Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Staphylococcus aureus and Virulence-Related Small RNA

Written By

Rudra Mishra Awdhesh Kumar Mishra, Bhama Mishra Awdhesh Kumar Mishra, Nalini Easwaran and Kodiveri Muthukaliannan Gothandam

Submitted: April 14th, 2021 Reviewed: May 22nd, 2021 Published: June 24th, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.98520

Chapter metrics overview

308 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Staphylococcus aureus causes a wide range of diseases, including both community-associated and hospital-acquired infections such as abscesses, wound infections, osteomyelitis, endocarditis and septicemia. Regulation of the expression of various virulence factors is initiated through complex coordination between two-component systems, transcriptional regulatory proteins and regulatory small RNAs (sRNAs). S.aureus uses many sRNA and RNA–RNA interactions mediated the regulation of the expression of genes post-transcriptionally, but it uses few sigma factors to initiate the transcription function. sRNA transcripts are encoded within intergenic regions or in antisense orientation to mRNA transcripts, and sRNA regulation plays a central role in the response to stress stimuli encountered by pathogens during infection. One of the most intriguing examples of sRNA-mediated post-transcriptional regulation is RNAIII from S.aureus, which interacts with and regulates various RNA targets involved in virulence. Several genes known to be regulated by RNAIII have been demonstrated to be regulated by the sarA locus, independent of its effect on the expression of RNAIII. We discuss the potential role of small RNA (sRNA) in the pathogenesis and virulence factors production of Staphylococcus aureus.


  • Staphylococcus aureus
  • regulatory small RNA (sRNA)
  • virulence factors
  • RNA–RNA interactions

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a human symbiotic microorganism that commonly colonizes in the anterior nasal regions and on the skin surface for 20–25% of the world population [1, 2, 3]. The distribution of multi-drug resistant strains among asymptomatic individuals is responsible for spreading the infections among the population very quickly [4]. Among the human populations, the carriage percentages of Staphylococcus aureus vary based on different factors. Broadly human carriers are classified into three categories: 20% non-carriers, 25% persistent carriers, and 60% population are intermediate carriers [5]. Usually, Staphylococcus aureus forms colonization in the nasal passage and axillae in humans and found its occurrence as flora in vaginal tracts and digestive tracts [6].

Among the various factors responsible for the regulation of virulence, small RNA (sRNA) has a major role in determining the virulence of the bacteria. sRNA are short 50–250 nucleotide long transcripts involving bacterial gene expression for rapid adaption to stress conditions. Small RNAs play a major role by pairing with bases of target mRNA or by interacting with the modulating proteins for both the positive and negative mechanism of biofilm formation. Staphylococcus aureus becomes more adherent resulting in increased biofilm formation when agr mediated mechanism is inhibited. Regulation of gene expression mediated by sRNAs is more beneficial when compared to proteins during a rapid response because it takes a short time for sRNAs to either synthesize or degrade. Various regulatory mechanism of sRNAs is similar to the regulation of quorum sensing in the bacteria. The quorum-sensing mechanism regulates the expression of virulence-related genes. Since the quorum sensing mechanism controls bacteria’s virulence factor, it is considered a major target for finding out the new therapeutic methods [7]. We discuss the potential role of small RNA (sRNA) in the pathogenesis and virulence factors production of Staphylococcus aureus (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Virulence factors regulation by RNAIII. RNAIII is regulated positively by the quorum-sensing agr operon. Post-transcriptional regulation is marked with colored lines, whereas up-regulation represented by green arrows and down-regulation by red cross bars. RNAIII in turn, positively regulates MapW and hla at a post-transcriptional level. MapW and hla prevents leucocyte attachment and promote dissemination by lysing host cells. RNAIII also negatively regulates LytM, rot, Spa and SarT, which will promote autolysis via LytM, blood cell toxicity by rot and expression of an IgG binding protein via SarT.


2. Bacterial small RNA

sRNAs mediate the regulation of mRNAs through direct binding interactions between the sRNA and the target. The sRNA usually binds to the 5′ end of the mRNA and blocks ribosomes binding. Although sRNAs often stimulate degradation of the target as well [8]. The interaction is initiated by a short sequence of perfect complementarity between the sRNA and target termed the seed region. Seed regions are generally 6–8 nt long, and a single sRNA can have one seed region that regulates all of its targets or multiple seed regions that each regulate a subset of targets. Additionally, seed regions are highly conserved, and mutations to the seed region lead to complete abrogation of target regulation. In order to facilitate intermolecular interactions with target mRNAs, seed regions are usually single-stranded in the folded sRNA and disruption of the sRNA secondary structure can drastically reduce sRNA function. However, seed regions alone are generally not sufficient to mediate target binding, most sRNA characterized to date rely on the assistance of an sRNA chaperone protein [9, 10].

Figure 2.

Integration of sRNAs into gene cascades regulation. The “agr-RNAIII” auto activation circuits is indicated with two feed-forward loops involving RNAIII. The autoinducing peptide (AIP) activates the agr autocatalytic circuit, leading to RNAIII transcription on attaining optimal cell density. RNAIII represses the expression of rot, which activates spa transcription and represses that of hla. RNAIII also activates hla mRNA translation and represses spa mRNA translation. The white and broken lines indicate the direct or indirect gene activations. The red lines represent the down regulations through different RNAs. The black question marks above the see-sawing triangles point to the unknown triggering factors. The transcriptional regulatory proteins are in blue [28].

The regulation mechanism for the SpoVG and SprX and their targets with interactions have been discussed below, which involves regulating virulence factors. Production of capsule, virulence factors, and the cell wall’s metabolism is regulated by a transcription factor SpoVG also called a master regulator. It is also responsible for resistance against methicillin and glycopeptide antibiotics [11]. Synthesis of pentaglycine crosslinks between peptidoglycan strands carried out by lytSR operon and glycine glycyl transferases is positively regulated by SpoVG, whereas murein hydrolysate lytN regulated negatively. Base pairing of sprX (Highly conserved RNA) with the SpoVG mRNA during the translation process prevents loading of the ribosome. Small RNA sprX negatively regulated SpoVG, in four phases of exponential growth (lag, log, linear and late phase), but it decreases during the stationary growth phase. The SpoVG dependent process increases glycopeptides susceptibility and disrupts the cell membrane metabolism and other independent SpoVG mechanisms [12].

Figure 3.

S. aureus sRNAs from the RNome implicated in bacterial virulence. Multitasking RNAIII is the effector of quorum sensing to perceive population density and regulates multiple targets involved in peptidoglycan synthesis, adhesions, exotoxins production and virulence. RNAIII internally encodes hemolysin represented in blue color. It contains three repressor domains which are represented in red color, containing accessible UCCC motifs that interact with antisense pairings, with the ribosome binding sites of numerous target mRNAs for translational repression (Tr.R), some triggering endoribonuclease III (RNase III) cleavages to induce target mRNA degradations and irreversible gene expression decay. Translation of at least two exotoxins is activated by RNAIII, one encoded (hld), and another (hla) by translation activation (Tr.A). SprD is expressed from the genome of a converting phage and interacts, by antisense pairings, with the 59 part of the sbi mRNA encoding an immune evasion molecule. SprD possesses an important role in S. aureus virulence, but the mechanism of its control is yet to be elucidated, with Sbi being only one player among others. The 891-nucleotide long SSR42 affects extracellular virulence expression, hemolysis, neutrophil virulence, and pathogenesis and contains a putative internal ORF. The mechanisms of target regulation remain to be elucidated. The SCCmec-encoded psm-mec RNA suppresses agrA translation and attenuates MRSA virulence, acting as a dual-function RNA regulator [64].

