Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Modification and Application of Carbon Nanotubes for the Removal of Emerging Contaminants from Wastewater: A Review

Written By

Abu Taleb, Mohammed Naif Al-sharif, Mohammed Ali Al-mutair, Saleh Almasoudi, Osama Madkhali and Mohammed Muzibur Rahman

Submitted: 01 October 2022 Reviewed: 03 January 2023 Published: 24 January 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.109781

From the Edited Volume

Carbon Nanotubes - Recent Advances, New Perspectives and Potential Applications

Edited by Mohammed Muzibur Rahman, Abdullah Mohammed Asiri and Mohammad Asaduzzaman Chowdhury

Chapter metrics overview

177 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The emerging contaminants (ECs) refer to chemical compounds either naturally originated or synthetically modified having potential toxic effects to the environment. The ECs include different pollutants such as biocides, pesticides, pharmaceuticals (antibiotic, analgesics, and hormones) and personal care products (cosmetics, fragrances, and hygiene products). The ECs are considering the top priority pollutants by the European Union (EU) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Among other materials, the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are one of widely used materials for the removal of ECs applying diverse techniques of wastewater decontamination. The momentous advancement of these functional nanostructured materials has found to be cost-effective, reusable, smart materials for the application of ECs removal. The aim of this chapter was to explore the modification routes and advancement of functionalization of CNTs with other functional groups by the reported works. The possible mechanistic insight of ECs removal reactions was also evaluated applying different methods for decontamination reported in the past studies. This review will be significant sources of information of CNTs-based materials for the application of wastewater treatment especially ECs removal from wastewater and ultimate environmental remediation.

Keywords

  • wastewater treatment
  • carbon nanotubes
  • emerging contaminants
  • removal

1. Introduction

The concurrent increasing trend of human needs and subsequent technological advancements, expansion of urban and transportation facilities, rapid growth of agricultural and manufacturing activities as well as over exploitation of environmental components are few instances among others human induced activities which are responsible for distressing water quality [1, 2, 3, 4]. Lack of sufficient sanitation also is lead to water contamination across the world at large [5]. Almost 2.5 billion of world’s citizen are lives without appropriate sanitation. According to the recent estimation of United Nations (UN) that the world wide 1500 km3 of wastewater annually has been produced due to industrial effluents [5]. More than 33% of untreated industrial effluents and about 70% household sewage are directly discharging into the aquatic system [5]. In this connection, millions of previous studies have been reported that, wastewater has been carrying a series of pollutants including emerging contaminants (ECs) [6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. The ECs including pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) are presents in aquatic system of different locations of the world with higher concentration beyond permissible limit [11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]. One of the pharmaceutical products, the antibiotics are using for killing of human and animal host pathogenic fungi and bacteria [5]. The water bodies are serving as main pans of misused antibiotics are prominently coming from the hospitals output, effluents from the pharmaceutical industries, sewage from animal farms, municipal runoff and effluents from wastewater treatment plants. Life cycle of ECs is depicted in Figure 1from sources to the environment [17]. Consequently, the aquatic system is carrying such kind of toxicants and subsequent severe impacts on human health and on other biotic components in the ecosystem as seen in Figure 2 illustrated by Rasheed et al., [17]. Hence, researchers are looking for special concerned to removal of ECs from wastewater. The traditional wastewater treatment plants are facilitating the sequestration of some known pollutants and suspended solids apart from emerging contaminates, which are not efficient for appropriately removal of some ECs including antibiotics due to their registrant and persistence nature [1, 17]. Different materials are utilizing for purification and decontamination of wastewater using various forms including tubes, films, powder, gels (hydrogel and aerogels) etc. [18, 19, 20]. Recent trends of wastewater treatment process are to modifying the composite materials with nanostructured materials due to their exclusive characteristics such as enlarged surface area, small size, available reactive sites and regeneration facilities [1, 2, 3]. Among other nanostructured materials, the carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are widely using for removal of ECs from wastewater [21, 22, 23, 24]. The CNTs having hexagonal sheets of carbon atoms revolved up into hollow structure taking diverse helicities seamless of graphitic sheets. CNTs are mainly two types, containing at least 2 layers of graphite sheets arranging between 4 and 30 nm in diameter and tabular shape of allotropes of carbon is denoted as multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) while a single unified cylindrical closed by each of end graphene is defined as single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) [25, 26, 27, 28, 29].

