Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Indigenous and Improved Postharvest Handling Methods and Processing of Fruits

Written By

Oluyinka Adewoyin, Adebayo Ibidapo, Lydia Babatola, Folasayo Fayose, Anthony Ekeocha and Temidayo Apata

Submitted: December 15th, 2021Reviewed: January 14th, 2022Published: March 10th, 2022

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.102668

Fruit IndustryEdited by Ibrahim Kahramanoglu

From the Edited Volume

Fruit Industry [Working Title]

Associate Prof. Ibrahim Kahramanoglu and Prof. Chunpeng Wan

Chapter metrics overview

39 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


After harvesting, fresh fruit’s quality cannot be improved but it can be maintained. Fruits should be harvested at the appropriate maturity stage and size. Harvesting of fruits at improper maturity stage reduces shelf-life. Time of harvest, method of harvest, tools used in harvesting also contribute to the wholesomeness of harvested fruits. Fruits are living organisms that continue their living processes after harvest; therefore, their handling directly affects freshness as well as optimum flavor. Maintaining cool temperatures, appropriate air combination to maintain the quality of fruits, producers, handlers, and retailers are to ensure that fruits going for processing, marketing, or into storage are at the best quality state. Indigenous handling refers to the native, age-long, cultural system of postharvest handling of horticultural crops. Postharvest handling comprises interconnected activities from harvest to sorting, grading, preservation, transportation, packaging, processing, marketing, and decision by the consumer to accept or reject the food. Improvement is the enhancement made on the traditional postharvest handling methods to reduce losses of agricultural produce by at least 5%. Various means have been developed over time to handle and preserve food and particularly fruits over ages of technology advancement from the Stone Age.


  • fruits
  • postharvest handling methods
  • processing
  • indigenous
  • improved postharvest methods

1. Introduction

Foods are substances consumed by living organisms to satisfy the appetite, meet physiological and chemical processes of growth, supply energy and facilitate adaptation to climate change [1]. Agriculture evolved from the gathering of fruits and vegetables from the wild, before the domestication of animals and cultivation of crops. Man has devised various methods by which these fruits are kept and handled. The principles adopted over time are to control agents of deterioration to maintain fruit quality [2, 3, 4]. Agents of deterioration are microbial activities; effects of temperature resulting in early senescence and death of tissue due to interruption of metabolic rate as a result of high or extremely low temperature; Loss of moisture through evaporation and transpiration which causes shriveling; low shelf life due to ethylene biosynthesis; low relative humidity; inappropriate proportion composition of air; Inappropriate use of herbicides; hormones; pesticides and insecticides [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. The nutritional quality of harvested fruits is also affected by other factors such as light, water activity and oxygen. Davey further affirmed that temperature and relative humidity were important factors in maintaining the quality of fruits after harvest [11]. Wilson also asserted that deterioration of fresh commodities can result from physiological breakdown due to ripening, water loss, physical damage, and invasion by micro-organisms and their interactions with temperature and relative humidity of the storage conditions [12]. Fruits for export require more attention and appropriate postharvest handling methods because the producers aim at getting the best return from the produce. John stated that maturity at harvest is one of the most important factors that determine the shelf-life and final fruit quality in mature fruits [5]. Fruits harvested at immature stage became insipid with bad flavor soon after harvest. Fruits require very scientific postharvest handling methods with cold storage at an exact temperature, suitable air movement and appropriate humidity [13]. The objective of studying post-harvest handling is to create an understanding of all operations from harvesting to distribution to facilitate proper technology in each step and in such a way as to minimize losses and maintain quality as high as possible during the distribution chain. This chapter takes an overview of the indigenous and improved postharvest handling methods and processing of fruits considering the total postharvest chain from harvesting methods, harvesting tools and implements, transportation, storage and processing. It identifies aspects of critical postharvest losses and finds solutions that would lead to a remarkable reduction in postharvest losses in quality and quantity of harvested fruits, thereby increasing the quality and quantity of marketable products.


