List of plant growth, physiological and quality parameters of French bean reported by various workers.
Abstract
French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is used profusely by the common people as an alternative diet of protein. The sparse nodulation in French bean mainly may be due to lack of threshold level of specific rhizobial cells in soil at the time of sowing. The isolates streaked on YEMA with BTB changed to yellow color showing the production of acid which is the characteristic of Rhizobium. Utilization of different carbon sources is an efficient tool to characterize the isolates. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria is the beneficial rhizobacteria inoculation of which increases growth and yield of French bean through different direct and indirect mechanisms. Inoculation of French beans with rhizobial and rhizobacterial isolates found to be improved growth, physiological, quality parameters and grain yield through symbiotic N2-fixation capacity and plant growth promoting abilities. Co-inoculation of rhizobial and rhizobacterial isolates enhanced the growth and grain yield of French bean. These isolates may be used as consortium to improve the growth of French bean, which may reduce the dependency of farmer on chemical fertilizer as well as risk of pollution. In this chapter characterization of Rhizobium and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and their effect on plant growth has been reviewed.
Keywords
- Rhizobium
- PGPR
- biofertilizer
- consortium
1. Introduction
In the present intensive agriculture practices leguminous plants play a critical role in natural ecosystem, agriculture and agroforestry because of their ability to fix nitrogen (N2) in symbiotic relationship with
2. French bean and its use
Gramineae and Leguminosae are two major source of world’s food supply, total 15 plant species of which account for more than 90 per cent of the total production of the major seed crops [7]. According to Harlan [8], three major cereal crops such as wheat (
3. Adaptation
French beans are well adapted to tropics, subtropics, and warm temperate regions, grown from 40°S to 40°N latitude. French bean completes their life cycle within 80 to 110 days which depends on variety and night temperatures during the growing season. Suitable temperature for growth of French bean varies between 20 and 22°C. The maximum temperature during flowering of French bean must be under 28°C. It requires a minimum of 500 to 600 mm of rain during the growing season if the crop is cultivated under rainfed conditions whereas an annual total of 600 to 700 mm is considered ideal. They are planted in warm soils with minimum temperatures preferably above 15°C after all danger of frost has passed. Soil texture such as sandy loam, sandy clay loam or clay loam with good drainage and clay content between 15 and 35 per cent is supposed to be best for cultivation of this crop. Soil pH of 6.0 to 6.5 is considered to be the best for the cultivation of French bean.
4. Biological nitrogen fixation
Biological N2-fixation is a biological phenomenon, which involves some legumes, whether grown as pulses for seed or as pasture in agro-forestry or in natural ecosystems [17]. Biological nitrogen fixation is very efficient in satisfying the high nitrogen requirements of legumes because of the conversion of gaseous nitrogen (N2) to ammonia (NH3) making it available to plant use. Enzyme nitrogenase facilitated the process of BNF. Many N2-fixing prokaryotes are diazotrophic,
Two protons are reduced by hydrogen for fixation of one molecule of dinitrogen and because of high stability of dinitrogen the reaction needs high energy [18]. Dupont et al. [19] reported that soon after germination of legume seeds, rhizobia present in the soil or added as seed inoculum invade the root hairs and move through an infection thread to the root. The bacteria multiply rapidly in the root, causing the swelling of root cells to form nodules. Nitrogen in the air of soil pores around the nodules is fixed by binding it to other elements and thus changing it into a plant available form. Some of the carbohydrates manufactured by the plant photosynthesis process are transported to the nodules where they are used as a source of energy by the rhizobia. The rhizobia also use some of the carbohydrates as a source of hydrogen in the conversion of atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia. Despite BNF being a naturally occurring process, many soils do not harbor sufficient numbers of appropriate rhizobia for effective symbioses. Inoculation of leguminous crop with appropriate and compatible rhizobia ensures maximum BNF. Inoculation is generally needed when certain new leguminous crops are introduced to new areas.
5. Rhizobium
Rhizobiaceae family is a physiologically heterogeneous and genetically diverse group of soil organisms, which are called rhizobia [20]. Rhizobia include a group of soil bacterial genera viz.;
6. Nitrogen fixation by Rhizobium
French beans have low ability to fix nitrogen symbiotically and surprisingly larger rates of N2-fixation can be obtained under appropriate conditions [27]. In the light of the poor nodulation in French bean, in general in India, it is feasible that under these situations BNF technologies can become extremely important in order to reduce the use of chemical nitrogenous fertilizers, improve the soil health and enhance the yield levels. Hence, inoculation with the effective rhizobial inoculum presents a great potential for increasing food production in N-W Himalayas and other parts of the French bean growing area. The number of nodules in the plant decreases with the higher rates of soil N application at planting. In leguminous plants, Nitrogen fixation is a symbiotic process between nitrogen fixing bacteria and legume roots, and occurs within specialized root nodules. Hungria et al. [28] observed an adverse effect on leguminous root nodule development at low temperature stress.
