Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Salt Stress Tolerance in Rice and Wheat: Physiological and Molecular Mechanism

Written By

Mohammad Hasanuzzaman

Submitted: July 8th, 2021Reviewed: November 8th, 2021Published: March 22nd, 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.101529

IntechOpen
Plant Defense MechanismsEdited by Josphert N. Kimatu

From the Edited Volume

Plant Defense Mechanisms [Working Title]

Prof. Josphert N. Kimatu

Chapter metrics overview

57 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Salinity is a major obstacle to global grain crop production, especially rice and wheat. The identification and improvement of salt-tolerant rice and wheat depending upon the genetic diversity and salt stress response could be a promising solution to deal with soil salinity and the increasing food demands. Plant responses to salt stress occur at the organismic, cellular, and molecular levels and the salt stress tolerance in those crop plant involving (1) regulation of ionic homeostasis, (2) maintenance of osmotic potential, (3) ROS scavenging and antioxidant enzymes activity, and (4) plant hormonal regulation. In this chapter, we summarize the recent research progress on these four aspects of plant morpho-physiological and molecular response, with particular attention to ionic, osmolytic, enzymatic, hormonal and gene expression regulation in rice and wheat plants. Moreover, epigenetic diversity could emerge as novel of phenotypic variations to enhance plant adaptation to an adverse environmental conditions and develop stable stress-resilient crops. The information summarized here will be useful for accelerating the breeding of salt-tolerant rice. This information may help in studies to reveal the mechanism of plant salt tolerance, screen high efficiency and quality salt tolerance in crops.

Keywords

  • antioxidant enzyme
  • Na+/K+ ratio
  • osmolytes
  • salt Tol gene
  • salinity
  • rice and wheat

1. Introduction

Salinity is an abiotic stress factor that has severe negative impacts on agricultural crop growth and yield potentiality [1]. The seed germination, traits of growth and yield-related components of crop plants such as rice and wheat are seriously damaged under salinity conditions [1, 2]. Currently, 230 million hectares of world’s areas are used for cultivation in which 20% lands are affected by varying degree of salinity and amount of saline affected area is increasing continuously due to the effect of sea level rise, coastal subsidence, increased tidal effect and continuous reduction of river flow, particularly during dry periods [3, 4, 5, 6]. Therefore, soil salinity is the major obstruction to crop cultivation. When the crop plants are exposed to salt-affected soil, the plants primarily develop osmotic stress and instantly inhibits the normal plant growth and development [7]. Later, ion toxicity is created in crop plants due to excess salinity level and causes imbalance in mineral homeostasis [3]. Osmotic stress and ion toxicity are major salt-induced stresses which create secondary oxidative stress in plants and overall growth inhibition. Salinity stress also interferes with the photosynthetic process by severely damaging photosynthetic pigments [8] and ultimately results in huge loss of crop yield globally [9]. To feed up the huge global population and ensure the food and nutritional security of the rising population, it is urgent to increase the crop production at least 70% by 2050 [10].

Rice and wheat are the first two ranked cereal crops that jointly feed approximately 80% of the world’s population, and are sensitive to salt stress [11, 12]. Developments of salt tolerant rice and wheat varieties is a prerequisite for salt stress management. To improve rice and wheat production, a thorough understanding of physiological response, biochemical activity, metabolism, epigenetic response, and gene expression under salt stress conditions is required. In this chapter, we discuss the salt-induced oxidative stress, osmotic stress and mineral toxicity to rice and wheat plants. Moreover, we systematically summarize the current understanding of salt-stress response and morpho-physiological and molecular mechanisms, and epigenetic response underlying salt tolerance in rice and wheat. This theoretical basis could be further useful for developing salt-tolerant and high yielding rice and wheat varieties in future.

Advertisement

2. Salt stress response of rice and wheat plants

Plant showed several morphological and anatomical changes under high salinity stress conditions e.g. shorter shoot, root system impairment, total biomass reduction, shoot tip rolling, leaf chlorosis, fewer tillers per plant, lower grain weight, and fewer spikelets per panicle ultimately leading to decrease in harvest index and grain yield [13, 14, 15, 16]. Salt stress significantly affects plant physiology and biochemical activity at germination, seedling and reproductive stages [17, 18, 19]. Excess salt causes osmotic stress and ionic toxicity on rice plants leading to overall oxidative stress and nutrient depletion [20, 21]. Plants show various morpho-physiological or biochemical changes and salt injury symptoms and even may die under high salinity stress conditions (Figure 1). Higher amounts of sodium ion (Na+) directly cause cellular damage in plants and excess Na+in root areas inhibits K+ uptake because of their antagonistic effect which hampered photosynthetic activity [22]. Ionic or mineral stress causes excess accumulation of sodium (Na+) and chlorine (Cl) in plant cells which finally results in premature leaf senescence and often plants die by salt antagonistic effects [23, 24]. Excess presence of Na+ in plant cells cytoplasm has an extreme inhibitory effect on enzyme activities which disrupted many cellular metabolism (e.g. protein synthesis), bio-molecular function, and photosynthesis [25, 26, 27, 28, 29]. Furthermore, abundance of Na+ in the cytoplasm hampers the normal uptake and transport of potassium (K+) and other macro- and micronutrients, for example nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca2+), magnesium (mg2+), zinc (Zn2+), and iron (Fe2+) [25, 30, 31, 32].

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram represents the morphological, physiological, biochemical and yield associated response of rice and wheat plants under salt stress conditions. High salinity stress severely damage the plants mineral homeostasis and osmotic maintenance, thereby retarded the plant growth and developments and finally reduce crop yield.