SpoVG and SprX both seem to contain extra regulatory targets, and antibiotic susceptibility through the SprX-dependant mechanism can be bound to susceptibility tied to extra phenotypic advantages that continue to be studied [13]. Various strains of S.aureus additionally show an antibiotic determination-related phenotypic variation called as small colony variants (SCVs), which stimulates the biofilm formation and reduced sensitivity to aminoglycosides [14]. The different variation form of small colony variants (SCV) of S. aureus has disturbed the expression of 18 sRNAs and increased regulation of the RsaA, which is a sigB dependent small RNA [15]. However, the network link among small colony variants, antibiotic resistance, and expression profiling of sRNAs has now no longer, but been delineated, those outcomes infer that regulatory sRNAs make contributions to antibiotic resistance through phenotypic maintenance of small colony variants [16].


RNAIII regulates the expression of genes encoding exoproteins and cell wall associated in Staphylococcus aureus. In the quorum sensing mechanism, RNAIII transcribed from the P3 operon, acts as an initiator for agr system in Staphylococcus aureus. It also contains the hld gene (delta haemolysin), which is 26 amino acid long sequences. By blocking the translation of transcription factor rot, it regulates its expression. It has been reported that binding of RNAIII with mRNA of transcriptional factor rot in an antisense manner, thus blocking the Shine-Dalgarno sequence [17, 18].

2.2 Teg49

It is a small RNA found in the extended promoter region of sarA, which is an accessory regulator of Staphylococcus bacteria. Confirmation and identification were performed by Northern blotting and RNA-sequencing method. Modulation of the expression of SarA it regulates the virulence factor of Staphylococcus aureus [19].

2.3 SprF1-SprG1

There are two types of Toxin-Antitoxin system, whereas Type I has two sub-type types, and Type II has three sub-types but remains uncharacterized. The first type I TA system was SprA1-SprAAS in, which the former denotes the toxin and the latter denotes the antitoxin in Staphylococcus aureus. Inhibition of translation and cell wall damage is done by toxin SprA1, a short peptide. txpA-ratA family, also referred to as SprF1-SprG1, is the second type I TA system, whereas SprG1 belongs to pore-forming toxin and antitoxin are SprF1. SprG1 consists of 44 amino acid sequence long peptide and 31 amino acid sequence of short peptide and they have cytotoxic properties [20].

It has been reported that a small RNA, which expresses from pathogenicity islands of SprD upon binding with antisense base pairing of sbi mRNA (encoding an immunoglobulin binding protein) will lead to an impaired host immune response [21]. Besides direct base-pairing with target mRNA, several other mechanisms, including dual-function sRNA that acts as an antisense molecule and codes for a small peptide (e.g., Hld in RNAIII), have been proposed to act on the same or other pathway genes, and also riboswitches that exhibit a structured receptor domain specifically recognized by a small molecule or metabolite [22].


3. Multifunctional small RNA couples QS to virulence

Regulation of virulence factors through quorum sensing mechanism involves the agr mediated pathway and the two-component system. RNAIII plays a major role in regulating the agr dependent transcriptional regulation in MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus). The significance of agr mediated regulations of S. aureus pathogenesis is the situation of an obvious paradox. By comparing with different S. aureus sRNAs, that has been discovered through bioinformatic strategies or RNA sequencing, RNAIII was the first predicted sRNA in transposon mutagenesis, which defines the epistasis outcomes for a point insertion [23]. The primary factor for virulence is agr and RNAIII, its effector molecule involved in producing virulence factors. Clinically isolated strains from acute infections of S.aureus have both virulence factor regulation through agr mediated along with RNAIII involvement. However, mutated strains of agr mediated pathway, which arose at some point of infection, also have been isolated from patients [24].

RNAIII as an effector regulates the expression of important virulence genes, including proteins associated with cell wall metabolism and exotoxins. Also involved in the expression of two-component systems, different global regulators such as arl, sae, srr, rot and other mechanisms in the formation of biofilm, synthesis of amino acid and peptidoglycan [25]. These factors vary quantitatively but not qualitatively in different staphylococcal strains.

Compared to UAMS-I (Virulent oxacillin susceptible clinical isolates) strain, the agr inactivation effect was observed more in the transcriptome of the NCTC 8325 strain [26], but whether it exerts direct or indirect effect was studied only in certain genes from the structural prediction of RNAIII. Structurally RNAIII comprises 14 loop and two long helices aligned through the long-range base pairing, which blocked off self-reliant structural domains [27]. Some particular site-defined RNAIII domains are responsible for the regulation of various targets. The secondary structure of intramolecular RNA removes the hla ribosomal binding sites upon directly competing with the 59 ends of RNAIII, which positively induces translation of hla and alpha-hemolysin (Figure 2) [29, 30].

Production of various virulence determinants such as coagulase, protein A, and the rot (repressor of toxins) are repressed with minor variations by conserved regions or domains at the post-transcriptional level. These are repressed either individually or in combination by the H13 RNAIII hairpin and H14 terminator of the 39 domain, and central domain hairpin H7. The mechanism behind the repression of these virulence factors by the RNAIII is mediated through repression of the initiation process in translation mechanisms wherein the degradation of mRNA is initiated by RNAIII [31].

Complex structure was dependent on their target mRNA and included two factors (i) presence of an extended duplex between the mRNA of Ribosomal Binding Site (RBS) and RNAIII and (ii) an imperfect duplex which removes the finished RBS by the interaction between the loops in the coding region [32]. In the above two factors, an individual interaction between the loops is not enough for complete repression, accordingly proscribing the capability of RNAIII to behave as a repressor to the mRNA targets. Hence it will not have Shine Dalgarno (SD) series complementary to H7, H13, or H14 of RNAIII, however, it still show a further vicinity of communication or the potential to produce prolonged duplication. Hfq is an RNA binding protein and an important chaperone present in different staphylococcus species, but it does not play a role in the RNAIII dependent regulatory mechanisms. Whereas in the in-vitro assay, it binds to the RNAIII [33, 34].

The repression of all the target mRNA is carried out by the direct effects of RNAIII except the translational initiation of hla protein. The repression of Rot (a transcriptional regulatory protein) by RNAIII leads to indirectly regulating transcription for several genes, particularly the protein A repression and the alpha-toxin activation [35].


4. sRNA dependent mechanism of antibiotic resistance

Small RNAs play a major role in altering bacterial cell wall and hence would contribute to the antimicrobial-resistance mechanism. Small RNAs are present prominently on mobile genetic elements on which the resistance pattern for the AMR pathogens is found. SmallRNAs do not exert direct regulation on the resistance gene expression [36]. For example, Fudoh, a regulatory RNA present in Staphylococcal species is encoded by the SCC mec family of methicillin resistance cassettes. SCCmec is a mobile element that is responsible for the antimicrobial resistivity of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). It also involves regulating the cell distribution process and the expression of alpha phenol soluble modulins, a catalytic peptide [28].

