Open access peer-reviewed chapter

All Optical Signal Processing Technologies in Optical Fiber Communication

Written By

Muhammad Irfan Anis

Submitted: March 19th, 2019 Reviewed: July 2nd, 2019 Published: November 4th, 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.88354

Chapter metrics overview

912 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics

Abstract

Due to continued growth of internet at starling rate and the introduction of new broadband services, such as cloud computing, IPTV and high-definition media streaming, there is a requirement for flexible bandwidth infrastructure that supports mobility of data at peta-scale. Elastic networking based on gridless spectrum technology is evolving as a favorable solution for the flexible optical networking supportive next generation traffic requirements. Recently, research is centered on a more elastic spectrum provision methodology than the traditional ITU-T grid. The main issue is the requirement for a transmission connect, capable of accommodating and handling a variety of signals with distinct modulation format, baud rate and spectral occupancy. Segmented use of the spectrum could lead to the shortage of availableness of sufficiently extensive spectrum spaces for high bitrate channels, resulting in wavelength contention. On-demand space assignment creates not only deviation from the ideal course but also have spectrum fragmentation, which reduces spectrum resource utilization. This chapter reviewed the recent research development of feasible solutions for the efficient transport of heterogeneous traffic by enhancing the flexibility of the optical layer for performing allocation of network resources as well as implementation of optical node by all optical signal processing in optical fiber communication.

Keywords

  • defragmentation
  • format conversion
  • grooming
  • multicasting
  • optical signal processing
  • semiconductor optical amplifier
  • wavelength conversion

1. Introduction

In recent years, with the proliferation of cloud computing and high-definition media streaming increasing the use of communications and information technology in photonic infrastructure. Fiber capacity crunch concerns are driving optical networking toward a spectral-efficiency-conscious design philosophy. Moreover, as the number of various high-capacity services increases such as video delivery service and data centers, transport network flexibility will become important, resulting in the demand of elastic transport optical networking [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Key methods for empowering the elastic/flexible optical system are: single SDN XCVR, BW increase, flexible spectrum approach, Multicore fiber using the SDM technology. Nonetheless, it would be cost-restrictive to convey an entirety set of advances.

Therefore, in the next generation optical communication, optical nodes will need to allocate resources in an elastic and effective way to professionally provision high and low data rate signals [6]. To represent this evolving network scenario, an elastic network is proposed and demonstrated, providing elastic resource allocation in spectrum as a means to address the disparity between required and allocated bandwidth. By using this technique it is possible to assign a customized bandwidth per channel depending on specific requirements. Elastic allocation in the spectral domain implies that the standard 50-GHz ITU grid is not used and a continuous spectrum can be allocated to accommodate high-capacity channels with large bandwidth requirements. Also, channels that require lower bandwidths can be accommodated more efficiently by using narrower channel spacing as long as the performance is not compromised. Next generation optical networking is expected to cope with a number of challenges, especially in terms of elastic optical nodes [7], as there is always a need of increasing flexibility in the allocation of spectral and temporal resources so that they are able to efficiently support on-demand services and functionality.

Apart from the obvious advances in capacity and performance, it is clear that with each progressive stage of evolution of the optical node, additional flexibility has been introduced, e.g. the introduction of wavelength granularity, the ability to add/drop individual wavelengths, reconfigurability, etc. Other types of functionality may also add flexibility to the system, e.g. wavelength conversion (WC), format conversion (FC), multicasting (MC), regeneration, etc. In [8] a broadcast and select node based on bandwidth-variable wavelength selective switches (BV-WSS) was proposed. However, the very nature of this architecture will restrict upgradeability and will limit support for evolving requirements and new functionalities, e.g. optical signal processing. However, in Reconfigurable Optical Add Drop Multiplexer (ROADM) architectures [9] it is difficult to introduce additional functionality due to the fact that several wavelengths are simultaneously switched over the same port. On the contrary, OXCs support additional functionality more naturally as wavelengths are split and switched individually. Thus, modules with the required functionality to operate on individual wavelengths can be positioned in the right place within the OXC. However, the requirement for a particular signal processing function is often uncertain, e.g. it may be required for some wavelengths at some time period and for other wavelengths at a different time period. Therefore, modules that provide a per-channel functionality are generally deployed for all wavelengths as there is no possibility of sharing them among several optical paths inside the OXC. A better solution would enable modules to be shared, thus improving modules’ utilization and reducing the amount of modules required to satisfy a given demand for the offered functionality, i.e. better hardware utilization and efficiency.

WDM networks utilize routing and wavelength allocation (RWA) algorithms to find available resources for new requests. However, in elastic optical networks the problem is more difficult due to the new flexible spectrum allocation, where elastic spectrum bands rather than single wavelengths are considered. For new requests with specific bandwidth requirements, routing and spectrum allocation (RSA) algorithms need to identify sufficiently wide spectrum slots that are available from source to destination. Furthermore, as channels are added and removed, they leave behind noncontiguous slots of free spectrum. Although these fragments may add up to a considerable amount of bandwidth, new channel requests may be blocked due to the lack of sufficient contiguous spectrum [10]. Spectrum fragmentation may be prevented to some extent by introducing appropriate policies in RSA algorithms. Alternatively, techniques to defragment the spectrum may also be utilized, e.g. using wavelength conversion.

Another issue of optical node is that, it should manage transport of blend of suppliers’ traffic facilities for legacy signals, core traffic and multiple format signals with variable bit rate. Thus, flexible optical nodes will ought to assign resources in an adaptable and proficient way to back a blend of super-channels and lower speed channels. The nodes’ density will mainly influenced on the link interoperability between segments (i.e. core segment: need signal processing and to support super-channels, metro segments: might carry legacy 10 Gb/s [11] links).

To address increasing traffic growth, the most straightforward and economical way in which this can be done is to deploy additional 10G wavelengths. Thus, new 10G wavelengths are placed 50 GHz, according to the standard WDM grid, until the available bandwidth is exhausted. However, the maximum capacity that can thus be provided is 800 Gb/s (i.e. 80 × 10 G using only the C band), which is already in sufficient for heavily used backbone network links. Furthermore, providing additional capacity in this manner is highly inefficient in terms of the spectral resources that are consumed. The immediate solution to this problem is to deploy 100 G links, despite their higher cost compared to 10 × 10 G. 100 G is more spectrally efficient than 10G as it can fit in a standard 50-GHz WDM slot, advance modulation formats (like DP-QPSK), coherent detection, extensive use of Forward Error Correction (FEC) and electronic impairment mitigation. However, this solution is expected to be viable only for the short and medium terms. For super-channels at 400 Gb/s [12], 1 Tb/s [13] and beyond [14, 15] will occupy broader spectrum, require more complex multilevel modulation formats with higher OSNR and consequent shorter reach which neither fits within the existing ITU grid nor is supported by conventional optical network infrastructures. For instance, optical cross-connects and ROADMs allocate only discrete 50-GHz slots of bandwidth due to their internal WDM (de)multiplexers. Channels that require wider bandwidths are severely distorted if passed through such devices. Therefore, in order to efficiently support high-speed channels, a flexible bandwidth infrastructure is required.

In spite of the increasing popularity of elastic optical networks, there has been very little work focusing on elastic node architectures. Therefore it is critical to investigate the details of realizing optical networking solutions toward flexible and efficient allocation of network resources. Further, provide fully functional intelligent infrastructure for simultaneously supporting the switching and transport of combination of high-capacity super-channels and lower bit rate channels [16]. How elastic nodes support dynamic and on-demand provisioning of functionality, such as spectrum defragmentation, wavelength conversion, regeneration, grooming, format conversion, time multiplexing, etc. leaves the door open for future research.

