Electrooxidation as a Pretreatment Process Before Cyanidation

The poor extraction of refractory gold ores is an old and still existing problem. Gold losses in cyanidation are mainly due to the presence of sulfide and carbonaceous materials (1,2,3). The decomposition of sulfide minerals during the cyanidation of refractory gold ores creates two types of impurities: metal cations and sulfur compounds (HS--, S2O32-, and SO32-). The metal cations form complexes with cyanide ion and consume reagent. The sulfide ion is considered to be a powerful poison during the cyanidation and may adsorb on gold, causing the inhibition of gold dissolution reaction by passivation. Sulfur compounds form thiocyanate by consuming cyanide ion and oxygen.


Introduction
The poor extraction of refractory gold ores is an old and still existing problem.Gold losses in cyanidation are mainly due to the presence of sulfide and carbonaceous materials (1,2,3).The decomposition of sulfide minerals during the cyanidation of refractory gold ores creates two types of impurities: metal cations and sulfur compounds (HS --, S 2 O 3 2-, and SO 3 2-).The metal cations form complexes with cyanide ion and consume reagent.The sulfide ion is considered to be a powerful poison during the cyanidation and may adsorb on gold, causing the inhibition of gold dissolution reaction by passivation.Sulfur compounds form thiocyanate by consuming cyanide ion and oxygen.
Carbonaceous gold ores contain (a) an activated component which is capable of adsorbing gold complexes from the solution, (b) a mixture of hydrocarbons usually associated with active carbon components (they formed a gold complex during the deposition that was not attacked by cyanide), and (c) an organic acid similar to humic acid, which contains functional groups capable of interacting with gold complexes to form organic gold compounds which might possibly be formed by chelation (1,2,3).
Various procedures had been investigated in an attempt to enhance gold recovery from different ores, including roasting, kerosene treatment, flotation, and aqueous oxidation.If roasting or aqueous oxidation is carried out before cyanidation, the sulfur species tend to oxidize to the less harmful sulfate form.There are several aqueous oxidation techniques prior to cyanidation to treat refractory gold ores: chemical (chlorine, hypochlorite, chlorates, perchlorates, ozone, oxygen, and sulfuric acid) or electrochemical oxidation, pressure leaching, and bacterial leaching.
Oxidation of carbon and sulfide minerals by sodium hypochlorite is a possible method to render the ore amenable to cyanidation, and earlier work by the USBM indicates that electrochemical generation of hypochlorite is promising.An electro-oxidation process was developed by the U.S. Bureau of Mines for generating oxidizing conditions in situ in a pulp prepared from finely ground carbonaceous gold ore and sodium chloride solution (4).Gold extraction by cyanidation after oxidation increased almost in every case compared to that obtained without pretreatment.Electro-oxidation of carbonaceous gold ores, sulfidic gold and silver ores containing pyrite, pyrrhotite, and arsenopyrite has been extensively studied in a laboratory and pilot scale.There are also several studies carried out on the oxidation of pyrite, pyrrhotite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, arsenopyrite, gersdorffite (NiAsS) in chlorine saturated water.Arsenopyritic gold is a major source of refractory gold not amenable to roasting.Biooxidation is a popular treatment option but is slow and needs careful control of the As content of the feed.Electrochemical slurry oxidation in-situ with chlorine in acidified salt water can provide a more environmentally friendly process flow-sheet than carbon-inpulp/leach processing and can be applied to a small or large resource.Chlorine and hypochlorite are not cheap and not fully used in oxidation, electrooxidation process may be alternative and economical to those since all hypochlorite produced in situ are fully used in oxidation.
In order to explain the mechanism of electrooxidation of refractory (carbonaceous and sulfide type) gold ores it is better to understand the production of hypochlorite that is given as follows.

Hypochlorite production
Hypochlorite solutions are easy to handle and relatively safe compared to chlorine, but purchased liquid hypochlorite has some disadvantages.Its transportation cost is high due to having concentrations normally range up to 12-15% of available chlorine.Even these concentrations tend to be unstable and decompose easily.A sodium hypochlorite solution generated in situ from readily available salt, on the other hand, is safe and relatively stable (5).Hypochlorite solutions are prepared commercially by electrolyzing a stirred sodium chloride solution.The electrolysis of sodium chloride solutions gives Cl 2 molecules and OH - ions, and stirring ensures that these species react with each other.The resulting solution is a hypochlorite ion that is a strong reagent (6).Two types of cell design are used to produce hypochlorite, the diaphragm type and non-diaphragm type electrolytic cells.

