Open access peer-reviewed chapter

A New Approach for Membrane Process Concentrate Management: Electrodialysis Bipolar Membrane Systems-A Short Communication

Written By

Taner Yonar

Submitted: April 10th, 2020 Reviewed: September 11th, 2020 Published: October 20th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93985

Chapter metrics overview

522 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

In most cases traditional and advanced treatment technologies transfers and concentrates the pollutants from one phase to other phase. However, nowadays, these concentrated flows containing heavy pollution are rapidly moving away from being manageable. In particular, membrane concentrate flows await immediate solutions to this issue. Electrodialysis Bipolar Membrane (EDBM) Processes are becoming a serious and potential solution technique for similar concentrate streams. In this chapter, principles and potentials of EDBM processes for the recycling or recovery of membrane concentrates are discussed.

Keywords

  • electrodialysis
  • electrodialysis bipolar membrane
  • concentrate
  • reuse
  • recovery

1. Introduction

Membrane processes, including Ultrafiltration, Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis, are widely used for the treatment of water and wastewater. Main advantage of these processes are well known operational conditions and wide application areas. But, main disadvantage of these processes is concentrate management. Mainly high amount of salt content in concentrate stream is limiting the discharge of these streams to water bodies.

Starting from evaporation to ion exchange, most of these processes transfer the pollutants from one phase to other phase. It means more concentrated streams can be created from these processes. Therefore, applicable and valuable product production techniques are urgently needed for membrane concentrates. Electrodialysis Bipolar Membrane (EDBM) Processes are promising technique for the disposal of membrane concentrates.

EDBM technique has too many advantages against other techniques such as, valuable product formation and low cost operation. On the other hand, there is still great limitations on application point such as limited company production, alkali element fouling on membranes, high capital cost etc.,

Briefly, technological opportunities may solve the application disadvantages of EDBM processes in near future. In this chapter, principles and potentials of EDBM processes are discussed.

Advertisement

2. Electrodialysis bipolar membrane: principles and definitions

Industrial wastewater differs in industrial pollutant components depending on the types of industries in which they are formed. This difference plays a major role in the selection of wastewater treatment technologies.

Treatment technologies applied for wastewater recycling; Secondary Treatment (IA), Nutrient Removal, Filtration, Surface Filtration, Microfiltration (MF), Ultrafiltration (UF), Flotation, Nanofiltration (NF), Reverse Osmosis (TO), Electrodialysis (ED), Carbon Adsorption, Ion Exchange, Advanced Oxidation and Disinfection [1]. Figure 1 shows the corresponding pore sizes of the pressure-operated membranes and their ability to hold specific wastewater components.

Figure 1.

Pressure operated membrane technology [2].

Membrane Processes (mainly reverse osmosis (RO) systems) and desalination plants are increasing day by day. In last two decades, over 10.000 membrane treatment plants have been established in most countries [3]. Daily treatment capacity of these plants may access 100 million m3/day in 2020.

With the introduction of low cost membrane modules in the 1960s and 1970s, membranes were widely used in industrial areas [4]. RO process (pore diameter < 0.0001 μm) can remove dissolved solids, bacteria, viruses and other microorganisms present in water [5]. By operating RO systems, which is one of the wastewater recycling processes, both high quality process water (filtrate flow) production is provided, and concentrate flow with high pollution load but low flow (silk) is formed. In RO systems with flow and concentrate modifications, approximately almost 90% filtrate and 10% concentrate can be formed from the inlet flow at high pressure [3].

The disposal of the concentrate from Membrane systems is still the main focus of most scientific research. This is an important issue for most country for the protection of water bodies and soil. As well known, discharged wastewater streams are still being used for irrigation. High salt content in concentrate streams means desertification of most valuable agricultural areas. The concentrate originating from membrane processes should be disposed or treated with feasible system.

