Open access peer-reviewed chapter

The Application of Chitosan-Based Compounds against Metallic Corrosion

Written By

Brahim El Ibrahimi, Lei Guo, Jéssica Verger Nardeli and Rachid Oukhrib

Submitted: 09 October 2020 Reviewed: 15 January 2021 Published: 04 February 2021

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.96046

From the Edited Volume

Chitin and Chitosan - Physicochemical Properties and Industrial Applications

Edited by Mohammed Berrada

Chapter metrics overview

597 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Biopolymers-based compounds were used by different manners for metal protection toward corrosion phenomena, namely via inhibiting additive and coating strategies. In the last decade, the application of these compounds or their chemically modified forms as effective replacements for toxic inorganic and organic inhibitors attracts more attention. Additionally to their intrinsic chemical stability, biodegradability, eco-friendly, low cost and renewability, biopolymers set were shown the remarkable effect to control the dissolution of several metallic materials in various corrosive environments. Among a large variety of available biopolymers, chitosan and its functionalized form, as well as its nanoparticle composites, have been reported and widely used as good anti-corrosion compounds for different metal/medium systems. In this context, the current chapter aims to shed more light on this subject.

Keywords

  • corrosion
  • chitosan
  • chitin
  • inhibitor
  • metal
  • solution
  • coating
  • composite

1. Introduction

Metal corrosion is defined as a spontaneous deterioration of metallic materials caused by the adjacent environments (e.g. during the acidic cleaning process) through electrochemical and/or chemical processes. Such a phenomenon is inevitable due to its undesirable outcomes on technological and industrial applications, which leads to huge loss of natural resources, human lives and economic [1]. In this regard, researchers were compelled to perform several scientific investigations to extend the working life of these materials and to overcome the devastating impact of corrosion. Among available technical solutions, the addition of corrosion inhibitors into the aggressive environment seems to be an attractive and economic technic to effectively control corrosion [2]. Diverse organic and inorganic substances have been employed as anti-corrosion compounds for many metal-environment systems [3]. Another efficient strategy to extend the life of metallic-based materials and protect them against corrosion is the application of organic coatings [4, 5, 6, 7].

In the present chapter, we interesting in the organic inhibitor category, which its protection ability is related to its adsorption onto the metal surface via electrostatic attraction or/and chemical bond formation, leading to the formation of a protective layer resulting in corrosion mitigation [8]. It is well known that the adsorption process of these compounds occurs via their electron-donator sites like heteroatoms (N, O, S and P) and multiple bonds (π-bonds) and aromatic rings as well. Even they are efficient, recently, the exploitation of organic substances as corrosion retarders has been limited by several strict environmental rules, and such a trend aims to limit their unsafe menace to ecology and health [9].

At this time, the use of biopolymers as promising replacement of toxic corrosion inhibitors is considered a new trend and novel strategy to omit metallic corrosion. One of the key advantages of these bio-macromolecules is their increased attachment sites to the metallic substrate, rising to good film-formation and adhesion as compared to small molecule inhibitors [10]. This capability can be further boosted by the insertion of additional adsorption sites, i.e. functional groups, within the biopolymers backbone [11]. On the other hand, these biopolymers are biodegradable, biocompatible, cheap and non-toxic. Besides, they are readily available and renewable sources of materials [12]. All these characteristics have made them ideal candidates to mitigate ecologically metallic corrosion. In this regards, a large variety of natural polymers are reported to act as anti-corrosion agents to secure the metal against dissolution such as alginate, sodium chitosan, pectin, carboxymethyl and hydroxylethyl cellulose [13, 14].

Among available biopolymers, chitosan (Figure 1(a)) was especially exhibited a noticeable ability to control corrosion. It is characterized by the existence of oxygen (of alcohol and ether functional groups) and nitrogen (of amine group) atoms within its backbone chain. These sites are known to act as the effective centers of adsorption to metallic substrates. Chitosan can be obtained by the deacetylation of chitin (Figure 1(b)), a natural polysaccharide and the main structural component of crustacean exoskeletons, and is soluble in acid media as compared to chitin, which is a highly insoluble and a non-reactive biopolymer [15]. Furthermore, chitosan exhibits a polycationic character and is non–toxic and biodegradable [16, 17].

Figure 1.

Molecular structure of (a) chitosan and (b) chitin bio-macromolecules.

