalurgiteMg4[B8O13(OH)2]2·7H2OMonoclinic
HungchaoiteMgB4O7·9H2OTriclinic
HydroxylboriteMg3(BO3)(OH)3Hexagonal
InderiteMgB3O3(OH)5·5H2OMonoclinic
KurnakoviteMgB3O3(OH)5·5H2OTriclinic
McallisteriteMg2[B6O7(OH)6]2·9H2OTrigonal
Pertsevite-(OH)Mg2(BO3)(OH)Orthorhombic
PinnoiteMg[B2O(OH)6]Tetragonal
PreobrazhenskiteMg3B11O15(OH)9Orthorhombic
SzaibélyiteMgBO2(OH)Monoclinic
WightmaniteMg5(BO3)O(OH)5·2H2OMonoclinic
DehydratedKotoiteMg3[BO3]2Orthorhombic
SuaniteMg2[B2O5]Monoclinic

Table 1.

Identified magnesium borates and their crystal systems [4].

AdsorbentMorphologySBET (m2/g)qM (mg/g)Reference
2MgO·B2O3·H2OHierarchic porous93.46183.15[22]
Mg2B2O5Hierarchic porous24.20139.30[37]
MgBO2(OH)Hierarchic porous57.22228.30[37]
7MgO·2B2O3·7H2OHierarchic porous103.62202.84[38]
β-3MgO·B2O3Hierarchic porous46.10170.07[38]

Table 2.

Comparison of maximum adsorbent capacity values for magnesium borates.

In the studies of Zhang et al. [22] and Ma and Liu [37] magnesium borates were fabricated in hydrothermal conditions whereas Guo et al. [38] preferred thermal conditions [22, 37, 38]. As it is seen in Table 2, it has been observed that hydrated compounds have a larger BET surface area and maximum adsorbent capacity. The results indicated that both hydrated and dehydrated forms of magnesium borates can be a promising candidate for toxic dye adsorption.

2.1.5 Thermal behavior

Determination of thermal behavior for the magnesium borates could increase the evaluation probability as fire-retardant agents. Zhang et al. [39] studied the fire retardant effects of magnesium borate addition to the polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and lignin composite [39].

Thermal behavior of magnesium borates is related to hydrate groups in the structure. For the hydrated magnesium borates, thermal decomposition process begins with the dehydration reaction which means to split off the crystal water (·xH2O), and continues with the dehydroxylation reaction which means to split off hydroxyl anions (OH) as a water molecule. With the increasing temperature, phase changes can also be seen.

As a typical example, thermal curves of TG and DTG for Admontite mineral between 25 and 750°C are presented in Figure 3. Admontite (MgB6O10·7H2O) mineral has lost its 7 moles of crystal water with a two-step reaction. In the first step, the reaction occurs in the range of 40–125°C, and the peak of DTG curve is seen at 116°C. The second step of decomposition emerges in the range of 125–570°C and the DTG peak is seen at 230°C. The mass losses of the first and second steps of decomposition are determined as 11% and 25%, respectively.

Figure 3.

TG and DTG curves of Admontite mineral (MgB6O10·7H2O).

For the dehydrated magnesium borate, only phase changes can be seen or the compound stays stable. This stability could be related with the reaction temperature of fabricated dehydrated magnesium borate.

Advertisement

3. Synthesis procedures of magnesium borates

The characteristic features of the samples associated with the composition, crystalline phases, and morphology are dependent on synthesis procedures. The magnesium borates can be fabricated in various morphologies of the rod, sphere, tube, whisker, belt, wire, porous, or multi-angular at both nanoscale and microscale [15, 40]. Examples of the different morphologies of magnesium borates were presented in Figure 4. Kumari et al. [15], synthesized the nano-scale whiskers of magnesium borates in hydrothermal conditions without a capping agent [15]. Liu et al. [40], prepared sub-micron rods of a dehydrated form of magnesium borates by calcination at higher temperatures than 600°C [40]. Guo et al. [38], designed a hybrid method to fabricate the 3D hierarchical flower-like particles of magnesium borates [38].

Figure 4.

Examples of the different morphologies of magnesium borates (a) nano-scale whisker by Kumari et al. [15], (b) sub-micron rod by Liu et al. [40], and (c) flower-like particle by Guo et al. [38].

