Age dating scale of
Abstract
The genus Ficus belongs to Moraceae (Mulberry family). It is comprised of around 1000 species from pantropica land subtropical origins; plants of the family are on the whole woody, ranging from trees and shrubs to climbers. F. benghalensis has many common names as Indian banyan tree, East Indian fig tree, and vada tree, banyan tree is considered sacred by Hindus and is largely grown near temples. It is a large and extensive growing tree of the Indian subcontinent. Ficus compound showed significant antioxidant effect, which might be ascribed to their polyphenolic nature. The stem bark of Ficus benghalensis L. and Ficus racemosa L. are utilized in India for the treatment of diabetes and various different illnesses. The bark of Ficus benghalensis decreased fasting blood sugar and glycosylated hemoglobin. The fruit of Ficus benghalensis is used in folk medicine for respiratory disorders and certain skin disease.
Keywords
- F. benghalensis
- banyan tree
- antioxidant effect
- folk medicine
- age dating
1. Introduction
The genus
The tree is harvested from the wild for its edible fruit and medicinal uses. The tree is considered sacred by Hindus and is commonly planted for religious purposes; it is also grown as an ornamental and to provide shade along roads as well as in parks and large gardens.
According to Edlin and Nimmo [4] proved that the latex (source of rubber) has been found in large quantity in the wood of
These days, Ficus trees are subjected to many threats affecting the presence of main populations. These threats comprised by the following points: (a) human cutting for general purposes, (b) cutting by council city for shifting landscape of the city, and (c) absence of a specific pollinating wasp in order to reproduce and spread [5]. For these reasons and subsequently results, it is very hard to find a new tree individuals coming up to these areas of
The present study is aimed to anticipate a strategic conservation plan for landscape construction primed by
2. Distribution
Banyan tree is widely cultivated in city parks and botanical gardens throughout the New World and Old World tropics. It grows well in tropical, semi-tropical areas, monsoon and rain forests with moderate to ample rainfall. Humid air and moist soil and is hardy, drought resistance and withstands mild frost is well suited for its growth [6].
Ismailia governorate is located in the eastern part of Egypt at the middle part of Suez Canal. It is bounded from the East by Suez Canal (that penetrates Temsah Lake and Bitter Lakes), from the West by the eastern borders of Delta along Damietta Nile branch, from the South by Suez-Cairo high way, Port Said and Manzala Lake from the North (Figure 2). It was established as a separate governorate by the declaration law number 24 in 1960. Its area is 5067 km2 and has seven main cities, Ismailia (the capital), Fayed, El-Tal El-Kber, El-Kantara east, El-Kantara west, El-Ksasen and Abo Souer. Human population of Ismailia governorate reaches 1.4 million individuals.
3. Description
Leaves are glossy, leathery and glabrous when mature, approximate hear the end of branches, ovate, mostly obtuse, base cordate or rounded, thickly coriaceous, basal nerves 3–7, the midrib with 4–6 pairs of secondary nerves, blade 10–20 cm, petiole 2–5 cm long, shoot pubescent, 1.5–2 cm in diameter, sessile, scarlet, red once ripe [7].
A flower has very small, separate, male and female flowers. The male flowers crowded near the mouth of the receptacle, whereas female flowers with shorter perianth, style long, male and female in the same receptacle [8].
Fruits are globular, sessile in axillary pairs, fleshy pericarp and with achenesen trenched in them, they are dark red in color, 1.5–2.0 cm diameter, red to dark purple when ripe; seeds are tiny. Fruit is not edible for humans but is eaten by birds and monkeys [8].
4. Ecology
In Egypt, various
Mousa et al. [9, 10] detailed that there are about 20 species of
5. Field visits and sampling
Four main localities characterized by large number of
6. Soil analysis
In each site, three soil samples (0–20 cm depth) were taken for soil chemical and physical analyses. Particle size analysis was done by dry sieving for the coarse sand and by pipette for fine sand, slit, and clay [14]. Soil aggregation was treated by 5% of sodium hexametaphosphate as a dispersing agent. Soil was classified based on the percentage of clay and sand using USDA limits of the basic soil textural classes [15]. Soil pH was measured electrometrically using pH meter model 1671 in soil suspension of ratio 1:2.5 soil to water. The soil-water mixture was first shacked for 2 hours, and then pH was measured [16].
