IntechOpen

Home > Books > Microwave Heating - Electromagnetic Fields Causing Thermal and Non-Thermal Effects

Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Influence of the Microwaves on the Sol-Gel Syntheses and on the Properties of the Resulting Oxide Nanostructures

Written By

Luminita Predoanǎ, Dániel Attila Karajz, Vincent Otieno Odhiambo, Irina Stanciu, Imre M. Szilágyi, György Pokol and Maria Zaharescu

Submitted: 23 July 2020 Reviewed: 06 November 2020 Published: 29 December 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94931

Microwave Heating IntechOpen
Microwave Heating Electromagnetic Fields Causing Thermal and No... Edited by Gennadiy I. Churyumov

From the Edited Volume

Microwave Heating - Electromagnetic Fields Causing Thermal and Non-Thermal Effects

Edited by Gennadiy I. Churyumov

Book Details Order Print

Chapter metrics overview

614 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics
Advertisement

Abstract

Among the chemical methods in the liquid phase, the sol–gel technique is a versatile and efficient method for pure or doped metal oxide films or powders preparation, showing some advantages over other preparation techniques (high homogeneity, the possibility to introducing dopants in large amount, low processing temperature and control over the stoichiometry). Combining the sol–gel (SG)method with the effect of ultrasounds(US) or microwaves (MW) leads to improving the sol–gel procedure. The microwave-assisted sol–gel method is most frequently used for obtaining nanocrystalline, monodispersed oxide nanoparticles, or to transform amorphous gels into well-crystallized nanopowders. Less studied is the influence of the microwaves on the sol–gel reactions in solutions. The benefit of using microwave-assisted sol–gel preparation highly depends on the reagents used and on the composition of the studied systems. In the present chapter, results on the influence of the microwaves on the chemical reactions that take place during the sol–gel synthesis and on the properties of the resulted samples are discussed.

Keywords

  • sol–gel method
  • microwaves
  • reactions in solutions
  • oxide nanostructures
  • properties

1. Introduction

Although heavily exploited in recent decades, the domain of oxide nanostructures remains of interest to researchers throughout the world. This is because that the shapes and sizes of oxide nanomaterials greatly influence their properties, which is reflected in their use in the most diverse fields [1, 2]. Oxide nanostructures have applications in catalysis, energy storage, environmental decontamination, microelectronics, medical technology, ceramics, cosmetics, and so on [3, 4, 5].

Among the most studied branches of nanostructures are metal oxides, with representatives such as TiO2, ZnO, CuO, Fe3O4, WO3, Cr2O3, Co3O4 [6].

The structure, morphology, and properties of the oxide nanostructures depend significantly on the obtaining method. A large number of available synthesis methods underlies the continuous interest in obtaining oxide nanostructures that can be used successfully in specific areas [1, 7]. However, most of these methods are limited due to the use of toxic reagents, high processing temperatures, high vacuum, expensive equipment, or long reaction times [8, 9].

Although physical methods have the advantage of high reproducibility, chemical methods in the liquid phase are more often used to obtain oxide nanostructures due to their advantages, such as low production temperature, homogeneous mixing of precursors at the molecular scale, design and control of the physico-chemical properties of final products, depending on the precursors, and the experimental conditions used [10, 11].

Among the various chemical procedures, the sol–gel method gained increasing importance in the field of materials science because it is cheap, simple, allows the introduction of dopants in large quantities, ensures high purity, and homogeneity, allows control of size, shape, and size distribution of the obtained nanomaterials [12, 13, 14].

Lately, for the preparation of functional nanomaterials, more and more attention is being paid to the use of microwave as the energy source for carrying out a chemical reaction [1, 15]. The microwave (MW) assisted sol–gel method is reported to be a simple, cheap, faster, more energy-saving, and efficient process as compared to conventional heating methods [16, 17, 18]. The use of microwaves has received increased attention in the technological field because, among other things, it reduces the reaction time from days to minutes or hours, improves the properties of synthesized nanostructures, and allows obtaining oxide nanocrystalline films on various substrates [8, 19, 20].

The improved properties of the oxide nanostructures obtained by microwaves assisted sol–gel method could be correlated to the influence of the microwaves on the chemical reactions that take place during the sol–gel synthesis, leading to the formation of different molecular species. Results on the influence of the microwaves on the chemical reactions during the sol–gel synthesis will be discussed in the present chapter.

Advertisement

2. General consideration on the sol-gel chemistry

Among the chemical methods in the liquid phase, the sol–gel technique is a versatile and efficient method for pure or doped metal oxide films or powders, as well as for oxide compounds preparation [21, 22, 23, 24].

A comprehensive definition of sol–gel method assumes that the process represents the formation of an inorganic polymeric network by reactions in the solution at low temperatures. In the second step, by adequate thermal treatments, the conversion of the inorganic amorphous polymers takes place either into glasses or into crystalline materials [1, 22].

Based on the type of the precursors and the reaction medium used, two types of sol–gel processes were developed: on the bases of the alcoholic (organic) or aqueous medium.

According to Pierre [25] in both polymeric and aqueous sol–gel routes, the precursors undertake the succession of the following transformations in the presence of water:

Hydrolysis→polymerization→nucleation→growthE1

In the case of the polymeric route, using alkoxides (non-ionized precursors), the reactions that occur are the following:

MORn+xH2O→MORn−xOHx+xROHE2
MORn−xOHx+MORn−xOHx→MORn−xOHx−1MOMORn−xOH+H2OE3
−M−OH+HO−M−→−M−O−M−+H2OE4

The aqueous sol–gel route has also two pathways: the colloidal route [26] and the aqueous route using different chelating agents [23, 26, 27].

In the case of the aqueous route, which starts from colloidal solutions in aqueous medium, the following reactions take place:

MXz→Mz++X−E5
Mz++nH2O→MOH2nz+E6
MH2Onz+→MH2On−1OHz−1+H+E7
xMH2Onz++yOH−+aA→MxOuOHy−2uH2OnAaxz−y−a++xn+u−nH2OE8

In the case of transition metals, it is more difficult to obtain gels, the metals having very high reactivity due to their higher electronegativity and their not satisfied coordination sphere.

To favor the gelling process, in case of the transition metals, chelating agents, as carboxylic acids or polyols, are used. A typical reaction is the following

MxH2OpOHy]z−+mAc→MxH2OpOHy−mAcmz−+mOH−E9

It is important to underline that in all mentioned cases the reactions take place simultaneously, not consequently, and they are also reversible, fact that determines a complex composition of the sol–gel solutions.

Prior to gelation, the sol–gel solution can be used to obtain thin films by using simple techniques such as dip or spin coating [23, 28].

