Adsorption energies E
Fluids confined to zeolites and other porous solids exhibit many distinct properties. One such property is the diffusivity, which exhibits anomalous dependence on the size of the guest molecule confined to the pore. This is termed the levitation effect. A diffusivity maximum as a function of the diameter of the guest is seen. The diameter for which the guest has maximum diffusivity is seen to be associated with a minimum in the activation energy. The existence of similar behavior in other porous solids, framework flexibility, and effect of temperature are discussed. Experimental verification of the existence of the anomalous maximum is then discussed. Diffusion of n-hexane and its isomers in zeolite NaY are then discussed in detail. The reduction in the end-to-end length of n-hexane while passing through the 12-ring window and the reasons for the same are discussed. Section 3 discusses possible observations of size-dependent maximum in other condensed matter systems.
- porous solids
- anomalous diffusivity
- size dependence
Zeolites are excellent catalysts due to the presence of acid sites on the framework. These catalyze a number of reactions such as hydrocarbon isomerization, hydrocarbon cracking or transformation. In recent times, there have been considerable increase in investigations pertaining to various aspects of zeolites [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. There have been several studies aimed at clarifying the mechanism involved in the reactions catalyzed by zeolites. Boronat and Corma have discussed the changes in energy on proton exchange between zeolite and an adsorbate. They attempt to compute the contribution due to the van der Waals interaction between the zeolite and the adsorbate, which can be significant when the molecules are of size similar to the pore . Davis and coworkers have attempted synthesis of enantiomerically enriched molecular sieve. Recently they succeeded in such a synthesis and this has been discussed in a recent article [11, 13]. Corma and coworkers have discussed various novel approaches to the synthesis of zeolites . Dusselier and Davis have discussed at length the synthesis and the use in catalysis of small pore zeolites . Corma and coworkers have discussed the synthesis of a new all-silica polymorph ITQ-55, which is highly efficient in the separation of ethane and ethylene with a high selectivity of 100 . Prashant Kumar et al.  have pointed out the novel synthesis of MFI nanosheets with sandwiched MEL. Zeolite can be used for separation of xylene isomers with a high degree of separation . From these it is evident that many new and novel aspects of zeolites are still being discovered and zeolites continues to be an exciting field of research with a bounty of surprises.
Zeolites are porous aluminosilicates capable of accommodating molecules within the pores. They are well known for their catalytic, ion-exchange, and separation properties. They are widely used in petrochemical industries for processing hydrocarbons. Hydrocarbon cracking, transformation, isomerization, etc. are achieved with the help of zeolites [14, 15]. Zeolites are also used in separating hydrocarbon molecules of various sizes . Larger hydrocarbons such as C15 and with still higher number of carbon atoms diffuse slowly through the pores and hence reach the bottom of a zeolite column last. Small molecules such as C1-C5 diffuse fast and exit from the column first [17, 18]. Other molecules of intermediate size have values of diffusivity in between those of C15 and C1-C5 and exit at intermediate times. Thus the various fractions from crude can be separated. This separation is much more energy efficient as compared to separation by distillation.
Another application of zeolites is its use for ion-exchange and water softening [19, 20]. Ions such as Ca2+ can be exchanged with Na+ already present in the zeolites, thus removing these ions from water. Zeolites are therefore used in detergents for washing clothes.
Apart from the use of zeolite for separation based on the size of the molecule, it is also of considerable use for separations based on the shape of the molecules. This property of zeolites is often referred to as shape selectivity . The pore dimensions of zeolites, which are not always of regular shape, make this possible. An oft quoted example is the separation of xylenes (p-, m-, and o-xylenes) using silicate or ZSM-5 [22, 23]. At sufficiently high temperatures, o-xylene will convert to p-xylene and ZSM-5 also acts as a catalyst.
Zeolites and other host materials also exhibit interesting properties. They exhibit window effect, single file diffusion, and levitation effect [24, 25, 26]. Here we will focus on the levitation effect, which refers to the dependence of diffusivity on the guest or diffusant diameter.
2. Diffusivity of guest molecules confined to the pores from MD simulations
In order to understand the diffusion of hydrocarbon and other molecules within the confined spaces of the zeolite, it is essential to carry out an investigation into diffusivity of guest molecules within the confined space provided by a zeolite or other porous solids. Such a study is essential for an understanding of the process of separation of hydrocarbon as well as other mixtures.