2. Indigenous postharvest handling practices of fruits

Indigenous postharvest handling practices of fruits go along with a lot of inappropriate handling methods resulting in huge postharvest losses as a result of knowledge gap for all stakeholders in the postharvest food chain of fruits. Wounding, bruising, and physical injury imparted on the produce from rough and abusive harvest practices and postharvest handling methods will result in significant produce quality loss and an increase in postharvest decay. In Figures 14 careless handling of fruits were observed which will result in internal bruising, abnormal physiological damage, splitting and skin breaks. Skin breaks provide sites for infection by disease organisms causing decay. Enzymes contained in the cells of fruit tissues may be released as a result of mechanical damage during postharvest handling. These enzymes break down cellular material. Chemical reactions catalyzed by the enzymes result in the degradation of quality leading to off-flavors, deterioration of texture, and the loss of nutrients [14]. Chemical reaction occurs when fruits are damaged by falling, breaking, crushing, cutting, insect punctures and peeling. These damages release enzymes that trigger chemical reactions such as rancidity in fruits, deterioration of chlorophyll pigments and flavor changes [15]. Other major chemical changes which occur are lipid oxidation and non-enzymatic browning. This leads to deterioration in sensory quality, changes in the color and flavor of foods. The lipid oxidation rate is influenced by light, water activity, local oxygen concentration, high temperature, and the presence of catalysts such as iron and copper [16]. In Figure 1, it was observed that the indigenous bamboo basket is already weak and fruits can easily be bruised by the sharp edges of the basket due to weakness in the basket the fruit can fall off during transportation, loading and unloading from one destination to the other. Figures 2 and 3 showed the exposure of fruits to direct sun which will increase the internal temperature and speed up chemical processes in the fruit. Food spoilage may be defined as any change that renders food unfit for human consumption. Every change in food that causes the food to lose its desired quality and eventually become inedible is called food spoilage or rotting [17]. Damage restricts the use of produce, whereas loss makes its use impossible. Quality attributes describe the traits that make fruits acceptable to consumers such as nutritional composition, freedom from defects such as cuts, over-ripeness, spots, and disease infections. Quantitative and qualitative losses occur at all stages in the post-harvest handling system and distribution chain of fruits from harvesting, through handling, packing, processing, storage and transportation to final delivery of the fresh produce to the consumer [18]. Factors affecting post-harvest losses vary from place to place depending on the season, the genetic constitution of the crop, postharvest management practice, temperature and relative humidity (Table 1). Various authorities have estimated that 25–70% of fresh fruit and vegetables produced are lost after harvest [19]. Further studies revealed 20–40 percentage loss in developing countries [20]. [12, 21, 22] estimated that from 5 to 25% of fruit from the farm gate never reaches the consumer. Post-harvest losses of banana, citrus, grapes, apples, avocado, and papaya were reported to be 20–80, 20–95, 53, 14, 43 and 40–100% respectively in developing countries [23, 24]. Food loss assessment provides the basis for programs aimed at reducing postharvest losses [7, 25, 26, 27, 28].

Figure 1.

Harvested lemon packed in worn-out sharp locally made basket.

Figure 2.

Fruits carelessly handled at retail point.

Figure 3.

Inappropriate and careless handling of fruits.

Figure 4.

Mishandling of fruits during transportation.

2.1 Harvest indices, tools, containers, storage temperature and relative humidity

In most developing world, orchards were established for a long period up to 50–100 years old. Fruits are plucked from the tree with hand by hired skilled laborer’s with the use of an indigenous bamboo ladder and the fruits are placed in a bamboo basket. Fruits are conveyed by the farmer with the use of a basket or jute bag to the collection sites. The fruits are thrown to the ground from a height of about one meter. In Nigeria, a harvesting knife (usually referred to as ‘go-to-hell’), consisting of a sickle-like metal head attached to a long wooden handle is employed in harvesting these fruits like orange, pear, African star apple, cashew from the trees (Table 2). The impact on the ground due to fall from the tree is reduced by gathering straw on the floor around the tree or heavy mulch is place on the ground with a thick depth of leaves. Sometimes a long cloth is attached to the tree branches from one end to the other and the fruits fall on the cloth without touching the ground. Sometimes the branches of the tree are shaken with hand and fruits will fall from the tree to the ground. The fruits would then be conveyed using the basket to the primary assembly point which is usually unprotected from environmental hazards such as heavy rain or sunshine until they produce are transported to wholesale markets. The delicate nature of the fruits and internal flesh should always be kept in mind while harvesting and handling produce. Physical damage is pronounced in the indigenous harvesting system due to the lack of knowledge and training.

Postharvest value chainActivitiesCauses of lossesPercentage lossSolution
Farm gateHarvesting, sorting, grading and sizing.Mechanical, Physiological, pathological5%Harvest timely properly, and with pedicel, removal of infected fruit
Packing house operationsPackaging, sorting, grading, sizing, trimming, washing, degreeningMechanical damage, pathological losses due to contamination5–10Avoid exposure to direct sun-ray, careful handling
TransportHandling, sorting, gradingMechanical losses due to mishandling, physiological changes, pathological damages due to action of micro-organism5–10Appropriate packaging method to prevent moisture loss, appropriate container, avoid hard packages
WholesalePacking, sorting, grading, at wholesales pointMechanical damages due to leveling, pathological damages due to the micro-organism, physiological damage due to moisture losses10–25Avoid exposure, store under shade, appropriate packaging materials, use of refrigerator or evaporative coolant structure, avoid delay, separated infected produce, avoid heaping especially fruit and vegetable
RetailBuying and selling, packing sorting, and grading.Pathological losses, slight mechanical damage, moisture loss.5–10Appropriate packaging, adequate storage facilities, avoid exposure, store under shade.
ConsumersBuying and selling, palatability test, choices.Physiological losses, pathological losses.5–10Well ventilation, appropriate package, use of refrigerator, use of evaporative coolant, washing

Table 1.

Identification of critical causes of postharvest losses and the solutions.

