Open access

Introductory Chapter: Spinal Cord Injury

Written By

Amedeo Piazza, Giorgio Lofrese, Andrea Perna, Sokol Trungu and Luca Ricciardi

Published: 08 February 2023

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.104358

From the Edited Volume

Spinal Cord Injury - Current Trends in Acute Management, Function Preservation and Rehabilitation Protocols

Edited by Luca Ricciardi, Giorgio Lofrese, Andrea Perna and Sokol Trungu

Chapter metrics overview

75 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

The annual global incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) was estimated by the Global Burden of Disease Study in 2016, and it resulted in as high as 0.93 million (0.78–1.16 million) per year, with an age-standardized incidence rate of 13 (11–16) per 100,000 population [1]. In the USA, the principal causes of SCI are represented by motor vehicle accidents (36–48%), violence (5–29%), falls (17–21%), and recreational activities (7–16%) [2]. The socioeconomic burden is extremely high due to the young age, the severity of acquired disabilities, and both direct and indirect health-related costs. In fact, the annual national cost in 2009 was as high as $1,7 billion [3], and for each patient ranged from $30,770 to $62,563 in 2016 [4]. The most significant cost derived from the severity of disability and complications developed during the hospitalization such as pressure ulcers and infections [5]. The SCI burden is extended also to the psychology of the younger patients, suddenly experiencing paraplegia or quadriplegia [6, 7]. It has been reported that people suffering from SCI are 2–5 times more likely to die prematurely compared to the healthy population [8, 9].

In SCI, the timing for intervention is crucial. Several studies have shown that early medical-surgical intervention could effectively improve functional outcomes. According to the Advanced Traumatic Life Support (ATLS) guidelines, any obstruction of upper airways should be restored while paying attention to neck and spine mobilization. The immobilization procedures should be fastidiously observed even in penetrating trauma without interfering with resuscitation efforts [10]. After immobilization, the patient should be quickly transferred to the closest trauma center hospital.

Advertisement

2. Clinical presentation

Clinical symptoms are SCI depend on the level of injury and include autonomy-related neurological dysfunctions such as cardiovascular disorders, sexual, bowel, and bladder dysfunction, sensory and motor deficit such as paresis, and spasticity [11].

The American spinal injury association developed a clinical classification (ASIA scale, see Table 1) for grading the severity of injury that now represents the international standard tool for evaluation [12, 13]. Unfortunately, epidemiology has confirmed that SCI often affects the cervical spine, likely due to the high mobility of the segment that may represent a poor factor in terms of clinical outcome.

American spinal injury association impairment scale
ANo motor or sensory function is preserved in the sacral segments S4–S5.
BSensory function preserved but not motor function is preserved below the neurological level and includes the sacral segments S4–S5.
CMotor function is preserved below the neurological level, and more than half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade less than 3.
DMotor function is preserved below the neurological level, and at least half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade of 3 or more.
EMotor and sensory functions are normal.

Table 1.

ASIA scale [12].

Advertisement

3. Mechanism of SCI

The pathophysiology of SCI may be divided into phases: primary and secondary injury.

  • Primary injury is defined as direct physical trauma to the spinal cord due to different mechanisms such as laceration, distraction, and transient or persistent compression [14]. The local damage of the spinal cord occurs during primary injuries that are irreversible.

  • Secondary injury consists of multiple cascades of biochemical events that determine craniocaudal damage extension and loss of functionality. Secondary injury is subdivided into acute, subacute, and chronic phases [15, 16, 17] (see Table 2). Principal actors of the acute phase are spinal shock, vascular disfunction neurotoxicity transmission, membrane, and ionic dysregulation. Those phenomes start immediately after the injury, disrupting the structural integrity of the CNS and activating the cascade events [18, 19]. Most of these phenomes overlap during the subacute phase.

