Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Photophysical Detection of Singlet Oxygen

Written By

Arnab Maity

Submitted: June 19th, 2021 Reviewed: August 12th, 2021 Published: September 19th, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99902

Chapter metrics overview

150 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The chemical reactivity of singlet oxygen (1O2) (SO) derives from its electronically excited state. Being a unique reactive oxygen species SO takes part in many important atmospheric, biological physical, chemical, and therapeutic process and attracted current research interest. To understand the mechanistic pathways in various process the detection and quantification of SO is very important. The direct method of detection is very challenging due to its highly reactive nature. Only direct method of determination of phosphorescence of SO at 1270 nm has been utilised but that also puts some limitation due to very low luminescence quantum yield. Indirect method using UV–Vis spectrophotometric, fluorescent and chemiluminescent probes has been extensively studied for this purpose. Elucidation of various mechanistic processes improvised the use of sophisticated spectroscopic detection probe for SO have been discussed in a simple and lucid manner in this article through citation of literature examples. Four major spectroscopic methods i.e. spectrophotometry, fluorescence, emission and chemiluminescence are elaborately discussed with special emphasis to chemical probes having high selectivity and sensitivity for SO.


  • Recative oxygen species (ROS)
  • Singlet Oxygen (SO)
  • 9
  • 10-Anthracenedipropionic acid (ADPA)
  • 9
  • 10-dimethyl anthracene (DMA)
  • DPA
  • DPBF
  • DMAX
  • ATTA-Eu3+
  • PATA-Tb3+
  • MTTA-Eu3+
  • CLA
  • MCLA
  • FCLA

“Old Man’s Advice to Youth: ‘Never Lose a Holy Curiosity.’”LIFE Magazine (May 2nd, 1955) p. 64.

Albert Einstein


1. Introduction

Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) is broadly used for those which contain oxygen radical such as superoxide anions (O2.−), hydroxyl radicals (HO.), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), nitric oxide (NO), peroxynitrite (ONOO), hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and singlet oxygen (1O2)(SO). These are usually metabolites of molecular oxygen formed due to normal or abnormal redox function in human body [1]. Numerous studies suggested that ROS can acts as toxins which can reduce the life span by causing ageing [2], synovial fluid degradation [3], neurodegenerative disease [4] etc. Singlet oxygen is known to be a highly reactive oxygen species that can oxidise a broad range of biomolecules including lipids [5], nucleic acids [6, 7] and proteins [8]. The oxidation chemistry of SO provide key mechanism in the regulation of intracellular signalling pathways [9, 10] and eventually connected to human pathophysiology. As SO is a very short lived species (τ1/2 = 10−6 to 10−5 s) in the aqueous milieu) [11] studies towards the molecular mechanism of 1O2 in vivo has been significantly retarded. Direct monitoring of SO phosphorescence also lacks practical utility due to very low photoluminescence quantum yields (PLQY≈10−6) [12]. Therefore an enormous demand for SO probe with high sensitivity and large dynamic range is required. In this article various photophysical techniques and related probes usually employed in detecting SO has been delineated in separate paragraph (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

The various photophysical singlet oxygen detection techniques based on absorbance or luminescence probes have been described pictorially. From top left clockwise (a) fluorescence detection probe (1,3-diarylisobenzofuran, adapted from [13]), (b) UV–Vis absorption based spectrophotometric probe (bis-9,10-anthracene-(4-trimethylphenylammonium) dichloride, adapted from [14]), (c) chemiluminescence probe (SOCL-phenol-dioxetane species, adapted from [15]) and (d) rare earth photoluminescence probe, ([4′-(9-anthryl)-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine-6,6″-diyl]bis (methylenenitrilo) tetrakis (acetate)-Eu3+ (ATTA-Eu3+) (adapted from [16]).


2. UV–Vis spectrophotometric detection probes

2.1 9,10-Anthracenedipropionic acid (ADPA)

Ground state of molecular oxygen exists as triplet state with a lowest lying excited state being a singlet state. The singlet state of oxygen can be generated in solution via energy transfer from excited photosensitizers (S, e.g., humic substance or Rose Bengal; Eq. (1)) [17].


The idea to detect environmentally relevant concentration prompted development of molecular probe that can trap SO and can also be used in studying kinetics. Lindig was the first to introduced 9,10-anthracenedipropionic acid (ADPA) as a quantitative efficient 1O2 detection probe [18]. The benefit of using ADPA is that it is water soluble and reacts rapidly and irreversible with 1O2 to form an endoperoxide with the result of photobleaching of absorbance peak approximately at 378 nm (Figure 2) [20]. Craig was the pioneer to demonstrate the use of ADPA for the quantitative measure of 1O2 from the surface of a series of porphyrin-incorporated hydrogels in comparison to the pervious study where ADPA used to ingress into the materials under investigation [19].

Figure 2.

The formation of endoperoxide upon reaction of ADPA with 1O2 (adapted from [19]).

2.2 9,10-dimethyl anthracene (DMA)

Another derivative of anthracene i.e. 9,10-dimethyl anthracene (DMA) reacts almost irreversibly with 1O2 in various organic and aqueous medium with a significantly high rate constant (6.8 × 107–5.7 × 1010 M−1S−1) with the result of producing non fluorescent 9,10-endoperoxide [21, 22, 23, 24]. Elim Albiter reported a facile photosensitized oxidation of 9,10 demethylanthracene with 1O2 in presence of safranin O/silica composite as a heterogeneous photosensitizer [21] in which they reported that oxidation rate does not depend on surface of the composite rather depend only the initial concentration of DMA, light intensity and the amount of composite formed. Their result correlates with the result if the same reaction performed in homogeneous medium. In a similar type experiment Eitan Gross et al. explored DMA inside liposome to study the kinetics of DMA with 1O2 in presence of photosensitizer [22].