The EC was measured in the soil water extract 1:1 using electrical conductivity meter model 4310 ENAWY [17]. Reported the degree of salinity for the course to loamy sand (1:1 soil water extract) as follows: 0.1–1 ds\m for non-saline, and 1.2–2.4 ds\m for slightly saline, 2.5–4.4 ds\m for modestly saline and 4.5–8.9 ds/m for strongly saline. Soil organic matter influences many soil properties including (i) the capacity of soil to supply, N, P and S and trace metals to plant’s, (ii) infiltration and retention of water, (iii) degree of aggregation and overall structure that affect air and water relationships, (iv) cation exchange capacity, (v) soil color, which in turn affects temperature relationships [18]. Soil organic matter was measured using loss-on ignition (LOI) method carried out at a high temperature. This method gives quantitative oxidation of organic matter [18].
7. Age dating
Age dating of
To describe the age dating structure of
Age dating scale (year) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Site no. | <150 | 151–200 | 201–250 | 251–300 | 301–350 | >350 | |
1 | (El Mawany) | 1 | 7 | 12 | 14 | 4 | 1 |
2 | (Mohamed Ali) | 0 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
3 | (Amon) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
4 | (Nemra Ceta) | 3 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 1 |
8. Data treatment
Data were statistically analyzed [19] using SPSS software (statistical package for social sciences, version 8). One-way ANOVA was carried out to test the variation of different variables between different four sites. Linear correlation coefficient,
9. Results
9.1 Vegetation parameters
The maximum tree height was 12.5 m recorded at site four (Nemra Ceta) while the minimum tree height was 1.70 m recorded at site two (Mohamed Ali). The circumference at base (CAB) ranged between 0.56 and 1.9 m found at Nemra Ceta, while the highest circumference at breast height (CBH) was 1.8 m and lowest value of 0.65 m, both found at site one (El Mawany). The crown cover of trees ranged between 3.70 and 268.67 m2, whereas the highest value was found at site three (Amon area) and the lowest value at site four (Nemra Ceta) (Table 2). The number of aerial roots that were recognized in the studied sites fluctuated from 1 to 183 roots. Mean values of four localities are shown in (Table 3).
Site no. one (El Mawany) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | ±SD | ||
Height | 55 | 3.52 | 11.52 | 7.0907 | 0.2485 | 1.8428 |
CAB | 33 | 70 | 170 | 121.1818 | 4.6857 | 26.9171 |
CBH | 40 | 65 | 180.03 | 110.8703 | 3.966 | 25.0832 |
Cover | 55 | 18.31 | 223.14 | 70.1522 | 5.6871 | 42.1767 |
Age | 40 | 142 | 394 | 242.425 | 8.6843 | 54.9241 |
Valid N (listwise) | 33 | |||||
Height | 16 | 1.7 | 12 | 6.6875 | 0.5972 | 2.3888 |
CAB | 7 | 90 | 125 | 121.1818 | 5.101 | 13.496 |
CBH | 16 | 80 | 135.02 | 110.8703 | 4.6881 | 18.7523 |
Cover | 16 | 13.68 | 104.72 | 70.1522 | 8.2362 | 32.9447 |
Age | 16 | 175 | 295 | 242.425 | 10.2881 | 41.1525 |
Valid N (listwise) | 7 | |||||
Height | 5 | 8.5 | 11 | 10.1 | 0.4301 | 0.9618 |
CAB | 0 | |||||
CBH | 5 | 109.9 | 157 | 138.998 | 8.2311 | 18.4053 |
Cover | 5 | 186.17 | 268.67 | 229.786 | 13.2333 | 29.5907 |
Age | 5 | 240 | 344 | 304 | 18.1466 | 40.5771 |
Valid N (listwise) | 0 | |||||
Height | 38 | 3 | 12.5 | 6.7629 | 0.3142 | 1.9368 |
CAB | 28 | 56 | 190 | 111.8929 | 7.3868 | 39.0871 |
CBH | 33 | 44 | 163.28 | 105.2173 | 5.6693 | 32.5675 |
Cover | 38 | 3.7 | 180.89 | 84.3755 | 7.9385 | 48.9363 |
Age | 33 | 96 | 357 | 229.9697 | 12.4407 | 71.4666 |
Valid N (listwise) | 28 |
Site one | Site two | Site three | Site four | |
---|---|---|---|---|
No. of trees | 55 | 16 | 5 | 38 |
Mean height | 7 | 60.68 | 10.1 | 6.76 |
Mean CAB | 121.8 | 98.82 | N. R | 105.21 |
Mean age | 242.42 | 216.06 | 138.99 | 229.96 |
Mean cover | 70.15 | 51.65 | 229.786 | 84.37 |
9.2 Soil properties
Soils of the examination region have two diverse surface classes, sand and loamy sand. Soil of site one (El Mawany) is loamy sand, whereas soils of the other three sites are sandy soils. Soil pH ranged from 7.43 to 9.14. Soil of site one (El Mawany) has the highest value (pH = 9.14) whereas site three (Amon) shows the lowest value (pH = 7.43) (Table 4).
