Flame Retardant Treatments of Nylon Textiles: A Shift towards Eco-Friendly Approaches

Among the synthetic polymeric textiles, Nylon (Polyamide) textiles (Nylon66/ Nylon 6) are one of the most widely used materials, especially as apparel and industrial uses for their excellent properties, namely higher strength and good wear resistance. Unfortunately, due to their organic structures, they show the relative ease of burning, which poses a great risk to fire. For the flame retardant (FR) treatment of nylon textiles, several strategies have been developed throughout the years and the earlier studies show the enormous uses of petroleum-based flame retardant compounds via energy intensive application methods. However, the rapid improvement in living standards as well as the recent call for a reduction of environmental impacts during manufacturing and use have been pushed researchers to come up with environmentally benign chemistries and processes. Therefore, the challenges in search of the most sustainable, efficient and durable flame retardant treatments for nylon textiles still remain as a hot topic to be addressed. This chapter discusses the eco-friendly approaches that have been taken in escalating the fire performance of these novel nylon textiles, especially focusing on the applied compounds and the application techniques along with the durability issues of such applications.


Introduction
The consequences of fire related incidents leave a serious impact on human life and its property as well. Frequently, these fires are ignited from the polymeric materials, including textiles we use in our daily life as in consumer goods, home furnishings, transportation, apparel and protective clothing, etc. The world fire statistics reveal that the textiles and upholstered furniture are the first item to be ignited by small flames such as cigarettes and candles, thus producing the most common fire [1,2]. Meanwhile, the textile materials release smoke and toxic gases while going through the combustion process, which in turn limit the evacuation in fire disasters and worsen the fire scenario [3,4]. In addition, these fires cause huge economical losses as well as deaths of human beings [5,6]. Thus, the researcher is making continual efforts to investigate the flammability of textiles in order to improve their fire performance. On the other hand, the growing concern over the sustainability issues infer that fire retardants should leave a low impact on health and the environment during the entire life cycle including recycling and disposal. It also demands to come up

General combustion behaviors of textiles and strategies of flame retardant mechanism
In general, combustion of a typical polymer substrate happens in contact of a fire source and in the presence of air or oxygen. Prior to the combustion process, the textile materials degrade thermally, while some of the degraded species turn into combustible volatiles and serially, in the presence of oxygen, they kindle the flame. In a logical way, while the heat generation exceeds the threshold to sustain the combustion process, the excessive heat transmitted to the textile material, usually accelerates the degradation process and form a self-sustaining combustion cycle as presented in Figure 1 [7]. In line, we also need to study the mechanism of action of various flame retardants on textiles to evaluate a particular flame-retardant system Combustion cycle of a typical textile material. [7], Copyright 2020. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier ltd. Flame Retardant Treatments of Nylon Textiles: A Shift towards Eco-Friendly Approaches DOI: http://dx.doi.org /10.5772/intechopen.94880 to a specific polymer. In general, the common flame retardant mechanism can be divided into two different modes of action likely (1) gas or vapor phase mechanism and (2) solid or condensed phase mechanism that break the polymer combustion cycle (see Figure 1). The gas phase flame retardant mechanism normally does not change the thermal decomposition of a polymeric substrate, whereas the flameretardant compound goes for decomposition in the presence of heat and generates free radicals. These free radicals either combine with atmospheric oxygen/ air through complex reactions or capture the radicals released from the polymer substrate to quench the total combustion process [12]. Meanwhile, in the condensed phase mechanism, combustion process brings structural changes in the polymer substrate via promoting polymer cross-linking to form a carbonaceous char onto the material surfaces. In line, these char residues make insulation between the polymer substrate and the flaming zone to curb the creation of new fuel and stop further burning. Another form of the condensed phase mechanism involves an additive, creating a physical barrier via releasing water during heating, which ultimately cools down the surface and slows the heat and mass transfer [13].
Briefly, a typical flame retardant (FR) compound inhibits the flammability of a polymeric/textile material in several ways mentioned as follows [14]: (i) FR compound can minimize the generation of heat to retard the combustion process, (ii) it can alter the pyrolysis pathway via lowering the generation of flammable volatiles while favoring the char formation to limit the heat and mass transfer via creating an insulation layer between the textile material and the fire source, (iii) in some extent, it can release water vapor as a byproduct to dilute the concentration of available oxygen and flammable volatiles to lower the heat flow back to the textile material, and (iv) it can release flame inhibitors in the gas phase (i.e., chlorinated, brominated and phosphorus species) to quench the intensity of combustion via capturing flammable radicals.

