Open access peer-reviewed chapter

Quantum Dot Light-Emitting Diode: Structure, Mechanism, and Preparation

Written By

Ning Tu

Submitted: September 2nd, 2019 Reviewed: January 13th, 2020 Published: March 6th, 2020

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.91162

Chapter metrics overview

1,195 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics


Quantum dot light-emitting diode (QLED) attracted much attention for the next generation of display due to its advantages in high color saturation, tunable color emission, and high stability. Compared with traditional LED display, QLED display has advantages in flexible and robust application, which makes wearable and stretchable display possible in the future. In addition, QLED display is a self-emissive display, in which light is generated by individual subpixel, each subpixel can be individually controlled. Each subpixel in LED display is constituted by liquid crystal and color filter, which make LED display have lower power efficiency and less enhanced functionality. This chapter introduces the QLED based on the QLED structure and light-emitting mechanism of QLED. Then, a novel method for fabricating QLEDs, which is based on the ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) incorporated into QD nanoparticles, will be introduced. The QLED device was fabricated by all-solution processes, which make the QLED fabrication process more flexible and more suitable for industrialization. What is more, as QLED devices were planned to integrate into a display, all-solution fabrication processes also make printing QLED display device possible in the near future.


  • quantum dots
  • light-emitting diode
  • display
  • quantum dot light-emitting diode
  • material
  • printing

1. Introduction

After QLED was first published in 1994, a lot effort had been spent to improve the reliability and performance of QLED devices [1, 2]. The first QLED device uses thick QDs acting as both the emission layer and electron transport layer, which can be referred to in Figure 1(a) and (b). The luminous efficiency of QLED device has been improved by the use of electron injection layer. Coe et al. published a sandwiched QLED structure in 2002, which consisted of two organic thin films with QDs as the emission layer. The luminescence was improved 25-fold over the best results of the previous QLED device, as shown in Figure 1(d) [3]. The QLEDs use Alq3 and poly-TPD as the electron transport layer, as shown in Figure 1(c). However, the organic thin layers were sensitive to moisture and oxygen. Thus, replacing organic material with inorganic material seems to be the best solution to improve the reliability of the QLED device. Mueller et al. fabricated an all-inorganic QLED in which QDs were sandwiched by n-type GaN and p-type GaN. Figure 1(e) shows the structure of QLED with GaN, while Figure 1(f) shows the corresponding electrical performance. Mueller et al. used metal-organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) method to deposit n-type GaN and p-type GaN [4]. However, the deposition method is too harsh for QDs that make the luminescence efficiency lower than the first type of QLED device. Then in 2010, Bendall et al. demonstrated an all-inorganic QLED with metal oxide as the electron transport layer. The QLED had a layer-by-layer structure, which had three-layer emission layers as shown in Figure 1(g) and (h) [5]. The overall device performance was still poor which is caused by the degradation of QDs during the harsh deposition process of inorganic materials. However, these devices showed condescending stability under long-term usage and high current density conditions.

Figure 1.

Structure designs and material designs for efficient QLEDs. (a) Energy-level structure of the first QLED. (b) Electroluminescence of the first QLED [1]. (c) Electroluminescence spectra and structures for a 40-nm-thick film of Alq3, followed by a 75-nm-thick Mg:Ag cathode with a 50 nm Ag cap. (d) The corresponding external quantum efficiency [3]. (e) QLED structure consists of p-type GaN and n-type GaN. (f) Electroluminescence of QLED consists of p-type GaN and n-type GaN [4]. (g) QLED structure with metal oxide as the electron transport layer with layer-by-layer structure in emission layer. (h) Electroluminescence and photoluminescence of the QLED with metal oxide as the electron transport layer with layer-by-layer structure in emission layer [5].