7. Morphological and biochemical characteristics of rhizobia
Morphological characteristics of rhizobia refers to external appearance of rhizobia
The isolates changed to yellow color showed the production of acid which is the characteristic of
In the glucose-peptone agar medium, growth of the
Biochemical characterization and protein profile by sds-page of French bean (
8. Morphological and biochemical characteristics of PGPR
The plant growth promoting rhizobacteria must be defined by some important attributes such as (a) an efficient tool to colonize the root surface (b) to survive, multiply and compete with other microorganisms and (c) to promote plant growth [42]. Anitha and Kumudini [43] reported that the isolates of fluorescent
9. Authentication and evaluation of Rhizobium
Authentication is the process by which we can ascertain that the isolates are
Evaluation or screening of the authenticated isolates can be done on the basis of plant dry matter response (effectiveness), nodule number and nodule dry weight of the inoculated isolates. Isolation, authentication and evaluation of rhizobial isolates from the soils of North-West Himalayas in French Bean (
10. Rhizobium inoculation, N-levels and interaction impact
10.1 Rhizobium
Grain legumes have been recognized worldwide as an alternative means of improving soil fertility through their ability to fix atmospheric nitrogen, increasing soil organic matter and improving soil structure [52]. Several studies have sought to identify efficient and competitive strains of rhizobia to cope the nitrogen requirements of common bean [53]. Deshwal et al. [54] observed that in addition to BNF rhizobia can promote plant growth by different direct or indirect mechanisms such as production of IAA, GA, solubilization of inorganic phosphates and biocontrol of plant diseases. Beneficial effects of rhizobium on French bean have been reported by various workers under different climatic and soil conditions [55, 56]. Ndlovu [57] reported that nodulation was significantly affected by inoculation with
There were significant differences in shoot, root and total dry biomass of
Yadegari and Rahmani [62] recorded the positive effect of inoculation with rhizobial strains Rb-133 and Rb-136 on plant growth. Rhizobial strain increased the seed yield, number of pods plant−1, number of seeds pod−1, weight of 100 seeds, seed protein yield, total dry matter over uninoculated control plants. During two years of study they registered the seed yield in inoculated plants ranging from 1221 to 4693 kg ha−1 depending on the strain and cultivars. Inoculation with suitable strains of
Inoculation of seeds by
Number of pods, number of grains, grain yield, protein content and protein yield in French bean was influenced significantly due to inoculation with rhizobial isolates over uninoculated control [69]. This positive effect due to inoculation with rhizobial isolates attributed to nodulation and nitrogen fixing capability which enhances the nitrogen supplement to plants, resulted higher vegetative growth and carbohydrate portioning and more protein formation. Phosphorus solubilizing capability of rhizobial isolates helps to solubilize inorganic fixed phosphate and make it available for plant uptake. Higher availability of phosphorus improves N2- fixation, root proliferation which results higher uptake of nutrient from soil and phosphorus also acts synergistically with nitrogen and helps in carbohydrate translocation and protein synthesis. An increase in number of pods plant−1, number of grains pod−1 and pod yield due to
10.2 Nitrogen levels
Nitrogen is an essential nutrient for plant growth and development. Nitrogen deficiency is frequently a major limiting factor for crop production all over the world [70, 71]. Therefore, adequate supply of nitrogen is necessary to achieve high yield potential in plants which usually depend upon combined or fixed form of N such as NH4+ and NO3− because it is unavailable in its most prevalent form as atmospheric N. The sparse nodulation in French bean needs more amount of nitrogen for growth and development in comparison to other legumes.
In French bean all the plant growth parameters except nodule number and nodule biomass were significantly improved with higher level of nitrogen application (from 0 to 120 kg N ha−1), reported in several studies (Table 1). This improvement is attributed to the high vegetative growth and higher formation of photosynthates. Nitrogen plays an important role in the formation of protein and nucleic acids structure, the most important building material for every cell. In addition to it nitrogen is also a component of chlorophyll that enables the plant to capture energy from sunlight thorough photosynthesis. Thus, nitrogen supply to a plant increased the concentration of protein, amino acids, protoplasm and chlorophyll which influenced cell size, leaf area and photosynthetic activity [91, 92]. Increased level of nitrogen application in French bean resulted in increased plant height [81]. The negative effect of N fertilizer on French bean nodulation is well documented [23]. However, farmers have gradually adopted the use of N fertilizers with French bean crops, to maximize yields, particularly when irrigation is used. According to Yadav [69] number of trifoliate leaves, leaf area and chlorophyll content of French bean was significantly increased with higher levels of nitrogen (from 0 to 120 kg N ha−1), the reason behind that N is chief constituent of amino acids which is the building unit of protein, protoplasm leading to improved vegetative growth. Nitrogen being constituent of chlorophyll higher dose of nitrogen increases chlorophyll concentration resulted in more photosynthesis and enhanced number of trifoliate leaves and leaf area which was reported by various workers (Table 1). N fertilization upto 120 kg N ha−1 in French bean increased number of pods plant−1 [77, 78, 79, 85]. Nitrogen supply affects a wide range of physiological processes in higher plants [87].