S/NFruitBotanical nameOriginHarvest indicesStorage T°C RH%Ethylene SensitivityHarvest ContainersHarvest tool
1.African star appleChrysophyllum albidumWest AfricaColour change green to orange, ease of abscission28 ± 2°C
InsensitiveHarvesting basket.Long harvesting knife
2.AppleMalus domesticNorth AmericaColour changes from leaf green to yellowish-green, firmness0°C
SensitiveApple basketApple picker Ladder
3.ApricotPrunus armeniacaChina Central AsiaHarvest when fruits are fully colored0°C
SensitiveGently place in a basketHand picking
4.AvocadoPersea AmericanaAfricaColour change, Ease of abscission6–7°C
SensitiveCloth bagPruner
5.BananaMusa domesticaSouth East AsiaColour change dark green to light green, peel/pulp ratio18°C
SensitiveGentle handling of bunchesCutlass, Sharp knife
6.ChestnutCastanea sativaAsia MinorFullness of size, Browning of pods0°C
InsensitiveBasket or wooden boxesLong stick or hand plucking
7.CherimoyaAnnona cherimolaTropical Americachanging in color from a darker to a light green or greenish tan15–30°C
SensitivePlastic box or Paper boxesHand picking
8.CashewAnacardium occidntale LSouth eastern Brazilease of abscission, Acidity level, firmness30°C
InsensitiveBasket, plastic boxesHand picking. Vibrator
9.Custard AppleAnonnona squamosal linnSouth AmericaColour change slightly yellow. Firmness25–30°C
SensitivePaper boxes, plastic boxesHandpicking
10.ClementineCitrus clementineMisserghin, AlgeriaFully yellow10°C
InsensitivePlastic boxesHand picking
11.DatesPhoenix dactyiferaWesten Parkistan, EgyptFruit turns brown0°C
InsensitiveJute bagHand picking
12.Elephant AppleDillenia indicaIndonesiaColour change from dark green to olive green0°C
SensitiveHarvesting boxesHand plucking
13.FigFicus caricaNorthern Asia MinorEase of abscission, aroma, colour0°C
SensitiveHarvesting boxesHand plucking
14.GrapeCitrus paradiseNorth AmericaEase of abscission, aroma, colour Firmness0°C
InsensitiveHarvesting boxesHand plucking
15.GuavaPsidium guajavaMexico, Central America, Northern South AmericaTSS acid ratio, specific gravity and colour5°C
SensitiveHarvesting boxesHand plucking
16.JaboticabaPliniacauli floraBrazilChange in colour.
InsensitiveHarvesting boxesHand plucking
17.JackfruitArtocarpus heterophylluusWestern Ghats of southern IndiaFirmness, ease of abscission13°C
SensitiveHarvesting boxLong harvesting knife
18.KiwiActinidiade liciosaSouthern ChinaFirmness, ease of abscission. Increase in sugar content−0.5°C
SensitiveHarvesting boxHand plucking
19.LimeCitrus aurantifoliaSouthern Iraq and PersiaFragrance, colour change9–10°C
InsensitiveHarvesting boxesHand plucking
20.LemonCitrus limonNorth-western IndiaEase of abscission, colour change from dark green to light green10–13°C
InsensitiveHarvesting boxesHand plucking
21.Mammee AppleMammee AmericanaSouth America Hawaii AfricaAsiaColour change, firmness, ease of abscissionNovember, December January0°C
SensitiveHarvesting boxesHand plucking
22.MangoMangifera indicaSouth
East Asia
Olive green colour, smooth and shiny, TSS 10–14% Starch content, flesh colour.April–June12°C
SensitiveHarvesting boxesHand plucking
23.NoniMorinda citrifoliaSouth AsiaColour change from light green to yellowish green. Firmness, Ease of abscissionNovember, December January10–13°C
SensitiveHarvesting boxesHand plucking
24.Sweet OrangeCitrus sinensisSouthern China, Northern and East India and South East Asia.Ease of abscission, colour change from dark green to light greenNovember, December January0–9°C
InsensitiveBasket. Harvesting boxHand plucking
25.OliveOlea europaeaMediterranean basinEase of abscission, FirmnessAugust—November5–10°C
InsensitiveBasket. Harvesting boxHand plucking
26.PeachPrunus persicaChinaEase of abscission, golden colour, firmnessMay—September−0.5–0°C
SensitivityBasket. Harvesting boxHand plucking
27.Passion fruitPassiflora eludesSouthern BrazilEase of abscission, dark green to light green depending on the varietyDecember – January in the tropics5–10°C
Harvesting box
Hand plucking
28.PomegranatePunica granatumIraq and Himalayas in northern IndiaSugar percentage should be 12–16% and acid percentage 1.5–2.5%,September–November5°C
InsensitiveBasket or cloth bagHand plucking
29.PawpawCarica papayaPanama and ColumbiaPatches of yellow, Jolliness of seedAugust – September7–13°C
SensitivityHarvesting boxesLong stick or hand plucking
30.PearPyrus communisChinaEase of abscissionMay – August−1.5 − 0.5°C 90–95%SensitivityHarvesting boxLong harvesting knife
31.PlumPrunus domesticaEastern Europe and ChinaFragrance, firmness, Ease of abscission soluble solids 17 percentJuly – September-0.5°C
SensitivityHarvesting boxPluck with hand
32.PineappleAnanas comosusSouth AmericaEase of abscission, colour change, taste.May – August7–13°C
InsensitiveHarvesting cratesSharp knife or cutlass
33.PersimmonDiospyros kakiChinaEase of abscission,
SensitivityPaper BoxesPluck with hand
34.RaspberryRubus spp.North AmericaEase of abscission, colour change, taste.April–August−0.5-0°C
InsensitivePaper BoxesPluck with hand
35.StrawberryFragaria spp.North AmericaEase of abscission, colour change, tasteApril–August0–0.5 °C
SensitivePaper BoxesPluck with hand
36.TangerineCitrus reticulateSouth AsiaEase of abscission, colour change, taste.April–November9–10°C
InsensitiveBasket. Cloth bag. BoxesPluck with hand
37.African WalnutPlukenetia conophoraTropical West African nationsEase of abscissionSeptember–December10–20°C
InsensitiveJute bag or boxesPluck with hand
38.WatermelonCitrullus lanatusEgyptColour change from dark green to light green, sound, browning tendrilsApril – September10–15°C
InsensitiveJute bag or boxesPluck with hand
39.PlantainMusa paradiseSouth AsiaColour change from dark green to light green, blackness of tip, peel/pulp ratio, blackness of tip, peel/pulp ratio,January – March18°C
SensitiveGentle handling of bunchesCutlass, Sharp knife