The experimental design should be both low-cost and eliminate the risk of byproduct formation. The design can be shaped according to the required features of particles. Therefore, synthesis procedures can be classified as liquid-state, solid-state, and hybrid synthesis with the effect of development in production technologies.

3.1 Liquid-state (hydrothermal) synthesis

Liquid-state synthesis of magnesium borates principally includes the dissolution of raw materials in a suitable solvent medium and the reaction occurs with the impulsive effect of temperature increase. Commonly, the type of magnesium salts such as magnesium oxide (MgO), magnesium chloride (MgCl2), magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), and magnesium nitrate (Mg(NO3)2) is reacted with boric acid (H3BO3) or tincal (Na2B4O7·10H2O). At the end of the reaction, the solution is filtrated and dried. The growth mechanism could be explained by dissolution, nucleation, and recrystallization.

The growth mechanism according to the study of Ma and Liu is explained in Eqs. (1) and (2) [22]:

B5O6OH4+H2O2B2O4OH24+H3BO3aq+7H+E1
2Mg2++B2O4OH24Mg2B2O4OH2E2

The particle shape and sizes can be controlled by optimizing the liquid-state reaction conditions. Derun et al. [6], fabricated the multi-angular particles of magnesium borate hydrates between the reaction temperatures of 80 and 100°C by using a traditional liquid-state method.

With the developing technology, liquid-state synthesis techniques can also be modified by the use of sonochemistry and capping agents.

3.1.1 Advantages of sonochemistry in liquid-state conditions

As being new and fast-growing technology, ultrasonic treatment has become a significant step in several industrial applications. It is seen that acoustic waves usage shortens the reaction time and increases the reaction yield in comparison with the traditional methods. Due to these effects of cavitation, energy saving can be obtained according to the experimental setup. For this reason, the use of an ultrasonic beam is preferred to obtain proper particle formation.

In many synthesis procedures, the ultrasonic treatment is accepted as a vital step. The employment of ultrasound in the synthesis procedure accelerates the reaction rate and yield. The effects of ultrasound can be operated by factors of power level, cycle, ultrasonic treatment time, and type of ultrasonic reactor. The common types of power sources for ultrasonic treatment in laboratory scale are presented in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The examples of ultrasound sources in laboratory scale; (a) ultrasonic prob, and (b) ultrasonic bath.

The reaction mechanism of sonochemistry has not been defined in a detailed way. However, the beneficial contributions of ultrasound make it frequently employable in applications. The studies on the use of sonochemistry are generally based on the prevention of by-product formation, efficient use of raw materials, eco-friendly solvent usage, better waste management (selectivity), and energy savings [41].

Yildirim et al. [42] synthesized the mixtures of Admontite (MgB6O10·7H2O) and Mcallisterite (Mg2[B6O7(OH)6]2·9H2O) at higher reaction yields than 84% by using acoustic cavitation [42]. Kipcak et al. [43], produced the magnesium borate hydrates at higher crystallinity in a sub-micron scale with the effect of ultrasound energy [43]. The comparison of the Admontite morphologies synthesized by the ultrasonic liquid-state method and the traditional liquid-state method was presented in Figure 6. As is seen in Figure 5. In comparison with the traditional liquid-state methods, smaller particle sizes were observed in the use of ultrasonic-assisted synthesis techniques [6, 42].

Figure 6.

The comparison of the Admontite morphologies synthesized (a) by ultrasonic liquid-state method [42], and (b) by traditional liquid-state method [6].

3.1.2 Effect of capping agent in liquid-state conditions

The capping agents can be employed to overcome the drawbacks of the synthesis procedures and to produce particles with homogenous and novel morphologies. The selected surfactant can be cationic, anionic, or non-ionic. In the use of capping agent, the type of capping agent is not able to highlight the relationship between the agent and the core particle. Some type of capping agents use could decrease the particle size; however, the crystallinity of samples could be affected adversely [15]. This situation might require a more detailed examination of the relationship between the capping agent and the magnesium borate particle.

