Transcriptomics analysis for some target genes among wild-type and mutants.
Abstract
A radiation-resistant bacterium, Deinococcus geothermalis has various stress response mechanisms, including antioxidation. Features that maintain vitality at high radiation doses include the following: enzymatic scavengers of ROS such as catalase, SOD, and peroxidase; strain-specific DNA repair systems such as Deinococcal unique proteins; non-enzymatic responses such as manganese complexes, carotenoids, and DNA-binding proteins. This chapter summarizes the primary response mechanism by redox balance centered on the cystine transporter. It also reviews action characteristics of DNA-binding protein Dps and a putative LysR family protein, and effects on loss of function of the carotenoid biosynthesis genes by transposition of insertion sequences. Environmental adaptation and molecular evolution of radiation-resistant bacterium are also considered to explain the potentials of molecular behavior induced by oxidative stress.
Keywords
- cystine ABC transporter
- Dps
- LysR regulator
- oxidative stress
- redox-potential
- transposition
1. Introduction
The radiation-resistant bacterium of genus
Only 20% of DNA damage is directly caused by radiation. In comparison, the remaining 80% is indirectly caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as superoxide and hydroxyl radicals which are chemically reactive molecules that can damage cell structures such as cell membrane, proteins, and nucleic acids (DNA and RNA) [1, 10]. Bacteria have a natural ROS scavenging system composed of enzymatic antioxidants (e.g. catalase, peroxidase, superoxide reductase, and superoxide dismutase (SOD)), and non-enzymatic antioxidants (e.g. intracellular manganese, pyrroloquinoline quinone, carotenoids), small antioxidant thiols (e.g. cystine, bacillithiol, or mycothiol), and DNA-protecting proteins [2, 13, 14, 15].
Specific regulators tightly control many stress response defense systems. Enzymatic ROS scavengers are regulated by the global transcriptional regulator OxyR, a LysR family regulator [16, 17, 18, 19, 20]. OxyR of
These gene regulation systems are also susceptible to intracellular redox balance through specific ABC transporters and chemical modification of low-molecular-weight (LMW) thiol compounds using unique enzyme reactions. The cystine importer is one of the redox controlling ABC transporters [22, 23, 24, 25]. It could sense the redox balance and affect gene regulation for enzymatic defense through the OxyR activation [15, 20]. There are also some exceptional OxyR regulons in bacteria [26, 27, 28].
This redox balance affects various enzymatic and chemical modification processes through a progressive transformation. For example, acetylation is a conserved modification used to regulate various cellular pathways such as gene expression, protein synthesis, detoxification, and virulence. Acetyltransferase enzymes can transfer an acetyl moiety, usually from acetyl coenzyme A (AcCoA), onto a target substrate, thereby modulating the activity or stability [29]. Gcn5-related N-acetyltransferase (GNAT) members can acetylate the amino group of an extensive range of substrates. They are classified into three groups: (1) small molecule acetyltransferases such as aminoglycosides and mycothiol; (2) peptide acetyltrandferases such as the peptidoglycan that is part of the cell wall; and (3) protein acetyltransferases such as the histone family [30]. In Gram-positive
As antioxidant substances, carotenoid compounds also act as scavengers of ROS.