Combustion and thermal behaviors of nylon textiles
To come up with a suitable flame retardant approach along with an applicable flame-retarding agent for nylon textiles, it is thus needed to understand their thermal and flammability behaviors. In general, the polymeric materials release gases like CO, NO 2 and HCN, etc. when they are burned [15] and it is also observed that the evolution of CO differs from fiber to fiber. Meanwhile, polyamide fibers show self-extinguishing behavior due to its extensive shrinkage and dripping in combustion [16]. During burning, polyamide ignites with molten droplets and drip away from the flame; most of the heat is carried away with the droplet, making the material selfextinguishing. However, if the molten droplets burn continuously, this will encourage a greater fire hazard and pose a secondary fire risk. In inert atmosphere and at a higher temperature range (i.e., above 300°C), the main decomposition products released by polyamides are about 95% non-volatiles and the remaining volatile compounds mainly consist of CO 2 , CO, water, ethanol, benzene, cyclopentanone, ammonia, others aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, etc. [17,18]. However, in air atmosphere and at temperatures below 200°C, the degradation pattern of polyamide is different [17] where the volatile products to be likely water 52%, CO 2 33%, CO 12%, and methanol, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde are around 1% each. Moreover, the pyrolysis process also causes de-polymerization of its structure [19]. The suggested oxidative decomposition mechanism of polyamide structure is given in Figure 2 [20].
From Figure 2, it is assumed that like the oxidative degradation of hydrocarbons, the oxygen molecule initiates the chain process of oxidation of polyamides (Eq. 1). At first, hydrogen atom will be abstracted and subsequently, either peroxide radical or a hydroperoxide will be formed (Eq. 2 and 3). Later, with the decomposition of hydroperoxide, water will be formed (Eq. 4). The formation of water can lead to the hydrolysis of the polymer and thus, on decarboxylation, CO 2 will be produced. Apart from the decomposition of peroxide, the peroxide radicals may also break down in the degradation process. These radicals may also go through isomerization via making reaction with the free valence of the adjacent C-C bond. Ultimately, this kind of isomerization as well as the breakdown of peroxide radicals causes the collapse of molecular chains to form a molecule with a terminal aldehyde group (a) and a radical (b) (Eq. 5). Afterwards, these aldehyde groups go for further decomposition to the form CO (Eq. 6), while the radicals (b) cause the rupture of the C-C bond to form a secondary C-O bond and thus, in turn direct the creation of formaldehyde (Eq. 7).

Flame retardant treatment of nylon textiles
Formerly, numerous approaches are considered to make the nylon textiles flame retardant, especially at a fiber stage. Of them, strategies like application of fire retardant additives and co-monomers during polymerization and in the spinning dope, development of inherently fire retardant fibers and fiber blending are notable [21]. However, due to the possibility of polymer degradation and leaching of flame retardant compounds at a fiber stage finishing, a kind of topical finishing or post-treatments are commonly proposed for conferring the flame retardancy of Possible oxidative decomposition mechanism for polyamides [20]. nylon textiles in the recent time [22]. Meanwhile, the earlier applications, mostly receive the attention of halogenated species [23,24] and petro-based flame retardant compounds containing phosphorus, nitrogen [25,26] and sulfur elements where the uses of bio-derived flame retardants are rarely seen.
Though the nylon textiles (nylon 66/nylon 6) possess almost similar chemical, physical, thermal and fire behaviors, they belong to a different chemical structure. Thus, they have different surface functional groups and a varied level of crystallinity, which ultimately affects the processing of these textiles during finishing. As we know that nylon 66 is made from two monomers namely, hexamethylenediamine and adipic acid; each containing 6 carbon atoms and carries amino and carboxylic acid as functional groups. While, nylon 6 is synthesized from a single monomer namely caprolactam (also called ε-caprolactam) having 6 carbons via ring-opening polymerization and only carries amino functional groups.
In the following section, the very common flame retardant finishes applied to nylon 66/nylon 6 textiles both at the fiber and fabric stage are discussed.