2.3 9,10-diphenyl anthracene (DPA)

Addition of two phenyl group in 9 and 10 position of anthacene generates a stable and specific 1O2 trap, 9,10-diphenyl anthracene (DPA) with higher stability of endoperoxide by reaction with 1O2. However, DPA is not a very suitable candidate as the detection method is based on decrease in absorbance at 355 nm band [25]. V. Nardello et al. enhanced the water solubility of 9,10-diphenyl anthracene (DPA) derivative by adding two quaternary ammonium functionality with the phenyl ring that do not interfere with 1O2 and also resulting compound [bis-9,10-anthracene-(4-trimethylphenylamonium) dichloride] BPAA is very much stable with common oxidising agent (Figure 3) [14].

Figure 3.

(a) Interaction ofbis-9,10-anthracene-(4-trimethylphenylammonium) dichloride (BPAA) with singlet oxygen resulting into the formation of water soluble endoperoxide (BPAAO2) and (b) UV–Vis absorption spectra of a: BPAA 10−4 M in water and b: the corresponding endoperoxide of BPAA, 10−4 M in water [adapted from [14]].

UV–Vis absorption band of BPAA is ranging from 320 to 420 nm which is originated from anthracene core structure and once it binds with 1O2 (Figure 3) the absorbance band is quenched totally confirming the formation of endoperoxide.


3. Fluorescent probe for the detection of singlet oxygen species

Among the various available techniques to detect ROS the fluorescence based methodology is an excellent one because of its high sensitivity, high spatial resolution in imaging techniques and also simplicity during data collection [26, 27]. Fluorescent probes are generally non fluorescent before being oxidised by some oxygen species and they are very much specific to some oxidant. Combination of 1O2 trap and a fluorophores like fluorescein [27, 28] reactive dienes [29] including 9,10-disubstituted anthracene [30, 31, 32, 33] etc. are the usual method to develop a fluorescent 1O2 probe. In fact 1O2 has huge affinity for biomolecules having cisoid-diene structure and easily undergo [2 + 4] cycloaddition reaction [1, 6, 27]. Thus for most of the probes the fluorescent signals were obtained after [2 + 4] cycloaddition reaction between the probe and 1O2 (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Chemical structure of fluorescence detection probes for 1O2, (a) DPBF, (b) PPBF, (c) PyPBF and (d) StPBF (adapted from [13]).

3.1 1,3 Diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF)

D. Song [13] synthesized a series of compounds of 1,3 Diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) which can acts as ratiometric fluorescence detection probe having singlet oxygen binding rate constant of 9.6 × 108 M−1S−1 in water [13]. Once DPBF reacts with 1O2 forms nonfluorescent endoperoxide or 1,2-dibenzoylbenzene thus fluorescence signal becomes off. To overcome this practical difficulties they synthesised three more derivatives of DPBF namely phenanthrene substituted phenylisobenzofuran (PPBF), pyrene substituted phenylisobenzofuran (PyPBF) and 4-(diphenylamino)stilbene substituted derivative (StPBF) by substituting one phenyl group of DPBF (Figure 5) [13].

Figure 5.

(a) Fluorescence spectra of StPBF in absence (red in colour) and with gradually increasing concentration of 1O2. The spectra gets blue shifted from 505 nm to 435 nm and fluorescence intensity increases with concentration of 1O2 as directed by arrow in spectra and inset shows the observable colour change from green (in absence) and in presence of 1O2 (blue in colour). (b) Graph of observed rate constant (Kobs) vs. concentration of various 1O2 probe (adapted from [13]).

These 1O2 probes exhibit significant red shift in their emission spectrum as the conjugation increases from DBPF to StPBF.

Upon interaction with 1O2 species the fluorescence signal of DPBF is getting turn off while PPBF, PyPBF and StPBF demonstrate a blue shift of the emission signal with significant ratiometric enhancement of fluorescence as shown in Table 1.

Systemλex (nm)λem nm (probe alone)λem (probe +1O2) nmFl ratio
DPBF +1O2415455Turn offNot determined
PPBF + 1O2331476370FI476/FI370 = 80
PPBF + 1O2358512398FI512/FI398 = 352
StPBF + 1O2350505435FI505/FI435 = 14

Table 1.

