Residue generated, surplus and burned (www.nicra.iari.res.in/Data/FinalCRM.doc).
Abstract
Cellulase is an enzyme which depolymerizes the cellulose into glucose. Cellulases are produced by a diverse array of microbes including fungi, bacteria, yeast and actinomycetes. Considerable research for understanding the mechanism of cellulases began in early 1950s because of the significant use of these enzymes in various industries. This review provides a general account structure and availability of lignocellulosic biomass, pretreatment strategies for effective digestion, cellulase producing organisms, cellulase activity assay, and enzymology of cellulose degradation. Cellulase production, optimization, purification and characterization studies in addition to the industrial application of cellulase have also been discussed. At last a brief account of present market scenario of cellulases and future prospects of the study are also taken into account.
Keywords
- cellulases
- lignocellulosic biomass
- fungi
- pretreatment
1. Introduction
Cellulases are inducible enzymes which breakdown cellulose (the most widely available source of fermentable sugars on earth) into glucose and synthesized during the growth of microorganisms on cellulosic substrates [1, 2]. Cellulase is biotechnological important enzyme due to various industrial applications including biofuel production [3]. Variety of microorganism having cellulose degrading capability, few of them produce considerable quantity of extracellular enzymes. Fungi are the main cellulase producing microorganisms.
A large number of industries are based upon the agricultural raw materials and it alone accounts for about 10% of the total wages from export. At present, in terms of agricultural production, country holds 2nd position in world (http://www.agrifest.in/aboutagrifest.php). Availability of lignocellulosic biomass varies from one region to another region in our country because of specific patterns of cultivation of crops in different regions. As estimated by the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), Report 2009, Government of India (GOI) every year about 500 Mt/yr residues are generated in India. Out of total residue generated, highest contributor is Utter Pradesh (60 Mt/yr), followed by Punjab (55 Mt/yr) and Maharashtra (46 Mt/yr). Among different crops, cereals crops contribute for the generation of 352 Mt residue followed by fiber crops (66 Mt/yr), oilseed (29 Mt/yr), pulses (13 Mt/yr) and sugarcane (12 Mt/yr). Among the cereal crops up to 70% is contributed by rice, wheat, maize and millets. Rice crop alone accounts for 34% followed by wheat contributing 22% of total residue generated by cereal crops. As depicted above, out of total residues generated from all crops, 13% is contributed by fiber crops. Among fibers, cotton holds 1st position by generating 53 Mt/yr (11% of crop residues) and coconut ranks 2nd with 12 Mt/yr of residue generation. The sugarcane residue (foliage and tops) generates 12Mt/yr, i.e., 2% of crop residues (Figure 1) (www.nicra.iari.res.in/Data/FinalCRM.doc).

Figure 1.
Contribution of various crops in residue generation (
The amount of crop residues, which have not any valuable uses is either left in the fields to rot or burnt away as such, is termed as surplus biomass. A brief idea about the amount of residue generated in different states of India, surplus residues left behind after conventional use, residue burned as reported by IPCC and [6] is shown in Table 1. Two reports dictated the burnt surplus agricultural biomass approximately 83.66 Mt/yr and 92.81 Mt/yr respectively. The data from two reports vary by 11% and this difference can be due to the climatic conditions, geographic separation, sample size and time of sampling used in above mentioned studies. However, in comparison to the total surplus residues, observed difference can be considered as insignificant. Besides biomass a massive quantity of industrial residues is disposed off as such in environment generating pollution and other related problems [7]. This huge amount of lignocellulosic biomass can likely be converted into different valuable products including biofuels, cheap energy sources for microbial fermentation, enzyme production and useful fine chemicals [8].
States | Residue generation (MNRE, 2009) | Residue surplus (MNRE, 2009) | Residue burned (IPCC coeff.) | Residue burned [6] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Andhra Pradesh | 43.89 | 6.96 | 5.73 | 2.73 |
Arunachal Pradesh | 0.4 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
Assam | 11.43 | 2.34 | 1.42 | 0.73 |
Bihar | 25.29 | 5.08 | 3.77 | 3.19 |
Chhattisgarh | 11.25 | 2.12 | 1.84 | 0.83 |
Goa | 0.57 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.04 |
Gujarat | 28.73 | 8.9 | 6.69 | 3.81 |
Haryana | 27.83 | 11.22 | 5.45 | 9.06 |
Himachal Pradesh | 2.85 | 1.03 | 0.20 | 0.41 |
Jammu and Kashmir | 1.59 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.89 |
Jharkhand | 3.61 | 0.89 | 1.11 | 1.10 |
Karnataka | 33.94 | 8.98 | 2.85 | 5.66 |
Kerala | 9.74 | 5.07 | 0.40 | 0.22 |
Madhya Pradesh | 33.18 | 10.22 | 3.46 | 1.91 |
Maharashtra | 46.45 | 14.67 | 6.27 | 7.41 |
Manipur | 0.9 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.07 |
Meghalaya | 0.51 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.05 |
Mizoram | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Nagaland | 0.49 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.08 |
Orissa | 20.07 | 3.68 | 2.57 | 1.34 |
Punjab | 50.75 | 24.83 | 8.94 | 19.62 |
Rajasthan | 29.32 | 8.52 | 3.58 | 1.78 |
Sikkim | 0.15 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
Tamil Nadu | 19.93 | 7.05 | 3.55 | 4.08 |
Tripura | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.22 | 0.11 |
Uttarakhand | 2.86 | 0.63 | 13.34 | 21.92 |
Uttar Pradesh | 59.97 | 13.53 | 0.58 | 0.78 |
West Bengal | 35.93 | 4.29 | 10.82 | 4.96 |
India | 501.76 | 140.84 | 83.66 | 92.81 |
Table 1.
2. Lignocellulosic biomass
Lignocellulosic biomass is consist of cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin, water, protein and other compounds (Table 2). Cellulose and hemicelluloses provide strength to fiber and lignin act as the concrete which hold the fibers [9].
Lignocellulosic materials | Cellulose (%) | Hemicelluloses (%) | Lignin (%) | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sugar cane bagasse | 42 | 25 | 20 | [11] |
Sweet sorghum | 45 | 27 | 21 | [11] |
Hard wood | 40–55 | 24–40 | 18–25 | [12] |
Soft wood | 45–50 | 25–35 | 25–35 | [12] |
Corn cobs | 45 | 35 | 15 | [13] |
Corn stover | 38 | 26 | 19 | [14] |
Rice straw | 32.1 | 24 | 18 | [13] |
Nut shells | 25–30 | 25–30 | 30–40 | [15] |
Newspaper | 40–55 | 25–40 | 18–30 | [16] |
Grasses | 25–40 | 25–50 | 10–30 | [12] |
Wheat straw | 29–35 | 26–32 | 16–21 | [17] |
Bagasse | 54.87 | 16.52 | 23–33 | [18] |
Table 2.
Composition of lignocellulosic materials [10].
About 50% of the CO2 fixed by plants through photosynthesis get stored in cell wall in the form of cellulose [19]. It is a homo-polysaccharide of glucose residues connected by β-1,4 linkages in linear un-branched fashion (Figure 2). Basic repeating unit of the cellulose polymer is a cellobiose unit, made up of two glucose anhydride [20]. The long-chain cellulose polymers are attached to each other by van der Waals and hydrogen bonds which results in packing cellulose chains into microfibrils [21, 22]. Overall structure is found to be consisted of two different types of regions: region where the chains are highly ordered is crystalline and the region with less ordered chain is amorphous [23]. The crystalline regions of cellulose are highly stiff thus these are not easily reachable to endo-cellulases [24]. Amorphous region is more readily hydrated and more accessible to enzyme.

Figure 2.
Structure of cellulose [
Other significant component of lignocellulose is hemicellulose (Figure 3). Hemicellulose usually contributes for about 25–35% of the mass in dry wood, about 28% of softwoods, and 35% of hardwoods [26]. As compared to cellulose these possesses low molecular weight. These are found to consist of comparatively shorter chains of about 500–3000 monosaccharide units as compared to 7000–15,000 glucose residues cellulose [27]. The monosaccharides of hemicelluloses include pentoses (arabinose, rhamnose and xylose,), hexoses (glucose, galactose and mannose), and uronic acids (d-glucuronic, d-galacturonic acids and 4-o-methylglucuronic). The backbone of hemicelluloses can be a homopolymer or a heteropolymer having β-1,4 or sometimes β-1,3 glycosidic linkages. In hardwood, xylose is the principal pentose sugar but in various agricultural residues and other herbaceous, arabinose is the chief pentose sugar of hemicelluloses [28].