As one of bacterial nucleoid proteins in gene expression specificity of growth phase-dependent manner, Dps (DNA-binding protein from starved cells) is initially suppressed at the exponential cell growth phase. It is then expressed in large quantities in the stationary growth phase to become the major protein [33, 34]. These sequential nucleoid protein transitions and overexpression of a particular protein demonstrate the function of a defense mechanism that can protect against cell damage during stress due to increased ROS and reduced nutrients that cells can consume. Dps proteins are found almost ubiquitously in bacterial genomes. Each bacterial genome contains species-specific Dps genes. Dps has multifaceted roles such as DNA binding, iron sequestration, and ferroxidase activity in various stress responses [35, 36, 37]. Dps was described initially in
Bacterial insertion sequence (IS) elements consist of a gene encoding transposase (one or two), terminal inverted repeats (TIR), and direct repeats (DR). Their lengths are less than 3 kb [41, 42]. According to the database of IS finding platform such as ISfinder, IS types vary [43]. IS densities are significantly less in chromosomes than in plasmids in bacteria. Perhaps plasmids are the primary IS carrier [44]. These IS elements can be transferred by high temperature, γ-irradiation, oxidative stress, and substances that could damage DNA and result in gene breakdown [45, 46, 47]. Regulation of IS transposition is also affected by various factors such as transcriptional repressors and inhibitors, ribosome frameshifting, methylation, mRNA stability, and target sequences [48, 49, 50, 51]. Gene breakdown by transposition of IS elements does not just have deleterious aspects. IS-mediated gene inhibition offers various advantages such as virulence, antibiotic/xenobiotic resistance, metabolism, and small promoter obtained by IS migration in the genome of a strain [52].
A comprehensive paper on

Figure 1.
WordCloud analysis of our owns four published papers [
2. An antioxidant defense system in a radiation-resistant bacterium
2.1 A cystine importer, redox balance and control of gene expression
In general, the primary antioxidant enzyme, e.g. catalase, is highly induced by an oxidative stress condition. It is positively controlled by a global transcriptional regulator OxyR [16]. In
The strain’s cystine transport has been found to be dependent on the growth phase. In other words, some features are often expressed in the latter half of the exponential phase. In a mutant with the importer gene removed, it reacts relatively sensitive to oxidative stress. However, if the importer is overexpressed, its resistance to hydrogen peroxide is increased. A mutant that artificially over-expression the importer shows increased resistance to hydrogen peroxide without being affected by catalase expression, which results from an increase in the content of total thiol entering the cell through the cystine importer [15]. Therefore, the intracellular reduction state through enhancing thiol contents is a primary defense system of
2.2 Hints from transcriptomic analysis
We performed transcriptomic analysis using RNA-Seq technology to define functional roles of bacterial TrmB (Dgeo_1985), Dps (Dgeo_0257), a cystine importer (Dgeo_1986-87), and LysR family regulator (Dgeo_2840). We constructed target gene disrupted mutants. Expression levels of all genes at OD600 4.0 as a late exponential growth phase in mutants were then compared to those in wild-type
First, a transcriptomic study was done to compare gene expression levels between wild-type and cystine importer deleted mutant of
Gene clusters | Genes | △ | △ | △ |
---|---|---|---|---|
CRISPR-Cas | Dgeo_0233-38 | 35.1–105.6 | — | 3.36 |
Dgeo_0956-65 | 10.3–65.2 | — | 4.59–5.46 | |
Iron transporter | Dgeo_1370 | — | — | 3.35 |
Dgeo_2443-44 | 4.69–12.42 | — | — | |
GCN5 | Dgeo_0369-70 | 12.53 | — | — |
Dgeo_2125 | 3.73 | — | — | |
Dgeo_2313 | 11.2 | — | — | |
MFS transporter | Dgeo_0249 | 3.75 | — | — |
Dgeo_0530 | 6.41 | — | — | |
Dgeo_1968 | 5.57 | — | — | |
Dgeo_2330 | 3.22 | — | — | |
ABC transporter | Dgeo_0543 | 3.34 | 0.35 | 1.62 |
Dgeo_0647 | 6.96 | 1.54 | — | |
Dgeo_1805 | 8.03 | — | — | |
Dgeo_2581 | 3.60 | 0.69 | — | |
RpiR family | Dgeo_2822 | — | — | 3.20 |
Dgeo_2619 | 0.20 | 0.29 | 0.28 |
Table 1.
