Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Plant-based Vaccines: The Future of Preventive Healthcare?

By Sinan Meriç, Tamer Gümüş and Alp Ayan

Submitted: March 23rd 2021Reviewed: April 23rd 2021Published: June 8th 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.97861

Downloaded: 191


Infectious diseases threatened humankind countless times through history, when knowledge on microorganisms was absent and medical capabilities were limited. Pandemics and outbreaks caused death of millions, brought empires to their knees and even wiped some ancient civilizations. In “modern” days, despite of improved medical application, sanitary precautions and effective medicines, infectious diseases are still cause of more than 54% of total mortality in developing countries. Millions of people are protected from the infectious diseases annually as a result of mass immunization campaigns. Nevertheless, novel diseases as COVID-19, MERS-CoV, avian influenza, Ebola, Zika and possible future infections require dynamic vaccine research and investment. Along with all the advantages of vaccines, there are several limitations regarding cost, biosafety/biosecurity, storage, distribution, degradation topics. Plant-based vaccine production for humans and animals has been under serious consideration to overcome some of these limitations. Nowadays, plant biotechnology brought new insight to vaccines research through gene transfer strategies to plants and improvements in amount, isolation and purification and addition of adjuvant for production of recombinant vaccine antigens in plants. Recombinant vaccines can undeniably offer us new standards and legal regulations to be introduced for the development, approval, authorization, licensing, distribution and marketing of such vaccines. The aim of this chapter is to exploit uses, methods and advantages of recombinant DNA technology and novel plant biotechnology applications for plant-based vaccine research in respect to existing infectious diseases.


  • Plant-based vaccine
  • recombinant protein
  • virus-like particles
  • transgenic plant
  • molecular farming
  • oral vaccine
  • chloroplast transformation
  • transient expression
  • stable nuclear transformation
  • COVID-19

1. Introduction

There are many breakthrough events during ongoing human civilization process. All of these individual events contributed the process in different significance. Nevertheless, agricultural development and animal domestication significantly accelerated all the other developments due to the fact that they saved people from daily boundary of finding nutrition and allowed more spare time for socialization and thinking.

Advantages of settled life style increased population in early cities rapidly. Ancient cities as Rome, Athens, Fayum varied in population between a hundred thousand to a million in various eras [1, 2]. Lacking the knowledge of microorganisms, hygiene and sanitation precautions, underdeveloped sewer systems and living so close to domesticated animals and people resulted to the rise of “civilization pathogens”. It is hypothesized that virulent pathogens were present but not persistent due to the limited population in human communities before agricultural development and urbanization. Most of the animals tend to live together in herds. Even though the herd lifestyle is very suitable for the transmission of pathogens, there were limited contact between humans and animals since hunting was the only viable way. Developments in agriculture and animal domestication lifted that barrier and allowed animal diseases to be transmitted to humans more frequently in higher population densities. Major fatal human diseases as measles, tuberculosis, smallpox, influenza, pertussis, and falciparum malaria are linked to early domesticated animals via phylogenetic analysis [3]. Throughout the history of human civilization there are several outbreaks of pandemic diseases which shaped the world socially, economically and politically (Table 1).

Common NameYear(s)CauseEstimated Death (Million)
Plague of Athens430 B.C.Salmonella enterica0.1
Antonine Plague165–180Small pox (Variola majorand Variola minor) Measles (Measles morbillivirus)5
Plague of Justanian541–542Yersinia pestis30–50
Black Death1347–1352Yersinia pestis75–200
New World Smallpox1520 - NAVariola majorand Variola minor25–55
Italian Plague1629–1631Yersinia pestis1
Great Plague of London1665Yersinia pestis0.075–0.1
Third Plague1885Yersinia pestis12
Russian Flu1889–1890A/H3N8, A/H2N2, or coronavirus OC43 (uncertain)1
Yellow FewerLate 1800sRNA virus from Flavivirusgenus0.15
Spanish Flu1918–1920Influenza strains of A/H1N150
Asian Flu1957–1958Influenza A virus subtype H2N21
Hong Kong Flu1968–1970H3N2 strain of the influenza A virus1
HIV-AIDS1981-ongoingLentivirus35 and counting
SARS2002–2003Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1)<0.001
Swine Flu2009H1N1 influenza virus0.2
MERS2015Coronavirus (MERS-CoV)<0.001
Covid-192019-ongoingCoronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)2.52 and counting

Table 1.

Major outbreak throughout the history of human civilizations [4].

In present day, vaccines are the vital part of the preventive healthcare globally. Many of the once deadly diseases are not present for decades, since the mass vaccination campaigns were applied worldwide. Based on their production method and protection mechanisms, vaccines are categorized under several classes including live attenuated, inactive (killed whole organism), toxoid, subunit (purified native or recombinant protein, polysaccharide or peptide), virus-like particle, outer membrane particle, protein-polysaccharide conjugate, viral vectored, nucleic acid, bacterial vectored, antigen-presenting cell vaccines [5, 6]. Despite the various new approaches to the vaccine production, most of the vaccines which are applied in immunization programs are either live attenuated, inactive or subunit vaccines. WHO (World Health Organization) vaccine-preventable diseases: monitoring system [7] offers important and comparable data on this topic based on all countries. Even so, there are public concerns over the topics as age and schedule of vaccination, common (injection site pain, redness and swelling, fever, malaise, headache) and rare side effects (anaphylaxis, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, narcolepsy, autism), immunodeficiency or antigenic overload issues. As in all daily life matters, misinformation on these topics and issues in social media and search engines greatly challenges vaccine production methods and public acceptance, although the scientific evidences prove the contrary.

As illustrated in Figure 1, one of the greatest challenges in vaccine research is based on logistics and distribution. Along with post-production purification and packaging issues, logistics of traditional vaccines under cold chain conditions in limiting shelf-life durations exhibit certain difficulties [6]. Especially in underdeveloped countries, lack of health infrastructure and required conditions threaten overall process. Moreover, world once again faced the same dilemma in Covid-19 pandemic as 16 of total 256 vaccine candidates passed to phase III trials by February, 2021 [8]. These manufacturers announced their plans to produce 10 billion doses (at least 2 doses are required for immunity in most) until the end of 2021 in their best estimations. Apparent insufficient annual production capacity leads priority groups to be formed for the early products. As in this latest ongoing example, inequity in access to vaccines is always a major issue [9].

Figure 1.

Main global challenges in vaccine research.

Leading Covid-19 vaccine candidates are mainly developed by private/industry association by 72%. Remaining 28% is consisted of academic, public and non-profit organizations. Also, there are bigger multinational vast vaccine manufacturer companies as Janssen, Sanofi, Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline which may ensure tolerating lack of large scale vaccine manufacturing inexperience and capacities of these relatively smaller organizations [10]. Even though, commercial viability apparently is not an issue for potential Covid-19 vaccine, it is a real drawback for many diseases. These diseases are mostly have devastating effects on restricted local areas as poor communities. In case of such rare infection diseases, development costs offset potential income. Vaccines against this kind of diseases as Ebola, which multinational manufacturers hesitate to invest due to commercial viability, are called ‘orphan vaccines’ [11]. More profitable vaccine production methods may withdraw hesitation over these diseases which are only producible with government assistance and still have high mortality rates regionally.