Figure 1.

Life cycle of ECs from sources to environment [17].

Figure 2.

Effect of ECs on environment and human health [17].

The CNTs are plying one of the promising nanostructured filler types materials for wastewater decontamination due to their exciting physical and chemical properties including good aspect ratio, excellent mechanical strength, high thermal conductivity, high electrical conductivity and electron emission, very good optical absorption and few loss of energy etc. [17, 20, 21, 22]. Generally, CNTs can be modify using facile method from graphene and subsequently owing high flexible strength, very low density and high thermal and electrical conductivities [22, 24]. Therefore, CNTs materials are promising and guarantee with exciting surface properties and subsequently utilizable in several engineering applications including wastewater treatment applications. Since last few decades, the CNTs are widely applying for removal of ECs including pharmaceuticals as because of their enlarged surface area and porous structured [27]. To get highest performance of CNTs, different methods of wastewater treatment have been used including adsorption, ozonation and catalytic ozonation etc. [28].

Besides adsorption process, the advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) is mostly used methods for removal of pharmaceutical pollutants. Different AOPs method are applying including photocatalysis, ozonation and photocatalytic ozonation etc. [30, 31].

The aimed of this chapter was to explore the modification routes, advancement of functionalization of CNTs with other functional groups by reported works. The possible mechanistic insight of ECs removal reactions was also evaluated applying different methods of decontamination reported in the past studies. Herein, the future prospects and promising research potentials of CNTs based materials were also proposed for removal of ECs and ultimate environmental remediation. Therefore, considering adsorption efficiency as well as process cost, the CNTs are promising for the decontamination of water pollution including ECs from wastewater.

Advertisement

2. Surface properties of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)

Carbon having atomic number six (6) is an abundant chemical element sprawling on the earth surface as native or with others compounds [32]. Carbon occupy its four electrons as the tetravalent position can make covalent chemical bond and its atomic orbital pattern is 1s22s22p2 [33]. CNT one of carbon based material was invented by Sumio lijima in 1991 applying arc-discharge method [34]. CNTs having hexagonal sheets of carbon atoms revolved up into hollow structure taking diverse helicities seamless of graphitic sheets. CNTs have exclusive strength because they are composing sp2 structure with stronger bonds rather than diamond having sp3 bonds. Some salient physical properties of CNTs are; BET surface area ranging among 90–350 m2/g, density 1.7 g/cm3, 15–30 μm length with tensile strength 150 GPa and purity 99% [27]. CNTs are promising nanostructured filler types materials for wastewater decontamination due to their exciting physical and chemical properties including high mechanical strength, high aspect ratio, high thermal conductivity, high electrical conductivity and electron emission, very good optical absorption and few loss of energy etc. [26, 27, 28].

Advertisement

3. Types of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)

CNTs are mainly two types, containing at least 2 layers of graphite sheets arranging between 4 and 30 nm in diameter and tabular shape of allotropes of carbon is denoted as multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) while a single unified cylindrical closed by each of end graphene is defined as single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) as seen in Figure 3 [33]. Usually almost same thermal and electrical conductivities seem in both types of CNTs. The purity of SWCNTs is more than 70% and they can soluble in organic solvent but insoluble in aqueous while MWCNTs is more than 95% having aqueous solubility [28]. Generally, the length of MWCNTs are in between 30 and 50 nm of diameter and SWCNTs are in between 0.7 and 1.2 nm of diameter [28].

Figure 3.

(a) Multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and (b) single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) [33].