Diaphragm type electrolytic cells
Chlorine is produced in an electrolyzer where a diaphragm separates the anodic compartment from the cathodic (7) A solution of sodium chloride flows into the anodic compartment and the reaction at the anode is: A gaseous chlorine dissolves to some extent in the brine and the following equilibria are established in the diaphragm: The cathodic reaction is: The OH -ions diffuse into the diaphram, where they combine with H + ions to form water: 371 In addition, chemical and electrochemical chlorate formation reactions take place according to the following reactions: Reactions ( 3) and ( 5) proceed much more rapidly than mass transport due to convection and diffusion.Reaction (6) proceeds relatively slowly with respect to those proceedings.The anodic side becomes acidic and the cathodic side is alkaline.The neutralization reaction in the diaphragm results in the formation of salt and water.At low pH, chlorate formation is mainly due to the homogeneous chemical reaction (6), as the electrochemical reaction (7) occurs at high pH (39).Reaction ( 6) is competitive with the main anodic reaction (1); therefore, it is inefficient with regard to chlorate formation.For chlorate formation according to reaction (6), both pH and temperature controls are important.The stoichiometric ratio of hypochlorous acid to hypochlorite ion required by reaction (3) is achieved by having a pH of about 6 and the rate of reaction increased by about two orders of magnitude by raising the temperature from 20°C to 80°C (8).At elevated temperatures, however, the solubility of chlorine decreases and the amount of undissociated hypochlorous acid escaping from the reactor increased, both of which lead to process inefficiencies.Figure 1 shows the temperature effect on the solubility of chlorine gas (9).The saturation concentration for chlorine is given as 0.06 mole/liter (10).Cell components, such as electrodes and separators, affect the design and the selection of the best electrolyzer.The design of the anode structure of a diaphragm type chlorine cell using a graphite plate anode used to be limited by the mechanical properties and the machinability of graphite.Gradual degradation during electrolysis was also a problem (11).Therefore, carbon electrodes were substituted nearly everywhere (chlor-alkali electrolysis, hypochlorite and chlorate productions) by oxide coated Ti and dimensionally stable anodes (DSA), and the coatings are reported to have life times of 3 to 5 years (11).The reasons for using titanium anodes are summarized as follows: (11, 12)


The excellent stability of titanium against general and pitting corrosion in acidic and slightly basic aqueous solutions. Application of RuO 2 coatings or other coatings containing metal oxides or platinum group metals allows the reduction of the over potential for anodic chlorine and anodic oxygen evolution (13).These coatings are particularly stable on a titanium base metal.


The price of titanium has decreased greatly during the last decade so that costs are no longer prohibitive for a more extensive use of the Ti anode.
Noble metals, in particular Pt metals, are too expensive to be used as bulk materials for electrodes.It is more appropriate to apply them as a coating to a suitable support.Now, because of using metal anodes, cell designs are more flexible.Due to corrosion, the cathodic compartment of a diaphragm type chlorine cell must be fabricated with corrosion resistant materials such as stainless steel (11).
Production of chlorate was studied with a divided laboratory cell equipped with the oxide coated (RuO 2 -TiO 2 , Pt-IrO 2 , and PdO) Ti anodes and Pt foil cathode in the respective compartments (14).Figure 2 shows an example of the concentration changes of the chemical species existing in the anolyte as functions of electrolysis time.The concentrations of ClO -, HCIO, and ClO 2 -increased for the first three hours and then became constant.On the other hand, the ClO 2 -concentration increased almost constantly with time after the electrolytic cell reached the steady state.The rates were found to be independent of anode material and are a function of temperature and solution pH.Only the PdO coated anode showed slightly lower values than the others.Ibl and Landolt have also studied the anodic chlorate formation in dilute NaCI solutions in a diaphragm type cell using graphite electrodes (10).The diaphragm was porous polyethylene and the solution temperature was 70.5°C.Hypochlorite and chlorate concentrations were measured as a function of time and the results are illustrated in Figure 3 (10).In the each run, the change of hypochlorite concentration with time was followed until a steady state with a constant hypochlorite concentration was reached.Concentration profiles near the anode are shown in Figure 4 (10).The hypochlorite concentration increases with the distance from the anode where chlorine concentration shows a decreasing trend.Separators are another component in the cell design which should be considered.Na + , Cl -, and OH -are the principal ionic species in the cell (11).The sodium ion is the principal electrolytic current carrier across the separator.Hydroxyl ions also carry some current which reduces the current efficiency of hypochlorite production process.Their transport into anolyte causes chlorate formation with the chlorine and unacceptable losses in reduced chlorine evolution.Therefore, the separator should be designed in such a way that the transportation of the OH -ions from the catholyte across the anolyte could be prevented.A diaphragm should be operated such that the bulk flow through the pores is sufficient to keep the OH -ions from migrating across the separator towards the anode in order to prevent reaction (7).