Bipolar membranes are a type of ion-selective membranes first introduced in the 1950s (Figure 2). Bipolar membranes are composite membranes consisting of a Cation exchange membrane and an Anion exchange membrane [7]. Cation exchange membrane and anion exchange membranes, which are among ion exchange membranes, are heterogeneous, while bipolar membranes are homogeneous. Homogeneous bipolar membranes can be prepared from many different materials. The properties of bipolar membranes formed from different materials are given in the table below (Table 1).

Figure 2.

Water splitting function of a bipolar membrane [6].

Polymer(s)İon exchange groupRemarks
Anion exchange layer
Poly-styrene-co- divinylbenzeneTertiary and quaternary aminesCrosslinked resin, heterogeneous
Poly-sulfoneDi-aminesCrosslinked homogeneous
Poly-sulfoneQuaternary aminesHomogeneous
Poly-vinylidene fluoride blend with poly-vinyl benzyl chlorideDifferent diaminesCrosslinked
Anion exchange resinNot specifiedPVC binder
Poly-ether sulfoneQuaternary aminesHomogeneous
Poly-divinylbenzene-codimethylamino propyl methacrylamide
Poly-methyl methacylate-coglycidyl methacrylateQuaternary amines
Cation exchange layer
Poly-styrene-co- divinylbenzeneSulfonic acidHeterogeneous (polyvinylchloride binder)
Poly-styrene-co- divinylbenzenePhosphoric acidPoly-ethylene binder
NafionSulfonic acidHomogeneous
Grafted perfluorinated polymer membranesSulfonic acid
Poly-butadiene-co-styreneSulfonic acid
Poly-phenylene oxide or poly-styreneSulfonic acidHomogeneous
Poly-ether sulfoneSulfonic acidHomogeneous
Poly-sulfoneSulfonic acidHomogeneous
Poly-ether ether ketoneSulfonic acidHomogeneous
Separate contact layer
Poly-vinyl amine
Poly-viylbenzylchrloride-co-divinylbenzene resinSulfonic acidHeterogeneous (polyvinyl benzyl chlorideco-styrene binder)
Poly-sulfoneAminated

Table 1.

Ion exchange polymers of bipolar membrane layers [8].

Earlier studies on electrodialysis began before the World War II in Germany. Industrial and pilot scale applications have been developed since 1950. The first applications were about obtaining drinking water from sea water. Later, in applications in the food industry, it was tried to produce demineralized sugarcane sugar. If we consider the electrodialysis system as a black box, as a result of natural brine feeding, acid and base are formed at the output of the system, this picture is shown in the picture below [8] (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Schematic illustration of EDBM process as a black-box [8].

Electrodialysis processes is one of the membrane process that the driving force is an electrical field. EDBM system consist of anionic, cationic and bipolar membranes [9]. EDBM systems are widely used in chemical industry, in food industry, biochemistry industry and environmental protection technologies [9].

Using bipolar membranes together with ion exchange membranes in electrodialysis processes, high quality process water production can be possible and EDBM may become a more viable method for industrial wastewater treatment applications [10].

In the EDBM process, direct current (DC) is supplied to the electrodes to electrolyse the water molecules. Electrical potential between anode and cathode works as a driving force for the movement of electrons in electrolyte solution [8]. In EDBM process, bipolar membranes realizes the acid and base production in electrolyte solution.

Organic acids such as lactic acid, ascorbic acid, salicylic acid, amino acid and inorganic acids such as hydrofluoric (HF) acid, sulfuric acid (H2SO4), hydrochloric acid (HCl) can be produced using EDBM systems. Alkali bases potassium hydroxide (KOH), Sodium Methoxide (CH3NaO) can also be produced in this systems [11].

In electrodialysis systems that separate water with bipolar membranes, an acid - base is formed from a very efficient energy-related salt concentration due to the accumulation of hundreds of cell units between 2 electrodes, such as conventional electrodialysis processes [7].

