Open access peer-reviewed chapter

A Review of the Macroscopic, Microscopic, and Ultramicroscopic Characteristics of Some Key Oocyte Developmental Processes in Fish Species

Written By

Mônica Cassel

Submitted: January 10th, 2019 Reviewed: June 11th, 2019 Published: August 28th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.87967

Chapter metrics overview

910 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Studies involving the reproductive biology of fish have several possibilities of approach, such as the understanding of gonadal development, oocyte development, and the reproductive cycle of the species. In addition, analyses of gonadal morphology can be made at macro-, micro-, and ultramicroscopic levels. This knowledge helps to define factors that determine the different stages of gonadal development, as well as the “triggers” that initiate the reproductive process. In females, the growth and maturation of the ovarian follicles depend on a carefully elaborated communication between the follicular cells and the oocyte and a precisely organized contractile system. Changes in these systems appear to be related to apoptotic cells. This extensive remodeling of gonadal tissue, due to cell proliferation and differentiation, promotes also changes in the extracellular matrix. With this in mind, we provide herein a complementary and in-depth information on cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions related to the process of oocyte development in fish species. This information, together with the existing structural and ultrastructural descriptions of ovaries of different species, will enable a better understanding of the reproductive processes for the group of fish.

Keywords

  • fish species
  • reproductive biology
  • gonadal and oocyte development
  • cell-cell interactions
  • cell-matrix interactions

1. Introduction

The knowledge on the reproductive characteristics of fish is fundamental to understand the adaptations developed to maximize the reproductive success in a given environment, considering the life history aspects of each species [1]. Studies involving the reproductive biology of fish have several possibilities of approach, such as the understanding of gonadal development and the reproductive cycle of the species. Analyses of gonadal morphology are important for the understanding of the biology of the species and have been widely applied in Teleostei, as in recent studies on spermatogenesis [2, 3, 4, 5], folliculogenesis [6, 7, 8], reproductive cycle [8, 9, 10, 11, 12], and fecundity [13].

Studies have been carried out to describe and classify the stages of gonadal development and reproductive stages of fish in the Neotropical region. One of the most classic and used bibliographic sources has been Vazzoler [14]. However, other proposals for description have already been made by Grier and Taylor [15], Grier [16], and Lo Nostro et al. [17], which detail the continuity and discontinuity of the germinal epithelium and the cell types present in the gonads. Recently, Brown-Peterson et al. [18] developed a simpler terminology to facilitate the communication and comparison of studies on the reproductive biology of fish. Still in order to make the nomenclature more comprehensive, the stages of oocyte development were simplified by Quagio-Grassiotto et al. [19], and the development of stages of atresia, which are characterized as involutive processes, follows according to Miranda et al. [20].

Gonadal development can be analyzed macroscopically, and changes in shape, size, color, and texture of the gonads have been used as parameters for the classification of maturation status in many studies of ecology and reproductive dynamics[14, 21]. However, the most used analysis has been of the microscopic characters, since it allows a more detailed and precise description of the transitions and morphological and structural transformations that happen during gonadal development [8, 22, 23]. Thus, regarding the microscopic aspects of the gonad, it is verified that [24]:

  • Spermatogenesis shows stages of development that include spermatogonia, spermatocytes, spermatids, and spermatozoa.

  • Oogenesis usually shows the following progression: oogonia, primary growth oocytes, a previtellogenic stage in which oocytes grow larger and often have cortical alveolar vesicles, an extensive vitellogenic phase, oocyte maturation, and ovulation.

The oocyte development in a mature egg is a complex process modulated by numerous environmental and endocrine factors [25], and understanding the morphological characteristics of oocytes is important to interpret the dynamics of oogenesis [26]. Among the oocyte processes, folliculogenesis results in the removal of the primary oocyte from oogonium nests and consequent formation of ovarian follicles [27]. Descriptions for the germinal epithelium made by Grier [28] conceptualized “follicular complex” as the functional unit of the ovary. This complex is formed by two compartments separated by a basement membrane. One compartment is the follicle, which consists of the oocyte surrounded by follicular cells and originated from the germinal epithelium. The second compartment is the theca, made up of undifferentiated ovarian stromal cells.

In the previtellogenic oocyte phase, multiple nucleoli are observed, as described by Grier et al. [29]. These oocytes are also called perinucleolar oocytes, when the nucleoli migrate to the nuclear periphery. There is also the formation of the zona pellucida, a complex structure consisting generally of two layers crossed by pores or channels containing the oocyte microvilli and/or follicular cell extensions. The zona pellucida reflects adaptations to different ecological conditions in which the eggs develop [30], whose inner layer protects the egg from mechanical damage and whose outer layer protects it from microorganisms.

Another cell characteristic that is used to describe the stages of oocyte development is the presence of nüages, Balbiani corpuscles, and cortical alveoli. The nüages are originated by the transfer from the nucleus to the cytoplasm of large amounts of heterogeneous and ribosomal RNA synthesized [31] and associated with proteins. Balbiani corpuscles or yolk nuclei, described by Hubbard [32], were recognized as clusters of organelles located near the nucleus, which proliferate intensely and spread throughout the cytoplasm. And, the cortical alveoli, as observed by Grier et al. [29], are vesicles filled with glycoproteins, formed by depressions of the oocyte membrane that become progressively larger, marking the final stage of primary or previtellogenic growth.

The described changes are followed by an expressive growth of the oocyte during vitellogenesis, in which the oocyte accumulates the nutritive reserves necessary for the development of the embryo. The oocyte also accumulates RNA and completes the differentiation of its cellular and noncellular envelopes. During this time, the oocyte interrupts the meiosis at the end of the prophase and in the diplotene stage. Maturation processes are characterized by the reduction or halting of endocytosis, resumption of meiosis, breakdown of the germinal vesicle, formation of a monolayer of cortical alveoli under the plasma oocyte membrane, and dissolution of yolk platelets; pelagic oocytes still undergo hydration [6].

The understanding of cellular modifications is used to describe the reproductive cycle. This allows the recognition of the reproduction period and the gonadal morphological changes that occur. Descriptions of the reproductive cycle were initially elaborated by Yamamoto [33] and Agostinho et al. [34, 35], revalidated by Vazzoler [14], and later used by many authors. Next, Nuñez and Duponchelle [10] defined five stages of ovarian development with greater cellular detail and other four stages of testicular development based on macro- and microscopic characteristics. The last descriptions made by Lowerre-Barbieri et al. [24] and Quagio-Grassiotto et al. [19] on oocyte development, coupled with the stages of the reproductive cycle described by Brown-Peterson et al. [18], brought a proposal to homogenize the terms used and that has been applied in more recent studies. Research on the reproductive cycle of a given species helps to define determinant phases of gonadal development, as well as the “triggers” that initiate the process of cell proliferation and differentiation in the formation of gametes [14, 36, 37, 38].

Advertisement

2. Important cellular morphological modifications during the oocyte development process

2.1 Cellular junctions and your distribution throughout the oocyte development

The growth and maturation of the ovarian follicles depend on carefully crafted communication between the somatic cells of the follicle and the oocyte. This association between somatic cell and germ cell in the ovaries of various vertebrate and invertebrate species is established through intercellular junctions [39, 40, 41, 42, 43]. In vertebrate ovarian follicles, direct cytoplasmic connections between the oocyte and follicular cells of the granulosa layer associated with it are established early in the oocyte development. In fish, amphibians, and mammals, these cytoplasmic connections are established at the points of contact between the oocyte microvilli and follicular cells or between follicular cell microvilli and oocyte, via specialized membrane junctions known as GAP junctions [44, 45, 46, 47].

GAP junctions are intermembrane channel aggregates between adjacent cells composed by connexin proteins [48]. These junctions are considered homologous when they connect follicular cells to follicular cells and heterologous when they connect follicular cells to the oocyte [49]. Recent observations suggest that the functional coupling of GAP junctions, especially homologous ones, is necessary for the occurrence of the oocyte maturation process [50]. A possible role for the heterologous GAP junctions is the transfer of cAMP (PKA activator) from the follicular cells to the oocyte in order to induce the production or activity of membrane receptors for the maturation-inducing hormone, or MIH [50], indirectly participating in the oocyte maturation process. GAP junctions may also be involved in specifying the pattern of polarity in the oocytes of various animal groups, so this junctional route can be used to pass intercellular signals from follicular cells to the oocyte to determine oocyte symmetry [51].

