IntechOpen

Home > Books > Heterocycles - Synthesis and Biological Activities

Open access peer-reviewed chapter

One-Pot-Condensation Reaction of Heterocyclic Amine, 1,3-Diketone and Aldehydes Using In Situ Generated Superoxide Ion: A Rapid Synthesis of Structurally Diverse Drug-Like Complex Heterocycles

Written By

Sundaram Singh and Savita Kumari

Submitted: 07 June 2018 Reviewed: 25 August 2018 Published: 27 June 2019

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.81146

Heterocycles IntechOpen
Heterocycles Synthesis and Biological Activities Edited by B. P. Nandeshwarappa

From the Edited Volume

Heterocycles - Synthesis and Biological Activities

Edited by B. P. Nandeshwarappa and Sadashiv S. O.

Book Details Order Print

Chapter metrics overview

1,055 Chapter Downloads

View Full Metrics
Advertisement

Abstract

A novel, convenient one-pot multicomponent synthesis of tetraheterocyclicbenzimidazolo/benzothiazolo quinazolin-1-one derivatives has been reported in the presence of tetraethylammonium superoxide under non-aqueous condition. The superoxide induced three-component reaction of various aromatic aldehydes, 2-aminobenzimadazole/2-aminobenzothiazole and dimedone/1,3- cyclohexanedione produced tetraheterocyclicbenzimidazolo/benzothiazolo quinazolin-1-one derivatives at room temperature under the mild reaction conditions. The tetraethylammonium superoxide has been generated by phase transfer reaction of potassium superoxide and tetraethylammonium bromide in dry DMF at room temperature. The present study extended the applicability of tetraethylammonium bromide as a phase transfer catalyst for the efficient use of superoxide ion in multi-component synthesis of structurally diverse drug-like complex heterocycles (quinazolines).

Keywords

  • superoxide ion
  • multicomponent reaction
  • Tetraethylammonium bromide
  • phase transfer catalyst
  • KO2

1. Introduction

The importance of oxygen in sustaining life is unquestionable but the aerobic life-style is fraught with danger. However, some recent reports about oxygen toxicity have caused much concern among the whole scientific community. The oxygen toxicity is due to various reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl radical (HO•), superoxide anion radical O2• −, and perhydroxyl radical. Hypochlorous acid (HOCl), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), singlet oxygen and ozone are also included in this category, although they are not free radicals but can lead to free radical reaction. Out of all the reactive oxygen species, superoxide anion radical is probably the most important ROS, which has come to the forefront of current chemical and biochemical research for the two reasons [1, 2, 3, 4]. First superoxide ion as a biochemical species which causes many diseases such as cancer, ageing, inflammation, heart attack and lung injury, etc. More recently, it has been implicated to play a key role in both aging and cancer. Second superoxide ion as a novel reagent. Further from its elementary reactivity pattern, this anion radical has been recognized as a multipotent reagent, which acts as a base, nucleophile, oxidant and reductant. In view of these two points, superoxide research has become an area of interdisciplinary investigation [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13].

Multi-component reactions (MCRs), in which multiple reactions are combined into one synthetic operation, have been used extensively to form carbon-carbon bonds in synthetic chemistry. Such reactions offer greater possibilities for molecular diversity per step with minimum reaction time, labor, cost, and waste production. The rapid assembly of molecular diversity utilizing MCRs has gained a great deal of attention, most notably for the construction of ‘drug-like’ libraries [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20].

Quinazolines are very interesting heterocycles [21, 22, 23, 24, 25] as they serve as building blocks in numerous natural and synthetic products [26]. They exhibit a wide spectrum of biological and pharmacological activities such as propyl hydroxylase inhibitor [27], antidiabetics [28], anti-inflammatory [29], antiviral [30], antimicrobial [31], antineoplastic [32] and potent immunosuppressive agents [33]. Moreover, benzimidazolo quinazolines have also been an important class of heterocyclic compounds in drug research, as they are formed from both biodynamic heterosystems, benzimidazole and quinazoline, which have shown significant anticancer activities. Many useful methods, have been reported for synthesis of tetrahydrobenzoimidazo [2,1-b] quinazolin-1(2H)-ones ring system skeletons, such as the condensation of aminoazoles with benzylidene compounds, or three-component condensation of 2-aminobenzothiazole or 2-aminobenzimidazole and an aldehyde with cyclic 1,3-diketone.These reported methodologies produce good results in many cases [34, 35]. However, some of them suffer with certain limitations such as expensive catalysts, low yields of products, long reaction times, tedious procedures for preparations of catalysts, and tedious workup conditions [36, 37, 38, 39, 40]. Thus, there is enough room for further investigation in this direction. With a view to investigate the behavior of the superoxide ion in multicomponent organic synthesis, which is of importance in itself and further to assess its synthetic scope, the reaction of this novel reagent was studied.