Table 2.

Harvest indices, tools, containers, storage temperature and relative humidity.

2.2 Distant market

Primary Collection Centre (Farm gate).

In the indigenous settings, open ground is used where fruits are heaped on bare ground for transportation to distant markets (Figure 5). At this point, there is no sorting, grading, sizing, precooling or washing. The fruits are packaged in baskets or used rice bags or jute bags and then loaded in Lorries or commuter vehicles and then transported to wholesale point or distant market which is usually on market days. The traditional method utilizes a local basket for packing and transportation of fruits. A sizable quantity of the fruits gets damaged in transit. The loading of the vehicles also exceeds the vehicle’s carrying capacity on very rough roads that promotes vibration and jostling of the produce on vehicles that are poorly maintained where the shock absorber may not be well fixed with poor ventilation. The loading and unloading of the vehicle are not done with careful handling; the produce is thrown over high elevations and over wide distances which promotes cuts and bruises. The environmental conditions in these center’s may promote excess heat, low humidity, mechanical damage, improper postharvest handling methods, poor sanitation, and poor environmental control. The field containers should be put under shade to minimize produce heating in the interval between harvest and transport to the packinghouse. In the improved postharvest handling system efforts to control these factors are often very successful. In the improved system, air-conditioned structure is usually erected where packing house operations takes place such as sorting, grading, washing, disinfestation, de-greening, waxing packaging. The plastic fruit crates ‘area’ are a more suitable option in this system [29, 30, 31]. The modern fruit plastic crates take care of problems such as bruises, cuts and other likely mechanical damage. For example, reducing mechanical damage during grading and packing greatly decreases the likelihood of postharvest disease because many disease-causing organisms would enter through wounds [32, 33, 34, 35, 36].

Figure 5.

Harvested fruits kept under a tree to prevent exposure to direct sunlight to reduce internal heat.

2.3 Indigenous temperature management practices of fruits

Farmers usually employ hired labour or collaborate among themselves by mobilising each other for harvest as early as 6 am when the temperature is low before 12 pm. The harvested produce is moved to the market for early sales to consumers or retailers. Sometimes, the produce harvested in the evening will be spread on flat surfaces overnight not allowing the produce to overlap one another; this will be sold in the market in the next morning. Oranges, Grapes, pear, mango, guava, African star apple, Avocado pear, African star apple are harvested when the color changes from deep green to slight yellow. At this stage, the produce can be transported to distant markets (Figure 6).

Figure 6.

Primary assembly point.

2.4 Improved temperature management practices

The improvement in temperature management requires rapid removal of the field heat through: hydro-cooling, packaging in iced containers, top icing, evaporative cooling, room cooling, forced air cooling, serpentine forced air cooling, vacuum cooling, and hydro-vacuum cooling. The cold chain system is required in the value chain of fruits from the farm gate to the consumer.

2.5 Indigenous pre-harvest quality management

Farmers have the age-long practice of keeping the best of their harvest as seed for the next season with the concept of maintaining the appropriate genetic resources from generation to generation to maintain produce qualities. The land preparation is done thoroughly to minimize weed infestation which reduces the quality of harvested produce. Farmers depend on accumulated hand-on experience or indigenous knowledge on when to harvest and how to harvest. Leguminous food crops are planted like cocoyam, melon, wrapping leaves, and vegetables are intercropped with the fruit trees to supply staple food for the household and regular income. It also reduces maintenance cost.

2.6 Improvement on pre-harvest quality management

Pre-harvest factors affect the rate of deterioration in the following ways:

Genetic factors:The rind thickness, skin layer affects rate deterioration. Some fruits outer layer has been improved to prolong shelf -life.