Site no. | pH | EC (ds\m) | OM (%) | Sand (%) | Silt (%) | Clay (%) | Soil type | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | (El Mawany) | 9.14 | 4.52 | 4.18 | 89.33 | 5.67 | 5.00 | Loamy sand |
2 | (Mohamed Ali) | 7.88 | 7.84 | 6.6 | 91.33 | 4.00 | 4.67 | Sandy |
3 | (Amon) | 7.43 | 4.56 | 7.3 | 92.67 | 3.67 | 3.67 | Sandy |
4 | (Nemra Ceta) | 7.93 | 5.47 | 7.8 | 91.00 | 3.67 | 5.33 | Sandy |
As appeared (Table 4) summarizing the soil properties of the four sites studied, site one (El Mawany) has the lowest EC (4.52 ds/m) whereas site two (Mohamed Ali) shows the highest EC (7.84 ds\m) and both EC values of sites three (Amon) and four (Nemra Ceta) were (4.56 ds\m) and (5.47 ds\m) respectively. Site four (Nemra Ceta) shows the highest content of organic matter (7.80%) whereas site one (El Mawany) show the lowest content (4.18%), while results for sites three (Amon) and two (Mohamed Ali) were 7.30 and 6.60%, respectively. Site one (El Mawany) shows the lowest content of sand was 89.33% whereas moderate content of clay 5% and highest content of silt 5.67%. Site three (Amon) shows highest content of sand 92.67% whereas the lowest silt content and clay 3.67%. Site four (Nemra Ceta) shows the highest content of clay 5.33% whereas moderate content of fine sand fraction 91% and lowest content of silt 3.67%.
9.3 Age dating
Diameter and annual rings of each branch were measured and regression equation was calculated using the data of diameter and number of growth rings in order to figure out the age dating of the main trunk of different
No. of rings = (−0.933 + 2.195 circumference) (cm) (Figure 5).
Age dating at El Mawany, ranged from 142 to 394 years. The oldest tree is 394 years, 10.51 m height and 106.73 m2 cover while the youngest tress is 142 years, 3.52 m height and 20.58 m2 cover. At site two (Mohamad Ali) which has 16 trees age dating of these trees ranges from 175 to 295 years, the oldest tree is 295 years, 7.50 m height and 59.42 m2 cover, and whereas the youngest tree is 1.70 m height and 80.32 m2 cover. Whereas site three (Amon) includes five trees, age of these trees range from 240 to 344 years, the oldest tree is 344 years, 10.50 m height and 268.67 m2 cover; whereas the youngest tree which is 240 years old, 10 m height and 224.20 m2 cover. Site four (Nemra Ceta) which has 38 trees, age of these trees ranges from 96 to 357 years, the oldest tree which is 357 years, 8 m height and 124.82 m2 cover, whereas the youngest tree is 126 years, 5 m height and 13.72 m2 cover.
