Abstract
Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common cause of sexually transmitted genital infections. Females are at high risk of cervix infections, and a significant proportion may also have urethral infections. Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) can develop as a result of C. trachomatis ascending to the upper reproductive tract. C. trachomatis is an obligate intracellular bacterium that infects the genital tract and may cause chronic inflammation, damage to epithelial tissues, and pelvic inflammation. It has also been clinically associated with cervical atypia and metaplasia. C. trachomatis is the most prevalent sexually transmitted pathogen, and it can cause infertility if left undetected and untreated. Infertile women may be more susceptible to chlamydial infections due to their longer periods of active sexual life. Several diagnostic techniques are available to diagnose chlamydia, including DNA amplification testing (NAAT), culture, antigen detection, and genetic probes; microscopy is not useful for this purpose Chlamydia is treated with empiric therapy, which includes tetracyclines, macrolides, and some fluoroquinolones.
Keywords
- chlamydial infection
- gynecology
- chlamydia trachomatis
- chlamydial infections diagnosis
- pelvic inflammatory disease (pid)
1. Introduction
1.1 A brief introduction
The most common cause of sexually transmitted genital infections is
Among 10 studies of untreated, uncomplicated genital chlamydial infections, 56–89% detected the presence of chlamydia over the short term (weeks to months after diagnosis), and 46–57% detected the presence of chlamydia over the long term [2]. There is, however, a lack of documentation of the date of infection or evaluation of whether the infection was persistent or recurrent. This limits our understanding of the duration of untreated chlamydial infections. According to subsequent modeling studies, chlamydial infections are less likely to establish. In contrast, once established, the disease progresses slowly and more slowly in males than in females (mean undetected durations of 2.84 and 1.35 years, respectively, in males and females [3, 4]. The treatment of all patients with Chlamydia is recommended, despite the possibility of spontaneous resolution.
1.2 A clinical analysis of female syndromes
The majority of females who are infected with
1.2.1 Genitourinary tract infection
Females are at high risk of cervix infections [5], and a significant proportion may also have urethral infections. When left untreated, cervical cavity infections may progress into the upper genital tract, resulting in pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, and chronic pain. Pregnant women with genital chlamydial infections are also at risk for complications.
An increased risk of chlamydial infection has been associated with cervical ectropion (columnar epithelium on the outer surface of the cervix in addition to the endocervical canal). Furthermore, some studies have linked cervical neoplasia to the infection [6, 7], but the extent of this effect remains unknown.
1.2.2 Cervicitis
In most cases (at least 85%) of females with cervicitis, no symptoms are observed, which is why young, sexually active females should undergo routine annual screenings. There was only 6–14% of females who developed a new infection within a year of testing who had symptoms of genital chlamydial infection in four out of five sites in a multinational study that looked at women at high risk for genital chlamydial infection using polymerase chain reaction testing of vaginal swabs [8]. Some of the symptoms that can be confused with vaginitis or genital tract pathology are a change in vaginal discharge, intermenstrual vaginal bleeding, and post-coital bleeding. These symptoms can present in many ways, such as an increase in release, a change in color or odor, an increase in itching or burning, or an increase in pain or discomfort during intercourse. The discharge may also have an abnormally high pH, indicative of an infection. Abnormal exam findings are found in approximately 10–20% of females with genital chlamydial infection. When signs of cervicitis are present, they include mucopurulent discharge from the endocervical cavity, easily induced bleeding from the endocervical cavity, and edematous ectopy.
It has been observed that some of these females report symptoms of urinary tract infections, such as frequency and dysuria, but they do not report symptoms specific to the urethra. If not subjected to specific tests for C trachomatis, these females may be mistaken for cystitis [9, 10]. Despite pyuria in the urine analysis, no organisms are detected in the Gram stain or bacterial culture. Therefore, it is reasonable to suspect that sexually active females with pyuria and no bacteriuria may have a chlamydial infection of the urethra based on the combination of symptoms described above.