As previously reported, the fish oocyte is enveloped by the zona pellucida (microvillus area), by the follicular cells and by the basement membrane. Thus, from a morphological and functional point of view, it is important to know if there are any tight junctions between adjacent follicular cells, since these joints promote barriers for the passage of fluids through the extracellular space between adjacent cell membranes and maintain tissue and cell integrity [45, 52, 53, 54]. The main components of the intercellular junctions are the tight junctions [55, 56], which are composed of different transmembrane proteins that promote a homophilic interaction. The cytoplasmic domain of the transmembrane adhesion molecules connects the binding proteins which, in turn, anchor the cytoskeletal adhesion complex. Of these molecules, occludins and claudins are the most extensively studied. Although occludin is a highly conserved molecule, claudins comprise a family of more than 20 different proteins, some of which are expressed in a tissue-specific manner [57, 58, 59].

As claudins, cadherins are a transmembrane superfamily of proteins that contain several homologous members, exhibiting tissue diversity and distinct binding specificities [60, 61, 62], with a highly conserved cytoplasmic domain [63, 64]. These molecules mediate cell-cell contact at adhesion junctions also anchored in the cytoskeleton, thus playing an important role in the separation, positioning and control of cell movements, and in morphogenesis [65, 66, 67]. In a study with Danio rerio, E-cadherin homologous proteins were identified, and their synthesis and storage during oogenesis were verified [62]. Also, the establishment of heterotypic junctions linking the oocyte to follicular cells throughout folliculogenesis and cooperating in the determination of follicle architecture was observed [62]. When oocytes progress in vitellogenesis, the localization of adhesion proteins in the oocyte becomes restricted to a more specific pattern, which reflects the points of contact between the oocyte and the follicle cells and their adjustment to changes in the oocyte cytoskeleton throughout this phase [62].

2.2 Distribution and structuration of the cytoskeleton throughout the oocyte development

All intracytoplasmic and cortical events in oocytes involve a precisely organized and collaborative contractile system and a stable support matrix [68]. The cytoskeleton of the oocytes and embryos is implicated in key developmental events, such as creation and maintenance of axial polarity, cytoplasmic reorganization, cell division, change of surface architecture, morphogenetic motions, and internal arrangement of organelles [69]. It seems very likely that cytoskeletal structures are responsible for spatial distribution of yolk, cortical and pigment granules, lipid droplets, or mitochondria [68, 70]. Thus, the spatial organization of cytoskeletal filaments may be important for the preservation of oocyte viability [71].

Among the different proteins expressed in the cytoskeleton, the intermediate filament proteins are exceptionally complex [72, 73], especially in the class of cytokeratins. This is a class of proteins typical and specifically induced in cells compromised for epithelial differentiation [72, 74, 75], and their identification in oocytes and eggs presents an interesting contrast when comparing to other cytoskeletal proteins in germ cells. Cytokeratins are not synthesized in previtellogenic oocytes but are expressed and accumulated in the vitellogenic stage. These filament proteins are first detectable in the cortex of oocytes in later stages of previtellogenesis; at the beginning of vitellogenesis, they are distributed primarily in the region closest to the nucleus and appear to become cortical again in mature oocytes [76]. Intermediate filaments of cytokeratin contribute to the complex structure of the oocyte and egg cortex, which is also rich in other cytoskeletal filaments such as actin filaments and microtubules [68, 77, 78, 79].

The microtubule matrix seems to be a very important component in the immature oocyte cortex in fish. The function of the cortical matrix of microtubules in oocytes remains undetermined but may be related to the mechanical stiffness that has been attributed to the cortex [80]. Even the basic mechanism of germinal vesicle migration and its mechanical anchoring in the region of the animal pole occur from the depolarization of the microtubules, leading to a consequent change in the position of the germinal vesicle [80, 81].

Evident changes occur in the distribution and localization of tubulin-containing structures in growing oocytes. In previtellogenic oocytes, a great amount of tubulin is concentrated in the Balbiani corpuscle [82, 83, 84, 85]. During vitellogenesis, mitochondria are displaced from the Balbiani corpuscle to the surface of the cell, while others remain around the nucleus [82, 86], and this movement seems to be related to the reorganization of tubulin [87]. With the disintegration of the Balbiani corpuscle, due to the anterior displacement of membranous organelles, the released space is gradually filled with yolk, i.e., the yolk granules are in a tubulin-positive region. As vitellogenesis progresses, rearrangement of cell growth and its contents occurs with the movement of endosomes to transport yolk through the microtubules [87].

The proper organization and assembly of the cytoskeleton microtubule is an integral phenomenon, which is related to the expression of cellular asymmetry. Particularly in oocytes, the microtubules exhibit a unique paradigm as forming an eccentric meiotic spindle which, consequently, gives rise to asymmetric cytokinesis to form the first and second polar bodies. Its existence and function are dynamically regulated throughout the process of cell division, particularly during the S and M phases of the cell cycle [88].

Another element that contributes to the oocyte asymmetry is the actin cytoskeleton. In oocytes, the actin filaments are not randomly distributed within the cell [89]. In germ cells, as in many other cells, two types of actin are present: filamentous (F-actin) and non-filamentous (G-actin) actins [90]. Actin polymerization-depolymerization process is essential for the translocation of many organelles, as mitochondria [91], Golgi system [92], and cortical granules [93, 94], as well as for the regulation of ion channel activity [95]. In addition, a certain proportion of F-actin and G-actin is required for the normal course of meiotic and mitotic divisions [96].

In many cells, a significant part of these filaments is in the area of the cellular cortex, so it has been proposed that they take part in the transduction of transmembrane information signals, including hormonal signaling [97, 98]. Still in the oocyte cortex, the cortex-specific F-actin layer is peculiarly absent in the space between the germinal vesicle and the plasma membrane at the animal pole. In fact, it is through this “corridor” that the two polar bodies are extruded in the posterior phase of meiosis [99, 100].

The formation of actin bundles in the oocyte cortex is one of the first morphological markers of induction to maturation [99]. The role of actin microfilaments in oocyte maturation seems to be related to the translocation of the endoplasmic reticulum structures to the germinal vesicle area and to the coordination of the cortical granules in the plasma membrane zone [93, 101]. Even during follicular atresia, the actin cytoskeleton undergoes changes associated with the yolk degradation, while it remains preserved in follicular cells. Thus, maintenance of the actin cytoskeleton may be a sign of survival for follicular cells during early and/or advanced atresia processes [102]. Cytoskeleton changes have been extensively reported in apoptotic cells, among which changes in cell shape and anchorage are dependent on the reorganization of actin filaments and focal adhesion contacts [103].

Advertisement

3. Morphological characteristics related to ovarian reorganization

3.1 Processes of atresia and cellular proliferation

Atresia is a degenerative process by which the ovarian follicles lose their integrity and are eliminated [104]. It is a common process in vertebrate ovaries under natural and/or experimental conditions [105] and can be induced by a series of exogenous and endogenous factors [106, 107, 108, 109]. Oocyte degeneration, or follicular atresia, is a process that may occur before spawning, in oocytes that have not reached maturity and thereafter in oocytes that are no longer ovulated [110, 111]. In fish, atresia is involved in normal ovary growth [112, 113] and postovulatory regression [114, 115, 116], especially in females that are not able to perform maturation or ovulation after the vitellogenesis process [117].

Fish, in general, exhibits a reproductive periodicity, and, therefore, oocytes at various stages of development may be resorbed with the resultant formation of an atretic body. Considering the foregoing, Rajalakshmi [118] made a classification of the atretic processes taking into account the following stages: (1) “immature oocyte atresia” begins with the distortion of the cell shape, followed by loss of cytoplasmic homogeneity and reabsorption of the structure (in this type of atresia, the follicular cells do not exhibit any activity so the reabsorption of oocytes without yolk seems to be a relatively simple process); (2) “mature oocyte atresia” begins with the loss of the soft outline of the zona pellucida and dissociation of the follicular cells, which will then present phagocytic characteristic (i.e., enzymatic activity of acid phosphatase that will liquefy the yolk), followed by a slow dissolution of the zona pellucida and culminating in total resorption of the follicle; (3) “postovulatory complex atresia” begins with the distortion of the follicular cell shape, followed by loss of cell boundaries and formation of a syncytial structure, and finally the follicle shrink, with consequent degenerative changes.

