Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Proprioceptors in Cephalic Muscles

Written By

Juan L. Cobo, Sonsoles Junquera, José Martín-Cruces, Antonio Solé-Magdalena, Olivia García-Suárez and Teresa Cobo

Submitted: October 9th, 2020 Reviewed: February 24th, 2021 Published: April 22nd, 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.96794

From the Edited Volume

Proprioception

Edited by José A. Vega and Juan Cobo

Chapter metrics overview

328 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

The proprioception from the head is mainly mediated via the trigeminal nerve and originates from special sensitive receptors located within muscles called proprioceptors. Only muscles innervated by the trigeminal nerve, and rarely some muscles supplied by the facial nerve, contain typical proprioceptors, i.e. muscle spindles. In the other cephalic muscles (at the exception of the extrinsic muscles of the eye) the muscle spindles are replaced by sensory nerve formations (of different morphologies and in different densities) and isolated nerve fibers expressing mechanproteins (especially PIEZO2) related to proprioception. This chapter examines the cephalic proprioceptors corresponding to the territories of the trigeminal, facial, glossopharyngeal and hypoglossal nerves.

Keywords

  • proprioception
  • muscle spindles
  • atypical proprioceptors
  • cephalic muscles
  • PIEZO2
  • mechanoproteins

1. Introduction

Proprioception is a quality of the somatosensory system that informs the central nervous system about the static and dynamics conditions of muscles and joints. This type of sensitivity has been studied in deep in the muscles depending on the spinal nerves and today the neurobiology of spinal proprioception is well known [1, 2, 3, 4]. On the contrary, the neuroanatomy as well as the cellular and molecular bases of the proprioception in the cephalic muscles is not well known. Nevertheless, it is clear that cephalic muscles permanently develop fine adjustments of stretching and tone in facial movements, regulation of chewing force, oromotor reflex behaviors, verbal and nonverbal facial communication, swallowing, coughing, vomiting or breathing [5, 6, 7].

The skeletal muscles contain an intrinsic mechanosensory system, the proprioceptive system, which provides unconscious and conscious information to the central nervous system. The proprioceptive inputs originate in specialized sensory organs (proprioceptors) present in muscles (muscle spindles [8, 9]), tendons (Golgi’s tendon organs [10]), joint capsules (Ruffini-like sensory corpuscles, Pacinian corpuscles and free nerve endings [11]), and presumably also the skin but their physiological properties suggest they are not the alternative to muscle spindles [2, 12, 13, 14]. The information encoded by the propioceptors gives rise to unconscious and conscious sensations, necessary for most basic motor functions [15]. For those interested in a recent review and in detail on both types of proprioceptors, we refer to the Banks [8] and Macefield and Knellwolf [16].

Some decades ago, Baumel [17] suggested that proprioceptive impulses from facial muscles are conveyed to the central nervous system via different branches of trigeminal nerve throughout multiple communications with the branches of the facial nerve. Actually, it is accepted that the proprioception of all cephalic muscles depends on the trigeminal nerve [6, 18].

Therefore, the first unresolved issue in cephalic proprioception is whether all cranial nerves that innervate striated muscles also collect their proprioceptive innervation. According to Lazarov [18] the proprioceptive innervation of all cephalic muscles depends exclusively on the trigeminal nerve. In other words: the sensory ganglia of cranial nerves lack of primary sensory neurons and the proprioceptors of the cephalic muscles are supplied by neurons from the trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus [19].

The second aspect pending clarification is: if the proprioception of the cephalic muscles depends exclusively, or mainly, on the trigeminal nerve, how do the fibers of this nerve reach the muscles of the territories of other nerves? This question can be answered because to extensive communications of the trigeminal nerve with other cranial nerves. The trigeminal nerve has numerous connections to the facial nerve [20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34] and the data collected from animal models indicate that the nerve fiber interchange is always from the trigeminal to the facial nerve and not on the contrary [35]. To serve facial proprioception additional connections between the facial and cervical spinal nerves exists [36, 37]. Apart from those communications no specific reference of communications between the trigeminal nerve with the glossopharyngeal, vagal and hypoglossal nerves were found. But presumably the trigeminal proprioceptive fibers pass from the trigeminal nerve to them directly on the target organs themselves (tongue, pharynx, palate) or through their connections with the facial nerve [28, 31, 32].