Salinity-induced continuous stress diminish the plant cell turgor pressure, which in turn decreases normal cell growth, and plants must enhance enzymatic activity to adjust osmotic potential and maintain cell expansion and growth [17, 25, 32, 33, 34]. Many investigations reported that Na+ accumulation in plant shoots is directly correlated with the rice and wheat plants’ survivability under saline condition [25, 26]. Therefore, lowering the cytosolic Na+ level is playing a vital role to enhance salt tolerance mechanisms in rice and wheat [25]. Because of osmotic stress in plants, water uptake is obstructed and due to lower water potential physiological drought is created in plants. Osmotic stress also results in interruption of nutrient uptake and rapid stomatal closure, which decline the CO2 assimilation capability of plants and highly inhibits photosynthesis [35]. Oxidative stress due to osmotic and ionic imbalance, causes higher accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which may severely damage the cellular macromolecules (e.g. DNA, lipids and enzymes) and structural components [36, 37]. Under salinity conditions, rice and wheat plants must amplify their physio-biochemical and enzymatic activity involved in the regulation of ion and osmotic homeostasis, oxidative stress, and nutritional balance [1, 23, 38, 39].

Advertisement

3. Salinity tolerance mechanism in rice and wheat

3.1 Maintenance of ionic homeostasis

Soil salinity induced stress in crop plants is commonly caused by high concentrations of Na+ and Cl [38, 39]. The ionic homeostasis must be regulated and re-established in saline stressed conditions [40]. The final determinants of salt tolerance mechanisms are different ion transporters that transport toxic ions at plant organ and cell levels [41]. Therefore, the most important fact of salinity tolerance studies is to find which transporters interfere with the entry of Na+ into the cell [42]. Na+ and K+ are normally transported into the plant cell by the same transporters, where these two cations compete for space [43]. Excess Na+ competes with K+ for absorption across the plasma membranes of plant cells, and K+ is required for the activities of several important catalytic enzymes [44].

Moreover, K+ is essential for the preservation of cell turgor, protein synthesis, osmoregulation, normal photosynthesis [45, 46]. Therefore, the regulation and adaptation of cellular Na+/K+ ratio is a crucial indicator that discerns the plant’s capability to survive in salinity stress conditions. Moreover, mechanisms to reduction in cytoplasmic Na+ uptake, compartmentalization of Na + in the vacuole and increase of Na+ efflux [1, 47]. It was reported that the removal of cytoplasms Na+ into the apoplast is due to the salt-inducible enzyme Na+/H+ antiporter of cell plasma membrane [3].

In the rice plants, the plasma membrane Na+/H+ antiporter (OsSOS1) excludes Na+ from the shoot and roots, adjusting the lower Na+/K+ ratio at cellular level and developing salt tolerance in rice [48, 49]. The vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporters (for instance OsNHX1, OsNHX2, OsNHX3, OsNHX4, OsNHX5 and OsARP/OsCTP) contribute a necessary roles in the vacuolar compartmentalization of Na+ and K+ which is accumulated by cells cytoplasm and so determine salt tolerance in rice [50, 51, 52]. In wheat, the accumulation of Na+ is controlled by the genes Nax1 and Nax2, located at 2A and 5A chromosomes position, respectively [53, 54]. These are also used as molecular markers in a wheat breeding program for salt tolerance. Under salt stress, vascular Na+/H+ antiporter (TNHX1, TNHX2, and TVP1) are responsible for wheat seedling growth and development by generating the pH gradient and facilitating sodium sequestration into [31].

3.2 Adjustment of osmotic potential

Osmotic adjustment is critical for regulating cell turgor for the maintenance of plant metabolic activity, growth, and finally productivity [55]. Crop plants synthesize compatible osmolytes for example proline, polyamines, soluble sugars and proteins, betaine, glycine to provide osmotic balance at the cellular level [56, 57, 58]. Under salinity stress, those important osmolytes provide the plants osmotic adjustment under as they reduce osmotic potential, stabilizing proteins and finally maintain cellular structures [2, 59]. Proline, a dominant substance for osmotic adjustment, possesses high water solubility, low molecular weight and in a free state, thereby no net charge in the physiological pH range in crop plants. The plant cells tend to uptake soluble osmotic adjustment substances to mitigate salt-mediated osmotic stress caused, importantly the biosynthesis of proline is clearly activated [60]. Therefore, proline level may be used as a physiological indicator of plant stress tolerance, especially salinity [61]. Wheat Ta-UnP, can significantly enhance the salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis and rice. Liang et al. [2] described that proline content in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana was significantly increased for maintaining the osmotic potential and protecting plant cells from salinity stress. The proline synthesis genes OsP5CS1 and OsP5CR enhances the proline production to improve the rice salinity stress tolerance [62]. A monosaccharide transporter, encoded by OsGMST1 increases monosaccharide accumulation and develops the salt tolerance in crop plants [63]. Glycine and betaine in rice, which is synthesized by the choline monooxygenase OsCMO and the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase OsBADH1, enhance salt tolerance by promoting glycine betaine accumulation [64, 65]. In wheat plants, some investigation proved that betaine can inhibit the transport speed and quantity of Naþ and Cl from roots to the aerial parts and promote Kþ transport to enhance tolerance capability against salinity stress [33]. The salt-regulated gene OsSALP1 encodes a small plant-specific membrane protein that develops salinity tolerance mechanism by enhancing the expression of OsP5CS and free proline content under salt stress [66].