Maturity:Fruits should be harvested at the proper maturity stage to give the best quality.

Seed Selection:The right seed that is disease free and give the best quality output should be used.

Site Selection:The soil fertility status must support growth and development and insect pest status should be low.

Tools and Implements:These must be free from disease and the most appropriate implement for harvesting of that particular fruit.

Climatic conditions:Erratic changes in temperature will reduce the quality of fruits in terms of water stress, which will reduce the liquid content of fruits while excess water will result in rot, absence of cold period will affect the formation of the orange color in citrus.

Cultural practice:All cultural practices must be done appropriately and timely. Planting must not be delayed in other to avoid pest peak period.

Use of chemicals:Use of various chemicals in excess should be avoided.

Water stress:Irrigation should be planned along with field establishment.

Disease, insect, rodents:Activities of field pest reduce quality of produce through boring, feeding and laying of egg. Often disease and pest are transferred from field to storage and along the postharvest chain.

Injury:This can be caused by insect pest or farm implements, sometimes lack of moisture in the atmosphere may result in cracking of fruits.

Irregular weeding:Weeds serve as alternative host for diseases and pests; therefore, it must be controlled.

Management practices:This can also affect postharvest quality. Produce that has been stressed by too much or too little water, high rates of nitrogen, or mechanical injury (scrapes, bruises, abrasions) are susceptible to postharvest diseases. They are also susceptible to mold and decay caused by fungus Rhizoctonia,as a result fruits lying on the ground, and it can be alleviated by using mulch (Figures 7 and 8) [37, 38]

Figure 7.

Fruit display by retailer with partial provision of shade.

Figure 8.

Fruits in display at retail market with minimum shade.

2.7 Indigenous postharvest quality management

Transportation to the market is done by trucks, lorries, wheelbarrows, and motorcycles. During loading, fruits are carried in basket on head and thrown over straw or fruits already present inside the truck from a meter height. These practices result in bruising of the fruits and as a result become unmarketable. Fruits have to face the same fate of rough handling during unloading. Storage is a much-neglected aspect in the whole process and there is no permanent structure for storage in any point of time during the whole process of harvesting to marketing. Rough handling practices are practiced during loading of the field containers in transit. Throwing of the field containers and excessive drop at high heights is practiced by the handlers. The consequences of these undesirable practices included noticeable physical injury and bruise damage to the product. The likelihood of postharvest decay of the injured items is high. The process of loading the field containers onto the transit vehicle and unloading at the packinghouse needs closer supervision [2]. Indigenous method of temperature management includes exposing harvested fruit to frozen air at night, or putting fruits in water immediately after.

2.8 Improved postharvest handling methods of fruits

Harvesting and handling;

  1. Harvesting should be done with extreme care due to soft tissue of the fruits

  2. Produce should be harvested at the best quality for storage to prolong shelf life.

  3. Harvesting should be done under cool condition

  4. Harvest in batches to give highest quality available to customers.

  5. Plant at different times using varying varieties to extend harvest season.

  6. Hold produces in a shaded area before transportation

  7. Poor quality produce should be removed to avoid contamination and distractions.

  8. Avoid increase in temperature and moisture loss during transportation and storage.

  9. Commodities for export must be handled carefully.

  10. Use appropriate tool, container and implements during handling

2.9 Evaporative cooling system as improvement on the use of clay pot to preserve fruits

Different types of Evaporative Cooling Systems have been developed for the small- and large-scale storage systems.

  1. Pot-in-Pot:This comprises of two clay pots in which a smaller pot with the smaller mouth is placed inside a bigger one and the interspace filled with riverbed sand. Fruits for storage are kept inside the smaller pot and covered with an insulating material. The riverbed sand is kept moist by wetting it once daily. Fruits kept in it can remain fresh for up to 1 month.

  2. Metal-in-Pot:This is similar to pot-in-pot except that the smaller inner pot is replaced with a metal pot – an old kerosene tin. The working principles are the same.

  3. Wall-in-Wall:This is the commercial size of (i) above. It involves building a block inside another block with a small door made of wooden materials. The inner part of the small block is provided with shelves. Tap water pipe could be connected to the interspace for the case of water supply to wet the riverbed sand. It could keep fruits for 1–3 months without a problem. This structure of size measuring 2.5 m × 2.5 m × 2.5 m could be used to store 15–20 baskets of fruits at a time.

  4. Metal-in-Wall:This is similar to (iii) above but for the fact that the inner block wall is replaced with a metal tank that has shelves inside. The working principles are the same.

  5. Bamboo Coolant Structure:The base of the cooler is made by a large diameter tray that contains water. Bricks are placed within this tray and an open ware cylinder of bamboo or similar materials is placed on top of the bricks. Hessian cloth is wrapped around the bamboo frame, ensuring that the cloth is dipped in water to allow it to be drawn up the cylinder’s wall and food kept in the cylinder with a lid placed on the top.