One of the early studies investigating the diffusivity of guest molecules in zeolites was the diffusion of xenon in zeolite Y and argon in NaCaA . The diffusivity is likely to be strongly influenced by the bottleneck for diffusion. In the case of xenon the bottleneck is the 12-ring window, which has a diameter of around 7.8 Å. In the case of argon the bottleneck is an 8-ring window, which has a diameter of around 4.5 Å. The ratio of the bottleneck to the molecular/atomic diameter for xenon-NaY system is 7.0/4.1 = 1.70 while in the case of argon-NaCaA it is 4.0/3.405 = 1.17. Although the diameters of the windows are approximate, it is clear that the window diameter is significantly larger than the diameter of xenon while this is not true for argon where the diameter of the window is only slightly larger than the argon diameter. From these it is evident that xenon in NaY should have a higher diffusvity than argon in NaCaA.
From MD, it was found that xenon in NaY has a diffusivity of while argon in NaCaA has a diffusivity of . As the diffusivity of argon in NaCaA is higher than xenon in NaY, further investigations were carried out to find the reasons for this. To start with the energy barrier at the bottleneck was computed. This is shown in Figure 1 . From the figure it is seen that the energy barrier for xenon at the window in Y is positive while the barrier at the window is negative for argon in A zeolite. This explains why the diffusivity of argon in A zeolite is higher than xenon in Y zeolite. The trends seen in the observed barrier appears to be due to the strong interaction of argon with the oxygens of the 8-ring window. As argon is about the same diameter as the window, its strength of interaction with the oxygens is optimum being close to , which occurs at a distance at which the Lennard-Jones curve is minimum in energy. This is not the case for xenon in zeolite Y where xenon can be close to only some of the oxygens of the 12-ring window. This is the first indication that nongeometrical factors can influence the diffusivity. This study shows that sorbate-zeolite interaction plays an important role.
This study suggests that an understanding of diffusivity as a function of the diameter of the guest species might show something interesting. Such a study was carried out and the results were indeed found to be interesting . A molecular dynamics study of monatomic guest molecules confined to zeolite NaY and NaCaA were carried out in which the diameter of the guest molecule was varied. The diffusivities of the guest species was computed from the time evolution of the mean square displacements. A plot of diffusivity as a function of the reciprocal of square of the guest diameter is shown in Figure 2 for guests in both zeolites Y and A . It is seen that the diffusivities decrease linearly with increase in the reciprocal of the square of the diameter of the guest molecule for small diameters. This is referred to as the linear regime (LR). As the diameter increases, it is seen that the diffusivity suddenly increases and later decreases sharply exhibiting a maximum in diffusivity. This is referred to as the anomalous regime (AR). This increase followed by a decrease in diffusivity was surprising and needed further investigations.
As can be seen the location of the guest diameter at which the maximum occurs is different in both zeolite Y and A (see Figure 3 ). In order to understand the reasons for the maximum in diffusivity we have tried to search in literature any report that refers to such an observation. Derouane and coworkers have reported a finding arrived at through a theoretical analysis. They showed that the nesting effect can lead to
In order to obtain a better understanding, we define a dimensionless parameter
where the numerator gives the distance at which the interactions between the guest and the zeolite atoms are optimum, that is, when this gives an interaction energy of
. The denominator is the window radius. Thus, the dimensionless parameter suggests that when these two are equal (
= 1) and when they are not equal (
). We now plot the diffusivity as a function of
. This is shown in Figure 4 . We see that the maximum is seen when
is between 0.9 and 1.0 for
When the guest passes through the window at the periphery. These points do not possess inversion symmetry and therefore there is no cancelation of forces exerted on the guest by the zeolite. This leads to lower diffusivity of these guest molecules.
The reason for the observed maximum in diffusivity arises from the lowered force on the guest molecule as compared to the smaller guest molecule, which encounters a higher force on itself due to the zeolite. These translate to a less undulating potential energy landscape with shallower minima and maxima for the larger guest molecule for which is close to unity. In the case of smaller guest molecule the larger force implies a highly undulating potential energy landscape with deep valleys and high mountains. However, in a recent report the lower force on the guest molecule at the window has not been found . More studies are required to understand the origin of the observed diffusivity maximum.
The activation energy for diffusion can be obtained from an Arrhenius plot of log(D) vs. 1/T, where T is the temperature and D is the diffusivity. Variation of activation energy as a function of the guest diameter has been plotted in Figure 6 . It is seen that the activation energy is higher for the linear regime than for the anomalous regime guests. It is also seen that activation energy is maximum for the size with minimum diffusivity and minimum for the guest size in the AR with maximum diffusivity.
