Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Laser Surface Treatment

Written By

Anas Ahmad Siddiqui and Avanish Kumar Dubey

Submitted: October 29th, 2019 Reviewed: February 18th, 2020 Published: June 24th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91800

Chapter metrics overview

742 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Laser surface treatment (LST) utilizes intense thermal energy of laser beam for modification, alloying, and cladding surface of substrate materials. In LST very high cooling rates of 104–106°C/s can be achieved. Such high cooling rate arrests the possibilities of segregation in the case of multicomponent systems. Moreover, very narrow heat-affected zone (HAZ) and easy automation make it suitable for large-scale industrial production. LST depends on many process parameters such as laser power, scan speed, focal length, spot size, substrate temperature, and type of material. Selection of proper range of process parameters for good surface quality is essential. Pores and cracks may arise due to improper selection of parameters. Multilayered, high-entropy, thermal barrier coatings using LST with good bonding with substrates have been developed.

Keywords

  • laser surface modification
  • laser surface alloying
  • laser cladding

1. Introduction

Metals and their alloys are one of the means to fulfill our imagination. With change in necessity, their utility is also changing. Today industries require materials that can meet the demands of challenging markets. In this age of miniaturization, we require materials that can form the framework for new technologies. Advanced biomaterials for bones and dentures with critical surface properties have been developed [1, 2]. These materials have shown to perform better than the available materials. Artificial bones of Mg and their alloys have been researched [3]. These may restrict the requirement of recursive surgeries in case of implants. In the nuclear industry, materials which can restrict the harmful radiations while themselves remaining neutral have been proposed [4]. Such materials may be able to improve the working conditions of nuclear industry workers and may restrict the radiation leakages in prolonged use. Chromium has been used for decades as a surface hardening and corrosion-resisting agent. In recent years there are some articles that discuss the effect of chromium on health [5, 6]. It has been found that few states of chromium may be the probable cause of cancer. Hence, alternate materials possessing properties similar to chromium coatings have been reported [7]. In an attempt to improve the efficiency of power plants, turbine blades which can handle high stresses have been tested [8]. These materials may help boost the limits of power plants, aircrafts, and other propulsion systems. The thrust of ever-expanding horizons of knowledge development of materials and surface properties has become essential.

Most of the advanced applications require superior surface properties such as high hardness, strength, wear resistance, corrosion resistance, high temperature oxidation resistance, and improved magnetic and chemical behavior. All these properties can be incorporated and developed by modifying the surface of the components. There are wide varieties of surface modification techniques available. Some of these techniques are thermochemical coatings (nitriding, carburizing, cyaniding, etc.), electrodeposition, electroless deposition, spray coatings (flame spray, thermal spray coating, plasma spray coating, etc.), physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), laser surface modification (LSM), etc. These diverse techniques mutually form a branch termed as surface engineering. All these surface modification techniques have certain advantages and disadvantages. Table 1 lists some of the desirable attributes and corresponding behavior observed with different processes. For precision coatings of thermally sensitive and multicomponent materials, usually laser material processing is employed. Due to its localized heating and rapid solidification rates, thermal distortion and segregation possibilities are diminished. Also, high energy density leads to melting of almost any metal [9]. High-energy-density laser beam produces high dilution and good bonding strength, and very low heat-affected zone can be developed. Other techniques usually suffer in one or the other reasons. Also, high repeatability and controllability makes it a suitable technique for industrial standards.

AttributesLSAElectrodepositionThermal sprayCVDPVD
DilutionHighNilHighNilNil
Bonding strengthHighLowModerateLowLow
Heat-affected zoneLowNilHighLowLow
Coating thicknessModerateModerateHighLowLow
RepeatabilityHighLowModerateHighHigh
ControllabilityHighLowModerateHighHigh

Table 1.

Characteristics of different techniques.

With the development in the automation sector, lasers having high accuracy and precision are available. Thus, in the last decade, a large number of literature dealing with application of lasers in various fields are available. These lasers may also be used to develop layer by layer lamina to develop a desired 3D structure. Laser-based techniques employed in 3D printing are selective laser melting and sintering. A part program of the 2D structure to be manufactured is developed. These 2D structures of the same or varying sections are developed above one another. These adjacent layers join together and form a required 3D structure. Hence, laser printing is very similar to surface treatment processes. This chapter in particular presents the ongoing trends of laser surface treatments in melt regime, i.e., it discusses techniques such as laser surface alloying, laser cladding (LC), selective laser melting, and laser glazing. Although the basis of these techniques is same, these techniques differ from one another in the desirability of final surface properties achieved. Numerical simulation and application of these techniques have been discussed.