Besides the fact that it offers the possibility of obtaining both films and powders of metal oxides at nanometric dimensions, the sol–gel method has also some advantages over other preparation techniques. Such advantages are purity, homogeneity, the possibility to introducing dopants in large quantities, ease of manufacturing, low processing temperature, control over the stoichiometry, composition, viscosity [13, 27, 29] and, in the case of thin films, easy control of thickness, as well as the ability to cover large and different type of surfaces [30, 31].

Lately, ultrasonic [32, 33] or microwave irradiation [9, 17, 18, 34, 35, 36] in sol–gel oxide nanomaterials synthesis have become methods of interest because, in addition to being cheap and environmentally friendly heating methods, offer the advantage of using shorter synthesis time, and allow the control of crystallinity, size and morphology of the resulted nanoparticles [9, 35].

Advertisement

3. Microwaves and their influence on the chemical reactions

Microwave radiation is a source of energy of great interest for chemical synthesis because, among other benefits, it has been observed that the use of microwaves improves the properties of obtained nanomaterials. The first reporting on the use of microwaves in a chemical synthesis dates back to 1986 [37]. Although initially microwaves have been applied in organic synthesis, lately their use has become quite widespread in obtaining inorganic products like metal oxides nanomaterials and metallic nanomaterials [38].

Microwaves are electromagnetic radiations located between infrared radiation and radio waves with frequencies between 300 MHz (100 cm) and 300 GHz (0.1 cm). For the nanomaterials synthesis in which aqueous solutions are used, 2.45 GHz frequency is commonly applied for microwave heating of the solutions, because water absorption is maximum at this value.

Subjected to a microwave field, the substances behave differently: absorb, transmit, reflect received radiation, or any combination of these three interactions. Polar substances absorb microwaves radiation, non-polar substances are transparent environments for this type of radiation, and electrical conductors reflect microwaves radiation. Therefore, microwave heating process is used for heating the materials which can absorb the microwave energy and convert it into heat especially by dipolar polarization or conduction mechanism [1, 39]. The interactions of polar molecules and ions with the electromagnetic field have already been described by many researchers. Shortly, the collisions resulting from the rotation of the dipoles during polarization and the load carriers during conduction give energy to the atoms and molecules from the solution in the form of heat [38, 39].

While conventional heating methods are slow enough and the heat transfer from the surface to the inner material or solution, producing non-homogeneous heating, microwave heating is done quickly because microwaves can penetrate the materials to a depth that depends on the dielectric properties of the material, heating them homogeneously [38]. Consequently, microwave heating can have certain benefits over conventional heating, like faster reaction, higher reproducibility, enhancement of product quality. It is instantaneous, with no heat dissipation effects, and advantageous for selective dielectric heating, as a result of the dielectric constant difference between the solvent and reactant [40].

In sol–gel synthesis, due to rapid and direct heating of the sample with microwave radiation, the instantaneous decomposition of the precursors and the obtaining of a supersaturated solution occur. In this way, the conditions for obtaining monodispersed nanoparticles (rapid and short nucleation in a supersaturated solution) can be obtained experimentally. At the same time, the in-situ approach of conversion of energy results in a minimized thermal gradient due to the fast heating rate consequently is providing perfect conditions for the uniform growth of nanocrystals [31, 41].

More, in the case of sol–gel synthesis using organic solvents, characterized by slow kinetics, microwave heating is an optimal method of increasing the rate of reaction [41].

From the research carried out so far, it has been observed that, by combining the sol–gel method with the microwave heating, the properties of the obtained oxide nanostructures are improved [9, 34].

Because the presence of MW, the interaction of the electromagnetic field with each molecule in the solution differs during the hydrolysis-condensation process, we can expect the formation of different molecular species as compared to the classical sol–gel synthesis.

Advertisement

4. Oxide nanostructures obtained by MW assisted sol–gel method

Up to now, there have been several reports regarding the synthesis of metal oxide nanomaterials by microwave-assisted sol–gel method. However, many of them have been performed using domestic microwave ovens, in which the reaction conditions cannot be accurately measured, making the experiments difficult to be reproduced.

According to the literature data, the MW irradiation in the sol–gel synthesis was used, most frequently, for precipitation of nanocrystalline metal oxides, for thermal treatment of amorphous oxide nanopowders as well as for drying and thermally treatment of the oxide films [36].

Less attention was given to study the reactions that take place in the sol–gel solutions during MW irradiation [42, 43, 44, 45].

4.1 Pure and doped oxide nanostructures

A large number of oxides were prepared by sol–gel and microwave assisted sol–gel methods. Using MW irradiations of the solutions, preparation of several oxides were mentioned in the literature data, as MgO [46], RuO2 [47], ZnO [16], ZrO2 [48], WO3 [49], SiO2 [50], TiO2 [35, 51]. The power of the used microwaves ranged from 140 W [51] to 850 W [47].

Among them, considerable interest is given to pure and doped TiO2. The doping of TiO2 was realized with a high number of elements, such as Cr [13], Ag [52], Au, Pt [14, 53], Sn-Cu-Ni [54], Fe, Pt, Pd [51] and V [55]. Doping TiO2 with different elements the properties of the resulted nanostructures are improved, while using microwave assisted preparation, supplementary improvement was also observed.

Our studies regarding the influence of the microwaves on the reactions in the sol–gel solutions were published by Predoana et al. [42] in the case of TiO2 and V-doped TiO2 nanostructures.

The use of vanadium as a doping agent has a beneficial influence on the TiO2 properties: it can reduce the band gap energy, enhance the absorption of visible light and increase the specific surface area of the powder. The mentioned properties are reflected mainly in its photocatalytic activity, previously presented by Huang et al. [55].

In our studies, the reagents used in the synthesis were titanium(IV) ethoxide Ti(OC2H5)4 in the case of TiO2, as well as, titanium(IV) ethoxide Ti(OC2H5)4 and vanadylacetylacetonate VO(AcAc), for V-doped TiO2. In both cases, ethanol C2H5OH as a solvent, 2,4 pentanedione (AcAc), as a chelating agent, and nitric acid HNO3 as catalyst were used.

By the classical sol–gel method the reagents were mixed for 2 hours at room temperature. By the microwave-assisted sol–gel method, the same mixture was exposed for 5 min at 300 W and a frequency of 2.45 GHz.

The first important result of using the microwave-assisted sol–gel method is the significantly increasing of the stability of the prepared solutions against gelation, having a great advantage for multilayer film deposition. This effect was assigned to the formation of different molecular species.

The solutions were used for obtaining thin films and the resulted gels were investigated for their structural and morphological properties.

In our studies for TiO2samples synthesized by sol–gel and microwave-assisted sol–gel methods, the TG/DTG/DTA curves corresponding to the decomposition of the obtained gels are presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

TG/DTG/DTA curves of the TiO2 samples obtained by SG and MW methods [42] (Reproduced with the permission of Springer Nature).