Recently, the application of chitosan-based compound as ecofriendly corrosion inhibitor was extended to the use of its functionalized form instead of pure one. Such tendency aims to decorate chitosan backbone with particular functional motifs, generally, through the chemical modification of the amino groups. Furthermore, the enhancement of chitosan capability for protection purposes has been also attained via its combination with other chemical materials to prepare nanoparticle composites, which are served to act as the effective coatings to mitigate corrosion. In this context, it has been reported that the combination of nano-scaled organic and inorganic fillers can successfully improve mechanical, adhesion and barrier qualities of polymer coatings [18]. Among the used additives in the matrix of chitosan-based coatings, there are zinc oxide, graphene oxide and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles.

On this basis, we aimed in the present chapter to shed more light on the merits to employ different chitosan forms as sustainable compounds for corrosion controlling of metallic materials in different aggressive environments.

Advertisement

2. Application of pure chitosan form as corrosion inhibitor

Chitosan is a naturally occurring polymer that meets the requirements to be classified as a green corrosion inhibitor, which is a low-cost alternative of widely used inhibitors in industrial applications. The solubility of inhibitor into the target corrosive media is one of among key prerequisites that judges its utilization. For instance, such property has limited the use of chitin biopolymer as a corrosion inhibitor. In this regard, temperature, degree of deacetylation, solution’s pH and molecular weight are the main factors affecting the solubilization of chitosan in the aqueous media. For instance, at the higher temperatures, with higher molecular weight (>29.2 kDa) and lower deacetylation degree, low water-solubility of pure chitosan was observed [19, 20].

As an inhibiting additive, pure chitosan has been reported to act as an effective retarder of corrosion in different aggressive environments, namely saline and acidic solutions, as well as natural ones such as seawater. Up to now, pure chitosan compound is widely applied for iron and its alloys, like mild steel and carbon steel. This particular attention owing to the fact that these metallic materials are extensively used in numerous industrial applications in which their corrosion is more intense. Table 1 collects the obtained inhibition efficiency (IE) for pure chitosan for some metallic materials in different corrosive environments. From tabulated data, it is clear that pure chitosan can act as a potent ecofriendly corrosion inhibitor even in the most aggressive environments. This is attributed to the formation of a protective layer upon the metal surface, which prevents it attack by the aggressive species present in the solution.

Metallic materialAggressive mediumIE(%) at [chitosan]Ref.
mild steel0.1 M HCl93% at 1.8 mM[21]
carbon steel1.0 M HCl93% at 5000 ppm[22]
mild steel3.65% NaCl90% at 1.2 wt%[23]
copper1.0 M HCl87% at 0.1 mg L−1[24]
copperSynthetic seawater +20 ppm Na2S89% at 800 ppm[25]
316 austenitic0.1 M HCl71% at 11 mM[26]
mild steel0.1 M HCl69% at 4 μM[27]

Table 1.

Some works on the use of pure chitosan form as corrosion inhibitor.

As mentioned above, the molecular weight of chitosan biopolymer can affect its solubility, consequently, the attained prevention efficiency. In this context, lower inhibition efficiency has been obtained for mild steel in seawater employing chitosan with higher molecular weights [28]. Furthermore, the role of exposure time to the corrosive solution on the ability of pure chitosan to reduce metallic dissolution was also evaluated. In the CO2-saturated saline environment, the extension of immersion time has implied an improvement in the inhibitive action of chitosan [29]. In another study, the opposite behavior is outlined from which the reduction of the inhibition efficiency is attributed to the destruction of the dense adsorbed film on the metal surface at longer exposure times [30]. Concerning the influence of temperature on the inhibition process of pure chitosan, there is no commune agreement, which a favorable effect is observed by some researchers, whereas the opposite one is reported by other ones [26].

To improve the inhibition property of pure chitosan form for some metal/solution systems, the synergistic corrosion inhibiting effect was applied. In this enhancement strategy, additional compounds such as cations and anions species are added into the corrosive solution with chitosan. As result, remarkable enhancement of protection capabilities of chitosan is pointed out. For instance, the combination of pure chitosan (200 ppm) with 5 ppm of KI was led to a significant improvement of the inhibition efficiency for mild steel in acidic solution, which 90% prevention percentage was achieved instead of 74% in the case of chitosan alone [31]. In this regard, a similar tendency is noted for another steel variety, i.e. St37 steel, in concentrated sulfuric acid solution in which 92% inhibition efficiency is attained [32]. On the other hand, it was found that the adsorption mechanism of chitosan onto metal surface depends on the adopted circumstances. Chitosan can adsorb on the metal surface either via physisorption or chemisorption modes [22, 27].

