Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Characterization, Photoelectric Properties, Electrochemical Performances and Photocatalytic Activity of the Fe2O3/TiO2 Heteronanostructure

Written By

Salah Kouass, Hassouna Dhaouadi, Abdelhak Othmani and Fathi Touati

Submitted: 29 September 2020 Reviewed: 07 June 2021 Published: 27 September 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.98759

Chapter metrics overview

295 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite was synthesized on FTO subtract via hydrothermal method. The crystal structure, morphology, band structure of the heterojunction, behaviors of charge carriers and the redox ability were characterized by XRD, HR-TEM, absorption spectra, PL, cyclic voltammetry and transient photocurrent spectra. The as-prepared Fe2O3/TiO2 photocatalysts with distinctive structure and great stability was characterized and investigated for the degradation of methylene blue (MB) dye in aqueous solution. The ability of the photocatalyst for generating reactive oxygen species, including O2− and.OH was investigated. It was revealed that the combination of the two oxides (Fe2O3 and TiO2) nano-heterojunction could enhance the visible response and separate photogenerated charge carriers effectively. Therefore, the remarkable photocatalytic activity of Fe2O3/TiO2 nanostructures for MB degradation was ascribed to the enhanced visible light absorption and efficient interfacial transfer of photogenerated electrons from to Fe2O3 to TiO2 due to the lower energy gap level of Fe2O3/TiO2 hybrid heterojunctions as evidenced by the UV–Vis and photoluminescence studies. The decrease of the energy gap level of Fe2O3/TiO2 resulted in the inhibition of electron–hole pair recombination for effective spatial charge separation, thus enhancing the photocatalytic reactions. Based on the obtained results, a possible mechanism for the improved photocatalytic performance associated with Fe2O3/TiO2 was proposed. The Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite has a specific capacity of 82 F.g−1 and shows a higher capacitance than Fe2O3.

Keywords

  • Fe2O3/TiO2
  • methylene blue degradation
  • heterojunction
  • holes and superoxide radicals
  • photocatalyst

1. Introduction

The environmental impact caused by the discharge of untreated wastewaters, or even partially treated in sewage stations, is an increasingly worrying problem, considering the damage caused to the environment [1]. In view of this, a great effort has been made to develop new technologies aiming the treatment of persistent substances in the environment such as heterogeneous photocatalysis, electrochemical techniques and photoelectrochemical processes [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Among these processes, the heterogeneous photocatalysis that belongs to the class of the advanced oxidation processes has proved very effective as it mineralizes the contaminations existing liquid phases. Over the last few decades, research in the photocatalysis area has been focusing on improving electrochemical and photocatalytic materials [7, 8, 9, 10]. So, various photocatalysts such as titanium dioxide (TiO2) were used. It is one of the most used photocatalysts given its efficiency in pollutant degradation in waste water, because of its inexpensiveness, hard-soluble and long-term photostability. However, there are two defects limiting the use of TiO2 in the photocatalysis: one, its wide band gap energy that limits its response to visible light and the other is the rapid recombination of photogenerated electron–hole which leads to the decrease of its photocatalytic activity. Therefore, much effort has been devoted to solving these problems. One solution to overcome the defects is to construct heterojunction photocatalysts. In order to construct a heterojunction photocatalyst based on TiO2, the adaptation of energy levels between the two components is determining, that is, the conduction band edge of the narrow band gap semiconductor is higher than that of TiO2.Fe2O3, as a highly active photocatalyst with a band gap of 2.0 eV [11, 12, 13], seems to be a good choice except it has a lower conduction band edge. However, the Fermi level (EF) of Fe2O3 is lower than that of TiO2. Indeed, Yanqing Cong and al. proved that Fe2O3 nanoparticles present a stronger photo-response under visible light irradiation in the nanostructured Fe2O3/TiO2 nanotube electrodes [14]. Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposites revealed outstanding photocatalytic activity under visible light and were used as photocatalysts in the degradation of oxytetracycline [15, 16, 17, 18]. In this study, we have synthesized by a hydrothermal approach a TiO2/F2O3 heterojunction photocatalyst that exhibited excellent performance in many fields.