And the third main question of cephalic proprioception regards the identification and characterization of proprioceptors in the cephalic muscles. The skeletal muscles innervated by spinal nerves contain neuromuscular spindles and Golgi tendon organs, in addition to other types of corpuscles with less functional entity [8, 9, 10, 11]. However, only the cephalic muscles supplied by the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve, and the platysma colli muscle contain neuromuscular spindles [38, 39, 40]. Therefore, cephalic proprioceptors, if any, have to be represented by other sensory nerve formations other than neuromuscular spindles. Recent studies, using immunohistochemistry techniques associated with specific markers related to mechanization, have shown that facial muscles [34, 41, 42] and some pharyngeal muscles [43] have differentiated sensory structures that presumably replace proprioceptors. However, it cannot be ruled out that sensitive nerve fibers reaching the muscles (especially nociceptive ones) can function as mechanoreceptors-proprioceptors (see [44]).

Advertisement

2. Distribution of typical proprioceptors in cephalic muscles

Typical proprioceptors of human cephalic muscles are represented by neuromuscular spindles as most of them lack Golgi tendon organs since they lack true tendons.

Muscle spindles have been found in muscles innervated by the trigeminal nerve while in the territory of the other cranial nerves, with very rare exceptions, are absent [6]. Recently, Junquera [45] determined the relative density of muscle spindles in human jaw muscles (Figure 1; Table 1). The M. temporalis, m. masseter, m. perygoideus medialis and m. pterygoideus lateralis contained numerous muscle spindles whereas they were less abundant in the digastricus and mylohyoideus muscles [45, 46]. The absence [45, 47] or presence [48] of muscle spindles in the tensor veli palatini muscle, also innervated by the trigeminal nerve, has been reported. It should be noted that atypical proprioceptors were also found in these muscles (Table 1; see below).

Figure 1.

Longitudinal and transversal sections of muscle spindles from different cephalic muscles. MS: muscle spinde.

MuscleMSType IType IIType IIIINS*
M. temporalis14686Yes
M. masseter23336Yes
M. pterygoideus lateralis183147Yes
M. pterygoideus medialis215103Yes
Venter anterior m. digastricus2311Yes
M. mylohyoideus1311Yes
M. tensor veli palatini0221Yes
M. corrugator supercilii +M. depresor supercilii137Yes
M. orbicularis oculii
pars palpebralis
pars orbitalis
0
0
3
1
11
7
9
9
Yes
Yes
M. orbicularis oris
pars marginalis
pars labialis
0
0
5
7
19
13
12
7
Yes
Yes
M. zygomaticus maior0144Yes
M. zygomaticus minor0120Yes
M. buccinator0192810Yes
M. depressor labii inferioris + mentalis0082
M. levator labii superioris0113Yes
Platysma colli**12/811/74/76/8Yes/Yes
M. genioglossus1162810Yes
M. palatoglossus0053Yes
M. uvulae0073Yes
M. constrictor pharyngis superior00614Yes
M. constrictor pharyngis inferior0059Yes

Table 1.

Distribution and density of muscle spindles (MS), atypical proprioceptors (types I to III) and isolated nerve fibers (INF) in muscles supplied by the trigeminal nerve (green), facial nerve (blue), hypoglossal nerve (white) and glossopharyngeal nerve (brown).

Isolated nerve fibers displaying immunoreactivity for any of the mechanoproteins investigated.


facial/cervical segments.


In muscles where the density of muscle spindles is higher, they consist of thick capsule, a shallow intracapsular space filled with variable number of intrafusal muscle fibers (ranging from 4 to 12). In muscles where the density of neuromuscular spindles was low, in general, the size of the spindles was smaller, had fewer intrafusal fibers and the capsule was less developed [45].

In the territory of the facial nerve one muscle spindle was found in the muscle orbicularis oculi in one pediatric specimen [49] whereas abundant muscle spindles have been found in the platysma colli [40]. Junquera [45] in her doctoral dissertation also observed typical muscle spindles in the plastysma colly more numerous in the cervical segment of the muscle than in the suprahyoid one.