Advertisement

2. Selection of laser

Many aspects are considered during selection of laser for LST processes. Some of the desirable characteristics are presented in the flow chart shown in Figure 1. The material to be processed is one of the factors for selection of laser type. Heat-sensitive materials and refractory materials are generally processed in pulsed mode [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15]. It is also observed that the solidified structure of developed materials may be different in the case of continuous and pulse laser modes [16]. Figure 2 shows the relationship between reflectivity of a material and wavelength of radiation [17]. Materials such as aluminum which have very low absorptivity are usually processed with low wavelength pulses [18]. Besides, these desirable properties also significantly affect the selection of laser for a particular application [19].

Figure 1.

Constraints considered in selection of laser source type.

Figure 2.

Reflectance of substrate vs wavelength of radiation for some materials [20].

The type of process also affects the selection of laser. Generally surface alloying requires a large amount of heat to melt considerable amount of substrate surface. Thus high-energy lasers are required. Glazing and sintering usually employ low-energy lasers, whereas cladding uses intermediate-energy lasers.

Advertisement

3. Laser surface treatment processes

Extensive laser surface treatment techniques are available. Laser surface treatment usually modifies the topography, phase composition, and microstructure of a substrate material to improve its surface properties. When a laser is incident on a substrate material, laser radiations are absorbed by conduction electrons near the surface region (in nm range). These excited electrons collide with lattice ions and rapidly produce heat. The heat produced in this thin layer is conducted to the bulk substrate. This causes swift heating of a layer of material, having a thickness greater than the characteristic radiation absorption depth. As soon as the laser irradiation is stopped, the substrate material cools due to heat transfer. Figure 3 presents a block diagram of laser interaction with substrate.

Figure 3.

Laser material interactions.

These thermal cycles may possibly cause phase transformations, topography, and microstructural variations. The extent of these changes depends on the behavior and type of material irradiated, the maximum temperature attained, and heating and cooling rates experienced. All the above said factors depend on the laser power density and interaction time between laser and substrate material. Laser surface treatment techniques are differentiated on the basis of temperature observed at the surface due to irradiation. If surface temperature attained due to laser irradiance is less than the melting temperature of a material, solid state transformations can be observed. Such a system is observed in hardening, shock peening, and engraving. When the surface temperature obtained is greater than the melting temperature but lower than the vaporization temperature of the substrate material, melting of substrate surface takes place. This is the most widely used regime for surface modification. Techniques such as laser cladding, laser alloying, laser glazing, and selective laser melting fall under this regime. If the surface temperature is greater than the vaporization temperature of the substrate, vaporization of substrate surface takes place. This regime is used in laser machining techniques such as laser drilling, cutting, and contouring. Figure 4 presents a block diagram of this classification.

Figure 4.

Classification of laser material processing techniques.

3.1 Laser cladding

Laser cladding technique is employed to produce coatings with enhanced surface properties or to repair surface defects of different components. LC employs high energy density of laser beams to melt and alloy the surface of substrate materials. Due to high energy density, most of the metals can be melted and alloyed. Usually when the dilution percent is less than 10%, LC is meaningful because low concentration of substrate is desired in LC. Thick to moderate layers of almost any material can be developed. Figure 8(a) shows a cross-sectional image of clad bead.

The material to be deposited on a substrate may be supplied using two techniques: preplaced powder deposition [21, 22, 23, 24, 25] or codeposition method [26, 27, 28, 29, 30]. These methods differ in the supply of clad material. In the first method as shown in Figure 5(a), the powder to be clad is first mixed with certain adhesives (polyvinyl alcohol) to form slurry. This slurry is placed above the substrate as a uniform coat and allowed to dry and harden. This is done so that it can withstand the pressure of the shielding gas and particle nature of laser.

Figure 5.

(a) Preplaced technique and (b) codeposition technique [33].

In the second method as shown in Figure 5(b), the powder to be clad is fed through the powder feeder nozzle onto the laser beam and subsequently on the molten pool. This powder feeding can be done at various angles through the laser beam. When the angle of feeding is zero degrees, it forms a coaxial feeding system. Some authors have also studied LMP using different types of nozzles [31, 32]. Generally, off axis, four stream and coaxial nozzles have been employed. Figure 6 shows the gas and particle flow patterns for various nozzles. Thus, cladding of substrate is possible using both the techniques.

Figure 6.

Gas and particle flow for (a) off focus, (b) four stream, and (c) coaxial nozzles [32].