Advertisement

2. Characterization

The XRD analysis of Fe2O3/TiO2 indicates the formation of the TiO2 anatase phase in the presence of the Fe2O3 rhombohedral structure. Fe2O3 and the Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite were recorded using high resolution transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM). As shown in Figure 1a, the Fe2O3 nanorods are well dispersed with an average diameter of 50 nm.

Figure 1.

HRTEM image of: (a) Fe2O3/TiO2, (b) HRTEM lattice fringe image of: Fe2O3/TiO2.

The magnified high resolution TEM image (Figure 1a) illustrates that the Fe2O3 nanorods cover the TiO2 nanoparticles surface. Lattice fringes in the HRTEM image (Figure 1b) of the binary hybrid nanocomposite Fe2O3/TiO2 could be assigned to a lattice spacing of 2.35 Å nm corresponding to the (103) plane of TiO2, while the lattice spacing of 2.52 Å nm could be indexed to the (110) plane of Fe2O3.

The band gap (Eg) for pure Fe2O3, TiO2 and the Fe2O3/TiO2is determined by extrapolating the absorption edge using the following Equation [19]:

αhν2=AhνEgE1

The Eg values are respectively, Eg1 = 3.1 eV, Eg2 = 1.93 eV and Eg3 = 2.6 eV for TiO2, Fe2O3 and Fe2O3/TiO2 junction. It is noted that the presence of Fe2O3 in the material increases the intensity of the bands and shifting them to higher wavelengths compared to TiO2.

Introducing an appropriate amount of transition metal oxide in the TiO2 matrix is a promising alternative used to modulate the band gap of the as-obtained nanocomposite. The weakness of band gap due to the electrons excited and injected into the conduction band of TiO2 leads to the improvement of the electron–hole pair separation. The higher degradation activity of the nanocomposite samples (Fe2O3/TiO2, CdO/ZnO, ZnO/TiO2, Bi2O3/TiO2 and CdS/TiO2) [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24] is correlated with its lower band gap and strong adsorption in the visible region. In our case, the synthesized Fe2O3/TiO2 heterojunction presents a moderate band gap (Eg = 2.6 eV) compared to the other nanocomposite samples. Consequently, the separation efficiency of photogenerated electron–hole pairs in the Fe2O3/TiO2 heterojunction could be improved, leading to the improvement of the photocatalytic activity.

Advertisement

3. Photocatalytic activity

The study of the photocatalytic activity of Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO heterojunction is realized by following the degradation of MB in an aqueous solution under visible light irradiation. The absorption spectrum of MB without a catalyst is characterized by a broad peak centered at 670 nm. The MB absorbance at around 650 nm decreases and there is almost no shift in the peak maximum. This shows that MB was degraded via the destruction of the conjugated structure. This demonstrates that Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO exhibits outstanding photocatalytic activity compared to pure TiO2. The obtained results confirm that TiO2 alone is unable to absorb under visible irradiation. This could be attributed to the scaling down of the distance between the valence band (VB) and the conduction band (CB) after the addition of Fe2O3 which boosts the transfer of electrons between bands after excitation. In comparison, the Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO exhibits better photocatalytic degradation than the TiO2 film. Photocatalytic activity is controlled by many factors, such as the phase structure, particle size, light absorption capacity and electron/hole recombination rate [25].

The heterogeneous photocatalysis mechanism has been discussed extensively in the literature [26, 27]. The photo-activity mechanism presented in this study of the Fe2O3/TiO2 thin film is described as follows: when the system is irradiated with visible light, the Fe2O3 electrons at the valence band are excited and hop to the conduction band, leaving a hole (h+). As a result, electron (e)/hole (h+) pairs are forming. Then, the excited-state electrons produced by Fe2O3 can be transferred to the conduction band (CB) of the coupled TiO2 due to the existence of electric fields between the two materials. At the same time, the photo-generated holes (h+) of TiO2 can quickly transfer to the VB of Fe2O3. The transferred electrons into the conduction band of TiO2 react with dissolved (O2) to form (O2) and further produce OH. On the other hand, the holes generated on the valence band of Fe2O3 can easily transfer to that of TiO2 inducing an effective charge separation and transfer. Then the positive charge hole (h+) on Fe2O3 surfaces reacts with H2O to generate OH.

