Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Endemic Vascular Plants from the Coromandel Coast of Tamil Nadu, Southern India

Written By

Dhatchanamoorthy Narayanasamy and Balachandran Natesan

Submitted: July 14th, 2020 Reviewed: October 5th, 2020 Published: December 8th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94333

Chapter metrics overview

482 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Intensive botanical survey was done more than two decades on Tropical Dry Evergreen Forest from four coastal districts viz. Cuddalore, Kancheepurm, Nagai and Villupuram of Tamil Nadu and Union Territory of Pondicherry. A total of 87 protected (hillocks, reserve forest) and unprotected (sacred groves, unclassified vegetation) sites were regularly studied from five districts. From this study 82 endemic taxa were enumerated. In addition 25 endemic species were added for the analysis through literature screening and herbarium consultation from 10 Coromandel coastal districts of Tamil Nadu. In all 107 species were recorded, among them 19 are trees, 18 shrubs, 9 climbers and 61 herbs. Distribution of these endemic species were analysed and categorised into endemic to the country, peninsular India, southern India, Eastern and Western Ghats, state and district level. Interestingly the study found that some endemic species were disjunctly distributed in between districts, states, ghats, climatic regimes and bioregions. The disturbance, threat status and conservation measures of few endemic and IUCN red listed species were also studied and discussed.


  • conservation
  • Coromandel Coast
  • disjunction
  • endemism
  • Pondicherry
  • Tamil Nadu
  • IUCN status
  • tropical dry Evergreen Forest

1. Introduction

India is one of the 18 extremely diverse and top 10 species-rich countries of the world, in which a total of 4381 taxa belonging to 1007 genera and 176 families, including 4303 angiosperms, 12 gymnosperms and 66 pteridophytes, out of 18,043 species have been confirmed as endemic to India [1]. Recently, in angiosperms a total of 58 genera have been identified as endemic to India, of which 49 are confined to Peninsular India [2]. Though the term ‘endemism’ coined during eighteenth century Chatterjee [3, 4] was the first who studied the endemism of the Indian flora. He was considered 6850 species that are unique to this region (61% of flowering plants), of which 3169 species are restricted to Himalayas and 2045 to Peninsular India (PI). Blasco [5] was estimated about 1268 endemic dicotyledons to south India; however Nayar [6] recorded 2100 flowering plants endemic to PI. Later, Nayar [7] reported 141 genera endemic to India; while Ahmedullah & Nayar [7] found 55 genera endemic to PI of which 45 are monotypic [7]. Recently, Irwin & Narasimhan [9] enumerated only 49 genera which are endemics to India, excluding several genera based on nomenclatural changes and extended distribution. Nayar [10] categorised the endemic genera of India into 3 patterns based on the distribution viz. Himalayan Endemic Genera, Peninsular Indian Endemic genera and Andaman & Nicobar Islands Endemic genera. Meanwhile there are no families which are endemic to India [8].

In India, Western Ghats has much more endemic (2116 species) taxa than rest of India. State-wise analysis Tamil Nadu ranking first with 410 species, followed by Kerala (357), Maharashtra (278) and Andaman and Nicobar Islands together contributes with 278 taxa [2]. In Eastern Ghats (EG), a total of 166 endemic taxa, under 117 genera and 43 families are known to occur, of which 129 dicots and 46 are monocots. Sudhakar Reddy & Raju [11] recorded 400 endemic spermatophytes from the EGs of Andhra Pradesh and their adjacent coastal plains.

The Flora of Tamil Nadu published during 1983, 1987 and 1989 in 3 volumes, and the report after Betty & Ramachandran [12] was added 192 taxa belonging to 130 genera and 61 families between the period 1989 and 2013. These additions were compiled from research articles, unpublished thesis and research reports by several botanists [13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Among them 87 taxa are new to the science as well as endemic to the state of Tamil Nadu. The high concentration of endemic plants once again proves that the southern India is one of the top ten mega biodiversity hotspot area. It directly reflects the habitat stability, environmental quality, and rich biodiversity and conservation values in a specific area. However the Coromandel Coast is another unique bioregion, as flood plain and a buffer zone between the hill range of Eastern Ghats and Bay of Bengal; and this was not studied or updated since Roxburgh [20]. The main aim of this work is to explore the wealth and threat status of endemic plants diversity from the Coromandel Coast and especially from the fragile ecosystem of Tropical Dry Evergreen Forests (TDEF), was classified by Champion and Seth [21].