Advertisement

4. Synthesis routes of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)

Different sources of carbon are using to prepare the carbon nanotubes such as xylene, methane, acetylene, carbon monoxide ethylene and benzene etc. [35]. Widely applying synthesis routes of CNTs modification are including arc discharge, chemical vapor deposition and laser deposition methods [26]. All methods of CNTs modification has their own merits and demerits are presented in Table 1. At the very beginning of CNTs modification, the arc discharge method was used by Sumio lijima in 1991. Basic principle of the arc discharge process CNTs preparation is applying 600 mbar of pressure using helium and argon as well as maximum 6000°C of temperature is generated by electric discharge for subsequent ejection of carbon atoms into plasma and consequently produced atoms deposited on the cathode [34]. On the other hand, laser tempted redirection of metallic elements and graphite mixture is being utilized in quartz tube based reactor at 2700–3200°C temperature for CNTs fabrication which is denoted as laser ablation method [26, 27, 28]. The high temperature required in the process is the low rate of CNTs production is one of the constrains of synthesis route for the industrial production of CNTs. Nowadays, the chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is applying for mass production of CNTs at low temperature (600–1200°C) [34]. In this CVD method can produce large scale industrial CNTs at remarkable lower heat. Among other methods of CNTs preparation, the CVD is now widely use method due to the low temperature require, economically viable and mass production of CNTs [39, 40, 41].

CNTs synthesis routeMeritsDemeritsRefs.
Chemical vapor depositionLow temperature, mass production, economically viable for large scale industrial productionBest method for MWCNTs but not suitable for SWCNTs[36]
Arc dischargeLimited structural defect, simple methodHigh temperature, required, short nanotube, low production[37]
Laser ablationHigh purity, very few structural defectsIntensive cost and labor required[38]

Table 1.

Some salient merits and demerits of different CNTs synthesis routs.

Advertisement

5. Functionalization of carbon nanotubes (CNTs)

To enhance the surface properties and subsequent removal efficiency of pollutants CNTs can modified by coupling/wrapping with versatile functional groups [26]. Functionalization can improve the compatibility, solubility of CNTs and also overawed the complexity of dispersion. The CNTs materials can functionalized by non-covalent physical coupling or wrapping with other molecules by rounded over the tabular structure of CNT. On the other hand, CNTs can modified by chemical functionalities with new functional groups by covalent or chemical bonding with carbon atoms in the tubes of CNTs.

5.1 Covalent/chemical functionalization

Chemical functionalization of CNTs are usually using several techniques including acidic treatment, oxidation reactions and modification by using chemical in gaseous media. Wet functionalization applying acidic treatment on CNTs surface is mostly used method due to its dual benefit, firstly coupling with new functional groups and secondly possible sequestration of amorphous carbon and metal residuals. Generally, nitric acid (HNO3), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), and piranha solution/hydrogen peroxide etc. are commonly using acids for acidic oxidation in presence of aqueous media of CNTs functionalization. Functionalization of CNTs surface by nitric acid is widely applied method due to better performance of functionalization. The functionalization CNTs using piranha solution can be dispersing in both polar no-polar media also can be attaching in both hydroxyl and carboxylic groups without deformation of sole structure of CNTs. Previous studies have been proved that, the acidic functionalization can decrease contact angle among CNTs vertical angle and water from 176°C (hydrophobic) to 25°C (hydrophilic). More wettability is occurring due to more oxygen containing functional groups on the surface of CNTs. The functionalization of CNTs surface without acidic treatment also reported in the literatures which called oxidation reactions without acids. Several previous studies reported that the oxidation reactions of CNTs surface functionalization is possible at lower oxygen content occurrence with slighter deformation of the honeycomb lattice. In this connection, Wepasnick et al. [27] was evaluated and compered the rate of CNTs oxidation using oxidizing chemical agents including ammonium per sulfate, potassium permanganate and hydrogen peroxide with nitric acid or sulfuric acid/nitric acid. The experiment was successfully illustrated that oxidation reactions can sufficiently decorate the surface of CNTs with abundant polar functional groups without acid treatment. Beside acidic and oxidation functionalization, another method was explored to oxidize CNTs using gaseous phase. This process assurances a significant reduction of waste release of the process and better homogenous functionalization than the acid based functionalization. For instance, Xia et al. [28] investigated the CNTs functionalization applying nitric acid vapor treatment in a gas-phase route and subsequently explored as 21% of oxygen containing functional groups on the surface of CNTs which is three-time higher efficiency than the use of conventional liquid nitric acid (7.9%).