3.3 ROS scavenging and antioxidant enzymes

Oxygen is one of the essential biomolecules which involves in cellular metabolism, mitochondrial respiration, and oxidative phosphorylation for energy production in plants. However, oxygen is converted into reactive oxygen species (ROS) during plants metabolic process. Plants under salt stress conditions can up-regulate the excess production of ROS e.g. O2 (superoxide radical), H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide), and OH (hydroxyl radical) [67, 68]. Although lower presence of ROS can act as a signal to salt stress responses, excess uptake of ROS causes cytoplasmic membrane damage, DNA mutation, peroxidation of carbohydrates, lipids and protein degradation, irreversible metabolic dysfunction, and finally cell death [68, 69]. In other crop plants, several important antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymes are activated during salinity stress to alleviate ROS stress in rice and wheat [69, 70, 71]. Various Enzymatic scavengers includes catalase (CAT), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutaredoxin (GRX), glutathione peroxidase (GR), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and glutathione peroxidases (GPXs) [1, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78]. Nonenzymatic scavengers include ascorbic acid (ASH), alkaloids, carotenoids, flavonoids, glutathione (GSH), phenolic compounds, and tocopherol [45, 70, 79].

Catalase (CAT) and glyoxylic acid-circulating is found in plant peroxisomes and bodies, respectively, which is one of the main enzymes that remove H2O2 and APX. Studies revealed that CAT is a main enzyme for scavenging H2O2 and is essential for H2O2 tolerance of crop plants [45]. The increment of ROS in the crop plant leads to lipid peroxidation in the cell membrane during higher and continuous salinity stress. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), the first line of defense of the plant antioxidant enzyme system, can eliminate the excess superoxide anions in the cells. SOD can disproportionate O2 to form H2O2 and diminish the toxicity of the superoxide anion. Ascorbate peroxidase (APX) is one of the main enzymes that remove excess H2O2 in cells Chloroplast APX mainly removes the H2O2 produced by the Miller reaction. Malondialdehyde (MDA) is the key product of membrane lipid peroxidation when plants are under salt stress, and its content represents the degree of cell membrane damage [80] Therefore, MDA content can indicate plant salt stress and salt tolerance. OsAPX2, OsAPX7, OsAPx8, OsAPXa, and OsAPXb increase APX activity, lower H2O2 and malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, decrease oxidative stress damage, and enhance rice tolerance to salt stress [81, 82, 83, 84]. Glutathione responsive rice glyoxalase II (OsGLYII-2) functions in salinity adaptation by maintaining better photosynthetic efficiency and increasing the antioxidant pool [85]. All these studies suggest that enhancing ROS-scavenging ability can efficiently increase the salt tolerance of rice and wheat.

3.4 Regulation of RGRs under salinity stress

Phytohormone levels fluctuate downstream of the early salt signaling phase, and the salt-induced signaling cascade eventually leads to adaptive responses [14]. Phytohormones are important endogenous chemical signals that regulate plant growth and development in both ideal and challenging environments [14]. Multiple phytohormones must be integrated and coordinated in order to respond and adapt to salt stress, such as abscisic acid (ABA), indole acetic acid (IAA), cytokinins (CK), ethylene (ETH), jasmonic acid (JA), gibberellic acid (GA), cytokinin (CK), and salicylic acid (SA), brassinosteroids (BR), triazoles (TR) which regulate normal growth and mediate responses to abiotic stress [14, 38, 86, 87, 88].

Advertisement

4. Salt stress tolerant gene in rice and wheat

Seed germination, seedling growth and development, vegetative and flowering stage growth, fruit setting, and root system structural development are all harmed by high saline levels. Crop yields will eventually suffer as a result of this phenomenon [89]. Modern agricultural research includes the use of biotechnological technologies and genetic engineering to study crop tolerance mechanisms, explore tolerant genes, and cultivated varieties of tolerant crops using molecular biology, molecular genetics, and other methods. The goal of plant tolerance research is to develop tolerant cultivars; nevertheless, the mechanism of plant stress tolerance is a difficult problem to solve. We can offer strategies to avoid salt damage and increase salt tolerance of plants based on basic research and a full understanding of the mechanisms of salt stress and salt tolerance of plants. A number of genes involved in salt stress have been investigated in order to better understand the salt tolerance process. It is hypothesized that overexpression of a single gene can increase transgenic plants’ salt tolerance. A. thalianaplasma membrane Naþ/Hþ antiporter gene SOS1 and vacuolar Naþ/Hþ antiporter gene AtNHX1 can considerably improve the salt tolerance capacity of the transgenic plants [90]. Researchers found that AtSAT32 transgenic plants have higher salt tolerance and activity of vacuolar H transport pyrophosphatase in high salt environments after overexpressing AtSAT32 in A. thaliana. The AtSAT32 mutant, on the other hand, is extremely sensitive to salt [91]. Furthermore, through rice ABA-dependent regulatory mechanisms, the rice OsbZIP71 gene can considerably improve transgenic plant tolerance to high salt and drought [92]. Plant tolerance can also be improved by increasing the activity of antioxidant enzymes and increasing the degree of antioxidant metabolism in plants. The use of genetic engineering to create highly effective transgenic plants makes it possible to investigate the role of antioxidant enzymes in the scavenging of active oxygen. In numerous transgenic plants, the necessity of scavenging active oxygen has been demonstrated, and overexpression of SOD, APX, GR, and GAT improves plant tolerance to oxidative stress. The SOD isoenzyme has been the subject of the most extensive investigation among the numerous antioxidant enzymes [93]. Wheat salt tolerance gene research could lead to the utilization of saline soil and the expansion of wheat planting areas, resulting in higher wheat yields. Wheat salt tolerance genes have been studied extensively by researchers, with some successes. Wheat genes Ta-UnP, TaZNF, TaSST, TaDUF1, and TaSP have been shown in lab research to improve the salt tolerance of transgenic plants [1, 94, 95, 96, 97]. Furthermore, ectopic expression of the wheat TaCIPK14 gene increases transgenic tobacco’s salt tolerance [98]. Bread wheat with TaHKT1; 5-D has a high salt tolerance [99]. The ability to tolerate salt is a multi-gene trait. Hundreds of thousands of genes and dozens of physiological systems are usually involved in its regulation. -As a result, research into the huge number of salt-tolerant genes is required. The study of salt-related gene function provides a theoretical foundation for increasing the stress signal network and improving rice and wheat plant tolerance to stress.