2. Materials and methods

The geographical area of Tamil Nadu is 130,058 km2 and has roughly rhomboidal shape in appearance. It lies between 8° 5′-13° 35’ N latitude and 76° 15′-80° 20′E longitude. The state occupies 4.08% of the total area of the country. It has the coast line of 990 km at east and land boundary of 1200 km towards west. The state is divided into 38 districts of which 13 districts lies on the east coast. The natural land mass of the state was divided into the Eastern Ghats, Coastal Plains, Central plateau and Western Ghats. Most part of the 13 coastal districts considered as the Coromandel Coast of Tamil Nadu (Figure 1). The entire coast of Tamil Nadu, is chiefly sandy with outcrops of rocky headlands at Kancheepuram, Kanyakumari, Tirunelveli and Villupuram districts. The coastal vegetation had further subdivided into Strand, Estuarine and Coastal Tropical Dry Evergreen Forest types (Nair and Henry [22]).

Figure 1.

Study area - Coromandel Coast and detailed study at district level.

2.1 Study area

The present study has included 13 coastal districts of Tamil Nadu; Karaikal and Puducherry regions from Union Territory (UT) of Pondicherry along the Coromandel Coast of south India. However, regular intensive survey was done since 1996 to till date on four coastal districts (Cuddalore, Kancheepuram, Nagai and Villupuram) and two regions (Puducherry and Karaikal) from the UT of Pondicherry. Forest cover of Cuddalore is 444 km2 (11.98%) out of 3706 km2, Kancheepuram 372 km2 (8.31%) out of 4474 km2 and Villupuram 1011 km2 (14.06%) out of 7190 km2 geographical area [23]. The forest cover at Union Territory of Pondicherry is 50.06 km2 (10.43%) out of 480 km2 area [24].

Geologically, part of Cuddalore and Villupuram districts belonged to the formation of Cuddalore sandstone during Miocene period [25]. The soil along the coast is sandy loam or red ferralitic and in certain places covered with alluvial deposits and becoming clayey at interior [26, 27]. The coastal plains are extending up to 40–60 km [28] and are overlained by a thin soil layer supporting agriculture. The substratum erupted into hillocks and mounds at Kancheepuram and Villupuram districts and into undulating terrain in Cuddalore districts. The scattered hillocks rise up to 450 m with interrupted vegetation among the charkonite or gneiss rocks. The natural vegetation is mostly found on less fertile and red ferralitic soil, whereas black clay and alluvial soils were brought under cultivation [29].

A typical maritime tropical climate with dissymmetric rainfall regime occurs in the study area. The mean annual rainfall recorded during 2007–2016 period was 1256 mm with mean rainy days of 56 per year. The minimum temperature 17.7°C is in January, maximum temperature 40.5°C in May and the mean is 28.5°C. The average relative humidity is 76% and the weather is generally cool during December to January with the late nights dewy. Dry weather prevails during April to June. Wind speed ranges from 5 to 9 km/h during July to September but extremely higher during the cyclonic days, during October to December [30].

2.2 Field survey

Four types of vegetation covers including micro and macro habitats viz., Hillocks (HL), Reserve Forest (RF), Sacred Groves (SG) and Unclassified Vegetation (UC) were identified using Geological Survey of India (GSI) map, Google map and interview with people. The areas of HL vegetation are ranging from 680 to 2200, RFs from 100 to 350, SGs from one to 40 and UCs from 0.5 to 35 hectares (ha). The elevation of HL was found between 150 and 450, RFs 100 to 350, SGs sea level to 80 and UC sea level to 40 m a.s.l.

Botanical surveys were made extensively once in a week on 87 sites from five districts with a team of four members, visiting each and every site with an interval of 4–6 months and monitored pre-monsoon and post-monsoon changes from 1996 to 2019. These sites were geo-referenced with Garmin Global Positioning System (GPS), followed by intensive species enumerations including herbs, shrubs, trees and climbers; collection of voucher samples and photographed the key characters of the plants. A total of 15,316 herbarium sheets were prepared from the sample collections and deposited at AURO! Herbarium, Auroville, India. The nomenclature of all plant species recorded in this study was verified in In addition, Endemic plants of Indian Region (Ahmedullah & Nayar [10]), The Flora of the Gulf of Mannar, Southern India [31], Endemic Vascular Plants of India [2], Plant Discoveries [32], research articles between 2013 and 2019 period and different herbarium such as Saint Joseph College (SJC) Tiruchirapalli, Madras Herbarium (MH!) Coimbatore, Foundation of Revitalization of Local HealthTraditions (FRLH) Bangalore, French Institute of Pondicherry (HIFP) Puducherry, and Sri ParamaKalyani Center for Ecological Studies (SPKCESH) Tirunelveli was referred and enriched the endemic species list to the study area.