Photophysical data of 1O2 probes [13]

3.2 9-[2-(3-Carboxy-9,10-diphenyl)anthryl]-6-hydroxy-3H-xanthen-3-one (DPAX)

In terms of sensitivity issue a fluorescence probe is always better than probes which work on the basis of absorbance. Umezawa developed a new sensitive and efficient fluorescence probe DPAX namely 9-[2-(3-carboxy-9,10-diphenyl)anthryl]-6-hydroxy-3H-xanthen-3-one, for the detection of 1O2 by fusing a fluorescein moiety, with DPA which serve the characteristics of fluorescence due to fluorescein as well as a good 1O2 trap for the presence of DPA [34]. DPAX and its derivatives show very low fluorescence intensity in aqueous solution but once binding with 1O2 the corresponding endoperoxide (DPAX-ED) shows excellent fluorescence intensity with quantum yield in the range of 0.5–0.7 (Figure 6) [35]. The DPAX and its derivatives demonstrate excellent selectivity towards 1O2 as the fluorescence intensity remains unchanged upon reaction with hydrogen peroxide, superoxide and nitric oxide [35]. DPAXs are suitable for application in neutral and basic aqueous solution but the fluorescence intensity is known to be decreased under acidic condition due to the protonation of phenoxide oxygen atom; thus are not suitable for application in acidic conditions [32]. The stability of the fluorescence intensity can be enhanced by incorporating electron withdrawing group like Cl, F at 2 and 7 position of the xanthenes moiety leading to generation of two derivatives of DPAX namely DPAX-2(Cl derivative) and DPAX-3(F-derivative). This structural change lowered the Pka value of the phenolic oxygen atom [34].

Figure 6.

Reaction of 9-[2-(3-carboxy-9,10-diphenyl)anthryl]-6-hydroxy-3H-xanthen-3-ones (DPAXs) with 1O2 to produce corresponding DPAX endoperoxides (DPAX-EPs) (adapted from [34]).

Absorption maxima (A), molar extinction coefficient (ε) and emission maxima (λem) are more or less same for DPAXs and DPAX-EPs but the quantum efficiencies of fluorescence are altered when DPAXs bind with 1O2. The emission maximum of DPAX-2-EP is shifted to longer wavelength than the corresponding DPAX-2 compound in comparison to other DPAXs compounds (Table 2) [34].

CompoundsAbsorption maxima(nm)ε (×104 M−1 cm−1)λmax (emission)Quantum yield (Φf)

Table 2.

Absorbance and fluorescence properties of DPAXs and DPAX-EPs (adopted from [36]).

DPAX-2 can be utilised as an efficient 1O2 sensor in both basic and neutral medium. Umezawa et al. used two different 1O2 generation system namely, MnO4/H2O2 and 3-(4-methyl-1-naphthyl)propionic acid endoperoxide (EP-1) which works in different pH values (10.5 and 7.4 respectively). In both the cases an increase in fluorescence intensity is established when this probe reacts with 1O2 generation system (Figure 7).

Figure 7.

Emission spectra of DPAX-2 at 505 nm in reaction with 1O2, generated from MnO4/H2O2 system. The reaction was performed in 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer medium of pH 10.5 containing 0.1 mM EDTA at 25°C (adapted from [34]).

To confirm the specificity of DPAX-2 towards 1O2, fluorescence experiment was performed in presence of hydrogen peroxide, superoxide and nitric oxide but no appreciable change was observed for those species. These observations suggest the specificity of this probe for 1O2 [34].

3.3 9-[2-(3-Carboxy-9,10-dimethyl)anthryl]-6-hydroxy-3H-xanthen-3-one (DMAX)

Following the same approach of Umezawa group, Tanaka et al. synthesised another fluorescence probe molecule for the faster and efficient detection of 1O2, 9-[2-(3-carboxy-9,10-dimethyl)anthryl]-6-hydroxy-3H-xanthen-3-one (DMAX) (Figure 8), targeting to achieve great sensitivity and rapid rate of formation of endoperoxide compare to already reported one i.e. DPAX (Figure 8) [27]. The crucial point of DMA compound is that it reacts rapidly with 1O2 to give the 9,10 endoperoxide, DMA-EP with rate constant k = 9.1 × 108 M−1 s−1 in water. This observation clearly indicates that DMAX shows much greater sensitivity for 1O2 than DPAX. Comparing to this reaction, the classical singlet oxygen trap 1,3-diphenylisobenzophuran (DPBF) reacts with 1O2 with a comparable rate constant k = 9.6 × 108 M−1 s−1 but DPBF reacts with other reactive oxygen species like hypochlorite, hydroxyl radical to generate the same products.

Figure 8.

Reaction of 9-[2-(3-carboxy-9,10-dimethyl)anthryl]-6-hydroxy-3H-xanthen-3-one (DMAX) with 1O2 to produce DMAX-EP (adapted from [27]). λex = 492 nm and λem = 515 nm.

Both DMAX and its endoperoxide DMAX-EP have similar excitation and emission wavelength (λex = 492 nm and λem = 515 nm) but DMAX-EP is highly fluorescent whereas DMAX itself is practically non-fluorescent (Figure 8). From their study Tanaka et al. confirmed that fluorescence intensity of DMAX increases with concentration dependent manner of singlet oxygen generator, 3-(1,4-Dihydro-1,4-epidioxy-4-methyl-1-naphthyl)propionic acid (EP-1) and a good linear relationship has been observed for fluorescence intensity and concentration of EP-1. This enables DMAX to use as a quantitative detection probe for 1O2. Figure 9 demonstrate the change of gradient of fluorescence intensity of DMAX and DPAX-1 with increasing concentration of EP-1 having gradient 1.0 and 1.9 × 10−2 (arbitrary unit)s−1[EP-1 (mM)]−1 for DMAX and DPAX respectively. This result suggests that DMAX reacts with 1O2 more rapidly and sensitivity is 53 times more than that of DPAX [27].

Figure 9.

Initial rate of fluorescence increase of DMAX (in hollow sphere) and DPAX-1(in hollow square) with increasing concentration of EP-1 [adapted from [27]].

