Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Protagonist of Mineral Nutrients in Drought Stress Tolerance of Field Crops

Written By

Malik Ghulam Asghar and Anam Bashir

Submitted: May 26th, 2020 Reviewed: September 21st, 2020 Published: December 18th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.94135

From the Edited Volume

Abiotic Stress in Plants

Edited by Shah Fahad, Shah Saud, Yajun Chen, Chao Wu and Depeng Wang

Chapter metrics overview

436 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


The food demand is increasing hastily, that is inducing continuous pressure on agriculture sector and industries to fulfill rising dietary needs. To meet with increasing demand, the food production must be elevated up to 70% until the year 2050. On the other hand, changing climate is disturbing crop production around the World. Crops grown under field conditions are affected by more than one abiotic stress. It is continuous task and challenge for agronomists to make crops environment hardy to obtain maximum yield. It is considered that different agronomic managements, if done appropriately, could be beneficial for increasing crop production. The optimal provision of plant nutrients can assist the crops to fight in better way with environmental stress like drought; it can help them to continue their normal metabolism even under hostile abiotic circumstances. The regions that have reduced availability of water for crop production, a balanced nutrient management can assist crops to give adequate production. Some of nutrients have potential of not only maintaining plant metabolism but also to enhance the quality of product. This chapter highlights the protagonist of plant nutrients in alleviation of drought stress in field crops.


  • drought
  • physiology
  • consequences
  • alleviation
  • macronutrients
  • micronutrients
  • mechanisms

1. Introduction

Water shortage is an emerging limitation to crop production due to climate change. It critically influences development and growth of crops and results in significant production loss. It is important to recognize morphological, physiological and bio-chemical effects of drought in relation to nutrient uptake in crops [1]. Drought impairs mineral transport and effects stomatal conductance. By considering nutrients role in plants growth, negative consequences of drought can be avoided by management strategies [2, 3]. Previously, many scientists have worked to understand the role of mineral nutrients in alleviation of drought stress, but more is to be done. Among minerals that are essential for plant growth, macronutrients has significant importance because their shortage lead to quick response and plants become more susceptible to other abiotic and biotic stresses. On the other hand, micronutrients deficiency effect at molecular level and results in altered enzymatic activity and blockage in signal transduction pathways [4]. Those plants that have capability to attain and retain water in large amount, as well as better water usage efficiency, are more tolerant to drought stress. Response in the direction of water stress depends upon crop growth stage, intensity and severity of drought [5, 6].

There are many reports available previously that addresses the consequences of drought on different physiological parameters like photosynthesis, respiration, homeostasis and assimilates transportation but very few discourses the drought effects on mineral in crops. Albeit, if crops are grown on mineral-rich soils, water limitations can be the reason of disruption in nutrient uptake. Minerals are taken up by plants in inorganic ionic forms. When a plant is subject to drought, due to low soil moisture, the diffusion of minerals is disrupted and ultimately transport is affected [3, 7, 8].


2. Effect of drought stress in crops

Field crops are simultaneously subjected to more than one abiotic stress during their complete life cycle. Drought and high temperature are the most detrimental abiotic stresses. It is continuous task for scientists to make crops hardy against biotic and more importantly abiotic stresses to increase food productivity. The simulation model predicts that to cope with rising food demand, supply must be increased to 70% till the year 2050 [9, 10, 11, 12].

Drought stress influences crops by disturbing their physiological and biochemical functioning [13, 14, 15, 16]. Previously, work is done making crops vigorous to deal with climatic challenges [9, 16, 17, 18] but more is still to be done.

Early droughts due to changing climate can reduce crop productivity [19]. The struggle of water use among domestic, industrial and agricultural sector is making situation worse for irrigated agriculture [20]. This problematic situation is shifting agriculture from irrigated to rainfed areas where periodic drought events are occurring due to disturbed rainfall pattern [21, 22].

2.1 Impact of drought on morphological traits

Crops when subjected to drought stress show different behavior. Some crops are resistant to drought while others are susceptible [23]. Those crops that have taproot system are more tolerant to short term drought events. They can stand with mild to moderate drought condition. On the other hand, prolonged drought can affect all crops likewise and can cause significant yield loss [24].

2.1.1 Effect of drought on seedling emergence

Seed germination is the most critical stage in complete life cycle; it is influenced by water availability for imbibition [25]. Drought stress at this stage can results in irregular germination and deprived seedlings [26, 27]. In rainfed areas, absence of shower at seedling establishment stage critically reduces field emergence [28, 29].

2.1.2 Growth phase affected by drought

Water shortage at vegetative stage disturbs growth and development through impaired turgor and stomatal conductance [30]. The reduction of water potential inside cytosol increases solute level. This leads to damage of cell structure and functioning. Cell division and expansion is also inhibited [31]. Under drought stress, nutrient uptake is also exaggerated that primes to reduction in leaf area and photosynthesis [32, 33]. Several traits of crops that are affected by drought at vegetative stage include leaf area, assimilation rate, total dry matter and chlorophyll [34, 35]. Root length and dry weight of leaves and stem is also reduced [36].

2.1.3 Effect of drought on crop yield

The loss of crop yield due to drought stress is decided by many factors like intensity, duration and ability of crop to tolerate drought stress. In higher plants, anthesis is the most drought susceptible stage [37]. Water shortage at that stage can results in substantial yield loss [30].

In oilseed crops, almost all yield related traits are affected by drought [38, 39, 40]. Severity of drought is also an important aspect; it distresses all growth stages regardless of crop, eventually results in considerable yield loss [41, 42, 43, 44].

2.1.4 Effect of drought on crop quality

Among oilseed crops, sunflower has significant importance because it is rich in linoleic acid. Drought stress at reproductive stage reduces oil quality in oilseed crops and deteriorates its texture [45]. Drought stress also reduces quality of end products. It disturbs biochemical enzymes [46] and gene regulation that are responsible for oil constituents in sunflower [47].

2.2 Effect of drought on physio-biochemical traits

Crops are responsive to abiotic stresses from molecular to morphological level. Those crops that are tolerant to drought stress modify their cells at molecular level like increasing concentration of osmolytes in cytosol under harsh environment [48, 49, 50, 51, 52]. However, in susceptible crops, drought can affect at biochemical level [53, 54, 55, 56].

2.2.1 Water relation disturbance

The key phenotypic adoption in drought tolerant crops is tap root system. They can extract water from deeper soil layer even under severe environment. Those plants that have shallow root system, when subjected to drought, it affects their water potential inside cell [57]. The low water potential leads to turgor loss and interrupted stomatal conductance [36, 41]. Transport of nutrients through xylem is concerned under drought [58, 59].

2.2.2 Photosynthesis reduction

The metabolic process of carbon fixation that occurs in leaves in the presence of light is called as photosynthesis. This is the main energy harvesting phenomenon that is accountable for growth and development. It is affected by different environmental factors like, availability of moisture, sunshine, humidity and temperature [60].

The plants that have C4 carbon fixation pathway are more efficient in carbon harvesting [61], but under drought, they perform in the same way as C3 plants. Stomatal closure is triggered by water deficit condition that eventually restricts CO2 diffusion [62], thus diminishes photosynthesis [36]. Ribulose bisphosphate is a vital enzyme in carbon fixation. The activity of RuBP is affected under drought stress. Those crops that can maintain RuBP production are more resistant to drought stress [63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68].