Advertisement

3. Atypical putative proprioceptors cephalic muscles

3.1 Criteria to characterize atypical proprioceptors

The identification of putative sensory receptors in the cephalic muscles that may serve as proprioceptors was based on the following criteria: independence of the nerve trajectory, be placed in close relation to muscle fibers, show a morphologically differentiated aspect, and display immunoreactivity for any putative mechanoprotein [34].

In agreement with the above premises, capsulated and non-capsulated corpuscle-like structures of variable size and shape containing numerous axon profiles complexly arranged, have been identified. Given the morphologic heterogeneity of the corpuscle-like structures that fulfill the preestablished criteria we attempt to classify them into three types: type I, capsulated by a thin capsule, the glial cells variably arranged and showing different morphologies; type II, partially capsulated (the capsule being continuous with the perimysium), with variable morphology and in most of the cases the direction of the long axis was parallel to the one of muscular fibers; type III, non-capsulated and both the axon and Schwann-like cells are variably arranged (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Types of putative proprioceptors in human cephalic muscles. INF: Isolated nerve fibers.

On the other hand, it is now well established that at the basis of mechanosensitivity are mechanically-gated ion channels [50]. At present acid-sensing ion channel 2 (ASIC2) and Piezo2 have been detected in muscle spindles and are strong candidates to initiate the mechanotransduction in proprioceptors [50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56]. Also, the putative mechanoprotein transient-receptor potential vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) was detected in proprioceptors of the facial and pharyngeal muscles [42, 43].

3.2 Distribution in the territory of the facial nerve

No typical muscle spindles have been found in the human facial muscles [42, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61] with the exception of on the facial part of the muscle platysma colli [40, 45]. Conversely, they contain numerous atypical proprioceptors (Table 1) the type II of being the predominating and the greater density being observed in the buccinator and orbicularis oris muscles.

3.3 Distribution in the territory of the glossopharyngeal nerve

Most research have not found typical muscle spindles in the muscles innervated by the glossopharyngeal nerve although they are present in the human palatoglossus muscle [48].

Regarding the pharyngeal muscles, typical muscle spindles were never found with the exception of the constrictor pharyngis inferior of the crab-eating monkey (Macaca irus) [62]. Nevertheless, human pharyngeal muscles are richly innervated. In particular, the constrictor pharyngis superior and muscle constrictor pharyngis inferior (innervated by branches of the pharyngeal plexus, derived from the glossopharyngeal and vagal nerves, and a small contribution of facial nerve; [63]) contain type II and III putative proprioceptors and isolated nerve fibers that display immunoreactivity for mechanoproteins (Table 1) [43].

3.4 Distribution in the territory of the hypoglossal nerve

As far as we know no muscles spindles have been reported in togue muscles. Junquera [45] observed one muscle spindle in the genioglossus muscle as well as numerous putative proprioceptors (Table 1).

Therefore, as a whole, the cephalic muscles have proprioceptive inervation, although only the muscles innervated by the trigeminal nerve and the platysma colli muscle innervated by the facial nerve contain neuromuscular spindles. The cephalic proprioceptors may be is involved in the coordination of facial movements and nonverbal communication, in language, swallowing and some other reflexes [64, 65, 66].