Through extensive review of articles, it was observed that beads produced using powder preplaced method are prone to more defects. This may be attributed to the presence of a bonding agent which vaporizes during laser beam interaction. Also, the height of clad can be manipulated in a codeposition method which is difficult in preplaced technique [34].

The type of microstructure formed depends on the temperature gradient (G) and solidification rate of crystal (R) [35, 36, 37]. High G/R ratio leads to planar structure, with decrease in G and increase in R columnar structure being achieved, and low G/R ratio leads to equiaxed dendritic structure. In LST high cooling rates (103–108 K/s) can be achieved [38]. Hence in LST generally dendritic structure is visible. Change in structure can also be realized with change in mode of laser. It is observed that in continuous laser mode, columnar dendritic structure was formed which was oriented towards the center of clad bead, whereas in pulsed laser mode, stacks of dendrite were randomly oriented. This was due to cyclic melting and resolidification phases, leading to progressive change in the molten pool. Figure 7 shows the LC using continuous (a) and pulsed (b) mode.

Figure 7.

LC using (a) continuous mode and (b) pulsed mode [39].

3.2 Laser surface alloying

Laser surface alloying (LSA) is a similar process to LC but using high energy density. LSA sample is shown in Figure 8(b) [40]. It is observed that dilution percent is greater than 10%. Hence, no clear distinction up to a certain depth can be observed, and alloy bead has some proportions of substrate material. Usually, LC is employed in applications requiring entirely different properties at the surface and core, whereas LSA is employed in applications requiring change in properties for greater depth.

Figure 8.

Cross-sectional images of (a) laser clad [30] and (b) laser surface alloyed bead [40].

3.3 Selective laser melting

Selective laser melting (SLM) utilizes laser energy to create 3D parts using a 3D CAD sketch of the part geometry to be produced. The 3D model is then broken to a 2D stack of layers which form the required geometry. These 2D layers are created by laser scanning over the cross-sectional area. This scanning of laser melts and bonds particles together to form a thin layer. Repeating this process, a subsequent layer may be produced and altogether bonded to previously produced layers. These formed stacks of 2D layers represent the final 3D required geometry. Selective laser sintering (SLS) is a similar process to SLM, but in SLS complete melting of powder does not take place. SLS uses low-power lasers for fabrication of 3D parts compared to SLM. Thus, the final products formed using SLS usually have high porosity and require impregnation of different materials. Figure 9 presents the steps in SLM.

Figure 9.

Steps in SLM technique [41].

Literatures suggests that SLM is successfully applied to aluminum and its alloys, high-speed steels, nickel, and copper alloys. The main problems with SLM are porosity, cracking, oxide inclusion, and loss of alloying elements. Porosity may be reduced by proper selection of laser energy density for specific material. Cracking can be reduced by decreasing the cooling and solidification rate.

3.4 Laser glazing

Laser glazing (LG) is a surface melting method using a continuous high-energy laser beam which traverses the surface of a substrate, generating a thin layer of melted material. After the solidification of this thin melted layer, the material’s surface appears glassy; therefore this method is termed as laser glazing. Researchers have done LG to improve surface properties [42, 43, 44]. It employs low peak power; hence vaporization of surface materials is restricted. LG is used to level the surface and develop a dense re-melted layer. Due to such a system microhardness, erosion resistance and thermal shock behavior of the substrate may be improved.

Advertisement

4. Numerical modeling of laser surface treatment processes

Since LST processes are highly nonlinear processes, hence for clear understanding of the process, numerical modeling is essential [45]. Besides laser beam interaction with the substrate, LC and LSA impose additional constraints of clad and alloying materials that may be supplied in the form of preplaced powder or through powder feeder. In case powder is supplied through powder feeder, then the study of powder flow dynamics becomes important. Hence, LC and LSA processes can be broken in three stages: powder stream dynamics, melt pool region, and quality variables. Experimental study of laser surface treatments is not sufficient to understand complex phenomena such as powder stream pattern, laser and substrate interaction, heat transfer mode, and melt pool behavior. Hence, analytical models and numerical simulations have been developed. Some of the brief advancements and understandings in these areas are presented.

4.1 Powder stream dynamics

Powder stream dynamics is a significant area in the blown powder technique because we can predict powder stream characteristics such as motion, flow profile, powder with laser system interaction, etc. These parameters may be further used in optimization of parameters and calculate powder efficiency. The behavior of powder flow is governed by the type of nozzle employed. The turbulent flow of carrier gas can be assumed to be a continuum; hence Navier-Stokes equations can be used. A dispersed powder in carrier gas is generally solved using the Lagrangian equation [46]. During powder–laser interaction, attenuation of laser energy takes place due to absorption, reflection, radiation, beam scattering, and ricocheting of powder particles. Models based on particle attenuation [47], ray tracing [48], resolution [49], and light propulsion force model [50] have been reported to predict the behavior of attenuated laser energy fairly. Finally, powder substrate interaction depends on the standoff distance. For high convergence the substrate should lie at the focus of the nozzle [51].