2.2.3 Disrupted uptake of nutrients

Under drought, absorption capacity of roots is affected that condenses nutrient uptake. Nitrogen, being a vital constituent of plants, is required in high quantity. The reduction of soil moisture reduces ability of roots to absorb adequate moisture. Phosphorus uptake, transport and translocation are also affected in drought conditions [6]. It lessens NPK uptake in sunflower [41].

2.2.4 Drought induced oxidative stress

Free radicals of oxygen, that are also known as reactive oxygen species has significant role in cell signaling. Their production remains continue unceasingly inside cell in controlled amount. When a plant is subjected to any environmental stress, its production increases. This augmented concentration induces oxidative stress to crops. They are highly reactive in action; they can cause injury to cellular structure [69]. In oilseeds like sunflower, drought overproduces ROS [70]. Malondialdehyde is an indicator of cell membrane damage in plants. Water deficiency increases MDA production that specifies increment in cellular injury [71, 72, 73].


3. Role of nutrients in drought stress alleviation

Optimum nutrient supply not only improves growth of crops but is also helpful for plants under adversative climatic conditions. There are seventeen nutrients that are crucial for plant growth [74]. Upon their requirement, these are grouped as macronutrient and micronutrient. This review deals with role of essential nutrients in drought stress mitigation.

3.1 Macronutrients

3.1.1 Nitrogen

Under dry climatic conditions, water use efficiency and growth of crops is restricted due to less accessibility of water. Efficient nitrogen application can serve the purpose under drought stress [75, 76]. Plants facing drought stress are more susceptible to heat tremors as well. Nitrogen deficiency in drought stress outcomes as biomass reduction in crops [77, 78]. Previous studies have suggested that shoot biomass is more affected under drought-cum-nitrogen stress, while root biomass is not much exaggerated primarily [79]. On the other hand, plants become drought hardy under sufficient soil nitrogen availability [75, 80, 81]. Increasing nitrogen significantly improved crop performance under drought stress. Nitrogen also play significant role in prevention of plasma membrane damage and osmotic adjustment. Application of N under water deficiency also enhances other major nutrient uptake like potassium and calcium [82].

Nitrogen availability diminishes malondialdehyde content that alleviates in drought stress [80]. It recovers photosynthetic contents and improves cell division that lead to leaf area increment [83]. At molecular level, drought stress greatly influences photosystem-II efficiency that is recovered by optimum nitrogen accessibility [51, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93].

3.1.2 Phosphorus

Previously, many researchers have testified that phosphorus application under water deficiency in many crops significantly enhance their water usage ability and helps in drought resistance [74, 94, 95]. It is also well known that optimum phosphorus in crops improves root growth and stomatal activity [96, 97]. Phosphorus availability also optimizes leaf area [98], plasma membrane stability and water use efficiency [99, 100, 101, 102]. It was observed that phosphorus in leaves was relatively higher under drought condition as compared to optimum water availability which suggests that phosphorus has contribution in drought tolerance [94, 96].

Phosphorus also improves nitrogen mobility under water deficiency [103]. Morphological and physiological parameters were also improved when phosphorus was applied at high rate in drought such as, plant height, leaf area, dry weight and water use efficiency [102, 104]. Application method of phosphorus also influences crop growth in drought, deep phosphorus placement (DPP) method works excellently for drought affected areas that ultimately promotes root growth [101, 105].

3.1.3 Potassium

Potassium is well-known for its osmoregulatory functions in crops. It regulates stomatal conductance and water uptake; the optimum K application increases WUE [106, 107]. Potassium soothes aquaporins and osmotic pressure that regulates water uptake, stomatal regulation, carbon intake, cell elongation and ROS detoxification [108, 109]. In grasses like sorghum, K application under drought improves photosynthesis which leads to growth and yield [106, 110]. In maize, potassium plays role photosynthates assimilation [111]. Potassium availability is correlated with aquaporins activity and stem cell expansion [112].

The hydraulic conductivity of root and anatomical traits has great influence on crop performance. The increment in hydraulic conductivity is associated with drought tolerance [113]. In higher plants, reduction in K influences aforementioned traits, hence compromised yield. Drought simulates ethylene production that in return hinders abscisic acid activity. The starvation of K further worsen the situation, it delays stomatal conductance [109]. Potassium also play role in ROS detoxification and promotes photosynthesis process [114, 115].

3.1.4 Magnesium

Magnesium has central place in chlorophyll molecule, thus has significant importance. It has great role in dry matter partitioning from sink to source. Passable Mg is required at reproductive stage to avoid flower sterility. Foliage application also improves nutrient mobility and helps in growth maintenance under stressful environment [116, 117]. Magnesium is highly mobile nutrient. It has positive correlation with nitrogen and potassium. Adequate magnesium increases their mobility; they are helpful in stress tolerance [118].

Drought stress in field crops affects magnesium uptake from soil. This deficiency can be fulfilled by foliar Mg application [119]. Earlier, it is known that foliage applied Mg can satisfy plant’s need [120]. The mechanisms of Mg that are responsible for drought stress induction include growth of root, NPK uptake and improvement of WUE [74].

3.1.5 Calcium

Drought stress leads to overgeneration of ROS that result in cell damage [121, 122, 123, 124]. Calcium has its role in detoxification of ROS [125]. It is known that in the activity of aquaporins, pH and calcium are of significance importance [126, 127]. Exogenous application of Ca induces drought resistance in wheat cultivars. Calcium has cell signaling mechanism, which simulates proline accumulation.

Calcium, when it is applied under drought stress, it improves chlorophyll and catalase activity and decreases plasma membrane damage. It also maintains osmolytes like proline and other soluble antioxidants [128, 129]. Foliage applied Ca under drought stress helps to improves drought stress alleviation by refining catalase, peroxidase and superoxide dismutase activity [130].

3.1.6 Sulfur

The role of sulfur application in mitigation of drought stress is very little known previously. It has a substantial role in stress signaling pathway. It improves crop growth, morphological parameters and nutrient contents [131]. In counter stress mechanism, increment in glutathione also has significant importance. It aids in ROS detoxification [132]. The uptake of sulfur in adequate amount helps crops to stand with drought events. Its transport and assimilation is among one of the drought stress responses [133, 134].

3.2 Micronutrients

3.2.1 Zinc

Zinc has role in various physiological processes like activity of catalytic, carboxypeptidase, superoxide dismutase, RNA polymerase and alkaline phosphates [4, 118, 135, 136]. Under water shortage, zinc has been known to improve drought resistance by improving WUE and water activity [4, 137, 138]. The reduction in zinc uptake, that is caused by water shortage, leads plants toward stress condition. Under limited soil moisture, zinc is immobile [118].

In cereals like wheat, when drought is subjected at anthesis and grain filling, it constrains nutrient uptake which become cause of stunted growth [139]. The process of photosynthesis and water activity is affected under zinc-cum-drought stress, however, when zinc is present in optimum amount, it helps crop to stand with drought. It aids in deactivation of ROS [4, 140]. At reproductive stage, plants are highly susceptible to Zn shortage [141]. When plants are subjected to prolonged drought, it impairs activity of different cell metabolic contents like NADPH. Zinc application inhibits photooxidative damage, reduces ROS generation, and promoting osmolytes concentration like SOD [74, 142, 143, 144, 145].

3.2.2 Manganese

It is vital micronutrient that has several functions in plants. It assists in activation of various metabolic enzymes of tricarboxylic cycle. It is the part of photosystem-II, also aids in ATP synthesis and RuBP carboxylase activity. It helps to maintain balance among superoxide dismutase activity and chlorophyll contents, even under water stress [130].