Growth parameters | References |
---|---|
Plant height | Negi and Shekhar [72]; Dwivedi et al. [73]; Kushwaha [74]; Saxena and Verma [75]; Singh and Rajput [76]; Singh and Singh [77]; Dhanjal et al. [78]; Prajapati et al. [79]; Veeresh [80], Jagdale et al. [81] |
Number of branches plant−1 | Dhanjal et al. [78]; Prajapati et al. [79]; Veeresh [80] |
Dry biomass production | Veeresh [80]; Prajapati et al. [79]; Singh et al. [82] |
Number of pods plant−1 | Sharma et al. [83]; Rajput et al. [84]; Singh and Singh [77]; Behura et al. [85] |
Number of seeds pod−1 | Dhanjal et al. [78]; Prajapati et al. [79]; Veeresh [80]; Behura et al. [85]; Singh et al. [82] |
Grain yield | Singh and Singh [77]; Singh et al. (2000); Dhanjal et al. [78];Veeresh [80]; Singh et al. [82] |
Number of trifoliate leaves | Escalante et al. [86]; Cechin and Fumis [87]; Yadav [69] |
Leaf area plant−1 | Hegde and Srinivas [88]; Rana and Singh [89]; Escalante et al. [86]; Veeresh [80]; Namvar et al. [90] |
Chlorophyll content | Escalante et al. [86]; Rana and Singh [89]; Namvar et al. [90] |
Protein content | Verma and Saxena [75]; Singh and Singh [77]; Veeresh [80] |
Water soluble carbohydrate | Namvar et al. [90]; Yadav [69] |
10.3 Rhizobium x N-level interaction
An inoculation of rhizobial isolates in combinations with different levels of nitrogen significantly improved the various plant growth parameters in French bean as compared to uninoculated control [61, 69, 90, 93, 94]. Growth, symbiotic and yield response of N-fertilized and
11. Compatibility between Rhizobium and PGPR
Under natural soil conditions microorganisms are effective to colonize the plant roots for function. Compatibility between the PGPR and other microorganism to colonize the root system without inhibiting each other is a prerequisite for getting beneficial result using multiple microbes in a crop field. The use of mixed cultures of beneficial microorganisms as soil inoculants is based on the principles of natural ecosystems which are sustained by their constituents such as the quality and quantity of their inhabitants and specific ecological parameters [99]. In the rhizosphere, PGPR and nodule promoting rhizobacteria induce phytoalexins production by the plant, creating antibiosis in the rhizosphere for pathogenic forms, siderophores production to chelate insoluble cations and associative action with the plant [100, 101].
12. Impact of PGPR on French bean
The effect of Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on plant growth is a well-documented fact. PGPR plays an important role in agricultural systems, especially as biofertilizer. A positive influence of inoculation with various PGPR isolates on shoots and roots length; dry biomass production; and shoot: root ratio was studied by Yadav [69]. The higher shoot length, root length, root volume and dry biomass production due to inoculation with various PGPR isolates could be attributed to their plant growth promoting traits such as IAA, GA, P-Solubilization, Zn-Solubilization, ammonia production, HCN production and nitrogen fixation. IAA and GA are the plant growth hormones in which IAA controls processes
13. Interaction effect of Rhizobium and PGPR on growth of French bean
An application of PGPR together with
As the main constituent of chlorophyll and an element of porphyrin ring, N content supplied by symbiotic nitrogen fixation and external application significantly improved the synthesis of chlorophyll ‘a’, chlorophyll ‘b’, chlorophyll ‘a’:‘b’ ratio in plant, when rhizobial and PGPR isolates applied in combination. Chlorophyll ‘a’ is always greater than chlorophyll ‘b’ and chlorophyll ‘a’ plays an important role in photosynthesis through absorbing light energy and converting it into chemical energy while chlorophyll ‘b’ as an accessory pigment absorb more light energy and transfers it to chlorophyll ‘a’ for photosynthesis. The chlorophyll ‘a’: chlorophyll ‘b’ ratio could be a useful indicator of N partioning within a leaf because this ratio is positively correlated with the ratio of PSII cores to light harvesting chlorophyll-protein complex.
Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake was significantly improved in plants could be attributed to higher N availability through symbiotic nitrogen fixation and high P availability through root acid phosphatase activity and phosphorus solubilizing ability of PGPR isolates. Significantly higher amount of fixed nitrogen in shoots, roots and grains of plant might be attributed to more nodulation and higher root growth due to phosphorus and nitrogen supplementation. The higher amount of nitrogen fixed in French bean due to combined inoculation of rhizobial isolate RD20–3 and PGPR isolate NAG-K3 over solitary inoculation of individual isolate is attributed to the higher phosphorus availability made due to P-solubilization and root acid phosphatase activity. The enhanced P-availability facilitates the more ATP synthesis which is required as a source of energy for carrying out the N2-fixation by an enzyme nitrogenase. Number of pods plant−1, pod yield, grains pod−1 and grain yield was significantly increased due to inoculation of French bean with rhizobial isolates and PGPR conjointly at 100 kg N ha−1 might be attributed to higher content of nitrogen and phosphorus in plant body which help in pod formation and grain formation in plants. Nitrogen as a chief constituent of protein and phosphorus also helps in protein synthesis, resulted highest protein content and protein yield plants receiving rhizobial and PGPR isolates both, at 100 kg N ha−1 application. Co-inoculation of rhizobial isolate RK3–1 (R2) and PGPR isolate CRC-J2 (P2) significantly reduced all plant growth parameters, physiological parameters, quality parameters, grain yield and nutrient uptake in plants compared to application of RK3–1 (R2) and CRC-J2 (P2), alone [69] which depicts the non-synergistic interaction between these rhizobial and PGPR isolates. Thus these two isolates RK3–1 (R2) and CRC-J2 (P2) may not be used as consortium to improve plant growth.
Co-inoculation of
14. Conclusion
This study revealed the presence of efficient multi-trait rhizobial and PGPR isolates in French bean rhizosphere. Those rhizobial isolates which nodulate the plant under controlled conditions may be authenticated as
Conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.
Dubey R C, Maheshwari D K, Kumar H, Choure K. 2010. Assessment of diversity and plant growth promoting attributes of rhizobia isolated from Cajanus cajan L. Afr J. Biotech. 9: 8619-8629 - 2.
Raverkar K P. 2017. To exploit the microbial biodiversity in various agro-ecologies for biofertilizer application in diverse cropping systems. Progress Report. All India Network Project on Soil biodiversity: Biofertil. 1-12 - 3.
Sharma A, Johri B N, Sharma A K, Glick B R. 2003. Plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas sp. strain GRP3 influences iron acquisition in mung bean (Vigna radiata L. Wilzeck). Soil Biol. Biochem. 35: 887-894 - 4.
Karthik C, Oves M, Sathya K, Padikasan I A. 2017. Isolation and characterization of multi-potential Rhizobium strain ND2 and its plant growth promoting activities under Cr (VI) stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2016.1261116 - 5.
Tsai S M, Bonetti R, Agbala S M, Rossetto R. 1993. Minimizing the effect of mineral on biological nitrogen fixation in common bean by increasing nutrient levels. Plant Soil 152:131-138 - 6.
Kaur J, Khanna K, Kumari P, Sharma R. 2015. Influence of psychrotolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria as co-inoculants with Rhizobium on growth parameters and yield of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus). Afric. J. Microbiol. Res. 9: 258-264 - 7.
Egli D B. 1998. Seed biology and the yield of grain crops. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. 32pp - 8.
Harlan J R. 1995. The Living Fields: Our Agricultural Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 271 pp - 9.
Heiser C B J. 1973. Seed to civilization-The story of Man's Food. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. 243 pp - 10.
Jensen E S, Nielsen H. 2003. How can increased use of biological N2-fixation in agriculture benefit the environment? Plant Soil 252: 177-186 - 11.
Debouck D.1991. Systematics and Morphology. In: A. van Schoonhoven and O. Voysest, (eds). Common beans research for crop improvement. Cali, Colombia: CAB International, CIAT - 12.
Broughton W J, Hernz G, Blair M, Vanderleyden J. 2003. French beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) model food legumes. Plant soil 252: 55-128 - 13.
Anonymous 2005. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO STAT database. http:/ www.fao , org. - 14.
Nleya T M, Slinkard A E, Vandenberg A. 2001. Differential performance of pinto beans under varying levels of soil moisture. Canad. J. Plant Sci. 81: 233-239 - 15.
Maesen L J G, Somaatmadja S. 1989. Phaseolus vulgaris L. In: L. J. G. van der Maesen and S. Somaatmadja, (eds). Plant Resources of South-East Asia 1.Pulses. Wageningen: Pudoc/ Prosea, 60-63 - 16.
Silbernagel M J, Janssen W, Davis J H C. 1991. Snap bean production in the tropics: implications for genetic improvement. In: A. van Schoonhoven and O. Voysest, (eds). Common Beans: Research for Crop Improvement. Wallingford, UK and Cali, Columbia, 835-862 - 17.
Hardarson G, Atkins C. 2003. Optimising biological N2-fixation by legumes in farming system. Plant Soil 252: 41-54 - 18.
Mellor R M, Werner D. 1990. Legume nodule biochemistry and function. In: P. M. Gresshof, (ed). Molecular Biology of Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation. Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc. 111-129 - 19.
Dupont L, Alloing G, Hopkins J, Hérouart D, Frendo P. 2012. The legume root nodule: From symbiotic nitrogen fixation to senescence. Senes. 1-34 - 20.
