## Abstract

Molar specific heat is one of the most important thermophysical properties to determine the sensible heat, heat of transformation, enthalpy, entropy, thermal conductivity, and many other physical properties present in several fields of physics, chemistry, materials science, metallurgy, and engineering. Recently, a model was proposed to calculate the Density of State by limiting the total number of modes by solid–liquid and solid–solid phase nucleation and by the entropy associated with phase transition. In this model, the new formulation of Debye’s equation encompasses the phonic, electronic, and rotational energies contributions to the molar heat capacity of the solids. Anomalies observed in the molar specific heat capacity, such as thermal, magnetic, configurational transitions, and electronic, can be treated by their transitional entropies. Model predictions are compared with experimental scatter for transitional elements.

### Keywords

- molar heat capacity
- density of state
- phase transition entropies
- transitional elements

## 1. Introduction

Einstein [1] developed the first model approach regarding the atoms in a crystalline solid as independent harmonic oscillators vibrating at the same frequency by assuming the density of state as a delta function. Debye [2, 3, 4] modeled the vibrations in a solid as normal modes of a continuous elastic body, which corroborates well for long-wavelength vibrations that do not depend on the detailed atomic character of the solid and do conform better with experimental scatters at lower temperatures. The density of state modeled by Debye failed for many materials, which present a gap in the density of state [5, 6]. The Debye model does not consider rotational, electronic, and magnetic contributions [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Ferreira et al. [12, 13] considering Gibbs–Thomson coefficients for equilibrium and non-equilibrium nucleation conditions, and the assumption that when cleaved, certain crystals exhibit surface stress that gives rise to small but detectable strains in the interior of the crystal, i.e., microscopic considerations that predict the presence of surface stress whenever a new surface is created [14], derived a model for pure elements and compounds, regarding the critical radius expressed in terms of the temperature drop employing the correlation between the solid–liquid surface tension and the bulk melting entropy by unit volume, given in terms of the Gibbs–Thomson coefficient [15, 16]. Consequently, based on the nucleation of solid–liquid or solid–solid phases, the total number of atoms in the volume and a correspondent density of * n* atoms limited by nucleation conditions were proposed to calculate the density of state. Ferreira et al.’s model consists of the phonic, electronic, rotations contributions and predicts magnetic anomalies, such as phase transition temperatures.

In this paper, model predictions of the molar heat capacity of transitional elements from absolute zero to the melting point are compared with the Thermo-Calc Software simulations and experimental data.

## 2. Modeling

The Gibbs–Thomson coefficient describes for pure elements the melting temperature depression * r* in the liquid phase; the Gibbs–Thomson equation for the structural melting point depression can be expressed by [12, 13]:

According to Gurtin et al. [14], surface stress gives rise to detectable strains in the interior of the crystal whenever a solid surface is created. A relation of surface tension in terms of

and,

By substituting (3) into (2) and making

where

For a stable nucleus, the critical radius can be expressed in terms of the temperature drop

The density of state

where

The first Brillouin zone is exchanged by an integral over a sphere of radius

Then, the density of atoms

As observed in Eq. (9), the element fundamental frequency is expressed as

where,

The electronic contribution to

where,

In 2019, Ferreira et al. [15, 16] considered the following approach for the rotational energy,

where,

where,

Debye’s temperature for transition elements is found in the literature [4]. The additions of Eq. (17) of the electronic and of Eq. (19) of the rotational contributions to

## 3. Results and discussion

Figure 1 presents the model predictions of molar heat capacities for pure Chromium and experimental data from absolute zero to the melting point. Debye’s model predictions are presented as a reference for Ferreira’s model calculations [15, 16]. Thermo-Calc equilibrium calculations were performed in the range 176 K to 2180 K. The proposed model agrees, for low and high temperatures, with the experimental data of Touloukian et al. [17].

Figure 2 shows model calculations for Niobium compared with calculations performed with Thermo-Calc, and four experimental data sets [18, 19, 20, 21]. In the literature, experimental values of molar heat capacity at high temperatures (for which measurements are complicated) generally overestimate the heat capacity. On the other side, at low temperatures, where measurements are difficult to control, the experimental values underestimate this property [22]. Furthermore, observations of the thermophysical properties of Nb applied in the model predictions, such as surface tension, Debye’s temperature, atomic radius, the density of solid at the melting point, latent heat of fusion, among others, should be carefully compared with those from different authors, as values for the thermophysical properties found in the literature differ from author to author, and they could also be a likely source of the slight deviation observed in the predicted curve. The equivalent wavevectors simulated are

Figure 3 shows the experimental scatter for Vanadium from the absolute zero to the melting point, Thermo-Calc and Ferreira et al. model’s calculations [15, 16]. The predictions for

Figure 4 shows the molar specific heat for Titanium, the experimental data from Chase [24] and found in Desai [23]. Chase experimental data, in green, follow

## 4. Conclusions

The model previously proposed by Ferreira et al. [15, 16] based on the critical radius of phase nucleation to determine the total numbers of modes, and consequently, the Density of State successfully predicted the molar specific heat capacity of transitional elements. In Cr and V, the experimental data follow the theoretical prediction curves with

## Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by FAPERJ (The Scientific Research Foundation of the State of Rio de Janeiro), CAPES and CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development).