4.2 Melt pool

The substrate melts due to absorption of remaining incident laser energy. The focuses of interest in this region are heat transfer, geometry of melt pool, fluid flow velocity, cooling rate, and solidification rate. These variables have been calculated using kinetic approach [52], volume method [53], and finite element method [54, 55]. Usually commercial multi-physics platforms such as ANSYS, COMSOL, FLUENT, and ABAQUS are employed for the problem.

4.3 Quality variables

The simulation of desirable properties is usually done in combination with developed thermal model. Phase transformation models along with thermal models provide base for the measurement of quality variables. Diffusion and diffusion-less phase transformations may occur in different material systems. Diffusion phase transformations have been modeled using the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami equation, while diffusion-less phase transformations are modeled using the Koinstinen Marburguer equation [56, 57]. Hardness measurement of a treated surface has been predicted by coupling thermo-kinetic relation and thermal model [58, 59]. Residual stresses develop in laser-treated parts; these lead to crack and distortion. The finite element method has been used to solve coupled elastic, plastic, and thermal strain equations with phase transformation equations [60, 61].

Advertisement

5. LST applications

LST has a wide application in aerospace, automobile, medical, nuclear, oil recovery, and refinery industries [62, 63, 64, 65, 66]. Aluminum and its alloys are widely used in aerospace industry; they have been efficiently clad with other novel metals to improve their surface properties [67]. Stainless steel is used in automobile and household applications [68, 69]. Titanium and its alloys are used in the medical sector [70]. LC on Ti6Al4V has been studied frequently to improve its surface properties [71].

LST applications can be classified in two categories. First is remanufacturing or refurbishing products to restore their properties and dimensions [72]. Second is development of new materials with improved properties. Table 2 presents some critical applications of LST.

MaterialsApplicationImprovementAuthor, year
CMSX-4 (Ni-based super alloy)Repair of turbine bladesThis method helped to develop monocrystalline CMSX-4Rottwinkel, 2016 [73]
Stellite-6/WC on B27 boron steelRepair of tools for soil cultivationFormation of intermetallic compounds improved the wear resistanceBartkowski, 2016 [74]
NI40 and NI60 on C60 steelImprovement of barrel-screw system in plastic injection moldingNi-Cr alloy clad improved the microhardnessZarini, 2014 [75]
CPM9V steel on H13 tool steelRepair of molds and dies used in hot and cold workingPresence of compressive stress due to formation of martensite phasePaul, 2017 [76]
Grade C wheel U75V rail with 316L, 420, 410Repair of damaged railway wheelsThe wear rates decrease with increased hardness of the clad materialsZhu, 2019 [77]
Titanium hydroxylapatite on NitinolCoating on Nitinol implants to restrict nickel releaseModulus of elasticity of coated samples falls in the range of 6–30 GPa which is similar to the natural boneChakraborty, 2019 [78]
Mg-Zn-Dy alloy casted and laser meltedRestrict in vitro degradation and improve tissue integrationImprovement in in vitro degradation due to formation of insoluble protective layerRakesh, 2019 [79]
Powdered Co29Cr9W3Cu alloySLM is used to develop Co29Cr9W3Cu alloy joint prosthesesInitiation of crack is arrested due to plastic deformation caused by strain-induced martensitic transformationLu, 2019 [80]
Ti powder on Ti6Al4V substrateImprove in vitro biocompatibility capacity of the titanium deposits to be used as medical implantsIn vitro test of samples in Hank’s solution shows that the leaching was within the desired valuesNyoni, 2016 [81]

Table 2.

Some applications of LST.

Advertisement

6. Conclusion

Laser surface treatment may be employed to provide advanced surface properties to a substrate material. The melt pool regime in laser irradiance is utilized to completely modify the surface properties. The interaction of laser with alloy/clad powder, laser and substrate material, powder particles, and substrate materials is important for clear understanding of the problem. Numerical-based techniques have provided a way to optimize, standardize the processes, and reduce wastage during actual processing. These techniques have a vast application horizon, i.e., from medical implants to turbine blades, all can be modified using these techniques.

