Open access

Introductory Chapter: Electron Crystallography

Written By

Devinder Singh

Submitted: 19 March 2020 Published: 22 July 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.93063

From the Edited Volume

Electron Crystallography

Edited by Devinder Singh and Simona Condurache-Bota

Chapter metrics overview

746 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

1. Introduction

The different properties of materials are structure dependent. There are many techniques that are developed for the structure analysis. The most common of them is X-ray crystallography for the structural study of periodic ordered structures at atomic scale level. Few years later, after the discovery of X-ray diffraction, electron diffraction of single crystals was invented. The wave nature of electrons was utilized to discover the state of the art instrument, electron microscope. Since then, electron microscope has been extensively used in many fields for the study of micro-/nanomaterials. Electron crystallography is used to collect different information by electron scattering. This has been used to study crystal structures and defects. After first electron microscopy image taken in 1933, the constant engineering developments from the last 80 years or so made it possible today to record high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images. Moreover, the powerful computers play a very important role in the further improvement of HRTEM images as well as to analyze them quantitatively by using different image processing programs. Modern transmission electron microscope (TEM) can be used for both structure and chemical analysis. The structure analysis is performed by electron diffraction and HRTEM, while the chemical analysis is performed by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS).

Although X-ray crystallography is known to be the best technique for the structure determination of unknown crystals, but under certain conditions, electron crystallography has some advantages over X-ray crystallography:

  • An electron scatters much more strongly than X-rays. Thus, much smaller crystals, million times smaller than those needed for single crystal X-ray diffraction can be studied by electron crystallography. The structure analysis (such as grain boundaries, phases, etc.) of crystals, too small for X-ray diffraction, can be done by electron crystallography.

  • HRTEM images of crystals can be recorded in electron crystallography while in X-ray crystallography, imaging is not possible. The phase information remains preserved in the case of HRTEM images.

  • The interaction mechanism with the crystal is also different for electron diffraction and X-ray diffraction. Electrons study electrostatic potential distribution in crystals while X-rays study electron density distribution in crystals.

  • The X-ray powder diffraction gives results from a sample which may contain millions of small crystals while electron diffraction gives results from a single or just few crystals. In some materials, where the phases are found to inter-grow with each other cannot be solved by X-ray crystallography, whereas in electron crystallography, this problem is eliminated as much smaller crystals are needed for electron diffraction.

  • The defects in crystals can be studied using HRTEM images.

Radiation damage is the common problem in X-ray crystallography and electron crystallography. This is especially troublesome in the case of electron crystallography. The proteins and organic molecules are the main sufferers when they are being imaged. Radiation damage can be limited by using electron cryo-microscopy where samples go through cryo-fixation and imaging done at liquid nitrogen or liquid helium temperatures. Due to this, X-ray crystallography is more successful for the structural study of proteins that are more prone to radiation damage. Recently, radiation damage was investigated by MicroED for three-dimensional (3D) thin crystals [1, 2]. In the past few years, several protein structures are studied by electron crystallography. The studies on inorganic crystals by electron crystallography were first done by Klug [3] and Hovmöller et al [4]. They used HRTEM images as it is possible to choose thin regions along the edge of the crystal for structure analysis using crystallographic image processing program (CRISP).

In recent years, electron diffraction is widely applied for determining the structure of unknown crystals [5, 6, 7, 8]. Electron diffraction is a technique which is well-complementing other techniques, single crystal X-ray diffraction and powder X-ray diffraction for determination of structure. Electron diffraction plays a very important role when crystals are very small for study using single crystal X-ray diffraction or very complex for structure solution by powder X-ray diffraction. The main drawbacks of electron diffraction are the problems in the complete collection of 3D-electron diffraction data using standard diffraction techniques and the collection of data is very time consuming. Also, the electron diffraction intensities suffered from dynamical scattering. There are two methods which are developed for the collection of complete 3D electron diffraction data: the rotation electron diffraction (RED) and automated electron diffraction tomography (ADT) [8, 9].