FR treatment at fiber stage
The fiber stage flame retardant finishing of Nylon 66 textiles is usually done using polymerization, electrospinning, mixing or blending techniques. In some applications, halogen free flame retardant compounds, namely a mixture; comprising of phosphorus and boron esters via ionic introduction [27] and melamine cyanurate (MCA) via in situ polymerization [28] are considered. While, a kind of condensation polymerization using nylon salt and 9,10-dihydro-9,10-oxa-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide (DOPO)-based flame retardant working in gas phase is also exploited [29] to prepare the flame retardant nylon 66 fibers. Recently, a hybridized flame retardant compound [30], namely a kind of encapsulated nanoscale graphene with red phosphorus is used to prepare core-shell structured polyamide 66 nanofiber via a coaxial electrospinning method. However, till the date, the application of fully green compounds as a flame retardant is still absent in preparing the flame retardant nylon 66 fibers. The main results of these applications are presented in Table 1.

FR treatment at fabric stage
The flame retardant treatment of nylon 66 textiles at the fabric stage is usually done in the form of surface coatings via numerous techniques, namely pad-dry-cure, UV grafting, plasma deposition, layer-by-layer assembly and sol-gel process [31][32][33][34]. In earlier applications, petro-based compounds are widely used, however, with the growing concern of adverse impacts posed by petro-based flame retardants, researchers are paying attention on the green flame retardants and in some extent, semi-green application approaches are also seen in the recent time.

Application of fully bio-based flame-retardants
The flame retardant treatment of nylon textiles using fully bio-based compounds are yet to be in extensive uses as a very few work focuses on it. For example, Kundu et al. [35] consider all green compounds, namely bio-derived chitosan (CS), phytic acid (PA) and oxidized sodium alginate (OSA) for the first time ever to improve the flame retardancy of nylon 66 textiles. These coatings with a 10 to 15 quadra-layer (QL; deposition of consecutive four layers constructs a single quadra-layer) (see Figure 3) depositions stop the melt dripping of fabric materials.
Here, the use of these green polyelectrolytes plays a multiple role as an acid source, a carbon source and a foaming agent and thus, their interactions facilitate the intumescent process in a condensed phase mechanism to control the flame spread process. More importantly, it is found that the use of OSA improves the durability of this multilayered nanocoating via offering covalent interactions. This is the first attempt to use fully renewable and environmentally friendly intumescent LbL coating in improving the flame retardant properties of a thermoplastic textile like nylon 66. In addition, this is also a very first attempt to improve the durability of LbL assembled coatings for nylon textiles against home laundering as the coatings developed via non-covalent forces (i.e., ionic interaction) show poor wash durability. In line, another environmentally friendly and fully bio-based synthesized compound, namely tannic acid-terephthalate (TAT) (see Figure 4x) obtained from tannic acid, is applied onto the nylon 66 fabric surfaces via pad-dry-cure process [36]. This kind of green coating surely imparts excellent flame retardancy to the textile substrate in terms of obtaining self-extinguishing behavior and reduced char length in the   vertical flame test (see Figure 4y). Here, the cross-linked phenol species belonging to TAT structure helps to build up charring in the solid phase and exhibits a positive impact in enhancing flame retardancy of nylon substrate. Just a very thin layer of such coating (i.e., only add-on of 6 wt.%) helps to obtain self-extinguishing behavior and brings a considerable decrease (i.e., 20-25%) in heat release rate. The main results of these applications are summarized in Table 2.