Some catalytic reactions take place in electrodialysis systems using bipolar membranes. Reactions between water molecules and functional chemical groups occur as Eq. (1), (2), (3), (4) [12]. The catalytic mechanism is underlined by chemical reaction model of water dissociation, that is, the water splitting could be considered as some type of proton-transfer reaction between water molecules and the functional groups or chemicals [7]:

B+H2OBH+OHBH++OHE1
BH++H2OBH3OB+H3OE2
A+H2OAHOHAH+OHE3
AH+H2OAH3O+A+H3OE4

where BH+ and A refer to the catalytic centers. The catalytic sites provide an alternative path with low effective activation energy for water splitting into hydrogen and hydroxyl ions [7]. EDBM configurations including acid base production schematic diagrams are given in Figure 4 [12].

Figure 4.

Bipolar membrane and EDBM: BP, bipolar membrane; A, anion selective membrane; C, cation selective membrane; M +, cation; X- anion; H +, hydrogen ion; R, OH or CH3O. (a) Bipolar membrane and its functions; (b) acid and base production; (c) acid production; (d) base production [12].

Advertisement

3. Usage areas of EDBM process

The bipolar membrane electrodialysis process is used in the latest technological way as an integrated process for the supply of potable water and industrial salt water and recovery of industrial effluent. On the other hand, both in chemical processes and environmental protection processes, they have been successfully applying in recent years. Another field of use of bipolar membrane is the chemical industry, where new products such as H2SO4 and NaOH are produced from a salt such as Na2SO4. Indeed, this method has become widespread recently and is used successfully. Especially, the production of acid and base without producing waste and the production of organic - inorganic acids increased the interest in this method. Many researchers have worked on this subject. It is possible to find many studies especially on acetic acid, propionic acid, gluconic acid, citric acid and lactic acid. In fact, some model studies have started to be carried out recently. Biotechnological research is ongoing to reduce costs in the electrodialysis process in order to reduce the cost in order to ensure acid recovery.

When ED and EDBM processes are compared with other treatment methods, it is an important advantage that it provides recovery from pollutants in wastewater and salt water. Studies show that it is possible to recover pollutants from solutions with one or more contaminants. In addition to this, the process of making acid and base production possible with EDBM process takes another step forward [13].

Advertisement

4. Recovery of concentrated wastes by EDBM process

An important advantage of the electrodialysis process over other processes is the possibility of recovery of concentrated waste. When the electrodialysis studies in the literature are taken into consideration, recovery has been proved possible. Electrodialysis studies are mainly in the form of recovery of those pollutants from aqueous solutions with single or multiple pollutants.

The process characteristics and economic evaluations of some studies in the literature are given in Table 2.