References

  1. 1. Dijkerman HC, de Haan EH. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behav Brain Sci. 2007; 30: 189-201
  2. 2. Proske U, Gandevia SC. The proprioceptive senses: their roles in signaling body shape, body position and movement, and muscle force. Physiol Rev. 2012; 92: 1651-1697
  3. 3. Butler AA, Héroux ME, Gandevia SC. Body ownership and a new proprioceptive role for muscle spindles. Acta Physiol. (Oxf) 2016; 220: 19-27
  4. 4. Blecher R, Heinemann-Yerushalmi L, Assaraf E, Konstantin N, Chapman JR, Cope TC, Bewick GS, Banks RW, Zelzer E. New functions for the proprioceptive system in skeletal biology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018; 373 (1759). pii: 20170327
  5. 5. Miller AJ. Oral and pharyngeal reflexes in the mammalian nervous system: their diverse range in complexity and the pivotal role of the tongue. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2002; 13:409-425
  6. 6. Cattaneo L, Pavesi G. The facial motor system. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014; 38:135-159
  7. 7. Frayne E, Coulson S, Adams R, Croxson G, Waddington G. Proprioceptive ability at the lips and jaw measured using the same psychophysical discrimination task. Exp Brain Res. 2016; 234:1679-1687
  8. 8. Banks RW. The innervation of the muscle spindle: a personal history. J Anat. 2015; 227:115-135
  9. 9. Bewick GS, Banks RW. Mechanotransduction in the muscle spindle. Pflugers Arch. 2015; 467:175-190
  10. 10. Ackermann PW, Salo P, Hart DA. Tendon Innervation. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016; 920:35-51
  11. 11. Heppelmann B. Anatomy and histology of joint innervation. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 1997; 2: 5-16
  12. 12. Collins DF, Refshauge KM, Todd G, Gandevia SC. Cutaneous receptors contribute to kinesthesia at the index finger, elbow, and knee. J Neurophysiol. 2005; 94: 1699-1706
  13. 13. Macefield VG. Physiological characteristics of low-threshold mechanoreceptors in joints, muscle and skin in human subjects. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2005; 32:135-144
  14. 14. Andreatta RD, Barlow SM. Somatosensory gating is dependent on the rate of force recruitment in the human orofacial system. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2009; 52:1566-1578
  15. 15. Akay T, Tourtellotte WG, Arber S, Jessell TM. Degradation of mouse locomotor pattern in the absence of proprioceptive sensory feedback. PNAS USA. 2014; 111:16877-16882
  16. 16. Macefield VG, Knllwolf TP. Functional properties of human muscle spindles. J Neurophysiol. 2018; 120: 452-467
  17. 17. Baumel J. Trigeminal-facial nerve communications. Arch Otolaryngol 1974; 99: 34-44
  18. 18. Lazarov NE. Neurobiology of orofacial proprioception. Brain Res Rew 2007; 56: 362-383
  19. 19. Yoshida A, Moritani M, Nagase Y, Bae YC. Projection and synaptic connectivity of trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus neurons controlling jaw reflexes. J Oral Sci. 2017; 59:177-182
  20. 20. Bendella H, Spacca B, Rink S, Stoffels HJ, Nakamura M, Scaal M, Heinen H, Guntinas-Lichius O, Goldbrunner R, Grosheva M, Angelov DN. Anastomotic patterns of the facial parotid plexus (PP): A human cadaver study. Ann Anat. 2017; 213:52-61
  21. 21. Shimada K, Moriyama H, Ikeda M, Tomita H, Shigihara S, Gasser RF. 1994. Peripheral communication of the facial nerve at the angle of the mouth. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. S:110-112
  22. 22. Hwang K, Han JY, Battuvshin D, Kim DJ, Chung IH. Communication of infraorbital nerve and facial nerve: Anatomic and histologic study. J Craniofac Surg 2004; 15:88-91
  23. 23. Hwang K, Hwang JH, Cho HJ, Kim DJ, Chung IH. Horizontal branch of the supraorbital nerve and temporal branch of the facial nerve. J Craniofac Surg. 2005; 16: 647-649
  24. 24. Hwang K, Jin S, Park JH, Kim DJ, Chung IH. Relation of mental nerve with mandibular branch of the facial nerve. J Craniofac Surg 2007. 18:165-168
  25. 25. Hwang K, Yang SC, Song JS. Communications Between the Trigeminal Nerve and the Facial Nerve in the Face: A Systematic Review. J Craniofac Surg. 2015; 26: 1643-1646