Advertisement

2. The roadmap toward elastic optical networks

A number of different industry surveys indicate the global IP traffic is increasing at a startling rate i.e. more than 30% per year [17] and estimates that by 2025 the Internet will burn 7% of the 2010 global electricity supply [18]. This heralds the start of a huge wave of data driven mainly by broadcasting or multicasting, streaming of IPTV, high-quality videos using ultrahigh-definition (4 k _ 8 k pixels) videos and rich media files that clients migrating to an all smart phones and tablets, enabling video to be consumed more conveniently stored in cloud architecture such as Microsoft Azure or Apple’s iCloud via network connections anywhere, anytime.

To cope with this expected growth in traffic volume technological advances to date have allowed an increase in DWDM data rates to higher than 100 Gb/s per optical carrier, but these technologies will soon be close their practical or theoretical limits. To offset this growing trend and the consequences of unbridled demand, research efforts are focused on the ways to improve the efficiency of these networks, often by leveraging photonic alternatives to provide improved performance [19]. The evolution of optical nodes and networks has been characterized by continuous enhancements in the parameters listed in Figure 1. These parameters are inter-dependent and their relative temporal evolution, combined with the related network economics, will dictate the exact network evolution, assuming maturity of the available technology. For an optical network to accommodate all the above requirements, it must transparently transmit, switch channels (e.g. wavelengths, wavebands, sub wavelength channels) and provide on-demand bandwidth in a scalable and reconfigurable fashion [20].

Figure 1.

Vision for a transparent reconfigurable optical network: it is the relative development of the each of five parameters with respect to time and that will dictate the network evolution.

The graph (Figure 2) shows that the evolution of transmission capacity x fiber link has been growing over the years. The optical fiber bandwidth utilization approaches its peak limit quickly. Given the potential for such capacity crunch, the research community has concentrated on finding alternatives that make the most of the scarce network resources and meet the consistently expanding traffic requests [21]. In such context, adaptability or reconfigurable capability of networks will become more and more critical and hence spectrum efficient optical networking techniques have been introduced as a way to offer efficient utilization of the available optical resources. The place to start is with the transport network, which forms the foundation of elastic networking.

Figure 2.

Evolution in optical transmission technology [22].

Currently, all deployed optical transport technologies are mainly based on a fixed grid 50 GHz or 100 GHz/frequency grid standardized by ITU-T and the same modulation technology has been used for optical signals at the same bitrate regardless of the transmission distance. In this scenario, the system is reaches its limits in terms of both capacity and flexibility [10, 23, 24] as higher capacities per fiber have been achieved by improving the spectral efficiency (SE) through increasing the bitrate per channel while keeping or even narrowing the channel spacing. In order to fully realize the vision of elastic optical networking, network operators have migrated to flexible transport technology solutions capable of supporting grid spacing flexibility. Opportunities for exploiting underutilized spectral resources are shown in Figure 3. The essence of elastic optical path network yields highly-efficient optical path accommodation. The resulting spectral savings is achieved by taking advantage of the spectral resources that had not yet been fully utilized, thus results in an increase in network capacity [25]. Let us consider an example in which mixed-rate with different modulation format traffic is transported in a single fiber. For spectrum A, four 100-Gb/s optical channels headed for the same destination. These can be combined them into a tightly spaced 400-Gb/s superchannel and transported as a single entity by eliminating the unnecessary spacing between the channels. Spectrum B shows the ITU-T fixed grid with excess channel spacing. In the next step (spectrum C) implement a flexible grid by using the all optical processing technique i.e. defragmentation. For client traffic that does not fill the entire capacity of a wavelength, the elastic optical path network provides the right sized intermediate bandwidth [26] by format conversion through adaptive modulation represented in spectrum D. This makes the unused client bandwidth available for use. The wavelengths routed in the same direction, grooming is performed as illustrated in spectrum E. Finally in spectrum F, for shorter optical paths, which suffer from less SNR degradation, employment of more spectrally efficient modulation format, such as 16QAM or DP-QPSK, further combined with elastic channel spacing, where the required minimum guard band for wavelength routing is assigned between channels is performed [25]. In this way, elastic optical path networks accommodate a wide range of traffic in a highly spectrally efficient manner [26].

Figure 3.

Roadmap toward elastic spectrum by all-optical signal processing based on transmission distance and user traffic volume [27].

Advertisement

3. Optical switching paradigms

To appreciate the benefits and challenges of all optical networking, it is instructive to review switching in the optical layer. In this section, we first discuss the carrier perspective on the design, functionality and application of switching technology.

Ongoing years have exhibited the constrained versatility of electronic switching changing to acknowledge transport systems. In reaction, all-optical switching/processing has been recognized as a candidate arrangement to empower high-capacity communication within the future. One of the elemental challenges is to proficiently bolster a wide range of traffic configuration, driving the requirement for hardware that is affordable to construct and deploy [28]. The purpose is to identify the key switch technology which can be used in the gridless elastic network scenario.

3.1 Switching technology

With the growth of network traffic due to continue to meet the insatiable consumer demand for transmission bandwidth, the need for more flexibility and better control over network capacity which drives the need for switching in the optical domain is apparent [29]. Figure 4 shows a potential photonics switch evolution. The switch fabric circuit is the fundamental building block of the next generation optical network, distributing all network traffic from ingress ports to egress ports and also providing the functionality of sharing the spectrum in the time domain with respect to sub wavelength switching. The performance of switch fabrics is very critical in network applications. Efficiencies must be delivered via the use of switch management which is autonomic and guided by intelligent software algorithms.

Figure 4.

Photonic switch evolution [27].

As mentioned elastic optical communication are based on the principle that the bandwidth of fiber can be partitioned dynamically into adaptable size spectrum slots. The size and state of each space are generally customized to the prerequisites of a particular (group of) channel(s) in order to achieve effective network-wide transport. This fine slicing and shaping of passbands is achievable with spectrum selective switching (SSS) devices feature a fine spectrum granularity that facilitates the employment of customizable filters with variable bandwidth, e.g. from 10 GHz to 5 THz in 1-GHz increments, and attenuation, e.g. programmable from 4 dB to 30 dB in 1-dB steps [30].

A few optical switch technologies are shown in Table 1 that can be used in elastic networks. The combination of gridless spectrum switching and rapid time switching devices advances empowers the provisioning of a wide range of optical bandwidth granularities [6]; however, they do not have a large port-count, which makes them incompatible for connecting devices in an elastic optical node. Fast switching are more easily achieved with semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOA) or electro-optic materials such as LiNbO3 or PLZT. Large port-counts are usually implemented with 3D-MEMS [38] or direct beam-steering devices [39] (achieves lower insertion loss than 3D-MEMS [40]), they have a slower response than fast switching devices, on the order of 10 ms.

MaterialConsPros
PLZT [31]Coupling lossHigh-speed switching (<5–10 ns), low driving voltage (5–10 V)
LiNbO3 [32]Polarization dependenceFast response (<10 ns), low voltage (3 V)
SOA [33]High PDL, wavelength dependenceFast response (3 ns), no insertion loss, low power consumption
Directional Coupler [34]High insertion lossFast response (∼100 ps), low cross talk
Polymer [35]Slow response (>1 ms), medium power consumptionLow loss (<0.5 dB/cm)
Silica (PLC) [36]High power consumptionHigh extinction ratio
MEMS [37]Slow response (∼10 ms), high voltage (50–200 V)Scalability, small cross talk

Table 1.

Optical switch technologies.