Application of hybrid flame-retardants
To address the environmental issues, researchers equally put focus on the numerous hybrid application techniques, namely they consider the combined use of both the bio-derived and petro-based compounds, even in some applications, they opt to blend the mineral with the bio/petro-based compounds in a semi eco-friendly application. For example, Kundu et al. [37] combine an inorganic boron compound like sodium tetraborate with the bio-derived compounds like chitosan (CS) and phytic acid (PA) to simultaneously improve the flame retardant properties of PA66 textiles and to stabilize the ionically assembled coatings (see Figure 5). Here, the modification of nylon 66 textile with chitosan, phytic acid and borate compounds boosts up the charring of the same while providing enhanced stability of char residues. In addition, the borate induced cross-linking offers added stability of as-prepared coating in detergent solution.
Presently, this hybrid methodology has been expanded further in several works where Kundu et al. [38] come up with the hybridization of some alkoxy silane based compounds, namely (3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES) and boron doped APTES sol solutions with some bio-originated compounds like chitosan and phytic acid in the hybrid application (i.e., LbL deposition/sol-gel process). Here, the simultaneously APTES and B-d-APTES sols treated and LbL deposited fabrics stop the melt-dripping in the vertical burning test. Meanwhile, the boron doped APTES sol treated fabrics reveal improved charring and thermal stability in TG analysis. It is speculated that the phytic acid, being a phosphorus compound, catalyzes the charring while the silicon and boron compounds endow with excellent shielding to these char residues. Thus, an added level of char yield% is experienced and finally, this thermally stable char residues impart enhanced flame retardancy to the nylon textile. In addition, this kind of hybrid application, namely LbL assembly (i.e., 5 bi-layers deposition) and simultaneous sol-gel treatment offers durability to the applied finish against home laundering. In another application, Kundu et al. [39] introduce a hybrid methodology via using a chitosan derivative, namely phosphorylated chitosan (PCS) along with an alkoxy-silane like (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES). Here, the PCS is grafted onto the surface of nylon 66 fabrics via UV-induced grafting polymerization and subsequently, these grafted fabrics are further modified by APTES through sol-gel process in order to form a cross-linked coating (see Figure 6). The   grafting and sol-gel treatment stop the melt dripping and improve other flame retardant parameters. The prominent flame retardant properties for the simultaneous PCS and APTES treated PA66 fabrics are due to the joint effect of thermal shielding exerted by the silica and char-forming effect derived from PCS. Hybridization in the deposition method, namely synchronization of layer by layer (LBL) assembly with the pad-dry-cure technique is seen in preparing a flame retardant hybrid coating for nylon 66 fabric [40]. Here, some bio-derived compounds like chitosan and phytic acid are combined with melamine and graphene oxide (GO). This hybrid application significantly improves the flame retardancy with a considerable improvement in thermal stability and char yield%. Furthermore, the application of a nanocomposite layer prepared from chitosan/ graphene oxide on top of the LbL assembled film offers covalent cross-linking to the underneath ionic-assembled coating, which impart considerable durability to the applied finishing to retain flame retardant performance even after 10 laundering cycles. In line, graphene oxide (GO) is functionalized with some plant derived biomolecules namely, lignin (L) and phytic acid (PA) (see Figure 7) and used accordingly in modifying the fire performance of nylon 66 fabrics in a one pot deposition [41]. Here, in some formulations, chitosan as a naturally derived charring agent is also considered to enhance the charrability of such finishing further. The as prepared thin film (i.e., add on is less than 10%) barely alters the physical properties (i.e., color, handle and tensile strength, etc.) of treated fabrics. Meanwhile, this kind of application offers better thermal stability and improved fire performance alongside the wash durability of applied finishes. Here, the inclusion of citric acid as a cross-linking agent extends some cross-linking interaction among the applied compounds to retain the flame retardancy even after 5 washing cycles.
Another bio-derived compound, namely soybean protein isolation (SPI) is used with thiourea via a simple pad-dry process to impart flame retardant properties to  nylon 66 fabrics [42]. This kind of hybridization in the applied compounds comes up with reduced burning length and no dripping for the modified textiles. Here, it is speculated that these hybrid compounds may release non-combustible gases like H 2 S, NH 3 and H 2 O in the gas phase and produce compact char residues in the solid phase during burning. In line, these noncombustible gases dilute the fuel/oxygen concentration and the obtained char layers provide insulation between the fire zone and textile substrate to prevent the transfer of heat and oxygen. Therefore, it is perceived that the N, P, S and metal elements in SPI play a vital role in modifying the fire behaviors of polymeric substrates and offer better flame retardancy in a sustainable manner.
In some application, pure chitosan (CS) along with its phosphorus-derivative, namely phosphorylated chitosan (PCS) are used to construct a flame retardant coating for nylon 66 textiles while poly-acrylate sodium (PAS) is accompanied with them as a cross-linking agent [43]. The coating is prepared both in LbL assembly and one pot deposition method to make a comparison between the application method (see Figure 8). Here, the LbL assembled coatings possess superior homogeneity in the coating structure over the one pot deposited one. Meanwhile, the LbL assembled coatings with a higher add on% offer an improved LOI value and also bring a considerable reduction in pHRR for the nylon substrate. In addition, the PAS cross-linking via thermal treatment stabilizes the deposited coatings to a certain extent; as the fabrics prepared in this process retain the UL-94-V1 rating after the 5 times washing in laundering. It is also found that the LbL assembly imparts better flame retardancy than the one-pot deposition technique as a higher weight gain% in LbL deposition offer this superior flame retardant properties irrespective of deposition techniques.
In another application [44], a petro-based P-compound, namely DOPA, a DOPO derivative, is combined with the bio-based chitosan (CS) in a semi bio-based flame retardant application via a simple pad-dry-cure method as shown in Figure 9. Here, the nylon 66 modified with chitosan and 10 wt. % of DOPA reveals an excellent flame retardancy in terms of significant reduction in pHRR compared to the nylon 66 modified only with DOPA. It is speculated that the P and N elements available from DOPA and chitosan respectively appear to be involved synergistically to offer enhanced flame retardancy. In line, the co-presence of DOPA and CS ensures a synergistic gas phase and solid phase activity where DOPA exhibits a quenching effect in the gas phase and chitosan takes part in the charring process in the condensed phase.
Even in some applications, several novel nanoparticles (NPs) namely, TiO 2 and SiO 2 are blended with naturally derived phytic acid (PA) and chitosan (CS) via a pad-dry-cure technique [45]. The blended formulation of PA-TiO 2 enhances the limiting oxygen index (LOI) and increases char yield% of treated textiles. Conversely, the introduction of chitosan (CS) into the PA-TiO 2 /SiO 2 formulations brings a significant reduction in the peak heat release rate (pHRR). In addition, the formulations containing nanoparticles (TiO 2 /SiO 2 ) along with phytic acid boost up the tensile strength of treated textiles. Here, it is realized that the hybrid complexes of nanoparticles and bio-based compounds can be considered as a big alternative of the traditional halogen and phosphorus containing synthetic compounds. The main results of these applications are presented in Table 3.