5.2 Non-covalent/physical functionalization

It is proven that the chemical/covalent methods are more efficient to introduce functional groups on the surface of CNTs [26]. Conversely, the chemical functionalization has some disadvantages: (i) reduction of mechanical properties and disturbance of p-electron system of CNTs surface due to huge amount of lattice defects formed on the CNTs, and (ii) more chemical reactants requirement is not environmental friendly at all [26, 27, 28]. So that, to find alternative and cost effective method of CNTs functionalization is prime concerned and non-covalent process is the option concerning about prevention of structural damage of CNTs and make lesser process cost as well as invention of more environmental friendly approach. Polymer wrapping and physysortion interaction between chemical and CNTs are the main types of no-covalent functionalization of CNTs [26, 27]. Several chemical and non-covalent CNTs functionalization are reported in the previous research but all processes have their own advantages and disadvantages as listed in the Table 2.

Types of CNTs functionalizationAdvantagesDisadvantagesRefs.
Chemical/covalent
  1. Highly efficient;

  2. Decorate CNTs surface with functional groups;

  3. No structural damage;

  4. Both functionalization and removal of residuals are occurred;

Costly, huge reactants are required not environmental friendly, some cases high temperature required;[27, 28]
Physical/non-covalent
  1. Dispersion allows on nanotubes;

  2. No lattice damages;

  3. Environmental friendly;

  4. Low cost;

Low rate of efficiency,
Low interaction rate between filler and matrix;
[27, 28]

Table 2.

Some advantages and disadvantages of different methods of CNTs functionalization.

Advertisement

6. CNTs for removal of ECs

6.1 Adsorptive removal of ECs

The adsorptive removal of ECs using CNTs are widely studied and subsequently finds high removal efficiencies due to large surface area and highly porous materials [27]. But some of constrains exists that including low rate of dispersion, small size and difficulties of separation of CNTs residuals from aquatic phase [26]. Therefore, researchers were modified the surface of CNTs with numerous functional groups for removal of ECs from contaminated environment [26, 27, 28].

Yu et al. [42] was developed a multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and modified with different ratios of oxygen contents and subsequently applied for sequestration of tetracycline (TC) from wastewater. The study found that the maximum monolayer adsorption capacities were 269.25, 217.56, 217.8, and 210.43 mg/g for MWCNTs with 3.2, 4.7, 2.0, and 5.9% of oxygen, respectively. Another study by same author Yu et al. [43] was further evaluated the adsorption of ciprofloxacin antibiotic onto oxidize MWCNTs by introducing oxygen ratios from 2.0% to 5.9% and adsorption results were150.6, 178.9, 206.0, and 181.2 mg/g for MWCNTs with 2.0–5.9% of oxygen.

Zhang et al. [44] utilized the modified CNTs for removal of sulfamethoxazole. MWCNT was functionalized and adsorption sites was increased with improved surface properties due to more functional groups on the surface of CNTSs. The adsorption mechanism was proposed that the sulfamethoxazole absorption onto MWCNTs primly due to hydrogen bonding, electrostatic, π-π interactions and hydrophobic reactions. It was also proved that oxidization is the more facile method for introducing ∙OH and C∙O groups on the surface of CNTs [44]. Peng et al. [45] was functionalized the MWCNT and SWCNTs for removal of ofloxacin and norfloxacin from wastewater. It was showed that the solubility of antibiotics and influence of functional groups were effected the adsorption rate, for instance, π-donor was increased due to OH group while, π-acceptor was increased due to C∙O group [45].

Xu et al. [46] synthesized a core-shell CNTs based nanocomposite for the adsorption of 2-naphthol from aqueous solution applying fixed-bed column technique [46]. The excellent adsorption capacity was exposed for 2-naphthol adsorption onto CNTs nanocomposite [46]. Other study was utilized the modified CNTs with biochar namely CNT-SBC for removal sulfamethoxazole (SMX) from wastewater [47]. Modified materials were significantly improved their surface properties due to existence of CNTs subsequently gained better adsorption capacity. Generally, adsorption mechanism of ECs including antibiotics onto CNTs surface is mainly proposed by chemisorption and physisorption. The physical adsorptions were occurred by hydrogen bond, pore filling and valence force. On the other hand, chemical adsorption was proposed through electrostatic interaction and hydrophobic reactions as depicted the scheme in Figure 4 [47].