Non-diaphragm type electrolytic cells
Chemical reactions which occur in this type of cell are summarized in the following.In the electrolysis of NaCI solutions, chlorine is generated at the anode according to the following reaction (5,10): The chlorine generated immediately undergoes hydrolysis according to the reactions: In non-diaphragm hypochlorite cells, solution pH is allowed to range from 7 to 9, insuring complete hydrolysis of the chlorine generated.The pH is balanced by the cathodic evolution of hydrogen as follows: Equations ( 8) to (11) describe the ideal behavior of a non-diaphragm hypochlorite cell.There are, however, several competing reactions which contribute to cell inefficiencies.Chlorate may be formed by either anodic oxidation of hypochlorite, or by the chemical reaction between the hypochlorite ion and hypochlorous acid: Both of these reactions (12 and 13) have been studied extensively because they are significant in the electrolytic production of chlorate.The chemical chlorate formation, equation ( 14), proceeds very slowly at room temperature and a basic pH, and when the solution is warmed the disproportionate reaction of hypochlorite occurs rapidly ( 16).This reaction is, therefore, not significant because cells do not operate over 40°C, and normally equilibrate near pH 9 when making 1 % available chlorine solutions.
Current efficiency may also be lost due to the anodic discharge of hydroxyl ions: This reaction competes with anodic chlorine evolution.Another reaction which is well documented in the literature (17) because of its importance in chlorate production cells is the cathodic reduction of hypochlorite: Finally, a small contribution to inefficiency can result from the chemical reaction: This reaction is normally significant only in the presence of electrolyte impurities such as iron, or in the presence of active catalytic surfaces.
In the basic solutions, the following reaction occurs instead of reaction ( 9) to produce hypochlorite (18): In reaction (8), neither H + nor OH -is involved, so the reduction potential is independent of p H . H o w e v e r , c h l o r i n e d o e s n o t e x i s t i n a q u e o u s s o l u t i o n a t p H ' s h i g h e r t h a n 5 .
Hypochlorous acid is a weak acid (pK a = 7.4), and therefore it predominates at any pH below 7.4 and OCl -is predominant in the basic solutions.The influence of pH on the dissociation of hypochlorous acid is shown in Figure 5 (19).
Fig. 5. Effect of pH on the dissociation of hypochlorous acid (19).
ClO 3 -is produced with the electrolysis of hot saturated NaCl solution with the addition of a little dichromate to modify the cathode behavior.Its influence is the formation of a thin diaphragm of insoluble chromium chromate on the cathode which is produced by the reduction of dichromate to chromic ions (20).The diaphragm prevents contact of the bulk of the solution with the electrode and thus with the hydrogen.The electrodes employed were graphite anode and iron cathode (18).In another study, a smooth platinum anode and a wrought iron cathode were used as electrodes (20).If the solution were kept cold and if the electrolysis were stopped at an earlier point, the main product would be hypochlorite.
The relative effects of operating parameters on cell performance were studied by Bennett in batch electrolysis (5).Experiments were performed in a simple compartment cell using DSA anodes (widely used by the chlorine industry), bare titanium cathodes, 1 A/in 2 current density, and 30 g/l NaCI feed.Anodic current efficiency for producing hypochlorite is found to be approximately 40%.Of the 60% current efficiency lost, approximately 35% is due to the cathodic reduction of hypochlorite, 10% to the anodic oxidation of hypochlorite, and 15% to the anodic evolution of oxygen from hydroxyl ion.According to these results, current density had a significant effect on the hypochlorite production.When 0.5 A/in 2 current density was used, anodic current efficiency was near zero due to the sharp increase in the tendency for the cathodic reduction of hypochlorites.Later, a multi-stage cell with continuous flow was developed.Hypochlorite production was gradually increased and total current efficiency in this case could be near 65%, or 25% higher than that for a single compartment.