With the introduction of advanced methodologies, recently, one of the most important methods for crystal structural analysis in the field of electron crystallography has been discovered. This software-based method is named as rotation electron diffraction (RED), which is capable of overcoming the drawbacks and reducing the dynamical effects [8]. There are two computer programs in a software package, that is, RED data collection and RED data processing. The program for collection of 3D-electron diffraction data used the combination of goniometer tilt and electron beam tilt in a transmission electron microscope (TEM). A fine step in the range 0.05–0.20° of electron beam tilt combined with a coarse step in the range 2.0–3.0° of goniometer tilts at common tilt-axis allowed to cover a crystal in a large range of tilt. At every combination, electron diffraction frames are collected. With the collection of about 1000–2000 electron diffraction frames, a complete 3D data set is obtained. Thus, a complete 3D-electron diffraction data set from a sub-micrometer sized single crystal can be collected in about 2 hours.

The program processes 3D-RED electron diffraction data created by the program RED data collection. It consists of correction of shift in electron diffraction frames, peak search in individual electron diffraction frames for diffraction spots, and identifying diffraction spots as reflections in 3D. The program containing RED data processing used to view and analysis of 3D reciprocal lattices which are reconstructed from electron diffraction frames. RED method is more capable for determination of structure and identification of phase of crystals which are not known. It is faster, easier, and more straight-forward than powder XRD and other techniques based on electron microscopy. The configuration used in RED is similar to the technique involving rotation as used in X-ray diffraction. Along one rotation axis, the sample is rotated continuously. Instead of doing continuous crystal rotation, coarse crystal rotation and fine electron-beam tilt on the same axis of rotation are combined in TEM. At every combination of crystal rotation and beam tilt, electron diffraction frame is collected. The 3D-reciprocal lattice is reconstructed from the collected electron diffraction frames with the help of RED data processing program.

RED has been used in the recent years to solve large number of crystal structures. These include the most complex zeolites ever solved, open-framework compounds, and quasicrystal approximants, such as the pseudo-decagonal approximants [10, 11, 12, 13]. The quasicrystal approximants are dense intermetallic compounds and consist of heavy elements. Thus, they are usual to have higher dynamical scattering. It is more challenging to solve the structure of quasicrystal approximants using RED. Quasicrystalline phases are having forbidden rotation symmetry in their electron diffraction pattern, which are not compatible with periodic translation. Quasicrystals are discovered in 1982 by D. J. Shechtman. A new idea of ordered but non-periodic arrangement of atoms exhibiting sharp diffraction peaks (with icosahedral symmetry) is created due to the breakthrough experiments by Shechtman et al. [14] on rapidly quenched alloys (AlMn) using TEM. Due to the aperiodicity, these materials can be used for applications in industries as they are having properties different from that of conventional metallic materials [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24]. Quasicrystals are known by a group of different properties, for example, higher hardness, low friction, low-surface energy, and thermal expansion which is as good as metals [25, 26, 27, 28, 29].

After the quasicrystals discovered in rapidly quenched AlMn alloys [14], the most important part of their studies has been related to their structure solution. The structure of quasicrystals has not been yet solved. A number of crystalline phases have been observed which are having crystals made up by the same clusters as found in quasicrystals, and they are named as quasicrystal approximants. These approximants are often found to co-exist with quasicrystals. They have similar electron diffraction patterns and similar chemical compositions as that of quasicrystals [30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]. The local atomic structures are similar in both quasicrystals and quasicrystal approximants. Thus, the structural study of quasicrystal approximants is an efficient way to understand the quasicrystalline structure. Many quasicrystal approximant series have been observed which are closely related on the basis of their structures. Out of the many quasicrystal approximants that are found till yet, only small number of them has been solved to atomic resolution. In this context, RED method is used to solve two very complicated alloy structures of pseudo-decagonal quasicrystal approximants PD2 and PD1 in Al-Co-Ni alloy system [12, 13]. These are built of characteristic 2 nm wheel clusters with five-fold rotational symmetry [36].