The organic materials had an advantage of high luminescence, while inorganic materials had an advantage of high reliability. Then the researcher combined the advantage of both organic materials and inorganic materials by using both organic materials and inorganic materials as the electron transport layers. MoS2, NiO, TiO2, and ZnO have been reported as the inorganic charge transport layers (CTLs) [6, 7, 8].

According to the type of electron transport layers, the structure of QLEDs can be categorized into four different types (Figure 2): (a) organic/QD bilayer, (b) all-organic electron transport layer, (c) all-inorganic electron transport layer, and (d) organic/inorganic electron transport layer. The four different types of QLED structure also represent the development history of QLEDs in sequence.

Figure 2.

Four representative QLED structure types based on electron transport layers. (a) Organic polymer electron transport layer, (b) all-organic polymer electron transport layer, (c) all-inorganic electron transport layer, and (d) organic/inorganic electron transport layer [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10].

Among these four types of QLED structure, inorganic materials are one of the most important choices for electron transport layers owing to their high electrical conductivity and good stability against environmental factors such as oxygen and moisture. ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) applied in electron transport layer are a significant breakthrough in QLED development history, due to their excellent electron mobility and no significant damage to the underlying QD layer during fabrication process. What’s more, ZnO NPs are compatible with both polar solvent and nonpolar solvent, which makes the QLED fabrication process more flexible. More details about ZnO NPs will be introduced in Section 3.


2. Light emission mechanism of QLED

The emission mechanism of QLED is discussed in this subsection. A QLED has a similar structure and behavior as an OLED. In the QLED, the emitter is a semiconductor nanoparticle, while in the OLED, the emitter is an organic material.

2.1 Electron molecular orbital

Once a molecular orbital achieved the maximum electron energy, it is called the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO). Otherwise, if a molecular orbital has unfilled electrons, the molecular orbital is called the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). The energies of HOMO and LUMO affect the ionization potential and electron affinity of materials (Figure 3) [12].

Figure 3.

The orientation of the HOMO and LUMO [12].

Ionization potential energy is the minimum energy required to extract one electron from the HOMO, and electron affinity is the energy required to add one electron to the LUMO so that the system is stabilized [11, 12].

Before considering the light emission mechanism, it is important to understand the electron configuration in both the ground state and the excited state. Before excitation, when in ground state, the electrons are placed with both upward spin and downward spin (Figure 3). When excited, the electrons in the upper state are allocated with the same spin state, or the spin is reversed. The light emission is resulting from the energy transfer from the excitation state to the ground state.

2.2 Electron transfer and recombination

Normal materials in QLED have high resistance at weak electric fields. Therefore, researchers introduced the thin film to create strong electric field and chose structures and materials suitable for charge injection [13]. The QLED performance is highly dependent on the choice of charge injection materials. Good charge injection materials should have high carrier mobility and balance the electron/hole injections well. The charge injection from electrodes follows the Schottky effect that means the injection barrier would be lowered according to the image force principle.

When an electron is injected into the electrode, if all the HOMO orbitals are occupied and cannot accept the additional charge, the charge will be transferred into the LUMO. When electrons are transferred into the LUMO, they form an electric current. At the same time, there will be a hole injected from the anode electrode which will be transferred into the HOMO. However, when the amount of injected charge exceeds the internal charge amount, the conduction system changes from ohmic to “space charge-limited current” [12, 13, 14].

If charge transfer by electric field and diffusion is taken into account and no trap is assumed, the electric current can be expressed as Eq. (1):


According to Eq. (1), the electric current is proportional to the square of the voltage. This is called the Mott-Gurney law, an extension of Child’s law that takes collision into consideration [15].

The recombination and generation of excitons of QLED are shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The energy diagram of QLED.

When an electron and a hole recombined in the emission layer, the photons formed, whose wavelength corresponds to the energy bandgap of the quantum dots. The more electron and hole are recombined, the more photos will be generated, which corresponds to more light we could detect. Thus, people applied the hole transport layer (HTL) and electron transport layer (ETL) to restrict the electrons and holes in the emission layer, in order to improve the device efficiency. There are five typical layers for a QLED structure:

  • Electron transport layer (ETL)—for electron injection from the cathode and transportation of the electron.