In the modified liquid-state synthesis of magnesium borates, the examples of the preferred capping agent are polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP), sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), nickel nitrate (Ni(NO3)2), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and triton (T) [15, 37, 44, 45]. The examples of the effects of different capping agents on the synthesized magnesium borates were presented in Figure 7. Kumari et al. [15] reported the characteristic effects of surfactant addition to the liquid-state synthesis of magnesium borate particles and indicated the notable changes in morphology to obtain nano-whiskers [15]. In the synthesis of inorganic ceramic compounds, PVP is utilized to decrease particle size and/or to sustain homogeneous morphology. However, hierarchic porous structures were obtained in the PVP-based synthesis of magnesium borates [44].

Figure 7.

The effects of different capping agents on the synthesized magnesium borates (a) CTAB, (b) SDS, (c) T at low magnification, and (d) T at high magnification [15].

3.2 Solid-state (thermal) synthesis

Solid-state synthesis of magnesium borates fundamentally involves the mixture of the powders of raw materials without any liquid component and the reaction of solid powders occurs with the impulsive effect of temperature increase in high-temperature furnaces. The common magnesium sources preferred in this synthesis method are MgO and magnesium hydroxide (Mg(OH)2). Mostly, the raw materials are reacted in air atmosphere. The prepared sample is commonly in micron-scale at heterogeneous morphology. Mg2B2O7, MgB4O7, and Mg3B4O6 are notable combinations of dehydrated magnesium borates [45, 46].

In the phase diagram of Liu et al. [40] for the solid-state synthesis of magnesium borates, the reaction commonly occurs at higher reaction temperatures than 800°C [40]. In this synthesis procedure, the main drawback of solid-state is the requirement of grinding and sieving processes after the solid-state reaction. Chen et al. [47] used capping agent addition of Ni(NO3)2 to eliminate these extra processes of the solid-state synthesis procedure [47].

3.2.1 Advantages of microwaves in solid-state conditions

Microwave energy can be defined as non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation with frequencies between 300 MHz and 300 GHz [48]. Similar to the effects of sonochemistry in liquid-state conditions, microwaves can be beneficial to solid-state synthesis procedures to increase the interaction between the powders of raw materials. Unlike traditional calcination techniques, the heating direction is from the inside to the outside of the heated sample in microwave conditions. This situation could assist both to increase reaction yield in solid-state conditions and to decrease the by-product formation. The temperature increase is supplied with the microwave effects. The reaction costs can be reduced effectively with the optimization of reaction conditions. In the reaction procedure, microwave power level and microwave treatment time are notable operating parameters. However, the relationship between the microwave parameters and supplied temperature increase has not been comprehensively studied. In that case, more detailed experimental setups should be designed for the determination of the reaction mechanisms.

Very few studies indicated the possible use of microwave energy in magnesium borate synthesis. Kipcak et al. [49, 50], proved the beneficial effects of microwave to decrease the reaction time in magnesium borate synthesis in comparison with traditional calcination techniques [49, 50].

3.3 Hybrid synthesis

Hybrid synthesis procedure can be defined as the combination of liquid and solid-state conditions. The experimental procedure generally begins in hydrothermal conditions and continues with a solid-state step. Pechini, combustion, and sol-gel synthesis techniques can be assumed as examples of hybrid synthesis [51]. The steps of the hybrid procedure could be more complex than the traditional techniques; however, high purity and homogeneous morphology can be obtained. To strengthen the properties of magnesium borates, hybrid methods should be supported with novel technologies.

Gonzalez et al. [27], synthesized the Tm and Ag-doped MgB4O7 with the reaction of Mg(NO3)2 and H3BO3 in urea medium, at the calcination temperature range of 750–950°C by using the combustion method [27]. Zhang et al. [37]; preferred the capping agent of N, N, − dimethylformamide nitrate to fabricate the hierarchic porous particles of magnesium borates. The liquid-state reaction occurred at 150°C for 12 hours whereas the solid-state reaction continued at 600°C for 12 hours [37]. Chen et al. [44], fabricated the mesoporous structure of Mg2B2O7 in microsphere morphology by adding the SDS to the reaction medium of Mg(NO3)2 and borax. The two-step process began with the 80°C for 2 hours and continued with 500°C for 4 hours [44]. Wang et al. [52], prepared the fibers of magnesium borates with a two-step reaction. The mixture of MgCl2 and borax is reacted at 80°C for 12 hours and then sintered at 800°C for 6 hours [52]. In the hybrid synthesis of Zhu et al., the high purity of Mg2B2O5 was synthesized with the reaction of MgCl2, H3BO3, and NaOH [53].

