Open access peer-reviewed chapter - ONLINE FIRST

Pathogenicity Mechanism of Candida albicans

By Snigdha Pattnaik, Laxmidhar Maharana and Manoj Sethi

Submitted: November 17th 2020Reviewed: July 30th 2021Published: September 5th 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99737

Downloaded: 37


In normal human microbiome, the polymorphic fungus Candida albicans is a crucial member. C. albicans resides mostly in individual as harmless commensal life. In specific situations, however, C. albicans can cause diseases that cause contaminations of the skin to life-threatening fundamental contaminations. Pathogenesis of Candida species is contributed by multiple factors. Some of the major contributors are enlisted here. These include host pathogen interaction, receptors molecule like TLR recognition, TLR signaling, C type lectin receptors, Dectin 1,2 and 3, mannose receptor, mincle, DC sign, Nod-Like Receptors (NLRs) and inflammasomes, soluble molecules in candida recognition, cellular responses to candida such as neutrophils, macrophages. This chapter enlightens all the components of candida pathogenicity by the assessment of Candida species pathogenic determinants. All together these will explain the current knowledge about how these determinant factors and receptors modulate virulence as well as consequent infection. Better understanding of candida pathogenicity mechanism can be the resultant of better treatment guidelines along with development of novel antifungal agents. Overall, in this review we present an update in the current understanding of the insight of pathogenicity mechanisms in this important human pathogen.


  • Pathogenicity
  • C. albicans
  • TLR
  • receptor
  • lectin

1. Introduction

Candida is a diploid parasite that as often as possible causes mucosal and fundamental contaminations in people [1]. Candida species can colonize a few particular anatomical locales. Greater part of diseases by commensal microorganisms comes from endogenous colonization. Notwithstanding, exogenous pollution, for example, diseases communicated through emergency clinic workers, medical clinic air, and biofilm-debased intrusive gadgets like catheters, can likewise happen [2, 3, 4]. Diseases brought about by Candida can be delegated shallow, cutaneous, mucosal, and fundamental infection. At the point when Candida spp. taint the oral cavity, skin, genitalia, respiratory framework, and the remainder of the gastrointestinal lot, the disease is delegated the shallow sort. Intrusive candidiasis is a disease portrayed with very extreme conditions, for example, candidemia, meningitis (influencing the mind), and endocarditis (influencing the heart) [5]. In hospitalized patients and those with bedraggled safe framework, intrusive contamination is a huge reason for dismalness and mortality along with increased frequency as well as pervasiveness rates.

Candida species pathogenesis is a complex cycle including numerous instruments and pathways. It is likewise a mind boggling and multifactorial system, including highlights of both the host and the microorganism [6]. For contamination to be set up, the pioneering microorganism should avoid, duplicate in the host climate, and make do in the safe arrangement of the host. The living being must likewise have the option to scatter to other body tissues and organs, most particularly in foundational disease [7]. Problem in skin or gastrointestinal boundaries can prompt dispersed or profound organ candidiasis. In more significant circumstances, circulatory system intrusion may some time possible which hence will disperse to various organs of the body.

Candida contaminations in a great many people are asymptomatic. This is because of the capacity of the immunological framework to checkmate the life form as it endeavors to spread in the body. In any case, consumption in resistant systemor changes in microbiota balance, combined with different elements, can work with the spread of Candida which is regularly deadly in 42% of announced cases [8, 9, 10]. C. albicansis answerable for about half of candidiasis and non-albicans Candida species are liable for the rest of the Candida contamination. Disease brought about by several other species of candida are of extraordinary concern. A portion of these non-albicans Candida species are presently viewed as arising artful microbes [11]. Forestalling Candida contaminations for the most part brought about by Candida species is a developing test in human medication. Indeed, even with the accessibility and utilization of antifungal prescription, scattered candidiasis is went with high death rate (around 40–60%), helpless conclusion, and unseemly illness the board. The overall clinical show of the patient likewise adds to the expansion in death rate. Protection from antifungal medications is not, at this point another issue. Indeed, even among people that have not been presented to anti-infection agents, obstruction has been accounted for [12]. Candida is one of the main sources of mucosal contaminations in sound people for now days. It additionally causes initial diseases particularly in immunosuppressive patients, regardless of its status as a commensal microorganism [13]. Truth be told, candidiasis is viewed as the third to fourth most regular infection in medical care offices inside the USA and even all around the world [14].

As anyone might expect, it is the destructiveness and pathogenic qualities and components that have gotten the most consideration from specialists throughout the long term. As of late, much have been found out about the components of Candida pathogenesis. Studies have shown that at the core of the capacity of Candida to multiply, change from non-destructiveness commensal to pioneering pathogenic organism and build up disease in the host lie profoundly interconnected elements made out of transcriptional circuits, morphology-related/harmfulness encoding qualities, metabolic versatility, genome pliancy, phenotypic exchanging, biofilm arrangement, tissue harming extracellular hydrolytic catalysts, and a few different variables that work with destructiveness and pathogenesis in Candida species [15]. Changes in ecological pH, vigorous supplement procurement framework, escape from phagocytosis, avoidance from have insusceptible framework, have microbiome coaggregation, protection from antifungal specialists, and the capacity to productively react to numerous anxieties are other crucial characteristics that upgrade endurance and pathogenesis.

In order to be capable of inducing such a diversity of infections C. albicanscan live in several anatomically discrete sites and translates several virulence factors. The phenomenon of phenotypic converting from yeast- to filament-growth is just one, but critical, factor that contributes to the virulence of C. albicans. It offers a basis for activating different receptors leading to diverse immune responses. Other virulence factors of C. albicanscontain adhesion factors, thigmotropism and secretion of several hydrolytic enzymes, such as lipase, phospholipase, and proteinase. During the past few years it has become increasingly clear that PRRs are vital for the host response to C. albicans, with various TLRs and LRs having distinctive roles in innate immunity. Each ligand–receptor system activates specific intracellular signaling pathways, which in turn leads to modulation of various components of the host immune response. While a few receptors, like TLR4, dectin 1 and the MR, apply an all the more favorable to fiery job, others employ immunosuppressive impacts (for instance, TLR2, CR3 and FcγR). After disclosure and characterized clarification of the part of TLRs in parasitic acknowledgment, further investigations have explained the job of the C-type lectin receptors with an emphasis basically on dectin-1 and dectin-2. The presence of various relationships among all of the components that guide the establishment of pollutions is an undeniable component in the pathogenesis of Candida species. This chapter is precisely based on the mechanisms of Candida pathogenesis with emphasis on the virulence factors mostly the important receptors and pathogenic determinants.