Δ
2.3 Mycothiol as a major under oxidation state
Genes | △ | △ | △ |
---|---|---|---|
MshA (Dgeo_2307) | 0.79 | 0.98 | 0.69 |
MshB (Dgeo_1021) | 1.14 | 1.00 | 1.10 |
MshC (Dgeo_1714) | 10.78 | 0.88 | 1.36 |
MshD (Dgeo_2313) | 11.2 | 1.21 | 0.99 |
Table 2.
Expression levels of MSH biosynthesis-related genes.
Somehow, intracellular redox potential affects these GNAT regulations. If two artificial conditions such as oxidation and reduction are provided, the expression levels of redox potential-dependent GNAT genes would be detected. These variable expression levels of GNAT genes will provide stress response control. At the moment, the physiological roles of these four GNAT proteins remain unclear. In general, proteins in the GNAT superfamily have broad-spectrum physiological functions. Their amino acid sequence identities are very low. Thus, predicting their functional roles through protein sequence similarities is difficult.
How about expression levels of bacillithiol (BSH) biosynthesis-related genes in the transcriptome of
2.4 Dps and its mysterious roles
We prepared both

Figure 2.
Illustration of DNA protection and iron detoxification roles of two Dps proteins in
2.5 Active transposition of insertion sequences under oxidative stress condition
Various selectable approaches have detected transposition events of ISs. For example, IS
The genome of

Figure 3.
Brief scheme of metabolic pathway (A) and the ISs integrated loci in the gene cluster for carotenoid biosynthesis (B).
3. Conclusion
As a model for oxidative stress response,
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2020R1F1A1070779) and SJL thanks Kyung Hee University’s support.
References
- 1.
Battista JR, Earl AM, Park MJ. Why is Deinococcus radiodurans so resistant to ionizing radiation? Trends in Microbiology. 1999;7:362-365. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-842x(99)01566-8. - 2.
Blasius M, Hubscher U, Sommer S. Deinococcus radiodurans : what belongs to the survival kit? Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;43:221-238. DOI: 10.1080/10409230802122274. - 3.
Agapov AA, Kulbachinskiy AV. Mechanisms of stress resistance and gene regulation in the radioresistant bacterium Deinococcus radiodurans . Biochem. (Mosc.) 2015;80:1201-1216. DOI: 10.1134/S0006297915100016. - 4.
Cox MM, Battista JR. Deinococcus radiodurans - the consummate survivor. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005; 3:882-892. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro1264. - 5.
Daly MJ. A new perspective on radiation resistance based on Deinococcus radiodurans . Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:237-245. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2073. - 6.
Slade D, Radman M. Oxidative stress resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans . Microbiol. Mol Biol Rev. 2011;75:133-191. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00015-10. - 7.
Hua Y, Narumi I, Gao G, Tian B, Satoh K, Kitayama S, Shen S. PprI: a general switch responsible for extreme radioresistance of Deinococcus radiodurans . Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2003;306:354-360. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00965-3. - 8.
Tanaka M, Earl AM, Howell HA, Park MJ, Eisen JA, Peterson SN, Battista JR. Analysis of Deinococcus radiodurans 's transcriptional response to ionizing radiation and desiccation reveals novel proteins that contribute to extreme radioresistance. Genetics. 2004;168:21-33. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.104.029249. - 9.
Selvam K, Duncan JR, Tanaka M, Battista JR. DdrA, DdrD, and PprA: components of UV and mitomycin C resistance in Deinococcus radiodurans R1. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69007. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069007. - 10.
Luan H, Meng N, Fu J, Chen X, Xu X, Feng Q , other authors. Genome-wide transcriptome and antioxidant analysis on gamma-irradiated phases of Deinococcus radiodurans R1. PLoS One. 2014;9:e85649. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085649. - 11.
Lim S, Jung J-H, Blanchard L, de Groot A. Conservation and diversity of radiation and oxidative stress resistance mechanisms in Deinococcus species. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2019;43:19-52. DOI: 10.1093.femsre/fuy037. - 12.