The morphological characteristics of the atretic bodies and their stages of involution, independent of cellular development stage, were summarized in the study of Miranda et al. [20], as (1) initial atresia, with the disintegration of the oocyte nucleus, fragmentation of the zona pellucida, and follicular cell hypertrophy; (2) intermediate atresia, with follicular cells presenting phagocytic characteristics and ingesting the yolk; (3) advanced atresia, with numerous myelinic figures in the cytoplasm of follicular cells; and (4) final atresia, with the reduction in the number of follicular and theca cells and presence of granules of lipofuscin and granulocytes near the atretic follicle. With the current emergence of the theme of cell death pathways, studies about ovarian involutive processes in fish were brought to the spotlight again with new descriptions being made [102, 108, 116, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124] that add and/or corroborate those morphological characteristics already proposed by Miranda et al. [20].

In fish, mammals and, presumably, other vertebrates, the molecular mechanism responsible for ovarian follicular atresia is cell death by apoptosis [102, 124, 125]. Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is a physiological process controlled by various hormones and growth factors. This is an evolutionarily conserved process, involved in remodeling, differentiation, and tissue degeneration in a variety of cell types [125]. It is characterized by biochemical and morphological changes such as chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation, and the formation of apoptotic bodies [126]. The main effector proteins in apoptosis are the caspases, a family of highly conserved cysteine proteases [127, 128]. Among the caspases, caspase-3 is the major effector one, including in the ovarian tissue in which it is expressed in the follicular cells of atretic follicles of fish and mammals [102, 124, 129].

In addition to apoptosis, Thomé et al. [130] presented a new route to cell death—the autophagy. This route differs from apoptosis by the purpose of the processes: apoptosis is the programmed cell death, and autophagy is a stress adaptation to prevent cell death. The functional relationship between apoptosis and autophagy is complex. In some cases, autophagy is a form of adaptation to suppress apoptosis, whereas, in other cases, autophagy constitutes an alternative pathway of cellular elimination called autophagic or type II cell death [131, 132, 133]. It has been understood that apoptosis is the main mechanism involved in the involution of postovulatory follicles [116, 121], while autophagy contributes to the regression of atretic follicles [20130]. Even though the limits and interrelationships between these two processes have not yet been well established, recent studies have shown that there may be a crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis pathways in the ovarian involution processes. A fine balance between the signs for survival and cell death appears to be essential for determining the fate of follicular cells, particularly in follicular atresia [102, 124].

During follicular development, a low rate of follicular cell apoptosis can be considered as a physiological event for the control of the appropriate number of cells and elimination of the undesirable ones [134]. However, high apoptosis values can be observed under unfavorable conditions, compromising follicular viability [135]. Thus, organic homeostasis is dependent on the balance between cell proliferation, differentiation, and death, so populations of rapidly proliferating cells usually have high rates of cell death by apoptosis [125, 136].

The mechanism of cell proliferation is a highly regulated process that seems to be essential for the maintenance of ovarian homeostasis [137], and yet the hormonal mechanism controlling oocyte proliferation and recruitment of oocytes is not understood completely for any vertebrate [6]. In contrast to mammals, oogonia continue to proliferate in adult female fish [138], thus renewing stocks of young oocytes and follicles [139, 140]. The pre-follicular and follicular cells begin to proliferate when in the folliculogenesis phase, to support the oocyte growth [19]. However, ovarian mitosis in fish is usually observed at the end of each reproductive cycle [137], when ovarian tissues are reorganized [141, 142]. Throughout ovigerous lamellae in adult females, germ cell proliferation and the formation of germline cysts result in extensions of the germinal epithelium that are segregated from the connective tissue by a basement membrane [19]. These extensions of the germinal epithelium are known as oogonium nests [28, 143] and mark the beginning of the reproductive cycle again.

3.2 Extracellular matrix and its changes through the reproductive cycle

During the reproductive cycle, ovarian tissue is constantly remodeled, with extensive cell proliferation and differentiation, as well as extracellular matrix changes from early follicular development to tissue involution after ovulation [144]. Among the processes and factors involved in tissue remodeling are apoptosis, changes in hormone levels, and degradation of the extracellular matrix in contact with cells [134].

The extracellular matrix is an insoluble network of several structural and functional macromolecules found in connective tissues and basement membranes [145]. It is both a barrier that separates the organism into tissue compartments and a substrate for cell adhesion [146]. In addition to these structural functions, the extracellular matrix is an essential regulator of cellular physiology, predominantly in cell survival, cell cycle, cell migration, and morphogenesis [147].

A coordinated interaction of signals is necessary to regulate the proliferation, differentiation, adhesion, and migration of specific cell types for the development and organization of structural tissues [148]. During the normal development of an organ or in pathological modifications, the matrix undergoes intense changes in its composition. This process, called matrix remodeling, is involved in many physiological processes, such as activation of immune cells [149], wound healing [150, 151], embryogenesis [152, 153], or reproductive cycle [154].

The extracellular matrix-cell interactions influence gene regulation, cytoskeletal structure, differentiation, and many aspects of cell growth [155]. Changes in the expression of components that make up the extracellular matrix accompany follicular growth, ovulation, and involution of postovulatory follicles, which in its turn may influence follicular maturation, cell survival, and steroidogenesis [134, 156, 157]. Studies with mammals demonstrate that gonadal support cells synthesize a variety of components comprising the extracellular matrix and the basement membrane, such as collagen, laminin, keratin, fibronectin, lectin, and fibril chains [158, 159].

The balance between the degradation and regeneration of the extracellular matrix in ovarian tissues is maintained, in part, by the action of extracellular proteolytic enzymes that are secreted by the local cells. Most of these enzymes are matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which depend on the Ca+2 or Zn+2 binding to their activity [160]. During oogenesis, great changes in the extracellular environment of the ovary were largely attributed to the action of MMPs [144]. MMPs play an important role in the ovulation process in different groups of vertebrates, acting on follicular rupture, basement membrane fragmentation, and follicular connective fibers [144, 161, 162].

The integrity of the basement membrane is also evidenced by the continuous marking of laminin-β2 and type IV collagen, which allows the development of ovarian follicles [159, 163]. On the other hand, the discontinuous labeling of laminin-β2 and type IV collagen in the basal membrane of postovulatory follicles indicates that basement membrane degradation occurs due to the breakdown of these major components [134]. The loss of the basement membrane integrity may contribute to the increase of follicular cell apoptosis, suggesting its influence on the survival of postovulatory follicle cells [116].

Fibronectin and laminin have been shown to be extracellular matrix proteins synthesized by follicular cells [164, 165]. The presence of fibronectin on the surface of postovulatory follicle cells is due to the need of interaction between their domains with type IV collagen and cell surface integrin, and it is important for the maintenance of cell adhesion in the extracellular matrix [159]. According to Iwahashi et al. [166], the type IV collagen detected in the connective tissue among theca cells may be involved in the organization of extracellular fibronectin. This interaction between type IV collagen and fibronectin may act on cell migration that occurs during the late remodeling of postovulatory follicles [134].

Thus, the structure and composition of the extracellular matrix play an important role during follicular development and post-spawning involution in teleost fish. The basement membrane integrity is important for follicular cell survival, and the loss of integrity contributes to increased follicular apoptosis. In addition, MMP-9 may be involved in the final oocyte maturation and regression of postovulatory follicles [134]. Therefore, it follows that different combinations and proportions in the assembly of extracellular matrix components, together with the presentation of a large variety of proteoglycans at various times during the development and maturation of the gonads, can orchestrate distinct gene expression programs and culminate in more diverse tissue variations and adaptations [148].