It could be noticed that the thermal decomposition of the gels is not essentially influenced by the method of preparation. Only a small increase of the thermal effect at 195o C is observed for the TiO2 sample obtained by MW assisted sol–gel method. The fact could be explained by the positive influence of microwaves on the formation of the molecular species that decompose at the mentioned temperature.

Based on the TG/DTG/DTA results, the samples prepared by both methods were thermally treated at 450°C for 1 h. By X-ray diffraction of the samples thermally treated at this temperature only anatase phase was detected (according to JCPDS card no. 21–1272), but a higher crystallinity is noticed in the case of sample obtained by MW-assisted procedure (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

The XRD patterns of the TiO2 samples obtained by SG and MW-assisted SG methods thermally treated at 450°C.

In the case of the V-doped TiO2 the TG/DTG/DTA measurements in the air are presented in Figure 3 for the gel containing 2 mol% V. In this case, increased thermal stability and a more complex decomposition of the gels obtained by the microwave-assisted sol–gel method is observed.

Figure 3.

TGA/DTG/DTA curves of the V-doped TiO2 samples obtained by SG and MW-assisted SG methods [42] (Reproduced with the permission of Springer Nature).

Confirmations of the TG/DTG/DTA results on the gels with 2 mol% V were obtained by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). The obtained DSC curves are presented in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

DCS curves of the V-doped TiO2 obtained by SG and MW-assisted SG methods [43] (Reproduced with the permission from Springer Nature).

According to the DSC results, the thermal stability of the gel obtained from the solution prepared in the presence of microwaves, is significantly higher (with about 100°C), as compared with the gel with similar compositions, but obtained by the classical sol–gel method.

At the same time, the number and temperatures of the thermal effects are different in the two discussed cases underlying the different compositions of the gels obtained in the presence or the absence of the microwaves.

The TG/DTG/DTA/EGA measurements, presented in Figure 5, have confirmed, once more, the results discussed above, regarding the different thermal behavior of the gels obtained by the microwave-assisted sol–gel method.

Figure 5.

TG/DTG/DTA/EGA curves of V-doped TiO2 obtained by (a) SG and (b) MW-assisted SG methods [42] (Reproduced with the permission of Springer Nature).

In the case of the microwave-assisted sol–gel method the same gasses are evolved, namely H2O and CO2, but a more complex thermal decomposition is observed, with different ratios among the two mentioned gases at the different temperatures. This result is assigned to the higher number of molecular species present in the gel, having different chemical composition and different thermal stability.

By X-ray diffraction of the V-doped TiO2 with 2 mol% V samples thermally treated at 450°C (Figure 6) only anatase phase was detected (according to JCPDS card no. 21–1272). As in the case of un-doped TiO2, a higher crystallinity is noticed in the case of samples obtained by MW assisted procedure.

Figure 6.

The XRD patterns of the V-doped TiO2 samples obtained by SG and MW-assisted SG methods, thermally treated at 450°C.

Before gelation, the solutions prepared in the presence and in the absence of MWs were used for thin film deposition by dip-coating on glass substrates [43].

In our studies for the TiO2films obtained by the sol–gel method, the SEM micrographs show surface cavities that were not observed in the case of microwaves-assisted sol–gel films (Figure 7a and c).

Figure 7.

SEM micrographs showing the film cross-section for samples (a) (TiO2)SG; (b) (TiO2)MW; (c) (V-dopedTiO2)SG; (d) (V-dopedTiO2)MW [43].

The sol–gel TiO2based films present also a similar variation of the morphology according to the method of preparation. A more dense and homogeneous aspect is observed in the film obtained in the presence of microwaves (Figure 7b and d).

Thickness values are around 200 nm both for TiO2 and V-doped TiO2 films, but slightly higher in the case of the films obtained from microwave-assisted sol–gel solutions.

The transmission spectra of obtained films are presented in Figure 8 show optical transmittance values mainly over 80% in the visible range.

Figure 8.

Optical transmission of the TiO2 and V-doped TiO2 films obtained by (a) SG and (b) MW-assisted SG methods.

To explain the differences induced by the microwave-assisted sol–gel process on the properties of the resulted films, their influence on the starting solution, and the evolution of the sol–gel process, should be taken into consideration. Based on the results obtained up to now, it could be assumed that in the presence of microwaves, different and more stable molecular species are formed as compared to the classical sol–gel method and this a fact influences the properties of the resulted films.

It was also observed that the effect of microwaves on the properties of the resulted materials is higher in the case of V-doped TiO2 samples, fact that could be correlated to an enhancement of the reactions between Ti and V reagents during the sol–gel process in the presence of the microwaves.

As presented in the several references, WO3based nanomaterials are widely investigated in the field of electrochromic devices [56], gas sensing [57], and photocatalysis [58] in different morphologies and structures. Even though the sol–gel process has a long past and is an intensely researched method [59] the literature of sol–gel preparation of WO3 using microwave-assistance is scarce. The following articles are all from the 2010s so further researches are to be expected.

Different nanostructures were prepared by microwave assisted sol–gel method with sodium tungstate as a precursor material by Kharade et al. [60, 61, 62]. The research group synthesizes various nanoparticles and nanofilms for electrochromic purposes. In 2012 WO3 nanofilms were deposited on the FTO substrate, which was the first time used MW-assisted two-step process. In the first step, the preparation of the gel was conducted with microwave assistance, then in the second step, the deposition of the thin film occurred by a chemical growth set up. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) showed that the surface is coated with petal-like WO3 nanodisks with dimensions of 450–600 nm length, 350–400 nm width, and 20–35 nm thickness. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis (Figure 9) points out that WO3 is in the hexagonal crystal form. Narrow and intense XRD peaks indicate that the material has good crystallinity and calculations determined that the crystal size is 71 nm, which is comparable to samples made by the regular sol–gel method [63]. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed that the W:O ratio is non-stoichiometric(2.89). Electrochromic capabilities were determined with different electroanalytical methods [60]. Comparing this to a regular sol–gel method shows that the morphology of the surface, namely the platelet like nanodisks is nearly the same with a small difference in size (regular sol–gel platelets: 10–30 nm thick and few hundred nm lengths and width). However, to achieve the same crystallinity a 500°C annealing process is required for the regular sol–gel method, in contrast to the 150°C drying of the MW-assisted sol–gel method [64].

Figure 9.

X-ray diffractogram of the WO3 thin film [60] (Copyright (2012), with permission from Elsevier).

The same hexagonal WO3 thin film was synthesized and its electrochromic properties were enhanced with different amounts of Ag nanoparticles [61]. The microwave-assisted sol–gel method was also used to produce WO3/MoO3 mixed oxide thin films. First, the WO3 layer were produced with the two-step method explained earlier, then MoO3 was deposited with vacuum evaporation [62].