Figure 4.

Proposed adsorption mechanisms of ECs adsorption onto CNTs materials [47].

Wang et al. [48] synthesized the functional SWCNTs and MWCNTs for the removal of triclosan as one of the personal care products and paracetamol as one of the drugs from water. The results were showed excellent adsorption capacity due to more functional groups present in the surface of CNTs and significantly allowed the wide range of solution pH from 4 to 10 [48]. So that, the CNTs materials are plying one of the promising nanostructured filler types materials for wastewater decontamination including ECs removal from the contaminated environment due to their exciting physical and chemical properties.

6.2 Catalytic degradation of ECs using CNTs

The previous studies reported that, the photocatalytic ozonation have gained great attention of scientists due to their degradation and mineralization efficiency of ECs and possibility of carbon dioxide production as the end product [30, 49]. Therefore, researchers are using this method for water treatment as well as for hydrogen production. Among other catalysts, the CNTs based materials are considering as good alternatives candidates for the degradation of ECs from the wastewater due to the large surface area, possibility of more functional groups attaching in edges of CNTs, and cost effective modification facility [27]. The photocatalytic ozonation process is producing high rate OH* radicals than the oxidation process due to more electrophilic nature of ozone than the oxygen to photogenerated electrons; hence, the faster and high rate of mineralization might be occurred in the photocatalytic ozonation process. The mechanism of photocatalytic ozonation is presenting in the following Figure 5 [30].

Figure 5.

Mechanism of photocatalytic ozonation process for degradation of ECs [30].

Substantial number of studies reported that CNTs modified nanomaterials are promising catalyst for catalytic degradation of ECs. Some of studies were evaluated the degradation of sulfamethoxazole, oxalic acid [50, 51] and oxytetracycline (OTC) [52] applying photocatalytic ozonation. The studies explored that the rate of degradations were higher than the conventional oxidation process even the literature agreed that the mineralization were higher while toxicity of MWCNTs/O3 were scarcer than conventional catalytic reduction of ECs from water. The abundant functional groups available on the surface functionalized CNTs influence the effective degradation of ECs in the of photocatalytic ozonation process. Zhang et al. [53] investigated catalytic ozonation using CNTs to form ROS. The proposed mechanisms were mainly directed by the following paths (i) interphase “HO* zone” might be produced in the surface of CNTs by straight confronting of reactive sites on Material surface with ozone and (ii) ozone reduced into oxygen O2 by influences of CNTs as seen in Figure 6 [53].

Figure 6.

Illustration of catalytic ozonation mechanism using CNTs based catalyst [53].

Besides catalytic ozonation, CNTs modified materials can also be couple in a combined system with other technology and subsequently oxidation capacity may perhaps much higher due to synchronizing and synergistic effect on the degradation of ECs. Orge et al. [54] evaluated the oxamic acid (OMA) degradation applying a combined system using TiO2-CNTs by ozonation and ultraviolet illumination consequent results showed OMA removal was much higher than other control system [54]. Other study explored that the carbon nanotubes can be utilize in the electrochemical filtration (ECF) as an anode with ozonation. The system was found effective synergistic reaction as well as more cost effective than the other oxidation process of ECs removal.

Advertisement

7. Conclusions

The ECs including pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) are carrying in aquatic system with higher concentration beyond permissible limit, such kind of toxicants have severe impacts on human health and on other biotic components in the ecosystem. The traditional wastewater treatment plants are facilitating the sequestration of some known pollutants and suspended solids apart from emerging contaminants, which are not efficient for appropriately removal of some ECs including antibiotics due to their registrant and persistence nature in the environment. CNTs are widely applying for removal of ECs due to their enlarged surface area and porous structure. To enhance the surface properties and subsequent removal efficiency of pollutants CNTs can modified by coupling/wrapping with versatile functional groups. Functionalization can improve the compatibility, solubility of CNTs and also overawed the complexity of dispersion. The adsorption mechanism of ECs including antibiotics onto CNTs surface is mainly reported by chemisorption and physisorption. The physical adsorptions were occurred by hydrogen bond, pore filling and valence force. On the other hand, chemical adsorption was proposed through electrostatic interaction and hydrophobic reactions.