Figure 2 shows the band gap structure and the possible charge carrier transfer between Fe2O3 and TiO2 under visible light radiation. Before the contact between the two materials, the conduction band (CB) of TiO2 lies above the CB of α-Fe2O3. The energy values of VB (Fe2O3) and CB (TiO2) were obtained by the two formulas: EVB = χ - Ee + 0.5Eg and ECB = EVB - Eg. [28, 29, 30], where Eg, Eeand χ represent the band gap energy of the semiconductor, the energy of free electrons (about 4.5 eV) and the electronegativity of the semiconductor, respectively. The χ values for TiO2 and Fe2O3 are 5.83 eV and 5.88 eV, respectively [19]. After substituting χ into the equation, the EVB of TiO2 and Fe2O3 are found to be 2.93 eV and 2.35 eV, respectively. Therefore, the CB potentials of TiO2 and Fe2O3 were calculated to be (−0.27 eV) and (0.4 eV), respectively. After coupling TiO2 with Fe2O3 to form the p-n heterojunction, the Fermi level of Fe2O3 was dragged upwards, while the Fermi level of TiO2was dragged downwards, until they were at the same level and reached equilibrium [31, 32].

Figure 2.

Schematic illustration of the MB degradation mechanism, under visible light irradiation on the surface of the Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO heterojunction.

Advertisement

4. Photoelectric properties

The PL spectrum is one of efficient approaches to depict the recombination efficiency of photogenerated electron–hole pairs through their different intensities [33]. When the photo-induced electrons and holes are easier to recombine and the lifetime of the photogenerated electrons is shorter, and correspondingly the fluorescence intensity is higher. It is obvious that the PL emission intensity of Fe2O3/TiO2 is lower than that of TiO2, implying that the coupling of TiO2 and Fe2O3 can effectively inhibit the recombination of the photo-generated electron–hole pairs. The decrease recombination rate would be more beneficial for many photocatalyst performance enhancement than TiO2 [34].

Figure 3 shows the transient photocurrent spectra for TiO2 and Fe2O3/TiO2 samples. As shown in Figure 3, the maximum photocurrent density of the Fe2O3/TiO2/FTO heterojunction electrode reached 0.25 mA.cm−2 which is almost the twice of the pure TiO2 electrode. This indicates more charge carriers are generated and transferred from conduction band of the photocatalysts to the electrodes. It could be seen that the photocurrent density produced instantly and increased sharply when exposed to visible light, but promptly reduced to zero as soon as the light source is turned off. Those results confirm that Fe2O3/TiO2 heterojunction is more effective in generating and separating the photogenerated charge carriers than TiO2, and much faster interfacial charge transfer, benefitting photocatalytic activity.

Figure 3.

Transient photocurrent vs. irradiation time for pure TiO2 and Fe2O3/TiO2 heterojunction samples in 0.1 M NaOH solution under visible light irradiation.

The improved photocurrent shows the effective interfacial charge transfer between Fe2O3 and TiO2. Thus, the stable and enhanced photocurrent of the obtained heterojunction is more favorable for photocatalytic dye degradation; furthermore, it is more efficient for water splitting [18].

From the resulting Mott-Schottky plot (C −2 versus the applied potential E) [35], the flat band potential EFB could be obtained as the intercept with the x-axis and from the slope of the linear part. The value of the flat band potential determined from capacitance measurements is reported to be −0.45 V and − 0.55 V vs. Ag/AgCl for TiO2 and Fe2O3/TiO2 Respectively. It should be noted that the EFB of the Fe2O3/TiO2 photoanode exhibits a positive shift in comparison to that of the pure TiO2 electrode. Combined with the Eg calculated from the DRS spectra, the optical band gaps of TiO2 and Fe2O3/TiO2 are 3.1 and 2.6 eV, respectively. According to the formula Eg = EVB - ECB, the valence band positions (EVB) of TiO2 and Fe2O3/TiO2 are 2.65 and 2.05 V vs. Ag/AgCl, respectively.