  • Electron injection layer (EIL)—for electron injection from the cathode electrode.

  • Hole transport layer (HTL)—for hole transportation from HIL to EML.

  • Hole injection layer (HIL)—for hole injection from the anode electrode.

  • Emission layer (EML)—electron/hole transportation and their recombination to form an exciton; this is the QD layer in QLED.

This direct injection of charge carriers is assumed as the most common phenomenon for creating an exciton in the device.

In Section 1, the QLED structure types are elaborated. Thus, it is very important to design a QLED by factoring in the relationships between the work function of each layer. The QLED device fabrication process will be discussed in Section 3.

2.3 ZnO nanoparticles

Behind the QLED structure, the ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) have gained substantial interest in the research community as the charge transport layer (CTL). In 2008, Janssen [8] and co-workers demonstrated all-solution-processed multilayer QLEDs by using ZnO NPs as ETLs and organic materials as HTLs. The colloidal ZnO NPs were dispersed in isopropanol, and the deposition of the ZnO NPs on the top of the QD layers did not dissolve the underlying layers. Since then, continuous efforts were made to improve the performance of QLED with solution-processed n-type oxides as CTLs. ZnO NPs are widely used as CTLs in the state of the art of high-performance QLEDs.

Generally, solution-processed oxide CTLs can be deposited by two approaches, the precursor approach and the nanocrystal approach. The molar ratio of zinc precursor to potassium hydroxide (KOH) played an important role in determining the shape of ZnO NPs and hence affected the conductivity and mobility of ZnO NP film prepared from ZnO NPs [15, 16, 17]. ZnO NPs were synthesized by hydrolysis/condensation reactions under basic conditions. The synthesis procedure will be introduced in Section 3.


3. QLED fabrication by spin coating

3.1 Experimental chemicals

Detergent TFD4 was purchased from BioLab, PEDOT:PSS 4083 from Heraeus, poly-TPD (LT-N149) from Luminescence Technology Corp Ltd., patterned ITO glass from Xinyan Technology Ltd., green (CdZnSeS/ZnS) quantum dots from Suzhou Mesolight Inc., and zinc acetate dihydrate powder, potassium hydroxide flakes, acetone, isopropyl alcohol, methyl alcohol, chloroform, and chlorobenzene all from Aldrich.

3.2 Synthesis of ZnO nanoparticles

The uncleation-dissolution-recrystallization growth method [16] was applied to synthesize the ZnO nanoparticles. Firstly 0.37 g potassium hydroxide was dissolved in 16.25 ml methyl alcohol. Then zinc acetate dihydrate solution was prepared by adding 0.74 g zinc acetate dihydrate in 31.25 ml methyl alcohol at 60°C under vigorous stirring. Then the potassium hydroxide solution was jetted into the zinc acetate dihydrate solution at the rate of 0.8 ml/min. The reaction takes around 1.7 h under N2 protection condition. After the reaction, the solution was allowed to sit for another 2 h to let the ZnO nanoparticles settle at the bottom of the reaction flask. The ZnO nanoparticles were washed twice by methyl alcohol. Then the ZnO nanoparticles were dispersed in chloroform and isopropyl alcohol mix solution at the concentration of 35 mg/ml.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL JEM 2010) was applied to characterize the morphology of the nanoparticles.