The comparison of the obtained morphological features of hybrid and traditional procedures can be seen in Figure 8. The uniform particle formation was obtained in the hybrid synthesis of Chen et al. [44] whereas the heterogeneous morphology can be seen in the traditional hydrothermal synthesis of Derun et al. [6].

Figure 8.

The comparison of the obtained particle morphologies (a) hybrid [44], and (b) traditional [6] synthesis.

Advertisement

4. Conclusion

Magnesium borates are beneficial for many industrial-scale applications. The ease of their synthesis increases the interest in the studies in this field. The properties of synthesized samples are related with their characteristics. This situation requires the modification of the traditional synthesis method with novel technologies. In this chapter, the relationship between the characteristics, properties, and novel technologies was interpreted. The comparative table of traditional and advanced synthesis methods can be seen in Table 3. The common points of the advanced syntheses techniques are the increase in contact interfaces between the molecules of starting materials. Decreasing the reaction time and temperature can be obtained at higher reaction yields with the help of effective contact of molecules. The other important advantage is the modification of particle surfaces.

MethodAdvantagesDisadvantages
Liquid-stateUltrasonic-Assisted
  • Decreasing the reaction time

  • Uniform morphology

  • Increasing reaction temperature with increasing ultrasonic-treatment

Traditional
  • Increasing crystallinity

  • Longer reaction times

  • Non-uniform morphology

Solid-stateMicrowave
  • Decreasing the reaction time

  • Uniform morphology

  • Complex experimental setup requires

Traditional
  • Increasing crystallinity

  • Higher reaction temperatures and times

  • Decreasing reaction yield

  • Non-uniform morphology

Hybrid
  • Modify the morphology

  • Decreasing the reaction time and temperature

  • Decreasing crystallinity

Table 3.

Comparison of traditional and advanced synthesis techniques.

The improved characteristics showed their effects in the applications. The common applications of magnesium borates are limited by mechanical and radiation permeation. However, the use of magnesium borates with the contribution of their redesigned morphologies was begun in adsorption, ion-battery agent, and hydrogen release agent in chemotherapy.

It is expected that the significance of magnesium borates in industrial applications would be expanded with the increase of advanced technologies in magnesium borate synthesis. In this case, the development of modified synthesis techniques with a novel experimental setup is suggested.

Advertisement

Nomenclature

CTABCetyltrimethylammonium bromide
DTGDifferential thermogravimetric analysis
PVCPolyvinyl chloride
qMMaximum adsorbent capacity
PVPPolyvinyl pyrrolidone
SBETBET surface area
SDSSodium dodecyl sulphate
TTriton
TGThermogravimetric analysis