Advertisement

3. Functionalized chitosan forms as anti-corrosion agents

The current trend in the use of chitosan-based compounds as corrosion inhibitors is its functionalization, afterward its application. This novel approach aims to increase the solubilization of these bio-compounds in almost corrosive media and to enhance their adsorption and adhesion abilities to the metallic surface. In this respect, further polar functional groups are attached to the chitosan molecular skeleton. The chemical modifications of chitosan biopolymer are often performed at amine group, which is an active site. As result, various chitosan-based derivatives with different structural compositions have been synthesized and then used to retard or suppressed metal corrosion in different aggressive environments. Even the simplest chitosan derivative, i.e. carboxymethyl chitosan (Figure 2(a)), an improved inhibition efficiency is attained as compared to the pure chitosan form, which is increased from 23 to 38% for steel in wastewater liquids [33].

Figure 2.

Molecular structure of some chitosan derivatives used as corrosion inhibitors.

Depending on the molecular structure, functionalized chitosan-based inhibiting additives could be classified into several categories, namely, chitosan Schiff bases, chitosan surfactants, triazole modified chitosan, chitosan polymeric salts, PEG cross-linked chitosan, carboxymethyl hydroxypropyl chitosan, chitosan thiocarbohydrazide, acid grafted chitosan, acetyl thiourea chitosan, polymer and biomaterial grafted chitosan. Here, we limit to present the inhibition activity of the three first functionalized chitosan sets.

During the last decade, Schiff bases class compounds have been attracted exceptional attention to be applied in the field of corrosion inhibition owing to the presence of imine linkage, i.e. −CH=N–. They are reported to act as potent anti-corrosion compounds for different metallic materials, especially in acidic solutions [34]. In this respect, the synthesis of chitosan Schiff bases derivatives via condensation reaction and/or under microwave irradiations are conducted. It was found that the introduction of Schiff bases functional group into the chitosan skeleton leads to a significant enhancement in the inhibition property and film adhesion of polymer on the metal surface. Generally, the achieved prevention efficiencies using those chitosan-based derivatives were higher than 80%, which outlined that chitosan Schiff base could be an appropriate candidate to employ as effective anti-corrosion agents [35]. Recently, three chitosan Schiff bases derivatives (CSB-1, −2 and − 3, Figure 2(b)) have been synthesized under microwave irradiations and tested as corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in acidic solution. According to the obtained experimental data, these modified chitosan compounds were exhibited significant tendencies to reduce metallic corrosion even at a lower concentration, which the supreme prevention efficiencies of 91, 87 and 85% (at 50 ppm) were attained for CSB-3, −2 and − 1, respectively [36]. Another chitosan-modified Schiff base, namely, the salicylaldeyde-chitosan Schiff base (Figure 2(c)), has been reported to act as a good inhibitor (IE(%) = 95.4% at 150 ppm) for J55 steel-variety in 3.5% NaCl solution saturated with carbon dioxide at elevated temperature. The merits of developed functionalized chitosan including its eco-friendly aspect, safe, simple and cheap synthesize of used Schiff base, as well as the improvement of inhibitor solubility compared to unmodified chitosan. All these listed advantages make salicylaldeyde-chitosan Schiff base as a good anti-corrosion agent for the oil and gas industries [37].

Surfactant is a surface-active agent that characterizes by the presence of hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups per molecule. These chemical compounds are largely served as effective corrosion inhibitors in the petrochemical industry dues to their affinity to be oriented at the metal/solution interface. In 2012, over 26% was the demand for surfactants as anti-corrosion components only for the petrochemical industry, as well as this request grew by 4.1% per year [38]. To combine the attractive anti-corrosion property of surfactant set with chitosan biopolymer, several chitosan-surfactants macromolecules are synthesized and then evaluated as potential retarders of corrosion. In this regard, the introduction of hydrophobic moiety into the chitosan skeleton has been led to an increase of its hydrophobic property to become surface-active polymers, which in result an enhancement of the prevention capability of chitosan. For instance, a sequence of seven modified hydrophobically chitosan surfactants were produced and their anti-corrosion property is measured for carbon steel in acid medium. As compared to the pure chitosan, good inhibition efficiencies between 93 and 74% (at 250 ppm) are achieved for those surfactants functionalized chitosan derivatives [39]. It was found that carboxymethyl chitosan thio-derivative provides the highest protection. This finding is related to its high surface activity and the presence of more active adsorption centers within its molecular skeleton as well.