2.3 Analyses

Based on phytogeographical distribution six groups of endemic regions were categorised, such as 1. the state Tamil Nadu, 2. Eastern Ghats (EG), 3. EG & Western Ghats (WG), 4. Southern India (SI), 5. Peninsular India (PI) and 6. Entire India except Himalayas. In addition, disjunct nature of distribution of these endemic species between or among the regions was also studied. Site disturbances such as browsing, cutting, lopping, and clear felling, encroachment for cultivation purposes, construction of big modern temple, construction and widening the metal road, digging irrigation channels and cementing the thrashing floor were studied and categorised into low, medium and high by following Venkateswaran & Parthasarathy [33]. High ranks signify high levels of anthropogenic disturbance in the forests. The disturbance codes were co-related with four life forms and threat status of all species was verified with (version 2020–2). Threat assessment and possible conservation measures were undertaken on few endemic and endangered species through Auroville greening and Botanical Garden Projects.


3. Results

Through our regular field study on 87 sites, 25 (SG) sites are from Cuddalore, 22 (8 HL, 6 RF, 4 SG, 4 UC) from Kancheepuram, one site (1RF) from Nagai, 28 (3 HL, 4 RF, 13 SG, 8 UC) from Villupuram districts of Tamil Nadu, 10 (8 SG, 2 UC) from Puducherry region and entire Karaikal region, Union Territory of Pondicherry. Altogether, 1197 species were listed from 127 families and 584 genera, of which 196 species are trees, 113 shrubs, 172 climbers and 716 herbs. Through literature screening and referring the herbarium 25 endemics were added. Finally a total of 107 endemic species were compiled for the Coromandel Coast of Peninsular India and analysed. Of which 19 species are trees, 18 shrubs, 9 climbers and 61 herbs (Figure 2). These endemic species were represented by 74 genera and 33 families, of which Leguminosae (17 species from 10 genera) is the dominant family followed by Acanthaceae (13 species from 5 genera), Euphorbiaceae (10 species from 5 genera) and Poaceae (9 from 9 genera). The other dominant families are Apocynaceae and Rubiaceae, had 4 species each (Figure 3).

Figure 2.

Endemic plants of CC and their habits representation.

Figure 3.

Detail of endemic plant families, genera and species.

3.1 Disturbance

Qualitatively, classified disturbances were noted from four vegetation types (Table 1; Figure 4). These disturbance codes were correlated with life form, threat status and ethno-botanical values of endemic species. In general, from 50 to 65% of species were represented in disturbed category. Maximum numbers of species are encountered at medium level of disturbance, followed by undisturbed, low and high level of disturbance. Reasons for the threat are: root of Decalepis hamiltonii and fruit of Phyllanthus indo-fischeri were extensively collected for their medicinal properties; Justicia beddomei, Leucas wightiana and Lindernia minima are endangered due to narrow and disjunct distribution; Derris ovalifolia, Drypetes porteri, and Koilodepas calycinum are facing habitat loss; Pterocarpus santalinus was threatened due to illegal logging; Sterculia populifolia living with rocky outskirts; and the herbs are generally facing pressure by grazing.

Life formHerbs (61)1612249
Shrubs (18)5634
Trees (19)7345
Climbers (9)4131
Threat statusIUCN categorised (7)3121
From publications (10)3331
Not evaluated (90)27192915

Table 1.

Correlation of endemic plants life form and threat status with disturbance gradience.

Figure 4.

Disturbance index with life-form and threat status.

3.2 Distribution

For an understanding based on geographical distribution the 107 endemic species that recorded from the CC plains were divided into eight groups and their representations are: 1. India (excluding Himalayas & north east) (6 species), 2. Peninsular India (22 species), 3. Southern India (28 species), 4. Southern India with one or two states of north India (11species), 5. Eastern and Western Ghats (5 species), 6. Eastern Ghats (5 species), 7. Tamil Nadu (27 species) and 8. Dispersed in different states (3 species) (Figure 5). The distribution of six species across the country is Crotalaria pusilla, Dolichandrone falcata and Hardwickia binata, Iseilema anthephoroides, Lophopogon tridentatus and Scleria stocksiana (Figure 6). Crotalaria willdenowiana, Deccania pubescens var. candolleana, Polycarpaea corymbosa, Pterocarpus santalinus and Sterculia populifolia were spotted only in EGs of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu (Figure 7). Five species viz. Derris ovalifolia, Mallotus resinosus var. muricatus, Mussaenda glabrata, Rhynchosia courtallensis and Tetrastigma tamilnadense was found both in EG and WG (Figure 7). At regional level south India has 28 species followed by 27 species restricted to Tamil Nadu and 22 taxa represented from peninsular India (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Geographical representation of endemics at regional and district level of Tamil Nadu.

Figure 6.

Representation of endemic plants distributed at national and regional level.