Hilaire et al. [49] prepared WO3 nanoparticles using a nonaqueous microwave-assisted sol–gel method for photoanodes. The synthesized nanoparticles were analyzed with FT-IR, which showed that no organic contaminant remained on the surface of the particles, but a weight indicates that there are a 4.4% water and organic residue after 800°C heating. XRD studies confirm the monoclinic crystalline structure of the WO3 nanoparticles.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed that the platelets like WO3 nanoparticles size is 20–40 nm and thickness of 3 nm. Moreover, TEM measurements indicate that the WO3 platelets face having the crystalline orientation of [0 0 2]. The WO3 nanoparticles were used for the production of photoanodes, which was proven to be an efficient method for water splitting. The comparison of this result with another nonaqueous regular sol–gel method shows that the morphology of the particles differs, but this can be caused by the usage of a different solvent (dicarboxylic acid) and modifier (polyethylene glycol).

The regular method resulted in larger (58 nm) rod-like nanoparticles. The case of the WO3 particle’s crystallinity is similar to the thin layer’s: without after annealing process, the MW assisted method provides better crystallinity [65].

It was also established [66] that microwave heating is more convenient than resistive heating to fabricate WO3 nanoparticles with high specific surfaces and very small particle sizes also in the case of hydrothermal method of preparation. In our studies [67, 68] hexagonal structured WO3 nanoparticles and wires were prepared using MW assisted hydrothermal process. SEM images are presented in the Figure 10.

Figure 10.

SEM images of the (a,b) hexagonal WO3 nanowire coated with TiO2 and (c, d) monoclinic WO3 nanoparticle coated with TiO2 [67] (Reprinted with permission from [67] copyright from RSC Advances).

The Au decorated h-WO3 nanowires were prepared for photocatalysis. The pre-decorated WO3 nanowires showed crystallinity and were composed of W and O only. The morphology also differs from nanodisks, the hydrothermally produced WO3 took the form of nanorods with 10 μm length and 10 nm diameter.

Nevertheless, the Au decorated nanowires showed great photocatalytic activities. Nanowires and nanoparticles coated with TiO2 using ALD were also synthesized, but the characteristics of the non-coated samples were done. Hexagonal and monoclinic nanoparticles were prepared using controlled annealing of the samples.

Similarly, further annealing is needed to reach a comparable crystallinity, but for the monoclinic structure it’s obligatory. The size of the crystals was 50–70 nm and 60–90 nm for hexagonal, and for the irregular shaped monoclinic WO3 nanoparticles respectively. The hexagonal WO3 nanowires were analogous to the earlier nanowire, several μm long and 5–10 nm diameter. The TiO2 coated nanostructures proved to be efficient photocatalysts [67, 68].

4.2 Oxide compounds

Let us deal with the results regarding the synthesis by microwave-assisted sol–gel methods of the precursor powders for SrCu2O2 preparation.

The interest for the SrCu2O2 compound are connected to its possible applications as thermoelectric or full oxide electronic devices, solar cells, liquid-crystal displays, touchscreen, and so on [45].

Among the CuO-based p-type TCOs, Cu-Sr-O has received attention due to its wide direct band gap, and its potential use in transparent optoelectronic devices; such as light-emitting diodes, laser diodes, solar cells, display technology, and other technologies [69]. In most of the published reports, Cu based p-type TCO thin films are deposited by high vacuum processes which are costly. Some of the processes include pulsed laser deposition (PLD), reactive evaporation, magnetron sputtering, thermal co-evaporation and radio frequency [70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76]. To date, few studies have reported on the preparation of a Cu-based p-type TCO by a non-vacuum solution chemical route.

Roy et al. [77] used sol–gel and annealing methods to prepare Cu2SrO2 thin films. They used different oxygen pressure, annealing time, and temperature combinations to attempt to obtain phase pure Cu2SrO2 thin films. Copper (II) methoxide and triethanolamine were mixed in the ration 1:1. Pure Sr-metal was dissolved separately in distilled anhydrous isopropanol under argon. The Cu-solution was then mixed drop-wise into the Sr-solution while stirring. The mixture was stirred continuously for 2 hrs at room temperature. The sol was spin-coated on clean substrates with 3000 rpm for 30 s. The coated films were heated at 225°C for 2 min in the air for partial pyrolysis. This coating/heating cycle was repeated ten times to obtain films of the desired thickness of 500 nm. After deposition, the film was annealed further under controlled oxygen pressure. Different annealing procedures were used to avoid the presence of excess Cu2O phase.

XRD analysis (Figure 11b) showed the films had a mixed-phase of excess Cu2O and Cu2SrO2 after final reduced-oxygen pressure annealing. Films annealed at lower oxygen pressure (1.3 × 10−2 and 1.3× 10−3 Pa) had similar phase composition and in all the three films Cu2O formed as a secondary phase with Cu2SrO2. For the film annealed at the highest oxygen pressure (1.3 × 10−1 Pa), CuSrO2 was observed as the amount of Cu2SrO2 decreased and the intensity of the Cu2O peaks did not change.

Figure 11.

(a) TEM image, (b) XRD spectra (c) SEM image of the films after final annealing at 750°C under 1.3 × 10−2 Pa oxygen pressure [77] (Reproduced by the permission of Elsevier).

Both SEM and TEM images (Figure 11a and c) show that two phases are present. The light-gray particles (differing sizes) in the SEM and large particles in TEM images are the Cu2SrO2 phases. The dark gray phase in the SEM image is a mixture of small Cu2SrO2 and Cu2O particles, as confirmed by the TEM images. The SEM and TEM images reveal that the Cu2O and Cu2SrO2 phases are intermingled with each other.

Ginley et al. [78] used sol–gel and annealing to prepare pure phased Cu2SrO2 films. Stoichiometric amounts of aqueous solutions copper formate and strontium acetate were mixed in methanol and stirred. Triethanolamine was added, the mixture stirred and evaporated at 80°C to form sol which was diluted by isopropyl alcohol and spin-coated on MgO (100) substrates for 20 s, at 3000 revs per min. The resulting films were annealed at 200°C temperature for 2 min and then pyrolyzed at 500°C for 2 min. The spin-coating and pyrolysis cycles were repeated 8–10 times. After the cycles, the films were first annealed at 750°C for 30 min in air and then at 775°C under 2.7 × 10−6 Torr oxygen. The films were characterized by XRD (Figure 12) and FTIR and showed to be phase pure.

Figure 12.

XRD patterns of Cu2SrO2 films as a function of processing time [78].

Predoana et al., are the first to report the synthesis of Sr-Cu-O gels by microwave (MW) assisted sol–gel methods [45]. Pure strontium acetyl acetonate (Sr(C5H7O2)2 and copper (II) acetyl acetonate (Cu(C5H7O2)2) were used as precursors for strontium and copper, respectively. The 0.25 M aqueous solutions of Sr.(C5H7O2)2 and Cu(C5H7O2)2 solution in absolute ethanol were mixed with triethanolamine, in the ratio 1:1. In the case of the sol–gel method, the starting solution was homogenized under vigorous stirring for 2 h at 80 C. For MW assisted sol–gel method, the same starting solution was homogenized by stirring and exposing to microwaves having power ~ 300 W and 2.45 GHz frequency for 5 minutes. The sol–gel and the microwave-assisted sol–gel prepared Sr-Cu-O were characterized by SEM, FTIR, XRD, and their thermal properties investigated by TG/DTA-MS in air, inert and reducing atmospheres.