A wide range of organic heterocyclic molecules has been employed to face against metallic corrosion. In this context, azole-based compounds have shown an excellent capacity to act as good anti-corrosion compounds for several metallic materials in different corrosive environments, especially in acidic ones. The latter molecule set includes N-azole, thiazole and oxazole cyclic molecules with different architectures [40]. The chemical incorporation of azole moieties or their derivatives into the chitosan backbone has shown excellent results in terms of inhibition efficiency. Recently, a novel triazole modified chitosan (Figure 2(d)) has been reported to act as an efficient retarder of carbon steel corrosion, which a maximum inhibition efficiency of 97% is reached using just 200 ppm of developed chitosan derivative [41]. The benefic effect of this triazole-modified chitosan biomacromolecule against corrosion can be revealed from the reported scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images as depicted in Figure 3. It is clear from Figure 3(a) that the morphology of carbon steel surface is more rough and damaged in the absence of modified chitosan inhibitor. Nevertheless, in its presence (Figure 3(b)) the morphology of steel surface become smoother, which supports the protection capacity of the developed chitosan derivative. In this work, it was found that the synthesized compound could block cathodic sites at the metal surface via the physical and chemical adsorption process.

Figure 3.

SEM images of carbon steel surface (a) without and (b) with the addition of developed triazole-modified chitosan at 200 ppm [42].

In addition to the amine group, i.e. –NH2, the functionalization of chitosan can be also carried out on both extra-functional groups including –OH group. This approach to amplify the inhibiting effect of chitosan has been attracting interest. We can list the example of poly (N-vinyl-imidazole) grafted carboxymethyl chitosan (Figure 2(e)), which is a polymer grafted chitosan. The newly synthesized chitosan derivative has exhibited interesting corrosion protection for steel metal in acid solution [43].

Advertisement

4. Using chitosan-nanoparticle composite form for metal protection

Chitosan composites have mainly been applied as inhibiting coatings and are used for corrosion protection purposes in different media. Some works have reported the preparation of composite coatings with chitosan to obtain protective systems to metal substrates [42, 44, 45]. To improve the anti-corrosion properties of the polymeric matrix, it is necessary to invest in improving the mechanical and adhesion properties through the incorporation of inorganic and organic fillers. It is reported that Nano-scaled fillers imply better barrier properties in the polymer coatings compared to the micron-size additives [15]. In general, a schematic for composite formation is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Schematic presentation of chitosan-nanoparticles composites formation process.

Biopolymer chitosan-based nanocomposite coatings have been investigated for protection against copper corrosion [46]. Coatings are composed of chitosan matrix with 2-mercaptobenzothiazole and silica nanoparticles. Overall, the combination of the organic corrosion inhibitor and inorganic nanoparticles enhanced the protection efficiency of chitosan coatings, which is an important advance toward developing sustainable corrosion protection coatings for different metals.

Several researchers have reported the viability of chitosan composites films e.g. chitosan/ZnO nanoparticle composite for protection against corrosion for steel [47, 48] and bio-corrosion inhibition for S150 carbon steel [49]. All of these studies showed that the quality of the chitosan film was improved due to the addition of ZnO nanoparticles. Another study [50] evaluated and compared corrosion protection of carbon steel using two different systems of chitosan e.g. oleic acid-modified chitosan-graphene oxide composite coating and pure chitosan coating. In this case, it was observed that the corrosion protection of oleic acid-modified chitosan-graphene oxide composite coating improved by 100 folds when compared with pure chitosan coating. Thus, oleic acid-modified chitosan-graphene oxide composite is more effective in corrosion protection of carbon steel.

Another composite coating [51] consisting of graphene oxide-chitosan-silver on Cu-Ni Alloy with enhanced anti-corrosive and antibacterial properties show graphene oxide retards the diffusion of corrosive ions to the substrate and minimizes the electron transport between the electrolyte and metal, while chitosan prevents the galvanic coupling of graphene oxide with the metal surface [51].

The system chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanoparticle composites revealed that they could inhibit corrosion in steel, however, it was found that the combination of chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanoparticle with other species provides more effective protection against corrosion [52, 53, 54]. Different composites such as chitosan/hydroxyapatite-Mg [55], chitosan/hydroxyapatite-Si [56], chitosan/hydroxyapatite-multiwalled carbon nanotube [57], chitosan/hydroxyapatite-CaSiO3 [58], and chitosan/hydroxyapatite-cellulose acetate [59] were synthesized and tested as corrosion protective layers. The composites chitosan/hydroxyapatite-Mg, chitosan/hydroxyapatite-Si, chitosan/hydroxyapatite-CaSiO3 and chitosan/hydroxyapatite-cellulose acetate demonstrated that the insertion of the third component exhibit a representative improvement in the corrosion protection of the chitosan/hydroxyapatite nanoparticle composite, except for composite chitosan/hydroxyapatite-multiwalled carbon nanotube. Consequently, it could be expected that the presence of carbon nanotubes in any non-conductive polymer coating provides lower protection against corrosion.