Figure 3.
Xyloglucan: a component of hemicelluloses [
Lignocellulosic microfibrils are found to be surrounded by a complex aromatic heteropolymer known as lignin which provides a tough protective shield to highly energetic cellulose fibers [30]. Lignin comprises of β-aryl ether, biaryl ether, phenylcoumaran, pinoresinol, or diaryl propane linked p-coumaryl, coniferyl and sinapyl alcohol units (Figure 4). It is categorized as softwood lignin when the coniferyl alcohol derivatives predominant, hardwood lignin where both coniferyl and synapyl alcohol derivatives exist together and grass lignin where it chiefly consisted of p-coumaryl alcohol derivatives [31].

Figure 4.
Chemical structure of lignin (
3. Pretreatment
Lignin is a recalcitrant component of the lignocellulosic biomass. Resistance to chemical and enzymatic attack increases with increase in lignin content [32]. Lignin the natural cement, acts as a ceiling for microbial/enzymatic attack. Hence, it is one of the major hurdles in using lingo-cellulosic materials in fermentation. Pretreatment is one of the most important steps in the process of converting renewable lignocellulosic biomass into useful products. The main target of any pretreatment is to alter or remove structural and compositional resistant to hydrolysis which further enhance digestibility of biomass [33]. It exposes cellulose and hemicellulose chains by breaking the crystalline matrix (Figure 5). To remove the obstacles for enzymatic scarification of lignocellulosic material following pretreatment used.

Figure 5.
Effect of pretreatment on lignocellulosic biomass [
3.1 Mechanical treatment
Major mechanical treatment includes chiping, grinding and milling to reduce the particle size which is responsible to increase surface area and increased surface area responsible for better interaction between substrate and enzyme [21, 35]. Physical treatment includes un-catalyzed steam explosion, hot water pretreatment and high energy radiations. By the process size reduces to 10–30 mm after chipping the biomass and finally after milling or grinding 0.2–2 mm size is attained.
3.2 Steam explosion
Mason [36] first time introduced steam explosion in which biomass is pretreated at 180–240°C under 1–3.5 MPa pressure for 1–10 min with hot steam, followed by an explosive decompression which bursts the rigid biomass fibers [37]. Nature of material to be processed and particle size are the determining factor for relationship between temperature and time [38]. Quick expansion in steam explosion vaporizes the saturated water present in fibril structure linkages between molecules, and produces a better lignocellulosic matrix [39]. Recoveries ranged from 46 to 90% indicated that significant autohydrolysis and degradation of sugars can occur during this pretreatment process [40]. Steam provides an effective mean to rapidly attain the required temperature without diluting the resulting sugar syrup. At the end, a rapid release of pressure brings temperature down and arrests the reaction [41].
3.3 Ultrasonic pretreatment
Scanning electron microscopy images reveal that ultrasonic treatment have the capacity to modify structure of lignocellulosic biomass [42]. Ultrasonic waves work by creating pressure difference within a solution [43]. The pressure wave travels through the liquid medium creating alternate regions of high (compression) and low (rarefaction) pressure (Figure 6).

Figure 6.
A pressure wave traveling through a solution [
3.4 Acid pretreatment
In this method lignocellulosic material is dipped in an acidic solution (typically H2SO4), and subjected to optimum temperature. Dilute sulfuric acid had been used at commercial scale for pretreatment of various biomasses such as Switch grass [44] Corn Stover [45] and Poplar [46]. By acid catalyzed hydrolysis (Figure 7) most of the hemicelluloses are almost removed from the micro fibrils of the biomass but delignification is achieved to a lesser extent. Dilute acids are highly effective in removing hemicelluloses as dissolved sugars as a result of which glucose yield from cellulose increase to almost 100%. The optimal conditions to attain maximum sugar yield depends on the target to be achieved [47].

Figure 7.
Cellulose hydrolysis in acidic media [
3.5 Alkaline pretreatment
It is responsible for the saponification of inter molecule delignification of the hemicelluloses. The biomass is exposed for the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicelluloses. As compared to other methods of pretreatment, alkali pretreatment is carried out for longer duration at low temperature and pressure [39]. It is supposed to act by saponification of inter-molecular ester bonds which are found to present between hemicelluloses and other components [48] (Figure 8). It is mainly responsible for delignification of lignocellulosic biomass. But it also removes some acetyl and uronic acid substitutions on hemicelluloses, which expose the biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose and hemicelluloses [49]. A major limitation of alkaline pretreatments is formation of some salts which are either irrecoverable or incorporated as salts into the biomass [50]. Reactor costs for alkali pretreatment are lower than those for acid pretreatments [51]. For a given quantity of biomass, lowest operating cost is for lime pretreatment [39]. However the use of more pricey salts at higher concentrations is the major drawback that poses environmental threats and may also hinder the recycling process [52].

Figure 8.
Ether bond cleavage in alkaline solution [
4. Enzymology of cellulose degradation
Cellulases are classified as hydrolases, i.e., they add water molecules to cleave glycosidic bonds. Cellulases purified from different microorganisms found to poses different molecular characteristics including molecular weight, amino acid composition, isoelectric point) absorbability for cellulose, catalytic activity and substrate specificity [53]. Three chief classes of cellulases recognized to date are:
Endo-β-1,4-glucanases (Cx) attacks soluble cellulose derivative in a random fashion forming nonreducing ends, producing new chain ends to be attacked by exoglucanases. These enzymes may be processive or nonprocessive. In processive enzymes, enzyme-substrate complex formation is followed by several successive breaks in a polysaccharide chain [23].
Exo-β-1,4-glucanases (C1) (avicelase) attack the reducing or nonreducing end of the cellulose polymer. Processive exo-β-1,4-glucanases are named as cellobiohydrolases. The end product of exo-glucanase hydrolysis are cellobiose and glucose units,
β-Glucosidases finally breaks cellobiose to glucose.
These enzymes act synergistically (Figure 9) [54]. An endo-acting enzyme generates new reducing and nonreducing ends. Exo-acting enzyme releases cellobiose from ends produced by endo-enzymes acting which is finally hydrolyzed by β-glucosidases to glucose [55]. Mainly four types of synergism have been identified [56]:
Endo-exo: among exo-glucanases and endo-glucanases.
Exo-exo: among exo-glucanases those processing from different ends (reducing and nonreducing ends).
Synergy between exo-glucanases and β-glucosidases that removes cellobiose.
Intramolecular synergy between catalytic domains and CBHs.

Figure 9.
Mechanism of action of cellulases [
In general cellulases comprise of two distinct domains, i.e., Small cellulose-binding module (CBM) which is noncatalytic, Large domain having catalytic characteristics (CD). Both the domains are found to be connected by a linker region (Figure 10) [57]. Till date, about 300 different CBMs have already been identified. CBMs are categorized into 45 families on the basis of their amino acid similarity [58]. This variation in affinity may be due to variation in spatial structure created by the presence of CBMs [60].

Figure 10.
Cellulases [
4.1 Source of cellulase
Cellulases are the hydrolytic enzymes which are produced by a diversity of microbes like actinomycetes, bacteria and fungi when grown on cellulosic substrates [61]. Among these organisms fungi are studied most extensively [62]. Filamentous fungi are the chief sources known for producing cellulases and hemicellulases [63]. Crude cellulases from
4.2 Cellulase activity assay
Two fundamental approaches used for measuring cellulase activity are:
Measuring individual cellulase (endoglucanases, exoglucanases and β-glucosidases) activities.
Measuring the total cellulase (FPase) activity [77].
Quantitatively cellulase activity can be assayed in three ways:
Accumulation of products after hydrolysis.
The reduction in substrate quantity.
Change in the physical properties of substrates.
The first one is ideal for measuring individual cellulase activity within a short time however the third one is a chosen for measuring total enzyme activity within a given time [77].