2. Pathogenicity mechanism of Candida species

2.1 Infection

The pathogenicity of C. albicansis identified with its change between the commensal yeast structure and the obtrusive hyphal shape [16]. Upon have cell connection, thigmotropism (contact detecting) triggers C. albicansfilamentation. This allows the creature to infiltrate further into the host tissues through extracellular compound emission [17]. The capacity of Candida to change over from yeast to hyphae stage or hyphae to yeast stage is named dimorphism. Every one of these periods of development is crucial for harmfulness and pathogenicity as it impacts how Candida gets away from the resistant framework. Yeast and fiber (hyphae) structures assume autonomous parts during scattered candidiasis. While the yeast structures engaged with scattering, the hyphal (filamentous) structure is associated with tissue intrusion and pathogenesis [18]. Candida species should have the option to adequately colonize its host and moreover adjust to assortments of unessential requirements like temperature, oxygen, pH, carbon dioxide, and diverse negative organic conditions, for example, carbon source, supplement accessibility, the immunological framework, and other existing together bacterial and contagious cells inside the specialty [19, 20]. Positive reaction to those imperatives has a quick impact in transformation and advancement of Candida harmfulness and pathogenicity. Before receptor-intervened epithelial acknowledgment by Candida species, a few flagging pathways are actuated. Temperature change, supplement starvation, oxidative pressure, osmotic pressure, and pH detecting trigger mitogen-enacted protein kinase, pathways based on CAMP, transduction of Rim-101, along with surprisingly hereditary mechanisms that constantly instigate numerous qualities. Most of the induced characteristics are connected with filamentous turn of events and biofilm plan. While assorted hereditary pathways transduce shifts from yeast to hyphae or hyphae to yeast stage, distinctive ecological signals emphatically and contrarily regulate morphology-related cell surface exchanging [21]. The flagging and variation pathways assume pivotal parts in different physiological and cell measures engaged with the Candida species pathogenicity as demonstrated in Table 1.

1Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathwaysImportant regulator of morphogenesis.[22, 23]
Involved in sensing and transmitting stress signals and other environmental signals
Three main MAP kinase pathways are the following:
  1. Mkc1- controls cellular integrity, invasive growth, cell wall biogenesis, and formation of biofilm

  2. Hog1- mediates response to thermal, osmotic, and oxidative stress. Controls cell wall formationand morphogenesis. Under osmotic stress, its activation leads to glycerol accumulation.

  3. Cek1- it mediates mating and hyphae formation and is also involved in adaptation to boththermal and nutrient stresses.

2Ras-CAMP-PKA pathwaysRegulate adhesion, dimorphism. Also involved in the formation of biofilms.[23, 25, 26]
Control hyphal formation and white-to-opaque change[27, 28]
Involved in drug tolerance and in the maintenance of cell wall integrity
3RIM 101 signal transductionEnables Candida albicansto sense pH changes, thus mediate pH-dependent responses[29]
4Stress response pathwaysContribute to virulence and pathogenesis
Facilitate adaptation to ever-changing environmental conditions.
Protect against host-derived stresses
5Ergosterol biosynthetic pathwaysLink between hyphae formation and virulence in C. albicans[31]
Enhance cell adhesion and damage to the tissues[32]
ERG3 and ERG11 play major roles in azole drug resistance; thus, it is the target of fluconazoleantifungals
6Genome plasticityTriggers adaptation to fluctuating host environment.
Leads to the generation of recombinant progeny with increased fitness.
Induces natural mutations that alter the balance between commensalism and pathogenicity.
[33, 34]
Facilitates resistance to stressors including antifungal agents and pathogenicity during systemic and mucosal infections[35]
Triggers polarized filamentous growth
Involved in the generation/evolution of new pathotypes or strains
Enhances the utilization of several nutrients.
Facilitates Candida growth rate, as well as its morphology and behaviors at the host interface
7Calcium-calcineurin pathwaysMajor mediator of stress responses[36]
Essential for survival in the presence of stressors[37]
Play crucial roles in virulence[38, 39]

Table 1.

Major pathogenicity inducing pathways/responses in Candida species.

The greater part of the flagging pathways are amazingly fundamental for protecting Candida spp. against immunological assault [40]. They assume different parts in the declaration of morphology related qualities. The co-articulation of morphology-connected proteins brings about synergistic association among quality items fundamental for biofilm foundation and development inside the host [41]. Along these lines, for hindering Candida endurance in have tissues, impedance with Candida species capacity to incorporate quality articulation to changes in morphology could be surely a potential restorative technique [42]. Also, distinguishing flagging segments saved among Candida species is vital for recognizing potential medication targets. During the interaction of pathogenesis, actuated endocytosis happens. It for the most part happens inside 4 h of starting contact to epithelial cell. Candida uses prompted endocytosis to sidestep invulnerable acknowledgment. The acknowledgment of invasins communicated on the contagious cell surface triggers prompted endocytosis. Until this point, only A1s3p and Ssa1p (invasins) are known for C. albicans. In a murine model of oropharyngeal candidiasis revealed by Sun et al., Als3 and Ssa1 freaks displayed diminished grip and intrusion of cells of epithelium [43]. Free of the cellular receptor of epithelium, instigated endocytosis can likewise happen. This is conceivable through the association of the host epithelial cell epidermal development factor receptor with the invasins of candida cell. Post actuated endocytosis, discharged harmfulness factors by pathogens to improve capacity to enter to surface of mucosa. The oral and vaginal mucosa, which are terminally separated and non-proliferative, are made out of delineated layers more averse to work with intrusion of parasites by means of initiated endocytosis. Candida species should use an elective course to attack a tissue less inclined to help disguise in a cycle called dynamic infiltration. Dynamic infiltration interceded through hyphae augmentation (constrained by Ume6 and Eed1) is a contagious actuated cycle that needs reasonable parasitic hyphae [44]. Actual powers, attachment, and hydrolytic chemicals like SAP additionally assume a part. C. albicansuses dynamic entrance as the underlying way to attack the furthest layers of the epithelium in vivo. Be that as it may, prompted endocytosis could likewise be obvious of additional upgraded attack once the fundamental proliferative layers of the epithelium have been gotten to by the growth. Along these lines, both dynamic infiltration and initiated endocytosis are unthinkingly noticeable systems required for disease foundation through mucosal boundaries in vivo. When all is said in done, the pathogenesis of Candida begins with colonization, shallow disease, and profound situated contamination before spread contamination. The overall strides in tissue intrusion by C. albicansincorporate in the following stages.