Advertisement

4. Conclusions

Studies in gametogenesis help to understand the ecological, adaptive, and evolutionary relationships in the groups of species, especially when the oocyte structures are analyzed in an ultrastructural level. This is even more important when we consider that there are few fish species that present descriptions with adequate morphological and/or functional detail. Most of the studies do not evaluate the reproductive characteristics with the necessary histological and ultrastructural details, which can lead to incomplete interpretations of the reproductive characteristics of the species. Likewise, studies involving organelles and their distribution throughout the reproductive cycle and cellular development in fish species are punctual or restricted to a developmental stage. The understanding of these processes is then due to the sum of several studies at different stages of development, but they do not necessarily represent the same environmental, behavioral, and population pressures that are being addressed to the individuals of a given species. Thus, the continuous study of these variables throughout the reproductive cycle of key species may allow more real parameters on the dynamics of the intracellular structures in germ cells and follicular cells, as well as the extracellular matrix. All of the above is even more relevant when applied to such a diverse group, as fish, that have great ecological, social, and economic importance.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all those who did or are part of the laboratories where I conducted my undergraduate and graduate studies and who culminated in the improvement of the knowledge reproduced here. I thank Dr. Adelina Ferreira, Dr. Mahmoud Mehanna, and Dr. Débora Fabiane Neves da Silva, advisors and colleagues at the Morphology and Morphometry Laboratory of the Federal University of Mato Grosso (UFMT), for the first steps taken in the area of Animal Reproduction. I would also like to thank Dr. Maria Inês Borella, Dr. Chayrra Chehade Gomes, Dr. Gisele Cristiane de Melo Dias, Dr. Lázaro Wender Oliveira de Jesus, MSc Giovana de Souza Branco, MSc Marília de Paiva Camargo, and laboratory technician Cruz Alberto Mendoza Rigonatti of the Laboratory of Fish Endocrinology, University of São Paulo, for the support during the doctorate and for all the knowledge obtained in that period. Lastly, I would like to thank the FAPEMAT, CAPES, and FAPESP funding agencies for the financial support provided during my academic trajectory, which culminated in the formulation of this chapter.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this chapter.