  6. Charcoal Cooler:The charcoal cooler is made from an open timber frame of approximately 50 mm × 25 mm in section. The door is made by simply hinging one side of the frame. The wooden frame is covered in mesh, inside and out leaving a 925 mm (1″) cavity; this is filled with pieces of charcoal. The charcoal is sprayed with water and when wet provides an evaporative cooling effect. The framework is mounted outside the house on a pole with metal to deter rats and a good coating of grease to prevent ants from getting to the food stored.

  7. Almirah Cooler:The Almirah cooler is a more sophisticated cooler that has a wooden frame covered with cloth. There is a water tray at the base and on top of the frame into which the cloth is dipped, thus keeping it wet. A hinged door and internal shelves allow easy access to the stored produce.

Various researches were carried out to investigate the effectiveness of the evaporative coolant structure in prolonging the shelf life of fruits [39]. [40] observed that Cucumis sativus stored best for 3 weeks under the refrigerator followed by evaporative coolant structure and then open shelf. The evaporative coolant stored Cucumber fruit effectively for 2 weeks. Babatola [41] also investigated the effect of storage conditions on nutrient composition and quality of Capsicum frutescensunder three storage conditions. Observations were made on colour, firmness, weight loss, disease incidence and pungency level of pepper fruit, it was observed that pepper fruits kept well for 21 days in the evaporative coolant structure at a temperature of 20–22°C. Babatola [42] further investigated the effect of NPK fertilizer levels on the growth, yield and storage of pepper on Capsicum annum. The result showed that fruits stored in the refrigerator stored best for 3 weeks, followed by evaporative coolant structure which stored for 2 weeks while fruits under the ambient deteriorate rapidly after 4 days. Another research was conducted on the postharvest quality of okra fruit under three storage conditions. Evaporative coolant structure was found to store okra effectively for 2 weeks [43]. The physicochemical changes and shelf life of guava as influenced by postharvest condition were observed, refrigeration was observed to prolong shelf life for 16–28 days followed by evaporative coolant structure [44]. Further research on the influence of storage conditions, such as deep freezing, refrigeration and evaporative coolant structure on the quality of varieties of carrots showed that carrots stored best in the deep freezer at the temperature of 0–4°C in terms of color, firmness and disease infection [45].

Postharvest technology is crucial in agricultural production and utilization system. It plays a key role in loss reduction, value addition, food security, employment and income generation [38, 39]. A postharvest technology revolution is essential with strong linkages of storage, marketing and distribution. Inappropriate postharvest management system resulted in large quantity of fruits gets damaged during the process of handling, transportation and marketing Figure 3 [36, 37]. Due to the absence of proper storage and marketing facilities, farmers are forced to sell their produces at throw-away prices. Sometimes farmers do not even get the two-way transportation cost, so they would rather dumb their produce near the market area than bear the transportation cost required for taking the product back. It is of utmost importance to identify all aspects of critical postharvest losses and find solutions that would lead to a remarkable reduction in postharvest losses.

Processing is a postharvest activity carried out to maintain or raise the quality of produce or change the form or characteristics of fresh produce, spoilage agent must be destroyed without ruining the nutritive value or palatability of the farm produce. Processing easily destroys Vitamin C in fruits, especially where heat is used. Produce that has been processed can also be stored to prevent spoilage and extend storage life; hence we have the term preservation. Processing and preservation aim at achieving the following goals:

  1. Increase the shelf life of the produce.

  2. Increase variety in the diet by providing a range of attractive flavours, colours, aromas and textures.

  3. Increase the economic value of the product by raising its quality.

  4. To create a new product.

  5. To remove inedible parts of produce.

  6. Facilitate efficient and easy transportation

  7. Reduce bulkiness

  8. Produce easy to display

  9. Increase sales

  10. It makes fruits available where it is not produced

  11. It makes fruits available throughout the year e.g., dried mango, pineapple.

  12. Stabilizes price

  13. Reduce postharvest losses

  14. Value addition is possible

  15. The waste from processing can be used to generate income.


3. Conclusion

Fruits are to be harvested at the appropriate maturity stage and size to prolong shelf life. Major losses in the postharvest chain of fruits are due to mechanical damages, physical bruises, a physiological disorder due to high temperature and unhygienic conditions. Time of harvest, method of harvest, tools used in harvesting, transportation affects wholesomeness or increased rate of deterioration of harvested fruits. The inappropriate postharvest management system in the postharvest chain of fruits results in huge losses during the process of harvesting, grading, packaging, handling, transportation and marketing. These losses are due to inappropriate harvesting methods and tools, unavailability of cold chain systems, absence of appropriate storage facilities and poor marketing strategies. To maintain and effectively preserve fruit quality. Postharvest handling must be efficient, rapid and coordinated by ensuring immediate removal of field heat, reducing damages by protecting from sun and unhygienic conditions. Knowledge on specific produce handling method, market requirement, appropriate container and simplified packing line is essential to achieve uniformity and ensure produce are properly placed and strapped for delivery to consumers. Workers involved in critical postharvest handling steps are to be well trained, remunerated and equipped with appropriate tools, risk-free and conducive working condition.


