Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Valorization Technologies of Marine By-Products

Written By

Amar Kaanane and Hind Mkadem

Submitted: May 13th, 2020 Reviewed: November 15th, 2020 Published: December 7th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.95031

Chapter metrics overview

466 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Generally, in different countries, strategies to improve food security have focused on increasing food production, which contributes to climate pollution and increases stress on scarce natural resources such as water and land. Due to the increase of world population (estimated to be 9 milliards in 2050), to the limited biological resources and to the increase of environmental pollution, there is a need in innovation in food industry. This can be done by improving food quality through new technologies for valorization of food and food by-products. According to Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), one third of world food production is lost or wasted along the food supply chain. In the sector of fisheries and aquaculture, 35% of the world’s harvest is lost or wasted each year. Thus, the valorization of marine by-products should be an obligation to assure the world food security and to satisfy the growing demand for fishery products. The objectives of this study are: First to review the sources of by-products and their characteristics and second to describe and evaluate the different technologies that are or can be used to valorize marine by-products in production of marine oils and concentrated fatty acids.


  • by-products
  • valorization
  • technologies
  • fish
  • marine oil
  • n-3 fatty acids

1. Introduction

According to the FAO, world fishery production has reached around 179 million tons in 2018, of which 156.4 million tons were intended for direct human consumption. This is equivalent to an annual supply estimated at 20.5 kg per inhabitant. While world capture fisheries production stagnates at around 96.4 million tons, aquaculture is experiencing continuous growth in the supply of fish for human consumption, contributing with 46% of the total supply [1].

Unfortunately, despite the expanding demand for fishery and aquaculture products and their importance to the food security of many populations, a large part of the catch is wasted [2, 3, 4]. From the catch to the finished product, unused secondary products are generated. Today, some of these by-products are used but a great amount is wasted [5]. In 2016, Jackson & Newton estimated that 11.7 million tons of by-products produced in processing plants around the world are not collected for the production of marine ingredients [6].

In the past, marine by-products were often discarded as waste, used directly as feed for aquaculture, livestock, pets or used in silage and fertilizers [2, 7]. However, in past two decades, other uses of marine by-products have appeared based on their important characteristics and their contents of high value molecules. In some cases, compounds from by-products are identified higher in value than the starting material [8, 9]. Furthermore, with improved processing technologies, marine by-products can be now used differently and more efficiently.

Several reviews have been previously published discussing the possibilities of using marine by-products to produce high added value compounds [8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. Different methods have allowed to produce useful molecules like proteins, gelatin, collagen, enzymes [7, 16, 17], biodiesel and biogas [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24], natural pigments [25], minerals [26, 27], hydroxyapatite [28], chitin and chitosan [29, 30], creatine and taurine [31, 32].

The possible valorizations of marine by-products can be divided into three main categories: production of marine proteins (fishmeal, silage and hydrolysates), oils rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and preparation of high value compounds such as vitamins, enzymes, minerals, taurine and creatine, hydroxyapatite, biodiesel and biogas for human and animal nutrition, industrial or pharmaceutical uses. In this review, we mainly present the sources of marine by-products, their characteristics, and the possible technologies that can be used to produce marine oils and concentrated n-3 fatty acids.


2. Marine by-products and their characteristics

There is no one definition of marine by-products. In the past, marine by-products have been often considered as fish offal or waste [5, 7]. Actually, the term by-products designates all unused parts that can be recovered during production operations. They designate viscera, heads, trimmings, bones, cartilage, tails, skin, scales, blood, shells, carcasses, or damaged fish. Depending on the fishing period, reproductive elements such as eggs, milt or soft roe may be among these by-products [33].

In some works, the definition of by-products was reserved for feed. In others, the terms fish waste [34, 35, 36, 37], waste streams [38], and rest raw material [5] have been used. In all cases, the biomass of by-products can be used to generate an added value unlike waste which has to be composted, burned or destroyed [5].

Generally, by-products can result from all aquatic food processing industries on-shore or even during transformation on board. Marine by-products often constitute more than 50% of the body weight of processed fish [2, 4, 7, 39, 40]. However, this amount can reach up to 70% of the catch depending on catching species and area, postharvest conditions and industrial preparation processes [2, 7, 8, 11, 34, 41, 42, 43, 44]. Processing operations like filleting, salting and smoking generate the most important amounts of by-products (50–75% of processed fish) [10], followed by the fish canning industry (30–65% of processed fish) and finally, the processing of crustaceans and mollusks [45]. It’s estimated that the quantities of fish by-products generated by the processing industries will continue to increase due to the increasing demand for fishery products as source of valuable nutrients and a balanced diet for health [11, 45].

Knowledge of the properties of by-products allows their valorization into highly valuable products that could be higher in value than the fish fillets [8]. Analysis of the composition of by-products has revealed their richness in potentially valuable molecules such as proteins, essential fatty acids, oil, vitamins, minerals but also in bioactive compounds [4, 5, 34, 38, 46, 47, 48].

The by-products protein fraction is easily digestible and rich in essential amino acids. It can be used for production of peptides and amino acids, hydrolysates, gelatin and collagen, thermostable protein dispersions and protamine. While marine oils contain n-3 fatty acids [36, 37, 49, 50, 51], phospholipids, squalene, fat-soluble vitamins, and cholesterols. Additionally, other valuable components can be extracted from marine by-products including nucleic acids, calcium, phosphorous, and hydroxyapatite [14, 28, 35] and other bioactive compounds such as astaxanthin [8], chitin and chitosan [25, 30], creatine and taurine [10, 15].

There are significant compositional differences between parts composing by-products [38]. In cases where the separation between the different parts of marine by-products is possible, the valorization will be optimal. For example, prioritizing the extraction of protein derivatives from the skin of the fish or oil from viscera and/or heads. Fatty fish by-products present an important raw material for the fish oil extraction industries especially during the high fat season. Aidos and co-authors studied the possibility of oil extraction and quality of oil from salted by-products of the maatjes herring (heads, frames, skin, viscera, etc.) by demonstrating that salt does not prevent the production of an oil of good quality [47]. A recent study showed that sardine cooking condensate and cooked by-products have a high potential for the recovery of oil with yields that can reach 32.9% during the fatty season [52].

The greatest valorization of these by-products depends on their handling according to the hygiene rules applied for food production [33]. Special care must be taken to maintain the temperature low during storage and transport to avoid alteration and to preserve their nutritional qualities as marine by-products are highly sensitive to degradation (oxidation, microbial spoilage and enzymatic reactions) [53].


3. Main valorization technologies of marine by-products

3.1 Production of marine oils

Marine oils are rich in PUFAs, especially, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20: 5 n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22: 6 n-3) [52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59]. These n-3 fatty acids have valuable benefits and medicinal properties. Numerous articles have described the benefits of n-3 fatty acids in regard to blood pressure, prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease [60, 61], atherosclerosis and thrombosis [62, 63, 64], hypertriglycemia [64, 65], schizophrenia and memory [66], stress and depression [67] and foetal development [57, 68, 69, 70, 71]. However, the most widely discussed benefits relate to cardiovascular health [61, 65, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79] and the prevention and treatment of inflammatory diseases [57, 80, 81, 82].

These fatty acids are of marine origin, found mainly in fatty fish and seafood. They are obtained by consumption of algae, fungi and phytoplankton [83]. However, certain human groups, such as premature babies and ill people, are unable to synthesize them. Even in people not belonging to these groups, the amount of EPA and DHA synthesized by the body may not be enough because the biosynthesis of these two acids becomes slow with age as well as with bad habits such as smoking, alcohol intake and poor fitness habits [11, 84]. In this case, a diet based on marine lipids (fish and its derivatives) provides the needed intake of EPA and DHA [85, 86].

Marine oils are mainly composed of mixtures of fatty acids esterified with glycerol in triacylglycerides [11]. They are the main natural source of n-3 PUFAs particularly, EPA and DHA [37, 50, 51]. Table 1 summarizes some variation intervals of EPA and DHA in certain oils extracted from fatty marine by-products. The variation depends on type of by-products used, the species, the catching season and the processing technology used for extraction and purification.