As a result of these conditions, several possible diagnoses are available, including low-colony urinary tract infections (such as
1.2.3 Pelvic inflammatory disease
As a result of C trachomatis ascending to the upper reproductive tract (uterus, fallopian tubes, and ovaries), pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) can develop [16–20]. The prevalence of clinical PID in females presenting to STI clinics ranged from 2 to 4.5% between the diagnosis of chlamydia infection and the follow-up visit [2]. Following the administration of ineffective antibiotics against Chlamydia, a small study of 20 females with
Most commonly, abdominal and pelvic pain is present with symptoms of PID. Infection with chlamydia in conjunction with cervicitis should raise a significant suspicion that the upper genital tract is involved. PID is characterized by cervical motion and tenderness in the uterus or adnexa. PID caused by C trachomatis is associated with a higher rate of subsequent tubal infertility, ectopic pregnancy, and chronic pelvic pain as compared with PID caused by gonorrhea, which typically presents in an acute manner [12].
1.2.4 Invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC)
Invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC) is most likely caused by the human papillomavirus (HPV). Research investigating the etiology of cervical neoplasia and invasive cervical carcinoma has recently examined factors that may affect susceptibility to or progression of HPV infection [13].
A case-control study from England and a pooled analysis of cohort studies from Finland, Norway and Sweden have found positive associations between
Squamous cell ICC may also be increased by infections with
1.2.5 Infertility
Worldwide, infertility is becoming an increasingly prevalent health issue [12].
Infertility associated with
It is reported that infertility is reported to last between 2 and 4 years in chlamydia-positive women [26]. Women with secondary infertility were more likely to contract
1.2.6 Complications of pregnancy
Furthermore, the chlamydial genital infection may increase the risk of premature rupture of the membranes during labor, preterm delivery, and low birth weight infants in addition to the risk of future ectopic pregnancy [27]. According to a study of 3913 pregnant Dutch women screened for
1.2.7 Perihepatitis (Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome)
Perihepatitis is an inflammation of the liver capsule and adjacent peritoneal surfaces that may occur in patients with chlamydia infection. An acute PID is more likely to result in perihepatitis, which occurs in 5–15% of cases. In most cases, there is no abnormality in liver enzymes, but there can be a pain in the right upper part of the rig or pleuritic pain. We do not fully understand the pathogenesis of this condition. An immunological mechanism may be involved, or the infected material could be directly transmitted from the cul-de-sac to the lymphatics and peritoneum [28, 29].
1.2.8 Reactive arthritis/reactive arthritis triad (RAT)
STIs can trigger reactive arthritis. There is a small percentage of patients with sexually acquired reactive arthritis who develop the complete reactive arthritis triad, consisting of arthritis, conjunctivitis, uveitis, and urethritis. It has been shown that
Detection of chlamydial nucleic acids in synovial tissue further supports the association between chlamydia and reactive arthritis. Seven out of nine patients with RAT had a positive in situ hybridization for chlamydial RNA in synovial tissue samples compared to three out of thirteen patients without RAT (the cause of arthritis was not otherwise determined). In addition, five of eight sexually acquired reactive arthritis patients and one control patient with another form of arthritis had stored synovial tissues that contained chlamydial DNA found by polymerase chain reaction.
1.2.9 Conjunctivitis
Serovars D through K of
1.2.10 Pharyngitis
There is no evidence that
1.2.11 L serovars
In European and North American MSM, particularly those living with HIV, lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV) has been reported to be caused by
1.2.12 D through K serovars
In addition to causing genital infection in MSM, these non-LGV serovars are also capable of causing rectum infection. This infection, however, is usually asymptomatic, unlike LGV. For example, according to a study of MSM screened for rectal chlamydial infection, only 16% (49 of 301 cases) of non-LGV infections were symptomatic compared to 95% (58 of 62 cases) of rectal LGV infections [32, 33].
Infected females with rectal C trachomatis usually have D through K serovars and are generally asymptomatic. It is also possible for females to develop symptomatic proctitis [33], but this occurs less frequently than in MSM.
2. Diagnosis of chlamydial infections
Several diagnostic techniques are available to diagnose chlamydia, including DNA amplification testing (NAAT), culture, antigen detection, and genetic probes; microscopy is not useful for this purpose. Nevertheless, NAAT is the preferred diagnostic technique due to its superior sensitivity, specificity, and wide availability [34, 35].