Another and probably the most challenging factor in vaccine research is based on immunological issues. Commercially viable vaccine targets for diseases like HIV, gonorrhea (Neisseria gonorrhoeae), syphilis (Treponema pallidum), malaria or seasonal influenza are generally caused by highly variable pathogens. These pathogens present variation both in and between host variations which emerge difficulty to identify common antigen target for immunization by vaccine. Some people produce natural antibodies against more conserved antigens of pathogens and have enhanced immunity but targeting these conserved antigens by vaccine induction has not been achieved for many of these diseases yet. Protection efficacy is a major issue due to the immunological variations even in post-production of the vaccines [6]. Even so, global reports over novel mutations of the virus will require re-evaluation of efficacy values and raise suspicion in public for existing vaccines. In some case as RTSS vaccine which is licensed for malaria disease, efficacy is lower as 30–40%. Therefore, considering all immunological factors together suggests long development time of traditional vaccines fail to satisfy rapid, flexible and upscale production requirements [6].

Following the rapid development of biotechnology and bioinformatics, precise genomic and proteomic target identification methods and instruments are emerged. Therefore, knowledge on structural biology and immunology is mostly available for many infectious diseases. Deciding vaccine production methods is based on delivery, immunogenicity, production capacity and speed, transport requirements and shelf life and economic viability. Along with the methods as viral vectored vaccines, nucleic acid-based vaccines, RNA vaccines, outer membrane vesicles, plant based vaccines present promising contribution to the field. Experimental and commercial applications of plant based vaccines will be evaluated further in this chapter in perspective of future preventive healthcare alternative.


2. Plant-based vaccine production

Especially in the last two decades, the expression studies of vaccine antigens in plants have been accelerated with the developments in the production of recombinant proteins in plants and it has been provided possibility to design effective plant-based vaccines against many diseases. In this process, both developments in transgenic approaches and transformation methods and improvements in various areas such as promoter selection, codon optimization, plastid transformation for increasing yield of recombinant protein have paved the way for the production of vaccine antigens. The significant increase in the world population and the emergence of epidemic and pandemic diseases cause demands that exceed the vaccine production capacity. However, the success of national vaccine programs is marred by both high cost-per-dose of producing vaccines and the limitations in the distribution of vaccine. In addition, there is a risk of exposure to dangerous pathogens caused by injection procedures during vaccination, resulting in diseases like HIV, hepatite C that can be transmitted through blood. Moreover, risk of contamination of other viruses such as SV40 and foamy virus, which can cause disease in humans and animals, is another important factor that should be evaluated in terms of health, although it depends on the nature of the vaccine (attenuated or inactivated), the titer of the contaminant, the degree of inactivation and pathogenicity [12]. When all these disadvantages are examined, it is seen that the use of plant systems for vaccine production has the potential to provide a biotechnological solution, considering that it can provide high-scale production and reduce the cost-per-dose and minimize the problems that may occur during vaccine production and distribution. While plants produce complex proteins similar to other eukaryotic systems, they can fold and modify these proteins post-translationally. However, they contain minor differences in glucosylation patterns compared to mammalian cells [13].

In general, the technical points taken into consideration for the plant transformation and the production of recombinant protein in plants should also be taken into account in planning for the production of recombinant vaccine antigens in plant systems. Two different systems are used in the production of recombinant proteins in plants known as stable genetic transformation and transient gene expression. Stable nuclear transformation results in stable expression in plant tissues by ensuring the insertion of recombinant DNA into the nuclear genome of the plant cell [13]. In addition, transgenes can stably integrate into the plastid genome other than the nuclear genome. The transfer of recombinant DNA is carried out by using direct and indirect methods and this preference varies according to the target plant species, target genome (nuclear or plastid), gene construct to be introduced. Natural plant pathogens, Agrobacterium tumefaciensand Agrobacterium rhizogenesare used for indirect gene transfer and are generally preferred for nuclear transformation. Biolistic or microparticle bombardment, which is the most preferred among direct methods, are mostly used in the transformation of the plastid genome and plant species where transformation mediated by Agrobacteriumspecies is not applicable. By using plant tissue culture methods with all these transformation methods, a whole transgenic plant can be obtained or plant tissue cultures (callus, hairy root) can be established for recombinant protein production from various plant tissues. In addition, by using plant tissues for recombinant protein production, plant cell cultures also become prominent as an alternative system. Generally, transgenic plants allow large-scale production of recombinant proteins with high expression of introduced gene. This system can also enable the production of multiple recombinant proteins in a single plant by crossing different transgenic plants. On the other hand, development of transgenic plants by stable transformation is relatively more time consuming and also needs improvement due to the low protein expression compared to other plant systems. Another disadvantage is that the transgene may show different profiles in its expression due to positional effect as a result of random entry into the nuclear genome. Moreover, in case of multiple insertions, unstable gene expression and gene silencing may occur. On the other hand, transient expression has many advantages for the expression of genes encoding recombinant proteins in plant tissues. Two processes are particularly prominent for transient transformation in plants named as transient expression of the transgene by Agrobacteriuminfiltration and viral vector-based transient expression. These two processes are based on the expression of transgenes transported by bacteria or virus vectors, and stable integration of the transgene into the genome is not required. The most important advantage of these systems is rapid recombinant protein production. Expression of extra chromosomal transgenes can be detected in 3–4 hours after DNA transfer, while it can reach the maximum expression level in 18–48 hours [14]. Gene expression can be maintained for 10–14 days, afterwards. Transient based expression is generally at a higher level than stable transformation. Plant viral vectors used for viral vector-based transient expression, can be preferred to increase the number of gene copies that can result in a much higher protein yield compared to stable transformation. Various RNA viruses such as tobacco mosaic virus (TMV), cauliflower mosaic virus (CMV), alfalfa mosaic virus (AVM) are used to construct plant viral expression vectors.

2.1 Nuclear transformation

It is ensured that vaccine antigens can be produced in large amounts in the tissues of transgenic plants that are transformed by nuclear transformation, and oral administration of the vaccine becomes possible thanks to the expression in edible plant organs in such as lettuce (Lactuca sativa). The gene integrated into nuclear genome can be maintained with transgenic seeds and replanted when needed. Moreover, by crossing different transgenic plants, different transgenes can be included in a single plant, allowing development of different characteristics of the plant in a short time. Transgenic plant lines, depending on the plant species, can be developed in a shorter time by nuclear transformation than chloroplast transformation. Recombinant vaccine antigens produced by nuclear transformation can be targeted to a variety of organelles such as chloroplasts, vacuoles and endoplasmic reticulum owing to signal peptides, and various post-translational modifications can be achieved particularly in the endoplasmic reticulum. On the other hand, the disadvantage of nuclear transformation is that it displays relatively low levels of expression compared to chloroplast transformation and transient expression, as well as position effect and gene silencing [15].

For many years, the nuclear genome has been the main target of plant gene transfer studies, which has enabled the production of recombinant vaccine antigens by nuclear transformation in plants to come to the fore and to be performed relatively easily. Thanks to nuclear transformation in plants, the production of vaccines against many disease factors from enteric bacteria to viruses that threaten human and animal health has been achieved (Table 2).