Sardinella maderensisLiver
Solvent extraction[87]
Sardinella auritaLiver
Cephalopholis taeniopsLiver
Cod (Gadus morhua)Liver
Solvent extraction
Saithe (Pollachius virens)Liver
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus)Liver
Tusk (Brosme brosme)Liver
Sardina pilcharduscooked by-products20.5–25.04.6–10.2Batch hydraulic pressing[52]
Tuna (Thunnus obesus)Skins
CO2 supercritical extraction[90]
Hexane Soxhlet extraction
Sardina pilchardusHeads, gut content, fins14.2018.59Wet reduction method[91]
Skipjack tunaPrecooked heads0.125.5Wet reduction method[92]
Non precooked heads0.118.8
Hake,OffcutsCO2 supercritical extraction/Cold extraction/ Wet reduction/enzymatic extraction[50]
Orange roughy,Offcuts
Jumbo squidLivers
Sardinella lemuruHead
Solvent extraction[37]
Sardina pilchardusHeads9.310.3Enzymatic hydrolysis[93]
SalmonFrames without heads9.311.3Enzymatic hydrolysis[94]
Black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo)Heads, viscera, frames, skin, trimmings2.76.2Enzymatic hydrolysis[95]
Sardine (Sardina pilchardus)Heads, viscera, frames, trimmings)Enzymatic hydrolysis[96]
SalmonBelly part3.173.85Pressing[97]
Belly part4.453.62CO2 supercritical extraction
Trimmed muscle3.533.46
Frame bone4.273.60
Belly part3.123.23n-
Hexane extraction
Trimmed muscle3.223.98
Frame bone3.854.32
Indian mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta)Skin11.91–12.3113.15–14.47CO2 supercritical extraction[98]
12.2213.86Soxhlet extraction
Salmonhead, skin, viscera, backbone, frames, cuts off2.462.97Cold pressing[99]
Salmon (Salmo salar)Heads7.711.9Enzymatic hydrolysis[100]
8.412.1Solvent extraction
Rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)Roe11.319.0Enzymatic hydrolysis[101]
11.524.0Solvent extraction [88]
Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)Bones with leftover fish meat, skin, scales, fins6.49–6.8914.76–5.72Isoelectric solubilization/precipitation[102]
Nile perch (Lates niloticus)Viscera3.09.0Enzymatic hydrolysis[103]
Nile perch (Lates niloticus)Heads3.47.7Enzymatic hydrolysis[104]
Salmon (Salmo salar)Heads6.18.4
SardineHeads10.9513.01CO2 supercritical extraction[105]

Table 1.

EPA and DHA content (% of total fatty acid) in oil produced from marine by-products by different methods of extraction and purification.

Marine oils are produced from whole fish mainly small pelagic species, but also from by-products generated by the transformation industry. In 2018, it was estimated that between 25 and 35% of the total volume of fishmeal and fish oil produced came from by-products [2]. In production of marine oils, different techniques can be employed such as wet reduction process [52, 91, 92], solvent extraction [37, 87, 89, 106], supercritical fluid extraction [50, 90, 97, 98, 107, 108], urea complexation [108], cold pressing [99] and enzymatic treatment [9, 93, 94, 95, 96, 101, 104, 109, 110, 111, 112].

3.1.1 Wet reduction process

The traditional process for the production of marine oils is coupled with the production process of fishmeal. It is based on a heat treatment of the raw material which allows breaking the cell membrane to liberate the oil, pressing and separation [15, 106]. The principle of this process is based on the separation of the lipid phase from various fish compounds. The oil is separated by a decanter that separates insoluble compounds from the liquid phase, and a separator, separating oil and water. Another possibility is to use a tricanter, which separates solid, water phase and oil in one operation [8]. This process is mainly used in the treatment of fatty species containing high levels of fats such as anchovies, menhaden, sardines, Atlantic herring or their by-products [13].

On an industrial scale, the wet extraction technique is the most used method to obtain the oil and a substrate rich in proteins [106]. This process consists of 3 main stages:

Cooking, where the biomass is heated in a continuous screw cooker. Oil and water are separated from the solid protein. In order to recover an oil of high quality, the temperature and pressure must be adapted to the type and size of used biomass. Cooking can be done by direct injection of steam or by indirect steam heating in order to denature cell proteins and facilitate oil extraction [113, 114].

Pressing, a screw press squeezes the oil and water from the cooked biomass to separate the liquid phase containing the oil and the solid material. Press juice contains a considerable amount of suspended solids in the form of coagulated proteins, scales, edge fragments which have escaped the pressing. These particles are added to the fishmeal while the liquid phase undergoes centrifugation [115].

Centrifugation, which is now preferable compared to decantation, separates the oil from the aqueous phase. Draining and press water can be treated with live steam, allowing better separation of the oily phase on a horizontal centrifugal decanter [116]. In this step, water can be added also to wash the oil from any remaining impurities. At the end of this operation, the oil and stick water are obtained. The stickwater is evaporated to a concentrate before to add it to the pressing cake [36, 47, 117].

Quality and stability of the oil produced depend on process conditions. On one hand, the quality of oil depends on temperature, pumping speed and centrifugation. The marine oil is more stable if high pumping speed is used [118]. On the other hand, Chantachum and co-authors studied the influence of precooking on the separation and quality of tuna heads oil [92]. The results obtained have showed that cooking at 85°C for 30 min, followed by pressing at 140 tons/m2 using a hydraulic press allows better release of the oily fractions which would be slowed down when cooked at a higher temperature due to the coagulation of proteins. The process conditions applied normally depend also on the type and quality of raw material used [117]. Comparison of quality of herring oils produced from three different types of by-products: heads, mixed by-products (heads, frames, skin, viscera, etc.), and headless byproducts showed that heads by-products and its oil presented the highest oxidation levels and the lowest R-tocopherol content. Heads contained the lowest PUFAs level and the highest amount of saturated fatty acids (SFAs) [55].

Oil recovery yield varies during the year depending on fat content of by-products. Extraction of oil from cooked by-products of Sardina pilchardus (skin, meat, bones and cooking condensate), using wet hydraulic pressing at 85°C for 30 min and centrifugation, gave an important oil yield varying between 6.0% and 32.9% depending on the fishing period [52]. Another study reported that the percentage of oil extracted from cooked by-products of Sardinella gibbosa was 8.96% [119].

Wet reduction process is more suitable to extract oil from fatty fish producing oil with improved quality and high level of n-3 PUFAs [50]. However, the main disadvantage of this technique is the use of high temperature during cooking that degrades oxidative quality of the oil and causes a loss of EPA and DHA contents due to hydrolysis and oxidation reactions [12, 111, 120].

In addition to the conventional extraction process called also wet reduction or hydraulic pressing, the extraction of marine oils could be obtained with several methods, such as enzymatic hydrolysis, physical fractionation, low-temperature solvent fractionation, supercritical fluid extraction and pH adjustement method to the isoelectric point (Table 1).

3.1.2 Enzymatic hydrolysis

The principle of enzymatic hydrolysis is based on the action of specific proteases at low temperature on protein tissue without use of solvents and high temperature [13, 50]. Firstly, the by-products are hydrolyzed by the use of commercial proteolytic enzymes and endogenous enzymes. These enzymes destroy the structure of cells walls. They broke down protein molecules to small peptides and amino acids which allows releasing the oil contained. After inactivation of the enzymes, the oil, hydrolysate and the insoluble residue are separated. The released oil can be centrifuged as previously described in the conventional process. For example, Batista and co-authors extracted oil from black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) by-products using enzymatic hydrolysis with 1% Protamex [95]. The percentage of free oil released from the by-products has reached 36% of the total amount.

The enzymatic extraction is influenced by several operating factors, namely: nature of enzymes, temperature, pH, concentration of enzymes during hydrolysis, method and quality of grinding, and water content of the raw material [93, 110, 111, 120]. Optimal conditions of hydrolysis of sardine heads by Protamex were studied (temperature, hydrolysis time and enzyme-substrate ratio) [93]. Results have showed that optimum conditions were found to be similar to recover lipids and phospholipids (29 min, 31°C with 2.6 enzyme). The same study has showed that hydrolysis could increase the extraction of lipids and phospholipids by 27% and 50%, respectively compared to classical extraction.

Šližyte and co-authors studied the enzymatic hydrolysis of mixtures of cod (Gadus morhua) by-products using Flavoenzyme and Neutrase [110]. The results demonstrated that the most important factor influencing the extraction yield is the added water regardless the type of enzyme. On the other hand, using an enzymatic process based on a proteolytic extraction of oil from crude tuna heads followed by a urea complexation (−5°C, 20 h) has allowed to obtain a mixture of DHA and EPA with a purity of 85.02% and a liquid recovery yield of 25.10% [121].

The enzymatic hydrolysis of salmon frames with Protamex, was able to separate the salmon frames into an aqueous fraction rich in soluble nitrogen (fish protein hydrolysate), an insoluble nitrogen fraction, an emulsion fraction, salmon oil and a bone fraction rich in protein and minerals. This process allows to separate oil from protein fraction that can be valorized to recover peptides, essential amino acids or other molecules [94].

Batista and co-authors studied the use of 0.5% of three commercial enzymes (Alcalase, Neutrase, and Protamex TM) and a water/fish ratio of 1:1 for production of protein hydrolysates and oil from raw and cooked sardine by-products from the canning industry [96]. Results have showed that the highest nitrogen solubilization and degree of hydrolysis were obtained with Alcalase and Protamex. The raw by-products were more easily hydrolyzed by these enzymes than the cooked sardine. The highest percentage of oil released was obtained from raw sardine, and Alcalase and Protamex were the most efficient. In another study, enzymatic extraction of oil from ground salmon heads at 55°C using different commercial enzymes (Alcalase, Neutrase, and Flavourzyme) showed that the highest oil recovery (17.4%) was obtained after 2 h by using Alcalase [111]. Same results were obtained later by other researchers [100, 101].