In the experimental conditions presented above pieces of gels of different size, and blueish-green color were obtained for both preparation methods. The results obtained by TG/DTA-MS analysis (Figure 13a and b) of the obtained gels demonstrated the influence of MW on the sol–gel synthesis. MW treated samples had one more mass loss step when heated in air attributed to complex compositions of the resulted gels that contain a higher number of molecular species with higher thermal stability. The results were confirmed with the FTIR spectra (Figure 13c and d) showing more vibration bands for the samples prepared by the MW sol-gel method, assigned according to [79, 80, 81].

Figure 13.

Thermal decomposition in air (a) sol–gel synthesized sample, (b) MW assisted sol–gel synthesized sample, (c) FTIR spectra of sol–gel synthesized sample, (d) FTIR spectra of MW assisted sol–gel synthesized sample [45] (Reproduced by the permission of Elsevier).

Based on the XRD patterns of the residues (Figure 14), the final product is composed of a mixture of phases that depend on the synthesis route and the annealing conditions.

Figure 14.

(a) XRD patterns of sol–gel synthesized samples (b) MW-assisted sol–gel samples annealed at 900°C in air, N2 and 5%H2/95%Ar [45].

For samples annealed in air, Sr–Cu–O phase was also present for the sol–gel synthesized sample, while the MW sample had CuO as the main component. In different atmosphere (N2 and H2/Ar) several compounds (Sr2CuO3, SrO and CuO) are present in varying amounts. Only traces of SrCO3 can be detected. In all annealing atmospheres, in the case of the samples synthesized by MW-assisted sol–gel method, powders with a lower degree of crystallization is formed. This result could be attributed to the formation of a higher number of molecular species with higher thermal stability.

The powders prepared in the mentioned conditions are intended to be investigated as precursors for SrCu2O2 compound preparation.

The presented results are important revealing the effect of MW on the reactions that take place during the sol–gel synthesis but should be considered preliminary. Direct methods of the solutions investigations, as High-Pressure Liquid Cromatogaphy (HPLC), are underway in order to bring more information on the sol–gel chemistry in the presence and the absence of microwaves.

Advertisement

5. Conclusions

The interest of using microwaves in obtaining oxide nanostructures by reactions in solutions is rather high, leading to obtaining powders or films with enhanced properties.

According to the literature data, the MW irradiation in the sol–gel synthesis was used, most frequently, for precipitation of nanocrystalline metal oxides, for thermal treatment to crystallize the amorphous oxide nanopowders as well as for drying and thermally treatment of the oxide films.

However, the influence of the microwaves on the chemical reactions that take place during the sol–gel synthesis is less investigated.

Results regarding the formation of pure or doped nanostructures, as well as oxide compound, by sol–gel method in the presence or absence of microwave are presented.

The main results of the studies have shown that in all cases in the presence of microwave formation different molecular species is observed with a positive influence on the properties of the resulted nanostructure.

The advantage of using the MW-assited sol–gel method is a more shorter time of synthesis and obtaining nanostructures with improved properties.

The obtained results are of interest, but could be considered preliminary and systematic studies on the chemical processes induced by the microwaves should be continued.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

This work was performed in the frame of Mobility Project “Reduced semiconductor oxides for TCO, photocatalysis and gas sensing applications”, 2019– 2021, between IlieMurgulescu Institute of Physical Chemistry of the Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania and Research Center for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Science Research Group of the Hungarian Academy of Science at the Budapest, Hungary. An NRDI K 124212 and an NRDI TNN_16 123631 grants are acknowledged. The research within project No. VEKOP-2.3.2-16-2017-00013 was supported by the European Union and the State of Hungary, co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The research reported in this paper was supported by the BMENanotechnology and Materials Science TKP2020 IE grant of NKFIH Hungary (BME IE-NAT TKP2020)and Stipendium Hungaricum scholarship grant.