4.1 Epigenetic response to abiotic stress in rice and wheat

Histone post-transcriptional modifications, histone variations, DNA methylation, and non-coding RNAs are examples of chromatin state modification which can arrange diverse chromatin states that epigenetically define specific transcriptional outputs. The identification of epigenetic markers and their effect on plant response to abiotic stressors has been made easier because to recent advances in the field of -omics of important crops.

Recent research using –omics technologies have found a link between changed DNA methylation patterns and varied gene expression across the genome in three rice cultivars with variable susceptibilities to increasing salt and drought stress [100]. DNA methylation alterations were seen in both salt-tolerant and salt-susceptible rice varieties upon exposure into high salinity [101]. DNA immunoprecipitation with the 5-methylcytosine antibody and high throughput sequencing (MeDIP-seq) were used to determine the genome-wide methylation status of a salt resistant rice variety under increased salinity in a recent study [102]. These research identified new epigenetic variables and target genes linked to rice’s response to salt stress, which could be used to improve resistance under salt stress conditions. The role of miRNAs in rice response to abiotic stress has been the subject of a lot of research over the last few years [103, 104, 105, 106]. Rice tolerance to salt stress was boosted by overexpression of a miR156, while the expression of transcription factor target genes like SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING ROTEIN LIKE-9 (SPL9)and DIHYDROFLAVONOL-4-REDUCTASE (DFR)which mostly associated with developmental processes was reduced [107].

Based on 850 RNA-seq data collected from 32 tissues sampled at different growth stages and/or under different stress treatments, an analysis of the wheat whole genome expression pattern (e.g. “expression atlas”) found higher average methylation status in low expressed genes [108]. Gardiner et al. [109] discovered that methylation patterns in wheat are not evenly distributed across the A, B, and D subgenomes, indicating that methylation patterns in progenitor species are different. In recent years, several research on epigenetic modifications in wheat in response to abiotic stress have been published. Wheat drought stress response has been linked to heterochromatic small interfering RNA (hc-siRNA) and micro RNAs (miRNA), both tiny regulatory RNAs [110]. For example, 2055 putative sites for 113 conserved durum miRNAs and 131 targets for four novel durum miRNAs that may contribute to genotypic stress tolerance have been found [111]. Differential epigenetic modifications in certain genes such as HKTs (high-affinity potassium transporters) were discovered in the shoots and roots of wheat genotypes with variable levels of susceptibility to salt stress [112].

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

Salinity stress is the one of the main abiotic factors that limits crop growth, development and yield. In this chapter, we briefly summarize how crop plants, especially rice and wheat respond to salinity induced osmotic, ion, and oxidative stresses and collect a significant number of studies and progress on the effects of salt stress on plants. Much research was undertaken to clarify physiological and biochemical and molecular mechanisms of plants salt tolerance applying molecular biology and biotechnological approach which will further explain the plant salt-tolerance mechanism and provide sufficient theoretical guidance for the future cultivation of salt stress tolerance rice and wheat. Moreover, by understanding the role of epigenetics in gene expression under abiotic stress could provide guidance in the development of climate-smart crops. Further enhancing plant salt tolerance and rich salt tolerant crop plants still need further study.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