The enzymatic process can be chosen to extract the oil for many reasons. First, it is conducted under mild conditions protecting PUFAs from oxidation. Second, this technique does not use chemical solvents in addition to short time of hydrolysis [120, 122]. However, this process focuses more on the yield and production of protein hydrolysates than on the production of high quality oil. This disadvantage is due to the presence of lipase in the by-products which still active during the hydrolysis therefore it affects the oil quality [96]. Furthermore, this effect is more important if the hydrolysis is done in the presence of oxygen which increases significantly the free fatty acids in the oil, compared with the conventional method [8]. The main product from this process is the protein hydrolysates that are produced with higher yields compared with the traditional process [8].

3.1.3 Supercritical carbon dioxide

Extraction with supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2) is a promising technique, as CO2 is nontoxic gas, nonflammable and clean solvent [123]. This technique can be carried out under mild operating conditions in an oxygen-free environment and at a moderate temperature, preventing degradation of PUFAs [12, 50, 90, 97, 98, 105]. CO2 used is a green solvent. At or above critical temperature and pressure (31.1°C, 7.39 MPa), CO2 is in a liquid state while at ambient temperature and pressure, CO2 becomes a gas and evaporates [120].

This technique allows the extraction of lipids of low polarity, avoids the extraction of impurities and reduces the heavy metal content [12, 50, 90]. Rubio-Rodriguez and co-authors proposed to couple this technique with extraction-fractionation process to remove free fatty acids and improve fish oil quality, alternatively to physical and chemical refining [50]. Same authors compared different oil extraction methods from fish by-products, cold extraction or centrifuging, wet reduction, enzymatic extraction and supercritical fluid extraction. This study has showed that SC-CO2 is an interesting method, operating conditions are suitable to prevent lipid oxidation and to reduce the amount of certain pollutants such as some arsenic products [50].

Another research has also compared 3 different oil extraction methods (supercritical carbon dioxide, n-hexane and traditional pressing) from Atlantic salmon by-products (belly part, trimmed muscle, frame bone and skin). The maximum oil yield was obtained by n-hexane extraction (total oil), followed by supercritical CO2 extraction (highly selective technique extracting non-polar compounds) and the traditional pressing that has showed the lowest yield. Likewise, differences were noted in the oil quality parameters between the 3 studied techniques, the longer oxidative stability was obtained in the oil extracted by supercritical fluid CO2 [97].

This technique was also compared to soxhlet extraction using hexane to produce oil from skins, bones and scales of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus). This study has confirmed improved quality parameters of oil obtained by supercritical CO2 technique extraction (low heavy metal content in the oil) [90].

Using the ground skin of Indian mackerel (Rastrelliger kanagurta), various techniques of supercritical CO2 were studied by varying pressure (20-35 MPa) and temperature (45–75°C). This study has showed that oil yield increased with pressure and temperature and the highest yields were 24.7, 53.2, 52.8, and 52.3/100 g sample (dry basis) for the continuous, cosolvent, soaking, and pressure swing techniques, respectively, at 35 MPa and 75°C [98].

Supercritical fluid technology coupled with membrane, enzymatic or adsorption process have been shown to produce high-quality oil with best reduction of levels of contaminants compared to traditional refining of oils [124, 125].

Faced with all these advantages, the main drawback of this method is the high cost of the application on an industrial scale [12, 50, 124]. In this contest, the effect of supercritical CO2 techniques on CO2 consumption was studied. The results have showed that the total amount of CO2 consumption decreases significantly with temperature and increases with pressure in all extraction modes using supercritical CO2 method. A higher amount of CO2 was needed for the continuous technique, compared to the techniques of cosolvent, soaking and pressure swing regardless of levels of pressure and temperature. Consequently, the best extraction technique of the oil with least amount of CO2 consumption was achieved with pressure swing mode at 35 MPa and 75 C [98].

3.1.4 Solvent extraction

Solvent extraction methods are numerous. They have been studied by several researchers applied on marine by-products [37, 87, 89, 106]. Unfortunately, these techniques have many disadvantages. Large amount of hazardous solvent and important energy are required. Besides, marine oils are oxidized exhibiting a strong red-brown or brown color when extraction of oil is done at high temperature and longtime [90]. Generally, extraction by solvent is only carried out on a laboratory scale for analytical purposes [124]. Among the widely used techniques, Bligh and Dyer method is the most recommended for the total extraction of lipids from biological tissues [126]. Most of the published data on lipid content are related to this method [105, 127, 128, 129]. The effectiveness of the Bligh and Dyer method was evaluated compared to Soxhlet method. The results have showed that the Bligh and Dyer extraction method is more effective in extracting polar and non-polar lipids from fish compared to the Soxhlet technique [130].

3.1.5 Cold pressing extraction

Other innovative processes are coming to the market such as cold pressing extraction, a patented process originating from the olive oil production industry [13]. This technique allows protection of PUFAs content, producing high quality marine oil from different types of by-products [50, 99]. This process is well known to produce a lower-yield, but higher quality of oil [131].

Due to its high degree in PUFAs, marine oils are very sensitive to oxidation. The degree of oxidation increases in the presence of air (oxygen), light and heat during extraction and storage [8, 47]. This phenomenon mainly reduces the shelf life of marine oils [53]. All techniques using high-temperature or toxic solvents can induce degradation and loss of nutritional qualities of marine oil.

For this, looking for gentle extraction of marine lipids or using non-heat processes might generate more stable lipid fractions [8]. It is also necessary to protect the oil by stopping or slowing down the oxidation process during the production and during storage. Adding antioxidants to the oil is one of the most used methods [132]. Using a modified atmosphere packaging [133], or encapsulation, which keeps marine oil away from oxygen and light [133, 134] can be also used. In addition to protecting the oil, the use of microencapsulation technology provides consumers with supplements n-3 fatty acids ready to consume.

3.2 Production of n-3 fatty acids concentrates

Another valorization of marine oils (produced from whole fish or from fish by-products) is their use in production of concentrated n-3 fatty acids in the form of free fatty acids, methyl and ethyl esters or acylglycerols [135]. Several processes can be used, the most important are urea complexation [108, 121, 136], molecular distillation [137], supercritical fluid extraction [98, 108], winterization [138, 139], fractionation by chromatography [120] and by enzymatic processes [111, 112, 140]. These techniques have been reviewed by many authors [13, 124, 135] and recently by [12]. The main challenge in the choice of concentration technique at industrial level is to reach higher yield and purity at lower cost [13, 124, 138]. Table 2 outlines some methods to produce n-3 fatty acids concentrates with levels achieved of enrichment in EPA and DHA.

SpeciesType of oilEPADHAProcessRef
Tuna (Thunnus albacares)Tuna oilEPA + DHA (85.02%)
recovery 25.10%
Concentration by urea complexation[121]
Rainbow sardine (Dussumieria acuta)Oil from white muscle15.3917.45Extraction [88][108]
Concentrate oilCO2 Supercritical extraction
19.4729.61Urea complexation
17.7425.51Low-temperature crystallization with ethanol
Pacific sardines (Sardinops sagax)Crude oil from Skin-on fillets)28.216.7[140]
Refined unhydrolyzed oil26.8613.62Extraction and refining
Concentrate oil33.7429.94Lipase-catalyzed hydrolysis
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)Crude Salmon by-products oil3.719.02[112]
Salmon oil 40% hydrolysis4.728.94Lipolysis, filtration
Esterified permeate5.6410.30Enzymatic re-esterification
SalmonOil from salmon heads3.69.9Enzymatic hydrolysis[111]
Permeate re-esterified5.0611.90Re-esterification
Arctic codArctic cod liver oil10.537.63[138]
Winterized oil21.0817.83Alternate solvent winterization and enzymatic interesterification
Tuna (Thunnus thynnus)Tunafish oil4.618.3[141]
Tunafish oil ethyl ester5.323.7Supercritical fluid chromatography
MenhadenMenhaden oil13.512.6[136]
Menhaden oil after urea inclusion29.441.8Urea inclusion method
Sardine (Sardinops sagax caeruleus)Refined oil14.5112.55[142]
n-3 PUFAs concentrate34.1739.47Chemical hydrolysis + urea complexation
n-3 PUFAs concentrate46.2640.32Enzymatic hydrolysis + urea complexation

Table 2.

Some methods of production of concentrated n-3 fatty acids in oil.

Concentration by winterization allows elimination of SFAs present in the oil, which crystallize at low temperatures [139]. Winterization is primarily designed for oils with a high content of SFAs. It allows elimination of stearic phase, by cooling the oil to 0–4°C. The degree of concentration of PUFAs by this process is evaluated as low as these interesting fatty acids could be lost in the stearic fraction [13]. However, this method produces n-3 PUFAs concentrate in natural form [138].