Advertisement

5. Electrochemical performances

Transition metal oxides such as oxides of Fe, Cu, Ni, Mn, Cu, and TiO2 for electrode materials offer rich redox reactions such as in electrochemical cells providing high specific capacitance values for supercapacitors [36, 37]. Among these metal oxides, Fe2O3, TiO2, metal doped TiO2 and composite Fe2O3/ TiO2 are very promising electrodes materials, due to their acceptable charge/discharge capacities [38, 39, 40]. Cycling stability and specific capacitance are critical factors in evaluating the electrochemical properties, influenced by synthesis method, morphology and grains size.

The specific capacitance of the electrode calculated from the CV curves, according to the following Equation [40, 41, 42]:

C=IVdVmνΔVE2

α -Fe2O3 with rod-like structure is synthesized to evaluate as electrode material comparing with Cu foil and Ni foam, the as-prepared electrodes with Ni-foam exhibited higher capacity of 415 mAh g−1 and more stable cycle performance [43]. Fe-based materials,Fe2O3, Fe3O4, and FeOOH, were synthesized via the microwave–hydrothermal process by Young Dong Noh and al, the results showed that FeOOH had better anode capacity as lithium-ion batteries than those of Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 [44]. Yudai Huang and al prepared -Fe2O3/MWCNTs composites by a simple hydrothermal process and show that initial discharge capacity of Fe2O3 is 992.3 mAh g−1 and the discharge capacity is 146.6 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles [45].

5.1 TiO2

Anantha Kumar and al demonstrated that synthesis of a grapheme-TiO2 using a microwave technique exhibited a high specific capacitance of 165 F g−1at a scan rate of 5 mV s_1 [46]. G. Wang and al fabricate TiO2-B nanotubes via a mixed solvothermal technical and subsequent heat treatment and found that specific capacitance is equal to17.7 F/g [47]. The same, capacitances of the CNTs, CNTs/TiO2 composite and UVlight irradiated CNTs/TiO2 composite materials were 4.1F/g; 6.4F/g and 9.8F/g, respectively [48].

5.2 TiO2-Fe2O3 composite

The performances of TiO2-Fe2O3 composite prepared using abundant ilmenite via a heat treatment are improved compared with that of P25, with the increased iron oxide content, the capacity gets higher [49]. Again, theα -Fe2O3/TiO2/C composite fibers prepared by Luis Zuniga and al, via centrifugal spinning and subsequent thermal processing, showed a superior specific capacity of 340 mAh g−1after 100 cycles, compared to 61 mAh g−1and 121 mAh g−1for TiO2/C and α -Fe2O3/C materials, respectively [50]. So, TiO2/FeTiO3@C porous materials, synthesized by carbonizing the mixture of pyrrole with lab-made TiO2/ Fe2O3, have a superior capacity of 441.5 mAh g−1after 300 cycles, Comparing with TiO2, TiO2@C, and TiO2/ Fe2O3 [51]. Also, TiO2, Fe2O3 NPs and TiO2- Fe2O3 are synthesized via green combustion method with Aloe Vera gel as a fuel. Compared to pure TiO2 and Fe2O3 materials, the composite showed stable electrochemical performance after 1000 cycles, which can be beneficial for rechargeable supercapacitor [52].

Based on the synergy between the two metallic oxides, TiO2 and Fe2O3, we have produced Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite and heterojunction film via the hydrothermal process. The electrochemical performance of the Fe2O3 and Fe2O3/TiO2 nanostructures as potential electrode material for supercapacitors, cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests were performed in a three-electrode cell with Na2SO4 aqueous electrolyte. The current response as a function of the potential applied to the working electrode, recorded at 100 mV/s in a potential range between −0.8 V and − 0.4 V with 1000 cycles of the Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite in the Na+-system. Therefore, the Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite shows electrochemical and structural stability during redox cycling.

The excellent pseudocapacitive performance of the Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite electrode is probably attributed to the positive synergistic effects between the Fe2O3 and TiO2.

First, This combination can not only inhibit the agglomerating of TiO2 nanoparticles but also reduce the aggregation of the nanoparticles made the nearly every Fe2O3 nanoparticle access to the electronic and ionic transport pathways resulting in high double–layer capacitance, and importantly, enhancing the utilization of active materials [28]. Second, the large distance between neighboring graphene nanosheets provide enough void spaces to buffer volume change during the redox reaction, and endow good electrical contact with the nanoparticles upon cycling [32, 37]. Third, the unique structure can facilitate the diffusion and migration of the electrolyte ions that can increase the specific capacitance value and improve the high rate charge–discharge performance [38, 39]. Finally, graphene also provides a highly conductive network for electron transport during the charge and discharge processes, thus reducing the polarization of the electrodes [44, 45, 46].