Total cellulase activity assay is always performed using insoluble substrates having pure cellulosic substrates such as Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The filter paper activity (FPase activity) is the key method for analysis of total cellulase activity which was developed by Mandels, cotton linter, microcrystalline cellulose, bacterial cellulose, algal cellulose and cellulose-containing substrates such as pretreated lignocellulose [78]. This standard filter paper method has been revised by Ghose which was established and published by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) [79]. He used Whatman No. 1 filter paper (1 × 6 cm strip) as the substrate. It is used as the standard substrate because of its readily availability and inexpensiveness [80].
Commercial avicel is also used for measuring exoglucanase activity because it has a low degree of polymerization (DP) and it is moderately hard to be attacked by endoglucanases [81]. Endoglucanase activity can be measured using a soluble cellulose derivative with a high degree of polymerization (DP) such as carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). It can be measured by both methods, i.e., reduction in substrate viscosity/increase in reducing sugar. CMCase activity using CMC is measured by determining reducing sugars released after 5 min of enzyme reaction with 0.5% CMC at pH 4.8 and 50°C [78]. Exoglucanases are known to cleave the easily accessible ends of cellulose molecules liberating glucose and cellobiose. β-glucosidases cleaves soluble cellobiose and other cellodextrins having DP up to 6 and liberates glucose as end product [82]. Various chromogenic and nonchromogenic substrates could be evaluated. In chromogenic method, p-nitrophenol-β-glucoside (P-NPG) can be used as the substrate. However, in the case of nonchromogenic substrates different methods used are based on nature of substrates. For example, when oligo or disaccharides (such as cellobiose) are used, released glucose can be evaluated by the GOD (glucose oxidase) method with a commercial kit but when polysaccharide are used a substrate, reducing sugars released is measured by the DNS (dinitrosalicylic acid) method [81].
4.3 Production of cellulases
The technique which are mainly used for the enzyme production are Submerged fermentation (SmF) and solid state fermentation (SSF) [83].
4.3.1 Submerged fermentation
When fermentation is performed with some free flowing nutrient media; it is termed as SmF [84]. In industry, enzymes are produced mostly by SmF, primarily due to the much simplified processes associated with scale-up compared to those involved for scale-up in SSF [85]. In fact, some other important factors like indulgence in controlling process parameters, monitoring and downstream processing makes SmF more significant [86]. Only a few designs are available in literature for SSF based bioreactors. This is principally due to several problems encountered in case of SSF for controlling various parameters like pH, temperature, aeration and moisture content. Fungal cellulase production is largely dependent on media composition and culture conditions. Thus development of a suitable fermentation strategy is necessary for full exploitation of potential of microorganism used for fermentation [87]. Several reports are available for cellulase production using SmF. Karthikeyan et al. [88] reported cellulase production from
4.3.2 Solid state fermentation
When fermentation is performed on nonsoluble materials in the absence of free flowing nutrient media, so that the material used can serve as a platform for support as well as nutrients; it is termed as solid state fermentation. While compared for their potential it was found SSF offers various opportunities over SmF because they are eco-friendly on account of lower energy requirements, produce lesser wastewater and they are based on employment of waste solid biomass [90]. Further advantages of SSF over SmF include prevalence of nonaseptic conditions, a wide variety of substrate are available, low capital cost, inexpensive downstream processing [91], higher product concentration, high reproducibility, lesser space requirements (compact fermenters), easy contamination management [92]. It is observed that production cost was decreased about 10 fold in SSF over SmF.
4.3.3 Fermentation conditions
Fermentation condition play the main role for the standardization of process parameters such as incubation period, inoculum size, pH, carbon and Nitrogen source, metal ions, etc. Maximum cellulase production may vary from 1 day to weeks. It is usually observed that fungal cultures require longer incubation period for cellulase production than bacterial cultures. The highest cellulase level was achieved 96 hrs of the fermentation while using
The age and concentration of inoculum also plays an important role in the production of cellulases. An increase in inoculum size up to an optimum limits results in rapid proliferation and biomass synthesis which leads to produced higher amount of cellulase [96]. On the other hand higher inoculum volume beyond optimum size leads to increases in the water content of medium in case of SSF creating aeration problems in SSF and it will responsible for reduction in overall yield [97].
Bacterial and fungal cellulase production found to be significantly affected by pH. Milala et al. [95] reported maximum cellulase activity at pH 4.0 by
The fermentation temperature plays a very significant role on the growth and metabolic activity of microbial cells. Optimum temperature for cellulase production under solid-state fermentation by
Various carbon sources such as metabolizable sugars, commercial cellulose and agricultural residues/by-products have been used for cellulase production. Some carbon sources resulted good growth with low enzyme production while some supported good growth along with high yield of enzyme secretion. Commercially available carbon sources used for cellulase production were Powdered cellulose by
Supplement | SmF (U/mL) | SSF (U/gDMB) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CMCase | FPase | CMCase | FPase | |
Carbon sources (5% w/v in SmF and 4% w/w in SSF) | ||||
Control | 0.7 | 0.4 | 3.7 | 2 |
Glucose | 1.52 | 0.54 | 11.1 | 6.5 |
Xylose | 1.2 | 1.42 | 15.7 | 6.6 |
Lactose | 3 | 1.71 | 18 | 10.9 |
Maltose | 1.51 | 1.5 | 17.5 | 6.3 |
Sucrose | 1.54 | 1.51 | 13.7 | 6.2 |
Table 3.
Effect of supplementation of various carbon sources [106].
Different researchers studied the effect of various nitrogen sources for cellulase production by employing different microbes. Peptone was reported as most effective nitrogen source for Penicillium sp. [110],
Cellulase production by some microorganisms has been found to be influenced by metal ions, chelators, detergents and surfactants. It was reported that usually metal ions such as Ag+, Cu2+, Hg2+, Fe3+, K+, Mn2+, Mg2+, and Zn2+ are slightly or completely inhibitory of cellulase, whereas metal ions such as Ca2+, Co2+ and Na+ either stimulate or does not affect the cellulase activity [113]. Addition of Tween20 leads to a significant increase in endoglucanase and xylanase production by
5. Purification of cellulase
It is an important step to remove any contaminants that are found to be present in the mixture. Hence, it is a vital step required for improving performance/functioning of an enzyme. Enzymes in the culture supernatant could be purified by the conventional methods which include ammonium sulfate precipitation and dialysis followed by column chromatography [117]. The most common matrix for gel exclusion chromatography is the Sephadex with different pore sizes which is employed in the purification of cellulase [118]. The purification folds and % yield are the two most important factors which are used to evaluate the efficiency of purification. First step (ammonium salt precipitation) is based upon difference in protein solubility. The solubility of protein firstly increase and then starts decreasing with increase in salt concentration and finally protein gets precipitate. This process is called Salting out [119]. Ammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4) is often used for this purpose because of its high solubility in water. Devi et al. [120] reported protein precipitation by addition of solid ammonium sulfate up to 80% saturation. Chen et al. [121] reported precipitation with (NH4)2SO4 at 40–60% saturation. Precipitation is followed by a concentrating step that separates proteins from salts called dialysis. For next step chromatographic technique is most widely used for the direct recovery of protein and other charged molecules. Various types of chromatography methods (gel filtration: Sephadex G-100 [73], ion exchange: DEAE-Cellulose [122] and affinity: swollen avicel [123] have been used for purification of cellulase from various fungal strains.
6. Characterization of cellulase
Different researchers reported different temperatures for maximum cellulase production. It is reported that the optimal temperature for cellulase production varies from strain to strain of microorganisms [69]. The optimum temperature of fungal cellulases ranges from 40 to 60°C and pH found to be 4.8. A battery of thermophilic fungal strains are known to produce thermostable enzymes which are stable and active at such high temperature which are not optimum for the growth of the microorganism. Filamentous fungi, e.g.,
7. Applications of cellulases
According to Sajith et al. [87] on the global enzyme market cellulases occupy the third place (i.e., ≈15%) after amylase (≈25%) and protease (≈18%). Cellulases are currently being produced on commercial scale by several industries all over the world and widely used in various industrial applications [128].