References

  1. 1. Mazzoni R, Mendonça RS, Caramaschi EP. Reproductive biology of Astyanax janeiroensis (Osteichthyes, Characidae) from the Ubatiba River, Maricá, RJ, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology. 2005;65(4):643-649. DOI: 10.1590/S1519-69842005000400012
  2. 2. Nóbrega RH, Batlouni SR, França LR. An overview of functional and stereological evaluation of spermatogenesis and germ cell transplantation in fish. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2008;35(1):197-206. DOI: 10.1007/s10695-008-9252-z
  3. 3. Schulz RW, França LR, Lareyre JJ, Legac F, Chiarini-Garcia H, Nóbrega RH, et al. Spermatogenesis in fish. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 2010;165(3):390-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.02.013
  4. 4. Costa FG, Adolfi MC, Gomes CC, Jesus LWO, Batlouni SR, Borella MI. Tests of Astyanax altiparanae:The Sertoli cell functions in a semicystic spermatogenesis. Micron. 2014;61:20-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2014.02.004
  5. 5. Camargo MP, Cassel M, Jesus LWO, Nóbrega RH, Borella MI. Characterization of undifferentiated spermatogonia and the spermatogonial niche in the lambari fish Astyanax altiparanae. Theriogenology. 2017;96:97-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.03.027
  6. 6. Lubzens E, Young G, Bobe J, Cerdà J. Oogenesis in teleosts: How fish eggs are formed. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 2010;165(3):367-389. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2009.05.022
  7. 7. Martins YS, Moura DF, Santos GB, Rizzo E, Bazzoli N. Comparative folliculogenesis and spermatogenesis of four teleost fish from a reservoir in south-eastern Brazil. Acta Zoologica. 2010;91(4):466-473. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2009.00437.x
  8. 8. Cassel M, Chehade C, Branco GS, Canepelle D, Romagosa E, Borella MI. Ovarian development and the reproductive profile of Astyanax altiparanae (Teleostei, Characidae) over one year: Applications in fish farming. Theriogenology. 2017;98:1-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2017.04.044
  9. 9. Carvalho PA, Paschoalini AL, Santos GB, Rizzo E, Bazzoli N. Reproductive biology of Astyanax fasciatus (Pisces: Characiformes) in a reservoir in southeastern Brazil. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 2009;25(3):306-313. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2009.01238.x
  10. 10. Nuñez K, Duponchelle F. Towards a universal scale to assess sexual maturation and related life history traits in oviparous teleost fishes. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2009;35(1):167-180. DOI: 10.1007/s10695-008-9241-2
  11. 11. Casali RCV, Vono V, Godinho HP, Luz RK, Bazzoli N. Passage and reproductive activity of fishes in the Igarapava fish ladder, Grande River, southeastern Brazil. River Research and Applications. 2010;26(2):157-165. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1242
  12. 12. Chehade C, Cassel M, Borella MI. Induced reproduction in a migratory teleost species by water level drawdown. Neotropical Ichthyology. 2015;13(1):205-212. DOI: 10.1590/1982-0224-20140028
  13. 13. Normando FT, Arantes FP, Luz RK, Thomé RG, Rizzo E, Sato Y, et al. Reproduction and fecundity of tucunaré, Cichla kelberi (Perciformes: Cichlidae), an exotic species in Três Marias reservoir, south eastern Brazil. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 2009;25(3):299-305. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2008.01174.x
  14. 14. Vazzoler AEAM. Biologia da reprodução de peixes teleósteos: teoria e prática. Maringá: Eduem; 1996. 169 p
  15. 15. Grier HJ, Taylor RG. Testicular maturation and regression in the common snook. Journal of Fish Biology. 1998;53(3):521-542. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1998.tb00999.x
  16. 16. Grier HJ. The germinal epithelium: Its dual role in establishing male reproductive classes and understanding the basis for indeterminate egg production in female fishes. In: Creswell RL, editor. Proceedings of the Fifty-Third Annual Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute. Fort Pierce: Mississippi/Alabama Sea Grant Consortium; 2002. pp. 537-552
  17. 17. Lo Nostro F, Grier H, Andreone L, Guerrero GA. Involvement of the gonadal germinal epithelium during sex reversal and seasonal testicular cycling in the protogynous swamp eel, Synbranchus marmoratus Bloch 1795 (Teleostei, Synbranchidae). Journal of Morphology. 2003;257(1):107-126. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10105
  18. 18. Brown-Peterson NJ, Wyanski DM, Saborido-Rey F, Macewicz BJ, Lowerre-Barbieri SK. A standardized terminology for describing reproductive development in fishes. Marine and Coastal Fisheries. 2011;3(1):52-70. DOI: 10.1080/19425120.2011.555724
  19. 19. Quagio-Grassiotto I, Grier H, Mazzoni TS, Nóbrega RH, Amorim JPA. Activity of the ovarian germinal epithelium in the freshwater catfish, Pimelodus maculatus (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Siluriformes): Germline cysts, follicle formation and oocyte development. Journal of Morphology. 2011;272(11):1290-1306. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.10981
  20. 20. Miranda ACL, Bazzoli N, Rizzo E, Sato Y. Ovarian follicular atresia in two teleost species: A histological and ultrastructural study. Tissue and Cell. 1999;31(5):480-488. DOI: 10.1054/tice.1999.0045
  21. 21. Wallace RA, Sellman K. Cellular and dynamic aspects of oocyte growth in teleosts. Integrative and Comparative Biology. 1981;21(2):325-343. DOI: 10.1093/icb/21.2.325
  22. 22. Dias JF, Peres-Rios E, Chaves PTC, Rossi-Wongtschowski CLD. Análise macroscópica dos ovários de teleósteos: problemas de classificação e recomendações de procedimentos. Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 1998;58(1):55-69
  23. 23. Honji RM, Vaz-dos-Santos AM, Rossi-Wongtschowski CLDB. Identification of the stages of ovarian maturation of the argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi Marini, 1933 (Teleostei: Merlucciidae): Advantages and disadvantages of the use of the macroscopic and microscopic scales. Neotropical Ichthyology. 2006;4(3):329-337. DOI: 10.1590/S1679-62252006000300004
  24. 24. Lowerre-Barbieri SK, Brown-Peterson NJ, Murua H, Tomkiewicz J, Wyanski DM, Saborido-Rey F. Emerging issues and methodological advances in fisheries reproductive biology. Marine and Coastal Fisheries: Management and Ecosystem Science. 2011;3(1):32-51. DOI: 10.1080/19425120.2011.555725
  25. 25. Coward K, Bromage NR. Reproductive physiology of female tilapia broodstock. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 2000;10(1):1-25. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008942318272
  26. 26. Tyler CR, Sumpter JP. Oocyte growth and development in teleosts. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 1996;6(3):287-318. DOI: 10.1007/BF00122584
  27. 27. Coward K, Bromage NR, Hibbitt O, Parrington J. Gamete physiology, fertilization and egg activation in teleost fish. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries. 2002;12(1):33-58. DOI: 10.1023/A:1022613404123
  28. 28. Grier HJ. Ovarian germinal epithelium and folliculogenesis in the common snook, Centropomus undecimalis (Teleostei: Centropomidae). Journal of Morphology. 2000;243(3):265-281. DOI: 10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4687%28200003%29243%3A3<265%3A%3AAID-JMOR4>3.0.CO%3B2-I
  29. 29. Grier JH, Uribe-Aranzábal MC, Patiño R. The ovary, folliculogenesis and oogenesis in teleosts. In: Jamieson BJM, editor. Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Fishes (Agnathans and Bony Fishes) Phylogeny Reproductive System Viviparity Spermatozoa. Enfield: Science Publishers; 2009. pp. 25-84
  30. 30. Stehr CM, Hawkes JW. The comparative ultrastructure of the egg membrane and associated pore structures in the starry flounder, Platichthys stellatus (Pallas), and pink salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha (Walbaum). Cell and Tissue Research. 1979;202(3):347-356. DOI: 10.1007/BF00220430
  31. 31. Francolini M, Lora Lamia C, Bonsignorio C, Cotelli F. Oocyte development and egg envelope formation in Oreochromis niloticus, a mouth-brooding cichlid fish. Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology and Pathology. 2003;35(1):49-60
  32. 32. Hubbard JW. The yolk nucleus in Cynematogaster aggregatus Gibbons. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1894;33(144):74-83
  33. 33. Yamamoto K. Studies on the formation of fish eggs. Annual cycle in the development of the ovarian eggs in the flounder, Lipsetta obscura. Journal of the Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Series IV—Zoology. 1956;12(3):362-373
  34. 34. Agostinho AA, Suzuki HI, Sampaio AA, Borges JD. Índice de atividade reprodutiva: uma proposta para avaliação da atividade reprodutiva em peixes. In: Encontro Brasileiro De Ictiologia, Abstract. Maringá – PR; 1991. p. 53
  35. 35. Agostinho AA, Mendes VP, Suzuki HI, Canzi C. Avaliação da atividade reprodutiva da comunidade de peixes dos primeiros quilômetros a jusante do reservatório de Itaipu. Revista UNIMAR. 1993;15(suppl):175-189
  36. 36. Munro AD. General introduction. In: Munro AD, Scott AP, Lam TJ, editors. Reproductive Seasonality in Teleosts: Environmental Influences. Florida: CRC Press; 1990. pp. 1-11
  37. 37. Munro AD. Tropical freshwater fish. In: Munro AD, Scott AP, Lam TJ, editors. Reproductive Seasonality in Teleosts: Environmental Influences. Florida: CRC Press; 1990. pp. 145-239
  38. 38. Suzuki HI, Vazzoler AEAM, Marques EE, Lizama MAP, Inada P. Reproductive ecology of the fish assemblages. In: Thomaz SM, Agostinho AA, Hahn NS, editors. The Upper Paraná River and Its Floodplain: Physical Aspects, Ecology and Conservation. Leiden: Backhuys Publishers; 2004. pp. 271-291
  39. 39. Nørrevanag A. Electron microscopic morphology of oogenesis. International Review of Cytology. 1968;23:113-186. DOI: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)60271-5