However, the resistance pattern of methicillin through fudoh is still not known. Regulatory small RNA is responsible for the expression of intrinsic antibiotic resistance and tolerance in different bacterial species. Since only some of the small RNA related research has been performed on the clinical strains, whereas most of the studies for RNA-dependent intrinsic antibiotic resistance were performed on the AMR-related pathogens [37].


5. sRNA and stress responses

Specific mechanisms and certain sRNAs involvement regulate the expression pattern of virulence factors under different stress conditions. Small RNA regulation can produce an immediate action to regulatory networks adapted to the acute stress induced by antibiotics. Emergency responders are referred to as Class I small RNAs because they enhance rapid stress responses and aids co-operative degradation of different mRNA targets. Class I sRNAs act in direct mode on the pre-existing mRNA clusters to alter the translation process or deterioration for the acute stress response. Mostly they are involved in disassociating the regulation of transcriptional responses and half-life kinetics of mRNA [38].

It has been reported that during the host infection, variations of temperature and pH, oxidative stress, quorum sensing, biofilm formation and nutrient starvation were related to the functional regulation of small RNAs in Staphylococcus aureus [39]. Such responses were controlled by alternative sB (sigma B factor). sB factor regulates several genes that regulate stress-mediated responses, biofilm formation, virulence factor expression, antibiotic resistance, and membrane transport mechanism [40].

Sigma B factor also represses several genes expression by an indirect pathway with the involvement of small RNA or sB-induced regulatory protein. RsaA has a typical sigma B factor promoter which detects its corresponding genes [41]. RsaA base pair with mRNAs repressed by sB like citM and involves in the encoding of Mg-citrate transport systems. sB-dependent sRNAs are the most conserved regions in S.aureus. It has been reported that among the three dependent sRNAs, two of them are expected to involve in the regulation of small, highly basic peptides [42].

Production of virulence factors has been regulated by sigma B factor under the stress-dependent activation process. SigB gets activated in the normal stress conditions, also during the growth phase transitions and in different physiological and biochemical changes in S.aureus [43]. Thus playing a major role for regulating several others downstream genes. Whereas rsaA are also regulated by a Sigma B-dependent promoter [44].


6. Regulatory sRNA network

Several sRNAs uses Hfq or ProQ chaperones to anneal with their respective mRNAs targets. Hfq, a RNA chaperone comprises a six-ring hexamer fostering annealing of RNAs by aligning to their distal and proximal surfaces [45]. The major function of small RNAs regulation is the suppression by base-pairing with the mRNA RBS to inhibit the initiation of translation. sRNA binding blocks binding of small ribosomal subunit [46]. They also regulate both positively and negatively various mechanisms involved in regulating gene expression [47]. The different mechanism includes the processing and stability of transcript process [48], transporting and localization of ribosomes, antisense sponging interactions and termination of transcription process [49, 50].

It has been reported that both small RNA and transcriptional mechanisms work together within interleaved feedback and feed-forward loops and regulate the expression of genes. 108 sRNAs were identified using RNA-seq analysis in the model organism E.coli [51], and similarly, around 1600–1900 sRNA-mRNA interactions were identified using interactome profiling analysis [52].

Therefore, it is hardly comparable with the 3446 sRNA-mRNA interactions being regulated by the 217 transcription factors with the chromosome [53]. Several transcriptional regulatory networks have an sRNA that integrates with the extra post-transcriptional networks. Small RNAs act similar to transcription factors as a regulatory centre and unevenly controls various RNAs targets. sRNAs are involved in antibiotic sensitivity by mRNAs interactions which take place in drug import, efflux pump regulation, cell membrane synthesis and enhancing antibiotic resistance pattern [54, 55].


7. sRNA expressions in infections

In S.aureus, some of the known sRNAs with their targets involve regulating major biochemical pathways that are further responsible for producing virulence factors [56]. Staphylococcus aureus sRNAs were identified using different techniques in various strains, and their expression profiling during the course of infections in humans was studied. Functions of around 250 sRNAs expressed under different conditions are yet unknown. But the expression profiling of RNAIII in clinical isolates from nasal cystic fibrosis patients was studied. In most of the clinical isolates of acute infections, RNAIII has been expressed in in-vivo conditions [5758]. Therefore these data infers that RNAIII majorly involves in the regulation of virulence factors and production of agr-defective mutants [59]. However, there has been a difference in the variation of agr-defective mutants in healthy and infected patients. Thus, agr regulation occurs during acute infections, whereas the agr mutants expression can only be observed during the stages of the chronic or dormant infection [60].

Expression profiling of five different small RNAs like RNAIII, RsaE, RsaH, RsaG and RsaA in S. aureus strains isolated from three conditions, including cutaneous infections, chronic cystic fibrosis and commensal nasal colonization [61]. Expression patterns of five small RNAs were strain-specific and do not have any correlations with respect to the variations of the infectivity pattern or colonization. However, it has been observed that there was a uniform expression pattern among the commensal strains in comparison to the infectious strains. Therefore, these results show that S.aureus was mainly a commensal strain and became an opportunistic pathogen [62, 63].

S. aureus regulatory RNA, SSR42, which modulates the expression of approximately 80 mRNA species, including several virulence factors, in S.aureus strains UAMS-1 and USA300 (LAC) during stationary-phase growth. Mutagenesis studies revealed that SSR42 codes for an 891-nucleotide RNA molecule and that the full-length transcript mediates the molecule’s regulatory effects. Western blotting and functional assays indicated that the regulatory effects of SSR42 correlate with biologically significant changes in corresponding protein abundances. Further, in S.aureus strain LAC, SSR42 is required for wild-type levels of erythrocyte lysis, resistance to human polymorphonuclear leukocyte killing, and pathogenesis in a murine model of skin and soft tissue infection (Figure 3) [65].


8. Pathogenicity Island encoded RNAs

SCCmec (Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec) is responsible for the regulation of antibiotic resistance genes, particularly for the methicillin resistance genes in facultative S.aureus. Thus it helps the pathogen to adapt under different stress conditions for survival in the hosts. Elements involved in these processes are genomic islands, transposons, plasmids, and the pathogenicity islands (PIs) acquired horizontally and encode various virulence factors like toxins and cell attachment factors, superantigens factors, invasion factors and two-component system [66]. Apart from the protein-coding genes, it pathogenicity islands also codes for phage-related genes and involves sRNA [67]. Several sRNAs are found in numerous copies distributed encircling the S.aureus genome and also some additional copies are present in the plasmids. Multiple copies are present due to either repeated events of gene duplication or horizontally gene transfer [68].