Tanaka et al. further confirmed that DMAX did not show any change in fluorescence intensity upon reaction with 1.0 mM H2O2, 0.1 mM nitric oxide and 0.2 mM superoxide suggesting the specificity towards 1O2. Further the hydrophobicity of DMAX is less than that of DPAXs making it suitable to use for assays in biological sample [27].


4. Rare earth chelate based luminescence probes

Rare-earth based chelate luminescence probe can also serve significant role in the detection of singlet oxygen. In comparison to organic fluorescence probe rare earth based chelate probes exhibits markedly different advantages including long luminescence lifetime, sharp emission profile, large Stokes shift, which makes them suitable to use in time-resolved luminescence detection of singlet oxygen [36]. Large Stokes shift helps to reduce the influence caused by excitation light effectively. Time resolved luminescence measurement using rare-earth-chelated probe can efficiently reduce the interference originated from the background noise associated with biological sample, scattering lights (Tyndall, Rayleigh and Raman scattering) and the optical components [16]. Rare earth chelate probes which are successfully applied for the detection of singlet oxygen including Eu, Tb and Re based chelate complexes are well-known [16, 31, 37].

4.1 [4′-(9-Anthryl)-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine-6,6″-diyl]bis (methylenenitrilo)tetrakis (acetate)-Eu3+ (ATTA-Eu3+)

Bo Song et al. first synthesised the Eu3+ cheleate based phosphorescence probe, [4′ -(9-anthryl)-2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine-6,6″-diyl] bis (methylenenitrilo) tetrakis (acetate)-Eu3+ (ATTA-Eu3+) (shown in Figure 9) for the time resolved luminescence study. The probe is highly sensitive, selective for 1O2 and water soluble for time resolved luminescence detection of 1O2 with a detection limit of 2.8 nM/L [16]. The almost non luminescent ATTA-Eu3+ specifically reacts with 1O2 to yield its endoperoxide (Figure 10) (EP- ATTA-Eu3+) resulting a great enhancement of luminescence intensity (luminescence quantum yield of EP- ATTA-Eu3+ is 17 fold greater than that of ATTA-Eu3+) as the population of the excited state of Eu3+ was increased enormously after formation of endoperoxide [16, 27]. The endoperoxide compound EP-ATTA-Eu3+ exhibit favourable chemical stability with a conditional stability constant was measured to be 1020 level. Apart from that no decrease in phosphorescence intensity was observed even after storage of EP-ATTA-Eu3+ for several days at room temperature.

Figure 10.

The chemical structure and the reaction scheme of (a) ATTA-Eu3+, (b) PATA-Tb3+ and (c) MTTA-Eu3+ with singlet oxygen (adapted from [16]).

Another advantage of EP-ATTA-Eu3+ is that the phosphorescence intensity of EP-ATTA-Eu3+ is stable even at very low pH of 3 whereas in case of fluorescein based probe (DPAXs and DMAXs) the rapid decrease of fluorescence intensity is reported below pH 7 [16, 27].

4.2 N,N,N´,N´-[2,6-Bis-(3′-aminomethyl-1′-pyrazolyl)-4-(9″-anthryl)pyridine]tetrakis(acetate)-Tb3+ (PATA-Tb3+)

Mingqian Tan et al. developed another chelate complex of Tb3+, N,N,N´,N´-[2,6-bis-(3′-aminomethyl-1′-pyrazolyl)-4-(9″-anthryl)pyridine] tetrakis(acetate) Tb3+ (PATA-Tb3+), (shown in Figure 10b) is known to be effective fluorescent probe for the detection of 1O2 [38]. Because of the presence of 9-anthryl moiety within the ligand the compound, PATA-Tb3+ is almost non fluorescent but once it reacts with 1O2 the corresponding endoperoxide, EP-PATA-Tb3+ becomes strongly fluorescent with almost 23 fold enhancement of fluorescent quantum yield [39]. PATA- Tb3+ is known to be an excellent fluorescent probe for 1O2 due to the characteristics, including high water solubility, wide applicable pH range and long fluorescence lifetime of endoperoxide (2.76 ms) which makes it suitable for time resolved fluorescent detection with a detection limit as low as 10.8 nM/L [27, 38]. The specificity of PATA- Tb3+ towards 1O2 is also confirmed upon reaction with some other reactive oxygen species, including hydroxyl radical, superoxide ion, peroxynitrite and hydrogen peroxide, the no significant change of fluorescence intensity support its specificity for 1O2.

4.3 [4′-(10-Methyl-9-anthryl)-2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine-6,6′′-diyl]bis(methylenenitrilo)tetrakis(acetate)-Eu3+, abbreviated as MTTA-Eu3+

To improve the selectivity, sensitivity and rapid reaction with singlet oxygen species, Bo Song et al. introduced a new chelate complex of Eu3+, [4′-(10-methyl-9-anthryl)-2,2′:6′,2′′-terpyridine-6,6′′-diyl]bis(methylenenitrilo) tetrakis(acetate)-Eu3+, abbreviated as MTTA- Eu3+ as a 1O2 probe [39]. MTTA- Eu3+ complex is highly water soluble and the reaction rate with 1O2 is much faster in comparison to previously mentioned ATTA-Eu3+ (Figure 10a and c) with reaction rate constant of 1010 M−1S−1. Apart from that this complex can also be applied for a wide pH range from 3 to 10 accompanied by the large enhancement of luminescence quantum yield from 0.90% to 13.8%. The complex is almost non luminescent and when specifically reacts with 1O2 to form the endoperoxide it becomes highly fluorescent with luminescent lifetime changes from 0.8 to 1.29 ms which makes the complex suitable for time gated luminescent measurement. The quantitative detection limit of 1O2 using MTTA- Eu3+ complex is found to be 3.8 nM/L which is very much comparable to the detection limit of ATTA- Eu3+ complex [31, 39].