Advertisement

4. Need for elastic optical node in optical fiber communication

Recent developments in optical networking have enabled elastic allocation of spectral resources in a gridless manner in order to accommodate high-speed and variable-bitrate signals and achieve high spectral efficiency [41]. For instance, in [42] the spectrum sliced elastic optical path network centered on OFDM, alters signal bandwidths by changing the number of sub-carriers in the transmitted OFDM channel. Other elastic networks based on single carrier (SC) adapt the transmission modulation format in order to mitigate losses or transmit at higher data-rates by exploiting the high OSNR margin [8] with a tradeoff between transmission range and spectral efficiency (SE). Such demonstration requires optical communication infrastructure with the suitable functionality in order to operate [8], frequency/time/space multiplexing, spectrum defragmentation, wavelength conversion, multicasting, format conversion, etc. However, it would be cost-prohibitive to deploy a complete set of technologies and infrastructure to fulfill the requirements for all possible signals and traffic profiles. Instead, emerging technologies need to co-exist with existing ones and provide a smooth migration path where old technology can be gradually replaced. Also, in the context of dynamic optical networks the required services functionalities might change overtime as channels with specific transport and switching requirements are setup and terminated. Providing efficient support for this combination of dynamic requirements with static optical node architectures is a major challenge, which may not be achievable or cost effective [8]. Thus, a new type of flexible and evolvable optical infrastructure needs to be developed in order to enable flexible allocation of resources, and provide any switching and processing capability on demand.

The network scenario considered herewith takes into account the potential applicability of all-optical processing techniques in the network domain. Figure 5 depicts a case within this framework which consists of four stages which can be placed in diverse geographical sites, i.e. arbitrary input traffic 12.5/42.7/170.8/Gb/s transmitters (WDM domain), an all-optical processing node, field transmission (dark fiber) and receiver. Upon entering the all-optical processing node and to deliver the optical routing function, all the WDM signals are routed through the 96 × 96 3D-microelectromechanical systems. The optical cross connect architecture consist of subsystems such as Quad Semiconductor Optical Amplifier-Mach-Zehnder interferometer, 200 ms LCoS based SSS [43], wavelength/waveband AWG, (De)-Multiplexer, optical power couplers/splitters and EDFA are interconnected using a 96 × 96 3D-microelectromechanical systems optical switch. The grooming node delivers required real time all-optical processing [44] functionalities, arbitrary spectrum switching and time-domain sub-wavelength switching [45]. It also considerably improves the efficiency and elasticity of the optical node and offers support for current and future data-rates with transparent facilities with low power consumption. All the traffic after node is routed over a dark fiber link, and performances are evaluated by means of BER measurements [7].

Figure 5.

Network scenario and switching node architecture. Four network sections are highlighted: transmission,all-optical processing in flexible architecture adaptable node (FC, format conversion; WC, wavelength conversion; WS, WaveShaper; MC, multicasting; OXC, optical cross connect), dark fiber, receiver [7].

Advertisement

5. Key functional building blocks for next generation elastic optical network: wavelength conversion, format conversion and multicasting

The foundation of a photonic network’s physical layer is transmission technology in the links and switching technology in the nodes. Different optical multiplexing techniques and modulation formats such as differential quadrature phase shift keying (DQPSK) and quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) can increase the transmission line rates per fiber to more than 100 Tbit/s [46]. Now research effort are targeted at the Optical Transport Network layer switching where optical processing in the network node allows highly efficient use of capacity, and the abstraction of client data rates from the super-channel data rate. Since some of the networking functions are difficult to carry out electrically, novel processing schemes are required. All-optical processing techniques remove the need for optical-to-electrical conversion, and electronic processing, resulting in optically transparent networks [47]. Figure 6 illustrates the key issues relating to the component and subsystem requirements for the main parts of the future all optical network [48]. As discussed earlier, flexibility is the important issue that will drive optical subsystem research and development over the next few years.

Figure 6.

Key issues of future photonics subsystem [27].

One of the challenges being faced by the elastic network is bandwidth assignment and channel numbering for different bit rates. When increasing number of channels, the spectrum gets fragmented as channels are added and removed leaving behind noncontiguous empty slots. When high bandwidth requests arrive there may not be sufficient contiguous bandwidth to accommodate them, resulting in blocking [49]. Techniques for spectrum defragmentation involve relocation of existing wavelengths by means of wavelength conversion. Providing such functionality to those channels that require it, and doing it in an efficient manner, is a major challenge. This holds true for other types of functionality such as time multiplexing, format conversion, regeneration, etc. Importantly all-optical modulation format conversion is likely to be used for future all-optical networks in order to add the optical network flexibility [50, 51]. In these networks, systems deployed in different regions could have different bit rates and modulation formats depending on the network size. Therefore, a critical requirement will be the transparent interconnection of these different network islands, which should take place by all-optical means at the network gateways [52].

Transparent optical multicast by multiwavelength conversion has revealed a brand-new way for performing data multicast function directly in the optical domain without passing through any electronics. It provides new visions of optical network designs in terms of optical network switching and forwarding efficiency, transparency, and effectiveness [53]. One-to-many or multichannel wavelength converters are very attractive because they could potentially reduce the number of converters in a routing node without adding more complexity in the switch design. Applications for optical multicast include teleconferencing, video distribution, multiparty gaming and global enterprise virtual private networks (VPNs), etc. [54].

Advertisement

6. All optical converters

The implementation of simple converters can be considered an enabling technology for taking the full advantage of the wavelength dimension in WDM networks. A straightforward implementation of a converter would be a detector followed by an electronic amplifier and a transmitter with the desired new output format/wavelength. However this principle suffers from both a high component count and a high power consumption making the approach impractical for use in large optical switches. Therefore, much attention has been devoted to the realization of all optical converters exploiting the properties of nonlinear devices relying on mechanisms such as cross gain modulation (XGM), cross phase modulation (XPM) and four-wave mixing (FWM) in nonlinear devices [55].

6.1 Cross gain modulation (XGM)

In its general form the principle of operation of the technique is that an optical input signal to be wavelength converted is used to saturate the gain of an active nonlinear element and thereby modulate a continuous wave (CW) signal (pump) at the desired output wavelength [49, 56, 57, 58] as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Schematic of wavelength conversion by XGM in nonlinear medium [27].

Several approaches have emerged to implement all optical wavelength conversion using XGM in SOA, but its conversion speed is determined by the carrier dynamics [59], which are governed by slow interband carrier recombination [60]. Some indicative examples include the work presented in [61] where a 1.2 mm long SOA is used for 40 Gb/s conversion with 1.5 dB power penalty. In [62] a 2 mm long SOA is used for achieving 100 Gb/s wavelength conversion based on XGM. In [63] 80 Gb/s conversion with reportedly low penalty has been achieved.

XGM WCs are attractive because of their simplicity and high conversion efficiency, and the conversion can be made independent of the polarization of the incoming signal. The XGM converter has a number of shortcomings, such as (bit stream) data polarity inversion and the relatively large chirp of the output signal due to the large gain modulation. Finally other than wavelength conversion, XGM has been used for many functions like: format conversion [64], multicasting [65] and header processing in packet switches [66, 67].

6.2 Cross phase modulation (XPM)

In XPM, phase change of the nonlinear element is used rather than the gain change. The optical input signal power controls the phase difference acquired by a pump along the two arms through the refractive index of the nonlinear element [68]. There are number of interferometric configurations that have been used for XPM, some of these are shown in Figure 8. A very promising method is XPM in delayed interference signal wavelength convertor configuration (DISC) [62, 69]. 3R regeneration with DISCs has been demonstrated in [70] and a Michelson’s interferometer (MI) [71], Mach-Zehnder (MZ) [72]. Some of the first implementations to appear using the interferometric technique is Terahertz Optical Asymmetrical Demultiplexer (TOAD) [73] configuration for the MZI where high-speed operation has been achieved [75].

Figure 8.

Different interferometric configurations that have been used as optical gates (a) MZ, (b) TOAD, (c) NOLM, (d) MI, (e) DISC or (f) UNI and (g) push-pull [74].

These converters can perform ultra-high bit rate operations, e.g., demultiplexing from 250 Gb/s [76]. Configurations like the TOAD or the Ultra-fast Nonlinear Interferometer (UNI) [77] have been used mainly for optical processing functions other than wavelength conversion. For instance, UNI configurations have successfully been used in [78] for optical packet switching and in [79] for clock recovery. The use of SOAs is favored over the other elements mentioned above by virtue of compactness and the potential for amplification in suitable all active configurations [56].