References

  1. 1. Garadkar KM, Kadam AN, Park J. Microwave-Assisted Sol–Gel Synthesis of Metal Oxide Nanomaterials. In: Klein L, Aparicio M, Jitianu A, editors. Handbook of Sol-Gel Science and Technology.Processing, Characterization andApplications.2nd ed.Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 1-22. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-19454-7_107-1
  2. 2. Uglov VV, Doroshevich IL, Kvasov NT, RemnevGE, Shymanski VI. On physical properties of nanoparticles: Size effect and scale of nanoobjects. Phys Status Solidi C. Current Topics in Solid State Physics.2016;13:903-907.DOI:10.1002/pssc.201600039
  3. 3. Canas-Carrell JE, Li S, Parra AM, Shrestha B. Metal oxide nanomaterials: health and environmental effects. In: Njuguna J, Pielichowski K, Zhu H, editors. Health and Environmental Safety of Nanomaterials. 1st ed.PolymerNancomposites and Other Materials Containing Nanoparticles. WoodheadPublishing; 2014. p. 200-221. DOI: 10.1533/9780857096678.3.200
  4. 4. Heera P, Shanmugam S. Nanoparticle characterization and application: An overview. Int J CurrMicrobiolAppl Sci. 2015;4:379-386.ISSN: 2319-7706
  5. 5. Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I. Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities. Arab J Chem. 2019;12:908-931. DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.011
  6. 6. Dey K, Srivastana AK. Metal oxide nanomaterials: an overview. In: Srivastava AK editor. Oxide Nanostructures: Growth, Microstructures, and Properties. Pan Stanford Publishing; 2009. p. 1-77. DOI: 10.1201/b15633-2
  7. 7. Patil KC, Hegde MS, Rattan T, Aruna ST. Chemistry of nanocrystalline oxidematerials. Combustionsynthesis, propertiesandapplications, New Jersey:World Scientific; 2008. 364 p. DOI: 10.1142/6754
  8. 8. Kim K, Kim E, Kim Y, Park K. Characteristics of ZnO Thin Film Transistors Fabricated Using a Microwave Sol-Gel Method. Korean J Met Mater. 2014; 52:155-161. DOI:10.3365/KJMM.2014.52.2.155
  9. 9. MudassarMuzaffar S, Naeem S, Yaseen S, Riaz S, Kayani ZN, Naseem S. Microwave assisted tuning of optical and magnetic properties of zinc oxide nanorods—efficient antibacterial and photocatalytic agent. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2020;95:88-100. DOI: 10.1007/s10971-020-05290-3
  10. 10. Cao G, Wang Y.Nanostructures and Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Properties and Applications Applications. 2nd ed. World Scientific Series in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, vol 2;2011. 581 p
  11. 11. Carp O, Huisman CL, Reller A. Photoinduced reactivity of titanium dioxide. Prog Solid State Chem.2004;32:33-177. DOI: 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2004.08.001
  12. 12. Darshana B, Parikh S, Shah M. Potential of Ag–Fe co-doped TiO2 nanocomposite for solar photocatalysis of high COD pharmaceutical effluent and influencing factors. Energ. Ecol. Environ. 2020;5:344-358. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-020-00162-6
  13. 13. Mendiola-Alvarez SY, Guzman-Mar JL, Turnes-Palomino G, Maya-Alejandro F, Hernandez-Ramirez A, Hinojosa-Reyes L. UV and visible activation of Cr(III)-doped TiO2 catalyst prepared by a microwave-assisted sol–gel method during MCPA degradation. Environ SciPollut Res. 2017;24:12673-12682. DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-8034-x
  14. 14. Hernandez R, Rosendo Hernandez-Resendiz J, Martinez-Chavez A, Velazquez-Castillo R, Escobar-Alarcon L, Esquivel K. X-ray diffraction Rietveld structural analysis of Au–TiO2 powders synthesized by sol–gel route coupled to microwave and sonochemistry. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2020;95:239-252. DOI: 10.1007/s10971-020-05264-5
  15. 15. Akbar A, Riaz S, Ashraf R, Naseem S. Magnetic and magnetization properties of iron oxide thin films by microwave assisted sol–gel route. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2015;74:320-328. DOI: 10.1007/s10971-014-3528-9
  16. 16. Assi N, Azar PA, Tehrani MS, Husain SW. Studies on photocatalytic performance and photodegradation kinetics of zinc oxide nanoparticles prepared by microwave-assisted sol–gel technique using ethylene glycol. J Iran Chem Soc. 2016;13:1593-1602. DOI: 10.1007/s13738-016-0875-1
  17. 17. Parangusan H, Ponnamma D, Al-Maadeed MAA. Effect of cerium doping onthe optical and photocatalytic properties of ZnOnanoflowers. Bull Mater Sci. 2019;42:179. DOI: 10.1007/s12034-019-1865-6
  18. 18. Falk GS, Borlaf M, Lopez-Munoz MJ, Farinas JC, Rodrigues Neto JB, Moreno R. Microwave-assisted synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles: photocatalytic activity of powders and thin films. J Nanopart Res. 2018; 20:23. DOI: 10.1007/s11051-018-4140-7
  19. 19. Dinelli M, Fabbri E, Bondioli F. TiO2–SiO2 hard coating on polycarbonatesubstratebymicrowaveassisted sol–gel technique. J Sol-Gel SciTechnol. 2011;58:463-469. DOI: 10.1007/s10971-011-2413-z
  20. 20. Giesz P, Celichowski G, Puchowicz D, Kaminska I, Grobelny J, Batory D, Cieslak M. Microwave-assisted TiO2: anatase formation on cottonandviscose fabric surfaces. Cellulose. 2016;23:2143-2159. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-0916-z
  21. 21. Sakka S. Sol-gel Process and Applications. In: Somiya S., editor. Handbook of Advanced Ceramics: Materials, Applications, Processing and Properties. 2nd ed. Boston: Academic Press; 2013. p. 883-910
  22. 22. Schmidt H. Chemistry of material preparation by the sol-gel process. J Non-Cryst Solids. 1988;100:51-64. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3093(88)9006-3
  23. 23. Brinker CJ, Scherer GW. Sol-gel science: the physics and chemistry of sol-gel processing. 1st ed. Boston: Academic Press; 1990. 912 p
  24. 24. Vartanyan M, Voytovich I, Gorbunova I, Makarov N. Preparation and Structural Characterization of Complex Oxide Eutectic Precursors from Polymer–Salt Xerogels Obtained by Microwave-Assisted Drying. Materials. 2020;13:1808. DOI: 10.3390/ma13081808
  25. 25. Pierre AC. Introductiontothe sol–gel process. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 1998. 394 p. DOI: 10. 1007/978-1-4615-5659-6
  26. 26. Iler RK. The chemistry of silica: Solubility, Polymerization, Colloid and Surface Properties and Biochemistry. Chichester: Wiley; 1979. 896 p
  27. 27. Livage J, Henry M, Sanchez C. Sol–gel chemistry of transition metal oxides. Prog Solid State Chem. 1988;18:259-341. DOI: 10.1016/0079-6786(88)90005-2
  28. 28. Atkinson C, Sansom CL, Almond HJ, Shaw CP. Coatings for concentrating solar systems – a review. Renew Sustainable Energy Rev. 2015;45:113-122. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.015
  29. 29. Akpan UG, Hameed BH. The advancements in sol–gel method of doped-TiO2 photocatalysts - a review. ApplCatal A: General. 2010;375:1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2009.12.023