No

Advertisement

Notes/thanks/other declarations

No

References

  1. 1.Yang Y, Guo Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt stress responses. The New Phytologist. 2018;217:523-539
  2. 2.Liang W, Cui W, Ma X, Wang G, Huang Z. Function of wheat Ta-UnP gene in enhancing salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis and rice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2014;450:794-801
  3. 3.Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2008;59:651-681
  4. 4.Shrivastava P, Kumar R. Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences. 2015;22(2):123-131
  5. 5.Siddiqui MN, Mostofa MG, Akter MM, Srivastava AK, Sayed MA, Hasan MS, et al. Impact of salt-induced toxicity on growth and yield-potential of local wheat cultivars: Oxidative stress and ion toxicity are among the major determinants of salt-tolerant capacity. Chemosphere. 2017;187:385-394
  6. 6.Kamran M, Parveen A, Ahmar S, Malik Z, Hussain S, Chattha MS, et al. An overview of hazardous impacts of soil salinity in crops, tolerance mechanisms, and amelioration through selenium supplementation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;21:148
  7. 7.Horie T, Kaneko T, Sugimoto G, Sasano S, Panda SK, Shibasaka M, et al. Mechanisms of water transport mediated by PIP aquaporins and their regulation via phosphorylation events under salinity stress in barley roots. Plant & Cell Physiology. 2011;52:663e675
  8. 8.Munns R, James RA, Läuchli A. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2006;57:1025-1043
  9. 9.Rengasamy P. Soil processes affecting crop production in salt-affected soils. Functional Plant Biology. 2010;37:613-620
  10. 10.Ganie SA, Molla KA, Henry RJ, Bhat K, Mondal TK. Advances in understanding salt tolerance in rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 2019;132(4):851-870
  11. 11.Statista. Rice Consumption Worldwide in 2019/2020. United States: Statista Incorporation; 2020. Available from:https://www.statista.com/statistics/255971/top-countries-based-on-rice-consumption2012-2013/[Accessed: 3 August 2020]
  12. 12.FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation). Production/Yield quantities of Rice, paddy in World. United States. 2020. Available from:http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC/visualize[Accessed: 3 August 2020]
  13. 13.Razzaq A, Ali A, Safdar LB, Zafar MM, Rui Y, Shakeel A, et al. Salt stress induces physiochemical alterations in rice grain composition and quality. Journal of Food Science. 2020;85:14-20
  14. 14.van Zelm E, Zhang Y, Testerink C. Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology. 2020;71:403-433
  15. 15.Hakim MA, Juraimi AS, Hanafi MM, Ismail MR, Selamat A, Rafii MY, et al. Biochemical and anatomical changes and yield reduction in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under varied salinity regimes. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014:208584
  16. 16.Machado RMA, Serralheiro RP. Soil salinity: Effect on vegetable crop growth, Management practices to prevent and mitigate soil salinization. Horticulturae. 2017;3:30
  17. 17.Kerepesi I, Galiba G. Osmotic and salt stress-induced alteration in soluble carbohydrate content in wheat seedlings. Crop Science. 2000;40:482-487
  18. 18.Hakim M, Juraimi AS, Hanafi MM, Ismail MR, Selamat A. The effect of salinity on growth, ion accumulation and yield of rice varieties. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2014;24:874-885
  19. 19.Hua-long L, Han-jing S, Jing-guo W, Yang L, De-tang Z, Hong-wei Z. Effect of seed soaking with exogenous proline on seed germination of rice under salt stress. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University. 2014;21(3):1-6
  20. 20.Rahman A, Nahar K, Al Mahmud J, Hasanuzzaman M, Hossain MS, Fujita M. Salt stress tolerance in rice: Emerging role of exogenous phytoprotectants. In: Advances in International Rice Research. Croatia: IntechOpen; 2017. pp. 139-174
  21. 21.Parida AK, Das AB. Salt tolerance and salinity effects on plants: A review. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2010;60:324-349
  22. 22.Xiong L, Zhu JK. Molecular and genetic aspects of plant responses to osmotic stress. Plant, Cell and Environment. 2002;25:131-139
  23. 23.Maathuis FJM, Amtmann A. Kþ nutrition and Naþ toxicity: The basis of cellular Kþ/Naþ ratios. Annals of Botany. 1999;84:123-133
  24. 24.Ma Z, Huang B, Xu S, Chen Y, Cao G, Ding G, Lin S. Ion flux in roots of Chinese fir (cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook). Plose one. 2016;11(6):156832
  25. 25.Horie T, Karahara I, Katsuhara M. Salinity tolerance mechanisms in glycophytes: An overview with the central focus on rice plants. Rice. 2012;5:11. DOI: 10.1186/1939-8433-5-11
  26. 26.Guo R, Yang Z, Li F, Yan C, Zhong X, Liu Q, et al. Comparative metabolic responses and adaptive strategies of wheat (Triticum aestivum) to salt and alkali stress. BMC Plant Biology. 2015;15:170
  27. 27.Gaxiola RA, Rao R, Sherman A, Grisafi P, Alper SL, Fink GR. The Arabidopsis thaliana proton transporters, atnhx1 and avp1, can function in cation detoxification in yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1999;96:1480-1485
  28. 28.Yue Y, Zhang M, Zhang J, Duan L, Li Z. SOS1 gene overexpression increased salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco by maintaining a higher Kþ/Naþ ratio. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2012;169:255-261
  29. 29.Ward JM, Hirschi KD, Sze H. Plants pass the salt. Trends in Plant Science. 2003;8:200-201
  30. 30.Lu W, Guo C, Li X, Duan W, Ma C, Zhao M, et al. Xiao, Overexpression of TaNHX3, a vacuolar Naþ/Hþ antiporter gene in wheat, enhances salt stress tolerance in tobacco by improving related physiological processes. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2014;76:17-28