The observed behavior has been termed the levitation effect (LE) as its origin is in the dispersion forces, which cancel each other leading to reduced forces on the guest molecule with maximum diffusivity. Unlike diffusion of p-xylene and o- and m-xylenes whose diffusivities are controlled by the steric repulsion and therefore only p-xylene manages to diffuse, here the diffusivities are controlled by the dispersion forces, which are always attractive in nature.
Arrhenius plots for two sizes, namely, 4.96 Å and 6.0 Å are shown in Figure 7 . The smaller sized guest atom has a higher slope and activation energy than the larger sized guest atom. The activation energies for the smaller and larger sized guest atoms are respectively 5.89 kJ/mol and 3.26 kJ/mol.
2.1 Effect of temperature on the levitation effect
The diffusivity maximum or the levitation effect is a consequence of the existence of dispersion forces. If the attractive part of the guest-zeolite interaction is switched off, then the diffusivity maximum disappears. This is shown in Figure 8 . Temperature plays an important role in the behavior of the diffusion coefficient as a function of the guest diameter.
At very higher temperatures the diffusivity maximum altogether disappears. This can be seen in Figure 9 . What determines the temperature at which the diffusivity maximum will vanish? It is the strength of interaction between the guest and the zeolite. At relatively higher temperatures when the diffusivity maximum vanishes and only a monotonic dependence on guest diameter is seen.
At low temperatures, the diffusivity maximum is very pronounced with the diffusivity of the guest of 6.0 Å (in zeolite Y) showing several orders of magnitude higher value than the diffusivity of the 4.96 Å guest. This is shown in Figure 9 .
At very low temperatures, the diffusivity maximum is seen to be very pronounced . This can be seen from Figure 10. The difference between the anomalous regime guest and the linear regime guest is now several orders of magnitude. This can not be easily utilized in the practice because of the low diffusivities of both the species.
Smit and coworkers have reported a study on carbon nanotubes (CNTs). They investigated diffusion of methane in CNTs of different diameters. They found that the diffusion coefficient is maximum in the CNTs with similar diameter as the methane. They also carried out a simulation at higher temperatures when the height of the diffusivity maximum decreased and eventually disappeared similar to the disappearance of the maximum in the zeolite.
Many of these simulations have been carried out with the zeolite framework fixed. Will the diffusivity maximum persist when the framework is flexible? For this, simulations with flexible framework were carried out and the results are shown in Figure 11 . As can be seen the diffusivity maximum persists in spite of the framework flexibility. The height of the maximum is marginally lower and slightly shifted to lower values of guest diameter.
Kar and Chakravarty reported instantaneous normal mode analysis of guest of different diameters to understand the levitation effect. They could reproduce the velocity autocorrelation functions of various guest molecules in zeolite NaY . Bhattacharyya and coworkers have carried out a mode coupling analysis of the levitation effect .
2.2 Studies on real molecular systems
Until now simulations have been on monatomic guest species diffusion in the pores of the zeolites. These guest molecules are not of interest in real laboratory or industry. Simulations were therefore carried out on hydrocarbons molecules within zeolites to see if the observed anomalous diffusion can be observed in these real hydrocarbons. Simulations were carried out on pentane isomers:
Simulations of pentane isomers,
2.3 Experimental verification of the diffusivity maximum
The diffusivity of a species changes with its mass as well as other parameters such as size, temperature, etc. In simulations, the diameter of the diffusing species were changed without changing its mass. Ideally, an experimental verification of the levitation effect should do the same, that is change the diameter without changing the mass. But in real laboratory this appears almost impossible. However, Dr. S.G.T. Bhat during one of our discussions mentioned that this indeed is possible. He suggested use of isomers of a hydrocarbon all of which will have the same mass but differ in their cross-sectional diameter . The choice of the experiments was also crucially important. Different techniques of measuring the diffusivity such as uptake, NMR, ZLC, or QENS yield different values of for the diffusivity of the same species. Kärger and coworkers have investigated the reasons for this [40, 41]. They have suggested that this is due to the difference in the sampling time and length scales. As MD sample over picoseconds to nanoseconds, a technique which samples for similar time scale would be ideal. As QENS samples over the same period, we choose to carry experiments with this technique. We chose zeolite NaY with three isomers of pentane, namely,
2.4 Hexane isomers in faujasite
Diffusion of hexane isomers in zeolite NaY was carried out with the help of MD technique. Linear hydrocarbons
There is little differene in the adsorption energies of the isomers. Hence, it is difficult to separate the isomers from each other using a method based on adsorption. Instead, a kinetic-based approach might be helpful for separating the mixtures consisting of hexane isomers. In Figure 13 the mean squared displacements of the isomers are shown for 2.25 ns. The lines are all straight suggesting good statistics . The diffusivities of the isomers at these temperatures are listed in Table 2.