The most promising implementation is based on Mach-Zehnder (MZ) structures, their compactness and broad range of functionalities give a very versatile, and thereby a very cost effective device. Nevertheless, owing to the carrier recovery time, the operating bit-rate of the MZ is limited, like the XGM gates. To tackle this problem push-pull configurations have been suggested where, by applying phase changes in both arms [56], the performance can be significantly enhanced [80, 81]. This configuration has been used in a number of different signal processing applications such as demultiplexing [81], regeneration [82], add-and-drop multiplexing [83], regenerative add-and-drop multiplexing [84] and format and wavelength conversion [85]. In fiber-based devices, the nonlinear loop mirror (NOLM) is of particular interest [86, 87]. Due to the inherently ultra-fast response of the Kerr nonlinearity, the NOLM is capable of performing a number of fast bit-level processes e.g., 640 to 10 Gb/s demultiplexing [88], regeneration [89], simultaneous 10 Gb/s wavelength conversion and regeneration [90], and clock extraction [91]. Other than in interferometric configurations, phase modulation can be translated into power modulation by a simple notch filter like that in [92] and XPM can be achieved. XPM in fibers has been used in other configurations to provide 160 Gb/s conversion and 3R regeneration [93] and low penalty wavelength conversion [94]. Recently Raman enhanced self-phase modulation in fibers attracted a lot of attention as an ultra fast technique with noise suppression capabilities [95], however the method is still immature. Generally, nonintegrated devices suffer from stability problems and encounter control issues.

6.3 Wave mixing based: four wave mixing (FWM)

The linearity of the optical reaction is lost when a high-power optical signal is introduced into a fiber. Four wave mixing is a sort of optical Kerr impact, happens when light of two or more unlike wavelengths is launched in a fiber, offering ascend to another wave. When two pump photons are formed, two photons are created: the first one at the signal frequency, the other one at a complementary frequency called idler as shown in Figure 9 [96, 97]. A schematic of the FWM process, that takes place in nonlinear media, is shown in Figure 10. The beating of two distinctive frequency waves modulates the medium’s polarization and generates a grating. The input wave interaction with the gratings leads to new components of the frequency. The cause of FWM in SOAs [98, 99, 100, 101, 102], is linked to interband and intraband carrier dynamics, while in passive devices and fibers it is because of the induced polarization of the medium under an electric field. The major disadvantage of FWM is its low efficiency, which results in low power FWM products. The main parameter that affects both the efficiency and optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) is the unsaturated gain [68, 103], which can be enhanced by utilizing either longer SOAs, with a smaller active layer [104] or different structures such as multiquantum well devices [103]. The use of an assisted beam has been suggested for the enhancement of the FWM efficiency in [105, 106].

Figure 9.

FWM effect in the spectral domain after the propagation of the signal and the two pumps in DSF fiber [27].

Figure 10.

Mixing of a control and input signal for a four-wave mixing based gate [27].

Another disadvantage is that FWM is normally polarization sensitive. The problem has been tackled by using dual-pump configurations [107, 108]. In [109] a 80 nm conversion bandwidth was achieved by dual pump configuration at 2.5 Gb/s. In [110] an almost constant efficiency (<3 dB variation) over a 36 nm wavelength conversion of a 10 Gb/s channel, was achieved.

Due to the nature of the nonlinearities, four wave mixing is very fast. In [111] a multiplexed channel of 100 Gb/s was converted over a range of 3.2 nm by a 2 mm SOA. In addition to converting high bit rate pulses [112, 113, 114], the method has been utilized to convert modulation formats [115, 116]. Very fast FWM conversion has been applied as in the demonstration of a 6.3 GHz clock extraction from a 400 Gb/s signal [117], 100 to 10 Gb/s demultipler based on photonic downconversion for a stable add/drop operation [118]. Regenerative properties of wavelength converters based on FWM in a semiconductor optical amplifier have also been demonstrated in [119].

Another advantage of FWM is that it supports the simultaneous conversion of multiple wavelengths. This has been demonstrated in [48] where 26 WDM channels were simultaneously converted in a highly nonlinear, specially designed fiber. In [101, 120] multichannel SOA based FWM is investigated. In [65, 121] it has been used for multicasting. In a highly nonlinear fiber for FWM was used to demonstrate simultaneous conversion of 200 Gb/s [122] and 32 × 10 Gb/s channels [123].

FWM is a very promising technique, but due to the complexity of the configuration for polarization insensitive operation or wide tunability it will probably be used only for converters operating at 100 Gb/s and beyond.

Advertisement

7. All optical signal processing functionalities survey

Many efforts have been put in the past years to design and implement the entire collection of subsystems required for enabling high speed all-optical routing and switching by all-optical signal processing exploiting a variety of nonlinear media [124]. Significant examples are, format conversion by cross phase modulation at 40 Gb/s based on single SOAs [125] and 160 Gb/s all-optical OOK to DPSK format converter based on HNLF [126]. Both the schemes require high input power, i.e. high clock power in the first case and high input power, 20 dBm for the HNLF, making their operation expensive in terms of energy consumption. Coupling loss of 8 dB between the lensed fiber and the waveguide is reported in [127], as reverse biased silicon-on-isolator p-i-n rib waveguides is wavelength converted via FWM. In [128], demonstration of FC NRZ-DPSK-to-RZ-DPSK, NRZ-DPSK-to-RZ-DPSK and NRZ-to-RZ in a PPLN waveguide by using SHG/DFG, while all-optical wavelength MC based on combination of XGM and XPM in a QD-SOA is presented in [129]. Here the detrimental effect of FWM coherent cross talk on the conversion is identified as the major drawback, responsible for degradation when using four equally spaced channels. Recently, T-H Cheng et al. demonstrated the multicasting in a HNLF loop mirror using FWM at 10 Gbit/s, but using three-pump lasers. In [130], demonstration of Grooming Switch for an OTDM Meshed Networking was reported, however OTDM-to-WDM would need thermally stabilized packaging and the light-paths in the WDM-to-OTDM must preferably be made of waveguides rather than fiber. Each of the demonstration could not support simultaneous MC, FC and WC of multiple modulation format signals to groom OTDM signals in a gridless elastic communication [7]. Table 2 summarizes the devices used in all optical processing functionalities to date.

Table 2.

Major technologies devices for all-optical processing reported to date.

The suitability of optical wavelength converters for future networks will be judged on specific criteria that these must fulfill [56, 60]. In particular, modules will ideally have to simultaneously present the following characteristics: compactness (can be integrated in a single substrate with the other switch modules), operation at low optical/electrical powers with high dynamic range, polarization insensitivity, complete transparency to bit-rate (>100 Gb/s) and format or easily adjustable, induce minimal transmission power penalty (small chirp, amplitude distortion and extinction ratio reduction, and large OSNR) to a signal and thus can be cascaded, provision of amplification and (ideally) regeneration and wide conversion bandwidth (tunability) without the need of filtering.

The fundamental idea, common for all technologies discussed here, is the exploitation of the physical properties of a nonlinear element to perform optical processing. The main nonlinear elements are: SOA-MZI, PPLN and HNLF. SOA based devices have the added advantages of compactness and low energy requirements to trigger nonlinearities. Fibers have an instantaneous response to pulses but on the other hand have limited nonlinearity, even in specially designed photonic crystal fibers, hence long lengths and high injected powers are required for efficient operation [74].