PlantPathogen/DiseaseAntigentTransfer Method% of Total Soluble Protein or μg of antigen/g fresh biomassAdjuvantImmunizationTarget OrganismImmun ResponseRef.
Lactuca sativaHepatitis B virussmall surface antigen
CaMV 35S promoter/
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated
22–63 μg/g FWWith adjuvant (alhydrogel)Orally-tablet, intramuscularly /total 200 ngHumanIgA[16]
Physcomitrella patensHIV / AIDSGp 120 and Gp 41 attached poly-HIVPEG-Mediated by Protoplast3.7 μg/g FWWith adjuvant (Freund’s complete adjuvant and Freund’s incomplete adjuvant)Subcutaneously/ 34 ngHumanIgG İnduction[17]
Mycobacterium tuberculosisTBAg-ELP Fusion ProteinCaMV 35S promoter/
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated
4% TSBWith adjuvant (Freund’s complete adjuvant and Freund’s incomplete adjuvant)Intraperitoneal/ for mice 10 μg, for piglet 360 μgHumanInduced IgG[18]
Lactuca sativaMeasles virusMeasles virus hemagglutinin (MV-H)Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediatedNAOnly intranasal with adjuvant (crude saponins)Intranasally (40-100 μg-tsb)/ Intraperitonealy/ (400-1000 μg-tsb)/ intramuscularly (50 μg-single dose)Human
Induced IgG[19]
Solanum tuberrosumInfectious bronchitis virus (IBV)Spike (S) proteinCaMV 35S promoter/
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated
2.5 μg/g FTWWitout adjuvantOrally 35 g/ intramuscularly 35 g extractPoultryInduced chIL-2[20]
Solanum tuberosum/ Lycopersicon esculentumNorwalk virus (NV)Recombinant capsid protein rNVDual-enhancer 35S promoter /Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediatedST:120 μg/g FW
LE:150 μg/g FW
Without adjuvantOrally/ 5 g dry weightHumanInduced serum IgG and intestinal IgA[21]
Zea maysRabies virus RVG proteinMaize ubiquitin promoter / transformed by biolistics25 μg/g FWWithout adjuvantOrally / 0.5–2 mg x 5 fresh kernelsHuman and DogNA[22]
E. coli, S. typhimurium, V. parahaemolyticusThe LTBentero proteinCaMV 35S promoter/
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated
5.29 μg/g FWWith complete Freund’s adjuvant / incomplete Freund’s adjuvantSubcutaneously (10 mg)HumanInduced IgG and mucosal IgA[23]

Table 2.

Plant-based vaccines developed by nuclear transformation/stable expression system.

FW: Fresh Weight, Tsb: Total Soluble Protein, NA: Not Available, FTW: Fresh Tuber Weight, CaMV: Cauliflower Mosaic Virus, AIDS: Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. ST: Solanum tuberosum, LE: Lycopersicon esculentum.

Every day, 200 million people in the world experience health problems due to gastroenteritis. In developing countries, more than 2 million people die annually from such enteric diseases [23]. It has been reported that a multiepitopic protein from the antigens of enterotoxigenic E. coli, S. typhimuriumand V. parahaemolyticusbacteria for use against these diseases is expressed in fresh leaf tissue as much as 5.29 μg g−1 in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants by A. tumefaciens-mediated transformation. Plant-made LTBentero antigen was found to be immunogenic when administered orally or subcutaneously to BALB/c mice, this antigen was also able to induce specific IgG (systemic) and IgA (mucosal) responses against LTB, ST, and LptD epitopes [23]. Moreover, by regulating the quality processes of transgenic plant-based vaccines, it has been ensured that the quality differences in the production steps are minimized. Especially for this purpose, closed hydroponic plant growing systems were established and oral cholera vaccine (MucoRice-CTB) was produced in accordance with legal regulations within the scope of “Good Manufacturing Practices” without the need for purification [24]. Thus, a plant-based vaccine production system, which can be harvested three times a year and is effective in terms of cost and production, has been implemented. Moreover, Needle- and cold chain free rice-based oral vaccine MucoRice-CTB has been reported to show immunogenicity in humans due to microbiota [25].

In recent years, except advanced monocot and dicot transgenic plants, various moss groups in the plant kingdom have started to be preferred for vaccine production. Env-based HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) multi-epitope protein (poly-HIV) produced in transgenic moss lines has been reported to elicit an immune response in mice as a candidate for subunit vaccine. Moss can be propagated under in vitroconditions in accordance with “Good Manufacturing Practices” standards and algae biomass does not have an apparent toxic effect. Therefore, this production system allows immunization with raw moss material. Moreover, mosses like Physcomitrella patensis able to perform post-translational modifications like N-glucosylation identical to higher plants [17].

Considerable efforts have been made to develop methods that can simplify the purification procedure as the downstream processing of recombinant vaccine antigens will significantly increase production costs. ELPylation as one of these methods, generally increases the accumulation of transgenic proteins in plants as reported in various examples [18]. In addition, ELPylated proteins can be rapidly purified by membrane-based inverse transition cycling (mITC) procedure. Using ELPylation, in which an elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) consisting of a series of pentapeptides is fused to the end of the target protein, an increase in antigen accumulation is observed in both transiently and stably transformed plants [26]. It has also been reported that the immune response increases significantly with the proper folding and trimerization of the antigen. In the study, in which the hemagglutinin of the avian influenza virus (AIV HA) was produced as a monomer and ELPylated trimer form in the tobacco plant (transient in Nicotiana benthamianaand stable in Nicotiana tabacum), it was observed that the trimeric AIV HA form increased the specific immune response to HA compared to the monomeric form [26].

Virus-like particles that do not contain viral nucleic acids and are formed by viral capsid proteins become prominent as much more reliable candidates when compared with attenuated viral vaccines. Studies in which capsid proteins are expressed in plants by nuclear transformation have been shown to induce specific antibodies comparable to attenuated vaccines when administered orally with an adjuvant [27]. VP2, VP6 and VP7 capsid proteins of group A rotavirus, one of the most common cause of human pathogen, acute infantile and pediatric gastroenteritis worldwide, have been expressed in transgenic tobacco plants. It has been reported to be significantly higher IgG antibodies in the serum of mice of the group VP 2/6/7 (immunized with transgenic tobacco plants) than group VP 2/6 (immunized with transgenic tobacco plants) and the group RV (immunized with orally attenuated RV vaccine) group IgG antibodies are significant. In addition, it was reported that the serum IgG titer in the VP 2/6 group was almost as high as that found in the RV group [27].

Using the nuclear transformation system, plant-based vaccines can be developed on the basis of low-cost multiepitopic recombinant proteins to contain epitope variants that can induce broad-spectrum antibodies. In addition, sequences containing adjuvant activity can be added to these multiepitopic proteins. Multiepitopic vaccines produced in plants trigger local and systemic immune responses more than their counterparts produced in bacteria. In orally inoculated BALBc mice, lettuce-derived HIV C4 (V3) 6 multiepitopic protein showed a higher immunogenic potential than E. coli-derived HIV C4 (V3) 6 multiepitopic protein [28].

Plant systems are also used in the production of vaccines against various parasitic diseases other than bacteria and viruses. Taenia soliumcysticercosis is one of the important parasitic diseases affecting human health especially in developing countries. Production of a low-cost and multi-epitope vaccine against this disease was achieved in the tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. The developed transgenic lines were self-pollinated and T1 generation transgenic plants were obtained from the harvested seeds. In these plants, several vaccine-related antigens were expressed in a polyprotein system based on the ribosomal skip mechanism via the 2A sequence derived from the foot-and mouth virus, which induces self-cleavage events at the translational level [29].