ApplicationScaleProcess characteristicsEconomic evaluationsReferences
HF and HNO3 RecoveryIndustrial Scale3 compartments, M. Area; 3x105 m2, BM Service Life; 2 years, Efficiency 90–95%Total $ 2,950,000
Annual Business Administration
Cost: $ 870,000
Pourcelly and Gavach [15]
NaOH RecoverySemi Industrial Pilot ScaleM. Area: 0.5 m2
Feed Speed 5 L / h
Initial conc. 22 g / L
Current Density 900 A/ m2
Efficiency 82% (1 M)
5.0kWh/kg NaOH[15]
NH3 and HNO3 Recovery GmbH, GermanySemi Industrial Pilot ScaleM. Area: 120 m2
Initial conc. 250 g / L
Current Density 1000 A / m2
Efficiency 97%
0.34 $/kg NaNO3Pourcelly and Gavach [15], Graillon and Persin [16]
Dimethylisopropylamine recoverySemi Industrial Pilot ScaleM. Area: 0,3 m2
Initial conc 110 g / L
Current Density 800 A / m2
Efficiency 30–70%
$ 2.5–5.0 / kg aminePourcelly and Gavach [15], Graillon and Persin [16]
Gluconic Acid RecoveryLab. scale2 compartments,
M. Area; 0,19 m2,
2.2 V – 415 A/m2
Efficiency 95%
Pourcelly and Gavach [15]
Methanesulfonic Acid RecoveryIndustrial Scale3 compartments,
M. Area; 64 m2,
2.26 V – 800 A/m2
Initial conc 80–250 g / L
Efficiency 95%
Total Expense:
$ 700,000
Oper. Goods. $ 354 / ton
MTA
Sales fee:
$ 5500 / ton MTA
Pourcelly and Gavach [15]
Amino Acid RecoveryIndustrial Scale3 compartments,
M. Area; 540 m2,
BM Service Life; 2 years,
Efficiency 4–6 M Org. Asit
Pourcelly and Gavach [15]
Lactic Acid ProductionIndustrial Scale2 compartments,
M. Area; 280 m2,
Efficiency 60–96%
UN Cost
0,12 $ / kg
1kWh / kg Acid
Pourcelly and Gavach [15], Aritomi [17]
Camphorsulfonic Acid RegenerationPilot Scale3 compartments,
BM. Area; 0,14m2,
Acid Conc. 0,8 M
Current Density 500 A / m2
Efficiency 98,5%
300 kWh/ton AcidPourcelly and Gavach [15]
Ascorbic acid ProductionLab. Scale -
Semi End.
Pilot Scale
2 Compartments
Current Density 1000 A / m2
Acid Conc. 1 M
1,4–2,3kWh/kg AcidPourcelly and Gavach [15], ve Novalic and Kulbe [18], Yu et al. [19]
Citric Acid ProductionPilot Scale2 compartments,
BM. Area; 0,004 m2,
Acid Conc. 30 M
Current Density 1000 A / m2
2–5 kWh/kg AcidWakamatsu [20], Xu [21], ve Novalic and Kulbe [18]
Salicylic Acid ProductionLab. - Pilot
Scale
3 Compartments
30 V - 750 A / m2
Acid Conc. 4.5 g / L
15–20 kWh / kg
product
Alvarez et al. [22]
Sodium Acetate conversionsPilot
Scale
5 Compartments
BM. Area; 0,008 m2,
Product 0.5 M Acetate
1.3–2.0 kWh / kg
product
Yu et al. [19], Trivedi et al. [23]
Toluenesulphonic Acid regenerationLab. Scale2 Compartments1,2kWh / kg Acid[19]
Formic Acid
regeneration
Lab. Scale3 compartments,
M. Area; 540 m2,
Acid Conc. 7 M
2.6kWh / kg AcidFerrer and Laborie [24]
Sulfuric Acid recoveryLab. Scale6 compartments
3 compartments
3.3kWh / kg Acid
2.4kWh / kg Acid
Cifuentes [25]
Magnesium and Protein recoveryLab. ScaleBipolar Membrane
electrodialysis
1.7kWh / kg Mg + 2
0.6kWh / kg protein
Pourcelly and Bazinet [26]

Table 2.

Recovery of concentrated wastes by EDBM process [14].

In addition to treatment and recovery, it is frequently encountered that electrodialysis method is used directly in acid and base production.

Advertisement

5. Advantages and disadvantages of EDBM process

Main advantage of EDBM systems is energy efficiency. In most cases high energy needed for most treatment processes mainly for pumping. But in EDBM process, system works with low pressure pumps (0.5–0.8 Bar). On the other hand direct current usage makes the EDBM systems advantageous against the other advanced treatment processes. Beside the most treatment processes, by products of EDBM are valuable materials such as acids and bases. Additionally, the inlet concentrated stream with a high salt content is deionized and water can be recovered. Briefly, salt content can be converted to valuable materials and water content can be reduced and recovered. Actually, it turns out that the EDBM system is a process capable of very high approach to zero waste practice.

The biggest advantages of using bipolar membranes in EDBM processes is that BPMs increase ionization by 50 million times compared to the self-hydrolysis of water. In addition, the anionic and cationic membranes inside the EDBM systems prevent the OH and H+ ions formed in the system from reaching the anodes and cathodes, and no O2 and H2 gas output is observed in the BPMs [3].