Advertisement

2. Results and discussion

In continuation of our ongoing program on superoxide research and the synthesis of biologically active compounds, it is our current endeavor to extent the applicability of Et4NO2 for the synthesis of tetraheterocyclicBenzimidazolo/benzothiazolo quinazolin-1-one ring systems 4 by a one-pot three-component condensation reaction of various aromatic aldehydes 2 and 1,3-diketones 3 with 2-aminobenzimidazole/2-aminobenzothiazole 1 using tetraethylammonium superoxide under non aqueous conditions (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

One-pot synthesis of compounds 4 by the three-component condensation reaction of various aldehydes and 1,3-diketones with 2-aminobenzimidazole/2-aminobenzothiazole under superoxide ion at room temperature.

In order to achieve the optimum yield of the product, the effect of various parameters such as effect of solvents (DMF, DMSO, and CH3CN) and molar proportion of the reactants were investigated in detail using benzaldehyde 2, dimedone 3 with 2-aminobenzimidazole 1 as a model reaction.

To investigate the effect of solvents, the model reaction was carried out in different aprotic solvents. The results obtained clearly indicate that DMF was the best solvent among all investigated solvents in terms of product yield and the reaction time (Table 1).

EntrySolventsTime%Yield
1Dichloromethane12 hTrace
2Acetonitrile8 h70
3Tetrahydrofuran14 h42
4Dimethylsulfoxide20 hTrace
5Dimethylformamide6 h88

Table 1.

Effect of solvents on the yield of the product 4a.

In order to establish the reactants molar ratio on the yield of product the model reaction was carried out in different concentration of reactants (Table 2).

EntryReactants molar ratioProduct yield* (%)
Benzaldehydes:dimidone:2-aminobezimidazole:KO2:Et4NBr
11.01.01.01.01.040
21.01.01.01.00.538
31.01.01.01.00.2528
41.01.01.02.51.2569
51.01.01.04.02.0088
61.01.01.06.03.0090

Table 2.

Effect of reactants molar ratio on the yield of product 4a.

A perusal of the table clearly indicates the profound effect of the concentration of KO2 and Et4NBr on the yield of the product 4a. As regards the ratio of KO2 and Et4NBr, it is evident from the entries 1, 2 and 3 that with the diminution of the concentration of Et4NBr, the yield of product 4a decreases. But as may be seen only a little difference in the yield of the product in the case of entries 1 and 2, the ratio of KO2 and Et4NBr was further kept to be 2:1. Therefore, in subsequent studies, the concentration of KO2 has been increased manifold but the ratio of KO2 and Et4NBr was all along maintained to be 2:1. Furthermore, in case of entries 5 and 6, there is just a 2% increase in the yield of the product and for that 2% increase, the concentration of KO2 and Et4NBr have been increased substantially (6 fold and 3 fold respectively). As a result, considering the high cost of KO2 and Et4NBr, the entry 5, with the reactants ratio 1:1:1:4:2, has been selected as the optimum ratio.

The scope and limitations of this reaction were fully illustrated with various ortho-, meta- and para-substituted benzaldehydes in the presence of 2-aminobenzimidazole and 2-aminobenzothiazole.

As indicated in Table 3, the reaction proceeded efficiently with both electron-withdrawing and electron releasing ortho-, meta- and para-substituted benzaldehydes.

Table 3.

Synthesis of tetraheterocyclicbenzimidazolo/benzothiazolo quinazolin-1-ones.

The products were identified by their physical and spectral data, which were in full agreement with the reported values.