The role of manganese is well known for detoxification of ROS like superoxide and hydrogen peroxide [146]. On the other hand, manganese shortage leads to oxidative stress in plants that causes chlorophyll damage thus stunted photosynthetic activity [4]. Water shortage can also be responsible for manganese deficiency. Low soil availability of manganese as it occurs under dry conditions makes it unavailable for plants [147]. The starvation of manganese leads to WUE reduction. In cereals like barley, lower WUE is correlated with abrupt stomatal control during the day and imperfection in stomatal closure during night. This leads to degradation of waxy layer of plasma membrane that is consequence of ROS activity [148].

3.2.3 Iron

It is involved in chlorophyll pigments production. It is the part of enzymes that are involved in transfer of energy, reduction of nitrogen and formation of lignin. It creates compounds along with sulfur that are the catalysts for other vital bio-chemical procedures in plants. The iron deficiency results in chlorosis which is the consequent of low chlorophyll concentration. Severe deficiency of iron turns leaf color from yellow to white that is sign of leaf death. Under high soil pH, iron uptake is affected. It also has antagonistic effects with phosphorus and manganese [149].

The moisture in soil greatly inhibits iron uptake [150]. The iron has vital protagonist in oxidative damage protection of leaves under stress. Its deficiency is highly dreadful for plants growth [4]. Sufficient iron amount in plant is essential for activities of antioxidants [151].

3.2.4 Boron

Boron is unavailable in soil barring basic pH and low moisture. It is highly immobile in pedosphere as well as plant. The continuous supply of boron can prevent crops from its deficiency and detrimental effects [152].

Low soil moisture greatly hampers boron uptake from rhizosphere. Its uptake via roots involve passive uptake frequently that is maintained by water uptake. As the water decreases in soil, its uptake is compromised [153]. Main function of boron is to take part in synthesis of cell wall and its extension. It also recovers biosynthesis of lignin and differentiation of xylem. It increases photosynthetic activity and plasma-membrane integrity. It facilitates assimilate transportation [4, 74].

It is necessarily required for H-ATPase activity and the coding involved for it. It also influences uptake of other nutrients like K and deteriorate cell expansion [4]. Boron is also involved in lessening of photochemical damage of cell. Among reasons for low photoinhibition, boron deficiency and drought are well known [153].

3.2.5 Copper

Among micronutrients, copper is essential for growth of plants. It has vital role in electron transport chain and cell wall loosening. It also involves in sensing ethylene, metabolism of cell wall and oxidative stress protection [154, 155]. The well-known function of copper is its involvement in formation of pollens and upholding their viability [4, 155].

There are many enzymes in which this metal acts as cofactor like ascorbic oxidase, laccase, amino oxidase and polyphenols. At molecular level, copper is also involved in cell signaling, trafficking of proteins, mobilization of iron and oxidative phosphorylation. The reproductive parts of plants are more susceptible to cooper deficiency [155, 156].


4. Conclusion

The changing climate is making situation worse for field crop production. Abrupt variations in rainfall and temperature is limiting crop yield. Under field condition, more than one abiotic stresses are disturbing plant growth simultaneously. Drought stress is among the major agricultural yield limiting factor worldwide. Different agronomic practices like optimum plant nutrition management are greatly obliging for crops under drought stress. It can alleviate drought consequences affectively. Drought stress greatly inhibits different physiological functions and biochemical processes. It leads to ROS over-generation that significantly damages cell structure. Optimal nutrients supply like NPK and Ca be accommodating for ROS detoxification and maintenance of cell functions. Under drought stress, they also facilitate in antioxidant generation like catalase, superoxide dismutase and peroxidase. They inhibit photooxidation of vital cell molecules and maintain cell membrane integrity. Likewise, micronutrients such as Zn and Mg also play role in antioxidant generation. Other mechanisms that are maintained by nutrients to induce drought stress are water uptake and stomatal conduction regulation. Optimum supply of K and Ca helps to regulate water activity and aquaporin function. In a nutshell, efficient nutrient management will be helpful in mitigation of drought stress in field crops. The best practice should be adopted to increase their availability to plants. Effective nutrient utilization cultivars need to be focused on.