  31. 31.Bulle M, Yarra R, Abbagani S. Enhanced salinity stress tolerance in transgenic chilli pepper ( Capsicum annuum, L.) plants overexpressing the wheat antiporter (TaNHX2) gene. Molecular Breeding. 2016;36:1-12
  32. 32.Xu LH, Wang WY, Guo JJ, Qin J, Shi DQ, Li YL, et al. Zinc improves salt tolerance by increasing reactive oxygen species scavenging and reducing Naþ, accumulation in wheat seedlings. Biologia Plantarum. 2014;58:751-757
  33. 33.Chen Z, Cuin TA, Zhou M, Twomey A, Naidu BP, Shabala S. Compatible solute accumulation and stress-mitigating effects in barley genotypes contrasting in their salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2007;58:4245-4255
  34. 34.Nawaz K, Ashraf M. Improvement in salt tolerance of maize by exogenous appllcation of glycinebetaine growth and water relations. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2007;39:1647-1653
  35. 35.Munns R, Husain S, Rivelli AR, et al. Avenues for increasing salt tolerance of crops, and the role of physiologically based selection traits. Plant and Soil. 2002;247:93-105
  36. 36.Dhindsa RS, Plumb-Dhindsa PL, Reid DM. Leaf senescence and lipid peroxidation: Effects of some phytohormones, and scavengers of free radicals and singlet oxygen. Physiologia Plantarum. 1982;56:453-457
  37. 37.Stadtman ER. Protein oxidation and aging. Science. 1992;257:1220-1224
  38. 38.Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Rahman A, Anee TI, Alam MU, Bhuiyan TF, et al. Approaches to enhance salt stress tolerance in wheat. In: Wheat Improvement, Management and Utilization. Croatia: IntechOpen; 2017. pp. 151-187
  39. 39.Qin H, Huang R. The phytohormonal regulation of Na+/K+ and reactive oxygen species homeostasis in rice salt response. Molecular Breeding. 2020;40:1-13
  40. 40.Ismail A, Takeda S, Nick P. Life and death under salt stress: Same players, different timing? Journal of Experimental Botany. 2014;65:2963-2979
  41. 41.Deinlein U, Stephan AB, Horie T, Luo W, Xu G, Schroeder JI. Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends in Plant Science. 2014;19:371-379
  42. 42.Assaha DV, Ueda A, Saneoka H, Al-Yahyai R, Yaish MW. The role of Na+ and K+ transporters in salt stress adaptation in glycophytes. Frontiers in Physiology. 2017;8:509
  43. 43.Greenway H, Munns R. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology. 1980;31:149-190
  44. 44.Fu HH, Luan S. AtKUP1: A dual-affinity K+ transporter from Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1998;10:63-73
  45. 45.Ashraf M, Harris P. Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Science. 2004;166:3-16
  46. 46.Freitas J, Chagas R, Almeida I, Cavalcanti F, Silveira J. Expression of physiological traits related to salt tolerance in two contrasting cowpea cultivars. Documentos Embrapa Meio Norte. 2001;56:115-118
  47. 47.Tester M, Davenport R. Na+ tolerance and Na+ transport in higher plants. Annals of Botany. 2003;91:503-527
  48. 48.El Mahi H, Pérez-Hormaeche J, De Luca A, Villalta I, Espartero J, Gámez-Arjona F, et al. A critical role of sodium flux via the plasma membrane Na+/H+ exchanger SOS1 in the salt tolerance of rice. Plant Physiology. 2019;180:1046-1065
  49. 49.Martínez-Atienza J, Jiang X, Garciadeblas B, Mendoza I, Zhu JK, Pardo JM, et al. Conservation of the salt overly sensitive pathway in rice. Plant Physiology. 2007;143:1001-1012
  50. 50.Liu S, Zheng L, Xue Y, Zhang Q, Wang L, Shou H. Overexpression of OsVP1 and OsNHX1 increases tolerance to drought and salinity in rice. Journal of Plant Biology. 2010;53:444-452
  51. 51.Fukuda A, Nakamura A, Hara N, Toki S, Tanaka Y. Molecular and functional analyses of rice NHX-type Na+/H+ antiporter genes. Planta. 2011;233:175-188
  52. 52.Uddin MI, Qi Y, Yamada S, Shibuya I, Deng XP, Kwak SS, et al. Overexpression of a new rice vacuolar antiporter regulating protein OsARP improves salt tolerance in tobacco. Plant & Cell Physiology. 2008;49:880-890
  53. 53.James RA, Davenport RJ, Munns R. Physiological characterization of two genes for Na+ exclusion in durum wheat, Nax1 and Nax2. Plant Physiology. 2006;142:1537-1547
  54. 54.James RA, Blake C, Byrt CS, Munns R. Major genes for Na+ exclusion, Nax1 and Nax2 (wheat HKT1; 4 and HKT1; 5), decrease Na+ accumulation in bread wheat leaves under saline and waterlogged conditions. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011;62:2939-2947
  55. 55.Sharp RE, Hsiao TC, Silk WK. Growth of the maize primary root at low water potentials II. Role of growth and deposition of hexose and potassium in osmotic adjustment. Plant Physiology. 1990;93:1337-1346
  56. 56.Kishor PBK, Hong ZL, Miao GH, Hu CAA, Verma DPS. Overexpression of D 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase increases proline production and confers osmotolerance in transgenic plants. Plant Physiology. 1995;108:1387-1394
  57. 57.Garg AK, Kim JK, Owens TG, Ranwala AP, Do Choi Y, Kochian LV, et al. Trehalose accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to different abioti stresses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2002;99:15898-15903
  58. 58.Taji T, Ohsumi C, Iuchi S, Seki M, Kasuga M, Kobayashi M, et al. Yamaguchi- accumulation in wheat seedlings. Biologia Plantarum. 2014;58:751-757
  59. 59.Farooq M, Aziz T, Hussain M, Rehman H, Jabran K, Khan MB. Glycinebetaine improves chilling tolerance in hybrid maize. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2008;194:152-160
  60. 60.Silveira JAG, de Almeida Viégas R, da Rocha IMA, Moreira ACDOM, de Azevedo Moreira R, Oliveira JTA. Proline accumulation and glutamine synthetase activity are increased by salt-induced proteolysis in cashew leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2003;160:115-123