Advertisement

8. Conclusion

Exploring methods for the processing of signals in the optical domain, the chapter includes the solutions for the efficient transport of heterogeneous traffic by enhancing the flexibility of the optical layer in allocating network resources as well as for the implementation of an adaptable infrastructure that provides on-demand functionality according to traffic requirements. Further provides a comprehensive review of the state-of-the art of optical signal processing technologies and devices. It presents breakthrough solutions for enabling a pervasive use of optical signal processing to overcome the capacity crunch in optical fiber applications. The chapter content ranges from the road map toward elastic optical networks, optical switching paradigms, need for elastic optical node and application that support gridless node in optical communication having the ability of repositioning signals in a fragmented spectrum by all-optical signal processing functionalities such as MC, spectrum defragmentation, FC, WC and grooming of high speed signals in order to maintain a proficient resource utilization.

References

  1. 1. Yan L, Willner AE, Wu X, Yi A, Bogoni A, Chen Z-Y, et al. All-optical signal processing for ultrahigh speed optical systems and networks. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2012;30(24):3760-3770
  2. 2. Willner AE, Fallahpour A, Alishahi F, Cao Y, Mohajerin-Ariaei A, Almaiman A, et al. All-optical signal processing techniques for flexible networks. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2018;37(1):21-35
  3. 3. Ji Y, Zhang J, Zhao Y, Yu X, Zhang J, Chen X. Prospects and research issues in multi-dimensional all optical networks. Science China Information Sciences. 2016;59(10):101301
  4. 4. Willner AE, Khaleghi S, Chitgarha MR, Yilmaz OF. All-optical signal processing. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2013;32(4):660-680
  5. 5. Zhong K, Zhou X, Huo J, Yu C, Lu C, Lau APT. Digital signal processing for short-reach optical communications: A review of current technologies and future trends. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2018;36(2):377-400
  6. 6. Amaya N, Zervas GS, Rofoee BR, Irfan M, Qin Y, Simeonidou D. Field trial of a 1.5 Tb/s adaptive and gridless OXC supporting elastic 1000-fold all-optical bandwidth granularity. Optics Express. 2011;19(26):B235-B241
  7. 7. Anis MI, Amaya N, Zervas G, Pinna S, Scaffardi M, Fresi F, et al. Field trial demonstration of spectrum defragmentation and grooming in elastic optical node. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2013;31(12):1845-1855
  8. 8. Jinno M, Takara H, Kozicki B, Tsukishima Y, Sone Y, Matsuoka S. Spectrum-efficient and scalable elastic optical path network: architecture, benefits, and enabling technologies. IEEE communications magazine. 2009;47(11):66-73
  9. 9. Jensen R, Lord A, Parsons N. Colourless, directionless,contentionless ROADM architecture using low-loss opticalmatrix switches. In: Proc. European Conf. Optical Communication (ECOC), Torino, Italy, Paper Mo.2.D.2. 2010. pp. 1-3
  10. 10. Wen K, Yin Y, Geisler DJ, Chang S, Yoo SJB. Dynamic on-demand lightpath provisioning using spectral defragmentation in flexible bandwidth networks. In: European Conference and Exposition on Optical Communications. Geneva, Switzerland: Optical Society of America; 2011. p. Mo-2
  11. 11. Alabarce MG. Politecnico di Torino. 2013. Available: https://iris.polito.it/retrieve/handle/11583/2506247/59343/phd_thesis_Garrich.pdf
  12. 12. Winzer PJ et al. Generation and 1,200-km transmission of 448-Gb/s ETDM 56-Gbaud PDM 16-QAM using a single I/Q modulator. In: 2010 36th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication (ECOC), Torino, Italy, Paper PDP2. 2. 2010. pp. 1-3
  13. 13. Chandrasekhar S, Liu X, Zhu B, Peckham DW. Transmission of a 1.2-Tb/s 24-carrier no-guard-interval coherent OFDM superchannel over 7200-km of ultra-large-area fiber. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC), Vienna, Austria, Paper PD2.6. 2009. pp. 1-3
  14. 14. Hillerkuss D, Schellinger T, Schmogrow R, Winter M, Vallaitis T, Bonk R, et al. Single source optical OFDM transmitter and optical FFT receiver demonstrated at line rates of 5.4 and 10.8 Tbit/s. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference; San Diego, CA. Optical Society of America; 2010. p. PDPC1
  15. 15. Yu J, Dong Z, Chi N. Generation, transmission and coherent detection of 11.2 Tb/s (112 × 100 Gb/s) single source optical OFDM superchannel. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference; Los Angeles, CA. Optical Society of America; 2011. p. PDPA6
  16. 16. Huang Y-K, Ip E, Xia TJ, Wellbrock GA, Huang M-F, Aono Y, et al. Mixed line-rate transmission (112-Gb/s, 450-Gb/s, and 1.15-Tb/s) over 3560 km of field-installed fiber with filterless coherent receiver. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2011;30(4):609-617
  17. 17. Eiselt M, Teipen B, Grobe K, Elbers J-P. WDM transport towards Terabits/s line rates—What will be gained? In: Photonic Networks, 12. ITG Symposium. Leipzig, Germany: VDE; 2011. pp. 1-6
  18. 18. Kakande J, Slavík R, Parmigiani F, Petropoulos P, Richardson D. All-optical processing of multi-level phase shift keyed signals. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference; Los Angeles, CA. Optical Society of America; 2012. p. OW1I-3
  19. 19. Payne DN. The optical fibre Internet: Where next? In: ICTON’12. Coventry, UK: University of Warwick; 2012
  20. 20. Gringeri S, Basch B, Shukla V, Egorov R, Xia TJ. Flexible architectures for optical transport nodes and networks. IEEE Communications Magazine. 2010;48(7):40-50
  21. 21. Angelou ITEPM. A survey of recent developments on flexible/elastic optical networking. In: ICTON’12. Coventry, United Kingdom: University of Warwick; 2012
  22. 22. Miyamoto Y, Kawamura R. Space division multiplexing optical transmission technology to support the evolution of high-capacity optical transport networks. NTT Technical Review. 2017;15(6):1-7
  23. 23. Essiambre RJ, Kramer G, Winzer PJ, Foschini GJ, Goebel B. Capacity limits of optical fiber networks. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2010;28(4):662-701
  24. 24. Ip EJ, Mateo P, Huang E, Xu YK, Qian L, Bai D, et al. 100G and beyond transmission technologies for evolving optical networks and relevant physical-layer issues. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2012;100(5):1065-1078
  25. 25. Jinno M, Takara H, Sone Y, Yonenaga K, Hirano A. Elastic optical path network architecture: Framework for spectrally-efficient and scalable future optical networks. IEICE Transactions on Communications. 2012;95(3):706-713
  26. 26. Jinno M, Takara H, Yonenaga K. Why do we need elastic optical path networking in the 1 Tb/s era? In: Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics/Pacific Rim; Sydney, Australia. Optical Society of America; 2011. p. C74
  27. 27. Anis MI. An experimental investigation of all-optical signal processing techniques for application in elastic optical networking [PhD]. UK: School of Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, University of Essex; 2014
  28. 28. De Leenheer M, Develder C, Buysse J, Dhoedt B, Demeester P. Performance analysis and dimensioning of multi-granular optical networks. Optical Switching and Networking. 2009;6(2):88-98
  29. 29. Mahony MO, Politi C, Hill G. Roadmap on optical transport network technologies. In: 2008 10th Anniversary International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, Athens, Greece. Vol. 1. IEEE; 2008. pp. 165-168