FR treatment at fiber stage
At the fiber stage finishing, a higher loading of a typical flame retardant is usually considered in imparting a satisfactory level of flame retardancy, which ultimately affects the mechanical properties of treated fibers and causes the spinning process difficult. For example, Coquelle et al. [46] use ammonium sulfamate (AS) as an additive flame retardant for nylon 6. Here, a loading of 5 wt.% AS in PA6 matrix leaves no significant changes since the pure PA6 and modified PA6 fiber come up with an almost similiar fiber diameter (see Figure 10). An investigation based on the loading % of AS on the physical properties of modified nylon 6 fibers show that the fibers modified with less than 7 wt. % of AS are quite spinnable without alteration of the mechanical properties. In contrast, a higher loading (i.e., 10 wt. %) makes the material brittle and   Table 3.
Collected results of flame retardant treatment for nylon 66 fabric.

Figure 10.
Optical microscope photographs of PA6 (a) and PA6/AS 5% (b) fibers [46], copyright 2014. Reproduced with permission from Elsevier ltd.  So, a low loading of additive compounds is preferable (i.e., less than or equal 10 wt. %) to retain spinablity of fibers to make the fabric from them and thus, a kind of trade-off between the loading of FR compounds and mechanical properties of fibers should be maintained in the fire retardant finishing of nylon 6 fibers. This low loading approach has been materialized in some application [47] where two different formulations are considered working in the different flame retardant mechanism (i.e., gas/solid). For example, aluminum diethyl phosphinate (AlPi) working primarily in the gas phase is mixed up with some clay additives like nanoclay, organically modified montmorillonite clay and Cloisite 25A active in the condensed phase. While, in another formulation, ammonium sulphamate (AS)/dipentaerythritol (DP) at 2.5/1 wt. % supposed to be active in the condensed phase, are blended with the same clay-based additives as mentioned earlier. Here, the different formulations come up with different level of flame retardancy as the AlPi-based formulation is incapable to impart self-extinguishability, though the clay-based additives can minimize the burning rate and modify the melt dripping phenomenon. In contrast, the AS/DP-based formulation at a loading of 5.5 wt. % or less offers better flame retardancy and in addition, the clay additives helps to rectify the dripping phenomenon remarkably. From the images of burning fabrics, it is observed that the PA6/AS/DP/clay-containing fabrics (see Figure 11y) show definite self-extinguishing characteristics unlike the PA6/AlPi/clay-containing fabric substrates (see Figure 11x) and thus, the PA6/AS/DP/ clay formulation exhibits potential to be considered in the commercial scale.
Another clay based (i.e., MMT) additive approach is considered [48] to prepare the flame retardant nylon 6 nanocomposite nanofibers. Here, the MMT platelets as a nano-filler is blended with Exolit OP1312; a phosphorus-based non-halogenated additive via electrospinning. In this application, a higher loading of filler material (i.e., nanoclay particles) also affects the electrospinnability of this nanocomposite like other ordinary additive compounds. In another application [49], flame retardant PA6 fiber is developed using a composite formulation, namely via incorporation of melamine cyanurate (MCA) in nylon 6 matrix through in-situ polymerization process. Here, the MCA disperses into the nylon 6 matrix in a homogeneous manner without agglomeration as seen in the SEM images (see Figure 12) and thus, the interfacial interaction with the matrix is amplified in many folds. The as prepared composite fiber with a loading of only 8 wt. % of MCA shows satisfactory flame retardancy. Even, this lower loading % deteriorates the physical properties of the composite fiber as the tenacity at break decreases from 4.85 to 3.11 cN.dtex −1 , but still meet the requirements of fabric preparation. Moreover, this in-situ polymerization approach opens the way for the preparation of flame retardant nylon 6 fibers with good spinnability.