Primary injury
  • Laceration

  • Distraction

  • Transient compression

  • Persistent compression

Secondary injury
 Acute:
  • Spinal shock

  • Vascular dysfunction

  • Membrane e ionic dysregulation

  • Neurotoxic transmission

 Subacute:
  • Free radical injury

  • Lipid peroxidation

  • Immune-associated neurotoxicity

  • Astrocytic glial scar formation

 Chronic:
  • Glial scar formation

  • Nogo receptors

Table 2.

Phases of SCI injury.

During the subacute phase, the damage progressively extends to the surrounding districts, and new processes are determined by the production of free radicals such as free radical injury, lipid peroxidation, immune-associated neurotoxicity, astrocytic glia scar formation [15, 17]. The chronic phase is characterized by glial scar formation [20, 21] and activation of Nogo Receptor [22, 23].

Advertisement

4. Treatments in acute phase

4.1 Surgical

The Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury study [24] and the Observational European Multicenter study on the efficacy of acute surgical decompression after traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: the SCI-(POEM) study [25] had shown that early surgical decompression (<24 h) significatively improves the clinical outcome.

4.2 Medical

4.2.1 Corticosteroid-based therapy

The use of high-dose methylprednisolone is currently under discussion due to the risk related to high corticosteroids doses, while its clinical-functional advantages have been not confirmed yet. Historically, methylprednisolone has been administered at high doses for 48 hours after the National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS) [26, 27]. It was also demonstrated that the clinical improvement could occur only if the treatment was started within 8 hours from trauma [26]. The AO spine, in 2017 [28, 29], suggests to use the NASCIS protocol for only 24 h (methylprednisolone: 30 mg/kg + 5,4 mg × 23 h), as reported by Bracken et al. [30].

4.2.2 High blood pressure

In order to supply the spinal cord, the AANS/CNS guideline suggests maintaining the mean arterial pressure ≥ 85–90 mm/hg in the 7 days after the injury.

Advertisement

5. Adult spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormalities (SCIWORA)

SCIWORA is a rare syndrome that results in objective signs of myelopathy after traumatic injuries without any radiological findings in TC or MRI imaging. This syndrome usually affects children, while it is reported rarely in the adult population [31, 32]. The genesis of SCIWORA seems related to hyperextension forces, as cervical acceleration causing whiplash injuries in car accidents, or from a direct impact to the face, very similar to the diffuse axonal injury in the brain trauma [32, 33]. The treatment is usually conservative with early immobilization of the neck [34]. However, up to 16% of these patients suffer from relevant post-traumatic disorders.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

Spinal cord injury represents a scenario of multidisciplinary interest in which the injury-to-treatment time represents the most relevant factor in determining the functional outcome. Functional disorders after SCI represent socioeconomic burdens, in terms of direct and indirect health-related costs. Therefore, there is a growing interest in both ameliorating the treatment strategies in the acute management of SCI and standardizing rehabilitation and long-term care protocols for these patients.