  26. 26. Tohma A, Mine K, Tamatsu Y, Shimada, K. Communication between the buccal nerve (V) and facial nerve (VII) in the human face. Ann Anat 2004;186: 173-178
  27. 27. Hu KS, Kwak J, Koh KS, Abe S, Fontaine C, Kim HJ. Topographic distribution area of the infraorbital nerve. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007; 29:383-388
  28. 28. Diamond M, Wartmann CT, Tubbs RS, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA, Loukas M. Peripheral facial nerve communications and their clinical implications. Clin Anat. 2011; 24:10-8
  29. 29. Odobescu A, Williams HB, Gilardino MS. Description of a communication between the facial and zygomaticotemporal nerves. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012; 65:1188-1192
  30. 30. Yang HM, Won SY, Kim HJ, Hu KS. Sihler staining study of anastomosis between the facial and trigeminal nerves in the ocular area and its clinical implications. Muscle & Nerve 2013; 48:545-550
  31. 31. Shoja MM, Oyesiku NM, Griessenauer CJ, Radcliff V, Loukas M, Chern JJ, Benninger B, Rozzelle CJ, Shokouhi G, Tubbs RS. Anastomoses between lower cranial and upper cervical nerves: a comprehensive review with potential significance during skull base and neck operations, part I: trigeminal, facial, and vestibulocochlear nerves. Clin Anat. 2014; 27:118-130
  32. 32. Shoja MM, Oyesiku NM, Shokouhi G, Griessenauer CJ, Chern JJ, Rizk EB, Loukas M, Miller JH, Tubbs RS. A comprehensive review with potential significance during skull base and neck operations, Part II: glossopharyngeal, vagus, accessory, and hypoglossal nerves and cervical spinal nerves 1-4. Clin Anat. 2014b; 27: 131-144
  33. 33. Tansatit T, Phanchart P, Chinnawong D, Apinuntrum P, Phetudom T, Sahraoui YM. A Cadaveric Study of the Communication Patterns Between the Buccal Trunks of the Facial Nerve and the Infraorbital Nerve in the Midface. J Craniofac Surg. 2016; 27:214-218
  34. 34. Cobo JL, Solé-Magdalena A, Junquera S, Cobo T, Vega JA, Cobo J. The proprioception in the muscles supplied by the facial nerve. En: Selected Topics in Facial Nerve Disorders, I Al-Zwaini y M Jalal Husseis (Eds). Intech, London, 2019; pp. 1-14
  35. 35. Bowden RE, Mahran ZY. Experimental and histological studies of the extrapetrous portion of the facial nerve and its communications with the trigeminal nerve in the rabbit. J Anat. 1960; 94: 375-386
  36. 36. Yang HM, Kim HJ, Hu KS. Anatomic and histological study of great auricular nerve and its clinical implication. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015; 68:230-236
  37. 37. Brennan PA, Elhamshary AS, Alam P, Anand R, Ammar M. Anastomosis between the transverse cervical nerve and marginal mandibular nerve: how often does it occur? Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 55:293-5
  38. 38. Scutter SD, Türker KS. The role of the muscle spindles in human masseter. Hum Mov Sci. 2001; 20: 489-497
  39. 39. Osterlund C, Liu JX, Thornell LE, Eriksson PO. Muscle spindle composition and distribution in human young masseter and biceps brachii muscles reveal early growth and maturation. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 2011; 294:683-693
  40. 40. May A, Bramke S, Funk RHW, May CA. The human platysma contains numerous muscle spindles. J Anat. 2018; 232: 146-51
  41. 41. Cobo JL. Neuroanatomía de la cara. Anatomía topográfica, quirúrgica, radiológica y microscópica de la inervación de la cara. Doctoral Thesis. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo; 2016
  42. 42. Cobo JL, Abbate F, de Vicente JC, Cobo J, Vega JA. Searching for proprioceptors in human facial muscles. Neurosci Lett. 2017; 640:1-5
  43. 43. de Carlos F, Cobo J, Macías E, Feito J, Cobo T, Calavia MG, García-Suárez O, Vega JA. The sensory innervation of the human pharynx: searching for mechanoreceptors. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2013; 296:1735-1746
  44. 44. Ackerley R, Watkins RH. Microneurography as a tool to study the function of individual C-fiber afferents in humans: responses from nociceptors, thermoreceptors, and mechanoreceptors. J Neurophysiol. 2018; 120: 2834-2846