7.1 Paper and pulp industries
Today, 90% of paper pulp is made of wood. Recycling one ton of newsprint and printing or copier paper saves about 1 ton and more than 2 tons of wood respectively [129]. Usually, the industrial process for eradicating wastepaper pollutants involves re-pulping, screening, cleaning, washing and flotation [130]. According to Shrinath et al. [131] the conventional recycling of waste papers is costly and hazardous to the environment due to the use of chemicals (hydrogen peroxide, sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate). Cellulases are mainly used for the pulping and deinking of waste papers. Enzymatic deinking as whole is an environmental friendly process [132]. Cellulase based pulping process is not only energy efficient, environment-friendly but also improve mechanical strength of the final paper product by improving the inter-fiber bonding [133]. When used with hemicellulases, cellulases improve the brightness and quality of the recycled paper [134]. Besides deinking and pulping, cellulases are also used in paper mills for drainage of clogged pipes by dissolving fiber residues [61] and for manufacturing easily biodegradable cardboards, sanitary papers [135].
7.2 Textile industry
Among the application textile industry dominated in the market in 2017. Cellulase application in textile play main role in the growth of textile industry. In textile industry worn-out look is given to the denim using stone washing. But stone washing have some disadvantages. It causes wear and tear of the fabric, huge loss of water due to extensive washing step and high labor cost, etc. Cellulases used for bio-polishing of cotton cloths and enzyme based stoning of jeans to impart stonewashed look for denims. Cellulase treatment gives a smooth and glossy appearance to fabric by removing short fibers, surface fuzziness and improves color brightness, hydrophilicity and moisture absorbance [136]. Most of the cotton and cotton mixed garments tend to become fluffy and dull during repeated washing due to detachment of microfibrils on the surface of garments. Cellulase treatment can restore a smooth surface and original color to the garments by removing these microfibrils [137]. According to a statistics of India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF), Indian textile market has increased from US$ 99 Billion in 2014 to US$137 Billion in 2016 and exhibited a CAGR of 17.6% during the period 2014–2016.
7.3 Food and feed processing
Cellulases are found to be highly valuable for feed and food Recently BIO-CAT introduced a cellulase (Cellulase C500) at IPPE 2016. The enzyme have been derived from a non-GMO, AAFCO approved microbial strain. Addition of Cellulase to animal feed increases its digestibility (http://www.bio-cat.com/introducing-cellulase-c500-animal-feed-enzyme/).
Use of cellulases in feed processing leads to improvement in feed digestibility and animal performance. As a component of macerating enzyme complex (cellulase, xylanase and pectinase) these are used for extraction and clarification of fruits and vegetable juices, nectars and oils [138]. Along with others, cell wall degrading enzymes cellulases can be used to reduce bitterness and increase the taste and aroma of citrus fruits [61].
7.4 Detergents
Nowadays liquid laundry detergent containing anionic or nonionic surfactant, citric acid or a water-soluble salt, protease, cellulose and a mixture of propanediol and boric acid or its derivatives are employed to improve the stability of cellulases [61]. Cellulases are added to detergents for the breakdown of hydrogen bonding under harsh environmental conditions such as alkaline or thermophilic conditions [139]. Cellulases are mixed with detergents to enhance brightness and hand feel, dirt removal from cotton and cotton blended garments because they are capable of modifying the structure of cellulose fibrils [62].
7.5 Biofuel production
With the fast exhaustion of fossil fuels the need to find a substitute source for renewable energy and fuels is intensifying day by day. Thus interest in the saccharification of lignocellulosic biomass using cellulases and other related enzymes is also increasing [14, 16]. In other words, the cellulase market could be expanded considerably by using cellulases for saccharification of pretreated cellulosic material to sugars which can be fermented further to bioethanol and other bio-based products on large scale [77]. By 2020 biofuels, especially bioethanol from renewable resources is expected to replace 20% of the fossil fuel consumption [140]. Cellulases produced by various filamentous fungi mainly
7.6 Wine and brewery industry
Microbial glucanases and related polysaccharides are usually used to produce alcoholic beverages including beers and wines by fermentation [144]. In wine production various enzymes such as pectinases, glucanases and hemicellulases plays an important role in improving wine quality and stability by improving color extraction, skin maceration, must clarification and filtration [145]. According to the precedent literature about 10–35% increase in the wine must extraction, a 70–80% increase in the rate of must filtration, 50–120 min decreased pressing time, and 30–70% decreased must viscosity, 20–40% energy saving while cooling thus a considerably improved wine stability. Thus supplementation of enzymes like cellulase and pectinase to the process are expected to enhance the productivity of brewing production [143]. β-Glucosidases can enhance the aroma of wines by modifying glycosylated precursors. Macerating enzymes also improve the juice, press ability and settling of grapes used for wine fermentation. A number of commercial enzyme preparations are now available to the wine industry.
7.7 Medical industry
Cellulolytic bacteria like Bacteroides cellulosilyticus and Ruminococcus champanellensis can be employed for the treatment of phytobezoars disease, which causes concretion of indigestible vegetable and fruit fibers in the gastrointestinal tract that may leads to surgical intrusion [128]. Moreover, cellulases have been utilized as excellent antibiofilm agents against pathogenic biofilms [146]. Further research is required to unravel yet unknown applications of cellulases in medical field.
8. Cellulase market demand
Demand for industrial enzymes in developed countries such as the US, Western Europe, Japan and Canada was relatively stable during the recent times while in developing economies of Asia-Pacific, Eastern Europe, Africa and Middle East regions, demand is increasing day by day [147]. Currently, by dollar volume cellulases are the third largest industrial enzyme globally, because of their extensive applications in animal feed additives, as detergent enzymes, cotton processing, juice extraction and paper recycling. However, cellulases may become the largest quantity industrial enzyme, if ethanol produced from lignocellulosic biomass through these enzymes becomes the major transportation fuel [112, 148]. They contribute to 8% of the worldwide industrial enzyme demand [149]. The international market for biofuel enzymes is expected to reach $9.0 billion by 2017 [150]. Global demand for industrial enzyme’s projected to grow 4.0% per year to $5.0 billion in 2021. Key players in the global cellulose market are Amano enzyme U.S.A, Worthington Biochemical Corporation, MP Biomedical LLC, Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC, Prozmix LLC, Creative Enzymes, bio-WORLD, Amano Enzyme Inc., Zhongbei Bio-Chem Industry Co., Ltd., Hunan Hong Ying Biotech Co., Ltd., Genencor and Novozyme are major producers they are known worldwide for cellulase production. All above companies played a noteworthy role for reducing production cost of cellulase several folds by their active research and are still continuing to bring down the cost by assuming novel technologies [112]. A few suppliers and source of enzyme samples are list below (Table 4). North America accounted for largest market share in global cellulose production in 2017. Production is depended on the increasing production of biofuel. According to a report by United States Energy information Administration in July 2018, the production of biofuel has increased in the U.S. from 1891 trillion butane to 2332 trillion, increasing at a CAGR of 5.4 during 2013 to 2017.
Enzyme samples | Supplier | Source |
---|---|---|
Cellubrix | Novozymes, Denmark | |
Novozymes 188 | Novozymes | |
Viscostar 150L | Dyadic (Jupiter, USA) | |
Multifect CL Genencor | Intl. (S.San Francisco, CA) | |
Energex L | Novozymes | |
Ultraflo L | Novozymes | |
Viscozyme L | Novozymes | |
GC 440 | Genencor-Danisco (Rochester, USA) | |
GC 880 | Genencor | |
Spezyme CP | Genencor | |
Accelerase® 1500 | Genencor | |
Cellulase AP30K | Amano Enzyme | |
Cellulase TRL | Solvay Enzymes (Elkhart, IN) | |
Econase CE | Alko-EDC (New York, NY) | |
Cellulase TAP106 | Amano Enzyme (Troy, VA) |
Table 4.
Suppliers and sources of enzyme samples [122].
9. Future prospects
The demand for cellulases is increasing day by day due to its volatile and the rise in oil prices which induced a shift in interest towards the application of cellulases in producing biofuel using lignocellulosic biomass [151]. Enhancing the cellulase activity and reducing the cost of production of enzyme are two key issues regarding the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic biomass. Genetic techniques can be used to clone the cellulase coding sequences into bacteria, yeasts, fungi, plants and animals to create new cellulase producing systems with improved production and activity of enzyme [152]. One of the major drawbacks of SSF is the low thermal conductivity of the solid medium used in SSF which restricts the removal of excess heat generated by microbial metabolism. The elevated temperature in bioreactors may lead to denaturation of thermo labile proteins [153]. Thus the thermo stable, modified fungal and bacterial strains are also good future prospects for cellulase production [62]. Interchangeably more advanced strategy is to engineer microbes for producing all major enzymes involved in cellulose hydrolysis in optimum ratio which may decrease the expenditure greatly [154]. Although the cellulase enzyme cost has dropped due to improvements in expression vectors and on-site production still there is a necessity of engineering a new generation cellulase cocktails that would further reduce cellulase cost. Efforts have to be made via hunting both diversity rich environments and extremophilic niches for identification of novel cellulase producers [150]. It can be made possible through following four approaches:
Mining novel cellulase genes via culturable/nonculturable strategies.