2.1 Nucleic acid amplification testing (test of choice)
DNA or RNA sequences from
2.2 The preferred testing specimen for diagnosis varies by syndrome
2.2.1 Genitourinary infection or screening in females
A vaginal swab is the most appropriate specimen that the patient can collect. NAAT can be performed on either endocervical specimens (for example, cervical specimens collected into liquid cytology medium for Pap testing) or vaginal swabs for females undergoing speculum exams (for example, to evaluate symptoms of cervicitis). Compared to vaginal and endocervical swab samples, first-catch urine samples detect up to 10% fewer infections in females [36, 37].
2.2.2 Test performance
The NAATs can collect specimens without a pelvic examination in females [38]. The most sensitive specimen for diagnosing chlamydial infection in females is a swab of vaginal fluid [38, 39]. Compared with urine and, in some cases, endocervical swabs, NAAT on vaginal swab fluid on females had higher sensitivity than urine and, in some cases, endocervical swabs. Several studies have shown that NAAT on rectal specimens can detect rectal chlamydia more accurately than culture and still have high specificity [40]. Men who have sex with men (MSM) can also self-collect these samples to facilitate screening [41].
2.3 Other diagnostic techniques
2.3.1 Rapid tests for chlamydia
Even though NAAT has replaced culture as the new “gold standard,” same-day results have not been available traditionally. NAAT-based rapid tests have been developed. Their use will likely be influenced by practical issues, such as waivers for non-laboratory use and cost, as they become more available [41].
2.3.2 The XPert C trachomatis/N gonorrhea (CT/NG) assay
A NAAT, the XPert C trachomatis/N gonorrhea (CT/NG) test provides results for chlamydia (and gonorrhea) within 90 minutes [42]. It is FDA-approved for use on vaginal and endocervical swabs. Using electrochemical detection technology, the Binx io CT/NG NAAT assay produces results within 30 min [43]. It is FDA-approved for use on vaginal swabs. 96, 99, 91, and 100% were the sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values for CT.
Adolescent girls and young women may no longer be required to visit their doctors annually since there is no longer a need for annual cervical cancer screening. A young woman’s annual visit is an important opportunity to obtain advice and information regarding her reproductive health, access contraception, receive counseling regarding sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), and to be screened for these diseases.
2.4 Who are the candidates to test for chlamydial infections
2.4.1 Symptomatic and at-risk asymptomatic patients
The diagnosis of
2.4.2 Patients with persistent symptoms
Symptoms that persist after appropriate treatment and good adherence to confirmed chlamydial infection are usually not the results of primary treatment failure. NAAT testing and ompA genotyping were used to characterize the reinfection or persisting infection rates in a longitudinal cohort of adolescent females assessed every 3 months [49]. There were 478 infections observed among 210 participants. Of these females, 121 experienced repeated infections. Only 2.2% were infections that persisted without documented treatment. Most of these infections (84%) were likely reinfections, 14% were probable or possible treatment failures, and 14% persisted without documented treatment.
2.4.3 Recurrence of symptoms
When chlamydia, gonorrhea, bacterial vaginosis, and other sexually transmitted diseases that cause urethritis or cervicitis have resolved after a first evaluation, a repeat evaluation is recommended for the prior treatment; NAAT remains the test of choice to diagnose reinfection in symptom recurrence [37]. Repeat diagnosis of chlamydia in previously treated patients usually indicates reinfection, as noted above [37].
Diagnosing
3. Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection
Males and females alike are most at risk for bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) caused by
Preventing complicated infections caused by chlamydia and its sequelae are the primary goals of management (e.g., pelvic inflammatory disease, infertility, chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, and epididymitis). The screening and treatment of young females for
Empiric therapy should also be offered to patients recently exposed to chlamydia. A patient with documented gonococcal infection should also receive empiric chlamydia treatment unless the nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) is negative [51].
3.1 Antimicrobial susceptibility of C trachomatis
Tetracyclines, macrolides, and some, but not all, fluoroquinolones are uniformly effective against
Moreover, the extracellular elementary body of
Maintaining antibiotic concentrations throughout the organism’s life cycle, ranging from 36 to 48 hours, is also necessary. To ensure adequate levels of antibiotics, either a prolonged course of therapy or the selection of an antibiotic with a long half-life is required [57, 58].