  45. 45. Junquera S. Propioceptores cefálicos: identificación basada en la expresión de PIEZO2. Doctoral Thesis. Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo; 2020
  46. 46. Saverino D, De Santanna A, Simone R, Cervioni S, Cattrysse E, Testa M. Observational study on the occurrence of muscle spindles in human digastric and mylohyoideus muscles. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 2014: 294263
  47. 47. Kuehn DP, Templeton PJ, Maynard JA. Muscle spindles in the velopharyngeal musculature of humans. J Speech Hear Res. 1990; 33: 488-93
  48. 48. Liss JM. Muscle spindles in the human levator veli palatini and palatoglossus muscles. J Speech Hear Res. 1990; 33:736-746
  49. 49. Nelson CC, Blaivas M. Orbicularis oculi muscle in children. Histologic and histochemical characteristics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991; 32:646-54
  50. 50. Kröger S. Propioception 2.0: novel functions for muscle spindles. Curr Opin Neurol. 2018; 31:592-598
  51. 51. Simon A, Shenton F, Hunter I, Banks RW, Bewick GS. Amiloride-sensitive channels are a major contributor to mechanotransduction in mammalian muscle spindles, J Physiol. 2010; 588: 171-85
  52. 52. Chen CC, Wong CW. Neurosensory mechanotransduction through acid-sensing ion channels. J Cell Mol Med. 2013; 17:337-349
  53. 53. Gautam M, Benson CJ. Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) in mouse skeletal muscle afferents are heteromers composed of ASIC1a, ASIC2, and ASIC3 subunits. FASEB J. 2013; 27:793-802
  54. 54. Woo SH, Lukacs V, de Nooij JC, Zaytseva D, Criddle CR, Francisco A, Jessell TM, Wilkinson KA, Patapoutian. Piezo2 is the principal mechanotransduction channel for proprioception. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18:1756-1762
  55. 55. Florez-Paz D, Bali KK, Kuner R, Gomis A. A critical role for Piezo2 channels in the mechanotransduction of mouse proprioceptive neurons. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:25923
  56. 56. Anderson EO, Schneider ER, Bagriantsev SN. Piezo2 in Cutaneous and Proprioceptive Mechanotransduction in Vertebrates. Curr Top Membr. 2017; 79: 197-217
  57. 57. Stål P, Eriksson PO, Eriksson A, Thornell LE. Enzyme-histochemical differences in fibre-type between the human major and minor zygomatic and the first dorsal interosseus muscles, Arch Oral Biol. 1987; 32: 833-841
  58. 58. Stål P, Eriksson PO, Eriksson A, Thornell LE. Enzyme-histochemical and morphological characteristics of muscle fibre types in the human buccinator and orbicularis oris, Arch Oral Biol. 1990; 35: 449-458
  59. 59. Kamen G, De Luca CJ. Firing rate interactions among human orbicularis oris motor units. Int J Neurosci. 1992; 64: 167-75
  60. 60. Happak W, Burggasser G, Liu J, Gruber H, Freilinger G. Anatomy and histology of the mimic muscles and the supplying facial nerve, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1994; 1994: S85-S86
  61. 61. Goodmurphy CW, Ovalle WK. Morphological study of two human facial muscles: orbicularis oculi and corrugator supercilii. Clin Ant. 1999; 12: 1-11
  62. 62. Sengupta BN, Sengupta S Muscle spindles in the inferior constrictor pharyngis muscle of the crab-eating monkey (Macaca irus). Acta Anat (Basel) 1978; 100:132-135
  63. 63. Shimokawa T, Yi SQ , Izumi A, Ru F, Akita K, Sato T, Tanaka S. An anatomical study of the levator veli palatini and superior constrictor with special reference to their nerve supply. Surg Radiol Anat, 2004; 26:100-105
  64. 64. Wild B, Erb M, Eyb M, Bartels M, Grodd W. Why are smiles contagious? An fMRI study of the interaction between perception of facial affect and facial movements. Psychiatry Res. 2003; 123: 17-36
  65. 65. van der Bilt A. Assessment of mastication with implications for oral rehabilitation: a review. J Oral Rehabil. 2011; 38, 754-780
  66. 66. Schötz S, Frid J, Löfqvist A 2013. Development of speech motor control: lip movement variability. J Acoust Soc Am. 2013; 133: 4210-4217

Written By

Juan L. Cobo, Sonsoles Junquera, José Martín-Cruces, Antonio Solé-Magdalena, Olivia García-Suárez and Teresa Cobo

Submitted: October 9th, 2020 Reviewed: February 24th, 2021 Published: April 22nd, 2021