However, the sRNAs expressed from S.aureus Pathogenicity Islands (SaPIs) were involved in the regulation of gene expression present on the regions of cognate PIs (Table 1). Therefore it forms the functional linkage between the PIs and the genome of the organisms. Expression of SprD (Small Pathogenicity islands D) by PIw involves repression of sbi mRNAs during the initiation process of translation, which encodes an immune evasion molecule [69]. A central hairpin of SprD binds with the sbi mRNA RBS and thus prevents the initiation of the translation process. SprD sRNA has a prominent effect on virulence factors, it involves different pathways for regulating staphylococcal infectivity by altering the expression patterns of SprD. Several other sRNAs are also responsible for pathogenicity through regulatory networks by either direct or indirect way and other translational process regulatory networks. However, from the recently determined sRNAs, 4 are present in PIs and other 6 are in the SCCmec mobile element, with 54 to 400 nucleotides long in size [70].

GroupExamples of virulence factorsPAI
Iron uptake systemFyuA, acrobactin, Sit, Pit2ABCDHPI, SPI-1, PPI-1, SHI-2,3, PAII-CFT073, PAI III, IV
AdhesinsType 4 pili, P-pili, S- and P-fimbriae, sap adhesins, Hek adhesins, AfasE-III, Iha, TcpAMajor PAI,PAI I, II CFT 073,PAI I-IV, PAI-I AL863, TAI, VPI-I
Pore forming toxinsListreiolysin, alpha-haemolysin, RTX-like exotoxinsaLIPI-I, PAI-I536
Second Messenger pathway toxinsCNF-IPAI-I C5, PAI II J96
Protein causing apoptosisSipBSPI-I
SuperantigensTSST-I, ETSAPI I, SAP I2, SAPIbov, etd
Secreted lipasesPlcA, plcB, SmlCLIPI I, LIPI II
Secreted proteaseEspC, SigA, Pic, ShetA1, Mop,SHI-I, EspC, PAI-I, VPI-I, BFPAI
O antigensGtrA, GtrB, GtrSHI-O
Proteins transported by type I, II, III, IV and V protein secretion systemAlpha -Hemolysin, EspI, EspC, SigA, Cag, Tir, EspB, G, F, map, SptP, Sae, SopD, SopE, SopE2, PipB, SifA, SifC, EspC, CagASHI-I, PAI-I, II536, PAI-I, PAI-II96, LPA, EspC, PAI, SPI-I, SPI-3, SPI-5, LEE, cag, PAI
Antibiotic resistance phenotypesPse-I, FloR, AadA2, Sull, TerR, GSGI-I

Table 1.

Groups of virulence factors encoded by PAI (pathogenicity islands).

Teg152 and SprF are two sRNAs that are completely complementary to other two sRNAs SprA1 and SprG. In type I TA (Toxins-Antitoxins) modules, the pairing of SprA1 with Teg152 and SprG with SprF sRNAs takes place. SprA and SprG encodes smaller hydrophobic peptides [53]. SprA1 is a multifunctional sRNA with pressumed antisense function. It’s 3-end pairs with 39-UTRs region of three different mRNA targets. The independent transcriptional regulation is responsible for synthesizing appropriate expression levels of sRNAs for effective functional regulation [71].


9. Phenotypes associated with sRNA expressions

The expression pattern of sRNAs is different in normal compared with SCV (small colony variants) phenotypes of S.aureus clinical isolates from the osteomyelitis patients [72]. Different characteristics of SCV strain are slow growth, low pigment production, lower hemolytic activity, lower susceptibility pattern to aminoglycosides, low production of toxins and improved intracellular persistence [73]. Usually, the normal phenotypes are considered as virulent strain and SCVs are considered as persister cells. RNA III expression is a phenotypic-specific, as it is detected in normal phenotypes but not in SCV phenotypes [74]. The absence of RNAIII sRNA in SCV phenotypes may be the reason for the reduced production of toxins and less virulence. Several PI encoded sRNAs’ expression pattern is switched off in the SCV phenotypes during the late growth phase. Also, the less expression profile of SprS in the SCV phenotypes may also be responsible for their less pathogenicity in comparison to the normal phenotypes [75] (Table 2).

FLIPrProtein that inhibits leucocyte response mediated by activation of FPR-like protein 1. FPR is a high affinity receptor for N-formly-met-leu-phe signaling tripeptide.[76]
CHIPSBinds C5aR and the formyl peptide receptor FPR[77]
CapsulePolysaccharide capsule prevents phagocytosis and adherence[78]
SCINStaphylococcal complement inhibitor interacts with C3 convertase, C4b2a and C3bBb[79]
EcbExtracellular complement binding protein blocks C3 and C5 convertase[80]
EfbExtracellular fibrinogen binding protein, blocks complement and binding of neutrophils to fibrinogen, and platelet aggregation[81]
Protease V8 (SspA)Inhibition to complement pathway[82]
Aureolysin (Aur)Inhibition to complement pathway[83]
Staphopain (SepA, SspB)Cysteine protease cleaving CXCR2 chemokine receptor[84]
Protein AInteracts with Fc region of IgG[85]
SbiInteracts with Fc region of IgG[85]
Dismutases (SodA, SodM)Conversion of superoxide to hydrogen peroxide[86]
Catalase (KatA)Conversion of hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen[86]
StaphyloxanthinsAntioxidant carotenoids[87]
DNAsesClears DNA in neutrophils extracellular traps, NETs[88]
Dlt operonAddition of D-alanyl esters to teichoic acids to protect against alpha defensins[89]
Phenol soluble modulinsSmall amphipathic alpha helical peptides[90]
Alpha toxins, hlaPore forming toxin, lyses human leucocyte, epithelial and endothelial cells, platelets[91]
Panton-valentine leucocidin (PVL)Pore forming bi-complement leucocidin[91]
Gamma- haemolysin (HlgAB, HlgCB)Pore forming bi-complement leukocidin[91]
CoagulaseActivate prothrombin to induce blood coagulation[92]
Von- willebrand factor binding proteinActivate prothrombin to induce blood coagulation[93]
StaphylokinasePlasminogen activator to form the active protease[94]

Table 2.

Factors used by S.aureus to counter host defense mechanism.

It has been reported that there is an up-regulation of Sau-13 in normal phenotypes, whereas it is down-regulated in the SCV phenotypes. Sau-13 involve in ion transport and other metabolism by its antisense function against the precursor phoB. But Sau-66 sRNA up-regulated in SCV phenotypes only and down-regulated in normal phenotypes [95]. Sau-66 has antisense region on a gene encoding protein which is involved in folate biosynthesis. Sau-66 has a major impact on the formation of thymidine autotrophs in SCV phenotypes in purine biosynthesis pathway because folate is a carbon donor [96].


10. sRNAs as antimicrobial drug targets

The evolution of CA-MRSA (Community Associated-Methicillin Resistance Staphylococcus aureus) strains are major threats to healthcare. Currently available narrow-spectrum antibiotics target only particular functions of bacteria such as synthesis of peptidoglycans, DNA replication, and protein synthesis. Hence, a broad spectrum of antibiotics can target different cellular pathways, thus reducing the resistance pattern among the pathogens. Other methods to reduce antimicrobial resistance are by targetting the production of virulence factors causing the host damage and disease [97].