References

  1. 1. Zhou B, Faucher A, Laskowski R, Terskikh VV, Kroeker S, Sun W, et al. Ultrahigh-Field 25Mg NMR and DFT study of magnesium borate minerals. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry. 2017;1(6):299-309. DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00049
  2. 2. Staiger MP, Pietak AM, Huadmai J, Dias G. Magnesium and its alloys as orthopedic biomaterials: A review. Biomaterials. 2006;27:1728-1734. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.10.003
  3. 3. Seeger M, Otto W, Flick W, Bickelhaupt F, Akkerman OS. Magnesium compounds. Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. 2011;22:41-78. DOI: 10.1002/14356007.a15_595.pub2
  4. 4. Mindat.org [Internet]. Available from:https://www.mindat.org/chemsearch.php[Accessed: February 09, 2022]
  5. 5. Anishia SR, Jose MT, Annalakshimi O, Ramasamy V. Thermoluminescence properties of rare earth doped lithium magnesium borate phosphors. Journal of Luminescence. 2011;213:2492-2498. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2011.06.019
  6. 6. Moroydor-Derun E, Kipcak AS, Senberber FT, Sari-Yilmaz M. Characterization and thermal dehydration kinetics of admontite mineral hydrothermally synthesized from magnesium oxide and boric acid precursor. Research on Chemical Intermediates. 2015;41(853):866. DOI: 10.1007/s11164-013-1237-6
  7. 7. Moroydor-Derun E, Senberber FT. Characterization and thermal dehydration kinetics of highly crystalline mcallisterite, synthesized at low temperatures. The Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014:1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2014/985185
  8. 8. Yongzhong J, Shiyang G, Shuping X, Jun L. FT-IR spectroscopy of supersaturated aqueous solutions of magnesium borate. Spectrochimica Acta A. 2000;56(7):1291-1297. DOI: 10.1016/s1386-1425(99)00227-9
  9. 9. Li S, Xu D, Shen H, Zhou J, Fan Y. Synthesis and Raman properties of magnesium borate micro/nanorods. Materials Research Bulletin. 2012;47(11):3650-3653. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.06.046
  10. 10. Ahmad P, Khan MI, Akhtar MH, Muhammed G, Iqbal J, Rahim A, et al. Single-step synthesis of magnesium-iron borates composite; An efficient electrocatalyst for dopamine detection. Microchemical Journal. 2021;160:1-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105679
  11. 11. Bahl S, Pandey A, Lochab SP, Aleynikov VE, Molokanov AG, Kumar P. Synthesis and thermoluminescence characteristics of gamma and proton irradiated nanocrystalline MgB4O7: Dy, Na. Journal of Luminescence. 2013;134:691-698. DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2012.07.008
  12. 12. Du A, Zhang Z, Qu H, Cui Z, Qiao L, Wang L, et al. An efficient organic magnesium borate based electrolyte with non-nucleophilic characteristic for magnesium sulfur battery. Energy & Environmental Science. 2017;10:2616-2625. DOI: 10.1039/C7EE02304A
  13. 13. Intemann J, Lutz M, Harder S. Multinuclear magnesium hydride clusters: Selective reduction and catalytic hydroboration of pyridines. Organometallics. 2014;33:5722-5729. DOI: 10.1021/om500469h
  14. 14. Hu ZR, Lai R, Wang LG, Chen ZL, Chen GX, Dong JX. Preparation and tribological properties of nanometer magnesium borate as lubricating oil additive. Wear. 2002;252(5–6):370-374. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1648(01)00862-6
  15. 15. Kumari L, Li WZ, Kulkarni S, Wu KH, Chen W, Wang C, et al. Effect of surfactants on the structure and morphology of magnesium borate hydroxide nanowhiskers synthesized by hydrothermal route. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2010;5:149-157. DOI: 10.1007/s11671-009-9457-9
  16. 16. Zeng Y, Yang H, Fu W, Qiao L, Chang L, Chen J, et al. Synthesis of magnesium borate (Mg2B2O5) nanowires, growth mechanism and their lubricating properties. Materials Research Bulletin. 2008;43:2239-2247. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2007.08.022
  17. 17. He C, Shui A, Ma J, Qian J, Cai M, Tian W, et al. In situ growth magnesium borate whiskers and synthesis of porous ceramics for sound-absorbing. Ceramics International. 2020;46:29339-29343. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.08.062
  18. 18. Huang X, Xiao X, Wang X, Yao Z, He J, Fan X, et al. In-situ formation of ultrafine MgNi3B2 and TiB2 nanoparticles: Heterogeneous nucleating and grain coarsening retardant agents for magnesium borate in Li-Mg-B-H reactive hydride composite. International Journal of Hydrogen. 2019;44:27529-27541. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.222