Improving production technologies by using novel bioreactors.
Designing novel cellulases through protein and metabolic engineering by understanding molecular mechanism and mode of interaction of cellulases with substrates.
Using mathematical, biophysical and enzymological approaches for cellulase production through consolidated bioprocessing in a cost-effective manner.
10. Conclusion
Lignocellulosic biomass is the most abundant biomass on the earth. They are the potential source of biofuels, and other useful chemicals. But one of the most severe hindrances in this process is the structure of biomass itself. This problem can be resolved up to a greater extent by various types of pretreatments and enzymatic hydrolysis, engineered cellulases and by consolidated bioprocessing.
Consolidated bioprocessing includes cellulose production, hydrolysis of cellulose and fermentation of Pentose and Hexose sugars in a single step which will reduce production cost and increase production/conversion efficiency as compared to the processes performing dedicated cellulase production. A good pretreatment should result in increased cellulose content and decreased hemicelluloses/lignin content of biomass. Another problem is the yield and efficiency of enzyme. Yield of enzyme can be increased by optimization of different parameters involved in enzyme production using one variable or statistical approach (RSM). Alternatively novel proteins with enhanced production can be synthesized by protein and metabolic engineering. Enzyme engineering must be focused on (1) to increase cellulase specific activity on pretreated biomass through enzyme cocktail (2) to increase cellulase stability for cellulase recycling, and (3) to reduce enzyme production costs. Consolidated bioprocessing microorganisms or consortium would simplify the whole process and increase productivity. The above three approaches would be integrated together for maximizing the process for lignocellulosic biomass management/conversion in to value added products.
Acknowledgments
Authors acknowledge CSIR, UGC, DST and HSCST for financial support in the form of fellowship and major research project (DST/INT/UKR/P-14/2015).
References
- 1.
Juwaied AA, Al-amiery AA, Adday HA, Anaam U. Optimization of cellulase production by Aspergillus niger andTricoderma viride using sugar cane waste. Journal of Yeast and Fungal Research. 2011;2 (2):19-23 - 2.
Chellapandi P, Jani HM. Production of endoglucanase by the native strains of Streptomyces isolates in submerged fermentation. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2008; 39 (1):122-127 - 3.
Pradeep NV, Anupama A, Vidyashree KG, Lakshmi P. In silico characterization of industrial important cellulases using computational tools. Advances in Life Science and Technology. 2012; 4 :2224-7181 - 4.
Chinedu SN, Okochi VI, Omidiji O. Cellulase production by wild strains of Aspergillus niger ,Penicillium chrysogenum andTrichoderma harzianum grown on waste cellulosic materials. Life Journal of Science. 2011;13 (1):57-62 - 5.
Immanuel G, Bhagavath CM, Raj PI, Esakkiraj P, Palavesam A. Production and partial purification of cellulase by Aspergillus niger andA. fumigatus fermented in coir waste and sawdust. The Internet Journal of Microbiology. 2007;3 (1):1-20 - 6.
Pathak H, Bhatia A, Jain N, Aggarwal PK. Greenhouse gas emission and mitigation in Indian agriculture—A review. In: Bijay-Singh, editor. ING Bulletins on Regional Assessment of Reactive Nitrogen, Bulletin No. 19. New Delhi: SCON-ING; 2010. pp. i-iv, 1-34 - 7.
De Oliveira SL, Maciel TC, de Oliveira Sancho S, Rodrigues S. Solid-state production of cellulase by Melanoporia sp. CCT 7736: A new strain isolated from coconut shell ( Cocos nucifera L.). Bioresources and Bioprocessing. 2016;3 (1):9 - 8.
Asgher M, Ahmad Z, Iqbal HM. Alkali and enzymatic delignification of sugarcane bagasse to expose cellulose polymers for saccharification and bio-ethanol production. Industrial Crops and Products. 2013; 44 :488-495 - 9.
Anand B, Sudha S, Keshaw A, Harit J. Value added products from agrowaste. Recent Research in Science and Technology. 2013; 5 (2):07-12 - 10.
Shahzadi T, Mehmood S, Irshad M, Anwar Z, Afroz A, Zeeshan N, et al. Advances in lignocellulosic biotechnology: A brief review on lignocellulosic biomass and cellulases. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology. 2014; 5 (03):246 - 11.
Kim M, Day DF. Composition of sugar cane, energy cane, and sweet sorghum suitable for ethanol production at Louisiana sugar mills. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology. 2011; 38 (7):803-807 - 12.
Malherbe S, Cloete TE. Lignocellulose biodegradation: Fundamentals and applications. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology. 2002; 1 (2):105-114 - 13.
Prasad S, Singh A, Joshi HC. Ethanol as an alternative fuel from agricultural, industrial and urban residues. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2007; 50 (1):1-39 - 14.
Zhu Y, Lee YY, Elander RT. Optimization of dilute-acid pretreatment of corn Stover using a high-solids percolation reactor. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2005; 124 (1-3):1045-1054 - 15.
Abbasi T, Abbasi SA. Biomass energy and the environmental impacts associated with its production and utilization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2010; 14 (3):919-937 - 16.
Howard RL, Abotsi EL, Van Rensburg EJ, Howard S. Lignocellulose biotechnology: Issues of bioconversion and enzyme production. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2003; 2 (12):602-619 - 17.
McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part 1): Overview of biomass. Bioresource Technology. 2002; 83 (1):37-46 - 18.
Guimarães JL, Frollini E, Da Silva CG, Wypych F, Satyanarayana KG. Characterization of banana, sugarcane bagasse and sponge gourd fibers of Brazil. Industrial Crops and Products. 2009; 30 (3):407-415 - 19.
Joshi VK, Pandey A. Biotechnology: Food Fermentation (Microbiology, Biochemistry and Technology). 1999; 2 :524-1372 - 20.
Mohan D, Pittman CU, Steele PH. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: A critical review. Energy & Fuels. 2006; 20 (3):848-889 - 21.
Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2009; 48 (8):3713-3729 - 22.
Parthasarathi R, Bellesia G, Chundawat SP, Dale BE, Langan P, Gnanakaran S. Insights into hydrogen bonding and stacking interactions in cellulose. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A. 2011; 115 (49):14191-14202 - 23.
Horn SJ, Vaaje-Kolstad G, Westereng B, Eijsink V. Novel enzymes for the degradation of cellulose. Biotechnology for Biofuels. 2012; 5 (1):45 - 24.
Bata M. The Use of Fibrolytic Enzymes to Improve Quality of Rice Bran and Cottonseed Meal and its Effect on Nutrient Utilization and Performance of Fattening Weaner Holstein Bulls in Indonesia. Gottingen, Germany: Cuvillier Verlag. Georg-August University; 2004 - 25.
Soliman SA, El-Zawahry YA, El-Mougith AA. Fungal biodegradation of agro-industrial waste. In: Cellulose-Biomass Conversion. London, UK: Intech, Intech Open Limited; 2013 - 26.
Balat M, Balat H, Öz C. Progress in bioethanol processing. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science. 2008; 34 (5):551-573 - 27.
Saha BC. Hemicellulose bioconversion. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2003; 30 (5):279-291 - 28.
Mohagheghi A, Evans K, Chou YC, Zhang M. Cofermentation of glucose, xylose, and arabinose by genomic DNA-lntegrated xylose/arabinose fermenting strain of zymomonas mobilis ax101. In: Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2002. pp. 885-898 - 29.
Ochoa-Villarreal M, Aispuro-Hernández E, Vargas-Arispuro I, Martínez-Téllez MÁ. Plant cell wall polymers: Function, structure and biological activity of their derivatives. In: Polymerization. Intech; 2012 - 30.
Vanholme R, Demedts B, Morreel K, Ralph J, Boerjan W. Lignin biosynthesis and structure. Plant Physiology. 2010; 153 (3):895-905 - 31.