At lower concentrations, salt utilization was found to be poor, and at higher concentrations, the loss of current efficiency made the operation economically unattractive.A multi-stage electrolytic hypochlorite cell (SANILAC, developed by Diamond Shamrock Corp.) developed as a result of this study, using DSA anodes, is capable of producing 50 lbs/day of chlorine (5).The cell feed consists of a 3% NaCI solution.At available chlorine concentrations of 9.0-9.5 g/l, this cell uses 2.3 to 2.4 kWh(AC) and approximately 3 lb of salt per lb of chlorine.Several sizes of cells producing up to 1000 lb/day of chlorine are commercially available.Similar technology is also being used to produce chlorine economically from seawater.

Electrooxidation of refractory gold ores
Electrolysis was investigated by the USBM as a means of generating oxidizing conditions in situ in the ore pulp prepared from finely ground carbonaceous ore and NaCl brine (4).This would result in (a) the potential reduction of costs incident to the purchase of hypochlorite and chlorine reagents as compared: (a) the costs of the power and salt, and (b) producing the required oxidant at the desired rate so that excess oxidant would not be consumed by the ore.
There are several important parameters in the investigation of electrooxidation, such as salt concentration, electrolysis time, temperature, current density, rate of electrolysis, types of electrodes, electrode spacing, and particle size of the ore.
The effect of salt concentration in the pulp on gold extraction was determined in a series of experiments in which the oxidation time was 7 hours and pulp density was maintained at 40%.Gold extraction increased linearly with respect to NaCl concentration (27).The concentration of salt maintained in the pulp is a principal variable since it affects the conductivity of the pulp and, consequently, the efficieney of hypochlorite production.The use of salt concentration in excess of 200 lb/ton ore resulted in a 95% gold extraction.The corresponding power consumption decreased from 100 kWh/ton ore to 65 kWh/ton ore at the 95% gold extraction range (4).
The effect of temperature on gold extraction was determined at 30, 40, and 50 o C. The maximum gold extraction was obtained at 40 o C. GeneralIy, the electrode spacing should be as close as is consistent with good pulp flow between the electrodes since the resistance between the electrodes inereases with an inerease in electrode spacing.Conductivity is a function of pulp density and electrode spacing; and pulp density must be adjusted to give the desired temperature.GeneralIy, the use of lower pulp densities enables the use of closer electrode spacing, which in turn allows the use of lower salt concentrations.However, this is limited by lower concentrations of the oxidant agent because of slow reaction rates (28).
Current density is another factor which affects the voltage and the temperature.As current density increases, the voltage required also increases.The result of high current density is excessive power consumption and increase of heat input to the system.High current densities also cause undesirable electrode reactions that produce NaClO 3 in the electrolytic cell.According to the results, it was found that a current density of 0.5 to 0.75 A/in 2 of anode surface was acceptable (4).
Grinding is an important part of any hydrometallurgical process beeause it is necessary to liberate the mineral from the host rock so that the minerals can come in contact with the reactants.Gold extraction increases as the partide size becomes smaller.It was found that 70% -200 mesh was satisfactory for this ore; however, every ore must be evaluated in order to find the optimum partide size for reaction (28).
Several electrode systems were investigated by the USBM (4,28,29).The first electrode design utilized was tubular electrodes, as shown in Figure 6.Preliminary experiments with this electrode indicated that considerable resistance to pulp flow was encountered, resulting in a buildup of pulp inside the cathode pipe.The circulation of pulp through this cell was satisfactory during the initial experiments, but with time a deposit of slimes was observed to build up on the cathode, restricting pulp flow.The second electrode system was a plate-type electrode system consisting of the series of copper cathodes and graphite anodes, as shown in Figure 7. Pulp flow through the eleetrodes was excellent, but a cathode deposit was still observed to build up with the continued use of the electrode.An alternative arrangement was to substitute graphite for the copper in the plate-type electrodes so that the deposit could be removed by reversing the current.The plate-type arrangement of the cell also offered much less resistance to the pulp flow through the 0.5 inch spacing between the electrodes.The other electrode design, utilizing a PbO 2 coated titanium anode and an iron cathode, was investigated to determine its effectiveness in generating that required oxidizing conditions at lower salt concentrations.90% gold extraction by subsequent cyanidation was achieved with 4% salt solution, but because of the lower conductivity of the pulp, an additional 20% power was required.
Some pilot plant studies were also done.The data from the larger scale experiments indicated that scale-up to commercial plants should not present any problems.