2.2 Chloroplast transformation

This section emphasized on recent advances in creation and development of transplastomic plants to produce plant-derived vaccines and protection against infectious diseases. Plastid transformation has come to be advantageous for the production of vaccines due to the high copy number in a single transformation allowing high levels of transgene expression and the absence of effects leading to gene silencing and the lack of concerns about positional and pleiotropic effects. In addition, as a result of maternal inheritance, the containment of foreign genes in the chloroplast genome and the absence of transgenes in the pollen are other advantages. Moreover, chloroplast transformation ensures expression of multiple genes in prokaryotic-like operon systems. However, this system is limited by the insufficient number of the target plant variety and the trials of very few plant varieties according to nuclear transformation. Another disadvantage is the lack of glucosylation ability of chloroplasts. Therefore, difficulty of expression of eukaryotic human or viral genes in prokaryotic chloroplasts is most important barrier to the use of transplastomic plants. Some major costs associated with the production of recombinant proteins in fermentation-based systems can be reduced by using chloroplasts as bioreactors. Chloroplast-derived therapeutics, especially when administered orally, eliminate expensive purification steps, cold storage, transportation and sterile injection requirements [30].

Advances in transgenic approaches and the development of gene gun and biolistic (particle bombardment method) technologies have enabled the transgene to be transferred directly to living cells. With these systems where tungsten and gold particles are used as microcarriers, the transformation of plastids can be carried out effectively. As an alternative to this system, plastids are transformed via polyethylene glycol (PEG) [31, 32]. PEG-mediated transformation allows the simultaneous transformation of many samples as a simple and efficient method and enables a large number of transformed cells with a high survival rate. However, it has a lower success rate than biolistic-mediated transformation. Despite its high transformation efficiency, biolistic is not available in many laboratories and standardization of its protocol is very difficult. It has been shown repeatedly that recombinant proteins capable of eliciting protective mammalian immune responses can also be produced in chloroplasts of plants. Thanks to chloroplast transformation, vaccines can be produced against viral diseases such as polio (poliovirus), human immunodeficiency (HIV), human papilloma virus (HPV), as well as numerous contagious and fatal bacterial infections and diseases such as cholera, tuberculosis, plague and anthrax (Table 3).

AntigensDisease/Pathogen% of Total Soluble Protein or μg of antigen/g fresh biomassPlantImmunizationTransfer
Viral protein 1PoliovirusNicotiana tabacumOrally (ORV)Biolistic[33]
gp120 and gp41 multiepitope
HIV16 μg /g fresh weightNicotiana tabacumOrally (ORV)Biolistic[34]
gp120 and gp41 multiepitope
HIV16 μg /g fresh weightNicotiana tabacumOrally (ORV)Biolistic[15]
ESAT-6 and
Mycobacterium tuberculosis7.5% for ESAT-6 and 1.2% for Mtb72FNicotiana tabacumOrally (ORV)Biolistic[35]
mmpI with Lymphotoxin-beta (LTB)Mycobacterium leprae and Mycobacterium aviumNicotiana benthamianaPolyethylene glycol (PEG)[36]
C4V3 polypeptideHIVNicotiana tabacumOrally (ORV)Biolistic[37]
L1 capsid protein fused with LTBHuman papillomavirus2%Nicotiana tabacumBiolistic[38]
dengue-3 serotype polyprotein (prM/E)Dengue virusLactuca sativaOrally (ORV)Biolistic[39]
cholera toxin-B
Vibrio cholera(Cholera)-Plasmodium (Malaria)13.17 and 10.11%Nicotiana
Subcutaneously (SQV) or orally (ORV)Biolistic[40]
cholera toxin-B
Vibrio cholera(Cholera)-Plasmodium (Malaria)7.3 and 6.1%Lactuca sativaSubcutaneously (SQV) or orally (ORV)Biolistic[40]
D2 fibronectin-binding
Staphylococcus aureus0.7%Chlamydomonas reinhardtiiOrally (ORV)Biolistic[41]
VP1Foot and mouth dis ease virus (FMDV)51%Nicotiana tabacumInoculatedBiolistic[42]
HIV-1 Pr55gag polyproteinHIV6.75%Nicotiana benthamianaBiolistic[43]
labile toxin B subunit heat-stable
toxin (LTB-ST)
ETEC-induced diarrhoeal disease2.3%Nicotiana tabacumOrally (ORV)Biolistic[44]
E7 and E7CP HPV proteinHuman papillomavirus0.1% and 0.5%Nicotiana tabacumBiolistic[45]
multi-epitope DPT fusion proteinCorynebacterium diphtheria, Bordetella pertussis, Clostridium tetani0.8%Nicotiana tabacumOrally (ORV)Biolistic[46]
F1-VYersinia pestis
14.8%Nicotiana tabacumOrally (ORV)Biolistic[47]
HIV-1 Pr55Gag, p24 and p17/p24HIV4 μg/g fresh weightN. benthamianaIntramuscularlyA. tumefaciens(chloroplast-targeted)[48]
L1 capsid proteinHuman papillomavirus24%Nicotiana tabacumIntraperitoneal (IP)Biolistic[49]
L1 capsid proteinHuman papillomavirus1.5%Nicotiana tabacumBiolistic[50]
Structural protein E2Swine
fever virus (CSFV)
1–2%Nicotiana tabacumSubcutaneous and intragastricBiolistic[51]
TetCClostridium tetani(Tetanus)10%Nicotiana tabacumOral and İntranasal (IN)Biolistic[52]
Spike Protein
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus0.2%Nicotiana tabacumOrally (ORV)Biolistic[53]
Protective antigen
Bacillus anthracis(Anthrax)2.7 and 1.7%Nicotiana tabacumBiolistic[54]
VP6Rotavirus3%Nicotiana tabacumBiolistic[55]

Table 3.

Plant-based vaccines developed by chloroplast transformation.

Virus-like particles formed by viral capsid proteins that do not contain viral nucleic acids are frequently preferred within vaccine production in plants due to their ability to elicit protective immune responses. In this context, Lenzi et al. [56] reported that the self-assembled L1 capsid protein of human papilloma virus (HPV), that is the causative agent of cervical cancer which is one of the most common causes of death for women, can be produced in chloroplasts of the Nicotiana tabacumplant. Thus, in tobacco chloroplasts, the HPV-16 L1 vaccine could be produced by expression of the L1 protein from a natural viral (L1v gene) or a synthetic sequence (L1pt gene) optimized for expression, under the control of plastid expression signals. In addition, accumulation of L1 antigen was obtained only when the first 14 amino acids of the N-terminal domain of the ATPase beta subunit or the Rubisco large subunit were translationally fused to the N-terminal of the L1 protein.

The level of transgene expression in chloroplasts varies depending on the origin of the coding sequence. Although the amount of transcript depends on the high copy number of the transgenes, it is also closely related to the efficiency of the promoter chosen and the regulatory sequences that affect translation. Most of the transgenes expressed in chloroplasts utilize the psbA promoter. It has also been reported that the 5’UTR sequence of psbA shows higher translation activity compared to many 5’UTR sequences. For this reason, studies connected with improving codon optimization benefited from psbA sequences, and it has been reported that codon optimization significantly increases translation in chloroplasts [57]. It has been indicated that the expression of the gene of the vaccine subunit is increased 50 times in chloroplasts by codon optimization [33].