  30. 30. Manole V, Dobromir M, Girtan M, Mallet R, Rusu G, Luca D. Optical properties of Nb-doped TiO2 thin films prepared by sol–gel method. Ceram Int.2013;39:4771-4776. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.11.066
  31. 31. Wang Y, He Y, Lai Q, Fan M. Review of the progress in preparing nano TiO2: An important environmental engineering material. J Environ Sci. 2014;26:2139-2177.DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.09.023
  32. 32. Babu SG, Neppolian B, AshokkumarM.Ultrasound-Assisted Synthesis of Nanoparticles for Energy and Environmental Applications. In Ashokkumar M, editor. Handbook of Ultrasonics and Sonochemistry. Singapore:Springer; 2016. p. 423-456. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-287-278-4_16
  33. 33. Goswami YC, Kumar V, Rajaram P, Ganesan V, Malik MA, O’Brien P. Synthesis of SnO2 nanostructures by ultrasonic-assisted sol–gel method. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2014;69:617-624. DOI: 10.1007/s10971-013-3241-0
  34. 34. Ishtiyaq MF, Bhuiyan AA, Roy U, BillahMM.Efect of the microwave-assisted thermal annealing on structural and optical properties of the sol–gel-derived ZnO thin flms. SN Applied Sciences. 2020;2:1294. DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-3098-0
  35. 35. Jaimy KB, Vidya K, Saraswathy HUN, Hebalkar NY, Warrier KGK. Dopant-free anatase titanium dioxide as visible-light catalyst: Facile sol–gel microwave approach. JECE. 2015;3:1277-1286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2014.06.023
  36. 36. Predoana L, Stanciu I, Zaharescu M. Metal oxide nanomaterials obtained by sol-gel and microwave assisted sol-gel method. In: Yurish SY, editor. Advances in Microelectronics: Reviews, Volume 2. Barcelona: IFSA Publishing; 2019. p. 221-250
  37. 37. Gedye R, Smith F, Westaway K, Ali H, Baldisera L, Laberge L, RousellJ. The use of microwave ovens for rapid organic synthesis. TetrahedronLett. 1986;27:279-282. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-4039(00)83996-9
  38. 38. Borja Diaz de Grenu, Ruth de los Reyes, Costero AM, Amoros P, Ros-Lis JV. Recent Progress of Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Silica Materials. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1092. DOI: 10.3390/nano10061092
  39. 39. Sun J, Wang W, Yue Q. Review on Microwave-Matter Interaction Fundamentals and Efficient Microwave-Associated Heating Strategies. Materials. 2016;9:231. DOI: 10.3390/ma9040231
  40. 40. Das S, Mukhopadhyay AK, Datta S, Basu D. Prospects of microwave processing: An overview. Bull Mater Sci.2009;32:1-13. DOI: 10.1007/ s12034-009-0001-4
  41. 41. Sciancalepore C, Bondioli F, Manfredini T, Gualtieri A. Quantitativephaseanalysisandmicrostructurecharacterization of magnetite nanocrystalsobtainedbymicrowaveassisted non-hydrolytic sol–gel synthesis. MaterCharact. 2015;100:88-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2014.12.013
  42. 42. Stanciu I, Predoana L, PandeleCusu J, Preda S, Anastasescu M, Vojisavljevic K, Malic B, ZaharescuM.Thermal behaviour of the TiO2-based gels obtained by microwave-assisted sol-gel method. JTAC. 2017;130:639-651. DOI:10.1007/s10973-017-6478-y
  43. 43. Predoana L, Calderon-Moreno JM, Anastasescu M, Stoica M, Stanciu I, Preda S, Gartner M, Zaharescu M. Structure and properties of the V-doped TiO2 thin films obtained by sol-gel and microwave-assisted sol-gel methods. J Sol-Gel SciTechn.2016;78:589-599. DOI: 10.1007/s10971-016-3972-9
  44. 44. Stanciu I, Predoana L, Preda S, Anastasescu M, Calderon-MorenoJM,Stoica M, Gartner M, Zaharescu M. Synthesis method and substrate influence on TiO2films doped with low vanadium content. Mater SciSemicond Process. 2017;68:118-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.mssp.2017.06.021
  45. 45. Predoana L, Atkinson I, Karaj DA, Odhiambo VO, Bakos LP, TN Kovacs TN, Pandele-Cusu J, Petrescu S, Rusu A, Szilagyi IM, Pokol G, Zaharescu M. Comparative study of the thermal behavior of Sr–Cu–O gels obtained by sol–gel and microwave-assisted sol–gel method. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s10973-019-09205-5
  46. 46. Mirzaei H, Davoodnia A. Microwave Assisted Sol-Gel Synthesis of MgO Nanoparticles and Their Catalytic Activity in the Synthesis of Hantzsch 1,4-Dihydropyridines. Chin J Catal. 2012;33:1502-1507. DOI: 10.1016/S1872-2067(11)60431-2
  47. 47. Sekularac G, Kosevic M, Drvenica I, Dekanski A, Panic V, Nikolic B. Titanium coated with high-performance nanocrystalline ruthenium oxide synthesized by the microwave-assisted sol–gel procedure.J Solid State Electrochem.2016;20:3115-3123. DOI: 10.1007/s10008-016-3343-z
  48. 48. Dwivedi R, Maurya A, Verma A, Prasad R, BartwalKS.Microwave assisted sol–gel synthesis of tetragonal zirconia nanoparticles. J Alloys Compd.2011;509:6848-685. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.03.138
  49. 49. Hilaire S, Suess MJ, Kranzlin N, Bienkowski K, Solarska R, Augustynski J, Niederberger M. Microwave-assisted nonaqueous synthesis of WO3 nanoparticles for crystallographically oriented photoanodes for water splitting. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2:20530-20537. DOI: 10.1039/c4ta04793a
  50. 50. Santiago A, Gonzalez A, Iruin JJ, Fernandez-Berridi MJ, Irusta L. Preparation of superhydrophobic silica nanoparticles by microwave assisted sol–gel process. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2012;61:8-13. DOI: 10.1007/s10971-011-2583-8
  51. 51. Colmenares JC, Aramendia MA, Marinas A, Marinas JM, Urbano FJ. Titanianano-photocatalysts synthesized by ultrasound and microwave methodologies: Application in depuration of water from 3-chloropyridine. J MolCatal A: Chem. 2010;331:58-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2010.07.014
  52. 52. Alsharaeh EA, Bora T, Soliman A, Faheem Ahmed F, Bharath G, Ghoniem MG, Abu-Salah KM, Dutta J. Sol-Gel-Assisted Microwave-Derived Synthesis of Anatase Ag/TiO2/GO Nanohybrids toward Efficient Visible Light Phenol Degradation. Catalysts. 2017;7:133. DOI:10.3390/catal7050133
  53. 53. Hernandez R, Duron-Torres SM, Esquivel K, Guzman C. Microwave Assisted Sol-Gel Synthesis and Characterization of M–TiO2 (M = Pt, Au) Photocatalysts. In: Perez Campos R, Contreras Cuevas A, Esparza Munoz R, editors. Characterization of Metals and Alloys. Cham: Springer; 2017. p.183-189, DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-31694-9_15
  54. 54. Maragatha J, Rajendran S, Endo T, Karuppuchamy S. Microwavesynthesis of metal doped TiO2 for photocatalyticapplications, J MaterSci: Mater Electron. 2017;28:5281-5287. DOI: 10.1007/s10854-016-6185-7
  55. 55. Hoang LH, Hai PV, Hanh PV, Hai NH, Chen XB, Yang IS. Microwave-assistedsynthesisandcharacterization of Ti1−xVxO2 (x=0.0-0.10) nanopowders. MaterLett. 2011;65:3047-3050.DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.06.034