  1. 1. Ramegowda V, Senthil-Kumar M. The interactive effects of simultaneous biotic and abiotic stresses on plants: mechanistic understanding from drought and pathogen combination. Journal of plant physiology. 2015;176:47-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.11.008
  2. 2. Swift J, Adame M, Tranchina D, Henry A, Coruzzi GM. Water impacts nutrient dose responses genome-wide to affect crop production. Nature communications. 2019;10(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09287-7
  3. 3. da Silva EC, Nogueira RJ, da Silva MA, de Albuquerque MB. Drought stress and plant nutrition. Plant stress. 2011;5(1):32-41.
  4. 4. Hajiboland R. Effect of micronutrient deficiencies on plants stress responses. In: Abiotic stress responses in plants 2012. pp. 283-329. Springer, New York, NY. ISBN 978-1-4614-0634-1
  5. 5. Laxa M, Liebthal M, Telman W, Chibani K, Dietz KJ. The role of the plant antioxidant system in drought tolerance. Antioxidants. 2019;8(4):94. DOI: 10.3390/antiox8040094
  6. 6. Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology. Sinauer Associates. Inc., Publishers. 2010. pp. 782. Sunderland, MA. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcg079
  7. 7. Akram R, Turan V, Hammad HM, Ahmad S, Hussain S, Hasnain A, Maqbool MM, Rehmani MI, Rasool A, Masood N, Mahmood F. Fate of organic and inorganic pollutants in paddy soils. In: Environmental pollution of paddy soils 2018. pp. 197-214. Springer, Cham.
  8. 8. Akram R, Turan V, Wahid A, Ijaz M, Shahid MA, Kaleem S, Hafeez A, Maqbool MM, Chaudhary HJ, Munis MF, Mubeen M. Paddy land pollutants and their role in climate change. In: Environmental Pollution of Paddy Soils 2018. pp. 113-124. Springer, Cham.
  9. 9. Wani SH, Sah SK. Biotechnology and abiotic stress tolerance in rice. Journal of Rice Research. 2014;2(2):100e105. DOI: 10.4172/jrr.1000e105
  10. 10. Fahad S, Ihsan MZ, Khaliq A, Daur I, Saud S, Alzamanan S, Nasim W, Abdullah M, Khan IA, Wu C, Wang D. Consequences of high temperature under changing climate optima for rice pollen characteristics-concepts and perspectives. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2018;64(11):1473-88.DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2018.1443213
  11. 11. Gul F, Ahmed I, Ashfaq M, Jan D, Fahad S, Li X, Wang D, Fahad M, Fayyaz M, Shah SA. Use of crop growth model to simulate the impact of climate change on yield of various wheat cultivars under different agro-environmental conditions in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2020;13(3):112. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-5118-1
  12. 12. ur Rahman MH, Ahmad A, Wajid A, Hussain M, Rasul F, Ishaque W, Islam MA, Shelia V, Awais M, Ullah A, Wahid A. Application of CSM-CROPGRO-Cotton model for cultivars and optimum planting dates: evaluation in changing semi-arid climate. Field Crops Research. 2019;238:139-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.07.007
  13. 13. Robert GA, Rajasekar M, Manivannan P. Triazole-induced drought stress amelioration on growth, yield, and pigments composition of Helianthus annuus L. (sunflower). International Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 2015;5:6-15.
  14. 14. Ibrahim MF, Faisal A, Shehata SA. Calcium chloride alleviates water stress in sunflower plants through modifying some physio-biochemical parameters. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Science. 2016;16(4):677-693. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2016.16.4.12907
  15. 15. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Alam M, Roychowdhury R, Fujita M. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. International journal of molecular sciences. 2013;14(5):9643-9684. DOI: 10.3390/ijms14059643
  16. 16. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Fujita M. Plant response to salt stress and role of exogenous protectants to mitigate salt-induced damages. In: Ecophysiology and responses of plants under salt stress 2013. pp. 25-87. Springer, New York, NY. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-4747-4_2
  17. 17. Manivannan P, Rabert GA, Rajasekar M, Somasundaram R. Drought stress induced modification on growth and Pigments composition in different genotypes of Helianthus annuus L. Current Botany. 2014;5:7-13.
  18. 18. Jedmowski C, Ashoub A, Momtaz O, Brüggemann W. Impact of drought, heat, and their combination on chlorophyll fluorescence and yield of wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum). Journal of Botany. 2015;120868:1-9. DOI: 10.1155/2015/120868
  19. 19. Debaeke P, Bedoussac L, Bonnet C, Bret-Mestries E, Seassau C, Gavaland A, Raffaillac D, Tribouillois H, Véricel G, Justes E. Sunflower crop: environmental-friendly and agroecological. Oilseeds & fats crops and Lipids. 2017;24(3):D304. 0.1051/ocl/2017020
  20. 20. Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J. World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. ESA Working paper; 2012;12(3):1-12. DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.288998
  21. 21. Elliott J, Deryng D, Müller C, Frieler K, Konzmann M, Gerten D, Glotter M, Flörke M, Wada Y, Best N, Eisner S. Constraints and potentials of future irrigation water availability on agricultural production under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(9):3239-3244. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1222474110
  22. 22. Farooq M, Hussain M, Siddique KH. Drought stress in wheat during flowering and grain-filling periods. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences. 2014;33(4):331-349. DOI: 10.1080/07352689.2014.875291
  23. 23. Hussain S, Ahmad M, Ahmad S, Iqbal J, Subhani MN, Nadeem SM, Atta S, Ibrahim M. Improvement of drought tolerance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by foliar application of abscisic acid and potassium chloride. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 2013;12(4):345. DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2013.345.352
  24. 24. Andrianasolo FN, Casadebaig P, Maza E, Champolivier L, Maury P, Debaeke P. Prediction of sunflower grain oil concentration as a function of variety, crop management and environment using statistical models. European Journal of Agronomy. 2014;54:84-96. DOI: 10.1051/ocl/2016052
  25. 25. Luan Z, Xiao M, Zhou D, Zhang H, Tian Y, Wu Y, Guan B, Song Y. Effects of salinity, temperature, and polyethylene glycol on the seed germination of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). The Scientific World Journal. 2014;170418:1-9. DOI: 10.1155/2014/170418
  26. 26. Wen B. Effects of high temperature and water stress on seed germination of the invasive species Mexican sunflower. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0141567. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141567
  27. 27. Farooq M, Hussain M, Wahid A, Siddique KH. Drought stress in plants: an overview. In: Plant responses to drought stress 2012.pp. 1-33. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0
  28. 28. Kaya MD, Okçu G, Atak M, Cıkılı Y, Kolsarıcı Ö. Seed treatments to overcome salt and drought stress during germination in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). European journal of agronomy. 2006;24(4):291-295. DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2005.08.001
  29. 29. Mwale SS, Hamusimbi C, Mwansa K. Germination, emergence and growth of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in response to osmotic seed priming. Seed Science and Technology. 2003;31(1):199-206. DOI: 10.15258/sst.2003.31.1.21
  30. 30. Benlloch-González M, Quintero JM, García-Mateo MJ, Fournier JM, Benlloch M. Effect of water stress and subsequent re-watering on K+ and water flows in sunflower roots. A possible mechanism to tolerate water stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2015;118:78-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2015.06.008
  31. 31. Lisar SY, Motafakkerazad R, Hossain MM, Rahman IM. Water stress in plants: Causes, effects and responses. In: Water Stress; Rahman, M., Hasegawa, H., (Eds.). 2012. pp. 1-14. InTech: Rijeka, Croatia. DOI: 10.5772/39363
  32. 32. Fernández-Moroni I, Fraysse M, Presotto A, Cantamutto M. Evaluation of Argentine wild sunflower biotypes for drought stress during reproductive stage. Helia. 2012;35(57):29-36. DOI: 10.2298/HEL1257029F
  33. 33. Hussain S, Saleem MF, Ashraf MY, Cheema MA, Haq MA. Abscisic acid, a stress hormone helps in improving water relations and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) hybrids under drought. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2010;42(3):2177-2189. ISSN :0556-3321