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

TiO2, Fe2O3 hematite nanoparticles and Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposites were synthesized via a simple hydrothermal process. The photocatalytic activity of the Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite was evaluated using the degradation of methylene blue (MB) under sunlight irradiation for pollution prevention. The results proved that the Fe2O3/TiO2heterojunction has a higher removal efficiency of MB and stronger photo-response under visible light irradiation. Compared to both pure TiO2 and Fe2O3, the Fe2O3/TiO2photocatalyst have enhanced photocatalytic activity. This improved activity of the heterojunction between the TiO2 and Fe2O3 nanoparticles results from the improved charge transfer and suppressed electron–hole recombination. We have also compared the photoelectric properties of Fe2O3/TiO2heterogeneous photocatalysts with that of pure TiO2. The obtained result demonstrated that the formation of heterojunction between Fe2O3 and TiO2 was pivotal for improving the separation and thus restraining the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes, which accounts for the enhancement of photocatalytic activity. The study of the role of the active species on Fe2O3/TiO2 confirmed that the crucial active species were both holes and superoxide radicals. The Fe2O3/TiO2sample also showed good stability and reusability, suggesting its potential for water purification applications. Likewise, the visible photogenerated electrons in the obtained heterojunction would provide a feasible route to improve solar water splitting, which will be investigated in further studies. The electrochemical properties of the as-synthesized nanocomposite materials (α-Fe2O3/TiO2) were evaluated by cyclic voltammetry for 1000 cycles. The α-Fe2O3/TiO2 nanocomposite materials exhibited an enhanced specific discharge capacity compared to Fe2O3 nanomaterials. The as-fabricated hybrid electrodes show an impressive performance as a high-capacity anode for Na+-ion batteries.