Somasegaran P, Hoben H J. 1994. Handbook for rhizobia.Methods in legume -Rhizobium technology. Springer Verlag, New York - 21.
Howieson J, Ballard R. 2004. Optimizing the legume symbiosis in stressful and competitive environments within southern Australia- some contemporary thoughts. Soil Biol. Biochem. 36: 1261-1273 - 22.
O' Hara G W, Howieson J G, Graham P H. 2003. Nitrogen fixation and agricultural practice. In: G. J. Leigh, (ed). Nitrogen Fixation at the Millennium. Amsterdam: 391-420 - 23.
Graham P H, Vance C P. 2000. Nitrogen fixation in perspective: an overview of research and extension needs. Field Crop Res. 65: 93-106 - 24.
Jordan D C. 1984. Family II. Rhizobiaceae. In Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. Vol. I (eds. By N. R.Krieg and J. G. Holt Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, M. D). pp. 232-242 - 25.
Martinez-Romero E, Segovia L, Mercante F M, Franco A A, Graham P H, Prado M A. 1991. Rhizobium tropici , a novel species nodulatingPhaseolusvulgaris beans andLeucaena sp . trees. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41: 417-426 - 26.
Aguilar O M, Riva O, Peltzer E. 2004. Analysis of Rhizobium etli and of its symbiosis with wildPhaseolus vulgaris supports co-evolution in centers of host diversification. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 13548-13553 - 27.
Vincent J M. 1970. Manual for practical study of root nodule bacteria.IBP Hand Book ‘5, Blackwell Scientific Publishing Company, Oxford - 28.
Hungria M, Andrade D S, Chueire L M d O, Probanza A, Guttierrer-Manero F J, Megias M. 2000. Isolation and characterization of new efficient and competitive bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) rhizobia from Brazil. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 32: 1515-1528 - 29.
Yadav S K, Raverkar K P, Chandra R, Pareek N, Chandra S. 2019. Isolation, authentication and evaluation of rhizobial isolates from the soils of North-West Himalayas in French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 7:141-149 - 30.
Koskey G, Simon W, Ezekiel M. 2018. Genetic characterization and diversity of Rhizobium isolated from root nodules of Mid-Altitude climbing Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties. Front. Microbiol. 9:1-10 - 31.
Rai R, Sen A. 2015. Biochemical characterization of French bean associated rhizobia found in North Bengal and Sikkim. J. Acad. Indu. Res. 4: 10-18 - 32.
Holt J G, Krieg N R, Sneath P H A, Staley J T, Williams S T. 1994. In Bergey’s Manual of determinative bacteriology. Williams and Wilkins Press, Baltimore. USA - 33.
Deshwal V K, Chaubey A. 2014. Isolation and characterization of Rhizobium leguminosarum from root nodule ofPisum sativum L. J. Acad. Indus. Res. 2: 464-467 - 34.
Deka A K, Azad P. 2006. Isolation of Rhizobium strains: cultural and biochemical characteristics. Legume Res. 29: 209-212 - 35.
Singh B, Kaur R, Singh K. 2008. Characterization of Rhizobium strain isolated from the roots ofTrigonellafoenumgraecum (fenugreek). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 7: 3671-3676 - 36.
Erum S, Bano A. 2008. Variation in phytohormone production in Rhizobium strains at different altitudes of Northern areas of Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 10: 536-540 - 37.
Gauri A, Bhatt R, Pant S, Bedi M, Naglot A. 2011. Characterization of Rhizobium isolated from root nodules ofTrifolium alexandrinum . J. Agric. Technol. 7: 1705-1723 - 38.
Hunter W J, Kuykendall L D, Manter D K. 2007. Rhizobuim selenireducens sp. nov: A selenite reducing- proteobacteria isolated from a bioreactor. Curr. Microbiol. 55: 455-460 - 39.
De Oliveira A N, de Oliveira L A, Andrade J S, Chagas J A F. 2007. Rhizobia amylase production using various starchy substances as carbon substrates. Braz. J. Microbiol. 38: 208-216 - 40.
Aneja K R. 1996. Experiments in Microbiology, Plant Pathology, Tissue Culture and Mushroom Cultivation. 2nd edition, New Age International Publishers, New Delhi, India. pp. 240-249 - 41.
Kumari B S, Ram M R, Mallaiah K V. 2010. Studies on nodulation, biochemical analysis and protein profiles of Rhizobium . Malay J. Microbiol. 6: 133-139 - 42.
Kloepper J W. 1994. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. In: Okon, Y. (Ed.), Azospirillum / Plant Associations. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 111-118 - 43.
Anitha G, Kumudini B S. 2012. Isolation and characterization of fluorescent Pseudomonads and their effect on plant growth promotion. J. Environ. Biol. 29: 627-635 - 44.
Battu P R, Reddy M S. 2009. Isolation of secondary metabolites from Pseudomonas fluorescens and its characterization. Asian J. Res. Chem. 2: 26-29 - 45.