  19. 19. Bai M, Hu L, Liang Y, Hong B, Lai Y. Enhanced electrochemical properties of lithium-rich cathode materials by magnesium borate surface coating. ChemistrySelect. 2021;6:2446-2455. DOI: 10.1002/slct.202004829
  20. 20. Jankowski P, Li Z, Zhao- Karger Z, Diement T, Fichtner M, Vegge T, et al. Development of magnesium borate electrolytes: Explaining the success of Mg[B(hfip)4]2 salt. Energy Storage Materials. 2022;45:1133-1143. DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2021.11.012
  21. 21. Fan M, Wen Y, Ye D, Jin Z, Zho P, Chen D, et al. Acid-responsive H2-releasing 2D MgB2 nanosheet for therapeutic synergy and side effect attenuation of gastric cancer chemotherapy. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2019;8:1-9. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201900157
  22. 22. Ma YQ, Liu ZH. Excellent adsorption performance for Congo red on hierarchical porous magnesium borate microsphere prepared by a template-free hydrothermal method. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2018;86:92-100. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtice.2018.02.015
  23. 23. Souza LF, Caldas LVE, Junot DO, Silva AMB, Souza DN. Thermal and structural properties of magnesium tetraborate produced by solid state synthesis and precipitation for use in thermoluminescent dosimetry. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2019;164:1-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.radpyschem.2019.108382
  24. 24. Prokic M. Individual monitoring based on magnesium borate. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2007;125(1–4):247-250. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncl116
  25. 25. Kumar J, Kumar S, Shekhar C, Brajpuriya R, Vij A. Effect of Eu doping on the thermoulminescence of UV and gamma irradiated Mg2B2O5 nanophosphors. Luminescence. 2022:1-19. DOI: 10.1002/bio.4197
  26. 26. Souza LF, Vidal RM, Souza SO, Souza DN. Thermoluminescent dosimetric comparison for two different MgB4O7: Dy production routes. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 2014;104:100-103. DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2014.04.036
  27. 27. Gonzalez PR, Avila O, Mendoza A, Escobar AL. Effect of sintering temperature on sensitivity of MgB4O7: Tm, Ag obtained by the solution combustion method. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 2021;167:1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2020.109459
  28. 28. Pagliaro F, Lotti P, Battiston T, Comboni D, Gatta GD, Camara F, et al. Thermal and compressional behavior of the natural borate kurnakovite, MgB3O3(OH)5·5H2O. Construction and Building Materials. 2021;266:1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121094
  29. 29. Oduko JM, Harris SJ, Stewart JC. Magnesium borate: Some advantages and disadvantages for practical dosimetry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 1984;8(4):257-260. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a083062
  30. 30. Prokic M, Christeen P. Graphite mixed magnesium borate TL dosemeters for beta ray dosimetry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 1983;6(1–4):133-136. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a082886
  31. 31. Pellicioni M, Prokic M, Esposito A, Nuccetelli CP. Energy response of graphite-mixed magnesium borate TLDs to low energy X-rays. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 1991;42(11):1037-1038
  32. 32. Gao X, Chen Y, Chen P, Xu Z, Zhao L, Hu D. Supercritical CO2 foaming and shrinkage resistance of thermoplastic polyurethane/modified magnesium borate whisker composite. Journal of CO₂ Utilization. 2022;57:1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101887
  33. 33. Zhang L, Zhang M, Chen Z. Study on mechanical and thermal expansion properties of oxide coated magnesium borate whiskers reinforced aluminum-based composite. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Sciences. 2021;634:1-7. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/634/1/012097
  34. 34. Baghebaradi MH, Naghizadeh R, Rezaie H, Vostakola MF. Synthesis of dehydrated magnesium borate powders and the effect on the properties of MgO-C refractories. Journal of Ceramic Processing Research. 2018;19(3):218-223. DOI: 10.36410/jcpr.2018.19.3.218
  35. 35. Loiland JA, Zhao Z, Patel A, Hazin P. Boron-containing catalysts for the oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane/propane mixtures. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2019;58:2170-2180. DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04906