2.1 Mechanism for the synthesis of tetraheterocyclicbenzimidazolo/benzothiazolo quinazolin-1-ones

The proposed mechanism for the formation of tetraheterocyclicbenzimidazolo/benzothiazolo quinazolin-1-ones ring system is given in Figure 2. The reaction was initiated by the abstraction of proton from 1,3-diketones 3 by tetraethylammonium superoxide which was in situ generated by the phase transfer reaction of potassium superoxide with tetraethylammonium bromide. Now, Knoevenagel condensation takes place between benzaldehyde 2 and subsequently, by dehydration, olefin 3-benzylidene-2,4-hexanedione 5 is produced. Then 2-aminobenzimidazole/2-aminobenzothiazole1 is reacted with compound 5 through a Michael addition to produce a product of type 6 and after cyclisation to afford tetraheterocyclicbenzimidazolo/benzothiazolo quinazolin-1-one ring systems 4.

Figure 2.

Plausible mechanism for the formation of tetraheterocyclicbenzimidazolo/benzothiazolo quinazolin-1-one derivatives (4a-o).

Potassium superoxide (1.42 g, 0.02 mol) and tetraethylammonium bromide (2.10 g, 0.01 mol) were weighed under nitrogen atmosphere using an atmosbag and were transferred into a three-necked R. B. flask, dry DMF (20 mL) was added to it and the mixture was agitated magnetically for 15 min to facilitate the formation of tetraethylammoniumsuperoxide. To the stirred reaction mixture, dimedone (0.70 g, 0.005 mol) 3 were added. After 10 min, benzaldehyde (0.53 g, 0.005 mol) 2 and 2-aminobenzimidazole (0.665 g, 0.005 mmol) 1 were introduced, and the stirring was continued 6 h. After the reaction was over as indicated by TLC, mixture was treated with cold brine solution (2 mL) followed by saturated sodium hydrogen carbonate solution (2 mL) to decompose the unreacted KO2. The mixture was then extracted with dichloromethane (3 × 15 mL) and the combined organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated to give the products 4a, which were purified by column chromatography.

All the products were characterized by IR and 1H NMR (because of low solubility of compounds 4a-o, 13C NMR was not obtained).

3,3–Dimethyl–12–phenyl–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]quinazolin–1(2H)–one (4a): M.p. > 300°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3445, 2885, 1640, 1618, 1610, 1565 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 11.16 (br. s, 1H, NH), 7.39–7.30 (m, 6H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.07–7.04 (m, 1H), 6.98–6.95 (m, 1H), 6.44 (s, 1H), 2.26 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 2.06 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.92 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd for C22H21N3O: C, 76.94; H, 6.16; N, 12.24; O, 4.66. Found: C, 76.90; H, 6.20; N, 12.26; O, 4.64.

12–(4–Methoxyphenyl)–3,3–dimethyl–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]quinazolin–1(2H)–one (4b): M.p. > 300°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3391, 2850, 1670, 1644, 1610, 1590 cm−1;1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 11.06 (br. s, 1H, NH), 7.36 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.26–7.24 (m, 3H), 7.04 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 6.36 (s, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.64–2.52 (m, 2H), 2.25 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.05 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.94 (s, 3H). Anal Calcd for C23H23N3O2: C, 73.97; H, 6.21; N, 11.25; O, 8.57. Found: C, 73.92; H, 6.26; N, 11.23; O, 8.59.

12–(4–Chlorophenyl)–3,3–dimethyl–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b] quinazolin–1(2H)–one (4c): M.p. > 300°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3440, 2934, 1655, 1650, 1613, 1580 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 11.10 (br. s, 1H, NH), 7.36 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (s, 2H), 7.15 (s, 1H), 7.04 (s, 1H), 6.95 (s, 1H), 6.41 (s, 1H), 2.63 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 2.26 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.93 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd for C22H20ClN3O: C, 69.93; H, 5.34; Cl, 9.38; N, 11.12; O, 4.23. Found: C, 69.90; H, 5.37; Cl, 9.34; N, 11.15; O, 4.24.

12–(4–Bromophenyl)–3,3–dimethyl–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b] quinazolin–1(2H)–one (4d): M.p. >300°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3441, 2956, 1645, 1614, 1590, 1566 cm−1; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ = 10.01 (br. s, 1H, NH), 6.99–7.89 (m, Ar–H), 6.43 (s, 1H), 2.59–2.67 (m, 2H), 2.20 (d, J = 16.00 Hz, 1H), 2.00 (d, J = 16.01 Hz, 1H) 1.05 (s, 3H), 0.94 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd for C22H20BrN3O: C, 62.57; H, 4.77; Br, 18.92; N, 9.95; O, 3.79. Found: C, 62.67; H, 4.86; Br, 18.80; N, 9.83; O, 3.90.