  1. 1.Odeyemi OO. Post-harvest food problems in Nigeria: Kinds and magnitude of spoilage and agents of deterioration. In: A 3-day Workshop on Reduction of Postharvest Food Losses in Nigeria. 20th–22nd March 2013. Nigeria: CCE hilltop Auditorium, FUTA; 2013
  2. 2.Aung MM, Chang YS. Traceability in a food supply chain safety and quality perspective. Food Control. 2014;39:172-184
  3. 3.Adugna D, Gerba D, Diriba B, Kassaye T. Identification of major causes of postharvest losses among selected fruits in jimma for proffering veritable solutions. International Journal of Current Research. 2011;3(11):40-43
  4. 4.Adekanmi and Olowofoyeku. African star apple; potentials and application of some indigenous species in Nigeria. Journal of Applied Science and Environmental Management. 2020;24(8):1307
  5. 5.Lorenzo M,PauloM,Ruben D,MirianP,Jorge S,Daniel F. Main groups of microorganisms of relevance for food safety and stability: General aspects and overall description. In: Innovative Technologies for Food Preservation. London: Academic Press; 2018. pp. 53-107. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-811031-7.00003-0. Elsevier Public Health Emergency Collection
  6. 6.Brecht J, Bergsma K, Sanchez C, Snyder G. Harvest maturity and storage temperature effects on quality of Chinese, water chestnut. Acta Horticulture. 1992;318:313-319
  7. 7.Kader AA. Increasing food availability by reducing post-harvest losses of produce. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS). 2005;682:2169-2176
  8. 8.Kitinoja L, Cantwell M. Identification of Appropriate Post Harvest Technologies for Improving Market Access and Income for Small Horticultural farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Virginia: World Food Logistics Organization; 2010. p. 321
  9. 9.Atanda SA, Pessu PO, Agoda S, Isong IU, Ikotun I. The concepts and problems of postharvest food losses in perishable crops. African Journal of Science. 2011;5(11):608-613
  10. 10.Msogoya TJ, Kimaro ES. Assessment and management of post-harvest losses of fresh mango under small-scale business in Morogoro, Tanzania. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences.2011;11(1):1358-1363; African Journal of Economic Review. 2021;9(2):305
  11. 11.Mohammed K, Afework B. Post-harvest loss and quality deterioration of horticultural crops in DireDawa Region, Ethiopia. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 2016;17(1):1-9
  12. 12.Kereth AG, Lyimo M, Mbwana HA, Mongi RJ, Ruhembe CC. Assessment of post-harvest handling practices: Knowledge and losses in fruits in Bagamoyo District of Tanzania. Journal of Food Science and Quality Management. 2013;11:2224-6088
  13. 13.Bachmann J, Earles R. Postharvest Handling of Fruits and Vegetables Ozark Mountains, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, NC, USA: ATTRA; 2000. pp. 1-19
  14. 14.Wilson LG, Boyette MD, Estes EA. Postharvest Handling and Cooling of Fruit, Vegetables and Flowers for Small Farms. Part 1: Quality Maintenance Ozark Mountains, University of Arkansas. Fayetteville, NC, USA: ATTRA; 1995
  15. 15.John EP, Read PE. The biology of Horticulture. An Introductory Text Book. Hoboken, New Jersey, United States: John Willey Son Inc; 1993
  16. 16.Steven AS, Celso LM. Tomato. 2005. Available from: htt:// 12, November 2009
  17. 17.Moris SC, Jobing J. Recent advances in the postharvest packaging and handling of tropical fruit. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Tropical and Subtropical Fruits. Cairns, Australia. 2000
  18. 18.Daramola AM, Okoye WI. Post-harvest loss prevention in horticultural crop produces. In: Proceedings Of 16th Annual Conference. Abeokuta, Nigeria: Horticultural Society of Nigeria; 1998. pp. 12-16
  19. 19.Barry. Production and marketing African indigenous vegetables in the Arumeru District of Tanzania: Assessing post-harvest loss and processing potential. Acta Horticulturae. 2009;806:481-488
  20. 20.Paul RE. Advances in postharvest technology for tropical and subtropical fruits. In: Proceedings of the International Technical and Trade Seminar on Tropical and Subtropical Fruits. Kuala Lumpur. 2001
  21. 21.Kumrul H, Bishan L, Akhter N. Post-harvest loss assessment: A study to formulate policy for loss reduction of fruits and vegetables and socioeconomic uplift of the stakeholders. In: National Food Policy Capacity Strengthening Programme Final Report. 2010
  22. 22.Vishal S, Hedayetullah MD, Parveen Z, Jagamohan M. Post-harvest technology of fruits and vegetables: An overview. Journal of Post-harvest Technology. 2014;2(2):124-135
  23. 23.Kughur PG, Iornenge GM, Ityonongu BE. Effects of post-harvest losses on selected fruits and vegetables among small-scale farmers in Gboko Local Government area of Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal of Innovation and Scientific Research. 2015;19(1):201-208