Rodríguez-Cáceres E A. 1982. Improved medium for isolation of Azospirillum spp . App. Environ. Microb. 44: 990-991 - 46.
Garcia de Salamone I E, Döbereiner J, Urquiaga S,Boddey R M. 1996. Biological nitrogen fixation in Azospirillum strain maize genotype associations as evaluated by 15N isotope dilution technique. Biol. Fertil. Soils 23: 249-256 - 47.
Maingi J, Shisanya C, Gitonga M N, Hornetz B. 2001. Nitrogen fixation by common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in pure and mixed stands in semi-arid south-east Kenya. Eur. J. Agron. 14:1-12 - 48.
Anglade J, Billen G, Garnier J. 2015. Relationship for estimating N2-fixation in legumes: Incidence for N balances of legume-based cropping systems in Europe. Ecosph. 6: 1-24 - 49.
Muthini M, Maingi J M, Muoma J O, Amoding A, Mukaminega D, Osoro N. 2014. Morphological assessment and effectiveness of indigenous rhizobia isolates that nodulate P. vulgaris in water hyacinth compost testing field in Lake Victoria basin. Ecosph. 4: 718-738 - 50.
Bala A, Abaidoo R, Woomer P. 2013. Strain isolation and characterization protocol Rhizobia . Annal Microbiol. 64: 209-218 - 51.
Pohajda I, Huić Babić K, Rajnović I, Kajić S, Sikora S. 2016. Genetic diversity and symbiotic efficiency of indigenous common bean rhizobia in Croatia. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54: 468-474 - 52.
Musandu A A O, Ogendo O J. 2001. Response of common bean to Rhizobium inoculation and fertilizers. J. Food Tech. 6: 121-125 - 53.
Asadi-Rahmani H, Rasanen L A, Afshari M, Lindstrom K. 2011. Genetic diversity and symbiotic effectiveness of rhizobia isolated from root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris grown in soil of Iran. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 48: 287-293 - 54.
Deshwal V K, Dubey R C, Maheshwari D K. 2003. Isolation of plant growth promoting strains of Bradyrhizobium (Arachis sp.) with biocontrol potential againstMacrophomina phaseolina causing charcoal rot of peanut. Curr. Sci. 84: 443-448 - 55.
Asadi R H, Afshari M, Khavazi K, Nourgholipour F, Otadi A. 2005. Effects of common bean nodulating rhizobia native to Iranian soils on the yield and quality of bean. Iranian J. Soil Water Sci. 19: 215-225 - 56.
Mnasri B, Elarbi Aouani M, Mhamdi R. 2007. Nodulation and growth of common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) under water deficiency. Soil Biol Biochem. 39: 1744-1750 - 57.
Ndlovu T J. 2015. Effect of Rhizobium phaseoli inoculation and phosphorus application on nodulation, growth and yield components of two Dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris ) cultivars. Mini dissertation Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science in Agriculture (Agronomy) at the University of Limpopo, South Africa - 58.
Rodriguez A, Frioni L. 2003. Characterization of rhizobia causing nodules on leguminous trees native to Uruguay using the rep-PCR technique. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 35: 193-197 - 59.
Das K. 2017. Varietal performance of bush type French bean varieties ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) for growth, fresh pod yield and quality. Thesis Submitted to the Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science - 60.
Meena J K, Ram R B, Meena M L. 2018a. Studies on bio-fertilizers yield and quality traits of French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars under Lucknow condition. J. Pharmaco. Phytochem. 7: 1571-1574 - 61.
Togay N, Togay Y, Mesut K, Turan M. 2008. Effects of rhizobium inoculation, sulfur and phosphorus applications on yield, yield components and nutrient uptakes in chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). Afric. J. Biotechnol. 7: 776-782 - 62.
Yadegari M, Rahmani H A. 2010. Evaluation of bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds inoculation withRhizobium phaseoli and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on yield and yield components. African J. Agril. Res. 5: 792-799 - 63.
Arruda N B D, Dehereiner J, German C N. 1968. Inoculation, N manuring and time pelleting with three soybean varieties. Pesq. Agropec. Brasil. 3: 201-204 - 64.
Figueiredo M V B, Burity H A, Martinez C R, Chanway C P. 2008. Alleviation of water stress effects in common bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) by co-inoculationPaenibacillus x Rhizobium tropici . Appl. Soil Ecol. 40: 182-188 - 65.
Otieno P E, Muthomi J W, Chemining'wa N G, John H N. 2009. Effect of rhizobia inoculation, farmyard manure and nitrogen fertilizer on nodulation and yield of food grain legumes. J. Biol. Sci. 9: 326-332 - 66.
Bambara S, Ndakidemi P A. 2010. Effect of Rhizobium inoculation, lime and molybdenum on nitrogen fixation of nodulatedPhaseolus vulgaris L. African. J Microbiol. Res. 4: 682-696 - 67.