References

  1. 1. Shahmoradi, B.; Ibrahim, I. A.; Sakamoto, N.; Ananda, S.; Row, T. N. G.; Soga, K.; Byrappa, K.; Parsons, S.; Shimizu, Y.;Dye Degradation Enhanced by Coupling Electrochemical Process and Heterogeneous Photocatalysis, Environ. Technol. 31(2010) 1213
  2. 2. Benehkohal, N. P.; Demopoulos, G. P.;"Electrophoretically self-assembled mixed oxide-TiO2 nano-composite film structures for photoelectrochemical energy conversion : Probing of charge recombination and electron transport resistances, J. Power Sources, 240 (2013) 667
  3. 3. Calva-Yanez, J. C.; Rincon, M. E.; de la Fuente, M. S.; Alvarado- Tenorio, G.Structural and photoelectrochemical characterization of MWCNT-TiO2 matrices sensitized with Bi2S3;J. Solid State Electrochem. 17 (2013) 2633
  4. 4. Khataee, A. R.; Zarei, M.; Ordikhani-Seyedlar, R.; Heterogeneous photocatalysis of a dye solution using supported TiO2nanoparticles combined with homogeneous photoelectrochemical process:Molecular degradation products, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 338(2011)84
  5. 5. Ochiai, T.; Fujishima, A.;Photoelectrochemical properties of TiO2 photocatalyst and its applications for environmental purificationJ. Photochem. Photobiol., C, 13 (2012) 247
  6. 6. Zhang, Z.; Wang P.,Optimization of photoelectrochemical water splitting performance on hierarchical TiO2 nanotube arrays; Energy Environ. Sci., 5 (2012)6506
  7. 7. Jinlin Long, Hongjin Chang, QuanGu, Jie Xu, Lizhou Fan, Shuchao Wang, Yangen Zhou, Wei Wei, Ling Huang, Xuxu Wang, Ping Liu, and Wei Huang, Gold-plasmon enhanced solar-to-hydrogen conversion on the {001} facets of anatase TiO2nanosheets, Energ. & Environ. Sci., 7(2014) 973-977
  8. 8. LingshuMeng, Zhenye Chen, Zhiyun Ma, Sha He, YidongHou, Hao-Hong Li, Rusheng Yuan, Xi-He Huang, Xuxu Wang, Xinchen Wang, Jinlin Long, Gold Plasmon-Induced Photocatalytic Dehydrogenative Coupling of Methane to Ethane on Polar Oxide Surfaces, Energ. & Environ. Sci. 11 (2018) 294-298
  9. 9. Jie Xu, Liufeng Luo, Guangrui Xiao, Zizhong Zhang, Huaxiang Lin, Xuxu Wang, and Jinlin Long, Layered C3N3S3 Polymer/Graphene Hybrids as Metal-Free Catalysts for Selective Photocatalytic Oxidation of Benzylic Alcohols under Visible Light, ACS Catal. 4 (2014) 3302-3306
  10. 10. C. C. Wang, Y. Zhan and Z. Y. Wang,TiO2, MoS2, and TiO2/MoS2 Heterostructures for Use in Organic Dyes Degradation, ChemistrySelect, 3 (2018) 1713-1718
  11. 11. Hongwen Zhang, Lei Ma, Jintao Ming, Bingqian Liu, YiboZhao,YidongHou, Zhengxin Ding, Chao Xu, Zizhong Zhang, Jinlin Long, Amorphous Ta2OxNy-Enwrapped TiO2 Rutile Nanorods for Enhanced Solar Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting, Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 243 (2019) 481-489
  12. 12. R.L. Spray, K.J. McDonald, K.S. Choi, Enhancing photoresponse of nanoparticulate alpha-Fe2O3 electrodes by surface composition tuning, J. Phys.Chem C. 115 (8) (2011) 3497-3506
  13. 13. A. Umar, M.Abaker, M. Faisal, S.W. Hwang, S.Baskoutas, S.A. Al-Sayari, High-yield synthesis of well-crystalline alpha-Fe2O3 nanoparticles: structural, optical and photocatalytic properties,J.Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 11 (4) (2011)3474-3480
  14. 14. Y. Cong, Z. Li, Z. Yi, W. Qi, X. Qian, Synthesis of α-Fe2O3/TiO2 nanotube arrays for photoelectro-Fenton degradation of phenol,Chem.Engin. J. 191(2012) 356-363
  15. 15. L.Rong, J.Yuefa, W. Jun, Z.Qiang, Photocatalytic Degradation and Pathway of Oxytetracycline in Aqueous Solution by Fe2O3/TiO2, Nanopowders,RSCAdvances.51(2015) 1-9
  16. 16. M. Ni, M. K. H. Leung, D.Y.C. Leung, K. Sumathy, A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 11 (2007) 401-425
  17. 17. J. Tang, J.R. Durrant, D.R. Klug, Mechanism of photocatalytic water splitting in TiO2 reaction of water with photoholes, importance of charge carrier dynamics, and evidence for four-hole chemistry, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 42 (2008) 13885-13891