  1. Adhesion to the cellular epithelium.

  2. Colonization.

  3. Penetration to epithelium/hyphal invasion.

  4. Dissemination of vasculature.

  5. Endothelial colonization/penetration.

Systemic candida infection only occurs by immune system escape than vasculature penetration and invading the blood components. Entry to the bloodstream occurs via two routes:

  1. Natural routes.

  2. Artificial routes.

Above subsequent course is worked with biofilm arrangement as pathogens can get away and invade the blood. For Candida to endure and spread in the blood, various qualities are upregulated: qualities engaged with protein amalgamation, glycolytic cycle, glycolysis, and reaction to oxidative pressure. The presence of Candida in the blood prompts a condition called candidemia. From the blood, the yeast is dispersed to different fundamental organs in the body where it causes foundational contaminations. Dispersed candidiasis is profoundly worked with by extracellular hydrolytic compounds, adhesins, phenotypic exchanging, and cytolytic proteins. Candida in the blood can likewise bring about candiduria by antegrade contamination. Albeit most diseases include biofilm arrangement, a few contaminations can happen without the development of biofilm. Indeed, hyphae development and development are the beginning stages in the pathogenicity of Candida species, with the exception of C. glabratathat does not shape hyphae. It is notable that few qualities straightforwardly or by implication incited by natural irritations trigger hyphae arrangement.

Notwithstanding, questions actually remain with respect to the instruments controlling its union, the receptors, and its carrier. In outline, the exchanging of Candida spp. from commensal to artful microbe is ascribed to destructiveness factors that are specifically communicated under reasonable inclining conditions. The majority of these destructiveness factors are under close guideline. More examinations in their administrative instruments could be fundamental in the mission for new antifungal specialists. Figure 1 is the significant organization of Candida destructiveness and pathogenesis showing the associations between the different pathogenic determinants and harmful variables.

Figure 1.

Simplified diagram illustrating the network of Candida virulence and pathogenicity. (1) planktonic yeast cells attach to surfaces. Favorable conditions facilitate overgrowth; adherence (2): The cells attach to host cells via adhesins; hyphae formation/extension (3): Environmental constrains induce the HSPs, signaling and adaptation pathways which induce morphology-associated genes. The formation of the hyphae marks the beginning of Candida pathogenesis. Epithelial/endothelial adhesion/invasion (4 and 6): This is facilitated by hydrolytic enzymes and it is achieved via two ways: Induced endocytosis and active penetration. Some species such asC. glabratado not form hyphae; rather, they form biofilms (5) prior to the establishment of infection. Destruction of epithelial and mucosal surfaces by the enzymes and cytolytic proteins gives rise to different types of candidiasis (8). Yeast cells can enter the blood (7) and then disseminate to the vital organs where they establish new biofilms. Infections associated with biofilms are of great clinical significance. Major Candida infections include vulvovaginal, oropharyngeal, and gastrointestinal candidiasis, candidemia, candiduria, and intra-abdominal candidiasis. Key: Dashed lines: Signals and inductions; single-headed thick dark red arrow: Major route of Candida pathogenesis; curved double-arrow connector: Interaction/association between factors; T-shaped thin red line: Inhibitory signal. The pool of virulence encoding genes house both the genes involved in hyphae and biofilm formation and other vital processes crucial for pathogenesis.

2.2 Host response to Candida species

Host insusceptible acknowledgment of Candida happens through a few instruments involving intrinsic and versatile insusceptibility. The versatile insusceptible framework perceives explicit antigenic moieties, prompting the advancement of a focused on safe reaction. Interestingly, inborn insusceptible acknowledgment is vague and wide and is the primary line of host protection against possibly hazardous organisms. These vague reactions are promptly endless supply of an organism in a pre-modified design and assume a fundamental part in controlling contagious weights and forestalling infection. Natural invulnerability includes a progression of dissolvable (supplement) and cell (neutrophil, macrophage) parts that act in show to keep by far most of microbes from setting up an intrusive disease. Further, it has become progressively clear that these reactions capacity to enact versatile insusceptibility just as acting along with other homeostatic cycles to give further security. Natural invulnerable acknowledgment of Candida happens through the acknowledgment of microorganism related atomic examples (PAMPs).

PAMPs are themes or particles that are regular between various sorts of growths. In contrast to antigens, individual PAMPs are not explicit to a solitary Candida animal variety but instead are divided among various species and contagious genera. These microbial PAMPs are perceived by have germline encoded design acknowledgment receptors (PRRs) [45] and give a pre-customized method of parasitic acknowledgment, taking into consideration moment acknowledgment of normal contagious parts. Most of contagious PAMPs are cell divider related and incorporate 𝛽-glucans, 𝑁-and 𝑂-connected mannans, and phospholipomannans [46]. These are perceived by three key PRR families: cost like receptors (TLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), and nucleotide-restricting area leucine-rich receptors (NLRs) [46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52]. Dendritic cells, monocytes, macrophages, polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), Tcells, Bcells, and epithelial cells all transmit PRRs on a surface level, in endosomes or in the cytoplasm of host cells. Sanctioning of these PRRs by PAMPs prompts setting off of intracellular hailing pathways, as MAPK (mitogen-started protein kinase) and NF-𝜅B (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of incited B cells) pathways, and finally to further developed record of countless characteristics drew in with have safe protections, including chemokines, cytokines, provocative center individuals, and antimicrobial peptides. Appropriately, PRRs are fundamental center individuals among intrinsic and adaptable safe responses.

3. Receptor molecules in Candida recognition

While comparing the human genome with murine genome; human genome encodes for ten TLR characteristics (TLR1–10) and murine genome encodes 12 i.e. TLR1 to TLR9 and TLR11 to TLR13. Each TLRs depicted as transmembrane type-1receptors having an enriched lucine extracellularly intermittent region which sees target PAMP and a Toll/interleukin-1 receptor-(TIR-) space containing cytoplasmic region that imparts the institution stimuli, which having closeness to the sort 1 interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor. TLR family is a developmentally monitored gathering of PRRs that react to an assortment of bacterial, viral, and contagious PAMPs just as some endogenous components delivered when have cells are harmed. The extracellular areas of TLRs perceive an assortment of microbial PAMPs, including lipopolysaccharide (LPS), peptidoglycan, proteins (counting triacylated proteins and flagellin), and changed nucleic acids [53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58].