  40. 40. Anderson H. Comparative aspects of ultrastructure of female gamete. International Review of Cytology. 1974;4(Suppl):1-70
  41. 41. Huebner E. Oocyte-follicle cell interaction during normal oogenesis and atresia in an insect. Journal of Ultrastructure Research. 1981;74(1):95-104. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5320(81)80112-8
  42. 42. Biliński S, Klag J. GAP junctions between oocyte and follicle cells in Acerentomon sp. (Insecta, Protura). International Journal of Invertebrate Reproduction and Development. 1982;5(6):331-335. DOI: 10.1080/01651269.1982.10553486
  43. 43. Khan HR, Saleuddin ASM. Cell contacts between follicle cells and oocyte of Helisoma (Mollusca, Pulmonata). Journal of Morphology. 1983;177(3):319-328. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051770308
  44. 44. Anderson E, Albertini DF. GAP junctions between the oocyte and companion follicle cells in the mammalian ovary. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1976;71(2):680-686. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.71.2.680
  45. 45. Toshimori K, Yasuzumi F. Tight junctions between ovarian follicle cells in the teleost (Plecoglossus altivelis). Journal of Ultrastructure Research. 1979;67(1):73-78. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5320(79)80019-2
  46. 46. Kobayashi W. Communications of oocyte-granulosa cells in the Chum salmon ovary detected by transmission electron microscopy. Development, Growth and Differentiation. 1985;27(5):553-561. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-169X.1985.00553.x
  47. 47. Larsen WJ, Wert SE. Roles of cell junctions in gametogenesis and in early embryonic development. Tissue and Cell. 1988;20(6):809-848. DOI: 10.1016/0040-8166(88)90025-0
  48. 48. White TW, Paul D. Genetic diseases and gene knockouts reveal diverse connexin functions. Annual Review of Physiology. 1999;61:283-310. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.61.1.283
  49. 49. Bolamba D, Patiño R, Yoshizaki G, Thomas P. Changes in homologous and heterelogous gap junction contacts during maturation-inducing hormone-dependent meiotic resumption in ovarian follicles of Atlantic croaker. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 2003;131(3):291-295. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-6480(03)00015-7
  50. 50. Patiño R, Thomas P, Yoshizaki G. Ovarian follicle maturation and ovulation: An integrated perspective. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2003;28:305-308. DOI: 10.1023/B:FISH.0000030565.74702.0a
  51. 51. Caveney S. The role of GAP junctions in development. Annual Review of Physiology. 1985;47:319-335. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ph.47.030185.001535
  52. 52. Friend DS, Gilula NB. Variations in tight and GAP junctions in mammalian tissues. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1972;53(3):758-776. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.53.3.758
  53. 53. Staehelin LA. Structure and function of intercellular junctions. International Review of Cytology. 1974;39:191-283. DOI: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)60940-7
  54. 54. Rodewald M, Herr D, Fraser HM, Hack G, Kreienberg R, Wulff C. Regulation of tight junction proteins occludin and claudin-5 in the primate ovary during the ovulatory cycle and after inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor. Molecular Human Reproduction. 2007;13(11):781-789. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gam066
  55. 55. Dejana E. Endothelial cell–cell junctions: Happy together. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2004;5(4):261-270. DOI: 10.1038/nrm1357
  56. 56. Schneeberger EE, Lynch RD. The tight junction: A multifunctional complex. American Journal of Physiology. Cell Physiology. 2004;286(6):C1213-C1228. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00558.2003
  57. 57. Morita K, Sasaki H, Furuse M, Tsukita S. Endothelial claudin: Claudin-5/TMVCF constitutes tight junction strands in endothelial cells. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1999;147(1):185-194. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.147.1.185
  58. 58. Morita K, Sasaki H, Furuse K, Furuse M, Tsukita S, Miyachi Y. Expression of claudin-5 in dermal vascular endothelia. Experimental Dermatology. 2003;12(3):289-295. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2003.120309.x
  59. 59. Peppi M, Ghabriel MN. Tissue-specific expression of the tight junction proteins claudins and occludin in the rat salivary glands. Journal of Anatomy. 2004;205(4):257-266. DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-8782.2004.00332.x
  60. 60. Cunningham BA, Edelman GE. Structure, expression, and cell surface modulation of cell adhesion molecules. In: Edelman GM, Cunningham BA, Thiery JP, editors. Morphoregulatory Molecules. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1990. pp. 9-40
  61. 61. Geiger B, Ayalon O. Cadherins. Annual Review of Cell Biology. 1992;8:307-332. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cb.08.110192.001515
  62. 62. Cerdà J, Reidenbach S, Prätzel S, Franke WW. Cadherin-catenin complexes during zebrafish oogenesis: Heterotypic junctions between oocytes and follicle cells. Biology of Reproduction. 1999;61(3):692-704. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod61.3.692
  63. 63. Gumbiner BM. Proteins associated with the cytoplasmic surface of adhesion molecules. Neuron. 1993;11(4):551-564. DOI: 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90068-3
  64. 64. Knudsen KA, Soler AP, Johnson KR, Wheelock MJ. Interaction of α-actinin with the cadherin cell–cell adhesion complex via α-catenin. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1995;130(1):67-77. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.130.1.67
  65. 65. Albelda SM, Buck CA. Integrins and other cell adhesion molecules. The FASEB Journal. 1990;4(11):2868-2880. DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.4.11.2199285
  66. 66. Geiger B, Ginsberg D. The cytoplasmic domain of adherens-type junctions. Cell Motility and Cytoskeleton. 1991;20(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1002/cm.970200102
  67. 67. Edelman GR. A golden age for adhesion. Cell Communication and Adhesion. 1993;1(1):1-7. DOI: 10.3109/15419069309095677
  68. 68. Gall L, Picheral B, Gounon P. Cytochemical evidence for the presence of intermediate filaments and microfilaments in the egg of Xenopus laevis. Biology of the Cell. 1983;47:331-342
  69. 69. Schroeder TE, Otto JJ. Snoods: A periodic network containing cytokeratin in the cortex of starfish oocytes. Developmental Biology. 1991;144(2):240-247. DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(91)90418-3
  70. 70. Ball EH, Singer SJ. Mitochondria are associated with microtubules and not with intermediate filaments in cultured fibroblasts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1982;79(1):123-126. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.1.123
  71. 71. Rizzo E, Godinho HP, Sato Y. Short-term storage of oocytes from the neotropical teleost fish Prochilodus marggravii. Theriogenology. 2003;60(6):1059-1070. DOI: 10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00108-0
  72. 72. Franke WW, Schmid E, Schiller DL, Winter S, Jarasch ED, Moll R, et al. Differentiation-related patterns of expression of proteins of intermediate-size filaments in tissue and cultured cells. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 1982;46:431-453. DOI: 10.1101/SQB.1982.046.01.041
  73. 73. Lazarides E. Intermediate filaments: A chemically heterogeneous, developmentally regulated class of proteins. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 1982;51:219-250. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.001251
  74. 74. Jackson BW, Grund C, Schmid E, Butki K, Franke WW, Ilimensee K. Formation of cytoskeletal elements during mouse embryogenesis: Intermediate filaments of the cytokeratin type and desmosomes in preimplantation embryos. Differentiation. 1980;17(1-3):161-179. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1980.tb01093.x
  75. 75. Osborn M, Geisler N, Shaw G, Sharp G, Weber K. Intermediate filaments. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. 1982;46:413-429. DOI: 10.1101/SQB.1982.046.01.040
  76. 76. Godsave SF, Wylie CC, Lane EB, Anderton BH. Intermediate filaments in the Xenopus oocyte: The appearance and distribution of cytokeratin-containing filaments. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology. 1984;83:157-167
  77. 77. Franke WW, Rathke PC, Seib E, Trendelenburg MF, Osborn M, Weber K. Distribution and mode of arrangement of microfilamentous structures and actin in the cortex of the amphibian oocyte. Cytobiologie. 1976;14(1):111-130
  78. 78. Bluemink JG. Effects of cytochalasin-b on surface contractility and cell junction formation during egg cleavage in Xenopus laevis. Cytobiologie. 1971;3:176-187
  79. 79. Bluemink JG. Cytokinesis and cytochalasin-induced furrow regression in the first-cleavage zygote of Xenopus laevis. Cell and Tissue Research. 1971;121(1):102-126
  80. 80. Otto JJ, Schroeder TE. Microtubule arrays in the cortex and near the germinal vesicle of immature starfish oocytes. Developmental Biology. 1984;101(2):274-281. DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90141-6
  81. 81. Lessman CA, Habibi HR, Macrae TH. Effect of microtubule reactive drugs on steroid- and centrifugation-induced germinal vesicle migration during goldfish oocyte meiosis. The Biology of the Cell. 1988;64(3):293-299. DOI: 10.1016/0248-4900(88)90003-2
  82. 82. Raven CHP. Oogenesis. The Storage of Developmental Information. New York: Pergamon Press; 1961. 274 p
  83. 83. Caron JM, Berlin RD. Interaction of microtubule proteins with phospholipid vesicles. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1979;81(3):665-671. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.81.3.665