Since most of the currently used antibiotics bind to the ribosomal RNA, this influences the designing of new multi-targeted antibacterial drugs with respect to small RNAs. Riboswitches, which are termed as metabolites sensing mRNAs, are currently used as a structured receptor that binds with smaller metabolites with higher precision and thus regulates downstream genes. Riboswitches regulates 7 operons and 33 genes, which respond for intracellular concentration of SAM, TPP, FMN, Glc-6P, certain amino acids residues and 7- aminomethyl-7-deazaguanine (preQ1) [98]. Targeting any of these riboswitches would alter the gene’s expression pattern even if the cells do not possess any natural compounds. Several synthetically designed analog of guanine upon binding with the purine riboswitches inhibits growth [99].

11. Conclusion

This review focuses on the functions of sRNA and their role in regulating genes in S. aureus. Combined application of High throughput screening (HTS), genomic analysis and phenotypic methods for the prediction and determination of sRNAs, functional proteins, RNA binding proteins and riboswitches would provide information on the mechanism of integration of proteins and regulatory RNAs into interwined regulatory networks responsible for adaptation to stress conditions and virulence production [100]. Further study is needed for the determination of signals that can initiate the regulation of sRNA transcription and their targets. Another point that needs to be focused on is host-virulence adaptation or interactions, then cell communication among the dense population of microorganisms and cell differentiation. The expression pattern of sRNAs will be different in a population, leading to adaptability in response to various environmental and stress variations. Furthermore, variations in sRNA expression and their regulatory networks due to host-microbiome interactions also need to be studied. Metagenomic studies, HTS approach, RNA-seq analysis and transcriptomics studies could help understand the mechanisms by which the commensal pathogens cause infections and disease.