Buckeridge MS, Goldman GH, editors. Routes to Cellulosic Ethanol. New York, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London: Springer Science & Business Media; 2011 - 32.
Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: A review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2008; 9 (9):1621-1651 - 33.
Hendriks AT, Zeeman G. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology. 2009; 100 (1):10-18 - 34.
Miao P, Naderi M, Acharya M, Khoo J, Burnett D, Williams D. Characterisation of wheat straw using dynamic vapour sorption method. In: Proceedings of the 55th International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology; Beijing, China; August 27-31, 2012 - 35.
Mtui GY. Recent advances in pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes and production of value added products. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009; 8 (8):1398-1415 - 36.
Mason WH, inventor. Process and apparatus for disintegration of wood and the like. United States patent US 1,578,609. 1926 - 37.
Stelte W. Steam Explosion for Biomass Pre-Treatment. Resultat Kontrakt (RK) Report Wolfgang Stelte: Danish Technological Institute; 2013 - 38.
Viola E, Cardinale M, Santarcangelo R, Villone A, Zimbardi F. Ethanol from eel grass via steam explosion and enzymatic hydrolysis. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2008; 32 (7):613-618 - 39.
Brodeur G, Yau E, Badal K, Collier J, Ramachandran KB, Ramakrishnan S. Chemical and physicochemical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: A review. Enzyme Research. 2011; 2011 :17. Article ID: 787532. DOI: 10.4061/2011/787532 - 40.
Weil J, Westgate P, Kohlmann K, Ladisch MR. Cellulose pretreaments of lignocellulosic substrates. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 1994; 16 (11):1002-1004 - 41.
Jørgensen H, Kristensen JB, Felby C. Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: Challenges and opportunities. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining. 2007; 1 (2):119-134 - 42.
Zhang YQ , Fu EH, Liang JH. Effect of ultrasonic waves on the saccharification processes of lignocellulose. Chemical Engineering & Technology: Industrial Chemistry Plant Equipment Process Engineering Biotechnology. 2008; 31 (10):1510-1515 - 43.
Bussemaker MJ, Zhang D. Effect of ultrasound on lignocellulosic biomass as a pretreatment for biorefinery and biofuel applications. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 2013; 52 (10):3563-3580 - 44.
Digman MF, Shinners KJ, Casler MD, Dien BS, Hatfield RD, Jung HJ, et al. Optimizing on-farm pretreatment of perennial grasses for fuel ethanol production. Bioresource Technology. 2010; 101 (14):5305-5314 - 45.
Du B, Sharma LN, Becker C, Chen SF, Mowery RA, van Walsum GP, et al. Effect of varying feedstock–pretreatment chemistry combinations on the formation and accumulation of potentially inhibitory degradation products in biomass hydrolysates. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2010; 107 (3):430-440 - 46.
Kumar R, Wyman CE. Effects of cellulase and xylanase enzymes on the deconstruction of solids from pretreatment of poplar by leading technologies. Biotechnology Progress. 2009; 25 (2):302-314 - 47.
Milagres AM, Carvalho W, Ferraz A. Topochemistry, porosity and chemical composition affecting enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials. In: Routes to Cellulosic Ethanol. New York, NY: Springer; 2011. pp. 53-72 - 48.
Jollet V, Chambon F, Rataboul F, Cabiac A, Pinel C, Guillon E, et al. Non-catalyzed and Pt/γ-Al2O3-catalyzed hydrothermal cellulose dissolution–conversion: Influence of the reaction parameters and analysis of the unreacted cellulose. Green Chemistry. 2009; 11 (12):2052-2060 - 49.
Chang VS, Holtzapple MT. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. In: Twenty-First Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2000. pp. 5-37 - 50.
Singh N, Devi A, Jaryal R, Rani K. An ecofriendly and efficient strategy for cost effective production of lignocellulotic enzymes. Waste and Biomass Valorization. 2018; 9 (6):891-898 - 51.
Canilha L, Chandel AK, Suzane dos Santos Milessi T, Antunes FAF, Luiz da Costa Freitas W, das Graças Almeida Felipe M, et al. Bioconversion of sugarcane biomass into ethanol: An overview about composition, pretreatment methods, detoxification of hydrolysates, enzymatic saccharification, and ethanol fermentation. BioMed Research International. 2012; 2012 :15. Article ID: 989572. DOI: 10.1155/2012/989572 - 52.
Hamelinck CN, Van Hooijdonk G, Faaij AP. Ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass: Techno-economic performance in short-, middle-and long-term. Biomass and Bioenergy. 2005; 28 (4):384-410 - 53.
Parsiegla G, Belaich A, Belaich JP, Haser R. Crystal structure of the cellulase Cel9M enlightens structure/function relationships of the variable catalytic modules in glycoside hydrolases. Biochemistry. 2002; 41 (37):11134-11142 - 54.
Harmsen PF, Huijgen W, Bermudez L, Bakker R. Literature review of physical and chemical pretreatment processes for lignocellulosic biomass. Wageningen UR-Food & Biobased Research. Bioenergy Report No. 1184. 2010 - 55.
Kostylev M, Wilson D. Synergistic interactions in cellulose hydrolysis. Biofuels. 2012; 3 (1):61-70 - 56.
Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, Van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews. 2002; 66 (3):506-577 - 57.
Quiroz-Castañeda RE, Folch-Mallol JL. Hydrolysis of biomass mediated by cellulases for the production of sugars. In: Sustainable Degradation of Lignocellulosic Biomass-Techniques, Applications and Commercialization. London, UK: Intech, Intech Limited; 2013 - 58.
Hashimoto H. Recent structural studies of carbohydrate-binding modules. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS. 2006; 63 (24):2954-2967 - 59.
Lehtiö J, Sugiyama J, Gustavsson M, Fransson L, Linder M, Teeri TT. The binding specificity and affinity determinants of family 1 and family 3 cellulose binding modules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2003; 100 (2):484-489 - 60.
Boraston AB, Bolam DN, Gilbert HJ, Davies GJ. Carbohydrate-binding modules: Fine-tuning polysaccharide recognition. Biochemical Journal. 2004; 382 (3):769-781 - 61.
Kuhad RC, Gupta R, Singh A. Microbial cellulases and their industrial applications. Enzyme Research. 2011; 2011 :10. Article ID: 280696. DOI: 10.4061/2011/280696 - 62.
Imran M, Anwar Z, Irshad M, Asad MJ, Ashfaq H. Cellulase production from species of fungi and bacteria from agricultural wastes and its utilization in industry: A review. Advances in Enzyme Research. 2016; 4 (02):44 - 63.
Baldrian P, Valášková V. Degradation of cellulose by basidiomycetous fungi. FEMS Microbiology Reviews. 2008; 32 (3):501-521 - 64.
Pandey S, Srivastava M, Shahid M, Kumar V, Singh A, Trivedi S, et al. Trichoderma species cellulases produced by solid state fermentation. Journal of Data Mining in Genomics & Proteomics. 2015; 6 (2):1 - 65.
Gupta C, Jain P, Kumar D, Dixit AK, Jain RK. Production of cellulase enzyme from isolated fungus and its application as efficient refining aid for production of security paper. International Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Research. 2015; 3 :11-19 - 66.
Li DC, Li AN, Papageorgiou AC. Cellulases from thermophilic fungi: Recent insights and biotechnological potential. Enzyme Research. 2011; 2011 :9. Article ID: 3087301. DOI: 10.4061/2011/308730 - 67.
Ravindran C, Naveenan T. Adaptation of marine derived fungus Chaetomium globosum (NIOCC 36) to alkaline stress using antioxidant properties. Process Biochemistry. 2011;46 (4):847-857 - 68.
Anthony T, Raj KC, Rajendran A, Gunasekaran P. High molecular weight cellulase-free xylanase from alkali-tolerant Aspergillus fumigatus AR1. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2003;32 (6):647-654 - 69.
Immanuel G, Dhanusha R, Prema P, Palavesam A. Effect of different growth parameters on endoglucanase enzyme activity by bacteria isolated from coir retting effluents of estuarine environment. International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology. 2006; 3 (1):25-34 - 70.
Gaur R, Tiwari S. Isolation, production, purification and characterization of an organic-solvent-thermostable alkalophilic cellulase from Bacillus vallismortis RG-07. BMC Biotechnology. 2015; 15 (1):19 - 71.