Apart from these, a phosphorus-based DOPO derivative, namely 9, 10-dihydro-10-[2, 3 di (hydroxycarbonyl) propyl]-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide (DDP), active in the gas phase, goes through the polycondensation reaction with caprolactam (see Figure 13) to develop intrinsically flame retardant nylon 6 fibers [50]. The melt-spun fiber prepared with a loading of 5 wt. % DDP attains a V-0 rating and also obtains a significant increase in LOI value. In addition, this kind of modification does not alter much the spinnability of such fibers in fabric preparation. Here, DDP acts both in the solid and gas phase via escalating charring and producing noncombustible gases respectively to impart fire retardant properties to the modified nylon 6 fibers.
The application of petro-based phosphorus compounds are further extended to develop flame-retarded nylon 6 fibers [51]. Here, at the first stage, co-condensation of ε-caprolactam is carried out via melt-polymerization process and later, a low loading of phosphorus-based FR co-monomer is introduced into the polymer chain with an aim to keep the tensile properties less hampered. Two different phosphorus compounds, namely 3 hydroxyphenylphosphinylpropanoic acid (3-HPP, 1) and 9,10-dihydro-10-[2,3 di(hydroxycarbonylpropyl]-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide (DDP, 2) are considered (see Figure 14a) and finally, they are integrated into the nylon 6 backbones (see Figure 14b). Such treatment eases the processing of flame  retardant nylon 6, especially at the fiber stage. In addition, this kind of facile application rarely alters the tensile properties of nylon substrate, which usually happens in the bulk state application of flame retardant compounds. In line, hexaphenoxycyclotriphosphazene (HPCP) [52], a petro-based phosphorus compound, is considered to modify the flame-retardant properties of nylon 6 fibers (see Figure 15a). Here, the nylon 6 chips are blended with the flame retardant compound (HPCP) and fibers are prepared via melt spinning process. It is found that a loading up to 15 wt. % of HPCP does not deteriorate the spinnability of the modified fibers while a slight reduction of tensile properties is observed. Meanwhile, such modification imparts added flame retardancy to the nylon 6 fibers, especially in terms of increased LOI value and improved charring. In addition, the burning behavior is modified as the damaged length and burning time become shortened while dripping rate is minimized and no smoldering effect is observed (see Figure 15b). Here, HPCP primarily acts in the condensed phase via producing aromatic char residues along with the release of noncombustible gases like CO, CO 2 and NH 3 in the gas phase.
Apart from the previous techniques, a newly adopted technique, namely electron beam irradiation [53] is also considered in several applications to develop flame retarded nylon 6 fibers. Using this irradiation, some sort of cross-linking is induced to the polymer structure to alter the physical-chemical and thermal behaviors of the same. In some occasion, this irradiation-based cross-linking is carried out in presence of triallylcyanurate (TAC) to avail added benefits. As this kind of cross-linking usually improves the anti-dripping properties of nylon fibers while enhancing the physical properties like breaking strength and elongation at break, especially at a lower dosing. In line, such irradiation is also carried out in the presence of γ-rays along with some sensitizers like trimethallylisocyanurate (TMAIC) and trimethylolpropanetrimethylacrylate (TMPTMA) [54]. In order to overcome the low yield % in cross-linking reaction under the low radiation technique, different types of sensitizers are associated to overcome this shortcoming [55]. Meanwhile, this sensitizer assisted cross-linking alters the nylon 6 fiber structure into a three-dimensional network, which imparts improved anti-dripping properties to the modified fibers. The major results of the above section are summarized in Table 4.