References

  1. 1. GBD 2016 Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990-2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurology. 2019;18(1):56-87
  2. 2. McDonald JW, Sadowsky C. Spinal-cord injury. Lancet. 2002;359(9304):417-425
  3. 3. Mahabaleshwarkar R, Khanna R. National hospitalization burden associated with spinal cord injuries in the United States. Spinal Cord. 2014;52(2):139-144
  4. 4. Benzel EC, Larson SJ. Functional recovery after decompressive operation for thoracic and lumbar spine fractures. Neurosurgery. 1986;19(5):772-778
  5. 5. Malekzadeh H et al. Direct cost of illness for spinal cord injury: A systematic review. Global Spine Journal. 2021
  6. 6. Sekhon LH, Fehlings MG. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26(Suppl. 24):S2-S12
  7. 7. Nas K et al. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injuries. World Journal of Orthopedics. 2015;6(1):8-16
  8. 8. Majdan M et al. Mortality due to traumatic spinal cord injuries in Europe: A cross-sectional and pooled analysis of population-wide data from 22 countries. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2017;25(1):64
  9. 9. Biering-Sørensen F et al. International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set (version 2.0)-including standardization of reporting. Spinal Cord. 2017;55(8):759-764
  10. 10. Theodore N et al. Prehospital cervical spinal immobilization after trauma. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(Suppl. 2):22-34
  11. 11. Hayta E, Elden H. Acute spinal cord injury: A review of pathophysiology and potential of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pharmacological intervention. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy. 2018;87:25-31
  12. 12. Roberts TT, Leonard GR, Cepela DJ. Classifications in brief: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 2017;475(5):1499-1504
  13. 13. American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). Abstracts. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 1998;21(2):151-194
  14. 14. Hachem LD, Ahuja CS, Fehlings MG. Assessment and management of acute spinal cord injury: From point of injury to rehabilitation. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine. 2017;40(6):665-675
  15. 15. Tubbs RS et al. Spinal cord ischemia and atherosclerosis: A review of the literature. British Journal of Neurosurgery. 2011;25(6):666-670
  16. 16. Kobayashi T. Experimental study on pathological phases of whiplash injury. Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 1968;42(1):1-12
  17. 17. Mortazavi MM et al. Chemical priming for spinal cord injury: A review of the literature. Part I-factors involved. Childs Nervous System. 2011;27(8):1297-1306
  18. 18. Guha A, Tator CH, Rochon J. Spinal cord blood flow and systemic blood pressure after experimental spinal cord injury in rats. Stroke. 1989;20(3):372-377
  19. 19. Tator CH, Koyanagi I. Vascular mechanisms in the pathophysiology of human spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurosurgery. 1997;86(3):483-492
  20. 20. Beattie MS, Farooqui AA, Bresnahan JC. Review of current evidence for apoptosis after spinal cord injury. Journal of Neurotrauma. 2000;17(10):915-925
  21. 21. Liu XZ et al. Neuronal and glial apoptosis after traumatic spinal cord injury. The Journal of Neuroscience. 1997;17(14):5395-5406
  22. 22. Ohtake Y, Li S. Molecular mechanisms of scar-sourced axon growth inhibitors. Brain Research. 2015;1619:22-35
  23. 23. Dickendesher TL et al. NgR1 and NgR3 are receptors for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans. Nature Neuroscience. 2012;15(5):703-712
  24. 24. Fehlings MG et al. Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: Results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32037
  25. 25. van Middendorp JJ et al. Design and rationale of a Prospective, Observational European Multicenter study on the efficacy of acute surgical decompression after traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: The SCI-POEM study. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(9):686-694
  26. 26. Bracken MB et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. The New England Journal of Medicine. 1990;322(20):1405-1411
  27. 27. Bracken MB et al. Efficacy of methylprednisolone in acute spinal cord injury. JAMA. 1984;251(1):45-52
  28. 28. Fehlings MG et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of acute spinal cord injury: Introduction, rationale, and scope. Global Spine Journal. 2017;7(Suppl. 3):84s-94s
  29. 29. Fehlings MG et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury: Recommendations on the use of methylprednisolone sodium succinate. Global Spine Journal. 2017;7(Suppl. 3):203s-211s
  30. 30. Bracken MB et al. Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. JAMA. 1997;277(20):1597-1604
  31. 31. Yucesoy K, Yuksel KZ. SCIWORA in MRI era. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery. 2008;110(5):429-433
  32. 32. Mahajan P et al. Spinal cord injury without radiologic abnormality in children imaged with magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2013;75(5):843-847
  33. 33. Boese CK et al. Spinal cord injury without radiologic abnormality in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2015;78(4):874-882
  34. 34. Freigang V et al. Management and mid-term outcome after “Real SCIWORA” in children and adolescents. Global Spine Journal. 2021

Written By

Amedeo Piazza, Giorgio Lofrese, Andrea Perna, Sokol Trungu and Luca Ricciardi

Published: 08 February 2023