Lin L, Kan X, Yan H, Wang D. Characterization of extracellular cellulose-degrading enzymes from Bacillus thuringiensis strains. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2012;15 (3):2 - 72.
Ariffin H, Abdullah N, Umi Kalsom MS, Shirai Y, Hassan MA. Production and characterization of cellulase by Bacillus pumilus EB3. International Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2006;3 (1):47-53 - 73.
Bakare MK, Adewale IO, Ajayi A, Shonukan OO. Purification and characterization of cellulase from the wild-type and two improved mutants of Pseudomonas fluorescens . African Journal of Biotechnology. 2005;4 (9):898-904 - 74.
Fischer R, Ostafe R, Twyman RM. Cellulases from insects. In: Yellow Biotechnology II. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. pp. 51-64 - 75.
Watanabe H, Noda H, Tokuda G, Lo N. A cellulase gene of termite origin. Nature. 1998; 394 (6691):330 - 76.
Watanabe H, Tokuda G. Animal cellulases. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS. 2001; 58 (9):1167-1178 - 77.
Zhang YH, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR. Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies. Biotechnology Advances. 2006; 24 (5):452-481 - 78.
Mandels M, Andreotti R, Roche C. Measurement of saccharifying cellulase. In: Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp.; United States. Vol. 6. MA: Army Natick Development Center; 1976 - 79.
Ghose TK. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1987; 59 (2):257-268 - 80.
Coward Kelly G, Aiello-Mazzari C, Kim S, Granda C, Holtzapple M. Suggested improvements to the standard filter paper assay used to measure cellulase activity. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2003; 82 (6):745-749 - 81.
Dashtban M, Maki M, Leung KT, Mao C, Qin W. Cellulase activities in biomass conversion: Measurement methods and comparison. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. 2010; 30 (4):302-309 - 82.
Kubicek CP. β-Glucosidase excretion by Trichoderma pseudokoningii : Correlation with cell wall bound β-1.3-glucanase activities. Archives of Microbiology. 1982;132 (4):349-354 - 83.
Murad HA, Azzaz HH. Cellulase and dairy animal feeding. Biotechnology. 2010; 9 (3):238-256 - 84.
Frost GM, Moss DA. Production of enzymes by fermentation. In: Rehm HJ, Reed G, editors. Biotechnology. Vol. 7a. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie; 1987. pp. 65-211 - 85.
Mrudula S, Murugammal R. Production of cellulase by Aspergillus niger under submerged and solid state fermentation using coir waste as a substrate. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2011;42 (3):1119-1127 - 86.
Sukumaran RK, Singhania RR, Pandey A. Microbial cellulases—Production, applications and challenges. Journal Scientific & Industrial Research Vol. Nov 2005; 64 :832-844 - 87.
Sajith S, Priji P, Sreedevi S, Benjamin S. An overview on fungal cellulases with an industrial perspective. Journal of Nutrition & Food Sciences. 2016; 6 (1):461 - 88.
Karthikeyan N, Sakthivel M, Palani P. Screening, Identifying of Penicillium KP strain and its cellulase producing conditions. Journal of Ecobiotechnology. 2010; 2 (10):4-7 - 89.
Narasimha G, Sridevi A, Buddolla V, Subhosh CM, Rajasekhar RB. Nutrient effects on production of cellulolytic enzymes by Aspergillus niger . African Journal of Biotechnology. 2006;5 (5):472-476 - 90.
Pandey A. Solid-state fermentation. Biochemical Engineering Journal. 2003; 13 (2-3):81-84 - 91.
Sato K, Sudo S. Small-scale solid-state fermentations. Manual of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology. 1999; 2 :61-63 - 92.
Devi A, Singh N, Bishnoi NR. Statistical optimization of endoglucanase enzyme production by a local isolate, Aspergillus heteromorphus using response surface methodology. Asian Journal of Environmental Science. 2009;4 (2):106-111 - 93.
Khan MH, Ali S, Fakhru’l-Razi A, Alam Z. Use of fungi for the bioconversion of rice straw into cellulase enzyme. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B. 2007; 42 (4):381-386 - 94.
Acharya PB, Acharya DK, Modi HA. Optimization for cellulase production by Aspergillus niger using saw dust as substrate. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2008;7 (22):4147-4152 - 95.
Milala MA, Shugaba A, Gidado A, Ene AC, Wafar JA. Studies on the use of agricultural wastes for cellulase enzyme production by Aspergillus niger . Research Journal of Agriculture and Biological Sciences. 2005;1 (4):325-328 - 96.
Singh N, Devi A, Kumar S, Verma A. Response surface methodology for standardisation of lignocellulosic biomass saccharification efficiency of NSF-2 fungus isolate. Journal of Environmental Biology. 2015; 36 (4):903-908 - 97.
Batool S, Asgher M, Sheikh MA, Rahman SU. Optimization of physical and nutritional factors for enhanced production of lignin peroxidase by Ganoderma lucidum IBL-05 in solid state culture of wheat straw. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences. 2013;23 (4):1166-1176 - 98.
Devi MC, Kumar MS. Isolation and screening of lignocellulose hydrolytic saprophytic fungi from dairy manure soil. Annals of Biological Research. 2012; 3 (2):1145-1152 - 99.
Gao J, Weng H, Zhu D, Yuan M, Guan F, Xi Y. Production and characterization of cellulolytic enzymes from the thermoacidophilic fungal Aspergillus terreus M11 under solid-state cultivation of corn Stover. Bioresource Technology. 2008;99 (16):7623-7629 - 100.
Solingen P, Meijer D, Kleij WA, Barnett C, Bolle R, Power SD, et al. Cloning and expression of an endocellulase gene from a novel streptomycete isolated from an East African soda lake. Extremophiles. 2001; 5 (5):333-341 - 101.
Mekala NK, Singhania RR, Sukumaran RK, Pandey A. Cellulase production under solid-state fermentation by Trichoderma reesei RUT C30: Statistical optimization of process parameters. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2008;151 (2-3):122-131 - 102.
Fatma HA, El-Zaher A, Fadel M. Production of bioethanol via enzymatic saccharification of rice straw by cellulase produced by Trichoderma reesei under solid state fermentation. New York Science Journal. 2010;3 (4):72-78 - 103.
Jang HD, Chen KS. Production and characterization of thermostable cellulases from Streptomyces transformant T3-1. World journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2003;19 (3):263-268 - 104.
Schrempf H, Walter S. The cellulolytic system of Streptomyces reticuli . International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 1995;17 (6):353-355 - 105.
Jasani H, Umretiya N, Dharajiya D, Kapuria M, Shah S, Patel J. Isolation, optimization and production of cellulase by Aspergillus niger from agricultural waste. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology. 2016;10 (2):1159-1167 - 106.
Picart P, Diaz P, Pastor FI. Cellulases from two Penicillium sp. strains isolated from subtropical forest soil: Production and characterization. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2007; 45 (1):108-113 - 107.
Chandra MS, Viswanath B, Reddy BR. Cellulolytic enzymes on lignocellulosic substrates in solid state fermentation by Aspergillus niger . Indian Journal of Microbiology. 2007;47 (4):323-328 - 108.
Azzaz HH. Effect of cellulytic enzymes addition to diets on the productive performance of lactating goats [doctoral dissertation, M.Sc. thesis]. Egypt: Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University - 109.
Weber J, Agblevor FA. Microbubble fermentation of Trichoderma reesei for cellulase production. Process Biochemistry. 2005; 40 (2):669-676 - 110.
Prasanna HN, Ramanjaneyulu G, Reddy BR. Optimization of cellulase production by Penicillium sp. 3 Biotech. 2016; 6 (2):162 - 111.
Han L, Feng J, Zhu C, Zhang X. Optimizing cellulase production of Penicillium waksmanii F10-2 with response surface methodology. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009;8 (16):3879-3886 - 112.
Singhania RR, Sukumaran RK, Patel AK, Larroche C, Pandey A. Advancement and comparative profiles in the production technologies using solid-state and submerged fermentation for microbial cellulases. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2010; 46 (7):541-549 - 113.
Nazir A, Soni R, Saini HS, Manhas RK, Chadha BS. Purification and characterization of an endoglucanase from Aspergillus terreus highly active against barley β-glucan and xyloglucan. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2009;25 (7):1189-1197 - 114.