An alternative solvent winterization and enzymatic interesterification was studied to concentrate n-3 fatty acids in cod liver oil [138]. The optimization parameters considered were separation method, solvent, oil concentration, time and temperature of winterization. Likewise, enzymes used were examined for interesterification efficiency under different system air condition, time and temperature. Authors proposed the optimal conditions of the technique via winterization (0.1 g/mL oil/acetone, 24 h, −80°C, precooled Büchner filtration) and interesterification (Lipozyme TL IM, N2 flow, 2.5 h, 40°C) improving n-3 fatty acid content to 43.20 mol%.

In another study, winterization was carried out on a bleached oil by a progressive cooling (30–5°C) in three phases. The effect of solvent type, solvent proportion, and agitation in the second cooling stage was studied. The results have demonstrated that using hexane has improved content of PUFA of 64.3% with 13% as a decrease percentage in level of SFAs compared to the fatty profile of bleached oil [139].

In addition to what is explained previously for CO2 supercritical fluid extraction, this technique could be used to concentrate fatty acids. It’s based on the use of CO2 which, in the supercritical state, behaves like an extraction fluid and entrains fatty acids. In several passages, their concentrations therefore increase [13]. This method can achieve high concentration levels of n-3 PUFAs.

Supercritical carbon dioxide was used for simultaneous extraction and fractionation of fish oil from Tuna by-products [143]. The obtained oil was divided into six fractions based on molecular weight and the chain length of triglycerides in terms of fatty acid constituents. The results showed that the three first separated fractions were rich in SFAs followed by monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs), then PUFAs. While the three last fractions contained high levels of MUFAs and PUFAs.

Melgosa and co-authors studied the use of supercritical CO2 as solvent in the lipase-catalyzed ethanolysis of fish oil. The effect of initial substrate ethanol/oil molar ratio (2–38), pressure (7.5–30 MPa), and temperature (323.15–353.15 K) on equilibrium conversion, reaction rate and oxidative status of the products were tested. The results have revealed the importance role of employing CO2 in improving reaction kinetics by reduction of mass transfer limitations and prevention of n-3 PUFAs oxidation due to displacement of oxygen [144].

The results of supercritical fluid extraction applied on Rainbow sardine oil have showed that the highest decrease in SFAs and MUFAs were obtained at 50–60°C and 350 bars [108]. This technique was evaluated selective even in the fractionation of fish oil with lower content of EPA (4.6%) and DHA (6.7%) under conditions of lower pressure (100 and 200 bar) [145]. In another study, conditions (pressure, temperature and supercritical CO2 flow rate) influencing concentration of fatty acids in fish oil by supercritical carbon dioxide were studied [146]. The results have demonstrated that fractionation by a supercritical fluid under optimal conditions: a pressure increase (at 5 kg/h flow rate) and flow rate increase (at 150 bar pressure), both determined a higher EPA + DHA concentration and decreased the EPA/DHA ratio. The same authors proposed to carry out a urea adduction during preparation to decrease the amount of SFAs in the starting oil before supercritical fractionation.

With regard to optimization conditions, numerous researches have worked on modeling, simulation, and optimization of the CO2 supercritical fractionation of EPA and DHA esters in fish oil [147, 148].

Optimal conditions of application by using adjuvant material and modifying CO2 volumetric density and temperature were also investigated in other studies to get the highest fractionation yield of EPA and DHA [149]. Likewise, Antunes-Corrêa and co-authors and Davarnejad and co-authors studied the optimal operating conditions (pressure and temperature) to fractionate fish oil. In the first study [150], the best results based on oil solubility were obtained using 7.8 MPa and 301.15 K. While in the second research [151], the maximal solubility of the fish oil (0.921 g of oil/100 g of CO2) was obtained at optimum conditions of 40°C and 27.2 MPa. In both studies, EPA fractionation was recorded not possible and low, respectively.

The experience of CO2 supercritical fluid chromatography was transferred to be used in laboratory in a pilot plant to produce EPA enriched mixtures. Fractionation was done on a silica adsorption column using CO2 as supercritical solvent [152]. This allowed to achieve best purity of 93% in EPA ethyl ester fraction with a 24.6% yield. The study of the technical and economic feasibility to produce n-3 PUFAs ethyl ester concentrates from trans esterified fish oil using CO2 supercritical fluid extraction has revealed that process cost is around 550 U.S $/kg DHA and EPA ethyl ester concentrate [141].

Other investigations have studied the use of enzymatic hydrolysis in production of n-3 PUFAs concentrates. This technique involves the use of specific enzymes (lipases), able to catalyze reactions such hydrolysis, ethanolysis or transesterification of triglycerides [124].

Concentration of Pacific sardines (Sardinops sagax) oil was carried out using lipase-catalyzed hydrolysis [140]. The results of this study have showed that hydrolysis with 250 U from Candida rugosa lipase has increased EPA concentration to a relatively constant level of 33.74% after 1.5 h. DHA levels were also significantly increased from 13.62% to 29.94% with 500 U after 9 h. This technique uses mild conditions (neutral pH and low temperatures), very important to preserve EPA and DHA from oxidation [140, 153].

Salmon oil produced from by-products of this species by controlled enzymatic procedure with Neutrase has followed a selective enzymatic hydrolysis under mild conditions, using Novozyme SP398 to enrich the n-3 PUFAs. The process used consist of a lipolysis, filtration in flat membrane device and enzymatic re-esterification with glycerol and Immobilized 1,3-specific lipase IM60 (Lipozym IM). This method induced a significant increase in the amount of PUFAs from 39.20 mol% of total fatty acids in the crude oil to 43.29 mol% in the re-esterified permeate [112].

The proteolytic extraction of oil from salmon heads using three different types of enzymes (Alcalase, Neutrase and flavourzyme) and the lipolysis of this oil to concentrate PUFAs were carried out. Lipolysis was done with Novozym SP398 to obtain a mixture of free fatty acids and glycerol (24 hours 45% hydrolysis). The mixture was then filtered. This process has allowed an increase of the PUFAs content from 41.6% in the crude oil to 46.5% in the permeate. Likewise, DHA and EPA percentages have increased from 9.9% to 11.6%, and from 3.6 to 5.6%, respectively [111]. The same authors used a re-esterification in the permeate with Lipozyme IM which permitted obtention of 5.06% and 11.90% in EPA and DHA contents, accordingly [111]. Moreover, other authors proposed combination of enzymatic or chemical hydrolysis with urea complexation to produce high concentrates of n-3 PUFAs. The enzymatic hydrolysis followed with urea complexation of refined sardine oil has increased the level of EPA and DHA from 14.51% to 46.26%, and from 12.55% to 40.32%, respectively [142].

Another technique, short path distillation was tested to purify Alaskan Walleye Pollock (Gadus chalcogrammus) and New Zealand Hoki (Macruronus novaezelandiae) liver oils [154]. Certainly, this process has reduced free fatty acids and lipid oxidation parameters, which is appreciated to produce purified oils. Consequently, the conduct of this operation at high temperatures may cause degradation of PUFAs or development of new undesirable compounds. The short path distillation was coupled to a previous enzymatic glycerolysis of sardine oil with glycerol [155]. This work showed that short path distillation is able to concentrate n-3 PUFAs in monoacylglycerols at suitable evaporator temperature (125°C) Same technique aided by a working fluid was evaluated efficient in removal of persistent organic pollutants in marine oils (PCDD/PCDF, dl-PCB and ndl-PCB) [156].

When comparing the effect of using urea complexation on the concentration yield compared with dry fractionation and low temperature solvent crystallization, results revealed that n-3 fatty acids were enriched in liquid fractions of all methods except by dry fractionation. The highest enrichment was achieved with the urea complexation method (83.00%) [157]. In the same context of valorization of marine by-products, application of urea crystallization on tuna oil recovered from liquid waste by-product from a tuna canning process allowed an increase in the concentration of n-3 PUFAs [158]. In another study conducted on concentration of fatty acids in sardine oil, the highest PUFA concentrations in low-temperature crystallization with ethanol were attained at −5°C, with EPA and DHA purities equivalent to 17.74 and 25.51%, respectively [108].

These authors also compared three different concentration techniques, supercritical fluid extraction (T = 40, 50, 60°C and 150, 250, 350 bar), Urea complexation (T = 1, −5, −10°C) and low-temperature crystallization with ethanol solvent (T = 10, 0, −5°C). The optimal conditions for each technique were determined. Nevertheless, the highest reduction of SFA and MUFA, the best increase in PUFA and the highest n-3 yield (47.53%), were obtained at −10°C in urea complexation method [108].

There are still several techniques used for the concentration of n-3 PUFAs, among which there is the use of polymeric membrane separation [159]. Optimal conditions of this method were found to be at the temperature of 36.19°C, pressure of 4.82 bar and stirring rate of 43.01 rpm with a desirability value of 0.99. With these conditions, a concentration of n-3 PUFAs of 34.98% was achieved.

Synthesized poly-vinylidene fluoride (PVDF) asymmetric membranes are also tested in concentration of n-3 PUFAs [160]. Conditions of preparation of PVDF membranes influences significantly results. In this work, PVDF membrane prepared at a coagulation bath temperature of 0°C resulted in the best n-3 PUFAs enrichment (40.4%) at 5 bar and 30°C.