|Isomer||250 K||300 K||330 K||350 K||400 K|
The cross-sectional diameter of the isomers can be computed from the geometry of the isomers. These are listed in Table 3 along with the
values for the isomers . As can be seen except for
From the Arrhenius plots of diffusivity (see Figure 14), we have obtained the activation energies . These are listed in Table 4 . It is seen that the activation energies of
|Region||Temp range (K)||Order of diffusivities|
|I||T < 300||nC6 < 2MP < 3MP < 23DMB < 22DMB|
|II||300,347||2MP < nC6 < 3MP < 23DMB < 22DMB|
|III||347,387||2MP < 3MP < nC6 < 23DMB < 22DMB|
|IV||387,418||2MP < 3MP < 23DMB < nC6 < 22DMB|
|V||418,528||2MP < 3MP < 23DMB < 22DMB < nC6|
|VI||528,549||2MP < 23DMB < 3MP < 22DMB < nC6|
|VII||549,586||23DMB < 2MP < 3MP < 22DMB < nC6|
|VIII||586,613||23DMB < 3MP < 2MP < 22DMB < nC6|
|IX||613,627||23DMB < 3MP < 22DMB < 2MP < nC6|
|X||6,271,172||23DMB < 22DMB < 3MP < 2MP < nC6|
|XI||T > 1172||22DMB < 23DMB < 3MP < 2MP < nC6|
The potential energy landscape of the various isomers as they diffuse during the passage through the 12-ring window of zeolite NaY is given in Figure 15 . It is seen that
2.4.1 Kinetic-based separation of hexane isomers
Arrhenius plots of diffusivities for various isomers cross each other at some temperature. Consider two isomers. They cross at some temperature referred to as the inversion temperature. Above the temperature if one isomer has a higher diffusivity, the same isomer below the inversion temperature will have the lower diffusivity among the two isomers. The Arrhenius plots of various isomers are plotted in Figure 16 . Various pairs of isomers cross each other at different temperatures. These are listed in Table 5 . Thus, from the table it is evident that pairs 2MP/
2.5 End-to-end length of
n-hexane during diffusion
An interesting observation from the study was the variation of end-to-end length, L
The distribution of end-to-end length of
2.6 Separation using levitation effect
Using the levitation effect, separation of molecular mixtures can be realized. This approach differs from the usual approach toward separation. In the usual approach separation is achieved because the smaller sized molecules generally diffuse faster as compared to larger sized guest molecules. Or alternately, certain molecules enter the pores while bigger sized molecules do not even enter the pore network. In this case only those which enter the pores are able to pass through the column of the zeolite while others are unable to pass through leading to good separation.
Consider now a binary mixtures in which both the components are able to enter the pore network. When we use the levitation effect, both mixtures will diffuse but here the larger sized guest will diffuse faster provided the bottleneck of the zeolite has a dimaeter that is comparable to the diameter of the larger sized guest molecule. The smaller diameter guest molecule will diffuse slower and this leads to separation of the components.
In all these separations, however, one thing that is common is that both the components (in the case of a binary mixture) will diffuse in the same direction. This leads at best to a reasonable degree of separation. However, much higher degree of separation can be achieved if the two components move in opposite directions. We have devised a novel approach to separation in which the two components move in opposite directions . In this approach, the fact that the guest in AR and the LR regimes have out-of-phase potential energy landscape is utilized. This is shown in Figure 20 . In addition, a hot zone is placed to the left of the 12-ring window in the system consisting of zeolite A with argon (of AR) and neon (of LR). The hot zone drives argon toward the left and the neon toward to right. The result is a very high degree of separation. This has been demonstrated through nonequilibrium Monte Carlo simulations with inhomogeneous temperature . In Figure 21 a plot of the separation factor as a function of Monte Carlo steps is shown. Normally separation factors that are achieved are of the order of 2000–4000. But here we see that separation factors of the order of >108–10 can be realized.