  36. 36. Songfeng E, Wu L, Li C, Zhu Z, Long X, Geng R, et al. Growth of boron nitride nanotubes from magnesium diboride catalysts. Nanoscale. 2018;10:13895-13901. DOI: 10.1039/C8NR03167C
  37. 37. Zhang Z, Zhu W, Wang R, Zhang L, Zhu L, Zhang Q. Ionothermal confined self-organization for hierarchical porous magnesium borate superstructures as high efficient adsorbents for dye removal. Journal of Materials Chemistry A. 2014;2:19167-19179. DOI: 10.1039/C4TA03580A
  38. 38. Guo RF, Ma YQ, Liu ZH. Three hierarchical porous magnesium borate microspheres: A serial preparation strategy, growth mechanism and excellent adsorption behavior for Congo red. RSC Advances. 2019;9:20009-20018. DOI: 10.1039/C9RA03654G
  39. 39. Zhang W, Wu H, Zhou N, Cai X, Zhang Y, Hu H, et al. Enhanced thermal stability and flame retardancy of poly(vinyl chloride) based composites by magnesium borate hydrate-mechanically activated lignin. Journal of Inorganic and Organometallic Polymers and Materials. 2021;31:3842-3856. DOI: 10.1007/s10904-021-02019-9
  40. 40. Liu Z, Yu J, Wang X, Zhang X, Wang J, Jia D, et al. Molten-salt assisted synthesis and characterization of Mg2B2O5 and Al18B4O33 whiskers. Journal of Asian Ceramic Societies. 2021;9(3):1298-1309. DOI: 10.1080/21870764.2021.1972591
  41. 41. Chatel G. How sonochemistry contributes to green chemistry. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry. 2018;40:117-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.03.029
  42. 42. Yildirim M, Kipcak AS, Moroydor DE. Sonochemical-assisted magnesium borate synthesis from different boron sources. Polish Journal of Chemical Technology. 2017;19(1):81-88. DOI: 10.1515/pjct-2017-0012
  43. 43. Kipcak AS, Moroydor- Derun E, Piskin S. Synthesis and characterization of magnesium borate minerals of admontite and mcallisterite obtained via ultrasonic mixing of magnesium oxide and various sources of boron: A novel method. Turkish Journal of Chemistry. 2014;38:792-805. DOI: 10.3906/kim-1307-61
  44. 44. Chen AM, Gu P, Ni ZM. 3D flower-like magnesium borate microspheres assembled by nanosheets synthesized via PVP-assisted method. Materials Letters. 2012;68:187-189. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.10.041
  45. 45. Storti E, Roso M, Modesti M, Aneziris CG, Colombo P. Preparation and morphology of magnesium borate fibers via electrospinning. Journal of the European Ceramic Society. 2016;36:2593-2599. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2016.02.049
  46. 46. Kipcak AS, Yilmaz-Baysoy D, Moroydor-Derun E, Piskin S. Characterization and neutron shielding behavior of dehydrated magnesium borate minerals synthesized via solid-state method. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. 2013;2013:1-9. DOI: 10.1155/2013/747383
  47. 47. Chen S, Zhang D, Sun G. In situ synthesis of porous ceramics with a frame work structure of magnesium borate whiskers. Materials Letters. 2014;121:206-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.01.064
  48. 48. Clark DE, Folz DC, West JK. Processing materials with microwave energy. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2000;287:153-158. DOI: 10.1016/S0921-5093(00)00768-1
  49. 49. Kipcak AS, Derun EM, Piskin S. Magnesium borate synthesis by microwave energy: A new method. Journal of Chemistry. 2013;2013:1-7. DOI: 10.1155/2013/329238
  50. 50. Kipcak AS, Gurses P, Kunt K, Derun EM, Piskin S. Magnesium borate synthesis by microwave method using MgCl2.6H2O and H3BO3. International Journal of Materials and Metallurgical Engineering. 2013;7(5):290-295
  51. 51. Lima HRBR, Nascimento DS, Sussuchi EM, Errico F, Souza SO. Synthesis of MgB4O7 and Li2B4O7 crystals by proteic sol–gel and Pechini methods. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology. 2017;81:797-805. DOI: 10.1007/s10971-016-4249-z
  52. 52. Wang X, Peng L, Hua H, Liu Y, Zhang P, Zhao J. Magnesium borate fiber coating separators with high lithium-in transference number of lithium-ion batteries. ChemEletroChem. 2020;7:1187-1192. DOI: 10.1002/celc.201901916
  53. 53. Zhu D, Nai X, Zhu C, Guo F, Bian S, Li W. Synthesis of Mg2B2O5 whiskers via coprecipitation and sintering process. International Journal of Minerals and Metallurgy. 2012;19(10):969-972. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-012-0656-5

Written By

Fatma Tugce Senberber Dumanli

Submitted: February 11th, 2022 Reviewed: March 14th, 2022 Published: April 17th, 2022