Moreover, the elementary body is relatively inert, limiting replication opportunities and resulting in antibiotic-resistant mutations [59].
3.2 Defining antibiotic efficacy
As part of its four primary outcomes of recommending antimicrobial regimens for treating sexually transmitted infections (along with symptom resolution, prevention of sequelae, and prevention of transmission), the Center for Disease Control and Prevention explicitly incorporated microbial eradication (along with symptom resolution, prevention of sequelae, and prevention of transmission) to one of four outcomes. The effectiveness of a drug can be more reliably predicted by its ability to cure bacteria than by its ability to cure the patient for two reasons: many patients have other coinfections that are not responsive to treatment [59], and most patients are not manifesting clinical symptoms at the beginning of the treatment.
3.3 Comprehensive treatment approach
The complete care of C trachomatis-infected patients includes antibiotic treatment, evaluation, and treatment of other sexually transmitted diseases (STIs, such as gonorrhea and HIV), counseling on adherence and sexual activity, follow-up testing, and managing sex partners. Females and males are more likely to have asymptomatic infections that can only be detected on screening; however, these should also be treated promptly [56].
3.4 Antibiotic treatment of chlamydia
3.4.1 Doxycycline as the preferred agent
For optimal outcomes, patients should be counseled to adhere to the prescribed dosage of 100 mg twice daily for 7 days [60]. It is safe and effective to administer delayed-release doxycycline (200 mg daily for 7 days) compared with twice-daily doxycycline. However, it is more costly and may not be accessible to all patients [60]. Previously, azithromycin was considered an alternative option, but mounting evidence indicates that doxycycline is a more effective microbial agent, especially for rectal infections and possibly pharyngeal infections [61]. Azithromycin is now considered an alternative. For this reason, azithromycin is reserved for individuals who are unlikely to be able to complete the seven-day doxycycline course (e.g., patients with adherence issues) and is administered as a single, directly observed dose of 1 g. It is also the preferred antibiotic for pregnant women [62].
3.4.2 Levofloxacin (500 mg orally once daily for 7 days)
Levofloxacin and ofloxacin (300 mg twice daily for 7 days) are highly effective against
References
- 1.
Workowski KA, Berman SM. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sexually transmitted disease treatment guidelines. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2011; 53 (suppl_3):S59-S63 - 2.
Geisler WM. Duration of untreated, uncomplicated chlamydia trachomatis genital infection and factors associated with chlamydia resolution: A review of human studies. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 15 Jun 2010; 201 (Supplement_2):S104-S113 - 3.
Lewis J, Price MJ, Horner PJ, White PJ. Genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections clear more slowly in men than women, but are less likely to become established. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2017;216 (2):237-244 - 4.
Price MJ, Ades A, Angelis DD, Welton NJ, Macleod J, Soldan K, et al. Mixture-of-exponentials models to explain heterogeneity in studies of the duration of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Statistics in Medicine. 2013;32 (9):1547-1560 - 5.
Dunne EF, Gift TL, Stamm WE. What about the men? Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Nov 2008; 35 (11 Suppl)S:1-2 - 6.
Jensen KE, Thomsen LT, Schmiedel S, Frederiksen K, Norrild B, van den Brule A, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse in women with persistent human papillomavirus infection: A cohort study. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2014;90 (7):550-555 - 7.
Vriend HJ, Bogaards JA, van Bergen JE, Brink AA, van den Broek IV, Hoebe CJ, et al. Incidence and persistence of carcinogenic genital human papillomavirus infections in young women with or without Chlamydia trachomatis co-infection. Cancer Medicine. 2015;4 (10):1589-1598 - 8.
Detels R, Green AM, Klausner JD, Katzenstein D, Gaydos C, Handsfield HH, et al. The incidence and correlates of symptomatic and asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis andNeisseria gonorrhoeae infections in selected populations in five countries. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2011;38 (6):503 - 9.
Shipman SB, Risinger CR, Evans CM, Gilbertson CD, Hogan DE. High prevalence of sterile pyuria in the setting of sexually transmitted infection in women presenting to an emergency department. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018; 19 (2):282 - 10.
Tomas ME, Getman D, Donskey CJ, Hecker MT. Overdiagnosis of urinary tract infection and underdiagnosis of sexually transmitted infection in adult women presenting to an emergency department. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2015; 53 (8):2686-2692 - 11.