References

  1. 1. Nannenga BL, Shi D, Leslie Andrew GW, Gonen T. High-resolution structure determination by continuous-rotation data collection in MicroED. Nature Methods. 2014;11:927-930
  2. 2. Hattne J, Shi D, Glynn C, Zee CT, Gallagher-Jones M, Martynowycz MW, et al. Analysis of global and site-specific radiation damage in cryo-EM. Structure. 2018;26:759-766
  3. 3. Klug A. Image analysis and reconstruction in the electron microscopy of biological macromolecules. Chemica Scripta. 1978/79;14:245-256
  4. 4. Hovmöller S, Sjögren A, Farrants G, Sundberg M, Marinder BO. Accurate atomic positions from electron microscopy. Nature. 1984;311:238
  5. 5. Zhang D, Oleynikov P, Hovmöller S, Zou XD. Collecting 3D electron diffraction data by the rotation method. Zeitschrift fuer Kristallographie. 2010;225:94-102
  6. 6. Zou XD, Hovmöller S, Oleynikov P. Electron crystallography: Electron microscopy and electron diffraction, chapter 11. In: International Union of Crystallography. Oxford, England, UK: Oxford Science Publications; 2011. ISBN: 978-0-19-958020-0
  7. 7. Willhammar T, Sun J, Wan W, Oleynikov P, Zhang D, Zou XD, et al. Structure and catalytic properties of the most complex intergrown zeolite ITQ-39 determined by electron crystallography. Nature Chemistry. 2012;4:188-194
  8. 8. Wan W, Sun J, Su J, Hovmöller S, Zou XD. Three-dimensional rotation electron diffraction: Software RED for automated data collection and data processing. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 2013;46:1863-1873
  9. 9. Kolb U, Mugnaioli E, Gorelik TE. Automated electron diffraction tomography—A new tool for nano crystal structure analysis. Crystal Research and Technology. 2011;46:542-554
  10. 10. Martinez-Franco R, Moliner M, Yun Y, Sun J, Wan W, Zou XD, et al. Synthesis of an extra-large molecular sieve using proton sponges as organic structure-directing agents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2013;110:3749-3754
  11. 11. Su J, Kapaca E, Liu L, Georgieva V, Wan W, Sun J, et al. Structure analysis of zeolites by rotation electron diffraction (RED). Microporous and Mesoporous Materials. 2013;189:115-125
  12. 12. Singh D, Yun Y, Wan W, Grushko B, Hovmöller S, Zou XD. A complex pseudo-decagonal quasicrystal approximant Al37(Co,Ni)15.5 solved by the rotation electron diffraction (RED) method. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 2014;47:215
  13. 13. Singh D, Yun Y, Wan W, Grushko B, Hovmöller S, Zou XD. Structure determination of a pseudo-decagonal quasicrystal approximant by the strong-reflections approach and rotation electron diffraction. Journal of Applied Crystallography. 2016;49:433-441
  14. 14. Shechtman D, Blech I, Gratias D, Cahn J. Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry. Physical Review Letters. 1984;53:1951-1953
  15. 15. Yadav TP, Singh D, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON. Enhanced microhardness of mechanically activated carbon–quasicrystal composite. Materials Letters. 2012;80:5-8
  16. 16. Singh D, Mandal RK, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON. Nanoindentation characteristics of Zr69.5Al7.5− xGaxCu12Ni11 glasses and their nanocomposites. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2011;509:8657-8663
  17. 17. Singh D, Yadav TP, Mandal RK, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON. Effect of Ga substitution on the crystallization behaviour and glass forming ability of Zr–Al–Cu–Ni alloys. Materials Science and Engineering A. 2010;527:469-473
  18. 18. Singh D, Yadav TP, Mandal RK, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON. Indentation characteristics of metallic glass and nanoquasicrystal-glass composite in Zr-Al (Ga)-Cu-Ni alloys. Intermetallics. 2010;18:2445-2452