12–(4–Hydroxyphenyl)–3,3–dimethyl–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b] quinazolin–1(2H)–one (4e): M.p. > 300°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3449, 2891, 1642, 1613, 1587, 1566 cm−1; 1H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ = 11.02 (br. s, 1H, NH), 9.33 (s, 1H, OH), 6.61–7.36 (m, 8H, Ar–H), 6.18 (s, 1H), 2.51–2.74 (m, 2H), 2.25 (d, J = 9.24 Hz, 1H), 2.05(d, J = 8.94 Hz, 1H), 1.07 (s, 3H), 0.96 (s, 3H), Anal. Calcd for C22H21N3O2: C, 73.52; H, 5.89; N, 11.69; O, 8.90. Found: C, 73.63; H, 5.97; N, 11.80; O, 8.71.

12–(3–Chlorophenyl)–3,3–dimethyl–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b] quinazolin–1(2H)–one (4f) M.p. > 300°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3400, 2891, 1660, 1652, 1613, 1575 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO−d6): δ = 11.18 (br. s, 1H, NH), 7.46 (s, 1H), 7.39 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.21 (m, 5H), 7.06 (s, 1H), 6.98 (s, 1H), 6.46 (s, 1H), 2.58 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.26 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.08 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.93 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd for C22H20ClN3O: C, 69.93; H, 5.34; Cl, 9.38; N, 11.12; O, 4.23. Found: C, 69.90; H, 5.37; Cl, 9.35; N, 11.14; O, 4.24.

3,3–Dimethyl–12–(2–nitrophenyl)–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]quinazolin–1(2H)–one (4 g): M.p. > 300°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3398, 2972, 1664, 1645, 1618, 1594 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 11.18 (br. s, 1H, NH), 7.46 (s, 1H), 7.31–7.19 (m, 5H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.98 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.46 (s, 1H), 2.62 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.55 (s, 1H), 2.26 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.08 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 1.06 (s, 2H), 0.93 (s, 2H). Anal. Calcd for C22H20N4O3: C, 68.03; H, 5.19; N, 14.42; O, 12.36. Found: C, 68.07; H, 5.15; N, 14.46; O, 12.32.

3,3–Dimethyl–12–(3–nitrophenyl)–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]quinazolin–1(2H)–one (4 h): M.p. > 300°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3394, 2970, 1660, 1648, 1615, 1598 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 11.26 (br. s, 1H, NH), 8.27 (s, 1H), 8.04 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.56 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.97 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.65 (s, 1H), 2.27 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 2.07 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.91 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd for C22H20N4O3: C, 68.03; H, 5.19; N, 14.42; O, 12.36. Found: C, 68.08; H, 5.14; N, 14.44; O, 12.34.

3,3–Dimethyl–12–(4–nitrophenyl)–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]quinazolin–1(2H)–one (4i): M.p. > 300°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3396, 2980, 1662, 1641, 1612, 1594 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 11.27 (br. s, 1H, NH), 8.12 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.07 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.60 (s, 1H), 2.65 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.54 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.27 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.06 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.91 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd for C22H20N4O3: C, 68.03; H, 5.19; N, 14.42; O, 12.36. Found: C, 68.04; H, 5.18; N, 14.40; O, 12.38.

12–(4–Methoxyphenyl)–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]quinazolin–1(2H)–one (4j): M.p. = 238–240°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3398, 2976, 1666, 1642, 1616, 1575 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 11.07 (br. s, 1H, NH), 7.36 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.26–7.22 (m, 3H), 7.06–7.01 (m, 1H), 6.95 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 6.78 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.37 (s, 1H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.68 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 2H), 2.29 (dd, J = 10.5, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.22 (dd, J = 16.0, 5.0 Hz, 1H), 2.02–1.93 (m, 1H), 1.88–1.80 (m, 1H). Anal. Calcd for C21H19N3O2: C, 73.03; H, 5.54; N, 12.17; O, 9.26. Found: C, 73.01; H, 5.56; N, 12.14; O, 9.29.