  30. 30. Guide P. WaveShaper—Family of Programmable Optical Processors. Available from: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:tFoPyk7UtlYJ:https://www.digikey.com/Site/Global/Layouts/DownloadPdf.ashx%3FpdfUrl%3DE470BF5108FB43B9A011925D65AB41DD+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=pk&client=firefox-b-d
  31. 31. Wang Z, Liu H, Sun Q , Huang N, Han J. All-optical wavelength conversion based on four-wave mixing in dispersion-engineered silicon nanowaveguides. Journal of Russian Laser Research. 2017;38(2):204-210
  32. 32. Moralis-Pegios M, Terzenidis N, Mourgias-Alexandris G, Vyrsokinos K, Pleros N. A 1024-port optical uni-and multicast packet switch fabric. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2019;37(4):1415-1423
  33. 33. Raja A, Mukherjee K, Roy J, Maji K. Analysis of polarization encoded optical switch implementing cross polarization modulation effect in semiconductor optical amplifier. Probe. 2019;5(1):1-5
  34. 34. Barral D, Bencheikh K, Olver PJ, Belabas N, Levenson JA. Symmetry-based analytical solutions to the χ(2) nonlinear directional coupler. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.04897. 2019
  35. 35. Ma Y, Sikdar D, Fedosyuk A, Velleman L, Zhao M, Tang L, et al. An auxetic thermo-responsive nanoplasmonic optical switch. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2019;11:22754-22760
  36. 36. Sun Q , Sun DG. Investigation for the thermal conduction of silicon oxide waveguide optical switch. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Manipulation, Manufacturing and Measurement on the Nanoscale (3M-NANO), Hangzhou, China. IEEE; 2018. pp. 159-162
  37. 37. Kwon K, Seok TJ, Henriksson J, Luo J, Ochikubo L, Jacobs J, et al. 128× 128 silicon photonic MEMS switch with scalable row/column addressing. In: CLEO: Science and Innovations; San Jose, CA, USA. Optical Society of America; 2018. p. SF1A-4
  38. 38. Nashimoto K, Kudzuma D, Han H. High-speed switching and filtering using PLZT waveguide devices. In: OECC 2010 Technical Digest, Sapporo, Japan. IEEE; 2010. pp. 540-542
  39. 39. Wu MC, Solgaard O, Ford JE. Optical MEMS for lightwave communication. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2007;24(12):4433-4454
  40. 40. Bitting M. New optical switches enable automated testing with true flexibility. In: Proceedings AUTOTESTCON 2004, San Antonio, TX, USA. IEEE; 2004. pp. 361-366
  41. 41. Amaya N, Zervas GS, Simeonidou D. Optical node architectures for elastic networks: From static to architecture on demand. In: 2012 14th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON), Coventry, United Kingdom. IEEE; 2012. pp. 1-4
  42. 42. Li Z, Yu X, Xie S, Wang Y, Wang Y, Zhao Y, et al. Module selection algorithm based on WSS/SSS-hybrid AoD node in dynamic elastic optical networks. In: International Conference on Communications and Networking in China. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. 194-203
  43. 43. Amaya N, Zervas GS, Simeonidou D. Architecture on demand for transparent optical networks. In: 2011 13th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, Stockholm, Sweden. IEEE; 2011. pp. 1-4
  44. 44. Simeonidou D, Amaya N, Zervas G. Infrastructure and architectures on demand for flexible and elastic optical networks. In: European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication; Amsterdam, Netherland. Optical Society of America; 2012. p. Tu-3
  45. 45. Anis MI, Amaya N, Zervas GS, Nejabati R, Simeonidou D, Scaffardi M, et al. Defragmentation and grooming on 85.4 Gb/s by simultaneous format and wavelength conversion in an integrated quad SOA-MZI. In: 2012 16th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modelling (ONDM). Colchester, UK: IEEE; 2012. pp. 1-6
  46. 46. Amaya N, Irfan M, Zervas G, Banias K, Garrich M, Henning I, et al. Gridless optical networking field trial: Flexible spectrum switching, defragmentation and transport of 10G/40G/100G/555G over 620-km field fiber. Optics express. 2011;19(26):B277-B282
  47. 47. Amaya N, Zervas G, Irfan M, Zhou Y, Lord A, Simeonidou D. Experimental demonstration of gridless spectrum and time optical switching. Optics Express. 2011;19(12):11182-11188
  48. 48. Wada N, Furukawa H. Evolution of dynamic optical networks. In: Presented at the 16th International Conference on Optical Network Design and Modelling (ONDM); Colchester, UK. 2012
  49. 49. Bondarczuk K. All-optical processing for terabit/s wavelength division multiplexed systems using two-photon absorption in a semiconductor micro-cavity [doctor of philosophy]. School of Electronic Engineering Dublin City University; 2009. Available from: http://doras.dcu.ie/3621/2/Thesis_KBondarczuk_3_copyright_clear.pdf
  50. 50. Aso O, Arai S, Yagi T, Tadakuma M, Suzuki Y, Namiki S. Broadband four-wave mixing generation in short optical fibres. Electronics Letters. 2002;36(8):709-711
  51. 51. Tzanakaki A. Tunable wavelength conversion in optical networks [PhD]. United Kingdom: University of Essex; 2000
  52. 52. Jun S, Park K, Kim H, Chung H, Lee J, Chung Y. Passive Optical NRZ to-RZ Converter. Vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: IEEE; 2004. p. 3
  53. 53. Wei X, Leuthold J, Zhang L. Delay Interferometer-based Optical Pulse Generator. Vol. 1. Los Angeles, CA: IEEE; 2004. p. 773
  54. 54. Mishina K, Maruta A, Mitani S, Miyahara T, Ishida K, Shimizu K, et al. NRZ-OOK-to-RZ-BPSK modulation-format conversion using SOA-MZI wavelength converter. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2006;24(10):3751-3758
  55. 55. Rouskas GN. Optical layer multicast: rationale, building blocks, and challenges. Network, IEEE. 2003;17(1):60-65
  56. 56. Yan N, Teixeira A, Silveira T, Koonen T, Tafur Monroy I, Monteiro P, et al. Simultaneous multi-wavelength signal conversion for transparent optical multicast. In: European Conference on Networks Optical communications (NOC). 2005
  57. 57. Mikkelsen B. Optical amplifiers and their system applications [PhD]. Electromagnetic Systems, Technical University of Denmark; 1994
  58. 58. Stubkjaer KE. Semiconductor optical amplifier-based all-optical gates for high-speed optical processing. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 2002;6(6):1428-1435
  59. 59. White I, Penty R, Webster M, Chai YJ, Wonfor A, Shahkooh S. Wavelength switching components for future photonic networks. Communications Magazine, IEEE. 2002;40(9):74-81
  60. 60. Yoo SJB. Wavelength conversion technologies for WDM network applications. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 1996;14(6):955-966
  61. 61. Durhuus T, Mikkelsen B, Joergensen C, Danielsen L, Stubkjaer KE. All-optical wavelength conversion by semiconductor optical amplifiers. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 1996;14(6):942-954
  62. 62. Danielsen S, Joergensen C, Vaa M, Mikkelsen B, Stubkjaer K, Doussiere P, et al. Bit error rate assessment of 40 Gbit/s all-optical polarisation independent wavelength converter. Electronics Letters. 2002;32(18):1688
  63. 63. Leuthold J, Joyner C, Mikkelsen B, Raybon G, Pleumeekers J, Miller B, et al. 100 Gbit/s all-optical wavelength conversion with integrated SOA delayed-interference configuration. Electronics Letters. 2002;36(13):1129-1130
  64. 64. Nesset D, Kelly T, Marcenac D. All-optical wavelength conversion using SOA nonlinearities. Communications Magazine, IEEE. 2002;36(12):56-61
  65. 65. Norte D, Willner AE. All-optical data format conversions and reconversions between the wavelength and time domains for dynamically reconfigurable WDM networks. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2002;14(6):1170-1182