The representations of species at different districts of Tamil Nadu are analysed, and the study shows that the species found in only one (17 species), two (17 species), three (13), four – many (51 species) and in all districts (9) were recorded (Figure 5).

Figure 7.

Representation of endemic plants distributed at state level and RET endemics.

3.3 Narrow or steno endemics

Thirteen species were showed very narrow distribution, found in only one district. They are Acrachne henrardiana of Poaceae (Pudukkottai district), Barleria durairajii of Acanthaceae (Thoothukudi), Caralluma adscendens var. gracilis of Apocynaceae (Pudukkottai), Cordia ramanujamii of Cordiaceae (Villupuram), Derris gamblei of Leguminosae (Pudukkottai), Huberantha senjiana of Annonaceae (Villupuram), Jatropha villosa var. ramnadensis of Euphorbiaceae (Ramanathapuram), Lepidagathis pungens of Acanthaceae (Tirunelveli), Leucas anandaraoana of Lamiaceae (Ramanathapuram), Polycarpaea diffusa and Polycarpaea majumdariana of Caryophyllaceae (Thoothukudi and Tirunelveli), Sporobolus hajrae of Poaceae (Pudukkottai) and Theriophonum sivaganganum of Araceae (Ramanathapuram); of which C. ramanujamii and H. senjiana are recently described neo-endemics (Figure 8).

Figure 8.

Recently described endemic species.

3.4 Disjunct distribution

The analysis shows interesting disjunctions between: 1. The districts of Tamil Nadu, 2. SI and north-east and 3. SI and north-west, and 4. SI and trans-Himalaya (Figure 9). Garnotia elata of Poaceae and Glossocardia bosvallia of Asteraceae are sharing their region between SI and Uttar Pradesh; Indigofera mysorensis of Leguminosae and Jatropha tanjorensis of Euphorbiaceae between SI and West Bengal; Manisuris myurus of Poaceae between SI & Manipur; Oldenlandia attenuata of Rubiaceae between EG and Uttar Pradesh; Leucas diffusa between SI and Delhi; L. wightiana and Senna montana between SI and Gujarat; and Tricholepis radicans between SI and Rajasthan are some important disjunct distributions between two major geographical regions (Figure 10).

Figure 9.

Representation of state and district level distribution of endemics.

Figure 10.

Disjunct distribution of endemics.

In Tamil Nadu at district level analysis (Figure 9) found that Blumea eriantha of Asteraceae (Coimbatore-Villupuram), Chlorophytum malabaricum of Asparagaceae (Nilgiri-Villupuram), Cordia diffusa of Cordiaceae (Coimbatore-Kancheepuram), Drypetes porteri of Euphorbiaceae (Theni-Villupuram), Justicia beddomei of Acanthaceae (Tirunelveli-Villupuram), Melothria angulata of Cucurbitaceae (Dindigul-Villupuram), Mussaenda tomentosa of Rubiaceae (Tirunelveli-Villupuram), Rhynchosia courtallensis of Leguminosae (Tirunelveli-Villupuram), Tetrastigma tamilnadense of Vitaceae (Tirunelveli-Villupuram) and Trachys narasimhanii of Poaceae (Chennai-Ramanathapuram) are showing great disjunction between the north and south district (Figure 10).

3.5 Doubtful endemics

There are six species viz. Ceropegia mannarana of Apocynaceae, Leucas nepetifolia of Lamiaceae, Mariscus clarkii of Cyperaceae, Stenosiphonium parviflorum of Acanthaceae Sehima sulcatum and Zenkeria elegans of Poaceae are considered as doubtful endemics because Singh et al. [2], Krishnamurthy et al. [34], Henry et al. [35] and Ahmedullah & Nayar [10] treated them as endemic whereas the for the former four species and Kabeer & Nair [13] for the latter two Poaceae members had marked them as non-endemic. Meanwhile, Krishnamurthy et al. [34] was included the two latter species under “endangered” list.

3.6 Threat status

According to IUCN [36], a total of 90 (84.11%) out of 107 endemic species were listed as “not evaluated” and their population status in the wild habitats is also unknown. So far, only seven species viz., Aglaia elaeagnoidea (LC [37]), Decalepis hamiltonii (EN-A2cd, [38]), Drypetes porteri (EN-B1 + 2c, [39]), Koilodepas calycinum (EN B1 + 2c, [39]), Lindernia minima (EN-B1ab + 2ab, [40]), Pterocarpus santalinus (EN-B1 + 2de, [41]), and Sterculia populifolia (CRD, [39]) are assessed according to IUCN criteria (Figure 7). From the published information found that 10 species such as, Chrysopogon verticillatus [13], Crotalaria willdenowiana [34], Derris ovalifolia [34, 42, 43], Dipcadi montanum var. madrasicum [10, 44], Discospermum sphaerocarpum [45], Justicia beddomei [10], Leucas wightiana [10], Melothria angulata [22], Rhynchosia courtallensis [34] and Sarcostemma intermedium [34] were came to known as rare or endangered or threatened endemic species.