  18. 18. P. Luan, M. Xie, X. Fu, Y. Qua, X. Sun, L. Jing, Improved photoactivities of TiO2/Fe2O3 nanocomposites for visible-light water splitting after phosphate bridging and mechanism, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17 (2015) 5043-5050
  19. 19. C. Wei, Z.Maojin, R.Xiaosai, M. Andrew, Synthesis and Photocatalytic Activity of Monolithic Fe2O3/TiO2, S. Afr. J. Chem. 70(2017) 127-131
  20. 20. D. Lee, Y. Rho, F. Allen, A. minor, S.H. Ko and C. Grigoropoulos, Synthesis of Hierarchical TiO2 Nanowires with Densely-Packed and Omnidirectional Branches, Nanoscale. (2013)
  21. 21. A Othmani, S. Kouass, Th. Khalfi, S. Bourchada, F. Touati and H. Dhaouadi, Studies of the photocatalytic and electrochemical performance of the Fe2O3/TiO2 heteronanostructure, Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13738-020-01993-0
  22. 22. J. Tauc, R.Grigorovici, A.Vancu, Optical Properties and Electronic Structure of Amorphous Germanium, Phys. Stat. Sol. 15(1966) 627-637
  23. 23. S. Yang, X.Quan, X. Li, Y. Liu, S.Chen, G. Chen, Preparation, characterization and photoelectrocatalytic properties of nanocrystalline Fe2O3/TiO2, ZnO/TiO2and Fe2O3/ZnO/TiO2 composite film electrodes towards pentachlorophenol degradation, Phys ChemChem Phys. 6 (2004) 659- 664
  24. 24. P.Linlin, X.Tengfeng, L.Yongchun, F.Haimei,W.Dejun, Synthesis, photoelectric properties and photocatalytic activity of the Fe2O3/TiO2 heterogeneous photocatalysts, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.12(2010) 8033-8041
  25. 25. L.Yin, Y. Xia, Core-Shell Structured α-Fe2O3@TiO2 Nanocomposites with Improved Photocatalytic Activity in Visible Light Region, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 42(2013) 1-7
  26. 26. J. Aslam, M.R. Mohammed, F. Mohammed, B.K. Sher, Studies on Photocatalytic Degradation of Acridine Orange and Chloroform Sensing Using as-Grown Antimony Oxide, Microstructures. Mater. Sc. Appl. 2(2011) 676-683
  27. 27. L.P. Zhu, N.C. Bing, D.D. Yang, Y. Yang, G.H. Liao, L.J Wang, Synthesis and photocatalytic properties of core–shell structured α-Fe2O3@SnO2shuttle-like nanocomposites, Cryst. Eng. Comm. 13 (2011) 4486-4490
  28. 28. M.R. Mohammed, M.A. Abdullah, E.Y. Tamer, M.M.Hadi, Photocatalytic degradation of remazol brilliant orange 3R using wet-chemically prepared CdO-ZnO nanofibers for environmental remediation, Mater. Express. 6(2016) 137-148
  29. 29. W.Liugang, Z.Junying, L.Chunzhi, Z. Hailing, W.Wenwen,W.Tianmin, Synthesis, Characterization and Photocatalytic Activity of TiO2 Film/Bi2O3Microgrid Heterojunction, J Mater Sci Technol. 27(2011) 59-63
  30. 30. Z.Panpan, L.Zhanggao, X. Yu, F. Jing, X.Jiangwei, Studies on facile synthesis and properties of mesoporous CdS/TiO2 composite for photocatalysis applications, J. Alloys. Compounds. 692(2017) 170-177
  31. 31. L. Peng, T. Xie, Y. Lu, H. Fan, D. Wang, Synthesis, Photoelectric Properties and Photocatalytic Activity of the Fe2O3/TiO2 Heterogeneous Photocatalysts, Phys. Chem. Chem.Phys. 12(2010) 8033-8041
  32. 32. M.Niu, F. Huang, L. Cui, P. Huang, Y. Yu, Y.Wang,Hydrothermal Synthesis, Structural Characteristics, and Enhanced Photocatalysis of SnO2/α-Fe2O3 Semiconductor Nanoheterostructures,ACS.Nano. 4(2010) 681-688
  33. 33. Cong Y., Zhang J., Chen F., Anpo, M. J. Phys. Chem. C, 111 (2007) 6976-6982
  34. 34. S.D. Deldkar, H.M. Yadav, S.N. Achary, S.S. Meena and S.H. Pawar, Structural refinement and photocatalytic activity of Fe-doped anatase TiO2 nanoparticles, Appl. Surf. Sci. 263 (2012) 536-545
  35. 35. Z. Chen, H. N. Dinh and E. Miller, Photoelectrochemical water splitting, Springer Briefs in Energy, New York, (2013) 49-61