4. Conclusion

Marine by-products (viscera, heads, trimmings, bones, cartilage, tails, skin, scales, blood, shells, carcasses, damaged fish, eggs, milt or soft roe), generated by marine transformation industries, constitute a good opportunity of valorization into highly valuable products. Their characterization determines the choice of the most suitable and efficient valorization method among all possibilities available, production of marine proteins (fishmeal, silage and hydrolysates), oils rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and preparation of high value compounds such as vitamins, enzymes, minerals, gelatin, collagen, chitin and chitosan, taurine and creatine, hydroxyapatite, natural pigments, biodiesel and biogas.

In this context, several studies have been carried out to explore possible technologies that can be used in the valorization of the marine by-products into marine oils and concentrated fatty acids. In addition to the conventional extraction process called also wet reduction process or hydraulic pressing, solvent extraction, supercritical fluid extraction, urea complexation, cold pressing or enzymatic hydrolysis processes could be used to transform these by-products into marine oils highly rich in PUFAs very demanded by food, nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries.

For more advanced enhancement, the concentration of fatty acids in marine oils is also widely practiced. Several techniques can be used such as winterization, urea complexation, short path distillation, supercritical fluid extraction, low temperature solvent crystallization, fractionation by chromatography or by enzymatic processes. Combined methods were also tested like solvent winterization and enzymatic interesterification, urea adduction before a supercritical fractionation. Many studies have focused on comparison between these techniques to provide differences, advantages, disadvantages, or even optimal conditions of operating.