5. Transition metal based singlet oxygen probe

Though lanthanide based fluorescent probes possess many advantages including low background interference, widely applicable pH range, and excellent water solubility; these probes can be expected to utilise for visualising spatial and temporal distribution of 1O2 in aqueous system but a major drawback of these probes is that they need ultraviolet light for excitation which might cause cell damage, thus limiting their application in biological system. Liu et al. demonstrated a ReI complex, Re(CO)3Cl(aeip){aeip = 2-(anthracen-9-yl)-1-ethyl-imidazo[4,5-f] [1, 10], phenanthroline, which can be excited via visible light of 410 nm wavelength in aqueous medium thus minimising the effect of cell damage (shown in Figure 11) [31]. The ReI complex is non-luminescent in the native state probably due to quenching of luminescence of Re → aeip (M → L) charge transfer transition in the excited state through exchange triplet-triplet intramolecular energy transfer by anthryl moiety as mentioned in similar type ReI complexes [37]. The strong enhancement of luminescence of ReI complex due to the formation of endoperoxide in both neutral and alkaline medium is perceived, that due to the termination of electronic coupling between the anthryl and the parent ReI complex (Figure 11). In comparison to other fluorescent probes of Eu3+ and Tb3+ complexes, ReI complex exhibits higher molar absorption at the visible wavelength of 410 nm and fluorescence can also be initiated with this wavelength of light [31].

Figure 11.

The ReI complex and the formation of endoperoxide via reaction with 1O2 (adapted from [37]).

With increasing concentration of 1O2 the luminescence intensity increases as shown in Figure 12 and the luminescence quantum yield changes from 8.9 × 10−5 to 7.1 × 10−4 and 4.7 × 10−5 to 8.7 × 10−4 in neutral and alkaline media [37]. The limit of detection obtained using ReI complex is found to be 4.9 nM/L and 10.5 nM/L in neutral and alkaline medium respectively, which are very much comparable with that obtained for Eu3+ and Tb3+ complex [31, 37, 39].

Figure 12.

Changes in the luminescence intensity of ReI complex (λex = 410 nm) with increasing concentration of 1O2 in (a) in neutral and (b) in alkaline medium. The inset of these figures show that the sharp change in luminescence intensity at 565 nm with gradually increasing concentration of 1O2 (adapted from [40]).

The additional benefit of visible light excitation and long lifetime enable ReI complex to be used in biological systems.


6. Chemiluminescence singlet oxygen probe

In the previous discussion, the detection of 1O2 was based upon either decrease in the absorbance of singlet oxygen probe or enhancement of luminescence signal of fluorescein based probe in presence of 1O2. In this respect Chemiluminescence is supposed to be one of the most suitable methods for singlet oxygen detection as it does not require any excitation light source, so background fluorescence and interference caused by background light can be eliminated. At the same time the signal to noise ratio can be improved and the possible damage of living cell caused by UV irradiation during fluorescence measurement can be eliminated.

6.1 TTF substituted singlet oxygen probe: 2-methyl-6-phenyl-3,7-dihydroimidazo[1,2-α]pyrazine-3-one (CLA), MCLA and FCLA

A number of Chemiluminescence probes have been developed in recent years for 1O2 detection. Among the mostly used Chemiluminescence probes for 1O2 includes 2-methyl-6-phenyl-3,7-dihydroimidazo[1,2-α] pyrazine-3-one (CLA), and its derivatives MCLA and FCLA [41, 42, 43] (shown in Figure 13). These compounds are very good in detecting 1O2 and spontaneously emit light but the major drawback of these compound is that they not only reacts with singlet oxygen but also with superoxide anion; thus lacks the selectivity for 1O2.

Figure 13.

(a) The chemical structure of CLA and its reaction with singlet oxygen; (b) the chemical structure of MCLA and (c) the chemical structure of FCLA (adapted from [41,42,43]).

Chemiluminescence probe with a strong electron donor tetra thiafulvalenem (TTF) and anthracene as a luminophore possess excellent selectivity and sensitivity for 1O2 detection. As TTF moiety is a strong electron donor, it enhances the reaction between anthracene skeleton to react specifically with 1O2 to form highly luminescent endoperoxide.

Guanxin Zhang et al. reported 4,4′(5′)-bis[2-(9-anthryloxy)ethylthio] tetrathiafulvalene (as shown in Figure 14) as selective and sensitive probe for 1O2 with a much better response for 1O2, representing better selectivity than CLA [40, 44]. 4,5-dimethylthio-4′-[2-(9-anthryloxy) ethylthio] tetrathiafulvalene was another Chemiluminescence probe with similar functionality [40, 45]. A linear relationships between the Chemiluminescence intensity and the amount of 1O2 was found for H2O2/ClO system and the LOD of 76 nM/L was reported for 1O2. In mixed solvent of tetrahydrofuran and H2O, both the probes cannot be applied. However, tetrathiafulvalene-anthracence dyad1 (as shown in Figure 13c) dissolve easily in methanol and ethanol and permits detection of 1O2 under relatively low polarity solvent.