  84. 84. Guraya SS. Recent advances in the morphology, cytochemistry and function of Balbiani’s vitelline body in animal oocytes. International Review of Cytology. 1979;59:249-321. DOI: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)61664-2
  85. 85. Klausner RD, Kumar N, Weinstein JN, Blumenthal R, Flavin M. Interaction of tubulin with membrane vesicles. I. Association with vesicles at the phase transition. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1981;256(11):5879-5885
  86. 86. Tourte M, Mignotte F, Mounolou J. Heterogenous distribution and replication activity of mitochondria in Xenopus laevis oocytes. European Journal of Cell Biology. 1984;34(1):171-178
  87. 87. Paleček J, Habrová V, Nedvídek J, Romanovský A. Dynamics of tubulin structures in Xenopus laevis oogenesis. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology. 1985;87:75-86
  88. 88. Khodjakov A, Rieder CL. The sudden recruitment of g-tubulin to the centrosome at the onset of mitosis and its dynamic exchange throughout the cell cycle, do not require microtubules. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1999;146(3):585-596. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.146.3.585
  89. 89. Santella L, Puppo A, Chun JT. The role of the actin cytoskeleton in calcium signaling in starfish oocytes. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 2008;52(5-6):571-584. DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.072560ls
  90. 90. Welch MD, Mallavarpu A, Rosenblatt J, Mitchison TJ. Actin dynamics in vivo. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 1997;99(1):54-61. DOI: 10.1016/S0955-0674(97)80152-4
  91. 91. Barnett DK, Clayton MK, Kimura J, Bavister BD. Glucose and phosphate toxicity in hamster preimplantation embryos involves distribution of cellular organization, including distribution of active mitochondria. Molecular Reproduction and Development. 1997;48(2):227-237. DOI: 10.1002/%28SICI%291098-2795%28199710%2948%3A2<227%3A%3AAID-MRD10>3.0.CO%3B2-V
  92. 92. Valderrama F, Babià T, Ayala I, Kok JW, Renau-Pigueras J, Egea G. Actin microfilaments are essential for the cytological position and morphology of the golgi complex. European Journal of Cell Biology. 1998;76(1):9-17. DOI: 10.1016/S0171-9335(98)80012-5
  93. 93. Terasaki M. Redistribution of cytoplasmic components during germinal vesicle breakdown in starfish oocytes. Journal of Cell Science. 1994;107(Pt7):1797-1805
  94. 94. Berg L, Wessel G. Cortical granules of the sea urchin translocate early in oocyte maturation. Development. 1997;124(9):1845-1850
  95. 95. Cantiello HF. Role of actin filament organization in cell volume and ion channel regulation. The Journal of Experimental Zoology. 1997;279(5):425-435. DOI: 10.1002/%28SICI%291097-010X%2819971201%29279%3A5<425%3A%3AAID-JEZ4>3.0.CO%3B2-Q
  96. 96. Wang WH, Abeydeera LR, Prather RS, Day BN. Polymerization of nonfilamentous actin into microfilaments is an important process for porcine oocyte maturation and early embryo development. Biology of Reproduction. 2000;62(5):1177-1183. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod62.5.1177
  97. 97. Lange K, Brandt U. Calcium storage and release properties of F-actin: Evidence for the involvement of F-actin in cellular calcium signaling. FEBS Letters. 1996;395(2-3):137-142. DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(96)01025-3
  98. 98. Janmey PA. The cytoskeleton and cell signaling: Component localization and mechanical coupling. Physiological Reviews. 1998;78(3):763-781. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1998.78.3.763
  99. 99. Schroeder TE, Stricker SA. Morphological changes during maturation of starfish oocytes: Surface ultrastructure and cortical actin. Developmental Biology. 1983;98(2):373-384. DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(83)90366-4
  100. 100. Otto JJ, Schroeder TE. Assembly-disassembly of actin bundles in starfish oocytes: An analysis of actin-associated proteins in the isolated cortex. Developmental Biology. 1984;101(2):263-273. DOI: 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90140-4
  101. 101. Santella L, De Riso L, Gragnaniello G, Kyozuka K. Cortical granule translocation during maturation of starfish oocytes requires cytoskeletal rearrangement triggered by InsP3-mediated Ca2+ release. Experimental Cell Research. 1999;248(2):567-574. DOI: 10.1006/excr.1999.4425
  102. 102. Morais RDVS, Thomé RG, Lemos FS, Bazzoli N, Rizzo E. Autophagy and apoptosis interplay during follicular atresia in fish ovary: A morphological and immunocytochemical study. Cell and Tissue Research. 2012;347(2):467-478. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-012-1327-6
  103. 103. Korsnes MS, Hetland DL, Espenes A, Aune T. Cleavage of tensin during cytoskeleton disruption in YTX-induced apoptosis. Toxicology In Vitro. 2007;21(1):9-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2006.07.012
  104. 104. Byskov AG. Follicular atresia. In: Jones RE, editor. The Vertebrate Ovary. New York: Plenum Press; 1978. pp. 533-562
  105. 105. Saidapur SK. Follicular atresia in the ovaries of non mammalian vertebrates. International Review of Cytology. 1978;54:225-244. DOI: 10.1016/S0074-7696(08)60169-2
  106. 106. Nagahama Y. The functional morphology of the teleost gonad. In: Hoar WS, Randall DJ, Donaldson EM, editors. Fish Physiology, Vol. IX, Chapter 6. Reproduction, Part A: Endocrine Tissues and Hormones. Cambridge: Academic Press; 1983. pp. 223-275. DOI: 10.1016/s1546-5098(08)60290-3
  107. 107. Nagahama Y. Endocrine regulation of gametogenesis in fish. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 1994;38(2):217-229
  108. 108. Mylonas CC, Woods LC III, Zohar Y. Cyto-histological examination of post-vitellogenesis and final oocyte maturation in captive-reared striped bass. Journal of Fish Biology. 1997;50(1):34-49. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01338.x
  109. 109. Guimarães CA, Linden R. Programmed cell deaths. Apoptosis and alternative deathstyles. European Journal of Biochemistry. 2004;271(9):1638-1650. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04084.x
  110. 110. Hoar WS. Reproduction. In: Hoar W, Randall DJ, editors. Fish Physiology. London: Academic Press; 1969. pp. 1-72
  111. 111. Ganeco LN, Nakaghi LSO, Urbinati EC, Dumont Neto R, Vasques LH. Análise morfológica do desenvolvimento ovocitário de piracanjuba, Brycon orbignyanus, durante o ciclo reprodutivo. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca—São Paulo. 2001;27(2):131-138
  112. 112. Janz DM, Van der Kraak G. Suppression of apoptosis by gonadotropin 17beta-estradiol and epidermal growth factor in rainbow trout preovulatory ovarian follicles. General and Comparative Endocrinology. 1997;105(2):186-193. DOI: 10.1006/gcen.1996.6820
  113. 113. Wood AW, Van der Kraak GJ. Apoptosis and ovarian function: Novel perspectives from the teleosts. Biology of Reproduction. 2001;64(1):264-271. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod64.1.264
  114. 114. Drummond CD, Bazzoli N, Rizzo E, Sato Y. Postovulatory follicle: A model for experimental studies of programmed cell death or apoptosis in teleost. The Journal of Experimental Zoology. 2000;287(2):176-182. DOI: 10.1002/1097-010X%2820000701%29287%3A2<176%3A%3AAID-JEZ8>3.0.CO%3B2-2
  115. 115. Thomé RG, Santos HB, Arantes FP, Prado PS, Domingos FFT, Sato Y, et al. Regression of post-ovulatory follicles in Prochilodus costatus Valenciennes, 1850 (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae). Brazilian Journal of Morphological Sciences. 2006;23(3-4):495-500
  116. 116. Santos HB, Thomé RG, Arantes FP, Sato Y, Bazzoli N, Rizzo E. Ovarian follicular atresia is mediated by heterophagy, autophagy, and apoptosis in Prochilodus argenteus and Leporinus taeniatus (Teleostei: Characiformes). Theriogenology. 2008;70(9):1449-1460. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2008.06.091
  117. 117. Agulleiro MJ, André M, Morais S, Cerdà J, Babin PJ. High transcript level of fatty acid-binding protein 11 but not of very low-density lipoprotein receptor is correlated to ovarian follicle atresia in a teleost fish (Solea senegalensis). Biology of Reproduction. 2007;77(3):504-516. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.107.061598
  118. 118. Rajalakshmi M. Atresia of oocytes and ruptured follicles in Gobius giuris (Hamilton-Buchanan). General and Comparative Endocrinology. 1966;6(3):378-385. DOI: 10.1016/S0016-6480(66)80025-4
  119. 119. Rizzo E, Bazzoli N. Follicular atresia in curimatá-pioa Prochilodus affinis Reinhardt, 1874 (Pisces, Characiformes). Revista Brasileira de Biologia. 1995;55:697-703
  120. 120. Linares-Casenave J, Van Eenennaam JP, Doroshov SI. Ultrastructural and histological observations on temperature-induced follicular ovarian atresia in the white sturgeon. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 2002;18:382-390. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0426.2002.00369.x
  121. 121. Santos HB, Rizzo E, Bazzoli N, Sato Y, Moro L. Ovarian regression and apoptosis in the South American teleost Leporinus taeniatus Lütken (Characiformes, Anostomidae) from the São Francisco Basin. Journal of Fish Biology. 2005;67(5):1446-1459. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2005.00854.x
  122. 122. Quintana CF, Cohene TB, Arbués R, Domitrovic H, González J. Follicular atresia in ovaries of Prochilodus lineatus. International Journal of Morphology. 2012;30:1301-1308. DOI: 10.4067/S0717-95022012000400008
  123. 123. Senerat S, Kettratad J, Jiraungkoorskul W. Classification stages of novel atretic structure in short mackerel Rastrelliger brachysoma (Bleeker, 1851) from the Upper Gulf of Thailand. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology. 2015;37:569-573
  124. 124. Cassel M, Camargo MP, Jesus LWO, Borella MI. Involution processes of follicular atresia and post-ovulatory complex in a characid fish ovary: A study of apoptosis and autophagy pathways. Journal of Molecular Histology. 2017;48(3):243-257. DOI: 10.1007/s10735-017-9723-6