  24. 24.Ngowi ER, Selejio O. Post-harvest loss and adoption of improved post-harvest storage technologies by smallholder maize farmers in Tanzania. African Journal of Economic Review. 2019;7(1):249-267
  25. 25.Rajabi S, Farhad L, Omidi M, Seyed J, Farajallah H. Quantifying the grapes losses and waste in various stages of supply chain. Biological Forum – An International Journal. 2015;7(1):225-229
  26. 26.Davey MW, Van Montagu M, Inz’e D, Sammartin M, Kanellis A, Smirnoff N, et al. Plant L-ascorbic acid: Chemistry, function, metabolism, bioavailability and effects of processing. Journal of Science Food Agriculture. 2000;80:825-860
  27. 27.David H. Postharvest Handling and Packing house Analysis of Fresh Produce and Recommendations for Improving Packing Line Design. Washington, D.C., United States: Chemonics International Inc.; 2004
  28. 28.Gram L, Ravn L, Rasch M, Bruhn JB, Christensen AB, Givskov M. Food spoilage—interactions between food spoilage bacteria. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 2002;78:79-97
  29. 29.Kitinoja L. Al-Hassan HA. Identification of appropriate post-harvest technologies for improving market access and incomes for small horticultural farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Part 1: Post-harvest losses and quality assessments. Acta Horticulturae. 2021;934: 31-40; AJER.9(2): 304
  30. 30.Kader AA. Postharvest biology and technology: An overview. In: Kader AA. editor. Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. University of California. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Publication No. 3311. 1992. pp. 15-20
  31. 31.Kader AA. Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. Wickson Hall, UC Davis: University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, UCANR Publications, UC Postharvest Research & Information Center, 2002. p. 535.
  32. 32.Kikulwe EM, Okurut S, Ajambo S, Nowakunda K, Stoian D and Naziri D. Post-harvest losses and their determinants: A challenge to creating a sustainable cooking banana value chain in Uganda. Journal of Sustainability. 2018;10:1-19
  33. 33.Kitinoja L, Kader AA. Small-scale postharvest handling practices: A manual for Horticultural Crops. 4th ed. UC Davis; UC Postharvest Research & Information Center; 2002. p. 260
  34. 34.Sablani SS, Opara LU, Al – Balushi, K. Influence of bruising and storage temperature on vitamin C content of tomato. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 2006;4(1):54-56
  35. 35.Turner DW. Bananas and plantains. In: Mitra SK, editor. Post-harvest physiology and storage of tropical and subtropical fruits. UK: CABI Publishing; 2001. pp. 45-77
  36. 36.Umar IA, Liu Y, Khalid M, Muhammad KB. An econometric estimation of post-harvest losses of kinnow in Pakistan. International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management United Kingdom. 2015;3(5):773-783
  37. 37.Verma A, Singh KP. An economic analysis of post-harvest losses in fresh vegetables. Indian Journal of Agricultural Marketing. 2004;18(1):136-139
  38. 38.Willis RD, Mc Glasson H, Graham NE, Hall EB. Postharvest: An Introduction to the Physiology and Handling of Fruit and Vegetable B. Oxford, London Edinburgh: Sp Professional; 1989. pp. 39-45, 699-693
  39. 39.Babarinsa FA, Nwagwa SC. Construction and assessment of two evaporative coolant structures for storage of fruits and vegetables. Report. Nigerian Stored Product Research Institute. 1986; Technical Report No. 3. Bechmann J, Earles R. Postharvest Handling of Fruit and Vegetables. ATTRA. Horticultural Technical Note. 2000. p. 19
  40. 40.Babatola LA, Adewoyin OB. Effect of levels of NPK fertilizer on growth and storability of Cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Hortson Proceedings; 2005:1(8):24-29
  41. 41.Babatola LA, Adewoyin OB. Effect of storage condition on nutrient composition and quality of capsicum frutescens. Nigerian Journal of Horticultural Society of Nigeria. 2006;11:7-11
  42. 42.Babatola LA, Adewoyin OB. (2007). Effects of NPK Fertilizer Levels on Growth, Yield and Storage of Pepper Capsicum annum. In Proceedings of 25th annual conference of Horticultural Society of Nigeria. 2007. pp. 287-291
  43. 43.Babatola LA, Adewoyin OB. Effect of N.P.K Fertilizer levels on yield of okra-sweetcorn inter crop and postharvest quality of okra fruit. Hortson Proceedings. 2002. pp. 74-78
  44. 44.Babatola JO, Babatola LA, Fariyike TA. Physicochemical change and shelf life of guava (Psidium guajava) as influenced by postharvest conditions. Hortson Proceedings. 2003. pp. 86-92
  45. 45.Babatola LA, Etukudo OO. Influence of storage conditions on quality of carrot varieties. Hortson Proceedings. 2003;106(1):235-240

Written By

Oluyinka Adewoyin, Adebayo Ibidapo, Lydia Babatola, Folasayo Fayose, Anthony Ekeocha and Temidayo Apata

Submitted: December 15th, 2021Reviewed: January 14th, 2022Published: March 10th, 2022