## References

- 1.
S.I. Abu-Eishah; Y. Haddad; A. Solieman; A. Bajbouj, A new correlation for the specific heat of metals, metal oxides and metal fluorides as a function of temperature, Lat. Am. Appl. Res. 34 (2004) 257–265. - 2.
A. Einstein. Die plancksche Theorie der Strahlung und die Theorie der Spezifischen Wärme, Ann. Phys. 22 (1907) 180–190. - 3.
P. Debye. Zur Theorie der Spezifischen Wärmen, Ann. Phys. 344 (1912) 789–839. - 4.
N.W. Ashcroft; N.D. Mermin. Solid State Physics, 1. ed., Cengage Learning, New York, 2011, pp. 491–598. - 5.
J.M. Schliesser; B.F. Woodfield. Development of a Debye heat capacity model for vibrational modes with a gap in the density of states, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27 (2015) 285402. - 6.
E.D.M. Costa; N.H.T. Lemes; M.O. Alves; J.P. Braga. Phonon density of states from the experimental heat capacity: an improved distribution function for solid aluminum using an inverse framework, J. Mol. Model. 20 (2360) (2014) 1–6. - 7.
D.V. Schroeder. An Introduction to Thermal Physics, 1st ed., Addison-Wesley Professional, New York, 1999, p. 409. - 8.
U. Mizutani; A. Kamiya; T. Matsuda; K. Kishi; Takeuchi, S. Electronic specific heat measurements for quasicrystals and Frank-Kasper crystals in Mg-AI-Ag, Mg-Al-Cu, Mg-Al-Zn, Mg-Ga-Zn and Al-Li-Cu alloy systems, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 3 (1991) 3711–3718. - 9.
G. Inden. Computer calculation of the free energy contribution due to chemical and/or magnetic ordering, Proc. Project Meeting CALPHAD, Dusseldorf, 1976, pp. 1–13. - 10.
M. Hillert; M. Jarl. A model for alloying in ferromagnetic metals, CALPHAD 2 (1978) 227–238. - 11.
Y. Chuang; R. Schmid; Y.A. Chang. Magnetic contributions to the thermodynamic functions of pure Ni, Co and Fe. Metall. Trans. A 16 (1985) 153–165. - 12.
I.L. Ferreira; A. Garcia. The application of numerical and analytical approaches for the determination of thermophysical properties of Al–Si–Cu–Mg alloys. Continuum Mech. Thermodyn. 32 (2020) 1231–1244. - 13.
P.A.D. Jácome; M.C. Landim; A. Garcia; A.F. Furtado; I.L. Ferreira. The application of computational thermodynamics and a numerical model for the determination of surface tension and Gibbs Thomson coefficient of aluminum-based alloys. Thermochimica Acta 523 (2011) 142–149. - 14.
M. E. Gurtin, A. I. Murdoch. Surface Stress in Solids. Int. J. Solids Struct. 14 (1978) 431–440. - 15.
I.L. Ferreira; J.A. de Castro; A. Garcia. Determination of heat capacity of pure metals, compounds and alloys by analytical and numerical methods. Thermochim. Acta 682 (2019) 178418. - 16.
I.L. Ferreira. On the heat capacity of pure elements and phases. Materials Res (2021) in press. - 17.
Y. S. Toulokian, C. Y. Ho. Properties of selected ferrous alloying elements. McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1981. - 18.
V. A. Kirillin, A. E. Scheindlin, V. Ya. Chekhovskoi, I. A. Zhukova. Themodynamic Properties of Niobium from 0K to the Melting Point, 2740K. In Advances in Thermophysical Properties at Extreme Temperature and Pressures Proceedings of the Third Symposium on Thermophysical Properties. ASME (1965) 152. - 19.
I. I. Novikov, V. V. Roshchupkin, A. G. Mozgovoi, N. A. Semashko. Specific heat of nickel and niobium in the temperature interval 300-1300K. High Temperature. 19 (1981) 694. - 20.
F. Righini, R. B. Roberts, A. Rosso. Measurements of thermophysical properties by a Pulse-Heating Method: Niobium in the range 1000-2500K. Int. J. Thermophys. 6 (1985) 681. - 21.
A. E. Scheindlin, B. Ya. Berezin, V. Ya. Chekhovskoi. Enthalpy of niobium in the solid and liquid state. High Temp – High Press. 4 (1972) 611–619. - 22.
V. Boodu, Paul Redner. Energetic Materials: Thermophysical properties, Predictions, and experimental measurements. CRC-Press – New York, 1 ^{st}Ed. (2010). - 23.
P. D. Desai. Thermodynamic Properties of Nickel. Int. J. Thermophys. 8 (1987) 763–780. - 24.
M.W. Chase Jr. NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 4 ^{th}Edition. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, Monograph 9 (1998) 1–1951.