FR treatment at fabric stage
A very few attempts have been adopted so far to modify the flame retardant behaviors of nylon 6 textiles at fabric stage. Apaydin et al. [56] first take the initiative to come up with surface finishing of nylon 6 fabrics and introduce layer by layer (LbL) technique in preparing a flame retardant coating using two different types of polyelectrolytes (see Figure 16x). One is petro-based organic compound, namely polyallylamine (PAH) (polycation) and the other is an inorganic mineral compound like montmorillonite (MMT) (polyanion). The prepared coatings come up with a homogeneous distribution of coating ingredients with some roughness while in 20 bilayers deposited fabric sample, the MMT platelets lay in a parallel alignment (see Figure 16y). And this parallel distribution of MMT platelets ultimately imparts better mechanical and barrier properties to the coating structure. Meanwhile, the as prepared coatings, especially with 10 and 20 bilayers deposition offer enhanced thermal stability of the fabric substrate with a significant reduction in pHRR.   Table 4.
Collected results of flame retardant treatment for nylon 6 fiber.
Apart from the LbL assembly, a sol-gel technique using DOPO-VTS and TEOS is also adopted in developing flame retardant finishes onto the nylon 6 fabric surfaces [57]. The co-application of silicon compounds with a DOPO derivative ensures added charring while providing thermal stability to these residues, which acts positively to stop the melt-dripping of nylon fabrics.
Moreover, flame-retarded nylon 6 textiles with a knitted structure is developed using a different technique [58]. Here, a blending technique is adopted to mix three different components, namely nylon 6 multifilament, commercially available nylon 6 polymer chips and synthesized flame-retarded nylon 66. Initially, the flame-retarded nylon 66 is developed through the co-condensation reaction of hexamethylenediammoniumadipate (AH-salt) with the salts of hexamethylene diamine and two different organophosphorus compounds  like 3 hydroxyphenylphosphinylpropanoic acid (3-HPP) and 9,10-dihydro-10-[2,3-di (hydroxycarbonylpropyl]-10-phosphaphenanthrene-10-oxide (DDP). Here, the mixing of flame retardant compounds with varied polyamides ensures better miscibility and compatibility of the composites, which help the modified nylon 6 fiber to retain its physical properties as well as overcoming the post-synthesis shortcomings related to bleeding and higher loading of flame retardant compounds. Finally, the prepared fabric with a knitted structure using these flame-retarded nylon 6 fibers come up with a very high LOI value (i.e., [36][37][38] and reveals improvements in other parameters. The key results of this section are presented in Table 5.

Conclusions
The flame retardant treatment of nylon textiles is getting constant development with time and becoming more sustainable in terms of uses of bio-derived flame retardant compounds and the green application processes. However, in the earlier applications, the use of petro-based flame retardant compounds has been more prominent. Additionally, it is seen that the fiber stage finishing has been more preferable over the topical finishing in the previous applications. Nonetheless, this fiber stage finishing still exists at a limited scale while some sort of modification is initiated in the current applications to convert this process more eco-friendly. However, due to the limitation of fiber stage finishing method related to the poor mechanical or physical properties in the modified fibers, the topical finishing has become very popular in today's applications. Meanwhile, the green practices in topical/surface finishing, especially in terms of flame retardant compounds and application methods are increasing day by day. These bio-derived compounds show efficacy in improving some crucial flame retardant parameters, namely reducing pHRR and enhancing the char yield % as their polyalcoholic aromatic structure favors the condensed phase mechanism. However, they are yet to show the potency in improving LOI values and thermal stability. Even in some extent, coatings developed from bio-derived polyelectrolytes via ionic interaction suffer from poor wash durability, which need to be optimized further. In line, some sort of hybridization, both in application methods (i.e., sol-gel/layer-by-layer assembly, etc.) and in flame retardant compounds (i.e., organic/inorganic/nanocompounds) have been enormously used in these days. In a typical application, flame retardant compounds belonging to organic species produce charring while the inorganic species offer shielding effect to these char residues to safeguard the underneath textiles from further burning. Such kind of hybridization has been found beneficial in improving  the charring ability of nylon textiles as the nylon polymers show poor charring due to their typical aliphatic structures. Though some recent works have already shown promise in imparting flame retardant properties to the nylon textiles considering the environmental impacts and durability issues of such finishing methods, still there are challenges to imply them commercially.