Ott E, Kawaguchi Y, Ozgen N, Yamagishi A, Rabbow E, Rettberg P, Weckwerth W, Milojevic T. Proteomic and metabolomics profiling of Deinococcus radiodurans recovering after exposure to stimulated low earth orbit vaccum conditions. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:909. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00909. - 13.
Chiancone E, Ceci P. The multifaceted capacity of Dps proteins to combat bacterial stress conditions: detoxification of iron and hydrogen peroxide and DNA binding. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1800:798-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.01.013. - 14.
Helmann JD. Bacillithiol, a new player in bacterial redox homeostasis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;15:123-133. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2010.3562. - 15.
Hillion M, Antelmann H. Thiol-based redox switches in prokaryotes. Biol Chem. 2015;396:415-444. DOI: 10.1515/hsz-2015-0102. - 16.
Christman MF, Storz G, Ames BN. OxyR, a positive regulator of hydrogen peroxide-inducible genes in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium, is homologous to a family of bacterial regulatory proteins. Proc Nat Acad Sci.USA. 1989;86:3484-3488. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.86.10.3484. - 17.
Storz G, Tartaglia LA, Ames BN. The OxyR regulon. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 1990;58:157-161. doi: 10.1007/bf00548927. DOI: 10.1007/BF00548927. - 18.
Schell MA. Molecular biology of the LysR family of transcriptional regulators. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1993;47:597-626. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.003121. - 19.
Åslund F, Zheng M, Beckwith J, Storz G. Regulation of the OxyR transcription factor by hydrogen peroxide and the cellular thiol disulfide status. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:6161-6165. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6161. - 20.
Kim SO, Merchant K, Nudekman R, Beyer Jr WF, Keng T, DeAngelo J, Hausladen A, Stamler JS. OxyR: a molecular code for redox-related signaling. Cell. 2002;109:383-396. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00723-7. - 21.
Chen H, Xu G, Zhao Y, Tian B, Lu H, Yu X, Xu Z, Ying N, Hu S, Hua Y. A novel OxyR sensor and regulator of hydrogen peroxide stress with one cysteine residue in Deinococcus radiodurans . PLoS One. 2008;3:e1602. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001602. - 22.
Burguière P, Auger S, Hullo MF, Danchin A, Martin-Verstraete I. Three different systems participate in L-cystine uptake in Bacillus subtilis . J Bacteriol. 2004;186:4875-4884. DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.15.4875-4884. - 23.
Ohtsu I, Kawano Y, Suzuki M, Morigasaki S, Saiki K, Yamazaki S, Nonaka G, Takagi H. Uptake of L-cystine via an ABC transporter contributes defense of oxidative stress in the L-cystine export-dependent manner in Escherichia coli . PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120619. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120619. - 24.
Chonoles Imlay KR, Korshunov S, Imlay JA. Physiological roles and adverse effects of the two cystine importers of Escherichia coli . J Bacteriol. 2015;197:3629-3644. DOI: 10.1128/JB.00277-15. - 25.
Kim M, Jeong S, Lim S, Sim J, Rhie HG, Lee S-J. Oxidative stress response of Deinococcus geothermalis via a cystine importer. J Microbiol. 2017;55:137-146. DOI: 10.1007/s12275-017-6382-y. - 26.
Loprasert S, Vattanaviboon P, Pratuan W, Chamnongpol S, Mongkolsuk S. Regulation of the oxidative stress protective enzymes, catalase and superoxide dismutase in Xanthomonas -a review. Gene. 1996;179:33-37. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(96)00427-1. - 27.
Milse J, Petri K, Rückert C, Kalinowski J. Transcriptional response of Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 to hydrogen peroxide stress and characterization of the OxyR regulon. J Biotechnol. 2014;190:40-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.07.452. - 28.
Liu X, Sun M, Cheng Y, Yang R, Wen Y, Chen Z, Li J. OxyR is a key regulator in response to oxidative stress in Streptomyces avermitilis . Microbiol. 2016;162:707-716. DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.000251. - 29.