12–(3–Nitrophenyl)–3,4,6,12–tetrahydrobenzo[4,5]imidazo[2,1-b]quinazolin–1(2H)–one(4 k): M.p. > 300°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3412, 2872, 2855, 1670, 1640, 1617, 1601 cm−1;1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 11.28 (br. s, 1H, NH), 8.26 (s, 1H), 8.03 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.54 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.40 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.96 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.66 (s, 1H), 2.40–2.18 (m, 2H), 1.93 (dd, J = 16.0, 2H);. Anal. Calcd for C20H16N4O3: C, 66.66; H, 4.48; N, 15.55; O, 13.32. Found: C, 66.64; H, 4.50; N, 15.53; O, 13.34.

3,3–Dimethyl–12–phenyl–2,3,4,12–tetrahydro–1H–benzo[4,5]thiazolo[2,3–b]quinazolin–1–one (4 l): M.p. = 208–210°C; IR (KBr, υ = cm−1) 3428, 2965, 1680, 1655, 1589, 1516, 1370 cm−1; 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 7.79 (d, J = 10.0 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (dd, J = 17.5, 7.7 Hz, 3H), 7.28 (dd, J = 16.0, 3H), 7.20 (dd, J = 16.0, 8.0 Hz, 2H), 6.51 (s, 1H), 2.47–2.36 (m, 2H), 2.24 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 2.05 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 1.02 (s, 3H), 0.86 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd for C22H20N2OS: C, 73.30; H, 5.59; N, 7.77; O, 4.44; S, 8.89. Found: C, 73.33; H, 5.56; N, 7.79; O, 4.41; S, 8.88.

3,3–Dimethyl–12–(4-methylphenyl)–2,3,4,12–tetrahydro–1H–benzo[4,5]thiazolo[2,3–b]quinazolin–1–one(4 m):

M.p. = 203–205°C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 7.49–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.34 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.22 (m, 1H), 7.18–7.15 (m, 2H), 7.06 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 6.47 (s, 1H), 2.49 (s, 2H), 2.28–2.17 (m, 5H), 1.09 (s, 3H), 0.97 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd for C23H22N2OS: C, 73.77; H, 5.92; N, 7.48; O, 4.27; S, 8.56. Found: C, 73.68; H, 5.71; N, 7.60; O, 4.35; S, 8.70.

3,3–Dimethyl–12–(4-bromophenyl)–2,3,4,12–tetrahydro–1H–benzo[4,5]thiazolo[2,3–b]quinazolin–1–one (4n): M.p. 182–184°C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 7.47 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.37–7.28 (m, 5H), 7.19 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 6.45 (s, 1H), 2.47 (s, 2H), 2.29–2.20 (m, 2H), 1.07 (s, 3H), 0.91 (s, 3H), Anal. Calcd for C22H19BrN2OS: C, 60.14; H, 4.36; Br, 18.19; N, 6.38; O, 3.64; S, 7.30. Found: C, 60.35; H, 4.49; Br, 18.37; N, 6.50; O, 3.80; S, 7.45.

3,3–Dimethyl–12–(4-methoxyphenyl)–2,3,4,12–tetrahydro–1H–benzo[4,5]thiazolo[2,3–b]quinazolin–1–one (4o): M.p. 87–88°C. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO–d6): δ = 7.49–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 7.23–7.07 (m, 2H), 6.74 (d, J = 8 Hz, 2H), 6.44 (s, 1H), 3.62 (s, 3H), 2.48 (s, 2H), 2.31–2.17 (m, 2H), 1.06 (s, 3H), 0.93 (s, 3H). Anal. Calcd for C23H22N2O2S: C, 70.74; H, 5.68; N, 7.17; O, 8.19; S, 8.21. Found: C, 70.89; H, 5.80; N, 7.35; O, 8.39; S, 8.40.

Advertisement

3. Conclusion

In conclusion, the reaction of in situ generated O2•− with imidazoles is able to mimic the in vivo biochemical reactions involved and corroborate the role of O2•− in living cells. Since the investigation has been performed at an ambient temperature in the presence of in situ generated O2•−, the results may be easily correlated with those occurring at physiological temperatures in more complex biological counterparts.

A novel synthetic route has been developed for the synthesis of tetraheterocyclic benzimidazolo/benzothiazolo quinazolin-1-one ring systems using tetraethylammonium superoxide under non aqueous condition at room temperature (mild reaction condition) within 6 h. The yield of the products was obtained up to 88% without using any tedious purification process. The applicability of tetraethylammonium bromide as an inexpensive alternative to 18-crown-6 for superoxide ion generation has been extended in present report.