The main challenge in the choice of extraction and concentration techniques at industrial level is to reach higher yield, purity, quality, stability at lower cost and low unwanted environmental effects.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. 1. FAO. The State of Food and Agriculture 2019. Moving Forward on Food Loss and Waste Reduction. Rome; 2019
  2. 2. FAO. 2020. State of the World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Sustainability in Action. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2020
  3. 3. Barthomeuf DJ, Bergé C, J.P. How enzymes may be helpful for upgrading fish by-products: Enhancement of fat extraction. J Aquatic Food Product Technol. 2004;13(2):69-84
  4. 4. Shahidi, F. 2007. Maximising the Value of Marine by-Products. Boca Raton, USA: Woodhead Publishing Ltd. ISBN: 9781845690137
  5. 5. Rustad T. Utilization of marine by-products. Electron. J. Environ. Agric. Food Chem. 2003;2(4):458-463 ISSN 1579-4377
  6. 6. Jackson A, Newton RW. Project to Model the Use of Fisheries by-Products in the Production of Marine Ingredients with Special Reference to Omega-3 Fatty Acids EPA and DHA. Institute of Aquaculture: University of Stirling et IFFO; 2016
  7. 7. Wasswa J, Tang J, Gu X. Utilization of fish processing by-products in the Gelatin industry. Food Reviews International. 2007;23:2,159-2,174. DOI: 10.1080/87559120701225029
  8. 8. Rustad T, Storrø I, Slizyte R. Possibilities for the utilization of marine by-products. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2011;2011(46):2001-2014
  9. 9. Dumay J, Donnay-Moreno C, Barnathan G, Jaouen P, Bergé JP. Improvement of lipid and phospholipid recoveries from sardine (Sardina pilchardus) viscera using industrial proteases. Process Biochemistry. 2006;41(11):2327-2332
  10. 10. Ferraro V, Cruz IB, Jorge RF, Malcata FX, Pintado ME, Castro PML. Valorisation of natural extracts from marine source focused on marine by-products: A review. Food Research International. 2010;43:2221-2233
  11. 11. Ferraro V, Carvalho A, Piccirillo C, Santos M, Castro P, Pintado M. Extraction of high added value biological compounds from sardine, sardine-type fish and mackerel canning residues - a review. Materials Science and Engineering, C. 2013;33:3111-3120
  12. 12. Bonilla-Méndez JR, Hoyos-Concha JL. Methods of extraction, refining and concentration of fish oil as a source of omega-3 fatty acids. Corpoica Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria. 2018;19(3):645-668
  13. 13. Grosdemange, A.G. 2010. De l’huile de foie de morue aux huiles de poisson concentrées, riches en acides gras polyinsaturés Vue d’ensemble des techniques de production d’huile de poisson. Ocl vol. 17 n° 4 juillet-août 2010
  14. 14. Kim SK, Mendis E. Bioactive compounds from marine processing byproducts – A review. Food Research International. 2006;39(4):383-393
  15. 15. Kristbergsson, K. Arason, S. 2007. Utilization of by-products and treatment of waste in the food industry. (Vol. 3, pp. 233-258). ISBN: 978-0-387-33511-7
  16. 16. Shahidi, F. Janak Kamil, Y.V.A. Enzymes from fish and aquatic invertebrates and their application in the food industry. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2001;12:435-464
  17. 17. Blanco M, Sotelo CG, Pérez-Martín RI. Hydrolysis as a valorization strategy for unused marine food biomass: Boarfish and small-spotted catshark discards and by-products. Journal of Food Biochemistry. 2015;39(2015):368-376
  18. 18. Kato S, Kunisawa N, Kojima T, Murakami S. Evaluation of ozone treated fish waste oil as a fuel for transportation. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan. 2004;37:863-870
  19. 19. Lopes da Silva T, Santos AR, Gomes R, Reis A. Valorizing fish canning industry by-products to produce ω-3 compounds and biodiesel. Environmental Technology and Innovation. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.eti.2017.11.002
  20. 20. Makoure D, Arhaliass A, Echchelh A, et al. Valorization of fish by-products using reactive extrusion for biodiesel production and optimization. Waste Biomass Valor. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-019-00840-5
  21. 21. Piccolo, T. 2008. Frame work analysis of fish waste to bio-diesel production – Aquafinca – case study, (Retrieved on September 12th, 2009).
  22. 22. Leung DYC, Wu X, Leung MKH. A review on biodiesel production using catalyzed transesterification. Applied Energy. 2010;87(4):1083-1095. DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.10.006
  23. 23. Lin CY, Li RJ. Fuel properties of biodiesel produced from the crude fish oil from the soap stock of marine fish. Fuel Processing Technology. 2009;90(1):130-136
  24. 24. El-Mashad HM, Zhang R, Avena-Bustillos RJ. A two-step process for biodiesel production from salmon oil. Biosysytems Engineering. 2008;99(2):220-227
  25. 25. Sachindra NM, Bhaskar N, Mahendrakar NS. Recovery of carotenoids from shrimp waste in organic solvents. Waste Management. 2006;26:1092-1098
  26. 26. Terzioğlu P, Öğüt H, Kalemtaş A. Natural calcium phosphates from fish bones and their potential biomedical applications. Materials Science and Engineering C. 2018;91(2018):899-911
  27. 27. Ishikawa M, Kato M, Mihori T, Watanabe H, Sakai Y. Effect of vapor pressure on the rate of softening of fish bone by super-heated steam cooking. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi. 1990;56:1687-1691
  28. 28. Granito, R.N. Renno, A. C. M. Yamamura, H., Cruz de Almeida, M., Ruiz, P.L.M., Ribeiro, D.A. 2018. Hydroxyapatite from fish for bone tissue engineering: A promising approach. Int J Mol Cell Med 2018, 7(2): 80-90. DOI:10.22088/IJMCM.BUMS.7.2.80
  29. 29. Kurita K. Chitin and chitosan: Functional biopolymers from marine crustaceans. Marine Biotechnology. 2006;8:203-226
  30. 30. Jang MK, Kong BG, Jeong YI, Lee CH, Nah JW. Physicochemical characterization of alpha-chitin, beta-chitin and Gama-chitin separated from natural resources. Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry. 2004;42:3423-3432. DOI: 10.1002/pola.20176
  31. 31. Newsholme E, Hardy G. Creatine: A review on its nutritional applications in sport. Nutrition. 1998;14(3):322-324
  32. 32. Omura Y, Inagaki M. Immunicytochemical localization of taurine in the fish retina under light and dark adaptation. Amino Acids. 2000;19:593-604
  33. 33. Dumay J. Extraction de lipides en voie aqueuse par bioreacteur enzymatique combiné à l’ultrafiltration: Application à la valorisation de co-produits de poisson (Sardina pilchardus). Thèse de doctorat de l’Université de Nantes; 2006 305 pp
  34. 34. Ghaly AE, Ramakrishnan VV, Brooks MS, Budge SM, Dave D. Fish processing wastes as a potential source of proteins, amino acids and oils: A critical review. J Microb Biochem Technol. 2013;5:107-129. DOI: 10.4172/1948-5948.1000110
  35. 35. Esteban AJ, Garcıa P, Ramos MCM. Evaluation of fruit–vegetable and fish wastes as alternative feedstuffs in pig diets M.B. Waste Management. 2007;27(2007):193-200
  36. 36. Skåra T, Cripps S. Upgrading of waste from salmon slaughteries using a three-phase separation process. In: Luten JB, Børresen T, Oehlenschläger J, editors. Seafood from Producer to Consumer, Integrated Approach to Quality. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science; 1997. pp. 103-111
  37. 37. Khoddami A, Ariffin, A.A. Bakar, J. Ghazali, H.M. 2009. Fatty acid profile of the oil extracted from fish waste (head, intestine and liver) (Sardinellale muru). World Allied Sciences Journal 7: 127-131
  38. 38. Bechtel PJ. Properties of different fish processing by-products from Pollock, cod and salmon. Journal of Food Processing Preservation. 2003;27(2003):101-116
  39. 39. Babbit JK. Intrinsic quality and species of north specific fish. In: Keller S, editor. Making Profits out of Seafood by-Products. Alaska: Proceeding of the International conference on fish by-products; 1990. pp. 39-43
  40. 40. Je JY, Qian ZJ, Byun HG, Kim SK. Purification and characterization of an antioxidant peptide obtained from tuna backbone protein by enzymatic hydrolysis. Process Biochemistry. 2007;42(5):840-846
  41. 41. Pastoriza L, Sampedro G, Cabo ML, Herrera JJR, Bernardez M. Solubilisation of proteins from rayfish residues by endogenous and commercial enzymes. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2004;84:83-88
  42. 42. Torres J, Chen A, Rodrigo-Garcia YC, Jaczynski J, J. Recovery of byproducts from seafood processing streams. In: Shahidi F, editor. Maximising the Value of Marine by-Products. Boca Raton, USA: CRC Press; 2007. pp. 65-90
  43. 43. Olsen RL, Toppe J, Karunasagar I. Challenges and realistic opportunities in the use of byproducts from processing of fish and shellfish. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 2014;36:144-151
  44. 44. Anon. Assessment of Harvest and Post-Harvest Losses - Marine Fisheries. Cochin: National Agricultural Technology Project, CIFT; 2005 122 p
  45. 45. Lopes C, Antelo LT, Amaya Franco-Uría A, Alonso AA, Pérez-Martín R. Valorisation of fish by-products against waste management treatments – Comparison of environmental impacts. Waste Management Volume. 2015;46:103-112
  46. 46. Gabrielsen BO, Austreng E. Growth, product quality and immune status of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. fed wet feed with alginate. Aquaculture Research. 1998;29:397-401
  47. 47. Aidos I, Luten JB, Boom RM, Padt AV. Upgrading of Maatjes herring byproducts: Production of crude fish oil. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry. 2001;49:3697-3704
  48. 48. Archer, M. Watson, R. Denton, J.W. 2001. Fish waste production in the United Kingdom-the quantities produced and opportunities for better utilisation. The sea fish industry authority sea fish technology, 1-57
  49. 49. Jacobsen CN, Horn NS, Sørensen AM, Bimbo AB. Food Enrichment with Omega-3 Fatty Acids. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2013. p. 107
  50. 50. Rubio-Rodriguez N, De Diego SM, Beltrán S, Jaime I, Sanz MT, Rovira J. Supercritical fluid extraction of fish oil from fish by-products: A comparison with other extraction methods. Journal of Food Engineering. 2012;109(2):238-248. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.10.011
  51. 51. Hamilton MC, Hites RA, Schwager SJ, Foran JA, Knuth BA. Lipid composition and contaminants in farmed and wild salmon. Environmental Science & Technology. 2005;39:8622-8629
  52. 52. Mkadem H, Kaanane A. Recovery and characterization of fish oil from by-products of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) in the canning process. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/10498850.2019.1682733
  53. 53. Falch E, Sandbakk M, Aursand M. Chapter 3: On-board handling of marine byproducts to prevent microbial spoilage, enzymatic reactions and lipid oxidation. In: Shahidi F, editor. Maximising the Value of Marine by-Products. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition; 2007. pp. 47-64 532 pp
  54. 54. Shahidi F. Bailey’s Industrial Oil and Fat Products, 6 Volume Set. 6th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience; 2015
  55. 55. Aidos I, Masbernat-Martinez S, Luten JB, Boom RM, Van Der Padt AJB. Composition and stability of herring oil recovered from sorted byproducts as compared to oil from mixed byproducts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50:2818-2824
  56. 56. Zlatanos S, Sagredos AN. The fatty acid composition of some important Mediterranean fish species. Fat Sci Tech nol. 1993;95(29):6669