  125. 125. Janz DM, McMaster ME, Munkittrick KR, Van der Kraak G. Elevated ovarian follicular apoptosis and heat shock protein-70 expression in white sucker exposed to bleached kraft pulp mill effluent. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 1997;147(2):391-398. DOI: 10.1006/taap.1997.8283
  126. 126. Hacker G. The morphology of apoptosis. Cell and Tissue Research. 2000;301:5-17. DOI: 10.1007/s004410000193
  127. 127. Huettenbrenner S, Maier S, Leisser C, Polgar D, Strasser S, Grusch M, et al. The evolution of cell death programs as prerequisites of multicellularity. Mutation Research. 2003;543:235-249. DOI: 10.1016/S1383-5742(02)00110-2
  128. 128. Krumschnabel G, Podrabsky JE. Fish as model systems for the study of vertebrate apoptosis. Apoptosis. 2009;14:1-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10495-008-0281-y
  129. 129. Boone DL, Tsang BK. Caspase-3 in the rat ovary: Localization and possible role in follicular atresia and luteal regression. Biology of Reproduction. 1998;58:1533-1539. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod58.6.1533
  130. 130. Thomé RG, Santos HB, Arantes FP, Domingos FFT, Bazzoli N, Rizzo E. Dual roles for autophagy during follicular atresia in fish ovary. Autophagy. 2009;5(1):117-119. DOI: 10.4161/auto.5.1.7302
  131. 131. Maiuri MC, Zalckvar E, Kimchi A, Kroemer G. Self-eating and self-killing: Crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis. Nature Reviews. Molecular Cell Biology. 2007;8(9):741-752. DOI: 10.1038/nrm2239
  132. 132. Mizushima N, Levine B, Cuervo AM, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion. Nature. 2008;451(7182):1069-1075. DOI: 10.1038/nature06639
  133. 133. Maiuri MC, Criollo A, Kroemer G. Crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy within the Beclin 1 interactome. The EMBO Journal. 2010;29(3):515-516. DOI: 10.1038/emboj.2009.377
  134. 134. Thomé R, Santos HB, Sato Y, Rizzo E, Bazzoli N. Distribution of laminin beta2, collagen type IV, fibronectin and MMP-9 in ovaries of the teleost fish. Journal of Molecular Histology. 2010;41(4-5):215-224. DOI: 10.1007/s10735-010-9281-7
  135. 135. Drevinick PE, Sandheinrich MB, Oris JT. Increased ovarian follicular apoptosis in fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) exposed to dietary methylmercury. Aquatic Toxicology. 2006;79(1):49-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2006.05.007
  136. 136. Saito D, Morinaga C, Aoki Y, Nakamura S, Mitani H, Furutani-Seiki M, et al. Proliferation of germ cells during gonadal sex differentiation in medaka: Insights from germ cell-depleted mutant zenzai. Developmental Biology. 2007;310(2):280-290. DOI: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.07.039
  137. 137. Krysko DV, Diez-Fraile A, Criel G, Svistunov AA, Vandenabeele P, D’Herde K. Life and death of female gametes during oogenesis and folliculogenesis. Apoptosis. 2008;13(9):1065-1087. DOI: 10.1007/s10495-008-0238-1
  138. 138. Tokarz RR. Oogonial proliferation, oogenesis and folliculogenesis in nonmammalian vertebrates. In: Jones RE, editor. The Vertebrate Ovary. Comparative Biology and Evolution. New York: Plenum Press; 1978. pp. 145-179
  139. 139. Jalabert B. Particularities of reproduction and oogenesis in teleost fish compared to mammals. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 2005;45(3):261-279. DOI: 10.1051/rnd:2005019
  140. 140. Nakamura S, Kobayashi K, Nishimura T, Tanaka M. Ovarian germline stem cells in the teleost fish, medaka (Oryzias latipes). International Journal of Biological Sciences. 2011;7(4):403-409. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.7.403
  141. 141. Sriramulu V, Rajalakshmi M. Origin of a new crop of oocytes in Gobius giuris (Hamilton-Buchanan). Zeitschrift für Mikroskopisch-Anatomische Forschung. 1966;75(1):64-73
  142. 142. Billard R. The reproductive cycle of male and female brown trout (Salmo trutta fario): A quantitative study. Reproduction Nutrition Development. 1987;27(1A):29-44. DOI: 10.1051/rnd:19870104
  143. 143. Selman K, Wallace RA, Sarka QIX. Stages of oocyte development in the zebrafish, Brachydanio rerio. Journal of Morphology. 1993;218(2):203-224. DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1052180209
  144. 144. Curry TE, Osteen KG. The matrix metalloproteinase system: Changes, regulation, and impact throughout the ovarian and uterine reproductive cycle. Endocrine Reviews. 2003;24(4):428-465. DOI: 10.1210/er.2002-0005
  145. 145. Larreta-Garde V, Berry H. Modeling extracellular matrix degradation balance with proteinase/transglutaminase cycle. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 2002;217(1):105-124. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3010
  146. 146. Price JT, Bonovich MT, Kohn EC. The biochemistry of cancer dissemination. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 1997;32(3):175-253. DOI: 10.3109/10409239709082573
  147. 147. Basbaum CB, Werb Z. Focalized proteolysis: Spatial and temporal regulation of extracellular matrix degradation at the cell surface. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 1996;8(5):731-738. DOI: 10.1016/S0955-0674(96)80116-5
  148. 148. Schalburg KR, Cooper GA, Yazawa R, Davidson WS, Koop BF. Microarray analysis reveals differences in expression of cell surface and extracellular matrix components during development of the trout ovary and testis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. 2008;3(1):78-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbd.2007.10.001
  149. 149. Dustin ML, De Fougerolles AR. Reprogramming T cells: The role of extracellular matrix in coordination of T cell activation and migration. Current Opinion in Immunology. 2001;13(3):286-290. DOI: 10.1016/S0952-7915(00)00217-X
  150. 150. Witte MB, Barbul A. General principles of wound healing. The Surgical Clinics of North America. 1997;77(3):509-528. DOI: 10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70566-1
  151. 151. Davis GE, Bayless KJ, Davis MJ, Meininger GA. Regulation of tissue injury responses by the exposure of matricryptic sites within extracellular matrix molecules. The American Journal of Pathology. 2000;156(5):1489-1498. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65020-1
  152. 152. Hay ED. Collagen and embryonic development. In: Hay ED, editor. Cell Biology of Extracellular Matrix. New York: PlenumPress; 1981. pp. 379-409
  153. 153. Perris R, Perissinotto D. Role of the extracellular matrix during neural crest cell migration. Mechanisms of Development. 2000;95(1-2):3-21. DOI: 10.1016/S0925-4773(00)00365-8
  154. 154. Hulboy DL, Rudolph LA, Matrisian LM. Matrix metalloproteinases as mediators of reproductive function. Molecular Human Reproduction. 1997;3(1):27-45
  155. 155. Irving-Rodgers HF, Rodgers RJ. Extracellular matrix in ovarian follicular development and disease. Cell and Tissue Research. 2005;322(1):89-98. DOI: 10.1007/s00441-005-0042-y
  156. 156. Oksjoki S, Sallinen S, Vuorio E, Anttila L. Cyclic expression of mRNA transcripts for connective tissue components in the mouse ovary. Molecular Human Reproduction. 1999;5(9):803-808. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/5.9.803
  157. 157. Rodgers RJ, Lavranos TC, Van Wezel IL, Irving-Rodgers HF. Development of the ovarian follicular epithelium. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 1999;151(1-2):171-179. DOI: 10.1016/S0303-7207(99)00087-8
  158. 158. Skinner MK, Tung PS, Fritz IB. Cooperativity between Sertoli cells and testicular peritubular cells in the production and deposition of extracellular matrix components. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1985;100(6):1941-1947. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.100.6.1941
  159. 159. Rodgers RJ, Irving-Rodgers HF, Russell DL. Extracellular matrix of the developing ovarian follicle. Reproduction. 2003;126(4):415-424
  160. 160. Sternilicht MD, Werb Z. How matrix metalloproteinase regulate cell behavior. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology. 2001;17(1):463-516. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.17.1.463
  161. 161. Smith MF, Ricke WA, Bakke LJ, Dow MPD, Smith GW. Ovarian tissue remodeling: Role of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2002;191(1):45-56. DOI: 10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00054-0
  162. 162. Ogiwara K, Takano N, Shinohara M, Murakami M, Takahashi T. Gelatinase A and membrane-type matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 2 are responsible for follicle rupture during ovulation in the medaka. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2005;102(24):8442-8447. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0502423102
  163. 163. Berkholtz CB, Lai BE, Woodruff TK, Shea LD. Distribution of extracellular matrix proteins type I collagen, type IV collagen, fibronectin, and laminin in mouse folliculogenesis. Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 2006;126(5):583-592. DOI: 10.1007/s00418-006-0194-1
  164. 164. Carnegie JA. Secretion of fibronectin by rat granulosa cells occurs primarily during early follicular development. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1990;89(2):579-589. DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0890579
  165. 165. Zhao Y, Luck MR. Gene expression and protein distribution of collagen, fibronectin and laminin in bovine follicles and corpora lutea. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. 1995;104(1):115-123. DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.1040115
  166. 166. Iwahashi M, Muragaki Y, Ooshima A, Nakano R. Type VI collagen expression during growth of human ovarian follicles. Fertility and Sterility. 2000;74(2):343-347. DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(00)00618-X

Written By

Mônica Cassel

Submitted: January 10th, 2019 Reviewed: June 11th, 2019 Published: August 28th, 2019