Advertisement

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to IIT(BHU),Varanasi for financial support.

Advertisement

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1. Capozzi G, Modena G. In: Patai S, editor. The Chemistry of Thiol Group: Part 2. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 1874. pp. 78-839
  2. 2. Reid EE. Organic Chemistry of Bivalent Sulfur. Vol. I. New York: Chemical Publishing Co. Inc.; 1958. pp. 118-126
  3. 3. Tarbell DS. In: Kharash N, editor. Organic Sulfur Compounds: Chapter 10. Vol. 1. New York: Pergamon Press; 1961. pp. 97-102
  4. 4. Wallace JG. Hydrogen Peroxide in Organic Chemistry, E. I. Wilmington, U.S.A: du Pont de Nemours and Co.; 1960
  5. 5. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine. 4th ed. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press; 2007
  6. 6. Bahorun T, Soobrattee MA, Luximon-Ramma V, Aruoma OI. Free radicals and antioxidants in cardiovascular health and disease. Internet Journal of Medical Update. 2006;1:1-17
  7. 7. Valko M, Izakovic M, Mazur M, Rhodes CJ, Telser J. Role of oxygen radicals in DNA damage and cancer incidence. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry. 2004;266:37-56
  8. 8. Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MT, Mazur M, Telser J. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. The International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell Biology. 2007;39:44-84
  9. 9. Droge W. Free radicals in the physiological control of cell function. Physiological Reviews. 2002;82:47-95
  10. 10. Willcox JK, Ash SL, Catignani GL. Antioxidants and prevention of chronic disease. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2004;44:275-295
  11. 11. Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiological Reviews. 2007;87:315-424
  12. 12. Genestra M. Oxyl radicals, redox-sensitive signalling cascades and antioxidants. Cellular Signalling. 2007;19:1807-1819
  13. 13. Halliwell B. Biochemistry of oxidative stress. Biochemical Society Transactions. 2007;35:1147-1150
  14. 14. Witt A, Bergman J. Recent developments in the field of quinazoline chemistry. Current Organic Chemistry. 2003;7:659-677
  15. 15. Connolly DJ, Cusack D, O’Sullivan TP, Guiry PJ. Synthesis of quinazolinones and quinazolines. Tetrahedron. 2005;61:10153-10202
  16. 16. Grasso S, Micale N, Monforte A-M, Monforte P, Polimeni S, Zappala M. Synthesis and in vitro antitumour activity evaluation of 1-aryl-1H, 3H-thiazolo [4, 3-b] quinazolines. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2000;35:1115-1119
  17. 17. Testard A, Picot L, Lozach O, Blairvacq M, Meijer L, Murillo L, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of the antiproliferative activity of novel thiazoloquinazolinone kinases inhibitors. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry. 2005;20:557-568
  18. 18. Weber L. The application of multi-component reactions in drug discovery. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2002;9:2085-2093
  19. 19. Hulme C, Gore V. Multi-component Reactions: Emerging Chemistry in Drug Discovery From Xylocain to Crixivan. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2003;10:51-80
  20. 20. Dömling A, Ugi I. Multicomponent reactions with isocyanides. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition. 2000;39:3168-3210
  21. 21. Shaabani A, Rahmati A, Naderi S. A novel one-pot three-component reaction: Synthesis of triheterocyclic 4H-pyrimido [2, 1-b] benzazoles ring systems. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters. 2005;15:5553-5557
  22. 22. Johne S, Herz W, Grisebach H, Kirby GW, Tamm Ch. The quinazoline alkaloids. InFortschritte der Chemie organischer Naturstoffe/Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products. Vol. 46. Wien: Springer; 1984. pp. 159-229
  23. 23. Johne S. In: Brossi A, editor. The Alkaloids, Chemistry and Pharmacology. Vol. 29. New York: Academic; 1986. pp. 99-140