Namvar A, Seyed Sharifi R, Sedghi M, Asghari Zakaria R, Khandan T, Eskandarpour B. 2011. Study on the effects of organic and inorganic nitrogen fertilizer on yield, yield components and nodulation state of chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.). Commun. in Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 42: 1097-1109 - 68.
Meena J K, Ram R B, Meena M L. 2018b. Efficacy of Bio-fertilizers on vegetative characters of French Bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Cultivars. Int J Pure App Biosci. 6:1351-1355 - 69.
Yadav S K. 2019. Development of microbial consortium for enhancing French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity. Thesis submitted to G. B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India - 70.
Aminifard M H, Aroiee H, Karimpour S. 2010. Response of egg plant ( Solanum melongena L.) to different rates of nitrogen under field condition. J. Cent. Eur. Agri. 11: 453-458 - 71.
Salvagiotti F, Daniel T, Dobermann A. 2008. Growth and nitrogen fixation in high-yielding soybean: impact of nitrogen fertilization. Agron. J. 101:958-970 - 72.
Negi S C, Shekhar J. 1993. Response of French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) genotypes to nitrogen. Indian J. Agron. 38: 321-322 - 73.
Dwivedi D K, Singh H, Singh K M, Shahi B, Rai J N. 1994. Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) to population density and nitrogen levels under mid-upland situation in north-east alluvial plains of Bihar. Indian J. Agron. 39: 581-583 - 74.
Kushwaha B L. 1994. Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to nitrogen application in north Indian plains. Indian J. Agron. 39: 34-37 - 75.
Saxena K K, Verma V S. 1995. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on the growth and yield of French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. ). Indian J. Agron. 40: 249-252 - 76.
Singh D P, Rajput A L. 1995. Effect of spacing and nitrogen on yield and economics of French bean. Haryana J. Hort. Sci. 11: 122-127 - 77.
Singh A K, Singh S S. 2000. Effect of planting date, nitrogen and phosphorus levels on yield contributing characters in French bean. Legume Res. 23: 33-36 - 78.
Dhanjal R, Prakash O, Ahlawat I P S. 2001. Response of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) varieties to plant density and nitrogen application. Indian J. Agron. 46:277-281 - 79.
Prajapati M P, Patil L R, Patel B M. 2003. Effect of integrated weed management and nitrogen levels on weeds and productivity of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under north Gujarat conditions. Legume Res. 26: 77-84 - 80.
Veeresh N K. 2003. Response of French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. ) to fertilizer levels in Northern Transitional Zone ofKarnataka. M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis submitted to University of Agricultural Science, Dharwad (India) - 81.
Jagdale R B, Khawale V S, Baviskar P K, Doshinge B B, Kore M S. 2005. Effect of inorganic and organic nutrients on growth and yield of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) . J Soil Crops 15: 401-405 - 82.
Singh R, Singh Y, Singh O N, Sharma S N. 2006. Effect of nitrogen and micronutrients on growth, yield and nutrient uptake by French bean. Indian J. Pulse Res. 19: 67-69 - 83.
Sharma H M, Singh R N P, Singh H, Sharma R P R. 1996. Effect of rates and timings of N application on growth and yield of winter rajmash. Indian J. Pulse Res. 9: 23-25 - 84.
Rajput V, Acharya P, Singh G. 1999. Effect of dates of sowing and graded doses of nitrogen on growth and yield of french bean cv. Contender in eastern U.P. Orissa J. Hort. 27: 39-42 - 85.
Behura A K, Mahapatra P K, Swain D. 2006. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on physiological growth parameters, yield and yield attributes of rajmash (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) . Res. on crops 7: 92-95 - 86.
Escalante A, Rodriguez M T, Escalante E. 1993. Effect of nitrogen on development and abscission of reproductive organs of beans. Agron Mesoameric. 10: 47- 53 - 87.
Cechin I, Fumis T F. 2004. Effect of nitrogen supply on growth and photosynthesis of sunflower plants grown in the greenhouse. Plant Sci. 166: 1379-1385 - 88.
Hegde D M, Srinivas K. 1989. Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on growth, yield and water use of French bean. Indian J. Agron. 34: 180-184 - 89.
Rana N S, Singh R. 1998. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth and yield of French bean ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. ). Indian J. Agron. 43: 367-370 - 90.
Namvar F, Mohamad R, Rahman H S. 2013. Antioxidant, antiproliferative and antiangiogenesis effects of polyphenol-rich seaweed ( Sargassum muticum ). Bio Med Res. Intern. 10:1- 10 - 91.
Ralcewicz M, Knapowski T, Kozera W,Barczak B. 2009. Technological value of ‘Zebra’ spring wheat depending on the nitrogen and magnesium application method. J. Central Eur. Agri. 10: 223-232 - 92.
Waraich E A, Ahmad R, Ashraf M Y. 2011. Role of mineral nutrition in alleviation of drought stress in plants. Australian J. Crop Sci. 5: 764-777 - 93.