References

  1. 1. Rajendran A, Pattanayak DK. Nanoporous, bioactive and cytocompatible TiO2 encapsulated Ti particles as bone augmentation material. Advanced Powder Technology. 2020;31:695-701. DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2019.11.024
  2. 2. Wu D, Spanou A, Diez-escudero A, Persson C. 3D-printed PLA/HA composite structures as synthetic trabecular bone: A feasibility study using fused deposition modelling. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2020;103:103608. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.103608
  3. 3. Lin Z, Zhao Y, Chu PK, Wang L, Pan H, Zheng Y. Biomaterials A functionalized TiO2/ Mg2TiO4 nano layer on biodegradable magnesium implant enables superior bone implant integration and bacterial disinfection. Biomaterials. 2019;219(March):119372. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119372
  4. 4. Was GS, Petti D, Ukai S, Zinkle S. Materials for future nuclear energy systems. Journal of Nuclear Materials. 2019;527:151837. DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151837
  5. 5. Yin J, Wang L, Chen Y, Zhang D, Hegazy AM, Zhang X. A comparison of accumulation and depuration effect of dissolved hexavalent chromium (Cr6+) in head and muscle of bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) and assessment of the potential health risk for consumers. Food Chemistry. 2019;286(February):388-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.01.186
  6. 6. Yang D, Liu J, Wang Q , Hong H, Zhao W, Chen S. Chemosphere Geochemical and probabilistic human health risk of chromium in mangrove sediments: A case study in Fujian, China. Chemosphere. 2019;233:503-511. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.245
  7. 7. Forsich C, Dipolt C, Heim D, Mueller T, Gebeshuber A, Holecek R. Potential of thick a-C:H:Si films as substitute for chromium plating. Surface and Coating Technology. 2014;241:86-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.11.011
  8. 8. Sexton L, Lavin S, Byrne G, Kennedy A. Laser cladding of aerospace materials. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2002;122:63-68
  9. 9. Brown MS, Arnold CB. Laser Precision Microfabrication. Vol. 135. Springer; 2010. pp. 91-120. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10523-4
  10. 10. Darkwa KM, Gupta RK, Kumar D. Fabrication and characterization of hydroxyapatite-magnesium composite thin films on magnesium plates for implant application. ASME IMECE. 2012;86918:1-6
  11. 11. Ganeev RA. Laser-Surface Interactions. Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York: Springer; 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-7341-7
  12. 12. Gladush GG, Smurov I. Physics of Laser Materials Processing. Springer Series in Material Science; 2011;146. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-19831-1
  13. 13. Ansari M, Soltani R, Sohi MH, Valefi Z. Microstructural and hardness study of pulsed Nd:YAG laser surface alloyed aluminum with iron. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science. 2016;47:1698-1704. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-015-3320-7
  14. 14. Gorunov AI. Laser alloying of surface of Ti-5.5Al-2Zr-1Mo-1V titanium near α-alloy prepared via melted by pulsed laser radiation TiC particles. Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2019;6(1):26-40. DOI: 10.1007/s40516-018-0076-0
  15. 15. Ansari M, Ramezani H, Yari S, Soltani R. Wear and corrosion resistance pulsed Nd:YAG laser surface alloying of AZ31 magnesium with nickel for improved wear and corrosion resistance. Journal of Laser Applications. 2016;28:012013. DOI: 10.2351/1.4937429
  16. 16. Dadoo A, Mohammad S, Boutorabi A, Kheirandish S. Effect of titanium carbide concentration on the morphology of MC carbides in pulsed laser surface alloyed AISI H13 tool steel. Optics and Laser Technology. 2019;112:236-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.11.001
  17. 17. Hamoudi WK, Ismail RA. Micro and nano laser pulses for melting and surface alloying of aluminum with copper. Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2017;4:24-35. DOI: 10.1007/s40516-017-0034-2
  18. 18. Roy NK, Dibua OJ, Jou W, He F, Jeong J, Wang Y, et al. A comprehensive study of the sintering of copper nanoparticles using femtosecond, nanosecond, and continuous wave lasers. ASMEJ Micro Nano-Manufacturing. 2017;6:1-21
  19. 19. Wang D, Hu Q , Zheng Y, Xie Y, Zeng X. Study on deposition rate and laser energy efficiency of laser-induction hybrid cladding. Optics and Laser Technology. 2016;77:16-22
  20. 20. Sun RL, Yang DZ, Guo LX, Dong SL. Laser cladding of Ti-6Al-4V alloy with TiC and TiCqNiCrBSi powders. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2001;135:307-312
  21. 21. Chen E, Zhang K, Zou J. Laser cladding of a Mg based Mg-Gd-Y-Zr alloy with Al-Si powders. Applied Surface Science. 2016;367:11-18