As shown previously, the use of chitosan-nanoparticle composites led to improvements in the corrosion protection of different surfaces, i.e. copper and steel. Bahari et al. [46] concluded that addition of nanoparticles contributes to the reduction in swelling of chitosan coatings and crosslinked chitosan coatings are superior to the non-crosslinked ones vis-a-vis in mitigation of corrosion of copper surface. When, John et al. [47] concluded that mitigation of corrosion of mild steel by nanostructured chitosan/ZnO nanoparticle films was obtained based on chemical stability, oxidation control of coatings. Therefore, the process of corrosion control depends on the structure of the coating (polymeric matrix, crosslinking, adhesion, among other parameters).

Advertisement

5. Conclusion

Efficient inhibitors and organic coatings are able to extend the life of some metal surfaces. Chitosan is a component with a high potential for protection against corrosion of metals when exposed to corrosive media. In the first stage, the pure chitosan form is used to omit the corrosion of numerous metallic-based materials. Nevertheless, the lower water-solubility of this biopolymer was limited to its application and its utilization to a broad aggressive media range such as near-neutral solutions. Although, such weakness can overcome and the prevention performance of chitosan can be improved through different functionalization demarches. Furthermore, chitosan can be combined with the other materials to develop new chitosan-nanoparticles composites that can apply as coatings.