References

  1. 1. Kumar R, Barakat MA, Taleb MA, Seliem MK. A recyclable multifunctional graphene oxide/SiO2@ polyaniline microspheres composite for Cu(II) and Cr(VI) decontamination from wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;20(268):122290
  2. 2. Taleb MA, Kumar R, Al-Rashdi AA, Seliem MK, Barakat MA. Fabrication of SiO2/CuFe2O4/polyaniline composite: A highly efficient adsorbent for heavy metals removal from aquatic environment. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2020;13(10):7533-7543
  3. 3. Barakat MA, Kumar R, Balkhyour M, Taleb MA. Novel Al2O3/GO/halloysite nanotube composite for sequestration of anionic and cationic dyes. RSC Advances. 2019;9(24):13916-13926
  4. 4. Kumar R, Barakat MA, Alseroury FA, Al-Mur BA, Taleb MA. Experimental design and data on the adsorption and photocatalytic properties of boron nitride/cadmium aluminate composite for Cr(VI) and cefoxitin sodium antibiotic. Data in Brief. 2020;1(28):105051
  5. 5. Geissen V, Mol H, Klumpp E, Umlauf G, Nadal M, Van der Ploeg M, et al. Emerging pollutants in the environment: A challenge for water resource management. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 2015;3(1):57-65
  6. 6. Dey S, Bano F, Malik A. Pharmaceuticals and personal care product (PPCP) contamination—A global discharge inventory. In: Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products: Waste Management and Treatment Technology. Butterworth-Heinemann; 2019. pp. 1-26. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128161890000019
  7. 7. Morin-Crini N, Lichtfouse E, Fourmentin M, Ribeiro AR, Noutsopoulos C, Mapelli F, et al. Removal of emerging contaminants from wastewater using advanced treatments. A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2022;12:1-43
  8. 8. Sivaranjanee R, Kumar PS, Saravanan R, Govarthanan M. Electrochemical sensing system for the analysis of emerging contaminants in aquatic environment: A review. Chemosphere. 2022;31:133779
  9. 9. Varsha M, Kumar PS, Rathi BS. A review on recent trends in the removal of emerging contaminants from aquatic environment using low-cost adsorbents. Chemosphere. 2022;1(287):132270
  10. 10. Khan S, Naushad M, Govarthanan M, Iqbal J, Alfadul SM. Emerging contaminants of high concern for the environment: Current trends and future research. Environmental Research. 2022;207:112609
  11. 11. Mukhopadhyay A, Duttagupta S, Mukherjee A. Emerging organic contaminants in global community drinking water sources and supply: A review of occurrences, processes and removal. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2022;16:107560
  12. 12. Ahmad HA, Ahmad S, Cui Q , Wang Z, Wei H, Chen X, et al. The environmental distribution and removal of emerging pollutants, highlighting the importance of using microbes as a potential degrader: A review. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;25(809):151926
  13. 13. Huff Chester A, Gordon C, Hartmann HA, Bartell SE, Ansah E, Yan T, et al. Contaminants of emerging concern in the Lower Volta River, Ghana, West Africa: The agriculture, aquaculture, and urban development nexus. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 2015;41(2):369-381
  14. 14. Sahani S, Sharma YC, Kim TY. Emerging contaminants in wastewater and surface water. In: New Trends in Emerging Environmental Contaminants. Singapore: Springer; 2022. pp. 9-30
  15. 15. Lee TH, Chuah J, Snyder SA. Occurrence of Emerging Contaminants in Southeast Asian Environments: Present Status, Challenges, and Future Prospects. ACS ES &T Watermark; 2022. p. 27. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestwater.1c00453
  16. 16. Shaheen JF, Sizirici B, Yildiz I. Fate, transport, and risk assessment of widely prescribed pharmaceuticals in terrestrial and aquatic systems: A review. Emerging Contaminants. 2022;2022:22
  17. 17. Rasheed T, Bilal M, Nabeel F, Adeel M, Iqbal HM. Environmentally-related contaminants of high concern: Potential sources and analytical modalities for detection, quantification, and treatment. Environment International. 2019;1(122):52-66