  61. 61.Toyooka K, Goto Y, Asatsuma S, Koizumi M, Mitsui T, Matsuokaa K. A mobile secretory vesicle cluster involved in mass transport from the golgi to the plant cell exterior. Plant Cell. 2009;4:1212-1229
  62. 62.Sripinyowanich S, Klomsakul P, Boonburapong B, Bangyeekhun T, Asami T, Gu H, et al. Exogenous ABA induces salt tolerance in indica rice (Oryza sativa L.): The role of OsP5CS1 and OsP5CR gene expression during salt stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2013;86:94-105
  63. 63.Cao H, Guo S, Xu Y, Jiang K, Jones AM, Chong K. Reduced expression of a gene encoding a Golgi localized monosaccharide transporter (OsGMST1) confers hypersensitivity to salt in rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of Experimental Botany. 2011;62:4595-4604
  64. 64.Hasthanasombut S, Supaibulwatana K, Mii M, Nakamura I. Genetic manipulation of Japonica rice using the OsBADH1 gene from Indica rice to improve salinity tolerance. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture. 2011;104:79-89
  65. 65.Tang W, Sun J, Liu J, Liu F, Yan J, Gou X, et al. RNAi-directed downregulation of betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (OsBADH1) results in decreased stress tolerance and increased oxidative markers without affecting glycine betaine biosynthesis in rice (Oryza sativa). Plant Molecular Biology. 2014;86:443-454
  66. 66.Yuan X, Sun H, Tang Z, Tang H, Zhang H, Huang J. A novel little membrane protein confers salt tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2016;34:524-532
  67. 67.Qin R. Huang, The phytohormonal regulation of Na+/K+ and reactive oxygen species homeostasis in rice salt response. Molecular Breeding. 2020;40:1-13
  68. 68.Ahanger MA, Tomar NS, Tittal M, Argal S, Agarwal RM. Plant growth under water/salt stress: ROS production; antioxidants and significance of added potassium under such conditions. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants. 2017;23:731-744
  69. 69.Miller G, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz S, Mittler R. Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signalling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant, Cell & Environment. 2010;33:453-467
  70. 70.Gill SS, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2010;48:909-930
  71. 71.You J, Chan Z. ROS regulation during abiotic stress responses in crop plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6:1092
  72. 72.Begara-Morales JC, Sánchez-Calvo B, Chaki M, Mata-Pérez C, Valderrama R, Padilla MN, et al. Differential molecular response of monodehydroascorbate reductase and glutathione reductase by nitration and S-nitrosylation. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2015;66:5983-5996
  73. 73.Wang X, Fang G, Yang J, Li Y. A thioredoxin-dependent glutathione peroxidase (OsGPX5) is required for rice normal development and salt stress tolerance. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2017;35:333-342
  74. 74.Das K, Roychoudhury A. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and response of antioxidants as ROS-scavengers during environmental stress in plants. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2014;2:53
  75. 75.Postiglione AE, Muday GK. The role of ROS homeostasis in ABA-induced guard cell signaling. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2020;11:968
  76. 76.Mittler R. ROS are good. Trends in Plant Science. 2017;22:11-19
  77. 77.Tabassum R, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Hasanuzzaman M, Sohag AA, Islam MS, Shafi SS, et al. Screening salt-tolerant rice at the seedling and reproductive stages: An effective and reliable approach. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2021;192:104629
  78. 78.Abdallah SB, Aung B, Amyot L, Lalin I, Lachâal M, Karray-Bouraoui N, et al. Salt stress (NaCl) affects plant growth and branch pathways of carotenoid and flavonoid biosyntheses in Solanum nigrum. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2016;38:72
  79. 79.Borghesi E, Gonzalez-Miret ML, Escudero-Gilete ML, Malorgio F, Heredia FJ, Melendez-Martinez AJ. Effects of salinity stress on carotenoids, anthocyanins, and color of diverse tomato genotypes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2011;59:11676-11682
  80. 80.Latef AAA, Hasanuzzaman M, Tahjib-Ul-Arif M. Mitigation of salinity stress by exogenous application of cytokinin in faba bean (Vicia faba L.). Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca. 2021;49(1):12192-12192
  81. 81.Zhang Z, Zhang Q, Wu J, Zheng X, Zheng S, Sun X, et al. Gene knockout study reveals that cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase 2(OsAPX2) plays a critical role in growth and reproduction in rice under drought, salt and cold stresses. PLoS One. 2013;8:e57472
  82. 82.Lu Z, Liu D, Liu S. Two rice cytosolic ascorbate peroxidases differentially improve salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Reports. 2007;26:1909-1917
  83. 83.Hong CY, Hsu YT, Tsai YC, Kao CH. Expression of ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE 8 in roots of rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings in response to NaCl. Journal of Experimental Botany. 2007;58:3273-3283
  84. 84.Chou TS, Chao YY, Kao CH. Involvement of hydrogen peroxide in heat shock- and cadmium-induced expression of ascorbate peroxidase and glutathione reductase in leaves of rice seedlings. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2012;169:478-486
  85. 85.Ghosh A, Pareek A, Sopory SK, Singla Pareek SL. A glutathione responsive rice glyoxalase II, OsGLYII-2, functions in salinity adaptation by maintaining better photosynthesis efficiency and anti-oxidant pool. The Plant Journal. 2014;80:93-105