3.1 Toll like receptors

3.1.1 TLR recognition of Candida

Key part for TLRs in host protection against fungal infection was initially identified when Drosophila inadequate in Toll receptor were seen to profoundly helpless to A. fumigatus disease [59]. Therefore by far most of the underlying antifungal insusceptibility research focused on how contagious cells were perceived. This provoked the distinctive verification of a couple of PRRs related with affirmation of different cell divider polysaccharides of parasites and C. albicansexplicitly, including TLR2 (phospholipomannan), TLR4 (𝑂-associated mannan), and mannose receptor (MR) (𝑁-associated mannan) [46, 48, 60].

At last, these investigations finished in the disclosure of another PRR, dectin-1 (dendritic cell associated C-type lectin-1), who perceives parasitic 𝛽-1,3 glucan [61]. Outstandingly, these parasitic PRRs can work both freely and related to each other. For instance, dectin-1 and TLR2 act additionally to perceive contagious yeasts, with dectin-1 prompting phagocytosis while TLR2 initiates cytokine creation [62, 63, 64]. Dectin-1 likewise synergises with TLR4 flagging [64]. Moreover, TLR1 and TLR6 structure heterodimers with TLR2 [65] however do not seem to assume a significant part in C. albicansacknowledgment in a mouse model of intrusive candidiasis [66]. Obviously depending upon the coreceptor included, coligation of TLR2 may either update TLR2-subordinate responses [67] or change its PAMPs distinction concerning the circumstance with galectin-3 [68].

Even so these are standard receptors utilized by macrophages and neutrophils to see C. albicans, various receptors have moreover been perceived inclusive of dectin-2 [69], mincle (macrophage inducible CTL) [70], Dendritic cell specific intercellular grasp particle 3- getting nonintegrin (DC-SIGN ) [71, 72], and galectin-3 [68]. The piece of these PRRs is correct now not totally settled; regardless, dectin-2 and DC-SIGN are perceived to assume a significant part in the acknowledgment of high mannose structures [73] and galectin-3 in the acknowledgment of 𝛽-1,2 mannosides [68].

Curiously, galectin-3 coimmunoprecipitates accompanied by dectin-1 [74], which recommends that galectin-3 can work with associations among TLR2 and dectin-1 flagging. TLR acknowledgment of other medicinally significant growths have likewise been concentrated yet are less very much described, despite the fact that apparently TLR3 perceives A. fumigatus conidia and TLR4 perceives Cryptococcus neoformansglucuronoxylomannan, with TLR9 perceiving A. fumigatus, C. albicansand C. neoformans[75].

3.1.2 TLR signaling

PAMP acknowledgment of TLRs brings about enactment of flagging cascade intracellularly (Figure 2) through connection of the cytoplasmic TIR spaces with various connector proteins: myeloid separation essential reaction quality (88) (MyD88), MyD88-connector like (MAL), TIR-area containing connector initiating interferon-𝛽 (TRIF), and TRIF-related connector atom (TRAM) [53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 76, 77, 78, 79]. This TLR-adapter interaction ends up in the activation of the IRAK ( IL-I receptor associated kinase) proteins and TRAF6 (TNF receptor associated factor-6). As a result it ends up in activation of the main signaling pathways together with NF-𝜅B, MAPK, and IRF (interferon regulative factor) pathways. MAPK activation contains 3 alleyways: p38, JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinase), and ERKI/2 (extracellular signal-regulated kinaseI/2). Finally, signaling pathway induction ends up in the activation and nuclear localisation of transcription factors as well as NF-𝜅B, AP-I (activating macromolecule I), and IRF-3 and IRF-7. the result of this activation cascade is to induce organic phenomenon and secretion of varied proteins concerned in immune defense as well as cytokines, chemokines, antimicrobial peptides, and alternative inflammatory mediators, all of that operate to stimulate innate and reconciling responses of immune system. It thought to be noted that the overwhelming majority of studies shaping the TLR-mediated pathways are performed victimization myeloid or humor cells, however elaborated analysis of TLR- mediated pathways in alternative cell varieties, and specifically animal tissue cells, could nonetheless establish novel and strange mechanisms of infectious agent (fungal) recognition and management at membrane surfaces.

Figure 2.

Signal pathway activation by TLRs and CLRs. TLRs and CLRs activate MAPK and NF-𝜅B signal pathways to varying extents, thereby allowing different innate immune responses to be generated. TLRs utilize TIR-domain containing adapter proteins such as MyD88, mal, TRAM, and TRIF. CLRs signal using ITAM domains within their cytoplasmic region (e.g., dectin-1) or associate with an ITAM-containing transducing protein (e.g., dectin-2 with FcR𝛾). Dectin-1 utilizes Src kinases and Syk kinase to activate a complex containing CARD9, MALT1, and Bcl1o to activate the downstream signal pathways. Figure adapted from [47].

3.1.3 Role of TLRs during Candida infection

Although animals missing the TLR signaling adaptor protein MyD88 are vulnerable to fungal infection [46, 80, 81, 82], the exact role of particular TLR receptors in fighting Candida infections is unclear. This is most likely because of contrasts in examination plan, where diverse contagious species, morphotypes, and courses of contamination have been surveyed [52]. Thusly, contemplates utilizing TLR knockout mice have uncovered critical contrasts in the putative jobs of various TLRs in fundamental or mucosal insusceptible reactions against contagious contaminations [83]. For instance, while a few examinations demonstrate that TLR2 and TLR4 impact vulnerability to murine scattered candidiasis [82, 84, 85, 86], not all investigations support this attestation [87, 88]. TLR7 might be needed for parasitic RNA acknowledgment in the autophagosome, which is needed for IFN-𝛽 discharge and is related with delayed C. glabratacontamination [89]. TLR9 perceives C. albicansDNA (unmethylated CpG arrangements) bringing about cytokine creation in dendritic cells [90]; notwithstanding, TLR9 knockout mice do not seem, by all accounts, to be more helpless to C. albicanscontamination, notwithstanding delivering diminished degrees of IL-I2 and expanded measures of IL-4 and IL-I0 [82, 90, 91, 92]. Outstandingly, explicit TLRs (TLR2, TLR4, TLR6, and TLR9) seem to hold various jobs relying upon which arm of the inborn invulnerable reaction they draw in with, for instance, advancement of versatile reactions by working with antigen show in dendritic cells [93].