  18. 18. Minamisawa H, Kojima Y, Aizawa M. Adsorption of inositol phosphate on hydroxyapatite powder with high specific surface area. Materials. 2022;15(6):2176
  19. 19. Wang Y, Lin Z, Zhu J, Liu J, Yu J, Chen R, et al. Ultra-high flexibility amidoximated ethylene acrylic acid copolymer film synthesized by the mixed melting method for uranium adsorption from simulated seawater. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2022;15(426):127808
  20. 20. Fang Y, Ren G, Ma Y, Wang C, Li M, Pang X, et al. Adsorption and reutilization of Pb (II) based on acid-resistant metal-organic gel. Separation and Purification Technology. 2022;11:121253
  21. 21. Duarte ED, Oliveira MG, Spaolonzi MP, Costa HP, da Silva TL, da Silva MG, et al. Adsorption of pharmaceutical products from aqueous solutions on functionalized carbon nanotubes by conventional and green methods: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;24:133743
  22. 22. Nyairo WN, Shikuku VO, Sanou Y. Carbon nanotubes in water treatment: Progress and challenges. Innovative Nanocomposites for the Remediation and Decontamination of Wastewater. 2022;2022:171-184
  23. 23. Adeyanju CA, Ogunniyi S, Selvasembian R, Oniye MM, Ajala OJ, Adeniyi AG, et al. Recent advances on the aqueous phase adsorption of carbamazepine. ChemBioEng Reviews. 2022;2022:19
  24. 24. Ozkan A. Novel research on the use of Multi-Wall carbon nanotubes functionalized with copper oxide nanocomposite in the adsorptive desulphurization of crude oil: Laboratory research. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology. 2022;2022:20
  25. 25. Peng J, He Y, Zhou C, Su S, Lai B. The carbon nanotubes-based materials and their applications for organic pollutant removal: A critical review. Chinese Chemical Letters. 2021;32(5):1626-1636
  26. 26. Ndlwana L, Raleie N, Dimpe KM, Ogutu HF, Oseghe EO, Motsa MM, et al. Sustainable hydrothermal and solvothermal synthesis of advanced carbon materials in multidimensional applications: A review. Materials. 2021;14(17):5094
  27. 27. Lavagna L, Nisticò R, Musso S, Pavese M. Functionalization as a way to enhance dispersion of carbon nanotubes in matrices: A review. Materials Today Chemistry. 2021;1(20):100477
  28. 28. Rathinavel S, Priyadharshini K, Panda D. A review on carbon nanotube: An overview of synthesis, properties, functionalization, characterization, and the application. Materials Science and Engineering B. 2021;1(268):115095
  29. 29. Kruusenberg I, Alexeyeva N, Kozlova J, Sammelselg V, Tammeveski K. Effect of purification of carbon nanotubes on their Electrocatalytic properties for ORR in acid solution. ECS Meeting Abstracts 2011, 1;31:1673
  30. 30. Mecha AC, Chollom MN. Photocatalytic ozonation of wastewater: A review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2020;18(5):1491-1507
  31. 31. Omar Ouda KM. Treated wastewater use in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and initiatives. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 2016;32(5):799-809
  32. 32. Dai H. Carbon nanotubes: Opportunities and challenges. Surface Science. 2002;500(1-3):218-241
  33. 33. Ebbesen TW. Carbon nanotubes. Annual Review of Materials Science. 1994;24(1):235-264
  34. 34. Iijima S. Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon. nature. Nature. 1991;354(6348):56-58
  35. 35. Akter M, Halawani RF, Aloufi FA, Taleb MA, Akter S, Mahmood S. Utilization of agro-industrial wastes for the production of quality oyster mushrooms. Sustainability. 2022;14(2):994
  36. 36. Hou PX, Zhang F, Zhang L, Liu C, Cheng HM. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes by floating catalyst chemical vapor deposition and their applications. Advanced Functional Materials. 2022;32(11):2108541