  86. 86.Kazan K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends in Plant Science. 2015;20:219-229
  87. 87.Sah SK, Reddy KR, Li J. Abscisic acid and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:571
  88. 88.Javid MG, Sorooshzadeh A, Moradi F, Modarres Sanavy SAM, Allahdadi I. The role of phytohormones in alleviating salt stress in crop plants. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2011;5(6):726-734
  89. 89.Wang Y, Li K, Li X. Auxin redistribution modulates plastic development of root system architecture under salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2009;166:1637-1645
  90. 90.He C, Yan J, Shen G, Fu L, Holaday AS, Auld D, et al. Expression of an Arabidopsis vacuolar sodium/proton antiporter gene in cotton improves photosynthetic performance under salt conditions and increases fiber yield in the field. Plant & Cell Physiology. 2005;46:1848-1854
  91. 91.Park MY, Chung MS, Koh HS, Lee DJ, Ahn SJ, Kim CS. Isolation and functional characterization of the Arabidopsis salt-tolerance 32 (AtSAT32) gene associated with salt tolerance and ABA signaling. Physiologia Plantarum. 2009;135:426-435
  92. 92.Liu C, Mao B, Ou S, Wang W, Liu L, Wu Y, et al. OsbZIP71, a bZIP transcription factor, confers salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Molecular Biology. 2014;84:19-36
  93. 93.Tanaka Y, Hibino T, Hayashi Y, Tanaka A, Kishitani S, Takabe T, et al. Salt tolerance of transgenic rice overexpressing yeast mitochondrial mn-sod in chloroplasts. Plant Science. 1999;148:131-138
  94. 94.Ma X, Liang W, Gu P, Huang Z. Salt tolerance function of the novel C2H2- type zinc finger protein TaZNF in wheat. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2016a;106:129-140
  95. 95.Li Y, Liang W, Han J, Huang Z. A novel TaSST gene from wheat contributes to enhanced resistance to salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana and Oryza sativa. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2016;38:113
  96. 96.Ma X, Gu P, Liang W, Zhang Y, Jin X, Wang S, et al. Analysis on the transcriptome information of two different wheat mutants and identification of salt-induced differential genes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2016b;473:1197-1204
  97. 97.Ma X, Cui W, Liang W, Huang Z. Wheat TaSP gene improves salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2015;97:187-195
  98. 98.Deng X, Zhou S, Hu W, Feng J, Zhang F, Chen L, et al. Ectopic expression of wheat TaCIPK14, encoding a calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase, confers salinity and cold tolerance in tobacco. Physiologia Plantarum. 2013;149:367-377
  99. 99.Byrt CS, Xu B, Krishnan M, Lightfoot DJ, Athman A, Jacobs AK, et al. The Naþ transporter, TaHKT1; 5-D, limits shoot Naþ accumulation in bread wheat. The Plant Journal. 2014;80:516-526
  100. 100.Garg R, Chevala VN, Shankar R, Jain M. Divergent DNA methylation patterns associated with gene expression in rice cultivars with contrasting drought and salinity stress response. Scientific Reports. 2015;5(1):1-16
  101. 101.Wang N, Ku L, Chen Y, Wang W. Comparative proteomic analysis of leaves between photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive maize inbred seedlings under long day treatments. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2015;37(1):1705
  102. 102.Ferreira LJ, Donoghue MT, Barros P, Saibo NJ, Santos AP, Oliveira MM. Uncovering differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in a salt-tolerant rice variety under stress: One step towards new regulatory regions for enhanced salt tolerance. Epigenomes. 2019;3(1):4
  103. 103.Grewal RK, Saraf S, Deb A, Kundu S. Differentially expressed microRNAs link cellular physiology to phenotypic changes in rice under stress conditions. Plant and Cell Physiology. 2018;59(10):2143-2154
  104. 104.Kalaivani N, Kumar IS. Drought response in rice: The miRNA story. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2019;20(15):3766
  105. 105.Shriram V, Kumar V, Devarumath RM, Khare TS, Wani SH. MicroRNAs as potential targets for abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2016;7:817
  106. 106.Xu J, Hou QM, Khare T, Verma SK, Kumar V. Exploring miRNAs for developing climate-resilient crops: A perspective review. Science of the Total Environment. 2019;653:91-104
  107. 107.Cui LG, Shan JX, Shi M, Gao JP, Lin HX. The miR156-SPL 9-DFR pathway coordinates the relationship between development and abiotic stress tolerance in plants. The Plant Journal. 2014;80(6):1108-1117
  108. 108.Appels R, Eversole K, Stein N, Feuillet C, Keller B, Rogers J, et al. Shifting the limits in wheat research and breeding using a fully annotated reference genome. Science. 2018;361(6403):1-16
  109. 109.Gardiner LJ, Quinton-Tulloch M, Olohan L, Price J, Hall N, Hall A. A genome-wide survey of DNA methylation in hexaploid wheat. Genome Biology. 2015;16(1):1-15
  110. 110.Budak H, Hussain B, Khan Z, Ozturk NZ, Ullah N. From genetics to functional genomics: Improvement in drought signaling and tolerance in wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;6:1012
  111. 111.Liu H, Able AJ, Able JA. Water-deficit stress-responsive microRNAs and their targets in four durum wheat genotypes. Functional & Integrative Genomics. 2017;17(2-3):237-251
  112. 112.Kumar S, Beena AS, Awana M, Singh A. Physiological, biochemical, epigenetic and molecular analyses of wheat (Triticum aestivum) genotypes with contrasting salt tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2017;8:1151

Written By

Mohammad Hasanuzzaman

Submitted: July 8th, 2021Reviewed: November 8th, 2021Published: March 22nd, 2022