A few examinations have related normal hereditary variations (polymorphisms) in TLR qualities with vulnerability or inclination to foundational candidiasis or constant mucocutaneous candidiasis (CMC). These recollect polymorphisms for TLRI (R80T , N248S , and S602I) [94, 95] and TLR3 (L4I2F) [96, 97]. Polymorphisms in TLR4 (D299G) and TLR2 (D753Q) have moreover been perceived as possible frailty markers for basic candidiasis [98] yet these could not be approved in a greater report [95]. As of now, a large portion of the information accessible recommends a solid part for TLRs in antifungal protection however recognizing explicit jobs for each TLR has been over shadowed by repetitive signs instigated by other PRRs [94].

3.2 C-type lectin receptors

CLRs (C-type lectin receptors) are a diverse restriction protein family defined by the presence of an extracellular carb acknowledgment space (CRD) or a C-type lectin like area (CTLD) [99]. The job of CLRs in antifungal insusceptibility has been the subject of serious investigation as of late and a few key CLRs have now been shown to show basic capacities in Candida acknowledgment, take-up, and executing and furthermore add to the commencement and additionally tweak of the resistant reaction to organisms [46, 100, 101]. By and by, the key CTLs in Candida affirmation appear, apparently, to be dectin-I, dectin-2, and MR. CLRs signal through incitation of ITAM/ITIM (immunoreceptor tyrosine-based actuation/restraint theme) cytoplasmic areas (Figure 3). This can be done by using their own cytoplasmic area, as dectin-I does, or by using coreceptor cytoplasmic spaces, as DAPI2 (DNAX actuation protein of I2 kDa) and FcR (Fc receptor gamma chain) do, as dectin-2 does. The activation of numerous connections to those activated by TLRs, most notably Src family kinases including Src, Lyn, and Fyn, is triggered when CLRs are ligated. If we talk about dectin-I , it prompts initiation of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) and the downstream actuation of the CARD9/BclI0/MALTI (caspase enlistment space family/B cell CLL-lymphoma I0/mucosa related lymphoid tissue lymphoma movement quality I) flagging complex. Independent of the CLR pathways and connectors utilized, a definitive outcome is the enactment of comparative flagging pathways as those initiated by TLRs, overwhelmingly NF-𝜅B and MAPK, that are discussed below point.

Figure 3.

Signaling and damage pathways activated by C. albicanshyphae. C. albicanshyphal cells, when in sufficient quantities, are recognized by an unknown PRR mechanism that results in the activation of NF-𝜅B, MAPK, and PI3K pathways. MAPK signaling via p38 and ERK1/2 appears to discriminate between yeast and hyphal cells. Activation of p38 by hyphae leads to activation of the c-Fos transcription factor, which, in conjunction with the p65/p50 NF-𝜅B heterodimers and PI3K/AKT results in upregulation of cytokine and inflammatory mediator expression. Concurrently, activation of ERK1/2 signaling, results in stabilization of the MKP1 phosphatase, which deactivates p38 and JNK, hence acting as part of a negative feedback loop and preventing a potentially deleterious overreaction of theimmune system. Damage induced by hyphae appears to be mediated via JNK activation and prevented via the PI3K/AKT/mTor pathway.

3.2.1 Dectin-I

Dectin-I, (also called CLEC7a) is that the main CLR known as taking part in a serious role in fungous recognition by the host system [102] and may be a sort II transmembrane macromolecule that belongs to a subgroup of CLRs referred to as natural killer (NK) receptor-like CLRs. The target ligands of dectin-I are 𝛽-I,3 glucan polymers, that comprise a serious part (∼60%) of fungous cell walls. The intracellular region of dectin-I contains a changed ITAM motif containing one amino acid residue rather than the standard 2 (hence the terms hem-ITAM or hemi- ITAM). Activation of the dectin-I results in phosphorylation of this domain and phosphorylation of SYK and activation of the BclI0- CARD9-MALTI complicated as mentioned on top of. This results in activation of each the canonical and noncanonical NF-𝜅B pathways [103] further as nuclear issue of activated T cells (NFAT) pathway [104]. Dectin-I can even induce signaling via Raf-I in an exceedingly SYK -dependent fashion [103] and is related to phospholipase C and A2 activation [50]. one in all the most important functions of dectin-I binding seems to be the induction of bodily process [105]. However, a singular feature of dectin-I is its ability to be activated or suppressed by its target matter. to completely activate dectin-I, cells got to be exposed to insoluble 𝛽-glucan particles. Notably, exposure of dectin-I to soluble 𝛽-glucan seems to dam activation. This appears to ensue to the apparent form type a vegetative cell conjunction,“whereby phosphatases that usually suppress ITAM motifs are accumulated. This exclusion later permits the phosphorylation of the intracellular hem-ITAM motif [106], thereby sanctioning bodily process. Dectin-I has additionally been shown to synergise with each TLR2 and TLR4, leading to the induction of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), IL-I0, transforming growth factor (TGF) and dendritic cell maturation [107, 108, 109]. In view of the fact that the 𝛽 - I,3 glucan polymers that are the main components of the fungal cell wall, and a strong activation of the immune system, dectin-I plays an important role in inducing antifungal activity of the host. This may also explain why some of the mold surface structure of “the mask” -I.3 glucan from the immune system. For example, Histoplasma capsulatum, masks are 𝛽-I,3 glucan, with a low - 𝛼-I,3 glucan [110] and it seems likely that the C. albicanshyphae of 𝛽-I,3 glucan has been covered over by layers of 𝑁 - 𝑂 - linked mannoproteins in order to prevent the discovery of the dectin-I. However, the yeast is in the form of C. albicans, while 𝑁 - 𝑂 - linked mannoproteins present in the underlying 𝛽 -glucan layer is exposed in the developing gut, which dectin-I in order to be recognized. Thus, it could be concluded that the most important role of dectin-I in the control of the yeast form of candidiasis (thrush). In addition, 𝛽 - glucan, which has been in the hyphal cell wall of C. albicans, it seems to be structurally different from the yeast 𝛽 - glucan [111] and, therefore, may not be immune to or understood by the dectin-I.