References

  1. 1. D.Q . Huong, T. Duong, and P.C. Nam, Effect of the Structure and Temperature on Corrosion Inhibition of Thiourea Derivatives in 1.0 M HCl Solution, ACS Omega 4 (2019), p. 14478-14489
  2. 2. A. Jmiai, B. El Ibrahimi, A. Tara, S. El Issami, O. Jbara, and L. Bazzi, Alginate biopolymer as green corrosion inhibitor for copper in 1 M hydrochloric acid: Experimental and theoretical approaches, J. Mol. Struct. 1157 (2018), pp. 408-417
  3. 3. B. EL Ibrahimi, L. Bazzi, and S. EL Issam, The role of pH in corrosion inhibition of tin using the proline amino acid: theoretical and experimental investigations, RSC Adv. 10 (2020), p. 29696
  4. 4. J.V. Nardeli, C.S. Fugivara, M. Taryba, M.F. Montemor, and A.V. Benedetti, Biobased self-healing polyurethane coating with Zn micro-flakes for corrosion protection of AA7475, Chemical Engineering Journal 404 (2021), p. 126478
  5. 5. J.V. Nardeli, C.S. Fugivara, M. Taryba, M.F. Montemor, and A. Benedetti, Self-healing ability based on hydrogen bonds in organic coatings for corrosion protection of AA1200, Corrosion Science 177 (2020), p. 108984
  6. 6. J.V. Nardeli, C.S. Fugivara, M. Taryba, M.F. Montemor, S.J.L. Ribeiro, and A.V. Benedetti, Novel healing coatings based on natural-derived polyurethane modified with tannins for corrosion protection of AA2024-T3, Corrosion Science 162 (2020), p. 108213
  7. 7. J.V. Nardeli, C.S. Fugivara, M. Taryba, E.R.P. Pinto, M.F. Montemor, and A.V. Benedetti, Tannin: a natural corrosion inhibitor for bare and coated aluminum alloys, Progress in Organic Coatings 135 (2019), pp. 368-381
  8. 8. B. El Ibrahimi, A. Jmiai, A. Somoue, R. Oukhrib, M. Chadili, S. El Issami, and L. Bazzi, Cysteine Duality Effect on the Corrosion Inhibition and Acceleration of 3003 Aluminium Alloy in a 2% NaCl Solution, Port. Electrochimica Acta 36(6) (2018), pp. 403-422
  9. 9. B. El Ibrahimi, A. Jmiai, K. El Mouaden, A. Baddouh, S. El Issami, L. Bazzi, and M. Hilali, Effect of solution's pH and molecular structure of three linear α-amino acids on the corrosion of tin in salt solution: A combined experimental and theoretical approach, J. Mol. Struct. 1196 (2019), pp. 105-118
  10. 10. R. Oukhrib, B. El Ibrahimi, H. Abou Oualid, Y. Abdellaoui, S. El Issami, L. Bazzi, M. Hilali, and H. Bourzi, In silico investigations of alginate biopolymer on the Fe (110), Cu (111), Al (111) and Sn (001) surfaces in acidic media: Quantum chemical and molecular mechanic calculations, Journal of molecular liquids 312 (2020), p. 113479
  11. 11. Jiyaul Haque, Vandana Srivastava, Dheeraj S. Chauhan, Hassane Lgaz, and Mumtaz A. Quraishi, Microwave-Induced Synthesis of Chitosan SchiffBases and Their Application as Novel and Green Corrosion Inhibitors: Experimental and Theoretical Approach, ACS Omega 3 (2018), p. 5654-5668
  12. 12. D. Elieh-Ali-Komi, and M.R. Hamblin, Chitin and Chitosan: Production and Application of Versatile Biomedical Nanomaterials, Int. J. Adv. Res. 4 (2016), pp. 411-427
  13. 13. S.A. Umoren, M.M. Solomon, A. Madhankumar, and I.B. Obot, Exploration of natural polymers for use as green corrosion inhibitors for AZ31 magnesium alloy in saline environment, Carbohydrate Polymers 230 (2020), p. 115466
  14. 14. S.A. Umoren, and U.M. Eduok, Application of carbohydrate polymers as corrosion inhibitors for metal substrates in different media: A review, Carbohydrate Polymers 140 (2016), pp. 314-341
  15. 15. H. Ashassi-Sorkhabi, and A. Kazempour, Chitosan, its derivatives and composites with superior potentials for the corrosion protection of steel alloys: A comprehensive review, Carbohydrate Polymers 237 (2020), p. 116110
  16. 16. M.R. Dedloff, C.S. Effler, A.M. Holban, and M.C. Gestal, Use of biopolymers in mucosally-administered vaccinations for respiratory disease, Materials 12 (2019), p. 2445
  17. 17. L.M. Anaya-Esparza, J.M. Ruvalcaba-Gómez, C.I. Maytorena-Verdugo, N. González-Silva, R. Romero-Toledo, S. Aguilera-Aguirre, A. Pérez-Larios, and E. Montalvo-González, Chitosan-TiO2: A Versatile Hybrid Composite, Materials 13 (2020), p. 811
  18. 18. J. Fang, K. Xu, L. Zhu, Z. Zhou, and H. Tang, A study on mechanism of corrosion protection of polyaniline coating and its failure, Corrosion Science 49 (2007), pp. 4232-4242
  19. 19. S.-H. Chang, H.-T.V. Lin, G.-J. Wu, and G.J. Tsai, pH Effects on solubility, zeta potential, and correlation between antibacterial activity and molecular weight of chitosan, Carbohydrate Polymers 134 (2015), pp. 74-81
  20. 20. M. Rinaudc, G. Pavlov, and J. Desbrieres, Solubilization of chitosan in strong acid medium, International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization 5 (1999), pp. 267-276
  21. 21. T. Rabizadeh, and S.K. Asl, Chitosan as a green inhibitor for mild steel corrosion: Thermodynamic and electrochemical evaluations, Materials and Corrosion 70 (2019), pp. 738-748