In silver and mercury recovery from tailings and Cinnabar ores, the plate-type electrode design which is similar to that used in the treatment of carbonaceous gold ores has been used (21)(22)(23).
The bipolar cell design shown in Figure 8 has been used in the recovery of Mo and Re from molybdenite ores (26).The spacing between electrodes was 5/16 in and the cell consists of ten graphite electrodes held in a plexiglass container.0.5 A/in 2 was applied.The operating temperature was maintained at 35-40°C by passing the pulp through water-cooled heat exchangers positioned between the stirred vessel and the celI.The pH was adjusted between 6 and 8.The capacity of the electrolytic oxidation was 1.5 lb/hr of Mo and the concentrate was fed at a rate of between 3.4 and 4.7 lb /h in order to determine the effects of process variables on Mo extraction (26).Chemical reactions which occur during the electrooxidation can be summarized as follows, (23) the chloride ion is converted to chlorine at the anode: At the cathode water is hydrolyzed to produce hydroxyl ion and hydrogen: The reaction between the chlorine and the hydroxyl ion produces hypochlorite according to the following reaction: Hypochlorite then reacts with the carbonaceous material in the ore, passivating activated carbon: and converting the metal sulfides to chlorides that can hydrolyze to a hydroxide depending the pH of the slurry (30): The dissolution of the cinnabar can be observed as a two-step process involving oxidation of the sulfide followed by dissolution of sulfate by the chloride ion as shown in the following reactions (23): HgSO 4 + excess Cl -→ HgCl 4 2-+ SO 4 2- ( AIso, direct oxidation of some of the cinnabar apparently occurs at the anode to produce mercuric sulfate: The hypochlorite reacts with molybdenite: The reaction for the oxidation of rhenium with hypochlorite is: When the technique was used for carbonaceous gold ores, the electrolyte performance was compared with the results obtained by chlorine on the same ore sample (30).The comparison showed that 1.3 to 1.5 kWh of power was required to replace around equivaIent of chlorine.At that time, a monopolar cell was used which has the disadvantage of requiring a high amperage rectifier and a large bus bar.In 1978, the cell had been improved, and the new design (a bipolar cell) had overcome the disadvantages.This cell is capabIe of producing a pound equivalent of chlorine for approximately 1 kWh.Depending on the chlorine prices and the electrical power supply capacity in northeastern Nevada, the electrooxidation technique may provide an economical treatment for carbonaceous ores.
The mechanism of electrooxidation of carbonecous and sulfide type ores was investigated by Arslan and Duby (31-34) using the two compartment cell as shown in Figure 9, by separating the anolyte and catholyte parts in NaCl solutions.Laboratory work was carried out on the production of hypochlorite and the oxidation of pyrite in an electrochemical cell with a 10% sodium chloride electrolyte at 35-40°C.The production rate of hypochlorite was higher when the pH was not controlled than when it was maintained at the initial value of about 6.5.First of all hypohlorite production is studied without any addition of carbon, pyrite or sulfide type gold ore (31,32).Similarly to the early ones, the chemical reactions which occur during the electrolysis of a NaCl solution can be expressed as follows.The chloride ion is converted to chlorine at the anode: At the cathode, water is hydrolyzed to produce hydroxyl ion and hydrogen: At the anodic side, hypochlorite is produced according to the following reactions.Chlorine reacts with water to produce hypochlorous acid: then, the dissociation of hypochlorous acid occurs depending on the solution pH: and hydroxyl ions produced at the cathode react with hydrogen ions to form water: After a certain time, hypochlorite production levels off and this is attributed to the production of chlorates, either chemically, 2HClO +ClO -→ ClO 3 -+ 2H + + 2Cl - (33) or electrochemically, Electrochemical reduction of hypochlorites at the cathode is also possible according to the following reaction: Another reaction is the anodic discharge of hydroxyl ions: During the experiments the potential and pH measurements are also supported these reactions according to the potential-pH diagrams drawn for the system as hon in Figure 10  During the electrooxidation of carbon, when the graphite anode was used, carbon oxidation was observed but it was difficult to determine the amount of CO 2 attributed to the oxidation of the graphite anode itself (31)(32).Therefore, experiments were run using a Pt/Ir coated Ti anode.Carbon is oxidized by hypochlorite which is produced electrochemically in the cell, according to the following equations: C + 2HClO  CO 2 + 2Cl -+ 2H + (38) According to the equations (37 and 38) two moles of HClO (or OCl -) are required for the oxidation of one mole of carbon to CO 2 , corresponding to 4 electrons.Potential and ph measurements taken during the tests were in agreement with those reactions and the potential-ph diagrams of C-Water system shown in Figure 12.