In recent years, the production of vaccine antigens in the chloroplasts of edible plants like lettuce and ensuring oral vaccination have come to the fore as an important development in order to eliminate the economically demanding and extremely expensive steps such as fermentation, purification, cold storage, cold chain and transportation. Lyophilized plant cells stored at ambient temperature retain their efficacy and antigen folding/assembly, thus eliminating the need for cold chain [33]. Thus, chloroplast bioreactors have become an important alternative to the production of fermentation-based vaccine antigens. Arlen et al. [47] have achieved the production of high levels of F1-V antigen, as much as 14.8% of the total soluble protein. In a study conducted by aerosol challenge with Y. pestis, 33% of subcutaneously F1-V (with adjuvant) immunized mice survived, while 88% of orally F1-V immunized mice survived. These data presented that oral doses of vaccine antigens produced in chloroplasts may be effective in eliciting protective immune responses in vivo. In yet another study, an increase in IgG1 and IgA titers was reported with oral boosting of low-cost, cold chain-free, chloroplast made viral protein 1 (VP1) subunit vaccine [28]. By producing multiple vaccine antigens in chloroplasts, immunity can be improved against more than one infectious disease at the same time. Cholera toxin-B subunit (CTB) fused malarial vaccine antigens apical membrane antigen-1 (AMA1) and merozoite surface protein-1 (MSP1), expressed in lettuce and tobacco chloroplasts inhibited the proliferation of malaria in red blood cells by inducing antigen-specific antibodies in mice [40].

Besides terrestrial plant systems, photosynthetic unicellular alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii’s chloroplasts are used for vaccine production against various pathogens. Algae vaccines can remain stable at room temperature for more than 1.5 years and show faster and more controllable growth characteristics than other members of the plant kingdom. D2 fibronectin-binding domain of CTB fused Staphylococcus aureuswas stably expressed in C. reinhardtiialgae and as a result of algae-based inoculation of mice, the amount of pathogen decreased and 80% of mice were protected against the lethal dose of S. aureus[41]. It was reported in another study that the fusion protein was developed against tuberculosis caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, one of the leading fatal diseases, can be stored in lyophilized leaf for up to 6 months at room temperature and preserves its stability and proper folding/assembly [36].

Production of vaccine antigens (HIV gag transgene; Pr55gag) by biolistic-mediated chloroplast transformation resulted in significantly greater protein accumulation than Agrobacterium-mediated nuclear transformation which vaccine antigens postranslationally targeted into plastids [43]. In transient expression experiments, various cellular organelles (cytosol, apoplast, endoplasmic reticulum, chloroplast and mitochondrion) were targeted. It was reported that specific Pr55gag sequences were expressed only in chloroplasts. The synthetic gene encoding the HIV C4V3 recombinant protein known to induce both systemic and mucosal immune responses in mammalian systems was expressed in chloroplasts of Nicotiana tabacumplants. It has been reported that the obtained plant-derived C4V3 elicits systemic and mucosal antibody responses in BALB /c mice by oral immunization [37]. Multepitopic protein (Multi-HIV) derived from HIV gp120 and gp41 envelope proteins expressed in tobacco chloroplasts also induced immune responses and T-helper specific responses by oral immunization in BALB/c mice [34].

2.3 Plant virus based expression system

Plant viruses are generally described as safe for humans and animals. Therefore, they are preferred for the production of therapeutic molecules. TMV (tobacco mosaic virus), PVX (potato virus X), BaMV (bamboo mosaic virus), CPMV (cowpea mosaic virus) are highly stable to high temperature, pressure and pH conditions and can be purified from host plants in amounts exceeding hundreds of mg/kg plant biomass [58]. Virus-like particles (VLPs) are multi-subunit molecules consist of self-assembly protein structures that are the same or highly similar to the general structure of authentic virus. Due to the fact that VLPs do not contain viral nucleic acids, therefore conversion to infectious viruses is not possible which is an important risk factor for attenuated vaccines. In recent years, the use of both VLPs and plant viruses for vaccine production has increased rapidly (Table 4). There are various recombinant vaccine production strategies that stand out in which different vaccine antigens can be produced by using plant viral structures. Launch vector-based on virus for plant transient expression system, plant virus-based vector systems by the incorporation of 2A peptide, plant virus conjugated with purified antigen from bacterial expression system are some of the systems by which recombinant vaccine antigens can be produced.

AntigensDisease/ PathogenRecombinant vaccine platforms for production of antigenPlantImmunizationVirusRef.
JEV envelope protein domain III (EDIII)Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV)BaMV-based vector systemChenopodium quinoaIntraperitoneally (IP)Bamboo mosaic virus (BaMV)[59]
OmpA-like protein (OmpA), chaperone protein DnaK and lipoprotein Tul4Francisella tularensisis(Tularemia)Bacterial system (E. coli) and chemically conjugatedNicotiana benthamianafor TMV-Lysine production)Intranasally (IN), subcutaneously (SC.)Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)[60]
Dengue virus envelope glycoprotein
(E) domain III
Dengue virusTMV-based vector systemNicotiana benthamiana(Agroinfiltration)Orally (ORV)Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV)[61]
RhoA-derived peptide (Antiviral peptide production/inhibitor)Respiratory
syncytial virus (RSV)
TMV-based vector systemNicotiana benthamiana(Agroinfiltration)Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV)[62]
Protective antigen
Bacillus anthracisLaunch vector-based plant transient expression systemNicotiana benthamiana(Agroinfiltration)Intramuscularly (IM)Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)[63]
Pfs25 VLPPlasmodium falciparum(Malaria)Launch vector-based on Tobacco mosaic virusNicotiana benthamianaIntramuscularly (IM)Tobacco Mosaic Virus (TMV)[64]
Norwalk virus capsid
Protein (NVCP)
Norwalk virusBeYDV-based geminiviral replicon
Lactuca sativa(Agroinfiltration)Bean yellow dwarf virus (BeYDV)[65]
PCV2 capsid proteinPorcine Circovirus (PCV)CMV-based expression systemNicotiana tabacum(inoculated with purified virions)Intraperitoneally (IP)Cucumber
mosaic virus (CMV)
Extracellular domain M2 protein (M2e) fused to hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)InfluenzaPotato X virus-based vector systemNicotiana benthamiana(Agroinfiltration)Intraperitoneally (IM)Potato X virus (PXV)[67]
Hemagglutinin (HA) proteinH5N1 influenza virusLaunch vector-based plant transient expression systemNicotiana benthamiana(Agroinfiltration)Subcutaneously (s.c.)Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)[68]
BTV coat proteinsBluetongue virus (BTV)Cowpea mosaic virus–based
HyperTrans (CPMV-HT) and associated pEAQ plant transient expression vector system
Nicotiana benthamianaSubcutaneously (s.c.)Cowpea mosaic virus[69]

Table 4.

Plant-based vaccines developed by plant virus-based expression system.