  34. 34. Canavar O, Gotz KP, Ellmer F, Chmielewski FM, Kaynak MA. Determination of the relationship between water use efficiency, carbon isotope discrimination and proline in sunflower genotypes under drought stress. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2014;8(2):232. ISSN: 1835-2693
  35. 35. Hemmati MH, Soleymani A. A study about drought stress effects on grain yield components of three sunflower cultivars. International journal of advanced biological and biomedical research. 2014; 2(3):564-572. DOI: JR_IJABBR-2-3_002
  36. 36. Ghobadi M, Taherabadi S, Ghobadi ME, Mohammadi GR, Jalali-Honarmand S. Antioxidant capacity, photosynthetic characteristics and water relations of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars in response to drought stress. Industrial Crops and Products. 2013;50:29-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.009
  37. 37. Hussain S, Saleem MF, Iqbal J, Ibrahim M, Ahmad M, Nadeem SM, Ali A, Atta S. Abscisic acid mediated biochemical changes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) grown under drought and well-watered field conditions. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2015;25(2):406-416. ISSN : 1018-7081
  38. 38. Buriro M, Sanjrani AS, Chachar QI, Chachar NA, Chachar SD, Buriro B, Gandahi AW, Mangan T. Effect of water stress on growth and yield of sunflower. Journal of Agricultural Technology. 2015;11(7):1547-1563. ISSN 1686-9141
  39. 39. Farzad BA, Mahmoud T, Majid N, Mohamad-Reza S. Effect of drought stress on yield and yield components of some sunflower recombinant inbred lines. International Journal of Biosciences. 2013;3:50-56. DOI: 10.12692/ijb/3.3.50-56 A
  40. 40. Hussain M, Malik MA, Farooq M, Khan MB, Akram M, Saleem MF. Exogenous glycinebetaine and salicylic acid application improves water relations, allometry and quality of hybrid sunflower under water deficit conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2009;195(2):98-109. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00354.x
  41. 41. Hussain RA, Ahmad R, Nawaz F, Ashraf MY, Waraich EA. Foliar NK application mitigates drought effects in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Acta physiologiae plantarum. 2016;38(4):83. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-016-2104-z
  42. 42. Elsheikh ER, Schultz B, Adam HS, Haile AM. Crop water productivity for sunflower under different irrigation regimes and plant spacing in Gezira Scheme, Sudan. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development. 2015;109(2):221-233. DOI: 10.12895/jaeid.20152.346
  43. 43. Danish S, Zafar-ul-Hye M, Fahad S, Saud S, Brtnicky M, Hammerschmiedt T, Datta R. Drought Stress Alleviation by ACC Deaminase Producing Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Enterobacter cloacae, with and without Timber Waste Biochar in Maize. Sustainability. 2020;12(15):6286. DOI: 10.3390/su12156286
  44. 44. Ilyas M, Nisar M, Khan N, Hazrat A, Khan AH, Hayat K, Fahad S, Khan A, Ullah A. Drought Tolerance Strategies in Plants: A Mechanistic Approach. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation. 2020:1-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00344-020-10174-5
  45. 45. Hussain S, Saleem MF, Iqbal J, Ibrahim M, Atta S, Ahmed T, Rehmani MI. Exogenous application of abscisic acid may improve the growth and yield of sunflower hybrids under drought. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2014;51(1):49-58. ISSN: 2076-0906
  46. 46. Schuppert GF, Tang S, Slabaugh MB, Knapp SJ. The sunflower high-oleic mutant Ol carries variable tandem repeats of FAD2-1, a seed-specific oleoyl-phosphatidyl choline desaturase. Molecular Breeding. 2006;17(3):241-256. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-005-5680-y
  47. 47. Anastasi U, Santonoceto C, Giuffrè AM, Sortino O, Gresta F, Abbate V. Yield performance and grain lipid composition of standard and oleic sunflower as affected by water supply. Field Crops Research. 2010;119(1):145-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.07.001
  48. 48. Fahad S, Hussain S, Bano A, Saud S, Hassan S, Shan D, Khan FA, Khan F, Chen Y, Wu C, Tabassum MA. Potential role of phytohormones and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in abiotic stresses: consequences for changing environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2015 Apr 1;22(7):4907-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3754-2
  49. 49. Fahad S, Hussain S, Saud S, Hassan S, Chauhan BS, Khan F, Ihsan MZ, Ullah A, Wu C, Bajwa AA, Alharby H. Responses of rapid viscoanalyzer profile and other rice grain qualities to exogenously applied plant growth regulators under high day and high night temperatures. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159590. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159590
  50. 50. Fahad S, Hussain S, Saud S, Hassan S, Ihsan Z, Shah AN, Wu C, Yousaf M, Nasim W, Alharby H, Alghabari F. Exogenously applied plant growth regulators enhance the morpho-physiological growth and yield of rice under high temperature. Frontiers in Plant Science. 201;7:1250. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016. 01250
  51. 51. Hussain MA, Fahad S, Sharif R, Jan MF, Mujtaba M, Ali Q , Ahmad A, Ahmad H, Amin N, Ajayo BS, Sun C. Multifunctional role of brassinosteroid and its analogues in plants. Plant Growth Regulation. 2020:1-6. DOI: 10.1007/s10725-020-00647-8
  52. 52. Wu C, Tang S, Li G, Wang S, Fahad S, Ding Y. Roles of phytohormone changes in the grain yield of rice plants exposed to heat: a review. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7792. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7792
  53. 53. Wang D, Fahad S, Saud S, Kamran M, Khan A, Khan MN, Hammad HM, Nasim W. Morphological acclimation to agronomic manipulation in leaf dispersion and orientation to promote “Ideotype” breeding: Evidence from 3D visual modeling of “super” rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 2019;135:499-510. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.11.010
  54. 54. Wu C, Cui K, Tang S, Li G, Wang S, Fahad S, Nie L, Huang J, Peng S, Ding Y. Intensified pollination and fertilization ameliorate heat injury in rice (Oryza sativa L.) during the flowering stage. Field Crops Research. 2020;252:107795
  55. 55. Yang Z, Zhang Z, Zhang T, Fahad S, Cui K, Nie L, Peng S, Huang J. The effect of season-long temperature increases on rice cultivars grown in the central and southern regions of China. Frontiers in plant science. 2017;8:1908. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01908
  56. 56. Zafar-ul-Hye M, Naeem M, Danish S, Fahad S, Datta R, Abbas M, Rahi AA, Brtnicky M, Holátko J, Tarar ZH, Nasir M. Alleviation of Cadmium Adverse Effects by Improving Nutrients Uptake in Bitter Gourd through Cadmium Tolerant Rhizobacteria. Environments. 2020;7(8):54. DOI: 10.3390/environments7080054
  57. 57. Kiani SP, Grieu P, Maury P, Hewezi T, Gentzbittel L, Sarrafi A. Genetic variability for physiological traits under drought conditions and differential expression of water stress-associated genes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theoretical and applied genetics. 2007;114(2):193-207. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-006-0419-7
  58. 58. Ruehr NK, Offermann CA, Gessler A, Winkler JB, Ferrio JP, Buchmann N, Barnard RL. Drought effects on allocation of recent carbon: from beech leaves to soil CO2 efflux. New Phytologist. 2009;184(4):950-961. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03044.x
  59. 59. Fahad S, Hussain S, Matloob A, Khan FA, Khaliq A, Saud S, Hassan S, Shan D, Khan F, Ullah N, Faiq M. Phytohormones and plant responses to salinity stress: a review. Plant growth regulation. 2015;75(2):391-404. DOI: 10.1007/s10725-014-0013-y
  60. 60. Andrianasolo F, Debaeke P, Champolivier L, Maury P. Analysis and modelling of the factors controlling seed oil concentration in sunflower: a review. Oilseeds and fats crops and lipids. 2016;23(2):1-12. DOI: 10.1051 / ocl / 2016004
  61. 61. Killi D, Bussotti F, Raschi A, Haworth M. Adaptation to high temperature mitigates the impact of water deficit during combined heat and drought stress in C3 sunflower and C4 maize varieties with contrasting drought tolerance. Physiologia plantarum. 2017;159(2):130-147. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12490