The surprising anomaly in the diffusivity of a guest diffusing within the confined regions of a zeolite or a CNT or any other porous solid has many uses. It also explains the observed increase in ionic conductivity as a function of ionic radius on going from Li+ to Na+ to K+ and Rb+ and Cs+ . Levitation effect was first observed in the experiments by Kemball and later Derouane showed its existence through theory [47, 48, 49]. It can be used in the separation of molecular mixtures as well as in separations of very high degree. Levitation effect can be better put into practice with single crystals and nano devices.
The authors wish to acknowledge support from Department of Science and Technology, New Delhi and computational facilities from Thematic Unit of Excellence for Computational Materials Science established with support from Nano Mission, DST, New Delhi.
Boronat M, Corma A. What is measured when measuring acidity in zeolites with probe molecules? ACS Catalysis. 2019; 9(2):1539-1548
Moliner M, Corma A. From metal-supported oxides to well-defined metal site zeolites: The next generation of passive nox adsorbers for low-temperature control of emissions from diesel engines. Reaction Chemistry & Engineering. 2019; 4:223-234
Li C, Moliner M, Corma A. Building zeolites from precrystallized units: Nanoscale architecture. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2018; 57(47):15330-15353
Bereciartua PJ, Cantín Á, Corma A, Jordá JL, Palomino M, Rey F, et al. Control of zeolite framework flexibility and pore topology for separation of ethane and ethylene. Science. 2017; 358(6366):1068-1071
Sastre G, Kärger J, Ruthven DM. Diffusion path reversibility confirms symmetry of surface barriers. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2019; 123(32):19596-19601
Toda J, Sastre G. Diffusion of trimethylbenzenes, toluene, and xylenes in uwy zeolite as a catalyst for transalkylation of trimethylbenzenes with toluene. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2018; 122(14):7885-7897
Zachariou A, Hawkins A, Lennon D, Parker SF, Suwardiyanto SK, Matam CRA, et al. Investigation of zsm-5 catalysts for dimethylether conversion using inelastic neutron scattering. Applied Catalysis A: General. 2019; 569:1-7
Caro J, Kärger J. From computer design to gas separation. Nature Materials
Kumar P, Kim DW, Rangnekar N, Xu H, Fetisov EO, Ghosh S, et al. One-dimensional intergrowths in two-dimensional zeolite nanosheets and their effect on ultra-selective transport. Nature Materials. 2020; 19:443-449
Quesne MG, Silveri F, de Leeuw NH, Catlow CRA. Advances in sustainable catalysis: A computational perspective. Frontiers in Chemistry. 2019; 7:182
Kang JH, Alshafei FH, Zones SI, Davis ME. Cage-defining ring: A molecular sieve structural indicator for light olefin product distribution from the methanol-to-olefins reaction. ACS Catalysis. 2019; 9(7):6012-6019
Dusselier M, Davis ME. Small-pore zeolites: Synthesis and catalysis. Chemical Reviews. 2018; 118(11):5265-5329
Davis ME. A thirty-year journey to the creation of the first enantiomerically enriched molecular sieve. ACS Catalysis. 2018; 8(11):10082-10088
Barrer RM. Hydrothermal Chemistry of Zeolites. London: Academic Press; 1982
Kärger J, Ruthven DM. Diffusion in Zeolites and Other Microporous Solids. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1992
Dong J, Lin YS, Liu W. Multicomponent hydrogen/hydrocarbon separation by mfi-type zeolite membranes. AIChE Journal. 2000; 46(10):1957-1966
Arruebo M, Falconer JL, Noble RD. Separation of binary c5 and c6 hydrocarbon mixtures through mfi zeolite membranes. Journal of Membrane Science. 2006; 269(1):171-176
Seader JD, Henley EJ. Separation Process Principles. 1st ed. New York, USA: John Wiley and Sons Inc.; 1998
Colella C. Ion exchange equilibria in zeolite minerals. Mineralium Deposita. 1996; 31(6):554-562
Loiola A, Andrade J, Sasaki J, da Silva L. Structural analysis of zeolite naa synthesized by a cost-effective hydrothermal method using kaolin and its use as water softener. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2012; 367(1):34-39
Smit B, Maesen TLM. Molecular simulations of zeolites: Adsorption, diffusion, and shape selectivity. Chemical Reviews. 2008; 108(10):4125-4184
Tarditi AM, Horowitz GI, Lombardo EA. Xylene isomerization in a zsm-5/ss membrane reactor. Catalysis Letters. 2008; 123(1):7-15
Young L, Butter S, Kaeding W. Shape selective reactions with zeolite catalysts: Iii. Selectivity in xylene isomerization, toluene-methanol alkylation, and toluene disproportionation over zsm-5 zeolite catalysts. Journal of Catalysis. 1982; 76(2):418-432