Multiple doses of multivalent vaccine can be administered in the immunization of mice without any adverse effects. In addition, multivalent subunit vaccines can be developed against various diseases using an efficient TMV-based delivery platform. A multivalent subunit vaccine consisting of the combination of OmpA, DnaK chaperone and Tul4 protective antigens of the Francisella tularensispathogen bacterium has been reported to be safe. F. tularensisproteins were chemically conjugated to the TMV surface and the developed subunit vaccine strongly induced humoral immune response [60]. Chen et al. [59] produced a candidate vaccine (BJ2A CVP) in Chenopodium quinoaand N. benthamianaagainst Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) using a bamboo mosaic virus-based chimeric virus particle (CVP) strategy. Chenopodium quinoaplant is preferred to reduce the side effects of nicotine and other alkaloids found in tobacco species in the purification of BJ2A CVP.

The genomes of both RNA and DNA viruses can be modified for recombinant protein production. Geminiviral replicon systems are one of the plant-viral based expression systems used to increase the expression of vaccine antigens in plants. In geminiviral derived vectors with a single stranded DNA genome, the viral genes encoding the coat and movement proteins are deleted and the expression cassette for protein of interest is inserted. In these strategies, it has been reported that the viral vector has transient expression only 4 days after it was transferred to Nicotiana benthamianaplant leaves by Agrobacteriuminfiltration and maintained this expression level up to 7 days [70]. On the other hand, by using plants with low secondary metabolite content such as lettuce in geminiviral replicon systems based on bean yellow dwarf virus, virus-like particles could be produced at high expression levels. Thus, vaccine candidates such as Norwalk virus capsid protein-VLP (NVCP-VLP) can be purified from lettuce plants without losing their functional activity. Plant virus-based expression methods along with Agrobacterium-mediated agroinfiltration are often preferred for increasing low expressions of vaccine antigens in plants and improving the feasibility of plant-based vaccines. The expression of recombinant proteins were carried out in Nicotiana benthamianaplant by using the Launch vector-based plant transient expression system with agroinfiltration, and it was reported that vaccine candidates caused up to 100% protection against diseases that could be used for bioterrorism such as anthrax after purification [63]. In another study, it has been reported that Consensus domain III of dengue virus E glycoprotein (cEDIII) shows high expression with plant virus-based expression (5.2 mg/g dry weight of leaf tissues) against Dengue virus [61]. Launch vector technologies, which are used in the production of VLP-based recombinant vaccines especially against infectious diseases, are also used in the production of protective vaccines such as malaria transmission blocking vaccines (TBVs). TBVs prevent successful sporogonic development of the sexual stage Plasmodium falciparumparasites ingested by female Anophelesmosquitoes [64]. Thus, the spread of parasites in endemic populations by transmission from human to mosquito is prevented [41]. Another plant virus-based expression approach is the fusion of the vaccine antigen to the virus-like carrier particle, either genetically or by chemical cross-linking [67]. It has been reported that the potato X virus-based recombinant viral vector provides a high level of expression of the hybrid protein consisting of influenza virus M2 protein (M2e) fused to hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) in Nicotiana benthamianaplants. This vector was transferred to plant leaves by agroinfiltration and the hybrid protein was synthesized to 1–2% of the total soluble protein.

2.4 Transient expression

In addition to stable transgene expression (nuclear or plastid transformation), transient expression is often preferred for the expression of genes encoding vaccine proteins in plant tissues. Since transient expression does not contain chromosomal integration, it is not affected by position effect. In addition, the expression of extrachromosomal transgenes can be detected 3 hours after transfer and can last for about 10 days [14]. The major advantage of transient expression is production of vaccine antigen rapidly at low cost and high yield. In addition, the easy applicability of the system and its ability to allow the production of complex proteins composed of subunits encourages its use against the novel viral diseases that emerge suddenly. Plant-based vaccines developed by transient expression are given in Table 5.

PlantPathogen/ DiseaseAntigentTransfer Method% of Total Soluble Protein or μg of antigen/g fresh biomassAdjuvantImmunizationTarget organismImmun responseRef.
Nicotiana benthamianaHPV-16/ Cervical cancerE7 protein fused 16E7SHAgrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated0.4–6 g/kg FWWith adjuvant/ (Freund’s incomplete adjuvant)Subcutaneous/ 5 μgHumanTumor size decrease and IgG ınduction[71]
Nicotiana benthamianaHepatitis B virusHBsAgMagnICON viral
Vectors/ Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated
0,64 mg/g FWWith adjuvant (alum)Intraperitoneal 346 mIU/mL at weekHumananti-HBsAg response[72]
Nicotiana benthamianaHIV/AIDSSubtype C Envelope gp140Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated4.9–6.2 mg/kg FWWith adjuvant (Alhydrogel®)Intramuscularly/ 50 μgHumanNA[73]
Nicotiana benthamianaPoliovirus (PV) type 3Capsid protein VP1Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated60 mg/kg FWIntraperitoneal / intramuscularHuman[74]
Nicotiana benthamianaInfectious Bursal Disease Virus (IBDV)Structural VP2 proteinAgrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated1% TSBWith adjuvant (Freund’s complete adjuvant and Freund’s incomplete adjuvant)Intramuscular/ (12 μg of VP2)PoultryNA[75]
Nicotiana benthamianaFMDVCapsid precursor P1-2A and the protease 3C fusionAgrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated3–4 mg/kg FWWith adjuvant (Montanide ISA 50)Intraperitoneal/ 500 ngmeat-producing animalsNA[76]
Nicotiana benthamianaPlasmodium falciparum/
Plasmodium Surface Protein Pf38 fused to Red floresan ProteinCaMV 35S promoter/
Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated
4–12 μg/g FWWith Gerbu MM AdjuvantIntraperitoneal (17 μg)HumanInduced IgG[77]

Table 5.

Plant-based vaccines developed by transient expression system.

FW: Fresh Weight, Tsb: Total Soluble Protein, NA: Not Available, CaMV: Cauliflower Mosaic Virus.

Margolin [73] achieved Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of soluble HIV Env gb140 antigens in Nicotiana benthamianaplant. It has been reported that rabbits immunized intramuscularly with lectin affinity purified antigens developed binding antibodies and neutralizing antibodies at high titers. The production of nucleo capsid (N) and membrane protein (M), two important antigens of SARS-CoV, was achieved in Nicotiana benthamianaplant with transient expression created by using both virus-based vector and agroinfiltration. In addition, tobacco leaves infiltrated with Agrobacterium tumafaciensC58 and GV3101 strains harboring the pBI-Mvector containing the M protein, SARS-CoV M protein production was successfully achieved without using any post-transcriptional gene silencing suppressors [78].

It is imperative to produce vaccines at rates which offset mutation frequency of viral infections such as influenza, for which a new and unique epidemic strain appears within a few years. In recent years, recombinant vaccines become prominent as one of the most important options to solve this problem. New recombinant strategies provided by plant biotechnology and the production of plant-based vaccines are becoming widespread in the struggle with pandemic and epidemic diseases such as Influenza A H1N1, Influenza H5N1, plague, Ebola, Zika, SARS-CoV and SARS-Cov-2 [78, 79, 80, 81]. Plant-based vaccines developed for pandemic and epidemic diseases are given in Table 6.