  36. 36. X. Zhang, P. Suresh Kumar, V. Aravindan, H.H. Liu, J. Sundaramurthy, S.G. Mhaisalkar, H.M. Duong, S. Ramakrishna, S. Madhavi , Electrospun TiO2—Graphene Composite Nanofibers as a Highly Durable Insertion Anode for Lithium Ion Batteries, J. Phys. Chem. C 116 (2012) 14780-14788
  37. 37. L. Zuniga, V. Agubra, D. Flores,; H. Campos J. Villareal, M. Alcoutlabi, Multichannel hollow structure for improved electrochemical performance of TiO2/Carbon composite nanofibers as anodes for lithium ion batteries, J. Alloys Compd. 686(2016) 733-743
  38. 38. L.W. Ji, Z. Lin, M. Alcoutlabi, X.W. Zhang, Recent developments in nanostructured anode materials for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries, Energy Environ. Sci. 4(2011) 2682-2699
  39. 39. L. Gao, H. Hu, G.J. Li, Q.C. Zhu, Y. Yu, Hierarchical 3D TiO2@Fe2O3 nanoframework arrays as high-performance anode materials, Nanoscale 6(2014) 6463-6467
  40. 40. S. Li, M.Y. Wang, Y. Luo, J.G. Huang, Bio-Inspired Hierarchical Nanofibrous Fe3O4-TiO2-Carbon Composite as a High-Performance Anode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater, Interfaces, 8(2016) 17343-17351
  41. 41. S.S. Shinde, G.S. Gunda, D.P. Dubal, S.B. Jambure, C.D. Lokhande, Morphological modulation of polypyrrole thin films through oxidizing agents and their concurrent effect on supercapacitor performance,Electrochim.Acta.119 (2014) 1-10
  42. 42. D. Qu, H. Shi, Studies of activated carbons used in double-layer capacitors, J. Power. Sources. 74 (1998) 99-107
  43. 43. L. Huang, Z. Min, Q. Zhang, Research and analysis on electrochemical performances of α -Fe2O3 electrode in Li-ion battery with different current collectors, Materials Research Bulletin 66 (2015) 39-44
  44. 44. K. Chen, Y. D. Noh, W. Huang, J. Ma, SridharKomarneni, Dongfeng Xue, Microwave-hydrothermal synthesis of Fe-based materials for lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors. Ceramics International 40 (2014) 2877-2884
  45. 45. Y. Huang, Z. Dong, D. Jia, Z. Guo d, Won Il Cho, Electrochemical properties of αFe2O3/MWCNTs as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries, Solid State Ionics 201 (2011) 54-59
  46. 46. A. Ramadoss, Sang Jae Kim, Improved activity of a grapheme-TiO2 hybrid electrode in an electrochemical supercapacitor, CA R B O N 6 3 (2013) 434-445
  47. 47. G. Wang, Z.Y. Liu, J.N. Wu, Q. Lu, Preparation and electrochemical capacitance behavior of TiO2-B nanotubes for hybrid supercapacitor, Materials Letters 71 (2012) 120 122
  48. 48. Bin Zhang, Rui Shi, Yupeng Zhang, Chunxu Pan, CNTs/TiO2 composites and its electrochemical properties after UVlight irradiation, Progress in Natural Science: Materials International 23(2) (2013)164-169
  49. 49. Li. Li, J. Zhangb and Q. Zhua, Novel fractional crystallization route to porous TiO2-Fe2O3 composites: large scale preparation and high performances as photocatalyst and Li-ion battery anode, Dalton Trans. 2015, DOI: 10.1039/C5DT04091D
  50. 50. Luis Zuniga, Gabriel Gonzalez, Roberto Orrostieta Chavez, Jason C. Myers,Timothy P. Lodge and Mataz Alcoutlabi, Centrifugally Spunα -Fe2O3/TiO2/Carbon Composite Fibers as Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries, Appl. Sci. 9 (2019) 4032
  51. 51. S. Guoa, J. Liu, S. Qiu, Y. Wang, X. Yan, N. Wu, S. Wang, Z. Guo, Enhancing Electrochemical Performances of TiO2 Porous Microspheres through Hybridizing with FeTiO3 and Nanocarbon, Electrochimica Acta 190 (2016) 556-565
  52. 52. M. R. Anil Kumar, B. Abebe, H. P. Nagaswarupa, H. C. Ananda Murthy, C. R. Ravikumar & Fedlu Kedir Sabir, Enhanced photocatalytic and electrochemical performance of TiO2-Fe2O3 nanocomposite: Its applications in dye decolorization and as supercapacitors, Scientific Reports 10 (2020) 1249

Written By

Salah Kouass, Hassouna Dhaouadi, Abdelhak Othmani and Fathi Touati

Submitted: 29 September 2020 Reviewed: 07 June 2021 Published: 27 September 2021