Based on the regression results, the oldest
9.4 Relationships between age and vegetation parameters
One way ANOVA (analysis of variance) of height, CAB, CBH, cover, and age have significant variation between the different sites. Multiple comparison of the significant variables using Duncan test showed that site three has the highest mean values of different parameters (height = 10.1, CBH = 138.9 m, cover = 229.8 m2, and age = 304 years), followed by site number one and four. On the other hand, site number two showed the lowest mean values of these parameters (CBH = 9.8 m and cover = 51.6 m2) (Table 3). Analyses of variance of vegetation parameters and age for
Sum of squares | Df | Mean square | F | Sig. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Between groups | 51.833 | 3 | 17.278 | 4.619 | 0.004 | |
Height | Within groups | 411.47 | 110 | 3.741 | ||
Total | 463.304 | 113 | ||||
Between groups | 2677.835 | 3 | 892.612 | 0.872 | 0.46 | |
CAB | Within groups | 65528.45 | 64 | 1023.882 | ||
Total | 68206.28 | 67 | ||||
Between groups | 6725.245 | 3 | 2241.748 | 3.099 | 0.031 | |
CBH | Within groups | 65107.9 | 90 | 723.421 | ||
Total | 71833.15 | 93 | ||||
Between groups | 131041.8 | 3 | 43680.6 | 23.502 | 0 | |
Cover | Within groups | 204448.2 | 110 | 1858.62 | ||
Total | 335,490 | 113 | ||||
Between groups | 32264.92 | 3 | 10754.98 | 3.092 | 0.031 | |
Age | Within groups | 313077.7 | 90 | 3478.641 | ||
Total | 345342.6 | 93 |
Correlation analysis of different parameters showed highly significant direct correlation between age dating, cover, height, CAB, and CBH. Age dating data showed the highest correlation coefficient with CBH (
10. Discussion
The present study showed that populations of
Nadel et al. [10] described the pollination process which is the main reason of not producing off spring of
As expressed by Nadel et al. [10], with few exceptions, each fig species is pollinated by a different species of wasp in the family
Age dating results of
Based on age dating results, the oldest
Age dating of
10.1 Chemical constituents
In
The bark of
The fruit of
11. Medicinal importance of Ficus benghalensis
11.1 Anthelmintic activity
The extracts from
11.2 Anti-inflammatory activity
The ethanolic (300 mg) and petroleum ether extracts (600 mg/kg/day) of
11.3 Anti-stress and anti-allergic
Various extracts of
11.4 Antioxidant activity
The extract was examined for its antioxidant activity by DPPH radical scavenging activity, hydroxyl radical scavenging activity, reducing capacity, hydrogen peroxide activity, total phenolic content using Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenolic reagent. The extract showed extreme scavenging of DPPH radical (96.07%) at 250 μg mL−1 concentration and hydrogen peroxide (69.23%) at 1000 μg mL−1 concentration. The extract shows good results when compared with other compounds. This shows the scavenging activity of the extract [30].
11.5 Antitumor activity
The chloroform extract of the fruit of
The other tested extracts showed no marked inhibition on the uptake of calcium in to rat pituitary cells GH4C1. The results support the traditional use of these plants in Folk medicine for respiratory disorders and certain skin diseases [9, 10].
11.6 Antidiarrheal activity
The ethanol extract of the hanging roots of
11.7 Antimicrobial activity
The chloroform concentrates of the product of
11.8 Antifungal activity
Mitosporic fungi and several sterile forms were isolated as endophytes from the leaf tissues and aerial roots of
The endophyte assemblages of the leaf and aerial root and of the aerial root growing in the air and soil showed little overlap suggesting that the nature of the host tissue as well as the environment determine the endophyte composition of a host [31].
References
- 1.
Wagner WL, Herbst DR, Sohmer SH. Manual of the Flowering Plants of Hawai’I. USA, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press; 1999. 1919 p - 2.
Neal MC. In: Bernice P, editor. Gardens of Hawaii. Bishop Museum; Special Publication 40; Honolulu, Hl; 1965 - 3.
Bailey LH, Bailey EZ. Hortus. 3rd ed. NY: Macmillan General Reference; 1976 - 4.
Edlin H, Nimmo M. The Illustrated Encyclopedia of Trees. Salamander, London: Timbers and Forests of the World; 1978. pp. 220-221 - 5.
Ramirez BW. Host specificity of fig wasps ( Agaonidae ). Evolution. 1970;24 :680-691 - 6.
Chopra RN. Indigenous Drugs of India: Their Medical and Economic Aspects. London, United Kingdom: Art Press; 1933 - 7.
Jayaweera DMA. Lanka NSCOS, Medicinal Plants Indigenous and Exotic Used in Ceylon. National Science Council of Sri Lanka; 1981 - 8.
Pullaiah T. Encyclopaedia of World Medicinal Plants. New York City, USA: Regency Publications; 2006 - 9.