  19. 19. Singh D, Yadav TP, Mandal RK, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON. Effect of Ti addition on the quasicrystalline phase formation and indentation characteristics of Zr69.5Al7.5Cu12Ni11 alloy. Philosophical Magazine. 2011;91:2837
  20. 20. Singh D, Mandal RK, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON. Effect of cooling rate on the crystallization and mechanical behaviour of Zr–Ga–Cu–Ni metallic glass composition. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2015;648:456-462
  21. 21. Singh D, Singh D, Mandal RK, Srivastava ON, Tiwari RS. Glass forming ability, thermal stability and indentation characteristics of Ce75Al25—xGax metallic glasses. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2014;590:15-20
  22. 22. Singh D, Singh D, Mandal RK, Srivastava ON, Tiwari RS. Effect of quenching rate on the microstructure and mechanical behavior of Ce75Al21Ga4 glassy alloy. Materials Characterization. 2017;134:18-24
  23. 23. Singh D, Singh D, Mandal RK, Srivastava ON, Tiwari RS. Effect of annealing on the devitrification behavior and mechanical properties of rapidly quenched Ce-based glassy alloys. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 2016;445:53-60
  24. 24. Singh D, Singh D, Tiwari RS. Effect of Ga substitution on low temperature transport and magnetic response of Ce75Al25 metallic glass. AIP Advances. 2018;8:095222
  25. 25. Singh D, Singh D, Yadav TP, Mandal RK, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON. Synthesis and indentation behavior of amorphous and Nanocrystalline phases in rapidly quenched Cu–Ga–Mg–Ti and Cu–Al–Mg–Ti alloys. Metallography Microstructure and Analysis. 2013;2:321-327
  26. 26. Singh D, Yadav TP, Mandal RK, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON. Nanoindentation studies of metallic glasses and nanoquasicrystal glass composites in ZrAl(Ga)CuNi alloys. International Journal of Nanoscience. 2011;10:929-933
  27. 27. Yadav TP, Singh D, Shahi RR, Shaz MA, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON. Formation of quasicrystalline phase in Al70-xGaxPd17Mn13 alloys. Philosophical Magazine. 2011;91:2474
  28. 28. Singh D, Singh D, Mandal RK, Srivastava ON, Tiwari RS. Crystallization behavior and mechanical properties of (Al90Fe5Ce5)100-xTix amorphous alloys. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2016;687:990-998
  29. 29. Singh D, Singh D, Srivastava ON, Tiwari RS. Microstructural effect on the low temperature transport properties of Ce-Al (Ga) metallic glasses. Scripta Materialia. 2016;118:24-28
  30. 30. Bancel PA. Dynamical phasons in a perfect quasicrystal. Physical Review Letters. 1989;63:2741-2744
  31. 31. Abe E, Tsai A. Quasicrystal-crystal transformation in Zn-Mg–rare-earth alloys. Physical Review Letters. 1999;83:753-756
  32. 32. Singh D, Tiwari RS, Srivastava ON. Phase formation in rapidly quenched Cu-based alloys. Journal of Materials Science. 2009;44:3883-3888
  33. 33. Zou X, Fung K, Kuo K. Orientation relationship of decagonal quasicrystal and tenfold twins in rapidly cooled Al-Fe alloy. Physical Review B. 1987;35:4526-4528
  34. 34. Singh D, Hovmöller S, Grushko B, Wan W, Yun Y, Zou XD. A complex pseudo-decagonal quasicrystal approximant solved by strong reflections approach. Acta Crystallographica. Section A. 2017;A73:c1192
  35. 35. Hovmöller S, Singh D, Wan W, Yun Y, Wan W, Grushko B, et al. Quasicrystal approximants solved by rotation electron diffraction (RED). Acta Crystallographica. Section A. 2014;A70:c1195
  36. 36. Hovmöller S, Zou L, Zou XD, Grushko B. Structures of pseudo-decagonal approximants in Al−Co−Ni. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London: Series A. 2012;370:2949-2959

Written By

Devinder Singh

Submitted: 19 March 2020 Published: 22 July 2020