Lamontagne DS, Baster K, Emmett L, Nichols T, Randall S, McLean L, et al. Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16-24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: A prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2007; 83 (4):292-303 - 12.
den Heijer CD, Hoebe CJ, Driessen JH, Wolffs P, van den Broek IV, Hoenderboom BM, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and female infertility: A retrospective cohort study among primary care patients. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69 (9):1517-1525 - 13.
Moreno V, Bosch FX, Muñoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV, Walboomers JM, et al. Effect of oral contraceptives on risk of cervical cancer in women with human papillomavirus infection: The IARC multicentric case-control study. The Lancet. 2002; 359 (9312):1085-1092 - 14.
Schachter J, Hill EC, King EB, Heilbron DC, Ray RM, Margolis AJ, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis and cervical neoplasia. JAMA. 1982;248 (17):2134-2138 - 15.
Moscicki AB, Grubbs Burt V, Kanowitz S, Darragh T, Shiboski S. The significance of squamous metaplasia in the development of low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in young women. Cancer. 1999; 85 (5):1139-1144 - 16.
Anttila T, Saikku P, Koskela P, Bloigu A, Dillner J, Ikäheimo I, et al. Serotypes of Chlamydia trachomatis and risk for development of cervical squamous cell carcinoma. JAMA. 2001;285 (1):47-51 - 17.
Jha P, Beral V, Pike M, Hermon C, Peto J, Deacon J, et al. Antibodies to human papillomavirus and to other genital infectious agents and invasive cervical cancer risk. The Lancet. 1993; 341 (8853):1116-1119 - 18.
Wallin KL, Wiklund F, Luostarinen T, Ångström T, Anttila T, Bergman F, et al. A population-based prospective study of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and cervical carcinoma. International Journal of Cancer. 2002;101 (4):371-374 - 19.
Castle PE, Hillier SL, Rabe LK, Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Bratti MC, et al. An association of cervical inflammation with high-grade cervical neoplasia in women infected with oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV). Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention. 2001; 10 (10):1021-1027 - 20.
Fan T, Lu H, Hu H, Shi L, McClarty GA, Nance DM, et al. Inhibition of apoptosis in chlamydia-infected cells: Blockade of mitochondrial cytochrome c release and caspase activation. The Journal of Experimental Medicine. 1998; 187 (4):487-496 - 21.
Eckert L, Hawes S, Wölner-Hanssen P, Money D, Peeling R, Brunham R, et al. Prevalence and correlates of antibody to chlamydial heat shock protein in women attending sexually transmitted disease clinics and women with confirmed pelvic inflammatory disease. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 1997; 175 (6):1453-1458 - 22.
Morris BJ, Rose BR. Cervical screening in the 21st century: The case for human papillomavirus testing of self-collected specimens. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. 2007; 45 (5):577-591 - 23.
Tubal infertility: serologic relationship to past chlamydial and gonococcal infection. World Health Organization Task Force on the Prevention and Management of Infertility. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Mar-Apr 1995; 22 (2):71-77 - 24.
Hoenderboom BM, Van Benthem BH, Van Bergen JE, Dukers-Muijrers NH, Götz HM, Hoebe CJ, et al. Relation between Chlamydia trachomatis infection and pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility in a Dutch cohort of women previously tested for chlamydia in a chlamydia screening trial. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2019;95 (4):300-306 - 25.
Akande V, Turner C, Horner P, Horne A, Pacey A, Society BF. Impact of Chlamydia trachomatis in the reproductive setting: British Fertility Society Guidelines for practice. Human Fertility. 2010;13 (3):115-125 - 26.
Shi X, Liu F, Zhang H. Study of Chlamydia trachomatis infection on cervical secretion of women with early pregnancy and secondary sterility. Hunan yi ke da xue xue bao= Hunan yike daxue xuebao= Bulletin of Hunan Medical University. 2001;26 (2):169-170 - 27.
Bender N, Herrmann B, Andersen B, Hocking JS, van Bergen J, Morgan J, et al. Chlamydia infection, pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy and infertility: Cross-national study. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 2011; 87 (7):601-608 - 28.