Spreading areaPlantPathogen/DiseaseAntigentTransfer Method% of Total Soluble Protein or μg of antigen/g fresh biomassAdjuvantImmunizationImmun responseRef.
EOryza sativaVibrio cholerae/CholeraCholera toxin B-subunitAgrobacterium tumefaciensmediatedNAWitout adjuvantOrally/150 mg seedInduced IgG and mucosal IgA[82]
ENicotiana benthamianaSARS-CoVSARS-CoV nucleocapsid (rN) proteinAgrobacterium tumefaciensmediated0.8–1% of the TSPWith complete Freund’s adjuvant/incomplete Freund’s adjuvantIntraperitoneal/500 mg fresh tobacco leavesInduced IgG1 and IgG2/Increased IFN-_ and IL-10/not changed IL-2 and IL-4[83]
PNicotiana benthamianaInfluenza A H1N1Soluble protein H1/H1-VLPAgrobacterium tumefaciensmediatedNA--Induced CD4+ and CD8+ T cells[84]
ENicotiana benthamianaInfluenza A H5N1Matrix protein 2 ectodomain (M2e) fused to N-terminal proline-rich domain (Zera®) of the γ-zein protein of maizeAgrobacterium tumefaciensmediated125–205 mg/kg FWWithout adjuvantIntramuscular/4.5 μgInduced IgG[85]
ENicotiana tabacum/Lycopersicon esculentumYersinia pestis/PlagueMajor capsular protein F1-V antigen fusedAgrobacterium tumefaciensmediatedNT: 1-4% FW
LE: 4-10% mg DW
With adjuvant NT: aluminum hydroxide t/LE: cholera toxinNT: Subcutaneously (10μg purified)/LE: Orally
(2 g tomato fruit)
Induced serum
IgG1, IgG2a and mucosal IgA
ENicotiana benthamianaFlavivirus/Yellow fever (YF)YF virus envelope protein (YFE) fusion to the bacterial enzyme lichenase (YFE-LicKM)Agrobacterium tumefaciensmediatedNAWith Alhydrogel adjuvantIntramuscularly 5 μg x3/5 μg x 2/30 μg x 3Induced IgG, İncreased IFNγ[87]
Ebola virus (EBOV)Envelope-associated protein VP40Agrobacterium tumefaciensmediated2.6 μg/g FWWith complete Freund’s adjuvant/incomplete Freund’s adjuvantOrally (25 ng)/
Subcutaneously (125 ng)
Induced IgM, IgG and intestinal IgA[88]
ENicotiana benthamianaZika virus (ZIKV)Envelope (E) proteinAgrobacterium tumefaciensmediated160 μg/g FWWith aluminium hydroxide gel adjjuvantSubcutaneously/50 μg x 24Induced IgG1
and IgG2, Increased IFN-γ, IL-4 and IL-6
PNicotiana benthamianaSARS-CoV-2Spike specific monoclonal antibody (mAb) CR3022Agrobacterium tumefaciensmediated130 μg/g FW---[90]

Table 6.

Plant-based vaccines developed for pandemic and epidemic diseases.

P: Pandemic, E: Epidemic, FW: Fresh Weight, Tsb: Total Soluble Protein, NA: Not Available, DW: Dry Weight. NT: Nicotiana tabacum, LE: Lycopersicon esculentum.

Especially the commercial scale production of these vaccines and their examination at Phase I, Phase II and Phase III levels beyond the functional evaluations in animal models indicates that in the future, plant-derived vaccines will be an important part of the struggle against pandemic and epidemic diseases. Plant-based vaccines produced in commercial scale and candidate vaccines are given in Table 7 by companies. For instance, COVID-19 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2/SARS-CoV-2), which has become a major threat to global health, has also significantly impacted the world economy and social mobility. So far, with its high contagiousness, rapid spreading nature and high mortality rate, more than 2.5 million people have died from COVID-19, and more than 116 million people have been infected with COVID-19 worldwide [97]. In order to control the pandemic, the whole world work hard to develop new strategies to be applied in the field of health, to deliver vital medical supplies to those in need, to develop and apply safe and effective vaccines. Especially, the development of vaccines and drugs for this new pathogenic Coronavirus, which emerged suddenly and mutated at certain times, became an inevitable target. Until now, the number of vaccines in preclinical development are 182 and the number of vaccines in clinical development is 74, worldwide [8]. Plant-based vaccines have also proven that they can play an active role in fighting against COVID-19 with their promising results in preclinical and clinical stages. Along with the initiative of commercial companies using plant biotechnology, transient expression of the SARS-CoV-2 antigen in plants was achieved, and a plant-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate was produced with a high-scale production technology [81]. The COVID-19 vaccine developed by Medicago company using a plant-based platform started Phase II clinical trials. In this approach, virus-like particles (SARS-CoV-2 spike protein self-assambles into VLPs) could be produced by transient expression in Nicotiana benthamianaplants within just 20 days after the acquisition of SARS-CoV-2 [81]. For Phase I, vaccine administration in healthy adults was performed as two intramuscular doses and at 3 different dose levels (S protein content 3.75, 7.5 or 15 μg), either alone or with adjuvant (AS03 or CpG1018). After the second dose administration, the adjuvanted CoVLP was able to induce humoral and cellular responses for all dose levels. Another company, BAT’s US Bio-tech arm, Kentucky BioProcessing (KBP), announced that the COVID-19 vaccine candidate will be evaluated in the Phase I trial after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) accepts the Investigational New Drug application. This candidate vaccine was developed using plant-based technology and it was stated that the active ingredient of the vaccine could be rapidly produced in a short period of 6 weeks according to conventional methods. In still another initiative, iBio, Inc. company announced that it was working on the subunit IBIO-201 candidate vaccine against SARS-CoV 2 immediately after the pandemic was declared. The candidate vaccine was produced by Agrobacterium-mediated infiltration in leaves of Nicotiana benthamianaplants and the target protein was purified and formulated for the final product. The candidate vaccine has been reported to induce the production of anti-spike neutralizing antibodies in immunized mice. Due to the new mutations of SARS-CoV-2, it has become important to produce subunits or virus-like particles as vaccine candidates at low cost-per-dose and higher production scale.

iBio, Inc[91]
Prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2
spike protein fused lichenase protein / Nicotiana benthamiana
Prophylaxis of Classical swine fever (CSF)
CSFV E2 glycoprotein / Nicotiana benthamiana
Medicago Inc.[92]
Prophylaxis of H7N9 influenza / Phase 2 / Nicotiana benthamiana
Prophylaxis of pertussis, diphtheria, tetanus, poliomyelitis and prophylaxis of Hib infection in infants /
Phase 3 / Nicotiana benthamiana
Prophylaxis of seasonal influenza / Nicotiana benthamiana
Prophylaxis of rotavirus gastroenteritis / Phase 1 / Nicotiana benthamiana
Prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2/ Phase 2 / Nicotiana benthamiana
Prophylaxis of H5N1 influenza / Phase 2 / Nicotiana benthamiana
Icon Genetics[93, 94]
Prophylaxis of Ebola virus / Nicotiana benthamiana
Norovirus Vaccine
Prophylaxis of Norovirus / Phase I / Nicotiana benthamiana
SoyMeds, Inc.[95]
Prophylaxis of Staphylococcal Enterotoxin B / Glycine max
Fraunhofer CMB[96]
Prophylaxis of H1N1 influenzaProphylaxis of H1N1 influenzaProphylaxis of Malaria

Table 7.

Plant-based vaccines producing companies and commercial products.