  22. 22. A.E. Okoronkwo, S.J. Olusegun, and O.O. Oluwasina, The inhibitive action of chitosan extracted from Archachatina marginata shells on the corrosion of plain carbon steel in acid media, Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials 62 (2015), pp. 13-18
  23. 23. O.S.I. Fayomi, I.G. Akande, O.O. Oluwole, and D. Daramola, Effect of watersoluble chitosan on the electrochemical corrosion behaviour of mild steel, Chemical Data Collections 17 (2018), pp. 321-326
  24. 24. A. Jmiai, B. El Ibrahimi, A. Tara, R. Oukhrib, S. El Issami, O. Jbara, L. Bazzi, and M. Hilali, Chitosan as an eco-friendly inhibitor for copper corrosion in acidic medium: protocol and characterization, Cellulose 24 (2017), pp. 3843-3867
  25. 25. K. El Mouaden, B. El Ibrahimi, R. Oukhrib, L. Bazzi, B. Hammouti, O. Jbara, A. Tara, D.S. Chauhan, and M.A. Quraishi, Chitosan polymer as a green corrosion inhibitor for copper in sulfide-containing synthetic seawater, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 119 (2018), pp. 1311-1323
  26. 26. A. Eddib, Y.A. Albrimi, A.A. Addi, J. Douch, R.M. Souto, and M. Hamdani, Inhibitory action of non toxic compounds on the corrosion behaviour of 316 austenitic stainless steel in hydrochloric acid solution: Comparison of chitosan and cyclodextrin, International Journal of Electrochemical Science 7 (2012), pp. 6599-6610
  27. 27. S.A. Umoren, M.J. Banera, T. Alonso-Garcia, C.A. Gervasi, and M.V. Mirífico, Inhibition of mild steel corrosion in HCl solution using chitosan, Cellulose 20 (2013), pp. 2529-2545
  28. 28. X. Yang, L. Shao, S. Zhang, W. Jiao, Y. Li, and B. Hou, Corrosion inhibition properties of water soluble chitosan and its degradation products for mild steel in seawater, Journal of Chinese Society for Corrosion and Protection 28 (2009), pp. 325-330
  29. 29. I.O. Arukalam, C.O. Alaohuru, C.O. Ugbo, K.N. Jideofor, P.N. Ehirim, and I.C. Madufor, Effect of xanthan gum on the corrosion protection of aluminium in HCl medium, International Journal of Advanced Research and Technology 3 (2014), pp. 5-16
  30. 30. S. Yang, Y. Wen, P. Yi, K. Xiao, and C. Dong, Effects of chitosan inhibitor on the electrochemical corrosion behavior of 2205 duplex stainless steel, International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials 24 (2017), pp. 1260-1266
  31. 31. N.K. Gupta, P.G. Joshi, V. Srivastava, and M.A. Quraishi, Chitosan: A macromolecule as green corrosion inhibitor for mild steel in sulfamic acid useful for sugar industry, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 106 (2018), pp. 704-711
  32. 32. M.M. Solomon, H. Gerengi, T. Kaya, E. Kaya, and S.A. Umoren, Synergistic inhibition of St37 steel corrosion in 15% H2SO4 solution by chitosan and iodide ion additives, Cellulose 24 (2017), pp. 931-950
  33. 33. H. Sun, H. Wang, H. Wang, and Q . Yan, Enhanced removal of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater through electrocoagulation using carboxymethyl chitosan as corrosion inhibitor for steel anode, Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology 4 (2018), pp. 1105-1113
  34. 34. K. Benbouguerra, S. Chafaa, N. Chafai, M. Mehri, O. Moumeni, and A. Hellal, Synthesis, spectroscopic characterization and a comparative study of the corrosion inhibitive efficiency of ana-aminophosphonate and Schiff base derivatives: Experimental and theoretical investigations, J. Mol. Struct. 1157 (2018), pp. 165-176
  35. 35. N.L. Chen, P.P. Kong, H.X. Feng, Y.Y. Wang, and D.Z. Bai, Corrosion mitigation of chitosan Schiff base for Q235 steel in 1.0 M HCl, Journal of Bio-and Tribo-Corrosion 5 (2019), p. 27
  36. 36. J. Haque, V. Srivastava, D.S. Chauhan, H. Lgaz, and M.A. Quraishi, Microwaveinduced synthesis of chitosan schiffbases and their application as novel and green corrosion inhibitors: Experimental and theoretical approach, ACS Omega 5 (2018), pp. 5654-5668
  37. 37. K.R. Ansari, D.S. Chauhan, M.A. Quraishi, M.A.J. Mazumder, and A. Singh, Chitosan Schiff base: an environmentally benign biological macromolecule as a new corrosion inhibitor for oil & gas industries, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 144 (2020), pp. 305-315
  38. 38. O. Kaczerewska, R. Leiva-Garcia, R. Akid, B. Brycki, I. Kowalczyk, and T. Pospieszny, Effectiveness ofO-bridged cationic gemini surfactants as corrosion inhibitors for stainless steel in 3 M HCl: Experimental and theoretical studies, Journal of Molecular Liquids 249 (2018), pp. 1113-1124
  39. 39. A.M. Alsabagh, M.Z. Elsabee, Y.M. Moustafa, A. Elfky, and R.E. Morsi, Corrosion inhibition efficiency of some hydrophobically modified chitosan surfactants in relation to their surface active properties, Egyptian Journal of Petroleum 23 (2014), pp. 349-359