3.3 QLED device preparation

The patterned ITO glass was cleaned by detergent, methyl alcohol, acetone, and isopropyl alcohol in turn, each sonication for 20 minutes. After cleaning, UV ozone plasma was applied for surface energy modification. PEDOT:PSS was spin-coated on the cleaned ITO surface at 3000 rpm for 30 s and then baked under vacuum at 150°C for 30 min. Then hole transport layer (HTL) was prepared by spin coating poly-TPD on the annealed PEDOT:PSS surface at 3000 rpm for 60 s and baking at 100°C for 30 min under vacuum protection. Quantum dots were also deposited on the annealed poly-TPD surface by spin coating at 3000 rpm for 30 s. Then the synthesized ZnO nanoparticle solution was spin-coated at 1500 rpm for 60 s. The baking temperature is 60°C for 30 min. The cathode was deposited by vapor deposition method. A more detailed QLED device fabrication process was mentioned in previous work [2].

3.4 Results and discussion

3.4.1 ZnO nanoparticle analysis

The concentration of precursor, evaporation rate, and the time of reaction were all significant synthetic parameters, which affected the growth of ZnO nanoparticel dimensions and structures. Figure 5 shows the TEM images of the as-synthesized ZnO NPs from a well-dispersed ZnO colloidal solution carried out with the reference condition. To investigate the effect of reaction time on the growth morphology, reaction times of 80 and 105 min were carried out. The nanoparticle’s size is smaller in the reaction of 105 min than in the reaction of 80 min. Moreover, the crystal lattice fringes are more clearly observed in the 105 min reaction sample rather than in the 80 min reaction sample. According to confinement effect, particles with smaller diameter would have higher energy. Therefore, the ZnO NPs used for QLED preparation are the smaller ZnO NPs.

Figure 5.

TEM images of two different sizes of ZnO NPs. (a, b) reaction times of 105 min and (c, d) 80 min.

In order to analyze the bandgap and quantum effects of the different ZnO NPs, their absorption and photoluminescence spectra need to be measured, which will be processed in future study. The energy bandgap (Eg) of the colloidal ZnO nanoparticles is determined from the intercept between the wavelength axis and the tangent to the linear section of the absorption band edge. The energy bandgap of ZnO NPs at 2.9 nm is 3.65 eV. The energy bandgap for the 5.5 nm ZnO NPs was 3.35 eV [17], while the energy bandgap of bulk ZnO is 3.2–3.3 eV [18], which is lower than the energy bandgap of ZnO NPs. It is found that the tendency of energy bandgap enlargement with decreasing size is consistent with the relationship based on effective mass approximation. Therefore, the reaction of 105 min can obtain smaller ZnO NPs than the ZnO NPs in the reaction of 80 min. In addition, the lattice fringes can be clearly observed in the TEM images, which suggests good crystallinity of the ZnO NPs.

3.4.2 QLED device performance and analysis

Figure 6(a) shows the structure of the QLED device, while Figure 6(b) shows the energy band diagram of the QLED device. The QLED device is a multilayer structure, which consists of PEDOT:PSS, poly-TPD, QDs, ZnO NPs, and Al. The thickness of each layer was measured by the surface profile (Alpha-Step 200 Tencor). Figure 7 shows the TEM image of quantum dots; the diameter of the quantum dots was around 7 nm.

Figure 6.

(a) The QLED device structure and (b) the QLED device energy-level diagram.

Figure 7.

The TEM image of green QDs from Mesolight.

The energy-level diagram in Figure 6(b) illustrated that the electrons and holes can be easily recombined together in the emission layer. Because ZnO NPs have a wide energy bandgap, the holes can be stored in the quantum dot layer. At the same time, poly-TPD’s energy bandgap is from −2.3 eV to −5.4 eV. −2.3 eV is larger than −3.8 eV, which can also restrict electrons in the quantum dot layer. What is more, adding PEDOT: PSS layer and poly-TPD layer reduces the energy gap for holes jumping into the emission layer (quantum dot layer). The introduction of ZnO NPs has a similar function as PEDOT:PSS and poly-TPD, which confine the excitation and recombination region, hence potentially improving the efficiency of photon generation. The thin layer structure of QLED device makes it a promising candidate for the next generation of flexible displays.