Although some studies have shown that the expression of dectin-I in the epithelial cells of the gastro- intestinal tract [112], and lung [113, 114], in oral epithelial cells express dectin-1 [115, 116]. What’s interesting is that dectin-I expression appears to be reduced in the presence of live C. albicanscells [116], and it is not affected by the dectin-I ligands [115, 117]. This suggests that dectin-I is likely to play only a minor role in the detection of C. albicansepithelial cells. Studies carried out with the help of dectin-I knockout mice have provided mixed data sets for the C. albicanssystemic infection models, to demonstrate these differences, [118] and increased mortality [119] depending on the study, the C. albicansstrain used. On the one hand, it is the work for the dectin-I is supported by the consideration that CARD9 knockout mice are susceptible to the most important infection [120] and in patients with head-and-CARD9 immunity and are particularly vulnerable to both the lining and the main foundation candidiasis [121]. In addition, another study, it has been the study of the normal function of the genetic polymorphism in CARD9 (SI2N), to CADR9, especially candidiasis, it is recommended that the method of fixing of the 𝛽 - glucan may be excessive for the first invulnerability of C. albicans[122]. However, recent studies have shown the potential role of dectin-I in the maintenance of tissue health. Dectin-I−/− the mice showed greater severity of the disease, at least one more commonly, however, this weight can be reduced by the removal of fungal and bacterial flora in [123]. Histologically, extensive infestations of fungi have been recorded from the underlying tissue, which was not seen in wild-type mice. Clinical trial data have shown that a subgroup of patients with ulcerative colitis, especially in aggressive disease, and shows a common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs2078I78 in dectin-I, possibly indicating a requirement for functional dectin-I receptors, and to maintain, mucosal health, in a commensal state [123]. However, the role of dectin-I in the intramucosal infections, it is far from clear, as recent studies in mice have demonstrated that dectin-I does not play an important role in the control of gastro-intestinal colonization by C. albicans[124]. In particular, it is well known that, in humans, mutations in the stop codon (Tyr238X in dectin-I is associated with an increased risk of developing mucocutaneous fungal infections, with an increased colonization of the oral cavity and the gastrointestinal (gi) tract and vulvovaginal candidiasis (thrush) infection (RVVC) [125, 126]. In another case, we obtained that the dectin-I polymorphism (I223S) was associated with oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) the susceptibility of West Africa, a group of HIV-positive patients [127]. That is why, even though the great one, the precise role of dectin-I in the susceptibility to candida infection is still unclear and requires further investigation.

3.2.2 Dectin-2

Dectin-2 (otherwise called CLEC6a) is a sort II transmembrane protein however is enacted contrastingly to dectin-I. Dectin-2 comes up short on an intracellular flagging area [128] and requirements to dimerise with FcR𝛾, which has an intracellular flagging space, to send a sign [69]. In myeloid cells and fiery monocytes, dectin-2 perceives high mannose structures that are normal to numerous parasites and ties to hyphae with higher proclivity than to yeast [129, 130]. This may clarify why dectin-2 inadequate mice are helpless to C. albicanscontamination be that as it may, strangely, not C. neoformans[130, 131]. Dectin-2 may moreover recognize 𝛼-mannosyl linkages [132]. Dectin-2 may activate a number of cytokines and chemokines via NF-B, MAPK, SYK, CARD9-BclI0-MaltI, and PKC, as well as initiate the NLRP3 (NOD-like receptor family, pyrin region containing 3) inflammasome and a respiratory burst [69, 133]. Furthermore, dectin-2 may have a role in protecting against C. glabrataillnesses, since dectin-2/lacking mice were more susceptible to C. glabratainfections, indicating a poor transmittable choice in kidneys [134].

3.2.3 Dectin-3

Dectin-3 (additionally called CLECsf8, MCL, or CLEC4d) was as of late distinguished and seems to shape heterodimers with dectin-2 to perceive 𝛼-mannans on the outside of C. albicanshyphae, prompting NF-𝜅B enactment [135]. Strikingly, dectin-3−/− mice were exceptionally helpless to C. albicansdisease. Contrasted and their particular homodimers, dectin-2/3 heterodimers bound 𝛼-mannans all the more viably, prompting strong incendiary reactions. This recommends that distinctive CLRs may shape an assortment of hetero and homodimers that may give diverse affectability and variety to have cells to identify different contagious contaminations.

3.2.4 DC-SIGN

DC-SIGN (otherwise called CD209) is another sort II transmembrane receptor that is communicated dominatingly on dendritic cells and macrophages. Dendritic Cell-Specific Intercellular adhesion molecule-3-Grabbing Non-integrin) also known as CD209 (Cluster of Differentiation 209) is a protein which in humans is encoded by the CD209 gene. DC-SIGN is a C-type lectin receptor present on the surface of both macrophages and dendritic cells Nonetheless, the part of DC-SIGN in antifungal invulnerability is muddled [101], in spite of the fact that DC-SIGN seems to perceive high (𝑁-connected) mannose containing glycoproteins and actuate IL-6 creation [71, 136]. Albeit the part of DC-SIGN in the endocytosis and take-up of microbes to advance antigen show is all around recorded [136, 137], its job in phagocytosis is sketchy [71, 136].

3.3 Mannose receptor

The MR (or called CD206) is a prototypical kind I transmembrane protein that is transcendently communicated on macrophage and dendritic cells. MR receptor ties a few starch particles, including extended 𝑁-connected mannans, N-acetylglucosamine, glucose, and fucose [138]. Thus, MR can perceive numerous contagious, bacterial, and viral pathogens.MR needs regular intracellular flagging spaces despite the fact that ligation actually prompts an assortment of cell reactions, including signal pathway acceptance, phagocytosis, advancement of antigen show to T cells, and cytokine discharge [63, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140]. For instance, the MR is enlisted to the phagosome after C. albicansingestion and actuates intracellular flagging and cytokine creation [141]. MR may likewise be needed for the enlistment of defensive ThI7 reactions in C. albicanscontamination [140] however may repress cytokine creation because of different organisms, for instance, Pneumocystis carinii [142]. Remarkably, MR inadequacy does not seem to present helplessness to C. albicansfoundational disease [143] as it does to C. neoformans[144], albeit minor changes in parasitic weights can be noticed [143]. In oral epithelial cells, MR impeding does not modify the discharge of IL-6, IL-8, and GM-CSF upon incitement with Candida cell divider parts [117]. As of now, there is no conclusive part for MR in mucosal antifungal host safeguards.