Burckhardt RM, Escalante-Semerena JC. Small-molecule acetylation by GCN5-related N-acetyltransferases in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2020;84:e00090–e00019. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.00090-19. - 30.
Favrot L, Blanchard JS, Vergnolle O. Bacterial GCN5-related N-acetyltransferases: from resistance to regulation. Biochem. 2016;55:989-1002. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01269. - 31.
Imber M, Pietrzyk-Brzezinska AJ, Antelmann H. Redox regulation by reversible protein S-thiolation in Gram-positive bacteria. Redox Biol. 2019;20:130-145. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.08.017. - 32.
Tian B, Hua Y. Carotenoid biosynthesis in extremeophilic Deinococcus -Thermus bacteria. Trends in Microbiol. 2010;18:512-520. DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2010.07.007. - 33.
Azam TA, Ishihama A. Twelve species of the nucleoid associated protein from Escherichia coli : sequence recognition specificity and DNA binding affinity. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:33105-33113. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.274.46.33105. - 34.
Ishihama A. The nucleoid: an overview. EcoSal Plus. 2009;3. DOI: 10.1128/ecosalplus.2.6. - 35.
Zhao G, Ceci P, Ilari A, Giangiacomo L, Laue TM, Chiancone E, Chasteen ND. Iron and hydrogen peroxide detoxification properties of DNA-binding protein from starved cells. A ferritin-like DNA-binding protein of Escherichia coli . J Biol Chem. 2002;277:27689-27696. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M202094200. - 36.
Chiancone E, Ceci P. The multifaceted capacity of Dps proteins to combat bacterial stress conditions: detoxification of iron and hydrogen peroxide and DNA binding. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1800:798-805. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2010.01.013. - 37.
Santos SP, Mitchell EP, Franquelim HG, Castanho MARB, Abreu IA, Romao CV. Dps from Deinococcus radiodurans : oligomeric forms of Dps1 with distinct cellular functions and Dps2 involved in metal storage. FEBS J. 2015;282:4307-4327. DOI: 10.1111/febs.13420. - 38.
Almirón M, Link AJ, Furlong D, Kolter R. A novel DNA binding protein with regulatory and protective roles in starved Escherichia coli . Genes Dev. 1992;6:2646-2654. DOI: 10.1101/gad.6.12b.2646. - 39.
Wolf SG, Frenkiel D, Arad T, Finkel SE, Kolter R, Minsky A. DNA protection by stress-induced biocrystallization. Nature. 1999;400:83-85. DOI: 10.1038/21918. - 40.
Ceci P, Cellai S, Falvo E, Rivetti C, Rossi GL, Chiancone E. DNA condensation and self-aggregation of Escherichia coli Dps are coupled phenomena related to the properties of the N-terminus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:5935-5944. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkh915. - 41.
Mahillon J, Chandler M. Insertion sequences. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62:725-774. - 42.
Siguier P, Gourbeyre E, Varani A, Ton-Hoang B, Chandler M. Everyman's guide to bacterial insertion sequences. Microbiol Spectrum. 2015;3:MDNA3-0030-2014. DOI: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0030-2014. - 43.
Siguier P, Perochon J, Lestrade L, Mahillon J, Chandler M. ISfinder: the reference centre for bacterial insertion sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D32–D36. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkj014. - 44.
Siguier P, Gourbeyre E, Chandler M. Bacterial insertion sequences: their genomic impact and diversity. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38:865-891. DOI: 10.1111/1574-6976.12067. - 45.
Narumi I, Cherdchu K, Kitayama S, Watanabe H. The Deinococcus radiodurans uvrA gene: identification of mutation sites in two mitomycin-sensitive strains and the first discovery of insertion sequence element from deinobacteria. Gene. 1997;198:115-126. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00301-6. - 46.