  24. 24. Liu JF, Kaselj M, Isome Y, Ye P, Sargent K, Sprague K, et al. Design and synthesis of a quinazolinone natural product-templated library with cytotoxic activity. Journal of Combinatorial Chemistry. 2006;8:7-10
  25. 25. Hattori K, Kido Y, Yamamoto H, Ishida J, Kamijo K, Murano K, et al. Rational approaches to discovery of orally active and brain-penetrable quinazolinone inhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2004;47:4151-4154
  26. 26. Young I, Woodside J. Antioxidants in health and disease. Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2001;54:176-186
  27. 27. Chai D, Fitch DM. WO Patent 09039322 A1. March, 2009
  28. 28. Kato F, Kimura H, Omatsu M, Yamamoto K, Miyamoto R. WO Patent 02040485. May 23, 2002
  29. 29. McMaster B. WO Patent 03105857. December 24, 2003
  30. 30. Shigeta S, Mori S, Baba M, Hosoya M, Mochizuki N, Chiba T, et al. Inhibitory effect of pyridobenzoazoles on orthomyxo-and paramyxovirus replication in vitro. Antiviral Chemistry and Chemotherapy. 1992;3:171-177
  31. 31. Nofal ZM, Fahmy HH, Mohamed HS. Synthesis, antimicrobial and molluscicidal activities of new benzimidazole derivatives. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2002;25:28-38
  32. 32. Abdel-hafez AA. Benzimidazole condensed ring systems: New synthesis and antineoplastic activity of substituted 3, 4-dihydro-and 1, 2, 3, 4-tetrahydro-benzo [4, 5] imidazo [1, 2-a] pyrinnidine derivatives. Archives of Pharmacal Research. 2007;30:678-684
  33. 33. Lunn W, Harper R, Stone R. Benzimidazo [2, 1-b] quinazolin-12-ones. New class of potent immunosuppressive compounds. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 1971;14:1069-1071
  34. 34. Lipson VV, Desenko SM, Shirobokova MG, Borodina VV. Synthesis of 9-Aryl-6, 6-dimethyl-5, 6, 7, 9-tetrahydro-1, 2, 4-triazolo [5, 1-b] quinazolin-8 (4H) ones. Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds. 2003;39:1213-1217
  35. 35. Lipson VV, Desenko SM, Shishkina SV, Shirobokova MG, Shishkin OV, Orlov VD. Cyclocondensation of 2-aminobenzimidazole with dimedone and its arylidene derivatives. Chemistry of Heterocyclic Compounds. 2003;39:1041-1047
  36. 36. Shaabani A, Farhangi E, Rahmati A. A Rapid Combinatorial Library Synthesis of Benzazolo [2, 1-b] quinazolinones and Triazolo [2, 1-b] quinazolinones. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (IJCCE). 2013;32:3-10
  37. 37. Ali M, Nakisa G. A three-component onepot procedure for the synthesis benzimidazoloquinazolinone derivatives in the presence of chitosan-supported metal nanocomposite as a green and reusable catalyst. In: ECSOC-17; 2013. pp. 1-9
  38. 38. Ahmad S, Elham F, Abbas R. Synthesis of tetrahydrobenzimidazo [1, 2-b] quinazolin-1 (2H)-one and tetrahydro-1, 2, 4-triazolo [5, 1-b] quinazolin-8 (4H)-one ring systems under solvent-free conditions. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening. 2006;9:771-776
  39. 39. Atar AB, Jeong YS, Jeong YT. Iron fluoride: The most efficient catalyst for one-pot synthesis of 4H-pyrimido [2, 1-b] benzothiazoles under solvent-free conditions. Tetrahedron. 2014;70:5207-5213
  40. 40. Heravi MM, Derikvand F, Ranjbar L. Sulfamic acid–catalyzed, three-component, one-pot synthesis of [1, 2, 4] triazolo/benzimidazolo quinazolinone derivatives. Synthetic Communications®. 2010;40:677-685

Written By

Sundaram Singh and Savita Kumari

Submitted: 07 June 2018 Reviewed: 25 August 2018 Published: 27 June 2019

© 2019 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

View All
Chapter 7 The Oxygen-Containing Fused Heterocyclic Compounds

By Hillemane Venkatachalam and Nanjangud Venkatesh An...

1670 downloads

Chapter 8 Synthesis and Anticancer Evaluation of Benzenesulf...

By Dattatraya Navnath Pansare and Rohini Narayan Shel...

1015 downloads

Chapter 9 Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Phosp...

By Avula Srinivas

935 downloads

Your cart

Discounts available on purchase of multiple copies. View rates

Subtotal £0.00

Local taxes (VAT) are calculated in later steps, if applicable.

Support: orders@intechopen.com