3.4 Nod-like receptors (NLRs) and inflammasomes

NLRs are a group of intracellular PRRs portrayed by leucine rich rehashes and a nucleotide-restricting area that identify PAMPs present in the cell cytoplasm. Like TLRs and CTLs, NLRs perceive microbial items yet they additionally perceive have determined threat signals or alarmins [145]. There are now 23 human NLRs and 34 mouse NLRs identified [146]. Inflammasomes are huge multimeric protein structures framed by NLRs and two distinct proteins, ASC (apoptosis-related spot like protein containing a CARD) and procaspase-I (procysteine-subordinate aspartate-coordinated protease I). The inflammasome’s main function is to convert procaspase-I to dynamic caspase-I, which causes young cells that are friendly to IL-I and supportive of IL- I8 to produce IL-I and IL-I8 [147]. Despite the fact that C. albicansis not recognized by NLRCI (NLR family CARD space containing protein I) or NLRC2 [148], it is known to activate inflammasomes fusing NLRP3 (NACHT , LRR, and PYD spaces containing protein 3) [149] and NLRC4 [150], resulting in the production of IL-I.

Surprisingly, NLRP3 is strongly expressed in nonkeratinizing epithelia, such as the oral cavity and throat [151], suggesting a possible role for NLRP3 in parasitic recognition in oral epithelial cells, which is supported by studies showing increased IL- I and IL- I8 levels in response to C. albicansstimulation [115, 152, 153, 154, 155]. Mice missing NLRP3 appear to be susceptible to candidiasis [156], but mice lacking IL-I receptor type I (IL- IRI), IL-I8, or caspase-I exhibit distinct contagious contamination helplessness profiles [157]. Strikingly, IL-I𝛽 (and IL-I𝛼) lacking mice show expanded mortality during scattered candidiasis [158]. Late reports have likewise recognized a significant part for NLRP3 along with TLR2 and dectin-I in forestalling dispersal of C. albicansin a murine model of oral contamination [159]. Steady with a part for NLRP3 inmucosal security [160], deficient NLRP3 actuation expands C. albicanscolonization in the gut and fuels Crohn’s illness [161], and a length polymorphism in intron 4 of the quality (CIASI) that codes for NLRP3 inclines patients to RVVC [162]. Nevertheless, the full degree of the practical jobs for NLRs and inflammasomes in antifungal host safeguards is as yet not completely comprehended.

4. Protein involves in pathogenesis

4.1 Mincle

Mincle (also known as CLEC4e or CLECsf9) is a type II transmembrane protein that transmits its signal after dimerizing with the FcR connector protein [128]. Macrophages, monocytes, neutrophils, myeloid dendritic cells, and certain B cell subsets all communicate mincle, while plasmacytoid dendritic cells, T cells, and NK cells do not [133]. Mincle binds -mannans-containing starch structures [143, 163] and detects C. albicans[70, 164, 165], Malassezia spp. [163], and Fonsecaea pedrosoi, the chromoblastomycosis causative pathogen [166]. As with dectin-2, mincle is not believed to be needed for phagocytosis [70] yet adds to the acceptance of cytokines and chemokines by means of NF-𝜅B, MAPK, SYK, CARD9-BclI0-MatIt, and PKC𝛿 [133, 163]. In spite of the fact that mincle-incited reactions have all the earmarks of being MyD88 autonomous, mincle may synergise with TLRs to instigate fiery cytokines and the respiratory burst [167].

4.2 Soluble proteins in Candida recognition

The supplement course assumes a significant part in have protection against parasitic microorganisms and is quickly enacted in light of host attack by Candida [168, 169, 170]. Candida actuates each of the three known pathways (old style, elective, and mannose-restricting lectin (MBL)) with nobody clear pathway overwhelming the reaction [171]. Given that the Candida cell surface is covered with a bounty of manno proteins, it is not astonishing that Candida microorganisms are viable at actuating the MBL pathway, which seems significant for opsonisation, phagocytosis, and other supplement capacities [172, 173]. The connection between enacted C3b and the supplement receptor CR3 is generally needed for the uptake of Candida cells by phagocytes [174]. C. albicanscell divider proteins (e.g., GpmI, PraI, and Gpd2) can possibly tie supplement segments, for example, Factor H, FHL-I, C4BP and plasminogen from human plasma that meddle with phagocytic opsonisation and take-up [168, 170, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180]. For example, restricting of Pra1 to factor H and FHL-1 most likely includes an avoidance methodology including the hindrance of C3 cleavage into opsonic and anaphylatoxic parts, in this manner forestalling acknowledgment and take-up by phagocytes [181]. C5 is likewise significant in Candida diseases since mice that need practical C5 quality duplicates are vulnerable to obtrusive foundational contaminations [182, 183, 184, 185]. C5 insufficiency is related with expanded creation of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF𝛼 and IL-6) and fast parasitic replication in organs that can prompt cardiovascular disappointment [186, 187]. Sanctioning of C5 prompts the improvement of C5b, which consequently triggers the plan of the film attack complex (MAC). Despite the fact that affidavit of MAC on the outside of C. albicansdoes not bring about fungicidal movement, presumably because of the thickness of the parasitic cell divider, it might work with the incitement of phagocytes and ensuing arrival of terminal supplement segments from these phones. Curiously, as no impact on irritation is recognized in C3 insufficient mice, this may recommend a generally C3-free preparing of C5 in foundational C. albicansdisease [188]. After phagocytosis, the oxidative burst is set off which prompts contagious executing, a cycle that can be hindered with monoclonal antibodies to forestall C3b-CR3 associations. C3b-CR3 contact also appears to be crucial for lymphocyte hyphal formation and cytokine production [189]. MBL has also been linked to the inhibition of Candida development [190] and the enhancement of TNF release from Candida-infected monocytes [191]. C3a, an anaphylatoxin released by C3 during supplement enactment, may have direct antifungal activity independent of its chemotactic effect [192]. These findings suggest that complement activation is critical in the host’s defense against C. albicansinfections. The reader is directed to the following reviews [168, 170] for further in-depth information on the involvement of complement in Candida infections.