Dubbeldam D, Calero S, Maesen TLM, Smit B. Understanding the window effect in zeolite catalysis. Angewandte Chemie International Edition. 2003; 42(31):3624-3626
Kärger J, Petzold M, Pfeifer H, Ernst S, Weitkamp J. Single-file diffusion and reaction in zeolites. Journal of Catalysis. 1992; 136(2):283-299
Yashonath S, Ghorai PK. Diffusion in nanoporous phases: Size dependence and levitation effect. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2008; 112(3):665-686
Yashonath S, Santikary P. Influence of non-geometrical factors on intracrystalline diffusion. Molecular Physics. 1993; 78(1):1-6
Yashonath S, Santikary P. Diffusion of sorbates in zeolites y and a: Novel dependence on sorbate size and strength of sorbate-zeolite interaction. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1994; 98(25):6368-6376
Sharma A, Ghorai PK. Effect of force and location of bottleneck for particle moving through window under encapsulation. Journal of Chemical Science. 2017; 129(8):1293-1300
Rajappa C, Yashonath S. Levitation effect and its relationship with the underlying potential energy landscape. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1999; 110(12):5960-5968
Yashonath S, Rajappa C. Temperature dependence of the levitation effect implications for separation of multicomponent mixtures. Faraday Discussions. 1997; 106:105-118
Ghorai PK, Yashonath S. Diffusion anomaly at low temperatures in confined systems from the rare events method. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2004; 108(22):7098-7101
Santikary P, Yashonath S. Dynamics of zeolite cage and its effect on the diffusion properties of sorbate: Persistence of diffusion anomaly in naa zeolite. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 1994; 98(37):9252-9259
Kar S, Chakravarty C. Instantaneous normal mode analysis of the levitation effect in zeolites. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2000; 104(4):709-715
Nandi MK, Banerjee A, Bhattacharyya SM. Non-monotonic size dependence of diffusion and levitation effect: A mode-coupling theory analysis. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2013; 138(12):124505
Federico J-C, Laredo GC. Molecular size evaluation of linear and branched paraffins from the gasoline pool by dft quantum chemical calculations. Fuel. 2004; 83:2183-2188
Bhide SY, Kumar AVA, Yashonath S. Diffusion of hydrocarbons in confined media: Translational and rotational motion. Journal of Chemical Sciences. 2001; 113(5):559-577
Jorgensen WL, Madura JD, Swenson CJ. Optimized intermolecular potential functions for liquid hydrocarbons. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 1984; 106(22):6638-6646
Personal communatication with Dr. S.G. Thirumaleshwara Bhat.
Kärger J, Ruthven DM. On the comparison between macroscopic and n.m.r. measurements of intracrystalline diffusion in zeolites. Zeolites. 1989; 9(4):267-281
Kärger J, Ruthven DM. Diffusion in nanoporous materials: Fundamental principles, insights and challenges. New Journal of Chemistry. 2016; 40:4027-4048
Borah BJ, Jobic H, Yashonath S. Levitation effect in zeolites: Quasielastic neutron scattering and molecular dynamics study of pentane isomers in zeolite nay. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 2010; 132(14):144507
Jobic H, Borah BJ, Yashonath S. Neutron scattering and molecular dynamics evidence for levitation effect in nanopores. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2009; 113(38):12635-12638
Thomas AM, Subramanian Y. Hexane isomers in faujasite: Anomalous diffusion and kinetic separation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 2017; 121(27):14745-14756
Anil Kumar AV, Yashonath S, Ananthakrishna G. Separation of mixtures at nano length scales: Blow torch and levitation effect. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2006; 110(8):3835-3840
Ghorai PK, Yashonath S. Evidence in support of levitation effect as the reason for size dependence of ionic conductivity in water: A molecular dynamics simulation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2006; 110(24):12179-12190
Kemball C. Entropy of adsorption. Advances in Catalysis. 1950; 2:233-250
Derouane EG. The energetics of sorption by molecular sieves: Surface curvature effects. Chemical Physics Letters. 1987; 142(3):200-204
Derouane EG, Andre J-M, Lucas AA. Surface curvature effects in physisorption and catalysis by microporous solids and molecular sieves. Journal of Catalysis. 1988; 110(1):58-73