  22. 22. Liu YH, Guo ZX, Yang Y, Wang HY, Hu JD, Li YX, et al. Laser (a pulsed Nd:YAG) cladding of AZ91D magnesium alloy with Al and Al2O3 powders. Applied Surface Science. 2006;253:1722-1728
  23. 23. Ma Q , Gao X, Li J. Microstructure performance and formation mechanism of laser alloying rare earth oxides modified nanocrystalline layer on TA7. Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures. 2016;77:29-33
  24. 24. Zhang H, Pan Y, He Y, Jiao H. Microstructure and properties of 6FeNiCoSiCrAlTi high-entropy alloy coating prepared by laser cladding. Applied Surface Science. 2011;257(6):2259-2263
  25. 25. Zeng X, Tao Z, Zhu B, Zhou E, Cui K. Investigation of laser cladding ceramic-metal composite coatings: Processing modes and mechanisms. Surface and Coatings Technology. 1996;79(1-3):209-217
  26. 26. Li Y, Zhang P, Bai P, Wu L, Liu B, Zhao Z. Microstructure and properties of Ti/TiBCN coating on 7075 aluminium alloy by laser cladding. Surface and Coating Technology. 2018;334:142-149
  27. 27. Qin R, Zhang X, Guo S, Sun B, Tang S, Li W. Laser cladding of high Co-Ni secondary hardening steel on18Cr2Ni4WA steel. Surface and Coating Technology. 2016;285:242-248
  28. 28. Yue TM, Xie H, Lin X, Yang HO, Meng GH. Solidification behaviour in laser cladding of AlCoCrCuFeNi high-entropy alloy on magnesium substrates. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2014;587:588-593
  29. 29. Siddiqui AA, Dubey AK, Paul CP. A study of metallurgy and erosion in laser surface alloying of AlxCu0.5FeNiTi high entropy alloy. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2019;361:27-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.01.042
  30. 30. Siddiqui AA, Dubey AK, Paul CP. Geometrical characteristics in laser surface alloying of a high-entropy alloy. Lasers in Engineering. 2019;43:237-259
  31. 31. Nagulin KY, Iskhakov FR, Shpilev AI, Gilmutdinov AK. Optical diagnostics and optimization of the gas-powder flow in the nozzles for laser cladding. Optics and Laser Technology. 2018;108:310-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.07.001
  32. 32. Karmakar DP, Gopinath M, Harmalkar S, Nath AK. Investigation of wear and corrosion characteristics of Stellite-6 and Stellite-21 layers deposited by co-axial laser cladding. Proceedings of the ASME MSEC. 2017;2841:1-6
  33. 33. Schneider M. Laser cladding with powder [Ph.D. thesis]. Enschede, The Netherlands: University of Twente; 1998. ISBN: 90-365-1098-8
  34. 34. Abioye TE, Farayibi PK, Clare AT. A comparative study of Inconel 625 laser cladding by wire and powder feedstock. Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 2017;32:1653-1659. DOI: 10.1080/10426914.2017.1317787
  35. 35. Alam MK, Edrisy A, Urbanic J. Microstructural analysis of the laser-cladded AISI 420 martensitic stainless steel. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science. 2019;50(5):2495-2506. DOI: 10.1007/s11661-019-05156-6
  36. 36. Liu Z, Li T, Ning F, Cong W, Kim H, Jiang Q , et al. Effects of deposition variables on molten pool temperature during laser engineered net shaping of Inconel 718 superalloy. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2019;102(1-4):969-976
  37. 37. Cai Y, Luo Z, Chen Y, Ao S. Influence of CeO2 on tribological behaviour of TiC/Fe-based composite coating. Surface Engineering. 2017;34:936-943. DOI: 10.1080/02670844.2017.1309742
  38. 38. Yan H, Wang A, Xu K, Wang W, Huang Z. Microstructure and interfacial evaluation of Co-based alloy coating on copper by pulsed Nd:YAG multilayer laser cladding. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2010;505(2):645-653
  39. 39. Muvvala G, Karmakar DP, Nath AK. Online monitoring of thermo-cycles and its correlation with microstructure in laser cladding of nickel based super alloy. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2017;88:139-152
  40. 40. Fogagnolo JB, Rodrigues AV, Leva ES, Lima MSF, Caram R. Surface stiffness gradient in Ti parts obtained by laser surface alloying with Cu and Nb. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2016;297:34-42
  41. 41. Olakanmi EO, Cochrane RF, Dalgarno KW. A review on selective laser sintering/melting (SLS/SLM) of aluminium alloy powders: Processing, microstructure, and properties. Progress in Materials Science. 2015;74:401-477. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.03.002
  42. 42. Kumar SRD, Duraiselvam M, Natarajan S, Panwar SS, Jana T, Khan SS. Enhanced ablation resistance through laser glazing of plasma sprayed LaTi2Al9O19 based functionally graded thermal barrier coating. Ceramics International. 2016;42(8):10184-10190. DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.03.134