We thank the Vellore Institute of Technology for providing the necessary facilities to carry out this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. Davoodabadi, F, Mobasherizadeh, S, Mostafavizadeh, K, Shojaei, H, Havaei, S. A, Koushki, A. M, Moghadasizadeh, Z, Meidani, M, & Shirani, K. Nasal colonization in children with community acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Advanced biomedical research, 2016;5, 86. DOI: 10.4103/2277-9175.182217
  2. 2. Bjarnsholt T, Jensen PØ, Fiandaca MJ, Pedersen J, Hansen CR, Andersen CB, Pressler T, Givskov M, Høiby N. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in the respiratory tract of cystic fibrosis patients. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009;44(6):547-58. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.21011
  3. 3. Waters LS, Storz G. Regulatory RNAs in bacteria. Cell. 2009;20;136(4):615-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.043
  4. 4. Geissmann T, Possedko M, Huntzinger E, Fechter P, Ehresmann C, Romby P. Regulatory RNAs as mediators of virulence gene expression in bacteria. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2006;(173):9-43. doi: 10.1007/3-540-27262-3_2
  5. 5. Svenningsen SL. Small RNA-Based Regulation of Bacterial Quorum Sensing and Biofilm Formation. Microbiol Spectr. 2018;6(4). DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.RWR-0017-2018
  6. 6. Eyraud A, Tattevin P, Chabelskaya S, Felden B. A small RNA controls a protein regulator involved in antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(8):4892-905. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku149
  7. 7. Liu X, Zhang S, Sun B. SpoVG Regulates Cell Wall Metabolism and Oxacillin Resistance in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strain N315. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;23;60(6):3455-61. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00026-16
  8. 8. Bohn C, Rigoulay C, Chabelskaya S, Sharma CM, Marchais A, Skorski P, Borezée-Durant E, Barbet R, Jacquet E, Jacq A, Gautheret D, Felden B, Vogel J, Bouloc P. Experimental discovery of small RNAs in Staphylococcus aureus reveals a riboregulator of central metabolism. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(19):6620-36. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq462
  9. 9. Schu DJ, Zhang A, Gottesman S, Storz G. Alternative Hfq-sRNA interaction modes dictate alternative mRNA recognition. EMBO J. 2015;14;34(20):2557-73. DOI: 10.15252/embj.201591569
  10. 10. Xu KD, McFeters GA, Stewart PS. Biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Microbiology (Reading). 2000;146(Pt 3):547-549. DOI: 10.1099/00221287-146-3-547
  11. 11. Abu-Qatouseh LF, Chinni SV, Seggewiss J, Proctor RA, Brosius J, Rozhdestvensky TS, Peters G, von Eiff C, Becker K. Identification of differentially expressed small non-protein-coding RNAs in Staphylococcus aureus displaying both the normal and the small-colony variant phenotype. J Mol Med (Berl). 2010;88(6):565-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00109-010-0597-2
  12. 12. Shimoni Y, Friedlander G, Hetzroni G, Niv G, Altuvia S, Biham O, Margalit H. Regulation of gene expression by small non-coding RNAs: a quantitative view. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:138. Doi: 10.1038/msb4100181
  13. 13. Benito Y, Kolb FA, Romby P, Lina G, Etienne J, Vandenesch F. Probing the structure of RNAIII, the Staphylococcus aureus agr regulatory RNA, and identification of the RNA domain involved in repression of protein A expression. RNA. 2000;6(5):668-79. Doi: 10.1017/s1355838200992550
  14. 14. Chao Y, Vogel J. The role of Hfq in bacterial pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13(1):24-33. Doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.01.001
  15. 15. Huntzinger E, Boisset S, Saveanu C, Benito Y, Geissmann T, Namane A, Lina G, Etienne J, Ehresmann B, Ehresmann C, Jacquier A, Vandenesch F, Romby P. Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII and the endoribonuclease III coordinately regulate spa gene expression. EMBO J. 2005;23;24(4):824-35. Doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600572
  16. 16. Chevalier C, Boisset S, Romilly C, Masquida B, Fechter P, Geissmann T, Vandenesch F, Romby P. Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII binds to two distant regions of coa mRNA to arrest translation and promote mRNA degradation. PLoS Pathog. 2010;12;6(3). Doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000809
  17. 17. Boisset S, Geissmann T, Huntzinger E, Fechter P, Bendridi N, Possedko M, Chevalier C, Helfer AC, Benito Y, Jacquier A, Gaspin C, Vandenesch F, Romby P. Staphylococcus aureus RNAIII coordinately represses the synthesis of virulence factors and the transcription regulator Rot by an antisense mechanism. Genes Dev. 2007;1;21(11):1353-66. Doi: 10.1101/gad.423507.
  18. 18. Traber KE, Lee E, Benson S, Corrigan R, Cantera M, Shopsin B, Novick RP. Agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Microbiology (Reading). 2008;154(Pt 8):2265-2274. Doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2007/011874-0
  19. 19. Ellis MJ, Haniford DB. Riboregulation of bacterial and archaeal transposition. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2016;7(3):382-98. Doi: 10.1002/wrna.1341
  20. 20. Fröhlich KS, Papenfort K. Interplay of regulatory RNAs and mobile genetic elements in enteric pathogens. Mol Microbiol. 2016;101(5):701-13. Doi: 10.1111/mmi.13428
  21. 21. Kaito C, Omae Y, Matsumoto Y, Nagata M, Yamaguchi H, Aoto T, Ito T, Hiramatsu K, Sekimizu K. A novel gene, fudoh, in the SCCmec region suppresses the colony spreading ability and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS One. 2008;3(12):e3921. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003921
  22. 22. Kaito C, Saito Y, Nagano G, Ikuo M, Omae Y, Hanada Y, Han X, Kuwahara-Arai K, Hishinuma T, Baba T, Ito T, Hiramatsu K, Sekimizu K. Transcription and translation products of the cytolysin gene psm-mec on the mobile genetic element SCCmec regulate Staphylococcus aureus virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2011; 3;7(2):e1001267. Doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001267
  23. 23. Rutherford ST, Valastyan JS, Taillefumier T, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL. Comprehensive analysis reveals how single nucleotides contribute to noncoding RNA function in bacterial quorum sensing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;3;112(44):E6038-47. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518958112
  24. 24. Schu DJ, Zhang A, Gottesman S, Storz G. Alternative Hfq-sRNA interaction modes dictate alternative mRNA recognition. EMBO J. 2015;14;34(20):2557-73. Doi: 10.15252/embj.201591569
  25. 25. Howden BP, Beaume M, Harrison PF, Hernandez D, Schrenzel J, Seemann T, Francois P, Stinear TP. Analysis of the small RNA transcriptional response in multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after antimicrobial exposure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(8):3864-74. Doi: 10.1128/AAC.00263-13
  26. 26. Jagodnik J, Chiaruttini C, Guillier M. Stem-Loop Structures within mRNA Coding Sequences Activate Translation Initiation and Mediate Control by Small Regulatory RNAs. Mol Cell. 2017; 5;68(1):158-170.e3. Doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.08.015
  27. 27. Soper T, Mandin P, Majdalani N, Gottesman S, Woodson SA. Positive regulation by small RNAs and the role of Hfq. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;25;107(21):9602-7. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004435107
  28. 28. Felden B, Vandenesch F, Bouloc P, Romby P. The Staphylococcus aureus RNome and its commitment to virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(3):e1002006. Doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002006
  29. 29. Figueroa-Bossi N, Valentini M, Malleret L, Fiorini F, Bossi L. Caught at its own game: regulatory small RNA inactivated by an inducible transcript mimicking its target. Genes Dev. 2009;1;23(17):2004-15. Doi: 10.1101/gad.541609
  30. 30. Miyakoshi M, Chao Y, Vogel J. Cross talk between ABC transporter mRNAs via a target mRNA-derived sponge of the GcvB small RNA. EMBO J. 2015;3;34(11):1478-92. Doi: 10.15252/embj.201490546
  31. 31. Rabhi M, Espéli O, Schwartz A, Cayrol B, Rahmouni AR, Arluison V, Boudvillain M. The Sm-like RNA chaperone Hfq mediates transcription antitermination at Rho-dependent terminators. EMBO J. 2011;14;30(14):2805-16. Doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.192
  32. 32. Göpel Y, Khan MA, Görke B. Domain swapping between homologous bacterial small RNAs dissects processing and Hfq binding determinants and uncovers an aptamer for conditional RNase E cleavage. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;29;44(2):824-37. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1161
  33. 33. Moon K, Gottesman S. A PhoQ/P-regulated small RNA regulates sensitivity of Escherichia coli to antimicrobial peptides. Mol Microbiol. 2009;74(6):1314-30. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06944.x
