Abstract
Parasitic plants are among the most problematic pests of agricultural crops worldwide. They are found worldwide in all plant communities except aquatic. Parasitic plants are the organisms that settle in the host plant by means of the special organs they have developed and penetrate the vascular tissues of the hosts and meet their nutritional, water and mineral needs from the host plant. This particular body they have is called a haustorium. The discovery and investigation of the haustorium structures led to the evaluation of many heterotrophic plant species previously defined as parasitic plants in different groups. Host organisms are very important in completing the life cycle of parasitic plants. In general, the parasite weakens the host, so it produces fewer flowers and viable seeds or the value of the timber is reduced. However, some parasites, mostly annual root parasites belonging to the Orobanchaceae, can kill the host and cause significant economic damage while attacking monocultures in agriculture, and much effort is put into controlling these harmful parasites. Parasitic weeds are difficult to control because there are few resources for crop resistance and it is difficult to apply sufficiently selective control methods to kill weeds without physically and biochemically damaging the crop to which they are attached.
Keywords
- Plants
- Parasitic
- Species
- Agriculture
1. Introduction
Parasitic plants are among the most problematic pests of agricultural crops worldwide. About 4000 parasitic plants exploit another plant vascular system to fulfill their nutrient requirements. The majority, about 90% of these species are hemiparasites retaining photosynthetic capacity while the rest, 390 species are holoparasites with obligate dependence on the host to obtain all their nutrients [1, 2]. They are extremely morphologically diverse and range from diminutive herbaceous plants to large trees, as well as highly reduced parasites that grow embedded in their host and lack leaves and roots. Parasitic plants can be divided according to whether they are photosynthetically active (hemiparasites) or lack of photosynthetic activity, and whether they are completely attached to a host for carbon (holoparasites), whether they are optional or obligate parasites, and whether they are attached to the roots or stem of the host. In natural ecosystems, parasitic plants form a component of the plant community and contribute to the overall community balance of parasitism. Conversely, when parasitic plants are established in low biodiverse agroecosystems, their persistence causes enormous yield losses and renders agricultural land inoperable. It has been determined that many features from seed germination to haustorium formation, from feeding patterns to host selection are based on the relationships between the host and the parasite [3].
Parasitic plants change in host dependence of and the rate at which they can attach. Facultative hemiparasites complete their life cycle without the need for a host. Also, obligate parasites (can be hemi- or holoparasites) need host to survive and reproduce. Most of facultative parasites have a broad range of hosts. For example,
Holoparasities and hemiparasites develop haustoria. There are two types of houstria. Primary haustorium develops directly from the primary root apex. It is the only haustorium to function during the parasite’s lifetime. When only the primary haustorium is present, the parasite is considered evolutionarily more advanced. The development of primary haustorim made holoparasitism possible because holoparasites with small seeds usually require water, and nutrients from a host immediately after germination [5].
Parasitism appeared several times independently during angiosperm evolution, and the lifestyles of parasitic plants vary widely between taxa [1]. Some species are optional parasites that can survive in the absence of a host, others are necessarily parasitic and cannot develop independently. A distinction can be made between hemiparasitic herbs containing chlorophyll and can produce some of the essential nutrients through photosynthesis, and holoparasitic plants that do not contain chlorophyll and are completely dependent on host sources, but this distinction is not always clear [6, 7]. They pose a tremendous threat to the world economy because they are virtually uncontrollable at the moment [8, 9]. They belong to a variety of plant families and are attached to host roots, shoots or branches. The mistletoes like
1.1 Parasitic plants
Weed parasites, usually unique to the host, do their greatest damage before they emerge; therefore, most crop yield loss may occur before infection is diagnosed. Despite intense efforts in the twentieth century, effective ways to selectively control various parasitic weed species are still scary or absent. While all agricultural weeds compete with crops for the field to obtain water, nutrients and light, parasitic weeds are also particularly harmful as they extract valuable water and nutrients directly from the host plant. To extract nutrients from host plants, parasitic weeds have developed a unique multicellular structure called the haustorium that invades the host, connects with the host vascular system and draws the water and nutrients it needs [10, 11]. A successful haustorial connection to the host causes permanent damage to a large part of the crop’s life cycle, lowering the harvested yield, lowering the crop value, and contaminating it with parasitic seeds. Parasitic weed infection strongly reduces crop harvest by disrupting crop orchestration of resource allocation by altering dry matter partitioning between crop organs that prioritize those adjacent to the [12].