Peter NG, Clark LR, Jaeger JR. Fitz-Hugh-Curtis syndrome: A diagnosis to consider in women with right upper quadrant pain. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2004; 71 (3):233-241 - 29.
Theofanakis CP, Kyriakidis A. Fitz-Hugh–Curtis syndrome. Gynecological Surgery. 2011; 8 :129-134 - 30.
de Vrieze NH, de Vries HJ. Lymphogranuloma venereum among men who have sex with men. An epidemiological and clinical review. Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy. 2014; 12 (6):697-704 - 31.
Høie S, Knudsen LS, Gerstoft J. Lymphogranuloma venereum proctitis: A differential diagnose to inflammatory bowel disease. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 2011; 46 (4):503-510 - 32.
Stoner BP, Cohen SE. Lymphogranuloma venereum 2015: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015; 61 (Suppl 8):S865-S873 - 33.
Rank RG, Yeruva L. An alternative scenario to explain rectal positivity in Chlamydia-infected individuals. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2015; 60 (10):1585-1586 - 34.
Meyer T, Buder S. The laboratory diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae : Current testing and future demands. Pathogens. 2020;9 (2):91 - 35.
Sarier M, Duman İ, Göktaş Ş, Demir M, Kukul E. Results of multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay to identify urethritis pathogens. Journal of Urological Surgery. 2017; 1 :18-22. DOI: 10.4274/jus.1328) - 36.
Malhotra M, Sood S, Mukherjee A, Muralidhar S, Bala M. Genital chlamydia trachomatis: An update. The Indian Journal of Medical Research. 2013; 138 (3):303 - 37.
Rodríguez-Granger J, López BE, Cobo F, Morente GB, Martinez AS, Sánchez JT, et al. Update on the diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas (English Edition). 2020; 111 (9):711-724 - 38.
Schachter J, McCormack WM, Chernesky MA, Martin DH, Van Der Pol B, Rice PA, et al. Vaginal swabs are appropriate specimens for diagnosis of genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis . Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2003;41 (8):3784-3789 - 39.
Davies B, Turner KM, Benfield T, Frølund M, Andersen B, Westh H, et al. Pelvic inflammatory disease risk following negative results from chlamydia nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) versus non-NAATs in Denmark: A retrospective cohort. PLoS Medicine. 2018; 15 (1):e1002483 - 40.
Geisler WM. Diagnosis and management of uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis infections in adolescents and adults: Summary of evidence reviewed for the 2010 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2011;53 (Suppl 3):S92-S98 - 41.
Cook RL, Hutchison SL, Østergaard L, Braithwaite RS, Ness RB. Systematic review: Noninvasive testing for Chlamydia trachomatis andNeisseria gonorrhoeae . Annals of Internal Medicine. 2005;142 (11):914-925 - 42.
Gaydos CA, Van Der Pol B, Jett-Goheen M, Barnes M, Quinn N, Clark C, et al. Performance of the cepheid CT/NG Xpert rapid PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis andNeisseria gonorrhoeae . Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2013;51 (6):1666-1672 - 43.
Hosenfeld CB, Workowski KA, Berman S, Zaidi A, Dyson J, Mosure D, et al. Repeat infection with chlamydia and gonorrhea among females: A systematic review of the literature. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 2009; 36 (8):478-489 - 44.
Verkooyen R, Willemse D, Hiep-van Casteren S, Mousavi Joulandan S, Snijder R, Van den Bosch J, et al. Evaluation of PCR, culture, and serology for diagnosis of Chlamydia pneumoniae respiratory infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1998;36 (8):2301-2307 - 45.
Keltz MD, Gera PS, Moustakis M. Chlamydia serology screening in infertility patients. Fertility and Sterility. 2006; 85 (3):752-754 - 46.
Meyer T. Diagnostic procedures to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Microorganisms. 2016;4 (3):25 - 47.
Tuuminen T, Palomäki P, Paavonen J. The use of serologic tests for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 2000; 42 (3):265-279 - 48.
Rose SB, Garrett SM, Stanley J, Pullon SRH. Retesting and repeat positivity following diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis andNeisseria gonorrhoea in New Zealand: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Infectious Diseases. 2017;17 (1):526 - 49.