Electrooxidation of pyrite with hypochlorite generated electrochemically in the cell can be expressed as (31,33): Pyrite oxidation with hypochlorite is a chemical reaction as given in reactions (39 and 40), but the production of chlorine that results in hypochlorite production is an electrochemical process.When the overall process is considered, 7.5 moles of HClO are required per mole of pyrite corresponding to 15 electrons.In tests of electrooxidation of pyritic gold flotation concentrate, stoichiometric calculations show that 23% of total iron in the concentrate is in the form of pyrite, 71% as pyrrhotite, and 6% as arsenopyrite (31,34).Therefore, the total iron dissolved in the solution may come from these minerals.Pyrite (as given above), pyrrhotite, and arsenpyrite are oxidized according to the following reactions: According to reactions (41-43), 15 electrons are needed for pyrite oxidation, 9 electrons for pyrrhotite oxidation and 14 electrons for arsenopyrite oxidation.Thus, the weighted average number of electrons is approximately 10.5 and the current efficiencies are calculated by using n=10.5 in all cases.At the end of each run the anolyte pH was around 1 and the catholyte pH was about 12. Analysis of anolyte solutions showed no Fe 2+ , therefore, all iron in the solution was in the form of Fe +3 .This agrees with the oxidation reactions given above and can be seen from Figure 14.
Abrantes and Costa is also studied electro-oxidation as a potential alternative process to conventional pre-treatment of a refractory gold ore was investigated.(35) A particulate bed anode of a Portuguese concentrate containing gold was electroleached in a twocompartment electrolytic cell.The effectiveness of the electrochemical treatment is emphasized by comparison with the results of direct leaching under similar conditions.The influence of the operative parameters (e.g., temperature, electrolysis time, current and slurry density) on the overall gold extraction are studied.Up to 90% gold extraction was obtained after electrolytic pre-treatment.A comparison between chemical and electrochemical oxidation using chloride and sulphate solutions was also carried out.The results demonstrate the better performance of chloride media and that the electrolytic route enhances the amount of precious metal dissolved.Since arsenopyritic gold is a major source of refractory gold not amenable to roasting and bio-oxidation is a popular treatment option but is slow and needs careful control of the As content of the feed, H. G.In Linge and N. J. Welham studied, electrochemical slurry oxidation in-situ with chlorine in acidified salt water in a membrane cell reactor has been evaluated at laboratory-scale level as a potential processing route (36).A refractory mine concentrate (cyanideable gold content 7%) containing arsenopyrite (FeAsS), pyrite (FeS 2 ) and gersdorffite (NiAsS) has been used to demonstrate that gold recovery > 90% could be achieved.Reaction rates are but sale of the co-produced NaOH can be a valuable process credit.This route can provide a more environmentally friendly process flow-sheet than carbon-in-pulp/leach processing and can be applied to a small or large resource.
The silver mine of the Phoenix Mountain in Guangxi is complicated silver mine with higher arsenic, antimony and copper content (37).The electroleaching of silver is studied and it was found that electrolysis conditions are controlled easy.The recurrence of the process of scalingup from small to large-size plant is very good, and the silver extraction rate is over 95%.
The electrochemical leaching technology for complex refractory ore was also studied for its high flexibility, easy operation and little pollution (38).It is pointed out that out-field intensification and multifield coupling technology was the development trend for ore processing.

Fig. 12 .
Fig.12.A potential-pH diagram for the system containing carbon and water at 40 o C (for dissolved substances).(Carbon concentration is 0.2M).(31)Total iron in the solution increased with time at the beginning but leveled off after 4 hours and the current efficiency was about 97%.The oxidation rate was directly related to the current and it was not affected by the pulp density.The solution pH was 1.7 at the end of a 7 hour run.This shows pyrite oxidation according to reaction (40).It was reported in the literature (26) that the oxidation of concentrates high in sulfur or pyrite causes a sharp drop in the pH value as observed in our study.The potential and pH measurements are also agreed with those findings by comparing the results with the potential-pH diagrams given in Figures12 and 13. .

Fig. 13 .
Fig.13.A potential-pH diagram for the system containing iron and water at 40 o C (for dissolved substances).(Iron concentration is 0.05M).(31)