1.1.1 Mistletoe
Mistletoe (
The way mistletoe spreads are quite interesting, with all leaves, flowers monogamous and sticky, juicy and soft fruit. Thanks to its sticky structure, the seeds that stick to the beaks and feet of the birds or the birds that eat the fruits, especially the junipers, leave their feces on the trees they put on, and the seeds continue to grow by germinating on the tree they are transported. The germinated mistletoe seeds pierce the bark of the tree and reach their suckers down to the wood pipes and share the water and mineral substances of the host. Yield losses of up to 50 percent can be seen in sensitive fruits due to mistletoe Mistletoe provides its food by inserting its suckers into the trunks and branches of fruit, park and forest trees. Swelling is seen in these parts. It weakens the host tree, decreases the yield, and sometimes causes the old trees to dry. The fruits are spherical and the abundant viscin substance in the fruit flesh provides the stickiness of the fruit and the seed [16]. The stem of the plant lives dependent on the host, if it cannot find a host, it cannot survive. Seed need to attach to the host in germination the duration is known to be 3–5 weeks. By moving the jab body end counterclockwise hugs the host he reaches. Of the held body parasitic plant from the host facing surface, it dips suckers to his host and these suckers connects with its host phloem and xylem. They typically exhibiting broad host ranges, and inflict serious damage to many crops, including forage legumes (alfalfa, clover, lespedeza), potato, carrot, sugar beets, chickpea, onion, cranberry, blueberry, and citrus [17].
1.1.2 Cuscuta spp
Seeds of
1.1.3 Orobanche spp
As a full parasitic weed,
1.1.4 Striga spp
The witchweeds (
In tropical Africa the most damaging parasitic weeds are
2. Management
The use of nitrogen-binding legumes as trap crops has the advantage of increasing soil fertility, which can further assist in
3. Conclusions
Parasitic plants are the biggest threats to important crops and can cause crop losses until complete failure of crop productivity. Integrated pest management systems seem to be the best solution to find effective, long-lasting, widely applicable and environmentally friendly methods for parasitic weed control. Considering the life cycle of parasitic weeds, prevention of seed germination and/or host binding would be ideal targets for the successful management of parasites. Recently, some fungal metabolites are in
References
- 1.
Nickrent D. L. Parasitic Plants of the World [Internet]. 1998. Chapter 2, pp 7-27 in: J A. López-Sáez, P. Catalán and L. Sáez [eds.], Parasitic Plants of the Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands. - 2.
Cimminoa A, Masia M, Rubialesb M, Evidentea A. Fernández-Apariciob M. Allelopathy for Parasitic Plant Management. Natural Product Communications. 2018; 13 (3):289-294. - 3.
Rubiales, D., Heide-Jorgensen, HS. Parasitic Plants. In Enciclopedia of Life Sciences (ELS), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd:Chichester. 2011; DoI:10.1002/9780470015902.a0021271. - 4.
Tawyford, A. Parasitic Plants.2018; DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.030. - 5.
Kuijt J. The Biology of Parasitic Flowering Plants. Berkeley:1969; University California Press. - 6.
Parker, C., Riches CR. Parasitic weeds of the world: biology and control. Wallingford, UK: CAB. International. 1993; 332 p. - 7.
Press MC, Graves JD. Parasitic plants.1995. Chapman and Hall, London. - 8.
Joel DM, Hershenhorn J, Eizenberg H. Biology and management of weedy root parasites. Horticultural Reviews. 2007; 33:267-349. - 9.
Parker, C. Observations on the current status of Orobanche andStriga problems worldwide. Pest Management Science. 2009; 65:453-459. - 10.
Riopel, JL., Timko, MP. Haustorial initation and differentiation. In Press, MC., Graves, JD. Parasitic Plants. Chapman and Hall, London, 1995; 39-79. - 11.
Joel, DM., Gressel, J., Musselman, LJ. eds. Parasitic Orobanchaceae, 2013; (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag). - 12.
Jeschke, WD.; Hilpert, A. Sink-stimulated photosynthesis and sink dependent increase in nitrate uptake: Nitrogen and carbon relations of the parasitic association Cuscuta reflexa –Ricinus communis. Plant Cell Environ. 1997, 20, 47-56. - 13.
Heide-Jørgensen, H.S.; Kuijt, J. The haustorium of the root parasite Triphysaria (Scrophulariaceae), with special reference to xylem bridge ultrastructure. Am. J. Bot. 1995, 82, 782-797. - 14.
Üstüner, T., Duzenli, S., Kitis, YE. Determination of Infection Rate of Mistletoe ( Viscum album ) on Hosts in Niğde. Turkish Journal of Weed Science. 2015; 18(1): 6-14. - 15.
Barney, CW. Hawksworth, FG., Geils, BW. European Journal of Forest Pathology. 1998; 28(3):187-208. - 16.