  62. 62. Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G, Sharkey TD. Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant biology. 2004;6(3):269-279. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-820867
  63. 63. Markulj Kulundžić A, Kovačević J, Viljevac Vuletić M, Josipović A, Liović I, Mijić A, Lepeduš H, Matoša Kočar M. Impact of abiotic stress on photosynthetic efficiency and leaf temperature in sunflower. Poljoprivreda. 2016;22(2):17-22. DOI: 10.18047/poljo.22.2.3
  64. 64. Galmés J, Aranjuelo I, Medrano H, Flexas J. Variation in Rubisco content and activity under variable climatic factors. Photosynthesis Research. 2013;117(1-3):73-90. DOI: 10.1007/s11120-013-9861-y
  65. 65. Saud S, Fahad S, Cui G, Yajun C, Anwar S. Determining nitrogen isotopes discrimination under drought stress on enzymatic activities, nitrogen isotope abundance and water contents of Kentucky bluegrass. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63548-w
  66. 66. Saud S, Fahad S, Yajun C, Ihsan MZ, Hammad HM, Nasim W, Arif M, Alharby H. Effects of nitrogen supply on water stress and recovery mechanisms in Kentucky bluegrass plants. Frontiers in plant science. 2017;8:983. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00983
  67. 67. Saud S, Li X, Chen Y, Zhang L, Fahad S, Hussain S, Sadiq A, Chen Y. Silicon application increases drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass by improving plant water relations and morphophysiological functions. The Scientific World Journal. 2014;2014.1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2014/ 368694
  68. 68. Saud S, Yajun C, Fahad S, Hussain S, Na L, Xin L, Alhussien SA. Silicate application increases the photosynthesis and its associated metabolic activities in Kentucky bluegrass under drought stress and post-drought recovery. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2016;23(17):17647-55. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6957-x
  69. 69. Cechin I, Cardoso GS, Fumis TD, Corniani N. Nitric oxide reduces oxidative damage induced by water stress in sunflower plants. Bragantia. 2015;74(2):200-206. DOI: 10.1590/1678-4499.353
  70. 70. Soleimanzadeh H. Response of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to selenium application under water stress. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2012;17(9):1115-1119. ISSN: 1818-4952
  71. 71. Adnan M, Fahad S, Zamin M, Shah S, Mian IA, Danish S, Zafar-ul-Hye M, Battaglia ML, Naz RM, Saeed B, Saud S. Coupling phosphate-solubilizing bacteria with phosphorus supplements improve maize phosphorus acquisition and growth under lime induced salinity stress. Plants. 2020;9(7):900. DOI: 10.3390/plants9070900
  72. 72. Ahmad S, Kamran M, Ding R, Meng X, Wang H, Ahmad I, Fahad S, Han Q . Exogenous melatonin confers drought stress by promoting plant growth, photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant defense system of maize seedlings. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7793. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7793
  73. 73. Izhar Shafi M, Adnan M, Fahad S, Wahid F, Khan A, Yue Z, Danish S, Zafar-ul-Hye M, Brtnicky M, Datta R. Application of Single Superphosphate with Humic Acid Improves the Growth, Yield and Phosphorus Uptake of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Calcareous Soil. Agronomy. 2020;10(9):1224. DOI: 10.3390/agronomy10091224
  74. 74. Waraich EA, Ahmad R, Ashraf MY, Saifullah, Ahmad M. Improving agricultural water use efficiency by nutrient management in crop plants. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Soil & Plant Science. 2011;61(4):291-304. DOI: 10.1080/09064710.2010.491954
  75. 75. Mahpara S, Shahnawaz M, Rehman K, Ahmad R, Khan FU. Nitrogen fertilization induced drought tolerance in sunflower: a review. Pure and Applied Biology. 2019;8(2):1675-1683. DOI: 10.19045/bspab.2019.80110
  76. 76. Shangguan ZP, Shao MA, Dyckmans J. Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on leaf photosynthetic gas exchange and water use efficiency in winter wheat. Environmental and experimental botany. 2000;44(2):141-149. DOI: 10.1016/S0098-8472(00)00064-2
  77. 77. Gong X, Li J, Ma H, Chen G, Dang K, Yang P, Wang M, Feng B. Nitrogen deficiency induced a decrease in grain yield related to photosynthetic characteristics, carbon–nitrogen balance and nitrogen use efficiency in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. 2020;66(3):398-413. DOI: 10.1080/03650340.2019.1619077
  78. 78. Rahimi A, Sayadi F, Dashti H. Effects of water and nitrogen supply on growth, water-use efficiency and mucilage yield of isabgol (Plantago ovata Forsk). Journal of soil science and plant nutrition. 2013;13(2):341-354. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-95162013005000028
  79. 79. Song CJ, Ma KM, Qu LY, Liu Y, Xu XL, Fu BJ, Zhong JF. Interactive effects of water, nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth, biomass partitioning and water-use efficiency of Bauhinia faberi seedlings. Journal of arid environments. 2010;74(9):1003-1012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.02.003
  80. 80. Saneoka H, Moghaieb RE, Premachandra GS, Fujita K. Nitrogen nutrition and water stress effects on cell membrane stability and leaf water relations in Agrostis palustris Huds. Environmental and Experimental Botany. 2004;52(2):131-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.01.011
  81. 81. Halvorson AD, Reule CA. Nitrogen fertilizer requirements in an annual dryland cropping system. Agronomy Journal. 1994;86(2):315-318. DOI: 10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600020020x
  82. 82. Ahanger MA, Tittal M, Mir RA, Agarwal RM. Alleviation of water and osmotic stress-induced changes in nitrogen metabolizing enzymes in Triticum aestivum L. cultivars by potassium. Protoplasma. 2017;254(5):1953-1963. DOI: 10.1007/s00709-017-1086-z
  83. 83. Wu FZ, Bao WK, Li FL, Wu N. Effects of water stress and nitrogen supply on leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters of Sophora davidii seedlings. Photosynthetica. 2008;46(1):40-48. DOI: 10.1007/s11099-008-0008-x
  84. 84. Fahad S, Adnan M, Hassan S, Saud S, Hussain S, Wu C, Wang D, Hakeem KR, Alharby HF, Turan V, Khan MA. Rice responses and tolerance to high temperature. In: Advances in rice research for abiotic stress tolerance 2019. pp. 201-224. Woodhead Publishing.
  85. 85. Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U, Anjum SA, Farooq A, Zohaib A, Sadia S, Nasim W, Adkins S, Saud S, Ihsan MZ. Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Frontiers in plant science. 2017;8:1147. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01147
  86. 86. Fahad S, Bano A. Effect of salicylic acid on physiological and biochemical characterization of maize grown in saline area. Pakistan Journal of Botany. 2012;44(4):1433-8.
  87. 87. Fahad S, Chen Y, Saud S, Wang K, Xiong D, Chen C, Wu C, Shah F, Nie L, Huang J. Ultraviolet radiation effect on photosynthetic pigments, biochemical attributes, antioxidant enzyme activity and hormonal contents of wheat. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment. 2013;11(3&4):1635-41.
  88. 88. Hammad HM, Abbas F, Ahmad A, Bakhat HF, Farhad W, Wilkerson CJ, Fahad S, Hoogenboom G. Predicting Kernel Growth of Maize under Controlled Water and Nitrogen Applications. International Journal of Plant Production. 2020:1-2. DOI: 10.1007/s42106-020-00110-8
  89. 89. Hammad HM, Abbas F, Saeed S, Fahad S, Cerdà A, Farhad W, Bernardo CC, Nasim W, Mubeen M, Bakhat HF. Offsetting land degradation through nitrogen and water management during maize cultivation under arid conditions. Land degradation & development. 2018;29(5):1366-75. DOI: 10.1002/ldr.2933
  90. 90. Hammad HM, Ashraf M, Abbas F, Bakhat HF, Qaisrani SA, Mubeen M, Fahad S, Awais M. Environmental factors affecting the frequency of road traffic accidents: a case study of sub-urban area of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019;26(12):11674-85. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-04752-8
  91. 91. Hammad HM, Farhad W, Abbas F, Fahad S, Saeed S, Nasim W, Bakhat HF. Maize plant nitrogen uptake dynamics at limited irrigation water and nitrogen. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017;24(3):2549-57. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-8031-0
  92. 92. Hammad HM, Khaliq A, Abbas F, Farhad W, Fahad S, Aslam M, Shah GM, Nasim W, Mubeen M, Bakhat HF. Comparative Effects of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Soil Organic Carbon and Wheat Productivity under Arid Region. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2020;51(10):1406-22. DOI: 10.1080/00103624.2020.1763385