3.7 Threat assessment and conservation measures

Rapid Assessment Workshop on Conservation of Tropical Dry Evergreen Forest was conducted by Auroville Green Group, Auroville in collaboration with Foundation for Revitalization of Local Health Traditions, Bengaluru held between 5 and 7 March, 2002. A team of 32 field botanist and experts involved and assessed 48 species but not published, in which 11 species such as Acrachne henrandiana, Aglaia elaeagnoidea, Cadaba trifoliata, Caralluma indica, Carissa salicina, Ceropegia juncea, Derris ovalifolia, Discospemum sphaerocarpum (syn. Tricalysia sphaerocarpa), Habenaria roxburghii, Manisuris myurus, and Pterospermum xylocarpum are endemic.

Since 1996, extensive effort was employed by Auroville Green Group to conserve on Tropical Dry Evergreen Forest, is an endangered forest type in India. More than one lakh seedlings from 250 native species produced every year planted and developed ‘Green Ring’ in 2000 hectares at Auroville. Basically they attempted to conserve all the TDEF species; in addition they were concentrated on endemic, endangered and rare Indo-Sri Lankan elements too. Few such endemic species are Commiphora berryii, Deccania pubescens, Derris ovalifolia, Discospermum sphaerocarpum, Dolichandrone atrovirens, Dolichandrone falcata, Drypetes porteri, Hardwickia binata, Justicia beddomei, Manilkara roxburghiana, Miliusa eriocarpa, Pterocarpus santalinus, Pterospermum xylocarpum, Sterculia populifolia and so on. They are standardised the germination through different techniques for most species but they are not successful in Terminalia paniculata of Combretaceae and two non-endemic native species viz. Anogeissus latifolia of Combretaceae and Hugonia mystax of Linaceae.

3.7.1 Sterculia populifolia, threat assessment: a status survey

The conservation status of Hildegardia populifolia (syn of Sterculia populifolia) was kept in different category by the experts of India. This species was assessed first as ‘Critically Endangered’ by The World Conservation Monitoring Center WCMC [13] (Figure 11) and there are no update to till date. Literature screening showed with other categories as viz. ‘Endangered’ by Krishnamurthy et al. [34], Walter and Gillet [46]; ‘Vulnerable’ by Reddy et al. [47]; ‘Very Rare’ by Rao and Pullaiah [48]. Whereas Sarcar and Sarcar [49] studied the population, propagation and conservation of the species and recommended the species as critically endangered. Madhavachetty et al. [50] was reported this species occurrence from Ankalamma Konda in Chittoor district. Recently Jaikrishnan [51] was made intensive population survey, counted all mature individual and assessed the new recruits at Gingee hills of Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu and finally concluded this species as ‘critically endangered’. The taxa which are under threatened status since 1997 categorised by IUCN and Botanical Survey of India was published Red data books in three volumes during 1987–1990, in which Hildegardia populifolia was also treated as endangered.

Figure 11.

Conservation status of Hildegardia populifolia and its habitat.


4. Discussion

The floral diversity in any state or country or world the dominant families are Leguminosae, Poaceae, Orchidaceae, Acanthaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Asteraceae, Apocynaceae, and Rubiaceae so on. This present endemic study was more intrinsically matching with, regional [52] and national [1, 2] studies/analysis. Also, the study reports from the coastal plains [26, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58] favoured the present study. Out of 107 endemics 27 species are restricted to the state Tamil Nadu, 5 to EG, 5 to EG & WG, 28 to SI, 11 species sharing between SI with different states of north India, 22 to PI, to entire India, and 3 to elsewhere. These data were enlightened the richness of plant diversity at the Coromandel coast, especially from the TDEF of Tamil Nadu and supporting the ‘coastal zone’ as one of the endemic centres of India.

The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources [46] assessed the global threat status of 33,418 species of Angiosperms, of which 1215 species are reported from India, of which 690 (55.8%) species were evaluated as Indeterminate (I). From this study 80% of endemic species were in ‘not evaluated’ category. According to Isik [59] three-quarters of narrow endemic species of plants and animals are known to have become extinct due to habitat loss or fragmentation. So as Nair [60] statement “it is very essential that rare, threatened and presumed extinct taxa should be repeatedly searched for in their type localities”, should be strictly followed and need to do their population assessment status from time to time. Narrow range and regional level assessments are making ambiguous with the IUCN category, so the WCMC should follow these publications and update them to the relevant species.