  66. 66. Xu L, Perros HG, Rouskas G. Techniques for optical packet switching and optical burst switching. Communications Magazine, IEEE. 2002;39(1):136-142
  67. 67. Park E, Norte D, Willner A. Simultaneous all-optical packet-header replacement and wavelength shifting for a dynamically-reconfigurable WDM network. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;7(7):810-812
  68. 68. Pinto A. Optical networks: A practical perspective. Journal of Optical Networking. 2002;1(6):219-220
  69. 69. Vlachos K, Raffaelli C, Aleksic S, Andriolli N, Apostolopoulos D, Avramopoulos H, et al. Photonics in switching: enabling technologies and subsystem design. Journal of Optical Networking. 2009;8(5):404-428
  70. 70. Nakamura S, Ueno Y, Tajima K. 168-Gb/s all-optical wavelength conversion with a symmetric-Mach-Zehnder-type switch. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;13(10):1091-1093
  71. 71. Leuthold J, Raybon G, Su Y, Essiambre R, Cabot S, Jaques J, et al. 40 Gbit/s transmission and cascaded all-optical wavelength conversion over 1000000 km. Electronics Letters. 2002;38(16):890-892
  72. 72. Pedersen R, Nissov N, Mikkelsen B, Poulsen H, Stubkjaer K, Gustavsson M, et al. Transmission through a cascade of 10 all-optical interferometric wavelength converter spans at 10 Gbit/s. Electronics Letters. 2002;32(11):1034-1035
  73. 73. Durhuus T, Joergensen C, Mikkelsen B, Pedersen R, Stubkjaer K. All optical wavelength conversion by SOA’s in a Mach-Zehnder configuration. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;6(1):53-55
  74. 74. Sokoloff J, Prucnal P, Glesk I, Kane M. A terahertz optical asymmetric demultiplexer (TOAD). Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;5(7):787-790
  75. 75. Politi C, Matrakidis C, Stavdas A. Optical wavelength and waveband converters. In: 2006 International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. Vol. 1. IEEE; 2006. pp. 179-182
  76. 76. Politi C, Matrakidis C, Stavdas A. Optical wavelength and waveband converters. In: 2006 International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. Vol. 1. Nottingham, UK: IEEE; 2006
  77. 77. Glesk I, Sokoloff J, Prucnal P. Demonstration of all-optical demultiplexing of TDM data at 250 Gbit/s. Electronics Letters. 2002;30(4):339-341
  78. 78. Patel N, Rauschenbach K, Hall K. 40-Gb/s demultiplexing using an ultrafast nonlinear interferometer (UNI). Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;8(12):1695-1697
  79. 79. Theophilopoulos G, Kalyvas M, Bintjas C, Pleros N, Yiannopoulos K, Stavdas A, et al. Optically addressable 2 x 2 exchange/bypass packet switch. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters. 2002;14(7):998-1000
  80. 80. Yiannopoulos K, Pleros N, Bintjas C, Kalyvas M, Theophilopoulos G, Avramopoulos H, et al. All-Optical Packet Clock Recovery Circuit. Vol. 2. Copenhagen, Denmark: IEEE; 2006. pp. 1-2
  81. 81. Wang Q , Zhu G, Chen H, Jaques J, Leuthold J, Piccirilli AB, et al. Study of all-optical XOR using Mach-Zehnder interferometer and differential scheme. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 2004;40(6):703-710
  82. 82. Tajima K. All-optical switch with switch-off time unrestricted by carrier lifetime. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics. 1993;32:L1746-L1749
  83. 83. Dutta AK, Dutta NK, Fujiwara M. WDM Technologies: Passive Optical Components. Vol. 1. San Diago, US: Academic Press; 2003
  84. 84. Hess R, Duelk M, Vogt W, Gamper E, Gini E, Besse P, et al. Simultaneous all-optical add and drop multiplexing of 40 Gbit/s OTDM signals using monolithically integrated Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Electronics Letters. 2002;34(6):579-580
  85. 85. Fischer S, Dulk M, Gamper E, Vogt W, Hunziker W, Gini E, et al. All-optical regenerative OTDM add-drop multiplexing at 40 Gb/s using monolithic InP Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2000;12(3):335-337
  86. 86. Jepsen K, Clausen A, Mikkelsen B, Poulsen H, Stubkjaer K. Alloptical Network Interface for Bit Synchronisation and Regeneration. Vol. 5. Edinburgh, UK: IET; 2002. pp. 89-92
  87. 87. Yu J, Zheng X, Peucheret C, Clausen AT, Poulsen HN, Jeppesen P. 40-Gb/s all-optical wavelength conversion based on a nonlinear optical loop mirror. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2002;18(7):1001-1006
  88. 88. Blow K, Doran NJ, Nelson B. Demonstration of the nonlinear fibre loop mirror as an ultrafast all-optical demultiplexer. Electronics Letters. 2008;26(14):962-964
  89. 89. Yamamoto T, Yoshida E, Nakazawa M. Ultrafast nonlinear optical loop mirror for demultiplexing 640 Gbit/s TDM signals. Electronics Letters. 2002;34(10):1013-1014
  90. 90. Lucek J, Smith K. All-optical signal regenerator. Optics letters. 1993;18(15):1226-1228
  91. 91. Yu J, Zheng X, Liu F, Buxens A, Jeppesen P. Simultaneous realization wavelength conversion and signal regeneration using a nonlinear optical loop mirror. Optics Communications. 2000;175(1-3):173-177
  92. 92. Nakazawa M, Suzuki K, Yamada E. NOLM oscillator and its injection locking technique for timing clock extraction and demultiplexing. Electronics Letters. 1996;32:1122
  93. 93. Olsson BE, Ohlen P, Rau L, Blumenthal DJ. A simple and robust 40-Gb/s wavelength converter using fiber cross-phase modulation and optical filtering. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;12(7):846-848
  94. 94. Schubert C, Ludwig R, Watanabe S, Futami E, Schmidt C, Berger J, et al. 160 Gbit/s wavelength converter with 3R-regenerating capability. Electronics Letters. 2002;38(16):903-904
  95. 95. Rau L, Wang W, Camatel S, Poulsen H, Blumenthal DJ. All-optical 160-Gb/s phase reconstructing wavelength conversion using cross-phase modulation (XPM) in dispersion-shifted fiber. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2004;16(11):2520-2522
  96. 96. Galili M, Oxenløwe LK, Zibar D, Clausen A, Jeppesen P. 160 Gb/s Raman assisted SPM Wavelength converter. In: 30th European Conference on Optical Communication. 2004
  97. 97. Osamu ASO, Tadakuma M, Namiki S. Four-wave mixing in optical fibers and its applications. Furukawa Electric Review, Japan. 2000;105:46-51
  98. 98. Haris M. Advanced modulation formats for high-bit-rate optical networks [doctor of philosophy]. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology; 2008
  99. 99. Yamawaku J, Yamazaki E, Takada A, Morioka T. Field trial of virtual-grouped-wavelength-path switching with QPM-LN waveband converter and PLC matrix switch in JGN II test bed. Electronics Letters. 2005;41(2):88-89
  100. 100. Guekos G. Photonic Devices for Telecommunications. Germany, Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1999. pp. 269-368
  101. 101. Diez S, Schmidt C, Ludwig R, Weber HG, Obermann K, Kindt S, et al. Four-wave mixing in semiconductor optical amplifiers for frequency conversion and fast optical switching. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 2002;3(5):1131-1145
  102. 102. Geraghty DF, Lee RB, Verdiell M, Ziari M, Mathur A, Vahala KJ. Wavelength conversion for WDM communication systems using four-wave mixing in semiconductor optical amplifiers. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 2002;3(5):1146-1155
  103. 103. Hsu A, Chuang S. Wavelength conversion by dual-pump four-wave mixing in an integrated laser modulator. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2003;15(8):1120-1122
  104. 104. D’ottavi A, Girardin F, Graziani L, Martelli F, Spano P, Mecozzi A, et al. Four-wave mixing in semiconductor optical amplifiers: A practical tool for wavelength conversion. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics. 2002;3(2):522-528