5. Cellular responses to Candida

5.1 Neutrophils

Neutrophils are a key effector cell in intrinsic insusceptibility, and they play a dual role in antifungal responses. First, they phagocytose and destroy contaminated Candida cells (below), and then, via cross communication with epithelial cells, they indirectly assist in mucosal protection (tended to above). TLRs and CTLs help neutrophils phagocytose nonopsonized Candida, while CR3 and the Fc receptor (FcR) help them phagocytose opsonized Candida [193]. Once phagocytosed, Candida is killed both inside and outside the cell through oxidative and nitrosative mechanisms, but fungicidal movement varies across Candida species [194, 195]. Preformed cytoplasmic granules interweave with the phagosome intracellularly, although unlike macrophages, no substantial pH changes occur [196]. Antimicrobial proteins found in neutrophil granules include defensins, lactoferrin, lysozyme, myeloperoxidase, and elastase [197], all of which can be transported into the extracellular environment. Candida’s phagocytic execution requires oxidative processes. During the oxidative burst, neutrophils create reactive oxygen species (ROS), which needs the NADPH oxidase catalyst complex to assemble in the cytoplasmic and phagosomal film [198]. First, the superoxide extremist is formed, which is subsequently dismutated to hydrogen peroxide, an oxidative and harmful particle [199].

Then, myeloperoxidase uses hydrogen peroxide to create hypochlorous acid, which is moreover an exceptionally oxidative particle that responds with natural amines to frame chloramines that have further antimicrobial stuffs [193, 200]. Candida’s phagocytic execution is further aided by reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [193]. When neutrophils are activated, they produce nitric oxide (NO) from arginine and oxygen via an enzyme called inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). NO is extremely sensitive, and it is converted to peroxynitrite, which is then reduced to nitrogen dioxide and a hydroxyl radical. Because iNOS is restricted to the intracellular compartment, RNS production is restricted to the intracellular compartment [199]. The creation of neutrophil extracellular catches (NETs) [201, 202], which are formed during a unique sequence of neutrophil cell death known as NETosis, is another more recently found way of Candida executing. Similar to serine proteases, antimicrobial peptides (e.g., calprotectin), and other microbicidal chemicals, the neutrophil “explodes,” unleashing a snare of chromatin fibrils coated with the neutrophil’s material. Candida spp. are well-versed in surviving the oxidative, nitrosative, osmotic, and restorative nerves encountered during interactions with neutrophils. Because of the weights, many cycles, features, and proteins are altered within the organism. These include upregulation of transporters (e.g., oligopeptide, ammonium, and iron), use of alternative carbon and nitrogen sources and metabolic cycles (e.g., glycolysis, glyoxylate, unsaturated fat, and amino destructive), and detoxification of neutrophil oxidative/nitrosative butchering instruments. (e.g., catalase, superoxide dismutases, and nitric oxide dioxygenase). In any event, these nuances are beyond the scope of this examination, and the reader is directed to a later examination that focuses on the Candida reaction to neutrophils [193, 203].

5.2 Macrophages

Macrophages can function as phagocytic cells as well as antigen-presenting cells capable of activating T lymphocytes. Upon activation, macrophages divide into two phenotypically and functionally distinct subsets, M1 and M2, based on the cytokine milieu in which they are initiated [204, 205, 206]. The M1 total is derived from receptiveness to the T colleague (Th)1 cytokine IFN, whereas the M2 total is derived from receptiveness to Th2 cytokines, IL-4 and IL- 13. M1 macrophages are microbic and proinflammatory, whereas M2 macrophages are involved in wound healing and extracellular network upgradation. Macrophages, like neutrophils, see and phagocytoze nonopsonised Candida via TLRs and CTLs, and opsonised Candida via CR3 and FcR [193, 207]. Nonetheless, macrophage phagosome formation differs from neutrophil phagosome development in that macrophage phagosomes follow the endocytic development route and grow into phagolysosomes with a distinctive acidic pH that promotes compound activity, such as cathepsin D [208]. M1 macrophages use both oxidative and nitrosative executing components (as seen above for neutrophils), but they also use the RNS, NO, to directly kill phagocytosed Candida via the translocation of iNOS. TNF and the chemokines CXCL9 and CXCL10 are also released by M1 macrophages [209]. These chemokines act as ligands for the CXCR3 receptor, which is found on Th1 cells and NK cells, attracting resistant cells to contamination sites.

M2 macrophages, then again, advance contagious ingenuity inside the macrophage, giving an instrument to invulnerable avoidance. M2 macrophages additionally express more significant levels of MR (CD206) bringing about expanded phagocytosis of Candida [210]. Correspondingly, the arginase-1 (Arg1) quality is additionally expanded in articulation, which rivals iNOS for a similar substrate (arginine), consequently diminishing NO levels [211]. This is additionally exacerbated by decreased degrees of TNF𝛼 creation in M2 macrophages. In light of this, macrophages anticipate playing an important role in Candida protection, but this is contingent on the Candida strain assisting the macrophage [212]. Candida spp., like neutrophils, are believed to rely on relative adaptations to survive in macrophages. C. albicansand C. glabratahave been shown to alter metabolic requirements by using alternative carbon sources, upregulating impetuses for gluconeogenesis, glyoxylate cycle, and -oxidation of unsaturated lipids, and downregulating protein synthesis and glycolysis [193, 207]. This combines the formation of catalase and superoxide dismutases for extracellular ROS detoxification [213] and the outflow of flavohemoglobin impetuses for intracellular RNS butchering [214]. Concerning C. albicans, intracellular dealing additionally seems unusual and the growth may repress both lysosomal fermentation and NO delivery [215]. For additional subtleties the peruser is guided to ongoing surveys that emphasis on the Candida reaction to macrophages [207].

Besides these receptors molecules, actively participated proteins and cellular mechanism system there is a lot of others factors in these mechanisms are linked like adhesins and invasins, biofilm formation, contact sensing and thigmotropism, secreted hydrolases, pH-sensing and its regulation, environment and metabolic adaptation, small HSPs, metal acquisition. So, for a complete understanding these factors also play significant role in pathogenicity mechanism of C. albicans.


6. Conclusion

This chapter has discussed the pathogenicity mechanism along with host and cellular responses in Candida species. Host reactions to Candida are profoundly assorted because of the assortment of contagious PAMPs and antigens perceived by various safe cells at different disease destinations. Many inquiries have been conducted on this important topic, particularly with C. albicans, and thus we have obtained a much improved understanding of the appropriate structures of the PAMPs & PRRs. Still, further analysis is needed in order to attain insight into the complex communication between PAMPs and the corresponding receptors. Definitely, co-stimulation via multiple PAMP–PRR interactions may increase together the sensitivity as well as the specificity of the immune recognition process.


chapter PDF

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Snigdha Pattnaik, Laxmidhar Maharana and Manoj Sethi (September 5th 2021). Pathogenicity Mechanism of <em>Candida albicans</em> [Online First], IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99737. Available from:

chapter statistics

37total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us