  57. 57. Horrocks LA, Yeo YK. Health benefits of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Pharmacological Research. 1999;40:211-225
  58. 58. Leaf A, Kang JX, Xiao YF, Billman GE, Voskuyl RA. The Antiarrythmic and anticonvulsant effects of dietary N-3 fatty acids. The Journal of Membrane Biology. 1999;172:1-11
  59. 59. Holub DJ, Holub BJ. Omega-3 fatty acids from fish oils and cardiovascular disease. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. 2004;263:217-225
  60. 60. Sidhu KS. Health benefits and potential risks related to consumption of fish or fish oil. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2003;38:336-344
  61. 61. Kris-Etherton PM, Harris WS, Appel LJ. American Heart Association nutrition committee. Fish consumption, fish oil, omega-3 fatty acids, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2002;106:2747-2757
  62. 62. Schacky CV. n-3 fatty acids and the prevention of coronary atherosclerosis. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2000;71:224-227
  63. 63. Schmidt EB, Arnesen H, De Caterina R, Rasmussen LH, Kristensen SD. Marine n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and coronary heart disease: Part I. background, epidemiology, animal data, effects on risk factors and safety. Thrombosis Research. 2005;115(3):163170
  64. 64. Barnerjee I, Saha S, Dutta J. Comparison of the effect of dietary fish oils with different n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid compositions on plasma and liver lipids in rats. Lipids. 1992;27:425-428
  65. 65. Goodnight SHH, Jr WS, Connor WE, Illingworth DR. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, Hyperlipidemia, and thrombosis. Arteriosclerosis. 1982;2:87-112
  66. 66. Mahadik SP, Evans D, Lal H. Oxidative stress and role of antioxidant and ω-3 essential fatty acid supplementation on schizophrenia. Prog. Neuro-psychopharmacol and Biol. Pshychiatry. 2001;25:463-493
  67. 67. Bourre JM. Dietary omega-3 fatty acids and psychiatry: Mood, behavior, stress, depression, dementia and aging. The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging. 2005;9:31-38
  68. 68. Weisinger HS, Armitage JA, Sinclair AJ, Vingrys AJ, Burns PL, Weisinger RS. Perinatal omega-3 fatty acid deficiency affetcs blood pressure laterin life. Nature Medecine. 2001;7:258-259
  69. 69. Bourre J, Bonneil M, Clement M, Dumont O, Durand G, Lafront H, et al. Function of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids in the nervous system. Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids. 1993;48:5-15
  70. 70. Makrides M, Neumann M, Simmer K, Pater J, Gibson R. Are long-chain polyunsaturated fatty-acids essential nutrients in infancy. Lancet. 1995;345(8963):1463-1468
  71. 71. Hoffman DR, Uauy R. Essentiality of dietary omega-3 fatty acid for premature infants: Plasma and red blood cell fatty acid composition. Lipids. 1992;27:886-896
  72. 72. Moyad MA. An introduction to dietary/supplemental omega-3 fatty acids for general health and prevention: Part II. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2005;23:36-48
  73. 73. Brouwer IA, Geelen A, Katan MB. n-3 fatty acids, cardiac arrhythmia and fatal coronary heart disease. Progress in Lipid Research. 2006;45:357-367
  74. 74. Reiffel JA, McDonald A. Antiarrhythmic effects of Omega-3 fatty acids. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2006;98:50-60
  75. 75. Psota TL, Gebauer SK, Kris-Etherton P. Dietary omega-3 fatty acid intake and cardiovascular risk. American Journal of Cardiology. 2006;98:3-18
  76. 76. Jacobson TA. Secondary prevention of coronary artery disease with Omega-3 fatty acids. The American Journal of Cardiology. 2006;98:61-70
  77. 77. Dagnelie PC, Rietveld T, Swart GR, Stijnen T, Van Den Berg JWO. Effect of dietary fish oil on blood levels of free fatty acids, ketone bodies and Triacylglycerolin humans. Lipids. 1994;29:41-45
  78. 78. Gebauer SK, Psota TL, Harris WS, Kris-Etherton PM. n-3 fatty acid dietary recommendations and food sources to achieve essentiality and cardiovascular benefits. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2006;83:1526-1535
  79. 79. Middaugh JP. Cardiovascular deaths among Alaskan natives, 1980-1986. American Journal of Public Health. 1990;80:282-285
  80. 80. Karmali RA, Marsh J, Fuchs C. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids on growth of a rat mammary tumor 2. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1984;73(2):457-461. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/73.2.457
  81. 81. Rogers AE, Conner B, Boulanger C, Lee S. Mammary Tumorogenesis in rats fed diets high in lard. Lipids. 1986;21:275-280
  82. 82. Wakimoto T, Kondo H, Nii H, Kimura K, Egami Y, Oka Y, et al. Furan fatty acid as an anti-inflammatory component from the green lipped mussel Perna canaliculus. Proceedings. National Academy of Sciences. United States of America. 2011;108:17533-17537
  83. 83. Tang S, Qin C, Wang H, Li S, Tian S. Study on supercritical extraction of lipids and enrichment of DHA from oil-rich microalgae. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2011;57(1):44-49
  84. 84. Covington MB. Omega-3 fatty acid. American Family Physician. 2004;70(1):133-140
  85. 85. Cho SY, Miyashita K, Miyazawa T, Fujimoto J, Kaneda T. Autoxidation of ethyl EPA and DHA. Journal of American Oil Chemists’ Society. 1987;64:876-879
  86. 86. Cunnane SC, Plourde M, Stewart K, Crawford MA. Docosahexaenoic acid and shore-based diets in hominin encephalization: A rebuttal. American Journal of Human Biology. 2007;19:578-581
  87. 87. Njinkoue JM, Barnathan G, Miralles J, Gaydou EM, Samb A. Lipids and fatty acids in muscle, liver and skin of three edible fish from the Senegalese coast: Sardinellamaderensis, Sardinellaauritaand Cephalopholistaeniops. Comp. Biochem. Phys. Part B. 2002;13:395-402
  88. 88. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Canadian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology. 1959;37:911-917
  89. 89. Falch E, Rustad T, Aursand M. By-products from gadiform species as raw material for production of marine lipids as ingredients in food or feed. Process Biochemistry. 2006;41:666-674
  90. 90. Raju A, Haq M, Cho YJ, Chun BS. Quality evaluation of oil recovered from by-products of bigeye tuna using supercritical carbon dioxide extraction. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2017;17:663-672
  91. 91. Soldo B, Simat V, Vlahovi J, Skroza D, Ljubenkov I, Mekinic IG. High quality oil extracted from sardine by-products as an alternative to whole sardines: Production and refining. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology. 2019;121:1800513
  92. 92. Chantachum S, Benjakul S, Sriwirat N. Separation and quality of fish oil from precooked and non-precooked tuna heads. Food Chemistry. 2000;69:289-294
  93. 93. Dumay J, Allery M, Donnay-Moreno C, Barnathan G, Jaouen P, Carbonneau ME, et al. Optimization of hydrolysis of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) heads with Protamex: Enhancemant of lipid and phospholipide extraction. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2009;89:1599-1606
  94. 94. Liaset B, Julshamn K, Espe M. Chemical composition and theoretical nutritional evaluation of the produced fractions from enzymatic hydrolysis of salmon frames with Protamex. Process Biochemistry. 2003;38:1747-1759
  95. 95. Batista I, Ramos C, Coutinho J, Bandarra NM, Nunes ML. Characterization of protein hydrolysates and lipids obtained from black scabbardfish (Aphanopus carbo) by-products and antioxidative activity of the hydrolysates produced. Process Biochemistry. 2010;45(1):18-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2009.07.019
  96. 96. Batista I, Ramos C, Mendonça R, Nunes ML. Enzymatic hydrolysis of sardine (Sardina pilchardus) by-products and lipid recovery. Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 2009;18(1-2):120-134
  97. 97. Haq M, Ahmed R, Cho YJ, Chun BS. Quality properties and bio-potentiality of edible oils from Atlantic salmon by-products extracted by supercritical carbon dioxide and conventional methods. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2016;8(6):1953-1967. DOI: 10.1007/s12649-016-9710-2
  98. 98. Sahena F, Zaidul IS, Jinap M, Jahurul S, Khatib MHA, Norulaini A, et al. Extraction of fish oil from the skin of Indian mackerel using supercritical fluids. Journal of Food Engineering. 2010;99(1):63-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.01.038
  99. 99. Fouda T. Using green cold pressing to produce high quality fish oil from industrial Salmon waste. V Journal of Zoological Research. 2020;2(1)
  100. 100. Gbogouri GA, Linder M, Fanni J, Parmentier M. Analysis of lipids extracted from salmon (Salmo salar) heads by commercial proteolytic enzymes. Euro J. Lipid Sci. Tech. 2006;108:766-775
  101. 101. Al-Sayed M, Linder K, Fanni M, Parmentier J, M. Characterization of the lipid fractions obtained by proteolytic and chemical extraction from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) roe. Process Biochemistry. 2008;43:376-383
  102. 102. Chen Y, Tou C, Jaczynski JC, J. Amino acid, fatty acid, and mineral profiles of materials recovered from rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) processing by-products using isoelectric solubilization/precipitation. Journal of Food Science. 2007;72(9):C527-C535
  103. 103. Mbatia B, Adlercreutz P, Mulaa F, Mattiasson B. Enzymatic enrichment of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in Nile perch (Lates niloticus) viscera oil. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology. 2010b;112:977-984
  104. 104. Mbatia B, Adlercreutz D, Adlercreutz P, Mahadhy A, Mulaa F, Mattiasson B. Enzymatic oil extraction and positional analysis of ω-3 fatty acids in Nile perch and salmon heads (2010a). Process Biochemistry. 2010a;45(5):815-819
  105. 105. Létisse M, Rozières M, Hiol A, Sargent M, Comeau L. Enrichment of EPA and DHA from sardine by supercritical fluid extraction without organic modifier: I. optimization of extraction conditions. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2006;38(1):27-36
  106. 106. Adeniyi OD, Bawa AA. Mackerel (Scomber Scrombrus) oil extraction and evaluation as raw materials for industrial utilization. Leonardo Journal of Sciences. 2006;8:33-42
  107. 107. Dunford N, Temelli T, LeBlanc F, F. Supercritical CO2 extraction of oil and residual proteins from Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) as affected by moisture content. Journal of Food Science. 1997;62:289-294
  108. 108. Homayooni B, Sahari MA, Barzegar M. Concentrations of omega-3 fatty acids from rainbow sardine fish oil by various methods. International Food Research Journal. 2014;21(2):743-748
  109. 109. Aspmo SI, Horn SJ, Eijsink VGH. Enzymatic hydrolysis of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) viscera. Process Biochemistry. 2005;40:1957-1966
  110. 110. Šližyte R, Rustad T, Storro I. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cod (Gadus morhua) by-products optimization of yield and properties of lipid and protein fractions. Process Biochemistry. 2005;40(2005):3680-3692
  111. 111. Linder M, Fanni J, Parmentier M. Proteolytic extraction of salmon oil and PUFA concentration by lipases. Marine Biotechnology. 2005;7:70-76
  112. 112. Linder M, Matouba E, Fanni J, Parmentier M. n-3 PUFA enrichment of salmon oil as obtained by lipolysis, filtration and enzymatic re-esterifiaction. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology. 2002;8(104):455-462