  43. 43. Salim MS, Ibrahim TK, Fouad S. Novel improvement glazing depth measurement model for concrete surface treated by CO2 laser. Optik. 2017;142:412-420. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.06.019
  44. 44. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Ophelia M, Zhong X, Li Q , Cao X. Laser glazing of lanthanum magnesium hexaaluminate. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2008;46:601-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2008.04.001
  45. 45. Tamanna N, Crouch R, Naher S. Progress in numerical simulation of the laser cladding process. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2019;122(May):151-163. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2019.05.026
  46. 46. Zhu G, Li D, Zhang A, Tang Y. Numerical simulation of metallic powder flow in a coaxial nozzle in laser direct metal deposition. Optics and Laser Technology. 2011;43:106-113. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2010.05.012
  47. 47. Tabernero I, Lamikiz A, Martínez S, Ukar E, López De Lacalle LN. Modelling of energy attenuation due to powder flow-laser beam interaction during laser cladding process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2012;212:516-522. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.10.019
  48. 48. Devesse W, De Baere D, Guillaume P, Brussel VU. Modeling of laser beam and powder flow interaction in laser cladding using ray-tracing. Journal of Laser Applications. 2015;27:0-8. DOI: 10.2351/1.4906394
  49. 49. Liu J, Li L, Zhang Y, Xie X. Attenuation of laser power of a focused Gaussian beam during interaction between a laser and powder in coaxial laser cladding. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics. 2005;38:1546-1550. DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/38/10/008
  50. 50. Kovaleva IO, Kovalev OB. Simulation of the acceleration mechanism by light propulsion for the powder particles at laser direct material deposition. Optics and Laser Technology. 2012;44:714-725. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2011.09.016
  51. 51. Lin J. Laser attenuation of the focused powder streams in coaxial laser cladding. Journal of Laser Applications. 2000;12:28. DOI: 10.2351/1.521910
  52. 52. Mirzade FK, Niziev VG, Panchenko VY, Khomenko MD, Grishaev RV, Pityana S. Kinetic approach in numerical modeling of melting and crystallization at laser cladding with powder injection. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 2013;423:69-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.physb.2013.04.053
  53. 53. Kumar A, Roy S. Effect of three-dimensional melt pool convection on process characteristics during laser cladding. Computational Materials Science. 2009;46:495-506. DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2009.04.002
  54. 54. Hofman JT, De Lange DF, Pathiraj B, Meijer J. FEM modeling and experimental verification for dilution control in laser cladding. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2011;211:187-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.09.007
  55. 55. El Cheikh H, Courant B, Branchu S, Hascoet JY, Guillen R. Analysis and prediction of single laser tracks geometrical characteristics in coaxial laser cladding process. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2012;50:413-422. DOI: 10.1016/j.optlaseng.2011.10.014
  56. 56. Fan Y, Cheng P, Yao YL, Yang Z, Egland K, Fan Y. Effect of phase transformations on laser forming of Ti6Al4V alloy. Journal of Applied Physics. 2005;98:013518. DOI: 10.1063/1.1944202
  57. 57. Suarez A, Tobar MJ, Yanez A, Perez I, Sampedro J, Amigo V. Modeling of phase transformations of Ti6Al4V during laser metal deposition. Physics Procedia. 2011;12:666-673
  58. 58. Farahmand P, Balu P, Kong F, Kovacevic R. Investigation of thermal cycle and hardness distribution in the laser cladding of AISI H13 tool steel produced by a high power direct diode laser. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. 2015. pp. 1-12
  59. 59. Santhanakrishnan S, Kong F, Kovacevic R. An experimentally based thermo-kinetic hardening model for high power direct diode laser cladding. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2011;211:1247-1259. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec. 2011.02.006
  60. 60. Bailey NS, Katinas C, Shin YC. Laser direct deposition of AISI H13 tool steel powder with numerical modeling of solid phase transformation, hardness, and residual stresses. Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 2017;247:223-233. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.020
  61. 61. Suarez A, Amado JM, Tobar MJ, Yanez A, Fraga E, Peel MJ. Study of residual stresses generated inside laser cladded plates using FEM and diffraction of synchrotron radiation. Surface and Coating Technology. 2010;204:1983-1988. DOI: 10.1016/ j.surfcoat.2009.11.037