Ashraf M A, Asif M, Zaheer A, Malik A, Ali Q, Rasool M. 2001. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and sustainable agriculture. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 7: 704-709 - 94.
Yoseph T, Shanko S. 2017. Growth, symbiotic and yield response of N-fertilized and Rhizobium inoculated common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Afric. J. Plant Sci. 11: 197-202 - 95.
Omoregie A U, Okpefa G O. 1999. Effects of time of application of nitrogen on nodulation, dry matter and mineral nutrition of cowpea Vigna unguiculata L. (Walp) in the Delta area of Nigeria. Nigerian Agril J. 30: 32-40 - 96.
Kucuk C, Kivanc M, Kinaci E. 2006. Characterization of Rhizobium sp. isolated from Bean. Turky J. Biol. 30: 127-132 - 97.
Appunu C, Sen D, Singh M K, Dhar B. 2008. Variation in symbiotic performance of Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains and soybean cultivars under field conditions. J. Eur. Cent. Agr. 9: 185-190 - 98.
Sajid M., Rab A, Hussain S A, Iqbal Z. 2011. Influence of rhizobium inoculation on growth and yield of groundnut cultivars. Sarhad J. Agric. 27: 573-576 - 99.
Higa T. 1994. Effective microorganisms: A new dimension for nature Farming. p. 20-22. In: Parr JF, Hornick SB and Simpson ME (Eds), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Kyusei Nature Farming. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA - 100.
Halverson L J, Handelsman J. 1991. Enhancement of soybean nodulation by Bacillus cereus UW85 in the field and in a growth chamber. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 57: 2767-2770 - 101.
Lifshitz R, Kloepper J W, Kozlowski M. 1987. Growth promotion of canola seedlings by a strain of Pseudomonas putida under gnobiotic condition. Can. J. Microbiol. 33: 390-395 - 102.
Sessitsch A, Coenye T, Sturz AV, Glick B R, Nowak J. 2005. Burkholderia phytofirmins sp Nov., a novel plant-associated bacterium with plant beneficial properties. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55: 1187-1192 - 103.
Karakurt H, Kotan R, Dadasoglu F, Sahin F. 2011. Effects of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on fruit set, pomological and chemical characteristics, colour values and vegetative growth of sour cherry ( Prunus cerasus ). Turky J. Biol. 35: 283-291 - 104.
Stefan M, Dunca Z, Olteanu L, Cojocaru D. 2010. Soybea ( Glycine max L.) inoculation withBacillus pumilus promotes plant growth and increases seed protein yield: relevance for environmentally-friendly agricultural applications. Carpathian J. Earth Environ. Sci. 5: 131-138 - 105.
Arora N K., Tewari S, Singh R. 2013. Multifaceted plant-associated microbes and their mechanisms diminish the concept of direct and indirect PGPRs In: Arora NK (ed.) Plant Microbe Symbiosis: Fundamentals and Advances. Springer, 411-449 - 106.
Nuruzzaman M, Lambers H, Michael D A, Veneklaas E J. 2006. Distribution of carboxylates and acid phosphatase and depletion of different phosphorus fractions in the rhizosphere of a cereal and three grain legumes. Plant Soil 281:109-120 - 107.
Tadano T, Ozawa K, Sakai H, Osaki M, Matsui H. 1993. Secretion of acid phosphatase by the roots of crop plants under phosphorus-deficient conditions and some properties of the enzyme secreted by lupin roots. Plant Soil 155: 95-98 - 108.
Trolove S N, Hedley A D, Kirk C, Loganathan P. 2003. A progress in selected areas of rhizosphere research on P acquisition. Aust. J. Soil Res. 41: 471-499 - 109.
Dashti N, Zhang F, Hynes R, Smith D I. 1997. Application of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria to soybean ( Glycine max L.) increases protein and dry matter yield under short-season conditions. Plant Soil 188: 33-41 - 110.
Samavat S, Ahmadzadeh M, Behboudi K, Besharati H. 2013. Comparing the Ability of Rhizobium andPseudomonas isolates in controlling bean damping-offcaused byRhizoctonia solani Kuhn. J. Biol. 3: 1-12 - 111.
Lucas Guarcia J A, Probanza A, Ramos B, Barriuso J, Gutierrez M. 2004. Effects of inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and Sinorhizobium fredii on biological nitrogen fixation, nodulation and growth ofGlycine max cv.Osumi . Plant Soil 267: 143-153 - 112.
Bashan Y, Harrison S K, Whitmoyer R E. 1990. Enhanced growth of wheat and soybean plants inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense is not necessarily due to general enhancement of mineral uptake. Appl. Environ. Microb.56: 769-775 - 113.
Mishra P K, Mishra G, Selvakumar S C, Bisht J K, Kundu S, Gupta S. 2008. Characterization of psychrotolerant plant growth promoting Pseudomonas sp. Strain PGERs 17 (MTCC 9000) isolated from North Western Indian Himalayas. Ann Microbiol. 58: 561-568