  37. 37. Aabir A, Naz MY, Shukrullah S. Synthesis of carbon nanotubes via plasma arc discharge method. In: Emerging Developments and Applications of Low Temperature Plasma. 2022. pp. 85-102. Available from: https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/synthesis-of-carbon-nanotubes-via-plasma-arc-discharge-method/294712
  38. 38. Eskandari MJ, Araghchi M, Daneshmand H. Aluminum oxide nanotubes fabricated via laser ablation process: Application as superhydrophobic surfaces. Optics and Laser Technology. 2022;1(155):108420
  39. 39. Anzar N, Hasan R, Tyagi M, Yadav N, Narang J. Carbon nanotube-a review on synthesis, properties and plethora of applications in the field of biomedical science. Sensors International. 2020;1(1):100003
  40. 40. Prasek J, Drbohlavova J, Chomoucka J, Hubalek J, Jasek O, Adam V, et al. Methods for carbon nanotubes synthesis. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2011;21(40):15872-15884
  41. 41. Ikegami T, Nakanishi F, Uchiyama M, Ebihara K. Optical measurement in carbon nanotubes formation by pulsed laser ablation. Thin Solid Films. 2004;457(1):7-11
  42. 42. Yu F, Ma J, Han S. Adsorption of tetracycline from aqueous solutions onto multi-walled carbon nanotubes with different oxygen contents. Scientific Reports. 2014;4(1):1-8
  43. 43. Yu F, Sun S, Han S, Zheng J, Ma J. Adsorption removal of ciprofloxacin by multi-walled carbon nanotubes with different oxygen contents from aqueous solutions. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2016;1(285):588-595
  44. 44. Zhang D, Pan B, Wu M, Wang B, Zhang H, Peng H, et al. Adsorption of sulfamethoxazole on functionalized carbon nanotubes as affected by cations and anions. Environmental Pollution. 2011;159(10):2616-2621
  45. 45. Peng H, Pan B, Wu M, Liu Y, Zhang D, Xing B. Adsorption of ofloxacin and norfloxacin on carbon nanotubes: Hydrophobicity-and structure-controlled process. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2012;30(233):89-96
  46. 46. Xu L, Wang S, Zhou J, Deng H, Frost RL. Column adsorption of 2-naphthol from aqueous solution using carbon nanotube-based composite adsorbent. Chemical Engineering Journal. 2018;1(335):450-457
  47. 47. Ma Y, Yang L, Wu L, Li P, Qi X, He L, et al. Carbon nanotube supported sludge biochar as an efficient adsorbent for low concentrations of sulfamethoxazole removal. Science of The Total Environment. 2020;718:137299
  48. 48. Wang Y, Zhu J, Huang H, Cho HH. Carbon nanotube composite membranes for microfiltration of pharmaceuticals and personal care products: Capabilities and potential mechanisms. Journal of Membrane Science. 2015;479:165-174
  49. 49. Harafan A, Gafoor SA, Kusuma TD, Maliyekkal SM. Graphene modified Photocatalysts for the abatement of emerging contaminants in water. New Trends in Emerging Environmental Contaminants. 2022;2022:371-406
  50. 50. Liu ZQ , Ma J, Cui YH, Zhao L, Zhang BP. Factors affecting the catalytic activity of multi-walled carbon nanotube for ozonation of oxalic acid. Separation and Purification Technology. 2011;78(2):147-153
  51. 51. Gonçalves AG, Órfão JJ, Pereira MF. Catalytic ozonation of sulphamethoxazole in the presence of carbon materials: Catalytic performance and reaction pathways. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 2012;15(239):167-174
  52. 52. Agasti N, Gautam V, Pandey N, Genwa M, Meena PL, Tandon S, et al. Carbon nanotube based magnetic composites for decontamination of organic chemical pollutants in water: A review. Applied Surface Science Advances. 2022;1(10):100270
  53. 53. Zhang S, Quan X, Zheng JF, Wang D. Probing the interphase “HO zone” originated by carbon nanotube during catalytic ozonation. Water Research. 2017;122:86-95
  54. 54. Orge CA, Faria JL, Pereira MF. Removal of oxalic acid, oxamic acid and aniline by a combined photolysis and ozonation process. Environmental Technology. 2015;36(9):1075-1083

Written By

Abu Taleb, Mohammed Naif Al-sharif, Mohammed Ali Al-mutair, Saleh Almasoudi, Osama Madkhali and Mohammed Muzibur Rahman

Submitted: 01 October 2022 Reviewed: 03 January 2023 Published: 24 January 2023