Baser, KHC. Ökseotu ( Viscum album L.)BagBahce 2014.54:22-23. - 17.
Nemli Y. Çiçekli Parazitlerden Cuscuta L.’nın Anadolu Türleri Üzerinde Morfolojik ve Sistematik Araştırmalar. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi. 1978; 108 p. İzmir. - 18.
Dawson JH., Musselman LJ., Wolswinkel P., Dorr I. Biology and control of ¨ Cuscuta , Rev Weed Sci. 1994; 6:265-317. - 19.
Goldwasser Y. Tolerance of tomato varieties to lespedeza dodder. Weed Sci. 2001; 49 520-523. - 20.
Nemli Y, Öngen N. Türkiye’nin Trakya Bölgesi Küsküt Türleri ( Cuscuta spp.) Üzerinde Taksonomik Çalışmalar. Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi. 1982; 6(3): 147-154. - 21.
Mishra J. S., (2009) Biology and Management of Cuscuta species, Indian Journal of Weed Science, 41 (1-2):1-11. - 22.
Töngel, MÖ., Ayan, İ., Samsun ili çayır ve meralarında yetişen bazı zararlı bitkiler ve hayvanlar üzerindeki etkileri. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 2005; 20(1): 84- 93. - 23.
Kaya I., Nemli Y. and Demir I. Taxonomic characteristics, distributions and hosts of dodder species ( Cuscuta spp. ) seen in agricultural and nonagricultural areas in Turkey. (In Turkish with English Abstract). Turk J Weed Sci, 2018; 21(1):1-7. - 24.
Aksoy, E., Arslan ZF., Tetik O., Eymirli S. Utilization Opportunities from Allelopathic Features of Some Catch and Trap Crops for Controlling Egyptian Broomrape [ Phelipanche aegyptiaca (Pers.) Pomel] in Tomato Fields. Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2014;20: 126-135 - 25.
Kadıoğlu, I., Küsküt (Cuscuta sp.) ve mücadelesi. Herboloji Haberleri, Ç. Ü., Ziraat Fak., Bitki Koruma Bölümü, 1992; 3(5): 1-11. - 26.
Linke KH, Singh KB, Saxena MC. Screening technique for resistance to Orobanche crenata Forsk., in chickpea. International Chickpea Newsletter. 1991;24, 32– 34. - 27.
Dafaallah, AB., Babiker, AGT, Zain El abdeen, MH. Variability in Striga hermonthica (Del.) Benth, Populations in Gadarif Area, Eastern Sudan.Sudan University of Science and Technology Journal of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences. 2015; 16 (2),119-132. - 28.
Westwood, JH., Yoder, JI., Timko, MP., Pamphilis, CW. The evolution of parasitism in plants. Trend. Plant Sci. 2010; 15 (4);227-235. - 29.
Gressel J. Crops with target-site herbicide resistance for Orobanche and Striga control. Pest Management Science. 2009; 65:560-565. - 30.
Sounders, AR. Studies in phanerogamic parasitism, with particular reference to Striga lutea Lour, South Africa Department of Agriculture Science Bulletin, 1993; 128:1-56. - 31.
Kotan, R., Okutucu, A., Gormez, AA., Karagoz, K., Dadasoglu, Karaman, I., Hasanekoglu, I., Kordali, S. Parasitic Bacteria and Fungi on Common Mistletoe (Viscum album L.) and Their Potential Application in Biocontrol. Journal of Phytopathology, 2012; doi: 10.1111/jph.12048. - 32.
Watson, AK. Biocontrol. In Parasitic Orobanchaceae ; Joel, DM., Gressel, J., Musselman, LJ., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; 469-497. - 33.
Oswald A Striga control: technologies and their dissemination. Crop Prot. 2005; 24:333-342. - 34.
Khan ZR, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ, Hassanali A, Midega CAO.Combined control of Striga hermonthica and stemborers by maize Desmodium spp. intercrops. Crop Prot. 2006; 25:989-995. - 35.
Lins RD, Colquhoun JB, Mallory-Smith CA (2006) Investigation of wheat as a trap crop for control of Orobanche minor . Weed Research 46: 313-318. - 36.
Botanga, C.J., S.O. Alabi, C.A. Echekwu and S.T.O. Lagoke, 2003. Genetics of suicidal germination of Striga hermonthica (Del.) benth by cotton. Crop Sci., 43: 483-488. - 37.
Khan, ZR., Picket, JA., Van den Berg, J., Wadhams LJ., Woodcock CM. Exploiting chemical ecology and species diversity: stemborer and Striga control for maize and sorghum in Africa Pest Manage. Sci. 2000; 56: 957-962.