Mousa O, Vuorela P, Kiviranta J, Wahab SA, Hiltohen R, Vuorela H. Bioactivity of certain Egyptian Ficus species. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 1994;41 :71-76 - 10.
Nadel H, Frank JH, Knight RJ. Escapees and accomplices: The naturalization of exotic Ficus and their associated faunas in Florida. Florida Entomologist. 1992;75 (1):29-38 - 11.
Barford CC, Wofsy SC, Goulden ML, Munger JW, Pyle EH, Urbanski SP, et al. Factors controlling long-and short-term sequestration of atmospheric CO2 in a multitude forest. Science. 2001; 294 (5547):1688-1691 - 12.
Jonard M, Andre F, Giot P, Weissen F, Van der Perre R, Ponette Q. Thirteen-year monitoring of liming and PK fertilization effects on tree vitality in Norway spruce and European beech stands. European Journal of Forest Research. 2010; 129 (6):1203-1211 - 13.
Martinez DE, Guiamet JJ. Distortion of the SPAD 205 chlorophyll meter. 2004 - 14.
Richards LA. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkaline Soils. Washington, DC: USDA Agric. Handbook No. 60 US Gover. Print. Office; 1954 - 15.
Gee GW, Bauder JW. Particle-size analysis. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd ed. Madison, Wisconsin USA: American Society of Agronomy; 1986 - 16.
Thomas GW. Soil pH and soil acidity. In: Sparks PL, Page AL, Helmke PA, Loppert HR, Soltanpour PN, Tabatabai MA, editors. Method of Soil Analysis, Part 3: Chemical Method. Madison, WI, USA; 1996 - 17.
Smith JL, Doran JW. Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analyses. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ, editors. Methods for Assessing of Soil Quality Analyses. Madison, Wisconsin: SSSA Special Publication no. 49. Soil Science Society of American; 1996 - 18.
Nelson DW, Somers LE. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Spercls DL, Dage AL, Helmke PA, Loppent HR, Saoltanpour PN, Tabatabiai MA, Johanston CT, Sumner ME, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 3: Chemical Methods. Madison, Wisconsin, USA: American Society of Agronomy; 1996 - 19.
Zar JH. Biostatistical Analysis. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.; 1984. 718p - 20.
Riffle RL. The Tropical Look. Portland, Oregon: Timber Press, Inc.; 1998 - 21.
El-Hadidi MN, Boulos L, El-Gohary M, Makar S. The Street Trees of Egypt. Rev Sub ed. Cairo, Egypt: The American University in Cairo Press; 1988 - 22.
Hill DS. Figs ( Ficus spp.) and fig-wasps (Chalcidoidea ). Journal of Natural History. 1967;1 :413-434 - 23.
Janzen DH. How to be a fig. The Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics. 1979; 10 :13-51 - 24.
Wiebes JT. Bornean fig wasps from Ficus stupenda Miquel (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie. 1966;109 :163-192 - 25.
Galil J, Eisikowitch D. On the pollination ecology of Ficus syconzorus in East Africa. Ecology. 1968;49 :259-269 - 26.
Galil J, Eisikowitch D. Further studies on the pollination ecology of Ficus sycomorus L . (Hymenoptera, Chalcidoidea, Agaonidae). Tijdschrift voor Entomologie. 1969;112 :1-3 - 27.
Patil VVPRB, Patil VR. Pharmacognostical studies and evaluation of anti-inflammatory activity of Ficus bengalensis Linn. Journal of Young Pharmacists. 2009;1 (1):24 - 28.
Aswar MAU, Watkar B, Vyas M, Wagh A, Gujar KN. Anthelmintic activity of Ficus bengalensis . International Journal of Green Pharmacy. 2008;2 (3):170-172 - 29.
Taur DJNS, Patil RY, Kharya MD. Anti-stress and ant allergic effects of Ficus bengalensis bark in asthma. Natural Product Research. 2007;21 (14):1266-1270 - 30.
Rimi Shukla SGJG, Prabhu KM, Murthy PS. Antioxidant effect of aqueous extract of the bark of Ficus benghalensis in hypercholesterolaemic rabbits. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2004;92 :47-51 - 31.
Pulok K, Mukherjee KS, Murugesan T, Mandal SC, Pal M, Saha BP. Screening of anti diarrhoeal profile of some plant extracts of a specific region of West Bengal, India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 1998; 60 :85-89