  62. 62. Liu Z, Jiang Q , Li T, Dong S, Yan S, Zhang H, et al. Environmental benefits of remanufacturing: A case study of cylinder heads remanufactured through laser cladding. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016;133:1027-1033
  63. 63. Orlovskii VP, Komlev VS, Barinov VS. Hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite based ceramics. Inorganic Materials. 2002;38:973-984
  64. 64. Cheng B, Kim YJ, Chou P. Improving accident tolerance of nuclear fuel with coated Mo-alloy cladding. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2016;48:16-25
  65. 65. Kim WJ, Kim D, Park JY. Fabrication and material issues for the application of SiC composites to LWR fuel cladding. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 2013;45:565-572
  66. 66. Yan H, Zhang P, Gao Q , Qin Y, Li R. Laser cladding Ni-based alloy/nano-Ni encapsulated h-BN self-lubricating composite coatings. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2017;332(March):422-427
  67. 67. Riquelme A, Rodrigo P, Rodriguez MDE, Rams J. Analysis and optimization of process parameters in Al-SiCp laser cladding. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2016;78:165-173
  68. 68. Nazemi N, Urbanic J. An experimental and simulation study for powder injection multitrack laser cladding of P420 stainless steel on AISI 1018 steel for selected mechanical properties. Journal of Manufacturing Science & Engineering—ASME. 2017;140(1):1-12
  69. 69. Saqib SM, Urbanic RJ. Investigation of the transient characteristics for laser cladding beads using 420 stainless steel powder. Journal of Manufacturing Science & Engineering—ASME. 2017;139(8):1-12
  70. 70. Ghaith ES, Hodgson S, Sharp M. Laser surface alloying of 316L stainless steel coated with a bioactive hydroxyapatite titanium oxide composite. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine. 2015;26:1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-015-5399-1
  71. 71. Tian YS, Chen CZ, Li ST, Huo QH. Research progress on laser surface modification of titanium alloys. Applied Surface Science. 2005;242(1-2):177-184
  72. 72. Yao JH, Zhang QL, Kong FZ. Laser Remanufacturing to Improve the Erosion and Corrosion Resistance of Metal Components. Series in Metals and Surface Engineering. Woodhead Publishing Limited. 2012. pp. 320-354. DOI: 10.1533/9780857095831.2.320
  73. 73. Rottwinkel B, Nölke C, Kaierle S, Wesling V. Laser cladding for crack repair of CMSX-4 single-crystalline turbine parts. Lasers in Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2017;4:13-23. DOI: 10.1007/s40516-016-0033-8
  74. 74. Bartkowski D, Bartkowska A. Wear resistance in the soil of Stellite-6/WC coatings produced using laser cladding method. International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials. 2017;64:20-26. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2016.12.013
  75. 75. Zarini S, Vedani M, Previtali B, Rovatti L. Cracks susceptibility elimination in fiber laser cladding of Ni based alloy with addition of Tungsten Carbides. Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis. 2014;20623:1-7
  76. 76. Paul S, Thool K, Singh R, Samajdar I, Yan W. Experimental characterization of clad microstructure and its correlation with residual stresses. Procedia Manufacturing. 2017;10:804-818. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.081
  77. 77. Zhu Y, Yang Y, Mu X, Wang W, Yao Z, Yang H. Study on wear and RCF performance of repaired damage railway wheels: Assessing laser cladding to repair local defects on wheels. Wear. 2019;431:126-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2019.04.028
  78. 78. Chakraborty R, Raza MS, Datta S, Saha P. Synthesis and characterization of nickel free titanium-hydroxyapatite composite coating over Nitinol surface through in-situ laser cladding and alloying. Surface and Coatings Technology. 2019;358:539-550. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.11.036
  79. 79. Rakesh KR, Bontha S, Ramesh MR, Das M, Krishna V. Laser surface melting of Mg-Zn-Dy alloy for better wettability and corrosion resistance for biodegradable implant applications. Applied Surface Science. 2019;480:70-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.02.167
  80. 80. Lu Y, Yang C, Liu Y, Yang K, Lin J. Characterization of lattice defects and tensile deformation of biomedical Co29Cr9W3Cu alloy produced by selective laser melting. Additive Manufacturing. 2019;30:100908. DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2019.100908
  81. 81. Nyoni E, Akinlabi ET. Process parameter interaction effect on the evolving properties of laser metal deposited titanium for biomedical applications. Thin Solid Films. 2016;620:94-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.09.060

Written By

Anas Ahmad Siddiqui and Avanish Kumar Dubey

Submitted: October 29th, 2019 Reviewed: February 18th, 2020 Published: June 24th, 2020