Figure 14.

The chemical structure and reaction scheme of (a) 4,4′(5′)-bis[2-(9-anthryloxy)ethylthio] tetrathiafulvalene, (b) 4,5-dimethylthio-4′-[2-(9-anthryloxy)ethylthio] tetrathiafulvalene with with 1O2 and (c) the chemical structure of tetrathiafulvalene-anthracence dyad1 (adapted from [40,44,45]).

6.2 Stable dioxetene chemiluminescence probe

Dioxetene chemistry offers potential for selective and sensitive detection of 1O2. McNeill and co-workers reported “trap and trigger” Chemiluminescence probe for 1O2 [46] using Schaap’s dioxetene [47] enol ether precursor to trap the 1O2 in the first step and in the second step Chemiluminescence was triggered by adding fluoride ion. This probe was limited application in organic solvents due to the quenching mechanism of the emitting species in water [48]. Nir Hananya et al. developed a new Chemiluminescence probe by incorporating an electron withdrawing substituent at the ortho position of phenol group of Schaap’s dioxetene, namely SOCL-CPP [15] (Figure 15). SOCL-CPP reacts with 1O2 to generate a phenol-dioxetene species that spontaneously decompose in aqueous medium to generate corresponding electronically excited benzoate ester [15].

Figure 15.

Structure of SO chemiluminescent probeSOCLand its chemiexcitation pathway upon reaction with 1O2 (adapted from [15]).

A green light emission is obtained from excited benzoate ester. The incorporation of acrylic acid substituent at the ortho position of phenol is to generate a donor-acceptor pair that enhances the emissive nature of benzoate intermediate [15]. Addition of a chlorine substituents at the ortho position reduces the pKa of the phenol and thus enriches the percentage of phenoxy ion that eventually accelerate the chemiexcitation kinetics of the phenol-dioxitene species to monitor in real time.


7. Conclusions

Singlet oxygen as a highly reactive form of molecular oxygen plays a vital role in many environmental and biomedical processes. Selective and sensitive detection and quantification of singlet oxygen species provides crucial information for understanding its involvement and mechanism in various processes. EPR method for the detection of 1O2 has major disadvantage of requiring an expensive instrument and complicated operating procedures. Direct photoluminescence measurement from 1O2 at about 1270 nm is useful for singlet oxygen detection but that also suffers drawback due to very low quantum efficiency. UV–Vis absorbance probes for selective detection of 1O2 is significant but low sensitivity put some limitation for spectrophotometric method. Molecular fluorescence or lanthanide based fluorescence probe and Chemiluminescence probe provides high sensitivity and desirable selectivity, therefore ensure great potential for singlet oxygen detection. Additional benefits of fluorescence probe including the capability of detection of 1O2 among various other reactive oxygen species. The temporal and spatial resolution of these probes can provide detailed information on site and the kinetics of singlet oxygen production or decay. In comparison to organic fluorescence probe, lanthanide complex based time gated luminescence probe possess many advantages such as long luminescence lifetime, large Stokes shift and sharp emission profile that makes them suitable for time gated detection mode for minimising background luminescence interference. Chemiluminescence probes does not require any excitation light sources, can be applied in certain cases where background fluorescence and various light scattering phenomena lower the signal to noise ratio. Furthermore, due to high sensitivity of Chemiluminescence detection, only low concentration of probe is necessary eventually decreasing the occurrence of artifactual interference of secondary reactions. Although, much has been conferred in this concise chapter, perhaps these are not all, but the future will invoke more questions and thus newer and emerging methods, would help expand the level of our understanding.