Jatinder KA, Chadha BS, Saini HS. Optimization of medium components for production of cellulases by Melanocarpus sp. MTCC 3922 under solid-state fermentation. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2006; 22 (1):15-22 - 115.
Odeniyi OA, Onilude AA, Ayodele MA. Production characteristics and properties of cellulase/polygalacturonase by a Bacillus coagulans strain from a fermenting palm-fruit industrial residue. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2009;3 (8):407-417 - 116.
Eriksson T, Börjesson J, Tjerneld F. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2002; 31 (3):353-364 - 117.
Benjamin S, Smitha RB, Jisha VN, Pradeep S, Sajith S, Sreedevi S, et al. A monograph on amylases from Bacillus spp. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology. 2013; 4 (02):227 - 118.
Tao YM, Zhu XZ, Huang JZ, Ma SJ, Wu XB, Long MN, et al. Purification and properties of endoglucanase from a sugar cane bagasse hydrolyzing strain, Aspergillus glaucus XC9. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2010;58 (10):6126-6130 - 119.
Nelson DL, Cox MM. Lehninger principles of Biochemistry. 7th ed. New York: WH Freeman and Company; 2017 - 120.
Devi MK, Banu AR, Gnanaprabha GR, Pradeep BV, Palaniswamy M. Purification, characterization of alkaline protease enzyme from native isolate Aspergillus niger and its compatibility with commercial detergents. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 2008;1 (7):1-6 - 121.
Chen PJ, Wei TC, Chang YT, Lin LP. Purification and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulase from Sinorhizobium fredii . Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica. 2004;45 :111-118 - 122.
Begum MF, Absar N. Purification and characterization of intracellular cellulase from Aspergillus oryzae ITCC-4857.01. Mycobiology. 2009;37 (2):121-127 - 123.
Ncube T. Development of a fungal cellulolytic enzyme combination for use in bioethanol production using hyparrhenia spp as a source of fermentable sugars [doctoral dissertation]. University of Limpopo (Turfloop Campus); 2013 - 124.
Viikari L, Alapuranen M, Puranen T, Vehmaanperä J, Siika-Aho M. Thermostable enzymes in lignocellulose hydrolysis. In: Biofuels. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2007. pp. 121-145 - 125.
Dixon M, Webb EC. Enzymes. 2nd ed. London: Longman Group Ltd.; 1964. pp. 67-188 - 126.
Asgher M, Irshad M, Iqbal HM. Purification and characterization of LiP produced by Schyzophyllum commune IBL-06 using banana stalk in solid state cultures. BioResources. 2012;7 (3):4012-4021 - 127.
Taha M, Shahsavari E, Al-Hothaly K, Mouradov A, Smith AT, Ball AS, et al. Enhanced biological straw saccharification through coculturing of lignocellulose-degrading microorganisms. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. 2015; 175 (8):3709-3728 - 128.
Fariq A. Microbial cellulases: Production and applications. Journal of Biotechnology Science Research. 2016; 3 (1):122-127 - 129.
Bhattacharjee, Islam. Development of a paper recycling process. In: Conference: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Paper Meet, the Institution of Engineers, at the Institution of Engineers, Dhaka, Bangladesh; 07-08 Feb. 2014; Dhaka, Bangladesh. 2014 - 130.
Britt KW. Handbook of pulp and paper technology. In: Handbook of Pulp and Paper Technology. 2nd ed. Vannastr & Reinhold (Trade); 1975 - 131.
Shrinath A, Szewczak JT, Bowen IJ. A review of ink-removal techniques in current deinking technology. Tappi Journal. 1991; 74 (7):85-93 - 132.
Puneet P, Bhardwaj NK, Singh AK. Enzymatic deinking of office waste paper: An overview. IPPTA. 2010; 22 (2):83-88 - 133.
Chen Y, Wan J, Zhang X, Ma Y, Wang Y. Effect of beating on recycled properties of unbleached eucalyptus cellulose fiber. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2012; 87 (1):730-736 - 134.
Ibarra D, Monte MC, Blanco A, Martínez AT, Martínez MJ. Enzymatic deinking of secondary fibers: Cellulases/hemicellulases versus laccase-mediator system. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology. 2012; 39 (1):1-9 - 135.
Hsu J, Lakhani N, inventors; Hsu Jay C, Lakhani Nauman N, assignee. Softer and higher strength paper products and methods of making such products. United States patent application US 10/143,674. 2002 - 136.
Bhat MK. Cellulases and related enzymes in biotechnology. Biotechnology Advances. 2000; 18 (5):355-383 - 137.
Ibrahim NA, El-Badry K, Eid BM, Hassan TM. A new approach for biofinishing of cellulose-containing fabrics using acid cellulases. Carbohydrate Polymers. 2011; 83 (1):116-121 - 138.
Ajayi AA, Peter-Albert CF, Atolagbe OM. Modification of cell wall degrading enzymes from Soursop (Annona muricata) fruit deterioration for improved commercial development of clarified Soursop juice—A review. Medicinal & Aromatic Plants. 2015; 4 (1):178. DOI: 10.4172/2167-0412.1000178 - 139.
Fowler T, Clarkson KA, Ward M, Collier KD, Larenas E. U.S. Patent No. 5,874,276. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office; 1999 - 140.
Rosegrant MW, Msangi S, Sulser TB, Valmonte-Santos RA. Bioenergy and agriculture: Promises and challenges: Biofuels and the global food balance. 2020 Vision for Food Agriculture, and the Environment F, Focus 14. Brief 3 of 12. 2006 - 141.
Binod P, Sindhu R, Singhania RR, Vikram S, Devi L, Nagalakshmi S, et al. Bioethanol production from rice straw: An overview. Bioresource Technology. 2010; 101 (13):4767-4774 - 142.
Chen H, Qiu W. Key technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulose. Biotechnology Advances. 2010; 28 (5):556-562 - 143.
Singh A, Sharma P, Saran AK, Singh N, Bishnoi NR. Comparative study on ethanol production from pretreated sugarcane bagasse using immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae on various matrices. Renewable Energy. 2013;50 :488-493 - 144.
Bamforth CW. Current perspectives on the role of enzymes in brewing. Journal of Cereal Science. 2009; 50 (3):353-357 - 145.
Singh A, Kuhad RC, Ward OP. Industrial application of microbial cellulases. In: Kuhad RC, Singh A, editors. Lignocellulose Biotechnology: Future Prospects. New Delhi: IK International Pvt. Ltd; 2007. pp. 345-358 - 146.
Menendez E, Garcia-Fraile P, Rivas R. Biotechnological applications of bacterial cellulases. AIMS Bioengineering. 2015; 2 (3):163-182. DOI: 10.3934/bioeng.2015.3.163 - 147.
Sarrouh B, Santos TM, Miyoshi A, Dias R, Azevedo V. Up-to-date insight on industrial enzymes applications and global market. Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques. 2012; 4 :002 - 148.
Binod P, Palkhiwala P, Gaikaiwari R, Nampoothiri KM, Duggal A, Dey K, et al. Industrial enzymes-present status and future perspectives for India. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research. 2013; 72 :271-286 - 149.
Acharya S, Chaudhary A. Bioprospecting thermophiles for cellulase production: A review. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2012; 43 (3):844-856 - 150.
Beniwal V, Sharma AK. IIndustrial Enzymes: Trends, Scope and Relevance (Biotechnology in Agriculture, Industry and Medicine). New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2014 - 151.
Kuhad RC, Deswal D, Sharma S, Bhattacharya A, Jain KK, Kaur A, et al. Revisiting cellulase production and redefining current strategies based on major challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016; 55 :249-272 - 152.
Li XH, Yang HJ, Roy B, Wang D, Yue WF, Jiang LJ, et al. The most stirring technology in future: Cellulase enzyme and biomass utilization. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2009; 8 (11):2418-2422 - 153.
Shweta A. Solid state fermentation for cellulase production. Biotechnological Research. 2015; 1 (1):108-112 - 154.
Rani V, Mohanram S, Tiwari R, Nain L, Arora A. Beta-glucosidase: Key enzyme in determining efficiency of cellulase and biomass hydrolysis. Journal of Bioprocessing & Biotechniques. 2014; 5 (197):2