Figure 8 shows the device performance analysis. The turn-on voltage is shown in Figure 8(a), which is between 2 V and 3 V. The low turn-on voltage is due to the high electron mobility of the ZnO NPs and the design of the QLED structures. When there is a current applied to the device, the electrons can easily be injected into the emission layer, while the holes can also flow to the emission layer easily and be restricted by the ZnO NP layer. At the same time, the electrons accumulate at the interface of the poly-TPD/quantum dots due to the ~1.5 eV energy offset between the LUMO of poly-TPD and quantum dots. When one high-energy hole can be obtained after absorbing the energy released from the interfacial recombination of an electron/hole pair, the high-energy holes can cross the injection barrier at the poly-TPD interface and recombine with the electrons inside the QD layer and then emit photons. This is called the Auger-assisted hole injection [14, 19]. Therefore, the high electron mobility of ZnO nanoparticles and the band alignment structure can facilitate the hole transport and balance of the carrier injection of the device.

Figure 8.

(a) The QLED current density versus the voltage (J-V) curve, (b) the QLED electroluminance spectra as the applied voltage increased and (c) the 1931 CIE coordinate of QLED.

The electroluminance (EL) spectra of the QLED under different voltages are shown in Figure 8(b). The inserted picture is the QLED device. The EL intensity of the QLED device increases as the applied voltage increases. The wavelength is 534 nm with the full width at half maximum (FWHM) value is 44 nm through the spectrum. The peak wavelength of QLED electroluminance spectra is 2 nm red shift compared with the peak wavelength of QD solution, which might be because of the dot-to-dot interactions in the close-packed solid film. Moreover, the electric field induced the Stark effect [20]. The 1931 CIE coordinate after emission is (0.31, 0.66) as shown in Figure 8(c).


4. Conclusions

This work discussed the structure and mechanism of QLED and demonstrated an all-solution process of QLED in the last section. The QLED has high luminance with low turn-on voltage. These properties, caused by the use of ZnO NPs, improve electron injection and enhance radiative recombination. The resulting QLED fabrication process also makes printing QLED a possible method in the future.


Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.