  1. 1. You, Y.; Nam, W., Designing photoluminescent molecular probes for singlet oxygen, hydroxyl radical, and iron–oxygen species.Chemical Science2014,5(11), 4123-4135
  2. 2. Finkel, T.; Holbrook, N. J., Oxidants, oxidative stress and the biology of ageing.Nature2000,408(6809), 239-47
  3. 3. McCord, J. M., Free radicals and inflammation: protection of synovial fluid by superoxide dismutase.Science1974,185(4150), 529-31
  4. 4. Barnham, K. J.; Masters, C. L.; Bush, A. I., Neurodegenerative diseases and oxidative stress.Nat Rev Drug Discov2004,3(3), 205-14
  5. 5. Francis Wilkinson, W. P. H. a. A. B. R., Rate Constants for the Decay and Reactions of the Lowest Electronically Excited Singlet State of Molecular Oxygen in Solution. An Expanded and Revised Computation.Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data1995,24(2), 664-672
  6. 6. Kang, P.; Foote, C. S., Formation of Transient Intermediates in Low-Temperature Photosensitized Oxidation of an 8-13C-Guanosine Derivative.Journal of the American Chemical Society2002,124(17), 4865-4873
  7. 7. Cadet, J.; Bellon, S.; Berger, M.; Bourdat, A. G.; Douki, T.; Duarte, V.; Frelon, S.; Gasparutto, D.; Muller, E.; Ravanat, J. L.; Sauvaigo, S., Recent aspects of oxidative DNA damage: guanine lesions, measurement and substrate specificity of DNA repair glycosylases.Biol Chem2002,383(6), 933-43
  8. 8. Davies, M. J., Singlet oxygen-mediated damage to proteins and its consequences.Biochem Biophys Res Commun2003,305(3), 761-70
  9. 9. Klotz, L. O.; Kröncke, K. D.; Sies, H., Singlet oxygen-induced signaling effects in mammalian cells.Photochem Photobiol Sci2003,2(2), 88-94
  10. 10. Kröncke, K.-D.; Klotz, L.-O.; Suschek, C. V.; Sies, H., Comparing NitrosativeVersusOxidative Stress toward Zinc Finger-dependent Transcription: UNIQUE ROLE FOR NO *.Journal of Biological Chemistry2002,277(15), 13294-13301
  11. 11. Lindig, B. A.; Rodgers, M. A. J., Laser photolysis studies of singlet molecular oxygen in aqueous micellar dispersions.The Journal of Physical Chemistry1979,83(13), 1683-1688
  12. 12. Schweitzer, C.; Schmidt, R., Physical Mechanisms of Generation and Deactivation of Singlet Oxygen.Chemical Reviews2003,103(5), 1685-1758
  13. 13. Song, D.; Cho, S.; Han, Y.; You, Y.; Nam, W., Ratiometric Fluorescent Probes for Detection of Intracellular Singlet Oxygen.Organic Letters2013,15(14), 3582-3585
  14. 14. Nardello, V.; Aubry, J.-M., Synthesis and properties of a new cationic water-soluble trap of singlet molecular oxygen.Tetrahedron Letters1997,38(42), 7361-7364
  15. 15. Hananya, N.; Green, O.; Blau, R.; Satchi-Fainaro, R.; Shabat, D., A Highly Efficient Chemiluminescence Probe for the Detection of Singlet Oxygen in Living Cells.Angewandte Chemie International Edition2017,56(39), 11793-11796
  16. 16. Song, B.; Wang, G.; Yuan, J., A new europium chelate-based phosphorescence probe specific for singlet oxygen.Chemical Communications2005,(28), 3553-3555
  17. 17. Zafiriou, O. C., Marine organic photochemistry previewed.Marine Chemistry1977,5(4), 497-522
  18. 18. Lindig, B. A.; Rodgers, M. A. J.; Schaap, A. P., Determination of the lifetime of singlet oxygen in water-d2 using 9,10-anthracenedipropionic acid, a water-soluble probe.Journal of the American Chemical Society1980,102(17), 5590-5593
  19. 19. Craig, R. A.; McCoy, C. P.; De Baróid, Á. T.; Andrews, G. P.; Gorman, S. P.; Jones, D. S., Quantification of singlet oxygen generation from photodynamic hydrogels.Reactive and Functional Polymers2015,87, 1-6
  20. 20. Moreno, M. J.; Monson, E.; Reddy, R. G.; Rehemtulla, A.; Ross, B. D.; Philbert, M.; Schneider, R. J.; Kopelman, R., Production of singlet oxygen by Ru(dpp(SO3)2)3 incorporated in polyacrylamide PEBBLES.Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical2003,90(1), 82-89
  21. 21. Albiter, E.; Alfaro, S.; Valenzuela, M. A., Photosensitized oxidation of 9,10-dimethylanthracene with singlet oxygen by using a safranin O/silica composite under visible light.Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences2015,14(3), 597-602
  22. 22. Gross, E.; Ehrenberg, B.; Johnson, F. M., SINGLET OXYGEN GENERATION BY PORPHYRINS AND THE KINETICS OF 9,10-DIMETHYLANTHRACENE PHOTOSENSITIZATION IN LIPOSOMES.Photochemistry and Photobiology1993,57(5), 808-813
  23. 23. Günther S., G.; Lemp M., E.; Zanocco, A. L., ON THE USE OF 9,10-DIMETHYLANTHRACENE AS CHEMICAL RATE CONSTANT ACTINOMETER IN SINGLET MOLECULAR OXYGEN REACTIONS.Boletín de la Sociedad Chilena de Química2000,45, 637-644
  24. 24. Okamoto, M.; Wada, O.; Tanaka, F.; Hirayama, S., Fluorescence Quenching by Oxygen of 9,10-Dimethylanthracene in Liquid and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A2001,105(3), 566-572
  25. 25. Gomes, A.; Fernandes, E.; Lima, J. L., Fluorescence probes used for detection of reactive oxygen species.J Biochem Biophys Methods2005,65(2-3), 45-80
  26. 26. Soh, N.; Katayama, Y.; Maeda, M., A fluorescent probe for monitoring nitric oxide production using a novel detection concept.Analyst2001,126(5), 564-566