  34. 34. Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, Silva E, Anzueto A, Martin CD, Moreno R, Lipman J, Gomersall C, Sakr Y, Reinhart K; EPIC II Group of Investigators. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA. 2009; 2;302(21):2323-9. Doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1754
  35. 35. Coyne S, Courvalin P, Périchon B. Efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance in Acinetobacter spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(3):947-53. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01388-10
  36. 36. Klobucar K, French S, Côté J-P, Howes JR, Brown ED. Genetic and chemical- genetic interactions map biogenesis and permeability determinants of the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. mBio, 2020. 11:e0016120. Doi : 10.1128/mBio.00161-20
  37. 37. Geissmann T, Chevalier C, Cros MJ, Boisset S, Fechter P, Noirot C, Schrenzel J, François P, Vandenesch F, Gaspin C, Romby P. A search for small noncoding RNAs in Staphylococcus aureus reveals a conserved sequence motif for regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(21):7239-57. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp668
  38. 38. Bouvier M, Sharma CM, Mika F, Nierhaus KH, Vogel J. Small RNA binding to 5' mRNA coding region inhibits translational initiation. Mol Cell. 2008;26;32(6):827-37. Doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.10.027
  39. 39. Bandyra KJ, Said N, Pfeiffer V, Górna MW, Vogel J, Luisi BF. The seed region of a small RNA drives the controlled destruction of the target mRNA by the endoribonuclease RNase E. Mol Cell. 2012;28;47(6):943-53. Doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.07.015
  40. 40. Papenfort K, Sun Y, Miyakoshi M, Vanderpool CK, Vogel J. Small RNA-mediated activation of sugar phosphatase mRNA regulates glucose homeostasis. Cell. 2013;11;153(2):426-37. Doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.003
  41. 41. Bossi L, Schwartz A, Guillemardet B, Boudvillain M, Figueroa-Bossi N. A role for Rho-dependent polarity in gene regulation by a noncoding small RNA. Genes Dev. 2012;15;26(16):1864-73. Doi: 10.1101/gad.195412.112
  42. 42. Rabhi M, Espéli O, Schwartz A, Cayrol B, Rahmouni AR, Arluison V, Boudvillain M. The Sm-like RNA chaperone Hfq mediates transcription antitermination at Rho-dependent terminators. EMBO J. 2011;14;30(14):2805-16. dDi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.192
  43. 43. Sedlyarova N, Shamovsky I, Bharati BK, Epshtein V, Chen J, Gottesman S, Schroeder R, Nudler E. sRNA-Mediated Control of Transcription Termination in E.coli. Cell. 2016;22;167(1):111-121. Doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.004
  44. 44. Kavita K, de Mets F, Gottesman S. New aspects of RNA-based regulation by Hfq and its partner sRNAs. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2018;42:53-61. Doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.10.014
  45. 45. Wong J., Pang I., Wilkins M., Tree J.J. Systems-Level Analysis of Bacterial Regulatory Small RNA Networks. Systems Biology. RNA Technologies. Springer, Cham. 2018; pp.97-127. Doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-92967-5_6
  46. 46. Li L, Huang D, Cheung MK, Nong W, Huang Q , Kwan HS. BSRD: a repository for bacterial small regulatory RNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D233-D238. Doi:10.1093/nar/gks1264
  47. 47. Iosub IA, van Nues RW, McKellar SW, Nieken KJ, Marchioretto M, Sy B, Tree JJ, Viero G, Granneman S. Hfq CLASH uncovers sRNA-target interaction networks linked to nutrient availability adaptation. Elife. 2020;1;9:e54655. Doi: 10.7554/eLife.54655
  48. 48. Sahar Melamed, Philip P. Adams, Aixia Zhang, Hongen Zhang, Gisela Storz. RNA-RNA Interactomes of ProQ and Hfq Reveal Overlapping and Competing Roles. Molecular Cell, 2020;77(2),411-425.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.10.022
  49. 49. Melamed S, Peer A, Faigenbaum-Romm R, Gatt YE, Reiss N, Bar A, Altuvia Y, Argaman L, Margalit H. Global Mapping of Small RNA-Target Interactions in Bacteria. Mol Cell. 2016;1;63(5):884-97. Doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.07.026
  50. 50. Waters SA, McAteer SP, Kudla G, Pang I, Deshpande NP, Amos TG, Leong KW, Wilkins MR, Strugnell R, Gally DL, Tollervey D, Tree JJ. Small RNA interactome of pathogenic E.coli revealed through crosslinking of RNase E. EMBO J. 2017;1;36(3):374-387. Doi: 10.15252/embj.201694639
  51. 51. Kosmidis C, Schindler BD, Jacinto PL, Patel D, Bains K, Seo SM, Kaatz GW. Expression of multidrug resistance efflux pump genes in clinical and environmental isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012;40(3):204-9. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.04.014
  52. 52. Lamers RP, Stinnett JW, Muthukrishnan G, Parkinson CL, Cole AM. Evolutionary analyses of Staphylococcus aureus identify genetic relationships between nasal carriage and clinical isolates. PLoS One. 2011;21;6(1):e16426. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016426
  53. 53. Feng L, Rutherford ST, Papenfort K, Bagert JD, van Kessel JC, Tirrell DA, Wingreen NS, Bassler BL. A qrr noncoding RNA deploys four different regulatory mechanisms to optimize quorum-sensing dynamics. Cell. 2015;15;160(1-2):228-40. Doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.051
  54. 54. Shopsin B, Drlica-Wagner A, Mathema B, Adhikari RP, Kreiswirth BN, Novick RP. Prevalence of agr dysfunction among colonizing Staphylococcus aureus strains. J Infect Dis. 2008;15;198(8):1171-4. Doi: 10.1086/592051
  55. 55. Song J, Lays C, Vandenesch F, Benito Y, Bes M, Chu Y, Lina G, Romby P, Geissmann T, Boisset S. The expression of small regulatory RNAs in clinical samples reflects the different life styles of Staphylococcus aureus in colonization vs. infection. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37294. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037294
  56. 56. Pichon C, Felden B. Small RNA genes expressed from Staphylococcus aureus genomic and pathogenicity islands with specific expression among pathogenic strains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;4;102(40):14249-54. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503838102
  57. 57. Geissmann T, Chevalier C, Cros MJ, Boisset S, Fechter P, Noirot C, Schrenzel J, François P, Vandenesch F, Gaspin C, Romby P. A search for small noncoding RNAs in Staphylococcus aureus reveals a conserved sequence motif for regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(21):7239-57. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp668
  58. 58. Novick RP, Subedi A. The SaPIs: mobile pathogenicity islands of Staphylococcus. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2007;93:42-57. Doi: 10.1159/000100857
  59. 59. Fozo EM, Makarova KS, Shabalina SA, Yutin N, Koonin EV, Storz G. Abundance of type I toxin-antitoxin systems in bacteria: searches for new candidates and discovery of novel families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38(11):3743-59. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq054
  60. 60. Romilly C, Caldelari I, Parmentier D, Lioliou E, Romby P, Fechter P. Current knowledge on regulatory RNAs and their machineries in Staphylococcus aureus. RNA Biol. 2012;9(4):402-13. Doi: 10.4161/rna.20103
  61. 61. Proctor RA, von Eiff C, Kahl BC, Becker K, McNamara P, Herrmann M, Peters G. Small colony variants: a pathogenic form of bacteria that facilitates persistent and recurrent infections. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006;4(4):295-305. Doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1384
  62. 62. Lannergård J, von Eiff C, Sander G, Cordes T, Seggewiss J, Peters G, Proctor RA, Becker K, Hughes D. Identification of the genetic basis for clinical menadione-auxotrophic small-colony variant isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(11):4017-22. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00668-08
  63. 63. Schmidt, Katherine & Manna, Adhar & Cheung, Ambrose. SarT Influences sarS Expression in Staphylococcus aureus. Infection and immunity. 2003;71. 5139-48. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.71.9.5139-5148.2003
  64. 64. Guillet J, Hallier M, Felden B. Emerging functions for the Staphylococcus aureus RNome. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(12):e1003767. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003767
  65. 65. Gao J, Stewart GC. Regulatory elements of the Staphylococcus aureus protein A (Spa) promoter. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(12):3738-48. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.12.3738-3748.2004
  66. 66. Beaume M, Hernandez D, Farinelli L, Deluen C, Linder P, Gaspin C, Romby P, Schrenzel J, Francois P. Cartography of methicillin-resistant S. aureus transcripts: detection, orientation and temporal expression during growth phase and stress conditions. PLoS One. 2010;20;5(5):e10725. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010725
  67. 67. Marchais A, Naville M, Bohn C, Bouloc P, Gautheret D. Single-pass classification of all noncoding sequences in a bacterial genome using phylogenetic profiles. Genome Res. 2009;19(6):1084-92. Doi: 10.1101/gr.089714.108