  105. 105. Girardin F, Eckner J, Guekos G, Dall’Ara R, Mecozzi A, D’Ottavi A, et al. Low-noise and very high-efficiency four-wave mixing in 1.5-mm-long semiconductor optical amplifiers. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 1997;9(6):746-748
  106. 106. Lee SL, Gong PM, Yang CT. Performance enhancement on SOA-based four-wave-mixing wavelength conversion using an assisted beam. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;14(12):1713-1715
  107. 107. Lee SL, Gong PM, Lin YM, Lee SSW, Yuang MC. High-efficiency wide-band SOA-based wavelength converters by using dual-pumped four-wave mixing and an assist beam. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2004;16(8):1903-1905
  108. 108. Hasegawa T, Inoue K, Oda K. Polarization independent frequency conversion by fiber four-wave mixing with a polarization diversity technique. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;5(8):947-949
  109. 109. Morgan TJ, Tucker RS, Lacey JPR. All-optical wavelength translation over 80 nm at 2.5 Gb/s using four-wave mixing in a semiconductor optical amplifier. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;11(8):982-984
  110. 110. Mak MWK, Tsang H, Chan K. Widely tunable polarization-independent all-optical wavelength converter using a semiconductor optical amplifier. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2000;12(5):525-527
  111. 111. Kelly A, Ellis A, Nesset D, Kashyap R, Moodie D. 100 Gbit/s wavelength conversion using FWM in an MQW semiconductor optical amplifier. Electronics Letters. 2002;34(20):1955-1956
  112. 112. Kelly A, Marcenac D, Nesset D. 40 Gbit/s wavelength conversion over 24.6 nm using FWM in a semiconductor optical amplifier with an optimised MQW active region. Electronics Letters. 2002;33(25):2123-2124
  113. 113. Ludwig R, Raybon G. BER measurements of frequency converted signals using four-wave mixing in a semiconductor laser amplifier at 1, 2.5, 5 and 10 Gbit/s. Electronics Letters. 2002;30(4):338-339
  114. 114. Arahira S, Ogawa Y. 160-Gb/s all-optical encoding experiments by four-wave mixing in a gain-clamped SOA with assist-light injection. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2004;16(2):653-655
  115. 115. Li Z, Dong Y, Mo J, Wang Y, Lu C. Cascaded all-optical wavelength conversion for RZ-DPSK signal based on four-wave mixing in semiconductor optical amplifier. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2004;16(7):1685-1687
  116. 116. Chan K, Chan CK, Chen LK, Tong F. Demonstration of 20-Gb/s all-optical XOR gate by four-wave mixing in semiconductor optical amplifier with RZ-DPSK modulated inputs. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2004;16(3):897-899
  117. 117. Kamatani O, Kawanishi S. Prescaled timing extraction from 400 Gb/s optical signal using a phase lock loop based on four-wave-mixing in a laser diode amplifier. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;8(8):1094-1096
  118. 118. Kamatani O, Katagiri Y, Kawanishi S. 100-Gbit/s optical TDM add/drop multiplexer based on photonic downconversion and four-wave mixing. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exhibit, 1998. OFC’98., Technical Digest. San Jose, CA: IEEE; 1998. pp. 112-113
  119. 119. Simos H, Argyris A, Kanakidis D, Roditi E, Ikiades A, Syvridis D. Regenerative properties of wavelength converters based on FWM in a semiconductor optical amplifier. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2003;15(4):566-568
  120. 120. Lacey J, Madden S, Summerfield M. Four-channel polarization-insensitive optically transparent wavelength converter. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2002;9(10):1355-1357
  121. 121. Contestabile G, Presi M, Ciaramella E. Multiple wavelength conversion for WDM multicasting by FWM in an SOA. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 2004;16(7):1775-1777
  122. 122. Watanabe S, Takeda S, Ishikawa G, Ooi H, Nielsen J, Sonne C. Simultaneous Wavelength Conversion and Optical Phase Conjugation of 200 Gb/s (5× 40 Gb/s) WDM Signal Using a Highly Nonlinear Fiber Four-wave Mixer. Vol. 5. Edinburgh, UK: IET; 2002. pp. 1-4
  123. 123. Watanabe S, Takeda S, Chikama T. Interband Wavelength Conversion of 320 Gb/s (32× 10 Gb/s) WDM Signal Using a Polarization-insensitive Fiber Four-wave Mixer. Vol. 3. Madrid, Spain: IEEE; 1998. pp. 83-87
  124. 124. Clausen HCHMAT, Palushani E, Galili M, Hu H, Ji H, Xu J, et al. Ultra-high-speed optical signal processing of serial data signals. In: ICTON’12. Coventry, UK: University of Warwick; 2012
  125. 125. Jianji Dong XZ, Xu J, Huang D, Songnian F, ShumZhang P, X. 40 Gb/s all-optical NRZ to RZ format conversion using single SOA assisted by optical bandpass filter. Optics Express. 2007;15(6):2907-2914
  126. 126. Schmidt-Langhorst C, Ludwig R, Galili M, Huettl B, Futami F, Watanabe S, et al. 160 Gbit/s all-optical OOK to DPSK in-line format conversion. In: Presented at the 2006 Eur. Conf. Opt. Commun., Cannes, France, Paper Th 4.3.5. pp. 37-38
  127. 127. Kuo YH, Rong H, Sih V, Xu S, Paniccia M, Cohen O. Demonstration of wavelength conversion at 40 Gb/s data rate in silicon waveguides. Optics Express. 2006;14(24):11721-11726
  128. 128. Wang J, Sun J, Zhang X, Huang D, Fejer MM. All-optical format conversions using periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 2009;45(2):195-205
  129. 129. Contestabile G, Maruta A, Sekiguchi S, Morito K, Sugawara M, Kitayama K. All-optical wavelength multicasting in a QD-SOA. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics. 2011;47(4):541-547
  130. 130. Zarris GH-S, Hugues-Salas E, Gonzalez NA, Weerasuriya R, Parmigiani F, Hillerkuss D, et al. Field experiments with a grooming switch for OTDM meshed networking. Journal of Lightwave Technology. 2010;28(4):316-327
  131. 131. Akashi Y, Matsui SE, Isawa S, Matsushita A, Matsumoto A, Matsushima Y, et al. Demonstration of all-optical logic gate device using MQW-SOA and 10 Gbps XNOR operation. Physica Status Solidi (a). 2019;216(1):1800529
  132. 132. Sheng Y, Chen X, Krolikowski W. Direct femtosecond laser writing of nonlinear photonic crystals. In: Advances in Optics: Reviews, Book Series. Vol. 2. Canberra, Australia: International Frequency Sensor Association (IFSA); 2018
  133. 133. Alishahi F, Fallahpour A, Zou K, Cao Y, Kordts A, Karpov M, et al. Experimental generation and time multiplexing of data-carrying nyquist sinc shaped channels from a single microresonator-based Kerr frequency comb. In: Optical Fiber Communication Conference. San Diego, CA: Optical Society of America; 2019. p. W3I.2
  134. 134. Kaur S, Goyal R. All-optical decoder/demultiplexer with enable using SOA based Mach-Zehnderinterferometers. In: 2019 6th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN). Noida, India: IEEE; 2019. pp. 780-784
  135. 135. Choudhary A, Liu Y, Vu K, Ma P, Madden S, Marpaung D, et al. Narrowband gain in chalcogenide waveguides for low-power RF delay lines. In: Fiber Lasers and Glass Photonics: Materials through Applications. Vol. 10683. Strasbourg, France: International Society for Optics and Photonics; 2018. p. 1068308
  136. 136. Li S, Koch J, Pachnicke S. Optical signal processing in the discrete nonlinear frequency domain. In: 2018 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exposition (OFC). San Diego, CA: IEEE; 2018. pp. 1-3
  137. 137. Huang T, Wu Y, Xie Y, Cheng Z. A slot-waveguide-based polarization beam splitter assisted by epsilon-near-zero material. Photonics and Nanostructures-Fundamentals and Applications. 2019;33:42-47

Written By

Muhammad Irfan Anis

Submitted: March 19th, 2019 Reviewed: July 2nd, 2019 Published: November 4th, 2019