  40. 40. B. El Ibrahimi, and L. Guo, Azole-based compounds as corrosion inhibitors for metallic materials, in Azoles - Synthesis, Properties, Applications and Perspectives, 2020
  41. 41. D.S. Chauhan, M.A. Quraishi, A.A. Sorour, S.K. Saha, and P. Banerjee, Triazole-modified chitosan: a biomacromolecule as a new environmentally benign corrosion inhibitor for carbon steel in a hydrochloric acid solution, RSC Advances 9 (2019), pp. 14990-15003
  42. 42. Q . Bao, D. Zhang, and Y. Wan, 2-Mercaptobenzothiazole doped chitosan/11-alkanethiolate acid composite coating: dual function for copper protection, Applied Surface Science 257 (2011), pp. 10529-10534
  43. 43. U. Eduok, E. Ohaeri, and J. Szpunar, Electrochemical and surface analyses of X70 steel corrosion in simulated acid pickling medium: Effect of poly (N-vinyl imidazole) grafted carboxymethyl chitosan additive, Electrochimica Acta 278 (2018), pp. 302-312
  44. 44. X. Pang, and I. Zhitomirsky, Electrodeposition of hydroxyapatite–silver–chitosan nanocomposite coatings, Surface and Coatings Technology 202 (2008), pp. 3815-3821
  45. 45. J. Carneiro, J. Tedim, and M.G.S. Ferreira, Chitosan as a smart coating for corrosion protection of aluminum alloy 2024: A review, Progress in Organic Coatings 89 (2015), pp. 348-356
  46. 46. H.S. Bahari, F. Ye, E.A.T. Carrillo, C. Leliopoulos, H. Savaloni, and J. Dutta, Chitosan nanocomposite coatings with enhanced corrosion inhibition effects for copper, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 162 (2020), pp. 1566-1577
  47. 47. S. John, A. Joseph, A.J. Jose, and B. Narayana, Enhancement of corrosion protection of mild steel by chitosan/ZnO nanoparticle composite membranes, Progress in Organic Coatings 84 (2015), pp. 28-34
  48. 48. Z.F. Lin, P. Wang, D. Zhang, and Y. Wang, A ZnO/chitosan composite film: Fabrication and anticorrosion characterization, Advanced Materials Research 152 (2011), pp. 1199-1202
  49. 49. P.A. Rasheed, K.A. Jabbar, K. Rasool, R.P. Pandey, M.H. Sliem, M. Helal, A. Samara, A.M. Abdullah, and K.A. Mahmoud, Controlling the biocorrosion of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) on carbon steel using ZnO/chitosan nanocomposite as an eco-friendly biocide, Corrosion Science 148 (2019), pp. 397-406
  50. 50. E.M. Fayyad, K.K. Sadasivuni, D. Ponnamma, and M.A.A. Al-Maadeed, Oleic acid-grafted chitosan/graphene oxide composite coating for corrosion protection of carbon steel, Carbohydrate Polymers 151 (2016), pp. 871-878
  51. 51. G. Jena, B. Anandkumar, S.C. Vanithakumari, R.P. George, J. Philip, and G. Amarendra, Graphene oxide-chitosan-silver composite coating on Cu-Ni alloy with enhanced anticorrosive and antibacterial properties suitable for marine applications, Progress in Organic Coatings 139 (2020), p. 105444
  52. 52. A.S. Hammood, M.A.S. Mahdi, L. Thair, and H. Haddad, Evaluating the effect of hydroxyapatite-chitosan coating on the corrosion behavior of 2205 duplex stainless steel for biomedical applications, Materials Research Express 6 (2019), p. 85411
  53. 53. X. Pang, and I. Zhitomirsky, Electrophoretic deposition of composite hydroxyapatite-chitosan coatings, Materials Characterization 58 (2007), pp. 339-348
  54. 54. I. Zhitomirsky, and X. Pang, Fabrication of chitosan-hydroxyapatite coatings for biomedical applications, ECS Transactions 3 (2007), pp. 15-22
  55. 55. S. Sutha, N.R. Dhineshbabu, M. Prabhu, and V. Rajendran, Mg-doped hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite coated 316l stainless steel implants for biomedical applications, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 15 (2015), pp. 4178-4187
  56. 56. S. Sutha, K. Kavitha, G. Karunakaran, and V. Rajendran, In-vitro bioactivity, biocorrosion and antibacterial activity of silicon integrated hydroxyapatite/chitosan composite coating on 316 L stainless steel implants, Materials Science and Engineering: C 33 (2013), pp. 4046-4054
  57. 57. F. Batmanghelich, and M. Ghorbani, Effect of pH and carbon nanotube content on the corrosion behavior of electrophoretically deposited chitosan–hydroxyapatite–carbon nanotube composite coatings, Ceramics International 39 (2013), pp. 5393-5402
  58. 58. X. Pang, T. Casagrande, and I. Zhitomirsky, Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite–CaSiO3–chitosan composite coatings, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 330 (2009), pp. 323-329
  59. 59. Z. Zhong, J. Qin, and J. Ma, Cellulose acetate/hydroxyapatite/chitosan coatings for improved corrosion resistance and bioactivity, Materials Science and Engineering: C 49 (2015), pp. 251-255

Written By

Brahim El Ibrahimi, Lei Guo, Jéssica Verger Nardeli and Rachid Oukhrib

Submitted: 09 October 2020 Reviewed: 15 January 2021 Published: 04 February 2021