Majority of endemic species are isolated due to geographical, ecological, edaphic and climatic barriers and these fragmented patches of vegetation were more pronounced in EG for the point of conservation [61, 62]. This condition was more privileged to the narrow endemic species like Cordia ramanujamii, Huberantha senjiana and Mussaenda tomentosa at Pakkam Malai reserve forest; Gingee hills of EG [53]. Meanwhile, the disjunctly distributed species like Blumea eriantha, Cyanotis tuberosa, Drypetes porteri, Derris ovalifolia, Discospermum sphaerocarpum, Indigofera mysorensis, Justicia beddomei, Leucas wightiana, Manisuris myuros, Melothria angulata between the two Ghats/bioregion have to be considered as crucial for the conservation actions.

It was estimated that 2–25% of plant species will become extinct or committed to extinction in tropical forest approximately in next years [63]. It is also opined that 22–47% of species might have already become threatened [64]. In India TDEF occupies about 2482.52 km2 (1.61% of the country territory), in which Tamil Nadu has only 41.08 km2 (0.1%) [65]. According to Krishnamurthy et al. [34] the TDEF found along the Coromandel Coast is an ‘endangered forest’ type. The degree of threat and richness of endemism is one of the major aspects in prioritising the areas for conservation. In this paradigm, Jain & Rao [66] statement “if endemic species are eliminated from our country it will mean that they will be annihilated from the whole world, will be loss to science, will be struck off the roles of biological resources of this earth” should be profoundly considered. In all, highly fragmented form of TDEF ecosystem, indeterminate IUCN status of narrow endemics and their disjunct distribution with different bioregions of India should be considered as high priority for the assessment and conservation programs at national, regional and state level in regular intervals.



The authors are thankful to Walter Gastmans, curator of AURO herbarium and Dr. Raphael Mathevet, Head of Ecology, French Institute of Pondicherry for their constant support and encouragement; financial support for the survey from 1994 to 2000 by Danish Government through Foundation for Revitalization of Local Health Traditions, Bengaluru; 2001-2004 by European Commission; 2005-2010 by Auroville Coastal Development Centre; WCT-Small Grant 2018-2019 Phase I; Head of Head of Forest Force, Chennai and District Forest Officer, Villupuram, Tamil Nadu granted permission to do the botanical survey in RFs; Mr. Paul Blanch Flower and Mr. Jaap Hollander accompanied all the times during the survey and provided photos of some species.