The first disadvantage of EDBM systems meets the mark in acid and base production from membrane process concentrates. Concentrates consisting of membrane processes from wastewater treatment processes, generally contain mixed ion groups instead of single ion groups. This is due to the type and variety of wastewater they treat. Mixed acids and bases may remain low in commercial value. Another problem is the permanent damage left in the membrane structure of the multivalent ions in the concentrated stream. For this, +2 and + 3 valence cations can be removed from the water by nanofiltration, ion exchange, evaporation etc., before reverse osmosis process. Or + 2-valued (especially calcium compounds) ions can be removed from the reverse osmosis concentrate content by processes such as precipitation. However, in both cases, the operating costs of the processes will increase and will lead to reductions in acid and base concentrations resulting from the decrease in ion concentration in the feed water to EDBM systems.

Another problem to be encountered in EDBM systems may be the locking of the system at low acid and base concentrations (1–2%) with the increase of osmotic pressure in the system due to the increasing ion content. As it is known, high acid and base levels are important in these systems both commercially and in terms of water recovery. The most important solution related to this lies in the separate collection and purification of the salt content in the wastewater source. In other words, these systems can be paved with clean production. In other words, the disadvantages of the EDBM system in mixed wastewater streams can be prevented by interventions at the source. Thus, the operating life of EDBM systems is preserved and operating costs and product quality are increased.

It is certain that the advantages mentioned so far will lead the EDBM systems to attract more attention in the future. However, the biggest obstacle to the implementation of EDBM systems is the high cost of the membranes used in the system. This is thought to be in favor of the price decrease of the balances in the market due to the widespread use of EDBM and increased membrane production over time. Because the vast majority of existing wastewater treatment systems transfer existing pollutants to another phase or make them more concentrated and present them as an even bigger problem. However, EDBM systems promise us to use new products from our waste. This; It plays an important role in the solution of many environmental problems from efficient use of resources to global warming.

Advertisement

6. Conclusions

For further usage of membrane processes without any problematic concrete flows on environment, new concentrate disposal technologies will be needed such as EDBM process. The main advantage of the EDBM process is the commercially obtaining precious product from environmentally problematic products. However, the most important problem at the moment is high initial investment costs. But, similar high investment problems are valid for many processes that are widely used today, and with the spread of manufacturing, this problem has disappeared and the possibility of widespread use has increased. Finally, membrane concentrate flows are waiting an urgent solution, and the spread of EDBM or similar technologies will not take too long.