Batteiger BE, Tu W, Ofner S, Van Der Pol B, Stothard DR, Orr DP, et al. Repeated Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections in adolescent women. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010;201 (1):42-51 - 50.
Lanjouw E, Ouburg S, De Vries H, Stary A, Radcliffe K, Unemo M. 2015 European guideline on the management of Chlamydia trachomatis infections. International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2016;27 (5):333-348 - 51.
Mishori R, McClaskey EL, WinklerPrins V. Chlamydia trachomatis infections: Screening, diagnosis, and management. American Family Physician. 2012;86 (12):1127-1132 - 52.
Wyrick PB. Chlamydia trachomatis persistence in vitro: An overview. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2010;201 (Suppl 2):S88-S95 - 53.
Wang SA, Papp JR, Stamm WE, Peeling RW, Martin DH, Holmes KK. Evaluation of antimicrobial resistance and treatment failures for Chlamydia trachomatis : A meeting report. The Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2005;191 (6):917-923 - 54.
Suchland R, Geisler W, Stamm WE. Methodologies and cell lines used for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Chlamydia spp. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2003; 47 (2):636-642 - 55.
Nwokolo NC, Dragovic B, Patel S, Tong CW, Barker G, Radcliffe K. 2015 UK national guideline for the management of infection with Chlamydia trachomatis . International Journal of STD & AIDS. 2016;27 (4):251-267 - 56.
Workowski KA, Berman S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recommendations and Reports. 17 Dec 2010; 59 (RR-12):1-110 - 57.
Hsu K. Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. In: Post TW, editor. UpToDate. Waltham, MA: UpToDate; 2020 - 58.
Hafner L, Timms P. Development status and future prospects for a vaccine against Chlamydia trachomatis infection.Vaccine. 20 Mar 2014; 32 (14):1563-1571 - 59.
Morré SA, Peña AS. An integrated approach to the understanding of Chlamydia infections: Introduction to the 2009 update. Drugs of Today. 2009; 45 (11):3 - 60.
Geisler WM, Uniyal A, Lee JY, Lensing SY, Johnson S, Perry RC, et al. Azithromycin versus doxycycline for urogenital chlamydia trachomatis infection. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015; 373 (26):2512-2521 - 61.
Bhengraj AR, Vardhan H, Srivastava P, Salhan S, Mittal A. Decreased susceptibility to azithromycin and doxycycline in clinical isolates of Chlamydia trachomatis obtained from recurrently infected female patients in India. Chemotherapy. 2010;56 (5):371-377 - 62.
Dukers-Muijrers NH, Wolffs PF, De Vries H, Götz HM, Heijman T, Bruisten S, et al. Treatment effectiveness of azithromycin and doxycycline in uncomplicated rectal and vaginal Chlamydia trachomatis infections in women: A multicenter observational study (FemCure). Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2019;69 (11):1946-1954 - 63.
Mikamo H, Sato Y, Hayasaki Y, Hua YX, Tamaya T. Adequate levofloxacin treatment schedules for uterine cervicitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis . Chemotherapy. 2000;46 (2):150-152 - 64.
Mikamo H, Sato Y, Hayasaki Y, Tamaya T. Adequate macrolide treatment schedules for uterine cervicitis caused by Chlamydia trachomatis . Chemotherapy. 1999;45 (5):396-398 - 65.
Deguchi T, Hatazaki K, Ito S, Kondo H, Horie K, Nakane K, et al. Macrolide and fluoroquinolone resistance is uncommon in clinical strains of Chlamydia trachomatis . Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2018;24 (8):610-614 - 66.
Yokoi S, Yasuda M, Ito S-I, Takahashi Y, Ishihara S, Deguchi T, et al. Uncommon occurrence of fluoroquinolone resistance-associated alterations in GyrA and ParC in clinical strains of Chlamydia trachomatis . Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy. 2004;10 (5):262-267 - 67.
Cramers M, Kaspersen P, From E, Møller B. Pivampicillin compared with erythromycin for treating women with genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sexually Transmitted Infections. 1988;64 (4):247-248 - 68.
How SJ, Hobson D, Hart CA, Webster RE. An in-vitro investigation of synergy and antagonism between antimicrobials against Chlamydia trachomatis . Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 1985;15 (5):533-538