  1. 1. Singh P, Dash SS. Plant Discoveries 2013. Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata; 2014
  2. 2. Singh P, Karthigeyan K, Lakshminarasimhan P, Dash SS. Endemic Vascular Plants of India. Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata; i-ixvi:1-339 pp
  3. 3. Chatterjee D. Studies on the endemic flora of India and Burma. J. Royal Asiatic Soc. Bengal. 1939 (1940). 5:19-69
  4. 4. Chatterjee D. Floristic pattern in Indian Vegetation. Proc. Summer School Botany, Darjeeling, New Delhi. 1962:32-42
  5. 5. Blasco F. 1971. Montagnes du sud deI’nde: forets, savanes, ecologie. Inst, Fr. Pondicherry, Trv, Sec. Sci. tech. Tome vol. X 436 pp.
  6. 6. Nayar MP. Changing pattern of distribution of endemic genera (angiosperm). Journal of Economic and Taxonomic Botany. 1977;1:99-110
  7. 7. Nayar MP. Endemism and patterns of distribution of endemic genera (angiosperms) in India. J. Eco. Tax. Bot. Vol. 1980a;1:99-110
  8. 8. Irwin SJ, Narasimhan D. Endemic genera of angiosperms in India: A review. Rheedea. 2011;21:87-105
  9. 9. Nayar MP. Endemic flora of Peninsular India and its significance. Bull. Bot. Surv. India. 1980b (1982);22(1-4):12-23
  10. 10. Ahmedullah M, Nayar MP. Endemic Plants of Indian Region. Vol. 1 (Peninsular India). Botanical Survey of India; 1986. pp. 1-261
  11. 11. Sudhakar Reddy C, Raju VS. Endemic spermatophytes of Andhra Pradesh, India. Proc. AP Akademi of Sciences. 2008;12:48-75
  12. 12. Betty T, Ramachandran VS. Additions to the Flora of Tamil Nadu. J. Biod. Photon. 2014;113:355-359
  13. 13. Kabeer KAA, Nair VJ. Flora of Tamil Nadu – Grasses. In: 1–525 pp. Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore. 2009: 525 pp
  14. 14. Manickam VS, Murugan C, Sundaresan V, Jothi GJ. Flora of Tirunelveli Hills: Southern Western Ghats. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehra Dun; 2008
  15. 15. Matthew KM. Flora of the Palni Hills. Vol. 1- III. Tiruchirapalli: The Rapinat Herbarium; 1999
  16. 16. Ramachandran VS, Balasubramaniam V, Pandikumar P. Additions to the grass flora of Tamil Nadu. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society. 2006;102(3):362-365
  17. 17. Uma Maheshwari P, Daniel P. Flora of Gulf of Mannar. Kolkata: Botanical Survey of India; 2001. pp. 1-688
  18. 18. Viswanathan MB, Manikandan U. A new species of Hedyotis (Rubiaceae) from India. Edinburgh Journal of Botany. 2008;65(3):387-392
  19. 19. Yarrayya K, Murthy GVS, Ratna Kumar PK. Addition of sedges to the flora of Tamil Nadu state. Ind. J Plant Sci. 2015;4(4):57-59
  20. 20. Roxburgh W. Plants of the Coast of Coromandel; Drawings and Descriptions. Vol. 1-3. London: Prn. W Bulmer & Co.; 1795-1805
  21. 21. Champion HG, Seth SK. Revised Survey of the Forest Types of India. New Delhi: Manager of Publications; 1968
  22. 22. Nair NC, Henry AN. Flora of Tamil Nadu, India. In: Series 1: Analysis vol 1. Botanical Survey of India: Coimbatore; 1983
  23. 23. Annamalai R. Tamil Nadu Biodiversity Strategy Action Plan. Government of Tamil Nadu, Chennai: Tamil Nadu Forest Department; 2004 143 pp
  24. 24. Forest Survey of India. Forest Cover In: India State Forest Report 2013, FSI, Dehra Dun, 11–32. accessed on 25 June 2020.
  25. 25. Meher-Homji VM. Notes on some peculiar cases of Phytogeographic distribution. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Society. 1970;67:81-87
  26. 26. Meher-Homji VM. On the origin of tropical dry evergreen forest of South India. Int. J. Eco. Environ. Science. 1974a;1:19-39
  27. 27. Meher-Homji VM. A new classification of the Phytogeographic zones of India. Indian J. Botany. 1984;7:224-233
  28. 28. Mani MS. Ecology and Biogeography in India. The Netherlands: BV Publishers; 1974
  29. 29. Marlange M, Meher-Homji VM. Phytosociological studies in the Pondicherry region. J. Indian Bot. Society. 1965:167-182
  30. 30. Meher-Homji VM. The climate of Cuddalore: A bioclimatic analysis. Geographical Review of India. 1974b;36(1):1-22
  31. 31. Daniel P, Umamaheswari P. The Flora of the Gulf of Mannar, Southern India. Calcutta: Botanical Survey of India; 2001. p. 688
  32. 32. Plant Discoveries. Botanical survey of India. Kolkatta. 2007-2018
  33. 33. Venkateswaran R, Parthasarathy N. Tropical dry Evergreen forests on the Coromandel Coast of India: Structure. Composition and Human disturbance. Ecotropica. 2003;9:45-58
  34. 34. Krishnamurthy K, Murugan R, Ravikumar K. Bioresources of the eastern Ghats, their conservation and management. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh: Dehra Dun; 2014. 824 pp
  35. 35. Henry AN, Chitra V, Balakrishnan NP. Flora of Tamil Nadu, India Series 1: Analysis. Vol 3. Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore. 1989.
  36. 36. IUCN 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-2. Downloaded on 28th June 2020
  37. 37. Pannell CM. Aglaia elaeagnoidea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 1998: e.T33711A9804005. Downloaded on 28 June 2020
  38. 38. Ved D, Saha D, Ravikumar K, Haridasan K. Decalepis hamiltonii. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T50126587A50131330. Downloaded on 28 June 2020