References

  1. 1. Visvanathan C, Asano T. The Potentıal for Industrıal Wastewater Reuse Environmental Engineering Program and Asian Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California; 2001. pp. 1-14
  2. 2. Sadr SMK, Saroj DP. 14 - Membrane Technologies for Municipal Wastewater Treatment, In: Basile a, Cassano a, Rastogi N.K, Editors. Advances in Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment: Woodhead Publishing; 2015. pp. 443-446
  3. 3. Badruzzaman M, Oppenheimer JS, Kumar M. Innovative beneficial reuse of reverse osmosis concentrate using bipolar membrane electrodialysis and electrochlorination processes. J. Membr. Science. 2009;326:392-399
  4. 4. Adham S, Burbano A, Chiu K, Kumar M. Development of a NF/RO knowledgebase, California Energy Commission. In: Public Interest Energy Research Program Report. 2005
  5. 5. Heijman SGJ, Guo H, Li S, van Dijk JC, Wessels LP. Zero liquid discharge: Heading for 99% recovery in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis. Desalination. 2009;236(1-3):357-362
  6. 6. Balster J. Membrane Module and Process Development for Monopolar and Bipolar Membrane Electrodialysis, PhD Thesis. The Netherland: University of Twente; 2006
  7. 7. Xu T. Ion exchange membranes: State of their development and perspective. Journal of Membrane Science. 2005;263:1-29
  8. 8. Wilhelm FG. Bipolar Membrane Electrodialysis. PhD. Thesis. Enschede: Twente University; 2001
  9. 9. Aksangür I. Investigation of Disposal and Optimization of Concentrate with Edbm System Which Originates from. Msc. Thesis. Bursa: Uludağ University; 2014
  10. 10. Strathmann H. Electrodialysis, a mature technology with a multitude of new applications. Desalination. 2010;264:268-288
  11. 11. Wilhelm FG, Punt IGM, Vegt NFA, Der V, Strathmann H, Wessling M. Cation permeable membranes from blends of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) and poly(ether sulfone). Journal of Membrane Science. 2002;199:167-176
  12. 12. Yazıcı S. Analysis of Fouling Mechanism and Prevention Works of Electrodialysis with Bipolar Membrane Processes: Leachate Sample, Msc. Thesis. Istanbul: Yıldız Teknik University; 2012
  13. 13. Yuzer B. Wastewater Treatment by Bipolar Membrane Electrodialysis Process and Evaluation of Reuse Alternatives. PhD. Thesis. Istanbul: İstanbul University-Cerrahpasa; 2018
  14. 14. Ilhan F. Investigation of Treatability and Recycling of Landfill Leachate by Electrodialysis Process, PhD Thesis. Istanbul: Yıldız Teknik University; 2012
  15. 15. Pourcelly, G. Gavach, C., (2000). Electrodialysis water splitting-application of electrodialysis with bipolar membranes, In Handbook on Bipolar Membrane Technology; Kemperman, A. J. B., Ed., Twente University Press: Enschede, The Netherlands, 17-46
  16. 16. Graillon, S.; Persin, F.; Pourcelly, G. ve Gavach, C., (1996). “Development of electrodialysis with bipolar membrane for the treatment of concentrated nitrate effluents”, Desalination, 107: 159-169
  17. 17. Aritomi T., Nago S. ve Hanada F., (2001). “Performance of an improved bipolar membrane”, Membrane Technology, 135: 11-13
  18. 18. Novalic, S. ve Kulbe, K. D., (1998). “Separation and concentration of citric acid by means of electrodialytic bipolar membrane technology”, Food Technology and Biotechnology, 36: 193-195
  19. 19. Yu, L. X., Guo, Q. F., Hao, J. H. ve Jiang, W. J., (2000). “Recovery of acetic acid from dilute wastewater by means of bipolar membrane electrodialysis”, Desalination, 129: 283-288
  20. 20. Wakamatsu Y., Matsumoto H., Minigawa M. ve Tanioka A., (2006), “Effect of ionexchange nanofiber fabrics on water splitting in bipolar membrane”, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 300(1): 442-445
  21. 21. Xu T. Electrodialysis processes with bipolar membranes (BMED) in environmental protection—A review. Resources Conservation Recycling. 2002;37(1)
  22. 22. Alvarez, F., Alvarez, R., Coca, J., Sandeaux, J., Sandeaux, R. ve Gavach, C. (1997). “Salicylic acid production by electrodialysis with bipolar membranes”, Journal of Membrane Science, 123: 61-69
  23. 23. Trivedi G.S., Shah B.G., Adhikary S.K., Indusekhar V.K. ve Rangarajan R., (1997). “Studies on bipolar membranes. part ıı – conversion of sodium acetate to acetic acid and sodium hydroxide”, Reactive & Functional Polymers, 32: 209-215
  24. 24. Ferrer, J.S.J., Laborie, S., Durand, G. ve Rakib, M., (2006). “Formic acid regeneration by electromembrane process”, Journal of Membran Science, 280(1-2): 509-516
  25. 25. Cifuentes, L., Garci’a, I., Ortiz, R. ve Casas, J. M., (2006). “The use of electrohydrolysis for the recovery of sulphuric acid from coppercontaining”, Separation and Purification Technology, 50(2): 167-174
  26. 26. Pourcelly, G. Bazinet, L. (2007). In handbook of membrane separations: Chemical, pharmaceutical and biotechnological applications, Pabby, A. K., Rizvi, S. S. H., Sastre, A. M., Eds.; CRC Pr I Llc:, Florida

Written By

Taner Yonar

Submitted: April 10th, 2020 Reviewed: September 11th, 2020 Published: October 20th, 2020