  27. 27. Tanaka, K.; Miura, T.; Umezawa, N.; Urano, Y.; Kikuchi, K.; Higuchi, T.; Nagano, T., Rational design of fluorescein-based fluorescence probes. Mechanism-based design of a maximum fluorescence probe for singlet oxygen.J Am Chem Soc2001,123(11), 2530-6
  28. 28. Gollmer, A.; Arnbjerg, J.; Blaikie, F. H.; Pedersen, B. W.; Breitenbach, T.; Daasbjerg, K.; Glasius, M.; Ogilby, P. R., Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green®: photochemical behavior in solution and in a mammalian cell.Photochem Photobiol2011,87(3), 671-9
  29. 29. Evans, D. F.; Upton, M. W., Studies on singlet oxygen in aqueous solution. Part 1. Formation of singlet oxygen from hydrogen peroxide with two-electron oxidants.Journal of the Chemical Society, Dalton Transactions1985,(6), 1141-1145
  30. 30. Schmitz, C.; Aubry, J. M.; Rigaudy, J., A new access to the anthracene core: Synthesis of two water soluble singlet oxygen traps derived from 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran and 9,10-diphenylanthracene.Tetrahedron1982,38(10), 1425-1430
  31. 31. Liu, Y.-J.; Wang, K.-Z., Visible-Light-Excited Singlet-Oxygen Luminescence Probe Based on Re(CO)3Cl(aeip).European Journal of Inorganic Chemistry2008,2008(33), 5214-5219
  32. 32. Baier, J.; Fuß, T.; Pöllmann, C.; Wiesmann, C.; Pindl, K.; Engl, R.; Baumer, D.; Maier, M.; Landthaler, M.; Bäumler, W., Theoretical and experimental analysis of the luminescence signal of singlet oxygen for different photosensitizers.Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology2007,87(3), 163-173
  33. 33. Baier, J.; Maier, M.; Engl, R.; Landthaler, M.; Bäumler, W., Time-Resolved Investigations of Singlet Oxygen Luminescence in Water, in Phosphatidylcholine, and in Aqueous Suspensions of Phosphatidylcholine or HT29 Cells.The Journal of Physical Chemistry B2005,109(7), 3041-3046
  34. 34. Umezawa, N.; Tanaka, K.; Urano, Y.; Kikuchi, K.; Higuchi, T.; Nagano, T., Novel Fluorescent Probes for Singlet Oxygen.Angew Chem Int Ed Engl1999,38(19), 2899-2901
  35. 35. Wu, H.; Song, Q.; Ran, G.; Lu, X.; Xu, B., Recent developments in the detection of singlet oxygen with molecular spectroscopic methods.TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry2011,30, 133-141
  36. 36. Dai, Z.; Tian, L.; Xiao, Y.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, R.; Yuan, J., A cell-membrane-permeable europium complex as an efficient luminescent probe for singlet oxygen.J Mater Chem B2013,1(7), 924-927
  37. 37. Schanze, K. S.; Brent MacQueen, D.; Perkins, T. A.; Cabana, L. A., Studies of intramolecular electron and energy transfer using the fac-(diimine)ReI(CO)3 chromophore.Coordination Chemistry Reviews1993,122(1), 63-89
  38. 38. Tan, M.; Song, B.; Wang, G.; Yuan, J., A new terbium(III) chelate as an efficient singlet oxygen fluorescence probe.Free Radical Biology and Medicine2006,40(9), 1644-1653
  39. 39. Song, B.; Wang, G.; Tan, M.; Yuan, J., A Europium(III) Complex as an Efficient Singlet Oxygen Luminescence Probe.Journal of the American Chemical Society2006,128(41), 13442-13450
  40. 40. Sun, S.; Li, X.; Zhang, G.; Ma, H.; Zhang, D.; Bao, Z., Determination of H2O2-dependent generation of singlet oxygen from human saliva with a novel chemiluminescence probe.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects2006,1760(3), 440-444
  41. 41. Norihiko, Y.; Nobuo, T.; Takeshi, T., Mechanism of Photosensitized Chemiluminescence of 2-Methyl-6-phenylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrazin-3(7H)-one (CLA) in Aqueous Solution.Chemistry Letters1999,28(6), 451-452
  42. 42. Zhu, D.; Xing, D.; Wei, Y.; Li, X.; Gao, B., Evaluation of the degree of medical radiation damage with a highly sensitive chemiluminescence method.Luminescence2004,19(5), 278-282
  43. 43. He, Y.; Xing, D.; Yan, G.; Ueda, K.-i., FCLA chemiluminescence from sonodynamic action in vitro and in vivo.Cancer Letters2002,182(2), 141-145
  44. 44. Zhang, G.; Li, X.; Ma, H.; Zhang, D.; Li, J.; Zhu, D., A selective and sensitive chemiluminescence reaction of 4,4′(5′)-bis[2-(9-anthryloxy)ethylthio]tetrathiafulvalene with singlet oxygen.Chemical Communications2004,(18), 2072-2073
  45. 45. Li, X.; Zhang, G.; Ma, H.; Zhang, D.; Li, J.; Zhu, D., 4,5-Dimethylthio-4′-[2-(9-anthryloxy)ethylthio]tetrathiafulvalene, a Highly Selective and Sensitive Chemiluminescence Probe for Singlet Oxygen.Journal of the American Chemical Society2004,126(37), 11543-11548
  46. 46. MacManus-Spencer, L. A.; Latch, D. E.; Kroncke, K. M.; McNeill, K., Stable Dioxetane Precursors as Selective Trap-and-Trigger Chemiluminescent Probes for Singlet Oxygen.Analytical Chemistry2005,77(4), 1200-1205
  47. 47. Schaap, A. P.; Chen, T.-S.; Handley, R. S.; DeSilva, R.; Giri, B. P., Chemical and enzymatic triggering of 1,2-dioxetanes. 2: fluoride-induced chemiluminescence from tert-butyldimethylsilyloxy-substituted dioxetanes.Tetrahedron Letters1987,28(11), 1155-1158
  48. 48. Matsumoto, M., Advanced chemistry of dioxetane-based chemiluminescent substrates originating from bioluminescence.Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews2004,5(1), 27-53

Written By

Arnab Maity

Submitted: June 19th, 2021 Reviewed: August 12th, 2021 Published: September 19th, 2021