2.5 Evaluation of plant-based vaccines side effect

Vital part of vaccine research is the risk assessment through randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre trials. Vaccine side effects can be evaluated under two categories as common side effects (high fever, vomiting, dizziness, anxiety and nausea) and rare side effects (risk of hospitalization, death or long-term morbidity). Same evaluation processes is required for plant-based vaccines as all traditional and recombinant vaccines. In literature, there are various studies in emphasis to safety and side effects of plant-based vaccines.

Plant-based vaccines can be evaluated in two different ways: cases in which the plant content is directly applied in pure form and the cases where the vaccine content is isolated and mixed with adjuvant. Phase studies were initiated for many candidate vaccines, where antigen or VLP was produced and then mixed with adjuvant before injection. In reported Phase I vaccine case against influenza A presented common side effects on volunteers as high fever, vomiting, dizziness, anxiety and nausea [96]. Similarly, in another case local effects occurred in the vaccination area and 93% of side effects were mild effects [98]. McCormick et al., stated in their studies that volunteers showed symptoms that were described as severe at a very low rate, but recovered within 1–2 days without the need for medical intervention, and the vaccine candidate was quite safe [99]. Moreover, Pillet et al. tested the vaccines with 300 healthy adults and 450 volunteers over the age of 50 in their phase III study on two different age groups. As a result, a higher rate of fatigue was observed in volunteers over 50 years old [100]. Ward et al. reported that the most common side effect was pain at the injection site in their studies on 22,854 volunteers and mortality rate was slightly higher for inactivated.

vaccine comparing to virus like particles [101]. Chichester et al., (2018) reported that 94% of the volunteers developed at least one of the side effects of high fever, vomiting, dizziness, anxiety and nausea [102]. In all of these studies with both oral and injectable vaccines, the observed effects were evaluated as mild to moderate. In this way, plant-based production has been defined as an effective and safe vaccine production tool [103]. Production of the adjuvants to be used to stimulate mucosal and peripheral immunity in the plant or the selection of plant which produce appropriate secondary metabolites that can act as mucosal adjuvants contributes to the decrease in the incidence of side effects. The number of studies in which plant-based vaccine candidates have passed to phase studies were much less than classical vaccine studies. When these studies are evaluated, there is no significantly increased side effect risk report concerning plant-based vaccines against any other vaccines production options [104].

2.6 Legal regulations involving plant-made pharmaceuticals

Regulatory processes of the vaccine development, approval, authorization, licensing, distribution, and marketing are as challenging as the production. There are both national and centralized regulatory agencies. These agencies emphasize on scientific evaluation of data, quality of the product, safety for human use, verification of reported efficacy and authenticity of product labels. In USA, centralized regulatory agency is Food and Drug Administration known as FDA. As plant based-vaccines are considered in biological materials apart from chemical entities, plant-made pharmaceutics are regulated under Biologics License Application (BLA) [105]. The European Union (EU) members have both their own national regulation and the centralized regulation under European Medicines Agency (EMA) which acts as the counterpart of FDA in Europe. The Committee on Herbal Medicinal Products (HMPC) is the EMA’s committee responsible for compiling and assessing scientific data on herbal substances, preparations and combinations, to support the harmonization of the European market [106]. However, considering the nature of plant based vaccines, they are under authorization of The Committee for Medical Products for Human Use (CHMP) which plays a vital role in the authorization of medicines in the European Union (EU).

Strictness of the regulation is mostly based on the production method and the host plant. Non-food plants as Nicotianaspecies and the controlled indoor production methods as plant tissue cultures or climate rooms are not regulated as strictly as in field production of GM food plants. However, there are opinion differences between EU and USA regarding the plant-made PMPs. In USA, regulation is at product level. Field use of GM plants and plants used in vaccine development are under secondary regulation of United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). In May, 2020 USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) released revision on 7 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Part 340 regulations (85 Fed. Reg. 29790) which regulates the importation, interstate movement, and environmental release of genetically engineered organisms that are or may be plant pests [107]. Therefore, scrutiny on biotechnological production is further reduced in favor of researchers and companies. PMPs are currently under regulation of Title 21 (Food and Drugs) US CFR along with other traditionally produced counterparts. In EU regulation is on both production and final product level. All GM plant derived pharmaceuticals including plant based vaccines are under the same regulation of other biotechnology derived drugs which is indicated in European Commission Directive 2001/83/EC (on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use) [108] and Regulation No 726/2004 (for the authorization and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use) [109]. Also, if the host plant is a human food or animal feed source, cultivation and release of GM plant is under regulation of EC Directive 2001/18/EC (on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms) [110] and 1829/2003/EC (on genetically modified food and feed).

Regulatory approval of a PMPs and other biotechnologically derived products may take up to a year depending on the legal response limits of the regulation agencies. However, Covid-19 pandemic triggered a realization on EU and UK for national and global needs. Therefore, product review, conditional approval and deployment timelines are significantly reduced for PMPs [111].

In conclusion, infectious diseases threatened humanity countless times throughout history. In particular, as pandemic and epidemic diseases killed millions of people, it increases in importance to develop safe and cost-effective vaccines and their storage and rapid distribution. Apart from many diseases such as diphtheria, cholera, typhoid, tuberculosis, which are controlled by vaccine campaigns in developed countries, new vaccine production systems using recombinant DNA technologies are needed for emerging diseases such as COVID-19, MERS-CoV, avian influenza, Ebola, Zika and possible future infections. Plant-based vaccine production for humans and animals stands out as an important alternative that can be used to overcome the disadvantages of existing conventional vaccines. Within the scope of plant biotechnology, it became possible to produce cost-effective, immunogenic and safe vaccines thanks to the development of gene transfer strategies to plants and improvements in amount, isolation and purification and addition of adjuvant for production of recombinant vaccine antigens in plants. It is an undeniable fact that the possibilities that recombinant vaccines can offer us will increase with new standards and legal regulations to be introduced for the development, approval, authorization, licensing, distribution and marketing of such vaccines. In scope of future preventive healthcare, it is hard to assume monopoly of one particular vaccine technology. There will always be some ups and downs in any vaccine production methods. However, plant based vaccines represent considerable strong suits and offer swift and viable solutions over traditional and other recombinant vaccines.

© 2021 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

How to cite and reference

Link to this chapter Copy to clipboard

Cite this chapter Copy to clipboard

Sinan Meriç, Tamer Gümüş and Alp Ayan (June 8th 2021). Plant-based Vaccines: The Future of Preventive Healthcare?, Botany - Recent Advances and Applications, Bimal Kumar Ghimire, IntechOpen, DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.97861. Available from:

chapter statistics

191total chapter downloads

More statistics for editors and authors

Login to your personal dashboard for more detailed statistics on your publications.

Access personal reporting

Related Content

This Book

Next chapter

microRNA Utilization as a Potential Tool for Stress Tolerance in Plants

By Jyoti Rani

Related Book

First chapter

Introductory Chapter: Trends on Hyperspectral Imaging Development

By Alejandro Isabel Luna Maldonado, Humberto Rodríguez Fuentes and Juan Antonio Vidales Contreras

We are IntechOpen, the world's leading publisher of Open Access books. Built by scientists, for scientists. Our readership spans scientists, professors, researchers, librarians, and students, as well as business professionals. We share our knowledge and peer-reveiwed research papers with libraries, scientific and engineering societies, and also work with corporate R&D departments and government entities.

More About Us