  113. 113. Crowther, J.B. Booth, B.H. Blackwell, D.D. 2000. Procédé de production d’une huile de poisson de qualité alimentaire. Brevet WOUS0042535
  114. 114. Chandrasekaran, M. Shine, K. 2013. Oil Seeds. Valorization of Food Processing by-Products. 978-1-4398-4887-6
  115. 115. Gbogouri GA. Co-valorisation des protéines et des lipides riches en lécithine et en acides gras polyinsatures oméga 3 à partir de têtes de saumon (salmo salar) par hydrolyse enzymatique. Institut national polytechnique de lorraine. Ecole Nationale Supérieure d’Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaires Laboratoire de Science et Génie Alimentaires. Thesis. 2005;2005
  116. 116. Ackman RG. Seafood lipids. In: Shahidi F, Botta JR, editors. Seafoods Chemistry, Processing Technology and Quality. New York: Blackie Academic and professional; 1994. pp. 34-48
  117. 117. Aspevik T, Oterhals A, Rønning S, Altintzoglou B, Wubshet T, Gildberg SG, et al. Top Curr Chem (Z). 2017;375:53. DOI: 10.1007/s41061-017-0143-6
  118. 118. Aidos, I.K.N. Boonman, M. Luten, J.B. Boom, R.M. Van Der, P.A. 2003. Influence of production parameters on fish oil quality in a pilot plant. J. of Food Sci., 68 (2): 581-587
  119. 119. Tengku, M. Tengku, R, Jeng, W.S. Amiza, M.A. 2018. Nutritional composition and thermal properties of Goldstripe Sardinella (Sardinella gibbosa) fillets and by-products, Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology, 27:6, 667-679, DOI:10.1080/10498850.2018.1483991
  120. 120. Mbatia B. Valorisation of Fish Waste Biomass through Recovery of Nutritional Lipids and Biogas. (PhD Thesis). Sweden: Department of Biotechnology, Lund University; 2011
  121. 121. Liu S, Zhang C, Hong P, Ji H. Concentration of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) of tuna oil by urea complexation: Optimization of process parameters. Journal of Food Engineering. 2006;73(3):203-209
  122. 122. Rolle RS. Review: Enzyme applications for agro-processing in developing countries: An inventory of current and potential applications. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1998;14:611-619
  123. 123. Lee JH, Asaduzzaman AKM, Yun JH, Yun JH, Chun BS. Characterization of the yellow croaker Larimichthys polyactis muscle oil extracted with supercritical carbon dioxide and an organic solvent. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2012;15:275-281. DOI: 10.5657/FAS.2012.0275
  124. 124. Rubio-Rodriguez N, Beltrán S, Jaime, I. De Diego, S. M. Sanz, M. T. Carballido, J. R. Production of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid concentrates: A review. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies. 2010;11(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2009.10.006
  125. 125. Kawashima A, Iwakiri R, Honda K. Experimental study on the removal of dioxins and coplanar polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) from fish oil. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry. 2006;54:10294-10299
  126. 126. Smedes F, Askland TK. Revisiting the development of the Bligh and Dyer total lipid determination method. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 1999;38:193-201
  127. 127. Mkadem H, Kaanane A. Seasonal changes in chemical composition and fatty acids of sardines (Sardina pilchardus) from the Dakhla coast (Morocco). Fisheries and Aquaculture. 2020;1(3)
  128. 128. Chakraborty K, Joseph D. Cooking and pressing is an effective and eco-friendly technique for obtaining high quality oil from Sardinella longiceps. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology. 2015;117(6):837-850. DOI: 10.1002/ejlt.201400539
  129. 129. Immanuel G, Sathasivan S, Shankar V, Peter S, Palavesam MJP, A. Processing and characterisation of low cost Balistid fish Sufflamen capistratus liver oil for edible purpose. Food Chemistry. 2009;115(2):430-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.12.023
  130. 130. Ozogul Y, Simşek A, Balikçi E, Kenar M. The effects of extraction methods on the contents of fatty acids, especially EPA and DHA in marine lipids. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition. 2011
  131. 131. Uitterhaegen E, Evon P. Twin–cold extrusion technology for vegetable oil extraction: A review. Journal of Food Engineering. 2017;2017(212):190-200
  132. 132. Kerry J. Chapter 2: Physical and chemical properties of lipid by-products from seafood waste. In: Shahidi F, editor. Maximising the Value of Marine by-Products. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition; 2007. pp. 22-46 532 pp
  133. 133. Hosseini H, Ghorbani M, Jafari SM, Sadeghi A, Mahoonak AS. Encapsulation of EPA and DHA concentrate from Kilka fish oil by milk proteins and evaluation of its oxidative stability. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2018. DOI: 10.1007/s13197018-3455-9
  134. 134. Mehrad, B. Shabanpour, B. Jafari, S.M. Pourashouri, P. 2015. Characterization of dried fish oil from menhaden encapsulated by spray drying. AACL Bioflux, 2015, V 8, Issue 1
  135. 135. Shahidi F, Wanasundara UN. Omega-3 fatty acid concentrates: Nutritional aspects and production technologies. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 1998;9:230-240
  136. 136. Lin T, Chen J, Chang SW, A. C. Enrichment of n-3 PUFA contents on triglycerides of fish oil by lipasecatalyzed trans-esterification under supercritical conditions. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2006;29(1-2):27-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2005.02.035
  137. 137. Cerón I, Cardona X, Toro CA, L. A. Simulación del proceso de concentración de aceite esencial de cidrón (Lippia citriodora) por destilación molecular de película descendente. Ingeniería y Competitividad. 2012;14(1):107-120
  138. 138. Lei Q, Ba S, Zhang H, Wei Y, Lee JY, Li T. Enrichment of omega-3 fatty acids in cod liver oil via alternate solvent winterization and enzymatic interesterification. Food Chemistry. 2016;199:364-371. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.12.005
  139. 139. Cunha D, Crexi C, De Almeida-Pinto VT, L. A. Winterization of fish oil with solvent. Food Science and Technology. 2009;29(1):207-213
  140. 140. Okada T, Morrissey MT. Production of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid concentrates from sardine oil by lipase-catalyzed hydrolysis. Food Chemistry. 2007;103:1411-1419
  141. 141. Alkio M, González C, Jäntti M, Aaltonen O. Purification of polyunsaturated fatty acid esters from tuna oil with supercritical fluid chromatography. JAOCS, Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 2000;77(3):315-321
  142. 142. Gamez-Meza N, Noriega-Rodrıguez JA, Medina-Juarez LA, Ortega-Garcia J, Monroy-Rivera J, Toro-Vazquez FJ, et al. Concentration of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid from fish oil by hydrolysis and urea complexation. Food Research International. 2003;36:721-727
  143. 143. Ferdosh S, Sarker Z, Norulaini N, Akanda J, Ghafoor K, Kadir O. Simultaneous extraction and fractionation of fish oil from tuna by-product using supercritical carbon dioxide (SC-CO2). Journal of Aquatic Food Product Technology. 2014;25(2):230-239. DOI: 10.1080/10 498850.2013.843629
  144. 144. Melgosa R, Sanz M, García T, Paz Á, Beltrán E, Lamas S, et al. Supercritical carbon dioxide as solvent in the lipase-catalyzed ethanolysis of fish oil: Kinetic study. Journal of CO2 Utilization. 2017;17:170-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcou.2016.11.011
  145. 145. Lopes BL, Sánchez-Camargo F, Ferreira AP, Grimaldi ALK, Paviani R, Cabral LC, et al. Selectivity of supercritical carbon dioxide in the fractionation of fish oil with a lower content of EPA+DHA. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2012;61:78-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.supflu.2011.09.015
  146. 146. Perretti G, Motori A, Bravi E, Favati F, Montanari L, Fantozzi P. Supercritical carbon dioxide fractionation of fish oil fatty acid ethyl esters. J. of Supercritical Fluids. 2007;40(2007):349-353
  147. 147. Espinosa S, Diaz S, Brignole EA. Thermodynamic modeling and process optimization of supercritical fluid fractionation of fish oil fatty acid ethyl esters. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2002;41(6):1516-1527
  148. 148. Gironi F, Maschietti M. Separation of fish oils ethyl esters by means of supercritical carbon dioxide: Thermodynamic analysis and process modelling. Chemical Engineering Science. 2006;61:5114-5126
  149. 149. Létisse M, Comeau L. Enrichment of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid from sardine by-products by supercritical fluid fractionation. Journal of Separation Science. 2008;31(8):1374-1380. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200700501
  150. 150. Antunes-Corrêa A, Arantes-Peixoto P, Guaraldo-Gonçalves C, Cabral LA, F. A. Fractionation of fish oil with supercritical carbon dioxide. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008;88:381-387
  151. 151. Davarnejad R, Kassim K, Zainal M, Sata A, S. A. Extraction of fish oil by fractionation through supercritical carbon dioxide. Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data. 2008;53(9):2128-2132
  152. 152. Pettinello G, Bertucco A, Pallado P, Stassi A. Production of EPA enriched mixtures by supercritical fluid chromatography: From the laboratory scale to the pilot plant. Journal of Supercritical Fluids. 2000;19:51-60
  153. 153. Breivik H, Haraldsson GG, Kristinsson B. Preparation of highly purified concentrates of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid. JAOCS. 1997;74(11):1425-1429
  154. 154. Oliveira-Carvalho P, Bueno-Campos P, D’Addio-Noffs R, Oliveira M, TsuneziShimizu JG, Silva M, et al. Aplicação de lipases microbianas na obtenção de concentrados de ácidos graxos poliinsaturados. Quimica Nova. 2003;26(1):75-80
  155. 155. Solaesa Á, Sanz G, Falkeborg MT, Beltrán M, Guo S, Z. Production and concentration of monoacylglycerols rich in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids by enzymatic glycerolysis and molecular distillation. Food Chemistry. 2016;190:960-967. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.06.061
  156. 156. Olli J, Breivik J, Thorstad H, O. Removal of persistent organic pollutants in fish oils using short-path distillation with a working fluid. Chemosphere. 2013;92(3):273-278. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.02.037
  157. 157. Tengku, M. Tengku, R, Birch, E. J. 2013. Enrichment of omega-3 fatty acids of refined hoki oil. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 90(8), 1111-1119. doi:10.1007/s11746-013-2260
  158. 158. Suriani N, Lawalata W, Komansilan HJ, A. Urea crystallization on the concentrate making of omega-3 fatty acid from oil of tuna fish (Thunnus sp.) canning byproduct. International Journal of Pharm Tech Research. 2014;6(7):1981-1990
  159. 159. Ghasemian S, Sahari M, Barzegar A, Gavlighi M, H. A. Concentration of Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids by polymeric membrane. International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2015;50(11):2411-2418. DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.12907
  160. 160. Ghasemian S, Sahari M, Barzegar A, Ahmadi M, H. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids concentration using synthesized poly-vinylidene fluoride (PVDF) asymmetric membranes. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 2016;93(9):1201-1210. DOI: 10.1007/s11746-016-2876-8

Written By

Amar Kaanane and Hind Mkadem

Submitted: May 13th, 2020 Reviewed: November 15th, 2020 Published: December 7th, 2020