  39. 39. World Conservation Monitoring Centre. 1998. Drypetes porteri (e.T38763A10143318); Hildegardia populifolia (e.T33656A9801072); Koilodepas calycinum (e.T32008A9673093). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. T38763A10143318.en. Downloaded on 28June 2020.
  40. 40. Rehel S. 2011. Lindernia minima. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2011: e.T177197A7387587. Downloaded on 28 June 2020.
  41. 41. CAMP Workshops on Medicinal Plants, India. Pterocarpus santalinus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 1998: e.T32104A9679328. Downloaded on 28 July 2020.
  42. 42. Balachandran N, Rajendiran K. Disjunct distribution of five endemic plants from the tropical dry evergreen forest of Tamil Nadu, India. Ind. J. Plant Sci. 2014;4(3):15-21
  43. 43. Thothathri K. Fascicles of Flora of India 8 Derris. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta; 1982
  44. 44. Prabhu Kumar KM, Binu T, Sreeraj V, Indira B, Rajendran A. Critical notes on the occurrence of Dipcadi montanum (Dalz.) baker (Hyacinthaceae) in South India. Science Research Reporter. 2013;3(2):120-123
  45. 45. Henry AN, Kumari GR, Chitra V. Flora of Tamil Nadu, India. Series 1: Analysis, Vol 2. Botanical Survey of India, Coimbatore. 1987
  46. 46. Walter KS, Gillett HJ, editors. (1997). IUCN Red List of Threatened Plants. Compi. World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Gland: IUCN - The World Conservation Union; 1998
  47. 47. Rao BRP, Babu MVS, Reddy AM, Sunitha S, Narayanaswamy A, Lakshminarayana G, et al. Conservation status of Hildegardia populifolia (Roxb.) Schott & Endl. (Malvaceae: Stervulioideae: Sterculieae), an endemic of southern peninsular India. Journal of Threatened Taxa. 2011;3(8):2018-2022
  48. 48. Rao DM, Pullaiah T. Ethnobotanical studies on some rare and endemic floristic elements of Eastern Ghats-Hill ranges of south east Asis. India. Ethnobotanical Leaflets. 2007;11:52-70
  49. 49. Sarcar MK, Status AB. Botanical description, Natural distribution zone, Propagation practices and Conservation efforts of Hildegardia populifolia (Roxb.) Schott & Endl.- A threatened tree species of Dry Tropical Forests in India. Indian Forester. 2002:757-770
  50. 50. Madhavachetty K, Sivaji TRK. Flowering plants of Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Tirupati Students Offset Printers; 2018
  51. 51. Jaikrishnan. Phytosociology and germination study of endemic and endangered species: Sterculia populifolia. MSc. Dissertaion. Botany Department. KMCPGS; Puducherry. 2018
  52. 52. Nayar MP. “Hot Spots” of Endemic Plants of India. Palode, Thiruvananthapuram: Nepal and Bhutan. Tropical Botanic Garden and Research Institute; 1996
  53. 53. Balachandran N. Perspectives of Plant Diversity in Tropical Dry Evergreen Forest along the Coromandel Coast of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry. PhD Thesis: Pondicherry University; 2016
  54. 54. Balasubramanian K. Biotaxonomical studies of Marakkanam RF, Coromandel coast. PhD thesis. Annamalai University. 1987
  55. 55. Parthasarathy N, Selwyn MA, Udayakumar M. Tropical dry evergreen forests of peninsular India: Ecology and conservation significance. Trop. Conserv. Science. 2008;1(2):89-110
  56. 56. Praveen Kumar CK. Plant biodiversity and biocultural perspectives of ten sacred groves in Cuddalore districts on Tamil Nadu. In: South India. Ph.D Thesis: Pondicherry University; 2011
  57. 57. Ramanujam MP, Ganesan T, Kadamban D, Kumaravelu G, Devaraj P. Flora of Sacred Groves of Puducherry (a Pictorial Guide), Forest Department, Puducherry; 2007: 186 pp
  58. 58. Ramanujam MP, Kadamban D. Rare, endangered and threatened plants occurring in the sacred groves of Pondicherry bioregion. In: National symposium on Emerging Trends in Plant Sciences. Dept. of Botany, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, 1999; Abstract 5, p 43.
  59. 59. Isik K. Rare and endemic species: Why are they prone to extinction? Turkish Journal of Botany. 2011;35:411-417
  60. 60. Nair NC. The Southern Western Ghats; a Biodiversity Plan Studied in Ecology and Sustainable Development. Vol. 4. Indian National Trust for Art & Cultural Heritage INTACH, New Delhi; 1991
  61. 61. Gopalan R, Henry AN. Endemic plants of India, camp for the strict endemics of Agasthiyamalai hills, southern Western Ghats. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh: Dehra Dun; 2000. 476 pp
  62. 62. Nayar MP, Ahmedullah M, Raju DCS. Endemic and rare plants of eastern Ghats. Indian J. Forestry. 1984;7(1):35-42
  63. 63. UNEP. Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995
  64. 64. Pitman NCA, Jorgensen PM. Estimating the size of the worlds threatened Flora. Science. 2002;298:989
  65. 65. Areendran G, Rao P. Vegetation Types of the Southern Eastern Ghats – A Remote Sensing Perspective. New Delhi, India: WWF India; 2006
  66. 66. Jain SK, Rao RR. An Assessment of the Threatened Plants of India. Botanical Survey of India, Kolkata. 1983

Written By

Dhatchanamoorthy Narayanasamy and Balachandran Natesan

Submitted: July 14th, 2020 Reviewed: October 5th, 2020 Published: December 8th, 2020