  93. 93. Hussain S, Mubeen M, Ahmad A, Akram W, Hammad HM, Ali M, Masood N, Amin A, Farid HU, Sultana SR, Fahad S. Using GIS tools to detect the land use/land cover changes during forty years in Lodhran District of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2019:1-7. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06072-3
  94. 94. Hansel FD, Amado TJ, Ruiz Diaz DA, Rosso LH, Nicoloso FT, Schorr M. Phosphorus fertilizer placement and tillage affect soybean root growth and drought tolerance. Agronomy Journal. 2017;109(6):2936-2944. DOI: 10.2134/agronj2017.04.0202
  95. 95. Garg BK, Burman U, Kathju S. The influence of phosphorus nutrition on the physiological response of moth bean genotypes to drought. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2004;167(4):503-508. DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200320368
  96. 96. Singh DK, Sale PW. Phosphorus supply and the growth of frequently defoliated white clover (Trifolium repens L.) in dry soil. Plant and Soil. 1998;205(2):155-162. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004316726665
  97. 97. Naeem M, Khan MM. Phosphorus ameliorates crop productivity, photosynthesis, nitrate reductase activity and nutrient accumulation in coffee senna (Senna occidentalis L.) under phosphorus-deficient soil. Journal of Plant Interactions. 2009;4(2):145-153. DOI: 10.1080/17429140802193178
  98. 98. Singh SK, Badgujar G, Reddy VR, Fleisher DH, Bunce JA. Carbon dioxide diffusion across stomata and mesophyll and photo-biochemical processes as affected by growth CO2 and phosphorus nutrition in cotton. Journal of Plant Physiology. 2013;170(9):801-813. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2013.01.001
  99. 99. Faustino LI, Bulfe NM, Pinazo MA, Monteoliva SE, Graciano C. Dry weight partitioning and hydraulic traits in young Pinus taeda trees fertilized with nitrogen and phosphorus in a subtropical area. Tree physiology. 2013;33(3):241-251. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tps129
  100. 100. Sawwan J, Shibli RA, Swaidat I, Tahat M. Phosphorus regulates osmotic potential and growth of African violet under in vitro-induced water deficit. Journal of plant nutrition. 2000;23(6):759-771. DOI: 10.1080/01904160009382057
  101. 101. Kang LY, Yue SC, Li SQ . Effects of phosphorus application in different soil layers on root growth, yield, and water-use efficiency of winter wheat grown under semi-arid conditions. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. 2014;13(9):2028-2039. DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60751-6
  102. 102. Singh V, Pallaghy CK, Singh D. Phosphorus nutrition and tolerance of cotton to water stress: I. Seed cotton yield and leaf morphology. Field Crops Research. 2006;96(3):191-198. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.06.009
  103. 103. Mariotte P, Cresswell T, Johansen MP, Harrison JJ, Keitel C, Dijkstra FA. Plant uptake of nitrogen and phosphorus among grassland species affected by drought along a soil available phosphorus gradient. Plant and Soil. 2020;448:121-132. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-04407-0
  104. 104. Osonubi O. Comparative effects of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and phosphorus fertilization on growth and phosphorus uptake of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) plants under drought-stressed conditions. Biology and fertility of soils. 1994;18(1):55-59. DOI:
  105. 105. Graciano C, Guiamét JJ, Goya JF. Impact of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on drought responses in Eucalyptus grandis seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management. 2005;212(3):40-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.02.057
  106. 106. Egilla JN, Davies FT, Drew MC. Effect of potassium on drought resistance of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis cv. Leprechaun: Plant growth, leaf macro-and micronutrient content and root longevity. Plant and soil. 2001;229(2):213-224. DOI:
  107. 107. Jatav KS, Agarwal RM, Tomar NS, Tyagi SR. Nitrogen metabolism, growth and yield responses of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to restricted water supply and varying potassium treatments. Journal of Indian Botany and Sociology. 2014;93(4):177-189. ISSN: 0019-4468
  108. 108. Zamani S, Naderi MR, Soleymani A, Nasiri BM. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) biochemical properties and seed components affected by potassium fertilization under drought conditions. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 2020;190:110017. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110017
  109. 109. Wang M, Zheng Q , Shen Q , Guo S. The critical role of potassium in plant stress response. International journal of molecular sciences. 2013;14(4):7370-7390. DOI: 10.3390/ijms14047370
  110. 110. Sharma PS, Kumari TS. Effect of potassium under water stress on growth and yield of sorghum in Vertisol. Journal of Potash. Research. 1996;12(3):319-325. DOI: 10.4236/as.2011.23034
  111. 111. Römheld V, Kirkby EA. Research on potassium in agriculture: needs and prospects. Plant and soil. 2010;335(1-2):155-180. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0520-1
  112. 112. Kanai S, Moghaieb RE, El-Shemy HA, Panigrahi R, Mohapatra PK, Ito J, Nguyen NT, Saneoka H, Fujita K. Potassium deficiency affects water status and photosynthetic rate of the vegetative sink in green house tomato prior to its effects on source activity. Plant science. 2011;180(2):368-374. DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.10.011
  113. 113. Benlloch-González M, Arquero O, Fournier JM, Barranco D, Benlloch M. K+ starvation inhibits water-stress-induced stomatal closure. Journal of plant physiology. 2008;165(6):623-630. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp379
  114. 114. Jiang M, Zhang J. Involvement of plasma-membrane NADPH oxidase in abscisic acid- and water stress-induced antioxidant defense in leaves of maize seedlings. Planta. 2002;215(6):1022-1030. DOI: 10.1007/s00425-002-0829-y
  115. 115. Cakmak I. The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2005;168(4):521-530. DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200420485
  116. 116. Senbayram M, Gransee A, Wahle V, Thiel H. Role of magnesium fertilisers in agriculture: plant–soil continuum. Crop and Pasture Science. 2016;66(12):1219-1229. DOI: 10.1071/CP15104
  117. 117. Ashraf M, Athar HR, Harris PJ, Kwon TR. Some prospective strategies for improving crop salt tolerance. Advances in agronomy. 2008;97:45-110. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(07)00002-8
  118. 118. Marschner H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 1995. Academic Press, San Diego. ISBN: 9780080571874
  119. 119. Cakmak I, Kirkby EA. Role of magnesium in carbon partitioning and alleviating photooxidative damage. Physiologia plantarum. 2008;133(4):692-704. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01042.x
  120. 120. Thalooth AT, Tawfik MM, Mohamed HM. A comparative study on the effect of foliar application of zinc, potassium and magnesium on growth, yield and some chemical constituents of mungbean plants grown under water stress conditions. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2006;2(1):37-46. ISSN: 1817-3047
  121. 121. Jan M, Anwar-ul-Haq M, Shah AN, Yousaf M, Iqbal J, Li X, Wang D, Fahad S. Modulation in growth, gas exchange, and antioxidant activities of salt-stressed rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes by zinc fertilization. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2019;12(24):775. DOI: 10.1007/s12517-019-4939-2
  122. 122. Kamran M, Cui W, Ahmad I, Meng X, Zhang X, Su W, Chen J, Ahmad S, Fahad S, Han Q , Liu T. Effect of paclobutrazol, a potential growth regulator on stalk mechanical strength, lignin accumulation and its relation with lodging resistance of maize. Plant growth regulation. 2018;84(2):317-32. DOI: 10.1007/ s10725-017-0342-8
  123. 123. Khan A, Tan DK, Afridi MZ, Luo H, Tung SA, Ajab M, Fahad S. Nitrogen fertility and abiotic stresses management in cotton crop: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017;24(17):14551-66. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8920-x
  124. 124. Khan A, Tan DK, Munsif F, Afridi MZ, Shah F, Wei F, Fahad S, Zhou R. Nitrogen nutrition in cotton and control strategies for greenhouse gas emissions: a review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2017;24(30):23471-87. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-0131-y