Ohtsubo Y, Genka H, Komatsu H, Nagata Y, Tsuda M. High-temperature-induced transposition of insertion elements in Burkholderia multivorans ATCC17616. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:1822-1828. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.4.1822-1828.2005. - 47.
Pasternak C, Ton-Hoang B, Coste G, Bailone A, Chandler M, Sommer S. Irradiation-induced Deinococcus radiodurans genome fragmentation triggers transposition of a single resident insertion sequence. PLoS Genetics. 2010;6:e1000799. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000799. - 48.
Roberts D, Hoopes BC, McClure WR, Kleckner N. IS10 transposition is regulated by DNA adenine methylation. Cell. 1985;43:117-130. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90017-0. - 49.
Escoubas JM, Prere MF, Fayet O, Salvignol I, Galas D, Zerbib D, Chandler M. Translational control of transposition activity of the bacterial insertion sequence IS1. EMBO J. 1991;10:705-712. - 50.
Kleckner N, Chalmers RM, Kwon D, Sakai J, Bolland S. Tn10 and IS10 transposition and chromosome rearrangements: Mechanism and regulation in vivo andin vitro . In: Transposable Elements. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1996;204:49-82. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-79795-8_3. - 51.
Kiss J, Nagy Z, Toth G, Kiss GB, Jakab J, Chandler M, Olasz F. Transposition and target specificity of the typical IS30 family element IS1655 from Neisseria meningitidis . Mol Microbiol. 2007;63:1731-1747. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05621.x. - 52.
Vandecraen J, Chandler M, Aertsen A, Van Houdt R. The impact of insertion sequences on bacterial genome plasticity and adaptability. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2017;43:709-730. DOI: 10.1080/1040841X.2017.1303661. - 53.
Qi H, Wang W, He J, Ma Y, Xiao F, He S. Antioxidative system of Deinococcus radiodurans . Res Microbiol. 2020;171:45-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2019.11.002. - 54.
Makarova KS, Omelchenko MV, Gaidamakova EK, Matrosova VY, Vasilenko A, other authors. Deinococcus geothermalis : the pool of extreme radiation resistance genes shrinks. PLoS One. 2007;2:e955. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000955. - 55.
Choo K, Kim M, Abdi Nansa S, Bae MK, Lee C, Lee S-J. Redox potential change by the cystine importer affected on enzymatic antioxidant protection in Deinococcus geothermalis . Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2020;113:779-790. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-020-01388-4. - 56.
Ud-Din AIMS, Tikhomirova A, Roujeinikova A. Structure and functional diversity of GCN5-related N-acetyltransferases (GNAT). Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:1018. DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071018. - 57.
Reon BJ, Nguyen KH, Bhattacharyya G, Grove A. Functional comparison of Deinococcus radiodurans Dps proteins suggests distinct in vivo roles. Biochem J. 2012;447:381-391. DOI: 10.1042/BJ20120902. - 58.
Bae MK. Purification and characterization of DNA binding proteins from starved cell (Dps) of Deinococcus geothermalis [thesis]. Seoul: Kyung Hee University; 2020. - 59.
Mennecier S, Servant P, Coste G, Bailone A, Sommer S. Mutagenesis via IS transposition in Deinococcus radiodurans . Mol Microbiol. 2006;59:317-325. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04936.x. - 60.
Gregory ST, Dahlberg AE. Transposition of an insertion sequence, ISTth7, in the genome of the extreme thermophile Thermus thermophiles HB8. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2008;289:187-192. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01389.x. - 61.
Lee C, Choi N, Bae MK, Choo K, Lee S-J. Transposition of insertion sequences was triggered by oxidative stress in radiation-resistant bacterium Deinococcus geothermalis . Microorganisms. 2019;7:446. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7100446. - 62.
Lee C, Choo K, Lee S-J. Active transposition of insertion sequences by oxidative stress in Deinococcus geothermalis . Front Microbiol. 2020;11:558747. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.558747.