quantum dot light-emitting diode


quantum dot


drop on demand


high-definition television


cathode-ray tube


liquid crystal display


light-emitting diode


organic light-emitting diode


poly(ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulphonate


zinc oxide nanoparticles


indium tin oxide




ethylene glycol butyl ether




trioctylphosphine oxide


dimethyl sulfoxide


hole transport layer


hole injection layer


electron injection layer


electron transport layer


emission layer


highest occupied molecular orbital


lowest unoccupied molecular orbital




Planck’s constant h = 6.63 × 10−34 Js


particle momentum


the energy of a single particle in free space


mass of a single particle in free space


the velocity of a single particle in free space


the magnitude of the wave vector


standing wave/the diameter of QDs


current density


carrier mobility of materials




dielectric constant


the thickness of the thin film


full width at half maximum


  1. 1. Colvin VL, Schlamp MC, Alivisatos AP. Lighting-emitting diodes made from cadmium selenide nanocrystals and a semiconducting polymer. Nature. 1994;370:354-357. DOI: 10.1038/370354a0
  2. 2. Tu N, Kowk ZH, Lee SW. Quantum dot light emitting diodes based on ZnO nanoparticles. In: 20th International Conference on Electronic Materials and Packaging (EMAP). 2018. pp. 1-4
  3. 3. Coe S, Woo WK, Bawendi M, Bulović V. Electroluminescence from single monolayers of nanocrystals in molecular organic devices. Nature. 2002;420:800-803. DOI: 10.1038/nature01217
  4. 4. Mueller AH, Melissa AP, Marc A, Donald JW, Elshan AA, Daniel DK, et al. Multicolor light-emitting diodes based on semiconductor nanocrystals encapsulated in GaN charge injection layers. Nano Letters. 2005;5:1039-1044. DOI: 10.1021/nl050384x
  5. 5. Bendall JS, Paderi M, Ghigliotti F, et al. Layer-by-layer all-inorganic quantum-dot-based LEDs: A simple procedure with robust performance. Advanced Functional Materials. 2010;20:3298-3302. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201001191
  6. 6. Caruge JM, Halpert JE, Bulovic V, Bawendi MG. NiO as an inorganic hole-transporting layer in quantum-dot light-emitting devices. Nano Letters. 2006;6:2991-2994. DOI: 10.1021/nl0623208
  7. 7. Wood V, Panzer MJ, et al. Selection of metal oxide charge transport layers for colloidal quantum dot LEDs. ACS Nano. 2009;3:3581-3586. DOI: 10.1021/nn901074r
  8. 8. Stouwdam JW, Janssen RAJ. Red, green, and blue quantum dot LEDs with solution processable ZnO nanocrystal electron injection layers. Journal of Materials Chemistry. 2008;18:1889-1894. DOI: 10.1039/b800028j
  9. 9. Pan JY, Chen J, Huang QQ , Khan Q , Liu X, Tao Z, et al. Flexible quantum dot light emitting diodes based on ZnO nanoparticles. RSC Advances. 2015;5:82192-82198. DOI: 10.1039/c5ra10656g
  10. 10. Choi MK, Yang J, Hygeon T, Kim D-H. Flexible quantum dot light-emitting diodes for next-generation displays. Nature Partner Journals. 2018;10:2-16. DOI: 10.1038/s41528-018-0023-3
  11. 11. Bogue R. Quantum dots: A bright future for photonic nanosensors. Sensor Review. 2010;30:279-284. DOI: 10.1108/02602281011072143
  12. 12. Tsujimura T. OLED Display: Fundamentals and Applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012. DOI: 10.1002/9781119187493
  13. 13. Tang CW, Van Slyke SA. Organic electroluminescent diodes. In: IEEE/LEOS 1995 Digest of the LEOS Summer Topical Meetings. Flat Panel Display Technology. 1995. pp. 3-4
  14. 14. Pankaj K, Jain SC, Vikram K. Current-voltage characteristics of an organic diode: Revisited. Synthetic Metals. 2007;157:905-909. DOI: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2007.08.021
  15. 15. Ishii H, Kudo K, Nakayama T, Ueno N, editors. Electronic Processes in Organic Electronics: Bridging Nanostructure, Electronic States and Device Properties. 1st ed. Springer Series in Materials Science. Tokyo, Japan: Springer; 2015. 427 pp
  16. 16. Seow ZLS, Wong ASW, Thavasi V, Jose R, Ramakrishna S, Ho GW. Controlled synthesis and application of ZnO nanoparticles, nanorods and nanospheres in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:045604. DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/20/4/045604
  17. 17. Dai X, Deng Y, et al. Quantum-dot light-emitting diodes for large-area displays: Towards the dawn of commercialization. Advanced Materials. 2017;29:1607022. DOI: 10.1002/adma.201607022
  18. 18. Ozgur U, Alivov YI, Liu C, Teke A, Reshchikov MA, Dogan S, et al. Comprehensive review of ZnO materials and devices. Journal of Applied Physics. 2005;98:041301. DOI: 10.1063/1.1992666
  19. 19. Peng H, Jiang Y, Chen S. Efficient vacuum-free-processed quantum dot light-emitting diodes with printable liquid metal cathodes. Nanoscale. 2016;8:17765-17773. DOI: 10.1039/c6nr05181b
  20. 20. Kim HH, Park S, Son DI, Park C, Hwang DK, Choi WK. Inverted quantum dot light emitting diodes using polyethyleneimine ethoxylate modified ZnO. Scientific Reports. 2015;5:8968. DOI: 10.1038/srep08968

Written By

Ning Tu

Submitted: September 2nd, 2019 Reviewed: January 13th, 2020 Published: March 6th, 2020