  68. 68. Kahl BC, Belling G, Becker P, Chatterjee I, Wardecki K, Hilgert K, Cheung AL, Peters G, Herrmann M. Thymidine-dependent Staphylococcus aureus small-colony variants are associated with extensive alterations in regulator and virulence gene expression profiles. Infect Immun. 2005;73(7):4119-26. Doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.7.4119-4126.2005
  69. 69. Anderson KL, Dunman PM. Messenger RNA Turnover Processes in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Emerging Studies in Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Microbiol. 2009;2009:525491. Doi: 10.1155/2009/525491
  70. 70. Prévost K, Desnoyers G, Jacques JF, Lavoie F, Massé E. Small RNA-induced mRNA degradation achieved through both translation block and activated cleavage. Genes Dev. 2011;15;25(4):385-96. Doi: 10.1101/gad.2001711
  71. 71. Papenfort K, Bouvier M, Mika F, Sharma CM, Vogel J. Evidence for an autonomous 5’ target recognition domain in an Hfq-associated small RNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(47):20435-20440. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1009784107
  72. 72. Peterman N, Lavi-Itzkovitz A, Levine E. Large-scale mapping of sequence-function relations in small regulatory RNAs reveals plasticity and modularity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;29;42(19):12177-88. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gku863
  73. 73. Richter AS, Backofen R. Accessibility and conservation: general features of bacterial small RNA-mRNA interactions? RNA Biol. 2012;9(7):954-65. Doi: 10.4161/rna.20294
  74. 74. Vogel J, Luisi BF. Hfq and its constellation of RNA. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;15;9(8):578-89. Doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2615
  75. 75. Lalaouna D, Baude J, Wu Z, Tomasini A, Chicher J, Marzi S, Vandenesch F, Romby P, Caldelari I, Moreau K. RsaC sRNA modulates the oxidative stress response of Staphylococcus aureus during manganese starvation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;10;47(18):9871-9887. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz728
  76. 76. Manna AC, Kim S, Cengher L, Corvaglia A, Leo S, Francois P, Cheung AL. Small RNA teg49 Is Derived from a sarA Transcript and Regulates Virulence Genes Independent of SarA in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2018;22;86(2):e00635-17. Doi: 10.1128/IAI.00635-17
  77. 77. Rochat T, Bohn C, Morvan C, Le Lam TN, Razvi F, Pain A, Toffano-Nioche C, Ponien P, Jacq A, Jacquet E, Fey PD, Gautheret D, Bouloc P. The conserved regulatory RNA RsaE down-regulates the arginine degradation pathway in Staphylococcus aureus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;28;46(17):8803-8816. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gky584
  78. 78. Felden B, Vandenesch F, Bouloc P, Romby P. The Staphylococcus aureus RNome and its commitment to virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7(3):e1002006. Doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002006
  79. 79. Prat C, Bestebroer J, de Haas CJ, van Strijp JA, van Kessel KP. A new staphylococcal anti-inflammatory protein that antagonizes the formyl peptide receptor-like 1. J Immunol. 2006;1;177(11):8017-26. Doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.11.8017
  80. 80. de Haas CJ, Veldkamp KE, Peschel A, Weerkamp F, Van Wamel WJ, Heezius EC, Poppelier MJ, Van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA. Chemotaxis inhibitory protein of Staphylococcus aureus, a bacterial antiinflammatory agent. J Exp Med. 2004;1;199(5):687-95. Doi: 10.1084/jem.20031636
  81. 81. Filkins LM, Graber JA, Olson DG, Dolben EL, Lynd LR, Bhuju S, O’Toole GA. Coculture of Staphylococcus aureus with Pseudomonas aeruginosa Drives S. aureus towards Fermentative Metabolism and Reduced Viability in a Cystic Fibrosis Model. J Bacteriol. 2015;197(14):2252-64. Doi: 10.1128/JB.00059-15
  82. 82. Rooijakkers SH, Ruyken M, Roos A, Daha MR, Presanis JS, Sim RB, van Wamel WJ, van Kessel KP, van Strijp JA. Immune evasion by a staphylococcal complement inhibitor that acts on C3 convertases. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(9):920-7. Doi: 10.1038/ni1235
  83. 83. Jongerius I, von Köckritz-Blickwede M, Horsburgh MJ, Ruyken M, Nizet V, Rooijakkers SH. Staphylococcus aureus virulence is enhanced by secreted factors that block innate immune defenses. J Innate Immun. 2012;4(3):301-11. Doi: 10.1159/000334604
  84. 84. Jusko M, Potempa J, Kantyka T, Bielecka E, Miller HK, Kalinska M, Dubin G, Garred P, Shaw LN, Blom AM. Staphylococcal proteases aid in evasion of the human complement system. J Innate Immun. 2014;6(1):31-46. Doi: 10.1159/000351458
  85. 85. Atkins KL, Burman JD, Chamberlain ES, Cooper JE, Poutrel B, Bagby S, Jenkins AT, Feil EJ, van den Elsen JM. S. aureus IgG-binding proteins SpA and Sbi: host specificity and mechanisms of immune complex formation. Mol Immunol. 2008;45(6):1600-11. Doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2007.10.021
  86. 86. Indian Network for Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (INSAR) group, India. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in India: prevalence & susceptibility pattern. Indian J Med Res. 2013;137(2):363-9
  87. 87. Casey JA, Cosgrove SE, Stewart WF, Pollak J, Schwartz BS. A population-based study of the epidemiology and clinical features of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in Pennsylvania, 2001-2010. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141(6):1166-79. Doi: 10.1017/S0950268812001872
  88. 88. Clauditz A, Resch A, Wieland KP, Peschel A, Götz F. Staphyloxanthin plays a role in the fitness of Staphylococcus aureus and its ability to cope with oxidative stress. Infect Immun. 2006;74(8):4950-3. Doi: 10.1128/IAI.00204-06
  89. 89. Berends ET, Horswill AR, Haste NM, Monestier M, Nizet V, von Köckritz-Blickwede M. Nuclease expression by Staphylococcus aureus facilitates escape from neutrophil extracellular traps. J Innate Immun. 2010;2(6):576-86. Doi: 10.1159/000319909
  90. 90. Queck SY, Khan BA, Wang R, Bach TH, Kretschmer D, Chen L, Kreiswirth BN, Peschel A, Deleo FR, Otto M. Mobile genetic element-encoded cytolysin connects virulence to methicillin resistance in MRSA. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(7):e1000533. Doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000533
  91. 91. Seilie ES, Bubeck Wardenburg J. Staphylococcus aureus pore-forming toxins: The interface of pathogen and host complexity. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017;72:101-116. Doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.04.003
  92. 92. Friedrich R, Panizzi P, Fuentes-Prior P, Richter K, Verhamme I, Anderson PJ, Kawabata S, Huber R, Bode W, Bock PE. Staphylocoagulase is a prototype for the mechanism of cofactor-induced zymogen activation. Nature.2003;2,425(6957):535-9. Doi: 10.1038/nature01962
  93. 93. Kroh HK, Panizzi P, Bock PE. Von Willebrand factor-binding protein is a hysteretic conformational activator of prothrombin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(19):7786-91. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811750106
  94. 94. McAleese F, Wu SW, Sieradzki K, Dunman P, Murphy E, Projan S, Tomasz A. Overexpression of genes of the cell wall stimulon in clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus exhibiting vancomycin-intermediate- S. aureus-type resistance to vancomycin. J Bacteriol. 2006;188(3):1120-33. Doi:10.1128/JB.188.3.1120-1133.2006
  95. 95. Tomasini A, François P, Howden BP, Fechter P, Romby P, Caldelari I. The importance of regulatory RNAs in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;21:616-26. Doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.11.016
  96. 96. Westermann AJ, Förstner KU, Amman F, Barquist L, Chao Y, Schulte LN, Müller L, Reinhardt R, Stadler PF, Vogel J. Dual RNA-seq unveils noncoding RNA functions in host-pathogen interactions. Nature. 2016;28;529(7587):496-501. Doi: 10.1038/nature16547
  97. 97. Eyraud A, Tattevin P, Chabelskaya S, Felden B. A small RNA controls a protein regulator involved in antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(8):4892-905. Doi: 10.1093/nar/gku149
  98. 98. Howden BP, Beaume M, Harrison PF, Hernandez D, Schrenzel J, Seemann T, Francois P, Stinear TP. Analysis of the small RNA transcriptional response in multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus after antimicrobial exposure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(8):3864-74. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00263-13
  99. 99. Carroll RK, Weiss A, Broach WH, Wiemels RE, Mogen AB, Rice KC, Shaw LN. Genome-wide Annotation, Identification, and Global Transcriptomic Analysis of Regulatory or Small RNA Gene Expression in Staphylococcus aureus. MBio. 2016;9;7(1):e01990-15. Doi: 10.1128/mBio.01990-15
  100. 100. Kim, S., Reyes, D., Beaume, M., Francois, P., and Cheung, A. Contribution of teg49 Small RNA in the 5′ upstream transcriptional region of sarA to virulence in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 2014;82, 4369-4379. Doi: 10.1128/IAI.02002-2014

Written By

Rudra Mishra Awdhesh Kumar Mishra, Bhama Mishra Awdhesh Kumar Mishra, Nalini Easwaran and Kodiveri Muthukaliannan Gothandam

Submitted: April 14th, 2021 Reviewed: May 22nd, 2021 Published: June 24th, 2021