  56. 56. Buch VR, Chawla AK, Rawal SK. Review on electrochromic property for WO3 thin films using different deposition techniques. Mater Today Proc. 2016;3:1429-1437.DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2016.04.025
  57. 57. Dong C, Zhao R, Yao L, Ran Y, Zhang X, Wang Y. A review on WO3 based gas sensors: Morphology control and enhanced sensing properties. J Alloys Compd. 2020;820:153194. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153194
  58. 58. Dong P, Hou G, Xi X, Shao R, Dong F. WO3-based photocatalysts: morphology control, activity enhancement and multifunctional applications. Environ Sci Nano. 2017;4:539-557. DOI: 10.1039/c6en00478d
  59. 59. Hench LL, West JK. The Sol-Gel Process. Chem Rev. 1990;90:33-72. DOI: 10.1021/cr00099a003
  60. 60. Kharade RR, PatilKR, Patil PS, Bhosale PN. Novel microwave assisted sol gel synthesis (MW-SGS) and electrochromic performance of petal like h-WO3 thin films. Mater Res Bull. 2012;47:1787-1793. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.03.025
  61. 61. Kharade RR, Mali SS, Patil PS, Patil KR, Gang MG, Patil PS, Kim JH, Bhosale PN. Enhanced electrochromic coloration in Ag nanoparticle decorated WO3 thin films. ElectrochimActa. 2013;102:358-368. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.123
  62. 62. Kharade RR, Mali SS, Mohite SS, Kondalkar VV, Patil PS, Bhosale PN. Hybrid Physicochemical Synthesis and Electrochromic Performance of WO3/MoO3 Thin Films. Electroanalysis. 2014;26:2388-2397. DOI: 10.1002/elan.201400239
  63. 63. Sivakumar R, Raj AME, Subramanian B, Jayachandran M, Trivedi DC, Sanjeeviraja C. Preparation and characterization of spray deposited n-type WO3 thin films for electrochromic devices. Mater Res Bull. 2004;39:1479-1489. DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2004.04.023
  64. 64. Breedon M, Spizzirri P, Taylor M, Du Plessis J, McCulloch D, Zhu J, Yu L, Hu Z, Rix C, Wlodarski W, Kalantar-zadeh K. Synthesis of nanostructured tungsten oxide thin films: A simple, controllable, inexpensive, aqueous sol-gel method. Cryst Growth Des. 2010;10:430-439. DOI: 10.1021/cg9010295
  65. 65. Ghasemi L, Jafari H. Morphological characterization of tungsten trioxide nanopowders synthesized by sol-gel modified Pechini’s method. Mater Res. 2017;20:1713-1721. DOI: 10.1590/1980-5373-MR-2017-0467
  66. 66. Le Houx N, Pourroy G, Camerel F, Comet M, Spitzer D. WO3 nanoparticles in the 5-30 nm range by solvothermal synthesis under microwave or resistive heating. J PhysChem C. 2010;114:155-161. DOI: 10.1021/jp908669u
  67. 67. Nagy D, Firkala T, Drotar E, Szegedi A, Laszlo K, Szilagyi IM. Photocatalytic WO3/TiO2 nanowires: WO3 polymorphs influencing the atomic layer deposition of TiO2. RSC Adv. 2016;6:95369-95377. DOI: 10.1039/c6ra18899k
  68. 68. Firkala T, Keri O, Gaber F, Kocs L, Horvolgyi Z, Nagy D, Zaharescu M, Szilagyi I. Photocatalytic Properties of Hexagonal WO3 Nanowires Decorated with Gold Nanoparticles. Rev RoumChim. 2017;62:767-773
  69. 69. Nie X, Wei SH, Zhang SB. First-principles study of transparent p-type conductive SrCu2O2and related compounds. Phys Rev B - Condens Matter Mater. Phys.2002;6:5 1-8. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.075111
  70. 70. Banerjee AN, Chattopadhyay KK. Electro-optical properties of all-oxide p-CuAlO2/n-ZnO: Al transparent heterojunction thin film diode fabricated on glass substrate. Cent Eur J Phys. 2008;6:57-63. DOI: 10.2478/s11534-008-0005-5
  71. 71. Kudo A, Yanagi H, Hosono H, Kawazoe H. SrCu2O2: A p-type conductive oxide with wide band gap. Appl Phys Lett. 1998;73:220-222. DOI: 10.1063/1.121761
  72. 72. Tambunan OT, Tukiman H, Parwanta KJ, Jeong DW, Jung CU, Rhee SJ, Liu C. Structural and optical properties of SrCu2O2 films deposited on sapphire substrates by pulsed laser deposition. Superlattices Microstruct. 2012;52:774-781. DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2012.06.012
  73. 73. Liu JW, Lee SC, Yang CH. Properties of strontium copper oxide films prepared by radio frequency reactive magnetron sputtering with different oxygen partial pressures. Mater Trans. 2007;48:2743-2746. DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.MER2007108
  74. 74. Bobeico E, Varsano F, Minarini C, Roca F. 2003 P-type strontium-copper mixed oxide deposited by e-beam evaporation. Thin Solid Films. 2003;444:70-74. DOI: 10.1016/S0040-6090(03)01023-X
  75. 75. Adachi Y, Takahashi K. MBD Preparation of SrCuO2 Infinite Layer Thin Films. Key Eng Mater. 1999;169-170:163-166. DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.169-170.163
  76. 76. Deschanvres JL, Millon C, Jimenez C, Khan A, Roussel H, Servet B, Durand O, Modreanu M. Study of the growth and annealing conditions of SrCu2O2 (SCO) thin films deposited by injection MOCVD. Phys Status Solidi Appl Mater Sci. 2008;205: 2013-2017. DOI: 10.1002/pssa.200778920
  77. 77. Roy B, Perkins JD, Kaydanova T, Young DL, Taylor M, Miedaner A, Curtis C, Kleebe HJ, Readey DW, Ginley DS. Preparation and characterization of sol-gel derived copper-strontium-oxide thin films. Thin Solid Films. 2008;516:4093-4101. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.10.002
  78. 78. Ginley DS, Roy B, Ode A, Warmsingh C, Yoshida Y, Parilla P, Teplin C, Kaydanova T, Miedaner A, Curtis C, Martinson A, Coutts T, Readey D, Hosono H, Perkins J. Non-vacuum and PLD growth of next generation TCO materials. Thin Solid Films. 2003;445:193-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2003.08.008
  79. 79. Zaharescu M, Mocioiu OC. Infrared Spectroscopy. In: Schneller T, Waser R, Kosec M, Payne D, editors. Chemical solution deposition of functional oxide thin films. Springer, Verlag-Wien; 2013. p. 213-230. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-99311-8
  80. 80. Coate J. Interpretation of infrared spectra, A practical approach. In: Meyers RA, editor. Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry. Wiley, London; 2006. p. 10815-10837. Doi: 10.1002/9780470027318.a5606
  81. 81. Nakamoto K. Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds. 4th ed. New York: Wiley; 1986

Written By

Luminita Predoanǎ, Dániel Attila Karajz, Vincent Otieno Odhiambo, Irina Stanciu, Imre M. Szilágyi, György Pokol and Maria Zaharescu

Submitted: 23 July 2020 Reviewed: 06 November 2020 Published: 29 December 2020

© 2020 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

View All
Chapter 6 Microwave Heating of Low-Temperature Plasma and It...

By Tetyana Frolova, Vyacheslav Buts, Gennadiy Churyum...

534 downloads

Chapter 7 Experimental Investigation on the Effect of Microw...

By Gaoming Lu and Jianjun Zhou

485 downloads

Chapter 8 Microwave Heating of Liquid Crystals and Ethanol-H...

By Akira Naito, Yugo Tasei, Batsaikhan Mijiddorj, Izu...

516 downloads