  125. 125. Verma G, Srivastava D, Tiwari P, Chakrabarty D. ROS modulation in crop plants under drought stress. Reactive Oxygen, Nitrogen and Sulfur Species in Plants: Production, Metabolism, Signaling and Defense Mechanisms. 2019:311-336. DOI: 10.1002/9781119468677.ch13
  126. 126. Hu W, Tian SB, Di Q , Duan SH, Dai K. Effects of exogenous calcium on mesophyll cell ultrastructure, gas exchange, and photosystem II in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum Linn.) under drought stress. Photosynthetica. 2018;56(4):1204-1211. DOI: 10.1007/s11099-018-0822-8
  127. 127. Hosseini SA, Réthoré E, Pluchon S, Ali N, Billiot B, Yvin JC. Calcium application enhances drought stress tolerance in sugar beet and promotes plant biomass and beetroot sucrose concentration. International journal of molecular sciences. 2019;20(15):3777. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20153777
  128. 128. Qiang L, Jianhua C, Longjiang Y, Maoteng L, Jinjing L, Lu G. Effects on physiological characteristics of Honeysuckle ('Lonicera japonica' Thunb) and the role of exogenous calcium under drought stress. Plant Omics. 2012;5(1):1-5. ISSN: 1836-0661
  129. 129. Xu WZ, Deng XP, Xu BC. Effects of water stress and fertilization on leaf gas exchange and photosynthetic light-response curves of Bothriochloa ischaemum L. Photosynthetica. 2013;51(4):603-612. DOI: 10.1007/s11099-013-0061-y
  130. 130. Upadhyaya H, Panda SK, Dutta BK. CaCl 2 improves post-drought recovery potential in Camellia sinensis (L) O. Kuntze. Plant cell reports. 2011;30(4):495-503. DOI: 10.1007/s00299-010-0958-x
  131. 131. Heidari M, Galavi M, Hassani M. Effect of sulfur and iron fertilizers on yield, yield components and nutrient uptake in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) under water stress. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2011;10(44):8816-8822. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.854
  132. 132. Ahmad MN. Impact of drought stress on the sulfur assimilation pathway in Zea mays [Thesis]. The Ruperto-Carola University of Heidelberg; Germany; 2006.
  133. 133. Majeed S, Nawaz F, Naeem M, Ashraf MY. Effect of exogenous nitric oxide on sulfur and nitrate assimilation pathway enzymes in maize (Zea mays L.) under drought stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum. 2018;40(12):206. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-018-2780-y
  134. 134. Chan KX, Wirtz M, Phua SY, Estavillo GM, Pogson BJ. Balancing metabolites in drought: the sulfur assimilation conundrum. Trends in Plant Science. 2013;18(1):18-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.07.005
  135. 135. Yuvaraj M, Subramanian KS. Significance of Zinc in Plant Nutrition. Biotica Research Today. 2020;2(8):823-825.
  136. 136. Blasco B, Graham NS, Broadley MR. Antioxidant response and carboxylate metabolism in Brassica rapa exposed to different external Zn, Ca, and Mg supply. Journal of plant physiology. 2015;176:16-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2014.07.029
  137. 137. Hajiboland R, Amirazad F. Growth, photosynthesis and antioxidant defense system in Zn-deficient red cabbage plants. Plant, Soil and Environment. 2010;56(5):209-217. DOI: 10.17221/207/2009-PSE
  138. 138. Khan HR, McDonald GK, Rengel Z. Zinc fertilization and water stress affects plant water relations, stomatal conductance and osmotic adjustment in chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.). Plant and Soil. 2004;267(2):271-284. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-005-0120-7
  139. 139. Karim MR, Zhang YQ , Zhao RR, Chen XP, Zhang FS, Zou CQ . Alleviation of drought stress in winter wheat by late foliar application of zinc, boron, and manganese. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2012;175(1):142-151. DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201100141
  140. 140. Foroutan L, Solouki M, Abdossi V, Fakheri BA. The effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles on enzymatic and osmoprotectant alternations in different Moringa peregrina populations under drought stress. International Journal of Basic Science Medics. 2018;3(4):178-187. DOI: 10.15171/ijbsm.2018.31
  141. 141. Khurana N, Chatterjee C. Influence of variable zinc on yield, oil content, and physiology of sunflower. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 2001;32(19-20):3023-3030. DOI: 10.1081/CSS-120001104
  142. 142. Muhammad B, Adnan M, Munsif F, Fahad S, Saeed M, Wahid F, Arif M, Amanullah J, Wang D, Saud S, Noor M. Substituting urea by organic wastes for improving maize yield in alkaline soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 2019;42(19):2423-34. DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2019.1659344
  143. 143. Rehman M, Fahad S, Saleem MH, Hafeez M, Rahman MH, Liu F, Deng G. Red light optimized physiological traits and enhanced the growth of ramie (Boehmeria nivea L.). Photosynthetica. 2020;58(4):922-31. DOI: 10.3390/agriculture10080334
  144. 144. Saleem MH, Fahad S, Adnan M, Ali M, Rana MS, Kamran M, Ali Q , Hashem IA, Bhantana P, Ali M, Hussain RM. Foliar application of gibberellic acid endorsed phytoextraction of copper and alleviates oxidative stress in jute (Corchorus capsularis L.) plant grown in highly copper-contaminated soil of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020:1-3. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09764-3
  145. 145. Saleem MH, Fahad S, Khan SU, Din M, Ullah A, Sabagh AE, Hossain A, Llanes A, Liu L. Copper-induced oxidative stress, initiation of antioxidants and phytoremediation potential of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) seedlings grown under the mixing of two different soils of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2020;27(5):5211-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-07264-7
  146. 146. Millaleo R, Reyes-Díaz M, Ivanov AG, Mora ML, Alberdi M. Manganese as essential and toxic element for plants: transport, accumulation and resistance mechanisms. Journal of soil science and plant nutrition. 2010;10(4):470-481. DOI: 10.4067/S0718-95162010000200008
  147. 147. Hu Y, Schmidhalter U. Drought and salinity: a comparison of their effects on mineral nutrition of plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 2005;168(4):541-549. DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200420516
  148. 148. Gholamin R, Khayatnezhad M. Effect of different levels of manganese fertilizer and drought stress on yield and agronomic use efficiency of fertilizer in durum wheat in Ardabil. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment. 2012;10:1326-1328. ISSN: 1459-0255
  149. 149. Waraich EA, Ahmad R, Ashraf MY. Role of mineral nutrition in alleviation of drought stress in plants. Australian Journal of Crop Science. 2011;5(6):764-777. ISSN: 1835-2707
  150. 150. Sardans J, Penuelas J, Ogaya R. Drought’s impact on Ca, Fe, Mg, Mo and S concentration and accumulation patterns in the plants and soil of a Mediterranean evergreen Quercus ilex forest. Biogeochemistry. 2008;87(1):49-69. DOI: 10.1007/s10533-007-9167-2
  151. 151. Lombardi L, Sebastiani L, Vitagliano C. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular effects of in vitro induced iron deficiency in peach rootstock Mr. S 2/5. Journal of plant nutrition. 2003;26(11):2149-2163. DOI: 10.1081/PLN-120024271
  152. 152. Taiz L, Zeiger E. Plant Physiology. Sinauer Associates. Inc., Publishers. 2006. pp. 764. Sunderland, MA. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcg079
  153. 153. Hajiboland R, Farhanghi F. Effect of low boron supply in turnip plants under drought stress. Biologia plantarum. 2011;55(4):775. DOI: 10.1007/s10535-011-0186-4
  154. 154. Printz B, Lutts S, Hausman JF, Sergeant K. Copper trafficking in plants and its implication on cell wall dynamics. Frontiers in plant science. 2016;7:601. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00601
  155. 155. Yruela I. Copper in plants: acquisition, transport and interactions. Functional Plant Biology. 2009;36(5):409-430. DOI: 10.1071/FP08288
  156. 156. Krämer U, Clemens S. Functions and homeostasis of zinc, copper, and nickel in plants. In: Molecular biology of metal homeostasis and detoxification. 2005. pp. 215-271. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: 10.1007/4735_96

Written By

Malik Ghulam Asghar and Anam Bashir

Submitted: May 26th, 2020 Reviewed: September 21st, 2020 Published: December 18th, 2020